1: % ****** Start of file apssamp.tex ******
2: %
3: % This file is part of the APS files in the REVTeX 4 distribution.
4: % Version 4.0 of REVTeX, August 2001
5: %
6: % Copyright (c) 2001 The American Physical Society.
7: %
8: % See the REVTeX 4 README file for restrictions and more information.
9: %
10: % TeX'ing this file requires that you have AMS-LaTeX 2.0 installed
11: % as well as the rest of the prerequisites for REVTeX 4.0
12: %
13: % See the REVTeX 4 README file
14: % It also requires running BibTeX. The commands are as follows:
15: %
16: % 1) latex apssamp.tex
17: % 2) bibtex apssamp
18: % 3) latex apssamp.tex
19: % 4) latex apssamp.tex
20: %
21: \documentclass[twocolumn,amsmath,amssymb,]{revtex4}
22: %\documentclass[preprint,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
23:
24: % Some other (several out of many) possibilities
25: %\documentclass[preprint,aps]{revtex4}
26: %\documentclass[preprint,aps,draft]{revtex4}
27: %\documentclass[prb]{revtex4}% Physical Review B
28:
29: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
30: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
31: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
32:
33: %\nofiles
34:
35: \begin{document}
36:
37: \preprint{}
38:
39: \title{Quintessence reconstruction of the new agegraphic dark energy model}% Force line breaks with \\
40:
41: \author{Jian-Pin Wu}
42: \email{jianpinwu@yahoo.com.cn}
43: \author{Da-Zhu Ma}
44: \email{mdzhbmy@126.com}
45: \author{Yi Ling}%
46: \email{yling@ncu.edu.cn}
47: \affiliation{ Center for Gravity and Relativistic Astrophysics,
48: Department of Physics, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China
49: }%
50:
51: \begin{abstract}
52: In this paper we implement the new agegraphic dark energy model with
53: quintessence field. We demonstrate that the new agegraphic evolution
54: of the universe can be described completely by a single quintessence
55: field. Its potential as a function of the quintessence field is
56: reconstructed numerically. In particular, the analytical solution of
57: the new agegraphic quintessence dark energy model (NAQDE) is
58: approximately obtained in the matter-dominated epoch. Furthermore,
59: we investigate the evolution of the NAQDE model in the
60: $\omega-\omega'$ phase plane. It turns out that by quantum
61: corrections, the trajectory of this model lies outside the thawing
62: and freezing regions at early times. But at late times, it enters
63: the freezing regions and gradually approaches to a static
64: cosmological constant state in the future. Therefore the NAQDE
65: should belong to the freezing model at late times. For comparison,
66: we further extend this model by including the interaction between
67: the NADE and DM and discuss its evolution in the $\omega-\omega'$
68: phase plane.
69: \end{abstract}
70:
71: \pacs{Valid PACS appear here} %PACS, %the Physics and Astronomy
72: %Classification Scheme.
73: \keywords{Suggested keywords}%Use showkeys class option if keyword
74: %display desired
75: \maketitle
76:
77: \section{Introduction}
78:
79: Recent astronomical observations indicate that the universe is
80: undergoing accelerated expansion at the present time \cite{1}.
81: Nowadays it is the most accepted idea that a mysterious dominant
82: component, dark energy (DE) with negative pressure, leads to this
83: cosmic acceleration. However, the nature and cosmological origin of
84: DE still remain enigmatic at present. It is not clear yet whether DE
85: can be described by a cosmological constant which is independent of
86: time, or by dynamical scalar fields such as quintessence, K-essence,
87: tachyon, phantom, ghost condensate or quintom. At the same time, the
88: so-called fine-tuning problem and coincidence problem still confuse
89: us.
90:
91: To shed light on these fundamental and difficult problems, some
92: interesting DE models were proposed recently, including holographic
93: dark energy model \cite{2} and agegraphic dark energy model
94: \cite{3,4}. The former is motivated from the holographic hypothesis.
95: The later is constructed in the light of the
96: K$\acute{a}$rolyh$\acute{a}$zy relation \cite{5} and a corresponding
97: energy fluctuations of space-time. Therefore, although a complete
98: theory of quantum gravity is not established yet today, we still can
99: make some attempts to investigate the nature of dark energy
100: according to some principles of quantum gravity. The holographic
101: dark energy model and the agegraphic model are just such examples,
102: which are originated from some considerations of the features of the
103: quantum theory of gravity. That is to say, the holographic and
104: agegraphic dark energy model possess some significant features of
105: quantum gravity.
106:
107: On the other hand, as we all admitted, the scalar field model is an
108: effective description of an underlying theory of dark energy. Scalar
109: fields naturally arise in particle physics including supersymmetric
110: field theories and string/M theory. Therefore, scalar field is
111: expected to reveal the dynamical mechanism and the nature of dark
112: energy. However, although fundamental theories such as string/M
113: theory do provide a number of possible candidates for scalar fields,
114: they do not uniquely predict its potential $V(\phi)$. Therefore it
115: becomes meaningful to reconstruct $V(\phi)$ from some dark energy
116: models possessing some significant features of the quantum gravity
117: theory, such as holographic and agegraphic dark energy model.
118:
119: Some works have been investigated on the reconstruction of the
120: potential $V(\phi)$ in holographic dark energy models. For instance
121: we refer to \cite{6,7}. In this paper, we intend to reconstruct the
122: potential of quintessence $V(\phi)$ for agegraphic dark energy
123: models.
124:
125: Let us first start with a close look at the agegraphic dark energy
126: model. According to the K$\acute{a}$rolyh$\acute{a}$zy relation,
127: the distance $t$ in Minkowski spacetime cannot be known to a
128: better accuracy than
129: \begin{equation}
130: \delta t = \lambda t ^{2/3} _{p} t ^{1/3}, \label{eq1}
131: \end{equation}
132: where $\lambda$ is a dimensionless constant of order unity. We use
133: the units $\hbar = c = k_{B} = 1$ throughout this work. Thus $l_{p}
134: = t_{p} = 1/M_{p}$ with $l_{p}$ , $t_{p}$ and $M_{p}$ being the
135: reduced Planck length, time and mass respectively.
136:
137: Following \cite{8,9}, corresponding to Eq.(\ref{eq1}) a length scale
138: $t$ can be known with a maximum precision $\delta t$ determining
139: thereby a minimal detectable cell $\delta t^{3} \sim t^{2}_{p} t$
140: over a spatial region $t^{3}$. Such a cell represents a minimal
141: detectable unit of spacetime over a given length scale $t$. If the
142: age of the Minkowski spacetime is $t$, then over a spatial region
143: with linear size $t$ (determining the maximal observable patch)
144: there exists a minimal cell $t^{3}$, the energy of which due to
145: time-energy uncertainty relation can not be smaller than
146: \begin{equation}
147: E_{\delta t^{3}} \sim t^{-1}.\label{eq2}
148: \end{equation}
149:
150: Therefore, the energy density of metric fluctuations of Minkowski
151: spacetime is given by
152: \begin{equation}
153: \rho_{q} \sim \frac{E_{\delta t^{3}}}{\delta t^{3}} \sim
154: \frac{1}{t_{p}^{2} t^{2}} \sim \frac{M_{p}^{2}}{t^{2}},\label{eq3}
155: \end{equation}
156: which for $t_{0}\sim H_{0}^{-1}$ gives pretty good value for the
157: present dark energy. We refer to the original papers \cite{8,9} for
158: more details.
159:
160: Here some arguments are given on cosmological implications of the
161: K$\acute{a}$rolyh$\acute{a}$zy uncertainty relation (\ref{eq1}) and
162: the energy density (\ref{eq3}). First, the
163: K$\acute{a}$rolyh$\acute{a}$zy relation (\ref{eq1}) obeys the
164: holographic black hole entropy bound \cite{9}: the relation
165: (\ref{eq1}) gives a relation between $\delta l$ (UV cutoff) and the
166: length scale $l$ (IR cutoff) of a system, $\delta l \sim
167: l_{p}^{2/3}l^{1/3}$; the system has entropy
168: \begin{equation}
169: S \leq (\frac{l}{\delta l})^{3}\sim (\frac{l}{l_{p}})^{2}\sim
170: S_{BH},\label{eq38}
171: \end{equation}
172: which is less than the black hole entropy with horizon radius $l$.
173: Therefore, the K$\acute{a}$rolyh$\acute{a}$zy uncertainty relation
174: (\ref{eq1}) is a reflection of interplay between UV scale and IR
175: scale in effective quantum field theory \cite{10}. The microscopic
176: energy scales of quantum mechanics and the macroscopic properties of
177: our present universe are intimately connected. Second, the energy
178: density (\ref{eq3}) is dynamically tied to the large scales of the
179: universe, thus violating naive decoupling between UV scale and IR
180: scale. The appearance of both the Planck length and the largest
181: observable scale in the energy density (\ref{eq3}) seems to suggest
182: that the dark energy is due to an entanglement between ultraviolet
183: and infrared physics \cite{11}. Therefore, we expect that the
184: interplay between UV scale and IR scale can give us some clues about
185: what is the reason that quantum gravity effects are still valid
186: today at large distance scales. Some expectations are born out by
187: explicit constructions of effective field theories from string
188: theory \cite{10}.
189:
190: Based on the energy density (3), a so-called agegraphic dark energy
191: (ADE) model was proposed in \cite{3}. There, as the most natural
192: choice, the time scale $t$ in Eq.(\ref{eq3}) is chosen to be the age
193: of the universe
194: \begin{equation}
195: T = \int_{0}^{a}\frac{da}{Ha},\label{eq4}
196: \end{equation}
197: where $a$ is the scale factor of our universe and H $\equiv$
198: $\dot{a}$/a is the Hubble parameter, where a dot denotes the
199: derivative with respect to cosmic time.
200:
201: Later, a new model of ADE was proposed in \cite{4}, where the time
202: scale in Eq.(\ref{eq3}) is chosen to be the conformal time $\eta$
203: instead of the age of the universe. This new agegraphic dark energy
204: (NADE) contains some new features different from the ADE
205: \cite{4,12,13} and overcome some unsatisfactory points. For
206: instance, the ADE suffers from the difficulty to describe the
207: matter-dominated epoch while the NADE resolved this issue.
208:
209: In this paper we intend to present a more detailed investigation on
210: the features of the NADE models through a quintessence
211: reconstruction. Our paper is organized as follows. We first present
212: brief review on the NADE in section $2$. Then we demonstrate a
213: correspondence between the NADE scenario and quintessence dark
214: energy model in section $3$. The potential of the new agegraphic
215: quintessence is reconstructed numerically. In addition, we provide
216: an analytical solution of the NAQDE in the matter-dominated epoch.
217: In section $4$, we investigate the evolution of the NAQDE model in
218: the $\omega-\omega'$ plane and obtain some important characteristics
219: on the NAQDE model. For comparison we consider the NADE with
220: interaction and investigate its evolution in the $\omega-\omega'$
221: plane in section $5$. Finally, the summary follows in section $6$.
222:
223: \section{review of the new agegraphic dark energy}
224: In the NADE model \cite{4}, the energy density of NADE is
225: \begin{equation}
226: \rho_{q} = \frac{3n^{2}M_{p}^{2}}{\eta^{2}},\label{eq5}
227: \end{equation}
228: where the conformal time $\eta$ is given by
229: \begin{equation}
230: \eta\ \equiv \int\frac{dt}{a} = \int\frac{da}{a^{2}H}.\label{eq6}
231: \end{equation}
232: Note that $\dot{\eta} = 1/a$.
233:
234: The numerical factor 3$n^{2}$ is introduced to parameterize some
235: uncertainties, such as the species of quantum fields in the
236: universe, the effect of curved spacetime (since the energy density
237: in Eq.(\ref{eq3}) is derived for Minkowski spacetime), and so on. In
238: \cite{13}, H. Wei and R. G. Cai find that the coincidence problem
239: can be solved naturally in the NADE model provided that $n$ is of
240: order unity. In addition, they constrain NADE by using the
241: cosmological obervations of SNIa, CMB and LSS. The joint analysis
242: gives the best-fit parameter (with 1$\sigma$ uncertainty)
243: $n=2.716_{-0.109}^{+0.111}$. And in \cite{14}, K. Y. Kim $\emph{et
244: al.}$ argued that the NADE model could describe the matter-dominated
245: (radiation-dominated) universe in the far past only when the
246: parameter $n$ is chosen to be $n>n_{c}$, where the critical values
247: are determined to be $n_{c}=2.6878(2.5137752)$ numerically.
248:
249: A flat FRW (Friedmann-Robertson-Walker) universe composed of the
250: NADE $\rho_{q}$ and the pressureless matter $\rho_{m}$ is governed
251: by the Friedmann equation
252: \begin{equation}
253: 3M_{p}^{2}H^{2} = \rho_{m} + \rho_{q}.\label{eq7}
254: \end{equation}
255:
256: Introducing the fractional energy densities $\Omega_{i} \equiv
257: \rho_{i}/(3M_{p}^{2}H^{2})$ for i = m and q, then one finds
258: \begin{equation}
259: \Omega_{q} = \frac{n^{2}}{H^{2}\eta^{2}}.\label{eq8}
260: \end{equation}
261:
262: Combining Eqs.(\ref{eq5}), (\ref{eq6}), (\ref{eq7}) and (\ref{eq8}),
263: and using the energy conservation equation $\dot{\rho_{m}}$ +
264: 3$H\rho_{m}$ = 0, we find that the equation of motion for
265: $\Omega_{q}$ is given by
266: \begin{equation}
267: \frac{d\Omega_{q}}{da} =
268: \frac{\Omega_{q}}{a}(1-\Omega_{q})(3-\frac{2}{n}\frac{\sqrt{\Omega_{q}}}{a}).\label{eq9}
269: \end{equation}
270:
271: We can also rewrite Eq.(\ref{eq9}) as
272: \begin{equation}
273: \frac{d\Omega_{q}}{dz} =
274: -\Omega_{q}(1-\Omega_{q})[3(1+z)^{-1}-\frac{2}{n}\sqrt{\Omega_{q}}],\label{eq10}
275: \end{equation}
276: where $z = 1/a - 1$ is the redshif of the universe, and we have set
277: the present scale factor $a_{0} = 1$. This equation describes the
278: behavior of the NADE completely.
279:
280: From the energy conservation equation $\dot{\rho_{q}} + 3H(\rho_{q}
281: + p_{q}) = 0$, as well as Eqs.(\ref{eq5}) and (\ref{eq8}), it is
282: easy to find that the equation-of-state of NADE $\omega_{q} \equiv
283: p_{q}/\rho_{q}$ is given by
284: \begin{equation}
285: \omega_{q} = -1 +
286: \frac{2}{3n}\frac{\sqrt{\Omega_{q}}}{a},\label{eq11}
287: \end{equation}
288:
289: or
290: \begin{equation}
291: \omega_{q} = -1 + \frac{2}{3n}\sqrt{\Omega_{q}}(1 + z).\label{eq12}
292: \end{equation}
293:
294: As is referred in \cite{4}, $-1\leq\omega_{q}\leq-\frac{2}{3}$.
295: Thus, the NADE can be described by the quintessence. As an
296: illustrative example, we plot in Fig.1 the evolutions of the
297: equation of state (11) of the NADE with the cases $n = 3.0, 3.5,
298: 4.0$ and $5.0$. It is clear to see that $\omega_q$ always evolves in
299: the region $-1\leq\omega_{q}\leq-\frac{2}{3}$, and converges to $-
300: 1$.
301:
302: \begin{figure}
303: \center{
304: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{fig1}% Here is how to import EPS art
305: \caption{\label{fig:wide}the evolutions of the equation of state of
306: the NADE. Here we take $\Omega_{q0} = 0.73$, and show the cases $n
307: = 3.0, 3.5, 4.0$ and $5.0$. Clearly, the cases always evolve in the
308: region $-1 \leq \omega_{q} \leq - \frac{2}{3}$, and converge to $-
309: 1$.} }
310: \end{figure}
311:
312: \section{new agegraphic quintessence}
313:
314: In this section, we link the new agegraphic dark energy model with
315: quintessence fields, forming a new agegraphic quintessence dark
316: energy model. Then we numerically simulate the evolution of the
317: quintessence field with explicit forms of the potential $V(\phi)$.
318: The analytical solution of the NAQDE in the matter-dominated epoch
319: is also obtained.
320:
321: \subsection{Reconstructing new agegraphic quintessence dark energy}
322:
323: The energy density and pressure for the quintessence field are as
324: following
325: \begin{equation}
326: \rho_{\phi} = \frac{1}{2}\dot{\phi}^{2} + V(\phi),\label{eq13}
327: \end{equation}
328: \begin{equation}
329: p_{\phi} = \frac{1}{2}\dot{\phi}^{2} - V(\phi).\label{eq14}
330: \end{equation}
331: Then one can obtain
332: \begin{equation}
333: V(\phi) = \frac{1-\omega_{\phi}}{2}\rho_{\phi},\label{eq15}
334: \end{equation}
335: \begin{equation}
336: \dot{\phi}^{2} = (1+\omega_{\phi})\rho_{\phi}.\label{eq16}
337: \end{equation}
338: Moreover, from the equation of FRW $3M_{p}^{2}H^{2} = \rho_{m} +
339: \rho_{\phi}$, we can obtain
340: \begin{equation}
341: E(a) \equiv \frac{H(a)}{H_{0}} =
342: (\frac{\Omega_{m0}}{(1-\Omega_{\phi})a^{3}})^{1/2},\label{eq17}
343: \end{equation}
344: where $\Omega_{m0}$ denotes the fractional energy density of
345: pressureless matter today.
346:
347: Using Eq.(\ref{eq17}), one can rewrite Eqs.(\ref{eq15}) and
348: (\ref{eq16}) respectively
349: \begin{equation}
350: \frac{V(\phi)}{\rho_{c0}} =
351: \frac{1}{2}(1-\omega_{\phi})\Omega_{\phi}E^{2},\label{eq18}
352: \end{equation}
353: \begin{equation}
354: \frac{\dot{\phi}^{2}}{\rho_{c0}} =
355: (1+\omega_{\phi})\Omega_{\phi}E^{2},\label{eq19}
356: \end{equation}
357: where $\rho_{c0} = 3M_{P}^{2}H_{0}^{2}$ is critical density of the
358: universe at present.
359:
360: Now we suggest a correspondence between the NADE and the
361: quintessence scalar field, namely, we identify $\rho_{\phi}$ with
362: $\rho_{q}$. Then, the quintessence field acquires the new agegraphic
363: nature such that $E$, $\Omega_{\phi}$ and $\omega_{\phi}$ are given
364: by Eqs.(\ref{eq10}), (\ref{eq12}) and (\ref{eq17}). Without loss of
365: generality, we assume $\dot{\phi} > 0$ in this paper \cite{6,15,16}.
366: Then, the derivative of the scalar field $\phi$ with respect to the
367: scale factor $a$ can be given by
368: \begin{equation}
369: \frac{\frac{d\phi}{da}}{M_{p}} =
370: \frac{\sqrt{3(1+\omega_{\phi})\Omega_{\phi}}}{a}.\label{eq20}
371: \end{equation}
372: Consequently, we can easily obtain the evolutionary form of the
373: field by integrating the above equation
374: \begin{equation}
375: \phi(a) = \int_{1}^{a}\frac{d\phi}{da}da,\label{eq21}
376: \end{equation}
377: where the field amplitude at the present epoch ($a=1$) is fixed to
378: be zero, namely $\phi(1) = 0$.
379:
380: In this way, we establish a new agegraphic quintessence dark energy
381: model and reconstruct the potential of the NAQDE.
382:
383:
384:
385: \subsection{The numerical solution of the NAQDE}
386:
387: The quintessence models with different potential forms have been
388: discussed widely in the literature. For the NAQDE model constructed
389: in this paper, the potential V($\phi$) can be determined by Eqs.
390: (\ref{eq18}), (\ref{eq19}) and (\ref{eq20}), and the evolution of
391: $\Omega_{\phi}$ and $\omega_{\phi}$ are determined by Eqs.
392: (\ref{eq9}) and (\ref{eq11}) respectively. The analytical form of
393: the potential V$(\phi)$ is hard to be derived due to the complexity
394: of these equations, but we can obtain the new agegraphic
395: quintessence potential numerically. According to Eqs.(\ref{eq20})
396: and (\ref{eq21}), $\phi(a)$ is displayed in Fig.2. The reconstructed
397: quintessence potential $V(\phi)$ is plotted in Fig.3. Selected
398: curves are plotted for the cases of $n = 2.7, 3, 3.5, 4$ and $5$,
399: and the present fractional matter density is chosen to be
400: $\Omega_{mo} = 0.27$. From Fig.2 and Fig.3, we can see that the
401: reconstructed quintessence potential is steeper in the early epoch
402: and becomes very flat near today. Consequently, the scalar field
403: $\phi$ rolls down the potential with the kinetic energy $\dot{\phi}$
404: gradually decreasing. Furthermore, we can also find that the $n$ is
405: smaller, the potential $V(\phi)$ is more flat near today. In the
406: next section, we will discuss the approximate solution of the model
407: in the matter-dominated epoch.
408:
409: \begin{figure}
410: \center{
411: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{fig2}% Here is how to import EPS art
412: \caption{\label{fig:wide}The revolutions of the scalar-field
413: $\phi(a)$ for the NAQDE, where $\phi$ is in unit of $M_{p}$. We take
414: here $\Omega_{mo} = 0.27$.} }
415: \end{figure}
416:
417: \begin{figure}
418: \center{
419: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{fig3}% Here is how to import EPS art
420: \caption{\label{fig:wide}The reconstruction of the potential for the
421: NAQDE, where $\phi$ is in unit of $M_{p}$ and V$(\phi)$ in
422: $\rho_{c0}$. We take here $\Omega_{m0} = 0.27.$} }
423: \end{figure}
424:
425:
426: \subsection{Approximate solution of the NAQDE in the matter-dominated epoch}
427:
428: As shown in section $4$, the quantum effect is more obvious at early
429: times than at late times. Therefore it is intriguing to considerate
430: the form of the potential $V(\phi)$ in the matter-dominated epoch.
431:
432: As pointed out in \cite{4}, In matter-dominated epoch,
433: $\omega_{\phi}\approx-2/3$, $\Omega_{\phi}=\frac{n^{2}}{4}a^{2}$.
434: From Eqs.(\ref{eq20}) and (\ref{eq18}), one can obtain respectively
435: \begin{equation}
436: \phi=-\frac{nM_{p}}{2}a+\alpha,\label{eq22}
437: \end{equation}
438: \begin{equation}
439: V(a)=\frac{5}{24}\rho_{c0}\Omega_{m0}n^{2}\frac{a^{-3}}{a^{-2}-\frac{n^{2}}{4}},\label{eq23}
440: \end{equation}
441: where $\alpha$ is an integration constant.
442:
443: Combining Eqs.(\ref{eq22}) and (\ref{eq23}), the potential $V(\phi)$
444: can be derived as
445: \begin{equation}
446: V(\phi)=\frac{\beta(\alpha-\phi)^{-3}}{M_{p}^{2}(\alpha-\phi)^{-2}-1},\label{eq24}
447: \end{equation}
448: where $\beta=\frac{5}{48}\rho_{c0}\Omega_{m0}n^{3}M_{p}^{3}$.
449:
450: It is intriguing to see the expansion of the potential $V(\phi)$
451: around $\phi=\alpha$. Setting $\varphi=\alpha-\phi$, the potential
452: around $\varphi=0$ can be expanded as
453: \begin{equation}
454: V(\varphi)=\frac{\beta}{M_{p}^{3}}[(\frac{\varphi}{M_{p}})^{-1}+\frac{\varphi}{M_{p}}+(\frac{\varphi}{M_{p}})^{3}+(\frac{\varphi}{M_{p}})^{5}+(\frac{\varphi}{M_{p}})^{7}+\cdots].\label{eq25}
455: \end{equation}
456:
457: This leads us to surmise that, in reality, $V(\phi)$ around
458: $\phi=\alpha$ might be considered as an effective potential
459: resulting from the combination of some different fields.
460:
461: From Eq.(\ref{eq25}), we can see that the first term is tracking
462: potential and the other terms are not tracking potential when
463: $\omega_{\phi}<\omega_{m}$\cite{17}. This implies that the potential
464: of the NAQDE in the matter-dominated epoch is not tracking
465: potential. In fact, we can easily find that $\Gamma(\phi)$ does not
466: always satisfy $\Gamma(\phi)>1$, where
467: $\Gamma(\phi)=\frac{V(\phi)''V(\phi)}{(V(\phi)')^{2}}$. Therefore
468: the potential of the NAQDE in the matter-dominated epoch is not a
469: tracking solution\cite{17}.
470:
471: \begin{figure*}[tbph]
472: \center{
473: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{fig4a.eps}
474: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{fig4b.eps}
475: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{fig4c.eps}
476: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{fig4d.eps}
477: \caption{The trajectory of the NAQDE in $\omega - \omega'$ plane,
478: where selected curves are plotted for the cases of $n = 3.0, 3.5,
479: 4.0$ and $5.0$, respectively. Here we take $\Omega_{\phi0}=0.73$.
480: } }
481: \end{figure*}
482:
483: \section{the evolution of the NAQDE in the $\omega-\omega'$ plane}
484: Recently, many authors have investigated the evolution of
485: quintessence dark energy models in the $\omega-\omega'$ plane
486: \cite{18,19,20}. According to different regions in the
487: $\omega-\omega'$ plane, the models can be classified into two types
488: which are called thawing and freezing models \cite{17,18}.
489: Distinguishing the thawing class of dark energy from the freezing
490: class would reveal important clues to the nature of the new physics
491: \cite{18,19,20}.
492:
493: In \cite{18}, R.R.Caldwell and E.V.Linder have analyzed the
494: following potentials for thawing behavior:
495: $V(\phi)=M^{4-\lambda}\phi^{\lambda}$, where $\lambda>0$ and
496: $V(\phi)=M^{4}\exp(-\beta\phi/M_{p})$. They have also analyzed the
497: following potentials for freezing behavior:
498: $V(\phi)=M^{4+\lambda}\phi^{-\lambda}$ and
499: $V(\phi)=M^{4+\lambda}\phi^{-\lambda}\exp(\alpha\phi^{2}/M_{p}^{2})$
500: for $\lambda>0$. They point out that if the result lies outside the
501: thawing and freezing regions then one may have to look beyond simple
502: explanations, perhaps to even more exotic physics such as a
503: modification of Einstein gravity. In what follows, we shall study
504: the cosmological dynamics of the NAQDE model in the $\omega-\omega'$
505: plane. For convenience, we will identify $\omega$ with $\omega_{q}$
506: and $\omega_{\phi}$.
507:
508: At first, let us consider the expression of $\omega'$, where
509: $\omega'$ is the variation with respect to the e-folding time
510: $N\equiv\ln a$. From (12), one can obtain
511: \begin{equation}
512: \frac{d\omega}{dz}=\frac{2}{3n}\sqrt{\Omega_{\phi}}+\frac{1}{3n}\frac{1}{\sqrt{\Omega_{\phi}}}\frac{d\Omega_{\phi}}{dz}(1+z).\label{eq26}
513: \end{equation}
514:
515: On the other hand,
516: \begin{equation}
517: \omega'\equiv\frac{d\omega}{dN}=-(1+z)\frac{d\omega}{dz}.\label{eq27}
518: \end{equation}
519:
520: Substituting Eq.(\ref{eq26}) into Eq.(\ref{eq27}), we have
521: \begin{equation}
522: \omega'=-(1+z)[\frac{2}{3n}\sqrt{\Omega_{\phi}}+\frac{1}{3n}\frac{1}{\sqrt{\Omega_{\phi}}}\frac{d\Omega_{\phi}}{dz}(1+z)].\label{eq28}
523: \end{equation}
524:
525: By employing Eqs.(\ref{eq10}), (\ref{eq12}) and (\ref{eq28}), we can
526: plot the trajectory of the NAQDE in $\omega - \omega'$ plane, as is
527: shown in Fig.4, where selected curves are plotted for the cases of
528: $n = 3.0, 3.5, 4.0$ and $5.0$ respectively. Here we take
529: $\Omega_{\phi0}=0.73$.
530:
531: The blue line is the coasting line $\omega' = 3(1+\omega)^{2}$
532: following from constant field velocity, with $\omega'$ greater
533: (smaller) than this for field acceleration (deceleration). As shown
534: in Fig.4, we can see that the trajectory of the NAQDE lies below
535: coasting line at late times and the field accelerates.
536:
537: The thawing region of phase space is defined by
538: \begin{equation}
539: 1 + \omega \leq \omega' \leq 3(1 + \omega).\label{eq29}
540: \end{equation}
541:
542: We note that the lower bound $1 + \omega$ is for $\Omega_{m0} < 0.8$
543: and $\omega < - 0.8$ at present.
544:
545: Alternatively, the freezing region of phase space is defined by
546: \begin{equation}
547: 3\omega(1 + \omega) \leq \omega' \leq 0.2\omega(1 +
548: \omega).\label{eq30}
549: \end{equation}
550:
551: The upper bound $0.2\omega(1 + \omega)$ is for $\Omega_{\phi0} >
552: 0.6$ and $\omega < - 0.8$ at present \cite{18,19}.
553:
554: Next, we discuss the physical implication of the trajectory in
555: $\omega-\omega'$ plane.
556:
557: At early times, as shown in Fig.4, the evolutionary trajectory in
558: the $\omega-\omega'$ plane lies outside the thawing and freezing
559: regions. We may ascribe this to the result of quantum corrections.
560: At late times, the trajectory of evolution enters the so-called
561: freezing region, gradually approaching to a static cosmological
562: constant state in the future. Roughly, the NAQDE should belong to
563: the freezing model at late times. Therefore, it turns out that the
564: quantum effect is more obvious at early times than at late times.
565:
566: As we have seen, the NAQDE model in the $\omega-\omega'$ plane
567: clearly shows the evolutionary character of the dark energy, and the
568: dynamics of the NAQDE can be explored explicitly by reconstruction.
569:
570: In addition, these results can be used to discriminate different
571: cosmological models and the future astronomical observations can
572: also discriminate the NAQDE models with different parameters
573: \cite{18,21}.
574:
575: \section{the NADE with interaction}
576:
577: Similar to \cite{4,21,22}, we further extend the NADE by including
578: the interaction between the NADE and a pressureless cold dark
579: matter, and investigate its evolution in $\omega-\omega'$ plane.
580:
581: \subsection{The NADE with interaction}
582:
583: We consider the interaction between NADE and DM such that $\rho_{m}$
584: and $\rho_{\phi}$ respectively satisfy
585: \begin{equation}
586: \dot{\rho}_{m}+3H\rho_{m}=Q,\label{eq31}
587: \end{equation}
588: \begin{equation}
589: \dot{\rho}_{\phi}+3H(1+\omega_{\phi})\rho_{\phi}=-Q,\label{eq32}
590: \end{equation}
591: where Q denotes the interaction term and can be taken as
592: $Q=3b^{2}H\rho$ with $b^{2}$ the coupling constant\cite{23,24}. A
593: more general consideration about the interaction term can be found
594: in\cite{25}.
595:
596: In this case, by using Eqs.(\ref{eq7}), (\ref{eq8}), (\ref{eq5}) and
597: (\ref{eq31}), we find that the equation of motion for
598: $\Omega_{\phi}$ is given by
599: \begin{equation}
600: \frac{d\Omega_{\phi}}{da}=\frac{\Omega_{\phi}}{a}[(1-\Omega_{\phi})(3-\frac{2}{n}\frac{\sqrt{\Omega_{\phi}}}{a})-3b^{2}],\label{eq33}
601: \end{equation}
602:
603: or
604: \begin{equation}
605: \frac{d\Omega_{\phi}}{dz}=-\Omega_{\phi}\{(1-\Omega_{\phi})[3(1+z)^{-1}-\frac{2}{n}\sqrt{\Omega_{\phi}}]-3b^{2}(1+z)^{-1}\},\label{eq34}
606: \end{equation}
607:
608: From Eqs.(\ref{eq31}), (\ref{eq8}) and (\ref{eq5}), we obtain the
609: EoS as (we can also refer to \cite{4})
610: \begin{equation}
611: \omega=-1+\frac{2}{3n}\sqrt{\Omega_{\phi}}\frac{1}{a}-\frac{b^{2}}{\Omega_{\phi}},\label{eq35}
612: \end{equation}
613:
614: or
615: \begin{equation}
616: \omega=-1+\frac{2}{3n}\sqrt{\Omega_{\phi}}(1+z)-\frac{b^{2}}{\Omega_{\phi}}.\label{eq36}
617: \end{equation}
618:
619: As is referred in \cite{4}, if $b^{2}\neq 0$, from Eq.(\ref{eq35})
620: or (\ref{eq36}), one can see that $\omega$ can be smaller than $-1$
621: or larger than $-1$. As shown in Fig.$5$ and Fig.$6$, we can clearly
622: see that $\omega$ can cross the phantom divide.
623:
624: Furthermore, as shown in Fig.$5$, we see that for a fixed
625: interaction parameter $b^{2}=0.10$ and $n=2.0, 2.5, 3.0$, $\omega$
626: is larger than $-1$ and crosses $-1$ earlier for larger n. But for
627: $n=4.0$ and $5.0$, we can see that $\omega$ is smaller than $-1$ at
628: early times. From Fig.$6$, for the constant $n=3.0$, except for
629: $b^{2}=0.10$, $\omega$ is smaller than $-1$ at early times and
630: crosses $-1$ then. We can also see that $\omega$ crosses $-1$ again
631: and earlier for larger interaction parameter $b^{2}$.
632:
633: \begin{figure}
634: \center{
635: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{fig5}% Here is how to import EPS art
636: \caption{\label{fig:wide}Behavior of the equation of state (35).
637: Here we take $\Omega_{q0} = 0.73$, and show the cases for a fixed
638: interaction parameter $b^{2}=0.1$ but for different values of the
639: constant $n = 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 4.0$ and $5.0$.} }
640: \end{figure}
641:
642: \begin{figure}
643: \center{
644: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{fig6}% Here is how to import EPS art
645: \caption{\label{fig:wide}Behavior of the equation of state (35).
646: Here we take $\Omega_{q0} = 0.73$, and show the cases for a fixed
647: constant $n = 3.0$ but for different values of the interaction
648: parameter $b^{2}=0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08$ and $0.10$.} }
649: \end{figure}
650:
651: \subsection{The evolution of the NADE with interaction in the $\omega-\omega'$ plane}
652:
653: \begin{figure*}[tbph]
654: \center{
655: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{fig7a.eps}
656: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{fig7b.eps}
657: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{fig7c.eps}
658: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{fig7d.eps}
659: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{fig7e.eps}
660: \caption{The trajectory of the NADE with interaction in
661: $\omega-\omega'$ plane, where selected curves are plotted for the
662: cases of a fixed constant $n = 3.0$ but different values of the
663: interaction parameter $b^{2}=0.10, 0.08, 0.06, 0.04$ and $0.02$.
664: Here we take $\Omega_{\phi0}=0.73$.
665: } }
666: \end{figure*}
667:
668: In this subsection we investigate the evolution of the NADE with
669: interaction in the $\omega - \omega'$ plane.
670:
671: At first, let us consider the expression of $\omega'$. From
672: Eq.(\ref{eq36}), one obtains
673: \begin{equation}
674: \omega'=-(1+z)[\frac{2}{3n}\sqrt{\Omega_{\phi}}+\frac{1}{3n}\frac{1}{\sqrt{\Omega_{\phi}}}\frac{d\Omega_{\phi}}{dz}(1+z)+\frac{b^{2}}{\Omega_{\phi}^{2}}\frac{d\Omega_{\phi}}{dz}].\label{eq37}
675: \end{equation}
676:
677: By using Eqs.(\ref{eq34}), (\ref{eq36}) and (\ref{eq37}), we can
678: plot in Fig.$7$ the trajectory of the NADE with interaction in
679: $\omega-\omega'$ plane, where selected curves are plotted for the
680: cases of $n=3$ and $b^{2}=0.10, 0.08, 0.06, 0.04, 0.02$
681: respectively. Here we take $\Omega_{\phi0}=0.73$.
682:
683: As shown in Fig.$7$, such coupling shift the trajectory of the NAQDE
684: in the $\omega-\omega'$ phase space, allowing for dynamics outside
685: the thawing and freezing regions. We can also see that except for
686: $b^{2}=0.10$, the trajectory lies above the coasting line at early
687: times and lies below the coasting line at late times. It elucidates
688: that the field acceleration at early times and deceleration in its
689: motion at late times. In the future, the trajectory crosses the
690: phantom divide and enters the phantom regions.
691:
692: \section{Summary}
693: It is fair to claim that the NADE provides a reliable framework for
694: investigating the problem of dark energy, owning to possessing some
695: features of the quantum gravity theory. In this paper, we suggest a
696: correspondence between the new agegraphic dark energy scenario and
697: the quintessence scalar-field model. We have demonstrated that the
698: new agegraphic evolution of the universe can be described completely
699: by a single quintessence field. Its potential is reconstructed
700: numerically. In addition, we have also obtained the approximate
701: solution of the NAQDE in the matter-dominated epoch and analyzed its
702: character. Furthermore, we have investigated the evolution of the
703: NAQDE in the $\omega-\omega'$ phase plane. We find that the quantum
704: effect is more obvious at early times than at late times. For
705: comparison, the evolution of the NADE model with interaction has
706: also been investigated in the $\omega-\omega'$ plane.
707:
708: This work is a first step towards studying the form of scalar
709: potential and the evolution in the $\omega-\omega'$ plane by quantum
710: corrections. It will also be interesting to further investigate the
711: analytical form of the NAQDE potential by some approximations. In
712: future works, we will extend such investigations including ADE, NADE
713: and holographic dark energy. In all this paper we assume our
714: universe is spatially flat but it is completely possible to show
715: that the parallel analysis could be extended to the spatially closed
716: and hyperbolic universe. We also expect that the further
717: investigation will provide us a more exact picture of dark energy.
718:
719: \begin{acknowledgments}
720: We are grateful to Rong-gen Cai and Xin Zhang for helpful
721: discussions, specially to Hao Wei for carefully reading the original
722: version of the manuscipt. This work is partly supported by
723: NSFC(Nos.10405027, 10663001), JiangXi SF(Nos. 0612036, 0612038) and
724: SRF for ROCS, SEM. We also acknowledge the support by the Program
725: for Innovative Research Team of Nanchang University.
726: \end{acknowledgments}
727:
728: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
729: \bibitem{1}
730: A. G. Riess $\emph{et al.}$ [Supernova Search Team Collaboration],
731: Astron. $\textbf{116}$, 1009 (1998) [arXiv:astro-ph/9805201];
732:
733: S. Perlmutter $\emph{et al.}$ [Supernova Cosmology Project
734: Collaboration], Astrophys. J.$\textbf{517}$, 565 (1999)
735: [arXiv:astro-ph/9812133];
736:
737: C. L. Bennett $\emph{et al.}$, Astrophys. J. Suppl. $\textbf{148}$ 1
738: (2003) [arXiv:astro-ph/0302207];
739:
740: D.N. Spergel $\emph{et al.}$ [WMAP Collaboration],
741: Astrophys.J.Suppl. $\textbf{148}$ 175 (2003)
742: [arXiv:astro-ph/0302209];
743:
744: M. Tegmark $\emph{et al.}$ [SDSS Collaboration], Phys.Rev.D
745: $\textbf{69}$, 103501 (2004) [arXiv:astro-ph/0310723];
746:
747: M. Tegmark $\emph{et al.}$ [SDSS Collaboration], Astrophys.J.
748: $\textbf{606}$, 702 (2004) [arXiv:astro-ph/0310725].
749: \bibitem{2}
750: M. Li, Phys.Lett.B $\textbf{603}$, 1 (2004) [arXiv:hep-th/0403127];
751:
752: X. Zhang, F. Q. Wu, Phys.Rev.D $\textbf{72}$, 043524 (2005)
753: [arXiv:astro-ph/0506310];
754:
755: Z. Chang, F. Q. Wu, X. Zhang, Phys.Lett.B $\textbf{633}$, 14-18
756: (2006) [arXiv:astro-ph/0509531];
757:
758: X. Zhang, F. Q. Wu, Phys.Rev.D $\textbf{76}$, 023502 (2007)
759: [arXiv:astro-ph/0701405].
760: \bibitem{3}
761: R. G. Cai, Phys.Lett.B $\textbf{657}$, 228-231 (2007)
762: [arXiv:hep-th/0707.4049].
763: \bibitem{4}
764: H. Wei, R. G. Cai, Phys.Lett. B $\textbf{660}$ 113 (2008)
765: [arXiv:astro-ph/0708.0884].
766: \bibitem{5}
767: F. K$\acute{a}$rolyh$\acute{a}$zy, Nuovo Cim. A $\textbf{42}$, 390
768: (1966);
769:
770: F. K$\acute{a}$rolyh$\acute{a}$zy, A. Frenkel and B.
771: Luk$\acute{a}$cs, in $\emph{Physics as Natural Philosophy}$, edited
772: by A. Simony and H. Feschbach, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1982);
773:
774: F. K$\acute{a}$rolyh$\acute{a}$zy, A. Frenkel and B.
775: Luk$\acute{a}$cs, in $\emph{Quantum Concepts in Space and Time}$,
776: edited by R. Penrose and C. J. Isham, Clarendon Press, Oxford,
777: (1986).
778: \bibitem{6}
779: X. Zhang, Phys.Lett.B $\textbf{648}$, 1-7 (2007)
780: [arXiv:astro-ph/0604484].
781: \bibitem{7}
782: X. Zhang, Phys.Rev.D $\textbf{74}$, 103505 (2006)
783: [arXiv:astro-ph/0609699];
784:
785: J. F. Zhang, X. Zhang, H. Y. Liu, [arXiv:astro-ph/0612642];
786:
787: J. F. Zhang, X. Zhang, H. Y. Liu, Phys.Lett.B $\textbf{651}$, 84-88
788: (2007) [arXiv:astro-ph/0706.1185];
789:
790: W. Zhao, Phys.Lett.B $\textbf{655}$, 97-103 (2007)
791: [arXiv:astro-ph/0706.2211];
792:
793: M. R. Setare, Phys.Lett.B $\textbf{648}$, 329 (2007)
794: [arXiv:hep-th/0704.3679];
795:
796: M. R. Setare, Phys.Lett.B $\textbf{653}$, 116-121 (2007)
797: [arXiv:hep-th/0705.3517].
798: \bibitem{8}
799: M. Maziashvili, Int.J.Mod.Phys.D $\textbf{16}$ 1531 (2007)
800: [arXiv:gr-qc/0612110];
801: \bibitem{9}
802: M. Maziashvili, Phys.Lett.B $\textbf{652}$, 165 (2007)
803: [arXiv:gr-qc/0705.0924].
804: \bibitem{10}
805: A. G. Cohen, D. B. Kaplan and A. E. Nelson, Phys.Rev.Lett.
806: $\textbf{82}$, 4971 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9803132].
807: \bibitem{11}
808: Y. J. Ng, Mod.Phys.Lett. A $\textbf{18}$ 1073-1098 (2003),
809: [arXiv:gr-qc/0305019].
810: \bibitem{12}
811: I. p. Neupane, Phys.Rev.D $\textbf{76}$, 123006 (2007)
812: [arXiv:hep-th/0709.3096].
813: \bibitem{13}
814: H. Wei, R. G. Cai, [arXiv:astro-ph/0708.1894].
815: \bibitem{14}
816: K. Y. Kim, H. W. Lee, Y. S. Myung, [arXiv:gr-qc/0709.2743].
817: \bibitem{15}
818: Y. Z. Ma, X. Zhang, [arXiv:astro-ph/0709.1517].
819: \bibitem{16}
820: Z. K. Guo and N. Ohta, Y. Z. Zhang, Mod.Phys.Lett.A $\textbf{22}$
821: 883-890 (2007) [arXiv:astro-ph/0603109].
822: \bibitem{17}
823: P. J. Steinhardt, L. Wang, I. Zlatev, Phys.Rev.D $\textbf{59}$,
824: 123504 (1999).
825: \bibitem{18}
826: R. R. Caldwell, E. V. Linder, Phys.Rev.Lett. $\textbf{95}$ 141301
827: (2005) [arXiv:astro-ph/0505494].
828: \bibitem{19}
829: E. V. Linder, [arXiv:astro-ph/0704.2064].
830: \bibitem{20}
831: E. V. Linder, Phys.Rev.D $\textbf{73}$, 063010 (2006)
832: [arXiv:astro-ph/0601052];
833:
834: T. Chiba, Phys.Rev.D $\textbf{73}$, 063501 (2006)
835: [arXiv:astro-ph/0510598].
836: \bibitem{21}
837: H. Wei, R. G. Cai, Phys.Lett.B $\textbf{655}$, 1-6 (2007)
838: [arXiv:gr-qc/0707.4526].
839:
840: \bibitem{22}
841: H. Wei, R. G. Cai, [arXiv:hep-th/0707.4052].
842: \bibitem{23}
843: D. Pavon, W. Zimdahl, Phys.Lett.B $\textbf{628}$, 206-210 (2005)
844: [arXiv:gr-qc/0505020].
845: \bibitem{24}
846: B. Wang, Y. G. Gong, E. Abdalla, Phys.Lett.B $\textbf{624}$, 141-146
847: (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0506069].
848: \bibitem{25}
849: B. Hu, Y. Ling, Phys.Rev.D $\textbf{73}$, 123510 (2006)
850: [arXiv:hep-th/0601093].
851: \end{thebibliography}
852: \newpage %Just because of unusual number of tables stacked at end
853: \bibliography{apssamp}% Produces the bibliography via BibTeX.
854:
855: \end{document}
856: %
857: % ****** End of file apssamp.tex ******
858: