1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass{emulateapj}
3: %
4: %
5: \def\magsqarcsec{mag$/$\raisebox{-0.4ex}{\hbox{$\Box^{\prime\prime}$}\,}}
6: \newcommand{\oversim}[2]{\protect{\mbox{\lower0.5ex\vbox{%
7: \baselineskip=0pt\lineskip=0.2ex
8: \ialign{$\mathsurround=0pt #1\hfil##\hfil$\crcr#2\crcr\sim\crcr}}}}}
9: \newcommand{\simgreat}{\mbox{$\,\mathrel{\mathpalette\oversim>}\,$}}% >~ sign
10: \newcommand{\simless} {\mbox{$\,\mathrel{\mathpalette\oversim<}\,$}}% <~ sign
11: %
12: %
13: \begin{document}
14: %
15: %
16: \shorttitle{The Tidal Stream of NGC\,5907}
17: \shortauthors{Mart\'{i}nez-Delgado et al.}
18: %
19: \title{The ghost of a dwarf galaxy: \\
20: fossils of the hierarchical formation of the nearby spiral galaxy
21: NGC\,5907}
22: %
23: \author{David Mart\'{i}nez-Delgado\altaffilmark{1,2,7}, Jorge
24: Pe\~narrubia\altaffilmark{3}, R.Jay
25: Gabany \altaffilmark{4}, Ignacio Trujillo\altaffilmark{1,7},\\ Steven R. Majewski \altaffilmark{5}, M. Pohlen
26: \altaffilmark{6}}
27: %
28: \altaffiltext{1} {Instituto de Astrof\'isica de Canarias, La Laguna, Spain}
29: \altaffiltext{2} {Max-Planck Institut f\"ur Astronomie, Heidelberg, Germany}
30: \altaffiltext{3} {University of Victoria, Canada}
31: \altaffiltext{4}
32: {Blackbird Observatory, New Mexico, USA}
33: \altaffiltext{5} {Department
34: of Astronomy, University of Virginia, USA}
35: \altaffiltext{6} {Cardiff
36: University, School of Physics \& Astronomy, Cardiff, UK}
37: \altaffiltext{7}
38: {Ram\'on y Cajal Fellow}
39:
40: %
41: %
42: %
43: \begin{abstract}
44: %
45:
46: We present an extragalactic perspective of an extended
47: stellar tidal stream wrapping around the edge-on, spiral galaxy NGC\,5907.
48: %
49: Our deep images reveal for the first time a large scale complex of
50: arcing loops that is an excellent example of how a low-mass satellite
51: accretion can produce an interwoven, rosette-like structure of debris
52: dispersed in the halo of its host galaxy. The existence of this
53: structure, which has probably formed and survived for several Gigayears,
54: confirms
55: that halos of spiral galaxies in the Local Universe may still contain a
56: significant number of galactic fossils from their hierarchical
57: formation.
58:
59:
60: To examine the validity of the external accretion scenario, we present
61: N-body simulations of the tidal disruption of a dwarf galaxy-like
62: system in a disk galaxy plus dark halo potential that demonstrate that
63: most of the observed tidal features observed in NGC\,5907 can be
64: explained by a single accretion event. Unfortunately, with no
65: kinematic data and only the projected geometry of the stream as
66: constraint, the parameters of our model are considerably degenerate
67: and, for now, must be considered illustrative only.
68:
69:
70: Interestingly, NGC\,5907 has long been considered a prototypical example of a
71: warped spiral in relative isolation. The presence of an extended tidal stream
72: challenges this picture and suggests that the gravitational perturbations
73: induced by the stream progenitor must be considered as a possible cause for the warp.
74: %
75: The detection of an old, complex tidal stream in a nearby galaxy with
76: rather modest instrumentation points to the viability of surveys to
77: find extragalactic tidal substructures around spiral galaxies in the
78: Local Volume ($<\!$ 15 Mpc) --- with the prospect of obtaining a
79: census with enough statistical significance to be compared with
80: cosmological simulations.
81: %
82: \end{abstract}
83: %
84: %
85: \keywords{galaxies: individual (NGC\,5907) --- galaxies: dwarf --- galaxies: evolution --- galaxies: interactions --- galaxies: halos --- dark matter}
86: %
87: %
88: %
89: \section{Introduction}\label{int}
90: %
91: %
92: The Cold Dark Matter ($\Lambda$CDM) paradigm predicts that stellar halos surrounding
93: large spiral galaxies formed through the accretion and tidal disruption of
94: satellite galaxies, a notion previously postulated \citep{Searle1978} on
95: empirical grounds from the character of stellar populations found in our own
96: Milky Way halo. Simulations have shown that the fossil records of those merger
97: events may be detected nowadays in the form of coherent stellar structures in
98: the outer regions of the host galaxies. The most spectacular of these fossil
99: structures are probably the formation of dynamically cold stellar streams,
100: which are similar to long rivers of stars (and likely dark matter; \cite{Penarrubia2008b}) tidally
101: stripped from a disrupting dwarf galaxy and wrapped around the host galaxy disk,
102: roughly tracing the orbit of the progenitor satellite. The now well-studied
103: Sagittarius (Sgr) tidal stream surrounding the Milky Way \citep{Ibata2001b,
104: Majewski2003, Martinez-Delgado2004} and the giant stream in Andromeda galaxy
105: \citep{Ibata2001a} are archetypes in the Local Group of these kinds of
106: fossilized satellite galaxy mergers and provide obvious support for the
107: scenario that tidally disrupted dwarf galaxies are an important contributor to
108: the stellar halos of disk galaxies.
109:
110:
111: Unfortunately, while the Milky Way and even M31 streams are close enough to be
112: resolved into individual stars that can be studied in detail, these nearby
113: streams can also span vast areas of sky, which currently presents particular
114: challenges to their study. In contrast, tidal streams around more distant
115: systems can be imaged in commensurately smaller fields of view, and --- at
116: least for those streams seen in diffuse light --- with equal contrast, given
117: the constancy of surface brightness with distance. However, over the past
118: decade, only a few cases of confirmed stellar tidal streams have been detected
119: in disk galaxies outside the Local Group \citep[e.g., ][and references
120: therein]{Malin1997, Forbes2003, Pohlen2004}, in contrast with the increasing
121: number of tidal structures detected in the Milky Way and M31 in recent years.
122: The presence of a multitude of tidal streams, arcs, shells and other irregular
123: structures possibly related to ancient merger events
124: in the deep panoramic view of the Andromeda halo \citep{Ibata2007}
125: reveals the level of stellar sub-structure that might be
126: present in the halos of nearby external spiral galaxies.
127:
128:
129: Extragalactic streams also offer a unique perspective to address some
130: interesting questions: Is the abundant number of stellar streams exceptional
131: in the Local Group or are tidal streams as common as has been predicted by
132: current cosmological models? What can we learn about the dark-matter halos of
133: the host galaxies from these streams? Can we use these systems to study the
134: star formation history of the disrupting dwarf galaxies? The frequency of
135: streams, their stellar population and orbital properties provide important
136: clues to the nature of the stream progenitors, lend insights into the
137: underlying gravitational potential and structure of the massive dark halo
138: they inhabit, and constrain hierarchical models of galaxy formation favored by
139: current cosmological models. In that respect, an interesting parameter that may possibly be constrained
140: through the detection of tidal streams in external galaxies is the flattening
141: of the dark matter halos surrounding the host galaxies. The spatial and
142: kinematic distributions of stream particles are fairly sensitive to this
143: quantity \citep[e.g.][and references therein]{Johnston2002, Helmi04,
144: Johnston2005, Law2005, Penarrubia2006} and the shapes and orientations of
145: dark matter halos with respect to the disk axi-symmetry plane reflect the nature
146: of dark matter \citep[see, e.g.][for shape estimates for cold, self-interacting and hot dark
147: matter models, respectively]{Dubinsky2001, Yoshida2000, Dave2001}. For example, $\Lambda$CDM models predict that dark matter
148: halos are triaxial, with minor axes perpendicular to the disk plane. On average the minor-to-major axis ratio near
149: the center is $c/a\simeq 0.7$ \citep{Hayashi2007}, although halos may become
150: considerably rounder after the baryonic galactic components have formed
151: \citep{Kazantzidis2004} or if dark matter is warm \citep{Biermann2007}. Thus,
152: using tidal streams in external galaxies might be an ideal tool to obtain a
153: significant statistical sample of flattening values that can be compared
154: against predictions from cosmological models.
155:
156:
157: These arguments suggest that a systematic survey
158: for tidal streams around extragalactic systems would provide a new way to
159: explore galaxy structure and evolution, with direct constraints on
160: cosmological models. Undertaking such a tidal stream survey
161: was urged by \cite{Johnston2001} in their comprehensive discussion of the
162: appearance and detectability of extragalactic tidal streams. Their analysis
163: suggests that a survey of 100 parent galaxies reaching to a surface brightness
164: of 30 mag arcsec$^{-2}$ would reveal many tens of tidal features; a slightly
165: higher estimate of about one per galaxy is obtained in their most recent
166: reanalysis of the problem \citep{Bullock2005}. These authors also point out
167: the advantage of exploring thin, edge-on disk systems because of the favorable
168: orientation for detecting low surface brightness features against light of the
169: parent system and the ability to assess limits on the mass ratio of the
170: satellite and parent galaxy by whether the disk of the parent appears to be
171: disturbed.
172:
173:
174:
175: \cite{Johnston2001} estimated that a search strategy designed to obtain
176: reliable photometry along the stream length would require about ten times
177: longer exposure times that those aimed at detection only. We adopted this
178: approach of striving for deep images to detect the full path of the
179: tidal stream, which, in the absence of kinematic data, is the main input for
180: comparison with N-body simulations (see Sec.\ref{nbody}). Using this strategy,
181: we started a pilot survey on some nearby galaxies which
182: has proven the concept with the discovery of a giant stellar tidal stream
183: around the spiral galaxy NGC\,4013 \citep{Martinez-Delgado2008} and the
184: detection of the faintest parts of the extended disk of the nearby spiral
185: galaxy M\,94 (Trujillo et al. 2008, in preparation).
186:
187:
188: With the hope of improving our understanding of the known tidal stream in
189: NGC\,5907, discovered by \cite{Shang1998}, and to demonstrate the sensitivity
190: of the small aperture telescope used in our survey (see Sec.\ref{data}), we
191: reobserved this system as a commissioning target.
192: In this paper we present our very deep image of NGC\,5907 that reveals
193: additional loops of debris in the halo (see Sec.\ref{sec:shape}) beyond those
194: reported by \cite{Shang1998}.
195: N-body simulations, described in Sec.\ref{nbody} show that most of the newly
196: found features can be explained as pieces of a spectacular, multiply-wrapped
197: stream of debris from the tidal disruption of a single companion galaxy.
198: We also discuss in Sec.\ref{discussion} the applications of such surveys to glean a deeper
199: theoretical understanding of galaxy formation and evolution, beyond placing
200: strong constraints on present cosmological scenarios. This foray into a more
201: systematic look for tidal streams in the nearby universe has yielded promising
202: results that encourage more aggressive attention to this new way of
203: understanding galaxy structure and evolution as advocated by the above
204: theoretical studies.
205: %
206: %
207: %
208: \section{Target, Observations and Data Reduction}
209: %
210: \subsection{The Target: NGC\,5907}
211: %
212: %
213: NGC\,5907 is a nearby \citep[14 Mpc;][]{Zepf2000}, edge-on, Sc galaxy, very
214: similar (e.g., type, absolute magnitude, and rotation speed) to the Milky Way.
215: %
216: NGC\,5907 has frequently been the target of deep surveys (radio, optical and
217: near-infrared) because it is an apparently undisturbed, almost edge-on disk
218: useful for exploring the properties of spiral disks, determining the
219: properties of dust and gas in disk galaxies, testing for the prevalence of
220: luminous thick disks and halos, searching for warps, and exploring the
221: strength of dark matter in disks \citep[e.g.][]{Sancisi1976, vdK1981,
222: Casertano1983, Skrutskie1985, Sasaki1987, Barnaby1992, Morrison1994,
223: Sackett1994, Lequeux1996, Lequeux1998, Rand1996, Dumke1997, Rudy1997,
224: James1998, Xilouris1999, Zheng1999}.
225: %
226: Although VLA HI maps of this galaxy showed that it has a large-scale
227: warped gas disk \citep{Sancisi1976}, NGC\,5907 was long considered to
228: be a prototypical example of a warped disk galaxy existing in relative
229: isolation since the identification of a neighbouring,
230: interacting galaxy was lacking.
231: %
232: However, deep imaging of NGC\,5907 by \cite{Shang1998} has revealed a
233: very faint, elliptically-shaped ring around the disk, and this has
234: been interpreted to be the remnant of a tidally disrupted dwarf
235: satellite galaxy, an analog to the debris stream created by the Milky
236: Way-Sgr interaction, although at higher surface brightness.
237: %
238: %
239: %
240: \subsection{Observation and Data Reduction}
241: \label{data}
242: %
243:
244: We have obtained deep optical images of NGC\,5907 with the 0.5-meter
245: Ritchey-Chretien telescope of the BlackBird Remote Observatory (BBRO)
246: situated in the Sacramento Mountains (New Mexico, USA). We used a Santa
247: Barbara Instrument Group (SBIG) STL-11100 CCD camera,
248: which yields a large field of view (27.7$\arcmin$ $\times$ 18.2$\arcmin$) at a plate scale of 0.45
249: arcseconds pixel$^{-1}$. The image set consists of multiple deep exposures
250: with a non-infrared, clear luminance ($3500<\lambda<8500$), a red, a green and a blue filter from the SBIG Custom Scientific filter set.
251: Table \ref{obslog} provides a summary of the images collected during
252: different dark sky observing runs during the period June through
253: August 2006. Column 3 refers to the total
254: exposure time of the co-added images from each filter obtained with each run.
255:
256:
257: The science images were reduced using the standard procedures for bias
258: correction and flat-fielding. A master dark and bias frame was created by
259: combining 10 dark sub-exposures each produced at the same exposure length and
260: camera temperature settings used for the luminance and the filtered images. A
261: master flat was produced by combining 10 separate sky flat exposures for each
262: filter. The red, green and blue filtered exposures were separately combined
263: (using a median procedure) to produce red, green and blue master images that
264: represented the total exposure time for each color filter. These color images
265: were obtained to investigate the color of the structures surrounding the
266: galaxy and to extend the overall exposure of the final luminance
267: image.
268: The master images
269: for each filter were subsequently summed to produce a synthetic luminance
270: image that represented the total exposure time of all the color filter
271: data. The synthetic luminance image was then combined (using a median
272: procedure) with all the clear filtered luminance sub-exposures (see Table 1)
273: to increase the contrast of the diffuse light. The resulting final image thus
274: represents the sum of all available CCD exposures collected for this project,
275: with an accumulated exposure time of 11.35 hours (including 5.75 hours in the clear luminance filter).
276:
277:
278:
279: To enhance the faint structures around NGC\,5907 and disentangle their true
280: appearance from image noise effects, the contrast and detail of the summed
281: image was optimized using two well-known image processing techniques:
282: i)a histogram equalization of the image using a non-linear transfer
283: function\footnote{see
284: http://http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/rbf/HIPR2/histeq.htm and references
285: within};
286: and ii) Gaussian blur filtering \citep[]{Davies1990,
287: Haralick1992}.
288: The first method is very effective to
289: reveal very faint features in images that contains a large dynamical range,
290: as it is the case of a spiral galaxy with a very bright, compact stellar
291: disk surrounded by a
292: very faint tidal stream. With the purpose of suppressing the bright portions
293: of the image and intensifying the fainter parts of the stream, histogram
294: equalization employs a monotonic, non-linear mapping which re-assigns the
295: intensity values of pixels in the input image such that the output image
296: contains an uniform distribution of intensities. In our case, we used an
297: iterative process that involves several passes of a S-shaped histogram
298: operator to the total image.
299: While this method was successful in revealing the presence of the surrounding
300: faint structure, it also resulted in
301: the over saturation of contrast and significantly reduced intensity variances
302: within the stellar stream.
303: Once the image was contrasted, a low-pass Gaussian filter with a radius of 2 pixels was applied
304: to reduce the low level noise contaminating the image.
305: The resulting noise-filtered image is shown in Fig.\ref{BBROimage}.
306:
307:
308: As discussed above, our search technique was designed to very clearly reveal
309: the position and morphology of faint structures (for example, by combining all the
310: available images obtained in different filters with the clear luminance deep
311: images), but does not permit accurate photometry. Therefore, follow-up
312: photometric observations are needed to
313: measure accurate surface brightnesses and to estimate the total luminosity of
314: the detected tidal debris (see Sec.~\ref{SB}).
315: Furthermore, the use of an uncalibrated luminance filter prevents us from
316: estimating the surface brightness
317: limit that we reached in our deep probe of the NGC\,5907 halo in any
318: particular, standard photometric band.
319: However, the detection of obvious diffuse light structures fainter than those
320: reported in previous studies
321: (with a surface brightness as faint as $\Sigma_R \sim$ 27.7 mag arcsec$^{-2}$;
322: see Sect.~\ref{SB}), suggests
323: that our images reach a surface brightness magnitude fainter than the $R=27$
324: mag arcsec$^{-2}$ limit of the deep NGC\,5907
325: image by \cite{Morrison1994} and \cite{Sackett1994}, and the $R=28.7$ mag arcsec$^{-2}$ limited image by \cite{Zheng1999}.
326:
327: Regardless, this result is a striking example of the scientific potential of
328: modest aperture telescopes (0.5-meter)
329: operating under very dark skies for probing the diffuse structure of galaxies.
330:
331:
332: \section{The Tidal Stream(s) of NGC\,5907}
333: %
334: \subsection{Observed Morphology of the NGC\,5907 System}
335: \label{sec:shape}
336: %
337: %
338: \subsubsection{Truncation and Optical Warp}
339:
340:
341: In this Section we focus on the outer, diffuse light properties revealed in
342: Figures \ref{BBROimage} and \ref{BBROimagePlabel}, but several comments about
343: the disk are worth pointing out briefly.
344:
345:
346: Our image shows that the disk of NGC\,5907 extends in diameter well
347: beyond where most previous images have tracked its disk light. The existence
348: of this light challenges previous claims that the disk is {\it sharply
349: truncated} (in the sense of the galaxy's outer edge) at a nominal {\it
350: cut-off} radius of about 6\arcmin ~from the center
351: \citep{vdK1981, Sasaki1987, Morrison1994}. From the original radial profiles
352: \citep[][Fig.9 and Fig.7,
353: respectively]{vdK1981,Sasaki1987} there is clearly a radial break feature
354: visible, however, it should be better described as a sharp change of slope than
355: a complete {\it cut-off}. This profile shape, well fitted with a broken
356: exponential function, is a relatively common feature of late-type spiral
357: galaxies \citep{Pohlen2006,Erwin2008}.
358:
359:
360: Figures \ref{BBROimage} and \ref{BBROimagePlabel} clearly show that NGC\,5907
361: has a stellar warp, which clearly extends after the nominal cut-off radius.
362: The observable faint radial extensions of the disk are strongly bent in the
363: same sense as the obvious HI warp found by \cite{Sancisi1976}, and are most
364: strongly visible on the northwest disk edge. Note, these same extended disk
365: features can also be seen in Fig.\ 2 of \cite{Shang1998}, and just about in
366: the near infrared image of \cite{Barnaby1992}.
367: %
368: Evidence for the warp in optical light was also previously seen in the optical
369: disk at smaller radii by \cite{Sasaki1987}, \cite{Florido1992}, and
370: \cite{Morrison1994} and was, of course, pointed out as well by
371: \cite{Shang1998}.
372: %
373:
374: %
375: \subsubsection{Diffuse Light Structures}
376:
377:
378: The most striking features, and the primary focus of the present discussion,
379: is the newly revealed network of arcing loops of diffuse light around
380: NGC\,5907 that are likely the product of the classical satellite tidal
381: disruption process. Our deep image (see Fig.\ref{BBROimagePlabel}) reveals that the
382: ring-shaped feature to the southeast, we refer to this here as the {\it SE loop},
383: discovered by \cite{Shang1998} is only the brighter part of a large-scale
384: complex of stellar debris arcs around NGC\,5907. We count about a
385: half-dozen other additional arc-like features in our image. On the eastern
386: side, it is possible to detect the full extension of the SE loop, turning
387: around and falling toward the disk. This yields a vertical structure (labeled
388: E1 in Fig.\ref{BBROimagePlabel}) that crosses the galactic plane and possibly
389: extends to the other side of the galaxy. In addition, an independent
390: structure (labeled E2), somewhat parallel to the SE-loop, can be seen to be
391: shifted about $\sim$ 10 $\arcmin$ to the northwest of the \cite{Shang1998}
392: structure and sweeping almost 180$^{\circ}$ around the center of NGC\,5907.
393:
394:
395: Although the accretion origin of this structure appears a reasonable
396: hypothesis, we must point out its extraordinary complexity --- especially on the
397: western side of NGC\,5907 where we find a faint, long tail extending $\sim$ 25 kpc from the
398: disk, labeled {\it SW tail} in Fig. \ref{BBROimagePlabel}, and previously
399: reported only
400: in some studies \citep[see Fig.\ 1b in][]{Reshetnikov2000}. From
401: south to north, three additional arcs are detected on the west side of the
402: disk (labeled W1, W2 and W3, respectively). These features appear to
403: cross each other fairly closely to the disk major axis of NGC\,5907, which
404: makes it difficult to discern which of these arcs are the continuation of the
405: features observed on the eastern side, that is, the SE loop, E1, and E2.
406:
407:
408: For example, it is obvious that the SE loop extends to the western side, but
409: it becomes unclear which path it takes (e.g., SW tail or W1). On the other
410: hand, it is clear that the W3 arc is the westernmost continuation of the E2
411: loop. Interestingly, this stream piece turns around, crosses the W2 arc and
412: finishes in the main disk again, forming the W1 arc. It is however more difficult to assess
413: whether the W2 arc (the most diffuse discernible structure,
414: highly contaminated by the diffuse light of the galaxy disk) or W1 could be the
415: western extension of the E1 tail.
416:
417:
418: \subsubsection{Evidence for a Single Coherent Structure}
419:
420: With the image in Fig. \ref{BBROimagePlabel} alone it is impossible to conclude
421: whether the smaller features on the western side are the continuation of the
422: loops on the eastern side and so whether the whole set of these identified
423: tidal structures originate from a single or different accretion events.
424: %
425: In general, the largest features (e.g., the SE and E2 loops) have similar
426: shapes, angular lengths, radius of curvature, and separations from the center
427: of NGC\,5907. In addition, all of the features (large and small) share a
428: similar projected width, $\sim$ 7 kpc \citep[consistent with the value
429: reported by][see Sec.\ref{SB}]{Shang1998}, as well as a similar, rather
430: bright surface brightness (see Sec.\ref{SB}). These similarities all provide
431: circumstantial evidence that the various features may all come from a single,
432: old\footnote{Following \cite{Johnston2001}, the age of the trail here refers to the epoch when the
433: debris were unbound from the satellite core (see
434: Fig.~\ref{nbodyfig} ) and not to the age of its stellar population, that is
435: unknown.} stellar tidal stream --- similar to the multiply-wrapped Sgr dwarf
436: galaxy stream around the Milky Way. These structures provide a rather unique
437: and spectacular external view of the classical rosette-like, multi-loop
438: patterns expected for tidally disrupting dwarf galaxies seen in N-body
439: simulations \citep[such as those made of the Sgr system ---
440: e.g., ][]{Johnston1995, Ibata1998, Martinez-Delgado2004, Law2005}. There are
441: further analogies of the NGC\,5907 structures with the Sgr stream in that they
442: have a similar linear cross-sectional width (suggesting similarly massed
443: progenitors), apogalacticon and apparent orbital ellipticity (suggesting a
444: similar orbit), and surface brightness and length (suggesting a similar mass
445: loss rate and age of interaction). In Section \ref{nbody} we explore this
446: working hypothesis in detail and provide a comprehensive, illustrative model
447: that further supports the notion that a single, Sgr-like system could create a
448: substantial fraction of the newly found diffuse structures.
449:
450:
451: Interestingly, while the surface brightness of these loops does show some
452: modulation, nowhere among these features do we see a bright spot that could be
453: identified with a remaining dwarf satellite {\it core}. Thus, our image provides
454: no definitive insights on the current position and final fate (that is,
455: whether or not it is completely disrupted by now) of the progenitor satellite
456: galaxy (since it could be hidden behind the disk). However, the full
457: panoramic view of the NGC\,5907 system in Figure \ref{BBROimage} provides no
458: evidence for any association of the stellar streams with the dwarf irregular
459: galaxy PGC\,54419 (a confirmed satellite of NGC 5907 situated at 36.9 kpc
460: projected distance from its center), as proposed by \cite{Shang1998}.
461: We shall return to this subject
462: in Sec.\ref{discussion}.
463: %
464:
465: \subsection{Diffuse Light: Halo or Stream?}
466: \label{halo}
467: %
468: As mentioned above, there have been a number of deep photometric studies of
469: NGC\,5907, and a popular point of discussion is the claimed detection and
470: properties of `` excess'', non-disk light away from and perpendicular to the
471: disk and commonly attributed to a diffuse luminous halo \citep{Sackett1994,
472: Lequeux1996, Lequeux1998, Rudy1997, James1998, Zepf2000, Irwin2006}. Figure
473: \ref{BBROimage} clearly shows how these previous studies may have been
474: affected by the coherent tidal stream structures, especially W1 and W2, which
475: lie along the southwestern minor axis at distances where such studies have
476: made the ``halo" detections. Indeed, the very shape of the ``inner triangle"
477: of light formed by W1 and W2 can be discerned in the image analyzed by
478: \citet[see, e.g., their Fig.\ 1]{Lequeux1996}, and a similar asymmetry seen in
479: the photometric data by \cite{Sackett1994} may also be explained by these same
480: structures \citep[e.g., see the lower right panel of
481: Fig.~\ref{BBROimagePlabel} in][]{Sackett1994}.
482:
483: One wonders if the presence of these structures may also explain the
484: differences in the colors of the ``halo" light found on either side of the
485: disk shown in Figure 1 of \cite{Lequeux1998}. \cite{Zheng1999} have
486: previously suspected that the presence of tidal debris light (particularly on
487: the western side) might be significantly contaminating the ``halo" light that
488: was previously reported; these authors concluded that, when combined with
489: residual scattered light from foreground stars, this debris effectively
490: reduces the need for a faint, extended halo.
491: We concur that indeed these previous studies were
492: probably strongly affected by the presence of the ``W'' features --- but of
493: course this {\it is} actually ``halo" light, it is just in the form of tidal
494: debris in what is obviously the active hierarchical formation of the NGC\,5907
495: halo. However, a low surface brightness halo
496: ($\Sigma_R \sim$ 30-31 mag arcsec$^{-2}$) similar to M31 one could be present
497: (Fliri et al. 2008, in preparation).
498: %
499: %
500: \subsection{Estimating the Surface Brightness, Total Luminosity and Stellar Mass of the NGC\,5907 Tidal Stream}
501: \label{SB}
502: %
503: Ideally, one would like to use the BBRO image to measure the surface
504: brightness of the observed stream. However, there are some concerns that
505: prevent us from extracting this information directly from this image. First
506: of all, the image is the result of the combination of multiple images in
507: different filters with those taken using an extremely wide (luminance) filter to
508: maximize the photon collection. This makes a calibration of the stars present
509: in the BBRO image using the same stars observed through standard filters
510: non-trivial. Significant color corrections are expected.
511: %
512:
513: %
514: In addition, the resulting background on the BBRO image is slightly patchy (see Fig. 1), and,
515: more importantly, the field of view is not large enough to allow us to properly
516: estimate the sky level. For the above reasons we have decided to
517: adopt the value reported by \cite{Zheng1999} for the mean surface brightness
518: of the stream in the NE loop in the $R$-band --- i.e. 27.7 mag arcsec$^{-2}$ ---
519: and rely on the BBRO image only to determine the morphology, position and width
520: of the stream in the sky.
521:
522: In order to determine the total luminosity of the tidal stream we first calculate the total area covered by
523: the tidal tails. To do so, we estimate the stream width in two different
524: strips A and B located in the bright stream piece detected by Sheng et al. (1998) (see Fig.~\ref{BBROimagePlabel}). The surface brightness
525: distribution in these two strips is shown in Fig.~\ref{width}. The width of
526: the stream in each of these strips is estimated using a Gaussian function and the Full Width Half Maximum
527: (FWHM) of these Gaussian fits are used as a
528: measurement of the stream width. To be conservative, we take the minimum
529: of the FWHM measured in both regions (i.e. $\sim$103 arcsec; see
530: Fig.~\ref{width}) as representative of the width of the stream. At the
531: distance of NGC\,5907 the above value corresponds to $\sim$7 kpc. Subsequently, we calculate the length of the stream by placing elliptical annuli at the inner at outer sides of each loop. Here we consider that the stream of Fig.~\ref{BBROimagePlabel} can be described by the loop L1 formed by the SW-SE-E1-W2 arcs and the half-loop L2 formed by the W3-E2 arcs. The area of each loop is then calculated as $A=\pi q (a^2-b^2)$, where $a$ and $b$ are the semi-major axis of the elliptical annuli and are related as $b=a-FWHM$. The minor-to-major axis ratio of the ellipses has an estimated value of $q\simeq 0.5$ for L1 and L2. We find that for L1 $a=540$ arcsec$=36.6$ kpc, so that $A_{L1}=728$ kpc$^2$, and for L2 $a'=27.5$ kpc, which implies $A_{L2}=527$ kpc$^2$.
532: On doing this, the approximate area subtended by these pieces of the stream is $A=A_{L1}+A_{L2}/2\simeq 990$ kpc$^2$.
533:
534:
535: Using this estimate of the area of the SE loop and E2 loop, the reported mean surface
536: brightness of 27.7 mag arcsec$^{-2}$ by
537: \cite{Zheng1999} (i.e. $\sim$0.217 L$_{\sun}$ pc$^{-2}$ in the $R$-band)
538: implies a total $R$-band luminosity for the stream of $\sim$2$\times$10$^8$
539: L$_{\sun}$. This value is one order of magnitude brighter than the luminosity
540: reported for the Sgr dwarf galaxy ($\sim$1.9$\times$10$^7$, Majewski et al. 2003), but it
541: is still consistent with
542: the possibility that this complex structure of debris resulted from the
543: disruption of a single dwarf galaxy during a recent interaction with NGC\,5907
544: (see Sec.~\ref{comparison}). We have also roughly estimated the total stellar mass of the
545: stream by using the color $R-I=$0.5$\pm$0.3 given in \cite{Zheng1999}. Using
546: the prescription given by \cite{Bell2001} the above color implies a
547: ($M/L$)$_R$ $\sim1.6^{+15.0}_{-1.4}$ and consequently a total stellar mass of
548: $\sim$3.5$\times$10$^8$ M$_{\sun}$. This value is very uncertain due to the
549: large error in the stream color. So, the total stellar mass should only be
550: taken as a rough estimate of the stellar mass in the stream within an order of
551: magnitude. Given the large uncertainties of our estimate it is encouraging
552: that the above stellar mass estimate is similar to the one estimated
553: ($\sim$2$\times$10$^8$ M$_\sun$) by \cite{Johnston2001} using dynamical
554: considerations.
555:
556: Unfortunately, none of the individual color filtered data set
557: were of sufficient exposure length to reveal hints of the faint surrounding
558: structures with enough signal--to--noise to permit detection or surface
559: brightness measurement. Therefore, it is not possible to constrain a
560: stellar population gradients
561: along the stream from this study.
562:
563:
564: %
565: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%55
566: \section{N-body Simulations}
567: \label{nbody}
568: %
569: The clear picture of a repeatedly wrapped tidal stream around NGC\,5907
570: naturally suggests fitting the system with N-body models. Typically the number
571: of free parameters implemented by N-body models of satellite accretion in
572: external galaxies is vast. In the case of NGC\,5907, although the mass within
573: the luminous radius is well constrained by measurements of its circular
574: velocity curve, no information is available on the flattening of its potential
575: on the scales where the tidal remnants are observed ($\sim 10$--50 kpc in
576: projection). Additionally, the present position and velocity vectors of the
577: progenitor system are unknown as well as its mass and luminous profiles.
578: %
579:
580: %
581: Currently, the only available information on the stream is its surface
582: brightness and projected geometry with respect to the host. This introduces a
583: new free parameter, which is the projection angle between the line of sight
584: and the orbital plane of the stream progenitor. Fortunately, NGC\,5907 presents
585: an edge-on disk
586: projection that eliminates a second projection angle between the line-of-sight
587: vector and the axi-symmetry plane of the disk. Kinetically data of bright
588: dynamical tracers (as planetary nebula and globular clusters)along the
589: stream would help to
590: disentangle the projection effects and to constrain the satellite orbit.
591: Unfortunately, these cannot be readily obtained from individual stars with the present observational
592: capabilities owing to the large distance of NGC\,5907.
593:
594: The huge degeneracy of the problem weakens any possible constraint obtained
595: through N-body modeling of the stream and, in fact, it is presently unclear
596: how much information can be gleaned from streams in external galaxies using
597: this technique. That is an open question that goes beyond the scope of this
598: paper and that will be studied in a future contribution (Pe\~narrubia et al.,
599: {\it in prep}).
600: %
601:
602: %
603: Nevertheless, in this paper our N-body models are only used to answer a more
604: simple question: can the complex stellar structure be the result of a {\it
605: single} merger event? This reduces the problem of finding one of the many
606: possible free parameter combinations that yields a reasonably good match to
607: the observations.
608: %
609: %
610: %
611: \subsection{Model Parameters}
612: %
613: We examine several illustrative N-body simulations of dwarf spheroidal systems
614: disrupting in a spiral galaxy having properties similar to NGC\,5907. This
615: galaxy is an Sc spiral with a maximum rotational velocity of $V_{c,{\rm
616: max}}=227$ km s$^{-1}$ and absolute magnitude $M_B\simeq -21$
617: \citep{Casertano1983} --- similar, therefore, to the Milky Way.
618: %
619:
620: %
621: Here we assume a static host galaxy potential during the satellite orbit. As
622: \cite{Penarrubia2006} show, the geometry and kinematics of a tidal stream are
623: independent of the past evolution of the host galaxy potential and solely
624: reflect the present properties of the host. Our satellite galaxy realizations
625: are injected in a host galaxy that has the following components: a
626: \cite{Miyamoto1975} disk, a \cite{Hernquist1990} bulge and a Navarro,Frenk \&
627: White (1996,1997)
628: dark matter halo. The determination of the disk, bulge and dark matter halo
629: mass from the circular velocity curve of NGC 5907 is very uncertain due to
630: the well-known disk-halo degeneracy. Here we adopt values that are similar
631: to those derived by \cite{Just2006} by fitting the observed rotation curve:
632: the disk and bulge masses are $M_d=8.4\times
633: 10^{10}M_\odot$ and $M_b=2.3\times 10^{10}M_\odot$, respectively. The radial
634: and vertical exponential scale-lengths of the disk are $R_d=6.4$ kpc and
635: $z_d=0.26$ kpc, respectively.
636: The bulge core radius is $c=0.6$ kpc. The halo density profile can be written as
637: %
638: \begin{equation}
639: \rho_{\rm NFW} =\frac{\delta_c\rho_c}{r/r_s (1 + r/r_s)^2},
640: \label{eq:rhonfw}
641: \end{equation}
642: %
643: where $\rho_c$=277.72 $h^{2}M_\odot{\rm kpc}^2$ is the present-day critical
644: density, $h=0.71$ is the Hubble constant in units of 100 ${\rm km}$ ${\rm
645: s}^{-1}$ ${\rm Mpc}^{-1}$ consistent with constraints from
646: cosmic microwave background (CMB) measurements and galaxy clustering (see Spergel et al 2007 and
647: references therein), $\delta_c$ is a dimensionless parameter and $r_s$
648: is the halo scale radius. For $\delta_c=200$ we use $M_{200}=6.8\times
649: 10^{11}M_\odot$, $r_s\simeq 8.2$ kpc and $r_{200}=180$ kpc. We must remark, however, that different combinations of the host
650: galaxy parameters can yield a similar value of $V_{c,{\rm max}}$ (see Just
651: et al. 2006 for a detailed disccusion). Unfortunately, this increases the
652: degeneracy inherent to the models of the tidal stream surrounding NGC 5907.
653: %
654:
655: %
656: The satellite galaxy is modeled as a \cite{King1966} profile for simplicity.
657: More realistic, multi-component models that distinguish between baryonic and
658: dark matter, such as those motivated by $\Lambda$CDM
659: \citep[e.g.][]{Penarrubia2008a,Penarrubia2008b}, would further increase the
660: number of free parameters. Our satellite galaxies have typical parameters for
661: nearby dwarf galaxies \citep{Mateo1998}: a total mass of $2\times 10^8
662: M_\odot$, core radius of $R_c=390$ pc and King concentration $c_k=\log_{10}(R_t/R_c)\simeq
663: 0.84$, where $R_t$ is the King tidal radius. These values were selected to
664: reproduce the projected width and extent of the stellar tidal stream detected
665: in NGC\,5907 (see below).
666:
667: In order to find an illustrative model that provides a reasonable match to the
668: projected distribution of debris, we run a set of N-body simulations that
669: explore some of the satellite's orbital and structural parameters. Following
670: \cite{Reshetnikov2000}, we assume that the orbital apocenter corresponds to
671: the maximum separation of the stream from the center of NGC 5907 (i.e. that of
672: the SE loop), so that $r_a=51$ kpc. To estimate the orbital eccentricity, we
673: vary the peri to apocentric distance ratio ($r_{\rm p}/r_{\rm a}=0.1,
674: 0.2,...,1.0$). Following the estimates of Johnston, Sackett \& Bullock (2001),
675: we explore three different progenitor masses ($10^8, 2\times 10^8$ and
676: $5\times 10^8 M_\odot$). To derive the age of the stream we integrate each
677: N-body realization a maximum time of 9 Gyr, recording the positions and
678: velocities of the N-body particles in 70 snap-shots (i.e. with a time interval of 0.14 Gyr). Each snap-shot is then visually inspected varying the projection angle ($\xi$).
679:
680:
681: %
682: \subsection{Comparison of N-body Models to the Data}
683: \label{comparison}
684: %
685:
686: %
687: In Fig.~\ref{nbodyfig} we show an illustrative single-accretion model that
688: produces a good overall match to most of the observed structures.\footnote{This figure is the final snapshot of a movie included as supplementary material in the electronic version of this paper.} This suggests
689: that most of the tidal loops could have formed from the accretion of a single
690: dwarf satellite with an initial total mass of $2\times 10^8 M_\odot$. For this particular model, the satellite has lost
691: 60\% of its mass due to tidal stripping after 3.6 Gyr of evolution. The
692: progenitor moves on a highly inclined orbit (orbital inclination
693: $i=80^\circ$ with respect to the disk plane), with relatively low eccentricity (the peri and apocenters are,
694: respectively, $r_p=21$ kpc and $r_a=51$ kpc, which translates into an
695: intermediate orbital eccentricity of $e\simeq 0.42$) and a radial orbital
696: period of $T_r\simeq 0.9$ Gyr. Remarkably, these parameters are
697: fairly similar to those derived for the Sgr stream in the Milky Way (Law et al. 2005).
698: In
699: addition, we find that the projection angle formed by the line-of-sight and the orbital
700: plane vector has a present value of $\xi\approx 57^\circ$ (an edge-on view of the
701: stream implies $\xi=90^\circ$), which explains the considerable elongation of the
702: stream in the vertical direction.
703:
704: In general, our model agrees with the previous model of \cite{Reshetnikov2000}, although a few differences must be noticed. For example, \cite{Reshetnikov2000} assume a perfectly polar orbit ($i=90^\circ$), which is therefore not affected by orbital precession, and derive a slightly higher orbital eccentricity ($\approx 0.6$), probably a result of the smaller amount of observational constraints (only the SE loop was known at that time).
705:
706:
707: %
708: Our model also provides a comprehensive explanation of the relation
709: between the different loops and arcs discussed in \S~\ref{sec:shape}. In
710: particular, this solution suggests that the leading arm forms the SE-loop,
711: bending toward the disk along the E1 loop and giving rise to the arc W2 after
712: it crosses the NGC\,5907 disk. The trailing tail of the tidal stream would be
713: visible as the arc W1 in the west, and its continuation bends toward the east
714: direction to form the W3 arc and the E2 loop after it crosses the disk. The
715: longest stream piece that fades away towards the west (the SW tail; Fig. 2)
716: would correspond to the oldest piece of the trailing tail with particles that,
717: according to our model, were stripped around 3.6 Gyr ago.
718: Although the shape of our illustrative stream model can reproduce most of the
719: prominent observed features, it also predicts the continuation of the E2 loop
720: that extends between the SE loop and E1 arc. This feature is not obvious in
721: Fig.\ref{BBROimage}, although the presence of an excess of light in the area
722: where this arc would be located (denoted as OV in Fig.~\ref{BBROimagePlabel}) is
723: noticeable.
724:
725:
726: Interestingly, the model also successfully reproduces the strong east-west
727: stream asymmetry (the SE loop reaches a projected distance of $\simeq 51$ kpc,
728: whereas the SW tail only extends out to $\simeq 27$ kpc), which results from
729: the eccentric orbit of the progenitor system and an inclined line-of-sight projection.
730:
731:
732: This illustrative model also provides a reasonable explanation for the fate of the progenitor satellite.
733: It suggests that the dwarf could have survived but
734: that its remnant core (black points in Fig.~\ref{nbodyfig}) might presently
735: be hidden behind the galaxy disk, $\sim15$ kpc from the galactic center. If
736: this hypothesis is correct, it leads us to conclude that the NE ring
737: feature of \cite{Shang1998} corresponds to a young piece of the stream.
738: In addition, our model suggests that the NGC\,5907 stellar stream may be
739: relatively old, with the fainter, outer loop material (SW tail in Fig. 2) becoming unbound at
740: least 3.6 Gyrs ago (blue points in Fig.~\ref{nbodyfig}). The new tidal tails presented in this paper are
741: considerably older than the previous stream pieces discovered by Shang et al. (Reshetnikov \& Sotnikova 2000 estimate age$\simless 1.5$ Gyr) and than any definitively established piece of the Sgr tidal
742: stream \citep[$\leq$ 2.5 Gyrs;][]{Majewski2003,Law2005}. The stellar stream around NGC 5907 may represent therefore one
743: of the most ancient wraps of a tidal stream ever reported in the halo of a
744: spiral galaxy.
745:
746:
747: %
748: %
749: %
750:
751: \section{Discussion}
752: \label{discussion}
753:
754: In this paper we present in detail an extragalactic perspective of
755: a stellar tidal stream surrounding the nearby spiral galaxy NGC\,5907. This
756: ghostly structure is an elegant example of how a single low-mass satellite
757: accretion occurring in the current epoch can produce a very complex,
758: rosette-like structure of debris dispersed in the halo of its host galaxy that
759: may survive for several Gigayears, a scenario predicted by N-body simulations of tidally disrupting stellar systems around the
760: Milky Way \citep[e.g., ][]{Law2005, Penarrubia2005, Martin2005,
761: Martinez-Delgado2007}.
762:
763: The external view of the stream wrapping NGC 5907 also offers for the first time a direct
764: observational evidence that the material stripped from disrupting satellite galaxies (stream stars likely accompanied by dark matter) may cross the inner regions of galactic
765: disks. This process will likely induce gravitational effects (e.g., creation of
766: spiral arms, star formation triggering, %...,
767: etc) that are not yet fully understood, a phenomena that
768: has been also suggested for the Sgr stream in our Galaxy
769: \citep{Majewski2003, Martinez-Delgado2007} but that lacks confirmation due to our inner perspective.
770: In addition, the presence of tidal streams wrapping galaxies with warped disks (see also Mart\'inez-Delgado et al. 2008) may suggest satellite galaxy perturbations as the origin of those features (e.g. Vel\'azquez \& White 1999, Weinberg \& Blitz 2006).
771:
772:
773:
774: Recent cosmologically-motivated simulations have shown that in a $\Lambda$CDM paradigm the accretion of several massive ($0.2$--0.6$M_{\rm disk}$) sub-halos onto the central regions of the host galaxy should be common from $z\simeq 1$ to the present (Kazantzidis et al. 2007). Such accretion events lead to strong warping, flaring and thickening of an initially cold disk as well as to the formation of long-lived, ring-like stellar features in the outskirts of the disk that may locate several kiloparsecs off the disk plane and have surface brightnesses in the range of 25--30 mag arcsec$^{-2}$ (see Fig.~6 of Kazantzidis et al. 2007). Given the similarities in shape and mass between NGC 5907 and the Milky Way, it is interesting to note that our deep images show none of the predicted features besides a classical warped disk. A statistically relevant sample of deep photometric images of nearby, edge-on spiral galaxies might reveal whether the absence of strongly perturbed old disks poses a problem for our theoretical understanding of how disk galaxies form in a $\Lambda$CDM context.
775:
776: Our survey reveals that the presence of complex structures from ancient streams in the outskirts of spiral
777: galaxies in the Local Volume ($\simless$ 15 Mpc) must be taken into account to
778: correctly interpret the results of deep, pencil-beam photometric probes
779: designed to constrain the formation and composition of galactic halos. This
780: concern is justified in the case of NGC\,5907, where several authors
781: \citep[e.g.,][]{Sackett1994, Lequeux1996} have reported the presence of a
782: peculiar, red, luminous, flattened stellar halo that may actually correspond
783: to tidal debris that in projection appears located closely below the disk plane
784: and that may have originated the faint residual light emission reported in
785: these previous studies \citep[as also suggested by][]{Zheng1999}.
786:
787: What can we learn from the theoretical study of tidal streams in galaxies
788: beyond the Local Group? Firstly it must be remarked that
789: theoretical models are severely hampered
790: by the impossibility of measuring the kinematics of individual stars
791: at distances of several Mpc with present instrumentation.
792: In the case of NGC 5907, the large degeneracies in the orbital and structural parameters of the stream progenitor force us to consider our N-body model as illustrative only. However, the model is certainly helpful to interpret most of the observed features of the NGC 5907 tidal stream and proves that such a complex stream-like structure can be explained by the accretion of a {\it single} satellite galaxy.
793:
794: Despite the degeneracy introduced by the observational limitations, an
795: advantage of the panoramic
796: perspective in external galaxies is that it simplifies the detection of
797: stream pieces that were lost several Gigayears ago,
798: which strongly increases the
799: number and strength of the constraints that can be derived from these systems. For
800: example, (i) the variation of width and surface brightness along tidal streams
801: constrains the number of dark matter sub-halos in the Milky Way
802: \citep{Ibata2002, Johnston2002, Penarrubia2006, Siegal2007}. These authors
803: show that the presence of dark matter sub-halos in spiral galaxies would result
804: in a progressive heating of tidal streams as a result of close encounters. As
805: \cite{Penarrubia2006} point out, the averaged number of dark matter
806: substructures (and, thus, the likelihood of encounters) in a Milky Way-like
807: galaxy decreases monotonically since $z\sim 2$ to the present, which clearly
808: implies that ``old'' stream pieces are more likely to reveal perturbations
809: than recently stripped ones. (ii) Constraints on the flattening of the host
810: galaxy potential become significantly stronger as the number of stream wraps
811: increase \citep[e.g.,][]{Johnston2001, Law2005, Penarrubia2005}. (iii) Finally,
812: detecting old stream pieces will allow us to study possible metallicity
813: gradients within the progenitor galaxy, as it is for example in the case of the
814: Sgr tidal stream \citep[e.g.,][]{Bellazzini2006,Chou2007}.
815:
816:
817: The detection of an old, complex tidal stream in NGC\,5907 (14 Mpc
818: away) with modest instruments suggests the viability of carrying out
819: extragalactic surveys of substructures in the surroundings of spiral
820: galaxies in the Local Volume. It is a relevant question to wonder how many stellar streams should we
821: expect in the Local Volume. Cosmological N-body simulations predict that the
822: incidence of large satellite galaxy accretion occurring in the current epoch
823: is commonly {\it one per spiral galaxy for its inner galactocentric regions},
824: $\simless$ 50 kpc \citep[e.g.,][]{Bullock2005}. The presence of such a complex
825: stream at 14 Mpc from us, easily detectable with present
826: observational capabilities, clearly suggests that deep photometric images may
827: reveal a large number of substructures in the stellar halos of spiral
828: galaxies. The different stellar streams detected in the Milky Way
829: \citep{Yanny2003, Majewski2003, Juric2005, Belokurov2006a, Belokurov2006b} and
830: in M31 \citep{Ibata2007} by large photometric surveys supports this
831: expectation.
832:
833: Table~\ref{streamtable} gives the confirmed stellar stream features
834: discovered up to date. Interestingly, the first outstanding characteristic of
835: the tidal streams discovered in external galaxies to the present day is there
836: are {\it no} detected tidal streams in the Local Group with surface brightnesses
837: as high as seen in NGC\,5907.
838:
839: Presently, observational limitations impede the resolution of stars in external galaxies, which poses a
840: detection threshold of around $\mu_R\sim$ 29 \magsqarcsec in unresolved light.
841: In contrast, star counts can reach a detection level as low as $\sim$33 \magsqarcsec
842: \citep[see e.g.,][]{Belokurov2006a}. This explains why we cannot find the counter-parts
843: of the stellar streams detected in the Local Group in external galaxies, but it is indeed
844: puzzling that no tidal stream in the Milky Way or M31 is remotely as bright as the one detected here.
845:
846: In addition, Table~\ref{streamtable} also reveals that, with the single
847: exception of the Sgr dwarf, the progenitor systems of most of the stellar
848: streams known to the present day remain {\it undetected}. The most logical
849: explanation is that the progenitor galaxies have been nearly destroyed by
850: now. This scenario is supported by the N-body simulations of
851: \cite{Penarrubia2008b}, who show that dwarf galaxies undergoing tidal mass
852: stripping have to lose more than 90--99\% of their initial dark matter halo
853: mass before a stellar tidal stream may start forming. Once the host's tidal
854: field begins to strip stellar material, the central surface brightness
855: ($\Sigma_0$) and the total luminosity ($L$) of the dwarf galaxy suffers a
856: sharp, monotonic decline so that $\Sigma_0/\Sigma_0(t=0)\propto
857: \big[L/L(t=0)\big]^{0.6}$ for $L/L[t=0]\ll 1$.
858: %
859: Therefore, as a tidal stream forms the likelihood to detect its progenitor
860: decreases until, eventually, the present surface brightness falls beyond the
861: detection limits of our instruments. A second possibility that we explore in
862: our illustrative model (see Fig.~\ref{nbodyfig}) is that the progenitor
863: systems might be hidden behind the host disk or bulge. Although this scenario
864: may be applied to some of the systems listed in Table~\ref{streamtable}, it is
865: fairly unlikely that it explains the absence of progenitor galaxies for all of
866: them.
867:
868:
869: The study of tidal streams in external galaxies is a relatively young field
870: and provides direct way of addressing some opened questions on galactic
871: formation and evolution. For example, studying stellar
872: population gradients along tidal streams via deep {\it Hubble Space Telescope}
873: photometry data
874: \citep[see for example][]{Aloisi2005} will render important
875: constraints on the effect of tides on the stellar formation history of
876: dwarf galaxies. The panoramic view of tidal streams in external galaxies also
877: offers an excellent opportunity to demonstrate tidal stripping of globular
878: clusters formed in satellite galaxies, which may correspond to an
879: important fraction of the globular cluster population of the host, as
880: earlier proposed by \cite{Searle1978}. Searching for associated globular
881: clusters and planetary nebula may also offer a means by which kinematics
882: in distant streams could be derived (i.e. from intrinsically bright absorption line sources
883: or sources with emission lines), so that kinematical constraints might be placed
884: on theoretical models that aim to reproduce tidal streams in external
885: galaxies. These models, in turn, may provide reasonable estimates of the
886: flattening of the dark matter halos that surround Local Volume
887: galaxies.
888: Ultimately, the ideal scenario would require resolving
889: stellar populations at a distance of 10--20 Mpc, which will be feasible in the
890: next one or two decades with large ground-based telescopes like the
891: {\it Thirty-Meter-Telescope}, or spatial missions like the {\it James Webb Space
892: Telescope}.
893:
894: \vskip1cm
895: We thank H.-W. Rix, E. Bell, A. McConnachie, E. J. Alfaro, R. Ibata and
896: L. Mayer for very fruitful discussions. We are also grateful to the anonymous
897: referee for constructive suggestions that helped to improve this manuscript.
898: D. M.-D. acknowledges the hospitality of the Max
899: Planck Institute for Astronomy (Heidelberg, Germany), the Institute for
900: Advance Studies (Princeton, USA) and the University of Victoria (Canada), where part of this work was done. D. M-D
901: acknowledge funding from the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science (Ramon
902: y Cajal program contract and research project AYA 2007-65090).
903: JP
904: thanks Julio F. Navarro for financial support. SRM acknowledge funding by NSF grant
905: AST-0307851 and NASA/JPL contract 1228235.
906: %
907: %
908: %
909: %
910: %
911: \begin{thebibliography}{}
912: %
913: %
914: \bibitem[Aloisi et al.(2005)]{Aloisi2005} Aloisi, A., van der Marel, R. P.,
915: Mack, J., Leitherer, C., Sirianni, M., Tosi, M. 2005, \apj, 631, L45
916: %
917: \bibitem[Barnaby \& Thronson(1992)]{Barnaby1992} Barnaby, D., \& Thronson, H.~A., Jr.\ 1992, \aj, 103, 41
918: %
919: \bibitem[Bell \& de Jong(2001)]{Bell2001} Bell, E. \& de Jong, R. S. 2001, \apj, 550, 212
920: %
921: \bibitem[Bellazzini et al.(2006)]{Bellazzini2006} Bellazzini, M., Newberg, H.~J., Correnti, M., Ferraro, F.~R., \& Monaco, L.\ 2006, \aap, 457, L21
922: %
923: \bibitem[Belokurov et al.(2006a)]{Belokurov2006a} Belokurov, V., et
924: al.\ 2006a, \apjl, 642, L137
925: %
926: \bibitem[Belokurov et al.(2006b)]{Belokurov2006b} Belokurov, V., Evans,
927: N.~W., Irwin, M.~J., Hewett, P.~C., \& Wilkinson, M.~I.\ 2006b, \apjl, 637,
928: L29
929: %
930: \bibitem[Biermann \& Munyaneza(2007)]{Biermann2007} Biermann, P.~L.,
931: \& Munyaneza, F.\ 2007, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, arXiv:astro-ph/0702173
932: %
933: \bibitem[Bullock \& Johnston(2005)]{Bullock2005} Bullock, J.S., Johnston, K. V. 2005, \apj, 635, 931
934: %
935: \bibitem[Casertano(1983)]{Casertano1983} Casertano, S.\ 1983, \mnras, 203, 735
936: %
937: \bibitem[Chou et al.(2007)]{Chou2007} Chou, M.-Y., et al.\ 2007,
938: \apj, 670, 346
939: %
940: \bibitem[Dave et al.(2001)]{Dave2001} Dav\'e, R., Spergel, D. N., Steinhardt,
941: P. J., Wandelt, B. D.\ 2001,
942: \apj, 547, 574
943:
944: \bibitem[Davies(1990)]{Davies1990} Davies, E. 1990, in {\it Machine Vision: Theory, Algorithms and Practicalities}, Academic Press, pp. 42
945: %
946:
947: \bibitem[Dubinsky et al.(1991)]{Dubinsky2001} Dubinsky, J. \& Calberg, R. G.\ 1991, \apj, 378, 496
948:
949: \bibitem[Dumke et al.(1997)]{Dumke1997} Dumke, M., Braine, J., Krause, M., Zylka, R., Wielebinski, R., \& Guelin, M.\ 1997, \aap, 325, 124
950: %
951: \bibitem[Erwin, Pohlen, \& Beckman(2008)Erwin et al.]{Erwin2008} Erwin, P., Pohlen, M., \& Beckman, J.E.\ 2008, AJ, 135, 20
952: %
953: \bibitem[Florido et al.(1992)]{Florido1992} Florido, E., Battaner, E., Gros, A., Prieto, M., \& Mediavilla, E.\ 1992, \apss, 190, 293
954: %
955: \bibitem[Forbes et al.(2003)]{Forbes2003} Forbes, D. A., Beasley, M. A., Bekki, K., Brodie, J. P., Strader, J. 2003, Science, 301, 1217
956:
957: \bibitem[Haralick \& Shapiro(1992)]{Haralick1992} Haralick, R., Shapiro, L. 1992, in {\it Computer and Robot Vision}, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, volume 1, chapter 7.
958: %
959: \bibitem[Hayashi, Navarro, \& Springel(2007)Hayashi et al.]{Hayashi2007}
960: Hayashi, E., Navarro, J.~F., \& Springel, V.\ 2007, \mnras, 377, 50
961: %
962: \bibitem[Helmi(2004)]{Helmi04} Helmi, A.\ 2004, \apjl, 610, L97
963: %
964: \bibitem[Hernquist(1990)]{Hernquist1990} Hernquist L., 1990, ApJ, 356, 359
965: %
966: \bibitem[Ibata \& Lewis(1998)]{Ibata1998} Ibata, R.~A., \& Lewis, G.~F.\ 1998,
967: \apj, 500, 575
968: %
969: \bibitem[Ibata et al.(2001a)]{Ibata2001a} Ibata, R., Irwin, M., Lewis, G., Ferguson, A.~M.~N., \& Tanvir, N.\ 2001a, Nature, 412, 49
970: %
971: \bibitem[Ibata et al.(2001b)]{Ibata2001b} Ibata, R., Lewis, G.~F., Irwin, M., Totten, E., \& Quinn, T.\ 2001b, \apj, 551, 294
972: %
973: \bibitem[Ibata et al.(2002)]{Ibata2002} Ibata, R.~A., Lewis, G.~F., Irwin,
974: M.~J., \& Quinn, T.\ 2002, \mnras, 332, 915
975: %
976: \bibitem[Ibata et al.(2007)]{Ibata2007} Ibata, R., Martin, N.~F., Irwin, M.,
977: Chapman, S., Ferguson, A.~M.~N., Lewis, G.~F., \& McConnachie, A.~W.\ 2007,
978: \apj, 671, 1591
979: %
980: \bibitem[Irwin \& Madden(2006)]{Irwin2006} Irwin, J.~A., \& Madden, S.~C.\ 2006, \aap, 445, 123
981: %
982: \bibitem[James \& Casali(1998)]{James1998} James, P.~A., \& Casali, M.~M.\ 1998, \mnras, 301, 280
983: %
984: \bibitem[Johnston, Spergel, \& Hernquist(1995)Johnston et al.]{Johnston1995} Johnston, K.~V., Spergel, D.~N., \& Hernquist, L.\ 1995, \apj, 451, 598
985: %
986: \bibitem[Johnston, Sackett, \& Bullock(2001)Johnston et al.]{Johnston2001} Johnston, K.~V., Sackett, P.~D., \& Bullock, J.~S.\ 2001, \apj, 557, 137
987: %
988: \bibitem[Johnston, Choi, \& Guhathakurta(2002)Johnston et al.]{Johnston2002}
989: Johnston, K.~V., Choi, P.~I., \& Guhathakurta, P.\ 2002, \aj, 124, 127
990: %
991: \bibitem[Johnston et al.(2005)]{Johnston2005} Johnston, K. V., Law, D. R., Majewski, S. R. 2005, \apj, 619, 800
992: %
993: \bibitem[Juric et al.(2005)]{Juric2005} Juric, M., et al.\ 2008, \apj, 673, 864
994: \bibitem[Just et al.(2006)]{Just2006} Just, A., M{\"o}llenhoff, C., \& Borch, A.\ 2006, \aap, 459, 703
995:
996:
997:
998: %
999: \bibitem[Kazantzidis et al.(2004)]{Kazantzidis2004} Kazantzidis, S.,
1000: Kravtsov, A.~V., Zentner, A.~R., Allgood, B., Nagai, D., \& Moore, B.\
1001: 2004, \apjl, 611, L73
1002: %
1003: \bibitem[Kazantzidis et al.(2007)]{2007arXiv0708.1949K} Kazantzidis, S.,
1004: Bullock, J.~S., Zentner, A.~R., Kravtsov, A.~V.,
1005: \& Moustakas, L.~A.\ 2007, ArXiv e-prints, 708, arXiv:0708.1949
1006: %
1007: \bibitem[King(1966)]{King1966} King, I.~R.\ 1966, \aj, 71, 64
1008: %
1009: \bibitem[Law, Johnston, \& Majewski(2005)Law et al.]{Law2005} Law, D. R.,
1010: Johnston, K. V., \& Majewski, S. R. 2005, \apj, 619, 807
1011: %
1012: \bibitem[Lequeux(1996)]{Lequeux1996} Lequeux, J., Fort, B., Dantel-Fort, M., Cuillandre, J.-C., \& Mellier, Y.\ 1996, \aap, 312, L1
1013: %
1014: \bibitem[Lequeux(1998)]{Lequeux1998} Lequeux, J., Combes, F., Dantel-Fort, M., Cuillandre, J.-C., Fort, B., \& Mellier, Y.\ 1998, \aap, 334, L9
1015: %
1016: \bibitem[Majewski et al.(2003)]{Majewski2003} Majewski, S. R., Skrutskie, M., Weinberg, M., Ostheimer, J. 2003, \apj, 599, 1082
1017: %
1018: \bibitem[Malin \& Hadley(1997)]{Malin1997} Malin, D. \& Hadley, B. 1997, PASA, 14,52
1019: %
1020: %\bibitem[Martin et al.(2004)]{Martin2004} Martin, N., Ibata, R. A., Bellazzini,% M., Irwin, M. j., Lewis, G. F., Dehnen, W., 2004, \mnras, 348,12
1021: %
1022: \bibitem[Martin et al.(2005)]{Martin2005} Martin, N.~F., Ibata, R.~A., Conn,
1023: B.~C., Lewis, G.~F., Bellazzini, M., \& Irwin, M.~J.\ 2005, \mnras, 362, 906
1024: %
1025: \bibitem[Mart\'\i nez-Delgado et al.(2004)]{Martinez-Delgado2004} Mart\'\i
1026: nez-Delgado, D., G\'omez-Flechoso, M. A., Aparicio, A., \& Carrera, R. 2004, \apj, 601, 242
1027: %
1028: \bibitem[Mart\'\i nez-Delgado et al.(2007)]{Martinez-Delgado2007} Mart\'\i
1029: nez-Delgado, D., Pe\~narrubia, J., Juric, M., Alfaro, E. J., Ivezic,
1030: Z. 2007, \apj, 660,1264
1031: %
1032: \bibitem[Mart\'\i nez-Delgado et al.(2008)]{Martinez-Delgado2008} Mart\'\i
1033: nez-Delgado, D., Pohlen, M., Gabany, R. J., Majewski, S.~R., Pe\~narrubia, J., \& Palma, C. 2008, \apj, submitted
1034: %
1035: \bibitem[Mateo(1998)]{Mateo1998} Mateo, M.~L.\ 1998, \araa, 36, 435
1036: %
1037: \bibitem[McConnachie et al.(2003)]{McConnachie2003} McConnachie, A. W., Irwin, M. J., Ibata, R. A., Ferguson, A. M. N., Lewis, G. F., Tanvir, N.,\mnras, 343, 1335
1038: %
1039: \bibitem[Miyamoto \& Nagai(1975)]{Miyamoto1975}Miyamoto M., Nagai R., 1975, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan, 27, 533
1040: %
1041: \bibitem[Morrison, Boroson, \& Harding(1994)Morrison et al.]{Morrison1994} Morrison, H.~L., Boroson, T.~A., \& Harding, P.\ 1994, \aj, 108, 1191
1042: %
1043: \bibitem[Navarro, Frenk, \& White(1996)Navarro et al.]{NFW1996} Navarro J.,
1044: Frenk C.S., \& White S.D.M., 1996, ApJ, 462, 563
1045:
1046: \bibitem[Navarro, Frenk, \& White(1997)Navarro et al.]{NFW1997} Navarro J.,
1047: Frenk C.S., \& White S.D.M., 1997, ApJ, 490, 493
1048: %
1049:
1050: %
1051: \bibitem[Pe{\~n}arrubia et al.(2005)]{Penarrubia2005} Pe\~narrubia et al. 2005, \apj, 626, 128
1052: %
1053: \bibitem[Pe{\~n}arrubia et al.(2006)]{Penarrubia2006} Pe{\~n}arrubia, J.,
1054: Benson, A.~J., Mart{\'{\i}}nez-Delgado, D., \& Rix, H.~W.\ 2006, \apj, 645,
1055: 240
1056: %
1057: \bibitem[Pe{\~n}arrubia et al.(2008a)]{Penarrubia2008a} Pe{\~n}arrubia,
1058: J., \& McConnachie, A.~W., Navarro, J.~F.,\ 2008a, \apj, 672, 904
1059: %
1060: \bibitem[Pe{\~n}arrubia et al.(2008b)]{Penarrubia2008b} Pe{\~n}arrubia,
1061: J., Navarro, J.~F., \& McConnachie, A.~W.\ 2008b, \apj, 673, 226
1062: %
1063: \bibitem[Pohlen et al.(2004)]{Pohlen2004} Pohlen, M., Mart\'\i nez-Delgado, D., Majewski, S. R, Palma, C., Prada, F., Balcells, M. 2004, in Satellite and Tidal Streams, PASP, vol 327, pg. 288
1064: %
1065: \bibitem[Pohlen \& Trujillo(2006)]{Pohlen2006} Pohlen, M., \& Trujillo, I.\ 2006, A\&A, 454, 759
1066: %
1067: \bibitem[Rand(1996)]{Rand1996} Rand, R.~J.\ 1996, \apj, 462, 712
1068: %
1069: \bibitem[Reshetnikov \& Sotnikova(2000)]{Reshetnikov2000}
1070: Reshetnikov, V. P., \& Sotnikova, N. Y. 2000, Astronomy Letters, Vol. 26, 277 %
1071: \bibitem[Rudy et al.(1997)]{Rudy1997} Rudy, R.~J., Woodward, C.~E., Hodge, T., Fairfield, S.~W., \& Harker, D.~E.\ 1997, \nat, 387, 159
1072: %
1073: \bibitem[Sackett et al.(1994)]{Sackett1994} Sackett, P.~D., Morrison, H.~L., Harding, P., \& Boroson, T.~A.\ 1994, \nat, 370, 441
1074: %
1075: \bibitem[Sancisi(1976)]{Sancisi1976} Sancisi, R.\ 1976, \aap, 53, 159
1076: %
1077: \bibitem[Sasaki(1987)]{Sasaki1987} Sasaki, T.\ 1987, \pasj, 39, 849
1078: %
1079: \bibitem[Searle \& Zinn(1978)]{Searle1978} Searle, L., Zinn, R. 1978, \apj, 225, 357
1080: %
1081: \bibitem[Shang et al.(1998)]{Shang1998} Shang, Z., et al.\ 1998, \apjl, 504, L23%
1082: \bibitem[Siegal-Gaskins \& Valluri(2007)]{Siegal2007} Siegal-Gaskins,
1083: J.~M., \& Valluri, M.\ 2007, ArXiv e-prints, 710, arXiv:0710.0385
1084: %
1085: \bibitem[Skrutskie, Shure, \& Beckwith(1985)Skrutskie et al.]{Skrutskie1985} Skrutskie, M.~F., Shure, M.~A., \& Beckwith, S.\ 1985, \apj, 299, 303
1086: %
1087: \bibitem[Spergel et al.(2007)]{2007ApJS..170..377S} Spergel, D.~N., et al.\
1088: 2007, \apjs, 170, 377
1089: %
1090: %
1091: \bibitem[van der Kruit \& Searle (1981)]{vdK1981} van der Kruit, P.~C., \& Searle, L.\ 1981, \aap, 95, 105
1092: %
1093: \bibitem[Velazquez \& White(1999)]{Velazquez1999} Velazquez, H. \& White, S. D. M. 1999, \mnras, 304, 254
1094: %
1095: \bibitem[Weinberg \& Blitz(2006)]{Weinberg2006} Weinberg, M.~D., \&
1096: Blitz, L.\ 2006, \apjl, 641, L33
1097: %
1098: \bibitem[Xilouris et al.(1999)]{Xilouris1999} Xilouris, E.~M., Byun, Y.~I., Kylafis, N.~D., Paleologou, E.~V., \& Papamastorakis, J.\ 1999, \aap, 344, 868
1099: %
1100: \bibitem[Yanny et al.(2003)]{Yanny2003} Yanny, B., et al.\ 2003, \apj, 588,
1101: 824
1102:
1103: \bibitem[Yoshida et al.(2000)]{Yoshida2000} Yoshida, H., Springel, V., White,
1104: S. D. M., \& Tormen, G. 2000, \apj, 535, L103
1105:
1106: %
1107: \bibitem[Zepf et al.(2000)]{Zepf2000} Zepf, S. E., Liu, M.C., Marleau, F. R., Sackett, P. D. \& Graham, J. R. 2000, \aj, 119, 1701
1108: %
1109: \bibitem[Zheng et al.(1999)]{Zheng1999} Zheng, Z., et al.\ 1999, \aj, 117, 2757
1110: %
1111: \end{thebibliography}
1112:
1113:
1114:
1115: %
1116: %
1117: %
1118: \begin{deluxetable}{lclc}
1119: \tablecaption{JOURNAL OF OBSERVATIONS}
1120: \tablewidth{12cm}
1121: \tablehead{\colhead{Date} & & \colhead{Filter} & \colhead{Total Exposure Time (s)}}
1122: %
1123: \startdata
1124: 2006 June 6 & &Blue & 6480\\
1125: 2006 June 6 & & Clear Luminance & 9000\\
1126: 2006 June 6 & & Green & 1080\\
1127: 2006 June 6 & &Red & 5400\\
1128: 2006 June 7 & &Clear Luminance & 3600\\
1129: 2006 June 7 & &Green & 2160\\
1130: 2006 June 9 & &Clear Luminance & 5400\\
1131: 2006 August 10 & & Blue & 2160 \\
1132: 2006 August 10 & & Clear Luminance & 2700\\
1133: 2006 August 10 & & Green & 1080\\
1134: 2006 August 10 & & Red & 1800 \\
1135: %
1136: \hline
1137: \enddata
1138: %\tablecomments{ }
1139: \label{obslog}
1140: \end{deluxetable}
1141: %
1142:
1143: \begin{table}
1144: %\begin{center}
1145: \caption{Stellar tidal streams detected in nearby spiral galaxies ($D<15$ Mpc)}
1146: \begin{tabular}{l c c c c } \hline \hline
1147: Name & Distance (Mpc) & $\mu$ (band) & Progenitor & Refs. \\ \hline
1148: {\bf Local Group} &&&& \\ \hline \hline
1149: Sagittarius (MW) & -- & 29.6 (V) & Sagittarius dwarf &(1) \\
1150: Monoceros (MW) & -- & 34.9 (V) & Canis Major dwarf (?) &(2),(3) \\
1151: Orphan (MW) & -- & 32.4 (R) & unknown&(4) \\
1152: M31 giant stream (M31) & 0.78 & 30.0 (V) & unknown &(5),(6) \\
1153: {\bf External galaxies} &&& \\ \hline \hline
1154: NGC 5236 (M83) & 5.2 & 26.5 (R) & unknown &(7),(8) \\
1155: NGC 5907 & 11.2& 26.8 (R) & unknown &(9),(10) \\
1156: NGC 4013 & 12.0& 27.0 (R) & unknown &(11) \\
1157: NGC 4594 (M104)& 12.4& -- & unknown &(8)\\
1158: NGC 3310 & 14.4& 25.6 (V) & unknown &(14) \\
1159: \hline \hline
1160: \end{tabular}\label{streamtable}
1161: \tablerefs{(1) Mart\'inez-Delgado et al. (2004); (2) Belokurov et al. (2006); (3) Martin et al. (2004); (4) Belokurov et al. (2007); (5) Ibata et al.
1162: (2001);(6) McConnachie et al. (2003); (7) de Jong et al. (2207);(8) Malin \& Hadley (1997); (9)
1163: Shang et al. (1998); (10) this manuscript; (11) Mart\'inez-Delgado et al. (2008); (12) Whener
1164: \& Gallagher (2005)}
1165: %\end{center}
1166:
1167: \end{table}
1168:
1169:
1170:
1171: \begin{figure}[!]
1172: \vspace{15.2cm}
1173: \special{psfile=f1.eps angle=0 hscale=70 vscale=70 hoffset=0 voffset=-10}
1174: \caption{Image of NGC\,5907 obtained with the BBRO 0.5-meter telescope. The total
1175: exposure time of this image is 11.35 hours, co-adding all images obtained in this project (see Table
1176: \ref{obslog}). The image has dimensions of 18.2 $\times$ 27.7 arcmins, which, at
1177: the distance of NGC\,5907 is $\sim$ 75 $\times$ 115 kpc. For a better
1178: comparison with the N-body simulations given in Fig.~\ref{nbody}, this image
1179: is shown east up and north to the right. The linear diagonal feature in the lower left corner of the image is
1180: spurious light from deflection of a bright star off of the edge of the CCD
1181: chip. The faint halos surrounding the field stars are due to the pass of the Gaussian filter mentioned in Sec. \ref{data}.}
1182:
1183: \label{BBROimage}
1184: \end{figure}
1185:
1186:
1187: \begin{figure}[!]
1188: \vspace{17.2cm}
1189: \special{psfile=f2.eps angle=0 hscale=70 vscale=70 hoffset=20 voffset= 0}
1190: \caption{Identified photometric features detected in the image of NGC\,5907
1191: obtained with the BBRO 20-inch telescope and discussed in Sec.3.1. For reference, a colour image obtained with the same telescope (see Table
1192: \ref{obslog}) has been superimposed on the saturated disk region of the galaxy. The
1193: position of the two different strips used to measure the width of the stream
1194: (see Sec. 3.2) are also indicated by red rectangles. The yellow lines mark
1195: the position of the nominal {\it cut-off} radius (see Sec 2.2). For comparison
1196: purposes, north is to the right and east is up.}
1197: %
1198: \label{BBROimagePlabel}
1199: \end{figure}
1200: %
1201: %
1202: %
1203: \begin{figure}[!]
1204: \vspace{15.2cm}
1205: \special{psfile=f3.eps angle=0 hscale=90 vscale=90 hoffset=0 voffset=0}
1206: \caption{Gaussian fits to the surface brightness distributions of the stream
1207: in two different strips (A and B) illustrated in Fig.2. The FWHM of these
1208: Gaussian fits are estimated to be $\sim$103 and $\sim$164 arcsec
1209: respectively. Note that 1 arcsec at the distance of NGC5907 corresponds to
1210: $\sim$0.068 kpc.}
1211: %
1212: \label{width}
1213: \end{figure}
1214: %
1215: %
1216: %
1217: \begin{figure}[!]
1218: %\plotone{f4.eps}
1219: \vspace{15.2cm}
1220: \special{psfile=f4.eps angle=0 hscale=80 vscale=80 hoffset=0 voffset=-50}
1221: \caption{Illustrative N-body model of the stellar stream detected in NGC
1222: 5907. The satellite is realized as a King model with an initial mass, King
1223: core and tidal radii of $M=2\times10^8 M_\odot$, $r_c=0.39$ kpc and $r_t=2.7$ kpc, respectively (see Sec. 4.2 for details). Different colours denote particles that became unbound after
1224: different peri-center passages, whereas black particles are those that
1225: remain bound to the main system. Our color code is so that cyan, green red
1226: and blue colours are particles lost during the first, second, third and four
1227: orbital periods, respectively. For this particular model the orbital period
1228: is $T_r=0.9$ Gyr. }
1229: \label{nbodyfig}
1230: \end{figure}
1231: %
1232: %
1233: %
1234: %
1235: \end{document}
1236: