1: \pdfoutput=1
2: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
3: %%% PASJ LaTeX template for draft(body)<2007/01/19>
4: %%%
5: %%% IMPORTANT NOTICE FOR AUTHORS
6: %%% 1. ``\draft'' creates single column and double spaces format.
7: %%% 2. If you comment out ``\draft'', the output will be double column
8: %%% and single space.
9: %%% 3. For cross-references, the use of \label/\ref/\cite and the
10: %%% thebibliography environment is strongly recommended
11: %%% 4. Do NOT use \def/\renewcommand.
12: %%% 5. Do NOT redifine commands provided by PASJ00.cls.
13: %%%
14: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
15: \documentclass[pdftex]{pasj00}
16: %\draft
17:
18: \begin{document}
19: \SetRunningHead{M. Sawada et al.}{X-ray observations of Sgr D}
20: \Received{2008/03/31}%{yyyy/mm/dd}
21: \Accepted{}%{yyyy/mm/dd}
22:
23: \title{X-Ray Observations of the Sagittarius D H \emissiontype{II} Region
24: \\ toward the Galactic Center with Suzaku}
25: %%% begin:list of authors
26: % Do NOT capitalize all letters in "textsc".
27: \author{Makoto~\textsc{Sawada},\altaffilmark{1}
28: Masahiro~\textsc{Tsujimoto},\altaffilmark{2}\thanks{Chandra Fellow}
29: Katsuji~\textsc{Koyama},\altaffilmark{1}
30: Casey~J.~\textsc{Law},\altaffilmark{3}\\
31: Takeshi~Go~\textsc{Tsuru},\altaffilmark{1}
32: and Yoshiaki~\textsc{Hyodo}\altaffilmark{1}}
33: %\thanks{}}
34: \affil{$^1$Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science,
35: Kyoto University \\
36: Kitashirakawa Oiwake-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502}
37: \affil{$^2$Department of Astronomy \& Astrophysics,
38: Pennsylvania State University\\ 525 Davey Laboratory,
39: University Park, PA 16802, USA}
40: \affil{$^3$Astronomical Institute ``Anton Pannekoek'', University of Amsterdam\\
41: Kruislaan 403, 1098 SJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands}
42: \email{sawada@cr.scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp}
43:
44: %% `\KeyWords{}' always has to be placed before `\maketitle'.
45: \KeyWords{ISM: H \emissiontype{II} regions --- ISM: individual (Sgr D)
46: --- ISM: supernova remnants --- radio continuum: ISM --- X-rays: ISM} %Do NOT move this preamble from here!
47:
48: \maketitle
49:
50: \begin{abstract}
51: %Please read ``IMPORTANT NOTICE'' carefully before preparing a manuscript.
52: We present a Suzaku X-ray study of the Sagittarius D (Sgr\,D) H\emissiontype{II}
53: region in the Galactic center region. Two 18\arcmin$\times$18\arcmin\
54: images by the X-ray Imaging Spectrometer (XIS) encompass the entire Sgr\,D complex.
55: Thanks to the low background, XIS discovered two diffuse sources
56: with low surface brightness and
57: obtained their high signal-to-noise ratio spectra.
58: One is associated with the core of the Sgr\,D H\emissiontype{II} region, arising from the
59: young stellar cluster. The other is a new object in the vicinity of the region.
60: We also present 3.5~cm and 6.0~cm radio continuum maps of the new source
61: using the 100~m Green Bank Telescope. We conclude that the source is
62: a new supernova remnant (SNR; G1.2--0.0) based on: (1) the 0.9$\pm$0.2~keV
63: thermal X-ray spectrum with emission lines from highly ionized atoms;
64: (2) the diffuse nature with an apparent extent of $\sim$10~pc
65: at the Galactic center distance inferred from the X-ray absorption
66: ($\sim$8.5$\times$10$^{22}$~cm$^{-2}$); and
67: (3) the nonthermal radio continuum spectral index ($\sim -$0.5).
68: Our discovery of an SNR in the Sgr\,D H\emissiontype{II} region leads to
69: a revision of the view of this system, which had been considered to be a
70: thermal H\emissiontype{II} region and its environment.
71: \end{abstract}
72:
73:
74: \section{Introduction}
75:
76: \begin{table*}
77: \begin{center}
78: \caption{Log of Suzaku and XMM-Newton observations.}\label{tab:obs}
79: \begin{tabular}{ccccccc}
80: \hline
81: Telescope/ & Sequence & Field & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Aim point} & Observation & Exposure \\
82: Instrument & number & name & $\alpha$ (J2000.0) & $\delta$ (J2000.0) & start date & time (ks)\footnotemark[$*$] \\ \hline
83: Suzaku/XIS & 501059010 & north & \timeform{17h48m22s} & \timeform{-27D56'08''} & 2007/03/15 & 62.2/62.2 \\
84: Suzaku/XIS & 502020010 & south & \timeform{17h48m46s} & \timeform{-28D08'00''} & 2007/09/06 & 139/139 \\
85: XMM-Newton/EPIC & 0112970101 & obs00 & \timeform{17h48m44s} & \timeform{-28D05'06''} & 2000/09/23 & 14.5/12.9 \\
86: XMM-Newton/EPIC & 0205240101 & obs05 & \timeform{17h48m17s} & \timeform{-28D07'50''} & 2005/02/26 & 28.7/16.6 \\
87: \hline
88: \multicolumn{7}{@{}l@{}}{\hbox to 0pt{\parbox{160mm}{\footnotesize
89: \footnotemark[$*$] The exposure time after screening of XIS FI/BI for the Suzaku and EPIC MOS/pn for the XMM-Newton observations.
90: }\hss}}
91: \end{tabular}
92: \end{center}
93: \end{table*}
94:
95: %%%intro. of Sgr D%%%
96: Sagittarius D (Sgr\,D) is one of the most intense radio sources in the
97: Galactic center (GC) region known from the earliest days of
98: GC radio observations (\cite{1966ApJ...146..653D}). It is
99: composed of an
100: H\emissiontype{II} region (Sgr\,D H\emissiontype{II} region or G1.13--0.10)
101: and a supernova remnant (SNR; Sgr\,D SNR or G1.05--0.15) adjoining
102: each other (figure~\ref{fig:fullimg}a).
103: Low-resolution radio continuum observations
104: (\cite{Lit1974}; \cite{1974IAUS...60..499S}; \cite{1979A&AS...35....1D})
105: identified thermal emission
106: from the H\emissiontype{II} region
107: and nonthermal emission from the SNR.
108:
109: %%%old obs.%%%
110: The Sgr\,D H\emissiontype{II} region is associated with its natal
111: giant molecular cloud (GMC),
112: which has a velocity different from those typical of GMCs
113: in the Galactic nuclear disk such as Sgr\,B2 (\cite{1991ApJ...379L..53L}; \cite{1992ApJS...82..495L}).
114: In higher resolution radio continuum images (\cite{1998ApJ...493..274M}; \cite{2000AJ....119..207L};
115: \cite{2004ApJS..155..421Y}),
116: the Sgr\,D H\emissiontype{II} region is comprised of several components of
117: different spatial scales.
118: Throughout this paper, we call the entire region ``the Sgr\,D H\emissiontype{II} complex''
119: and treat three components separately (figure~\ref{fig:fullimg}a):
120: (1) ``core'', the brightest knot, which is referred to as ``G1.12--0.10''
121: (\cite{1992ApJS...82..495L}; \cite{1998ApJ...493..274M}) or
122: the ``compact H\emissiontype{II} region'' (\cite{1999ApJ...512..237B}),
123: (2) ``extended'', a $\sim$\timeform{7'} shell surrounding the ``core'' (\cite{1999ApJ...512..237B}),
124: and (3) ``tail'', the structure extending eastward from the ``extended'' component,
125: which is labeled ``G1.2+0.0'' (\cite{2008ApJS...01..001L}).
126: The ``core'' is an H\emissiontype{II} region with a Lyman continuum photon intensity
127: equivalent of an O5.5 star based on its infrared properties
128: (\cite{1984ApJ...283..601O}; \cite{1999ApJ...512..237B}).
129: The latter two structures may be at the edge of
130: the H\emissiontype{II} region;
131: the ``extended'' component is created by ionizing photons from the ``core'' and
132: the ``tail'' by gas escaping away from the ``extended'' component (\cite{1998ApJ...493..274M}).
133:
134: %%%recent obs.%%%
135: Recent observational results, however,
136: are diverging away from this view of the
137: Sgr\,D H\emissiontype{II} complex. There are two contradictory
138: estimates of its distance.
139: Narrow molecular line emission and broad H$_{2}$CO absorption features
140: indicate that the complex is on the far side of the GC region
141: (\cite{1998ApJ...493..274M}), whereas the near-infrared star counts
142: around the ``core'' suggest the system
143: lies on the near side of the GC (\cite{1999ApJ...512..237B}), possibly in the
144: $\sim$160~pc expanding molecular ring (\cite{1991ApJ...379L..53L}).
145: The latest radio continuum study
146: on arcminute spatial scales indicates a mixture of thermal
147: and nonthermal emission in this complex
148: \citep{2008ApJS...01..001L}, which historically had been considered solely
149: a thermal radio source.
150:
151: %%%new view of Sgr D HII%%%
152: These new lines of evidence do not support the long-standing
153: interpretation that the Sgr\,D H\emissiontype{II} complex is
154: a single H\emissiontype{II} region and its environment. Rather, it is more
155: likely that the system is made up of multiple components at various
156: distances projected along the same line of sight. Previous results should be
157: carefully reviewed and new observations should be conducted to better understand
158: the system.
159:
160: %%%X-ray diffuse%%%
161: X-ray observations are indispensable in this pursuit. Both SNRs and
162: GMCs can be identified through X-ray imaging as emission extended by
163: $\sim$10~pc. The two types of emission can be distinguished by
164: their X-ray spectra; SNRs show
165: thermal plasma with emission lines from highly ionized atoms
166: (e.g., \cite{1979ApJ...234L..73B}), while GMCs show emission produced
167: by external X-ray irradiation (\cite{2000ApJ...534..283M}).
168: H\emissiontype{II} regions are also
169: an emerging class of diffuse X-ray sources with a similar spatial scale.
170: They show a variety of spectral shapes, including soft thermal
171: (\cite{2003ApJ...593..874T}; \cite{2008PASJ...60S..85H}),
172: hard thermal (\cite{2002ApJ...573..191M}; \cite{2006ApJ...638..860E}),
173: and nonthermal (\cite{2002ApJ...580L.161W}; \cite{2004ApJ...611..858L};
174: \cite{2006MNRAS.371...38W}; \cite{2007PASJ...59S.229T}; \cite{2006ApJ...638..860E})
175: emission. In addition to the X-ray emission, the measurement
176: of the X-ray absorption gives a constraint on the distance
177: and hence the physical scale of extended objects.
178:
179: %%%X-ray obs. of Sgr D%%%
180: Several X-ray observations were reported in the Sgr\,D region.
181: In a BeppoSAX study (\cite{2001A&A...372..651S}), diffuse X-ray emission was
182: significantly detected from the Sgr\,D SNR and marginally detected from
183: the Sgr\,D H\emissiontype{II} complex.
184: In an ASCA study (\cite{2002ApJS..138...19S}), the image was plagued
185: by stray lights from a nearby bright source and was unsuitable to search
186: for diffuse X-ray sources.
187: In an XMM-Newton study (\cite{2006A&A...456..287S}),
188: dozens of point sources were identified, but no diffuse emission was detected
189: presumably due to high background. The possible diffuse X-ray
190: detection by BeppoSAX in the Sgr\,D H\emissiontype{II} complex has not been confirmed
191: and no spectral information exists for this source.
192:
193: %%%Our obs.%%%
194: We conducted X-ray observations of the Sgr\,D H\emissiontype{II} complex
195: using the X-ray Imaging Spectrometer (XIS: \cite{2007PASJ...59S..23K})
196: onboard Suzaku (\cite{2007PASJ...59S...1M}).
197: The low background of XIS makes it
198: particularly well-suited for finding diffuse sources of low surface brightness and yielding
199: their high signal-to-noise ratio spectra. Indeed, a series of XIS studies in the GC region identified
200: several new SNRs and irradiated GMCs (\cite{2007PASJ...59S.221K};
201: \cite{2008PASJ...60S.183M}; \cite{2008PASJ...60S.191N})
202: and reported detailed spectroscopy of an H\emissiontype{II} region
203: (\cite{2007PASJ...59S.229T}). Upon the confirmation of
204: the previously claimed marginal diffuse detection in the Sgr\,D H\emissiontype{II} complex,
205: we further aim to construct the X-ray spectrum
206: which gives important insights into the origin of
207: the emission and the entire complex.
208:
209: \medskip
210:
211: %%%Our work%%%
212: Here, we present a significant detection of diffuse X-ray emission from
213: the Sgr\,D H\emissiontype{II} complex with the Suzaku XIS.
214: High signal-to-noise ratio spectra were obtained from two different
215: diffuse sources.
216: We discuss their X-ray characteristics and their association with
217: sources observed in our study using the 100~m Green Bank Telescope (GBT)
218: and in other archived multiwavelength data sets.
219: Based on these data, we propose a new view of the Sgr\,D H\emissiontype{II}
220: complex.
221: In this paper, we supplement the Suzaku data
222: with those taken by XMM-Newton in order to evaluate
223: the contribution of point sources to the diffuse emission.
224: Throughout this paper, we use east and west in the Galactic longitude direction,
225: and north and south in the Galactic latitude direction for simplicity.
226:
227: \section{Observations}
228:
229: \begin{figure*}
230: \begin{center}
231: \FigureFile(180mm,140mm){1.jpg}
232: %%% \FigureFile(width,height){filename}
233: \end{center}
234: \caption{Wide-band (0.7--5.5~keV) smoothed images by the (a) XIS and (b) MOS
235: shown with the logarithmic intensity scale. Overlaid green contours in
236: (a) are an 18~cm radio continuum map from the Very Large Array
237: (VLA; \cite{1998ApJ...493..274M}). The point source extraction
238: aperture and background accumulation region are shown in (b).
239: See \S~\ref{sec:psspec} for details.
240: For the XIS image, we merged events with the three CCDs,
241: subtracted the non--X-ray background (\cite{2008PASJ...60S..11T}),
242: corrected for the vignetting, and mosaicked the two fields
243: with different exposure times normalized.
244: The fields of view are shown with two solid squares
245: with \timeform{18'} in length. For the MOS image,
246: we merged two CCDs and mosaicked the two fields with normalized exposures.
247: The fields are shown with two circles with \timeform{30'} in diameter.\label{fig:fullimg}}
248: \end{figure*}
249:
250: \subsection{Suzaku}
251: %%%Suzaku observation of Sgr D%%%
252: We used two XIS fields covering the Sgr\,D H \emissiontype{II} complex in the
253: Suzaku GC mapping project (table~\ref{tab:obs}).
254: We hereafter call the two fields as north and south
255: field (figure~\ref{fig:fullimg}a).
256: The north field covers the entire complex.
257: The overlapping area of the north and south fields also cover a part of
258: the complex, for which we additionally use the south field data.
259: Results in the remaining part of the south field will be reported in a separate paper.
260:
261: %%%introduction of the XIS%%%
262: The XIS consists of four CCD cameras (XIS 0, 1, 2, and 3)
263: each placed at the focal planes of the four X-ray Telescopes
264: (XRT: Serlemitsos et al. 2007).
265: One of the cameras (XIS~1) uses a back-illuminated (BI) CCD
266: while the others (XIS~0, 2, and 3) use front-illuminated (FI) CCDs.
267: One of the FIs (XIS~2) has not been functional since an unexpected
268: anomaly in 2006 November.
269:
270: %%%performance of the XIS and the XRT%%%
271: %%spectroscopy properties%%
272: The XIS is sensitive in an energy range of 0.2--12~keV with
273: the FI CCDs superior in the hard band and the BI CCD in the soft band.
274: For the purpose of mitigating the degradation of the energy resolution in the orbit,
275: the XIS employs the spaced-row charge injection (SCI) technique
276: (\cite{2004SPIE.5501..111B}; \cite{2007SPIE.6686...U}).
277: Artificial charges are periodically injected to fill
278: charge traps caused by radiation damage in order to
279: reduce the charge transfer inefficiency (CTI).
280: In the present data, the resolution at 5.9~keV is
281: measured to be $\sim$150~eV (FI) and $\sim$170~eV (BI) in the
282: full width at half maximum (FWHM) using the $^{55}$Fe calibration sources
283: installed in the two corners of each CCD.
284:
285: %%imaging properties%%
286: %size of FOV etc.%
287: Combined with the XRT, an \timeform{18'}$\times$\timeform{18'}
288: region is covered with a pixel scale of \timeform{1''}~pixel$^{-1}$.
289: An angular resolution of \timeform{1.9'}--\timeform{2.3'}
290: in the half power diameter (HPD) is almost independent of
291: the off-axis angles within $\sim$10$\%$.
292: %effective area and background environment%
293: The total effective area excluding the inoperational XIS~2 is
294: $\sim$430~cm$^2$ at 8~keV.
295: Due to the Suzaku's low orbital altitude at $\sim$550~km,
296: the XIS achieves a low and stable background environment
297: suited for studying faint diffuse sources.
298:
299: %%%screening%%%
300: In the two observations presented here, the XIS was operated
301: in the normal clocking mode with the SCI technique.
302: Starting from the pipeline products in the processing version 2.0,
303: we recalculated the energy scales by taking into account of
304: the time dependence of the CTI and the positional dependence
305: of the SCI efficiency.\footnote{See
306: (http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/suzaku/analysis/sci\_gain\\\_update.html)
307: for details.} The resultant systematic uncertainty in the energy gain
308: is $\lesssim$10~eV at 5.9~keV.
309: We removed events during the South Atlantic Anomaly passages,
310: Earth elevation angles below \timeform{5D},
311: and Earth day-time elevation angles below \timeform{20D}.
312: We also removed hot and flickering pixels.
313: The net exposures are 62.2 and 139~ks for the north and
314: south fields, respectively.
315: We reduced the data using the software packages
316: HEADAS\footnote{See (http://heasarc.nasa.gov/lheasoft/).}
317: version 6.4 and XSpec \citep{1996ASPC..101...17A} version 11.3.2.
318: In the spectral analysis, we used the redistribution matrix function
319: released on 2006-02-13
320: %that best reproduces the observed calibration source spectra
321: and the auxiliary response function generated
322: by a ray-tracing simulator (\texttt{xissimarfgen}: \cite{2007PASJ...59S.113I}).
323:
324: \subsection{XMM-Newton}
325: %%%XMM-Newton observation of Sgr D%%%
326: We retrieved the archived XMM-Newton \citep{2001A&A...365L...1J} data
327: to supplement the Suzaku data, and found that two observations taken
328: in 2000 and 2005 cover Sgr\,D. We hereafter refer to them
329: as obs00 and obs05, respectively (table~\ref{tab:obs}).
330: The obs05 data were presented by \citet{2006A&A...456..287S}, upon
331: which we add the obs00 data to make deeper images.
332: Both data sets were obtained with the European Photon Imaging Camera (EPIC),
333: which is comprised of two MOS CCDs \citep{2001A&A...365L..27T}
334: and a pn CCD \citep{2001A&A...365L..18S}.
335:
336: %%spectroscopy properties%%
337: %energy resolution etc.%
338: The EPIC is sensitive in an energy range of 0.1--10~keV
339: with an energy resolution of $\sim$140~eV (MOS) and $\sim$170~eV (pn) in the
340: FWHM at 5.9~keV for the retrieved data.
341: The MOS and pn cover a $\sim$\timeform{30'} diameter circle with a pixel scale of
342: \timeform{1''}~pixel$^{-1}$ and \timeform{4''}~pixel$^{-1}$, respectively.
343: The HPD and the total effective area at 8~keV are
344: \timeform{4.2''}--\timeform{6.6''} at the optical axis and $\sim$900~cm$^2$, respectively.
345: The combination of XMM-Newton's large effective area and imaging capability
346: makes EPIC observations highly sensitive to point sources.
347:
348: %%%property of the obs., screening etc.%%%
349: In the two observations, both the MOS and the pn were operated
350: in the full frame mode with the medium filter.
351: We removed events taken during periods with
352: background rates higher than $0.5$~counts~s$^{-1}$ (MOS)
353: and $0.3$~counts~s$^{-1}$ (pn)
354: in the 10--15~keV energy band.
355: We also removed hot and flickering pixels.
356: The resultant effective exposures are shown in table~\ref{tab:obs}.
357: The XMM-Newton Science Analysis System\footnote{See (http://xmm.vilspa.esa.es/sas/).}
358: version 7.1.0 was used for reducing the EPIC data.
359:
360: \begin{figure*}
361: \begin{center}
362: \FigureFile(180mm,200mm){2.jpg}
363: %%% \FigureFile(width,height){filename}
364: \end{center}
365: \caption{Close-up XIS images of the Sgr\,D H \emissiontype{II} complex
366: in various energy bands: (a) soft (0.7--2.0~keV), (b) medium (2.0--4.0~keV),
367: (c) hard (4.0--5.5~keV), and (d) S \emissiontype{XV} K$\alpha$ (2.4--2.5~keV).
368: Crosses in (a) represent positions of point sources by XMM-Newton \citep{2007A&G....48e..30W}.
369: The source and background extraction regions are shown
370: with solid and broken symbols, respectively; thick circles for PS1
371: and thin ellipses for DS1 and DS2. See \S~\ref{sec:psspec} and \S~\ref{sec:dsspec} for details.
372: The images were processed in the same way as the wide-band XIS image
373: (figure~\ref{fig:fullimg}a). \label{fig:xisimg}}
374: \end{figure*}
375:
376: \section{Results}
377:
378: \subsection{Images}
379:
380: \subsubsection{Wide-Band Images}
381: %%%About images and overall features%%%
382: Figure~\ref{fig:fullimg} shows the wide-band (0.7--5.5~keV)
383: X-ray images obtained with the XIS and the EPIC MOS.
384: Here, we restricted the energy range to be below 5.5~keV to
385: eliminate the signals from the calibration sources in the XIS image.
386: We find that the Sgr\,D H \emissiontype{II} complex is accompanied by
387: both diffuse and point-like X-ray emission.
388: The former is more noticeable in the XIS image while the latter is in
389: the MOS image, reflecting the complementary capability of the two imagers.
390:
391: %%%PS in MOS and Astrometry%%%
392: In the MOS image (figure~\ref{fig:fullimg}b), we found three bright
393: point-like sources in and around the complex listed in the
394: Second XMM-Newton Serendipitous Source Catalogue \citep{2007A&G....48e..30W}:
395: PS1 (2XMM~J174835.9--275619),
396: PS2 (2XMM J174841.1--280136), and PS3 (2XMM J174848.7--280100).
397: We matched the astrometric positions between the XIS and the MOS images
398: using bright and isolated point-like sources.
399: The absolute astrometry of XMM-Newton is accurate to
400: $\sim$\timeform{2''}\footnote{See
401: (http://xmm.esac.esa.int/docs/documents/CAL-TN-0018.pdf) for details.},
402: while that of Suzaku can be uncertain up to $\sim$\timeform{20''}
403: \citep{2008PASJ...60S..35U}.
404: The XIS south field was shifted to match the MOS image by
405: ($\Delta$R.\,A., $\Delta$Dec.) = (\timeform{0''}, \timeform{22''}),
406: while the north field was unchanged as it is consistent with the MOS
407: astrometric positions.
408:
409: \subsubsection{Band-Limited Images}
410: %%%XIS broad images%%%
411: XIS images were exposed for much longer times than MOS images
412: (table~\ref{tab:obs}). Sufficient photon counts enable us to construct
413: both broad-band and narrow-band images with XIS.
414: Figure~\ref{fig:xisimg} shows the close-up view of
415: the Sgr\,D H \emissiontype{II} complex in four limited energy bands:
416: (a) soft (0.7--2.0~keV), (b) medium (2.0--4.0~keV), (c) hard (4.0--5.5~keV),
417: and (d) S \emissiontype{XV} K$\alpha$ (2.4--2.5~keV).
418:
419: %%%broad-band images%%%
420: In the three broad-band images
421: (figure~\ref{fig:xisimg}a--\ref{fig:xisimg}c),
422: PS1 appears only in the
423: soft and medium bands, indicating that it is soft,
424: lightly attenuated, and thus a foreground source.
425: The soft band image lacks diffuse features.
426: However, in the medium and hard bands, diffuse emission emerges
427: with different colors at the north field center and
428: at the Sgr\,D H\emissiontype{II} core.
429: We consider that the two diffuse sources are different
430: and call them DS1 and DS2
431: (figure~\ref{fig:xisimg}).
432:
433: %%%narrow-band image%%%
434: In the narrow-band image tracing the S \emissiontype{XV}
435: K$\alpha$ line emission (figure~\ref{fig:xisimg}d),
436: PS1 and DS1 are conspicuous.
437: These sources are likely to be thermal emission of
438: a few~keV plasma temperatures.
439: DS2, on the contrary, is faint in this band.
440: This reinforces the claim that DS1 and DS2 have different origins.
441:
442: \subsection{Spectra}
443:
444: \subsubsection{Point-Like Sources}\label{sec:psspec}
445: %%%analyzed data%%%
446: We first present the spectral fits of the three bright point sources
447: that may contaminate the diffuse emission.
448: Figure~\ref{fig:fitps} shows their background-subtracted spectra.
449: %PS1%
450: For PS1, we used the XIS data as it is detected and the
451: statistics is higher than the EPIC data.
452: The source photons were accumulated from a \timeform{1'} radius
453: (the thick solid circle in figure~\ref{fig:xisimg}a) to maximize
454: the ratio against the background. The background photons were
455: from a concentric annulus around the source (the thick dashed annulus)
456: to suppress the contamination from DS1.
457: In the spectrum (figure~\ref{fig:fitps}a), emission lines are seen
458: from several species of highly ionized atoms. We fitted the data with
459: a thin-thermal plasma model
460: (\texttt{apec} in the XSpec fitting package: \cite{2001ApJ...556L..91S})
461: attenuated by interstellar extinction (\texttt{wabs}: \cite{1983ApJ...270..119M}).
462: The chemical abundance is fixed to the solar value \citep{1989GeCoA..53..197A}.
463: The best-fit parameters are given in table~\ref{tab:pntpar}
464: for the amount of extinction ($N_{\rm{H}}$), the plasma temperature ($k_{\rm{B}}T$),
465: the X-ray photon flux ($f_{\rm{X}}$),
466: and the absorption-corrected X-ray luminosity ($L_{\rm{X}}$).
467: We obtained a similar but less constrained result for the
468: EPIC spectrum of PS1.
469:
470: For PS2 and PS3, we used the EPIC data as they are not detected
471: in the XIS image. Source photons were extracted from a 90\%
472: encircled energy radius of $\sim$\timeform{50''} for both sources
473: (the aperture size is shown at the top right in figure~\ref{fig:fullimg}b).
474: The background common to both sources was taken from the region shown
475: with the thick dashed circle in figure~\ref{fig:fullimg}b.
476: A suggestion of a faint Fe K emission line is found for PS2 in the EPIC spectra,
477: but other lines are not seen due to lack of counts
478: (figure~\ref{fig:fitps}b and \ref{fig:fitps}c).
479: The PS2 and PS3 spectra were fitted using the same model with PS1.
480: The best-fit parameters are also given in table~\ref{tab:pntpar}.
481:
482: \begin{figure}
483: \begin{center}
484: \FigureFile(80mm,160mm){PS.jpg}
485: \end{center}
486: \caption{Background-subtracted spectra (pluses) and the best-fit models
487: (histograms) of PS1--3 (a--c) in the top panels and the residuals to the fit
488: in the bottom panels. For PS1, XIS merged FI and BI spectra are shown
489: in black and red. For PS2 and PS3, EPIC merged MOS and pn spectra are shown
490: in black and red. Black spectra are scaled upward by a factor of 5 for clarity.}\label{fig:fitps}
491: \end{figure}
492:
493: \begin{table}
494: \begin{center}
495: \caption{Best-fit parameters of the point-like sources.}\label{tab:pntpar}
496: % \begin{minipage}{80mm}
497: \begin{tabular}{lccc}
498: \hline
499: Parameter & PS1 & PS2 & PS3 \\ \hline
500: Data & XIS & EPIC & EPIC \\ \hline
501: $N_{\rm{H}}$ (10$^{22}$~cm$^{-2}$)\footnotemark[$*$] & 2.1$^{+0.6}_{-0.5}$ & 5.7$^{+2.0}_{-1.6}$ & $<$0.30 \\
502: $k_{\rm{B}}T$ (keV)\footnotemark[$*$] & 1.9$^{+0.6}_{-0.4}$ & 7.6$^{+\infty}_{-7.6}$ & 0.48$^{+0.08}_{-0.12}$ \\
503: $f_{\rm{X}}$ (s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$)\footnotemark[$\dagger$] & 2.9$\times 10^{-5}$ & 1.7$\times 10^{-5}$ & 1.3$\times 10^{-5}$ \\
504: $L_{\rm{X}}$ (erg~s$^{-1}$)\footnotemark[$\dagger$]\footnotemark[$\ddagger$] & 7.4$\times 10^{32}$ & 2.1$\times 10^{33}$ & $<$2.2$\times 10^{30}$ \\
505: $\chi ^2$/d.o.f. & 46/32 & 24/27 & 26/26 \\ \hline
506: \multicolumn{4}{@{}l@{}}{\hbox to 0pt{\parbox{85mm}{\footnotesize
507: \par\noindent
508: \footnotemark[$*$] Statistical uncertainty is represented by the 90\% confidence intervals.
509: \par\noindent
510: \footnotemark[$\dagger$] Values in the 0.7--8.0~keV band.
511: \par\noindent
512: \footnotemark[$\ddagger$] The absorption is corrected and the distances are assumed to be 6.8~kpc (PS1),
513: 8.0~kpc (PS2), and $<$0.97~kpc (PS3). See \S\ref{sec:disothers} for details.
514:
515: }\hss}}
516: \end{tabular}
517: % \end{minipage}
518: \end{center}
519: \end{table}
520:
521:
522: \subsubsection{Diffuse Sources}\label{sec:dsspec}
523: %%%DS1%%%
524: We next present the spectra of diffuse sources using XIS.
525: Figure~\ref{fig:fitds} shows their background-subtracted spectra.
526: For DS1, source photons were extracted from a region defined by the emission
527: morphology in the S \emissiontype{XV} narrow-band image
528: (the thin solid ellipse in figure~\ref{fig:xisimg}).
529: Spectra of faint diffuse sources are prone to uncertainties
530: stemming from the background subtraction.
531: We considered the following to minimize possible systematic effects.
532: First, the data in the same observation (the north field) were used both for
533: the source and background signals. Second, the background spectrum was constructed
534: from two regions at the same Galactic latitude
535: (the thin dashed ellipses in figure~\ref{fig:xisimg}b) as the background
536: is dominated by the Galactic center diffuse X-ray emission distributed symmetrically
537: with respect to the Galactic plane (\cite{1989Natur.339..603K}; \cite{1990ApJ...365..532Y}).
538: Third, the difference in the effective area due to
539: the different off-axis angles between the source and background regions
540: was taken into account (\cite{2008PASJ...60S..85H}).
541:
542: %%%DS2%%%
543: For DS2, we used both the north and south field data.
544: The source spectrum was integrated from a $\sim$\timeform{1.7'} radius
545: to encompass the Sgr\,D H\emissiontype{II} core (the thin solid circle in figure
546: \ref{fig:xisimg}).
547: The background subtraction was performed separately in each field and
548: then merged.
549: In the north field, we utilized the background region
550: for DS1, which happens to be at the symmetric position to the
551: Galactic plane with DS2. In the south field, the background was
552: constructed from the thin dashed circle in figure~\ref{fig:xisimg}c.
553: Other procedures follow DS1.
554:
555: %%%fits%%%
556: The spectra of DS1 and DS2 are both characterized by emission lines
557: from highly ionized atoms (figure \ref{fig:fitds}).
558: Thermal fits were tried using the same model
559: with the point sources. Because of stronger signal,
560: we are able to derive the chemical abundances relative to solar for elements
561: with conspicuous emission lines ($Z_{\rm{S}}$, $Z_{\rm{Ar}}$,
562: $Z_{\rm{Ca}}$, and $Z_{\rm{Fe}}$).
563: The best-fit values are summarized in table~\ref{tab:specpar}.
564: For DS1, we also tried a non-equilibrium ionization model (\texttt{nei};
565: \cite{2001ApJ...548..820B}). This examines how much a plasma
566: has relaxed toward a collisional equilibrium among ions and electrons.
567: The degree of the relaxation is parameterized by $n_{\rm{e}}t$,
568: where $n_{\rm{e}}$ is the electron density and $t$ is the time from
569: the plasma creation. A lower limit of $n_{\rm{e}}t$ was
570: derived as $\sim$10$^{11.2}$~s~cm$^{-3}$, which is consistent with
571: DS1 being in collisional equilibrium
572: ($n_{\rm{e}}t>$10$^{12}$~s~cm$^{-3}$; \cite{1984Ap&SS..98..367M}).
573: For DS2, we found that an additional
574: Gaussian model at $\sim$6.4~keV improves the fit
575: (F-test significance of $\sim$98\%) with an equivalent width of $\sim$270~eV.
576: More counts are necessary to confirm this.
577:
578: %%%time variability%%%
579: Because the DS2 emission may largely originate from unresolved point sources, we
580: examined time variation. Light curves in several energy bands
581: are tested against the null hypothesis that the flux is constant using the
582: $\chi^{2}$ statistics. We found a marginal variability
583: (significant at a $\sim$97\% level) in DS2
584: in the north field data. For comparison, we conducted the same
585: procedure for DS1 and the background regions. Their signals were found to be
586: constant at high confidence levels. We thus believe that the procedure
587: to test the time variability is reliable, and that DS2 varies.
588:
589: \begin{figure}
590: \begin{center}
591: \FigureFile(80mm,100mm){DS.jpg}
592: \end{center}
593: \caption{Background-subtracted XIS spectra and the best-fit models of
594: (a) DS1 and (b) DS2. Symbols follow figure~\ref{fig:fitps}.}\label{fig:fitds}
595: \end{figure}
596:
597: \begin{table}
598: \begin{center}
599: \caption{Best-fit parameters of the diffuse sources by XIS.}\label{tab:specpar}
600: \begin{tabular}{lcc}
601: \hline
602: Parameter & DS1 & DS2 \\ \hline
603: $N_{\rm{H}}$ (10$^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$)\footnotemark[$*$] & 8.5$^{+1.4}_{-1.2}$ & 5.6$^{+2.3}_{-1.0}$ \\
604: $k_{\rm{B}}T$ (keV)\footnotemark[$*$] & 0.91$^{+0.17}_{-0.17}$ & 3.4$^{+1.1}_{-1.2}$ \\
605: $Z_{\rm{S}}$ ($Z_{\odot}$)\footnotemark[$*$] & 1.6$^{+0.5}_{-0.4}$ & 1 (fixed) \\
606: $Z_{\rm{Ar}}$ ($Z_{\odot}$)\footnotemark[$*$]\footnotemark[$\dagger$] & 1.8$^{+1.1}_{-0.9}$ & 4.8$^{+4.0}_{-3.0}$ \\
607: $Z_{\rm{Ca}}$ ($Z_{\odot}$)\footnotemark[$*$]\footnotemark[$\dagger$] & 1.8$^{+1.1}_{-0.9}$ & 4.8$^{+4.0}_{-3.0}$ \\
608: $Z_{\rm{Fe}}$ ($Z_{\odot}$)\footnotemark[$*$] & 1 (fixed) & 0.52$^{+0.41}_{-0.28}$ \\
609: $f_{\rm{X}}$\footnotemark[$\ddagger$] (s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$) & 6.9$\times 10^{-5}$ & 4.1$\times 10^{-5}$ \\
610: $L_{\rm{X}}$\footnotemark[$\ddagger$]\footnotemark[$\S$] (erg~s$^{-1}$) & 1.4$\times 10^{35}$ & 6.0$\times 10^{33}$ \\
611: $\chi^2$/d.o.f. & 66/75 & 70/65 \\ \hline
612: \multicolumn{3}{@{}l@{}}{\hbox to 0pt{\parbox{70mm}{\footnotesize
613: \par\noindent
614: \footnotemark[$*$] Statistical uncertainty is represented by
615: the 90\% confidence intervals.
616: \par\noindent
617: \footnotemark[$\dagger$] The values of $Z_{\mathrm{Ar}}$ and $Z_{\mathrm{Ca}}$ are fixed to one another.
618: \par\noindent
619: \footnotemark[$\ddagger$] Values in the 0.7--8.0~keV band.
620: \par\noindent
621: \footnotemark[$\S$] The absorption is corrected and the distances are assumed to be 8.0~kpc.
622: See \S~\ref{sec:disds1} and \S~\ref{sec:disothers} for details.
623: }\hss}}
624: \end{tabular}
625: \end{center}
626: \end{table}
627:
628: \section{Discussion}
629:
630: \subsection{Diffuse Source DS1}\label{sec:disds1}
631:
632: \subsubsection{Nature of X-ray Emission}
633: We first argue that the level of contamination to DS1 by point sources is
634: negligible. The largest contaminant is PS1 among all point sources listed in the XMM-Newton
635: catalog (pluses in figure 2a), but its contribution accounts only for $\sim$3\% of the
636: total XIS counts of DS1. Other point sources make even smaller contributions.
637:
638: We next argue that DS1 is an extended source.
639: We retrieved optical images using the Digitized Sky Survey from the Space Telescope Science
640: Institute\footnote{See (http://archive.stsci.edu/cgi-bin/dss\_form) for details.} and
641: near-infrared (NIR) and mid-infrared (MIR) images respectively using the Two Micron All Sky
642: Survey (\cite{1997ASSL..210...25S}) and the Spitzer Space Telescope
643: (\cite{2004ApJS..154....1W}) from the Infrared Science
644: Archive\footnote{See (http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/) for details.}.
645: We compared these images with our X-ray image and found no stellar distribution
646: with a morphology similar to DS1.
647: The point source distribution in the EPIC image (figure 1b)
648: differs significantly from the surface brightness distribution
649: of DS1 in the XIS image (figure~\ref{fig:fullimg}a).
650: We thus conclude that DS1 is extended in nature, and not an ensemble of unresolved point sources.
651:
652: The extinction ($\sim$8.5$\times$10$^{22}$~cm$^{-2}$) derived from the X-ray spectral fit
653: (table~\ref{tab:specpar}) indicates that DS1 is in the GC region
654: (\cite{2003ApJ...591..891B}).
655: The apparent extent converts to $\sim$9$\times$16~pc at an 8~kpc distance \citep{1993ARA&A..31..345R}.
656: A source like DS1 has not been previously reported in the literature.
657: It is therefore a new celestial object.
658:
659: \subsubsection{Origin of X-ray Emission}
660: Classes of diffuse X-ray emission with an extent of $\sim$10~pc include
661: SNRs, irradiated GMCs, pulsar wind nebulae (PWN; \cite{2008ApJ...673..251M}), and
662: H\emissiontype{II} regions (\cite{2002ApJ...570..665Y}; \cite{2004ApJ...611..858L};
663: \cite{2006MNRAS.371...38W}; \cite{2007PASJ...59S.229T}) in the GC region.
664: Since DS1 shows unambiguous thermal features of a $\sim$0.9~keV temperature with
665: enhanced abundances of metals, the GMC and PWN origins are unlikely.
666: At the position of DS1, H\emissiontype{II} regions are not known
667: nor found in our inspection of Spitzer MIR images, which makes
668: an H\emissiontype{II} region origin also unlikely.
669: The XIS spectrum is akin to those
670: found in SNRs in the GC region (\cite{2007PASJ...59S.221K};
671: \cite{2008PASJ...60S.183M}; \cite{2008PASJ...60S.191N}).
672: Thus, we propose that DS1 is X-ray emission from a new SNR.
673: The lack of X-ray variation is consistent with the SNR interpretation.
674:
675: SNRs are expected to show nonthermal synchrotron emission
676: in centimeter bands. The Sgr\,D H\emissiontype{II} complex has long
677: been considered to have
678: thermal emission, not nonthermal emission, from the flat radio spectral indices
679: (\cite{1966ApJ...146..653D}; \cite{1974IAUS...60..499S};
680: \cite{Lit1974}; \cite{1979A&AS...35....1D}).
681: However, all these results were based on low resolution data, and the spectral indices
682: were dominated by two H\emissiontype{II} regions with strong thermal emission in
683: and around this complex;
684: the Sgr\,D H\emissiontype{II} core and the other H\emissiontype{II} region
685: to the east (G1.3+0.1 in figure~\ref{fig:fullimg}a; \cite{1998ApJ...493..274M}).
686:
687: The latest work by \citet{2008ApJS...01..001L} presented radio continuum maps
688: on spatial scales comparable to the X-ray images.
689: The spectral indices were derived from the 3.5~cm and 6.0~cm continuum maps
690: obtained with GBT along several slices across the Sgr\,D H\emissiontype{II}
691: complex. Some indices indicate that there is a mixture of
692: thermal and nonthermal emission.
693:
694: Using this GBT data set, we constructed the intensity and the spectral index
695: profiles along a slice including DS1 but not the Sgr\,D H\emissiontype{II} core
696: (figure~\ref{fig:slice}). The slice was taken from two images (3.5~cm and 6.0~cm)
697: convolved to the same beam size of $\sim$\timeform{2.5'}.
698: Details of the data and other reduction procedures are described in \citet{2008ApJS...01..001L}.
699: The background-subtracted index is consistently about --0.5,
700: indicating that nonthermal synchrotron emission dominates the
701: spectrum (\cite{2004BASI...32..335G}). The radio continuum peak corresponds to
702: the position of DS1. This result constitutes independent evidence for classifying DS1
703: as an SNR.
704:
705: \begin{figure}
706: \begin{center}
707: \FigureFile(85mm,200mm){slice.jpg}
708: %%% \FigureFile(width,height){filename}
709: \end{center}
710: \caption{Profiles of 3.5~cm and 6.0~cm intensity (solid curves) and the spectral index (crosses) between the two bands along the slice shown in figure~\ref{fig:gbt}a. Background (dashed lines) is derived by linearly fitting the slope at the two sides of the source region, where the indices are computed. The error bars indicate 1$\sigma$ uncertainty.} \label{fig:slice}
711: \end{figure}
712:
713: \begin{figure*}
714: \begin{center}
715: \FigureFile(180mm,200mm){gbt.jpg}
716: %%% \FigureFile(width,height){filename}
717: \end{center}
718: \caption{(a) Composite color image with Suzaku X-ray (0.7--5.5~keV) in blue, Spitzer MIR (24~$\mu$m) in green, and GBT radio (6.0~cm) in red. The slice for the radio continuum index (figure~\ref{fig:slice}) is shown with a ticked vector. Objects are labeled in Italic for SNRs and in Roman for H\emissiontype{II} regions. (b) X-ray image with CO ($J=$~3--2) emission at 100$\pm$5~km~s$^{-1}$ (\cite{2007PASJ...59...15O}) in red contours and CS ($J=$1--0) emission at $-$15$\pm$5~km~s$^{-1}$ (\cite{1999ApJS..120....1T}) in blue contours.} \label{fig:gbt}
719: \end{figure*}
720:
721: \subsubsection{Structure of the Sgr\,D~H\emissiontype{II} Complex}
722: We now have sufficient information to decompose and deproject the Sgr\,D H\emissiontype{II}
723: complex. The data are displayed in figure~\ref{fig:gbt} with the same scale as
724: figure~\ref{fig:fullimg}. Figure~\ref{fig:gbt} (a) is composed of the Suzaku X-ray (0.7--5.5~keV; blue),
725: Spitzer MIR (24~$\mu$m; green), and GBT radio continuum (6.0~cm; red) images. In this color
726: code, SNRs appear in magenta with X-ray and nonthermal radio emission such as DS1 and the southwestern part
727: of the Sgr\,D SNR. H\emissiontype{II} regions appear in yellow with MIR and thermal radio emission, which
728: include G1.3+0.1 and another H\emissiontype{II} region inferred by \citet{1979A&AS...35....1D}
729: in the northeast of the Sgr\,D SNR (we name this component G1.05--0.14). The Sgr\,D H\emissiontype{II} core,
730: which has emission in all three bands, does not
731: appear white because the Spitzer image is saturated.
732: Figure~\ref{fig:gbt} (b) is a superposition of the X-ray image with millimeter emission line maps in two different
733: velocities at the local standard of rest; 100~km~s$^{-1}$ by CO ($J=$~3--2) in red contours
734: (\cite{2007PASJ...59...15O}) taken by the Atacama Submillimeter Telescope Experiment and $-$15~km~s$^{-1}$ by CS ($J=$~1--0) in blue contours
735: (\cite{1999ApJS..120....1T}) taken by the Nobeyama 45~m telescope.
736:
737: We argue that ``tail'' is the new SNR (we name G1.2--0.0) and the northwestern part of it is bright in X-ray as
738: DS1. The X-ray morphology of DS1 is not well-correlated with the well-defined shell labeled
739: ``extended'' in figure~\ref{fig:fullimg}a. It is therefore unlikely that the two objects
740: are physically related. It is more reasonable to consider that DS1 is associated with ``tail''.
741: The index across ``tail'' is almost constant (figure~\ref{fig:slice}),
742: suggesting that this is a uniform structure. Both
743: X-ray and radio properties indicate that this is an SNR. The X-ray is bright only
744: in the western part of the imperfect shell-like morphology of the ``tail''.
745: The lack of X-ray emission in other parts is attributable to an intervening
746: GMC seen in figure~\ref{fig:gbt} (b). The CO emission with a 100~km~s$^{-1}$
747: velocity (red contours) is anti-correlated with the X-ray emission; DS1 is just
748: outside of the sharp boundary of the CO cloud. The extinction along this GMC
749: is $N_{\rm{H}}\sim$10$^{24}$~cm$^{-2}$ from the CO data (private communication with T. Oka),
750: which is sufficient to block the $k_{\rm{B}}T\sim$0.9~keV X-ray emission behind it.
751:
752: The Sgr\,D H\emissiontype{II} core is associated with a GMC in
753: a different velocity (blue contours), which was suggested by \citet{1991ApJ...379L..53L}
754: and \citet{1992ApJS...82..495L}. \citet{1999ApJ...512..237B} proposed that ``core'' is a
755: blister H\emissiontype{II} region on the GMC. We speculate that the H\emissiontype{II}
756: region G1.05--0.14 is another blister on the other side of the GMC.
757: H~109$\alpha$ emission was detected at this position and its velocity is
758: the same with the GMC (\cite{1975A&A....44..259P}).
759:
760: It is now clear that Sgr\,D H\emissiontype{II} complex is not a single H\emissiontype{II}
761: region and its environment as was considered in the past.
762: We propose that an SNR and two H\emissiontype{II} regions on both sides of a GMC are
763: projected along the same line of sight. The SNR lies behind the H\emissiontype{II} regions, which is
764: justified by a larger $N_{\rm{H}}$ value in DS1 (a part of the SNR) than in DS2 (``core'').
765: The SNR position behind the 100~km~s$^{-1}$ cloud puts this object in or behind the GC region,
766: whereas the H\emissiontype{II} regions associated with a GMC at $-$15~km~s$^{-1}$ is
767: on the near side of the GC in agreement with the NIR star count study (\cite{1999ApJ...512..237B}).
768:
769: \subsection{Other X-ray Sources}\label{sec:disothers}
770: \subsubsection{Point Sources PS1--PS3}
771: PS1 and PS3 are sources 7 and 11 respectively in the XMM-Newton study by \citet{2006A&A...456..287S}.
772: PS1 has several
773: anonymous NIR sources within the positional uncertainty, and its counterpart
774: cannot be identified.
775: PS3 is identified as HD\,316290 in \citet{2006A&A...456..287S}, which is an F8
776: star with the \textit{B}-band and \textit{V}-band magnitudes
777: of 10.3~mag and 9.8~mag, respectively (\cite{1995A&AS..110..367N}).
778:
779: We consider that both sources are foreground objects from their values of
780: $N_{\rm{H}}$. Assuming an interstellar hydrogen density of $n_{\rm{H}}=$~1~cm$^{-3}$, we
781: derived the distance to PS1 as $\sim$6.8 kpc and constrained that to PS3
782: as $\lesssim$0.97 kpc, respectively.
783: The X-ray spectrum and luminosity suggest that both
784: sources are individual stars, but their nature is not constrained any further.
785:
786: PS2, on the other hand, shows an $N_{\rm{H}}$ value consistent with being in the
787: GC region. We identify a bright NIR source (star A in \cite{1999ApJ...512..237B}) within
788: the position uncertainty of PS2, which is located $\sim$8\arcsec\ north to the center of
789: the Sgr\,D H\emissiontype{II} core.
790: The NIR photometry of the star can not distinguish an M giant
791: photosphere with the \textit{K}-band extinction $A_{K}=$~1.0~mag or 10,000~K blackbody
792: with $A_{K}=$~2.4~mag \citep{1999ApJ...512..237B}. The X-ray result favors the latter
793: with $N_{\rm{H}}$ compatible to the larger $A_{K}$ value.
794:
795: \subsubsection{Diffuse Source DS2}
796: Similarly to DS1, we first evaluate the level of contamination by point sources.
797: Two bright point sources (PS2 and PS3) are found in and around DS2.
798: PS3 has a different X-ray hardness than DS2,
799: and its contribution is minor above 2~keV (figures~\ref{fig:fitps}c and \ref{fig:fitds}b).
800: However, the contamination by PS2 is significant.
801: By comparing the time-averaged flux of PS2 by EPIC and DS2 by XIS,
802: $\sim$ 40\% of 0.7--8.0~keV counts of DS2 is attributable to PS2.
803: Similar spectral shapes between PS2 and DS2 (figures~\ref{fig:fitps}b and \ref{fig:fitds}b)
804: and the XIS detection of a marginal flux variation during the north field observation
805: indicate that a significant fraction of the DS2 emission stems from PS2.
806:
807: Nevertheless, PS2 alone cannot account for all properties of DS2. DS2 has an extent
808: inconsistent with a single point source. Figure~\ref{fig:radpro} shows the background-subtracted
809: radial profile of DS2 around PS2 in comparison to a simulated radial profile of
810: a point-like source.
811: The excess emission is noticeable in the profile as well as in the X-ray image (figure~\ref{fig:xisimg}c),
812: where the diffuse emission is localized to the northeast of PS2.
813:
814: %%%origin of excess%%%
815: The origin of the excess emission is uncertain.
816: It can be either an ensemble of numerous unresolved point sources or the truly extended emission
817: associated with the H\emissiontype{II} region. Considering a large concentration of stars
818: in the Sgr\,D H\emissiontype{II} core (\cite{1999ApJ...512..237B}; \cite{2003A&A...408..127D}),
819: the former possibility is likely. If it is of an extended nature,
820: DS2 has quite a hard thermal spectrum for diffuse emission in H\emissiontype{II} regions, which is
821: comparable to only a few cases (\cite{2002ApJ...573..191M}; \cite{2006ApJ...638..860E}).
822: The metallicity (table~\ref{tab:specpar}) above one solar is larger than
823: diffuse X-ray emission in other H\emissiontype{II} regions (e.g. \cite{2008PASJ...60S..85H}),
824: which may be due to the enhanced metallicity in the GC region (\cite{2007ApJ...669.1011C}).
825: The current data do not give a conclusive interpretation for this emission.
826: Further observations are expected.
827:
828: \begin{figure}
829: \begin{center}
830: \FigureFile(80mm,60mm){rad.jpg}
831: %%% \FigureFile(width,height){filename}
832: \end{center}
833: \caption{Radial profile of the background-subtracted
834: intensity around PS2 (solid pluses with dots), which is
835: fitted with a simulated radial profile of a point-like source at the
836: same detector position (solid curve). The energy range of 2.0--5.5~keV is
837: used to suppress the emission by PS3. The observed profile is constructed
838: from the north field data.} \label{fig:radpro}
839: \end{figure}
840:
841: \section{Summary}
842: We presented a Suzaku X-ray study of the Sgr\,D H\emissiontype{II} complex.
843: XIS detected two diffuse X-ray sources and obtained their
844: high signal-to-noise ratio spectra for the first time. Both
845: sources have a thermal origin with emission lines
846: from highly ionized atoms.
847:
848: One of the diffuse sources is associated with an H\emissiontype{II} region
849: and the other is a newly identified source.
850: We use the X-ray characteristics to conclude that the new source is a new SNR in the
851: GC region. The radio continuum data
852: reinforces the idea.
853:
854: By assembling images across wavelengths, we proposed a new view of
855: the Sgr\,D H\emissiontype{II} complex. It is a projection of an SNR in or
856: beyond the GC and a GMC with two blister H\emissiontype{II} region
857: in front of it. This revises a long-standing view that
858: the Sgr\,D H\emissiontype{II} region is a single H\emissiontype{II} region
859: and its environment.
860:
861: In this study, we demonstrated the capability of Suzaku XIS to investigate
862: diffuse X-ray emission at low surface brightnesses.
863: Along with the high-resolution radio and infrared images, the Suzaku X-ray data
864: played a critical role in better understanding Sgr\,D, which is conceivably
865: the case for other regions in the GC as well.
866:
867: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
868: %%%acknowledgement%%%
869: \vspace{1pc}
870:
871: The authors thank Shigeo Yamauchi at Iwate University and
872: Eric D. Feigelson at Pennsylvania State University for improving the draft
873: and Tomoharu Oka at Keio University for providing the CO data.
874: Support for this work was provided by the National Aeronautics and Space
875: Administration (NASA) through Chandra Postdoctoral Fellowship Award Number
876: PF6-70044 issued by the Chandra X-ray Observatory Center, which is
877: operated by the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory for and on behalf
878: of the NASA under contract
879: NAS8-03060.
880: Y.\,H. acknowledges financial support from the Japan Society for the Promotion of
881: Science.
882: This work is supported by a Grants-in-Aid for the 21st Century COE
883: ``Center for Diversity and Universality in Physics''
884: and for Scientific Researches on Priority Areas in Japan (Fiscal Year 2002--2006)
885: ``New Development in Black Hole Astronomy'' and another (No.18204015)
886: from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
887: of Japan.
888:
889: The research has made use of the SIMBAD database,
890: operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France.
891: The Digitized Sky Surveys were produced at the Space Telescope Science Institute under U.S. Government grant NAG W-2166. The images of these surveys are based on photographic data obtained using the Oschin Schmidt Telescope on Palomar Mountain and the UK Schmidt Telescope. The plates were processed into the present compressed digital form with the permission of these institutions.
892: This research has also made use of the NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the NASA.
893: \par
894:
895:
896: %\begin{longtable}{lll}
897: % \caption{Sample of ``longtable"}\label{tab:LTsample}
898: % \hline
899: % name & value1 & value2 \\
900: %\endfirsthead
901: % \hline
902: % name & value & value2 \\
903: %\endhead
904: % \hline
905: %\endfoot
906: % \hline
907: %\endlastfoot
908: % \hline
909: % aaaaa & bbbbb & ccccc \\
910: % ...... & ..... & ..... \\
911: % ...... & ..... & ..... \\
912: % ...... & ..... & ..... \\
913: % xxxxx & yyyyy & zzzzz \\
914: %\end{longtable}
915: %
916: %\appendix
917: %\section{Method of .....}
918: %
919: %\section{Approximation of ...}
920: %
921: %\section*{Complete data}
922:
923:
924: %%%
925: % See the manual for the detail.
926: %%%
927: \begin{thebibliography}{}
928: % Journals(e.g. A\&A,ApJ,AJ,NMRAS,PASP ...)
929: % Authors, Year, Journal, Vol#, Page#
930: % Journal Title Abbreviation >> http://www.asj.or.jp/pasj/Jabb.html
931: %\bibitem[Anantharamiah \& Yusef-Zadeh(1989)]{Ana1989} Anantharamaiah, K. R., \& Yusef-Zadeh, F. 1989, in IAU Symp. 136, The Center of the Galaxy, ed. M. Morris (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 159
932: \bibitem[Anders \& Grevesse(1989)]{1989GeCoA..53..197A} Anders, E., \&
933: Grevesse, N.\ 1989, \gca, 53, 197
934: \bibitem[Arnaud(1996)]{1996ASPC..101...17A} Arnaud, K.~A.\ 1996, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, 101, 17
935: \bibitem[Baganoff et al.(2003)]{2003ApJ...591..891B} Baganoff, F.~K., et
936: al.\ 2003, \apj, 591, 891
937: \bibitem[Bautz et al.(2004)]{2004SPIE.5501..111B} Bautz, M.~W., Kissel,
938: S.~E., Prigozhin, G.~Y., LaMarr, B., Burke, B.~E., \& Gregory, J.~A.\ 2004,
939: \procspie, 5501, 111
940: \bibitem[Becker et al.(1979)]{1979ApJ...234L..73B} Becker, R.~H., Smith,
941: B.~W., White, N.~E., Holt, S.~S., Boldt, E.~A., Mushotzky, R.~F.,
942: \& Serlemitsos, P.~J.\ 1979, \apj, 234, L73
943: \bibitem[Blum \& Damineli(1999)]{1999ApJ...512..237B} Blum, R.~D., \& Damineli, A.\ 1999, \apj, 512, 237
944: \bibitem[Borkowski et al.(2001)]{2001ApJ...548..820B} Borkowski, K.~J.,
945: Lyerly, W.~J., \& Reynolds, S.~P.\ 2001, \apj, 548, 820
946: \bibitem[Cunha et al.(2007)]{2007ApJ...669.1011C} Cunha, K., Sellgren, K.,
947: Smith, V.~V., Ramirez, S.~V., Blum, R.~D.,
948: \& Terndrup, D.~M.\ 2007, \apj, 669, 1011
949: \bibitem[Downes \& Maxwell(1966)]{1966ApJ...146..653D} Downes, D., \& Maxwell, A.\ 1966, \apj, 146, 653
950: \bibitem[Downes et al.(1979)]{1979A&AS...35....1D} Downes, D., Goss, W.~M., Schwarz, U.~J., \& Wouterloot, J.~G.~A.\ 1979, \aaps, 35, 1
951: %\bibitem[Downes et al.(1980)]{1980A&AS...40..379D} Downes, D., Wilson, T.~L., Bieging, J., \& Wink, J.\ 1980, \aaps, 40, 379
952: \bibitem[Dutra et al.(2003)]{2003A&A...408..127D} Dutra, C.~M., Ortolani, S., Bica, E., Barbuy, B., Zoccali, M., \& Momany, Y.\ 2003, \aap, 408, 127
953: \bibitem[Ezoe et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...638..860E} Ezoe, Y., Kokubun, M.,
954: Makishima, K., Sekimoto, Y., \& Matsuzaki, K.\ 2006, \apj, 638, 860
955: \bibitem[Green(2004)]{2004BASI...32..335G} Green, D.~A.\ 2004, Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India, 32, 335
956: \bibitem[Hyodo et al.(2008)]{2008PASJ...60S..85H} Hyodo, Y., Tsujimoto, M.,
957: Hamaguchi, K., Koyama, K., Kitamoto, S., Maeda, Y., Tsuboi, Y.,
958: \& Ezoe, Y.\ 2008, \pasj, 60, S85
959: \bibitem[Ishisaki et al.(2007)]{2007PASJ...59S.113I} Ishisaki, Y., et al.\ 2007, \pasj, 59, S113
960: \bibitem[Jansen et al.(2001)]{2001A&A...365L...1J} Jansen, F., et al.\
961: 2001, \aap, 365, L1
962: %\bibitem[Kazes \& Aubry(1973)]{1973A&A....22..413K} Kazes, I., \& Aubry,
963: %D.\ 1973, \aap, 22, 413
964: \bibitem[Koyama et al.(1989)]{1989Natur.339..603K} Koyama, K., Awaki, H.,
965: Kunieda, H., Takano, S., \& Tawara, Y.\ 1989, \nat, 339, 603
966: \bibitem[Koyama et al.(2007a)]{2007PASJ...59S..23K} Koyama, K., et al.\
967: 2007a, \pasj, 59, S23
968: \bibitem[Koyama et al.(2007b)]{2007PASJ...59S.221K} Koyama, K., et al.\
969: 2007b, \pasj, 59, S221
970: \bibitem[LaRosa et al.(2000)]{2000AJ....119..207L} LaRosa, T.~N., Kassim, N.~E., Lazio, T.~J.~W., \& Hyman, S.~D.\ 2000, \aj, 119, 207
971: \bibitem[Law et al.(2008)]{2008ApJS...01..001L} Law, C.~J., Yusef-Zadeh,
972: F., Cotton, W.~D.,
973: \& Maddalena, R.~J.\ 2008, \apjs, in press
974: \bibitem[Law
975: \& Yusef-Zadeh(2004)]{2004ApJ...611..858L} Law, C., \& Yusef-Zadeh, F.\ 2004, \apj, 611, 858
976: \bibitem[Lis(1991)]{1991ApJ...379L..53L} Lis, D.~C.\ 1991, \apj, 379, L53
977: \bibitem[Liszt(1992)]{1992ApJS...82..495L} Liszt, H.~S.\ 1992, \apjs, 82, 495
978: \bibitem[Little(1974)]{Lit1974} Little, A. G. 1974, in IAU Symp. 60, Galactic Radio Astronomy, ed. F. J. Kerr \& S. C. Simonson III (Dordrecht: Reidel), 491
979: \bibitem[Masai(1984)]{1984Ap&SS..98..367M} Masai, K.\ 1984, \apss, 98, 367
980: \bibitem[Mehringer et al.(1998)]{1998ApJ...493..274M} Mehringer, D.~M., Goss, W.~M., Lis, D.~C., Palmer, P., \& Menten, K.~M.\ 1998, \apj, 493, 274
981: \bibitem[Mitsuda et al.(2007)]{2007PASJ...59S...1M} Mitsuda, K., et al.\
982: 2007, \pasj, 59, S1
983: \bibitem[Moffat et al.(2002)]{2002ApJ...573..191M} Moffat, A.~F.~J., et
984: al.\ 2002, \apj, 573, 191
985: \bibitem[Mori et al.(2008)]{2008PASJ...60S.183M} Mori, H., Tsuru, T.~G.,
986: Hyodo, Y., Koyama, K., \& Senda, A.\ 2008, \pasj, 60, S183
987: \bibitem[Morrison \& McCammon(1983)]{1983ApJ...270..119M} Morrison, R., \&
988: McCammon, D.\ 1983, \apj, 270, 119
989: \bibitem[Muno et al.(2008)]{2008ApJ...673..251M} Muno, M.~P., Baganoff,
990: F.~K., Brandt, W.~N., Morris, M.~R., \& Starck, J.-L.\ 2008, \apj, 673, 251
991: \bibitem[Murakami et al.(2000)]{2000ApJ...534..283M} Murakami, H., Koyama,
992: K., Sakano, M., Tsujimoto, M., \& Maeda, Y.\ 2000, \apj, 534, 283
993: \bibitem[Nesterov et
994: al.(1995)]{1995A&AS..110..367N} Nesterov, V.~V., Kuzmin, A.~V., Ashimbaeva, N.~T., Volchkov, A.~A., R{\"o}ser, S., \& Bastian, U.\ 1995, \aaps, 110, 367
995: \bibitem[Nobukawa et al.(2008)]{2008PASJ...60S.191N} Nobukawa, M., et al.\
996: 2008, \pasj, 60, S191
997: \bibitem[Odenwald \& Fazio(1984)]{1984ApJ...283..601O} Odenwald, S.~F., \& Fazio, G.~G.\ 1984, \apj, 283, 601
998: %\bibitem[Odenwald(1989)]{Ode1989} Odenwald, S. F.\ 1989, in IAU Symp. 136, the Center of the Galaxy, ed. M. Morris (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 205
999: \bibitem[Oka et al.(2007)]{2007PASJ...59...15O} Oka, T., Nagai, M.,
1000: Kamegai, K., Tanaka, K., \& Kuboi, N.\ 2007, \pasj, 59, 15
1001: \bibitem[Pauls \& Mezger(1975)]{1975A&A....44..259P} Pauls, T., \& Mezger, P.~G.\ 1975, \aap, 44, 259
1002: \bibitem[Reid(1993)]{1993ARA&A..31..345R} Reid, M.~J.\ 1993, \araa, 31, 345
1003: \bibitem[Sakano et al.(2002)]{2002ApJS..138...19S} Sakano, M., Koyama, K., Murakami, H., Maeda, Y., \& Yamauchi, S.\ 2002, \apjs, 138, 19
1004: \bibitem[Serlemitsos et al.(2007)]{2007PASJ...59S...9S} Serlemitsos, P.~J.,
1005: et al.\ 2007, \pasj, 59, S9
1006: \bibitem[Sidoli et al.(2001)]{2001A&A...372..651S} Sidoli, L., Mereghetti, S., Treves, A., Parmar, A.~N., Turolla, R., \& Favata, F.\ 2001, \aap, 372, 651
1007: \bibitem[Sidoli et al.(2006)]{2006A&A...456..287S} Sidoli, L., Mereghetti, S., Favata, F., Oosterbroek, T., \& Parmar, A.~N.\ 2006, \aap, 456, 287
1008: \bibitem[Skrutskie et al.(1997)]{1997ASSL..210...25S} Skrutskie, M.~F., et
1009: al.\ 1997, The Impact of Large Scale Near-IR Sky Surveys, 210, 25
1010: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2001)]{2001ApJ...556L..91S} Smith, R.~K., Brickhouse,
1011: N.~S., Liedahl, D.~A., \& Raymond, J.~C.\ 2001, \apj, 556, L91
1012: \bibitem[Str{\"u}der et al.(2001)]{2001A&A...365L..18S} Str{\"u}der, L., et
1013: al.\ 2001, \aap, 365, L18
1014: \bibitem[Swarup et al.(1974)]{1974IAUS...60..499S} Swarup, G.,
1015: Gopal-Krishna, \& Sarma, N.~V.~G.\ 1974, Galactic Radio Astronomy, 60, 499
1016: \bibitem[Tawa et al.(2008)]{2008PASJ...60S..11T} Tawa, N., et al.\ 2008,
1017: \pasj, 60, S11
1018: \bibitem[Townsley et al.(2003)]{2003ApJ...593..874T} Townsley, L.~K.,
1019: Feigelson, E.~D., Montmerle, T., Broos, P.~S., Chu, Y.-H.,
1020: \& Garmire, G.~P.\ 2003, \apj, 593, 874
1021: \bibitem[Tsuboi et al.(1999)]{1999ApJS..120....1T} Tsuboi, M., Handa, T.,
1022: \& Ukita, N.\ 1999, \apjs, 120, 1
1023: \bibitem[Tsujimoto et al.(2007)]{2007PASJ...59S.229T} Tsujimoto, M., Hyodo,
1024: Y., \& Koyama, K.\ 2007, \pasj, 59, S229
1025: \bibitem[Turner et al.(2001)]{2001A&A...365L..27T} Turner, M.~J.~L., et
1026: al.\ 2001, \aap, 365, L27
1027: \bibitem[Uchiyama et al.(2007)]{2007SPIE.6686...U} Uchiyama, H., et al.\ 2007, \procspie, 6686, 66860P
1028: \bibitem[Uchiyama et al.(2008)]{2008PASJ...60S..35U} Uchiyama, Y., et al.\
1029: 2008, \pasj, 60, S35
1030: \bibitem[Werner et al.(2004)]{2004ApJS..154....1W} Werner, M.~W., et al.\
1031: 2004, \apjs, 154, 1
1032: %\bibitem[Whiteoak \& Gardner(1974)]{1974A&A....37..389W} Whiteoak, J.~B., \& Gardner, F.~F.\ 1974, \aap, 37, 389
1033: %\bibitem[Wink et al.(1982)]{1982A&A...108..227W} Wink, J.~E., Altenhoff, W.~J., \& Mezger, P.~G.\ 1982, \aap, 108, 227
1034: \bibitem[Wang et al.(2006)]{2006MNRAS.371...38W} Wang, Q.~D., Dong, H.,
1035: \& Lang, C.\ 2006, \mnras, 371, 38
1036: \bibitem[Watson(2007)]{2007A&G....48e..30W} Watson, M.\ 2007, Astronomy and Geophysics, 48, 30
1037: \bibitem[Wolk et al.(2002)]{2002ApJ...580L.161W} Wolk, S.~J., Bourke,
1038: T.~L., Smith, R.~K., Spitzbart, B., \& Alves, J.\ 2002, \apj, 580, L161
1039: \bibitem[Yamauchi et al.(1990)]{1990ApJ...365..532Y} Yamauchi, S., Kawada,
1040: M., Koyama, K., Kunieda, H., \& Tawara, Y.\ 1990, \apj, 365, 532
1041: \bibitem[Yusef-Zadeh et al.(2002)]{2002ApJ...570..665Y} Yusef-Zadeh, F.,
1042: Law, C., Wardle, M., Wang, Q.~D., Fruscione, A., Lang, C.~C.,
1043: \& Cotera, A.\ 2002, \apj, 570, 665
1044: \bibitem[Yusef-Zadeh et al.(2004)]{2004ApJS..155..421Y} Yusef-Zadeh, F., Hewitt, J.~W., \& Cotton, W.\ 2004, \apjs, 155, 421
1045: % Books
1046: %\bibitem[Koyama et al.(2007c)]{key-2}
1047: % Aauthor, A., Author, B.\ 2001, Name of Book(Publisher, Tokyo) ch0
1048: % Books
1049: %\bibitem[Aauthor \& Bauthor(2001b)]{key-3}
1050: % Aauthor, A., Bauthor, B.\ 2001, Name of Book(Publisher, Tokyo) page0
1051: %......
1052: % Editorial Books
1053: %\bibitem[Dauthor(2001)]{key-n}
1054: % Dauthor A. A.\ 2001, in Name of Book,
1055: % ed Editor D.\ Editor(Publisher, Tokyo) page0
1056: \end{thebibliography}
1057:
1058: \end{document}
1059: