1: %% D.T.Frayer Jan. 2008

2: %% dvips -Ppdf -t letter -o texfile.ps texfile

3: %%  ps2pdf13 texfile.ps  texfile.pdf

4: %

5: %% Modified 2005 December 5

6: %%

7: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the

8: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.

9: %%

10: \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}

11: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

12: %\documentclass[11pt,preprint]{aastex}

13: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}

14: %\documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}

15: %\documentstyle[emulateapj]{article}

16: %comment out for ApJ/AJ submission

17: \usepackage{emulateapj5}

18: %\newcommand{\etal}{et al.\ }

19: %\newcommand{\eg}{e.g., }

20: %\newcommand{\ie}{i.e., }

21: \newcommand{\co}{\rm CO}

22: \newcommand{\hh}{{\rm H}_2}

23: \newcommand{\hi}{\rm HI}

24: \newcommand{\kps}{\,\textstyle\rm{km~s}^{-1}}

25: \newcommand{\Mpc}{\,\textstyle\rm{Mpc}}

26: \newcommand{\cocm}{{\rm CO(3-2)}}

27: \newcommand{\cobm}{{\rm CO(2-1)}}

28: \newcommand{\coam}{{\rm CO(1-0)}}

29: \newcommand{\tto}{{\rm 2-1}}

30: \newcommand{\otz}{{\rm 1-0}}

31: %\newcommand{\cocm}{{\rm CO}(3\rightarrow2)}

32: %\newcommand{\cobm}{{\rm CO}(2\rightarrow1)}

33: %\newcommand{\coam}{{\rm CO}(1\rightarrow0)}

34: \newcommand{\coc}{CO(2$\rightarrow$1)~}

35: \newcommand{\cob}{CO(2$\rightarrow$1)~}

36: \newcommand{\coa}{CO(1$\rightarrow$0)~}

37: \newcommand{\yr}{\,\textstyle\rm{yr}}

38: \newcommand{\Gyr}{\,\textstyle\rm{Gyr}}

39: \newcommand{\msun}{\,M_{\odot}}

40: \newcommand{\lsun}{\,L_{\odot}}

41: \newcommand{\cm}{\,\textstyle\rm{cm}}

42: \newcommand{\GHz}{\,\textstyle\rm{GHz}}

43: \newcommand{\erg}{\,\textstyle\rm{erg}}

44: \newcommand{\Hz}{\,\textstyle\rm{Hz}}

45: \newcommand{\s}{\,\textstyle\rm{s}}

46: \newcommand{\g}{\,\textstyle\rm{g}}

47: \newcommand{\mjy}{\,\textstyle\rm{mJy}}

48: \newcommand{\jy}{\,\textstyle\rm{Jy}}

49: \newcommand{\K}{\,\textstyle\rm{K}}

50: \newcommand{\Kkpspc}{\,\rm{K}\,\rm{km~s}^{-1}\,{\rm pc}^{2}}

51: 

52: 

53: \slugcomment{Accepted ApJL 02 May 2008}

54: 

55: \shorttitle{Molecular Gas in GOODS\,J123634.53+621241.3}

56: \shortauthors{Frayer et al.}

57: 

58: \begin{document}

59: 

60: \title{Molecular Gas in the {\scriptsize z}=1.2 Ultraluminous

61: Merger GOODS\,J123634.53+621241.3}

62: 

63: \author{David T. Frayer\altaffilmark{1}, Jin Koda\altaffilmark{2},

64: Alexandra Pope\altaffilmark{3,4}, Minh T. Huynh\altaffilmark{1},

65: Ranga-Ram Chary\altaffilmark{5}, Douglas Scott\altaffilmark{6}, Mark

66: Dickinson\altaffilmark{4}, Douglas C.-J. Bock\altaffilmark{7}, John

67: M. Carpenter\altaffilmark{2}, David Hawkins\altaffilmark{8}, Mark

68: Hodges\altaffilmark{8}, James W. Lamb\altaffilmark{8}, Richard

69: L. Plambeck\altaffilmark{9}, Marc W. Pound\altaffilmark{10}, Stephen

70: L. Scott\altaffilmark{8}, Nicholas Z. Scoville\altaffilmark{2}, and

71: David P. Woody\altaffilmark{8}}

72: 

73: 

74: \altaffiltext{1}{Infrared Processing and Analysis Center, California

75: Institute of Technology 100-22, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA;

76: frayer@ipac.caltech.edu}

77: 

78: %\altaffiltext{2}{NASA Herschel Science Center, California

79: %Institute of Technology 100-22, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA}

80: 

81: \altaffiltext{2}{Astronomy Department, California Institute of Technology

82: 105--24, Pasadena, CA  91125, USA} 

83: 

84: \altaffiltext{3}{{\em Spitzer} Fellow}

85: 

86: 

87: \altaffiltext{4}{National Optical Astronomy Observatory, 950 N. Cherry

88: Ave., Tucson, AZ, 85719, USA}

89: 

90: \altaffiltext{5}{{\em Spitzer} Science Center, California Institute of

91: Technology 220-6, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA}

92: 

93: 

94: \altaffiltext{6}{Department of Physics \& Astronomy, University of

95: British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z1, Canada}

96: 

97: 

98: \altaffiltext{7}{Combined Array for Research in Millimeter-wave

99: Astronomy, P.O Box 968, Big Pine, CA 93513, USA}

100: 

101: \altaffiltext{8}{Owens Valley Radio Observatory, California Institute

102: of Technology, Big Pine, CA 93513, USA}

103: 

104: \altaffiltext{9}{Department of Astronomy and Radio Astronomy

105: Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA}

106: 

107: \altaffiltext{10}{Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland,

108: College Park, MD 20742, USA}

109: 

110: 

111: \begin{abstract}

112: 

113: We report the detection of \cob emission from the $z=1.2$

114: ultraluminous infrared galaxy (ULIRG) GOODS\,J123634.53+621241.3 (also

115: known as the sub-millimeter galaxy GN26).  These observations

116: represent the first discovery of high-redshift CO emission using the

117: new Combined Array for Research in Millimeter-Wave Astronomy (CARMA).

118: Of all high-redshift ($z>1$) galaxies within the GOODS-North field,

119: this source has the largest far-infrared (FIR) flux observed in the

120: {\em Spitzer} 70\,$\mu$m and 160\,$\mu$m bands.  The CO redshift

121: confirms the optical identification of the source, and the bright \cob

122: line suggests the presence of a large molecular gas reservoir of about

123: $7\times 10^{10} M_{\sun}$.  The infrared-to-CO luminosity ratio of

124: $L({\rm IR})/L^{\prime}(\co) = 80\pm 30 \lsun (\Kkpspc)^{-1}$ is

125: slightly smaller than the average ratio found in local ULIRGs and

126: high-redshift sub-millimeter galaxies.  The short star-formation time

127: scale of about 70\,Myr is consistent with a starburst associated with

128: the merger event and is much shorter than the time scales for spiral

129: galaxies and estimates made for high-redshift galaxies selected on the

130: basis of their $B-z$ and $z-K$ colors.

131: 

132: 

133: \end{abstract}

134: 

135: \keywords{galaxies: evolution --- galaxies: formation --- galaxies:

136:   individual (GOODS\,J123634.53+621241.3) --- galaxies: starburst}

137: 

138: 

139: \section{Introduction}

140: 

141: Observations of molecular gas are fundamental to our understanding of

142: galaxy evolution by providing measurements of the material from which

143: stars form.  The discovery of sub-millimeter galaxies

144: \citep[SMGs,][]{sma97, hug98, bar98} enabled the ability to measure

145: the molecular CO properties of the most luminous infrared sources at

146: high-redshift \citep{fra98, fra99, ner03, gre05, tac06, tac08}.  These

147: observations have shown that the CO properties of the SMGs are similar

148: to local ultraluminous infrared galaxies (ULIRGs, $L_{\rm IR} >

149: 10^{12} \lsun$), and their number densities indicate that ULIRGs are

150: 1000 times more common at $z \sim 2$ than locally \citep{cha05}.  The

151: importance of ULIRGs at high-redshift has been reinforced by deep

152: {\em Spitzer} mid-infrared (MIR) surveys at 24\,$\mu$m

153: \citep[e.g.,][]{cha04, lag04}.  At $z\sim 1$--2, the majority of

154: star-formation and AGN activity occurs within dust-rich luminous

155: infrared galaxies \citep{lef05, pap06, cap07}.

156: 

157: Although the bulk of the infrared luminosity of galaxies arises in the

158: rest-frame far-infrared band (FIR, 40--120\,$\mu$m), this band has

159: been mostly unexplored at high-redshift.  The majority of

160: high-redshift ULIRGs have been identified by 24\,$\mu$m and sub-mm/mm

161: surveys.  These surveys yield highly uncertain bolometric corrections

162: for the infrared luminosity.  Deep surveys at 70\,$\mu$m and

163: 160\,$\mu$m with {\em Spitzer} enable the direct identification of

164: luminous sources within the FIR band.  In this Letter we report on CO

165: observations of the brightest FIR source at $z>1$ in GOODS-North.  The

166: source GOODS\,J123634.53+621241.3 (also known as SMG GN26) was

167: identified as being unusually bright at 70\,\&\,160\,$\mu$m

168: \citep{fra06,huy07} and for having strong emission from polycyclic

169: aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) molecules \citep{pop08}.  At optical

170: wavelengths, GN26 has a merger-like morphology with a disturbed core

171: and evidence of tidal tails on larger scales.  Although it has a large

172: FIR flux, it is among the faintest 850~$\mu$m sources detected to date

173: \citep{bor03, pop06}.  A cosmology of $h_{70}\equiv {\rm H}_0

174: (70\kps\,{\rm Mpc}^{-1})^{-1} = 1$, $\Omega_{\rm M}=0.3$, and

175: $\Omega_{\Lambda}=0.7$ is assumed throughout this paper.

176: 

177: 

178: \section{Observations}

179: 

180: The \cob observations of GN26 were taken between 2007 April 14 -- June

181: 28 with the Combined Array for Research in Millimeter-Wave Astronomy

182: (CARMA) in the low-resolution D-configuration, resulting in a total of

183: 26.4 hours of on-source data.  The adopted phase center was the IRAC

184: position of $\alpha$(J2000)=$12^{\rm h} 36^{\rm m}34\fs5$,

185: $\delta$(J2000)=$+62\arcdeg 12\arcmin 41\arcsec$ \citep{pop06}.  The

186: CO line was observed using a digital correlator configured with two

187: adjacent $13\times31.25$\,MHz bands centered on 103.89274 GHz in the

188: upper side-band, corresponding to \cob emission at the reported

189: optical redshift of $z=1.219$ \citep{coh96}.  The nearby quasar

190: J1153+495 ($14\arcdeg$ from GN26) was observed every 15 minutes for

191: amplitude and phase calibration, and the bright quasars 3C\,273,

192: 3C\,345, and J0927+390 were used for passband calibration and

193: pointing.  We estimate an uncertainty of 14\% for the absolute

194: calibration scale based on the observations of 3C\,273 and 3C\,345.

195: 

196: The data were reduced and calibrated using the Multichannel Image

197: Reconstruction, Image Analysis, and Display (MIRIAD) software package

198: \citep{sau95}.  An interactive UV-plotting tool was used to visualize

199: and flag spurious visibilities per baseline (105 baselines in total).

200: Figure~1 shows the ``dirty'' (no cleaning) natural-weighted integrated

201: \cob map made by averaging over the 10 channels showing CO emission at

202: the phase center.  No improvement in image quality was made using

203: clean algorithms since the side-lobes are weaker than the noise due to

204: the large number of baselines.  The data are consistent with an

205: unresolved point source.  The weak tail extending eastward is not

206: currently significant (Fig.~1).  Higher resolution data with higher

207: signal-to-noise would be needed to measure the CO morphology of the

208: source.

209:  

210: \section{Results}

211: 

212: The total \cob line flux of $3.45 \pm 0.46\jy\kps$ was derived from

213: the integrated CO map ($7.5\sigma$, Fig.~1).  The CO position and the

214: limit to the CO source size of $<4\arcsec$ (33\,kpc) were derived from

215: a ``robust''-weighted image (ROBUST$=0$).  The derived position is

216: consistent with previous optical and radio positions.  The CO emission

217: peaks at the central location of the merger event.  With the current

218: sensitivity and resolution, there is no evidence for CO emission from

219: the nearby companion galaxy GOODS J123634.69+621243.7 at $z=1.225$

220: \citep{cow04}, which is about $3\arcsec$ north-east of GN26.

221: 

222: Figure~2 shows the \cob spectrum at the peak of the CO image.  The

223: spectrum was Hanning-smoothed for display purposes, but a Gaussian fit

224: of the un-smoothed data was used to derive the CO redshift and line

225: width (Table~1).  The CO redshift of $z(\co)=1.2234\pm0.0007$ is

226: slightly red-ward ($600\kps$) of the reported optical redshift of

227: $z=1.219$ \citep{coh96,cow04}, which is not unusual for dust-obscured

228: ultra-luminous systems \citep{fra99, gre05}.  \cite{wir04} observed

229: the galaxy with the Keck DEIMOS spectrograph but did not report a

230: redshift.  However, visual inspection of the spectrum using the Team

231: Keck Treasury Redshift Survey on-line database shows an emission line

232: consistent with [OII] $\lambda3727$\AA\ at a redshift of

233: $z=1.224\pm0.001$, which agrees well with the measured CO redshift.

234: In addition, the CO redshift is consistent with the redshift based on

235: the PAH lines ($z=1.23\pm0.01$) observed with {\em Spitzer} IRS

236: \citep{pop08}.  Based on its sub-mm and radio flux densities

237: \citep[S850\,$= 2.2$\,mJy; S1.4\,GHz\,$=0.19$\,mJy,][]{pop06}, the

238: continuum level at 3\,mm is expected to be less than about 0.05\,mJy.

239: As expected, no continuum was detected from the co-addition of the

240: lower and upper side-band line-free channels; S(3mm)$ < 0.66$\,mJy

241: ($3\sigma$).  Since the 3~mm continuum level is negligible in

242: comparison to the strong CO line, no continuum was subtracted from the

243: data.

244: 

245: The observed \cob line flux implies an intrinsic CO line luminosity of

246: $L^{\prime}[\cobm] = (6.8\pm1.8) \times 10^{10} \Kkpspc$ \citep[see

247: formulae in][]{sv05}, which is a factor of 150--200 times larger than

248: that for our Galaxy.  The CO luminosity is related to the mass of

249: molecular gas (including He) by $M(\hh)/L^{\prime}(\co) = \alpha$.

250: Given that \cite{tac08} have found that the conversion factor $\alpha$

251: for the SMGs is similar to that derived for local ULIRGs, we have

252: adopted the average ULIRG value for GN26.  Assuming $\alpha(\otz) =

253: 0.8 \msun(\Kkpspc)^{-1}$ and

254: $L^{\prime}[\cobm]/L^{\prime}[\coam]\simeq 0.8$ as found for local

255: ULIRGs \citep{ds98}, we adopt $\alpha(\tto) = 1 \msun(\Kkpspc)^{-1}$;

256: i.e., $\alpha(\tto) = \alpha(\otz)

257: (L^{\prime}[\cobm]/L^{\prime}[\coam])^{-1}$.  For $\alpha(\tto) = 1$,

258: the molecular gas mass for GN26 is $M(\hh) \simeq 7\times 10^{10}

259: M_{\sun}$.

260: 

261: The baryonic gas fraction provides an estimate of the evolutionary

262: state of the system [$\mu \equiv M_{\rm gas}/(M_{\rm gas}+M_{\rm

263: stars})]$ \citep[e.g.,][]{fb97}.  Massive local spirals have gas

264: fractions of $\mu \simeq 0.05$--0.1 \citep{ys91}, while younger

265: gas-rich systems have higher gas fractions and more evolved systems

266: have lower gas fractions.  To derive the stellar mass and the gas

267: fraction for GN26, we used the \cite{bc03} population synthesis models

268: to fit the multi-wavelength (U through z-band and {\em Spitzer} IRAC

269: 3-6$\mu$m) photometry.  We assumed solar metallicities, a Salpeter

270: IMF, and star-formation histories ranging from a single instantaneous

271: burst to various $e$-folding timescales, including constant

272: star-formation.  We estimate an age of the stellar population of

273: 1.3~Gyr and a total stellar mass of

274: (2.1$\pm$0.6)$\times$10$^{11}$\,M$_{\sun}$ for an e-folding timescale

275: of 1.0~Gyr.  Neglecting H{\sc I} ($M_{gas} \simeq M(\hh)$), the

276: implied gas fraction is $\mu = 0.25\pm0.10$.

277: 

278: The dynamical mass is highly uncertain given the lack of resolution of

279: the CO data and the uncertain kinematics associated with the merger

280: event.  However, the CO size of $\theta({\rm FWHM})<4\arcsec$

281: (diameter $< 33$\,kpc) can provide a crude constraint on the dynamical

282: mass.  For a wide range of mass distributions, the dynamical mass can

283: be approximated by $M_{\rm dyn}\approx R(\Delta V/[2\sin(i)])^2/G$,

284: where $\Delta V$ is the observed FWHM line width, $G$ is the

285: gravitational constant, and $i$ is the inclination.  If the intrinsic

286: axial ratio is about 1, the observed optical morphology implies an

287: inclination of $i\simeq 40\arcdeg$.  For a radius of $R<16.5$\,kpc, a

288: CO line width of $560\kps$, and $i\simeq 40\arcdeg$, the dynamical

289: mass is $M_{\rm dyn} < 7\times 10^{11} \msun$.  This result implies a

290: gas-fraction of larger than 10\% which is consistent with the estimate

291: based on the stellar mass.

292: 

293: We derive a FIR (42.5--122.5\,$\mu$m) luminosity of $L({\rm FIR}) =

294: (4.0\pm1.2) \times 10^{12} L_{\odot}$ and a total infrared luminosity

295: (8--1000\,$\mu$m)\footnote{We adopt an IR definition of

296:   8--1000\,$\mu$m and the {\em IRAS} FIR definition of

297:   42.5--122.5\,$\mu$m throughout this paper.} of $L({\rm IR}) =

298: (5.6\pm1.7) \times 10^{12} L_{\odot}$, using the 70, 160, and

299: 850\,$\mu$m flux densities \citep{pop06, huy07} and the IRS spectrum

300: \citep{pop08}.  A single-temperature greybody with $T_{d}= 41\pm3$\,K

301: and a dust-emissivity index of $\beta \simeq 2$ fit the data.  Similar

302: luminosities have been previously derived based on local spectral

303: energy distribution (SED) templates \citep{huy07,pop08}, but a simple

304: greybody provides a better fit to the FIR data for this system.

305: 

306: \section{Discussion}

307: 

308: GN26 has a disturbed, merger-like morphology (Fig. 1) similar to local

309: ULIRGs and many high-redshift ULIRGs/SMGs.  The {\em Spitzer} mid-infrared

310: IRS spectrum \citep{pop08}, the infrared-to-radio flux density ratio

311: \citep{huy07}, and the X-ray emission \citep{ale05} are all consistent

312: with GN26 being predominantly powered by star formation.  The large

313: \cob flux is consistent with this view.

314: 

315: We derive a total star-formation rate of SFR\,$\simeq 950 \msun

316: \yr^{-1}$, using SFR($\msun \yr^{-1}) = 1.7\times 10^{-10} L({\rm

317: IR})/\lsun$ which assumes a Salpeter IMF \citep{ken98}.  The $L({\rm

318: IR})/L^{\prime}(\co)$ ratio provides an indication of the intensity of

319: star-formation and star-formation efficiency.  Strong starbursts and

320: ULIRGs tend to show high IR-to-CO luminosity ratios of $\ga 100$,

321: while local spiral galaxies have lower values of about 10--50

322: \citep[e.g.,][]{sv05}.  For GN26, $L({\rm IR})/L^{\prime}(\co) = 80\pm

323: 30\,\lsun (\Kkpspc)^{-1}$.  An average ratio of 350 has been reported

324: for high-redshift CO sources \citep{sv05}.  However, previous $L({\rm

325: IR})$ estimates for the SMGs assume a temperature of 40\,K

326: \citep{gre05}, while multi-wavelength data suggest a lower average

327: dust temperature of about 35\,K for the SMG population \citep{cha05,

328: kov06, pop06, pop08, huy07}, implying a factor of two decrease in

329: their luminosities.  If adopting an average temperature of 35\,K for

330: the SMGs and placing the data on the same infrared luminosity scale,

331: we find that both the high-redshift SMGs \citep{gre05} and local

332: ULIRGs \citep{sol97} have a similar average value of $L({\rm

333: IR})/L^{\prime}(\co) \simeq 200\pm 100 \lsun (\Kkpspc)^{-1}$.  The

334: value for GN26 is on the low end of the range of values found for the

335: more distant SMGs and local ULIRGs.

336: 

337: 

338: In comparison, the recent CO observations of the massive $z\sim 2$ BzK

339: galaxies \citep[galaxies selected on the basis of their $B-z$ and

340: $z-K$ colors,][]{dad07} suggest a similar ratio of $L({\rm

341: IR})/L^{\prime}(\co) = 60\pm30\lsun (\Kkpspc)^{-1}$ \citep{dad08}.

342: Although the IR-to-CO luminosity ratios for GN26 and the BzKs are

343: similar, the BzKs are suspected to have much longer star-formation

344: time scales.  For the adopted CO-to-H$_2$ conversion factor

345: ($\alpha[\tto] \simeq 1)$, the estimated star-formation (gas

346: consumption) time scale of $M(\hh)/{\rm SFR}= 70$\,Myr for GN26 is

347: consistent with a merger-driven starburst and the short time scales

348: estimated previously for starbursts in local ULIRGs and distant SMGs

349: \citep{sv05, tac08}. In contrast, the BzK are thought to have much

350: longer star-formation time scales of order $\ga 400$\,Myr based on

351: their estimated duty cycle \citep{dad07}.  The gas consumption time

352: scales for the BzKs based on the CO data would be consistent with

353: these results if the Galactic CO-to-H$_2$ conversion factor is adopted

354: for the BzKs \citep[e.g., $\alpha(\otz) = 4.8

355: \msun(\Kkpspc)^{-1}$,][]{san91}.  Within this paradigm, BzK galaxies

356: would be analogous to local spirals with enhanced SFRs and long

357: star-formation time scales, while the SMGs would be analogous to local

358: ULIRGs with short time scales.  However, such generalizations may be

359: an over simplification.  High-redshift galaxies such as GN26 and the

360: BzKs may have a wide range of star-formation time scales between the

361: intense short-lived starbursts found in local ULIRGs of order 10\,Myr

362: and the long time scales of order 1\,Gyr found for local spirals.

363: Future high-resolution CO observations are needed to constrain the

364: CO-to-H$_2$ conversion factors and the associated gas consumption time

365: scales before definitive conclusions may be drawn.

366: 

367: GN26 is not representative of most SMGs studied to date.  It has a

368: relatively low redshift, is faint at 850\,$\mu$m, and is warmer than

369: other SMGs detected at $z\sim 1$ \citep{cha05}.  It also has the

370: largest observed S(CO)/S850 ratio of any SMG to date by a factor of 5

371: (in part due to the K-correction of this ratio).  Previous

372: high-redshift CO surveys have concentrated on the brightest

373: 850\,$\mu$m sources which are typically at $z>2$.  For sources at

374: $z\sim1$, the {\em Spitzer} 70 and 160\,$\mu$m surveys and future

375: Herschel surveys which probe the peak of the FIR SED may be more

376: effective at identifying the brightest CO sources than the current

377: 850\,$\mu$m surveys.  The relative importance of low-redshift SMGs

378: \citep[$z\sim1$,][]{wan06,wan08}, ``typical'' SMGs \citep[$2\la z

379: \la3$,][]{bla02, cha05}, and the most distant SMGs

380: \cite[$z>3$,][]{dun04, wan07, you07, you08, dan08} is an active topic

381: of discussion.  \cite{wal08} have recently argued for two distinct

382: populations of SMGs: ULIRGs at $z\sim1$ and more luminous ULIRGs at

383: $z\sim$2--3.  Comparing the CO properties of SMGs as a function of

384: redshift and luminosity may help to test the hypothesis of multiple

385: SMG populations.

386: 

387: 

388: \section{Concluding Remarks}

389: 

390: GN26 is a merger-driven starburst with a molecular gas mass of about

391: $7\times 10^{10} M_{\sun}$.  Although it is the brightest FIR

392: (70\,$\mu$m and 160\,$\mu$m) high-redshift ($z>1$) source in

393: GOODS-North, it has not been previously observed in CO given that it

394: is among the faintest 850\,$\mu$m sources.  The CO properties of GN26

395: are consistent with local ULIRGs and the high-redshift SMGs. The

396: derived gas fraction of $0.25\pm0.10$ based on the stellar and

397: molecular gas mass estimates suggests that about 75\% of the available

398: baryonic mass has already been converted into stars.  Furthermore, at

399: the current star-formation rate, the molecular gas will be depleted

400: within $\la 100$~Myr.  The short gas consumption time scale for GN26

401: is in contrast to long time scales found for local spiral galaxies and

402: estimates made for the high-redshift BzKs.

403: 

404: These observations represent the first discovery of high-redshift CO

405: using CARMA.  Planned improvements of the CARMA receivers will allow

406: for CO observations of significant samples of distant ULIRGs

407: discovered by the ongoing {\em Spitzer} programs and future Herschel

408: surveys.

409: 

410: \acknowledgments

411: 

412: Support for CARMA construction was derived from the Gordon and Betty

413: Moore Foundation, the Kenneth T. and Eileen L. Norris Foundation, the

414: Associates of the California Institute of Technology, the states of

415: California, Illinois, and Maryland, and the National Science

416: Foundation.  Ongoing CARMA development and operations are supported by

417: the National Science Foundation under a cooperative agreement, and by

418: the CARMA partner universities.  This work is based in part on

419: observations made with the {\em Spitzer} Space Telescope and has made use of

420: the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED), both of which are operated

421: by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology

422: under a contract with NASA.  The optical image was obtained from the

423: Multi-mission Archive at the Space Telescope Science Institute (MAST).

424: 

425: 

426: \begin{thebibliography}{}

427: 

428: \bibitem[Alexander et al.(2005)]{ale05} Alexander, D.~M., Bauer, F.~E.,

429: Chapman, S.~C., Smail, I., Blain, A.~W., Brandt, W.~N., \& Ivison,

430: R.~J.\ 2005, \apj, 632, 736

431: 

432: \bibitem[Barger et al.(1998)]{bar98} Barger, A.~J., Cowie, L.~L.,

433: Sanders, D.~B., Fulton, E., Taniguchi, Y., Sato, Y., Kawara, K., \&

434: Okuda, H.\ 1998, \nat, 394, 248

435: 

436: \bibitem[Blain et al.(2002)]{bla02} Blain, A.~W., Smail, I., 

437: Ivison, R.~J., Kneib, J.-P., \& Frayer, D.~T.\ 2002, \physrep, 369, 111 

438: 

439: \bibitem[Borys et al.(2003)]{bor03} Borys, C., Chapman, S., 

440: Halpern, M., \& Scott, D.\ 2003, \mnras, 344, 385 

441: 

442: 

443: \bibitem[Bruzual \& Charlot(2003)]{bc03} Bruzual, G., \& Charlot, S.\

444: 2003, \mnras, 344, 1000

445: 

446: \bibitem[Caputi et al.(2007)]{cap07} Caputi, K.~I., et al.\ 

447: 2007, \apj, 660, 97 

448: 

449: \bibitem[Chapman et al.(2005)]{cha05} Chapman, S.~C., Blain, 

450: A.~W., Smail, I., \& Ivison, R.~J.\ 2005, \apj, 622, 772 

451: 

452: \bibitem[Chary et al.(2004)]{cha04} Chary, R., et al.\ 2004, 

453: \apjs, 154, 80 

454: 

455: 

456: \bibitem[Cohen et al.(1996)]{coh96} Cohen, J.~G., Cowie, L.~L., Hogg,

457: D.~W., Songaila, A., Blandford, R., Hu, E.~M., \& Shopbell, P.\ 1996,

458: \apjl, 471, L5

459: 

460: \bibitem[Cowie et al.(2004)]{cow04} Cowie, L.~L., Barger, 

461: A.~J., Hu, E.~M., Capak, P., \& Songaila, A.\ 2004, \aj, 127, 3137 

462: 

463: 

464: \bibitem[Daddi et al.(2008)]{dad08} Daddi, E., Dannerbauer, H., Elbaz,

465:  D., Dickinson, M., Morrison, G., Stern, D., \& Ravindranath, S.\

466:  2008, \apjl, 673, L21

467: 

468: \bibitem[Daddi et al.(2007)]{dad07} Daddi, E., et al.\ 2007, 

469: \apj, 670, 156  

470: 

471: \bibitem[Dannerbauer et al.(2008)]{dan08} Dannerbauer, H., 

472: Walter, F., \& Morrison, G.\ 2008, \apjl, 673, L127 

473: 

474: 

475: \bibitem[Downes \& Solomon(1998)]{ds98} Downes, D., \& 

476: Solomon, P.~M.\ 1998, \apj, 507, 615 

477: 

478: \bibitem[Dunlop et al.(2004)]{dun04} Dunlop, J.~S., et al.\ 2004,

479: \mnras, 350, 769

480: 

481: \bibitem[Frayer et al.(2006)]{fra06} Frayer, D.~T., et al.\ 

482: 2006, \apjl, 647, L9 

483: 

484: \bibitem[Frayer et al.(1999)]{fra99} Frayer, D.~T., et al.\ 

485: 1999, \apjl, 514, L13

486: 

487: \bibitem[Frayer et al.(1998)]{fra98} Frayer, D.~T., Ivison, 

488: R.~J., Scoville, N.~Z., Yun, M., Evans, A.~S., Smail, I., Blain, A.~W., \& 

489: Kneib, J.-P.\ 1998, \apjl, 506, L7 

490: 

491: \bibitem[Frayer \& Brown(1997)]{fb97} Frayer, D.~T., \& Brown, R.~L.\

492: 1997, \apjs, 113, 221

493: 

494: \bibitem[Greve et al.(2005)]{gre05} Greve, T.~R., et al.\ 

495: 2005, \mnras, 359, 1165 

496: 

497: \bibitem[Hughes et al.(1998)]{hug98} Hughes, D.~H., et al.\ 

498: 1998, \nat, 394, 241 

499: 

500: \bibitem[Huynh et al.(2007)]{huy07} Huynh, M.~T., Pope, A., 

501: Frayer, D.~T., \& Scott, D.\ 2007, \apj, 659, 305 

502: 

503: \bibitem[Kennicutt(1998)]{ken98} Kennicutt, R.~C., Jr.\ 1998, \araa,

504: 36, 189

505: 

506: \bibitem[Kov{\'a}cs et al.(2006)]{kov06} Kov{\'a}cs, A., 

507: Chapman, S.~C., Dowell, C.~D., Blain, A.~W., Ivison, R.~J., Smail, I., 

508: \& Phillips, T.~G.\ 2006, \apj, 650, 592 

509: 

510: \bibitem[Lagache et al.(2004)]{lag04} Lagache, G., et al.\ 

511: 2004, \apjs, 154, 112 

512: 

513: \bibitem[Le Floc'h et al.(2005)]{lef05} Le Floc'h, E., et 

514: al.\ 2005, \apj, 632, 169 

515: 

516: \bibitem[Neri et al.(2003)]{ner03} Neri, R., et al.\ 2003, 

517: \apjl, 597, L113

518: 

519: 

520: \bibitem[Papovich et al.(2006)]{pap06} Papovich, C., et al.\ 

521: 2006, \apj, 640, 92 

522: 

523: 

524: \bibitem[Pope et al.(2008)]{pop08} Pope, A., et al.\ 2008, 

525: ApJ, in press (arXiv:0711.1553) 

526: 

527: \bibitem[Pope et al.(2006)]{pop06} Pope, A., et al.\ 2006, 

528: \mnras, 370, 1185 

529: 

530: 

531: \bibitem[Sault et al.(1995)]{sau95} Sault, R.~J., Teuben,

532: P.~J., \& Wright, M.~C.~H.\ 1995, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and

533: Systems IV, 77, 433

534: 

535: \bibitem[Sanders et al.(1991)]{san91} Sanders, D.~B., Scoville, N.~Z.,

536: \& Soifer, B.~T.\ 1991, \apj, 370, 158

537: 

538: \bibitem[Smail et al.(1997)]{sma97} Smail, I., Ivison, R.~J., 

539: \& Blain, A.~W.\ 1997, \apjl, 490, L5 

540: 

541: \bibitem[Solomon \& Vanden Bout(2005)]{sv05} Solomon, P.~M., \& Vanden

542: Bout, P.~A.\ 2005, \araa, 43, 677

543: 

544: 

545: \bibitem[Solomon et al.(1997)]{sol97} Solomon, P.~M., Downes, 

546: D., Radford, S.~J.~E., \& Barrett, J.~W.\ 1997, \apj, 478, 144 

547: 

548: \bibitem[Tacconi et al.(2008)]{tac08} Tacconi, L.~J., et al.\ 2008,

549: \apj, in press (arXiv:0801.3650)

550: 

551: \bibitem[Tacconi et al.(2006)]{tac06} Tacconi, L.~J., et al.\ 2006,

552: \apj, 640, 228

553: 

554: \bibitem[Wall et al.(2008)]{wal08} Wall, J.~V., Pope, A., 

555: \& Scott, D.\ 2008, \mnras, 383, 435 

556: 

557: \bibitem[Wang et al.(2008)]{wan08} Wang, W.-H., Cowie, L.~L., \&

558: Barger, A.~J.\ 2008, \apss, 313, 317

559: 

560: \bibitem[Wang et al.(2007)]{wan07} Wang, W.-H., Cowie, L.~L., van

561: Saders, J., Barger, A.~J., \& Williams, J.~P.\ 2007, \apjl, 670, L89

562: 

563: \bibitem[Wang et al.(2006)]{wan06} Wang, W.-H., Cowie, L.~L., \&

564: Barger, A.~J.\ 2006, \apj, 647, 74

565: 

566: \bibitem[Wirth et al.(2004)]{wir04} Wirth, G.~D., et al.\ 

567: 2004, \aj, 127, 3121 

568: 

569: \bibitem[Young \& Scoville(1991)]{ys91} Young, J.~S., \& Scoville,

570: N.~Z.\ 1991, \araa, 29, 581

571: 

572: \bibitem[Younger et al.(2008)]{you08} Younger, J.~D., et al.\ 2008,

573: MNRAS, submitted (arXiv:0801.2764)

574: 

575: \bibitem[Younger et al.(2007)]{you07} Younger, J.~D., et al.\ 

576: 2007, \apj, 671, 1531 

577: 

578: \end{thebibliography}

579: 

580: %\clearpage

581: 

582: \begin{table}

583: \begin{center}

584: \caption{\cob Observational Results}

585: \tablewidth{300pt}

586: \begin{tabular}{lr}

587: \tableline\tableline

588: Parameter & Value \\

589: \tableline

590: $\alpha$(J2000)  & $12^{\rm h} 36^{\rm m}34\fs51\pm0\fs08$ \\

591: $\delta$(J2000) &$+62\arcdeg 12\arcmin 41\farcs2\pm0\farcs5$ \\

592: $z(\co)$  &$1.2234\pm0.0007$ \\

593: Linewidth (FWHM)& $560\pm90\kps$\\

594: $S(\co)$\tablenotemark{a}& $3.45\pm0.93\jy\kps$ \\

595: $L(\co)$\tablenotemark&  $(2.7\pm0.7)\times 10^{7} h_{70}^{-2}

596: L_{\sun}$ \\

597: $L^{\prime}(\co)$\tablenotemark& $(6.8\pm1.8)\times 10^{10}

598: h_{70}^{-2}\Kkpspc$\\

599: $M(\hh)$\tablenotemark{b} & $7\times10^{10} h_{70}^{-2} M_{\sun}$\\

600: \tableline

601: \end{tabular}

602: \tablenotetext{a}{Observed total \cob line flux.  Uncertainty

603: includes the 14\% systematic calibration uncertainty and the

604: 13\% ($7.5\sigma$ detection) random noise.}

605: \tablenotetext{b}{Estimated assuming $\alpha(\tto) = 1 \msun

606: (\Kkpspc)^{-1}$.}

607: \end{center}

608: \end{table}

609: 

610: \clearpage

611: 

612: \begin{figure}

613: \epsscale{.60}

614: \plotone{f1.ps}

615: \vspace*{3cm}

616: \caption{The integrated \cob map of GN26 averaged over 312.5\,MHz

617:   ($904\kps$) overlaid on an optical {\em HST}-ACS $z$-band image

618:   (grey-scale).  The $1\sigma$ error is $0.46\jy\kps$/beam, and the

619:   contour levels are $1\sigma\times$($-$2,2,3,4,5,6,7); positive

620:   contours are solid lines and negative contours are dotted lines.

621:   The synthesized beam size (white ellipse) for the observations is

622:   shown in the lower left ($5\farcs4\times4\farcs6, {\rm

623:   PA}=80\arcdeg$).}

624: 

625: \end{figure}

626: 

627: \clearpage

628: 

629: \begin{figure}

630: \epsscale{0.9}

631: \plotone{f2.eps}

632: \caption{ The \cob spectrum for GN26.  The spectrum has been

633: Hanning-smoothed.  The channel increment is 31.25\,MHz ($90.4\kps$),

634: and the $1\sigma$ error bar per smoothed channel is shown to the

635: right.  The dotted-line shows a Gaussian fit of the line profile for

636: the unsmoothed data.}

637: 

638: \end{figure}

639: 

640: 

641: 

642: 

643: 

644: 

645: \end{document}

646: 

647: