1: %\documentclass[preprint,tightenlines,aps,prd,groupedaddress,showpacs]
2: %\documentclass[twocolumn,aps,prl,groupedaddress,showpacs]{revtex4}
3: %\documentclass[tightenlines,aps,prd,showpacs]{revtex4}
4: \documentclass[preprint,aps,prd,showpacs,nofootinbib]{revtex4}
5: %\documentclass[aps,prd,showpacs,nofootinbib]{revtex4}
6: %\documentclass[preprint,tightenlines,aps,prd,showpacs,nofootinbib]{revtex4}
7: %\documentclass[preprint,aps,prd,showpacs]{revtex4}
8: \usepackage{graphicx}
9: \usepackage{amsmath}
10: \usepackage{amssymb}
11: \usepackage{bm}
12: \usepackage{bbm}
13: \begin{document}
14: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
15: %Title of paper
16: \title{
17: Invariant-mass distribution of $\bm{c}\bar{\bm{c}}$
18: in $\bm{\Upsilon(1S)\to}\bm{c}\bar{\bm{c}}+\bm{X}$}
19: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
20: \author{Hee~Sok~Chung}
21: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea}
22: \author{Taewon~Kim}
23: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea}
24: \author{Jungil~Lee}
25: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea}
26: \date{\today}
27: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
28: \begin{abstract}
29: We calculate the invariant-mass distribution for the $c\bar{c}$ pair
30: produced in the inclusive $\Upsilon(1S)$ decay based on the
31: color-singlet mechanism of the nonrelativistic quantum chromodynamics
32: factorization approach at leading order in the bottom-quark velocity
33: $v_b$ in the meson rest frame. As the short-distance processes, we
34: consider $b\bar{b}\to g^*gg$ followed by $g^*\to c\bar{c}$ and
35: $b\bar{b}\to \gamma^*\to c\bar{c}$ at leading order in the strong
36: coupling. The invariant-mass distribution of the $b\bar{b}\to c\bar{c}gg$
37: contribution has a sharp peak just above the threshold and that of
38: the $b\bar{b}\to\gamma^*\to c\bar{c}$ channel is concentrated at the
39: maximally allowed kinematic end point. We predict that
40: $\Gamma[\Upsilon(1S)\to c\bar{c}+X]/%
41: \Gamma[\Upsilon(1S)\to \textrm{light hadrons}]= 0.065\,\alpha_s$,
42: which is smaller than a previous result by about $20\,\%$.
43: \end{abstract}
44: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
45: % insert suggested PACS numbers in braces on next line
46: \pacs{12.38.-t, 13.20.Gd, 14.40.Gx}
47: % 12.38.-t Quantum chromodynamics
48: % 12.39.St Factorization
49: % 13.20.Gd Decays of J/psi, Upsilon, and other quarkonia
50: % 14.40.Gx Mesons with S=C=B=0, mass > 2.5 GeV (including quarkonia)
51: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
52: % insert suggested keywords - APS authors don't need to do this
53: %\keywords{}
54: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
55: %\maketitle must follow title, authors, abstract, \pacs, and \keywords
56: \maketitle
57: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
58: % body of paper here - Use proper section commands
59: % References should be done using the \cite, \ref, and \label commands
60: %--------------------------------------------------------------------
61: \section{\label{sec:intro}Introduction}
62: %--------------------------------------------------------------------
63: Recent experimental analyses being carried out by the CLEO III
64: experiment on the inclusive charm production in bottomonia
65: decays~\cite{CLEO} have activated a series of theoretical
66: studies~\cite{Bodwin:2007zf,Kang:2007uv,Hao:2007rb}
67: based on the nonrelativistic quantum chromodynamics (NRQCD)
68: factorization approach~\cite{Bodwin:1992ye,Bodwin:1994jh}.
69: Predictions for the branching fractions and the charmed-hadron
70: momentum distributions in inclusive $\chi_{bJ}$ ($J=0$, $1$, and $2$)
71: decays were presented in Ref.~\cite{Bodwin:2007zf}.
72: These processes are nice probes to investigate the color-octet
73: mechanism of the NRQCD factorization approach which is distinguished
74: from the color-singlet-model calculation in
75: Ref.~\cite{Barbieri:1979gg}.
76: In addition to the spin-triplet $P$-wave (${}^3P_J$) bottomonium
77: decay, the CLEO Collaboration also analyzes the charm production in
78: the spin-triplet $S$-wave (${}^3S_1$) bottomonium decay.
79: Early theoretical studies on the inclusive charm production in
80: the inclusive $\Upsilon(1S)$ decay began in the late 1970s. In 1978,
81: Fritzsch and Streng calculated the invariant-mass distribution
82: of the $c\bar{c}$ pair produced in the inclusive $\Upsilon(1S)$
83: decay~\cite{Fritzsch:1978ey} by considering the QCD process
84: $b\bar{b}\to g^*gg\to c\bar{c}gg$ within the color-singlet model,
85: where they predicted the branching fraction
86: $\textrm{Br}[\Upsilon(1S)\to c\bar{c}+X]$ to be a few percents
87: in the limit that the charm-quark momentum $\bm{p}_c^*$ in
88: the $c\bar{c}$ rest frame can be neglected. In 1996,
89: Cheung, Keung, and Yuan calculated the $J/\psi$ production
90: rate with the same short-distance process, where they
91: considered the decay of the color-singlet $b\bar{b}$ pair
92: producing a $c\bar{c}$ pair in the color-octet spin-triplet
93: state that evolves into the $J/\psi$~\cite{Cheung:1996mh}.
94: One can find more studies on the bottomonium decay in
95: Refs.~\cite{Mackenzie:1981sf,Keung:1982jb,%
96: Campbell:2007ws}.
97:
98: In this paper, based on the color-singlet mechanism of the
99: NRQCD factorization approach, we compute the invariant-mass
100: distribution of the $c\bar{c}$ pair
101: in $\Upsilon(1S)\to c\bar{c}+X$. This is an extension of a
102: recent work on the total charm production rate and the momentum
103: distribution of the charm hadrons produced in the inclusive
104: $\Upsilon(nS)$ decay~\cite{Kang:2007uv}.
105: As is studied in Ref.~\cite{Kang:2007uv}, we consider
106: the decay of the color-singlet spin-triplet $b\bar{b}$ pair
107: [$b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)$] into $g^*gg$ followed
108: by $g^*\to c\bar{c}$, which we call the QCD contribution.
109: We also consider the short-distance process
110: $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)\to\gamma^*\to c\bar{c}$, which we call
111: the QED contribution. The perturbative calculations of the
112: short-distance processes are carried
113: out at leading order in the strong coupling $\alpha_s$ and
114: the QED coupling $\alpha$. For the long-distance part of the
115: NRQCD factorization formula, we consider the leading contribution
116: with respect to the bottom-quark velocity $v_b$ in the $\Upsilon(1S)$
117: rest frame. The relevant NRQCD matrix element for the channel is
118: $\langle\Upsilon(1S)| \mathcal{O}_1({}^3S_1)|\Upsilon(1S)\rangle$
119: defined in Ref.~\cite{Bodwin:1994jh}, where $\mathcal{O}_1({}^3S_1)$
120: is the color-singlet spin-triplet four-quark operator for the
121: annihilation decay of the $\Upsilon(1S)$.
122: At higher orders in $v_b$, the color-octet short-distance processes
123: $b\bar{b}_8({}^3S_1)\to g^*\to c\bar{c}$, $b\bar{b}_8({}^1S_0)\to
124: g^*g\to c\bar{c}g$, and $b\bar{b}_8({}^3P_J)\to g^*g\to c\bar{c}g$
125: can also contribute to the charm production in the inclusive
126: $\Upsilon(1S)$ decay. The color-octet contributions are estimated
127: to be about $10\,\%$ of the color-singlet contributions
128: $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)\to c\bar{c}gg$ and
129: $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)\to\gamma^*\to c\bar{c}$~\cite{Kang:2007uv}.
130: Therefore, we neglect the color-octet processes in this work.
131:
132: This paper is organized as follows: In Sec.~\ref{sec:cc}, we present
133: the NRQCD factorization formula for the inclusive charm production
134: in $\Upsilon(1S)$ decay and compute the short-distance coefficients
135: for the $c\bar{c}$ invariant-mass distribution of the process.
136: Numerical analysis for the invariant-mass distribution is given
137: in Sec.~\ref{sec:rate}, which is followed by a summary
138: in Sec.~\ref{summary}.
139: %--------------------------------------------------------------------
140: \section{\label{sec:cc}Charm-quark production in $\bm{\Upsilon(1S)}$
141: decay}
142: %--------------------------------------------------------------------
143: In this section, we present the NRQCD factorization formula for the
144: $c\bar{c}$ invariant-mass distribution in $\Upsilon(1S)\to c\bar{c}+X$
145: within the color-singlet mechanism at leading order in $v_b$. As the
146: short-distance contributions, we consider the QCD process
147: $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)\to g^*gg$ followed by $g^*\to c\bar{c}$ and
148: the QED process $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)\to \gamma^*\to c\bar{c}$.
149: We follow the formalism to calculate the inclusive charm production
150: rate in the $\Upsilon(nS)$ decay in Ref.~\cite{Kang:2007uv}.
151: %--------------------------------------------------------------------
152: \subsection{\label{sec:NRQCD}NRQCD factorization formula}
153: %--------------------------------------------------------------------
154: Within the color-singlet mechanism of the NRQCD factorization
155: formalism the differential rate for the inclusive decay
156: $\Upsilon(1S)\to c\bar{c}+X$ at leading order in $v_b$ is given
157: by~\cite{Kang:2007uv}
158: %------------------
159: \begin{equation}
160: \label{Gam-c}%
161: %------------------
162: d\Gamma[\Upsilon(1S) \to c\bar{c} + X] =
163: dC_1^{(c)}\,
164: \frac{\langle \mathcal{O}_1({}^3S_1) \rangle_{\Upsilon(1S)}}{m_b^2},
165: %------------------
166: \end{equation}
167: %------------------
168: where $\langle \mathcal{O}_1({}^3S_1) \rangle_{\Upsilon(1S)}=%
169: \langle\Upsilon(1S)| \mathcal{O}_1({}^3S_1)|\Upsilon(1S)\rangle$
170: is the leading-order color-singlet NRQCD matrix element for the
171: $\Upsilon(1S)$ and $m_b$ is the mass of the bottom quark. The
172: short-distance coefficient $dC_1^{(c)}$ is insensitive to the
173: long-distance nature of the $\Upsilon(1S)$ and calculable as a
174: perturbative series of the strong coupling $\alpha_s$. At leading
175: order in $\alpha_s$ and $\alpha$, the dimensionless short-distance
176: coefficient $dC_1^{(c)}$ is the sum of the QCD and QED contributions:
177: %------------------
178: \begin{equation}
179: %------------------
180: \label{dc1}%
181: dC_1^{(c)} =
182: dC_1^{(\textrm{QCD})}+dC_1^{(\textrm{QED})}.
183: %------------------
184: \end{equation}
185: %------------------
186: As is mentioned earlier, the QCD process denotes
187: $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)\to c\bar{c}gg$ followed by $g^*\to c\bar{c}$
188: and the QED process stands for
189: $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)\to\gamma^*\to c\bar{c}$. We use the identifiers
190: (QCD) and (QED) to denote those contributions, respectively,
191: in the remainder of this paper.
192:
193: The short-distance coefficients can be determined by
194: perturbative matching. If we replace the heavy-quarkonium state
195: $|\Upsilon(1S)\rangle$ in Eq.~(\ref{Gam-c}) with the perturbative
196: $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)$ state, $|b\bar{b}_1({}^{3}S_1)\rangle$, then
197: the long-distance matrix element $\langle
198: \mathcal{O}_1({}^{3}S_1)\rangle_{\Upsilon(1S)}$ is replaced by
199: the perturbative NRQCD matrix element $\langle \mathcal{O}_1({}^{3}S_1)%
200: \rangle_{b\bar{b}_1({}^{3}S_1)}$, while the short-distance
201: coefficient $dC_1^{(c)}$ remains the same:
202: %------------------
203: \begin{equation}
204: \label{pert-fac}%
205: %------------------
206: d\Gamma[b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)\to c\bar{c}+X]
207: =dC_1^{(c)}\frac{
208: \langle \mathcal{O}_1({}^{3}S_1)\rangle_{b\bar{b}_1({}^{3}S_1)}
209: }{m_b^2}.
210: %------------------
211: \end{equation}
212: %------------------
213: Both the left side of Eq.~(\ref{pert-fac}) and the matrix element
214: $\langle \mathcal{O}_1({}^{3}S_1)\rangle_{b\bar{b}_1({}^{3}S_1)}$
215: are calculable perturbatively.
216: By taking the ratio of the two quantities, we can determine the
217: short-distance coefficient $dC_1^{(c)}$.
218: %------------------------------------------------
219: \subsection{\label{sec:amp-qcd}Short-distance coefficients }
220: %------------------------------------------------
221: In this section, we describe the procedure to compute the
222: short-distance coefficient $dC_1^{(\textrm{QCD})}$ for the QCD process.
223: We also provide the expression for $dC_1^{(\textrm{QED})}$ by quoting a
224: previous result in Ref.~\cite{Kang:2007uv}. In both short-distance
225: processes, the momenta of the $b$ and the $\bar{b}$ can be expressed
226: in terms of the total momentum $P$ and the relative momentum $q$ of
227: the $b\bar{b}$ pair:
228: %------------------
229: \begin{subequations}
230: \begin{eqnarray}
231: %------------------
232: p&=&\tfrac{1}{2}P+q,
233: \\
234: \bar{p}&=&\tfrac{1}{2}P-q,
235: %------------------
236: \end{eqnarray}
237: \end{subequations}
238: %------------------
239: where $p$ and $\bar{p}$ satisfy the on-shell conditions
240: $p^2=\bar{p}^2=m_b^2$ and $P\cdot q=0$. In the rest frame of the
241: $b\bar{b}$ pair, $P=(2E_b,0)$ and $q=(0,\bm{q})$, where
242: $E_b=\sqrt{m_b^2+\bm{q}^2}$.
243:
244: At leading order in $\alpha_s$, the full QCD
245: amplitude for the short-distance process $b(p)\bar{b}(\bar{p})\to
246: c(p')\bar{c}(\bar{p}') g(p_2) g(p_3)$ is given by
247: %------------------
248: \begin{eqnarray}
249: \label{amp-qcd}%
250: %------------------
251: \mathcal{M}_{b\bar{b}}^{(\textrm{QCD})} &=&
252: \frac{(4\pi \alpha_s)^2}{(p'+\bar{p}')^2}
253: \bar{u}(p') T^a \gamma_\lambda v(\bar{p}')
254: \epsilon^{b *}_{2\,\sigma}(p_2)\epsilon^{c *}_{3\,\tau}(p_3)
255: \nonumber
256: \\
257: &&
258: \times
259: \sum_\textrm{perm} \bar{v}(\bar{p})
260: \left[ \gamma^\lambda \frac{1}{\not\!p-\not\!p_2-\not\!p_3-m_b}
261: \gamma^\sigma \frac{1}{\not\!p-\not\!p_3-m_b}\gamma^\tau
262: \otimes T^a T^b T^c \right] u(p),
263: %------------------
264: \end{eqnarray}
265: %------------------
266: where $\sum_\textrm{perm}$ denotes the summation over the
267: permutations of the three gluons attached to the bottom-quark line,
268: $T^a$ is a generator of the SU(3)-color in the
269: fundamental representation, $a$, $b$, and $c$ are color indices for
270: the gluons, and $\epsilon_2$ and $\epsilon_3$ are polarization
271: four-vectors of the external gluons with momenta $p_2$ and $p_3$,
272: respectively.
273:
274: In order to extract the $b{\bar b}_1({}^3S_1)$ contribution from the
275: $b\bar{b}$ amplitude (\ref{amp-qcd}), we employ the
276: covariant-projection method~\cite{Kuhn:1979bb,Guberina:1980dc,%
277: Bodwin:2002hg}, which replaces the outer product
278: $u(p) {\bar v}({\bar p})$ of the $b\bar{b}$ spinors with
279: the direct product of the color-singlet projector $\pi_1$
280: and the spin-triplet projector $\epsilon\cdot \Pi_3$,
281: which are defined by
282: %------------------
283: \begin{subequations}
284: \label{projectors}%
285: \begin{eqnarray}
286: %------------------
287: \label{color-projector}%
288: \pi_1 &=& \frac{1}{\sqrt{N_c}} \mathbbm{1},
289: \\
290: \label{spin-projector}%
291: \epsilon\cdot\Pi_3 &=& -\frac{1}{4\sqrt{2}E_b(E_b+m_b)}
292: (/\!\!\!{p}+m_b)(\,/\!\!\!\!P\!+\!2E_b) \,/\!\!\!\epsilon\,
293: (/\!\!\!\bar{p}-m_b),
294: %------------------
295: \end{eqnarray}
296: \end{subequations}
297: %------------------
298: where $N_c=3$ is the number of colors,
299: $\mathbbm{1}$ is the unit matrix of the SU(3)-color,
300: and $\epsilon$ is the polarization four-vector of the
301: $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)$ state so that $P \cdot \epsilon = 0$. The
302: projectors (\ref{projectors}) are normalized as
303: $\textrm{Tr}[\pi_1\pi_1^\dagger]=1$ and
304: $\textrm{Tr}[(\epsilon\cdot\Pi_3)%
305: (\epsilon\cdot\Pi_3)^\dagger]=4p_0\bar{p}_0$.
306:
307: Because we are to compute the $c\bar{c}$ invariant-mass
308: distribution, it is convenient to write the amplitude (\ref{amp-qcd})
309: as the product of the vector current $\mathcal{C}^\mu$ for
310: $g^*\to c\bar{c}$ and the amputated amplitude $\mathcal{B}^{\mu}$
311: for $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)\to ggg^*$, where
312: %------------------
313: \begin{subequations}
314: \label{current}%
315: \begin{eqnarray}
316: %------------------
317: \mathcal{B}^\mu&=&
318: \sum_\textrm{perm} \textrm{Tr}\left[
319: \gamma^\mu\frac{1}{\not\!p-\not\!p_2-\not\!p_3-m_b}\not\!\epsilon_2
320: \frac{1}{\not\!p-\not\!p_3-m_b}\not\!\epsilon_3 \epsilon\cdot\Pi_3
321: \right],\\
322: \mathcal{C}^\mu&=&
323: \frac{1}{(p'+\bar{p}')^2} \bar{u}(p') \gamma^\mu v(\bar{p}').
324: %------------------
325: \end{eqnarray}
326: \end{subequations}
327: %------------------
328: Note that we do not include the color factor and the coupling
329: in Eq.~(\ref{current}). At leading order in $v_b$, the
330: amplitude for the QCD process $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)\to c\bar{c} gg$
331: becomes
332: %------------------
333: \begin{equation}
334: \label{amp-S}%
335: %------------------
336: \mathcal{M}_{b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)}^{(\textrm{QCD})} =
337: \frac{
338: (4\pi\alpha_s)^2
339: }{4\sqrt{N_c}}
340: d^{abc}T^a_{ij}
341: \mathcal{B}_\mu \mathcal{C}^\mu
342: \biggl\vert_{q=0},
343: %------------------
344: \end{equation}
345: %------------------
346: where $i$ and $j$ are color indices for the charm quark and the
347: charm antiquark, respectively. In Eq.~(\ref{amp-S}), we put $q=0$
348: to take the $v_b$-leading contributions so that $E_b=m_b$, used
349: Tr$[T^aT^bT^c]=(d^{abc}+if^{abc})/4$, and chose only the symmetric
350: component of the color factor. At $v_b=0$, which we take at leading
351: order in $v_b$, the amplitude (\ref{amp-S}) is infrared (IR) finite
352: in the soft limits of any external gluons. However, in the limit that
353: the charm quark becomes massless, the amplitude (\ref{amp-S}) may
354: acquire collinear divergences. We will return to this point later
355: in Sec.~\ref{sec:collinear}.
356:
357:
358: Squaring the amplitude (\ref{amp-S}) for
359: $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)\to c\bar{c} gg$, averaging over the spin-triplet
360: states, and summing over the spins of the final states, we obtain the
361: differential annihilation rate for the QCD process.
362: The contribution of the QCD process $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)\to c\bar{c}gg$
363: to the left side of Eq.~(\ref{pert-fac}) is
364: %------------------
365: \begin{equation}
366: \label{dgam-qcd}%
367: d\Gamma^{(\textrm{QCD})}_{b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)}=
368: \frac{(N_c^2-1)(N_c^2-4)}{N_c^2}
369: \frac{8\pi^4\alpha_s^4}{3}\,
370: \mathcal{B}^{\mu\nu}\mathcal{C}_{\mu\nu}
371: \frac{d\Phi_4}{2!},
372: \end{equation}
373: %------------------
374: where $d\Phi_4$ is the phase space element for the $c\bar{c}gg$
375: final state and the factors 1/3 and $1/2!$
376: are for the average over the initial spins and for the two
377: identical particles (gluons) in the final state, respectively.
378: The tensors $\mathcal{B}^{\mu\nu}$ and $\mathcal{C}^{\mu\nu}$
379: in Eq.~(\ref{dgam-qcd}) are defined by
380: %------------------
381: \begin{subequations}
382: \label{tensor}%
383: \begin{eqnarray}
384: \mathcal{B}^{\mu\nu}&=&
385: \sum_{\textrm{spins}}\mathcal{B}^\mu \mathcal{B}^{* \nu},
386: \\
387: \mathcal{C}^{\mu\nu}&=&\sum_{\textrm{spins}}
388: \mathcal{C}^\mu \mathcal{C}^{* \nu}
389: \nonumber \\
390: &=&
391: \frac{
392: \textrm{Tr}\left[
393: (/\!\!\!{p'}+m_c)\gamma^\mu (/\!\!\!{\bar{p}'}-m_c)\gamma^\nu \right]
394: }{(p'+\bar{p}')^4}.
395: \end{eqnarray}
396: \end{subequations}
397: %------------------
398: The polarizations for the external gluons and the
399: $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)$ pair in $\mathcal{B}^{\mu\nu}$ are summed as
400: %------------------
401: \begin{subequations}
402: \label{Imunu}%
403: \begin{eqnarray}
404: %------------------
405: \sum_\lambda \epsilon_i^\alpha(\lambda)\epsilon_i^{*\beta}(\lambda)
406: &=&-g^{\alpha\beta}~\textrm{ for }~i=2,\textrm{ }3,
407: \\
408: \sum_\lambda \epsilon^\alpha(\lambda)\epsilon^{*\beta}(\lambda)
409: &=&-g^{\alpha\beta}+\frac{P^\alpha P^\beta}{P^2}.
410: %------------------
411: \end{eqnarray}
412: \end{subequations}
413: %------------------
414: By substituting Eq.~(\ref{dgam-qcd}) to the left side of
415: Eq.~(\ref{pert-fac}) and using the following value for
416: the perturbative NRQCD matrix element
417: %------------------
418: \begin{equation}
419: \label{me-pert-norm}%
420: \langle\mathcal{O}_1({}^3S_1)
421: \rangle_{b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)}
422: =2N_c (2E_b)^2= 8N_cm_b^2+\mathcal{O}(v_b^2),
423: \end{equation}
424: %------------------
425: we determine the short-distance coefficient $dC_1^{(\textrm{QCD})}$ as
426: %------------------
427: \begin{equation}
428: \label{dC}%
429: dC_1^{(\textrm{QCD})}=
430: \frac{(N_c^2-1)(N_c^2-4)}{N_c^3}
431: \frac{\pi^4\alpha_s^4}{3}
432: \mathcal{B}^{\mu\nu}\mathcal{C}_{\mu\nu}
433: \frac{d\Phi_4}{2!}.
434: \end{equation}
435: %------------------
436:
437: For the QED process $bb_1({}^3S_1)\to \gamma^*\to c\bar{c}$,
438: we quote the result given in Ref.~\cite{Kang:2007uv}, which was
439: obtained by making use of the short-distance coefficient for
440: the leptonic decay of $\Upsilon(1S)$:
441: %------------------
442: \begin{equation}
443: \label{dc1-qed}%
444: %------------------
445: dC_1^{(\textrm{QED})}
446: =
447: \frac{\pi}{3}e_b^2e_c^2N_c\alpha^2 (2+r)
448: \sqrt{1-r}\,\delta(1-\xi)d\xi,
449: %------------------
450: \end{equation}
451: %------------------
452: where $e_Q$ is the fractional electric charge of the heavy quark
453: for $Q=c$, $b$ and the dimensionless variables $r$ and $\xi$
454: are defined by
455: %------------------
456: \begin{subequations}
457: \label{variables1}
458: \begin{eqnarray}
459: \label{variables1a}
460: r&=&\frac{m_c^2}{m_b^2},\\
461: \label{variables1b}
462: \xi &=& \frac{m_{c\bar{c}}^2}{P^2},
463: \end{eqnarray}
464: \end{subequations}
465: %------------------
466: where $m_{c\bar{c}}$ is the invariant mass of the $c\bar{c}$ pair
467: and $m_c$ is the charm-quark mass.
468: The factor $\sqrt{1-r}$ in Eq.~(\ref{dc1-qed}) is the ratio of
469: the phase space for the $c\bar{c}$ final state to the massless
470: two-body phase space.
471: %------------------------------------------------
472: \subsection{\label{sec:phase-space}Phase-space integral
473: for the QCD process}
474: %------------------------------------------------
475: In order to compute the $c\bar{c}$ invariant-mass distribution of
476: the QCD process, it is convenient to factor out the two-body phase
477: space of the $c\bar{c}$ pair $d\Phi_2(p_1\to p'+\bar{p}')$
478: from the four-body phase space $d\Phi_4$ in Eq.~(\ref{dC}), where
479: $p_1$, $p'$, and $\bar{p}'$ are the momenta for the $c\bar{c}$
480: pair, the $c$, and the $\bar{c}$, respectively. Then $d\Phi_4$
481: becomes the product of $d\Phi_2(p_1\to p'+\bar{p}')$ and
482: the three-body phase space $d\Phi_3(P\to p_1+p_2+p_3)$,
483: where $p_2$ and $p_3$ are the momenta for the external gluons,
484: convolved with the $c\bar{c}$ invariant mass $m_{c\bar{c}}$ as
485: %-------------------
486: \begin{equation}
487: \label{dPhi4_1}
488: d\Phi_4(P\to p'+\bar{p}' +p_2+p_3)
489: =d\Phi_3(P\to p_1+p_2+p_3)\frac{dm_{c\bar{c}}^2}{2\pi}d\Phi_2(p_1\to p'+\bar{p}').
490: \end{equation}
491: %-------------------
492: The phase space (\ref{dPhi4_1}) can further be
493: simplified by using the dimensionless variable $\xi$ in
494: Eq.~(\ref{variables1b}) and the scaled energy fraction $x_i$
495: in the $b\bar{b}$ rest frame:
496: %-------------------
497: \begin{equation}
498: \label{x_i}
499: x_i = \frac{2P\cdot p_i}{P^2}
500: \end{equation}
501: %-------------------
502: for $i=1$, 2, and 3. Rewriting the phase space (\ref{dPhi4_1}) in
503: terms of $\xi$ and $x_i$, we get
504: %-------------------
505: \begin{equation}
506: \label{dPhi4_2}
507: d\Phi_4
508: =\frac{dx_1 dx_2 dx_3}{128\pi^3}\delta(2-x_1-x_2-x_3)
509: \frac{P^4 d\xi}{2\pi} \frac{|\bm{p}_c^*|d\Omega^*}{4m_{c\bar{c}}(2\pi)^2},
510: \end{equation}
511: %-------------------
512: where $\Omega^*$ is the solid angle of the charm quark with
513: the three momentum $\bm{p}_c^*$ in the $c\bar{c}$ rest frame.
514: The scaled energy fraction $x_3$ can be integrated out by using the
515: energy delta function. Then the $c\bar{c}$ invariant-mass
516: distribution is obtained as a double integral of $x_1$
517: and $x_2$, where the physical ranges for $\xi$, $x_1$, and $x_2$
518: are given by
519: %-------------------
520: \begin{subequations}
521: \label{ranges}
522: \begin{eqnarray}
523: \label{ranges-r}
524: r \leq &\xi& \leq 1, \\
525: 2\sqrt{\xi} \leq &x_1& \leq 1+\xi, \\
526: \frac{1}{2}\bigg( 2-x_1-\sqrt{x_1^2-4\xi}\bigg)
527: \leq &x_2& \leq \frac{1}{2}\bigg( 2-x_1+\sqrt{x_1^2-4\xi}\bigg).
528: \end{eqnarray}
529: \end{subequations}
530: %-------------------
531:
532: We observe that $\mathcal{C}^{\mu\nu}$ is the only factor
533: that has the $\Omega^*$ dependence in Eq.~(\ref{dC}).
534: The angular integral can easily be done if we express the
535: momenta $p'$ and $\bar{p}'$ in terms of $p_1$ and the
536: relative momentum $q'$ as
537: %-------------------
538: \begin{subequations}
539: \label{cc-mom}
540: \begin{eqnarray}
541: p'&=&\tfrac{1}{2}p_1+q',
542: \\
543: \bar{p}'&=&\tfrac{1}{2}p_1-q',
544: \end{eqnarray}
545: \end{subequations}
546: %-------------------
547: where $p_1=(m_{c\bar{c}},\bm{0})$ and $q'=(0,\bm{p}_c^*)$
548: in the $c\bar{c}$ rest frame. After integrating out the
549: solid angle $\Omega^*$ analytically, we get
550: %-------------------
551: \begin{equation}
552: \label{intJ}
553: \int d\Omega^* \mathcal{C}^{\mu\nu}=
554: \frac{8\pi}{m_{c\bar{c}}^2}
555: \left(1-\frac{4|\bm{p}_c^*|^2}{3m_{c\bar{c}}^2}\right)
556: \left( -g^{\mu\nu} + \frac{p_1^\mu p_1^\nu}{p_1^2}\right).
557: \end{equation}
558: %-------------------
559: Eq.~(\ref{intJ}) behaves like the massive
560: spin-1 tensor with momentum $p_1$ with $p_1^2=m_{c\bar{c}}^2$.
561: Substituting Eqs.~(\ref{dPhi4_1}) and (\ref{intJ}) into Eq.~(\ref{dC}),
562: setting $P^2=4m_b^2$ at leading order in $v_b$, we simplify the
563: differential short-distance coefficient for the QCD process:
564: %------------------
565: \begin{equation}
566: \label{dc1-qcd}%
567: dC_1^{(\textrm{QCD})}=
568: \frac{(N_c^2-1)(N_c^2-4)}{N_c^3}
569: \frac{d\xi}{\xi}
570: \sqrt{1-\frac{r}{\xi}} \left(1+\frac{r}{2\xi}\right)
571: \frac{\alpha_s^4}{36\pi}
572: \int dx_1dx_2 \,F(\xi,x_1,x_2).
573: \end{equation}
574: %------------------
575: Here, the ranges of $x_1$ and $x_2$ integrals are given in
576: Eq.~(\ref{ranges}) and the integrand $F(\xi,x_1,x_2)$ is
577: given by
578: %------------------
579: \begin{equation}
580: \label{F}
581: F(\xi,x_1,x_2)= \sum_{n=0}^{4}\frac{f_n(x_1,x_2)\,\xi^n}
582: {(x_1-2 \xi)^2 x_2^2 x_3^2},
583: \end{equation}
584: %------------------
585: where the coefficients $f_n(x_1,x_2)$ are
586: %------------------
587: \begin{subequations}
588: \label{fn}
589: \begin{eqnarray}
590: f_0(x_1,x_2)&=& x_1^2(x_1 - 1)^2 + x_2^2(x_2 - 1)^2
591: + x_3^2(x_3 -1)^2,
592: \\
593: f_1(x_1,x_2)&=&-8+20(x_2+x_3)-20(x_2+x_3)^2+12x_2x_3+8(x_2+x_3)^3
594: \nonumber\\
595: && -14x_2x_3(x_2+x_3)+x_2^2x_3^2,
596: \\
597: f_2(x_1,x_2)&=&6 - 16(x_2 + x_3)+ 12(x_2 + x_3)^2
598: +2x_2x_3(x_2+x_3-6),
599: \\
600: f_3(x_1,x_2)&=&-4 + 8(x_2 + x_3) + 2 x_2 x_3,
601: \\
602: f_4(x_1,x_2)&=&2.
603: \end{eqnarray}
604: \end{subequations}
605: %------------------
606: Note that we use $x_3=2-x_1-x_2$ in Eqs.~(\ref{F}) and (\ref{fn}).
607: The QCD contribution to the $c\bar{c}$ invariant-mass distribution
608: in the inclusive $\Upsilon(1S)$ decay is finally obtained by replacing
609: $dC_1^{(c)}$ in Eq.~(\ref{Gam-c}) with $dC_1^{\textrm{(QCD)}}$
610: in Eq.~(\ref{dc1-qcd}).
611:
612: Our result can be compared with a previous result in
613: Ref.~\cite{Fritzsch:1978ey}. Neglecting the term proportional to
614: $|\bm{p}_c^*|^2/m_{c\bar{c}}^2$ in Eq.~(\ref{intJ}),
615: we reproduce the function $\rho(\xi)$ in Ref.~\cite{Fritzsch:1978ey}
616: analytically, where $\rho(\xi)$ is defined by
617: %-------------------
618: \begin{equation}
619: \label{rho}
620: \rho(\xi)=
621: \frac{d\Gamma[\Upsilon(1S)\to c\bar{c}+X]/d\xi}
622: {\Gamma[\Upsilon(1S)\to \textrm{light hadrons}]}.
623: \end{equation}
624: %-------------------
625: In Ref.~\cite{Fritzsch:1978ey} the authors used the order-$\alpha_s^3$
626: color-singlet contribution to $\Upsilon(1S)\to ggg$ for the
627: $\Gamma[\Upsilon(1S)\to \textrm{light hadrons}]$. Imposing these
628: approximations, we get
629: %-------------------
630: \begin{equation}
631: \label{rho2}
632: \rho(\xi)=
633: \frac{dC_1^{(\textrm{QCD})}/d\xi}
634: {F_1({}^3S_1)},
635: \end{equation}
636: %-------------------
637: where $F_1({}^3S_1)$ is the short-distance coefficient
638: of $\Upsilon(1S)\to ggg$ at leading order in $\alpha_s$ and
639: $v_b$~\cite{Mackenzie:1981sf,Bodwin:1994jh,Bodwin:2002hg}:
640: %-------------------
641: \begin{subequations}
642: \label{F3S1}
643: \begin{eqnarray}
644: \Gamma[\Upsilon(1S)\to ggg]
645: &=&F_1({}^3S_1)
646: \frac{\langle \mathcal{O}_1({}^3S_1)\rangle_{\Upsilon(1S)}}
647: {m_b^2},
648: \\
649: F_1({}^3S_1)&=&
650: \frac{(N_c^2-1)(N_c^2-4)}{N_c^3}\frac{(\pi^2-9)}{18}
651: \alpha_s^3.
652: \end{eqnarray}
653: \end{subequations}
654: %-------------------
655:
656: Another check on the formula (\ref{dc1-qcd}) can be done in comparison
657: with a previous result for the color-octet spin-triplet $c\bar{c}$
658: contribution to the inclusive $J/\psi$ production in $\Upsilon(1S)$ decay:
659: Eq.~(\ref{dc1-qcd}) is to be compared with Eq.~(20) of
660: Ref.~\cite{Cheung:1996mh}. The function $F(\xi,x_1,x_2)$ in
661: Eq.~(\ref{F}) is equivalent to Eq.~(21) of
662: Ref.~\cite{Cheung:1996mh} up to an overall factor. After considering
663: the differences in the phase space and the normalization for the
664: states, we reproduce the results in Ref.~\cite{Cheung:1996mh} at
665: the leading order in $\alpha_s$, $v_b$, and the charm-quark velocity
666: $v_c$ in the $J/\psi$ rest frame ($\bm{p}_c^*=0$).
667: %------------------------------------------------
668: \subsection{\label{sec:collinear}Massless-charm-quark limit}
669: %------------------------------------------------
670: As is discussed earlier in this section, the short-distance coefficient
671: $dC_1^{(\textrm{QCD})}$ (\ref{dc1-qcd})
672: for the QCD process is free of IR and collinear divergences
673: as long as the charm quark is massive. However, in the limit where the
674: charm quark becomes massless, $m_c\to 0$, $dC_1^{(\textrm{QCD})}$ may
675: acquire collinear divergences. These singularities cancel only if we
676: include the charm-quark contributions to the loop corrections to the
677: gluon wave functions in the process $\Upsilon(1S)\to ggg$
678: \cite{Bodwin:2007zf}. In the remainder of this section, we check
679: if $dC_1^{(\textrm{QCD})}$ (\ref{dc1-qcd}) satisfies correct
680: collinear behavior in the massless-charm-quark limit.
681:
682: As the first step of the check, we can take
683: the limit $\xi\to 0$ on the function $F(\xi, x_1,x_2)$ in Eq.~(\ref{F}).
684: We find that $F(0,x_1,x_2)=f_0(x_1,x_2)$ and this value is proportional
685: to the color-singlet short-distance coefficient
686: $F_1({}^3S_1)$ in Eq.~(\ref{F3S1}) for the decay $\Upsilon(1S)\to ggg$
687: at leading order in $\alpha_s$ and
688: $v_b$~\cite{Mackenzie:1981sf,Bodwin:1994jh,Bodwin:2002hg}:
689: %------------------
690: \begin{equation}
691: \label{F1LO}%
692: F_1({}^3S_1)=
693: \frac{(N_c^2-1)(N_c^2-4)}{N_c^3}\frac{\alpha_s^3}{18}
694: \lim_{\xi\to 0}\int dx_1dx_2 \,F(0,x_1,x_2).
695: \end{equation}
696: %------------------
697:
698: Next, we investigate the asymptotic behavior of Eq.~(\ref{dC})
699: in the limit $m_{c\bar{c}}\to 2m_c$ and $m_c\to 0$.
700: As $m_{c\bar{c}}\to 0$, $|\bm{p}_c^*|$ approaches
701: $m_{c\bar{c}}/2$ and gauge invariance requires
702: $p_1$ to be orthogonal to $\mathcal{B}_{\mu\nu}$.
703: By making use of Eqs.~(\ref{dPhi4_1}), (\ref{intJ}),
704: and (\ref{dC}), we get
705: %-------------------
706: \begin{equation}
707: \label{BC-limit}
708: \mathcal{B}_{\mu\nu}
709: \int d\Phi_2(P\to p'+\bar{p}') \mathcal{C}^{\mu\nu}
710: \to
711: \frac{\mathcal{B}_{\mu\nu}}{2\pi m_{c\bar{c}}^2}\frac{1}{3}
712: \left( -g^{\mu\nu}\right).
713: \end{equation}
714: %-------------------
715: Note that, in this limit, $-\mathcal{B}_{\mu\nu}g^{\mu\nu}$
716: becomes the squared amplitude for $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)\to ggg$.
717: Substituting Eq.~(\ref{dPhi4_1}) into Eq.~(\ref{dC}),
718: and using the limiting value (\ref{BC-limit}), we find that
719: the short-distance coefficient $C_1^{(\textrm{QCD})}$ is
720: divergent logarithmically in the limit
721: $m_{c\bar{c}}\to 2m_c$ and $m_c\to 0$.
722: %------------------
723: \begin{equation}
724: \label{dc1-div}
725: C_1^{(\textrm{QCD})}\to
726: \frac{\alpha_s}{2\pi}
727: \left[
728: \frac{1}{8N_c}
729: \left(\frac{d^{abc}}{4\sqrt{N_c}}\right)^2
730: \left(4\pi\alpha_s\right)^3
731: \int \frac{d\Phi_3}{3!}
732: \left(-\frac{1}{3}g^{\mu\nu}\mathcal{B}_{\mu\nu}\right)
733: \right]_{p_1^2=0}
734: \int_{(2m_c)^2}^{(2m_b)^2}
735: \frac{dm_{c\bar{c}}^2}{m_{c\bar{c}}^2}
736: \end{equation}
737: %------------------
738: where the factor $8N_c$ comes from the perturbative NRQCD matrix
739: element in Eq.~(\ref{me-pert-norm}), the second and the third
740: factors in the brackets are the color factor and the coupling
741: for the process $\Upsilon(1S)\to ggg$, respectively,
742: $1/3!$ is the symmetry factor for the three gluons,
743: and the factor $1/3$ is for the average over the initial spin
744: states.
745: The quantity inside the square brackets in Eq.~(\ref{dc1-div})
746: is independent of $m_{c\bar{c}}$ and is finite.
747: Simplifying the leading
748: divergent term in Eq.~(\ref{dc1-div}), we obtain the asymptotic form
749: of $C_1^{(\textrm{QCD})}$. Because the collinear divergence is
750: absent in the QED contribution, the collinear divergent contribution
751: in the QCD process is the same as that in the short-distance
752: coefficient $C_1^{(c)}$:
753: %-------------------
754: \begin{equation}
755: \label{dc1-qcd-divf}
756: C_1^{(c)}
757: \to \frac{\alpha_s}{\pi}\,
758: F_1({}^3S_1)\log\frac{m_b}{m_c}.
759: \end{equation}
760: %-------------------
761: It is explicit in Eq.~(\ref{dc1-qcd-divf}) that the collinear divergent
762: contribution, which is of order $\alpha_s^4$, is proportional to the
763: short-distance coefficient for $\Upsilon(1S)\to ggg$ at order
764: $\alpha_s^3$.
765:
766: The only order-$\alpha_s^4$ contributions to $\Upsilon(1S)\to$ light
767: hadrons that depend on $m_c$ except for the $q\bar{q}gg$ final state
768: are the virtual charm-quark loop corrections to the gluon wave functions
769: in $\Upsilon(1S)\to ggg$. The leading divergent term of the virtual
770: correction is
771: %-------------------
772: \begin{eqnarray}
773: \label{dc1-virtual}
774: C_1^{(c,\textrm{virtual)}} &\to&
775: -3i\Pi(0)F_1({}^3S_1) \nonumber\\
776: &=& \frac{\alpha_s}{\pi}F_1({}^3S_1)\log\frac{m_c}{\mu},
777: \end{eqnarray}
778: %-------------------
779: where $\Pi(0)$ is the virtual charm-quark loop contribution to the
780: vacuum polarization for an on-shell gluon and $\mu$ is
781: the renormalization scale. We find that the collinear divergence
782: cancels in the sum of the right sides of Eqs.~(\ref{dc1-qcd-divf})
783: and (\ref{dc1-virtual}). Therefore,
784: $C_1^{(c)}+C_1^{(c,\textrm{virtual})}$, which is
785: the complete $m_c$ dependent contributions to the hadronic decay of
786: the $\Upsilon(1S)$ at order $\alpha_s^4$, is free of collinear divergence.
787:
788:
789: %------------------------------------------------
790: \section{\label{sec:rate}Numerical Analysis}
791: %------------------------------------------------
792: In this section, we provide a phenomenological prediction
793: for the $c\bar{c}$ invariant-mass distribution in inclusive
794: $\Upsilon(1S)$ decay by making use of the NRQCD factorization
795: formula obtained in Sec.~\ref{sec:cc}. As shown in Eq.~(\ref{dc1}),
796: the short-distance coefficient $dC_1^{(c)}$ is the sum of
797: the QCD and the QED contributions in Eqs.~(\ref{dc1-qcd})
798: and (\ref{dc1-qed}), respectively. Substituting the $dC_1^{(c)}$
799: into the NRQCD factorization formula (\ref{Gam-c}), we obtain the
800: differential rate depending on the scaled invariant mass
801: $\xi$ defined in Eq.~(\ref{variables1b}). The resultant $c\bar{c}$
802: invariant-mass distribution is
803: %-------------------
804: \begin{equation}
805: \label{dmcc}
806: \frac{d}{dm_{c\bar{c}}^2}\Gamma[\Upsilon(1S)\to c\bar{c}+X]
807: =\frac{1}{m^2_{\Upsilon(1S)}}
808: \frac{dC^{(c)}_1}{d\xi}
809: \frac{\langle \mathcal{O}_1({}^3S_1)\rangle_{\Upsilon(1S)}}{m_b^2},
810: \end{equation}
811: %-------------------
812: where we use $P^2=m^2_{\Upsilon(1S)}$ and $m_{\Upsilon(1S)}$ is
813: the mass of the $\Upsilon(1S)$. In our numerical analysis,
814: we use the same input parameters as those used in Ref.~\cite{Kang:2007uv},
815: where the momentum distribution of the charm quark produced in the
816: inclusive $\Upsilon(1S)$ decay is studied.
817:
818: The short-distance coefficient $dC_1^{(c)}$
819: depends on the strong coupling $\alpha_s$ and the ratio $r$
820: defined in Eq.~(\ref{variables1a}). For the strong coupling,
821: we take the running coupling $\alpha_s(m_{\Upsilon(1S)}/2) = 0.215$.
822: As shown in Eq.~(\ref{ranges-r}), the threshold of the phase space
823: is determined by the ratio $r=m_c^2/m_b^2$. In order to make the
824: end points of the phase space fit to the physical ones, we use
825: $m_c=m_D$ and $m_b=m_{\Upsilon(1S)}/2$ in evaluating the ratio $r$, where
826: $m_D=1.87$~GeV is the average mass of the $D^0$ and $D^+$
827: and $m_{\Upsilon(1S)}=9.46$~GeV~\cite{Yao:2006px}. Then the numerical
828: value for the ratio becomes $r=4m_D^2/m_{\Upsilon(1S)}^2\approx 0.1563$.
829: This choice of $m_c$ and $m_b$ for the ratio $r$ seems reasonable for
830: the open-charm production in the $\Upsilon(1S)$ decay. For the
831: bottom-quark mass $m_b$ that appears in the NRQCD factorization
832: formulas (\ref{Gam-c}) and (\ref{dmcc}), we use the one-loop pole
833: mass $m_b=4.6\pm 0.1$ GeV. The numerical value for the long-distance
834: NRQCD matrix element in Eqs.~(\ref{Gam-c}) and (\ref{dmcc}) is quoted
835: from Ref.~\cite{Kang:2007uv}:
836: %------------------
837: \begin{equation}
838: \label{ME}%
839: %------------------
840: \langle \mathcal{O}_1({}^3S_1) \rangle_{\Upsilon(1S)} =%
841: 3.07^{+0.21}_{-0.19}~\textrm{GeV}^3.
842: %------------------
843: \end{equation}
844: %------------------
845: For more details of the determination of the NRQCD matrix
846: element in Eq.~(\ref{ME}), we refer the readers to
847: Refs.~\cite{Bodwin:2007fz,Bodwin:2007ga,Bodwin:2006dn,Chung:2008sm}.
848:
849:
850: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
851: \begin{figure}[tb]
852: \includegraphics*[width=12cm,angle=0,clip=true]{fig1}
853: \caption{\label{fig1}%
854: Invariant-mass distribution of the $c\bar{c}$ pair produced in the
855: inclusive $\Upsilon(1S)$ decay as a function of $\xi$, which is
856: defined in Eq.~(\ref{variables1b}). Only the contribution from the
857: QCD process $b{\bar b}({}^3S_1)\to c{\bar c}gg$ is shown. The
858: contribution from the QED process
859: $b{\bar b}({}^3S_1)\to\gamma^*\to c{\bar c}$,
860: which is proportional to $\delta(1-\xi)$, is not shown.}
861: \end{figure}
862: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
863: The $c\bar{c}$ invariant-mass distribution from the QCD process
864: is obtained by substituting Eqs.~(\ref{dc1-qcd}) and (\ref{ME})
865: into Eqs.~(\ref{Gam-c}) and (\ref{dc1}), and integrating out
866: $x_1$ and $x_2$ over the ranges in Eq.~(\ref{ranges}).
867: We plot the QCD contribution to the invariant-mass
868: distribution $d\Gamma[\Upsilon(1S)\to c\bar{c}+X]/d\xi$
869: in Fig.~\ref{fig1} as a function
870: of the dimensionless variable $\xi$. Note that
871: $d\Gamma[\Upsilon(1S)\to c\bar{c}+X]/dm^2_{c\bar{c}}=%
872: m_{\Upsilon(1S)}^{-2}d\Gamma[\Upsilon(1S)\to c\bar{c}+X]/d\xi$.
873: The distribution in Fig.~\ref{fig1} has a sharp peak of
874: height $5.48\,$keV at $\xi=0.20$, which is just above the
875: threshold at $\xi=r$.
876: The invariant-mass distribution of the $c\bar{c}$ from
877: the QED process is obtained in a similar way by using
878: Eq.~(\ref{dc1-qed}). As shown in Eq.~(\ref{dc1-qed}),
879: the QED contribution is proportional to the delta function
880: $\delta(1-\xi)$ so that the contribution is concentrated
881: at the kinematic end point $\xi=1$. Therefore, the contribution
882: of the QED process is well distinguished from the QCD contribution.
883:
884:
885:
886: Integrating the invariant-mass distribution over the variable $\xi$,
887: we obtain the total production rate of the $c\bar{c}$ pair in the
888: inclusive $\Upsilon(1S)$ decay:
889: %------------------
890: \begin{subequations}
891: \label{total}%
892: \begin{eqnarray}
893: %------------------
894: \Gamma[\Upsilon(1S)\to c\bar{c}+X]&=&
895: \Gamma^{(\textrm{QCD})}+\Gamma^{(\textrm{QED})},
896: \\
897: \Gamma^{(\textrm{QCD})}&=& 1.44 \pm 0.36 ~ \textrm{keV},
898: \\
899: \Gamma^{(\textrm{QED})}&=& 2.60 \pm 0.65 ~ \textrm{keV},
900: %------------------
901: \end{eqnarray}
902: \end{subequations}
903: %------------------
904: where the theoretical uncertainties in Eq.~(\ref{total}) come from
905: the uncertainties of $m_b$, the NRQCD matrix element in Eq.~(\ref{ME}),
906: and uncalculated next-to-leading-order relativistic and
907: QCD corrections, which we set to be
908: 10\,\% ($v_b^2\sim 0.1$)
909: and
910: 21.5\,\% ($\alpha_s= 0.215$)
911: of the central value, respectively.
912: The QED contribution $\Gamma^{(\textrm{QED})}$ to $\Upsilon(1S)\to c\bar{c}+X$
913: agrees with that in Ref.~\cite{Kang:2007uv}. The QCD contribution
914: $\Gamma^{(\textrm{QCD})}$ differs from that in Ref.~\cite{Kang:2007uv} by
915: about $2$\,\% because we omit the contribution of the process
916: $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)\to g^*g\gamma$ followed by $g^*\to c\bar{c}$
917: while this tiny contribution is included in Ref.~\cite{Kang:2007uv}.
918: As shown in Eq.~(\ref{total}), the QED contribution
919: $\Gamma^{(\textrm{QED})}$ occupies about 60\,\% of the total charm
920: production rate of the inclusive $\Upsilon(1S)$ decay. As is discussed in
921: Ref.~\cite{Kang:2007uv}, we expect that the QCD next-to-leading-order
922: corrections to the QED process
923: may modify the shape of the invariant-mass distribution.
924:
925: Our result for $\Gamma^{(\textrm{QCD})}$ can be compared with
926: another previous result~\cite{Fritzsch:1978ey}.
927: In Ref.~\cite{Fritzsch:1978ey}, the ratio of the total charm
928: production rate in the inclusive $\Upsilon(1S)$ decay to
929: $\Gamma[\Upsilon(1S) \to \textrm{light hadrons}]$ is predicted
930: to be $\Gamma[\Upsilon(1S)\to c{\bar c}+ X]/%
931: \Gamma[\Upsilon(1S) \to \textrm{light hadrons}]\approx 0.081 \,\alpha_s$.
932: This is greater by about $20$\,\% than our result,
933: \begin{equation}
934: \frac{\Gamma[\Upsilon(1S) \to c{\bar c}+ X]}
935: {\Gamma[\Upsilon(1S) \to \textrm{light hadrons}] }%
936: =0.065\,\alpha_s.
937: \end{equation}
938: As we discussed in Sec.~\ref{sec:cc},
939: the authors of Ref.~\cite{Fritzsch:1978ey} made the approximation
940: of neglecting $|\bm{p}_c^*|^2/m_{c\bar{c}}^2$ in computing the
941: function $\rho(\xi)$ in comparison with Eq.~(\ref{intJ}) of this
942: paper. The approximation leads to the overestimation
943: of the height of the peak in the invariant-mass distribution
944: and this is the reason for the discrepancy between the two results.
945: To check this point explicitly, we carry out the same calculation
946: with the approximations that were used in Ref.~\cite{Fritzsch:1978ey}.
947: The calculation shows that the height of the peak increases by
948: about 8\,\% from $5.48\,$keV to $5.93\,$keV at the same horizontal
949: position at $\xi=0.20$. The difference increases as $\xi$ increases
950: ranging up to $30\,\%$. As a result, the total rate without
951: approximation is smaller by about $20\,\%$.
952: %------------------------------------------------
953: \section{\label{summary}Summary}
954: %------------------------------------------------
955: We have calculated the invariant-mass distribution of the $c\bar{c}$
956: pair produced in the inclusive decay of the $\Upsilon(1S)$ based
957: on the color-singlet mechanism of the NRQCD factorization formalism
958: at leading order in the bottom-quark velocity $v_b$ in the meson
959: rest frame. As the short-distance processes, we considered
960: the QCD process $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)\to g^*gg$ followed by
961: $g^*\to c\bar{c}$ at leading order in $\alpha_s$ and the QED process
962: $b\bar{b}_1({}^3S_1)\to \gamma^*\to c\bar{c}$ at leading order
963: in $\alpha$ and $\alpha_s$.
964:
965: The QCD contribution to the $c\bar{c}$ invariant-mass distribution
966: has a sharp peak just above the threshold, and that of the QED
967: process is concentrated at the maximally allowed kinematic end point.
968: In comparison with a previous analysis on the QCD process,
969: our prediction for the peak of the QCD contribution is lower than
970: that in Ref.~\cite{Fritzsch:1978ey} and the total production
971: rate of the $c\bar{c}$ pair in the inclusive $\Upsilon(1S)$ is smaller
972: than that in Ref.~\cite{Fritzsch:1978ey} by about 20\,\%. The main
973: reason for the discrepancy is that, in Ref.~\cite{Fritzsch:1978ey},
974: the authors made an approximation of neglecting
975: $|\bm{p}_c^*|^2/m_{c\bar{c}}^2$ while we keep the full expression
976: in Eq.~(\ref{intJ}) of this paper.
977:
978: We also investigate the collinear divergences of the decay rate
979: in the massless charm-quark limit $m_c\to 0$. Although the decay
980: rate of leading order in $v_b$ is free of both IR and collinear
981: divergences if the charm quark is massive, the rate acquires
982: collinear divergences in the limit $m_c\to 0$. We have confirmed
983: that our analytic expression for the differential decay rate
984: reproduces the correct collinear behavior in this limit so that
985: the divergence exactly cancels that of the charm-quark loop
986: corrections to the gluon wave function for the $\Upsilon(1S)\to ggg$
987: process. The sum of the two contributions are the $m_c$ dependent
988: contribution to the inclusive $\Upsilon(1S)$ decay into light
989: hadrons at order $\alpha_s^4$.
990: %--------------------------------------------------------------------
991: \begin{acknowledgments}
992: %--------------------------------------------------------------------
993: % put your acknowledgments here.
994: The work of HSC was supported by the BK21 program.
995: %
996: The work of TK was supported by the Korea Research Foundation under
997: MOEHRD Basic Research Promotion grant KRF-2006-311-C00020.
998: %
999: The work of JL was supported by the Korea Science and Engineering
1000: Foundation (KOSEF) funded by the Korea government (MEST)
1001: under Grant No. R01-2008-000-10378-0.
1002: \end{acknowledgments}
1003: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1004: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
1005: %\cite{CLEO}
1006: \bibitem{CLEO}
1007: B. Heltsley, CLEO Collaboration, talk given at International
1008: Workshop on Heavy Quarkonium, 17-20 Oct. 2007, DESY Hamburg,
1009: http://www.desy.de/qwg07/talks/Heltsley\_071018.pdf.
1010:
1011: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
1012: \bibitem{Bodwin:2007zf}
1013: G.~T.~Bodwin, E.~Braaten, D.~Kang, and J.~Lee,
1014: %``Inclusive Charm Production in chi_b Decays,''
1015: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 76}, 054001 (2007)
1016: [arXiv:0704.2599 [hep-ph]].
1017: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D76,054001;%%
1018: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
1019: %\cite{Kang:2007uv}
1020: \bibitem{Kang:2007uv}
1021: D.~Kang, T.~Kim, J.~Lee, and C.~Yu,
1022: %``Inclusive Charm Production in Upsilon(nS) Decay,''
1023: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 76}, 114018 (2007)
1024: [arXiv:0707.4056 [hep-ph]].
1025: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0707.4056;%%
1026: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
1027: %\cite{Hao:2007rb}
1028: \bibitem{Hao:2007rb}
1029: G.~Hao, C.~F.~Qiao, and P.~Sun,
1030: %``Investigate the Bottomonium Ground State \eta_b via Its Inclusive Charm
1031: %Decays,''
1032: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 76}, 125013 (2007)
1033: [arXiv:0710.3339 [hep-ph]].
1034: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D76,125013;%%
1035:
1036: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
1037: %\cite{Bodwin:1992ye}
1038: \bibitem{Bodwin:1992ye}
1039: G.~T.~Bodwin, E.~Braaten, and G.~P.~Lepage,
1040: %``Rigorous QCD predictions for decays of P wave quarkonia,''
1041: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 46}, R1914 (1992)
1042: [arXiv:hep-lat/9205006].
1043: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D46,1914;%%
1044:
1045: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
1046: %\cite{Bodwin:1994jh}
1047: \bibitem{Bodwin:1994jh}
1048: G.~T.~Bodwin, E.~Braaten, and G.~P.~Lepage,
1049: % ``Rigorous QCD analysis of inclusive annihilation and production of heavy
1050: % quarkonium,''
1051: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 51}, 1125 (1995)
1052: [Erratum-ibid.\ D {\bf 55}, 5853 (1997)]
1053: [arXiv:hep-ph/9407339].
1054: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D51,1125;%%
1055:
1056:
1057: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
1058: %\cite{Barbieri:1979gg}
1059: \bibitem{Barbieri:1979gg}
1060: R.~Barbieri, M.~Caffo, and E.~Remiddi,
1061: %``Hadronic Decays Of Quarkonium Into Heavy Quarks,''
1062: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 83}, 345 (1979).
1063: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B83,345;%%
1064:
1065: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
1066: %\cite{Fritzsch:1978ey}
1067: \bibitem{Fritzsch:1978ey}
1068: H.~Fritzsch and K.~H.~Streng,
1069: % ``Quarkonium Decay Into Heavy Quark Flavors,''
1070: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 77}, 299 (1978).
1071:
1072: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
1073: %\cite{Cheung:1996mh}
1074: \bibitem{Cheung:1996mh}
1075: K.~Cheung, W.~Y.~Keung, and T.~C.~Yuan,
1076: % ``Color-Octet $J/\psi$ Production in the $\Upsilon$ Decay,''
1077: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 54}, 929 (1996)
1078: [arXiv:hep-ph/9602423].
1079: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D54,929;%%
1080:
1081:
1082: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
1083: %\cite{Mackenzie:1981sf}
1084: \bibitem{Mackenzie:1981sf}
1085: P.~B.~Mackenzie and G.~P.~Lepage,
1086: %``QCD Corrections To The Gluonic Width Of The Upsilon Meson,''
1087: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 47}, 1244 (1981).
1088: %%CITATION = PRLTA,47,1244;%%
1089:
1090: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
1091: %\cite{Keung:1982jb}
1092: \bibitem{Keung:1982jb}
1093: W.~Y.~Keung and I.~J.~Muzinich,
1094: %``Beyond The Static Limit For Quarkonium Decays,''
1095: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 27}, 1518 (1983).
1096: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D27,1518;%%
1097:
1098:
1099: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
1100: %\cite{Campbell:2007ws}
1101: \bibitem{Campbell:2007ws}
1102: J.~Campbell, F.~Maltoni, and F.~Tramontano,
1103: %``QCD corrections to J/psi and Upsilon production at hadron colliders,''
1104: arXiv:hep-ph/0703113.
1105: %%CITATION = HEP-PH/0703113;%%
1106:
1107:
1108: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
1109: %\cite{Bodwin:2002hg}
1110: \bibitem{Bodwin:2002hg}
1111: G.~T.~Bodwin and A.~Petrelli,
1112: %``Order v**4 corrections to S-wave quarkonium decay,''
1113: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 094011 (2002)
1114: [arXiv:hep-ph/0205210].
1115: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D66,094011;%%
1116:
1117:
1118: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
1119: %\cite{Kuhn:1979bb}
1120: \bibitem{Kuhn:1979bb}
1121: J.~H.~Kuhn, J.~Kaplan, and E.~G.~O.~Safiani,
1122: %``Electromagnetic Annihilation Of E+ E- Into Quarkonium States With Even
1123: %Charge Conjugation,''
1124: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 157}, 125 (1979).
1125: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B157,125;%%
1126:
1127: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
1128: %\cite{Guberina:1980dc}
1129: \bibitem{Guberina:1980dc}
1130: B.~Guberina, J.~H.~Kuhn, R.~D.~Peccei, and R.~Ruckl,
1131: %``Rare Decays Of The Z0,''
1132: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 174}, 317 (1980).
1133: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B174,317;%%
1134:
1135:
1136: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
1137: %\cite{Bodwin:2007fz}
1138: \bibitem{Bodwin:2007fz}
1139: G.~T.~Bodwin, H.~S.~Chung, D.~Kang, J.~Lee, and C.~Yu,
1140: %``Improved determination of color-singlet nonrelativistic QCD matrix elements
1141: %for S-wave charmonium,''
1142: arXiv:0710.0994 [hep-ph].
1143: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0710.0994;%%
1144: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
1145:
1146: %\cite{Bodwin:2007ga}
1147: \bibitem{Bodwin:2007ga}
1148: G.~T.~Bodwin, J.~Lee, and C.~Yu,
1149: %``Resummation of Relativistic Corrections to e+ e- -> J/psi+eta_c,''
1150: arXiv:0710.0995 [hep-ph].
1151: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0710.0995;%%
1152: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
1153: %\cite{Bodwin:2006dn}
1154: \bibitem{Bodwin:2006dn}
1155: G.~T.~Bodwin, D.~Kang and J.~Lee,
1156: %``Potential-model calculation of an order-v**2 NRQCD matrix element,''
1157: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 74}, 014014 (2006)
1158: [arXiv:hep-ph/0603186].
1159: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D74,014014;%%
1160:
1161: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
1162: %\cite{Chung:2008sm}
1163: \bibitem{Chung:2008sm}
1164: H.~S.~Chung, J.~Lee, and D.~Kang,
1165: %``Cornell Potential Parameters for S-wave Heavy Quarkonia,''
1166: J.\ Korean Phys.\ Soc.\ {\bf 52}, 1151 (2008)
1167: [arXiv:0803.3116 [hep-ph]].
1168: %%CITATION = JKPSD,52,1151;%%
1169:
1170: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
1171: %\cite{Yao:2006px}
1172: \bibitem{Yao:2006px}
1173: W.~M.~Yao {\it et al.} [Particle Data Group],
1174: %``Review of particle physics,''
1175: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 33}, 1 (2006).
1176: %%CITATION = JPHGB,G33,1;%%
1177:
1178:
1179: \end{thebibliography}
1180: \end{document}
1181: