1: \section{Analysis}

2: \label{sec:analysis1}

3: % Editors: Ana, Lisa

4: 

5: The goal of this analysis is to measure the cross section for CC single charged pion production in the resonance region, $\nu_{\mu} N \rightarrow \mu^{-} N \pi^{+}$ (CC1$\pi^{+}$), relative to the cross section of CCQE.  The CC1$\pi^+$ cross section is normalized to the CCQE cross section in this analysis to reduce the impact of neutrino flux uncertainties.  The dominant contribution to CC1$\pi^{+}$ is the $\nu_{\mu} p \rightarrow \mu^{-} p \pi^{+}$ (CCp$\pi^{+}$) mode, with a small contribution from the $\nu_{\mu} n \rightarrow \mu^{-} n \pi^{+}$ (CCn$\pi^{+}$) mode.

6: 

7: To make our measurement, we bin the data and perform a maximum likelihood fit to determine the cross sections of CC1$\pi^{+}$ and CCQE relative to the MC predictions.  From the MC prediction and the results of the fit, the observed CC1$\pi^{+}$ to CCQE cross section ratio can be extracted.  The data are divided into four samples that differ in their relative contributions from CCQE, CC1$\pi^{+}$ and other neutrino interactions.  The data in these four samples is binned using basic muon kinematic variables.

8: 

9: Note that we are concerned only with single pion production in the resonance region; in other words, our definition of CC1$\pi^{+}$ only includes neutrino interactions with $W<2$~GeV/$c^2$ that produce a single $\pi^{+}$.  We enforce this definition in the MC; the fit adjusts the rate of this interaction, among other things. The best fit predicts the CC1$\pi^{+}$ interaction rate in the data sample.  We do not attempt to identify CC1$\pi^{+}$ events in the data on an event-by-event basis.

10: 

11: We report the cross section for the interaction of the neutrino with the nucleon inside the nucleus, correcting for hadronic final state interactions.  For example, an event in which a $\pi^{+}$ produced via resonance is absorbed in the nucleus is included in our definition of CC1$\pi^{+}$.  We do not report the cross section after final state interactions because it is difficult to find pion tracks in the final state, making the experimental signature based on the full final state topology (rather than on muon kinematics, as discussed below) difficult to accomplish.  In addition, a measurement including final state interactions cannot easily be compared to measurements made with nuclear targets other than carbon.

12: 

13: We measure both the total cross section ratio and the energy-dependent cross section ratio.  The energy bins used in the energy-dependent measurement are 0-1.35, 1.35-1.72, 1.72-2.22, and $>$2.22 in units of GeV, denoted by indices $k$ = 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively, in the text.  These bins are chosen so that the statistical uncertainty in the cross section ratio in each bin is similar. According to our simulation, the average true neutrino energy of all interactions that are either CC1$\pi^{+}$ or CCQE is 0.97, 1.52, 1.94 and 2.65 GeV for the four energy bins, respectively.

14: 

15: \input{analysis1_selection}

16: \input{analysis1_corrections}

17: 

18: