1: \documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}
2:
3: %%% PREAMBLE MATTER
4:
5: \usepackage{asp2006}
6: \usepackage{epsf}
7: \usepackage{psfig}
8: \usepackage{lscape}
9:
10: \markboth{Brodwin, Eisenhardt, Gonzalez et al.}{A Large Population of High Redshift Galaxy Clusters in the IRAC Shallow Cluster Survey} %%% Fill in authors' names and short running title
11:
12: \pagestyle{myheadings}
13: \setcounter{equation}{0}
14: \setcounter{figure}{0}
15: \setcounter{footnote}{0}
16: \setcounter{section}{0}
17: \setcounter{table}{0}
18:
19: %%% MAIN PART OF DOCUMENT
20:
21: \usepackage{natbib}
22:
23: \begin{document}
24: \title{A Large Population of High Redshift Galaxy Clusters in the IRAC Shallow Cluster Survey} %%% Fill in title
25: \author{Mark Brodwin\altaffilmark{1}, Peter R.~Eisenhardt\altaffilmark{2}, Anthony H.~Gonzalez\altaffilmark{3}, S.~Adam Stanford\altaffilmark{4}, Daniel Stern\altaffilmark{2}, Leonidas A.~Moustakas\altaffilmark{2}, Michael J.~I.~Brown\altaffilmark{5}, Ranga-Ram Chary\altaffilmark{6}, Audrey Galametz\altaffilmark{2,7}} %%% Fill in author names
26: \altaffiltext{1}{NOAO, 950 N.~Cherry Ave., Tucson, AZ 85719}
27: \altaffiltext{2}{JPL/Caltech, 4800 Oak Grove Dr., MS 169--327, Pasadena, CA 91109}
28: \altaffiltext{3}{Dept.~of Astronomy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611}
29: \altaffiltext{4}{University of California, Davis, CA 95616}
30: \altaffiltext{5}{School of Physics, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia}
31: \altaffiltext{6}{SSC, California Institute of Technology, Mail Stop 220-6, Pasadena, CA 91125}
32: \altaffiltext{7}{Observatoire Astronomique de Strasbourg, 11 rue de l'Universit\'e, 67000 Strasbourg, France}
33:
34:
35: %\affil{} %%% Fill in author affiliations
36:
37: \begin{abstract} %%% Abstract to run on from here.
38:
39: We have identified 335 galaxy cluster and group candidates spanning
40: $0<z<2$, using a 4.5$\mu$m selected sample of galaxies in a 7.25
41: deg$^2$ region in the {\it Spitzer}/IRAC Shallow Survey. Using full
42: redshift probability distributions for all galaxies, clusters were
43: identified as 3-dimensional overdensities using a wavelet algorithm.
44: To date 12 clusters at $z>1$, and over 60 at $z < 0.5$ have been
45: spectroscopically confirmed. The mean I-[3.6] color for cluster
46: galaxies up to $z\sim 1$ is well matched by a $z_f=3$ passively
47: evolving model. At $z>1$, a wider range of formation histories is
48: needed, but higher formation redshifts (i.e.\ $z_f \ge 4-5$) are
49: favored for most clusters. The cluster autocorrelation function,
50: measured for the first time out to $z=1.5$, is found not to have
51: evolved over the last 10 Gyr, in agreement with the prediction from
52: $\Lambda$CDM. The average mass of the IRAC Shallow Cluster Survey
53: sample, inferred from its clustering, is $\sim 10^{14} M_\odot$.
54: \end{abstract}
55:
56: %%% MAIN BODY OF TEXT GOES HERE. CONSULT "INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS USING
57: %%% LATEX2E MARKUP", SECTIONS 2.3-2.6 FOR HELP WITH EQUATIONS, FIGURES,
58: %%% AND TABLES.
59:
60: \section{Introduction}
61:
62: The bulk of the stellar mass in the universe is created at $1<z<3$
63: \citep{dickinson03, rudnick06} in very massive luminous and
64: ultraluminous galaxies \citep[LIRGs and ULIRGs,][]{lefloch05,
65: papovich06}. Recent studies show that the SFR at $z=1$ increases
66: with increasing local density \citep{elbaz07, cooper08}, a reversal of
67: the local SFR-density relation \citep{lewis02, brinchmann04}. To
68: obtain a complete census of massive galaxy formation at $z>1$ we need
69: to study it across a range of environments, not least because most
70: massive galaxies are found in very rich environments. Here we
71: describe the IRAC Shallow Cluster Survey \citep[ISCS;][hereafter
72: E08]{eisenhardt08}, the largest, best-studied sample of stellar mass
73: selected clusters at $z>1$.
74:
75: \section{The IRAC Shallow Cluster Survey}
76:
77: The ISCS is a sample of 335 galaxy clusters spanning $0.1<z<2$ in the
78: IRAC Shallow Survey \citep[ISS,][]{eisenhardt04} area of the NOAO
79: Deep-Wide Field Survey (NDWFS, \citealt{ndwfs99}; Jannuzi et al.\ in
80: prep) in Bo\"otes. The clusters are selected using a wavelet
81: detection algorithm which identifies peaks in cluster probability
82: density maps constructed from accurate photometric redshift
83: probability functions for 175,431 galaxies brighter than 13.3$\mu$Jy
84: at 4.5$\mu$m in a 7.25 deg$^2$ region (\citealt{brodwin06_ISS},
85: hereafter B06, E08). The redshift distribution is shown in Fig.\
86: \ref{N(z)}.
87:
88: \begin{figure}[bthp]
89: \vspace*{-0.25cm}
90: \plotfiddle{brodwin_fig1.eps}{3in}{0.}{40.}{40.}{-100.}{0}
91: \vspace*{-0.5cm}
92: \caption{Observed redshift distribution of 335 galaxy clusters in the
93: ISCS. The curve, a fit to the distribution, is used in the
94: clustering analysis in \textsection{4}.}
95: \label{N(z)}
96: \end{figure}
97:
98: The AGES survey (Kochanek et al.\ in prep) in Bo\"otes provides
99: spectroscopic confirmation for over 60 clusters at $z\le 0.5$ (E08).
100: At higher redshift, a multi--year Keck spectroscopic campaign has to
101: date confirmed 12 $z>1$ clusters, many with $\sim 10-20$ members, at
102: redshifts from 1.06 to 1.41 (\citealt{stanford05}; \citealt{elston06};
103: B06; E08).
104:
105: \section{Formation of Massive Galaxies}
106:
107: The extensive redshift baseline of the ISCS sample permits a test of
108: various plausible star formation histories (E08). Fig.\ \ref{SFH}
109: ({\it left}) plots the average k-corrected I-[3.6] color for galaxies
110: within 1 Mpc of each cluster center whose integrated redshift
111: probability distribution in the range $z_{\mbox{\scriptsize cl}} \pm
112: 0.06(1+z_{\mbox{\scriptsize cl}})$ exceeds 0.3 (circles; filled
113: symbols indicate $z>1$ spectroscopically confirmed clusters. The red
114: curve is not a fit, but rather a \citet{bc03} population synthesis
115: model in which the stars formed in a 0.1 Gyr burst at $z_f=3$ and
116: evolved passively thereafter. This scenario clearly describes the
117: data better than a no-evolution model. Also plotted are the average
118: k-corrected colors for galaxies more massive than a passively evolving
119: $L^*$ galaxy (red boxes). These are systematically redder than the
120: full cluster population, showing the persistence of the
121: color-magnitude relation in clusters out to $z\approx 1.5$, and
122: suggesting the early existence of a mass-metallicity relation in
123: clusters and/or providing evidence of downsizing.
124:
125: \begin{figure}[bthp]
126: \plottwo{brodwin_fig2.eps}{brodwin_fig3.eps}
127: \caption{({\it left)}: Mean, k-corrected I-[3.6] color vs.\ redshift
128: for clusters in the ISCS (circles; filled symbols are confirmed
129: $z>1$ clusters). The red curve is a passively evolving $z_f=3$
130: model. Red boxes are the mean colors of massive ($L>L^*$) galaxies
131: only and are systematically redder than the overall cluster
132: population. {\it right}: Mean I-[3.6] color relative to the $z_f=3$
133: PE model. Clusters at $z\ga 1.2$ formed their stars at very high
134: redshift ($z_f \ga 4$). }
135: \label{SFH}
136: \end{figure}
137:
138: In Fig.\ \ref{SFH} ({\it right}) the average k-corrected color of $L >
139: L^*$ cluster galaxies is plotted relative to the $z_f=3$ passive
140: evolution model (horizontal line). Overplotted are models with
141: formation redshifts of $z_f =[1.5, 2, 4, 5, 30]$, as well as a
142: no-evolution model. The offset between all models and the data at low
143: redshift is primarily due to the redder colors of these massive
144: galaxies discussed above. Nevertheless we can draw two robust
145: conclusions from this figure regarding the star formation histories of
146: $z>1$ clusters. First, the variation in the average cluster colors
147: increases markedly at $z>1$. Second, we find that the stars in most
148: high-redshift clusters, particularly those above $z>1.2$, formed at $z
149: \sim 4-5$ or even earlier.
150:
151: \section{Clustering of Galaxy Clusters to $z=1.5$}
152:
153: The large, uniformly selected ISCS cluster sample has permitted the
154: first measurement of the galaxy cluster autocorrelation function in
155: the first half of the Universe \citep{brodwin07}. Specifically, the
156: autocorrelation function was measured in two broad bins, at $0.25 \le
157: z \le 0.75$ and $0.75 < z \le 1.5$, with resulting clustering
158: amplitudes of $r_0 = 17.40^{+3.98}_{-3.10}$ and
159: $r_0=19.14^{+5.65}_{-4.56}$ h$^{-1}$ Mpc, corresponding to average
160: halo masses of $\log [M_{\mbox{\scriptsize 200}}/M_\odot]$ $\sim
161: 13.9^{+0.3}_{-0.2}$ and $\sim 13.8^{+0.2}_{-0.3}$, respectively.
162: Errors are computed via bootstrap resampling of the cluster catalog
163: and are therefore rather conservative.
164:
165: These correlation lengths are quite similar to the values for local
166: clusters (e.g.\ Abell, APM, SDSS) as well as those at $z \approx 0.5$
167: \citep{gonzalez02}. This constancy with redshift is a key prediction
168: of $\Lambda$CDM, as shown in Fig.\ \ref{r0} ({\it left}).
169: Measurements of the cluster clustering amplitude, $r_0$, are plotted
170: vs.\ intercluster distance, $d_c$, for several different surveys
171: spanning redshifts up to $z\approx 0.5$. Overplotted are the present
172: measurements, at effective redshifts of 0.5 and 1.0 (filled symbols).
173: The hashed regions shows the prediction from a high-resolution
174: numerical simulation \citep{younger05} that over $0 <z< 1.5$ very
175: little evolution is expected, in agreement with our results.
176:
177: \begin{figure}[bthp]
178: \plottwo{brodwin_fig4.eps}{brodwin_fig5.eps}
179: \caption{{\it Left}: $r_0$ vs.\ $d_c$ for the present sample (filled
180: circles) along with several $z\la 0.5$ measurements from the
181: literature \citep[][and references therein]{bahcall03}. The
182: hashed region shows the $\Lambda$CDM prediction over $0 <z<1.5$
183: \citep{younger05}. {\it Right}: Comoving correlation lengths for
184: the ISCS clusters, other cluster samples at low-z, and high-z,
185: highly clustered galaxy populations. The filled region (dotted
186: lines) illustrates the predicted $r_0$ evolution in a biased
187: structure formation model for our $z_{\mbox{\scriptsize
188: eff}}=0.53$ ($0.97$) cluster samples. The dashed lines
189: represent simple stable clustering models.}
190: \label{r0}
191: \end{figure}
192:
193: In Figure \ref{r0} ({\it right}) we plot a compilation of recent
194: clustering amplitudes for various cluster surveys, as well as for
195: highly clustered galaxy populations. Following
196: \citet{moustakas&somerville02}, we overplot the halo conserving model
197: of \citet{fry96} normalized to our two measurements in order to
198: explore possible evolutionary connections with structures at other
199: redshifts. The shaded area (dotted lines) shows the 1\,$\sigma$
200: region for the $z_{\mbox{\scriptsize eff}}=0.53$ ($0.97$) measurement.
201: In this model the ISCS clusters will evolve into typical present--day
202: massive clusters, such as those in the SDSS, APM or Abell surveys. In
203: the stable--clustering picture, in which clustering is fixed in
204: physical coordinates \citep[dashed lines]{groth&peebles77}, the
205: $z_{\mbox{\scriptsize eff}}=0.97$ ISCS clusters grow into the most
206: massive clusters in the local Universe, typically identified in X--ray
207: surveys.
208:
209: Most of the plotted high redshift galaxy clustering measurements are
210: rather uncertain due to both small number statistics and poorly known
211: redshift distributions. Several authors also find clustering
212: amplitudes for galaxy populations which are inconsistent with their
213: space densities \citep[e.g.][]{quadri07}. Indeed, only obscured
214: ULIRGs have space densities similar to the present cluster sample, a
215: prerequisite for drawing evolutionary connections from these
216: particular models. Their clustering is consistent with that of the
217: ISCS clusters, providing a measure of support for recent studies
218: \citep[e.g.][]{magliocchetti07} indicating that they may be associated
219: with, or progenitors of, groups or low--mass clusters.
220:
221: \acknowledgements %%% Text of acknowledgements runs on after this command.
222: We'd like to thank the organizers for organizing an excellent
223: conference and for awesome sushi at the banquet. This work is based
224: in part on observations made with the Spitzer Space Telescope, which
225: is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of
226: Technology under a contract with NASA. This paper made use of data
227: from the NDWFS, which was supported by NOAO, AURA, Inc., and the
228: NSF. We thank A.~Dey, B.~Jannuzi and the entire NDWFS survey team.
229: NOAO is operated by AURA, Inc., under a cooperative agreement with the
230: National Science Foundation.
231: \bibliographystyle{astron3}
232: \bibliography{bibfile}
233:
234: \end{document}
235:
236:
237: