1: % paper on Chandra observations of NGC 4194 and NGC 7541
2: %\documentclass{aastex}
3: %\usepackage{emulateapj5,apjfonts}
4:
5: % format needed for submission
6: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
7: % preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
8: \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
9: %\usepackage{psfig}
10:
11: % You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
12: \slugcomment{submitted to ApJ}
13:
14: \shorttitle{Star Formation and X-ray Sources}
15: \shortauthors{Kaaret and Alonso-Herrero}
16:
17: \begin{document}
18:
19: \title{X-Ray Sources in the Star Forming Galaxies NGC 4194 and NGC 7541}
20:
21: \author{Philip Kaaret\altaffilmark{1,2} and Almudena
22: Alonso-Herrero\altaffilmark{3}}
23:
24: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of
25: Iowa, Van Allen Hall, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA}
26:
27: \altaffiltext{2}{Universit\'e Paris 7 Denis Diderot and Service
28: d'Astrophysique, UMR AIM, CEA Saclay, F-91191 Gif sur Yvette, France}
29:
30: \altaffiltext{3}{Departamento de Astrofisica Molecular e Infrarroja,
31: Instituto de Estructura de la Materia, CSIC, E-28006 Madrid, Spain}
32:
33: %\thanks{E-mail: philip-kaaret@uiowa.edu}
34:
35: \begin{abstract}
36:
37: We examine the X-ray point source population and 2-10~keV luminosity for
38: two galaxies with high star formation rates (SFRs), NGC 4194 and NGC
39: 7541. The X-ray point source luminosity function (XLF) for these two
40: galaxies is consistent with the XLF found by Grimm et al.\ (2003) for a
41: sample of star-forming galaxies. Combining our results with a sample of
42: galaxies with SFRs above 1~$M_{\odot}$/yr, we find that the number of
43: X-ray point sources above a luminosity of $2 \times 10^{38} \rm \, erg
44: \, s^{-1}$ is $N = (1.8 \pm 0.4) {\rm SFR}/(M_{\odot} \rm \, yr^{-1})$.
45: This number is lower than previously inferred by Grimm et al.\ based on
46: a sample of galaxies with lower SFRs. We find that the ratio of X-ray
47: luminosity in the 2-10~keV band to SFR is $L_X/(10^{40} \rm \, erg \,
48: s^{-1}) = (0.37 \pm 0.08) {\rm \, SFR}/(M_{\odot} \rm yr^{-1})$. This
49: value may serve as a calibration in attempts to use X-ray luminosity to
50: measure the SFR of galaxies at cosmological distances. The ratio of
51: mass accreted onto compact objects versus mass used to form stars is
52: near $10^{-6}$. This ratio may be useful in constraining population
53: synthesis models of X-ray binary formation in actively star forming
54: systems.
55:
56: \end{abstract}
57:
58: \keywords{black hole physics -- galaxies: individual: NGC 4194 --
59: galaxies: individual: M100 -- galaxies: individual: NGC 4945 --
60: galaxies: individual: NGC 7541 -- galaxies: stellar content -- X-rays:
61: galaxies}
62:
63:
64: \section{Introduction}
65:
66: The bulk of bright X-ray sources in most galaxies are compact objects
67: formed at the endpoint of the stellar evolution of massive stars
68: (typically $> 8 M_{\odot}$). Because compact objects can be visible as
69: X-ray binaries for lifetimes far exceeding those of their progenitor
70: massive stars, the X-ray binary populations may be used as `fossils' to
71: study the star formation history of their host galaxies
72: \citep{Griffiths90,David92}. Recently, \citet{Ranalli03} demonstrated a
73: correlation between the 2-10 keV X-ray luminosity and star formation
74: rates (SFR) for 23, mainly nearby, galaxies.
75:
76: \citet{Grimm03}, hereafter GGS03, extended these results to consider the
77: X-ray point source luminosity function (XLF) in addition to the total
78: X-ray luminosity. They found a correlation between the number of X-ray
79: sources in a galaxy and the star formation rate. This correlation does
80: not suffer the strong Malmquist bias of the luminosity correlation.
81: However, due to the limitations of their sample, GGS03 measured the
82: correlation between the number of X-ray sources in a galaxy and the star
83: formation rate only for galaxies with star formation rates of $7
84: M_{\odot}/\rm yr$ or less. It is of interest to extend these
85: measurements to galaxies with larger star formation rates.
86:
87: We have obtained {\it Chandra} observations of two galaxies, NGC 4194
88: and NGC 7541, selected from the sample of \citet{Devereux89}. Both have
89: high star formation rates, near $12 M_{\odot}/\rm yr$, but are close
90: enough, nearer than 40~Mpc, to distinguish individual X-ray sources.
91: See Table~\ref{galaxies} for some basic properties of the galaxies. NGC
92: 4914, also known as the Medusa, is a minor merger at a distance of
93: 39.5~Mpc \citep{Weistrop04}. NGC 7541 is an SBc galaxy and has a
94: companion galaxy NGC 7537. It was the host of SN1998dh which allows an
95: accurate distance estimate of $37.1 \pm 1.5$~Mpc \citep{Jha07}. We also
96: extracted results from the literature and from the data archives for
97: additional galaxies with star formation rates above $1 M_{\odot}$/yr.
98: Our observations and analysis are described in section \S 2. In \S 3,
99: we discuss the X-ray point source luminosity functions. In \S 4, we
100: discuss the relation of X-ray source populations to star formation rate.
101:
102:
103: \begin{table}[tb]
104: \begin{center}
105: \begin{tabular}{lll}
106: \hline
107: Name & NGC 4194 & NGC 7541 \\ \hline
108: RA (J2000) & 12 14 09.6 & 23 14 43.86 \\
109: DEC (J2000) & +54 31 35.8 & +04 32 01.8 \\
110: Distance (Mpc) & 39.5 & 37.1 \\
111: SFR ($M_{\odot}$/yr) & 12.3 & 12.0 \\
112: Major diameter & 1.82$\arcmin$ & 3.47$\arcmin$ \\
113: Minor diameter & 1.10$\arcmin$ & 1.15$\arcmin$ \\
114: Position angle & 164$\arcdeg$ & 102$\arcdeg$ \\ \hline
115: X-ray sources & 5-10 & 15 \\
116: $L_{X} (10^{40} \rm \, erg \, s^{-1})$
117: & 3.0 & 1.8 \\ \hline
118: \end{tabular} \end{center}
119:
120: \caption{contains for each galaxy: the galaxy name, RA, DEC, distance,
121: star formation rate (SFR), the major and minor diameters and position
122: angle of the $d_{25}$ ellipse from the RC3 catalog, the number of X-ray
123: sources above a luminosity of $2 \times 10^{38} \rm \, erg \, s^{-1}$,
124: and the total X-ray luminosity $(L_{X})$ in the 2-10 keV band. The
125: distances are from \citet{Weistrop04} for NGC 4914 and from
126: \citet{Jha07} for NGC 7541.} \label{galaxies} \end{table}
127:
128: \section{Observations and Analysis}
129:
130: \subsection{New observations}
131:
132: Observations of NGC 4194 and NGC 7541 were made using the Advanced CCD
133: Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS; Bautz et al.\ 1998) on board the Chandra
134: X-Ray Observatory. The {\it Chandra\/} observation of NGC 4194 (ObsID
135: 7071) began on 9 September 2006 at 23:30:18 UT and had a useful exposure
136: of 35.5~ks. The observation of NGC 7541 (ObsID 7070) began on 31
137: October 2006 at 21:35:08 UT and had a useful exposure of 39.0~ks. The
138: Chandra data were subjected to standard data processing and event
139: screening. The total rate on the S3 chip was below 1.5~c/s for NGC 4194
140: and below 1.6~c/s for NGC 7541 indicating that there were no strong
141: background flares.
142:
143: For each observation, we constructed an image using all valid events in
144: the 0.3--8~keV band on the S3 chip and used the {\it wavdetect} tool
145: which is part of the {\it CIAO} version 3.4 data analysis package to
146: search for X-ray sources. For NGC 4194, which has extended diffuse
147: X-ray emission near its core, we also searched for sources in the
148: 1.5--8~keV band. Lists of sources with detection significance of
149: $3.0\sigma$ or higher within the $d_{25}$ ellipse of each galaxy are
150: given in Tables~\ref{ngc4194src} and \ref{ngc7541src}. In order to
151: calculate the source fluxes, we computed an exposure map for an assumed
152: source spectrum of a powerlaw with photon index of 1.7 absorbed by the
153: total Galactic {\sc H i} column density along the line of sight
154: \citep{Dickey90} which we take as $5.2 \times 10^{20} \rm \, cm^{-2}$
155: for NGC 4194 and $1.5 \times 10^{20} \rm \, cm^{-2}$ for NGC 7541. We
156: also calculated source luminosities in the 2-10~keV band using the same
157: spectral model and assuming that the sources are at the same distance as
158: the galaxy. In order to give some indication of the spectral shape of
159: each source, we calculate the ratio of the Chandra counts in the
160: 1--8~keV band to counts in the 0.3--8~keV band. The source fluxes,
161: luminosities, and colors are listed in Tables~\ref{ngc4194src} and
162: \ref{ngc7541src}.
163:
164: \begin{deluxetable}{rllrrcccl}
165: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
166: \tablecaption{X-ray sources within the field of NGC 4194
167: \label{ngc4194src}}
168: \tablewidth{0pt}
169: \tablehead{ \# & \colhead{RA} & \colhead{DEC} &
170: \colhead{S/N} & \colhead{Counts} &
171: \colhead{Flux} & \colhead{Luminosity} & \colhead{Hardness} &
172: \colhead{Counterpart} \\
173: & & & & & ($10^{-15} \, \rm erg \, cm^{-2} \, s^{-1}$) & ($10^{38} \, \rm erg \, s^{-1}$) }
174: \startdata
175: 1 & 12 14 09.69 & +54 32 15.6 & 164.8 & 455 & 110 $\pm$ 5 & 129 & 0.54 \\
176: 2 & 12 14 09.62 & +54 31 35.9 & 139.8 & 870 & 210 $\pm$ 7 & 246 & 0.68 & Nucleus \\
177: 3 & 12 14 06.18 & +54 31 43.0 & 126.2 & 390 & 95 $\pm$ 5 & 111 & 0.60 & SDSS \\
178: 4 & 12 14 09.99 & +54 31 27.1 & 13.3 & 86 & 22 $\pm$ 2 & 25.5 & 0.48 \\
179: 5 & 12 14 09.90 & +54 31 42.2 & 5.6 & 21 & 5.1 $\pm$ 1.1 & 5.9 & 0.95 \\
180: 6 & 12 14 09.23 & +54 31 44.9 & 4.7 & 21 & 5.1 $\pm$ 1.1 & 5.9 & 0.52 \\
181: % 7 & 12 14 12.53 & +54 31 29.0 & 2.9 & 7 & 1.7 $\pm$ 0.6 & 2.0 & 0.71 \\
182: % 8 & 12 14 08.96 & +54 31 33.7 & 2.4 & 18 & 4.4 $\pm$ 1.0 & 5.0 & 0.67 \\
183: \enddata
184: \tablecomments{Listed for each source: number; RA and DEC -- the
185: position of the source in J2000 coordinates; S/N -- significance of the
186: source detection as calculated by {\it wavdetect}; Counts - counts in
187: the 0.3--8~keV band; Flux -- source flux in units of $10^{-15} \, \rm
188: erg \, cm^{-2} \, s^{-1}$ in the 0.3--8~keV band calculated assuming a
189: power law spectrum with photon index of 1.7 and corrected for the
190: Galactic absorption column density along the line of sight; Luminosity
191: -- source luminosity in units of $10^{38} \, \rm erg \, s^{-1}$ in the
192: 2--10~keV band using the same spectral model; Hardness - the hardness
193: ratio defined as the ratio of counts in the 1--8~keV band to counts in
194: the 0.3--8~keV band.} \end{deluxetable}
195:
196: \begin{deluxetable}{rllrrcccl}
197: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
198: \tablecaption{X-ray sources within the field of NGC 7541
199: \label{ngc7541src}}
200: \tablewidth{0pt}
201: \tablehead{ \# & \colhead{RA} & \colhead{DEC} &
202: \colhead{S/N} & \colhead{Counts} &
203: \colhead{Flux} & \colhead{Luminosity} & \colhead{Hardness} &
204: \colhead{Counterpart} \\
205: & & & & & ($10^{-15} \, \rm erg \, cm^{-2} \, s^{-1}$) & ($10^{38} \, \rm erg \, s^{-1}$) }
206: \startdata
207: 1 & 23 14 42.21 & +04 31 40.1 & 71.0 & 229 & 49 $\pm$ 3 & 57.0 & 0.73 \\
208: 2 & 23 14 42.39 & +04 32 31.0 & 44.7 & 121 & 26 $\pm$ 2 & 30.3 & 0.73 \\
209: 3 & 23 14 38.85 & +04 32 04.1 & 23.0 & 63 & 13.6 $\pm$ 1.7 & 15.8 & 0.73 \\
210: 4 & 23 14 43.91 & +04 32 02.6 & 22.3 & 141 & 30 $\pm$ 3 & 35.1 & 0.60 \\
211: 5 & 23 14 39.17 & +04 32 04.3 & 20.4 & 50 & 10.8 $\pm$ 1.5 & 12.5 & 0.80 \\
212: 6 & 23 14 39.81 & +04 32 18.2 & 19.3 & 46 & 9.9 $\pm$ 1.5 & 11.6 & 0.96 \\
213: 7 & 23 14 46.22 & +04 31 56.4 & 14.9 & 48 & 10.3 $\pm$ 1.5 & 12.0 & 0.83 \\
214: 8 & 23 14 39.92 & +04 32 02.0 & 13.9 & 39 & 8.4 $\pm$ 1.3 & 9.7 & 0.62 \\
215: 9 & 23 14 46.01 & +04 32 03.2 & 11.4 & 36 & 7.7 $\pm$ 1.3 & 9.0 & 0.89 \\
216: 10 & 23 14 46.97 & +04 31 54.2 & 8.3 & 21 & 4.5 $\pm$ 1.0 & 5.2 & 0.76 \\
217: 11 & 23 14 42.63 & +04 32 15.7 & 6.5 & 18 & 3.9 $\pm$ 0.9 & 4.5 & 0.78 \\
218: 12 & 23 14 40.21 & +04 32 03.9 & 5.8 & 14 & 3.0 $\pm$ 0.8 & 3.5 & 1.00 \\
219: 13 & 23 14 42.43 & +04 32 03.4 & 4.7 & 13 & 2.8 $\pm$ 0.8 & 3.2 & 0.77 & 2MASS \\
220: 14 & 23 14 47.33 & +04 32 06.4 & 4.6 & 10 & 2.2 $\pm$ 0.7 & 2.5 & 0.80 \\
221: 15 & 23 14 41.64 & +04 31 51.7 & 3.4 & 8 & 1.7 $\pm$ 0.6 & 2.0 & 0.88 \\
222: % 16 & 23 14 47.51 & +04 31 50.9 & 2.2 & 5 & 1.1 $\pm$ 0.5 & 1.3 & 0.80 \\
223: % 17 & 23 14 48.85 & +04 32 20.6 & 2.2 & 5 & 1.1 $\pm$ 0.5 & 1.3 & 0.40 \\
224: \enddata
225:
226: \tablecomments{The quantities are as defined for
227: Table~\ref{ngc4194src}.} \end{deluxetable}
228:
229:
230: We searched for counterparts to the X-ray sources in the USNO B1 catalog
231: \citep{usnob1} to attempt to improve the {\it Chandra} astrometry. We
232: found three matches within $1\arcsec$ in the S3 image for NGC 4194.
233: After a shift of $0.3\arcsec$, the X-ray and optical positions for all
234: three objects agree within $0.22\arcsec$. For NGC 7541, we found two
235: coincidences, but both were at the edge of the S3 chip where the {\it
236: Chandra} point spread function is relatively large and the source
237: location accuracy is relatively poor. Thus, we chose not to correct the
238: astrometry for NGC 7541. We also searched for counterparts in the 2MASS
239: catalog \citep{2mass}. The only counterpart in the NGC 4194 field was
240: for the nucleus of the galaxy. The core of NGC 4194 has strong,
241: extended near-IR emission which may obscure point sources near the
242: center of the galaxy. There were several counterparts within $1\arcsec$
243: within NGC 7541, but crowding of 2MASS sources in the disk of the galaxy
244: prevents confident assignment of unique counterparts.
245:
246: We searched for X-ray variability by comparing the photon arrival times
247: for each source to the distribution expected for a constant source with
248: the same average flux using a Kolmogorov-Smirnoff (KS) test. No
249: background subtraction was performed. We find significant variability
250: only for CXOU J231438.85+043204.1 in NGC 7541. This source shows a
251: marked decrease in flux across the observation.
252:
253: \begin{deluxetable}{llcccc}
254: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
255: \tablecaption{X-ray spectra for bright point sources
256: \label{xspec}}
257: \tablewidth{0pt}
258: \tablehead{
259: \colhead{RA} & \colhead{DEC} & \colhead{$\chi^2$/DoF} &
260: \colhead{$\Gamma$} & \colhead{$N_H$} & \colhead{Flux} \\
261: & & & &
262: \colhead{(10$^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$)} &
263: \colhead{(10$^{-14}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$)} }
264: \startdata
265: \multicolumn{6}{l}{NGC 4194} \\
266: 12 14 09.69 & 54 32 15.6 & 18.2/36 & $2.6^{+0.5}_{-0.4}$ & $1.1^{+0.9}_{-0.6}$ & 6.1 \\
267: 12 14 06.18 & 54 31 43.0 & 10.5/33 & $2.1^{+0.5}_{-0.4}$ & $0.6^{+0.8}_{-0.1}$ & 6.3 \\
268: \hline
269: \multicolumn{6}{l}{NGC 7541} \\
270: 23 14 42.21 & 04 31 40.1 & 13.8/19 & $2.2^{+0.6}_{-0.5}$ & $2.6^{+1.6}_{-1.2}$ & 3.3 \\
271: 23 14 42.39 & 04 32 31.0 & 2.3/12 & $2.0^{+0.9}_{-0.7}$ & $2.0^{+2.2}_{-1.8}$ & 2.1 \\
272: 23 14 43.91 & 04 32 02.6 & 8.1/11 & $2.3^{+1.3}_{-0.9}$ & $1.8^{+2.6}_{-1.6}$ & 1.5 \\
273: \enddata
274:
275: \tablecomments{Listed for each source: the position in RA and DEC
276: (J2000), the goodness of the fit, the photon index, the absorption
277: column density, and the absorbed flux in the 0.3--8~keV band.}
278: \end{deluxetable}
279:
280: We performed X-ray spectral fitting for the sources with more than 100
281: counts. We fitted the spectra using the {\it Sherpa} fitting package
282: and response matrices calculated using the {\tt mkrmf} tool in {\it
283: CIAO}. We used the $\chi^2$-Gehrels statistic to evaluate the quality
284: of the fits due to the low numbers of counts. The fit results are shown
285: in Table~\ref{xspec}. All of the spectra, except for the nuclear region
286: of NGC 4194, were adequately fitted with an absorbed power-law. NGC
287: 4194 shows extended X-ray emission near the nucleus, so we extracted two
288: spectra: one in a circular region with a radius of 2 pixels and the
289: other with a radius of 13 pixels covering the region of extended
290: emission. We fit these spectra with a model consisting of a power-law
291: plus thermal emission from diffuse gas, specifically the APEC model.
292: The large region spectrum is best fitted, $\chi^2/{\rm DoF} = 54.3/99$,
293: when the thermal component has a temperature $kT = 0.77 \pm 0.06$~keV
294: and an unabsorbed flux of $(9.7 \pm 1.8) \times 10^{-14} \rm \, erg \,
295: cm^{-2} \, s^{-1}$ in the 0.3--8~keV band, the power-law component has a
296: flux of $(2.3 \pm 0.6) \times 10^{-13} \rm \, erg \, cm^{-2} \, s^{-1}$
297: and a photon index $\Gamma = 2.0 \pm 0.3$, and the absorption column
298: density is $N_H = (1.3 \pm 0.5) \times 10^{21} \rm \, cm^{-2}$. We
299: fitted the small region spectrum with the APEC temperature fixed to $kT
300: = 0.77$. In the best fit, $\chi^2/{\rm DoF} = 22.0/33$, the power-law
301: component describing the nuclear point source had a photon index $\Gamma
302: = 1.7 \pm 0.4$ and an unabsorbed flux of $(9 \pm 3) \times 10^{-14} \rm
303: \, erg \, cm^{-2} \, s^{-1}$ in the 0.3--8~keV band where we have
304: corrected for the encircled energy within the 2 pixel radius.
305:
306: \begin{figure*}[tb]
307: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=6.0in]{f1.eps}} \caption{HST/ACS
308: F814W (I-band) image of NGC 7541. The crosses indicate the positions of
309: the X-ray sources listed in Table~\ref{ngc7541src}. The arrow points
310: North and has a length of $10\arcsec$.} \label{i7541} \end{figure*}
311:
312: Observations of both galaxies were made using the Advanced Camera for
313: Surveys (ACS) on the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) under GO program
314: 10769. Images were obtained in the broad band filter F814W (I-band)
315: using the Wide-Field Camera (WFC). NGC 7541 was observed on 8 August
316: 2006. We used the images delivered by the standard ACS pipeline
317: processing (OPUS 2006\_5 and CALACS code version 4.6.1) which removes
318: cosmic-rays, corrects for optical distortion, and dither combines the
319: images. We aligned the image to stars in the USNO B1.0 catalog
320: \citep{usnob1} using the Graphical Astronomy and Image Analysis Tool
321: ({\it GAIA}; Starlink version 2.8-0). Fig.~\ref{i7541} shows the
322: positions of the X-ray sources detected with Chandra overlaid on the
323: HST/ASC I-band image of NGC 7541.
324:
325: \begin{figure}[tb] \centerline{\includegraphics[width=3.0in]{f2.eps}}
326: \caption{NICMOS F110W infrared image of NGC 4194. The green contours
327: represent the diffuse X-ray emission and correspond to 0.5, 1, and 2
328: counts per ACIS pixel ($0.492\arcsec$ square). The diffuse X-ray
329: emission is located at the region with a dense stellar population as
330: indicated by the IR intensity. The crosses indicate the positions of
331: the X-ray sources listed in Table~\ref{ngc4194src}. The arrow points
332: North and has a length of $10\arcsec$.} \label{nic4194} \end{figure}
333:
334: Observations of both galaxies were also made with the Near Infrared
335: Camera and Multi-Object Spectrometer (NICMOS) on HST using the NIC3
336: camera that has a pixel size of $0.2\arcsec$ and a field of view (FOV)
337: of $\sim 51.2\arcsec \times 51.2\arcsec$. We used two broad-band
338: filters: F110W and F160W. The images were reduced using the {\it
339: HST}/NICMOS pipeline routines, which involve subtraction of the first
340: readout, dark current subtraction on a readout-by-readout basis,
341: correction for linearity and cosmic ray rejection, and flat fielding.
342: Since the size of the galaxies exceeds the FOV of the NIC3 camera, for
343: each galaxy we took four pointings to produce a final mosaic covering an
344: approximate FOV of $1.6\arcmin \times 1.6\arcmin$. We aligned the
345: mosaic images to stars in the 2mass catalog \citep{2mass} using {\it
346: GAIA}. Fig.~\ref{nic4194} shows the positions of the X-ray sources and
347: contours of the X-ray diffuse emission overlaid on the F110W mosaic of
348: NGC 4194.
349:
350: One of the sources in the NGC 4194 field with an USNO B1 counterpart
351: falls within the $d_{25}$ ellipse of the galaxy. The R magnitude is
352: 19.43. The X-ray to optical flux ratio of the source, $\log(f_x/f_R) =
353: \log f_X + 5.50 +R/2.5 = 0.9$, is in the range found for AGN
354: \citep{Hornschemeier01}. This source also has a Sloan Digital Sky
355: Survey counterpart, SDSS J121406.21+543143.1, which is identified as a
356: faint quasar based on the optical colors. The source lies within the
357: $d_{25}$ ellipse of NGC 4194, but not in the main body of the galaxy or
358: the tidal tail. On the HST F814W (I-band) image, we find no stars close
359: to the source other than the counterpart. Thus, we conclude that the
360: source is most likely a background AGN.
361:
362:
363: \subsection{Additional galaxies}
364:
365: We analyzed archival Chandra data for the galaxies M100 and NGC 4945
366: following the same procedures described above. The observation of NGC
367: 4945 was made on 27 Jan 2000 (ObsID 864) beginning at 19:00:10 UT with
368: an exposure of 24.5~ks. We reprocessed the data using recent
369: calibrations and procedures current in Ciao 3.4. The galaxy is larger
370: than the ACIS S3 chip, but the roll angle of the observation placed the
371: entire $D_{25}$ ellipse of the galaxy on ACIS chips S2, S3, and S4.
372: Thus, we extracted sources and calculated exposure maps for all three
373: chips. The observation of M100 was made on 18 Feb 2006 (ObsID 6727)
374: beginning at 19:00:10 UT with an exposure of 24.5~ks. The target was SN
375: 1979C, which is not at the center of M100, so we included ACIS chips S2
376: and S3 in order to cover the whole galaxy. Lists of sources with
377: detection significance of $3.0\sigma$ or higher within the $d_{25}$
378: ellipse of each galaxy are given in Tables~\ref{m100src} and
379: \ref{ngc4945src}. We estimated the number of background AGN at fluxes
380: above that equivalent to $2 \times 10^{38} \rm \, erg \, s^{-1}$
381: within each galaxy using the source counts from \citet{Giacconi01} in
382: the 2--10~keV band.
383:
384: \begin{table}[tb]
385: \begin{center}
386: \begin{tabular}{lccc}
387: \hline
388: Galaxy & Distance & SFR & Sources \\
389: & (Mpc) & ($M_{\odot}$/yr) & \\ \hline
390: NGC 4194 & 39.5 & 12.3 & 10 \\
391: NGC 7541 & 37.1 & 12.0 & 15 \\
392: NGC 1068 & 14.4 & 9.0 & 18 \\
393: M51 & 8.4 & 4.9 & 13 \\
394: Antennae & 13.8 & 3.6 & 9 \\
395: M100 & 16.8 & 3.3 & 11 \\
396: NGC 4945 & 3.7 & 2.7 & 4 \\
397: M82 & 3.6 & 1.4 & 7 \\
398: NGC 4579 & 16.8 & 1.3 & 3 \\
399: M74 & 8.8 & 1.2 & 2 \\ \hline
400: \end{tabular} \end{center}
401:
402: \caption{contains for each galaxy: the galaxy name, distance, star
403: formation rate, and net number of X-ray sources above a luminosity of $2
404: \times 10^{38} \rm \, erg \, s^{-1}$ in the 2-10 keV band after removal
405: or subtraction of background AGN.} \label{nsfr_table} \end{table}
406:
407: For the galaxies M51, M74, M82, NGC 4579, NGC 1068, and the Antennae, we
408: extracted source counts from the literature. In each case, we
409: estimated the number of background AGN included in the count using the
410: source counts from \citet{Giacconi01} unless this was already done in
411: the reference or background and foreground sources were already excluded
412: by a search for counterparts at other wavelengths. Below we will
413: integrate the XLF to find the total X-ray luminosity due to point
414: sources. For this to be valid, the energy band used to find the point
415: source luminosities must match the energy band used to calculate the
416: total X-ray luminosity, specifically 2--10~keV. Thus, we corrected the
417: source luminosities from the literature to this energy band. We used
418: the spectral model assumed in each paper. However, using a power-law
419: model as for NGC 4194 and NGC 7541 produced no significant change.
420:
421: We note that GGS03 extracted X-ray point source luminosities from the
422: literature and made no attempt to correct for the differing energy bands
423: and assumptions concerning spectra shape made in the various papers. We
424: find that, for the galaxies in their sample, making the energy band
425: correction produces a large change only for the Antennae. In addition
426: to the energy band correction, \citet{Ivo04} recently found a distance
427: to the Antennae based on the red giant branch tip of $13.8 \pm 1.7$~Mpc
428: that is significantly lower than previous distances including that used
429: by GGS03. Also, one of the Antennae sources was identified as a
430: background AGN \citep{Clark05}. Thus, the star formation rate for the
431: Antennae becomes $3.6 \, M_{\odot} \rm \, yr^{-1}$ and the number of
432: sources above $2 \times 10^{38} \rm \, erg \, s^{-1}$ becomes 9.
433:
434: For M51, we find 11 net sources above $2 \times 10^{38} \rm \, erg \,
435: s^{-1}$ in the 2-10~keV band using the 2--8 keV band results of
436: \citet{Terashima04}. For M74, we estimate two sources from the 2--8 keV
437: band results of \citet{Kilgard02,Kilgard05}. For M82, we estimate 7 net
438: sources from the 2--10 keV band results of \citet{Griffiths00}. For NGC
439: 4579, we estimate 3 sources from the results of \citet{Eracleous02}.
440: For NGC 1068, we estimate 18 net sources from the 0.5--8 keV band
441: results of \citet{Smith03}. For these galaxies, we have adopted the
442: SFRs quoted by GGS03 rescaled to the distances listed in
443: Table~\ref{nsfr_table} except for NGC 1068 and NGC 4945 where we have
444: calculated the SFR from the FIR luminosities quoted in
445: \citet{Koribalski96} rescaled to the distances quoted in
446: Table~\ref{nsfr_table}. Both are Seyfert 2 galaxies containing an
447: active galactic nucleus which produces infrared emission. Thus, the SFR
448: calculated from the total FIR luminosity may overestimate the true SFR.
449: However, the starburst in NGC 1068 is known to dominate the flux at
450: wavelengths longer than 30~$\mu$m \citep{Telesco84}, so AGN
451: contamination does not strongly affect the SFR estimate.
452:
453:
454: \begin{figure}[tb] \centerline{\includegraphics[width=3.25in]{f3.eps}}
455: \caption{\label{xlf4194} X-ray point source luminosity function for NGC
456: 4194. The dashed line indicates the functional form from GGS03
457: normalized to have the same number of sources with luminosity above $2
458: \times 10^{38} \rm \, erg \, s^{-1}$ as observed in the galaxy.}
459: \end{figure}
460:
461: \begin{figure}[tb] \centerline{\includegraphics[width=3.25in]{f4.eps}}
462: \caption{\label{xlf7541} X-ray point source luminosity functions for NGC
463: 7541. The dashed line indicates the functional form from GGS03
464: normalized to have the same number of sources with luminosity above $2
465: \times 10^{38} \rm \, erg \, s^{-1}$ as observed in the galaxy.}
466: \end{figure}
467:
468: \section{X-ray point source luminosity functions}
469:
470: Figs.~\ref{xlf4194} and \ref{xlf7541} show the X-ray point source
471: luminosity functions (XLFs) for NGC 7541 and NGC 4194. The dashed
472: curves are the `universal' XLFs for star-forming galaxies suggested by
473: GGS03. The dashed curves are normalized to have the same number of
474: sources with luminosity above $2 \times 10^{38} \rm \, erg \, s^{-1}$ as
475: observed in the comparison galaxy. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test indicates
476: that the distributions for both galaxies are consistent with this form.
477:
478: At low luminosities, $2-5 \times 10^{38} \rm \, erg \, s^{-1}$, the XLF
479: for NGC 4194 appears flatter than the GGS03 XLF. The observation
480: duration is sufficient to detect sources with luminosities down to at
481: least $2 \times 10^{38} \rm \, erg \, s^{-1}$ with high efficiency; a
482: luminosity of $2 \times 10^{38} \rm \, erg \, s^{-1}$ should produce 7
483: counts and a $3.2\sigma$ detection. However, the diffuse X-ray emission
484: near the nucleus, where most of the star formation is concentrated,
485: hampers our ability to detect sources. Indeed, there is a possible
486: source located at $\rm R.A. = 12^h 14^m 08\fs96$, $\rm Decl. =
487: +54\arcdeg 31\arcmin 33\farcs7$ (J2000) that lies in the region of
488: diffuse emission. The source is marginally detected at a significance
489: of $2.4\sigma$ and only in the 1.5--8~keV band, but appears to have a
490: luminosity of $5 \times 10^{38} \rm \, erg \, s^{-1}$.
491:
492: The excess 2-10 keV flux in the nuclear region not accounted for in
493: detected point sources is $5.5 \times 10^{-14} \rm \, erg \, cm^{-2} \,
494: s^{-1}$ equivalent to a luminosity of $1.0 \times 10^{40} \rm \, erg \,
495: s^{-1}$. By integrating a differential XLF, we can find the number of
496: sources above a given luminosity. By weighting the integrand by the
497: luminosity, we can find the total luminosity produced by the set of
498: sources above a given luminosity. For the GGS03 XLF, specifically eq.~6
499: in their paper, the relation between the number of sources, $N$, with
500: luminosities above $2 \times 10^{38} \rm \, erg \, s^{-1}$ and the total
501: luminosity, $L$, of all point sources is $N = 4.9 L/10^{40} \rm \, erg
502: \, s^{-1}$. If the excess emission in the central region arises from
503: point sources, then $N = 5.0^{+1.7}_{-1.2}$ sources would be expected.
504: Using this estimate, the adjusted number of point sources in NGC 4194
505: would be 10. This is the number used in Table~\ref{nsfr_table} and
506: Fig.~\ref{nsfr}.
507:
508:
509: \begin{figure}[tb] \centerline{\includegraphics[width=3.25in]{f5.eps}}
510: \caption{\label{nsfr} Number of point sources with luminosity above $2
511: \times 10^{38} \rm \, erg \, s^{-1}$ versus star formation rate for the
512: galaxies listed in Table~\ref{nsfr_table}. The solid line is the linear
513: fit described in the text.} \end{figure}
514:
515: \section{Relation of X-ray source population to star formation rate}
516:
517: Our primary goal is to extend the study of the relation between star
518: formation rate and X-ray point source populations of galaxies to higher
519: star formation rates (SFRs). NGC 7541 and NGC 4194 have SFRs
520: significantly higher than any galaxy for which the X-ray point source
521: population (as opposed to the total galactic X-ray luminosity) was
522: studied by GGS03.
523:
524: For NGC 4194, using the FIR luminosity versus SFR conversions adopted in
525: GGS03 to calculate the SFR for stars more massive than $5M_{\odot}$ and
526: correcting for our assumed distance of 39.5~Mpc, we estimate a SFR of
527: $9.1 \, M_{\odot} \rm \, yr^{-1}$ based on the far infrared (FIR)
528: luminosity quoted by \cite{Buat02}, a rate of $12.6 \, M_{\odot} \rm \,
529: yr^{-1}$ based on the FIR luminosity in \citet{Young96}, and a rate of
530: $15.3 \, M_{\odot} \rm \, yr^{-1}$ based on the FIR luminosity in
531: \citet{Deutsch87}. The 1.4~GHz radio flux of NGC 4194 is 91.0~mJy when
532: measured with a $1.5\arcsec$ beam \citep{Condon90}, which gives a SFR of
533: $30 \, M_{\odot} \rm \, yr^{-1}$ ($32.0 \, M_{\odot} \rm \, yr^{-1}$ for
534: a $1.5\arcsec$ beam) using the relations in GGS03. The wide range of
535: the SFR estimates for NGC 4194 highlight the difficulties with SFR
536: estimation. Because we compare the X-ray luminosity directly with the
537: FIR luminosity below, we adopt the mean, $12.3 \, M_{\odot} \rm \,
538: yr^{-1}$, of the three FIR estimates as our best estimate of the SFR.
539:
540: For NGC 7541, we estimate a SFR of $12.0 \, M_{\odot} \rm \, yr^{-1}$
541: based on the FIR luminosity in \citet{Young96} calculated from the 60
542: and 100~$\mu$m fluxes, and a rate of $12.1 \, M_{\odot} \rm \, yr^{-1}$
543: based on the FIR luminosity calculated from the 12, 25, 60, and
544: 100~$\mu$m fluxes from the IRAS survey using the formula in
545: \citet{Deutsch87}. We adopt the mean, $12.0 \, M_{\odot} \rm \,
546: yr^{-1}$, of the two FIR estimates as our best estimate of the SFR.
547:
548: Fig.~\ref{nsfr} shows the relation between star formation rate and the
549: number of X-ray point sources with luminosities above $2 \times 10^{38}
550: \rm \, erg \, s^{-1}$ for the galaxies listed in
551: Table~\ref{nsfr_table}. Fitting a linear relation to the data, we find
552: a slope of $N(L > 2 \times 10^{38} {\rm \, erg \, s^{-1}}) = (1.8 \pm
553: 0.4) {\rm SFR}/(M_{\odot} \rm \, yr^{-1})$. This fit was done
554: considering the errors in both the SFR and the number of sources. The
555: error on the SFR was taken as 30\% of the SFR, for consistency with
556: GGS03. The error on the number of sources was calculated using the
557: method of \citet{Gehrels86}. The fit has $\chi^2/{\rm DoF} = 6.1/9$.
558:
559: We note that our slope is lower than that quoted by GGS03. We expect
560: that the number of sources found for each galaxy by GGS03 is higher than
561: the true number for the following reasons. GGS03 did not correct the
562: source luminosities quoted in the literature in various energy bands
563: usually extending down to 0.5 or 0.1~keV to the 2-10~keV band used for
564: the SFR versus X-ray luminosity relation. The GGS03 sample contained
565: mainly nearby and large angular diameter galaxies, and, thus, would
566: likely include a significant number of background AGN. These were not
567: subtracted out. The GGS03 sample may be biased to galaxies with
568: unusually large X-ray point source populations, since the early {\it
569: Chandra} observations of galaxies tended to be of those with high X-ray
570: fluxes. Also, their sample contained many face-on galaxies. The source
571: detection included counts in the soft X-ray band (usually down to
572: 0.3~keV), and was, thus, most efficient for face-on galaxies where
573: absorption within the host is low. This could be corrected by using
574: only counts in the 2--10~keV for source detection. However, the
575: relatively low effective area of Chandra above 2~keV would increase the
576: detection threshold above $2 \times 10^{38} \rm \, erg \, s^{-1}$ in
577: many cases. It is also possible that the difference reflects some
578: dependence of X-ray source formation on the properties of the host
579: galaxy.
580:
581: The total X-ray luminosity has been suggested as a SFR indicator by
582: \citet{Ranalli03}. We estimated the X-ray flux in the 2--10~keV band
583: for each galaxy by summing the counts in the 2--8 keV band for all the
584: point sources and then converting this sum to a total count rate and
585: then to an unabsorbed energy flux assuming a power-law spectrum with a
586: photon index $\Gamma = 1.7$ and given the absorption column density
587: along the line of sight to the galaxy. For NGC 4194, we included all
588: the counts in the larger nuclear region, but excluded the likely
589: background AGN. We find a luminosity in the 2--10 keV band of $3.0
590: \times 10^{40} \rm \, erg \, s^{-1}$ for NGC 4194 and $1.8 \times
591: 10^{40} \rm \, erg \, s^{-1}$ for NGC 7541. We note that both galaxies
592: have sufficiently high SFR that they are in the linear regime of the
593: $L_X$-SFR relation. The ratio of 2-10 keV luminosity, $L_{40}$, in
594: units of $10^{40} \rm \, erg \, s^{-1}$, to SFR, in units of $M_{\odot}
595: \rm yr^{-1}$, is $L_{40}/\rm SFR = 0.24$ for NGC 4194 and 0.15 for
596: NGC7541. From the relation quoted above between SFR and the number of
597: X-ray sources, and assuming the X-ray luminosity function of GGS03, we
598: calculate a value of $0.37 \pm 0.08$. This value is somewhat lower
599: than, but not inconsistent with, the ratio of 0.5 found by
600: \citet{Ranalli03}. Comparing directly with the FIR luminosity, we find
601: $L_X = 1.6 \times 10^{-4} L_{\rm FIR}$.
602:
603: It is possible to estimate the fraction of mass involved in star
604: formation which is accreted onto compact objects. We define $f =
605: \dot{M}/{\rm SFR}$, where $\dot{M} = L_X/(\eta c^2)$ and $\eta$ is the
606: efficiency for conversion of matter into radiation. If $\eta \sim 0.1$,
607: then $f = (1.8 \times 10^{-6}) L_{40}/SFR$, where $L_{40}$ is the
608: luminosity in units of $10^{40} \rm \, erg \, s^{-1}$ and $SFR$ is the
609: star formation rate in $M_{\odot}/\rm yr$. Using the X-ray luminosity
610: of SFR ratio found above, we find $f \sim 7 \times 10^{-7}$. Allowing a
611: bolometric correction for the X-ray luminosity would increase this value
612: by a factor of $\sim 3$. This value should constrain population
613: synthesis models of the formation and evolution of X-ray binaries. We
614: note that this value includes only the `prompt' accretion, i.e.\ that
615: occurring while the star formation is still active. Additional
616: accretion may occur, notably in the formation of low-mass X-ray
617: binaries, well after active star formation has subsided.
618:
619:
620: \section*{Acknowledgments}
621:
622: We thank the anonymous referee for comments which helped improve the
623: paper. PK acknowledges partial support from Chandra grant CXC GO4-7075X
624: and STScI grant HST-GO-10769. This research has made use of the VizieR
625: catalogue access tool, CDS, Strasbourg, France. This research has made
626: use of the USNOFS Image and Catalogue Archive operated by the United
627: States Naval Observatory, Flagstaff Station. This publication makes use
628: of data products from the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint
629: project of the University of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing
630: and Analysis Center/California Institute of Technology, funded by the
631: National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science
632: Foundation.
633:
634:
635: %--------------
636:
637: \begin{thebibliography}{}
638:
639: \bibitem[Buat et al.(2002)]{Buat02} Buat, V., Boselli, A., Gavazzi, G.,
640: Bonfanti, C.\ 2002, A\&A, 383, 801
641:
642: \bibitem[Clark et al.(2005)]{Clark05} Clark, D.M.\ et al.\ 2005, ApJ,
643: 631, L109
644:
645: \bibitem[Condon et al.(1990)]{Condon90} Condon, J.J., Helou, G.,
646: Sanders, D.B., Soifer, B.T.\ 1990, ApJS, 73, 359
647:
648: \bibitem[David et al.(1992)]{David92} David, L.P., Jones, C., \& Forman
649: W.\ 1992, ApJ, 388, 82
650:
651: \bibitem[Deutsch \& Willner(1987)]{Deutsch87} Deutsch, L.K.\ \& Willner,
652: S.P.\ 1987, ApJS, 63, 803
653:
654: \bibitem[Devereux(1989)]{Devereux89} Devereux, N.A.\ 1989, ApJ, 346, 126
655:
656: \bibitem[Dickey \& Lockman(1990)]{Dickey90} Dickey, J.M.\ \& Lockman,
657: F.J.\ 1990, ARA\&A, 28, 215
658:
659: \bibitem[Eracleous et al.(2002)]{Eracleous02} Eracleous, M., Shields,
660: J.C., Chartas, G., Moran, E.C.\ 2002 ApJ, 565, 108
661:
662: \bibitem[Giacconi et al.(2001)]{Giacconi01} Giacconi, R.\ 2001, 551, 624
663:
664: \bibitem[Gehrels(1986)]{Gehrels86} Gehrels, N.\ 1986, ApJ, 303, 336
665:
666: \bibitem[Griffiths \& Padovani(1990)]{Griffiths90} Griffiths, R.E.\ \&
667: Padovani, P.\ 1990, ApJ, 360, 483
668:
669: \bibitem[Griffiths et al.(2000)]{Griffiths00} Griffiths, R.E., Ptak, A.,
670: Feigelson, E.D., Garmire, G., Townsley, L., Brandt, W.N., Sambruna, R.,
671: Bregman, J. N.\ 2000, Science, 290, 1325
672:
673: \bibitem[Grimm et al.(2003)]{Grimm03} Grimm, H.-J., Gilfanov, M., \&
674: Sunyaev, R.\ 2003, MNRAS, 339, 793 -- GGS03
675:
676: \bibitem[Hornschemeier et al.(2001)]{Hornschemeier01} Hornschemeier,
677: A.H.\ 2001, ApJ, 554, 742
678:
679: \bibitem[Ivo et al.(2004)]{Ivo04} Ivo, S., Hibard, J.E., Rich, R.M.\
680: 2004, AJ, 127, 660
681:
682: \bibitem[Jha et al.(2007)]{Jha07} Jha, S., Riess, A.G., Kirshner, R.P.\
683: 2007, ApJ, 659, 122
684:
685: \bibitem[Kaaret(2001)]{Kaaret01} Kaaret, P.\ 2001, ApJ, 560, 715
686:
687: \bibitem[Kilgard et al.(2002)]{Kilgard02} Kilgard, R.E., Kaaret, P.,
688: Krauss, M.I., Prestwich, A.H., Raley, M.T., Zezas, A.\ 2002, ApJ, 573,
689: 138
690:
691: \bibitem[Kilgard et al.(2005)]{Kilgard05} Kilgard, R.E.\ et al.\ 2005,
692: ApJS, 159, 214
693:
694: \bibitem[Koribalski(1996)]{Koribalski96} Koribalski, B.\ 1996, ASP
695: Conf.\ 106, 238, ed.\ E.D.\ Skillman
696:
697: \bibitem[Monet et al.(2003)]{usnob1} Monet, D.G.\ et al.\ 2003, AJ,
698: 125, 984
699:
700: \bibitem[Ranalli et al.(2003)]{Ranalli03} Ranalli, P., Comastri, A., \&
701: Setti, G.\ 2003, A\&A, 399, 39
702:
703: \bibitem[Smith \& Wilson(2003)]{Smith03} Smith, D.A.\ \& Wilson, A.S.\
704: 2003, ApJ, 591, 138
705:
706: \bibitem[Skrutskie et al.(2006)]{2mass} Skrutskie, R.M.\ et al.\ 2006,
707: AJ, 131, 1163
708:
709: \bibitem[Telesco et al.(1984)]{Telesco84} Telesco, C.M., Becklin, E.E.,
710: Wynn-Williams, C.G., Harper, D.A.\ 1984, ApJ, 282, 427
711:
712: \bibitem[Terashima \& Wilson(2004)]{Terashima04} Terashima, Y.\ \&
713: Wilson, A.S.\ 2004, ApJ, 601, 735
714:
715: \bibitem[Weistrop et al.(2004)]{Weistrop04} Weistrop, D., Eggers, D.,
716: Hancock, M., Nelson, C.H., Bachilla, R., Kaiser, M.E.\ 2004, AJ, 127,
717: 1360
718:
719: \bibitem[Young et al.(1996)]{Young96} Young, J.S., Allen, L., Kenney,
720: J.D.P., Lesser, A., Rownd, B.\ 1996, AJ, 112, 1903
721:
722:
723: \end{thebibliography}
724:
725:
726: \begin{deluxetable}{rllrrcccl}
727: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
728: \tablecaption{X-ray sources within the field of M100
729: \label{m100src}}
730: \tablewidth{0pt}
731: \tablehead{ \# & \colhead{RA} & \colhead{DEC} &
732: \colhead{S/N} & \colhead{Counts} &
733: \colhead{Flux} & \colhead{Luminosity} & \colhead{Hardness} &
734: \colhead{Counterpart} \\
735: & & & & & ($10^{-15} \, \rm erg \, cm^{-2} \, s^{-1}$) & ($10^{38} \, \rm erg \, s^{-1}$) }
736: \startdata
737: 1 & 12 22 58.69 & +15 47 51.8 & 65.0 & 169 & 37 $\pm$ 3 & 7.6 & 0.62 & SN 1979C \\
738: 2 & 12 22 54.78 & +15 49 16.2 & 51.2 & 470 & 11 $\pm$ 5 & 21.6 & 0.66 & C3 \\
739: 3 & 12 22 54.15 & +15 49 12.3 & 42.6 & 203 & 46 $\pm$ 3 & 9.3 & 0.45 & C2 \\
740: 4 & 12 22 49.12 & +15 48 31.2 & 32.6 & 87 & 20 $\pm$ 2 & 4.1 & 0.79 \\
741: 5 & 12 22 54.86 & +15 49 18.1 & 28.2 & 205 & 46 $\pm$ 3 & 9.4 & 0.56 & C1 \\
742: 6 & 12 22 50.40 & +15 48 17.5 & 23.6 & 58 & 13.1 $\pm$ 1.7 & 2.7 & 0.78 \\
743: 7 & 12 22 46.20 & +15 48 49.6 & 20.0 & 55 & 13.2 $\pm$ 1.8 & 2.7 & 0.75 & C6? \\
744: 8 & 12 22 55.68 & +15 49 24.9 & 16.3 & 88 & 23 $\pm$ 2 & 4.7 & 0.65 \\
745: 9 & 12 22 58.24 & +15 48 59.3 & 16.2 & 39 & 8.8 $\pm$ 1.4 & 1.8 & 0.69 \\
746: 10 & 12 22 50.93 & +15 50 42.7 & 14.9 & 46 & 16 $\pm$ 2 & 3.2 & 0.78 \\
747: 11 & 12 22 58.38 & +15 49 18.9 & 14.7 & 38 & 8.6 $\pm$ 1.4 & 1.8 & 0.87 \\
748: 12 & 12 22 51.59 & +15 49 37.7 & 14.7 & 35 & 28 $\pm$ 5 & 5.7 & 0.74 \\
749: 13 & 12 22 54.25 & +15 49 44.2 & 14.0 & 30 & 18.9 $\pm$ 3.5 & 3.8 & 0.67 & C4 \\
750: 14 & 12 22 54.96 & +15 49 20.1 & 13.9 & 104 & 23 $\pm$ 2 & 4.8 & 0.40 & Nucleus \\
751: 15 & 12 22 57.16 & +15 48 57.4 & 12.6 & 30 & 6.8 $\pm$ 1.2 & 1.4 & 0.57 \\
752: 16 & 12 22 43.76 & +15 51 01.9 & 11.8 & 47 & 17 $\pm$ 3 & 3.5 & 0.91 \\
753: 17 & 12 22 43.22 & +15 51 04.7 & 11.6 & 46 & 17 $\pm$ 3 & 3.5 & 0.70 & SDSS\\
754: 18 & 12 22 44.54 & +15 49 28.0 & 11.5 & 27 & 15 $\pm$ 3 & 3.0 & 0.78 \\
755: 19 & 12 23 00.87 & +15 46 38.4 & 11.0 & 24 & 5.3 $\pm$ 1.1 & 1.1 & 0.33 & 2mass \\
756: 20 & 12 22 50.83 & +15 47 01.4 & 10.3 & 24 & 5.4 $\pm$ 1.1 & 1.1 & 0.88 \\
757: 21 & 12 22 51.11 & +15 48 59.5 & 8.9 & 26 & 5.9 $\pm$ 1.2 & 1.2 & 0.69 \\
758: 22 & 12 22 54.52 & +15 49 04.4 & 8.5 & 31 & 7.0 $\pm$ 1.3 & 1.4 & 0.65 \\
759: 23 & 12 22 47.11 & +15 49 13.1 & 8.0 & 24 & 5.7 $\pm$ 1.2 & 1.2 & 0.88 \\
760: 24 & 12 22 55.99 & +15 48 41.3 & 7.6 & 18 & 4.0 $\pm$ 0.9 & 0.8 & 0.89 \\
761: 25 & 12 22 58.40 & +15 47 26.5 & 7.4 & 17 & 3.9 $\pm$ 1.0 & 0.8 & 0.71 \\
762: 26 & 12 22 52.06 & +15 47 14.6 & 6.3 & 16 & 3.6 $\pm$ 0.9 & 0.7 & 0.88 \\
763: 27 & 12 22 54.73 & +15 48 03.6 & 6.2 & 15 & 3.3 $\pm$ 0.9 & 0.7 & 1.00 \\
764: 28 & 12 22 55.97 & +15 49 09.9 & 6.1 & 22 & 5.0 $\pm$ 1.1 & 1.0 & 0.68 \\
765: 29 & 12 22 56.83 & +15 46 30.9 & 5.9 & 15 & 3.3 $\pm$ 0.9 & 0.7 & 0.80 \\
766: 30 & 12 23 01.97 & +15 51 33.1 & 5.5 & 15 & 5.0 $\pm$ 1.3 & 1.0 & 0.73 \\
767: 31 & 12 22 57.39 & +15 48 19.8 & 5.4 & 13 & 2.9 $\pm$ 0.8 & 0.6 & 0.69 & [FFH96] C64? \\
768: 32 & 12 22 52.23 & +15 48 59.9 & 5.1 & 13 & 2.9 $\pm$ 0.8 & 0.6 & 0.69 \\
769: 33 & 12 22 50.00 & +15 48 28.2 & 5.1 & 16 & 3.6 $\pm$ 0.9 & 0.7 & 0.44 \\
770: 34 & 12 22 49.75 & +15 51 30.9 & 4.8 & 11 & 3.8 $\pm$ 1.1 & 0.8 & 0.73 \\
771: 35 & 12 22 49.70 & +15 47 43.7 & 4.4 & 10 & 2.3 $\pm$ 0.7 & 0.5 & 0.80 \\
772: 36 & 12 22 57.71 & +15 49 36.5 & 4.2 & 9 & 5.0 $\pm$ 1.7 & 1.0 & 0.67 \\
773: 37 & 12 22 45.94 & +15 47 16.6 & 4.1 & 11 & 2.8 $\pm$ 0.8 & 0.6 & 0.73 \\
774: 38 & 12 22 53.06 & +15 48 33.4 & 4.1 & 10 & 2.2 $\pm$ 0.7 & 0.5 & 0.60 \\
775: 39 & 12 23 05.67 & +15 48 53.1 & 4.1 & 9 & 2.0 $\pm$ 0.7 & 0.4 & 1.00 \\
776: 40 & 12 22 51.06 & +15 49 47.6 & 4.0 & 10 & 3.5 $\pm$ 1.1 & 0.7 & 0.70 \\
777: 41 & 12 22 57.65 & +15 48 39.4 & 3.9 & 9 & 2.0 $\pm$ 0.7 & 0.4 & 0.33 \\
778: 42 & 12 22 57.54 & +15 48 16.5 & 3.7 & 9 & 2.0 $\pm$ 0.7 & 0.4 & 0.89 \\
779: 43 & 12 22 54.89 & +15 50 16.7 & 3.6 & 8 & 2.6 $\pm$ 0.9 & 0.5 & 0.62 \\
780: 44 & 12 22 54.49 & +15 50 15.4 & 3.6 & 8 & 2.6 $\pm$ 0.9 & 0.5 & 0.12 \\
781: 45 & 12 23 03.02 & +15 48 27.0 & 3.6 & 8 & 1.8 $\pm$ 0.6 & 0.4 & 1.00 \\
782: 46 & 12 22 52.68 & +15 48 36.2 & 3.4 & 9 & 2.0 $\pm$ 0.7 & 0.4 & 0.44 \\
783: 47 & 12 22 48.08 & +15 50 53.5 & 3.3 & 8 & 2.7 $\pm$ 1.0 & 0.6 & 0.50 \\
784: 48 & 12 22 55.42 & +15 49 16.8 & 3.2 & 39 & 8.8 $\pm$ 1.4 & 1.8 & 0.31 & 2mass \\
785: 49 & 12 22 53.23 & +15 48 32.2 & 3.1 & 7 & 1.6 $\pm$ 0.6 & 0.3 & 0.43 \\
786: 50 & 12 23 05.62 & +15 50 44.5 & 3.0 & 6 & 2.0 $\pm$ 0.8 & 0.4 & 0.50 \\
787: % 51 & 12 23 03.84 & +15 50 45.5 & 2.4 & 5 & 1.7 $\pm$ 0.7 & 0.3 & 0.20 \\
788: % 52 & 12 22 57.17 & +15 48 07.3 & 2.4 & 8 & 1.8 $\pm$ 0.6 & 0.4 & 0.38 \\
789: % 53 & 12 22 53.21 & +15 50 15.2 & 2.3 & 10 & 3.3 $\pm$ 1.0 & 0.7 & 0.90 \\
790: % 54 & 12 23 01.34 & +15 51 34.2 & 2.3 & 5 & 1.7 $\pm$ 0.7 & 0.7 & 0.00 \\
791: % 55 & 12 22 59.37 & +15 46 59.9 & 2.2 & 5 & 1.1 $\pm$ 0.5 & 0.2 & 0.40 \\
792: % 56 & 12 22 45.82 & +15 51 48.0 & 2.2 & 5 & 2.0 $\pm$ 0.9 & 0.4 & 0.60 \\
793: % 57 & 12 22 43.80 & +15 49 21.8 & 2.2 & 5 & 2.5 $\pm$ 1.1 & 0.5 & 0.40 \\
794: % 58 & 12 22 46.74 & +15 50 10.2 & 2.2 & 5 & 1.7 $\pm$ 0.8 & 0.4 & 0.20 \\
795: % 59 & 12 22 58.55 & +15 48 34.7 & 2.2 & 5 & 1.1 $\pm$ 0.5 & 0.2 & 1.00 \\
796: % 60 & 12 22 54.86 & +15 50 00.3 & 2.0 & 5 & 1.8 $\pm$ 0.8 & 0.4 & 0.80 \\
797: % 61 & 12 22 44.83 & +15 49 55.9 & 2.0 & 6 & 2.1 $\pm$ 0.8 & 0.4 & 1.00 \\
798: \enddata
799: \tablecomments{The quantities are as defined for
800: Table~\ref{ngc4194src}. Counterparts C1-C6 indicate sources from
801: \citet{Kaaret01}.} \end{deluxetable}
802:
803:
804: \begin{deluxetable}{rllrrcccl}
805: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
806: \tablecaption{X-ray sources within the field of NGC 4945
807: \label{ngc4945src}}
808: \tablewidth{0pt}
809: \tablehead{ \# & \colhead{RA} & \colhead{DEC} &
810: \colhead{S/N} & \colhead{Counts} &
811: \colhead{Flux} & \colhead{Luminosity} & \colhead{Hardness} &
812: \colhead{Counterpart} \\
813: & & & & & ($10^{-15} \, \rm erg \, cm^{-2} \, s^{-1}$) & ($10^{38} \, \rm erg \, s^{-1}$) }
814: \startdata
815: 1 & 13 05 21.95 & -49 28 26.6 & 389.5 & 1349 & 466 $\pm$ 13 & 5.0 & 0.89 \\
816: 2 & 13 05 32.88 & -49 27 34.1 & 358.5 & 1311 & 439 $\pm$ 12 & 4.7 & 0.93 \\
817: 3 & 13 05 38.10 & -49 25 45.5 & 232.4 & 705 & 328 $\pm$ 12 & 3.5 & 0.91 \\
818: 4 & 13 05 18.54 & -49 28 24.0 & 189.0 & 496 & 172 $\pm$ 8 & 1.85 & 0.82 \\
819: 5 & 13 05 35.49 & -49 29 11.4 & 139.7 & 340 & 118 $\pm$ 6 & 1.27 & 0.82 \\
820: 6 & 13 05 34.61 & -49 27 51.8 & 124.9 & 297 & 99 $\pm$ 6 & 1.06 & 0.92 \\
821: 7 & 13 05 27.49 & -49 28 05.2 & 86.6 & 341 & 121 $\pm$ 7 & 1.29 & 1.00 \\
822: 8 & 13 05 22.25 & -49 29 12.5 & 86.5 & 223 & 76 $\pm$ 5 & 0.8 & 0.66 \\
823: 9 & 13 05 22.86 & -49 29 01.4 & 74.5 & 197 & 67 $\pm$ 5 & 0.7 & 0.96 \\
824: 10 & 13 05 25.47 & -49 28 32.4 & 70.4 & 194 & 66 $\pm$ 5 & 0.7 & 0.98 \\
825: 11 & 13 05 40.78 & -49 26 03.6 & 62.5 & 115 & 54 $\pm$ 5 & 0.6 & 0.99 \\
826: 12 & 13 05 21.18 & -49 27 41.3 & 58.0 & 157 & 59 $\pm$ 5 & 0.6 & 0.82 \\
827: 13 & 13 05 28.96 & -49 29 44.3 & 57.7 & 133 & 46 $\pm$ 4 & 0.5 & 0.86 \\
828: 14 & 13 05 16.36 & -49 27 34.8 & 54.3 & 128 & 44 $\pm$ 4 & 0.5 & 0.80 \\
829: 15 & 13 05 21.69 & -49 27 37.0 & 49.6 & 130 & 46 $\pm$ 4 & 0.5 & 0.77 \\
830: 16 & 13 04 42.57 & -49 34 49.5 & 44.4 & 350 & 196 $\pm$ 10 & 2.1 & 0.96 \\
831: 17 & 13 05 22.40 & -49 26 57.5 & 41.1 & 95 & 32 $\pm$ 3 & 0.3 & 0.87 \\
832: 18 & 13 05 22.51 & -49 29 35.3 & 40.1 & 88 & 31 $\pm$ 3 & 0.3 & 0.93 \\
833: 19 & 13 05 24.35 & -49 27 21.8 & 29.0 & 59 & 20 $\pm$ 3 & 0.2 & 0.78 \\
834: 20 & 13 05 28.95 & -49 27 05.2 & 25.0 & 54 & 18 $\pm$ 2 & 0.2 & 0.91 \\
835: 21 & 13 05 22.79 & -49 28 52.9 & 22.2 & 40 & 14 $\pm$ 2 & 0.15 & 0.98 \\
836: 22 & 13 05 22.67 & -49 27 53.0 & 21.9 & 48 & 16 $\pm$ 2 & 0.18 & 0.96 \\
837: 23 & 13 05 27.11 & -49 28 04.4 & 19.4 & 73 & 26 $\pm$ 3 & 0.3 & 0.95 \\
838: 24 & 13 05 11.04 & -49 31 26.1 & 18.3 & 62 & 22 $\pm$ 3 & 0.2 & 0.39 \\
839: 25 & 13 05 29.79 & -49 26 43.1 & 16.2 & 31 & 10 $\pm$ 2 & 0.11 & 0.81 \\
840: 26 & 13 05 09.79 & -49 31 42.8 & 16.0 & 62 & 21 $\pm$ 3 & 0.2 & 0.95 \\
841: 27 & 13 05 37.23 & -49 26 02.0 & 15.0 & 29 & 13 $\pm$ 2 & 0.14 & 0.86 \\
842: 28 & 13 05 25.42 & -49 28 24.0 & 13.1 & 33 & 11 $\pm$ 2 & 0.12 & 1.00 \\
843: 29 & 13 05 13.26 & -49 28 33.7 & 10.9 & 24 & 8.7 $\pm$ 1.7 & 0.09 & 0.75 \\
844: 30 & 13 05 43.39 & -49 24 31.4 & 8.8 & 20 & 10 $\pm$ 2 & 0.11 & 0.95 \\
845: 31 & 13 05 35.49 & -49 25 27.0 & 8.4 & 16 & 7.5 $\pm$ 1.9 & 0.08 & 1.00 \\
846: 32 & 13 05 26.65 & -49 27 41.9 & 7.0 & 21 & 7.1 $\pm$ 1.5 & 0.08 & 0.62 \\
847: 33 & 13 04 56.68 & -49 33 40.2 & 6.2 & 33 & 17 $\pm$ 3 & 0.18 & 0.82 \\
848: 34 & 13 05 30.01 & -49 28 20.2 & 5.9 & 13 & 4.5 $\pm$ 1.3 & 0.05 & 0.85 \\
849: 35 & 13 05 24.91 & -49 28 39.9 & 5.3 & 11 & 3.8 $\pm$ 1.1 & 0.04 & 1.00 \\
850: 36 & 13 05 39.10 & -49 25 29.7 & 5.1 & 11 & 5.1 $\pm$ 1.6 & 0.06 & 0.82 \\
851: 37 & 13 05 11.13 & -49 29 02.5 & 4.9 & 10 & 3.5 $\pm$ 1.1 & 0.04 & 1.00 \\
852: 38 & 13 05 33.16 & -49 27 01.4 & 4.9 & 9 & 3.0 $\pm$ 1.0 & 0.03 & 0.44 \\
853: 39 & 13 05 27.47 & -49 29 30.8 & 4.9 & 10 & 3.5 $\pm$ 1.1 & 0.04 & 1.00 \\
854: 40 & 13 05 31.19 & -49 27 49.0 & 4.6 & 10 & 3.4 $\pm$ 1.1 & 0.04 & 0.90 \\
855: 41 & 13 05 31.78 & -49 26 58.2 & 4.4 & 10 & 3.4 $\pm$ 1.1 & 0.04 & 0.80 \\
856: 42 & 13 05 35.63 & -49 26 58.8 & 4.2 & 7 & 2.4 $\pm$ 0.9 & 0.03 & 1.00 \\
857: 43 & 13 05 23.14 & -49 27 54.9 & 4.1 & 11 & 3.7 $\pm$ 1.1 & 0.04 & 0.73 \\
858: 44 & 13 05 36.70 & -49 27 22.1 & 4.0 & 9 & 3.0 $\pm$ 1.0 & 0.03 & 1.00 \\
859: 45 & 13 05 14.92 & -49 30 42.5 & 3.8 & 12 & 4.0 $\pm$ 1.2 & 0.04 & 0.50 \\
860: 46 & 13 05 52.86 & -49 23 12.2 & 3.7 & 11 & 5.5 $\pm$ 1.7 & 0.06 & 0.45 \\
861: 47 & 13 05 42.95 & -49 25 09.1 & 3.6 & 7 & 3.3 $\pm$ 1.3 & 0.04 & 1.00 \\
862: 48 & 13 05 19.53 & -49 30 03.2 & 3.0 & 5 & 1.7 $\pm$ 0.8 & 0.02 & 0.60 \\
863: % 49 & 13 04 54.81 & -49 31 14.5 & 2.8 & 14 & 5.0 $\pm$ 1.3 & 0.05 & 0.86 \\
864: % 50 & 13 05 11.05 & -49 31 07.5 & 2.7 & 8 & 2.7 $\pm$ 1.0 & 0.03 & 0.62 \\
865: % 51 & 13 05 24.08 & -49 29 22.7 & 2.6 & 4 & 1.4 $\pm$ 0.7 & 0.015 & 0.50 \\
866: % 52 & 13 05 32.50 & -49 27 19.6 & 2.5 & 6 & 2.0 $\pm$ 0.8 & 0.026 & 0.67 \\
867: % 53 & 13 05 31.54 & -49 27 30.6 & 2.5 & 4 & 1.3 $\pm$ 0.7 & 0.014 & 1.00 \\
868: % 54 & 13 05 06.65 & -49 29 56.3 & 2.3 & 4 & 1.3 $\pm$ 0.7 & 0.014 & 1.00 \\
869: % 55 & 13 05 17.53 & -49 28 56.7 & 2.1 & 4 & 1.4 $\pm$ 0.7 & 0.015 & 0.50 \\
870: \enddata
871: \tablecomments{The quantities are as defined for
872: Table~\ref{ngc4194src}.} \end{deluxetable}
873:
874: \label{lastpage}
875:
876:
877: \end{document}
878:
879: