1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
4:
5: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
6:
7: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
8:
9: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
10:
11: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
12: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
13: %% use the longabstract style option.
14:
15: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
16:
17: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
18: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
19: %% the \begin{document} command.
20: %%
21: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
22: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
23: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
24: %% for information.
25:
26:
27: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
28: \newcommand{\myemail}{gdoppmann@noao.edu}
29:
30:
31: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
32:
33: \slugcomment{Accepted to ApJ, 15 May 2008}
34:
35: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
36: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
37: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
38: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
39: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
40: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
41:
42: \shorttitle{Infrared Spectroscopic Properties of GV Tau}
43: \shortauthors{Doppmann et al.}
44:
45: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
46: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
47:
48:
49: \newcommand{\teff}{\,T_{\rm eff}}
50: \newcommand{\logg}{\,\log g}
51: \newcommand{\vsini}{\,v\sin i}
52: \newcommand{\rk}{\,r_{K}}
53: \newcommand{\kms}{\rm \,km\,s^{-1}}
54: \newcommand{\gsqcm}{\rm \,g\,cm^{-2}}
55: \newcommand{\Msun}{\,M_\odot}
56: \newcommand{\Lsun}{\,L_\odot}
57: \newcommand{\Rsun}{\,R_\odot}
58: \newcommand{\Mstar}{\,M_*}
59: \newcommand{\Lstar}{\,L_*}
60: \newcommand{\Rstar}{\,R_*}
61: \newcommand{\vlsr}{\,v_{\rm LSR}}
62: \newcommand{\invcm}{\rm \,cm^{-1}}
63: \newcommand{\Mdotstar}{\,\dot M_*}
64: \newcommand{\Mdotdisk}{\,\dot M_{\rm d}}
65: \newcommand{\Msunperyr}{\,M_\odot \rm yr^{-1}}
66: \newcommand{\Lsunperyr}{\,L_\odot \rm yr^{-1}}
67:
68: \begin{document}
69:
70: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
71: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
72: %% you desire.
73:
74: \title{Stellar and Circumstellar Properties of the Pre-Main Sequence
75: Binary GV Tau from Infrared Spectroscopy\altaffilmark{1}}
76:
77: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
78: %% author and affiliation information.
79: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
80: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
81: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
82: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
83:
84: \author{Greg W. Doppmann\altaffilmark{2},
85: Joan R. Najita\altaffilmark{2}, and John S. Carr\altaffilmark{3}}
86:
87:
88: \email{gdoppmann@noao.edu}
89: \email{najita@noao.edu}
90: \email{carr@nrl.navy.mil}
91:
92:
93:
94: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
95: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
96: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
97: %% affiliation.
98:
99: \altaffiltext{1}{Data presented herein were obtained at the W.M. Keck Observatory from telescope time allocated to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration through the agency's scientific partnership with the California Institute of Technology and the University of California. The Observatory was made possible by the generous financial support of the W.M. Keck Foundation.}
100:
101: \altaffiltext{2}{NOAO, 950 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85719}
102:
103: \altaffiltext{3}{Naval Research Laboratory, Code 7210, Washington, DC 20375}
104:
105: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
106: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
107: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
108: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
109: %% editorial office after submission.
110:
111: \begin{abstract}
112:
113: We report spatially resolved spectroscopy of both components of the
114: low-mass pre-main-sequence binary GV Tau. High resolution
115: spectroscopy in the $K$- and $L$-bands is used to characterize the
116: stellar properties of the binary and to explore the nature of the
117: circumstellar environment. We find that the southern component, GV
118: Tau S, is a radial velocity variable, possibly as a result of an
119: unseen low-mass companion. The strong warm gaseous HCN absorption
120: reported previously toward GV Tau S \citep{gibb2007} was not present
121: during the epoch of our observations. Instead, we detect warm
122: ($\sim$500~K) molecular absorption with similar properties toward the
123: northern infrared companion, GV Tau N. At the epoch of our
124: observations, the absorbing gas toward GV Tau N was approximately at
125: the radial velocity of the GV Tau molecular envelope, but it was
126: redshifted with respect to the star by $\sim$13~$\kms$. One
127: interpretation of our results is that GV Tau N is also a binary and
128: that most of the warm molecular absorption arises in a circumbinary
129: disk viewed close to edge-on.
130:
131: \end{abstract}
132:
133: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
134: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
135: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
136: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
137:
138: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
139: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so in the
140: %% subject header. Objects should be in the appropriate "individual"
141: %% headers (e.g. quasars: individual, stars: individual, etc.) with the
142: %% additional provision that the total number of headers, including each
143: %% individual object, not exceed six. The \objectname{} macro, and its
144: %% alias \object{}, is used to mark each object. The macro takes the object
145: %% name as its primary argument. This name will appear in the paper
146: %% and serve as the link's anchor in the electronic edition if the name
147: %% is recognized by the data centers. The macro also takes an optional
148: %% argument in parentheses in cases where the data center identification
149: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper.
150:
151:
152: \keywords{infrared: stars -- stars: formation, fundamental parameters,
153: late-type, low-mass, pre--main sequence --- stars:
154: circumstellar matter, stars: individual (GV Tau)--- techniques: spectroscopic, radial velocities}
155:
156: %\object{GV Tau}
157:
158: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
159: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
160: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
161: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
162: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
163: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
164: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
165: %% each reference.
166:
167: \section{Introduction}
168:
169: \objectname{GV Tau} (Haro 6-10, Elias 7, HBC 389, IRAS 04263+2426) is an unusual
170: young stellar object (YSO) in the Taurus molecular cloud. While the
171: spectral energy distribution of the system has the strongly rising
172: 2--25~$\micron$ continuum that is characteristic of Class I sources
173: \citep[e.g.,][]{furlan2007}, millimeter studies find comparatively
174: weak dust and gas emission from the source compared to other low-mass
175: embedded YSOs \citep{hogerheijde1998}. This, and the poorly defined
176: molecular outflow structure from the source, suggest that the system
177: lacks a significant envelope component \citep{hogerheijde1998} and may
178: be a more evolved Class I system.
179:
180: GV Tau is also a binary \citep[projected separation
181: 1\farcs2;][]{leinert1989}. It is one of a small population of
182: low-mass pre-main-sequence binaries in which one component is
183: optically visible, while the other is optically faint and radiates
184: primarily at infrared wavelengths. The optically visible component in
185: the GV Tau system is the southern component (GV Tau S), a T Tauri
186: star. Its stellar properties have been characterized previously based
187: on high resolution infrared \citep{doppmann2005} and optical
188: \citep{white2004} spectroscopy. GV Tau S is unusual in that its
189: radial velocity has been found to differ significantly (by more than
190: 3-$\sigma$) from both the radial velocity of the surrounding molecular
191: cloud (by $> 7.5~\kms$) and the radial velocity distribution of other
192: Taurus sources \citep{doppmann2005,covey2006}. In addition, $L$- and
193: $M$-band absorption by gaseous warm organic molecules (HCN,
194: C$_2$H$_2$, CO) has been reported toward GV Tau S \citep[]{gibb2007},
195: making it one of the few pre-main-sequence sources in which such
196: absorption features have been detected.
197:
198: Less is known about the northern component, the infrared companion of
199: the binary system (GV Tau N). It is approximately 100 times fainter
200: than GV Tau S at optical wavelengths (Stapelfeldt et al., in preparation), is
201: bright at infrared wavelengths, and experiences significant
202: extinction, as indicated by the strong water ice and silicate
203: absorption observed toward the source
204: \citep{whittet1988,vancleve1994,leinert2001}. Extended emission (on a
205: $10\arcsec$ scale) associated with the GV Tau system is found to be
206: highly polarized (6\%) at infrared wavelengths, a result that is
207: attributed to scattering by a flattened envelope (i.e., a shell with
208: an aspect ratio of 10:1) or a disk viewed at high inclination
209: \citep{menard1993}. Since strong silicate absorption is found only in
210: the spectrum of GV Tau N and not GV Tau S, this is taken as evidence
211: for an edge-on disk associated with GV Tau N \citep{vancleve1994}.
212:
213: High angular resolution observations provide limited support for this
214: interpretation. When studied at $0\farcs08$ resolution at $K$, GV Tau
215: N is found to be surrounded by a nebula whose shape may be consistent
216: with the presence of an edge-on disk, but the shape of the nebula is
217: irregular and varies with time \citep{koresko1999}. The irregular
218: structure is in marked contrast to the symmetric lens-like shape of
219: scattered light distribution seen in the HK Tau B system, a system
220: that is also believed to possess a nearly edge-on disk
221: \citep{stapelfeldt1998, koresko1998}. Adding further complexity,
222: significant photometric variability is found for both components at
223: $1.6-4.5~\micron$ on timescales as short as a month
224: \citep{leinert2001}, with the $3.1~\micron$ water ice band absorption
225: strength also varying toward both components.
226:
227: Here we use spatially resolved high resolution infrared spectroscopy
228: of both binary components to characterize the stellar and
229: circumstellar components of the GV Tau system. Our $K$- and $L$-band
230: spectroscopic observations are described in \S~2 and the detected
231: spectral features are described in \S~3. We use these data to
232: characterize the stellar and circumstellar properties of the system
233: (\S~4). The results are discussed in \S~5 and our conclusions
234: presented in \S~6.
235:
236:
237: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
238:
239: \subsection{Spectroscopic Observations}
240:
241: $K$- and $L$-band infrared spectra were obtained on 2007 January 03 using
242: the cryogenic echelle facility spectrometer, NIRSPEC
243: \citep{mclean1998}, on the 10-m Keck II telescope atop Mauna Kea,
244: Hawaii. Spectra were acquired through the 0\farcs432 (3 pixel) wide
245: slit, providing spectroscopic resolution $R \equiv \lambda / \delta
246: \lambda = 24,000$ (12.5~$\kms$). The echelle and cross disperser
247: angles were oriented to obtain $L$-band spectra of transitions of HCN
248: and C$_2$H$_2$ (e.g. 3.04 - 3.09~$\micron$, order 25). We used the KL
249: blocking filter to image the $L$-band orders onto the instrument's
250: 1024 $\times$ 1024 InSb detector. Immediately following the $L$-band
251: observations, the echelle and cross disperser gratings were
252: re-oriented to allow key $K$-band features (i.e., Mg I, Al I, Na I,
253: $\nu$=2-0 CO, and Br$\gamma$) to fall onto the detector. In this
254: configuration, orders 32 -- 38 (non-contiguous) were imaged through
255: the NIRSPEC-7 blocking filter onto the detector array.
256:
257: Both binary components of GV Tau were acquired in the slit
258: simultaneously, at a position angle on the sky of 356$\arcdeg$
259: \citep{leinert1989}. Initially, GV Tau N (the brighter component in
260: our observations of $\lambda >2.09~\micron$) was centered in the slit.
261: During the $L$- and $K$-band observations the slit was held physically
262: stationary to avoid slight grating angle shifts caused by vibrations
263: from the slit rotator motor. During the time we integrated on the
264: binary pair ($<$25 min. total), the measured flux ratio of the
265: components in the slit did not change systematically. This is
266: consistent with the negligible expected motion of the binary pair
267: within the slit as the non-equatorially mounted telescope tracked.
268: Despite some wind shake in the direction across the slit in the
269: east-west direction, the individual components (separated by
270: 1$\farcs$2) were well resolved in median seeing ($\sim$0$\farcs6$),
271: allowing separate spectral extractions of the southern and northern
272: components.
273:
274: The data were acquired in pairs of exposures of 40s and 60s in the
275: $L$- and $K$-bands, respectively. The telescope was nodded
276: $\pm6\arcsec$ from the slit center in an ABBA sequence along the
277: 24$\arcsec$ long slit so that each frame pair would contain object and sky
278: in both nod positions. To correct for telluric absorption, we also
279: obtained spectra of an early-type star located close to GV Tau in the
280: sky (HR 1412), before and after the GV Tau observations ($L$- and
281: $K$-band settings, respectively). Spectra of the internal NIRSPEC
282: continuum lamp were taken for flat fields at the $K$- and $L$-band
283: settings. Exposures of the Argon, Neon, Krypton, and Xenon Arc lamps
284: provided wavelength calibration for all the $K$-band orders, except in
285: order 33 where we used the telluric lines for calibration due to the
286: scarcity of arc lamp lines in this order. We also obtained short
287: exposure (10 $\times$ 0.1s) $K$- and $L$-band images of the GV Tau
288: binary using the slit viewing camera detector (SCAM) in order to
289: measure the relative brightness of the two components.
290:
291:
292:
293: \subsection{Data Reduction}
294:
295: The spectra were reduced using standard IRAF packages
296: \citep{massey1992,massey1997}. Sky subtracted beam pairs were divided
297: by a normalized flatfield. Individual echelle orders were parsed from
298: the multi-order, co-added images. Bad pixels (i.e., hot or low
299: responsivity pixels) in each order were identified by inspection, and
300: removed by interpolation using $\it{fixpix}$ in IRAF. To better
301: remove telluric emission features which are more severe in the
302: $L$-band, we rectified the slit in our $L$-band data using 3rd order
303: transform solution derived from the brightest emission sky lines
304: (typically 10-12 per order) traced along the slit length at each beam
305: position before sky subtraction. Transformed and cleaned orders were
306: extracted using the $\it{apall}$ task. Extractions for each binary
307: component of GV Tau were based on a signal profile down to 50\% (FWHM)
308: on both sides of the profile peak, to minimize the contaminating flux
309: from the nearby companion. For the $L$-band spectra, residual
310: background sky was subtracted in the extraction using selected regions
311: of the profile cut that were well outside of the profile of the
312: spatially double-peaked binary.
313:
314: Wavelength calibration in the $L$-band was achieved using selected
315: telluric absorption features present in the spectra of the telluric
316: standard star (HR 1412). Stronger unblended telluric lines were
317: selected over weaker ones, while avoiding very saturated lines whose
318: depths went to zero. Rest wavelengths for the absorption features
319: were obtained from the HITRAN database \citep{rothman1998}. Most or
320: all of these same lines were used to derive a wavelength solution for
321: the target, with the exception of those lines that might fall very
322: close in wavelength to emission or absorption lines present in the
323: target spectrum.
324:
325: Telluric features present in the spectra of GV Tau at each nod
326: position in the slit were removed by dividing by the spectrum of the
327: telluric standard (HR 1412) observed at the same nod position.
328: Several weak stellar absorption lines were present in the K-band
329: orders of the standard due to its relatively late spectral type (A7
330: III). These atomic lines were modeled and removed by dividing the
331: standard spectrum by the best fit stellar synthetic spectrum before
332: division into the GV Tau spectrum. The stellar synthetic spectra were
333: generated with the program MOOG \citep{sneden1973} using the NextGen
334: model atmospheres \citep{hauschildt1999}. The initial line list was
335: taken from \citet{kurucz1993}, and individual line parameters were
336: adjusted to fit the observed disk-center solar spectrum of
337: \citet{livingston1991}. For HR 1412, we used a model with $\teff =
338: 7600$ K and $\logg = 3.5$. Small adjustments were made in the
339: elemental abundances to give the best empirical fit to HR 1412. We
340: measured $\vsini = 75 \kms$, in agreement with published values
341: \citep{royer2002}.
342:
343: Br $\gamma$ absorption at 2.166 $\micron$ was also present in the
344: telluric standard. We therefore used the synthetic telluric spectral
345: modeling program, AT (Grossman, private communication) to model the
346: telluric features that we observed in this region of the HR 1412
347: spectrum. We fit the depths of the observed telluric lines and then
348: used the best-fit synthetic spectrum to divide out the telluric lines
349: in the GV Tau spectra in this order (order 35,
350: Fig. \ref{fig-kband.ord33}c).
351:
352: In order to view the true continuum shape within each echelle order,
353: we then multiplied the resulting GV Tau spectra by the spectral slope
354: of a 7600~K blackbody (Figs. \ref{fig-kband.ord33}a --
355: \ref{fig-kband.ord33}e).
356:
357: Simple aperture photometry of the SCAM images showed that GV Tau N was
358: 35-40\% brighter than GV Tau S in the K+open, NIRSPEC7, and KL
359: filters. The relative flux of the GV Tau N and S $K$-band spectra in
360: orders 33 and 34 (Figs. \ref{fig-kband.ord33}a \&
361: \ref{fig-kband.ord33}b), which are located in the middle of the
362: $K$-band filters above, are consistent with the aperture photometry.
363:
364: \section{Detected Spectral Features}\label{sec-k+lspec}
365:
366: Emission and absorption features in GV Tau N and GV Tau S were
367: detected in the $K$-band spectra of each object
368: (Figs. \ref{fig-kband.ord33}a -- \ref{fig-kband.ord33}d). In order 33
369: (2.269 -- 2.304~$\micron$, Fig. \ref{fig-kband.ord33}a), $\nu$=2-0 CO
370: overtone emission and absorption are present in both GV Tau N and GV
371: Tau S. The emission component dominates the spectrum in GV Tau N in
372: this order, while the absorption dominates in GV Tau S. Lines due to
373: absorption of neutral atomic species that are present in GV Tau S in
374: this order (e.g., Fe I at 2.2747~$\micron$ and Mg I at
375: 2.2814~$\micron$) are absent in GV Tau N. The $K$-band absorption
376: features in both components are presumed to originate from the stellar
377: photosphere.
378:
379: Emission features of Na I and H$_2$ dominate the structure of the GV
380: Tau N spectrum in order 34 (2.203 -- 2.236~$\micron$,
381: Fig. \ref{fig-kband.ord33}b). Interestingly, the broad emission lines
382: near 2.2065 and 2.2090~$\micron$ in GV Tau N appear to show absorption
383: components possibly of a photospheric origin. The S(0) 1-0 H$_2$
384: emission at 2.2235~$\micron$ is detected in both components, and is
385: spatially extended (see $\S$~\ref{sec-h2.emis}). Other than the H$_2$
386: emission, the spectrum of GV Tau S in this order displays neutral
387: atomic absorption lines of photospheric origin
388: (Fig. \ref{fig-kband.ord33}b).
389:
390: The spectra in order 35 (2.140 -- 2.173~$\micron$,
391: Fig. \ref{fig-kband.ord33}c) are characterized by strong H I Br$\gamma$
392: emission in both GV Tau N and GV Tau S. The continuum level near the
393: Brackett $\gamma$ line is $\sim$20\% higher in GV Tau N, while the
394: equivalent width of the emission line is 3 times greater in GV Tau S.
395:
396: In order 36 (2.081 -- 2.113~$\micron$, Fig. \ref{fig-kband.ord33}d),
397: the spectrum of GV Tau N appears featureless. In contrast, GV Tau S
398: exhibits photospheric absorption lines (e.g., Mg I at 2.1065~$\micron$
399: and Al I at 2.1099~$\micron$), which are useful as diagnostics of the
400: stellar effective temperature and surface gravity.
401:
402: With our $L$-band spectra in order 25 (3.0450--3.0865~$\micron$,
403: Fig. \ref{fig-kband.ord33}e), we detect strong HCN absorption
404: ($\sim$10\% deep) and weaker C$_2$H$_2$ absorption in GV Tau N. In
405: contrast, no molecular absorption is detected in the GV Tau S
406: spectrum. In \S~\ref{sec-molecular.abs} we characterize the molecular
407: absorption in GV Tau N.
408:
409: \section{Results}
410:
411: \subsection{Stellar and Circumstellar Properties}\label{sec-gvt.stellprops}
412: \subsubsection{South Component}\label{sec-gvts.stellprops}
413:
414: All four $K$-band orders of the GV Tau S spectrum display stellar
415: photospheric absorption by neutral atomic features (e.g., Na I, Si I,
416: Sc I, Mg I, Al I) and $\nu$=2-0 CO. We used synthetic stellar
417: spectral models generated by the synthesis program MOOG
418: \citep{sneden1973} and using NextGen stellar atmosphere model
419: structures \citep{hauschildt1999} to constrain the stellar properties
420: of GV Tau S. Our modeling focused on three spectral sub-regions: The
421: ``Na" region (2.204--2.210~$\micron$), the ``Mg/Al" region
422: (2.104--2.111~$\micron$), and the ``CO" region
423: (2.292--2.300~$\micron$). These regions of the $K$-band contain the
424: strongest absorption features with which to measure the stellar
425: properties of low-mass YSOs \citep{doppmann2005}. The absorption
426: lines of Na I and Mg I are particularly gravity and temperature
427: sensitive, but in the opposite sense from each other. For example, at
428: cool effective temperatures (3200--4500~K) and subdwarf surface
429: gravities ($3.5 \le \logg \le 4.5$) Na and Mg lines both grow stronger
430: as $\logg$ increases, but an increase in $\teff$ causes Mg lines to
431: grow while the Na lines weaken. A simultaneous fit of synthesis
432: models to the Na and Mg/Al regions
433: (Fig. \ref{fig-kband.gvts.modelfit}) constrains these key stellar
434: properties in reducing or breaking the temperature-gravity degeneracy
435: displayed in a single absorbing species \citep{doppmann2005}.
436:
437: The best model fit to these wavelength sub-regions yields $\teff$=3800
438: $\pm$100~K, $\logg$=4.0 $\pm$0.17, $\vsini$ rotation= 24
439: $\pm$3~$\kms$, and $K$-band veiling $\rk$=2.5 $\pm$0.2
440: (Fig. \ref{fig-kband.gvts.modelfit}). From the $\teff$ and $\logg$
441: derived above, we estimate a stellar luminosity, mass, and radius of
442: $\Lstar=0.3 \Lsun, \Mstar=0.5 \Msun, \Rstar=1.2 \Rsun$ using the
443: pre-main-sequence model tracks of \citet{siess2000}, where a 3 Myr
444: isochrone was consistent with our values of temperature and gravity.
445: The derived luminosity and effective temperature imply an estimated
446: $K$-band extinction toward GV Tau S of $A_{\rm K}=0.7$ based on the
447: most recent photometery from the literature \citep[2000 March
448: 07;][]{leinert2001}, which reported a value ($m_{\rm K} = 8.61$)
449: that was within 1-$\sigma$ of the average in the study over the time
450: period from September 1988 to March 2000 ($m_{\rm K} = 8.1 \pm 0.7$).
451: Our derived $K$-band extinction is consistent with the average optical
452: extinction of $A_{\rm V} = 5.6$ estimated by \citet{koresko1997}.
453:
454: Our derived $\teff$, $\vsini$, and $\vlsr$ values are consistent with
455: the high resolution optical study of \citet{white2004} given the low
456: signal to noise (S/N $<$ 10) in their 1999 December 06 observation of GV
457: Tau S. The moderately high veiling we derive ($\rk=2.5$) is more
458: characteristic of Class I or flat spectrum YSOs than of T Tauri stars,
459: although still within the range of veiling values measured in a sample
460: of Ophiuchus Class II sources \citep{doppmann2003}.
461:
462: These results agree well with the veiling measured from the previous
463: observation of GV Tau S from 2001 November 06 \citep{doppmann2005}.
464: \citet{doppmann2005} quote a veiling value of $\rk$= 1.8, which
465: includes a correction for a systematic effect seen in the best fit
466: synthesis models to observations of MK standards \citep[see Eqn. 1 in
467: \S~3.6 of][]{doppmann2005}. The measured veiling without the
468: correction for the systematic effect was $\rk$= 2.4, which is
469: consistent with our measured value.
470:
471: The constraint on effective temperature and surface gravity is
472: consistent with the results from \citet{doppmann2005}.
473: \citet{doppmann2005} reported a somewhat warmer effective temperature
474: ($\teff=4500K$) and higher surface gravity ($\logg=4.4$), which was
475: based on fits to synthetic spectra of a smaller number of photospheric
476: absorption features (excluding Sc I lines at 2.2058 and 2.2071 $\mu$m)
477: at similar signal-to-noise and slightly lower spectral resolution
478: ($R$=18,000). A comparably good fit to the 2001 data can be obtained
479: with $\teff=4000K$ and $\logg=3.9$ that includes the Sc I lines above
480: as was done in this study.
481:
482: The radial velocity of GV Tau S was measured by shifting a synthetic
483: template spectrum to independently match each of 12 selected
484: absorption lines that were present in orders 33 and 34 (see Table 1).
485: The error was determined from the quadrature sum of the systematic
486: error, dominated by the uncertainty in the wavelength calibration of
487: the data, and the statisical error, measured from the variation in the
488: radial velocity values among the individual absorption lines. Our
489: measured $\vlsr$ of GV Tau S differs from previous measurements in the
490: literature for this source. In 2001, the radial velocity of GV Tau S
491: was measured to be $\vlsr$= --6.2 $\pm 1.5~\kms$ \citep{covey2006},
492: blueshifted by $\sim$9--15~$\kms$ relative to the observations of this
493: study and that of \citet[][$\vlsr=+3.1 \pm 3.8~\kms$]{white2004}. As
494: a result, this source was flagged as a radial velocity outlier, since
495: its radial velocity was $>$~3-$\sigma$ from the mean of all the Taurus
496: sources in the survey \citep{covey2006}. Our 2007 observations now
497: place the radial velocity of GV Tau S ($\vlsr= 9.4 \pm1.7~\kms$) close
498: to the mean $\vlsr$ ($4.6 \pm 1.8~\kms$) of the sources in the 2001
499: Taurus survey \citep{doppmann2005,covey2006}. We discuss the radial
500: velocity variations further in \S~\ref{sec-gvts.binary}.
501:
502: As described in $\S$~\ref{sec-k+lspec}, the CO $\nu$=2-0 bandhead of
503: GV Tau S has both emission and absorption components. Using the best
504: fit stellar parameters obtained from the Na and Mg/Al regions of the
505: GV Tau S spectrum as a constraint on the stellar photospheric
506: properties, we fit the CO feature with a composite model of
507: circumstellar disk emission and stellar photospheric absorption
508: (Fig. \ref{fig-kband.gvts.modelco}). The emission component is
509: modeled as arising from a differentially rotating disk that is in
510: chemical equilibrium. The emission arises between an inner radius
511: $R_i$, at which the projected disk rotational velocity has a specified
512: value of $\vsini$, and an outer radius $R_o$. The disk temperature
513: and column density are modeled as simple radial gradients that
514: decrease as power laws \citep{carr1993,carr2004}. The star and disk
515: are placed at the same radial velocity and the composite model
516: spectrum is smoothed to the $13\kms$ velocity resolution of NIRSPEC.
517: The model fit parameters are given in the caption to
518: Fig. \ref{fig-kband.gvts.modelco}.
519:
520: \subsubsection{North Component}\label{sec-gvtn.stellprops}
521:
522: The spectrum of GV Tau N shows emission and absorption components in
523: both the CO and Na regions (Figs. \ref{fig-kband.gvtn.modelco} \&
524: \ref{fig-kband.gvtn.modelna}) of the $K$-band. We attribute the
525: emission to a circumstellar disk; the absorption features are presumed
526: to arise from the stellar photosphere, implying a late spectral type
527: for the star. We assume a stellar mass of $M_*$=0.8$\Msun$ and an age
528: of $\tau$=3 Myr for this object, consistent with the typical values
529: found for low-mass YSOs in Taurus \citep{briceno2002}.
530: These assumptions imply an effective temperature of $\teff$=4100~K and a
531: surface gravity of $\logg \sim4.0$ from pre-main-sequence evolutionary
532: model tracks \citep{siess2000}.
533:
534: Using these assumed stellar properties, we modeled the CO feature
535: observed in GV Tau N as a combination of circumstellar disk emission
536: and stellar photospheric absorption. As in the case of GV Tau S, the
537: emission component is fit with a simple model of CO emission from a
538: differentially rotating disk. The details of the model fit are given
539: in the caption to Fig. \ref{fig-kband.gvtn.modelco}. We find a good
540: fit to the observed CO overtone emission
541: (Fig. \ref{fig-kband.gvtn.modelco}) with the additional assumptions of
542: slow stellar rotation ($\vsini$= 15~$\kms$) and heavy veiling
543: ($\rk$=12). Such a substantial infrared veiling greatly exceeds what
544: has been measured from near--IR photospheric absorption lines in past
545: studies \citep[e.g., $\rk \le
546: 4.5$,][]{luhman1998,luhman1999,doppmann2003,doppmann2005}. It also
547: results in large uncertainties in the inferred $K$-band extinction.
548:
549: Broad Na emission has been observed in several Class I and flat
550: spectrum protostars, always accompanied by $\nu$=2-0 CO emission
551: \citep{doppmann2005}. The absorption lines in the Na region, apparent
552: within the broader emission features, can be fit with the same stellar
553: photospheric model and somewhat larger veiling ($\rk=15$,
554: Fig. \ref{fig-kband.gvtn.modelna}) than was used in fitting the CO
555: region. If we subtract the stellar photospheric model from the
556: observed spectrum, the resulting spectrum is similar to the Na
557: emission seen in other T Tauri stars. The absence of detected
558: spectral features in the Mg/Al region of GV Tau N in our data
559: (signal-to-noise $\sim170$) is also consistent with the model
560: assumptions.
561:
562: The radial velocities of the CO and Na absorption components in GV Tau
563: N are in agreement with one another ($\vlsr=-4.5\kms$, see Table 2),
564: and with the radial velocity of the emission component from which they
565: arise. Given the assumed mass $\Mstar=0.8 \Msun$, we estimate the
566: stellar luminosity, radius, and $K$-band extinction (i.e., $\Lstar=0.6
567: \Lsun,~\Rstar=1.4 \Rsun$, and $A_K=2.6$) from the photospheric
568: absorption we find in our spectra, using \citet{siess2000}
569: evolutionary model tracks and \cite{leinert2001} photometry from 2000
570: March 07 ($m_{\rm K}=8.66$).
571:
572: The unknown apparent magnitude of GV Tau N on the date
573: of our observations introduces an uncertainty in the derived $K$-band
574: extinction and veiling. If the apparent magnitude was the historical
575: average of $m_{\rm K}=9.8$ \citep{leinert2001}, instead of the value
576: reported on 2000 March 07 of $m_{\rm K}=8.66$ \citep{leinert2001},
577: then the extinction ($A_K$) would increase by 1.2. If we had assumed
578: a higher ($\teff$=4300~K) or lower ($\teff$=3900~K) temperature than
579: the value we use here ($\teff$=4100~K), which was based on the IMF
580: peak \citep{briceno2002}, this would imply a veiling ($\rk$) of 11 or
581: 13, and an extinction ($\Delta A_{\rm K}$) of +0.5 or -0.6 relative to
582: the derived value presented above ($A_{\rm K}$=2.6).
583:
584: \subsection{Brackett $\gamma$ Emission}\label{sec-brg.emis}
585:
586: We detect H I Br$\gamma$ emission in both components of GV Tau
587: (Fig. \ref{fig-kband.brg}). The broad emission profiles (i.e., 175
588: and 170~$\kms$ FWHM, GV Tau S and N, respectively) are consistent with
589: the Br$\gamma$ width of other active T Tauri stars
590: \citep{najita1996,folha2001}. In GV Tau S, where the equivalent width
591: is three times greater than in GV Tau N (EW$_{\rm South} = -3.9$ \AA
592: ), the centroid velocity is very close to the stellar velocity, as
593: measured by the stellar photospheric absorption lines (see
594: $\S$~\ref{sec-gvts.stellprops}). However, the centroid velocity of
595: the Br$\gamma$ line in GV Tau N is blueshifted by 12.5~$\kms$ relative
596: to the CO absorption component ($\S$~\ref{sec-gvtn.stellprops}).
597: Blueshifted Br$\gamma$ centroids, which are common among T Tauri
598: stars, are consistent with an origin for the emission in gas infalling
599: in a stellar magnetosphere
600: \citep{najita1996,muzerolle1998b,folha2001}.
601:
602: We can use the Br$\gamma$ line strength to place a rough constraint on
603: the contribution of stellar accretion in GV Tau N and GV Tau S to the
604: bolometric luminosity of the system. We first convert the emission
605: equivalent width to a line luminosity using the 2000 March 07 $K$-band
606: photometry from \citet{leinert2001}, and the estimated $K$-band
607: extinction for each component (\S~\ref{sec-gvtn.stellprops} and
608: \S~\ref{sec-gvts.stellprops}). The estimated Br$\gamma$ luminosities
609: for GV Tau N and S are $9\times 10^{-5} \Lsun$ and $5\times 10^{-5}
610: \Lsun$, respectively. Using the empirical relation given by
611: \citet{muzerolle1998b} in their Figure 4, we infer accretion
612: luminosities of 0.1 and 0.2 $\Lsun$ for GV Tau N and S, respectively.
613: Thus, we estimate the total luminosity (stellar+hot accretion) of the
614: GV Tau system to be 1.2 $\Lsun$, below what has been estimated for its
615: bolometric system luminosity \citep[$L_{\rm bol}=7 - 9
616: \Lsun$;][]{kenyon1995,furlan2007}.
617:
618: \subsection{H$_2$ emission}\label{sec-h2.emis}
619:
620: The S(0) 1-0 H$_2$ emission (2.22329~$\micron$) that we detect from GV
621: Tau is marginally resolved in our spectra with a velocity width of 14
622: and 17~$\kms$ for GV Tau S and N, respectively. Spatially, the bulk
623: of the emission is coincident with GV Tau N and GV Tau S (within the
624: 0$\farcs$5 extraction aperture) but extends along the slit to the
625: south (P.A.=176$\arcdeg$) ending at a bright knot 6$\farcs$5 south of
626: GV Tau S (Fig. \ref{fig-gvtau.h2emis}).
627:
628: HST imaging of the GV Tau system shows resolved nebular emission
629: extending away in an arc to the East, South and Southwest of the GV
630: Tau S while GV Tau N is comparatively free of nebulosity
631: (K. Stapelfeldt, private communication). The location of the emission
632: knot is spatially coincident with a wisp of faint optical nebulosity
633: in the HST image. No near-IR line emission is seen immediately to the
634: North of GV Tau, which is coincident with a lack of optical nebulosity
635: in this region. The radial velocity of the H$_2$ emission is constant
636: along the slit ($\vlsr=8.5~\kms$), and agrees with the radial velocity
637: of the HCN absorption (\S~\ref{sec-molecular.abs}) and molecular
638: envelope for this system \citep{hogerheijde1998}.
639:
640: In order 37, we detect S(2) 1-0 H$_2$ emission in both stellar
641: components. The emission is extended southward along the slit in the
642: same way as the S(0) emission. The emission is 2--3 times brighter
643: than the S(0) line emission. As with the S(0) line, the S(2)
644: equivalent width is $\sim 2$ times stronger in GV Tau S compared to GV
645: Tau N. In both components, the equivalent widths and velocity widths
646: are greater than their counterparts in the S(0) lines. The observed
647: H$_2$ line ratios (i.e., 1-0 S(2)/1-0 S(0)) in GV Tau N and S are
648: consistent with shock excitation, similar to most of the classical T
649: Tauri stars observed by \citet{beck2007}.
650:
651: \subsection{Molecular Absorption}\label{sec-molecular.abs}
652:
653: In order to characterize the molecular absorption detected in the
654: $L$-band spectrum of GV Tau N, we used a simple model of absorption by
655: a slab at a single temperature and column density. We adopted the HCN linelist from the HITRAN database \citep{rothman1998}.
656: The data are well fit with a slab temperature $T=550~$K and column
657: density $N_{\rm HCN}=1.5 \times 10^{17} \rm{cm}^{-2}$, with a
658: microturbulent line broadening of $v_{\rm turb}=3~\kms$ and radial
659: velocity $\vlsr = 8.7 \pm 1.0~\kms$
660: (Fig. \ref{fig-lband.gvtn.modelhcn}). The radial velocity of the
661: molecular absorption was measured using selected P-branch lines (Table
662: 3) in regions of the spectrum that had good telluric transmission and
663: that were unblended with other species (such as C$_2$H$_2$). We
664: constructed an average HCN absorption profile from four selected HCN
665: absorption transitions (P11, P14, P15, and P16) to which we fit a
666: Gaussian profile (Fig. \ref{fig-gvtn.hcnprofile}). The 3-$\sigma$
667: error of $1.0 \kms$ on the radial velocity was estimated by comparing
668: the Gaussian fit of the average absorption profile to each of the
669: P-branch line fits separately.
670:
671: \section{Discussion}
672:
673: To summarize, both GV Tau N and S appear to possess slowly rotating
674: ($\vsini=15-24\kms$) late type ($\sim$K7--M2) photospheres. While
675: the stellar properties are consistent with an age of $\sim 3$\, Myr based on current pre-main-sequence stellar evolutionary tracks, the age estimate is uncertain because ages inferred from the tracks have
676: yet to be observationally verified. We also find that GV Tau S is a
677: radial velocity variable. For GV Tau N, we
678: find that the system shows strong CO overtone emission, strong
679: $K$-band veiling ($r_K=12-15$), and a blue-shifted Br$\gamma$
680: centroid. These properties are consistent with a young star
681: undergoing active accretion in a disk and stellar magnetosphere. The
682: stellar radial velocity found for GV Tau N ($\vlsr=-4.5 \pm4.0~\kms$)
683: differs from the radial velocity of the GV Tau molecular envelope
684: \citep[$\vlsr=7.0\pm0.5~\kms$,][]{hogerheijde1998} and the radial
685: velocity of the warm ($\sim 550$~K) HCN absorption detected in the
686: $L$-band ($\vlsr=8.7 \pm 1.0\kms$). We discuss the possible
687: implications of these results in the rest of this section.
688:
689: \subsection{Radial Velocity Variability in GV Tau S}\label{sec-gvts.binary}
690:
691: The stellar radial velocity of $\vlsr = 9.4 \pm1.7~\kms$ found for GV Tau S
692: differs from the $\vlsr$ observed in November 2001
693: \citep[$-6.2 \pm1.5~\kms$;][]{covey2006}, and the $\vlsr$ in December
694: 1999 \citep[$3.1 \pm4~\kms$, see Table 4;][]{white2004}. The $\vlsr$
695: reported here differs slightly from the $6.2 \pm0.5\kms$ velocity of
696: the Taurus molecular cloud in the vicinity of GV Tau, as measured in
697: the CO $J$=1-0 transition \citep{dame2001} and the $\vlsr= 7.0
698: \pm0.5~\kms$ measured for the gaseous envelope surrounding GV Tau
699: \citep{hogerheijde1998}.
700:
701: A plausible explanation for the radial velocity variations exhibited
702: by GV Tau S is that it is a spectroscopic binary with a secondary that
703: is sufficiently faint that it is undetectable in our spectra.
704: Assuming that the systemic velocity is that of the molecular cloud and
705: that the primary has the stellar properties ($\teff,M_*$) derived
706: earlier (\S~\ref{sec-gvts.stellprops}), the three reported radial
707: velocities for GV Tau S can be accounted for if GV Tau S possesses a
708: $\sim 0.13 \Msun$ companion in a $P_{\rm{orbit}}\sim 38$ day circular
709: orbit ($i=90, a=0.35$\,AU). A companion with this mass at the typical
710: age of Taurus sources ($\sim1-3$ Myr), would contribute a small
711: fraction (20\%) of the observed $K$ continuum. Its $K$-band spectral
712: features would appear only $\sim$2\% deep in the observed spectrum,
713: consistent with the apparent lack of such features in our observed
714: spectrum. The observed radial velocity variation and the $K$-band
715: spectrum are also consistent with smaller companion masses and orbital
716: separations. A larger stellar mass for the companion in a more face-on
717: orbit is ruled out since it would be detectable in our high
718: signal-to-noise spectra.
719:
720:
721: \subsection{Warm Molecular Absorption in GV Tau N}\label{sec-gvtn.mol.abs}
722:
723: \citet{gibb2007} previously reported absorption toward GV Tau S in the
724: HCN low-$J$ R and P lines near $3.0~\micron$, based on observations
725: made on 2006 February 17 and 18. The HCN absorption was characterized by
726: equivalent widths $\sim0.015~\invcm$, a radial velocity
727: $\vlsr=9.2\pm1.9~\kms$, and a rotational temperature of $T=115$~K. No
728: HCN absorption was reported toward GV Tau N in the \citet{gibb2007}
729: study. The wavelength coverage of our observations includes many of
730: the same lines that were observed by \citet{gibb2007} as well as
731: higher rotational lines.
732:
733: At the epoch of our observations, no HCN absorption was present toward
734: GV Tau S. However, HCN absorption was detected toward GV Tau N. The
735: absorption lines we detect toward GV Tau N have equivalent widths and
736: radial velocities similar to those reported by \citet{gibb2007} toward
737: GV Tau S.
738:
739: We find a higher temperature ($\sim550$~K) for the absorbing gas
740: toward GV Tau N, but this temperature is consistent with the relative
741: HCN line strengths observed by \citet{gibb2007}. Their lower
742: temperature was based on analysis of only low-$J$ lines (i.e., R1--R6,
743: P2--P7); warmer temperatures are indicated when the higher-$J$ lines
744: used in our analysis are included. Consistent with our results, HCN
745: absorption with properties similar to those reported here was also
746: detected toward GV Tau N (but not GV Tau S) in mid-infrared
747: observations made with TEXES on Gemini-North at an intermediate epoch
748: (November 2006; Najita et al., in preparation).
749:
750: These results may indicate that the molecular absorption toward both
751: components is variable. Indeed, both GV Tau N and S are found to
752: experience significant photometric variability in the $H$- through
753: $M$-bands and in the $3.1~\micron$ ice feature (Leinert et al.\ 2001).
754: The high temperature of the absorbing gas suggests that the gas is
755: located close to the star rather than in a distant circumbinary
756: envelope or the molecular cloud. So if variability accounts for the
757: difference in the absorption properties, we are likely to be observing
758: the variations in the near-circumstellar environment of each source,
759: rather than the motion of a distant absorber across our
760: line-of-sight. Such a distant absorber is believed to account for the
761: photometric variations in GV Tau S and perhaps variations in the ice
762: absorption \citep{leinert2001}.
763:
764: Another, more mundane, possibility is that the components of the
765: binary pair were misidentified by \citet{gibb2007}. The
766: interpretation that the warm molecular absorption is entirely
767: associated with GV Tau N would be consistent with the systematically
768: stronger $3.1~\micron$ ice feature measured toward this component, the
769: strong silicate absorption that is detected only toward GV Tau N (Van
770: Cleve et al.\ 1994), and the hypothesis from the literature that GV
771: Tau N is surrounded by an edge-on disk. Additional observations of
772: the GV Tau system would be useful in resolving this issue.
773:
774: Setting aside for now the possibility that the HCN absorption is time
775: variable, we can explore the nature of the absorbing gas that we
776: observed based on the stellar and circumstellar properties that we
777: have found for GV Tau N. As described at the beginning of this
778: section, the stellar velocity is blueshifted from the envelope
779: velocity by $\sim 11~\kms$. This suggests that the detected stellar
780: component of GV Tau N possesses an orbiting companion. If it does
781: not, at a velocity of $ 11~\kms$ relative to the envelope, the star
782: would travel 0.1 pc in $10^4$\,yr, escaping its molecular envelope on
783: a timescale much less than the age of the system. If GV Tau N is then
784: a binary, the envelope velocity is the more appropriate velocity
785: reference frame for the system. Another possibility is that the
786: stellar light is not seen directly, but rather in reflection against
787: material on the far side of the envelope that is infalling toward us
788: (S. Strom, private communication). In either interpretation, the
789: measured stellar velocity is not the systemic velocity.
790:
791: As also described at the beginning of this section, the radial
792: velocity of the HCN absorption is marginally different from that of
793: the GV Tau molecular envelope by $1.7\pm1.0~\kms$. The small velocity
794: difference allows for the possibility that some of the absorption
795: arises in gas that is infalling with respect to the envelope. Higher
796: spectral resolution observations (e.g., with TEXES; Najita et al., in
797: preparation) can better determine whether this is the case.
798:
799: In the meantime, we can consider two possible scenarios for the origin
800: of the HCN absorption: (1) Some fraction of the absorption arises in
801: gas infalling from the molecular envelope toward the star at $\sim
802: 2~\kms$ and/or (2) the absorption arises in warm gas in orbit around
803: the star.
804:
805: {\it Origin in an Envelope.} Since the bolometric luminosity of
806: the system is 7--9$\Lsun$ \citep{kenyon1995, furlan2007} and the
807: stellar contribution (photospheric and stellar accretion,
808: \S~\ref{sec-gvtn.stellprops} and \S~\ref{sec-brg.emis}) to the
809: luminosity is $\sim1.0\Lsun$, the residual disk and envelope accretion
810: is $L_{\rm acc} \sim6-8\Lsun$. The large residual accretion
811: luminosity compared to the stellar accretion luminosity for GV Tau N
812: inferred from the Br$\gamma$ emission ($\sim0.2\Lsun$;
813: \S~\ref{sec-brg.emis}) implies that the disk/envelope accretion rate
814: is much larger than the stellar accretion rate for GV Tau N, similar
815: to the results obtained for Class I sources by \citet{white2004}. For
816: accretion in a disk inward to a radius of $R_{\rm{in}}$, the disk
817: accretion luminosity $L_d=GM_*\Mdotdisk / 2R_{\rm{in}}$ of 7$\Lsun$
818: corresponds to a disk accretion rate of $\Mdotdisk \sim10^{-6}\Msunperyr$
819: for $R_{\rm{in}}=2.5 \Rsun$ and a stellar mass of $\Mstar = 0.8\Msun$.
820: In comparison, the spectral energy distributions of most of the Class
821: I sources in Taurus are fit with envelope accretion rates up to an
822: order of magnitude larger \citep{furlan2007}. A lower accretion rate
823: $\sim 10^{-6}\Msunperyr$ is more consistent with the weak envelope
824: emission and outflow activity associated with GV Tau.
825:
826: For the estimated mass of the stellar component(s) of GV Tau N
827: (0.8$\Msun$), the envelope infall velocity $v_r = (2GM_*/r)^{1/2}$ is
828: expected to be $\sim 2~\kms$ at distances of 360\,AU. In contrast,
829: models of gas in collapsing protostellar envelopes suggest that the
830: observed HCN temperature of $\sim 500$~K can be achieved only close to
831: the star, within 2\,AU given the accretion luminosity of the system
832: \citep[][their figure 4]{ceccarelli1996}, i.e., well within the
833: distance of 360\,AU that would be inferred for the infalling gas based
834: on its velocity relative to the molecular envelope. It therefore
835: appears unlikely that most of the absorption could arise in an
836: infalling envelope unless there are additional heating processes for
837: the infalling gas beyond those considered in
838: \citet{ceccarelli1996}.
839: If other heating processes, such as oblique shocks, can heat distant
840: material to $\sim 500$\,K, the warm molecular absorption that we
841: observe could also arise in a distant, non-infalling envelope. However,
842: the lack of molecular absorption observed toward GV Tau S argues
843: against the gas originating from a distant envelope which would surround both GV Tau N and S.
844:
845: An alternative scenario is that GV Tau N is a single star and its
846: measured stellar velocity is the appropriate systemic velocity. In
847: this case, at a distance 2\,AU from the star, the radial component of
848: the infall velocity would be $(G\Mstar/r)^{1/2} \sim $20~$\kms$
849: \citep{cassen1981} for the estimated stellar mass of GV Tau N. This
850: is similar to the $13~\kms$ velocity difference between the HCN
851: absorption and GV Tau N stellar photosphere (Table 4). If GV Tau N is
852: a single star, it is then moving relative to the molecular envelope
853: and, as already discussed above, it will travel $\sim 0.1$\,pc in
854: $<10^4$\,yr. It then seems unlikely that the star and the envelope
855: are physically associated, which makes it difficult to account for the
856: origin of the infalling gas in this scenario.
857:
858: {\it Origin in a Circumstellar Disk.} Another possibility is that
859: the HCN absorption arises in the heated atmosphere of a gaseous disk
860: \citep[see also][]{gibb2007}. Models of the chemistry of the inner
861: regions of circumstellar disks predict that HCN will be abundant at
862: radial distances of a few AU \citep{markwick2002}. Models of the
863: thermal structure of disk atmospheres further predict that the disk
864: surface will reach temperatures $\gtrsim 500$\,K at distances of a few
865: AU \citep[e.g.,][]{glassgold2004}. If the disk in the GV Tau N system
866: is viewed edge-on, as hypothesized in the literature
867: \citep{menard1993,vancleve1994}, it seems plausible that the warm HCN
868: absorption could arise in the disk atmosphere seen in absorption
869: against the warmer, inner region of the disk that produces the
870: $L$-band continuum.
871:
872: The rarity of such a line--of--sight through a disk may also explain
873: another unusual characteristic of GV Tau: the low CO$_2$ ice
874: absorption optical depth toward the source compared to its silicate
875: optical depth. The data of \citet{furlan2007} show that the peak
876: 10~$\micron$ silicate optical depth is $\sim9$ times the peak optical
877: depth of the 15.2~$\micron$ CO$_2$ ice absorption. All other Taurus
878: Class I sources in the Furlan sample have $\tau_{\rm
879: silicate}/\tau_{\rm CO_2} \lesssim 4$, with the exception of DG Tau B,
880: another possible edge-on source. A high ratio of $\tau_{\rm
881: silicate}/\tau_{\rm CO_2}$ may occur if a substantial fraction of the
882: silicate optical depth is produced in a warm disk region in which
883: CO$_2$ ice has sublimated.
884:
885: GV Tau N would be a spectroscopic binary in this scenario, in order to
886: account for the difference in radial velocity between the stellar
887: photosphere and the warm molecular absorption. Because the warm HCN
888: absorption is approximately at rest relative to the molecular envelope
889: velocity, in this scenario it would arise in a {\it circumbinary} disk
890: seen edge-on. In contrast, the CO overtone emission, which is found
891: to share the radial velocity of the stellar photosphere, arises from
892: the {\it circumstellar} disk of the primary component.
893:
894: \subsection{Comparison to IRS 46}
895:
896: Strong absorption by gaseous warm organic molecules appears to occur
897: rarely among low mass young stars. GV Tau and another source, IRS 46,
898: are the only systems in which such absorption has been reported to
899: date. IRS 46 is a low-mass YSO with a spectral energy distribution
900: that indicates either a Class I source or a Class II source viewed
901: nearly edge-on \citep{lahuis2006}. IRS 46 is similar to GV Tau N in
902: that it also shows Br$\gamma$ and 2.3~$\micron$ CO overtone emission \citep[see YLW 16B in][]{doppmann2005} and strong absorption by gaseous warm organic
903: molecules in the $L$-band and at mid-infared wavelengths \citep[CO,
904: HCN, C$_2$H$_2$, CO$_2$;][]{lahuis2006}. The temperature
905: ($\sim400$~K) and equivalent width of the HCN absorption are similar
906: to that observed toward GV Tau N. Unlike GV Tau N, the warm HCN
907: absorption in IRS 46 ($\vlsr = -20~\kms$) shows a large velocity
908: offset from the surrounding molecular cloud ($\vlsr = 4.4~\kms$, Table
909: 4). In contrast to the situation for GV Tau N, the stellar radial
910: velocity of IRS 46 is unknown. If the system is at the cloud
911: velocity, the warm molecular absorption is {\it blueshifted} from the
912: system by $24~\kms$. \citet{lahuis2006} speculated that the warm
913: molecular absorption in IRS 46 arises in the inner region of a
914: circumstellar disk, possibly at the footpoint of an outflowing disk
915: wind in order to account for the presumed blueshift of the absorption.
916: This scenario is consistent with the interpretation of the spectral
917: energy distribution as indicating a disk system viewed edge-on. Our
918: ``disk origin'' scenario for GV Tau N is similar to the explanation
919: given by \citet{lahuis2006} for the HCN absorption in IRS 46. In both
920: cases, the warm molecular absorption arises in a disk,
921: although there is no outflow component to the flow in the case of GV
922: Tau N.
923:
924: \section{Summary and Conclusions}
925:
926: We have used spatially resolved $K$- and $L$-band spectroscopy to
927: characterize the stellar and circumstellar properties of the GV Tau
928: binary system. We find that GV Tau S is a radial velocity variable,
929: possibly the result of an unseen low-mass companion. The radial
930: velocities measured here and in the literature, when combined with the
931: apparent absence of the spectral signature of a companion in our
932: $K$-band spectra, are consistent with a companion with $M_*< 0.15
933: \Msun$ and $a< 0.35$\,AU. Further spectroscopic monitoring of this
934: source would be useful to confirm our interpretation and to better
935: constrain the companion properties.
936:
937: The other component of the binary system, GV Tau N, is found to show
938: strong CO overtone emission, strong $K$-band veiling ($\rk=12-15$),
939: and Br$\gamma$ emission with a blue-shifted emission centroid;
940: signatures consistent with a young actively accreting star. From the
941: presence of apparent stellar absorption features in the 2-0 CO
942: overtone bandhead and the 2.2~$\micron$ Na emission features, we infer
943: a late spectral type ($\teff \sim 4100$~K) and a stellar radial
944: velocity of $\vlsr = -4.5~\kms$. The warm ($T=550$\,K) HCN absorption
945: found toward GV Tau N in the $L$-band spectrum of this source is
946: offset in velocity by $\sim 13~\kms$ relative to the star and $\sim
947: 2~\kms$ relative to the GV Tau molecular envelope. The large velocity
948: of the star relative to its molecular envelope would cause it to
949: escape the molecular envelope on a timescale much shorter than its age
950: unless the star is a spectroscopic binary.
951:
952: The small redshift ($1.7\pm 1.0~\kms$) of the warm molecular
953: absorption relative to the molecular envelope velocity (assumed to be
954: the systemic velocity) suggests that most of the absorption arises in a disk atmosphere viewed close to edge on, although an
955: origin in the molecular envelope is not ruled out completely. This
956: interpretation can be tested with further observations of GV Tau N.
957: Observations at higher spectral resolution can better constrain the
958: radial velocity of the absorbing gas relative to the systemic
959: velocity. Observations that explore the molecular abundances of the
960: absorbing gas may also be useful in testing a disk origin for the
961: absorption.
962:
963: \acknowledgments
964:
965: The authors wish to recognize and acknowledge the very significant
966: cultural role and reverence that the summit of Mauna Kea has always
967: had within the indigenous Hawaiian community. We are most fortunate
968: to have the opportunity to conduct observations from this mountain.
969: We thank Al Conrad and other Keck Observatory staff who provided
970: support and assistance during our NIRSPEC run. We thank Sean Brittain
971: for sharing results from \citet{gibb2007} in advance of publication.
972: We thank Elise Furlan for information on the silicate and CO$_2$ ice
973: optical depths of Taurus Class I sources in advance of publication.
974: Nathan Crockett contributed helpful advice on data-reduction
975: strategies. Financial support for this work was provided by the NASA
976: Origins of Solar Systems program and the NASA Astrobiology Institute
977: under Cooperative Agreement No.\ CAN-02-OSS-02 issued through the
978: Office of Space Science. This work was also supported by the Life and
979: Planets Astrobiology Center (LAPLACE).
980:
981: %% To help institutions obtain information on the effectiveness of their
982: %% telescopes, the AAS Journals has created a group of keywords for telescope
983: %% facilities. A common set of keywords will make these types of searches
984: %% significantly easier and more accurate. In addition, they will also be
985: %% useful in linking papers together which utilize the same telescopes
986: %% within the framework of the National Virtual Observatory.
987: %% See the AASTeX Web site at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX
988: %% for information on obtaining the facility keywords.
989:
990: %% After the acknowledgments section, use the following syntax and the
991: %% \facility{} macro to list the keywords of facilities used in the research
992: %% for the paper. Each keyword will be checked against the master list during
993: %% copy editing. Individual instruments can be provided in parentheses,
994: %% after the keyword, but they will not be verified.
995:
996: {\it Facility:} \facility{Keck:II(NIRSPEC)}.
997:
998: %% Appendix material should be preceded with a single \appendix command.
999: %% There should be a \section command for each appendix. Mark appendix
1000: %% subsections with the same markup you use in the main body of the paper.
1001:
1002: %% Each Appendix (indicated with \section) will be lettered A, B, C, etc.
1003: %% The equation counter will reset when it encounters the \appendix
1004: %% command and will number appendix equations (A1), (A2), etc.
1005:
1006:
1007:
1008: %\clearpage
1009:
1010: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.
1011: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.
1012: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of
1013: %% curly braces. If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error
1014: %% "Perhaps a misrg \item?".
1015: %%
1016: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite
1017: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a
1018: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds
1019: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).
1020: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the
1021: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain
1022: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in
1023: %% place of the \cite commands.
1024:
1025: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.
1026: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.
1027: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.
1028:
1029: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly
1030: %% different from previous examples. The natbib system solves a host
1031: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly
1032: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.
1033: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options
1034:
1035:
1036:
1037: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1038:
1039: \bibitem[Adams et al.(1987)Adams, Lada, \& Shu]{adams1987} Adams, F.~C., Lada, C.~J., \& Shu, F.~H.\ 1987, \apj, 312, 788
1040: \bibitem[Baraffe et al.(1998)Baraffe, Chabrier, Allard, \& Hauschildt]{baraffe1998} Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F., \& Hauschildt, P.~H.\ 1998, \aap, 337, 403
1041: \bibitem[Beck et al.(2007)]{beck2007} Beck, T.~L., McGregor, P.J., Takami, M., \& Pyo, T.S. \ 2007, astroph \#0711.3844
1042: \bibitem[Bertout et al.(1999)]{bertout1999} Bertout, C., Robichon, N., \& Arenou, F.\ 1999, \aap, 352, 574
1043: \bibitem[Brice{\~n}o et al.(2002)]{briceno2002} Brice{\~n}o, C., Luhman, K.~L., Hartmann, L., Stauffer, J.~R., \& Kirkpatrick, J.~D.\ 2002, \apj, 580, 317
1044: \bibitem[Carr(1993)]{carr1993} Carr, J.~S.\ 1993, \apj, 406, 553 \bibitem[Carr et al.(2004)]{carr2004} Carr, J.~S., Tokunaga, A.~T., \& Najita, J.\ 2004, \apj, 603, 213
1045: \bibitem[Cassen \& Moosman(1981)]{cassen1981} Cassen, P., \& Moosman, A.\ 1981, Icarus, 48, 353
1046: \bibitem[Ceccarelli et al.(1996)]{ceccarelli1996} Ceccarelli, C., Hollenbach, D.~J., \& Tielens, A.~G.~G.~M.\ 1996, \apj, 471, 400
1047: \bibitem[Chandler et al.(2005)]{chandler2005} Chandler, C.~J., Brogan, C.~L., Shirley, Y.~L., \& Loinard, L.\ 2005, \apj, 632, 371
1048: \bibitem[Covey et al.(2006)]{covey2006} Covey, K.~R., Greene, T.~P., Doppmann, G.~W., \& Lada, C.~J.\ 2006, \aj, 131, 512
1049: \bibitem[Dame et al.(2001)]{dame2001} Dame, T.~M., Hartmann, D., \& Thaddeus, P.\ 2001, \apj, 547, 792
1050: \bibitem[Devine et al.(1999)]{devine1999} Devine, D., Reipurth, B., Bally, J., \& Balonek, T.~J.\ 1999, \aj, 117, 2931
1051: \bibitem[Doppmann et al.(2005)]{doppmann2005} Doppmann, G.~W., Greene, T.~P., Covey, K.~R., \& Lada, C.~J.\ 2005, \aj, 130, 1145
1052: \bibitem[Doppmann et al.(2003)]{doppmann2003} Doppmann, G.~W., Jaffe, D.~T., \& White, R.~J.\ 2003, \aj, 126, 3043
1053: \bibitem[Folha \& Emerson(2001)]{folha2001} Folha, D.~F.~M., \& Emerson, J.~P.\ 2001, \aap, 365, 90
1054: \bibitem[Furlan et al.(2007)]{furlan2007} Furlan et al. 2007, in press, \apjs
1055: \bibitem[Gibb et al.(2007)]{gibb2007} Gibb, E.~L., Van Brunt, K.~A., Brittain, S.~D., \& Rettig, T.~W.\ 2007, \apj, 660, 1572
1056: \bibitem[Hauschildt et al.(1999)Hauschildt, Allard, \& Baron]{hauschildt1999} Hauschildt P. H., Allard, F. \& Baron, E. 1999, \apj, 512, 377
1057: \bibitem[Hogerheijde et al.(1998)]{hogerheijde1998} Hogerheijde, M.~R., van Dishoeck, E.~F., Blake, G.~A., \& van Langevelde, H.~J.\ 1998, \apj, 502, 315
1058: \bibitem[Hoffmeister et al.(2006)]{hoffmeister2006} Hoffmeister, V.~H., Chini, R., Scheyda, C.~M., N{\"u}rnberger, D., Vogt, N., \& Nielbock, M.\ 2006, \aap, 457, L29
1059: \bibitem[Hollenbach et al.(1995)]{hollenbach1995} Hollenbach, D.~J., Ceccarelli, C., Neufeld, D.~A., \& Tielens, A.~G.~G.~M.\ 1995, From Gas to Stars to Dust, 73, 243
1060: \bibitem[Glassgold et al.(2004)]{glassgold2004} Glassgold, A.~E., Najita, J., \& Igea, J.\ 2004, \apj, 615, 972
1061: \bibitem[Goodrich(1986)]{goodrich1986} Goodrich, R.~W.\ 1986, \aj, 92, 885
1062: \bibitem[Gullbring et al.(1998)]{gullbring1998} Gullbring, E., Hartmann, L., Briceno, C., \& Calvet, N.\ 1998, \apj, 492, 323
1063: \bibitem[Kenyon \& Hartmann(1995)]{kenyon1995} Kenyon, S.~J.~\& Hartmann, L.\ 1995, \apjs, 101, 117
1064: \bibitem[Koresko et al.(1999)]{koresko1999} Koresko, C.~D., Blake, G.~A., Brown, M.~E., Sargent, A.~I., \& Koerner, D.~W.\ 1999, \apjl, 525, L49
1065: \bibitem[Koresko(1998)]{koresko1998} Koresko, C.~D.\ 1998, \apjl, 507, L145
1066: \bibitem[Koresko et al.(1997)]{koresko1997} Koresko, C.~D., Herbst, T.~M., \& Leinert, C.\ 1997, \apj, 480, 741
1067: \bibitem[Kurucz(1993)]{kurucz1993} Kurucz, R.\ 1993, ATLAS9 Stellar Atmosphere Programs and 2 km/s grid.~Kurucz CD-ROM No.~13.~Cambridge, Mass.: Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, 1993., 13
1068: \bibitem[Kurucz \& Bell(1995)]{kurucz1995} Kurucz, R.~L., \& Bell, B.\ 1995, Kurucz CD-ROM, Cambridge, MA: Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, |c1995, April 15, 1995
1069: \bibitem[Lahuis et al.(2006)]{lahuis2006} Lahuis, F., et al.\ 2006, \apjl, 636, L145
1070: \bibitem[Livingston \& Wallace(1991)]{livingston1991} Livingston, W., \& Wallace, L.\ 1991, NSO Technical Report, Tucson: National Solar Observatory, National Optical Astronomy Observatory, 1991
1071: \bibitem[Leinert et al.(2001)]{leinert2001} Leinert, C., Beck, T.~L., Ligori, S., Simon, M., Woitas, J., \& Howell, R.~R.\ 2001, \aap, 369, 215
1072: \bibitem[Leinert \& Haas(1989)]{leinert1989} Leinert, C., \& Haas, M.\ 1989, \apjl, 342, L39
1073: \bibitem[Luhman \& Rieke(1999)]{luhman1999} Luhman, K.~L., \& Rieke, G.~H.\ 1999, \apj, 525, 440
1074: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(1998)]{luhman1998} Luhman, K.~L., Rieke, G.~H., Lada, C.~J., \& Lada, E.~A.\ 1998, \apj, 508, 347
1075: \bibitem[McLean et al.(1998)]{mclean1998} McLean, I. S. et al. 1998, \procspie, 3354, 566
1076: \bibitem[Markwick et al.(2002)]{markwick2002} Markwick, A.~J., Ilgner, M., Millar, T.~J., \& Henning, T.\ 2002, \aap, 385, 632
1077: \bibitem[Massey(1997)]{massey1997} Massey, P.\ 1997 A User's Guide to CCD reductions with \textit{IRAF}, National Optical Astronomy Observatory
1078: \bibitem[Massey et al.(1992)Massey, Valdes, \& Barnes]{massey1992} Massey, P., Valdes, F., Barnes, J. 1992 A Users's Guide to Reducing Slit Spectra with \textit{IRAF}, National Optical Astronomy Observatory
1079: \bibitem[Menard et al.(1993)]{menard1993} Menard, F., Monin, J.-L., Angelucci, F., \& Rouan, D.\ 1993, \apjl, 414, L117
1080: \bibitem[Movsessian \& Magakian(1999)]{movsessian1999} Movsessian, T.~A., \& Magakian, T.~Y.\ 1999, \aap, 347, 266
1081: \bibitem[Muzerolle et al.(1998a)]{muzerolle1998a} Muzerolle, J., Calvet, N., \& Hartmann, L.\ 1998a, \apj, 492, 743
1082: \bibitem[Muzerolle et al.(1998b)Muzerolle, Hartmann, \& Calvet]{muzerolle1998b} Muzerolle, J., Hartmann, L., \& Calvet, N.\ 1998b, \aj, 116, 2965
1083: \bibitem[Najita et al.(1996)]{najita1996} Najita, J., Carr, J.~S., Glassgold, A.~E., Shu, F.~H., \& Tokunaga, A.~T.\ 1996, \apj, 462, 919
1084: \bibitem[Reipurth et al.(2004)]{reipurth2004} Reipurth, B., Rodr{\'{\i}}guez, L.~F., Anglada, G., \& Bally, J.\ 2004, \aj, 127, 1736
1085: \bibitem[Rothman et al.(1998)]{rothman1998} Rothman, L.~S., et al.\ 1998, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 60, 665
1086: \bibitem[Royer et al.(2002)]{royer2002} Royer, F., Grenier, S., Baylac, M.-O., G{\'o}mez, A.~E., \& Zorec, J.\ 2002, \aap, 393, 897
1087: \bibitem[Scoville et al.(1983)Scoville, Kleinmann, Hall, \& Ridgway]{scoville1983} Scoville, N., Kleinmann, S.~G., Hall, D.~N.~B., \& Ridgway, S.~T.\ 1983, \apj, 275, 201
1088: \bibitem[Siess et al.(2000)]{siess2000} Siess, L., Dufour, E., \& Forestini, M.\ 2000, \aap, 358, 593
1089: \bibitem[Sneden(1973)]{sneden1973} Sneden, C. 1973 PhD Thesis, University of Texas at Austin
1090: \bibitem[Stapelfeldt et al.(1998)]{stapelfeldt1998} Stapelfeldt, K.~R., Krist, J.~E., Menard, F., Bouvier, J., Padgett, D.~L., \& Burrows, C.~J.\ 1998, \apjl, 502, L65
1091: \bibitem[Stojimirovi{\'c} et al.(2007)]{stojimirovic2007} Stojimirovi{\'c}, I., Narayanan, G., \& Snell, R.~L.\ 2007, \apj, 660, 418
1092: \bibitem[Strom et al.(1986)]{strom1986} Strom, K.~M., Strom, S.~E., Wolff, S.~C., Morgan, J., \& Wenz, M.\ 1986, \apjs, 62, 39
1093: \bibitem[Terebey et al.(1984)]{terebey1984} Terebey, S., Shu, F.~H., \& Cassen, P.\ 1984, \apj, 286, 529
1094: \bibitem[Van Cleve et al.(1994)]{vancleve1994} Van Cleve, J.~E., Hayward, T.~L., Miles, J.~W., Gull, G.~E., Schoenwald, J., \& Houck, J.~R.\ 1994, \apss, 212, 231
1095: \bibitem[White \& Hillenbrand(2004)]{white2004} White, R.~J., \& Hillenbrand, L.~A.\ 2004, \apj, 616, 998
1096: \bibitem[Whitney et al.(1997)Whitney, Kenyon, \& Gomez]{whitney1997} Whitney, B.~A., Kenyon, S.~J., \& Gomez, M.\ 1997, \apj, 485, 703
1097: \bibitem[Whittet et al.(1988)]{whittet1988} Whittet, D.~C.~B., Bode, M.~F., Longmore, A.~J., Adamson, A.~J., McFadzean, A.~D., Aitken, D.~K., \& Roche, P.~F.\ 1988, \mnras, 233, 321
1098:
1099:
1100: \end{thebibliography}
1101:
1102:
1103: \clearpage
1104: % TABLES
1105:
1106:
1107: \input{tab1.tex}
1108:
1109: \input{tab2.tex}
1110:
1111: \input{tab3.tex}
1112:
1113: \input{tab4.tex}
1114:
1115: \clearpage
1116:
1117: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
1118: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
1119: %% To embed the sample graphics in
1120: %% the file, uncomment the \plotone, \plottwo, and
1121: %% \includegraphics commands
1122: %%
1123: %% If you need a layout that cannot be achieved with \plotone or
1124: %% \plottwo, you can invoke the graphicx package directly with the
1125: %% \includegraphics command or use \plotfiddle. For more information,
1126: %% please see the tutorial on "Using Electronic Art with AASTeX" in the
1127: %% documentation section at the AASTeX Web site,
1128: %% http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX.
1129: %%
1130: %% The examples below also include sample markup for submission of
1131: %% supplemental electronic materials. As always, be sure to check
1132: %% the instructions to authors for the journal you are submitting to
1133: %% for specific submissions guidelines as they vary from
1134: %% journal to journal.
1135:
1136:
1137: %% This example uses \plotone to include an EPS file scaled to
1138: %% 80% of its natural size with \epsscale. Its caption
1139: %% has been written to indicate that additional figure parts will be
1140: %% available in the electronic journal.
1141:
1142:
1143:
1144:
1145: % FIGURES & CAPTIONS
1146:
1147:
1148: % figure 1a
1149:
1150: \begin{figure}
1151: %\epsscale{0.80}
1152: \plotone{f1a.eps}
1153: \caption
1154: {\label{fig-kband.ord33}
1155: Simultaneous spectra of GV Tau N (top) and GV Tau S (bottom) in the
1156: $K$-band in order 33 (Fig. \ref{fig-kband.ord33}a), order 34
1157: (Fig. \ref{fig-kband.ord33}b), order 35 (Fig. \ref{fig-kband.ord33}c),
1158: order 36 (Fig. \ref{fig-kband.ord33}d), and in the $L$-band order 25
1159: (Fig. \ref{fig-kband.ord33}e). The relative flux ratio (f$_{\rm
1160: {South}}$/f$_{\rm {North}}$) of the two components is $\sim$0.7 (order
1161: 33, Fig. \ref{fig-kband.ord33}a), 0.74 (order 34,
1162: Fig. \ref{fig-kband.ord33}b), 0.85 (order 35,
1163: Fig. \ref{fig-kband.ord33}c), $\sim$1.0 (order 36,
1164: Fig. \ref{fig-kband.ord33}d), and 0.45 (order 25,
1165: Fig. \ref{fig-kband.ord33}e). The $K$-band orders show emission
1166: features in both objects, while absorption lines dominate the spectra
1167: in GV Tau S. The $L$-band spectrum of GV Tau N
1168: (Fig. \ref{fig-kband.ord33}e) shows strong P-branch absorption lines of
1169: HCN (red tick marks, labeled) and several weaker C$_2$H$_2$ lines
1170: (blue tick marks), while these features are absent in GV Tau S.
1171: Spectral regions with poor telluric transmission have been excised
1172: from Fig. \ref{fig-kband.ord33}e.
1173: }
1174: \end{figure}
1175: \clearpage
1176: {\plotone{f1b.eps}}
1177: \centerline{Fig. 1b. --- Continued.}
1178: %\label{fig-kband.ord34}
1179: \clearpage
1180: {\plotone{f1c.eps}}
1181: \centerline{Fig. 1c. --- Continued.}
1182: %\label{fig-kband.ord35}
1183: \clearpage
1184: {\plotone{f1d.eps}}
1185: \centerline{Fig. 1d. --- Continued.}
1186: %\label{fig-kband.ord36}
1187: \clearpage
1188: {\plotone{f1e.eps}}
1189: \centerline{Fig. 1e. --- Continued.}
1190: %\label{fig-lband.ord25}
1191:
1192:
1193:
1194: \clearpage
1195: % figure 2
1196:
1197: \begin{figure}
1198: %\epsscale{0.80}
1199: \plotone{f2.eps}
1200: \caption
1201: {\label{fig-kband.gvts.modelfit}
1202: Two regions of the $K$-band of GV Tau S (black histogram) that show
1203: stellar photospheric absorption lines. A spectral synthesis model
1204: (dotted blue) with $\teff$=3800~K, $\logg$ = 4.0, $\vsini$ = 24~$\kms$
1205: (includes instrumental broadening), along with a veiling of $\rk$ =
1206: 2.5 fits the spectrum. The model fit in the top panel is at a radial
1207: velocity of $\vlsr$ = 9.1 $\kms$ (see Table 1).}
1208: \end{figure}
1209:
1210: % figure 3
1211:
1212: \begin{figure}
1213: %\epsscale{0.80}
1214: \plotone{f3.eps}
1215: \caption
1216: {\label{fig-kband.gvts.modelco}
1217: The CO overtone spectral region of GV Tau S (black histogram) showing
1218: both emission and absorption components. We fit the observed spectrum
1219: using a model of disk emission and stellar photospheric absorption
1220: components at the same radial velocity. Our disk emission model
1221: (dashed red line) has the properties: $\vsini$~(inner~edge) =
1222: 88~$\kms$, $R_o/R_i$~=~7, $T = 3500~(r/R_i)^{-0.5}$~K, $\Sigma =
1223: 0.5~(r/R_i)^{-0.5}\gsqcm$, where $r$ is the disk radius. The stellar
1224: model (dotted blue line) has a temperature $\teff$=3800~K, gravity
1225: $\logg$ =4.0, rotation $\vsini=24~\kms$, and veiling $\rk =2.6$. The
1226: radial velocity of the model fit ($\vlsr= 9.4~\kms$) is consistent
1227: with the stellar radial velocity of GV Tau S reported in Table 4. The
1228: stellar model used in the fit is consistent with the fit to the Na and
1229: Mg/Al regions (Fig. \ref{fig-kband.gvts.modelfit}). The combined disk
1230: emission and photospheric absorption model (solid green) is a
1231: reasonable fit to the observed spectrum.}
1232: \end{figure}
1233:
1234: % figure 4
1235:
1236: \begin{figure}
1237: %\epsscale{0.80}
1238: \plotone{f4.eps}
1239: \caption
1240: {\label{fig-kband.gvtn.modelco}
1241: The observed $\nu$=2-0 CO spectrum of GV Tau N (black histogram) also
1242: showing both emission and absorption components. A model of CO emission
1243: from a rotating disk (dashed red line) is constructed from the
1244: following parameters: $\vsini$~(inner~edge) = 95~$\kms$, $R_o/R_i$~=~7, $T
1245: = 3000~(r/R_i)^{-0.35}$~K,~$\Sigma = 2.0~(r/R_i)^{-0.5}\gsqcm$, where
1246: $r$ is the disk radius. The disk model is combined with a model of
1247: stellar photospheric CO absorption (dotted blue line) at the same
1248: radial velocity having the physical parameters $\teff$ = 4100~K,
1249: $\logg$ =4.0, $\vsini$ =15~$\kms$, and $\rk$ = 12.0. At
1250: $\vlsr=-4.5\kms$ (Table 4), the combination (solid green), is a
1251: reasonable fit to the observed CO feature in GV Tau N.}
1252: \end{figure}
1253:
1254:
1255: % figure 5
1256:
1257: \begin{figure}
1258: %\epsscale{0.80}
1259: \plotone{f5.eps}
1260: \caption
1261: {\label{fig-kband.gvtn.modelna}
1262: High resolution (R = 24,000) spectrum of GV Tau N (black histogram)
1263: with a stellar photospheric model fit (dotted blue) to the absorption
1264: component that appears to be present within the broad emission
1265: observed in the Na region of the $K$-band. The Na absorption component
1266: is reasonably fit with the same stellar parameters used in modeling
1267: the CO region (Fig. $\ref{fig-kband.gvtn.modelco}$; $\teff$=4100~K,
1268: $\logg$=4.0, $\vsini=15\kms$, and $\vlsr=-4.5\kms$) and with veiling
1269: $\rk=15$. The emission spectrum (red histogram), obtained by
1270: subtracting the model absorption from the observed spectrum, reveals
1271: broad emission in the Na lines and possibly the Si line.}
1272: \end{figure}
1273:
1274: % figure 6
1275:
1276: \begin{figure}
1277: %\epsscale{0.80}
1278: \plotone{f6.eps}
1279: \caption
1280: {\label{fig-kband.brg}
1281: Resolved Br$\gamma$ emission profiles for GV Tau S (top), and GV Tau N
1282: (bottom). Zero velocity is defined as the stellar velocity, traced by
1283: the radial velocity of $K$-band absorption lines (Table 4). The
1284: vertical dashed lines show the respective velocity centroids of the
1285: Br$\gamma$ feature, while the solid horizontal lines illustrate the
1286: feature width (FWHM). The velocity centroid relative to the stellar
1287: velocity is blueshifted by 5.7 and 12.5~$\kms$ for GV Tau S and N,
1288: respectively (Table 1 and 2).}
1289: \end{figure}
1290:
1291: % figure 7
1292:
1293: \begin{figure}
1294: \epsscale{0.80}
1295: \plotone{f7.eps}
1296: \caption
1297: {\label{fig-gvtau.h2emis}
1298: Spectral images of both components of GV Tau showing extended H$_2$
1299: emission. The S(0) 1-0 emission (2.2233~$\micron$, top) and the S(2)
1300: 1-0 emission (2.0338~$\micron$, bottom) are observed at the positions
1301: of both GV Tau S and GV Tau N. In both images, a bright knot of
1302: emission is also clearly present 6$\farcs$5 south of the GV Tau S
1303: spectral trace.}
1304: \end{figure}
1305:
1306: % figure 8
1307:
1308: \begin{figure}
1309: \epsscale{1}
1310: \plotone{f8.eps}
1311: \caption
1312: {\label{fig-lband.gvtn.modelhcn}
1313: $L$-band spectra of GV Tau N and the telluric standard, HR 1412 (black
1314: histograms) in the topocentric velocity frame where the observed HCN
1315: lines (red tickmarks) are redshifted by $35.3\kms$. Spectral regions
1316: with poor telluric cancelation have been excised from the GV Tau N
1317: spectrum. The blue tickmarks denote the expected positions of
1318: $C_2H_2$ lines ($\nu _3$ and $\nu _2 +(\nu _4 + \nu _5)^0_+$, lower
1319: and upper sets, respectively). A synthetic model of HCN absorption in
1320: a disk with temperature $T$ = 550 K and column density $N=1.5\times
1321: 10^{17}$cm$^{-2}$ (green line) provides a good fit to the
1322: observations.}
1323: \end{figure}
1324:
1325: % figure 9
1326:
1327: \begin{figure}
1328: %\epsscale{0.80}
1329: \vspace*{-17mm}
1330: \plotone{f9.eps}
1331: \caption
1332: {\label{fig-gvtn.hcnprofile}
1333: HCN absorption lines in GV Tau N in spectral regions with atmospheric
1334: transmission $\ge$ 70\% (P11, P14, P15, and P16 transitions, thin blue
1335: lines) averaged together (thick black line) and fit with a Gaussian
1336: profile (dashed red). The velocity centroid and 1-$\sigma$ error of
1337: the Gaussian fit to the average profile is $8.7 \pm 0.3~\kms$
1338: ($\vlsr$).}
1339: \end{figure}
1340:
1341:
1342:
1343:
1344:
1345:
1346:
1347:
1348: \end{document}
1349: