1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

2: 

3: \usepackage{graphicx,natbib}

4: 

5: \begin{document}

6: 

7: \newcommand{\ndla}{71}

8: \newcommand{\kms}{km~s$^{-1}$ }

9: \newcommand{\cm}[1]{\, {\rm cm^{#1}}}

10: \newcommand{\mkms}{{\rm \; km\;s^{-1}}}

11: \newcommand{\delv}{$\Delta v_{90}$}

12: \newcommand{\hdelv}{$\Delta v_{90}^{\rm high}$}

13: \newcommand{\wsi}{$W_{\rm 1526}$}

14: \newcommand{\wciv}{$W_{\rm CIV}$}

15: \newcommand{\mwciv}{W_{\rm CIV}}

16: \newcommand{\ohi}{$\Omega_g$}

17: \newcommand{\lya}{Ly$\alpha$}

18: \newcommand{\nv}{N\,V}

19: \newcommand{\ovi}{O\,VI}

20: \newcommand{\N}[1]{{N({\rm #1})}}

21: \newcommand{\sci}[1]{{\rm \; \times \; 10^{#1}}}

22: \newcommand{\mnhi}{N_{\rm HI}}

23: \newcommand{\mnciv}{N_{\rm CIV}}

24: \newcommand{\afeg}{[$\alpha$/Fe]$_g$}

25: \newcommand{\nhii}{$\N{H^+}$}

26: \newcommand{\nhi}{$N_{\rm HI}$}

27: \newcommand{\nhtwo}{$N_{\rm H_2}$}

28: \def\fnhi{$f(\mnhi)$}

29: \def\mfnhi{f(\mnhi)}

30: \def\ltk{\left [ \,}

31: \def\ltp{\left ( \,}

32: \def\ltb{\left \{ \,}

33: \def\rtk{\, \right  ] }

34: \def\rtp{\, \right  ) }

35: \def\rtb{\, \right \} }

36: \def\lnhi{$\log N_{HI}$}

37: \def\omt{$\Omega_m^{Total}$}

38: \def\momt{\Omega_m^{Total}}

39: 

40: \title{The Rapidly Flaring Afterglow of the Very Bright and Energetic GRB\,070125}

41: 

42: \author{Adria C. Updike\altaffilmark{1}, Josh B. Haislip\altaffilmark{2}, 

43: Melissa C. Nysewander\altaffilmark{3}, Andrew S. Fruchter\altaffilmark{3},

44: D. Alexander Kann\altaffilmark{4}, Sylvio Klose\altaffilmark{4},

45: Peter A. Milne\altaffilmark{5}, 

46: G. Grant Williams\altaffilmark{6}, Weikang Zheng\altaffilmark{7},

47: Carl W. Hergenrother\altaffilmark{8},

48: Jason X. Prochaska\altaffilmark{9},  Jules P. Halpern\altaffilmark{10},

49: Nestor Mirabal\altaffilmark{10}, John R. Thorstensen\altaffilmark{11},

50: Alexander J. van der Horst\altaffilmark{12}, 

51: Rhaana L. C. Starling\altaffilmark{13},

52: Judith L. Racusin\altaffilmark{14},  David N. Burrows\altaffilmark{14},

53: N. P. M. Kuin\altaffilmark{15}, Peter W. A. Roming\altaffilmark{14},

54: Eric Bellm\altaffilmark{16}, Kevin Hurley\altaffilmark{16},

55: Weidong Li\altaffilmark{17}, Alexei V. Filippenko\altaffilmark{17},

56: Cullen Blake\altaffilmark{18},  Dan Starr\altaffilmark{17}, 

57: Emilio E. Falco\altaffilmark{19}, Warren R. Brown\altaffilmark{18}, 

58: Xinyu Dai\altaffilmark{20}, 

59:  Jinsong Deng\altaffilmark{7},

60:  Liping Xin\altaffilmark{7},

61: Yulei Qiu\altaffilmark{7}, Jianyan Wei\altaffilmark{7},

62: Yuji Urata\altaffilmark{21,22},

63: Domenico Nanni\altaffilmark{23,24}, 

64:  Elisabetta Maiorano\altaffilmark{25}, Eliana Palazzi\altaffilmark{25},

65:  Giuseppe Greco\altaffilmark{26}, Corrado Bartolini\altaffilmark{26},

66: Adriano Guarnieri\altaffilmark{26}, Adalberto Piccioni\altaffilmark{26},

67: Graziella Pizzichini\altaffilmark{25}, Federica Terra\altaffilmark{23},

68:   Kuntal Misra\altaffilmark{27,28},

69: B. C. Bhatt\altaffilmark{29}, G. C. Anupama\altaffilmark{30}

70: X. Fan\altaffilmark{5},

71: L. Jiang\altaffilmark{5}, 

72: Ralph A. M. J. Wijers\altaffilmark{31}, 

73: Daniel E. Reichart\altaffilmark{2},

74: Hala A. Eid\altaffilmark{1}, Ginger Bryngelson\altaffilmark{1},

75: Jason Puls\altaffilmark{1}, R. C. Goldthwaite\altaffilmark{1},

76: and Dieter H. Hartmann\altaffilmark{1}

77: }

78: 

79: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Clemson University 

80: 118 Kinard Laboratory, Clemson, SC 29634.}

81: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University 

82: of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box 3255, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.}

83: \altaffiltext{3}{Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San

84: Martin Dr., Baltimore, MD 21218.}

85: \altaffiltext{4}{Th\"uringer Landessternwarte Tautenburg,  

86: Sternwarte 5, D--07778 Tautenburg, Germany.}

87: \altaffiltext{5}{Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson

88: AZ 85721-0065.}

89: \altaffiltext{6}{MMT Observatory, University of Arizona, 

90: Tucson AZ 85721-0065.}

91: \altaffiltext{7}{National Astronomical Observatories, 20A Datun Rd., 

92: Chaoyang Dist., Beijing 100012, China.}

93: \altaffiltext{8}{Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University

94: of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85721-0092.}

95: \altaffiltext{9}{UCO/Lick Observatory, University of California,

96: Santa Cruz, CA 95064.}

97: \altaffiltext{10}{Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory, Columbia University,

98: 550 West 120th Street, New York, NY 10027.}

99: \altaffiltext{11}{Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Dartmouth College

100: 6127 Wilder Laboratory

101: Hanover, NH 03755-3528.}

102: \altaffiltext{12}{NASA Postdoctoral Program Fellow, NSSTC, 320 Sparkman Drive, Huntsville, AL 35805.}

103: \altaffiltext{13}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.}

104: \altaffiltext{14}{Penn State University, Department of Astronomy

105: \& Astrophysics, 525 Davey Lab, University Park, PA 16802.}

106: \altaffiltext{15}{Mullard Space Science Laboratory/UCL, Holmbury St. Mary, Dorking, Surrey, HR5, 6NT, UK.}

107: \altaffiltext{16}{University of California, Space Sciences Laboratory, 7 Gauss Way, Berkeley, CA 94720-7450.}

108: \altaffiltext{17}{Department of Astronomy, University of California,

109: Berkeley, CA 94720-3411.}

110: \altaffiltext{18}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics,

111: 60 Garden Street, MS-20, Cambridge, MA 02138.}

112: \altaffiltext{19}{Smithsonian Institution, Whipple Observatory,

113: 670 Mt. Hopkins Road, P.O. Box 6369, Amado, AZ 85645.}

114: \altaffiltext{20}{Ohio State University Department of Physics,

115: 191 W. Woodruff Ave, Columbus, OH 43210-1117.}

116: \altaffiltext{21}{Dept. of Physics, Saitama University,

117: Shimookubo, Urawa 338-8570 Japan.}

118: \altaffiltext{22}{Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics,

119: Taipei 106, Taiwan, Republic of China.}

120: \altaffiltext{23}{Second University of Roma "Tor Vergata," Italy.}

121: \altaffiltext{24}{INAF/OAR.}

122: \altaffiltext{25}{INAF/IASF Bologna, via Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy.}

123: \altaffiltext{26}{Dipartimento di Astronomia, Universite di Bologna, 

124: via Ranzani 1, 40127  Bologna, Italy.}

125: \altaffiltext{27}{Aryabhatta Research Institute of observational sciencES (ARIES), Manora Peak, Nainital - 263 129 India.}

126: \altaffiltext{28}{Inter University Center for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Post Bag 4, Ganeshkhind, Pune 411 007 India.}

127: \altaffiltext{29}{Center for Research and Education in Science and Technology (CREST), Hosakote, Bangalore - 562 114 India.}

128: \altaffiltext{30}{Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Bangalore - 560 034 India.}

129: \altaffiltext{31}{Astronomical Institute, University of Amsterdam, Kruislaan 403, 1098 SJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.}

130: 

131: 

132: \begin{abstract}

133: 

134: We report on multi-wavelength observations, ranging 

135: from X-ray to radio wave bands, of the IPN-localized 

136: gamma-ray burst GRB 070125.  Spectroscopic observations reveal the presence 

137: of absorption lines due to O~I, Si~II, and C~IV, implying a likely 

138: redshift of $z$ = 1.547.   The well-sampled light curves,

139: in particular from 0.5 to 4 days after the burst,

140: suggest a jet break at 3.7

141: days, corresponding to a jet opening angle of $\sim$7.0$^\circ$, and

142: implying an intrinsic GRB energy in the 1--10,000 keV band of around 

143: $E_{\gamma} = (6.3-6.9) \times 10^{51}$ erg (based on the 

144: fluences measured by the gamma-ray detectors of

145: the IPN network). GRB\,070125 is among the brightest 

146: afterglows observed to date.  The spectral energy distribution implies 

147: a host extinction of $A_{V} < 0.9$ mag.   

148: Two rebrightening episodes are observed, one with  

149: excellent time coverage, showing an increase in flux of 56\% in  

150: $\sim$8000 seconds.  The evolution of the afterglow 

151: light curve is achromatic at all times.  

152: Late-time observations of the afterglow do not show evidence 

153: for emission from an underlying host galaxy or supernova.  Any host 

154: galaxy would be subluminous, consistent with current GRB  

155: host-galaxy samples.  Evidence for strong Mg~II absorption features 

156: is not found, which is  

157: perhaps surprising in view of the relatively  

158: high redshift of this burst and the 

159: high likelihood for such features  

160: along GRB-selected lines of sight. 

161:  

162: \end{abstract} 

163:  

164: \keywords{gamma-ray bursts: GRB 070125} 

165:  

166: \section{Introduction}   

167: 

168: Since the detection of the first gamma-ray burst (GRB) in 1967 with detectors  

169: aboard the Vela satellites \citep{1973ApJ...182L..85K}, our understanding of  

170: the nature of this still somewhat mysterious phenomenon went through several  

171: major advances. In particular, the establishment of their cosmological  

172: distances via ground-based follow-up spectroscopy of their afterglow emission,  

173: first accomplished for GRB 970508 \citep{1997Natur.387..878M} at a redshift  

174: of $z$ = 0.835, led to a spectacular world-wide effort to accumulate  

175: prompt and afterglow observations which have yielded many surprises  

176: and breakthrough discoveries. One decade after the first afterglow was  

177: discovered with BeppoSAX \citep{1997Natur.387..783C, 1997Natur.386..686V},  

178: the accumulated sample of about 500 GRBs\footnote{See the compilation  

179: in http://www.mpe.mpg.de/\symbol{126}jcg/grbgen.html} exhibits   

180: X-ray, optical, and radio afterglows to varying degrees.  

181: Their observed redshift distribution \citep{2006A&A...447..897J}  

182: is very broad, with more than half of the GRBs at distances beyond  

183: the peak of the cosmic star formation rate at $z$ $\sim$ $1-2$, and  

184: with GRB 050904 at $z$ = 6.29 currently being the most  

185: distant burst \citep{2006Natur.440..181H, 2006Natur.440..184K}. The  

186: association of long-duration GRBs with Type Ib/c supernovae (see 

187: \citealt{1997ARA&A..35..309F} for a review of supernova classification), 

188: established  

189: in a few cases via direct spectroscopy and in a larger sample  

190: via a late extra emission component revealed in broad-band photometric  

191: observations (e.g., \citealt{1998Natur.395..670G,  

192: 2003Natur.423..847H, 2003ApJ...591L..17S, 2004ApJ...609..952Z,  

193: 2004ApJ...609L...5M, 2006Natur.442.1011P, 2006ApJ...643L..99M,  

194: 2006ARA&A..44..507W}) has thus opened promising observational  

195: windows into star formation in the universe  

196: (e.g., \citealt{2006ApJ...642..382B}), cosmic chemical  

197: evolution via absorption-line  

198: spectroscopy of intervening clouds and host galaxies (e.g.,  

199: \citealt{2006NJPh....8..195S, 2006ApJ...642..979B}),   

200: and may eventually provide valuable constraints on the cosmic  

201: re-ionization history in  

202: the crucial $z>6$ epoch (e.g., \citealt{2006ARA&A..44..415F,  

203: 2006PASJ...58..485T, 

204: 2007arXiv0710.1303G, 2007arXiv0710.1018M}).  

205: Every new GRB provides yet another opportunity to investigate these  

206: topics, or the  

207: GRB environment via features in the afterglow power-law decay, or to add  

208: key data to enable  

209: a better understanding of their statistical properties and morphological  

210: classification. 

211:  

212: Here we report on follow-up observations of GRB\,070125,  

213: which was discovered by detectors aboard  

214: the IPN members Mars Odyssey, Suzaku, INTEGRAL,  

215: Konus-Wind, and RHESSI at $T_0$ = 07:20:42 (UT dates and times 

216: are used throughout this paper) on January 25, 2007 

217: \citep{2007GCN..6024....1H}. 

218: The BAT detector aboard \emph{Swift} \citep{2004ApJ...611.1005G}  

219: recorded the burst during a  

220: slew, and therefore did not trigger.  

221: The BAT position is consistent with  

222: the IPN localization.  

223: The position was  monitored with the  

224: XRT from 0.54 to 18.5 days after $T_0$.  We  

225: report these observations and their implications  

226: (see also \citealt{2007GCNR...28....3R}), as  

227: well as the results obtained from ground-based  

228: follow-up observations with a large group of  

229: small, mid-sized, and large-aperture telescopes.  

230: As observed by RHESSI, GRB 070125 had a  

231: duration of $T_{90}$=63.0 $\pm$ 1.7 seconds \citep{2007arXiv0710.4590B},  

232: and thus clearly belongs in the class of  

233: long-(soft) GRBs (e.g., \citealt{1993ApJ...413L.101K}).  

234: Details of the prompt emission can be found in  

235: \cite{2007arXiv0710.4590B}.  From a joint fit to the 

236: RHESSI and Konus data, \cite{2007arXiv0710.4590B} 

237: derived isotropic energies in the 1 keV $-$ 10 MeV band of  

238: $(9.44^{+0.40}_{-0.41}) \times 10^{53}$ erg (Konus)  

239: and $(8.27 \pm 0.39) \times 10^{53}$ erg (RHESSI). 

240:  

241: Starting with our early response using the 0.9~m  

242: SARA telescope and the 2.3~m Bok telescope  

243: on Kitt Peak, we compile observations from a large set of  

244: follow-up programs to establish the afterglow light-curve  

245: properties. We analyze a diverse set of data with  

246: a uniform analysis method to reduce any 

247: scatter and establish a well-sampled light curve  

248: (which is usually not possible with data from a  

249: single telescope). We obtained Keck-I spectra to  

250: establish a burst redshift of $z$ = 1.547  

251: \citep[which agrees with the value derived from  

252: Gemini-North spectroscopy,][]{2007arXiv0712.2828C}. 

253: The afterglow initially appeared to have a jet break  

254: around day 1.5, but the analysis presented here shows  

255: that at this time multiple rebrightening episodes occur,  

256: which are in fact better fit with abrupt  

257: jumps in the flux, and not the usual jet-break.  

258: However, the available sparse late-time data do 

259: indicate that a break in fact does take place,  

260: at $\sim$ 3.7 days after the burst, which agrees with the  

261: radio light curve at 4.8 GHz presented here, spanning 

262: a time range from 1.5 to 278 days after the burst. 

263:  

264:  

265: We discuss how these observations place GRB\,070125  

266: into the context of other gamma-ray bursts and  

267: how the late-time observations may  

268: constrain the properties of the underlying host  

269: and a potential supernova that is expected to reach  

270: its light maximum $\sim$ 10(1+$z$) days after gamma-ray  

271: emergence. 

272: Emission was detected from this source with  

273: the LBT at $t$ = 26.8 days  

274: \citep{2007GCN..6165....1G, 2007arXiv0712.2239D}, but the flux  

275: is too large to be explained with  

276: emission from the commonly assumed SN 1998bw-like template  

277: at the burst redshift of 1.547, and we instead consider the  

278: LBT detection to be  

279: the afterglow.  This interpretation is supported by a  

280: second-epoch LBT observation  ($R > 26.1$ mag)  

281: which did not result in a detection \citep{2007arXiv0712.2239D}. 

282:  

283: The paper is organized as follows. In $\S$2 we  

284: describe our set of observations of GRB\,070125,  

285: from early X-ray and UVOT data from \emph{Swift}  

286: to late-time optical observations with the 8.4m LBT  

287: and late-time radio observations with the WSRT. 

288: In $\S$3, we describe the data analysis and results  

289: derived from the multi-wavelength data, and  

290: in $\S$4 we discuss the implications of this combined  

291: data set. In particular, we discuss GRB\,070125  

292: in the context of the existing data on afterglow  

293: emission properties, and we examine the implied  

294: burst energies in light of the standard models  

295: for long-soft GRBs and their interactions with  

296: the circumburst medium.  

297:  

298:  

299: \section{Observations} 

300:  

301: 

302: GRB\,070125 was detected at 07:20:42 on January 25, 2007, by Mars Odyssey 

303: (HEND and GRS), Suzaku (WAM) (\citealt{yamaoka1}, Yamaoka 2008 in prep.),  

304: INTEGRAL (SPI-ACS), KONUS, and RHESSI \citep{2007GCN..6024....1H}. 

305: The \emph{Swift} satellite detected the burst, but did not trigger because  

306: \emph{Swift} was slewing. The GRB entered the coded field of view of the 

307: \emph{Swift} BAT 6 minutes after the trigger time, and ground processing  

308: revealed a significant source at the intersection of the IPN annuli,  

309: strongly reducing the error box.  The Burst Alert Telescope  

310: (BAT) \citep{2005SSRv..120..143B} produced a refined J2000 location of  

311: $\alpha = 7^{\rm h}\ 51^{\rm m}\ 24^{\rm s}$,  

312: $\delta = +31^{\circ}\ 08'\ 24''$  based on data taken about  

313: 6 minutes after $T_0$ 

314: \citep{2007GCNR...28....1R}.  

315: About 13 hours later, \emph{Swift} began observing  

316: GRB 070125 as a target of opportunity observation.   

317: The afterglow was discovered with the Palomar 1.5~m telescope 

318: \citep{2007GCN..6028....1C} and produced an accurate afterglow location of  

319: $\alpha = 7^{\rm h}\ 51^{\rm m}\ 17^{\rm s}$,  

320: $\delta = +31^{\circ}\ 09'\ 04'' $ ($\pm$ 0.5$''$ in each coordinate). 

321:  

322: Below, we describe space-based observations  

323: with instruments on the \emph{Swift} satellite, as well as ground-based  

324: photometric and spectroscopic observations. Figure~\ref{fig:prompt} shows a  

325: false-color image of the field derived from $BVR$ observations with the Bok  

326: telescope (described in greater detail below). The afterglow shown in  

327: the image  

328: within the circle has a brightness of $R = 18.7$ mag at one

329:  day after the burst. The  

330: field has a relatively low star density 

331: (Galactic coordinates $l = 189.4^\circ$, $b = 25.6^\circ$) and has 

332: only a little foreground extinction of $E(B-V) = 0.052$ mag, 

333: $A_{V} = 0.16$ mag   

334: \citep{1998ApJ...500..525S}. 

335:  

336: \subsection{Space-Based Observations} 

337:  

338: The space-based observations reported in this section consist of ultraviolet, 

339: optical, and X-ray data, carried out by the UVOT and XRT  

340: instruments on $Swift$  

341: beginning 12.97 hours after the burst trigger. The afterglow was detected in  

342: the X-ray band and all six UVOT filters, ranging from $V$ to uvw2 (central 

343: wavelengths of 546 nm and 193 nm, respectively). 

344:  

345: \subsubsection{XRT Observations} 

346:  

347: Although GRB\,070125 was detected by the \emph{Swift}-BAT  

348: in ground analysis, the BAT did 

349: not trigger due to the occurrence of the burst during a  

350: pre-planned slew phase, and  

351: consequently the narrow-field instruments did not  

352: obtain prompt observations. \emph{Swift}  

353: began Target of Opportunity observations of GRB\,070125  

354: about 13 hours after the 

355: trigger at 20:18:48 January 25, 2007. 

356:  

357: The X-ray afterglow was initially detected by the XRT  

358: \citep{2005SSRv..120..165B} in the  

359: first few orbits of observation and was followed  

360: up for 18.5 days post-trigger until the  

361: afterglow was no longer detected by the XRT. The total  

362: exposure time of GRB\,070125  

363: with the XRT was 170 ks. All observations used the 

364:  Photon Counting (PC) mode due to the low count rate of  

365: the source. Level-1 data products were downloaded from  

366: the NASA/GSFC \emph{Swift} Data  

367: Center (SDC) and processed using XRTDAS software (v2.0.1).  

368: The {\it xrtpipeline}  

369: task was used to generate level-2 cleaned event files.  

370: Only events with PC grades 

371: 0--12 and energies in the range $0.3-10.0$ keV were used in  

372: subsequent temporal and 

373: spectral analysis. 

374:  

375: The XRT light curve was created by extracting the counts in a circular region 

376: around the afterglow position with a variable radius designed to optimize 

377: the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N)  

378: depending on the count rate. A region with 40 pixels  

379: radius clear of serendipitous  

380: background sources was used to estimate the contribution  

381: of background counts in  

382: the source extraction region. The number of counts per  

383: bin was chosen depending on  

384: the count rate to show sufficient detail with reasonable  

385: error bars. Background-subtracted  

386: count rates were also corrected for the  

387: portion of the PSF excluded by  

388: the extraction region and any proximity to bad columns  

389: and hot pixels in the XRT  

390: CCD. Pile-up is negligible at these flux levels. 

391:  

392: We carried out spectral analysis on this data set to obtain a counts-to-flux  

393:  conversion for the purpose of  creating an XRT light curve in   

394: standard units.  Spectral analysis was carried out using XSPEC   

395: (v12.3.1) and the XRT ancillary response file created with the   

396: standard {\it xrtmkarf} task using the response matrix file   

397: swxpc0to12s0$\_$20010101v010.rmf from CALDB (release 2007-12-04).  We   

398: fit the spectrum to a simple absorbed power law with an absorption   

399: system at $z = 0$ fixed to the Galactic HI column density ($4.8\times10^  

400: {20}\ {\rm cm}^{-2}$, \citealt{1990ARA&A..28..215D}),  

401: and allowed the absorption at the   

402: host-galaxy redshift ($z = 1.547$) to vary.  The resulting fit to the PC   

403: spectrum gave an intrinsic effective hydrogen column density of   

404: $N_H=0.19^{+0.20}_{-0.18}\times10^{22}\ {\rm cm}^{-2}$ and  

405: a photon index of $2.00^  

406: {+0.15}_{-0.14}$, with a reduced $\chi^2$ of 0.67 (29 degrees of freedom [d.o.f.]).   

407: The  absorption column is in excess of the Galactic foreground   

408: value, suggesting the possibility that the host galaxy or the circumburst  

409: medium contribute somewhat to the observed extinction.  We   

410: address this issue below with the X-ray/optical/near-IR afterglow  

411: spectral energy distribution (SED).    

412: The mean absorbed (un-absorbed) flux is $3.9\times  

413: 10^{-13}\ {\rm erg} \ {\rm cm}^  

414: {-2}\ {\rm s}^{-1}$ ($4.7\times 10^{-13}\ {\rm erg} \  

415: {\rm cm}^{-2}\ {\rm s}^{-1}$) with a   

416: corresponding mean count rate of $9.0 \times 10^{-3}\  

417: {\rm counts}\ {\rm s}^{-1}  

418: $.  The resulting light curve is shown (arbitrarily scaled) in Figure 2. 

419:  

420: \subsubsection{UVOT Observations} 

421:  

422:  The UVOT \citep{2005SSRv..120...95R} began observing  

423: 13 hours after the trigger. 

424: The data were retrieved from the \emph{Swift} archive at GSFC. 

425: Data taken in the uvm2 filter had not all been 

426: aspect-corrected, 

427: but inspection of the individual images showed that the sources fell 

428: within their 3\arcsec $\ $ radius region files.

429:  The counts were measured twice,  

430: using XIMAGE and UVOTMAGHIST, the 

431: latter during testing of the software updates for HEADAS version 6.3. The 

432: measurements were made for  3\arcsec $\ $ and 5\arcsec $\ $ radius 

433: apertures, both for the 

434: transient as 

435: well as for four field stars. Following the recommendations in  

436: \cite{2008MNRAS.383..627P}, 

437: an aperture correction was derived based on the observations of field stars 

438: having count rates of 1--10 ct/s, sufficiently low that the point-spread  

439: function (PSF) is not considered 

440: to be affected by the UVOT coincidence loss. The calibration of  

441: \cite{2008MNRAS.383..627P} was used (CALDB update of 2007-07-11).   

442:  

443: Since the UVOT is a photon-counting  

444: instrument, subsequent images can be co-added to improve the 

445: S/N. This was done by writing software to co-add the 

446: counts until a desired value of S/N was found as well as optimizing the time 

447: resolution. We checked that there was no noticeable difference in 

448: co-adding counts 

449: before or after doing background subtraction or coincidence-loss 

450: corrections, as 

451: expected for the low count rates of the transient.  The measurement 

452: error of the UVOT 

453: is Binomial due to the finite number of frames in an observation, and 

454: the errors were calculated accordingly with the formula given by  

455: \cite{2008MNRAS.383..383K}. Magnitudes were derived using the new  

456: zeropoints of \cite{2008MNRAS.383..627P}. 

457:  

458: The UVOT images of GRB\,070125 were further reduced following the 

459: recipe outlined by \cite{2006PASP..118...37L}, which provided an independent 

460: photometric calibration to the $U$, $B$, and $V$ filters employing a small 

461: aperture (radius of $2.5''$) for photometry 

462: (thus no need to do aperture correction).   

463: Comparison between the two reductions indicates that the measurements  

464: are consistent with each other within the uncertainties. 

465:  

466: \subsection{Ground-Based Observations} 

467:  

468: \subsubsection{Ground-Based Afterglow Photometry} 

469:  

470: The GCN burst notice \citep{2007GCN..6024....1H} was sent out  

471: at 21:46:48 Jan 25, approximately 13 hours and 26 minutes after  

472: the burst had been detected by the IPN.  The SARA 0.9~m telescope on Kitt  

473: Peak began imaging of the  

474: field of GRB\,070125 in the $V$ band  

475: $\sim$ 19 hours and 15 minutes after the trigger time, and  

476: was closely followed by the 0.41~m PROMPT telescope on Cerro Tololo 

477:  (20 hours and 34 minutes) in $BVRI$ 

478: and the Bok 2.3~m telescope on Kitt Peak in $V$ (24 hours). 

479: An afterglow candidate was detected by  

480: \cite{2007GCN..6028....1C} in the Palomar 1.5~m images.  Further 

481: observations were obtained with TNT, EST, SOAR, MDM, MMT, Kuiper, Loiano,  

482: KAIT, PAIRITEL, TNG, HCT, and the LBT (see Table~\ref{tab:obs}). 

483: Observations around 4 days after the trigger were hampered by  

484: the full Moon, which may explain why many telescopes stopped observing  

485: at that time. 

486:  

487: The SARA (Southeastern Association for Research in Astronomy) 

488: 0.9~m telescope is located on Kitt Peak. SARA observations were carried out  

489: for three days following the burst until the afterglow was no longer  

490: detectable \citep{2007GCN..6029....1U}. Observations with SARA were 

491: limited to the $V$ band using the SARA Apogee Alta U47 camera. 

492:  

493: The Bok 2.3~m telescope is located at Kitt Peak  

494: National Observatory (KPNO) and is operated by the University of Arizona 

495: Steward Observatory. Bok observations utilized the 90prime 

496: instrument \citep{2004SPIE.5492..787W} and provide $BVRI$ data.  

497: Supplemental observations  

498: were obtained by the Kuiper Mont4k Imager  on the Kuiper 1.54~m  

499: telescope (located on Mt. Bigelow in Arizona) in the $R$ band.   

500:  

501: PROMPT observations were carried out in $BVRI$ by one of the five PROMPT  

502: (Panchromatic Optical Monitoring and Polarimetry Telescopes)  

503: telescopes located on Cerro Tololo, Chile. PROMPT5 is a 0.41~m 

504: Ritchey-Chr\'etien telescope outfitted with a rapid-readout  

505: Apogee Alta U47+ camera \citep{2007GCN..6044....1H}. 

506:  

507: The MDM observations were taken with the 2.4~m and 1.3~m Hiltner telescopes 

508: on Kitt Peak, a SITe backside-illuminated CCD, and $VRI$ filters. 

509:  

510: Observations from the Loiano 1.52~m telescope of the Bologna Astronomical 

511: Observatory, located at Loiano (Italy), were taken in the Cousins $R$  

512: band equipped with BFOSC, 

513: a multi-purpose instrument for imaging and spectroscopy  

514: \citep{2007GCN..6047....1G}. 

515:  

516: The 0.8~m TNT telescope and 1~m EST telescope are located at 

517: Xinglong Observatory of the National Astronomical Observatories of 

518: China. Each telescope is equipped with a Princeton Instruments 

519: $1340 \times 1300$ pixel CCD. Observations were carried out in the $R$ 

520: and $V$ bands. Observational details can be found in \cite{Deng2006}. 

521:  

522: The 3.58~m Telescopio Nazionale Galileo (TNG) is located  

523: at La Palma in the Canary Islands (Spain). TNG  

524: was equipped with the spectrophotometer DOLoRES (Device Optimized for  

525: the LOw RESolution) operating in imaging mode with a scale of $0.275''$ 

526: pixel$^{-1}$. 

527:  

528: The KAIT (Katzman Automatic Imaging Telescope;  

529: \citealt{2001ASPC..246..121F}) 0.76~m data 

530: are unfiltered, and were obtained with an Apogee AP7 camera.  

531: \cite{ 2003PASP..115..844L} 

532: demonstrated that the KAIT unfiltered magnitudes can be reliably transformed 

533: to the standard Cousins $R$ band with a precision of $\sim$5\%, if 

534: the color of the object is known. Since we have reliable color information for 

535: GRB\,070125 during the time of the KAIT observations, we calibrated the KAIT 

536: data to the $R$ band following the procedure in \cite{2003PASP..115..844L}.  

537:  

538: The SOAR (Southern Observatory for Astrophysical Research) 4.1~m telescope is  

539: located on Cerro Pachon, Chile. SOAR observations were taken in the near-IR  

540: using OSIRIS (Ohio State InfraRed Imager/Spectrometer). 

541:  

542: PAIRITEL (Peters Automated Infrared Imaging Telescope) is a 1.3~m  

543: telescope located on Mt. Hopkins in Arizona.  It is a robotic telescope 

544: which allows for rapid follow-up IR imaging of GRB targets.  The PAIRITEL observations 

545: were taken in the near-IR using a 2MASS instrument. 

546:  

547: The MMT  is located at the Whipple  

548: Observatory on Mt. Hopkins in Arizona. It is a 6.5~m telescope which 

549: contributed near-IR observations, obtained with SWIRC, the SAO 

550: Widefield Infrared Camera. 

551:   

552: Optical observations of the afterglow were carried out by the 2.01~m  

553: Himalayan Chandra Telescope (HCT) at the Indian Astronomical  

554: Observatory (IAO), Hanle (India). The CCD used at HCT was a  

555: 2048 $\times$ 4096 pixel SITe chip mounted on the Himalayan Faint Object  

556: Spectrograph Camera (HFOSC).  Filters used are Bessell $V$, $R$ and $I$. 

557:  

558: The images were reduced and stacked where appropriate. Optical calibration was  

559: performed using IRAF PSF photometry and comparison to  

560: 15 standard stars, whose magnitudes were obtained through a field calibration 

561: using Graham standard stars \citep{1982PASP...94..244G} and the Hardie method 

562:  \citep{1964aste.book.....H}. 

563: Near-IR images were reduced in IRAF using standard 

564: reduction pipelines. The MMT images were calibrated 

565: relative to standards observed during the same night, and the SOAR images 

566: were calibrated relative to the Graham standard stars.  LBT  

567: (Large Binocular Telescope) data cited are derived from 

568: \cite{2007GCN..6165....1G} and \cite{2007arXiv0712.2239D}.  Note that 

569: the Sloan $r'$ observation has been converted to the $R$ band.  All  

570: observations carried out by this collaboration can be found  

571: in Table~\ref{tab:obs}. 

572:  

573: \subsubsection{Ground-Based Afterglow Spectroscopy}  

574:  

575: We observed the afterglow of GRB~070125 with the Keck-I LRIS 

576: double spectrograph \citep{1995PASP..107..375O} through a long 

577: slit $1.0''$ wide starting 

578: at 05:44:05 on January 26. Two 600~s exposures were acquired using the 

579: D560 dichroic, the 400/3400 grism, and the 600/5000 grating. 

580: This instrumental configuration yields nearly continuous spectra over 

581: the range 3000--8000~{\AA}\ at a spectral resolution (full width 

582: at half-maximum intensity; FWHM) of $\sim$8~{\AA}\ on the blue side and  

583: $\sim$6~{\AA}\ on the red side. The data were reduced 

584: using standard procedures (bias subtracted, flat-fielded) and  

585: extracted with a boxcar encompassing $\sim$90\% of the flux. 

586: 

587: \subsubsection{Ground-Based Radio Observations} 

588:  

589: Radio observations were performed with the Westerbork Synthesis  

590: Radio Telescope (WSRT) at 1.4, 4.8, and 8.4 GHz. We used the Multi  

591: Frequency Front Ends \citep{1991ASPC...19...42T} in combination  

592: with the IVC+DZB back end\footnote{See \S 5.2 at  

593: http://www.astron.nl/wsrt/wsrtGuide/node6.html} in continuum mode,  

594: with a bandwidth of $8 \times 20$ MHz. Gain and phase calibrations  

595: were performed with the calibrator 3C~286. The first observation  

596: at 4.8~GHz, 1.5 days after the burst, was reported as a  

597: non-detection with a 3$\sigma$ upper limit of 261 $\mu$Jy  

598: \citep{2007GCN..6042....1V}, but a careful reanalysis of the data  

599: resulted in a 3.7$\sigma$ detection. The radio afterglow detection  

600: at $\sim5$ days was reported by \citet{2007GCN..6061....1C} and  

601: \citet{2007GCN..6063....1V}, using the Very Large Array at 8.64~GHz  

602: and the WSRT at 4.8~GHz respectively. The afterglow was bright  

603: enough to be detected up to 170 days after the burst at 4.8 GHz; after  

604: that, the flux dropped below the sensitivity limit. The measurement  

605: at 1.4 GHz resulted in a non-detection, while at 8.4 GHz we had a  

606: clear detection at 95 days after the burst. The details of our  

607: observations are shown in Table~\ref{tab:obs}; the 4.8~GHz light  

608: curve is shown in Figure~\ref{wsrt6cmresults}. 

609:  

610: \section{Data Analysis and Results} 

611:  

612: \subsection{The Light Curve} 

613:  

614: The light curve (Figure~\ref{fig:lc}) combines our optical,  

615: near-IR, and \emph{Swift} data. The bands have been offset from  

616: their actual magnitudes for ease in reading. The original  

617: unextinguished magnitudes 

618: are listed in Table~\ref{tab:obs}.   

619: Throughout this paper, we assume a standard flat cold dark matter cosmology 

620: ($\Lambda$CDM), with parameters ($\Omega_{\Lambda}, \Omega_{\rm M}, H_{0}) =  

621: (0.761, 0.239, 73\ {\rm km}\  {\rm s}^{-1}  {\rm Mpc}^{-1})$,  

622: as found in the third-year WMAP data release \citep{2007ApJS..170..377S}  

623: assuming large-scale structure traced by luminous red  

624: galaxies (Tegmark et al. 2006). The particular set of values corresponds  

625: to the \textquotedblleft Vanilla model\textquotedblright of  

626: \cite{2006PhRvD..74l3507T}. 

627:  

628: \subsection{Fitting the Light Curve} 

629:  

630: \emph{Swift} observations began 0.54 days after the burst, followed  

631: by ground-based observations beginning 0.8 days by the SARA telescope,  

632: closely followed by the rest of the various telescopes collected in this  

633: collaborative effort. Due to a lack of early coverage, it is not immediately  

634: clear whether or not there is a jet break. We fit a broken power-law decay  

635: to each band separately using the Beuermann function  

636: \citep{1999A&A...352L..26B}  

637: as revised by  \cite{2001ApJ...546..117R}: 

638:  

639: \begin{equation} 

640: \noindent F_{\nu}(t)=2^{\frac{1}{n}} F_{\nu}(t_{b}) \left[ \left( \frac{t}{t_{b}} \right)^{\alpha_{1}n} 

641: + \left( \frac{t}{t_{b}} \right)^{\alpha_{2}n} \right]^{-\frac{1}{n}}, 

642: \end{equation} 

643:  

644: \noindent where $F$ is the flux density in band $\nu$,  

645: $F_{\nu}(tb)$ is the flux  

646: density in band $\nu$ at the break time, $\alpha_{1}$ and $\alpha_{2}$ are 

647: the slopes of the power-law decay (before and after the jet break, 

648: respectively), and $n$ is the smoothness of the curve at the break. 

649:  

650: The complicated shape of our light curve (see Figure~\ref{fig:noflare}) 

651: makes fitting the overall structure difficult.  By using 

652:  the flux at 2 days, we shifted all bands to the extinction-corrected $R$ band 

653: for comparison and fitting.  The entire data set is obviously  

654: not well-fit by a broken power-law function.  Rapid  

655: flaring observed between one and two days post-trigger ($\S$ 3.5), 

656: influences the fit.  Broken power-law fits to the optical/UV/near-IR 

657: data set and the X-ray data set showed that this was indeed a poor 

658: model to the data set.  In addition, this fit predicted that  

659: the afterglow would have been nearly a magnitude brighter than  

660: it was observed to be at 26.8 days.  This would suggest the need  

661: for a second, non-standard jet break after 4 days. 

662:  

663: By eliminating the flaring region between 1 and 2 days  

664: after the trigger, we can better constrain our fit.  However, 

665: the best fit was determined by only considering the data taken after 

666: 2 days.  At this point, it appears as if the flaring has settled 

667: to the point where the best estimate for the break time can be made. 

668: From the optical/UV/near-IR data set after 2 days, we  

669: determine an $\alpha_1$ = 1.56 $\pm$ 0.27, $\alpha_2$ = 2.47 

670: $\pm$ 0.13, and a jet break time of $t$ = 3.73 $\pm$ 0.52 days. 

671: While the X-ray data do not require a break before 9 days,

672: they are also not inconsistent with a break (see Table~\ref{tab:lctable}).

673: Lack of an achromatic break is not an uncommon feature in 

674: Swift-era bursts (e.g., \cite{2007MNRAS.381L..65C}). 

675: The results of all of the fits to the optical/UV/near-IR and  

676: X-ray data can be found in Table~\ref{tab:lctable}. 

677:  

678: Late-time MDM, LBT, and Chandra observations  

679: \citep{2007GCN..6186....1C} were invaluable  

680: in the determination 

681: of a late jet break time, as were the numerous early observations 

682: which allowed us to resolve the early flaring activity so as not 

683: to be confused with a jet break.  While the late MDM upper limit 

684: implied an optical jet break, the LBT detection at 26.8 days 

685: post-trigger confirmed the existence of a jet break.  Second-epoch 

686: deep imaging of the field of GRB\,070125 by the LBT did not  

687: result in the further detection of the source, thus allowing us 

688: to interpret the first detection as the afterglow  

689: \citep{2007arXiv0712.2239D}. Late-time Chandra X-ray Telescope 

690: observations also imply a late jet break in the X-ray light 

691: curve.  The Chandra upper limit of 2$\times$10$^{-15}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ 

692: s$^{-1}$ \citep{2007GCN..6186....1C} at 39.76 days after 

693: the burst was obtained in

694: the 0.3 -- 10 keV energy range, and is thus directly comparable 

695: to the XRT observations.  Fits to the XRT data (Table~\ref{tab:lctable})

696: do not include this upper limit.

697: 

698:  

699: The fluence of the burst was measured independently by the Konus-Wind 

700: and RHESSI instruments. By extrapolating to the GRB rest-frame energy band  

701: of 1 keV -- 10 MeV, we infer an isotropic energy of 

702: $E_{iso,Konus}=(9.44^{+0.40} 

703: _{-0.41})\times10^{53}$ erg and $E_{iso,RHESSI}=(8.27\pm0.39)\times10^{53}$  

704: erg \citep{2007arXiv0710.4590B}. 

705: Assuming a jet break at $t$ = 3.73 days and using the equations described in  

706: \cite{1999ApJ...519L..17S}, including a circumburst density of $n$ = 3 

707: ${\rm cm}^{-3}$ and a gamma-ray efficiency of $\eta_{\gamma}$ = 0.2  

708: \citep{2007arXiv0710.4590B}, 

709: we find a jet half-opening angle of  

710: $\theta_{j,Konus}$= 

711: $5.65^{+0.03}_{-0.03}$ degrees  or $\theta_{j,RHESSI}$ = $5.74 \pm 0.04$ 

712:  degrees.   

713: For a jet break time of 3.73 days, the corresponding collimated energy  

714: emission  

715: is $E_{\gamma,Konus} = 4.58^{+0.24}_{-0.25} \times10^{51}$ erg,  

716: or $E_{\gamma,RHESSI} = (4.15 \pm 0.25)\times10^{51}$ erg following 

717: \cite{2003ApJ...594..674B}. 

718: 

719: Comprehensive broadband and energetics modeling of GRB\,070125 

720: was presented by Chandra et al. (2008).  They derived a circumburst density

721: of n $\sim$ 50 cm$^{-3}$ from the kinetic energy and n = 15.7 cm$^{-3}$

722: from a broadband fit using the synchrotron model.  If we use n = 50

723: cm$^{-3}$ to calculate $E_{\gamma}$, we find $E_{\gamma,Konus} =

724: 9.26^{+0.49}_{-0.50}\times10^{51}$ erg ($\theta_{j,Konus} = 8.03 \pm 0.04$ 

725: degrees); $E_{\gamma,RHESSI} = 

726: (8.39 \pm 0.50)\times10^{51}$ erg ($\theta_{j,RHESSI} = 8.16 \pm 0.05$ degrees).  Using the broadband fit n = 15.7

727: cm$^{-3}$, we derive $E_{\gamma,Konus} = 6.93^{0.37}_{0.38}\times10^{51}$ erg 

728: ($\theta_{j,Konus} = 6.94 \pm 0.03$ degrees),

729: $E_{\gamma,RHESSI} = (6.28 \pm 0.37)\times10^{51}$ erg ($\theta_{j,RHESSI} = 7.07 \pm 0.04$ degrees).  The most plausible

730: value for the circumburst density comes from the broadband fit, so the 

731: energies derived from n = 15.7 will be quoted as the energy of the burst

732: in this paper.

733:  

734: At $z$ = 1.547, a jet break at 3.73 days  

735: (Figure~\ref{fig:noflare}) implies a rather large energy release  

736: (when placed 

737: in the context of the sample studied by \citealt{2003ApJ...594..674B}).   

738: Both the observations of  

739: Konus-Wind and RHESSI  

740: imply that GRB\,070125 is one of the most energetic bursts discovered to date  

741: \citep{2003ApJ...594..674B}.  

742:  

743:  

744: \subsection{Spectral Energy Distribution} 

745:  

746: Due to the variable nature of the early-time light curve,  

747: special care was used in determining the SED. We used the  

748: method employed by \cite{2006ApJ...641..993K} for deriving the SED  

749: of  GRB 030329. Using the $R$-band light curve as a reference, the  

750: other optical, UV, and near-IR  

751: bands were shifted until they matched the $R$-band light  

752: curve, which assumes the achromaticity already demonstrated above.  

753: Since we find no evidence for color evolution, use of the method is  

754: reasonable. The SED is then determined from the different colors,  

755: such as $U-R$. The $R$-band value is arbitrary, and thus also the  

756: absolute flux density scale of the SED. Also, due to achromaticity,  

757: no specific time should be associated with the SED shown in  

758: Figure~\ref{fig:sed2}.  

759:  To model the intrinsic optical extinction, we  

760: use the three best-modeled  

761: extinction curves --- those of the Milky Way (MW), Large  

762: Magellanic Cloud (LMC), and Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) 

763: as parametrized by \cite{1992ApJ...395..130P}. 

764: We fit the SED with the method described by \cite{2006ApJ...641..993K}.  

765: The results  

766: are given in Table~\ref{tab:sed}. We find a clear preference for the  

767: SMC dust model ($A_{V} = 0.11\pm0.04$ mag).  

768: This preference, as well as  

769: the intrinsic  

770: spectral slope $\beta$ and the small host-galaxy extinction $A_{V}$,  

771: are all typical  

772: for the afterglows of (long) GRBs \citep[e.g.,][]{2006ApJ...641..993K, 

773: 2007arXiv0712.2186K,2007ApJ...661..787S, Schady2007}. 

774:  

775: We combined the optical, UV, and near-IR photometry at,  

776: or extrapolated to, 4.26 days post-trigger 

777: with an X-ray spectrum extracted such that the log midpoint coincided 

778: with that of the optical SED described above. The {\it Swift} XRT X-ray  

779: spectrum was extracted using the 

780: method stated in $\S$ 2.1.1 and with the same extraction regions. The UVOT 

781: fluxes were obtained using the conversions in \cite{2008MNRAS.383..627P}. 

782: We calculated the transmission through the Lyman-$\alpha$ forest for each 

783: optical and UV band \citep[e.g.,][]{1995ApJ...441...18M}  

784: adopting the spectral slope 

785: $\beta=0.58$ derived from the optical SED, and corrected  

786: for these factors: $U$ transmission = 0.996, 

787: uvw1 = 0.848, uvm2 = 0.633, and uvw2 = 0.539. Galactic  

788: absorption and extinction were fixed at 

789: 4.8 $\times$ 10$^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$ \citep{1990ARA&A..28..215D}  

790: and $E(B-V) = 0.052$ mag 

791: \citep{1998ApJ...500..525S}, respectively. 

792: The SED was created in count space following the 

793: method given by \cite{2007ApJ...661..787S}, and having the 

794: advantage that no model for the X-ray data need be assumed {\it a priori}. 

795: We fit the SED using models consisting of an absorbed power law or  

796: absorbed broken 

797: power law with slopes free or tied to $\Gamma_1 = \Gamma_2 - 0.5$ as expected 

798: for a cooling break. X-ray absorption  

799: is modeled with the 

800: Xspec model {\it zphabs} and assuming solar metallicity.  

801:  

802: We find that a broken power law provides a significantly better fit 

803: to the continuum than a single power law. The 

804: difference in slope between the two segments of the power law when both  

805: are left to vary tends to that expected for a cooling break:  

806: $\Delta\Gamma = 0.5$. Fixing the 

807: difference in the power-law slopes to 0.5 confirms this.  

808: (When compared to the single power law, the improvement in  

809: fit is significant according to the F-test, with probabilities 

810: of MW:10$^{-6}$, LMC:10$^{-9}$, and SMC:10$^{-8}$.)  

811: The cooling break can be 

812: well constrained to lie at 0.002 keV, 4.26 days since trigger.   

813: However, we caution that the distinction between the detection  

814: of a cooling break and a non-detection relies solely on the observed 

815: $K$-band flux, for which we have only two data points  

816: (see Table~\ref{tab:obs}).  Optical extinction is found to be 

817: $E(B-V) \approx 0.03$ mag (roughly equivalent to $A_V < 0.09$ mag),  

818: in full agreement with the fit from the optical SED alone.  

819: LMC and 

820: SMC extinction curves provide better fits than the MW extinction curve.  

821: The intrinsic X-ray absorption is relatively high, on the order of 

822: $N_{\rm H} \approx$ 2 $\times$ 10$^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$. Details of the  

823: fits are presented in  

824: Table~\ref{tab:sed2}. The unfolded SED and best-fitting model (BKNPL+LMC) are 

825: shown in Figure~\ref{fig:sed2}. 

826:  

827: \subsection{Light Curve and SED Analysis} 

828:  

829: The light curves at X-ray, UV, optical, and near-IR frequencies,  

830: and the SED spanning this large frequency range,  

831: can be utilized to determine the energy power-law index $p$ of  

832: the electrons emitting the synchrotron radiation.  

833: Adopting the standard blast-wave model, the temporal and spectral indices,  

834: $\alpha$ and $\beta$ (respectively), can be expressed in terms of 

835:  $p$ \citep{2004IJMPA..19.2385Z},  

836: assuming either a homogeneous or stellar wind-like circumburst medium.  

837: A single power-law fit to the X-ray light curve after the flare  

838: at $1.5 \times 10^5$  

839: seconds results in a temporal index of $\alpha_X=1.68^{+0.19}_{-0.15}$.  

840: For the analysis of the optical temporal slopes we take the fits without the  

841: flares (see Table~\ref{tab:lctable}), i.e., $\alpha_{\rm opt}=1.56\pm 0.27$  

842: before the break and  

843: $\alpha_{\rm opt}=2.47\pm 0.13$ after the break. 

844:  

845: The SED fits suggest that there is a cooling break at 0.002 keV (i.e. in the  

846: $R$ band) 4.26 days after trigger.  

847: However, this result should be interpreted with caution, since there is no  

848: achromatic light-curve break across the optical bands observed  

849: and the $K$-band flux is the only one that discriminates between presence or  

850: absence of a cooling break in the optical regime.  

851: Furthermore, the value of $p$ one can derive from the spectral slope above  

852: the tentative cooling break is $2\beta+1=2.12\pm 0.02$,  

853: which is not in agreement with the values one obtains from the X-ray temporal  

854: slope, $p=(4\alpha_{\rm X}+2)/3=2.91^{+0.25}_{-0.20}$,  

855: and from the optical temporal slope in the case of a homogeneous circumburst  

856: medium, $p=(4\alpha_{\rm opt}+3)/3=3.08\pm 0.36$.  

857: If the circumburst medium is structured like a stellar wind,  

858: $p=(4\alpha_{\rm opt}+1)/3=2.41\pm 0.36$ from the optical temporal slope  

859: is in agreement with the spectral slope,  

860: but the X-ray temporal slope remains inconsistent. Such a discrepancy 

861: is not unprecedented 

862: (e.g., \cite{2007astro.ph..3538P}).  However, we can derive an 

863: interpretation which is 

864: consistent with both the spectral and temporal fits (see below).

865:  

866: If one adopts the single power-law fit to the SED, all of the observed 

867: bands are either in between, or all of them are above, the peak frequency  

868: $\nu_m$ and cooling frequency $\nu_c$.  One then finds  

869: that $p=2\beta+1=2.98\pm 0.02$ 

870: or $p=2\beta=1.98\pm 0.02$, respectively. 

871:  

872: If one assumes that $\nu_m<\nu_X<\nu_c$, $p$ is equal to  

873: $(4\alpha_{\rm X}+3)/3=3.24^{+0.25}_{-0.20}$ or  

874: $(4\alpha_{\rm X}X+1)/3=2.57^{+0.25}_{-0.20}$,  

875: for a homogeneous or wind-like medium, respectively; if $\nu_m<\nu_c<\nu_X$,  

876: $p=(4\alpha_{\rm X}X+2)/3=2.91^{+0.25}_{-0.20}$.  

877: Comparing these values for $p$ with the ones from the single power-law SED  

878: fit, it is clear that they are only consistent for  

879: $\nu_m<\nu_X<\nu_c$ and a homogeneous medium.  

880:  

881: The pre-break optical temporal slope results in values for $p$ of  

882: $(4\alpha_{\rm opt}+3)/3=3.08\pm 0.36$ ($\nu_m<\nu_O<\nu_c$ and homogeneous medium),  

883: $(4\alpha_{\rm opt}+1)/3=2.41\pm 0.36$ ($\nu_m<\nu_O<\nu_c$ and stellar-wind medium),  

884: and $(4\alpha_{\rm opt}+2)/3=2.75\pm 0.36$ ($\nu_m<\nu_c<\nu_O$).  

885: Comparing these values for $p$ with the values from the SED fit,  

886: again $\nu_m<\nu_O<\nu_c$ and a homogeneous medium,  

887: which is the preferred situation from the X-ray temporal analysis,  

888: is consistent.  

889:  

890: Concluding, the X-ray to infrared bands at $\sim$4 days are  

891: situated in between $\nu_m$ and $\nu_c$, with $p \approx 3$ and the  

892: circumburst medium is homogeneous. We note that the $p$-value we 

893: derive for GRB\,070125 lies at the high end 

894: of the observed distribution, and is similar to that measured for 

895: e.g. GRB\,980519 ($p$=$2.96^{+0.06}_{-0.08}$, \cite{2008ApJ...672..433S}). 

896: \cite{2008ApJ...672..433S} showed that the $p$-distribution for a 

897: subsample of 

898: {\it BeppoSAX} GRBs is inconsistent with a single value of $p$ for all 

899: bursts at the 3$\sigma$ level, and constrain the intrinsic width of the 

900: parent distribution of $p$-values to 0.03$<\sigma_{\rm scat}<$1.40 

901: (3$\sigma$). A similar result was obtained for a {\it Swift} GRB subsample 

902: by  \cite{2006MNRAS.371.1441S}.

903: If we adopt a mean observed $p$-value of 2.04, as measured for the 

904: BeppoSAX subsample, then $p$=3 lies within the expected observational 

905: scatter. 

906:  

907: \subsection{Rebrightening Episodes} 

908:  

909: From the light curve (Figure~\ref{fig:lc}), 

910: we find evidence for two rebrightening or flaring episodes.   

911: These occur at $t$ = 1.15 days (as observed 

912: by the Bok telescope, SARA, TNT, and KAIT) and $t$ = 1.36 days (as observed by TNT and  

913: UVOT). The episode at $t$ = 1.15 days is the best sampled, 

914: as illustrated by the Bok data in Figure~\ref{fig:lcbok}. From 

915: the $V$ band alone, we derive a change in magnitude of  

916: about 0.5 (corresponding 

917: to a 56\% increase in flux) over a time period  

918: of $\Delta T \approx 8000$~s (0.093  

919: days), or an average increase in flux density of 17.1 $\mu$Jy/hour. 

920:  

921: Rebrightening episodes are not an uncommon afterglow phenomenon,  

922: and have been  

923: attributed to a variety of causes, including density fluctuations in the  

924: external medium (clumps, turbulence, or wind-termination shock structures), 

925: energy injection episodes (refreshed shocks) from the catch-up of faster shells 

926: in the outflow, patchy shells leading to angular inhomogeneities, extended  

927: activity of the central engine, multi-component jets, or, in rare cases,  

928: microlensing; see the recent summary by \cite{2007MNRAS.380.1744N} for links  

929: to  

930: the original literature on these options. \cite{2007MNRAS.380.1744N} 

931:  reconsidered  

932: the density fluctuation model with detailed numerical simulations, and find  

933: that  

934: sharp rebrightening episodes   

935: with   $\Delta T/T <$ 1 cannot be explained within this  

936: model. This result is in conflict with earlier conclusions, and the authors  

937: argue  

938: that their treatment of the reverse shock and photon travel-time effects  

939: explain 

940: the different outcome of their study.  

941:  

942: The rebrightening episodes seen in GRB\,070125 resemble those observed in 

943: GRB 021004 (\citealt{2005A&A...443..841D, 2003BASI...31...19P,  

944: 2003Natur.422..284F,  

945: 2003ApJ...584L..43B, 2003PASJ...55L..31U}),  

946: where three episodes with $\Delta T/T <$ 1 are noted at $t \approx 0.05$, 

947: 0.8, and 2.6 days. The preferred interpretation for these episodes is  

948: fluctuations  

949: in the energy surface density, i.e., a patchy-shell model  

950: (\citealt{2003ApJ...594L..83G, 2004ApJ...602L..97N}).  

951:  

952: Another burst that lends itself to a comparison to GRB\,070125 is the  

953: well-sampled ``bumpy-ride'' event GRB 030329. Late-time energy 

954: injection (\textquotedblleft refreshed shocks\textquotedblright)  

955: has been invoked to explain the ``bumps'' in this  

956: GRB \citep{2003Natur.426..138G}. The well-resolved  

957: rebrightening episode discussed 

958: here is thus not likely caused by density fluctuations in the circumburst  

959: medium, but more likely attributed to angular or temporal energy fluctuations.  

960: Recently, \cite{2006ApJ...647.1238J} presented a detailed analysis of 

961: relativistic fireballs with discrete or continuous energy injection, and  

962: showed that energy injection imprints significant features  

963: on the afterglow, and thus provides a 

964: valuable diagnostic tool to study GRB fireball physics beyond the  

965: single-explosion  

966: standard model. In particular, \cite{2006ApJ...647.1238J} find that refreshed  

967: shocks from a discrete injection episode at $t$ = 1.4  

968: days (with an energy twice that of the initial 

969: energy injection) may, if not delivered uniformly across the shock surface  

970: (i.e., if a patchy shell is assumed), explain the sharp  

971: bump at $t$ = 3.5 days observed in GRB 000301C.  A more detailed  

972: follow-up paper is planned to further explore the rebrightening 

973: episodes found in GRB\,070125. 

974:  

975: \subsection{Radio Light Curve} 

976:  

977: The WSRT light curve at 4.8 GHz (see Figure~\ref{wsrt6cmresults}) displays  

978: the typical radio 

979: afterglow light-curve characteristics (e.g., \citealt{1997Natur.389..261F,  

980: 1998ApJ...494L..49S}). 

981: Except for the first measurement, all the observations were performed 

982: after the jet-break time we derived from the optical light curves. 

983: At early times, the radio bands are situated below the synchrotron 

984: self-absorption frequency $\nu_a$ and the peak frequency $\nu_m$. 

985: Since these two characteristic frequencies move to lower observing 

986: frequencies in time, the light curve first rises up to the jet break, 

987: after which the flux remains constant. 

988: The measurements at 1.5 and 5.6 days seem to deviate from this behavior, 

989: but this can be explained by the effect of radio  

990: scintillation \citep{1997NewA....2..449G}. 

991: The rise in flux after $\sim$~40 days is caused by the passage of $\nu_m$ 

992: through the observing band, and the turnover at $\sim$~90 days by the 

993: passage of $\nu_a$, 

994: after which the light curve declines quite steeply with a temporal index 

995: equal to the electron energy power-law index $p \approx 3$. More 

996: detailed modeling of the radio light curve will be presented in a 

997: follow-up paper.

998:  

999: \subsection{Spectroscopy} 

1000:  

1001: It is evident from Figure~\ref{fig:aftspec} that the spectrum 

1002: taken on Jan 26, 2007 at 05:44:05  

1003: is nearly featureless.   

1004: We have convolved the spectrum 

1005: with a Gaussian matched to the instrumental resolution,  

1006: and derive a $4\sigma$ equivalent width limits of approximately 

1007: 10~{\AA}\ at 3100~{\AA}, 5~{\AA} at 3200~{\AA}, 3~{\AA} at 3400~{\AA},  

1008: 1.5~{\AA}\ at 4000~{\AA}, and 1~{\AA}\ redward of 6000~{\AA}. 

1009: We identify only a few features at $4\sigma$ statistical  

1010: significance\footnote{Note that systematic errors (e.g.,\ continuum  

1011: fitting) imply that the true significance limit is approximately $3\sigma$.} 

1012: as listed in Table~\ref{tab:ew}. 

1013:  

1014: \cite{2007arXiv0712.2828C} have reported the detection of a relatively weak 

1015: \ion{Mg}{2} doublet ($W_{MgII} < 1~${\AA}) in their afterglow spectrum of  

1016: GRB~070125, leading to an implied redshift of 1.547. 

1017: Our spectra do not confirm this line measurement, but the reported 

1018: equivalent width lies below our detection threshold. However, 

1019: we identify a strong feature at 3947.1~{\AA}\ which corresponds 

1020: to the expected position of the \ion{C}{4} doublet for $z=1.547$. 

1021: C$^{+3}$ gas is frequently associated with 

1022: \ion{Mg}{2} absorbers \citep{2000ApJ...543..577C} 

1023: and also gas surrounding GRB host galaxies \cite[e.g.,][]{2003ApJ...595..935M}. 

1024: Unfortunately, we lack the spectral resolution 

1025: to resolve the \ion{C}{4} doublet, but the likelihood of a  

1026: misidentification is very low given the paucity of absorption lines 

1027: in our data set. Furthermore, we observe weak  

1028: absorption at the expected position of the \ion{Si}{4} doublet  

1029: for $z=1.547$ which is spectrally resolved 

1030: (Figure~\ref{fig:aftspec}) but has less than $4\sigma$ 

1031: statistical significance. Altogether, the spectrum provides strong evidence 

1032: for a metal-line absorption system at $z=1.547$, especially given  

1033: the independent report of \ion{Mg}{2} absorption by \cite{2007GCN..6071....1F}. 

1034: In turn, we establish this redshift as the lowest possible  

1035: value for GRB\,070125. 

1036:  

1037: Of principal interest to our study is whether this metal-line 

1038: absorption system results from gas in the GRB host galaxy and 

1039: therefore establishes the redshift of GRB~070125. There are two 

1040: indisputable signatures that an absorption system corresponds 

1041: to a GRB host galaxy. (1) One observes fine-structure levels of  

1042: O$^0$, Si$^+$, or Fe$^+$. These transitions, which have never been detected 

1043: in an intervening system with quasar absorption-line spectroscopy,  

1044: are known to arise from indirect radiative pumping by the GRB afterglow 

1045: \citep{2006GCN..4593....1P,2007A&A...468...83V}. 

1046: (2) One positively identifies the \lya\ forest  

1047: imprint of the intergalactic medium and associates the highest 

1048: redshift \lya\ absorption with the GRB.  In this latter case, one frequently 

1049: observes a damped \lya\ (DLA) profile\footnote{\ion{H}{1} column  

1050: density $\mnhi > 2\sci{20}\cm{-2}$.} at the GRB redshift  

1051: \citep{2006A&A...447..897J}. 

1052:  

1053: Our spectrum reveals neither of these two signatures. First, 

1054: we note no significant absorption from even the resonance lines 

1055: of O$^0$, Si$^+$, or Fe$^+$, and we place relatively stringent upper 

1056: limits on their equivalent widths  

1057: (Table~\ref{tab:ew}). Second, our spectrum does not  

1058: unambiguously show the \lya\ forest. Figure~\ref{fig:lya} presents 

1059: the spectral region at $\lambda < 3400$~{\AA}. Overplotted on the 

1060: data (green line) is a DLA profile centered at $z=1.547$ assuming  

1061: $\mnhi = 10^{20.3} \cm{-2}$. Although the data formally reject 

1062: the presence of a DLA system at this redshift, we caution 

1063: that systematic effects (wavelength calibration, continuum placement) 

1064: are not sufficiently large at $\lambda < 3100$~{\AA}\ to rule out a 

1065: DLA profile at $>99\%$~c.l. The data do, however, rule out a DLA profile  

1066: at all wavelengths greater than 3140~{\AA}. 

1067:  

1068: The absence of a strong DLA system or an obvious series 

1069: of \lya\ absorption lines (i.e., the \lya\ forest) places an 

1070: upper limit on the redshift of GRB~070125.  A reasonable 

1071: estimate is to designate the absorption line (presently unidentified) 

1072: at $\lambda = 3375$~{\AA}\ as a \lya\ transition and set $z_{GRB} \le  

1073: 1.78$. The identification of this feature as \lya\ 

1074: is not supported by any coincident metal-line absorption  

1075: (e.g., \ion{C}{4}). Furthermore, the implied 

1076: rest equivalent width, $W_{Ly\alpha} = 1.4~${\AA}, would be  

1077: significantly lower than any thus far reported for gas surrounding 

1078: a GRB. Nevertheless, we cannot rule out this 

1079: interpretation altogether. 

1080: Applying Occam's razor to our full set of observations, we 

1081: associate the metal-line absorption system at $z=1.547$ 

1082: with the host galaxy of GRB~070125. To date, every absorption 

1083: system which has been unambiguously associated with a GRB host 

1084: galaxy (i.e.,\ using the criteria above) has shown strong \lya,  

1085: \ion{Mg}{2}, and \ion{C}{4} absorption. 

1086: In fact, this afterglow spectrum would already  

1087: represent the weakest \ion{Mg}{2} doublet ever reported, 

1088: although weaker \ion{C}{4} equivalent widths exist \citep{2006astro.ph..8327S}. 

1089:  

1090: Whether or not we associate the $z=1.547$ metal-line system with 

1091: GRB~070125, this afterglow spectrum is remarkable in several 

1092: respects. First, it is evident that the \ion{H}{1} column density 

1093: is low. Taking $z_{GRB} = 1.547$, we have argued that the data 

1094: prefer $\mnhi < 10^{20.3} \cm{-2}$, which is a rare but not 

1095: unprecedented result \citep{2005ApJ...633..317F, 

1096: 2005GCN..3971....1P,2006GCN..4593....1P}.   

1097: If $z>1.547$, then the \lya\ transition has the lowest equivalent 

1098: width reported for a GRB. Either way, the low \nhi\ value is 

1099: remarkable given the expectation that the GRB progenitor arises 

1100: in a high density, star-forming region. Similar cases are discussed  

1101: in \cite{2007ApJ...660L.101W}.  Second, even taking $z_{GRB}= 

1102: 1.547$ the \ion{C}{4}, \ion{Mg}{2}, and other low-ion equivalent  

1103: widths are among the lowest observed to date for gas surrounding a  

1104: GRB. Unfortunately, it is difficult to estimate the gas metallicity 

1105: without a meaningful constraint on the \nhi\ value. Adopting $\mnhi =  

1106: 10^{19} \cm{-2}$, the upper limit to the equivalent width of \ion{Mg}{2} 

1107: $\lambda$2796 implies a Mg/H ratio less than 1/10 the solar value. 

1108: We derive a similar value adopting the upper limit to the 

1109: equivalent width of \ion{Si}{2}~1526 ($W^{rest}_{1526} < 0.5$~{\AA}) and  

1110: assuming the metallicity/$W_{1526}$ relation of \cite{2008ApJ...672...59P}. 

1111:  

1112: Taking both the spectroscopy and SED results into consideration, 

1113: the host-galaxy properties of GRB\,070125 are consistent with 

1114: those found in the sample presented by \cite{2006Natur.441..463F}. 

1115:  

1116: \section{Implications and Conclusions} 

1117:  

1118: While we do not have data before 0.545 days (the first exposures were obtained  

1119: in $V$ with the UVOT), sampling thereafter is reasonably dense in time  

1120: (see Figure~\ref{fig:lc}), until about 4 days after $T_0$.  

1121: These observations suggest a possible jet break in the 1--3 day window. 

1122: However, the strong  

1123: variability (rebrightening episodes) around $t \approx$ 1--2 days  

1124: interferes with a clean  

1125: detection of the jet break, and it is conceivable that the actual  

1126: afterglow light  

1127: curve is not best represented by a broken power law (the Beuermann-like  

1128: profile)  

1129: with superimposed ``flares,'' but instead by  

1130: three or more power laws, interrupted and perhaps re-established  

1131: by several periods of rebrightening. GRB 030329 provides an  

1132: example of a GRB with a jet break at $t \approx 0.5$ days  

1133: (\citealt{2003Natur.423..843U,  

1134: 2003Natur.423..844P}), followed by multiple rebrightening episodes during  

1135: subsequent days (e.g. \citealt{2003Natur.426..157G, 2004ApJ...606..381L}). 

1136: Given that the light curve of GRB\,070125 exhibits strong variability, 

1137: a jet-break interpretation requires extreme care.  However, the sparse 

1138: late-time data do suggest that a break has occurred.  Fitting the data 

1139: past 2 days indicates that the actual jet break is more likely to  

1140: be identified with the required change in slope at $t$ = 3.7 days.    

1141: If there indeed was no very early break in the optical power-law decay  

1142: (before 0.5 days)  

1143: and this late break time established from  

1144: our fits is to be identified with the jet break, the indicated 

1145: jet half-opening angle  

1146: of $6.94^\circ$ implies $E_{\gamma}=6.93\times10^{51}$ erg (from  

1147: $E_{iso,Konus}$), and GRB\,070125 is  

1148: consistent with the Ghirlanda relation \citep{2004ApJ...616..331G}.  

1149:  

1150: The redshift allows us to place GRB\,070125 in general context.  

1151: Figure~\ref{fig:big2} shows the intrinsic afterglow  

1152: of GRB\,070125 in comparison with 52 other afterglows from the  

1153: samples of \cite{2006ApJ...641..993K}  

1154: and \cite{2007arXiv0712.2186K}. These afterglows are in the $R$  

1155: band and have been corrected for 

1156: Galactic extinction  

1157: and, where possible, for host galaxy and supernova contributions.  

1158: The afterglow of GRB\,070125  

1159: was constructed by shifting $BVI$ data to the $R$ band, as only $BV$  

1160: data are available at early times.  

1161: Using the method described by \cite{2006ApJ...641..993K}, all  

1162: afterglows have been corrected for rest-frame extinction and shifted  

1163: to a common redshift of 1,  

1164: allowing a direct comparison.  The afterglow of GRB\,070125  

1165: is found to be among the most  

1166: luminous afterglows; at the time of the rebrightening at one day,  

1167: only the afterglow of GRB 021004  

1168: is brighter.  The afterglow properties thus corroborate the  

1169: inferences we made in the previous  

1170: section, where the beaming-corrected burst energy in the 1--10,000  

1171: keV regime \citep{2007GCN..6025....1B} 

1172: was found to be on the high side of the observed statistical distribution. 

1173:  

1174: Had GRB\,070125 been much nearer, it would have given us  

1175: an unprecedented opportunity to observe an  

1176: afterglow on a much longer time scale, detect the  

1177: additional emissions from an associated supernova, and  

1178: possibly revealed a host galaxy. At a redshift of  

1179: 1.547, an unextinguished  

1180:  SN 1998bw would have peaked at $R \approx  

1181: 27$ mag about one month after the burst. The LBT detection  

1182: at late times could be explained with a supernova  

1183: like SN 1998bw, if one allows a scaling factor of $k$ = 2.25, which  

1184: is significantly larger than indicated by the properties  

1185: of the sample of established GRB-supernovae  

1186: (\citealt{2005NCimC..28..617Z, 2006A&A...457..857F}).  

1187: Additionally, assuming that the late-time  

1188: detection is composed entirely of supernova emission 

1189: implies an even steeper afterglow decay.  Given the  

1190: uncertainties when extrapolating the light-curve  

1191: properties of SN 1998bw to a redshift of 1.5, we caution  that 

1192: this factor has a large uncertainty. Based on what is known so far 

1193: about the luminosities of GRB-SNe  

1194: (\citealt{2004ApJ...609..952Z, 2006A&A...457..857F}),   

1195: it seems unlikely that the LBT data point is indeed  

1196: representing SN light.  Another alternative is light from an  

1197: underlying host galaxy (not discernible in the images).   

1198: Due to the second-epoch non-detection  

1199: by the LBT \citep{2007arXiv0712.2239D},  

1200: we can conclude that the host galaxy must be fainter than 

1201: $M_V=18.2$ mag ($R > 26.1$ mag), which is comparable to   

1202: the Magellanic Clouds or even fainter 

1203: \citep{2000CAS....35.....V}, but  

1204: consistent with the distribution found in the {\it Hubble Space Telescope} 

1205: survey by \cite{2006Natur.441..463F}. The low metallicity  

1206: we inferred from the spectra would also be  

1207: consistent with a small, low-luminosity host galaxy.  

1208:  

1209: GRB\,070125 was unusual in several aspects. It had  

1210: at least two sharp rebrightening episodes, it was 

1211: intrinsically bright, and did not reveal the often  

1212: associated DLA and Mg~II features in its smooth 

1213: spectrum. The collective efforts of a large group allowed  

1214: us to learn much about this burst, but it 

1215: also provides a good example of the all-too-common  

1216: situation that the world resources are too scarce 

1217: to follow every burst with the kind of intensity in  

1218: time and bandpass that may be required to extract 

1219: enough information about each burst. Bumps have to be  

1220: resolved, light curves need to be followed over 

1221: longer time scales with greater sampling frequency,  

1222: SEDs need to be established at many epochs, the 

1223: associated supernovae should be checked even 

1224: if the redshift is large, and host-galaxy properties  

1225: should be established. Global coverage is necessary so  

1226: that bumps and jet breaks are not missed, especially 

1227: if future mission, such as EXIST \citep{2006AIPC..836..631G},

1228: may result in much higher burst rates. 

1229: 

1230: 

1231:  

1232: \acknowledgments 

1233:  

1234: A.C.U. and D.H.H. would like to thank Martha Leake and Matt Wood 

1235: for generously sharing their SARA time with us. 

1236: J.R.T. would like to acknowledge support from NSF grant 

1237: AST-0307413.  D.A.K. and S.K. were supported by DFG grant 

1238: Kl 766/13-2.  J.P.H. acknowledges support from Swift Guest Investigator  

1239: Grant NNG06GJ25G.  The work of P.W.A.R., D.N.B., and J.L.R. was  

1240: sponsored at Penn State University by NASA contract NAS5-00136.   

1241: Observations reported here were in part obtained at the MMT  

1242: Observatory, a joint facility of the University of Arizona and the  

1243: Smithsonian Institution. J.D., W.Z, and Y.Q. are supported 

1244: by NSFC Grant No. 10673014.  E.M. and E.P. are members of the  

1245: Collaborazione Italiana Burst Ottici (CIBO) and thank the staff  

1246: astronomers of the TNG for the excellent support.  Effort by C.W.H.  

1247: was supported by a grant from NASA's Planetary Astronomy Program.   

1248: R.L.C.S. acknowledges support from STFC.  

1249: K.C.H. is grateful for IPN support under NASA grants NNG06GE69G 

1250: and NNX06AI36G, and under JPL Contract 128043.  The Westerbork 

1251: Synthesis Radio Telescope is operated by ASTRON (Netherlands Foundation 

1252: for Research in Astronomy) with support from the Netherlands Foundation 

1253: for Scientific Research (NWO).  A.J.v.d.H. was supported by an appointment 

1254: to the NASA Postdoctoral Program at NSSTC, administered by Oak Ridge 

1255: Associated Universities through a contract with NASA. A.V.F.'s group 

1256: at UC Berkeley is supported by NSF grant AST--0607485, NASA/Swift 

1257: grant NNG06GI86G, the TABASGO Foundation, and the Sylvia and Jim 

1258: Katzman Foundation. Some of the data presented herein were obtained at  

1259: the W. M. Keck Observatory, which is operated as a scientific partnership 

1260: among the California Institute of Technology, the University of California 

1261: and NASA. The Observatory was made possible by the generous financial 

1262: support of the W. M. Keck Foundation.  

1263:  

1264:  

1265: %******************************************** 

1266:  

1267: \begin{thebibliography} 

1268:  

1269: \bibitem[Amati(2006)]{2006MNRAS.372..233A} Amati, L.\ 2006, \mnras, 372,  

1270: 233  

1271:  

1272: \bibitem[Barthelmy et al.(2005)]{2005SSRv..120..143B} Barthelmy, S.~D., et  

1273: al.\ 2005, Space Science Reviews, 120, 143  

1274:  

1275: \bibitem[Bellm et al.(2007a)]{2007GCN..6025....1B} Bellm, E., Bandstra, M.,  

1276: Boggs, S., Wigger, C., Hajdas, W., Smith, D.~M., \& Hurley, K.\ 2007, GRB  

1277: Coordinates Network, 6025, 1  

1278:  

1279: \bibitem[Bellm et al.(2007b)]{2007arXiv0710.4590B} Bellm, E.~C., et al.\  

1280: 2007, ArXiv e-prints, 710, arXiv:0710.4590  

1281:  

1282: \bibitem[Berger et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...642..979B} Berger, E., Penprase,  

1283: B.~E., Cenko, S.~B., Kulkarni, S.~R., Fox, D.~B., Steidel, C.~C., \& Reddy,  

1284: N.~A.\ 2006, \apj, 642, 979  

1285:  

1286: \bibitem[Bersier et al.(2003)]{2003ApJ...584L..43B} Bersier, D., et al.\  

1287: 2003, \apjl, 584, L43  

1288:  

1289: \bibitem[Bessell(1979)]{1979PASP...91..589B} Bessell, M.~S.\ 1979, \pasp,  

1290: 91, 589  

1291:  

1292: \bibitem[Beuermann et al.(1999)]{1999A&A...352L..26B} Beuermann, K., et  

1293: al.\ 1999, \aap, 352, L26  

1294:  

1295: \bibitem[Bloom et al.(2007)]{2007GCN..6054....1B} Bloom, J.~S., Starr, D.,  

1296: \& Blake, C.~H.\ 2007, GRB Coordinates Network, 6054, 1  

1297:  

1298: \bibitem[Bloom et al.(2003)]{2003ApJ...594..674B} Bloom, J.~S., Frail,  

1299: D.~A., \& Kulkarni, S.~R.\ 2003, \apj, 594, 674  

1300:  

1301: \bibitem[Bromm \& Loeb(2006)]{2006ApJ...642..382B} Bromm, V., \& Loeb, A.\  

1302: 2006, \apj, 642, 382  

1303:  

1304: \bibitem[Burrows \& Racusin(2007)]{2007GCN..6181....1B} Burrows, D.~N., \&  

1305: Racusin, J.\ 2007, GRB Coordinates Network, 6181, 1 

1306:  

1307: \bibitem[Burrows et al.(2005)]{2005SSRv..120..165B} Burrows, D.~N., et al.\  

1308: 2005, Space Science Reviews, 120, 165  

1309:  

1310: \bibitem[Cardelli(1994)]{1994Sci...265..209C} Cardelli, J.~A.\ 1994,  

1311: Science, 265, 209  

1312:  

1313: \bibitem[Cardelli et al.(1989a)]{1989IAUS..135P...5C} Cardelli, J.~A.,  

1314: Clayton, G.~C., \& Mathis, J.~S.\ 1989, Interstellar Dust, 135, 5P  

1315:  

1316: \bibitem[Cardelli et al.(1989b)]{1989ApJ...345..245C} Cardelli, J.~A.,  

1317: Clayton, G.~C., \& Mathis, J.~S.\ 1989, \apj, 345, 245  

1318:  

1319: \bibitem[Cenko et al.(2007a)]{2007arXiv0712.2828C} Cenko, S.~B., et al.\  

1320: 2007, ArXiv e-prints, 712, arXiv:0712.2828  

1321:  

1322: \bibitem[Cenko \& Fox(2007)]{2007GCN..6028....1C} Cenko, S.~B., \& Fox,  

1323: D.~B.\ 2007, GRB Coordinates Network, 6028, 1  

1324:  

1325: \bibitem[Cenko(2007)]{2007GCN..6034....1C} Cenko, S.~B.\ 2007, GRB  

1326: Coordinates Network, 6034, 1  

1327:  

1328: \bibitem[Cenko et al.(2007b)]{2007GCN..6186....1C} Cenko, S.~B., Soderberg,  

1329: A.~M., Frail, D.~A., \& Fox, D.~B.\ 2007, GRB Coordinates Network, 6186, 1  

1330:  

1331: \bibitem[Chandra et al.(2007a)]{2007GCN..6102....1C} Chandra, P., Chandra,  

1332: I., \& Gupta, N.\ 2007, GRB Coordinates Network, 6102, 1  

1333:  

1334: \bibitem[Chandra et al.(2007b)]{2007GCN..6073....1C} Chandra, P., Bock, D.,  

1335: Soderberg, A.~M., Frail, D.~A., \& Kulkarni, S.~R.\ 2007, GRB Coordinates  

1336: Network, 6073, 1  

1337:  

1338: \bibitem[Chandra \& Frail(2007)]{2007GCN..6061....1C} Chandra, P., \&  

1339: Frail, D.~A.\ 2007, GRB Coordinates Network, 6061, 1  

1340:  

1341: \bibitem[Christensen et al.(2004)]{2004A&A...425..913C} Christensen, L.,  

1342: Hjorth, J., \& Gorosabel, J.\ 2004, \aap, 425, 913  

1343:  

1344: \bibitem[Churchill et al.(2000)]{2000ApJ...543..577C} Churchill, C.~W.,  

1345: Mellon, R.~R., Charlton, J.~C., Jannuzi, B.~T., Kirhakos, S., Steidel,  

1346: C.~C., \& Schneider, D.~P.\ 2000, \apj, 543, 577  

1347:  

1348: \bibitem[Costa et al.(1997)]{1997Natur.387..783C} Costa, E., et al.\ 1997,  

1349: \nat, 387, 783  

1350: 

1351: \bibitem[Curran et al.(2007)]{2007MNRAS.381L..65C} Curran, P.~A., et al.\ 

1352: 2007, \mnras, 381, L65 

1353:  

1354: \bibitem[Dai et al.(2007)]{2007arXiv0712.2239D} Dai, X., et al.\ 2007,  

1355: ArXiv e-prints, 712, arXiv:0712.2239  

1356:  

1357: \bibitem[de Ugarte Postigo et al.(2005)]{2005A&A...443..841D} de Ugarte  

1358: Postigo, A., et al.\ 2005, \aap, 443, 841  

1359:  

1360: \bibitem[Della Valle et al.(2006)]{2006Natur.444.1050D} Della Valle, M., et  

1361: al.\ 2006, \nat, 444, 1050  

1362:  

1363: \bibitem[Deng \& Zheng(2006)]{Deng2006} Deng, J., \& Zheng, W. \ 2006, 

1364: Il Nuovo Cimento B, 121, 1469 

1365:  

1366: \bibitem[Dickey \& Lockman(1990)]{1990ARA&A..28..215D} Dickey, J.~M., \&  

1367: Lockman, F.~J.\ 1990, \araa, 28, 215  

1368:  

1369: \bibitem[Durig(2007)]{2007GCN..6051....1D} Durig, D.~T.\ 2007, GRB  

1370: Coordinates Network, 6051, 1  

1371:  

1372: \bibitem[Durig \& Gary(2007)]{2007GCN..6048....1D} Durig, D.~T., \& Gary,  

1373: B.\ 2007, GRB Coordinates Network, 6048, 1  

1374:  

1375: \bibitem[Fan et al.(2006)]{2006ARA&A..44..415F} Fan, X., Carilli, C.~L., \&  

1376: Keating, B.\ 2006, \araa, 44, 415  

1377:  

1378: \bibitem[Ferrero et al.(2006)]{2006A&A...457..857F} Ferrero, P., et al.\  

1379: 2006, \aap, 457, 857  

1380:  

1381: \bibitem[Filippenko et al.(2001)]{2001ASPC..246..121F} Filippenko, A.~V.,  

1382: Li, W.~D., Treffers, R.~R., \& Modjaz, M.\ 2001, in Small  

1383: Telescope Astronomy on Global Scales, ed. W. P. Chen, C. Lemme, \&  

1384: B. Paczy\'{n}ski (San Francisco: ASP, Conf. Ser. Vol. 246), 121 

1385: 

1386: \bibitem[Filippenko(1997)]{1997ARA&A..35..309F} Filippenko, A.~V.\ 1997, 

1387: \araa, 35, 309 

1388:  

1389: \bibitem[Fox et al.(2007)]{2007GCN..6071....1F} Fox, D.~B., Berger, E.,  

1390: Price, P.~A., \& Cenko, S.~B.\ 2007, GRB Coordinates Network, 6071, 1  

1391:  

1392: \bibitem[Fox et al.(2003)]{2003Natur.422..284F} Fox, D.~W., et al.\ 2003,  

1393: \nat, 422, 284  

1394:  

1395: \bibitem[Frail et al.(2001)]{2001ApJ...562L..55F} Frail, D.~A., et al.\  

1396: 2001, \apjl, 562, L55  

1397:  

1398: \bibitem[Frail et al.(1997)]{1997Natur.389..261F} Frail, D.~A., Kulkarni,  

1399: S.~R., Nicastro, L., Feroci, M., \& Taylor, G.~B.\ 1997, \nat, 389, 261  

1400:  

1401: \bibitem[Fruchter et al.(2006)]{2006Natur.441..463F} Fruchter, A.~S., et  

1402: al.\ 2006, \nat, 441, 463  

1403:  

1404: \bibitem[Fynbo et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...633..317F} Fynbo, J.~P.~U., et al.\  

1405: 2005, \apj, 633, 317  

1406:  

1407: \bibitem[Fynbo et al.(2006)]{2006Natur.444.1047F} Fynbo, J.~P.~U., et al.\  

1408: 2006, \nat, 444, 1047  

1409:  

1410: \bibitem[Galama et al.(1998)]{1998Natur.395..670G} Galama, T.~J., et al.\  

1411: 1998, \nat, 395, 670  

1412:  

1413: \bibitem[Gal-Yam et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...639..331G} Gal-Yam, A., et al.\  

1414: 2006, \apj, 639, 331  

1415:  

1416: \bibitem[Gallerani et al.(2007)]{2007arXiv0710.1303G} Gallerani, S.,  

1417: Salvaterra, R., Ferrara, A., \& Choudhury, T.~R.\ 2007, ArXiv e-prints,  

1418: 710, arXiv:0710.1303 

1419:  

1420: \bibitem[Garnavich et al.(2007)]{2007GCN..6165....1G} Garnavich, P., et  

1421: al.\ 2007, GRB Coordinates Network, 6165, 1  

1422:  

1423: \bibitem[Gehrels et al.(2006)]{2006astro.ph.10635G} Gehrels, N., et al.\  

1424: 2006, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, arXiv:astro-ph/0610635  

1425:  

1426: \bibitem[Gehrels(2004)]{2004NewAR..48..431G} Gehrels, N.\ 2004, New  

1427: Astronomy Review, 48, 431 

1428:  

1429: \bibitem[Gehrels et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...611.1005G} Gehrels, N., et al.\  

1430: 2004, \apj, 611, 1005  

1431:  

1432: \bibitem[Ghirlanda et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...616..331G} Ghirlanda, G.,  

1433: Ghisellini, G., \& Lazzati, D.\ 2004, \apj, 616, 331  

1434:  

1435: \bibitem[Golenetskii et al.(2007)]{2007GCN..6049....1G} Golenetskii, S.,  

1436: Aptekar, R., Mazets, E., Pal'Shin, V., Frederiks, D., \& Cline, T.\ 2007,  

1437: GRB Coordinates Network, 6049, 1 

1438:  

1439: \bibitem[Goodman(1997)]{1997NewA....2..449G} Goodman, J.\ 1997, New  

1440: Astronomy, 2, 449  

1441:  

1442: \bibitem[Graham(1982)]{1982PASP...94..244G} Graham, J.~A.\ 1982, \pasp, 94,  

1443: 244  

1444:  

1445: \bibitem[Granot \& K\"{o}nigl(2003)]{2003ApJ...594L..83G} Granot, J.,  

1446: \& K\"{o}nigl, A.\ 2003, \apjl, 594, L83  

1447:  

1448: \bibitem[Granot et al.(2003)]{2003Natur.426..138G} Granot, J., Nakar, E.,  

1449: \& Piran, T.\ 2003, \nat, 426, 138  

1450:  

1451: \bibitem[Greco et al.(2007)]{2007GCN..6047....1G} Greco, G., et al.\ 2007,  

1452: GRB Coordinates Network, 6047, 1 

1453:  

1454: \bibitem[Greiner et al.(2003)]{2003Natur.426..157G} Greiner, J., et al.\  

1455: 2003, \nat, 426, 157  

1456:  

1457: \bibitem[Greiner et al.(2007)]{2007GCN..6449....1G} Greiner, J., et al.\  

1458: 2007, GRB Coordinates Network, 6449, 1  

1459:  

1460: \bibitem[Grindlay \& The Exist Team(2006)]{2006AIPC..836..631G} Grindlay,  

1461: J.~E., \& The Exist Team 2006, Gamma-Ray Bursts in the Swift Era, 836, 631  

1462:  

1463: \bibitem[Haislip et al.(2007)]{2007GCN..6044....1H} Haislip, J., Reichart,  

1464: D., Lacluyze, A., Ivarsen, K., Nysewander, M., Foster, A., \& Crain, J.~A.\  

1465: 2007, GRB Coordinates Network, 6044, 1  

1466:  

1467: \bibitem[Haislip et al.(2006)]{2006Natur.440..181H} Haislip, J.~B., et al.\  

1468: 2006, \nat, 440, 181  

1469: 

1470: \bibitem[Hiltner(1964)]{1964aste.book.....H} Hiltner, W.~A.\ 1964,  

1471: Astronomical Techniques, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

1472:  

1473: \bibitem[Hjorth et al.(2003)]{2003Natur.423..847H} Hjorth, J., et al.\  

1474: 2003, \nat, 423, 847 

1475:  

1476: \bibitem[Hurley et al.(2007)]{2007GCN..6024....1H} Hurley, K., et al.\  

1477: 2007, GRB Coordinates Network, 6024, 1  

1478:  

1479: \bibitem[Jakobsson et al.(2006)]{2006A&A...447..897J} Jakobsson, P., et  

1480: al.\ 2006, \aap, 447, 897  

1481:  

1482: \bibitem[J{\'o}hannesson et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...647.1238J}  

1483: J{\'o}hannesson, G., Bj{\"o}rnsson, G., \& Gudmundsson, E.~H.\ 2006, \apj,  

1484: 647, 1238  

1485:  

1486: \bibitem[Jordi et al.(2006)]{2006A&A...460..339J} Jordi, K., Grebel, E.~K.,  

1487: \& Ammon, K.\ 2006, \aap, 460, 339  

1488:  

1489: \bibitem[Kaneko et al.(2006)]{2006ApJS..166..298K} Kaneko, Y., Preece,  

1490: R.~D., Briggs, M.~S., Paciesas, W.~S., Meegan, C.~A., \& Band, D.~L.\ 2006,  

1491: \apjs, 166, 298  

1492:  

1493: \bibitem[Kann et al.(2007)]{2007arXiv0712.2186K} Kann, D.~A., et al.\ 2007,  

1494: ArXiv e-prints, 712, arXiv:0712.2186  

1495:  

1496: \bibitem[Kann et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...641..993K} Kann, D.~A., Klose, S., \&  

1497: Zeh, A.\ 2006, \apj, 641, 993  

1498:  

1499: \bibitem[Kawai et al.(2006)]{2006Natur.440..184K} Kawai, N., et al.\ 2006,  

1500: \nat, 440, 184  

1501:  

1502: \bibitem[Klebesadel et al.(1973)]{1973ApJ...182L..85K} Klebesadel, R.~W.,  

1503: Strong, I.~B., \& Olson, R.~A.\ 1973, \apjl, 182, L85  

1504:  

1505: \bibitem[Kouveliotou et al.(1993)]{1993ApJ...413L.101K} Kouveliotou, C.,  

1506: Meegan, C.~A., Fishman, G.~J., Bhat, N.~P., Briggs, M.~S., Koshut, T.~M.,  

1507: Paciesas, W.~S., \& Pendleton, G.~N.\ 1993, \apjl, 413, L101  

1508:  

1509: \bibitem[Kuin \& Rosen(2008)]{2008MNRAS.383..383K} Kuin, N.~P.~M., \&  

1510: Rosen, S.~R.\ 2008, \mnras, 383, 383  

1511:  

1512: \bibitem[Le Floc'h et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...642..636L} Le Floc'h, E.,  

1513: Charmandaris, V., Forrest, W.~J., Mirabel, I.~F., Armus, L., \& Devost, D.\  

1514: 2006, \apj, 642, 636  

1515:  

1516: \bibitem[Li et al.(2003)]{2003PASP..115..844L} Li, W., Filippenko, A.~V.,  

1517: Chornock, R., \& Jha, S.\ 2003, \pasp, 115, 844 

1518:  

1519: \bibitem[Li et al.(2006)]{2006PASP..118...37L} Li, W., Jha, S., Filippenko,  

1520: A.~V., Bloom, J.~S., Pooley, D., Foley, R.~J., \& Perley, D.~A.\ 2006,  

1521: \pasp, 118, 37  

1522:  

1523: \bibitem[Lipkin et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...606..381L} Lipkin, Y.~M., et al.\  

1524: 2004, \apj, 606, 381  

1525:  

1526: \bibitem[Madau(1995)]{1995ApJ...441...18M} Madau, P.\ 1995, \apj, 441, 18  

1527:  

1528: \bibitem[Malesani et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...609L...5M} Malesani, D., et al.\  

1529: 2004, \apjl, 609, L5  

1530:  

1531: \bibitem[Marshall et al.(2007)]{2007GCN..6041....1M} Marshall, F.~E.,  

1532: vanden Berk, D.~E., \& Racusin, J.\ 2007, GRB Coordinates Network, 6041, 1  

1533:  

1534: \bibitem[McQuinn et al.(2007)]{2007arXiv0710.1018M} McQuinn, M., Lidz, A.,  

1535: Zaldarriaga, M., Hernquist, L., \& Dutta, S.\ 2007, ArXiv e-prints, 710,  

1536: arXiv:0710.1018  

1537:  

1538: \bibitem[Metzger et al.(1997)]{1997Natur.387..878M} Metzger, M.~R.,  

1539: Djorgovski, S.~G., Kulkarni, S.~R., Steidel, C.~C., Adelberger, K.~L.,  

1540: Frail, D.~A., Costa, E., \& Frontera, F.\ 1997, \nat, 387, 878  

1541:  

1542: \bibitem[Mirabal et al.(2007)]{2007GCN..6096....1M} Mirabal, N., Halpern,  

1543: J., \& Thorstensen, J.~R.\ 2007, GRB Coordinates Network, 6096, 1  

1544:  

1545: \bibitem[Mirabal et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...643L..99M} Mirabal, N., Halpern,  

1546: J.~P., An, D., Thorstensen, J.~R., \& Terndrup, D.~M.\ 2006, \apjl, 643,  

1547: L99  

1548:  

1549: \bibitem[Mirabal et al.(2003)]{2003ApJ...595..935M} Mirabal, N., et al.\  

1550: 2003, \apj, 595, 935  

1551:  

1552: \bibitem[Nakar \& Granot(2007)]{2007MNRAS.380.1744N} Nakar, E., \& Granot,  

1553: J.\ 2007, \mnras, 380, 1744  

1554:  

1555: \bibitem[Nakar \& Oren(2004)]{2004ApJ...602L..97N} Nakar, E., \& Oren, Y.\  

1556: 2004, \apjl, 602, L97  

1557: 

1558: \bibitem[Oke et al.(1995)]{1995PASP..107..375O} Oke, J.~B., et al.\ 1995, 

1559: \pasp, 107, 375 

1560:  

1561: \bibitem[Pandey et al.(2003)]{2003BASI...31...19P} Pandey, S.~B., et al.\  

1562: 2003, Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India, 31, 19  

1563:  

1564: \bibitem[Pei(1992)]{1992ApJ...395..130P} Pei, Y.~C.\ 1992, \apj, 395, 130  

1565: 

1566: \bibitem[Perley et al.(2007)]{2007astro.ph..3538P} Perley, D.~A., et al.\ 

1567: 2007, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, arXiv:astro-ph/0703538 

1568:  

1569: \bibitem[Pian et al.(2006)]{2006Natur.442.1011P} Pian, E., et al.\ 2006,  

1570: \nat, 442, 1011  

1571:  

1572: \bibitem[Poole et al.(2008)]{2008MNRAS.383..627P} Poole, T.~S., et al.\  

1573: 2008, \mnras, 383, 627  

1574:  

1575: \bibitem[Price et al.(2003)]{2003Natur.423..844P} Price, P.~A., et al.\  

1576: 2003, \nat, 423, 844  

1577:  

1578: \bibitem[Prochaska et al.(2008)]{2008ApJ...672...59P} Prochaska, J.~X.,  

1579: Chen, H.-W., Wolfe, A.~M., Dessauges-Zavadsky, M., \& Bloom, J.~S.\ 2008,  

1580: \apj, 672, 59  

1581:  

1582: \bibitem[Prochaska et al.(2006a)]{2006GCN..4593....1P} Prochaska, J.~X.,  

1583: Foley, R., Tran, H., Bloom, J.~S., \& Chen, H.-W.\ 2006, GRB Coordinates  

1584: Network, 4593, 1  

1585:  

1586: \bibitem[Prochaska et al.(2006b)]{2006ApJ...648...95P} Prochaska, J.~X.,  

1587: Chen, H.-W., \& Bloom, J.~S.\ 2006, \apj, 648, 95  

1588:  

1589: \bibitem[Prochaska et al.(2005)]{2005GCN..3971....1P} Prochaska, J.~X.,  

1590: Foley, R.~J., Chen, H.-W., Bloom, J.~S., Hurley, K., Cooper, M.,  

1591: Guhathakurta, R., \& Li, W.\ 2005, GRB Coordinates Network, 3971, 1  

1592:  

1593: \bibitem[Racusin et al.(2007a)]{2007GCNR...28....3R} Racusin, J.~L.,  

1594: Cummings, J., Marshall, F.~E., Burrows, D.~N., Krimm, H., \& Sato, G.\  

1595: 2007, GCNR, 28, 3 (2007), 28, 3  

1596:  

1597: \bibitem[Racusin et al.(2007b)]{2007GCNR...28....2R} Racusin, J., Cummings,  

1598: J., \& Marshall, F.~E.\ 2007, GCNR, 28, 2 (2007), 28, 2  

1599:  

1600: \bibitem[Racusin et al.(2007c)]{2007GCNR...28....1R} Racusin, J., Cummings,  

1601: J., \& Marshall, F.\ 2007, GCNR, 28, 1 (2007), 28, 1  

1602:  

1603: \bibitem[Racusin \& Vetere(2007)]{2007GCN..6030....1R} Racusin, J., \&  

1604: Vetere, L.\ 2007, GRB Coordinates Network, 6030, 1  

1605:  

1606: \bibitem[Rhoads \& Fruchter(2001)]{2001ApJ...546..117R} Rhoads, J.~E., \&  

1607: Fruchter, A.~S.\ 2001, \apj, 546, 117  

1608:  

1609: \bibitem[Roming et al.(2005)]{2005SSRv..120...95R} Roming, P.~W.~A., et  

1610: al.\ 2005, Space Science Reviews, 120, 95  

1611:  

1612: \bibitem[Sari(1998)]{1998ApJ...494L..49S} Sari, R.\ 1998, \apjl, 494, L49  

1613:  

1614: \bibitem[Sari et al.(1999)]{1999ApJ...519L..17S} Sari, R., Piran, T., \&  

1615: Halpern, J.~P.\ 1999, \apjl, 519, L17  

1616:  

1617: \bibitem[Savaglio(2006)]{2006NJPh....8..195S} Savaglio, S.\ 2006, New  

1618: Journal of Physics, 8, 195  

1619:  

1620: \bibitem[Schady et al.(2007)]{Schady2007}Schady, P., et al. 2007, \mnras, 377, 273 

1621:  

1622: \bibitem[Schlegel et al.(1998)]{1998ApJ...500..525S} Schlegel, D.~J.,  

1623: Finkbeiner, D.~P., \& Davis, M.\ 1998, \apj, 500, 525 

1624: 

1625: \bibitem[Shen et al.(2006)]{2006MNRAS.371.1441S} Shen, R., Kumar, P., 

1626: \& Robinson, E.~L.\ 2006, \mnras, 371, 1441  

1627:  

1628: \bibitem[Shin et al.(2006)]{2006astro.ph..8327S} Shin, M.-S., et al.\ 2006,  

1629: ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, arXiv:astro-ph/0608327  

1630:  

1631: \bibitem[Spergel et al.(2007)]{2007ApJS..170..377S} Spergel, D.~N., et al.\  

1632: 2007, \apjs, 170, 377  

1633:  

1634: \bibitem[Spergel et al.(2003a)]{2003ApJS..148..175S} Spergel, D.~N., et al.\  

1635: 2003, \apjs, 148, 175  

1636:  

1637: \bibitem[Stanek et al.(2003b)]{2003ApJ...591L..17S} Stanek, K.~Z., et al.\  

1638: 2003, \apjl, 591, L17  

1639:  

1640: \bibitem[Starling et al.(2008)]{2008ApJ...672..433S} Starling, R.~L.~C.,  

1641: van der Horst, A.~J., Rol, E., Wijers, R.~A.~M.~J., Kouveliotou, C.,  

1642: Wiersema, K., Curran, P.~A., \& Weltevrede, P.\ 2008, \apj, 672, 433  

1643:  

1644: \bibitem[Starling et al.(2007)]{2007ApJ...661..787S} Starling, R.~L.~C.,  

1645: Wijers, R.~A.~M.~J., Wiersema, K., Rol, E., Curran, P.~A., Kouveliotou, C.,  

1646: van der Horst, A.~J., \& Heemskerk, M.~H.~M.\ 2007, \apj, 661, 787  

1647:  

1648: \bibitem[Tan(1991)]{1991ASPC...19...42T} Tan, G.~H.\ 1991, IAU Colloq.~131:  

1649: Radio Interferometry.~Theory, Techniques, and Applications, 19, 42  

1650:  

1651: \bibitem[Tegmark et al.(2006)]{2006PhRvD..74l3507T} Tegmark, M., et al.\  

1652: 2006, \prd, 74, 123507  

1653:  

1654: \bibitem[Terra et al.(2007)]{2007GCN..6064....1T} Terra, F., et al.\ 2007,  

1655: GRB Coordinates Network, 6064, 1  

1656:  

1657: \bibitem[Totani et al.(2006)]{2006PASJ...58..485T} Totani, T., Kawai, N.,  

1658: Kosugi, G., Aoki, K., Yamada, T., Iye, M., Ohta, K., \& Hattori, T.\ 2006,  

1659: \pasj, 58, 485  

1660:  

1661: \bibitem[Totani et al.(2007)]{2007HiA....14..265T} Totani, T., Kawai, N.,  

1662: Kosugi, G., Aoki, K., Yamada, T., Iye, M., Ohta, K., \& Hattori, T.\ 2007,  

1663: Highlights of Astronomy, 14, 265  

1664:  

1665: \bibitem[Uemura et al.(2007)]{2007GCN..6039....1U} Uemura, M., Arai, A., \&  

1666: Uehara, T.\ 2007, GRB Coordinates Network, 6039, 1  

1667:  

1668: \bibitem[Uemura et al.(2003a)]{2003PASJ...55L..31U} Uemura, M., Kato, T.,  

1669: Ishioka, R., \& Yamaoka, H.\ 2003, \pasj, 55, L31  

1670:  

1671: \bibitem[Uemura et al.(2003b)]{2003Natur.423..843U} Uemura, M., et al.\  

1672: 2003, \nat, 423, 843  

1673:  

1674: \bibitem[Updike et al.(2007)]{2007GCN..6029....1U} Updike, A.~C., Hartmann,  

1675: D.~H., Bryngelson, G.~L., Goldthwaite, R.~C., \& Puls, J.~R.\ 2007, GRB  

1676: Coordinates Network, 6029, 1  

1677:  

1678: \bibitem[van den Bergh(2000)]{2000CAS....35.....V} van den Bergh, S.\ 2000,  

1679: Cambridge Astrophysics Series, 35,   

1680:  

1681: \bibitem[van der Horst(2007a)]{2007GCN..6063....1V} van der Horst, A.~J.\  

1682: 2007, GRB Coordinates Network, 6063, 1  

1683:  

1684: \bibitem[van der Horst(2007b)]{2007GCN..6042....1V} van der Horst, A.~J.\  

1685: 2007, GRB Coordinates Network, 6042, 1  

1686:  

1687: \bibitem[van Paradijs et al.(1997)]{1997Natur.386..686V} van Paradijs, J.,  

1688: et al.\ 1997, \nat, 386, 686  

1689:  

1690: \bibitem[Vreeswijk et al.(2007)]{2007A&A...468...83V} Vreeswijk, P.~M., et  

1691: al.\ 2007, \aap, 468, 83  

1692:  

1693: \bibitem[Watson et al.(2007)]{2007ApJ...660L.101W} Watson, D., Hjorth, J.,  

1694: Fynbo, J.~P.~U., Jakobsson, P., Foley, S., Sollerman, J., \& Wijers,  

1695: R.~A.~M.~J.\ 2007, \apjl, 660, L101  

1696:  

1697: \bibitem[Williams et al.(2004)]{2004SPIE.5492..787W} Williams, G.~G.,  

1698: Olszewski, E., Lesser, M.~P., \& Burge, J.~H.\ 2004, \procspie, 5492, 787  

1699:  

1700: \bibitem[Wolf \& Podsiadlowski(2007)]{2007MNRAS.375.1049W} Wolf, C., \&  

1701: Podsiadlowski, P.\ 2007, \mnras, 375, 1049 

1702:  

1703: \bibitem[Woosley \& Bloom(2006)]{2006ARA&A..44..507W} Woosley, S.~E., \&  

1704: Bloom, J.~S.\ 2006, \araa, 44, 507  

1705:  

1706: \bibitem[Xing et al.(2007)]{2007GCN..6035....1X} Xing, L.~P., Zhai, M.,  

1707: Qiu, Y.~L., Wei, J.~Y., Hu, J.~Y., Deng, J.~S., Urata, Y., \& Zheng, W.~K.\  

1708: 2007, GRB Coordinates Network, 6035, 1  

1709:  

1710: \bibitem[Yamaoka et al.(2005)]{yamaoka1}Yamaoka, K., et al.\ 

1711: 2005, Nuclear Science, IEEE Transactions on, 52, 2765 

1712:   

1713: \bibitem[Yoshida et al.(2007)]{2007GCN..6050....1Y} Yoshida, M.,  

1714: Yanagisawa, K., \& Kawai, N.\ 2007, GRB Coordinates Network, 6050, 1  

1715:  

1716: \bibitem[Zeh et al.(2005)]{2005NCimC..28..617Z} Zeh, A., Kann, D.~A.,  

1717: Klose, S., \& Hartmann, D.~H.\ 2005, Nuovo Cimento C Geophysics Space  

1718: Physics C, 28, 617  

1719:  

1720: \bibitem[Zeh et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...609..952Z} Zeh, A., Klose, S., \&  

1721: Hartmann, D.~H.\ 2004, \apj, 609, 952  

1722:  

1723: \bibitem[Zhang \& M{\'e}sz{\'a}ros(2004)]{2004IJMPA..19.2385Z} Zhang, B.,  

1724: \& M{\'e}sz{\'a}ros, P.\ 2004, International Journal of Modern Physics A,  

1725: 19, 2385  

1726:  

1727: \end{thebibliography} 

1728:  

1729: %******************************************** 

1730:  

1731: %*********TABLES*************** 

1732:  

1733: %**********OBSTABLE%************* 

1734:  

1735: \begin{deluxetable}{ c  c  c  c  l } 

1736: \tablewidth{0pc} 

1737: \tablecaption{OBSERVATIONAL CAMPAIGN\label{tab:obs}} 

1738: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize} 

1739: \tablehead{\colhead{Time} & \colhead{Mag or Flux} & \colhead{Error} & 

1740: \colhead{Instrument} & \colhead{Band} }  

1741: \startdata 

1742: 1.517	& 203 & 5.5E-5  & WSRT  &   4.8 GHz \\ 

1743: 5.642	& 102 & 2.6E-5  & WSRT  &   4.8 GHz \\ 

1744: 8.634	& 241 & 2.6E-5  & WSRT  &   4.8 GHz \\ 

1745: 12.929	& 220  & 2.6E-5  & WSRT  &   4.8 GHz \\ 

1746: 13.927	& -25.0 & 6.3E-5  & WSRT  &   1.4 GHz  \\ 

1747: 17.916	& 222 & 2.7E-5  & WSRT  &   4.8 GHz  \\ 

1748: 34.854	& 196 & 3.0E-5    & WSRT  &   4.8 GHz \\ 

1749: 50.827	& 240  & 4.5E-5  & WSRT  &   4.8 GHz \\ 

1750: 85.730	& 318 & 4.9E-5  & WSRT  &   4.8 GHz  \\ 

1751: 95.703	& 450  & 1.0E-4 & WSRT  &   8.4 GHz  \\ 

1752: 170.499	& 157 & 5.2E-5  & WSRT  &   4.8 GHz  \\ 

1753: 278.204	& 126 & 7.9E-5  & WSRT  &   4.8 GHz  \\ 

1754:      1.349  &     19.25  &      0.10  & UVOT & uvw2   \\ 

1755:      1.416  &     19.14  &      0.10  & UVOT & uvw2   \\ 

1756:      1.484  &     19.41  &      0.11  & UVOT & uvw2   \\ 

1757:      1.749  &     19.51  &      0.15  & UVOT & uvw2   \\ 

1758:      1.816  &     19.44  &      0.15  & UVOT & uvw2   \\ 

1759:      1.883  &     19.92  &      0.18  & UVOT & uvw2   \\ 

1760:      1.950  &     19.59  &      0.16  & UVOT & uvw2   \\ 

1761:      2.017  &     20.33  &      0.21  & UVOT & uvw2   \\ 

1762:      2.085  &     19.77  &      0.17  & UVOT & uvw2   \\ 

1763:      2.149  &     19.90  &      0.18  & UVOT & uvw2   \\ 

1764:      2.252  &     20.61  &      0.18  & UVOT & uvw2   \\ 

1765:      2.285  &     19.75  &      0.18  & UVOT & uvw2   \\ 

1766:      2.521  &     20.54  &      0.17  & UVOT & uvw2   \\ 

1767:      2.723  &     20.42  &      0.17  & UVOT & uvw2   \\ 

1768:      2.929  &     20.79  &      0.18  & UVOT & uvw2   \\ 

1769:      3.297  &     20.95  &      0.16  & UVOT & uvw2   \\ 

1770:      3.525  &     20.97  &      0.17  & UVOT & uvw2   \\ 

1771:      4.157  &     21.68  &      0.12  & UVOT & uvw2   \\ 

1772:      1.360  &     18.91  &      0.11  & UVOT & uvm2   \\ 

1773:      1.427  &     19.13  &      0.14  & UVOT & uvm2   \\ 

1774:      1.492  &     19.31  &      0.24  & UVOT & uvm2   \\ 

1775:      1.755  &     19.41  &      0.20  & UVOT & uvm2   \\ 

1776:      1.822  &     19.28  &      0.20  & UVOT & uvm2   \\ 

1777:      1.889  &     19.64  &      0.23  & UVOT & uvm2   \\ 

1778:      1.956  &     19.27  &      0.21  & UVOT & uvm2   \\ 

1779:      2.023  &     19.82  &      0.26  & UVOT & uvm2   \\ 

1780:      2.090  &     19.76  &      0.25  & UVOT & uvm2   \\ 

1781:      2.155  &     19.62  &      0.24  & UVOT & uvm2   \\ 

1782:      2.290  &     20.68  &      0.26  & UVOT & uvm2   \\ 

1783:      2.627  &     20.55  &      0.37  & UVOT & uvm2   \\ 

1784:      3.101  &     21.03  &      0.23  & UVOT & uvm2   \\ 

1785:      2.425  &     20.28  &      0.34  & UVOT & uvm2   \\ 

1786:      2.491  &     20.00  &      0.25  & UVOT & uvm2   \\ 

1787:      2.626  &     20.49  &      0.30  & UVOT & uvm2   \\ 

1788:      4.098  &     21.58  &      0.23  & UVOT & uvm2   \\ 

1789:      1.337  &     18.92  &      0.11  & UVOT & uvw1   \\ 

1790:      1.404  &     19.33  &      0.13  & UVOT & uvw1   \\ 

1791:      1.473  &     19.02  &      0.12  & UVOT & uvw1   \\ 

1792:      1.743  &     19.27  &      0.17  & UVOT & uvw1   \\ 

1793:      1.810  &     19.45  &      0.19  & UVOT & uvw1   \\ 

1794:      1.910  &     19.50  &      0.14  & UVOT & uvw1  \\ 

1795:      2.110  &     20.18  &      0.17  & UVOT & uvw1  \\ 

1796:      2.313  &     19.95  &      0.17  & UVOT & uvw1  \\ 

1797:      2.515  &     20.26  &      0.18  & UVOT & uvw1  \\ 

1798:      2.716  &     20.18  &      0.17  & UVOT & uvw1  \\ 

1799:      3.123  &     20.66  &      0.12  & UVOT & uvw1  \\ 

1800:      2.279  &     19.53  &      0.20  & UVOT & uvw1  \\ 

1801:      4.049  &     21.09  &      0.11  & UVOT & uvw1  \\ 

1802:      1.340  &     18.81  &      0.10  & UVOT &    U  \\ 

1803:      1.408  &     18.83  &      0.10  & UVOT &    U  \\ 

1804:      1.476  &     18.81  &      0.10  & UVOT &    U  \\ 

1805:      1.745  &     19.19  &      0.14  & UVOT &    U  \\ 

1806:      1.845  &     19.85  &      0.13  & UVOT &    U  \\ 

1807:      1.879  &     19.46  &      0.16  & UVOT &    U  \\ 

1808:      1.946  &     19.65  &      0.17  & UVOT &    U  \\ 

1809:      2.246  &     20.28  &      0.10  & UVOT &    U  \\ 

1810:      2.517  &     20.03  &      0.13  & UVOT &    U  \\ 

1811:      2.854  &     20.69  &      0.09  & UVOT &    U   \\ 

1812:      3.487  &     20.85  &      0.08  & UVOT &    U  \\ 

1813: 0.555   &   18.66  &   0.03   &   UVOT       &   B    \\ 

1814: 0.622	 &   18.95  &	0.04   &   UVOT       &   B    \\ 

1815: 0.689	 &   18.92  &	0.04   &   UVOT       &   B    \\ 

1816: 0.857	 &   19.69  &	0.05   &   PROMPT     &   B    \\ 

1817: 0.947	 &   19.70   &	0.04   &   PROMPT     &   B    \\ 

1818: 1.034	 &   19.76  &	0.01   &   Bok        &   B    \\ 

1819: 1.035	 &   19.72  &	0.01   &   Bok	      &   B    \\ 

1820: 1.037	 &   19.71  &	0.01   &   Bok	      &   B    \\ 

1821: 1.038	 &   19.73  &	0.02   &   Bok	      &   B    \\ 

1822: 1.040	 &   19.71  &	0.01   &   Bok	      &   B    \\ 

1823: 1.041	 &   19.73  &	0.01   &   Bok	      &   B    \\ 

1824: 1.042	 &   19.71  &	0.01   &   Bok	      &   B    \\ 

1825: 1.044	 &   19.69  &	0.01   &   Bok	      &   B    \\ 

1826: 1.343	 &   19.92  &	0.09   &   UVOT       &   B    \\ 

1827: 1.410	 &   19.85  &	0.09   &   UVOT       &   B    \\ 

1828: 1.478	 &   19.49  &	0.08   &   UVOT       &   B    \\ 

1829: 1.813	 &   20.12  &	0.07   &   UVOT       &   B    \\ 

1830: 2.316	 &   20.89  &	0.05   &   UVOT       &   B    \\ 

1831: 3.187	 &   21.06  &	0.04   &   UVOT       &   B    \\ 

1832: 4.651	 &   22.31  &	0.22   &   TNG	      &   B    \\ 

1833: 0.545   &   18.37   &  0.05  & UVOT	     &  V      \\ 

1834: 0.611	 &   18.66   &  0.05  & UVOT	     &  V      \\ 

1835: 0.679	 &   18.66   &  0.05  & UVOT	     &  V      \\ 

1836: 0.736	 &   18.80    &  0.05  & UVOT	     &  V      \\ 

1837: 0.802	 &   19.15   &  0.07  & SARA	     &  V      \\ 

1838: 0.821	 &   18.95   &  0.04  & SARA	     &  V      \\ 

1839: 0.889	 &   19.33   &  0.05  & SARA	     &  V      \\ 

1840: 0.891	 &   19.21   &  0.02  & PROMPT      &   V     \\ 

1841: 0.914	 &   19.15   &  0.05  & SARA	     &  V      \\ 

1842: 0.935	 &   19.23   &  0.04  & SARA	     &  V      \\ 

1843: 0.957	 &   19.28   &  0.04  & SARA	     &  V      \\ 

1844: 0.967	 &   19.14   &  0.04  & PROMPT      &   V   	    \\ 

1845: 0.981	 &   19.21   &  0.04  & SARA	     &  V   	    \\ 

1846: 1.007	 &   19.33   &  0.03  & SARA	     &  V   	    \\ 

1847: 1.046	 &   19.20    &  0.01  & Bok 	     &  V   	    \\ 

1848: 1.049	 &   19.15   &  0.01  & Bok	     &  V   	    \\ 

1849: 1.051	 &   19.15   &  0.01  & Bok 	     &  V   	    \\ 

1850: 1.052	 &   19.15   &  0.01  & Bok 	     &  V   	    \\ 

1851: 1.054	 &   19.15   &  0.02  & Bok 	     &  V   	    \\ 

1852: 1.055	 &   19.16   &  0.01  & Bok 	     &  V   	    \\ 

1853: 1.056	 &   19.17   &  0.01  & Bok 	     &  V   	    \\ 

1854: 1.058	 &   19.15   &  0.02  & Bok 	     &  V   	    \\ 

1855: 1.059	 &   19.14   &  0.02  & Bok 	     &  V   	    \\ 

1856: 1.063	 &   18.88   &  0.05  & SARA	     &  V   	    \\ 

1857: 1.063	 &   19.13   &  0.01  & Bok 	     &  V   	    \\ 

1858: 1.066	 &   19.12   &  0.01  & Bok 	     &  V   	    \\ 

1859: 1.071	 &   19.06   &  0.04  & SARA	     &  V   	    \\ 

1860: 1.078	 &   19.05   &  0.04  & SARA	     &  V   	    \\ 

1861: 1.083	 &   19.07   &  0.01  & Bok	     &  V   	    \\ 

1862: 1.084	 &   19.08   &  0.01  & Bok	     &  V   	    \\ 

1863: 1.087	 &   19.06   &  0.01  & Bok	     &  V   	    \\ 

1864: 1.088	 &   19.20    &  0.05  & SARA	     &  V   	    \\ 

1865: 1.088	 &   19.04   &  0.01  & Bok	     &  V   	    \\ 

1866: 1.090	 &   19.05   &  0.01  & Bok	     &  V   	    \\ 

1867: 1.091	 &   19.04   &  0.01  & Bok	     &  V   	    \\ 

1868: 1.094	 &   19.02   &  0.01  & Bok	     &  V   	    \\ 

1869: 1.095	 &   19.03   &  0.01  & Bok	     &  V             \\ 

1870: 1.097	 &   19.04   &  0.01  & Bok	     &  V             \\ 

1871: 1.098	 &   19.04   &  0.01  & Bok	     &  V             \\ 

1872: 1.099	 &   18.98   &  0.06  & SARA	     &  V             \\ 

1873: 1.099	 &   19.03   &  0.01  & Bok	     &  V             \\ 

1874: 1.102	 &   18.99   &  0.02  & Bok	     &  V             \\ 

1875: 1.103	 &   19.00      &  0.01  & Bok	     &  V             \\ 

1876: 1.105	 &   19.00      &  0.01  & Bok	     &  V             \\ 

1877: 1.106	 &   18.98   &  0.01  & Bok	     &  V             \\ 

1878: 1.108	 &   19.04   &  0.05  & SARA	     &  V             \\ 

1879: 1.108	 &   18.98   &  0.01  & Bok	     &  V             \\ 

1880: 1.109	 &   18.98   &  0.02  & Bok	     &  V             \\ 

1881: 1.110	 &   18.97   &  0.01  & Bok	     &  V             \\ 

1882: 1.113	 &   18.90    &  0.03  & Bok	     &  V             \\ 

1883: 1.115	 &   18.90    &  0.03  & Bok	     &  V             \\ 

1884: 1.117	 &   19.05   &  0.06  & SARA	     &  V             \\ 

1885: 1.118	 &   18.85   &  0.04  & Bok	     &  V             \\ 

1886: 1.120	 &   18.90    &  0.03  & Bok	     &  V             \\ 

1887: 1.123	 &   18.92   &  0.03  & Bok	     &  V             \\ 

1888: 1.125	 &   18.88   &  0.03  & Bok	     &  V             \\ 

1889: 1.128	 &   18.87   &  0.03  & Bok	     &  V             \\ 

1890: 1.130	 &   18.91   &  0.03  & Bok	     &  V             \\ 

1891: 1.132	 &   18.92   &  0.03  & Bok	     &  V             \\ 

1892: 1.135	 &   18.96   &  0.02  & Bok	     &  V             \\ 

1893: 1.137	 &   19.19   &  0.05  & SARA	     &  V             \\ 

1894: 1.137	 &   18.97   &  0.03  & Bok	     &  V             \\ 

1895: 1.140	 &   18.98   &  0.01  & Bok	     &  V             \\ 

1896: 1.143	 &   18.95   &  0.02  & Bok	     &  V             \\ 

1897: 1.145	 &   18.96   &  0.03  & Bok	     &  V             \\ 

1898: 1.148	 &   18.95   &  0.04  & Bok	     &  V             \\ 

1899: 1.150	 &   18.92   &  0.03  & Bok	     &  V    	     \\ 

1900: 1.164	 &   19.08   &  0.02  & SARA	     &  V    	     \\ 

1901: 1.164	 &   18.96   &  0.04  & Bok	     &  V    	     \\ 

1902: 1.166	 &   19.13   &  0.20   & TNT 0.8m     &  V    	     \\ 

1903: 1.166	 &   18.92   &  0.02  & Bok	     &  V    	     \\ 

1904: 1.169	 &   18.97   &  0.04  & Bok	     &  V    	     \\ 

1905: 1.172	 &   18.98   &  0.02  & Bok	     &  V    	     \\ 

1906: 1.175	 &   19.01   &  0.02  & Bok	     &  V    	     \\ 

1907: 1.175	 &   19.40    &  0.20   & TNT 0.8m     &  V    	     \\ 

1908: 1.178	 &   19.03   &  0.02  & Bok	     &  V    	     \\ 

1909: 1.180	 &   18.91   &  0.03  & SARA	     &  V    	     \\ 

1910: 1.180	 &   18.98   &  0.02  & Bok	     &  V    	     \\ 

1911: 1.183	 &   18.97   &  0.02  & Bok	     &  V    	     \\ 

1912: 1.186	 &   18.98   &  0.15  & TNT 0.8m     &  V    	     \\ 

1913: 1.186	 &   19.01   &  0.03  & Bok	     &  V    	     \\ 

1914: 1.193	 &   18.94   &  0.04  & SARA	     &  V    	     \\ 

1915: 1.194	 &   19.07   &  0.15  & TNT 0.8m     &  V    	     \\ 

1916: 1.209	 &   19.16   &  0.05  & SARA	     &  V    	     \\ 

1917: 1.210	 &   19.03   &  0.02  & Bok	     &  V    	     \\ 

1918: 1.213	 &   19.08   &  0.01  & Bok	     &  V    	     \\ 

1919: 1.215	 &   19.06   &  0.01  & Bok	     &  V    	     \\ 

1920: 1.219	 &   19.07   &  0.01  & Bok	     &  V    	     \\ 

1921: 1.221	 &   19.07   &  0.02  & Bok	     &  V    	     \\ 

1922: 1.224	 &   19.11   &  0.02  & Bok	     &  V    	     \\ 

1923: 1.224	 &   19.06   &  0.04  & SARA	     &  V    	     \\ 

1924: 1.226	 &   19.07   &  0.02  & Bok 	     &  V    	     \\ 

1925: 1.227	 &   19.14   &  0.10   & TNT 0.8m     &  V    	     \\ 

1926: 1.229	 &   19.09   &  0.02  & Bok	     &  V    	     \\ 

1927: 1.231	 &   19.06   &  0.01  & Bok	     &  V    	     \\ 

1928: 1.234	 &   19.14   &  0.02  & Bok	     &  V    	     \\ 

1929: 1.236	 &   19.14   &  0.02  & Bok	     &  V             \\ 

1930: 1.241	 &   19.10    &  0.10   & TNT 0.8m     &  V             \\ 

1931: 1.241	 &   19.10    &  0.07  & EST 1m       &  V             \\ 

1932: 1.258	 &   19.35   &  0.12  & TNT 0.8m     &  V             \\ 

1933: 1.287	 &   19.28   &  0.12  & TNT 0.8m     &  V             \\ 

1934: 1.288	 &   19.37   &  0.10   & EST 1m       &  V             \\ 

1935: 1.299	 &   19.23   &  0.12  & TNT 0.8m     &  V             \\ 

1936: 1.312	 &   19.24   &  0.12  & TNT 0.8m     &  V             \\ 

1937: 1.355	 &   18.98   &  0.11  & UVOT	     &  V             \\ 

1938: 1.360	 &   19.07   &  0.14  & TNT 0.8m     &  V             \\ 

1939: 1.376	 &   19.12   &  0.12  & TNT 0.8m     &  V             \\ 

1940: 1.411	 &   19.38   &  0.12  & TNT 0.8m     &  V             \\ 

1941: 1.422	 &   19.44   &  0.12  & UVOT	     &  V             \\ 

1942: 1.423	 &   19.22   &  0.13  & TNT 0.8m     &  V             \\ 

1943: 1.472	 &   19.57   &  0.13  & TNT 0.8m     &  V             \\ 

1944: 1.536	 &   19.64   &  0.20   & TNT 0.8m     &  V             \\ 

1945: 1.572	 &   19.76   &  0.10   & HCT	     &  V             \\ 

1946: 1.582	 &   19.44   &  0.06  & HCT	     &  V             \\ 

1947: 1.721	 &   20.00      &  0.07  & UVOT	     &  V             \\ 

1948: 1.822	 &   19.81   &  0.06  & SARA        &   V   	    \\ 

1949: 1.848	 &   19.83   &  0.05  & PROMPT      &   V   	    \\ 

1950: 1.914	 &   19.93   &  0.05  & SARA        &   V   	    \\ 

1951: 1.987	 &   20.07   &  0.01  & MDM	     &  V   	    \\ 

1952: 2.199	 &   20.24   &  0.15  & TNT 0.8m     &  V   	    \\ 

1953: 2.237	 &   20.40    &  0.14  & TNT 0.8m     &  V   	    \\ 

1954: 2.964	 &   20.76   &  0.05  & SARA        &   V   	    \\ 

1955: 3.000	 &   20.88   &  0.02  & MDM	     &  V             \\ 

1956: 3.003	 &   20.81   &  0.02  & MDM	     &  V             \\ 

1957: 3.006	 &   20.91   &  0.03  & MDM	     &  V             \\ 

1958: 3.008	 &   20.89   &  0.02  & MDM	     &  V             \\ 

1959: 4.356	 &   21.45   &  0.22  & HCT	     &  V      \\ 

1960: 4.642	 &   21.60    &  0.16  & TNT 0.8m     &  V      \\ 

1961: 0.900   & 18.76   & 0.02	   & PROMPT    &  R   \\ 

1962: 0.998   & 18.78   & 0.02	   & Bok       &  R   \\ 

1963: 0.999   & 18.80    & 0.02	   & Bok       &  R   \\ 

1964: 1.001   & 18.77   & 0.02	   & Bok       &  R   \\ 

1965: 1.002   & 18.80    & 0.01	   & Bok       &  R   \\ 

1966: 1.003   & 18.80    & 0.01	   & Bok       &  R   \\ 

1967: 1.005   & 18.79   & 0.02	   & Bok       &  R   \\ 

1968: 1.006   & 18.81   & 0.02	   & Bok       &  R   \\ 

1969: 1.008   & 18.80    & 0.01	   & Bok       &  R   \\ 

1970: 1.009   & 18.78   & 0.01	   & Bok       &  R   \\ 

1971: 1.010   & 18.78   & 0.02	   & Bok       &  R   \\ 

1972: 1.019   & 18.81   & 0.02	   & Bok       &  R   \\ 

1973: 1.013   & 18.79   & 0.01	   & Bok       &  R   \\ 

1974: 1.015   & 18.80    & 0.02	   & Bok       &  R   \\ 

1975: 1.016   & 18.84   & 0.01	   & Bok       &  R   \\ 

1976: 1.017   & 18.84   & 0.02	   & Bok       &  R   \\ 

1977: 1.019   & 18.83   & 0.02	   & Bok       &  R   \\ 

1978: 1.063   & 18.61   & 0.21	   & KAIT      &  R   \\ 

1979: 1.065   & 18.60    & 0.16	   & KAIT      &  R   \\ 

1980: 1.070   & 18.75   & 0.11	   & KAIT      &  R   \\ 

1981: 1.070   & 18.59   & 0.11	   & KAIT      &  R   \\ 

1982: 1.075   & 18.67   & 0.09	   & KAIT      &  R   \\ 

1983: 1.078   & 18.66   & 0.07	   & KAIT      &  R   \\ 

1984: 1.081   & 18.68   & 0.07	   & KAIT      &  R   \\ 

1985: 1.084   & 18.63   & 0.07	   & KAIT      &  R   \\ 

1986: 1.087   & 18.60    & 0.08	   & KAIT      &  R   \\ 

1987: 1.087   & 18.66   & 0.08	   & KAIT      &  R   \\ 

1988: 1.093   & 18.59   & 0.08	   & KAIT      &  R   \\ 

1989: 1.095   & 18.63   & 0.08	   & KAIT      &  R   \\ 

1990: 1.095   & 18.71   & 0.08	   & KAIT      &  R   \\ 

1991: 1.102   & 18.40    & 0.13	   & KAIT      &  R   \\ 

1992: 1.104   & 18.42   & 0.10	   & KAIT      &  R   \\ 

1993: 1.104   & 18.51   & 0.14	   & KAIT      &  R   \\ 

1994: 1.110   & 18.41   & 0.27	   & KAIT      &  R   \\ 

1995: 1.120   & 18.44   & 0.11	   & KAIT      &  R   \\ 

1996: 1.120   & 18.58   & 0.15	   & KAIT      &  R   \\ 

1997: 1.125   & 18.26   & 0.12	   & KAIT      &  R   \\ 

1998: 1.151   & 18.52   & 0.14	   & TNT 0.8m  &  R   \\ 

1999: 1.159   & 18.88   & 0.17	   & TNT 0.8m  &  R   \\ 

2000: 1.201   & 18.53   & 0.13	   & TNT 0.8m  &  R   \\ 

2001: 1.209   & 18.76   & 0.10	   & TNT 0.8m  &  R   \\ 

2002: 1.222   & 18.71   & 0.10	   & EST 1m    &  R   \\ 

2003: 1.266   & 19.00   & 0.10	   & EST 1m    &  R   \\ 

2004: 1.273   & 18.85   & 0.09	   & TNT 0.8m  &  R   \\ 

2005: 1.331   & 18.68   & 0.15	   & TNT 0.8m  &  R   \\ 

2006: 1.339   & 18.79   & 0.15	   & TNT 0.8m  &  R   \\ 

2007: 1.343   & 18.58   & 0.15	   & TNT 0.8m  &  R   \\ 

2008: 1.346   & 18.74   & 0.16	   & TNT 0.8m  &  R   \\ 

2009: 1.394   & 18.93   & 0.10	   & TNT 0.8m  &  R   \\ 

2010: 1.450   & 18.96   & 0.10	   & TNT 0.8m  &  R   \\ 

2011: 1.462   & 18.82   & 0.17	   & TNT 0.8m  &  R   \\ 

2012: 1.513   & 19.00   & 0.14	   & TNT 0.8m  &  R   \\ 

2013: 1.555   & 18.77   & 0.06	   & HCT       &  R   \\ 

2014: 1.563   & 18.92   & 0.02	   & HCT       &  R   \\ 

2015: 1.796   & 19.43   & 0.05	   & Kuiper    &  R   \\ 

2016: 1.802   & 19.49   & 0.04	   & Kuiper    &  R   \\ 

2017: 1.807   & 19.53   & 0.05	   & Kuiper    &  R   \\ 

2018: 1.813   & 19.52   & 0.04	   & Kuiper    &  R   \\ 

2019: 1.905   & 19.58   & 0.03	   & PROMPT    &  R   \\ 

2020: 1.912   & 19.63   & 0.02	   & Kuiper    &  R   \\ 

2021: 1.964   & 19.60    & 0.04	   & MDM       &  R   \\ 

2022: 1.968   & 19.70    & 0.02	   & MDM       &  R  	\\ 

2023: 1.971   & 19.64   & 0.02	   & MDM       &  R  	\\ 

2024: 1.975   & 19.64   & 0.01	   & MDM       &  R  	\\ 

2025: 1.979   & 19.64   & 0.01	   & MDM       &  R  	\\ 

2026: 1.983   & 19.61   & 0.02	   & MDM       &  R  	\\ 

2027: 2.036   & 19.70    & 0.01	   & Kuiper    &  R  	\\ 

2028: 2.130   & 19.90    & 0.01	   & Kuiper    &  R  	\\ 

2029: 2.160   & 20.23   & 0.15	   & TNT 0.8m  &  R  	\\ 

2030: 2.213   & 19.93   & 0.18	   & EST 1m    &  R  	\\ 

2031: 2.275   & 20.00   & 0.11	   & TNT 0.8m  &  R  	\\ 

2032: 2.312   & 19.97   & 0.10	   & TNT 0.8m  &  R  	\\ 

2033: 2.350   & 20.15   & 0.10	   & TNT 0.8m  &  R  	\\ 

2034: 2.387   & 20.29   & 0.10	   & TNT 0.8m  &  R  	\\ 

2035: 2.427   & 20.10    & 0.10	   & TNT 0.8m  &  R  	\\ 

2036: 2.464   & 20.07   & 0.10	   & TNT 0.8m  &  R  	\\ 

2037: 2.500   & 20.17   & 0.12	   & TNT 0.8m  &  R  	\\ 

2038: 2.533   & 20.01   & 0.12	   & TNT 0.8m  &  R  	\\ 

2039: 2.644   & 20.25   & 0.04	   & Loiano    &  R  	\\ 

2040: 2.659   & 20.23   & 0.05	   & Loiano    &  R  	\\ 

2041: 2.677   & 20.16   & 0.04	   & Loiano    &  R  	\\ 

2042: 2.781   & 20.44   & 0.06	   & Loiano    &  R  	\\ 

2043: 2.795   & 20.36   & 0.04	   & Loiano    &  R  	\\ 

2044: 2.843   & 20.46   & 0.04	   & Kuiper    &  R  	\\ 

2045: 2.854   & 20.42   & 0.03	   & Kuiper    &  R  	\\ 

2046: 2.865   & 20.40    & 0.02	   & Kuiper    &  R  	\\ 

2047: 2.989   & 20.40    & 0.02	   & MDM       &  R  	\\ 

2048: 2.992   & 20.38   & 0.02	   & MDM       &  R  	\\ 

2049: 2.995   & 20.40    & 0.02	   & MDM       &  R  	\\ 

2050: 2.997   & 20.41   & 0.02	   & MDM       &  R  	\\ 

2051: 3.006   & 20.47   & 0.03	   & Kuiper    &  R  	\\ 

2052: 3.631   & 20.73   & 0.14	   & Loiano    &  R  	\\ 

2053: 4.034   & 20.92   & 0.04	   & MDM       &  R  	\\ 

2054: 4.038   & 21.00   & 0.03	   & MDM       &  R  	\\ 

2055: 4.042   & 20.99   & 0.05	   & MDM       &  R  	\\ 

2056: 4.046   & 21.03   & 0.05	   & MDM       &  R  	\\ 

2057: 4.678   & 20.97   & 0.12	   & TNG       &  R   \\ 

2058: 4.866   & 22.23   & 0.08	   & Kuiper    &  R    \\ 

2059: 12.001  & 23.80    & Upper limit   & MDM       &  R    \\ 

2060: 26.800  & 26.10    & 0.30	   & LBT       &  R    \\ 

2061: 0.929  & 18.21  & 0.02  & PROMPT    & I  \\ 

2062: 1.020	& 18.25  & 0.02  & Bok	     & I  \\ 

2063: 1.022	& 18.22  & 0.02  & Bok	     & I  \\ 

2064: 1.023	& 18.23  & 0.03  & Bok	     & I  \\ 

2065: 1.025	& 18.21  & 0.03  & Bok	     & I  \\ 

2066: 1.026	& 18.21  & 0.02  & Bok	     & I  \\ 

2067: 1.028	& 18.19  & 0.03  & Bok	     & I  \\ 

2068: 1.029	& 18.19  & 0.03  & Bok	     & I  \\ 

2069: 1.030	& 18.17  & 0.03  & Bok	     & I  \\ 

2070: 1.039	& 18.15  & 0.03  & Bok	     & I  \\ 

2071: 1.591	& 18.41  & 0.09  & HCT	     & I  \\ 

2072: 1.599	& 18.61  & 0.09  & HCT	     & I  \\ 

2073: 1.947	& 19.01  & 0.05  & PROMPT    & I  \\ 

2074: 1.992	& 19.08  & 0.02  & MDM	     & I  \\ 

2075: 2.977	& 19.88  & 0.02  & MDM	     & I  \\ 

2076: 2.980	& 19.82  & 0.02  & MDM	     & I  \\ 

2077: 2.982	& 19.82  & 0.03  & MDM	     & I  \\ 

2078: 4.693	& 20.84  & 0.06  & TNG	     & I  \\ 

2079: 1.854	   &  	   18.17	&     0.24  &    SOAR     &   J  \\ 

2080: 2.090  &  	   18.35	&     0.04  &    MMT	    &   J  \\ 

2081: 2.916    &       18.82	&     0.26  &    PAIRITEL &   J \\ 

2082: 1.907 &       17.58	&     0.22  &    SOAR     &   H  \\ 

2083: 2.916    &       18.33	&     0.25  &    PAIRITEL  &  H  \\  

2084: 1.877  &  	   16.96	&     0.28  &    SOAR     &  Ks  \\ 

2085: 2.916    &       17.86	&     0.25  &    PAIRITEL &  Ks\\   

2086: 0.550    &	    5.44e-12   &    4.95e-13   &    XRT	&   X   \\ 

2087: 0.610    &	    4.23e-12   &    6.47e-13   &    XRT	&   X   \\ 

2088: 0.621    &	    3.51e-12   &    5.30e-13   &    XRT	&   X   \\ 

2089: 0.679    &	    4.16e-12   &    6.36e-13   &    XRT	&   X   \\ 

2090: 0.688    &	    3.62e-12   &    5.70e-13   &    XRT	&   X   \\ 

2091: 0.737    &	    4.19e-12   &    7.12e-13   &    XRT	&   X   \\ 

2092: 1.349     &	    2.19e-12   &    3.41e-13   &    XRT	&   X   \\ 

2093: 1.437     &	    2.00e-12   &    3.23e-13   &    XRT	&   X   \\ 

2094: 1.483     &	    2.19e-12   &    3.61e-13   &    XRT	&   X   \\ 

2095: 1.909     &	    6.85e-13   &    9.24e-14   &    XRT	&   X   \\ 

2096: 2.248     &	    5.83e-13   &    9.04e-14   &    XRT	&   X   \\ 

2097: 2.552     &	    6.01e-13   &    1.09e-13   &    XRT	&   X   \\ 

2098: 2.988     &	    4.08e-13   &    7.35e-14   &    XRT	&   X   \\ 

2099: 3.359     &	    4.05e-13   &    8.70e-14   &    XRT	&   X   \\ 

2100: 3.896     &	    3.37e-13   &    6.75e-14   &    XRT	&   X   \\ 

2101: 4.470     &	    1.73e-13   &    4.86e-14   &    XRT	&   X   \\ 

2102: 8.884     &	    6.21e-14   &    1.55e-14   &    XRT	&   X   \\ 

2103: 10.423     &	    4.99e-14   &    1.55e-14   &    XRT	&   X   \\ 

2104: 15.139     &       1.62e-14   &    6.75e-15   &    XRT   &   X   \\  

2105: 39.760       &       2e-15         &    Upper limit     &    Chandra & X   \\ \hline			              		      	  	     

2106: \enddata 		              		       

2107: \tablecomments{Observations carried out by this collaboration, late-time LBT 

2108: detection \citep{2007arXiv0712.2239D}, and late-time Chandra observation 

2109: \citep{2007GCN..6186....1C}.  X-ray fluxes have units of ${\rm erg}\ {\rm 

2110: cm}^{-2}\ {\rm s}^{-1}$.  Radio fluxes are given in ${\rm \mu Jy}$.} 

2111: \end{deluxetable} 	               

2112: 			              

2113: %******************************** 

2114: %********LCTABLE***************** 

2115:  

2116: \begin{deluxetable}{ c  c  c  c  c  c } 

2117: \tablewidth{0pc} 

2118: \tablecaption{LIGHT-CURVE FITTING\label{tab:lctable}} 

2119:  

2120: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize} 

2121: \tablehead{\colhead{Band} & \colhead{Model} & \colhead{$\alpha_1$} & \colhead{$\alpha_2$} & \colhead{Break Time} & \colhead{$\chi^{2}$/d.o.f.}} 

2122: \startdata 

2123: opt/uv/nir & all data & 0.47 $\pm$ 0.10 & 2.05 $\pm$ 0.04 & 1.39 $\pm$ 0.04 & 10.25 \\ 

2124: opt/uv/nir & no flaring & 1.24 $\pm$ 0.09 & 2.49 $\pm$ 0.13 & 3.37 $\pm$ 0.36 & 3.35 \\ 

2125: opt/uv/nir & after two days & 1.56 $\pm$ 0.27 & 2.47 $\pm$ 0.13 & 3.73 $\pm$ 0.52 & 2.98 \\  

2126: X-ray & all data & $1.16^{+0.23}_{-0.87}$ & $1.85^{+0.19}_{-0.15}$ & $1.34^{+0.24}_{-0.51}$ & 1.6 \\ 

2127: X-ray & no flaring & $1.49^{+0.14}_{-0.09}$ & $1.94^{+0.39}_{-0.30}$ & $3.93^{+9.72}_{-1.85}$ & 0.80 \\ 

2128: X-ray & after two days & $1.0^{+0.62}_{-1.81}$ & $1.99^{+0.46}_{-0.32}$ & $3.34^{+9.03}_{-1.27}$ & 0.50 \\ \hline 

2129: \enddata 		              		       

2130: \tablecomments{Results of fitting a Beuermann function 

2131: \citep{1999A&A...352L..26B} (as revised by  \citealt{2001ApJ...546..117R}) 

2132: broken power-law function to the data set; 

2133: opt/uv/nir refers to the combined data set of optical, UV, and  

2134: near-IR data.  The  

2135: columns labelled ``no flaring'' have removed the data between 1  

2136: and 2 days from the fit.}\label{tab:lc} 

2137: \end{deluxetable} 	               

2138: 		 

2139:  

2140: %******************************** 

2141: %**********SEDTAB**************** 

2142:  

2143: \begin{deluxetable}{ c  c  c  c } 

2144: \tablewidth{0pc} 

2145: \tablecaption{UV/OPTICAL/NIR SPECTRAL ENERGY DISTRIBUTION\label{tab:sed}} 

2146: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize} 

2147: \tablehead{\colhead{dust} & \colhead{$\chi^2$/d.o.f.} & \colhead{$\beta$} & 

2148: \colhead{$A_V$ (mag)}} 

2149: \startdata 

2150: none & 2.615 & 0.854 $\pm$ 0.036 & none \\ 

2151: MW & 3.137 & 0.855 $\pm$ 0.058 & 0.00 $\pm$ 0.032 \\ 

2152: LMC & 2.643 & 0.736 $\pm$ 0.129 & 0.067 $\pm$ 0.070 \\ 

2153: SMC & 0.896 & 0.519 $\pm$ 0.104 & 0.139 $\pm$ 0.041 \\ \hline 

2154: \enddata 		              		       

2155: \tablecomments{Spectral energy distribution for UV, optical, and near-IR data only.  We see that the SMC dust is strongly preferred.}   

2156: \end{deluxetable}  

2157:  

2158: %******************************** 

2159: %******SEDRHAANA***************** 

2160:  

2161: \begin{deluxetable}{ c  c  c  c  c  c  c } 

2162: \tablewidth{0pc} 

2163: \tablecaption{X-RAY/UV/OPTICAL/NIR SPECTRAL ENERGY DISTRIBUTION\label{tab:sed2}} 

2164: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize} 

2165:  

2166: \tablehead{\colhead{Model} & \colhead{$\Gamma_1$} & \colhead{E$_{\rm bk}$} & \colhead{$\Gamma_2$} & \colhead{$E(B-V)$} & \colhead{$N_{\rm H}$} & \colhead{$\chi^2$/d.o.f.}  

2167: \\ & & keV & & (mag) & ($10^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$) & }

2168: \startdata

2169: PL+MW & 1.99$\pm$0.01 & - & - & 0$^{+8\times 10^{-4}}_{-0}$ & 2.5$^{+1.6}_{-1.3}$ 

2170: & 3.74 \\ 

2171: PL+LMC & 1.99$\pm$0.01 & - & - & 0$^{+8\times 10^{-4}}_{-0}$ & 

2172: 2.5$^{+1.6}_{-1.3}$ & 3.74 \\ 

2173: PL+SMC & 1.99$\pm$0.01 & - & - & 0$^{+9\times 10^{-4}}_{-0}$ & 

2174: 2.5$^{+1.6}_{-1.3}$ & 3.74 \\ 

2175: BKNPL+MW & 1.6$\pm$0.1 & 0.0019$\pm$0.0002 & 2.03$\pm$0.03 & 

2176: $<$0.02 & 1.4$^{+1.6}_{-{1.3}}$ & 1.72 \\ 

2177: BKNPL+LMC & 1.5$\pm0.1$ & 0.0023$\pm$0.0001 & 2.06$^{+0.03}_{-0.02}$ & 

2178: 0.03$\pm$0.01 & 1.8$\pm$1.3 & 1.17 \\ 

2179: BKNPL+SMC & 1.6$\pm$0.1 & 0.0024$^{+0.0002}_{-0.0004}$ & 2.06$^{+0.02}_{-0.03}$ & 

2180: 0.02$^{+0.04}_{-0.01}$ & 1.8$^{+1.7}_{-1.3}$ & 1.31 \\ 

2181: BKNPL+MW & $\Gamma_2$-0.5&0.0019$\pm$0.0002 & 2.04$^{+0.03}_{-0.02}$ & 

2182: 0.02$\pm$0.01 & 1.3$^{+1.6}_{-{1.2}}$ & 1.73 \\ 

2183: BKNPL+LMC & $\Gamma_2$-0.5 & 0.0023$^{+0.0001}_{-0.0002}$ & 2.06$\pm$0.02 & 

2184: 0.028$^{+0.007}_{-0.008}$ & 1.8$^{+1.7}_{-1.3}$ & 1.13 \\ 

2185: BKNPL+SMC & $\Gamma_2$-0.5 & 0.0024$^{+0.0003}_{-0.0005}$ & 2.07$^{+0.05}_{-0.03}$ & 

2186: 0.030$^{+0.007}_{-0.014}$ & 1.8$^{+1.7}_{-1.3}$ & 1.30 \\ 

2187: \enddata  

2188:  

2189: \tablecomments{	Results of fits to the near-IR/optical/UV/X-ray SED at 4.26 

2190: days since trigger, with power law and broken power law continuum models  

2191: absorbed by MW-, LMC-, and SMC-like extinction and by X-ray absorption  

2192: assuming solar metallicity. Galactic absorption and extinction were fixed at 

2193: $N_{\rm H,Gal} = 4.8 \times 10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$ and $E(B-V) = 0.052$ mag,  

2194: respectively, and only intrinsic (at $z = 1.547$) quantities are reported  

2195: in the table. PL = power law (where $\Gamma = 1+ \beta$); BKNPL = broken  

2196: power law; MW = Milky Way extinction curve; LMC = Large Magellanic Cloud  

2197: extinction curve; SMC = Small Magellanic Cloud extinction curve  

2198: \citep[as parametrized by][]{1992ApJ...395..130P}.} 

2199:  

2200: \end{deluxetable}  

2201:  

2202: %******************************** 

2203: %*********TAB_EW***************** 

2204:  

2205: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccc} 

2206: \tablewidth{0pc} 

2207: \tablecaption{ABSORPTION LINES\label{tab:ew}} 

2208: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize} 

2209: \tablehead{\colhead{$\lambda_{obs}$} &\colhead{$W_\lambda^a$} & \colhead{Trans.} & \colhead{$\lambda_{rest}$} & 

2210: \colhead{$z_{abs}$} \\ 

2211: (\AA) & (\AA) & & (\AA) & }  

2212: \startdata 

2213: 3316.6&$< 2.766$&    OI 1302  &1302.168&1.5470\\ 

2214: 3375.3&$ 3.838\pm0.706$&&&\\ 

2215: 3549.9&$< 1.810$&  SiIV 1393 & 1393.755 & \\

2216: 3888.5&$< 1.180$&  SiII 1526  &1526.707&1.5470\\ 

2217: 3947.1&$ 2.586\pm0.318$&   CIV 1548  &1548.195&1.5495\\ 

2218: &&   CIV 1550  &1550.770&1.5452\\ 

2219: 3989.2&$ 1.501\pm0.428$&&&\\ 

2220: 4096.7&$< 1.180$& FeII 1608 & 1608.451 & \\

2221: 4255.5&$< 1.124$&  AlII 1670  &1670.787&1.5470\\ 

2222: 

2223: \enddata 

2224: \tablenotetext{a}{Observed equivalent width.} 

2225: \end{deluxetable} 

2226:  

2227: %******************************** 

2228:  

2229: %***********FIGURES************ 

2230:  

2231:  

2232: \begin{figure} 

2233: \begin{center} 

2234: \epsscale{0.7}

2235: \plotone{f1.eps} 

2236: \caption{The field of GRB\,070125 as imaged by the Bok telescope on Jan. 26, 

2237: 2007, 08:11:08 ($BVR$).  The field is 6.4' in diameter.  The OT is circled. In 

2238: this image, north is up and east is to the left.} 

2239: \label{fig:prompt} 

2240: \end{center} 

2241: \end{figure} 

2242:  

2243: \begin{figure} 

2244: \plotone{f2.eps} 

2245: \caption{The combined data set (Vega magnitude system), corrected for Galactic extinction, arbitrarily 

2246: scaled with respect to the $R$ band for ease in reading.  The XRT fluxes have 

2247: been converted to magnitudes ($m = -2.5 \times {\rm log} F_{\nu}$). MDM and  

2248: Chandra upper limits are represented by upside-down triangles.  Band magnitude shifts are $Ks -$ 3.0, $H -$ 2.0, $J -$ 1.0, $I -$ 0.5, $V +$ 1.0, $B +$ 2.0, $U +$ 3.0, uvw1 $+$ 5.0, uvm2 $+$ 6.5, uvw2 $+$ 8.0.  All errors (excluding upper limits) are shown.} 

2249: \label{fig:lc} 

2250: \end{figure} 

2251:  

2252: \begin{figure}[ht] 

2253: \begin{center} 

2254: \plotone{f3.eps} 

2255: \caption{WSRT observations of GRB\,070125 at 4.8 GHz. 

2256: \label{wsrt6cmresults}} 

2257: \end{center} 

2258: \end{figure} 

2259:  

2260: \begin{figure} 

2261: \begin{center} 

2262: \plotone{f4.eps} 

2263: \caption{All UV, optical, and near-IR data contained in Figure~\ref{fig:lc} have been shifted to the $R$ band based on the flux at 2 days post-trigger.   Data before 2 days have been removed from this fit due to rapid flaring. The residuals to the fit are shown.  We derive a jet break time of 3.73 $\pm$ 0.52 days.} 

2264: \label{fig:noflare} 

2265: \end{center} 

2266: \end{figure} 

2267:  

2268: \begin{figure} 

2269: \epsscale{0.8}

2270: \plotone{f5.eps} 

2271: \caption{The unfolded SED at 4.26 days since trigger, including a {\it Swift} 

2272: XRT spectrum and near-IR/optical/UV photometry (black points, upper panel). The 

2273:  line indicates the best-fitting model of an absorbed, broken power law plus 

2274: LMC-like extinction. The lower panel shows the residuals of the fit.} 

2275: \label{fig:sed2} 

2276: \end{figure} 

2277:  

2278: \begin{figure} 

2279: \begin{center} 

2280: \plotone{f6.eps} 

2281: \caption{Bok $BVRI$ data shifted to the $V$ band, showing high S/N detection of 

2282: the second rebrightening episode, which has been confirmed by KAIT, TNT, and 

2283: SARA data.} 

2284: \label{fig:lcbok} 

2285: \end{center} 

2286: \end{figure} 

2287:  

2288: \begin{figure} 

2289: \epsscale{0.8} 

2290: \plotone{f7.eps} 

2291: \caption{Normalized Keck/LRIS spectrum of the afterglow of GRB~070125. 

2292: The figure shows the data acquired with the blue camera using 

2293: the 400/3400 grism. 

2294: The labeled arrows identify transitions associated with the metal 

2295: absorption system at $z=1.547$. This gas most likely arises in the 

2296: host galaxy of GRB~070125. We also mark several significant absorption  

2297: features which remain unidentified.} 

2298: \label{fig:aftspec} 

2299: \end{figure} 

2300:  

2301: \begin{figure} 

2302: \epsscale{0.8} 

2303: \plotone{f8.eps} 

2304: \caption{Close-up view of the spectral region near 3100~\AA\  

2305: for the normalized Keck/LRIS spectrum of the GRB~070125 afterglow. 

2306: The dotted line indicates the $1\sigma$ statistical error. The solid 

2307: curve traces a damped \lya\ profile with $\mnhi = 10^{20.3} \cm{-2}$ 

2308: centered at the redshift of the observed metal-line absorption 

2309: system ($z=1.547$; Figure~\ref{fig:aftspec}). 

2310: The data are formally inconsistent with a damped \lya\  

2311: feature at this redshift, but we caution that systematic uncertainty 

2312: (wavelength calibration and continuum placement error) do not rule 

2313: out such a profile at very high confidence ($>99\%$~c.l.). 

2314: The data do rule out the presence of a strong \lya\ absorber 

2315: ($W_{Ly\alpha} > 5$~\AA) redward of 3140~\AA.   

2316: Furthermore, there is no obvious signature of 

2317: the \lya\ forest in this spectrum.   

2318: For these reasons, we argue that the metal-line absorber at $z=1.547$ 

2319: is gas associated with the host galaxy of GRB~070125. 

2320: We cannot rule out, however,  

2321: the possibility that the feature at $\lambda \approx 3375$~\AA\ 

2322: is relatively weak \lya\ absorption at $z=1.78$. 

2323: This sets a formal upper limit to the redshift of GRB~070125. 

2324: } 

2325: \label{fig:lya} 

2326: \end{figure} 

2327:  

2328: \begin{figure} 

2329: \plotone{f9.eps} 

2330: \caption{Afterglow light curves for 52 GRBs as they would look if all the 

2331: bursts occurred at a redshift of 1 with no extinction 

2332: \citep{2007arXiv0712.2186K}.  The thick line is the light curve of GRB\,070125.} 

2333: \label{fig:big2} 

2334: \end{figure} 

2335:  

2336: %************************************* 

2337:  

2338: \end{document} 

2339:          

2340: