1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %%% PASJ LaTeX template for draft(body)<2001/02/08>
3: %%%
4: %%% IMPORTANT NOTICE FOR AUTHORS
5: %%% 1. ``\draft'' creates single column and double spaces format.
6: %%% 2. If you comment out ``\draft'', the output will be double column
7: %%% and single space.
8: %%% 3. For cross-references, the use of \label/\ref/\cite and the
9: %%% thebibliography environment is strongly recommended
10: %%% 4. Do NOT use \def/\renewcommand.
11: %%% 5. Do NOT redifine commands provided by PASJ00.cls.
12: %%%
13: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
14: \documentclass{pasj00}
15:
16: %\draft
17:
18: \SetRunningHead{Y. Takeda et al.}{Stellar Parameters and
19: Elemental Abundances of Late-G Giants}
20: \Received{2008/02/26}%{yyyy/mm/dd}
21: \Accepted{2008/05/07}%{yyyy/mm/dd}
22:
23: \begin{document}
24:
25: \title{Stellar Parameters and Elemental Abundances of Late-G Giants
26: \thanks{Based on observations carried out at Okayama Astrophysical
27: Observatory (Okayama, Japan).}
28: \thanks{While the large datasets separately provided in the machine-readable
29: form (electronic tables E1, E2, and E3) will be available in the electronic
30: edition of PASJ upon publication, they are also downloadable from the web site
31: of $\langle$http://optik2.mtk.nao.ac.jp/\~{ }takeda/gg300/$\rangle$. }
32: }
33:
34: %%% begin:list of authors
35: % Do NOT capitalize all letters in "textsc".
36: \author{Yoichi \textsc{Takeda}}
37: \affil{National Astronomical Observatory, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588}
38: \email{takeda.yoichi@nao.ac.jp}
39:
40: \author{Bun'ei \textsc{Sato}}
41: \affil{Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8550}
42: \email{sato.b.aa@m.titech.ac.jp}
43:
44: \and
45:
46: \author{Daisuke \textsc {Murata}}
47: \affil{Graduate School of Science and Technology, Kobe University,
48: 1-1 Rokkodai, Nada, Kobe 657-8501}
49: \email{dmurata@harbor.scitec.kobe-u.ac.jp}
50: %%% end:list of authors
51:
52: %% `\KeyWords{}' always has to be placed before `\maketitle'.
53: %\KeyWords{xxxx:xxxx ......} %Do NOT move this preamble from here!
54: \KeyWords{stars: abundances ---
55: stars: atmospheres --- stars: fundamental parameters ---
56: stars: late-type
57: }
58:
59: \maketitle
60:
61: \begin{abstract}
62: The properties of 322 intermediate-mass late-G giants (comprising 10
63: planet-host stars) selected as the targets of Okayama Planet Search Program,
64: many of which are red-clump giants, were comprehensively investigated
65: by establishing their various stellar parameters
66: (atmospheric parameters including turbulent velocity fields,
67: metallicity, luminosity, mass, age, projected rotational velocity, etc.),
68: and their photospheric chemical abundances for 17 elements,
69: in order to study their mutual dependence, connection with the existence
70: of planets, and possible evolution-related characteristics.
71: The metallicity distribution of planet-host giants was found to be
72: almost the same as that of non-planet-host giants, making marked
73: contrast to the case of planet-host dwarfs tending to be metal-rich.
74: Generally, the metallicities of these comparatively young (typical age of
75: $\sim 10^{9}$~yr) giants tend to be somewhat lower than those of dwarfs at
76: the same age, and super-metal-rich ([Fe/H] $>$ 0.2) giants appear to be lacking.
77: Apparent correlations were found between the abundances of C, O, and Na,
78: suggesting that the surface compositions of these elements have undergone
79: appreciable changes due to dredge-up of H-burning products by
80: evolution-induced deep envelope mixing which becomes more efficient
81: for higher-mass stars.
82: \end{abstract}
83:
84: %\section{}
85: %
86: %\noindent IMPORTANT NOTICE\\
87: %1. ``\verb|\draft|'' creates single column and double spaces format.\\
88: %2. If you comment out ``\verb|\draft|'', the output will be double column
89: % and single space.\\
90: %3. For cross-references, the use of ``\verb|\label|, \verb|\ref|, \verb|\cite|'%'
91: % and the thebibliography environment is strongly recommended. \\
92: %4. Do NOT use ``\verb|\def|, \verb|\renewcommand|''.\\
93: %5. Do NOT redifine commands provided by PASJ00.cls.\\
94:
95: \newpage
96:
97: %Section 1
98: \section{Introduction}
99:
100: Since the beginning of the 21 century, a project of searching planets around
101: intermediate-mass (1.5--5 $M_{\odot}$) stars by using the Doppler technique
102: has been undertaken at Okayama Astrophysical Observatory,
103: which intensively targets evolved late-G type giants because they are
104: considered to be most suitable for this purpose.\footnote{Intermediate-mass
105: stars of other spectral types are less advantageous: spectral lines of B--F
106: main-sequence stars are too few and broad/shallow to attain sufficient
107: radial-velocity precision, while the atmospheres of cooler K giants tend
108: to be intrinsically more unstable (compared to G-giants) which makes them
109: less suitable for detecting delicate wobbles caused by orbiting planets.}
110: This ``Okayama Planet Search Program'' has so far produced successful results
111: of newly discovering planets around 5 giants (HD~104985, $\epsilon$ Tau,
112: 18~Del, $\xi$~Aql, and HD~81688; cf. Sato et al. 2003, 2007, 2008) and
113: 1 brown dwarf around 11~Com (Liu et al. 2008). And it is still going on
114: with an extended monitoring sample of more than 300 stars (considerably
115: increased from the first 50--60 targets when the project started), sorting
116: out further new promising candidates of possible substellar companions,
117: which will be reported in forthcoming papers.
118:
119: Now that such planet-host candidates have increasingly emerged from this
120: project, it appears necessary to thoroughly review the characteristics of
121: the sample targets, since such basic information consistently obtained
122: for the whole sample is requisite to gain insight to the
123: physical nature of planet-formation in intermediate-mass stars, given
124: a number of questions to answer; e.g.:
125: To which population do the sample stars belong in the Galaxy?
126: What are the key stellar parameters especially important to understand
127: the mechanism of planet-formation (such as the mass, age, metallicity,
128: rotational velocity, etc.)? Are there any difference between planet-host
129: giants and other normal giants? What are the ages of planet-host giants like?
130:
131: Thus, as a natural extension of Takeda et al.'s (2005c; hereinafter referred
132: to as Paper~I) study which confined to 57 late-G giants (the targets of
133: the initial phase), we decided to conduct an extensive investigation for
134: a total of 322 program stars, in order to clarify their properties from
135: comprehensive point of view, so as to allow statistically meaningful
136: discussion. Practically, our aim is to establish the atmospheric parameters,
137: stellar fundamental quantities, kinematic parameters, and surface chemical
138: compositions, while mostly based on the high-dispersion spectra accumulated
139: during the course of the project. This is the primary purpose of this paper.
140:
141: Besides, making use of the results we gained as by-products, we pay
142: attention especially to discussing the chemical properties of these late-G
143: giants, since several disputable tendencies were tentatively reported in
144: Paper~I concerning the metallicity and the surface chemical composition
145: (e.g., mass-dependent metallicity, subsolar trend of metallicity distribution,
146: $\lambda$ Boo-like C vs. Si anti-correlation, under/over-abundance of O/Na
147: implying H-burning product dredged-up by non-canonical deep mixing).
148: Since the number of the sample has been considerably increased by a factor
149: of $\sim 6$, we would hope that more convincing results may be obtained
150: concerning the reality of these features, which is counted as another
151: purpose of this study.
152:
153: The remaining parts of this paper are organized as follows:
154: Section 2 describes the basic observational data invoked in this study.
155: The determinations of stellar parameters (atmospheric parameters by using
156: the spectroscopic method, and fundamental parameters with the help of
157: theoretical stellar evolutionary tracks) are presented in section 3,
158: where comparisons with previous studies are also made. Section 4
159: deals with the kinematic parameters describing the orbital motions
160: in the Galaxy (used to discuss the population nature of the sample stars)
161: and the projected rotational velocity as well as the macroturbulent velocity
162: (both estimated from the line-broadening width resulting from the spectrum
163: fitting analysis). The chemical abundances of various elements are determined
164: in section 5, followed by section 6 where the characteristics of the metallicity
165: distribution and chemical abundances of several key elements are discussed
166: in connection with other stellar parameters as well as the existence of
167: planets. In addition, an extra section for discussing the reliability of
168: [O~{\sc i}] 5577 line as an abundance indicator is prepared as Appendix.
169:
170: %Section 2
171: \section{Observational Data}
172:
173: \subsection{Sample Stars}
174:
175: The 322 program stars of this study, which are simultaneously the targets
176: of Okayama Planet Search Program, were originally selected
177: by the following criteria:
178: \renewcommand{\labelitemi}{---}
179: \begin{itemize}
180: \item
181: Apparently bright ($V < 6$) stars whose declinations are not too low
182: ($\delta > -25^{\circ}$) so as to be effectively observable from Okayama.
183: \item
184: The ranges of $B-V$ colors and visual absolute magnitudes are
185: within $0.6 < B-V < 1.0$ and $-3 < M_{V} < +2.5$, respectively,
186: corresponding to the spectral type of late-G giants (G5--K1~III).
187: \item
188: Those stars, which are catalogued as apparently variable stars or
189: unresolvable binaries, were excluded.
190: \end{itemize}
191:
192: The list of these stars is given in table 1, where the HD number,
193: the apparent visual magnitude, and the spectral type are presented,
194: which were taken from the Hipparcos catalogue (ESA 1997). All of
195: the 57 stars studied in Paper~I are included in the present sample.
196: As indicated in the last column of table 1, we regard in this paper
197: specific 10 stars (out of 322 objects) as stars hosting planets:
198: HD~104985 (Sato et al. 2003);
199: HD~62509 (Reffert et al. 2006; Hatzes et al. 2006);
200: HD~28305 (Sato et al. 2007); HD~142091, HD~167042, and HD~210702
201: (Johnson et al. 2007; Sato et al., in preparation);
202: HD~107383\footnote{Strictly speaking, it is not a planet but a brown
203: dwarf ($m\sin i \sim 20 M_{J}$) which was found in this star.
204: However, we included it in this stellar group, which we define to
205: be the one hosting substellar companions in a more global sense.}
206: (Liu et al. 2008);
207: HD~81688, HD~188310, and HD~199665 (Sato et al. 2008).
208:
209: \subsection{Observations and Data Reductions}
210:
211: Regarding the basic observational material, we used the ``pure star''
212: (i.e., without I$_{2}$ cell) spectra covering the $\sim$~5000--6200~$\rm\AA$
213: region,\footnote{A small fraction of the spectra observed in the early
214: time (2000--2001) of the project are of somewhat different spectral ranges
215: shifted slightly bluewards (e.g., $\sim$~4800--6000~$\rm\AA$).}
216: which were obtained at least once for each star as the standard template
217: to be used to derive radial velocity variations by analyzing the spectra
218: taken with the I$_{2}$ cell.
219:
220: Most of the observations were done during the period from 2000 to 2005
221: by using the HIDES spectrograph equipped at the coud\'{e} focus of
222: the 188 cm reflector at Okayama Astrophysical Observatory.
223: The reduction of the spectra (bias subtraction, flat-fielding,
224: scattered-light subtraction, spectrum extraction, wavelength
225: calibration, and continuum normalization) was performed by using
226: the ``echelle'' package of the software IRAF\footnote{
227: IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatories,
228: which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research
229: in Astronomy, Inc. under cooperative agreement with the National
230: Science Foundation.} in a standard manner.
231: Since 2--3 consecutive frames (mostly 10--20 min exposure for each)
232: were observed in a night for each star in many cases, we co-added
233: these to improve the signal-to-noise ratio, by which the average S/N
234: of most stars turned out to be in the range of $\sim$~100--300.
235: The spectral resolving power is $\sim 67000$, corresponding to the standard
236: slit width of 200~$\mu$m.
237:
238: We then determined the stellar radial velocities by comparing these
239: spectra with the theoretically synthesized spectra, which were then
240: converted into the heliocentric system by using the IRAF task ``dopcor.''
241: The basic data of our observational material (date of observation, radial
242: velocities in the laboratory as well as in the heliocentric system)
243: are given in the ``obspec.dat'' file in e-table E1.
244:
245: %Section 3
246: \section{Fundamental Stellar Parameters}
247:
248: \subsection{Atmospheric Parameters}
249:
250: As in our previous studies, we used Kurucz's ATLAS9 grid of
251: model atmospheres computed for a wide range of parameters
252: (Kurucz 1992, 1993), from which atmospheric models for each of
253: the stars can be generated by interpolations.
254:
255: The four atmospheric parameters necessary for constructing model
256: atmospheres as well as for abundance determinations [$T_{\rm eff}$
257: (effective temperature), $\log g$ (surface gravity), $v_{\rm t}$
258: (microturbulent velocity dispersion), and [Fe/H] (metallicity,
259: represented by the Fe abundance relative to the Sun)] were
260: spectroscopically derived from the measured equivalent widths
261: ($W_{\lambda}$) of Fe~{\sc i} and Fe~{\sc ii} lines based on the
262: principle and algorithm described in Takeda, Ohkubo, and Sadakane (2002).
263: Practically, we used the TGVIT program (Takeda et al. 2005b) by following
264: the same procedure as adopted in Paper~I (cf. section 3.1 therein).\footnote{
265: The only difference is that we adopted a more stringent condition for the
266: line selection and limited to using lines satisfying $W_{\lambda} \le 120$~m$\rm\AA$
267: (instead of the upper limit of $150$~m$\rm\AA$ in Paper~I), since it
268: revealed that the solutions are rather significantly influenced by
269: saturated lines with non-negligible damping wings, where difficulties
270: are generally involved in precise $W_{\lambda}$ measurements.}
271:
272: The finally converged solutions of $T_{\rm eff}$, $\log g$, $v_{\rm t}$,
273: and [Fe/H] are summarized in table 1. The results are also given in the file
274: ``tgvf\_solution.dat'' in e-table E1, where the intrinsic statistical
275: uncertainties (typically $\sim$~10--30K, $\sim$~0.05--0.1~dex,
276: 0.05--0.1~km~s$^{-1}$, and $\sim$~0.02--0.04~dex) involved in the solutions
277: of $T_{\rm eff}$, $\log g$, $v_{\rm t}$, and the Fe abundance estimated
278: in the manner described in section 3.2 of Takeda et al. (2002)
279: are also presented, though realistic internal errors may be somewhat larger
280: than these (especially for $T_{\rm eff}$ and $\log g$; cf. subsection 3.3.).
281: The measured $W_{\lambda}$ values for each of the adopted Fe~{\sc i}
282: and Fe~{\sc ii} lines ($\sim 100$ and $\sim 10$, respectively) and
283: the abundances from these lines corresponding to the final
284: solutions of the parameters are given for each star in e-table E2
285: (the results for HD~?????? are contained in the``??????.abd'' file).
286:
287: %Figure 1
288: \setcounter{figure}{0}
289: \begin{figure}
290: \begin{center}
291: \FigureFile(80mm,140mm){figure1.eps}
292: %%% \FigureFile(width,height){filename}
293: \end{center}
294: % \caption{This is the first figure.}\label{fig:sample}
295: \caption{Correlations of the atmospheric parameters
296: obtained by the spectroscopic method using Fe~{\sc i} and
297: Fe~{\sc ii} lines:
298: (a) $T_{\rm eff}$ vs. $\log g$, (b) [Fe/H] vs. $T_{\rm eff}$,
299: (c) $v_{\rm t}$ vs. $\log g$, (d) $v_{\rm t}$ vs. $T_{\rm eff}$,
300: (e) [Fe/H] vs. $\log g$, (f) [Fe/H] vs. $v_{\rm t}$,
301: (f) $\log g_{\rm TLM}$ (cf. subsection 3.1) vs. $\log g$,
302: and (g) $T_{\rm eff}^{B-V}$ (cf. subsection 3.1)
303: vs. $T_{\rm eff}$.
304: }
305: \end{figure}
306:
307: The correlations between any two combinations of these four parameters
308: are depicted in figures 1a--f. It is worth noting that different stellar
309: groups appear to be involved; i.e., the major population composed of
310: many stars having rather similar parameters to each other,
311: and the minor population showing more diversed parameter values.
312: For example, regarding the $T_{\rm eff}$ vs. $\log g$ relation (figure 1a),
313: while $T_{\rm eff}$ tends to be lowered with a decrease in $\log g$ for a
314: majority of (densely clumped) stars, there are also stars satisfying
315: both low-$\log g$ and high-$T_{\rm eff}$. Actually, the main characteristics
316: of our sample stars tend to be determined by the former population
317: (red-clump giants), as mentioned in subsection 3.2.
318: Another remarkable feature is the marked $\log g$-dependence of $v_{\rm t}$
319: (figure 1c), which clearly indicates the growth of the atmospheric
320: turbulent velocity field as the surface gravity decreases (an intuitively
321: reasonable tendency).
322:
323: As a consistency check of our spectroscopically established $T_{\rm eff}$
324: and $\log g$, they were compared with $T_{\rm eff}^{B-V}$ (the effective
325: temperature derived from the $B-V$ color by using the calibration of
326: Alonso et al. 1999) and $\log g_{TLM}$ (the surface gravity derived from
327: $T_{\rm eff}$, $L$, and $M$ determined in subsection 3.2) as shown in
328: figures 1g and h, respectively. We may state that no significantly
329: systematic discrepancy is seen in these figures, even though the dispersion
330: tends to increase toward lower-$\log g$ or higher-$T_{\rm eff}$ stars.
331:
332: \subsection{Luminosity, Radius, Mass, and Age}
333:
334: The stellar luminosity ($L$) was derived from the apparent visual
335: magnitude ($m_{V}$), the parallax ($\pi$) from the Hipparcos catalogue
336: (ESA 1997), the interstellar extinction ($A_{V}$) from
337: Arenou et al.'s (1992) table, and the bolometric correction (B.C.)
338: from Alonso et al.'s (1999) calibration.\footnote{We used their empirical
339: formula instead of interpolating Kurucz's (1993) theoretical B.C which we
340: adopted in Paper~I. As a result, the extent of B.C in this study tends to be
341: slightly smaller (by $\sim 0.1$~mag) than that in Paper~I.}
342: We then obtained the stellar radius ($R$) from $L$ and $T_{\rm eff}$.
343:
344: %Figure 2
345: \setcounter{figure}{1}
346: \begin{figure}
347: \begin{center}
348: \FigureFile(80mm,140mm){figure2.eps}
349: %%% \FigureFile(width,height){filename}
350: \end{center}
351: % \caption{This is the first figure.}\label{fig:sample}
352: \caption{
353: $\log (L/L_{\odot})$ vs. $\log T_{\rm eff}$ plots based on the data
354: given in table 1, along with Lejeune and Schaerer's (2001)
355: theoretical evolutionary tracks (for the initial masses of
356: 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0 $M_{\odot}$) corresponding to
357: three metallicities: $z=0.008$ ([Fe/H] = $-0.4$; blue lines),
358: $z=0.02$ ([Fe/H] = $0.0$; green lines), and $z=0.04$ ([Fe/H] =
359: $+0.3$; red lines). (Colored only in the electronic edition.)
360: }
361: \end{figure}
362:
363: Now that $T_{\rm eff}$, $L$, and the metallicity
364: ($z \equiv 0.02\times 10^{\rm [Fe/H]}$, where $z_{\odot}$ is 0.02)
365: for each star have been established, we can derive the mass ($M$) and
366: age ($age$) by comparing the position on the $\log L$ vs.
367: $\log T_{\rm eff}$ diagram with Lejeune and Schaerer's (2001)
368: theoretical evolutionary tracks
369: [$\log L = f_{L}(age|M,z)$, $\log T_{\rm eff} = f_{T}(age|M,z)$],
370: as depicted in figure 2.
371: The resulting parameter values are presented in table 1, and the
372: more detailed results including the errors\footnote{
373: The internal errors in $age$ ($M$) were estimated from the
374: difference between $age^{\rm max}$ and $age^{\rm min}$
375: ($M^{\rm max}$ and $M^{\rm min}$), which were obtained
376: by perturbing the input values of ($\log L$, $\log T_{\rm eff}$,
377: and $\log z$) interchangeably by typical amounts of uncertainties
378: ($\Delta \log L$ corresponding to parallax errors given in the Hipparcos
379: catalog, $\Delta \log T_{\rm eff}$ of $\pm 0.01$ dex almost corresponding
380: to $\sim \pm 100$ K, and $\log z$ of $\pm 0.1$ dex).
381: Similarly, the error in $R$ was evaluated from $\Delta \log L$ and
382: $\Delta \log T_{\rm eff}$.}
383: are summarized in the file ``stellar\_params.dat'' in e-table E1.
384: The inter-relations between such derived $L$, $R$, $age$, $M$ are
385: displayed in figure 3, where the $M$-dependence of $T_{\rm eff}$,
386: $\log g$, and [Fe/H] are also shown.
387:
388: %Figure 3
389: \setcounter{figure}{2}
390: \begin{figure}
391: \begin{center}
392: \FigureFile(80mm,140mm){figure3.eps}
393: %%% \FigureFile(width,height){filename}
394: \end{center}
395: % \caption{This is the first figure.}\label{fig:sample}
396: \caption{
397: Correlations between the fundamental stellar parameters
398: ($M$, $L$, $age$) or their dependences upon
399: atmospheric parameters ($T_{\rm eff}$, $\log g$, and [Fe/H]):
400: (a) $M$ vs. $\log L$ (vertical ticks indicate the
401: internal errors in $M$, which are also replotted in the lower
402: part of the figure), (b) $\log R$ (with errors indicated by
403: ticks as in panel a) vs. $\log L$, (c) $\log age$ (with errors)
404: vs. $M$, (d) $T_{\rm eff}$ vs. $M$, (e) $\log g$ vs. $M$,
405: and (f) [Fe/H] vs. $M$ (several $age$ values are also indicated).
406: }
407: \end{figure}
408:
409: Several features are recognized from figures 2 and 3:\\
410: --- As we can clearly see from figure 2, many of our program stars
411: clump in the region of $3.67 \ltsim \log T_{\rm eff} \ltsim 3.71$
412: and $1.6 \ltsim \log L/L_{\odot} \ltsim 2.1$ (corresponding to
413: $2 \ltsim M/M_{\odot} \ltsim 3$), indicating that
414: these objects belong to ``red-clump giants'' (post red-giants
415: after the ignition of core He; see Zhao et al. 2001 and the
416: references therein).\\
417: --- Brighter stars tend to be of higher mass almost following
418: the relation of $M/M_{\odot} \sim 2 \log (L/L_{\odot}) - 1$,
419: though stars around $M \sim$ 2--3 $M_{\odot}$ (corresponding to
420: red-clump giants) do not necessarily conform to this relation
421: and show a rather large diversity (figure 3a). \\
422: --- According to figure 3b, the radius ($R$) is almost a unique function
423: of luminosity ($L$) following the relation of $R \propto L^{1/2}$,
424: which means that the change in $T_{\rm eff}$ (mostly confined to a
425: rather narrow range of several hundred K) does not play any
426: significant role here.\\
427: --- A tight relationship exists between mass ($M$) and age ($age$) as
428: $\log age ({\rm yr}) \simeq 10.74 -1.04 (M/M_{\odot}) +0.0999 (M/M_{\odot})^{2}$
429: (figure 3c). This is reasonably understandable because $age$'s of
430: giant stars are practically the same as the main-sequence life time
431: (uniquely determined by $M$) which they spent in the past.\\
432: --- We can see a rough tendency in figure 3d that $T_{\rm eff}$ tends
433: to be higher for larger $M$. This may be related to the slope
434: of the evolutionary tracks rising toward upper-right (at
435: $\log T_{\rm eff} \ltsim 3.7$), by which a larger $M$ is assigned to
436: a star as its $T_{\rm eff}$ becomes higher (if $L$ remains the same).\\
437: --- There is a general trend in figure 3e that $\log g$ becomes lower
438: toward larger $M$, which is because that the growth rate of
439: $(R/R_{\odot})^{2}$ ($\propto L/L_{\odot} \sim 10^{(1+M/M_{\odot})/2}$) with
440: increasing $M$ is much larger than that of $M$ itself, though somewhat
441: opposite tendency is locally seen for a homogeneous group of red-clump
442: giants at $M \sim$ 2--3 $M_{\odot}$ (indicating that $R$ do not
443: vary much among these).\\
444: --- Figure 3f suggests that the metallicity ([Fe/H]) tends to become higher
445: as $M$ increases, which was also pointed out in Paper~I. This trend
446: may be interpreted as due to the metallicity dependence of stellar
447: evolutionary tracks ($L$ tends to be lowered with a decrease in $z$
448: for a given $M$; cf. figure 2). That is, if a star with a given $L$
449: is considered, a larger $M$ will be assigned as its metallicity
450: becomes higher.
451:
452: \subsection{Comparison with Other Studies}
453:
454: Figures 4a--f compare the values of $T_{\rm eff}$, $\log g$,
455: $v_{\rm t}$, [Fe/H], $M$, and $\log R$ derived in this study
456: with those derived in Paper~I for 57 stars in common.
457: We may state that both results are almost in agreement
458: without any significant systematic differences.
459: The average [Paper~I $-$ this study] differences ($\pm \sigma$:
460: standard deviation) are +28~($\pm 67$)~K, +0.06~($\pm 0.17$)~dex,
461: $-0.01$~($\pm 0.04$)~km~s$^{-1}$, +0.05~($\pm 0.06$)~dex,
462: +0.10~($\pm 0.11$)~$M_{\odot}$, +0.51~($\pm 0.52$)~$R_{\odot}$,
463: respectively. Since differences in atmospheric parameters are
464: essentially due to the changes in the used $W_{\lambda}$ set of
465: Fe~{\sc i} and Fe~{\sc ii} lines (newly re-measured this time also
466: for these 57 stars independently from Paper~I; cf. subsection 3.1),
467: these results suggest that $\ltsim$~50--100~K, $\ltsim$~0.1--0.2~dex,
468: $\ltsim$~0.05--0.1~km~s$^{-1}$, and $\ltsim$~0.05--0.1~dex
469: may be the realistic estimates of internal errors (under
470: consideration of $W_{\lambda}$-measurement ambiguities) in
471: $T_{\rm eff}$, $\log g$, $v_{\rm t}$, and [Fe/H], respectively.
472:
473: %Figure 4
474: \setcounter{figure}{3}
475: \begin{figure}
476: \begin{center}
477: \FigureFile(80mm,140mm){figure4.eps}
478: %%% \FigureFile(width,height){filename}
479: \end{center}
480: % \caption{This is the first figure.}\label{fig:sample}
481: \caption{
482: Comparison of the stellar parameters determined in this study with
483: those of 57 stars derived in Paper~I: (a) $T_{\rm eff}$, (b) $\log g$,
484: (c) $v_{\rm t}$, (d) [Fe/H], (e) $M$, and (f) $R$.
485: }
486: \end{figure}
487:
488: For the purpose of consistency check with the parameter results
489: of other groups, we refer to McWilliam (1990), which is presumably
490: the most extensive investigation so far on 671 G--K giants, as well as
491: to the three latest studies available (da Silva et al. 2006,
492: Luck \& Heiter 2007, and Hekker \& Mel\'{e}ndez 2007).
493: How our results are compared with others is graphically displayed
494: in figures 5, 6, 7, and 8, respectively.
495: A glance at these figures suffices to realize that systematic
496: differences are more or less observed in many cases; this may simply
497: suggest the difficulty of parameter determinations in the case of
498: giant stars, which critically depends on the method to be adopted
499: (e.g., photometric vs. spectroscopic etc.) as well as on the data
500: to be used (e.g., which lines to be adopted among those of different
501: strengths or of atomic parameters). Several remarkable features
502: (notable systematic trends specific to our results, considerable
503: discrepancies, etc.) are summarized below:\\
504: --- Our spectroscopically determined $\log g$ values appear to be
505: systematically lower by 0.2--0.3~dex (cf. figures 5b, 6b, 7b, and 8b),
506: compared to other four previous studies, where
507: McWilliam (1990) adopted the direct $g$-determination method
508: [from $L$, $T_{\rm eff}$, and $M$ (estimated from evolutionary tracks)],
509: while the spectroscopic method based on Fe~{\sc i} and Fe~{\sc ii} lines
510: (similar to that we used) was invoked by da Silva et al. (2006),
511: Luck and Heiter (2007),\footnote{While Luck and Heiter (2007) published
512: three different sets of stellar parameters determined in different
513: ways (``spectroscopic'', ``MARCS75'', and ``physical''; cf. their table 2),
514: we used their ``spectroscopic'' parameters for the present
515: comparison, which they derived from the Fe~{\sc i} and Fe~{\sc ii} lines
516: based on the ``new'' MARCS grid of model atmospheres.},
517: and Hekker and Mel\'{e}ndez (2007). Differences in the
518: used set of lines may have something to do with this tendency,
519: similarly to the case of $v_{\rm t}$ as mentioned below.\\
520: --- There is a trend that our $v_{\rm t}$ results are smaller by
521: several tenths of km~s$^{-1}$ as compared to others.
522: This may be attributed to the difference in the lines used
523: (especially in terms of line strengths), because $v_{\rm t}$ tends to
524: be depth-dependent (i.e., increasing with height) in low-gravity stars
525: (see, e.g., appendix B in Takeda \& Takada-Hidai 1994).\\
526: --- Even so, McWilliam's (1990) $v_{\rm t}$ values ($\sim$~2--4~km~s$^{-1}$)
527: seem to be exceptionally too large (figure 5b), if we consult the review of
528: Gray (1988; see figure 3-8 therein), which indicates that $v_{\rm t}$
529: generally falls in the range of $\sim$~1--2~km~s$^{-1}$ for G--K giants
530: of luminosity class III.\\
531: --- Luck and Heiter's (2007) $M$ values are appreciably smaller
532: than our results (figure 7e). We suspect that this may be due to
533: their use of evolutionary ``isochrones'' (instead of ``tracks''
534: we adopted), since it may cause considerable errors due to
535: the insufficient time-step of theoretical calculations
536: when applied to giants under the phase of rapid evolution
537: (see subsection 3.3 in Paper~I).
538:
539: %Figure 5
540: \setcounter{figure}{4}
541: \begin{figure}
542: \begin{center}
543: \FigureFile(80mm,140mm){figure5.eps}
544: %%% \FigureFile(width,height){filename}
545: \end{center}
546: % \caption{This is the first figure.}\label{fig:sample}
547: \caption{
548: Comparison of the atmospheric parameters determined in this study
549: with those derived by McWilliam (1990) for 150 stars in common:
550: (a) $T_{\rm eff}$, (b) $\log g$, (c) $v_{\rm t}$, and (d) [Fe/H].
551: }
552: \end{figure}
553:
554: %Figure 6
555: \setcounter{figure}{5}
556: \begin{figure}
557: \begin{center}
558: \FigureFile(80mm,140mm){figure6.eps}
559: %%% \FigureFile(width,height){filename}
560: \end{center}
561: % \caption{This is the first figure.}\label{fig:sample}
562: \caption{
563: Comparison of the stellar parameters determined in this study
564: with those derived by da Silva et al. (2006) for 9 stars in common:
565: (a) $T_{\rm eff}$, (b) $\log g$, (c) $v_{\rm t}$, (d) [Fe/H],
566: (e) $M$, and (f) $\log R$.
567: }
568: \end{figure}
569:
570: %Figure 7
571: \setcounter{figure}{6}
572: \begin{figure}
573: \begin{center}
574: \FigureFile(80mm,140mm){figure7.eps}
575: %%% \FigureFile(width,height){filename}
576: \end{center}
577: % \caption{This is the first figure.}\label{fig:sample}
578: \caption{
579: Comparison of the stellar parameters determined in this study
580: with those (spectroscopically) derived by Luck and Heiter (2007)
581: for 93 stars in common:
582: (a) $T_{\rm eff}$, (b) $\log g$, (c) $v_{\rm t}$, (d) [Fe/H],
583: (e) $M$, and (f) $\log L$.
584: }
585: \end{figure}
586:
587: %Figure 8
588: \setcounter{figure}{7}
589: \begin{figure}
590: \begin{center}
591: \FigureFile(80mm,140mm){figure8.eps}
592: %%% \FigureFile(width,height){filename}
593: \end{center}
594: % \caption{This is the first figure.}\label{fig:sample}
595: \caption{
596: Comparison of the atmospheric parameters determined in this study
597: with those derived by Hekker and Mel\'{e}ndez (2007) for 147 stars
598: in common: (a) $T_{\rm eff}$, (b) $\log g$, (c) $v_{\rm t}$, and
599: (d) $A^{\rm Fe}$ (logarithmic Fe abundance in the usual normalization
600: of $A^{\rm H} = 12.00$).
601: }
602: \end{figure}
603:
604: %Section 4
605: \section{Kinematics and Stellar Rotation}
606:
607: \subsection{Kinematic Properties}
608:
609: In order to examine the kinematic properties of the program stars,
610: we computed their orbital motions within the galactic gravitational
611: potential based on the positional and proper-motion data
612: (taken from the Hipparcos catalog) along with the radial-velocity
613: data (measured by us), following the procedure described in
614: subsection 2.2 of Takeda (2007).
615: The adopted input data and the resulting solutions of kinematic
616: parameters are given the file ``kinepara.dat'' contained in e-table E1.
617: Figures 9a and b show the correlations of
618: $z_{\rm max}$ (maximum separation from the galactic plane) vs.
619: $V_{\rm LSR}$ (rotation velocity component relative to LSR) and
620: $e$ (orbital eccentricity) vs. $\langle R_{\rm g} \rangle$
621: (mean galactocentric radius), respectively.
622: Applying Ibukiyama and Arimoto's (2002) classification criteria
623: to figure 9a, we can see that most ($\sim 97\%$) stars belong to
624: the group of normal thin-disk population, while only 8 stars
625: (indicated by open symbols) may be of thick-disk population
626: having characteristics of large eccentricity (figure 9b),
627: high space-velocity as well as low metallicity (figure 9c),
628: and comparatively aged stars of lower-mass (figure 9d).
629:
630: %Figure 9
631: \setcounter{figure}{8}
632: \begin{figure}
633: \begin{center}
634: \FigureFile(80mm,140mm){figure9.eps}
635: %%% \FigureFile(width,height){filename}
636: \end{center}
637: % \caption{This is the first figure.}\label{fig:sample}
638: \caption{
639: (a) Correlation diagram between $z_{\rm max}$ (maximum separation
640: from the galactic plane) and $V_{\rm LSR}$ (rotation velocity
641: component relative to LSR), which may be used for classifying
642: the stellar population (the halo/thick-disk/thin-disk boundaries
643: are also shown by dashed lines according to Ibukiyama \& Arimoto 2002).
644: Eight stars, which may be thick-disk candidates, are indicated by
645: their HD numbers. (b) $e$ (orbital eccentricity)
646: plotted against $\langle R_{\rm g} \rangle$ (mean galactocentric radius).
647: (c) [Fe/H]-dependence of the space velocity relative to LSR
648: [$|v_{\rm LSR}| \equiv (U_{\rm LSR}^{2} + V_{\rm LSR}^{2} +
649: W_{\rm LSR}^{2})^{1/2}$]. (d) $M$-dependence of $|v_{\rm LSR}|$
650: (approximate $age$'s at four different $M$ values are
651: also indicated). Shown by open symbols in all four panels are the
652: possible thick-disk candidates.
653: }
654: \end{figure}
655:
656: \subsection{Rotational Velocity}
657:
658: \subsubsection{Modeling of macro-broadening function}
659:
660: In order to derive the projected rotational velocity ($v_{\rm e}\sin i$)
661: from the widths of spectral lines, we made the following assumptions
662: regarding the line-broadening functions.\\
663: --- (1) The observed stellar spectrum ($D_{\rm obs}$) is a
664: convolution of the modeled intrinsic spectrum ($D_{0}$; computable if
665: a model atmosphere, a microturbulence, and elemental abundances are given)
666: and the total macro-broadening function $f_{\rm M}(v)$; i.e.,
667: $D_{\rm obs} = D_{0} * f_{\rm M}$ (``*'' means the convolution procedure ).\\
668: --- (2) The total macrobroadening function is a convolution of
669: three component functions: the instrumental broadening (denoted as ``ip''),
670: rotation (``rt''), and macroturbulence (``mt''); i.e.,
671: $f_{\rm M} = f_{\rm ip} * f_{\rm rt} * f_{\rm mt}$.\\
672: --- (3) All of the relevant broadening functions are assumed to
673: have the same Gaussian form parameterized by the $e$-folding half-width
674: ($v_{\alpha}$) as $f_{\alpha}(v) \propto \exp(-v^{2}/v_{\alpha}^{2}$),
675: where $\alpha$ represents any of the suffixes. Then,
676: a simple relation holds between the broadening parameters as
677: $v_{\rm M}^{2} = v_{\rm ip}^{2} + v_{\rm rt}^{2} + v_{\rm mt}^{2}$.\\
678: --- (4) For convenience, we also use the combined broadening function
679: $f_{\rm r+m}$, which is the ``macroturbulence + rotation'' function
680: defined as $f_{\rm r+m} \equiv f_{\rm rt} * f_{\rm mt}$ (with a relation
681: $v_{\rm r+m}^{2} = v_{\rm rt}^{2} + v_{\rm mt}^{2}$).
682:
683: \subsubsection{Determination of $v_{r+m}$ from 6080--6089~$\AA$ fitting}
684:
685: Regarding the actual determination of line broadening for each star, we
686: applied the automatic spectrum-fitting technique (Takeda 1995) to the
687: 6080--6089~$\rm\AA$ region (given the model atmosphere corresponding
688: to the atmospheric parameters derived in subsection 3.1), which
689: successfully establishes such solutions of seven free parameters
690: that accomplish the best fit: the abundances of six elements
691: (Si, Ti, V, Fe, Co, and Ni) and the total macrobroadening ($v_{\rm M}$).
692: See subsection 4.2 of Takeda et al. (2007) for more details.
693: Two examples of how the theoretical spectrum corresponding to the final
694: solutions matches the observed spectrum are shown in figure 10a.
695:
696: Once $v_{\rm M}$ is known, we can obtain $v_{\rm r+m}$
697: ($\equiv \sqrt{v_{\rm M}^{2} - v_{\rm ip}^{2}}$ by definition) by
698: subtracting $v_{\rm ip}$ (2.69~km~s$^{-1}$) corresponding to
699: the spectrum resolving power of $R \simeq 67000$.\footnote{Since
700: the Gaussian FWHM is $3 \times 10^{5} / 67000 \simeq 4.48$~km~s$^{-1}$,
701: the corresponding $e$-folding half-width makes
702: $4.48/(2\sqrt{\ln 2}) \simeq 2.69$~km~s$^{-1}$.}
703:
704: %Figure 10
705: \setcounter{figure}{9}
706: \begin{figure}
707: \begin{center}
708: \FigureFile(80mm,140mm){figure10.eps}
709: %%% \FigureFile(width,height){filename}
710: \end{center}
711: % \caption{This is the first figure.}\label{fig:sample}
712: \caption{
713: (a) Examples of the spectrum-synthesis fitting in the 6080--6089~$\rm\AA$
714: region for evaluating the total macro-broadening parameter ($v_{\rm M}$),
715: from which $v_{\rm r+m}$ (macroscopic broadening velocity field including
716: both rotation and macroturbulence) is derived by subtracting the
717: effect of instrumental broadening. The upper (HD~13994) and lower (HD~4732)
718: spectra show the typical cases of higher $v_{\rm e}\sin i$ and lower
719: $v_{\rm e}\sin i$, respectively. Identifications of prominent lines are
720: also given.
721: (b) Correlation between $v_{\rm r+m}$ and $\log g$, in which we may regard
722: the lower envelope boundary ($4.3 - 0.67 \log g$; indicated by the dashed line)
723: as representing the $\log g$-dependence of $v_{\rm mt}$ (macroturbulence
724: velocity dispersion).
725: (c) Relation between the rotational broadening $v_{\rm rt}$
726: [$\equiv \sqrt{v_{\rm r+m}^{2} - v_{\rm mt}^{2}}$] and the projected
727: rotational velocity ($v_{\rm e} \sin i$) determined by Gray (1989)
728: from his elaborate line-profile analysis, plotted for 44 stars
729: in common. The dashed line shows the linear-regression line (derived
730: by the least-squares fit),
731: $v_{\rm e} \sin i = 1.01 v_{\rm rt} +0.67$, which we adopted to convert
732: $v_{\rm rt}$ to $v_{\rm e} \sin i$.
733: (d) Comparison of such derived $v_{\rm e} \sin i$ values with the literature
734: values: filled circles are those from de Medeiros and Mayor (1999) (128 stars
735: in common), while open triangles are those from Massarotti et al. (2008)
736: (plotted for 96 stars out of 157 stars in common, where 61 stars with
737: $v_{\rm e} \sin i^{\rm Massarotti} = 0$ are excluded).
738: (e) $T_{\rm eff}$-dependence of $v_{\rm e} \sin i$. 10 planet-host stars
739: are indicated by open circles. (f) $M$-dependence of $v_{\rm e} \sin i$.
740: Indicated above are the approximate $age$'s at four different $M$ values,
741: while 10 planet-host stars are shown by open circles.
742: }
743: \end{figure}
744:
745: \subsubsection{Separation of rotation and macroturbulence}
746:
747: Since we now know $v_{\rm r+m}$, the rotational broadening ($v_{\rm rt}$)
748: can be evaluated by extracting the macroturbulence component ($v_{\rm mt}$)
749: from it. Here, we make a practical assumption that ``the macroturbulence
750: depends only on the surface gravity,'' which we believe to be justified
751: for the following two reasons.\\
752: --- (a) According to Gray's (1989) detailed line-profile study on G giants,
753: we may regard that the $T_{\rm eff}$-dependence of the macroturbulence\footnote{
754: We can see from figure 7 of Gray (1989) that, while the radial-tangential
755: macroturbulence ($\zeta_{\rm RT}$) in late-G giants tends to slightly decrease
756: from $\zeta_{\rm RT} \sim 6$~km~s$^{-1}$ at G5~III to
757: $\zeta_{\rm RT} \sim 5$~km~s$^{-1}$ at K0~III on the average, this trend
758: is not significant compared to the scatter ($\sim 3$~km~s$^{-1}$).}
759: is almost negligible for our sample stars clustering at the spectral type
760: of late-G.\\
761: --- (b) In view of the reasonable connection between the macroturbulence
762: and microturbulence (see, e.g., Gray 1988), the remarkably tight
763: $\log g$-dependence of $v_{\rm t}$ (increasing with a decrease in $g$;
764: cf. figure 1c) suggests that the variation of $v_{\rm mt}$ is essentially
765: dominated by the change in $\log g$.
766:
767: The $v_{\rm r+m}$ values are plotted against $\log g$ in figure 10b.
768: Interestingly, we can recognize in this figure a clear-cut boundary line
769: ($v_{\rm r+m}^{\rm boundary} \simeq 4.3 - 0.67 \log g$), below which
770: no stars are seen. Considering that the contribution of projected rotational
771: velocity can be as small as zero (in case of nearly pole-on stars), we can
772: reasonably assume that this lower boundary represents the case of
773: $v_{\rm rt} \simeq 0$, which leads to the relation we use for estimating
774: the macroturbulence
775: \begin{equation}
776: v_{\rm mt} = 4.3 - 0.67 \log g.
777: \end{equation}
778: We point out that the $v_{\rm mt}$ range of $\sim$~2--3~km~s$^{-1}$
779: derived from this equation is just consistent with Gray's (1989)
780: result of $\zeta_{\rm RT} \sim$~5--6~km~s$^{-1}$, since
781: the relationship of $v_{\rm mt} \simeq 0.4 \zeta_{\rm RT}$
782: is expected to hold.\footnote{While the $v^{*}$ value corresponding to
783: the half-maximum is $0.83 v_{\rm mt} (=\sqrt{\ln 2} \, v_{\rm mt})$ for the
784: Gaussian macroturbulence function, it is $v^{*} \simeq 0.35 \zeta_{\rm RT}$
785: for the case of the radial-tangential-type macroturbulence function
786: (see, e,g., figure 17.5 in Gray 2005).
787: That is, on the requirement that the FWHM of two broadening functions of
788: different types be equal, we obtain
789: $v_{\rm mt} \simeq (0.35/0.83) \zeta_{\rm RT} \simeq 0.42 \zeta_{\rm RT}$.
790: Quite similarly, since $v^{*} \simeq 0.78 v_{\rm e}\sin i$ for the realistic
791: rotational broadening function (e,g., figure 18.5 in Gray 2005), we have
792: $v_{\rm rt} \simeq (0.78/0.83) v_{\rm e}\sin i \simeq 0.94 v_{\rm e}\sin i$
793: as the relation between $v_{\rm rt}$ and $v_{\rm e}\sin i$.}
794:
795: \subsubsection{Calibration of $v_{e} sin i$}
796:
797: Now that the macroturbulence ($v_{\rm mt}$) for each star has been
798: assigned, we can obtain the rotational broadening parameter ($v_{\rm rt}$)
799: from the already known $v_{\rm r+m}$ as
800: $v_{\rm rt} = \sqrt{v_{\rm r+m}^{2} - v_{\rm mt}^{2}}$.
801: However, since our modeling is based on a rather rough approximation
802: of Gaussian rotational broadening, we have to find an appropriate
803: calibration relation connecting $v_{\rm rt}$ and $v_{\rm e}\sin i$,
804: for which we invoke Gray's (1989) $v_{\rm e} \sin i$ results for
805: G giants derived from his elaborate line-profile analysis.
806: Figure 10c shows the correlation of our $v_{\rm rt}$ and Gray's (1989)
807: $v_{\rm e}\sin i$ for 44 stars in common.
808: We then have a linear-regression relation,
809: \begin{equation}
810: v_{\rm e} \sin i = 1.01 v_{\rm rt} + 0.67,
811: \end{equation}
812: which we finally adopted to obtain $v_{\rm e}\sin i$.
813: We point out that this proportionality factor of 1.01 is quite reasonable,
814: considering the value of 1.05 (=1/0.94) expected from a rough estimation
815: (see footnote 11).
816:
817: The resulting values of $v_{\rm e}\sin i$ (along with $v_{\rm r+m}$ and
818: $v_{\rm mt}$) are given in the file ``profit6085.dat'' contained
819: in e-table E1, where the abundances of Si, Ti, V, Fe, Co, and Ni
820: (derived as by-products of 6080--6089~$\rm\AA$ fitting) are also presented.
821: As shown in figure 10d, our $v_{\rm e}\sin i$ results are in reasonable agreement
822: (even though ours tend to be slightly smaller at the high $v_{\rm e}\sin i$
823: range of $\sim 10$~km~s$^{-1}$) with the recent two extensive determinations
824: by de Medeiros and Mayor (1999) and Massarotti et al. (2008).
825: Note that, although these two studies are based on different techniques
826: (cross-correlation method with CORAVEL, line-broadening width measurement
827: similar to ours), they both used Gray's results as the calibration standards.
828:
829: Figures 10e and f display the correlations of $v_{\rm e}\sin i$ vs.
830: $T_{\rm eff}$ and $v_{\rm e}\sin i$ vs. $M$, respectively.
831: We can confirm in figure 10e an apparent rotational break at
832: $T_{\rm eff} \sim 5000$~K, below which $v_{\rm e} \sin i$ quickly
833: falls off, consistently with the conclusion of Gray (1989).
834: The tendency of increasing $v_{\rm e}$ toward larger $M$ (figure 10f)
835: may be interpreted as mainly due to the positive correlation between
836: $M$ and $T_{\rm eff}$ (cf. figure 3d), though it may partly reflect
837: the real $M$-dependence of the angular momentum.
838: Since the distribution of $v_{\rm e}\sin i$ for 10 planet-host stars
839: does not differ much from that of non-planet-host stars (figures 10e and f),
840: we could not nominate any clear such candidates that have acquired excess
841: angular momentum by ingestion of planets (see also Massarotti et al. 2008).
842:
843: %Section 5
844: \section{Elemental Abundances}
845:
846: The abundances of 17 elements (C, O, Na, Si, Ca, Sc, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Co,
847: Ni, Cu, Y, Ce, Pr, Nd) relative to the Sun were derived from the measured
848: equivalent widths in the same way as described in subsection 4.1 of
849: Paper~I,\footnote{One difference is that (unlike Paper~I) we did not
850: determine the abundances of elements with $Z > 60$ (e.g., Gd, Hf) this time,
851: because they are based mostly on only one line and thus unreliable.}
852: which should be consulted for more details.
853:
854: The detailed line-by-line results of relative-to-Sun differential
855: abundances ($\Delta$) and their average ([X/H] $\equiv \langle \Delta \rangle$)
856: are presented in e-table E3 (the results for HD~?????? are contained in
857: the``??????.cmb'' file). Also, the [X/H] values for each of the species
858: are summarized in the file ``xhresults.dat'' of e-table E1.
859: The [X/Fe] ratios ($\equiv$ [X/H] $-$ [Fe/H])
860: are plotted against [Fe/H] in figure 11, where the results corresponding to
861: the abundances (of Si, Ti, V, Fe, Co, and Ni) derived from 6080--6089~$\rm\AA$
862: fitting are also shown for comparison. We can see by comparing this figure
863: with figure 7 of Paper~I that the characteristic trend of [X/Fe] vs. [Fe/H]
864: exhibited by each species (useful for discussing the chemical
865: evolution in the Galaxy) has become more manifest in the present study
866: thanks to the increased number of stars.
867:
868: %Section 6
869:
870: \section{Abundance and Metallicity Characteristics}
871:
872: Now that we have accomplished our main purpose of determining
873: the parameters and surface abundances of 322 late-G giants
874: in the preceding sections 2--5, some discussion based on these results
875: may be appropriate here regarding the notable features seen in the derived
876: abundances and the metallicity, especially in connection with their
877: dependence upon stellar parameters or with the nature of planet-host stars.
878:
879: \subsection{Abundance Anomalies in C, O, and Na}
880:
881: By comparing figure 11 with Takeda's (2007) figure 12, we can confirm
882: that the behaviors of [X/Fe] vs. [Fe/H] plots for these late-G giants are
883: mostly similar to those of F--G--K dwarfs in the solar neighborhood
884: for many comparatively heavier species (i.e., Si, Ca, Sc, Ti, V, Cr,
885: Mn, Co, Ni, Cu), which suggests that the abundance trends of these elements
886: are reasonably understood as due to the chemical evolution of the Galaxy.
887:
888: However, the situation is different for the three lighter elements
889: (C, O, Na), as can be recognized when figures 11a, b, c are compared
890: with Takeda and Honda's (2005) figures 6a and 6c and Takeda's (2007)
891: figure 12a, respectively. Namely, the zero point (the value of [X/Fe]
892: corresponding to the solar metallicity of [Fe/H] = 0) is appreciably
893: discrepant from zero ([C/Fe]~$<$~0, [O/Fe]~$<$~0,\footnote{Unfortunately,
894: we are not confident with the O abundance derived from only one forbidden
895: [O~{\sc i}] line at 5577.34~$\rm\AA$. Actually, it is probable
896: that our [O/H] values derived for these giant stars are significantly
897: underestimated by as much as 0.3--0.4~dex (the zero point might have
898: to be shifted down to the position shown by the dotted line in figure 11b).
899: This problem is separately discussed in Appendix more in detail.
900: Anyway, we use in this discussion our [O/H] values as they are, hoping that
901: they still correctly describe the {\it relative} behaviors
902: (i.e., the slope of $|$[O/Fe]/[Fe/H]$|$ or $|$[O/Fe]/[C/Fe]$|$, for example)
903: even if considerable zero-point errors are involved in [O/H] or [O/Fe] in
904: the absolute sense.} and [Na/Fe]~$>$~0) and the slope of
905: $|$[X/Fe]/[Fe/H]$|\sim 1$ for C and O is appreciably steeper than the case
906: of dwarf stars ($\sim$~0.2 for C and $\sim$~0.4 for O; cf. subsection 5.1
907: in Takeda \& Honda 2005).
908: More interestingly, we can observe a correlation between C and O and
909: an anti-correlation between C and Na (and also between O and Na) as
910: shown in figures 12a, b, and c. Besides, these C, O, and Na abundances
911: appear to depend upon the stellar mass (figures 12e, f, and g).
912:
913: It is then natural to consider that the abundances of these three elements
914: (C, O, Na) in the photosphere of late-G giants have suffered appreciable
915: changes (a decrease in C and O, an increase in Na) from their original
916: composition and the effect of such ``a posteriori'' abundance changes
917: becomes progressively pronounced as $M$ becomes larger. Regarding the
918: mechanism for this cause, it is likely to be mixing of the H-burning product
919: dredged-up from the deep interior, where C and O are reduced by the CN- and
920: ON-cycles while Na is enriched by the NeNa-cycle (as already speculated
921: in subsection 5.3 of Paper~I).
922: Further, the extent of this mixing-induced anomaly tends to be larger for
923: higher-metallicity stars because of the positive correlation between [Fe/H]
924: and $M$ (cf. figure 3f), which reasonably accounts for the trends in
925: [C/Fe] vs. [Fe/H] and [O/Fe] vs. [Fe/H] (steep gradient) as well as in
926: [Na/Fe] vs. [Fe/H] (conspicuous raise toward [Fe/H] $\gtsim 0$) seen in
927: figures 11a, b, and c.
928:
929: This scenario naturally explains the relationship between [C/Si] and [Si/H]
930: (cf. subsection 5.2 of Paper~I\footnote{In that paper this tendency was
931: discussed in terms of the selective depletion of refractory elements
932: (such as Si) while the volatile species (such as C) remain unchanged,
933: which is seen in $\lambda$ Boo-type stars. Instead, we now consider
934: it is C that has acquired anomaly.}); that is, since the reduction of
935: photospheric C becomes more efficient at higher metallicity
936: as well as higher mass, the tendency of anticorrelation seen in [C/Si] vs.
937: [Si/H] (figure 12d) and [C/Si] vs. $M$ (figure 12h) is reasonably understood.
938:
939: We remark, however, that such abundance changes due to evolution-induced
940: envelope mixing in late-G giants of 1.5--5 $M_{\odot}$ has not yet been
941: theoretically justified at least for O and Na. Namely, according to
942: the canonical stellar evolution calculations (e.g.; Lejeune \& Schaerer 2001),
943: such giant stars of intermediate-mass only show a sign of CN-cycled products
944: (C-deficient and N-enriched material, while O and Na are essentially unchanged)
945: because the mixing is not so deep as to salvage ON-cycle or NeNa-cycle products.
946: Therefore, it would be highly desirable to investigate from the theoretical side
947: whether such an O-deficiency and Na-enrichment is ever feasible or not in the
948: photosphere of late-G giants (including red-clump giants), such as seen in
949: old globular cluster stars (where Na vs. O anti-correlation is reported;
950: see, e.g., Kraft 1994) or high-mass supergiants (Na is generally overabundant as
951: discussed in Takeda \& Takada-Hidai 1994; and the possibility of O-deficiency
952: due to mixing of ON-cycled gas was suspected by Luck \& Lambert 1985).
953:
954: Also, we would again call attention to the poor reliability (at least
955: in the absolute sense) of our O-abundances derived from the [O~{\sc i}] 5577
956: line (cf. footnote 13 and the appendix), which may contain considerable
957: zero-point error.
958: Hence, as far as the results involving [O/Fe] or [O/H] are concerned, further
959: check or examinations using various other lines (e.g., [O~{\sc i}] 6300/6363
960: or O~{\sc i} 7771--5 triplet) would be required before reaching the final
961: conclusion.
962:
963: %Figure 12
964: \setcounter{figure}{11}
965: \begin{figure}
966: \begin{center}
967: \FigureFile(80mm,140mm){figure12.eps}
968: %%% \FigureFile(width,height){filename}
969: \end{center}
970: % \caption{This is the first figure.}\label{fig:sample}
971: \caption{
972: Correlations between the abundance ratios and their $M$-dependences:
973: (a) [O/Fe] vs. [C/Fe], (b) [Na/Fe] vs. [C/Fe], (c) [Na/Fe] vs. [O/Fe],
974: (d) [C/Si] vs. [Si/H], (e) [C/Fe] vs. $M$, (f) [O/Fe] vs. $M$,
975: (g) [Na/Fe] vs. $M$, and (h) [C/Si] vs. $M$. In panels (a), (c), and
976: (f), the position of [O/Fe] = $-0.37$ is shown by a dotted line,
977: to which the zero-point of [O/Fe] might be lowered (cf. Appendix).
978: Planet-host stars are indicated by open symbols.
979: }
980: \end{figure}
981:
982: \subsection{Metallicity Distribution}
983:
984: Form the viewpoint of planet formation, an important subject is to examine
985: whether the metallicity distribution of planet-harboring giants shows
986: any difference from that of ordinary giants without planets.
987: Figures 13a and b show the histogram of [Fe/H] distribution for our 322
988: targets, separated for 312 non-planet-host stars (non-PHS) and
989: 10 planet-host stars (PHS), respectively. We can recognize in figure 13a
990: that [Fe/H] has a characteristic distribution, which is peaked at a
991: slightly subsolar value ($\sim -0.1$) with a gradual/steep decline
992: toward lower/higher metallicity. It is also worth noting that no
993: super-metal-rich stars ([Fe/H] $> +0.2$) are found in our sample.
994: Regarding the [Fe/H] trend of planet-host giants, although the number of
995: the sample is too small to make any definite argument, the metallicity range
996: (from $\sim -0.4$ to $\sim +0.2$ centering around $\sim -0.1$) is quite
997: similar (figure 13b) to that of non-planet-host stars;
998: actually, the average values are almost indistinguishable
999: ($\langle$[Fe/H]$\rangle^{\rm nonPHS} = -0.11$
1000: and $\langle$[Fe/H]$\rangle^{\rm PHS} = -0.13$).
1001: Hence, we conclude that there is no essential difference in the metallicity
1002: distribution between planet-host giants and non-planet-host giants,
1003: which makes marked contrast to the case of F--G--K dwarfs,\footnote{
1004: In addition, we note from figures 11 and 12 that this argument
1005: also holds for the relative abundance patterns (i.e.,, distribution of
1006: [X/Fe] ratios), which means that planet-host giants and non-planet-host
1007: giants are practically indiscernible in terms of the chemical abundance
1008: properties in general.}
1009: where plane-harboring stars tend to be generally metal-rich (see, e.g.,
1010: Gonzalez 2003 or Udry \& Santos 2007, and the references therein).
1011:
1012: %Figure 13
1013: \setcounter{figure}{12}
1014: \begin{figure}
1015: \begin{center}
1016: \FigureFile(80mm,140mm){figure13.eps}
1017: %%% \FigureFile(width,height){filename}
1018: \end{center}
1019: % \caption{This is the first figure.}\label{fig:sample}
1020: \caption{
1021: Metallicity distribution (histogram of the numbers of stars per
1022: 0.1 dex bin in [Fe/H]) of the program stars, separately shown for
1023: (a) 312 non-planet-host stars and (b) 10 planet-host stars.
1024: }
1025: \end{figure}
1026:
1027: This consequence (lack of metal-rich tendency in planet-host giants) is
1028: in fair agreement with the result of Pasquini et al. (2007). However, we can
1029: not lend support for Hekker and Mel\'{e}ndez's (2007) contradictory argument
1030: that planet-host giants are more metal-rich by 0.13 dex as compared to
1031: the large sample of ordinary giants. We suspect that this may reflect
1032: their sample choice of planet-host stars, in which not so much giants as
1033: subgiant stars of near-solar-mass are included (i.e., the general trend may
1034: be partly affected/contaminated by the characteristics of higher-gravity stars).
1035: We would further point out that they used ``literature [Fe/H] values'' taken
1036: from various sources for planet-host giants, which were compared with their
1037: own [Fe/H] results of normal giants; this makes us feel that their results
1038: had better be viewed with caution, especially when delicate abundance
1039: differences as small as $\sim 0.1$~dex are involved.
1040:
1041: How should we interpret the absence of metal-rich trend in planet-host giants
1042: in contrast to the case of dwarfs (i.e., the fact that planets can form around
1043: rather metal-poor intermediate-mass stars)? Some explanations may be
1044: possible even within the framework of the standard core-accretion theory
1045: favoring the metal-rich condition (e.g., Hayashi et al. 1985; Ida \& Lin 2004):\\
1046: --- (1) Since the mass of the proto-planetary disk tends to be generally large
1047: for massive stars, sufficient material for core-formation may still be
1048: available even in the metal-deficient condition as low as [Fe/H] $\sim -0.3$,
1049: making the planet formation feasible.\\
1050: --- (2) While planet-formation may proceed efficiently in the metal-rich case,
1051: such planets (formed in a rather short time scale) are apt to migrate inward
1052: (because substantial amount of disk-gas may still remain without being
1053: dissipated), which would not survive as planets around giants because of
1054: being engulfed. In this sense, not-so-metal-rich system might be even more
1055: favorable for planet-detection around giants.\\
1056: --- (3) Alternatively, the planet-formation around intermediate-mass stars
1057: might occur by a mechanism other than the canonical core-accretion.
1058: As a matter of fact, in order to explain the metal-poor long tail of
1059: [Fe/H] distribution in planet-host dwarfs (e.g., Udry \& Santos 2007),
1060: it has been argued that two different planet-formation processes may be
1061: coexistent; i.e., the metallicity-dependent core-accretion process,
1062: and the disk-instability mechanism (e.g., Boss 2002) which is considered
1063: to take place almost independently on the metallicity. If planets around
1064: intermediate stars are preferentially formed by the latter mechanism,
1065: the observational fact may be reasonably explained.
1066:
1067: %Figure 14
1068: \setcounter{figure}{13}
1069: \begin{figure}
1070: \begin{center}
1071: \FigureFile(80mm,140mm){figure14.eps}
1072: %%% \FigureFile(width,height){filename}
1073: \end{center}
1074: % \caption{This is the first figure.}\label{fig:sample}
1075: \caption{
1076: Age--metallicity relation. Circles show the results for
1077: 322 late-G giants investigated in this study, while
1078: squares are those for the 160 F--G--K dwarfs
1079: taken from Takeda (2007). Planet-host stars (10 out of 322
1080: for the former and 27 out of 160 for the latter) are
1081: indicated by open symbols.
1082: }
1083: \end{figure}
1084:
1085: Finally, the age--metallicity relation for 322 late-G giants is displayed
1086: in figure 14, where the similar relation obtained for 160 F--G--K dwarfs
1087: taken from Takeda (2007) is also shown for comparison.
1088: As discussed above, the metal-rich tendency of planet-host dwarfs and
1089: the absence of such trend for planet-host giants are manifestly observed.
1090: We can also see that planet-host giants so far reported have ages older
1091: than several $\times 10^{8}$ years (corresponding to $M \ltsim 3 M_{\odot}$),
1092: which might be related to the time scale of planet formation.
1093: A strange feature recognized from this figure is the apparent discontinuity
1094: in the metallicity distribution between giants and dwarfs; that is,
1095: while the large scatter of [Fe/H]$_{\rm dwarfs}$ seen in old stars
1096: ($age \sim 10^{10}$~yr) tends to converge toward medium-aged stars
1097: ($age \sim 10^{9}$~yr), a large spread reappears in [Fe/H]$_{\rm giants}$
1098: at $age \sim 10^{9}$~yr which again shrinks toward young stars
1099: ($age \sim 10^{8}$~yr). Also, the metallicity upper-limit of giants
1100: ($\sim +0.2$~dex) is lower than that for dwarfs ($\sim +0.4$~dex),
1101: which results in the ``lack of super-metal-rich giants'' as already
1102: remarked at the beginning of this subsection. If this trend is real,
1103: it might serve as a clue to investigate the past history of galactic
1104: chemical evolution (e.g., a special event such as a substantial infall
1105: of metal-poor primordial gas might have happened $\sim 10^{9}$ years ago).
1106: It would thus be desirable/necessary to check on late B through F
1107: main-sequence stars (i.e., progenitors of giants) whether the same
1108: tendency as seen in these G-giants is observed.
1109:
1110: %Section 7
1111: \section{Summary and Conclusion}
1112:
1113: For the purpose of clarifying the properties of the targets of
1114: Okayama Planet Search Program, we conducted a comprehensive investigation
1115: of stellar parameters and photospheric chemical abundances for 322
1116: intermediate-mass late-G giants (including 10 planet-host stars).
1117:
1118: The atmospheric parameters ($T_{\rm eff}$, $\log g$, $v_{\rm t}$, and [Fe/H])
1119: were determined from the equivalent widths of Fe~{\sc i} and Fe~{\sc ii} lines,
1120: and the mass and age were estimated from the position on the HR diagram
1121: with the help of stellar evolutionary tracks. Many of our program stars
1122: were found to be ``red-clump giants.''
1123:
1124: The kinematic parameters ($z_{\rm max}$, $V_{\rm LSR}$, $e$,
1125: $\langle R_{\rm g} \rangle$, etc.) were evaluated by computing the
1126: orbital motion in a given galactic gravitational potential.
1127: Most stars ($\sim 97\%$) appear to belong to the thin-disk population,
1128: though eight stars are suspected to be of thick-disk origin.
1129:
1130: The projected rotational velocities ($v_{\rm e}\sin i$) were determined
1131: from the width of macro-broadening function, evaluated by the spectrum-fitting
1132: in the 6080--6089~$\rm\AA$ region, by subtracting the effect of macroturbulence.
1133: We confirmed a rotational break at $T_{\rm eff} \sim 5000$~K, below which
1134: $v_{\rm e}\sin i$ quickly falls off.
1135:
1136: The photospheric chemical abundances (differential values relative to the Sun)
1137: of 17 elements (C, O, Na, Si, Ca, Sc, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, Y, Ce, Pr, Nd)
1138: were derived from the equivalent widths of selected spectral lines.
1139: The resulting [X/Fe] vs. [Fe/H] relations for giants were found to be similar
1140: to those of F--G--K dwarfs for most of the heavier elements (Si--Cu),
1141: indicating that the abundance trends of these elements may be understood
1142: within the framework of the galactic chemical evolution.
1143:
1144: However, abundance peculiarities were found in C, O, and Na, in the sense
1145: that C and O are deficient while Na is enriched, and the extents of
1146: these anomalies appear to increase with the stellar mass. We thus suspect
1147: that the surface abundances of these elements have suffered changes caused
1148: by mixing of H-burning products (CN-, ON-, and NeNa-cycle) salvaged from
1149: the deep interior, though our results for O derived from the [O~{\sc i}] 5577
1150: line should be regarded with caution which may be considerably underestimated.
1151:
1152: The metallicity distribution of planet-host giants was found to be
1153: almost the same as that of non-planet-host giants (i.e., planets are equally
1154: found for metal-poor as well as metal-rich giants), which makes marked
1155: contrast to the case of planet-host dwarfs tending to be metal-rich.
1156: Any theory for planet-formation around intermediate-mass should
1157: account for this fact.
1158:
1159: When the metallicities of these comparatively young (typical $age$ of
1160: $\sim 10^{9}$~yr) giants are compared with those of F--G--K dwarfs
1161: (mainly $10^{8}$~yr~$\ltsim age \ltsim 10^{9}$~yr), a discontinuity
1162: appears to exist between these two groups, and [Fe/H]$_{\rm giants}$
1163: tend to be somewhat lower than [Fe/H]$_{\rm giants}$ at the same age
1164: with an apparent lack of super-metal-rich ([Fe/H] $>$ 0.2) giants.
1165: \newline
1166: \newline
1167: This study is based on the observational material which has been
1168: accumulated during the course of the Okayama Planet Search Program
1169: over the past 7 years. We are grateful to all the project members
1170: for their collaboration and encouragement, as well as to the observatory
1171: staff for their helpful support in the observations.
1172: Special thanks are due to M. Omiya, E. Toyota, S. Masuda, E. Kambe,
1173: and H. Izumiura, who have made particularly large contributions
1174: in carrying out the observations. We further thank S. Ida
1175: for his insightful comments from the theoretical side concerning the
1176: metallicity-independence of planet-host giants.
1177: Financial supports by Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) No.17740106
1178: (to B.S.) and by ``The 21st Century COE Program: The Origin and Evolution
1179: of Planetary Systems'' in Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports,
1180: Science and Technology (MEXT) (to D.M.) are also acknowledged.
1181:
1182: %Appendix
1183: \appendix
1184: \section*{[O I] 5577 as Abundance Indicator}
1185:
1186: In this study, we had to invoke only one forbidden [O~{\sc i}] line
1187: of low excitation at 5577.34~$\rm\AA$
1188: (2p$^{4}$~$^{1}$D$_{2}$--2p$^{4}$~$^{1}$S$_{0}$, $\chi_{\rm low}$ = 1.97~eV)
1189: for O-abundance determination, since this was the only available line
1190: in our spectrum data covering the 5000--6200~$\rm\AA$ region.\footnote{
1191: Although we searched for the high-excitation O~{\sc i} 6155--58 lines
1192: as another possibility, they were too weak to be detected.}
1193: Having compared the resulting oxygen abundances ([O/H]$_{5577}$) with
1194: those of Takeda et al. (1998) derived from the O~{\sc i} 7771--5
1195: lines ([O/H]$_{7773}^{\rm NLTE}$)\footnote{We used
1196: $A_{\odot}^{\rm O,NLTE} = 8.82$ (Takeda \& Honda 2005)
1197: as the reference solar oxygen abundance for [O/H]$_{7773}^{\rm NLTE}$.
1198: Therefore, since the [O/H] values given in table 1
1199: of Takeda et al. (1998) are the abundances relative to $\beta$ Gem
1200: ($A_{\beta{\rm Gem}}^{\rm O,NLTE} = 8.88$), a correction of +0.06 should be
1201: added in order to convert them to the abundances relative to the Sun.} for
1202: the 12 stars in common, we found a significantly large
1203: systematic difference (by $\sim$~0.3--0.4 dex; 0.37~dex on the average)
1204: between these two (the former is lower than the latter) as shown in figure 15a.
1205: Furthermore, when compared with Luck and Heiter's (2007) [O/H]$_{6300}$
1206: results derived from the [O~{\sc i}] 6300.31~$\rm\AA$ line, a similar
1207: discrepancy was again recognized (figure 15b), which makes us suspect
1208: that our [O/H]$_{5577}$ may be considerably underestimated.
1209:
1210: The error in the $gf$ value (if any exists) is not relevant here,
1211: because our analysis is purely differential relative to the Sun.
1212: Also, it can not be due to the [O I] 5577 emission line of geo-atmospheric
1213: origin (which is surely observed in our spectrum), since its wavelength
1214: is generally different from that of the stellar line due to the Doppler
1215: shift (we anyhow gave up its measurement when an overlapping was confirmed
1216: by eye-inspection).
1217:
1218: More strangely, when it comes to F--G--K dwarfs, [O/H]$_{5577}$
1219: and [O/H]$_{7773}$ are consistent with each other as we can see in figures
1220: 15c and d (though the uncertainties in the former are larger because of
1221: the difficulty in measuring weak lines), which means that the large
1222: discrepancy ([O/H]$_{5577} < $[O/H]$_{7773}$) occurs {\it only in giants}.
1223:
1224: As a possibility for explaining this confusing situation, we speculated
1225: that ``the [O~{\sc i}] 5577 line is significantly contaminated (even if
1226: superficially undetectable) by some blending component in solar-type dwarfs
1227: (including the Sun), whereas this blending effect becomes insignificant
1228: in the condition of low-gravity giants.'' If this is really the case,
1229: while the resulting overestimated solar oxygen abundance would cause
1230: an underestimation of [O/H]$_{5577}^{\rm giants}$, the
1231: [O/H]$_{5577}^{\rm dwarfs}$ would not be essentially affected because
1232: the error (acting on both the star and the Sun) is cancelled each other.
1233:
1234: Following this consideration, we searched Kurucz and Bell's (1995) list
1235: of spectral lines in the neighborhood of 5577.34~$\rm\AA$ and found
1236: that the Y~{\sc i} line at 5577.42~$\rm\AA$ can have an appreciable
1237: contribution. In order to examine whether its blending produces any
1238: quantitatively significant effect,
1239: we carried out spectrum synthesis analyses of the [O~{\sc i}]~5577
1240: region to find the best-fit O-abundance solutions of the Sun and HD~28305
1241: ($\epsilon$ Tau; selected as a representative giant star) for the two cases:
1242: (1) both O and Y abundances are varied while including the Y~{\sc i} line,
1243: and (2) only O abundance is varied while neglecting the Y~{\sc i} line.
1244: The resulting solutions of $\log\epsilon$(O) for cases (1)/(2) are
1245: 8.99/9.05 (Sun) and 8.95/9.02 (HD~28305), and the appearance of the final
1246: fit between observed and theoretical spectra is depicted in figures 15e
1247: (Sun) and f (HD~28305). We may conclude from these results that,
1248: although this Y~{\sc i} line shows some contribution to the absorption
1249: feature at $\sim 5577$~$\rm\AA$ (its inclusion surely improves the fitting),
1250: its effect is insignificant in the quantitative sense (the extent of the
1251: abundance change is only $\ltsim 0.1$~dex) and thus can not be the cause
1252: of the discrepancy amounting to $\sim$~0.3--0.4~dex.
1253:
1254: Consequently, we could not find any reasonable solution to the problem of
1255: why our [O/H] results derived from [O~{\sc i}] 5577 for late-G giants
1256: tend to be markedly lower than those based on O~{\sc i} 7771--5 or
1257: [O~{\sc i}]~6300. Further intensive studies toward clarifying the cause
1258: of this disagreement (such as searching for some other blending candidate
1259: on an updated line list, or investigating the line-formation
1260: mechanism\footnote{According to the conventional non-LTE calculation
1261: (e.g., Takeda et al. 1998) using ordinary plain-parallel atmospheric models,
1262: the formation of the [O~{\sc i}] 5577 line is almost perfectly described
1263: in LTE; i.e., no emission line is produced.}
1264: in the presence of the extended circumstellar gas in order to search for a
1265: possibility of filled-in emission which may lead to a weakening of absorption)
1266: would be required to settle this puzzling situation.
1267:
1268: In any case, modestly speaking, our results on oxygen abundances should be
1269: viewed with caution since they may be systematically underestimated,
1270: though we would not conclude them to be totally erroneous
1271: as long as a possibility still exists (even if marginal) that
1272: the results from the other lines are overestimated by some unknown
1273: reasons (e.g., blending effect in [O~{\sc i}] 6300 occurring only in giants,
1274: intensification of O~{\sc i} 7771--5 lines caused by chromospheric
1275: temperature rise).
1276:
1277: %Figure 15
1278: \setcounter{figure}{14}
1279: \begin{figure}
1280: \begin{center}
1281: \FigureFile(80mm,140mm){figure15.eps}
1282: %%% \FigureFile(width,height){filename}
1283: \end{center}
1284: % \caption{This is the first figure.}\label{fig:sample}
1285: \caption{
1286: (a) [O/H]$^{\rm NLTE}_{7773}$ (from O~{\sc i} 7771--5; Takeda et al. 1998) vs.
1287: [O/H]$_{5577}$ (from [O~{\sc i}] 5577; this study) correlation for
1288: 12 stars in common. The relation
1289: $\langle$[O/H]$^{\rm NLTE}_{7773}\rangle - \langle$[O/H]$_{5577}\rangle = -0.37$
1290: holds between these two averages, as shown by the dashed line.
1291: (b) Comparison of [O/H]$_{6300}$ determined by Luck and Heiter (1997)
1292: from the [O~{\sc i}] 6300 line with [O/H]$_{5577}$ derived in this study
1293: based on the [O~{\sc i}] 5577 line, for 93 stars in common.
1294: The dashed line indicates the relation [O/H]$_{6300}$ = [O/H]$_{5577}$ + 0.37
1295: tentatively drawn in analogy with panel (a).
1296: (c) Comparison of [O/H]$_{7773}^{\rm NLTE}$ and [O/H]$_{5577}$ for F--G--K
1297: dwarfs. The former is the non-LTE abundance derived from
1298: O~{\sc i} 7771--5 triplet lines taken from table 2 of Takeda and Honda
1299: (2005), while the latter is the (LTE) abundance from the [O~{\sc i}] 5577 line
1300: newly determined for this study based on Takeda et al.'s (2005a) spectra
1301: database (measurable for 70 objects out of 160 stars available).
1302: (d) [O/Fe] vs. [Fe/H] relation for F--G--K dwarfs.
1303: Open squares represent [O/Fe]$_{5577}$ for 70 stars described above,
1304: while filled circles correspond to [O/Fe]$_{7773}^{\rm NLTE}$ of
1305: 160 stars (i.e., the same as figure 6c of Takeda \& Honda 2005).
1306: (e) Spectrum fitting of the solar flux spectrum (Kurucz et al. 1984)
1307: in the 5577.0--5577.6~$\rm\AA$ region comprising [O~{\sc i}] 5577.34 and
1308: Y~{\sc i} 5577.42 lines. Open circles represent the observed spectrum,
1309: while the best-fit theoretical spectra for two cases of different treatment
1310: for the Y~{\sc i} line are shown by the solid line (Y~{\sc i} line included)
1311: and the dashed line (Y~{\sc i} line neglected). The strong feature at
1312: $\lambda \sim 5577$~$\rm\AA$ is due to Fe~{\sc i} 5577.03.
1313: (f) Spectrum fitting of HD~28305 ($\epsilon$ Tau) in the
1314: 5577.0--5577.6~$\rm\AA$ region. Otherwise, the same as in panel (e).
1315: }
1316: \end{figure}
1317:
1318: \newpage
1319:
1320: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1321: % Journals(e.g. A\&A,ApJ,AJ,NMRAS,PASP ...)
1322: %
1323: \bibitem[]{}
1324: Alonso, A., Arribas, S., \& Mart\'{\i}nez-Roger, C. 1999,
1325: A\&AS, 140, 261
1326: \bibitem[]{}
1327: Arenou, F., Grenon, M., \& G\'{o}mez, A. 1992, A\&A, 258, 104
1328: \bibitem[]{}
1329: Boss, A. P. 1997, Science, 276, 1836
1330: \bibitem[]{}
1331: da Silva, L., et al. 2006, A\&A, 458, 609
1332: \bibitem[]{}
1333: de Medeiros, J. R., \& Mayor, M. 1999, A\&AS, 139, 433
1334: \bibitem[]{}
1335: ESA 1997, The Hipparcos and Tycho Catalogues, ESA SP-1200
1336: \bibitem[]{}
1337: Gonzalez, G. 2003, Reviews of Modern Physics, 75, 101
1338: \bibitem[]{}
1339: Gray, D. F. 1988, Lectures on Spectral-Line Analysis: F, G, and K stars
1340: (Arva, Ontario: The Publisher)
1341: \bibitem[]{}
1342: Gray, D. F. 1989, ApJ, 347, 1021
1343: \bibitem[]{}
1344: Gray, D. F. 2005, The Observation and Analysis of Stellar Photospheres,
1345: 3rd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
1346: \bibitem[]{}
1347: Hatzes, A. P., et al. 2006, A\&A, 457, 335
1348: \bibitem[]{}
1349: Hayashi, C., Nakazawa, K., \& Nakagawa, Y. 1985,
1350: in Protostars and Planets II (A86-12626 03-90)
1351: (Tucson, Arizona: University of Arizona Press), p.1100
1352: \bibitem[]{}
1353: Hekker, S., \& Mel\'{e}ndez, J. 2007, A\&A, 475, 1003
1354: \bibitem[]{}
1355: Ibukiyama, A., \& Arimoto, N. 2002, A\&A, 394, 927
1356: \bibitem[]{}
1357: Ida, S., \& Lin, D. N. C 2004, ApJ, 616, 567
1358: \bibitem[]{}
1359: Johnson, J. A., et al. 2007, ApJ, 665, 785
1360: \bibitem[]{}
1361: Kraft, R. P. 1994, PASP, 106, 553
1362: \bibitem[]{}
1363: Kurucz, R. L. 1992, in The Stellar Populations of Galaxies,
1364: Proc. IAU Symp. 149, eds. B. Barbuy \& A. Renzini (Dordrecht: Kluwer), p.225
1365: \bibitem[]{}
1366: Kurucz, R. L. 1993, Kurucz CD-ROM No.13, Atlas 9 Stellar
1367: Atmosphere Programs and 2 km~s$^{-1}$ Grid
1368: (Cambridge: Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory)
1369: [available at $\langle$http://kurucz.harvard.edu/cdroms.html$\rangle$]
1370: \bibitem[]{}
1371: Kurucz, R. L., \& Bell, B. 1995, Kurucz CD-ROM No.23,
1372: Atomic Line List (Cambridge: Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory)
1373: [available at $\langle$http://kurucz.harvard.edu/cdroms.html$\rangle$]
1374: \bibitem[]{}
1375: Kurucz, R. L., Furenlid, I., Brault, J., \& Testerman, L. 1984,
1376: Solar Flux Atlas from 296 to 1300 nm
1377: (Sunspot, New Mexico: National Solar Observatory)
1378: [available at $\langle$http://kurucz.harvard.edu/sun.html$\rangle$]
1379: \bibitem[]{}
1380: Lejeune, T., \& Schaerer, D. 2001, A\&A, 366, 538
1381: \bibitem[]{}
1382: Liu, Y.-J., et al. 2008, ApJ, 672, 553
1383: \bibitem[]{}
1384: Luck, R. E., \& Heiter, U. 2007, AJ, 133, 2464
1385: \bibitem[]{}
1386: Luck, R. E., \& Lambert, D. L. 1985, ApJ, 298, 782
1387: \bibitem[]{}
1388: Massarotti, A., Latham, D. W., Stefanik, R. P., \& Fogel, J. 2008,
1389: AJ, 135, 209
1390: \bibitem[]{}
1391: McWilliam, A. 1990, ApJS, 74, 1075
1392: \bibitem[]{}
1393: Pasquini, L., D\"{o}llinger, M. P., Weiss, A., Girardi, L.,
1394: Chavero, C., Hatzes, A. P., da Silva, L., \& Setiawan, J. 2007,
1395: A\&A, 473, 979
1396: \bibitem[]{}
1397: Reffert, S., Quirrenbach, A., Mitchell, D. S., Simon, A., Hekker, S.,
1398: Fischer, D. A., Marcy, G. W., \& Butler, R. P. 2006, AJ, 652, 661
1399: \bibitem[]{}
1400: Sato, B., et al. 2003, ApJ, 597, L157
1401: \bibitem[]{}
1402: Sato, B., et al. 2007, ApJ, 661, 527
1403: \bibitem[]{}
1404: Sato, B., et al. 2008, PASJ, in press
1405: \bibitem[]{}
1406: Takeda, Y. 1995, PASJ, 47, 287
1407: \bibitem[]{}
1408: Takeda, Y. 2007, PASJ, 59, 335
1409: \bibitem[]{}
1410: Takeda, Y., et al. 2005a, PASJ, 57, 13
1411: \bibitem[]{}
1412: Takeda, Y., \& Honda, S. 2005, PASJ, 57, 65
1413: \bibitem[]{}
1414: Takeda, Y., Kawanomoto, S., Honda, S., Ando, H., \& Sakurai, T. 2007,
1415: A\&A, 468, 663
1416: \bibitem[]{}
1417: Takeda, Y., Kawanomoto, S., \& Sadakane, K. 1998,
1418: PASJ, 50, 97
1419: \bibitem[]{}
1420: Takeda, Y., Ohkubo, M., \& Sadakane, K. 2002,
1421: PASJ, 54, 451
1422: \bibitem[]{}
1423: Takeda, Y., Ohkubo, M., Sato, B., Kambe, E., \& Sadakane, K. 2005b,
1424: PASJ, 57, 27 [Erratum: 57, 415]
1425: \bibitem[]{}
1426: Takeda, Y., Sato, B., Kambe, E., Izumiura, H., Masuda, S.,
1427: \& Ando, H. 2005c, PASJ, 57, 109 (Paper~I)
1428: \bibitem[]{}
1429: Takeda, Y., \& Takada-Hidai, M. 1994, PASJ, 46, 395
1430: \bibitem[]{}
1431: Udry, S., \& Santos, N. 2007, ARA\&A, 45, 397
1432: \bibitem[]{}
1433: Zhao, G., Qiu, H. M., \& Mao, S. 2001, ApJ, 551, L85
1434: \end{thebibliography}
1435:
1436: \newpage
1437:
1438: %\clearpage
1439: \onecolumn
1440:
1441: %Figure 11
1442: \setcounter{figure}{10}
1443: \begin{figure}
1444: \begin{center}
1445: \FigureFile(160mm,200mm){figure11.eps}
1446: %%% \FigureFile(width,height){filename}
1447: \end{center}
1448: % \caption{This is the first figure.}\label{fig:sample}
1449: \caption{
1450: In panels (a) through (q), [X/Fe] values ($\equiv$ [X/H] $-$ [Fe/H]
1451: for each element X) derived from our abundance analyses using the
1452: measured equivalent widths are plotted against [Fe/H].
1453: (a) [C/Fe], (b) [O/Fe] (see Appendix for the meaning of the horizontal
1454: dotted line at [O/Fe] = $-0.37$, down to which the zero-point
1455: might be lowered), (c) [Na/Fe], (d) [Si/Fe], (e) [Ca/Fe],
1456: (f) [Sc/Fe], (g) [Ti/Fe], (h) [V/Fe], (i) [Cr/Fe], (j) [Mn/Fe],
1457: (k) [Co/Fe], (l) [Ni/Fe], (m) [Cu/Fe], (n) [Y/Fe], (o) [Ce/Fe],
1458: (p) [Pr/Fe], and (q) [Nd/Fe]. For Sc, Ti, V, and Cr, two kinds of
1459: results from lines of different ionization stages are separately
1460: shown in panels (f), (g), (h), and (i), respectively, where the lower
1461: results (vertically offset by $-0.5$~dex) may be comparatively less
1462: reliable because of being based on smaller number of lines.
1463: Meanwhile, the [X/Fe]$_{6085}$ values corresponding to the abundances
1464: ($A_{6085}^{\rm Si}$, $A_{6085}^{\rm Ti}$, $A_{6085}^{\rm V}$,
1465: $A_{6085}^{\rm Fe}$, $A_{6085}^{\rm Co}$, and $A_{6085}^{\rm Ni}$)
1466: derived from the spectrum fitting in the 6080--6089~$\rm\AA$ region
1467: are plotted against [Fe/H]$_{6085}$ in the last three panels:
1468: (r) [Si/Fe]$_{6085}$ and [Ti/Fe] (offset by $-0.5$~dex),
1469: (s) [V/Fe]$_{6085}$ and $A_{\rm std}^{\rm Fe} - A_{6085}^{\rm Fe}$
1470: (offset by $-0.5$~dex), and (t) [Co/Fe]$_{6085}$ and [Ni/Fe]
1471: (offset by $-0.5$~dex). In all panels, 10 planet-host stars are
1472: indicated by open symbols.
1473: }
1474: \end{figure}
1475:
1476: \setcounter{table}{0}
1477: %\scriptsize
1478: \small
1479: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{0.8}
1480: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{3pt}
1481: \begin{longtable}{rlccccrrrrrrrcrcc}
1482: \caption{Basic data and the parameter solutions of the program stars.}
1483: %\begin{center}
1484: %\begin{tabular}{rl@{}ccccrrrrrrrcrcc}
1485: \hline\hline
1486: HD & Sp. & $V$ & $T_{\rm eff}$ & $\log g$ & $v_{\rm t}$ &
1487: [Fe/H] & $\pi$ & $\sigma_{\pi} / \pi$ & $A_{V}$ & $M_{V}$ & B.C. &
1488: $\log L$ & $M$ & $\log age$ & $\log g_{TLM}$ & Rem. \\
1489: \hline
1490: \endhead
1491: \hline
1492: \endfoot
1493: %%% begining of foot in last page
1494: \hline
1495: \multicolumn{15}{l}{\hbox to 0pt{\parbox{180mm}{\footnotesize
1496: Note. \\
1497: The basic stellar data in columns 1--3 are self$-$explanatory,
1498: which were taken from the Hipparcos catalogue.
1499: The values of $T_{\rm eff}$ (in K) , $\log g$ (in cm~s$^{-2}$),
1500: $v_{\rm t}$ (in km~s$^{-1}$), and [Fe/H] given in columns 4--7
1501: are the finally established solutions based on our spectroscopic
1502: method using Fe~{\sc i} and Fe~{\sc ii} lines. Columns 8--15 gives
1503: the Hipparcos parallax ($\pi$; in unit of m.a.s.) along with the
1504: fractional error ($\sigma_{\pi}/\pi$) involved (ESA 1997), the
1505: estimated interstellar extinction ($A_{V}$), the absolute visual
1506: magnitude ($M_{V}$), the bolometric correction (B.C.), the stellar
1507: luminosity ($\log L/L_{\odot}$), the stellar mass ($M/M_{\odot}$),
1508: the stellar age ($\log age$, in yr) and the
1509: theoretical surface gravity ($\log g_{TLM}$, in cm~s$^{-2}$).
1510: See the text (sections 2 and 3) for more details. The planet-host
1511: stars are indicated by ``PHS'' in column 17, where ``PHS (BD)'' for
1512: HD~107383 means that the companion is considered to be a brown dwarf.
1513: }}}
1514: \endlastfoot
1515: \hline
1516: 87&G5~III & 5.55& 5072& 2.63& 1.35& $-$0.07& 8.8& 0.09& 0.07& +0.19& $-$0.24& 1.92& 2.74& 8.66& 2.73& \\
1517: 360&G8~III: & 5.99& 4850& 2.62& 1.34& $-$0.08& 9.8& 0.09& 0.10& +0.84& $-$0.32& 1.69& 2.34& 8.86& 2.82& \\
1518: 448&G9~III & 5.57& 4780& 2.51& 1.32& +0.03& 11.2& 0.06& 0.12& +0.69& $-$0.34& 1.76& 2.25& 8.99& 2.70& \\
1519: 587&K1~III & 5.84& 4893& 3.08& 1.13& $-$0.09& 18.2& 0.05& 0.10& +2.04& $-$0.30& 1.20& 1.58& 9.36& 3.15& \\
1520: 645&K0~III & 5.84& 4880& 3.03& 1.18& +0.07& 15.3& 0.05& 0.10& +1.67& $-$0.30& 1.35& 1.95& 9.08& 3.08& \\
1521: 1239&G8~III & 5.74& 5114& 2.21& 1.63& $-$0.24& 5.1& 0.11& 0.49& $-$1.22& $-$0.23& 2.48& 3.75& 8.28& 2.32& \\
1522: 2114&G5~III & 5.77& 5230& 2.57& 1.57& $-$0.03& 5.5& 0.19& 0.10& $-$0.63& $-$0.19& 2.23& 3.29& 8.45& 2.55& \\
1523: 2952&K0~III & 5.93& 4844& 2.67& 1.32& +0.00& 8.7& 0.08& 0.18& +0.44& $-$0.32& 1.85& 2.54& 8.76& 2.69& \\
1524: 3421&G5~III & 5.45& 5287& 1.88& 2.14& $-$0.20& 3.2& 0.24& 0.24& $-$2.27& $-$0.18& 2.88& 4.43& 8.13& 2.05& \\
1525: 3546&G5~III...& 4.34& 4882& 2.09& 1.44& $-$0.67& 19.3& 0.04& 0.08& +0.69& $-$0.31& 1.75& 2.00& 8.95& 2.70& \\
1526: 3817&G8~III & 5.30& 5041& 2.52& 1.40& $-$0.12& 9.5& 0.09& 0.11& +0.07& $-$0.25& 1.97& 2.81& 8.62& 2.68& \\
1527: 3856&G9~III-IV& 5.83& 4766& 2.28& 1.35& $-$0.15& 6.5& 0.09& 0.42& $-$0.53& $-$0.35& 2.25& 3.09& 8.55& 2.34& \\
1528: 4188&K0~IIIvar& 4.77& 4844& 2.58& 1.32& $-$0.01& 15.5& 0.05& 0.10& +0.63& $-$0.32& 1.77& 2.54& 8.75& 2.76& \\
1529: 4398&G8/K0~III& 5.49& 4892& 2.56& 1.37& $-$0.18& 9.8& 0.07& 0.10& +0.34& $-$0.30& 1.88& 2.59& 8.72& 2.68& \\
1530: 4440&K0~IV & 5.86& 4842& 2.91& 1.15& $-$0.10& 14.7& 0.09& 0.04& +1.65& $-$0.32& 1.37& 1.81& 9.19& 3.02& \\
1531: 4627&G8~III & 5.92& 4599& 2.05& 1.40& $-$0.20& 4.9& 0.17& 0.12& $-$0.74& $-$0.43& 2.37& 3.06& 8.56& 2.16& \\
1532: 4732&K0~III & 5.90& 4959& 3.16& 1.12& +0.01& 17.7& 0.06& 0.10& +2.04& $-$0.27& 1.19& 1.74& 9.24& 3.22& \\
1533: 5395&G8~III-IV& 4.62& 4774& 2.17& 1.40& $-$0.45& 15.8& 0.04& 0.18& +0.44& $-$0.35& 1.86& 1.95& 9.08& 2.54& \\
1534: 5608&K0 & 5.99& 4854& 3.03& 1.08& +0.06& 17.2& 0.05& 0.06& +2.11& $-$0.31& 1.18& 1.55& 9.40& 3.15& \\
1535: 5722&G7~III & 5.62& 4893& 2.49& 1.39& $-$0.23& 10.3& 0.09& 0.10& +0.59& $-$0.30& 1.78& 2.26& 8.95& 2.72& \\
1536: 6186&K0~III & 4.27& 4829& 2.30& 1.35& $-$0.31& 17.1& 0.05& 0.05& +0.39& $-$0.32& 1.88& 2.30& 8.92& 2.61& \\
1537: 7087&K0~III & 4.66& 4908& 2.39& 1.53& $-$0.04& 7.4& 0.09& 0.14& $-$1.13& $-$0.29& 2.47& 3.83& 8.28& 2.27& \\
1538: 9057&K0~III & 5.27& 4883& 2.49& 1.37& +0.04& 11.3& 0.07& 0.09& +0.44& $-$0.30& 1.85& 2.56& 8.78& 2.71& \\
1539: 9408&K0~III & 4.68& 4746& 2.21& 1.40& $-$0.34& 16.0& 0.04& 0.18& +0.52& $-$0.36& 1.83& 2.04& 9.00& 2.57& \\
1540: 9774&G8~II-III& 5.28& 4980& 2.50& 1.60& +0.02& 7.3& 0.10& 0.09& $-$0.49& $-$0.27& 2.20& 3.25& 8.46& 2.49& \\
1541: 10348&K0~III & 5.97& 4931& 2.55& 1.56& +0.01& 6.2& 0.13& 0.22& $-$0.28& $-$0.28& 2.12& 3.04& 8.54& 2.52& \\
1542: 10761&K0~III & 4.26& 4952& 2.43& 1.43& $-$0.05& 12.6& 0.07& 0.07& $-$0.30& $-$0.28& 2.13& 3.04& 8.53& 2.52& \\
1543: 10975&K0~III & 5.94& 4866& 2.47& 1.37& $-$0.17& 10.6& 0.07& 0.10& +0.96& $-$0.31& 1.64& 2.19& 8.94& 2.84& \\
1544: 11037&G9~III & 5.91& 4862& 2.45& 1.33& $-$0.14& 9.9& 0.09& 0.08& +0.82& $-$0.31& 1.70& 2.30& 8.88& 2.80& \\
1545: 11949&K0~IV & 5.70& 4845& 2.85& 1.17& $-$0.10& 13.2& 0.05& 0.11& +1.20& $-$0.32& 1.55& 2.17& 8.94& 2.92& \\
1546: 12139&K0~III-IV& 5.89& 4833& 2.53& 1.36& $-$0.09& 8.2& 0.10& 0.12& +0.33& $-$0.32& 1.89& 2.45& 8.87& 2.62& \\
1547: 12339&G8~III & 5.22& 5011& 2.52& 1.51& $-$0.03& 7.7& 0.07& 0.08& $-$0.44& $-$0.26& 2.18& 3.19& 8.48& 2.51& \\
1548: 12583&K0~II/III& 5.87& 4969& 2.51& 1.45& +0.00& 9.9& 0.09& 0.10& +0.75& $-$0.27& 1.71& 2.48& 8.78& 2.86& \\
1549: 13468&G9~III: & 5.94& 4893& 2.54& 1.34& $-$0.16& 9.2& 0.09& 0.09& +0.67& $-$0.30& 1.75& 2.31& 8.92& 2.76& \\
1550: 13692&K0~III & 5.86& 4868& 2.55& 1.35& $-$0.12& 8.2& 0.10& 0.10& +0.32& $-$0.31& 1.90& 2.52& 8.80& 2.65& \\
1551: 13994&G7~III & 5.99& 4974& 2.44& 1.83& $-$0.11& 4.6& 0.15& 0.52& $-$1.22& $-$0.27& 2.50& 3.84& 8.28& 2.27& \\
1552: 14129&G8~III & 5.51& 4936& 2.61& 1.37& $-$0.01& 9.6& 0.10& 0.10& +0.32& $-$0.28& 1.88& 2.70& 8.68& 2.71& \\
1553: 14770&G8~III & 5.19& 4977& 2.47& 1.47& +0.01& 8.7& 0.08& 0.17& $-$0.28& $-$0.27& 2.12& 3.03& 8.54& 2.54& \\
1554: 15779&G3~III: & 5.36& 4846& 2.63& 1.26& +0.00& 12.3& 0.09& 0.07& +0.73& $-$0.32& 1.73& 2.49& 8.78& 2.79& \\
1555: 15920&G8~III & 5.17& 5061& 2.74& 1.33& $-$0.06& 12.7& 0.04& 0.29& +0.40& $-$0.24& 1.84& 2.63& 8.71& 2.79& \\
1556: 16400&G5~III: & 5.65& 4785& 2.35& 1.33& $-$0.06& 10.3& 0.09& 0.08& +0.63& $-$0.34& 1.78& 2.43& 8.82& 2.71& \\
1557: 16901&G0~Ib & 5.43& 5624& 1.42& 3.17& +0.00& 4.7& 0.19& 0.37& $-$1.57& $-$0.11& 2.57& 4.03& 8.21& 2.43& \\
1558: 17656&G8~III & 5.86& 5100& 2.67& 1.37& $-$0.06& 8.2& 0.10& 0.22& +0.21& $-$0.23& 1.91& 2.73& 8.66& 2.75& \\
1559: 17824&K0~III & 4.76& 5051& 2.82& 1.19& $-$0.04& 17.9& 0.04& 0.10& +0.92& $-$0.24& 1.63& 2.37& 8.83& 2.95& \\
1560: 18474&G4p & 5.47& 5013& 2.38& 1.42& $-$0.23& 5.8& 0.13& 0.30& $-$0.99& $-$0.26& 2.40& 3.59& 8.33& 2.35& \\
1561: 18953&K0~II-III& 5.32& 5029& 2.93& 1.23& +0.14& 12.7& 0.07& 0.10& +0.73& $-$0.25& 1.71& 2.53& 8.74& 2.89& \\
1562: 18970&K0~II-III& 4.77& 4791& 2.44& 1.30& $-$0.07& 15.9& 0.05& 0.19& +0.59& $-$0.34& 1.80& 2.44& 8.81& 2.70& \\
1563: 19476&K0~III & 3.79& 4933& 2.82& 1.24& +0.14& 29.1& 0.02& 0.06& +1.05& $-$0.28& 1.59& 2.36& 8.83& 2.94& \\
1564: 19525&G9~III & 6.28& 4801& 2.59& 1.38& $-$0.11& 7.0& 0.16& 0.08& +0.42& $-$0.33& 1.87& 2.37& 8.88& 2.63& \\
1565: 19845&G9~III & 5.93& 4968& 2.86& 1.30& +0.14& 10.5& 0.06& 0.17& +0.86& $-$0.27& 1.67& 2.47& 8.77& 2.90& \\
1566: 20618&G8~IV & 5.91& 5049& 3.08& 1.10& $-$0.22& 15.9& 0.07& 0.06& +1.85& $-$0.25& 1.26& 1.85& 9.12& 3.21& \\
1567: 20791&G8.5~III & 5.70& 4976& 2.63& 1.36& +0.07& 11.2& 0.07& 0.03& +0.92& $-$0.27& 1.64& 2.42& 8.81& 2.93& \\
1568: 20894&G8~III & 5.50& 5119& 2.67& 1.44& $-$0.07& 7.8& 0.09& 0.16& $-$0.21& $-$0.22& 2.07& 2.97& 8.56& 2.63& \\
1569: 21755&G8~III & 5.93& 5012& 2.45& 1.39& $-$0.13& 6.3& 0.15& 0.10& $-$0.17& $-$0.26& 2.07& 2.95& 8.56& 2.59& \\
1570: 22409&G7~III: & 5.56& 5005& 2.67& 1.32& $-$0.25& 8.6& 0.09& 0.14& +0.09& $-$0.26& 1.97& 2.78& 8.62& 2.66& \\
1571: 22675&G5~III: & 5.86& 4878& 2.50& 1.29& $-$0.06& 8.3& 0.09& 0.15& +0.32& $-$0.30& 1.89& 2.58& 8.76& 2.66& \\
1572: 22796&G6~III: & 5.55& 4999& 2.72& 1.36& $-$0.10& 8.1& 0.10& 0.06& +0.04& $-$0.26& 1.99& 2.76& 8.67& 2.64& \\
1573: 23526&G9~III & 5.91& 4837& 2.50& 1.30& $-$0.15& 9.7& 0.09& 0.04& +0.80& $-$0.32& 1.71& 2.27& 8.90& 2.78& \\
1574: 26409&G8~III & 5.44& 5012& 2.67& 1.42& +0.03& 8.7& 0.09& 0.05& +0.08& $-$0.26& 1.97& 2.82& 8.62& 2.67& \\
1575: 27022&G5~III & 5.26& 5314& 2.92& 1.29& $-$0.01& 9.8& 0.07& 0.25& $-$0.03& $-$0.17& 1.98& 2.84& 8.62& 2.76& \\
1576: 27348&G8~III & 4.93& 5001& 2.75& 1.26& +0.05& 14.4& 0.06& 0.45& +0.27& $-$0.26& 1.90& 2.74& 8.66& 2.73& \\
1577: 27371&G8~III & 3.65& 4923& 2.57& 1.34& +0.10& 21.2& 0.06& 0.06& +0.22& $-$0.29& 1.93& 2.80& 8.63& 2.68& \\
1578: 27697&G8~III & 3.77& 4984& 2.64& 1.38& +0.12& 21.3& 0.04& 0.06& +0.35& $-$0.27& 1.87& 2.73& 8.66& 2.75& \\
1579: 27971&K1~III & 5.29& 4886& 2.62& 1.31& +0.05& 13.4& 0.06& 0.48& +0.45& $-$0.30& 1.84& 2.56& 8.77& 2.71& \\
1580: 28100&G8~III & 4.69& 5011& 2.54& 1.59& $-$0.08& 7.2& 0.11& 0.24& $-$1.27& $-$0.26& 2.51& 3.94& 8.23& 2.28& \\
1581: 28305&K0~III & 3.53& 4883& 2.57& 1.46& +0.13& 21.0& 0.04& 0.06& +0.09& $-$0.30& 1.99& 2.84& 8.62& 2.62& PHS \\
1582: 28307&G7~III & 3.84& 4924& 2.63& 1.24& +0.10& 20.7& 0.04& 0.08& +0.34& $-$0.29& 1.88& 2.73& 8.66& 2.72& \\
1583: 29737&G6/G8~III& 5.56& 4858& 2.33& 1.37& $-$0.45& 10.3& 0.07& 0.21& +0.42& $-$0.31& 1.86& 2.23& 8.93& 2.63& \\
1584: 30557&G9~III & 5.64& 4859& 2.57& 1.31& $-$0.02& 10.2& 0.07& 0.34& +0.33& $-$0.31& 1.89& 2.51& 8.84& 2.65& \\
1585: 30814&K0~III & 5.03& 4842& 2.54& 1.34& $-$0.02& 13.4& 0.05& 0.18& +0.49& $-$0.32& 1.83& 2.49& 8.80& 2.70& \\
1586: 32008&G4~V & 5.39& 5235& 3.21& 1.10& $-$0.25& 18.3& 0.06& 0.06& +1.64& $-$0.20& 1.32& 1.96& 9.04& 3.24& \\
1587: 33833&G7~III & 5.90& 4963& 2.67& 1.33& $-$0.04& 7.3& 0.10& 0.13& +0.09& $-$0.27& 1.97& 2.78& 8.65& 2.65& \\
1588: 34538&G8~IV & 5.48& 4809& 2.86& 1.08& $-$0.39& 20.7& 0.04& 0.05& +2.01& $-$0.33& 1.23& 1.25& 9.65& 2.99& \\
1589: 34559&G8~III & 4.96& 4998& 2.74& 1.36& +0.00& 15.8& 0.05& 0.24& +0.72& $-$0.26& 1.72& 2.49& 8.77& 2.87& \\
1590: 35369&G8~III & 4.13& 4852& 2.44& 1.33& $-$0.25& 18.7& 0.04& 0.06& +0.43& $-$0.31& 1.85& 2.33& 8.90& 2.65& \\
1591: 35410&K0~III & 5.07& 4809& 2.58& 1.17& $-$0.33& 18.9& 0.04& 0.05& +1.41& $-$0.33& 1.47& 1.69& 9.24& 2.88& \\
1592: 36079&G5~II & 2.81& 5209& 2.45& 1.62& $-$0.25& 20.5& 0.04& 0.05& $-$0.68& $-$0.20& 2.25& 3.29& 8.43& 2.52& \\
1593: 37160&G8~III-IV& 4.09& 4704& 2.49& 1.19& $-$0.65& 28.1& 0.03& 0.03& +1.30& $-$0.38& 1.53& 1.08& 9.87& 2.58& \\
1594: 38527&G8~III & 5.78& 5046& 2.77& 1.19& $-$0.11& 10.9& 0.08& 0.07& +0.89& $-$0.25& 1.64& 2.36& 8.83& 2.93& \\
1595: 38656&G8~III & 4.51& 4901& 2.50& 1.35& $-$0.17& 15.3& 0.05& 0.07& +0.37& $-$0.30& 1.87& 2.57& 8.74& 2.69& \\
1596: 39004&G7~III: & 5.60& 5002& 2.67& 1.39& +0.04& 8.7& 0.11& 0.20& +0.09& $-$0.26& 1.97& 2.83& 8.62& 2.67& \\
1597: 39007&G8~III & 5.79& 4994& 2.69& 1.16& +0.08& 9.8& 0.09& 0.08& +0.66& $-$0.26& 1.74& 2.55& 8.74& 2.85& \\
1598: 39019&G9~III: & 5.54& 4964& 2.91& 1.30& +0.19& 10.4& 0.10& 0.07& +0.56& $-$0.27& 1.79& 2.65& 8.69& 2.81& \\
1599: 39364&G8~III/IV& 3.76& 4593& 2.30& 1.18& $-$0.72& 29.1& 0.02& 0.04& +1.04& $-$0.43& 1.66& 0.94& 10.03& 2.36& \\
1600: 41361&G7~III: & 5.67& 4921& 2.12& 1.82& $-$0.08& 3.0& 0.29& 0.31& $-$2.28& $-$0.29& 2.93& 4.79& 8.05& 1.91& \\
1601: 41597&G8~III & 5.35& 4494& 1.69& 1.46& $-$0.62& 9.3& 0.07& 0.05& +0.15& $-$0.49& 2.04& 1.34& 9.58& 2.09& \\
1602: 43023&G8~III & 5.83& 5005& 2.71& 1.30& $-$0.10& 10.4& 0.07& 0.06& +0.85& $-$0.26& 1.66& 2.38& 8.82& 2.90& \\
1603: 43039&G8~IIIvar& 4.32& 4726& 2.27& 1.40& $-$0.32& 19.3& 0.04& 0.05& +0.70& $-$0.37& 1.77& 1.86& 9.12& 2.59& \\
1604: 45410&K0~IV & 5.86& 4978& 3.16& 1.10& $-$0.13& 17.6& 0.04& 0.03& +2.05& $-$0.27& 1.19& 1.71& 9.24& 3.23& \\
1605: 45415&G9~III & 5.55& 4753& 2.39& 1.33& $-$0.12& 11.2& 0.07& 0.11& +0.68& $-$0.36& 1.77& 1.96& 9.12& 2.62& \\
1606: 46241&K0~V & 5.88& 4919& 2.57& 1.37& $-$0.05& 6.3& 0.15& 0.19& $-$0.31& $-$0.29& 2.14& 3.04& 8.53& 2.50& \\
1607: 46480&G8~IV-V & 5.94& 4866& 3.04& 1.05& $-$0.55& 18.8& 0.04& 0.03& +2.28& $-$0.31& 1.11& 1.08& 9.94& 3.06& \\
1608: 48432&K0~III & 5.34& 4891& 2.83& 1.19& $-$0.11& 15.7& 0.05& 0.03& +1.29& $-$0.30& 1.51& 2.12& 8.97& 2.97& \\
1609: 50522&G5~III-IV& 4.35& 4850& 2.71& 0.96& +0.04& 19.1& 0.04& 0.03& +0.73& $-$0.31& 1.73& 2.50& 8.77& 2.80& \\
1610: 51000&G5~III & 5.91& 5203& 2.94& 1.33& $-$0.06& 8.5& 0.11& 0.05& +0.50& $-$0.20& 1.78& 2.56& 8.73& 2.89& \\
1611: 51814&G8~III & 5.96& 4846& 2.23& 1.57& $-$0.02& 3.5& 0.25& 0.16& $-$1.47& $-$0.32& 2.61& 4.17& 8.16& 2.14& \\
1612: 53329&G8~IV & 5.55& 4888& 2.35& 1.35& $-$0.48& 10.7& 0.08& 0.01& +0.68& $-$0.30& 1.75& 1.99& 9.05& 2.70& \\
1613: 54131&G8~III & 5.47& 4737& 2.37& 1.31& $-$0.18& 10.7& 0.08& 0.08& +0.53& $-$0.36& 1.83& 2.26& 8.91& 2.62& \\
1614: 54810&K0~III & 4.91& 4703& 2.48& 1.23& $-$0.32& 15.4& 0.05& 0.04& +0.81& $-$0.38& 1.73& 2.09& 8.96& 2.68& \\
1615: 55730&G6~III & 5.71& 4810& 2.47& 1.38& $-$0.17& 9.8& 0.09& 0.08& +0.60& $-$0.33& 1.79& 2.33& 8.86& 2.70& \\
1616: 57478&G8/K0~III& 5.59& 5032& 2.35& 1.43& $-$0.04& 5.9& 0.13& 0.12& $-$0.69& $-$0.25& 2.28& 3.42& 8.40& 2.46& \\
1617: 57727&G8~III & 5.04& 5001& 2.89& 1.18& $-$0.12& 21.2& 0.04& 0.00& +1.67& $-$0.26& 1.34& 1.96& 9.07& 3.14& \\
1618: 58367&G8~III & 4.99& 4911& 1.76& 2.04& $-$0.14& 3.3& 0.27& 0.20& $-$2.62& $-$0.29& 3.07& 4.78& 8.03& 1.77& \\
1619: 60986&K0~III & 5.58& 5059& 2.78& 1.31& +0.03& 10.7& 0.09& 0.01& +0.71& $-$0.24& 1.71& 2.50& 8.77& 2.89& \\
1620: 61363&K0~III & 5.58& 4762& 2.33& 1.38& $-$0.31& 10.0& 0.08& 0.05& +0.53& $-$0.35& 1.83& 2.12& 8.96& 2.60& \\
1621: 62345&G8~III & 3.57& 4979& 2.58& 1.39& $-$0.06& 22.7& 0.04& 0.00& +0.35& $-$0.27& 1.87& 2.65& 8.70& 2.74& \\
1622: 62509&K0~IIIvar& 1.16& 4904& 2.84& 1.26& +0.06& 96.7& 0.01& 0.00& +1.09& $-$0.29& 1.58& 2.31& 8.86& 2.94& PHS \\
1623: 64152&K0~III & 5.62& 5017& 2.89& 1.18& +0.07& 11.9& 0.06& 0.06& +0.94& $-$0.25& 1.62& 2.41& 8.81& 2.95& \\
1624: 65228&F7/F8~II & 4.20& 5932& 1.96& 3.30& +0.01& 6.5& 0.11& 0.09& $-$1.83& $-$0.07& 2.66& 4.18& 8.16& 2.45& \\
1625: 65345&K0~III & 5.30& 4983& 2.73& 1.27& $-$0.05& 12.3& 0.08& 0.00& +0.75& $-$0.27& 1.71& 2.45& 8.79& 2.86& \\
1626: 65714&G8~III: & 5.87& 4923& 2.45& 1.53& +0.08& 2.9& 0.31& 0.44& $-$2.26& $-$0.29& 2.92& 4.91& 7.97& 1.93& \\
1627: 67447&G8~II & 5.34& 4974& 2.12& 2.12& $-$0.06& 3.1& 0.21& 0.04& $-$2.26& $-$0.27& 2.91& 4.85& 8.03& 1.95& \\
1628: 68077&G9~III & 5.88& 4881& 2.48& 1.48& $-$0.01& 6.6& 0.11& 0.07& $-$0.10& $-$0.30& 2.06& 2.89& 8.61& 2.55& \\
1629: 68290&K0~III & 4.72& 5028& 2.92& 1.21& +0.06& 17.6& 0.04& 0.04& +0.91& $-$0.25& 1.64& 2.41& 8.81& 2.94& \\
1630: 68312&G8~III & 5.36& 5037& 2.70& 1.30& $-$0.12& 10.3& 0.08& 0.03& +0.40& $-$0.25& 1.84& 2.61& 8.71& 2.78& \\
1631: 68375&G8~III & 5.55& 5041& 2.77& 1.29& $-$0.09& 11.2& 0.05& 0.00& +0.79& $-$0.25& 1.68& 2.42& 8.80& 2.90& \\
1632: 71088&G8~III & 5.89& 4944& 2.75& 1.33& $-$0.07& 10.1& 0.06& 0.00& +0.92& $-$0.28& 1.64& 2.33& 8.85& 2.89& \\
1633: 71115&G8~II & 5.13& 5062& 2.53& 1.49& $-$0.07& 9.1& 0.10& 0.00& $-$0.08& $-$0.24& 2.03& 2.90& 8.59& 2.64& \\
1634: 71369&G4~II-III& 3.35& 5242& 2.64& 1.51& $-$0.09& 17.8& 0.04& 0.00& $-$0.40& $-$0.19& 2.14& 3.09& 8.51& 2.62& \\
1635: 73017&G8~IV & 5.66& 4735& 2.44& 1.20& $-$0.54& 13.6& 0.05& 0.06& +1.26& $-$0.37& 1.54& 1.31& 9.63& 2.67& \\
1636: 73593&G0~IV & 5.35& 4755& 2.62& 1.16& $-$0.23& 18.1& 0.04& 0.06& +1.58& $-$0.35& 1.41& 1.48& 9.45& 2.86& \\
1637: 74395&G2~Ib & 4.63& 5257& 1.68& 2.47& $-$0.07& 5.4& 0.18& 0.17& $-$1.88& $-$0.19& 2.73& 4.44& 8.08& 2.20& \\
1638: 74739&G8~Iab: & 4.03& 4905& 2.25& 1.80& $-$0.06& 10.9& 0.12& 0.00& $-$0.77& $-$0.29& 2.33& 3.43& 8.42& 2.36& \\
1639: 74918&G8~III & 4.32& 5063& 2.70& 1.34& $-$0.14& 14.4& 0.11& 0.12& $-$0.01& $-$0.24& 2.00& 2.86& 8.60& 2.66& \\
1640: 75506&K0~III & 5.15& 4811& 2.35& 1.38& $-$0.35& 11.9& 0.06& 0.07& +0.46& $-$0.33& 1.85& 2.05& 9.06& 2.58& \\
1641: 76219&G8~II-III& 5.23& 4904& 2.13& 1.75& $-$0.15& 5.7& 0.15& 0.06& $-$1.06& $-$0.29& 2.44& 3.59& 8.37& 2.27& \\
1642: 76294&G8~III-IV& 3.11& 4844& 2.30& 1.41& $-$0.11& 21.6& 0.05& 0.03& $-$0.24& $-$0.32& 2.12& 2.93& 8.60& 2.48& \\
1643: 76813&G9~III & 5.23& 5043& 2.64& 1.33& $-$0.06& 10.2& 0.07& 0.00& +0.27& $-$0.25& 1.89& 2.70& 8.67& 2.74& \\
1644: 77912&G8~Ib-II & 4.56& 4899& 1.75& 2.13& $-$0.14& 4.8& 0.16& 0.07& $-$2.10& $-$0.30& 2.86& 4.60& 8.08& 1.96& \\
1645: 78235&G8~III & 5.42& 5123& 3.00& 1.19& $-$0.03& 12.6& 0.06& 0.00& +0.91& $-$0.22& 1.63& 2.38& 8.83& 2.98& \\
1646: 78668&G6~III & 5.76& 5020& 2.74& 1.28& $-$0.07& 7.1& 0.13& 0.16& $-$0.15& $-$0.25& 2.06& 2.94& 8.57& 2.60& \\
1647: 79181&G8~III & 5.72& 4842& 2.47& 1.35& $-$0.29& 10.8& 0.07& 0.11& +0.79& $-$0.32& 1.71& 2.10& 8.97& 2.74& \\
1648: 79452&G6~III & 5.98& 4990& 2.27& 1.47& $-$0.74& 7.2& 0.13& 0.07& +0.19& $-$0.27& 1.93& 2.04& 9.01& 2.56& \\
1649: 80499&G8~III & 4.77& 5033& 2.44& 1.46& $-$0.09& 10.2& 0.08& 0.12& $-$0.31& $-$0.25& 2.12& 3.05& 8.53& 2.56& \\
1650: 81688&K0~III-IV& 5.40& 4771& 2.26& 1.36& $-$0.34& 11.3& 0.07& 0.10& +0.57& $-$0.35& 1.81& 2.07& 8.98& 2.61& PHS \\
1651: 82087&G8~III: & 5.87& 4867& 2.59& 1.33& +0.02& 6.3& 0.14& 0.14& $-$0.26& $-$0.31& 2.13& 3.05& 8.53& 2.50& \\
1652: 82210&G4~III-IV& 4.54& 5299& 3.49& 1.13& $-$0.21& 30.9& 0.02& 0.00& +1.99& $-$0.18& 1.18& 1.81& 9.15& 3.37& \\
1653: 82734&K0~III & 5.02& 4959& 2.62& 1.61& +0.17& 9.8& 0.07& 0.12& $-$0.15& $-$0.27& 2.07& 3.03& 8.52& 2.58& \\
1654: 82741&K0~III & 4.81& 4801& 2.42& 1.31& $-$0.22& 14.2& 0.06& 0.08& +0.50& $-$0.34& 1.84& 2.17& 9.00& 2.62& \\
1655: 83506&K0~III & 5.15& 4860& 2.36& 1.70& +0.07& 7.4& 0.08& 0.00& $-$0.51& $-$0.31& 2.23& 3.30& 8.44& 2.43& \\
1656: 83805&G8~III & 5.61& 4997& 2.64& 1.33& +0.01& 9.6& 0.08& 0.11& +0.41& $-$0.26& 1.84& 2.65& 8.70& 2.77& \\
1657: 84441&G0~II & 2.97& 5385& 2.18& 1.88& $-$0.09& 13.0& 0.07& 0.03& $-$1.49& $-$0.16& 2.56& 4.01& 8.21& 2.36& \\
1658: 85444&G6/G8~III& 4.11& 5045& 2.56& 1.35& $-$0.01& 11.9& 0.07& 0.10& $-$0.61& $-$0.25& 2.24& 3.34& 8.43& 2.48& \\
1659: 91190&K0~III & 4.86& 4962& 2.59& 1.33& $-$0.03& 12.7& 0.04& 0.00& +0.38& $-$0.27& 1.86& 2.66& 8.70& 2.74& \\
1660: 91612&G8~II-III& 5.07& 4920& 2.55& 1.31& $-$0.20& 10.2& 0.08& 0.02& +0.10& $-$0.29& 1.98& 2.60& 8.78& 2.60& \\
1661: 92125&G0~II & 4.68& 5468& 2.22& 2.07& +0.03& 6.9& 0.12& 0.05& $-$1.18& $-$0.14& 2.43& 3.72& 8.30& 2.48& \\
1662: 93291&G4~III: & 5.49& 5039& 2.74& 1.28& $-$0.10& 11.3& 0.08& 0.02& +0.74& $-$0.25& 1.70& 2.43& 8.79& 2.88& \\
1663: 94402&G8~III & 5.45& 4984& 2.64& 1.36& +0.03& 10.4& 0.08& 0.02& +0.53& $-$0.27& 1.79& 2.59& 8.73& 2.80& \\
1664: 94497&G7~III: & 5.73& 4804& 2.69& 1.24& $-$0.14& 10.7& 0.07& 0.05& +0.82& $-$0.33& 1.71& 1.96& 9.12& 2.70& \\
1665: 95808&G7~III...& 5.51& 4935& 2.62& 1.29& $-$0.09& 10.2& 0.09& 0.11& +0.45& $-$0.28& 1.84& 2.58& 8.74& 2.74& \\
1666: 98839&G8~II & 4.99& 4936& 2.30& 1.78& $-$0.05& 6.6& 0.10& 0.08& $-$0.98& $-$0.28& 2.41& 3.69& 8.33& 2.33& \\
1667: 99055&G8~IIICN.& 5.39& 5060& 2.65& 1.38& $-$0.05& 8.9& 0.09& 0.02& +0.12& $-$0.24& 1.95& 2.78& 8.64& 2.70& \\
1668: 99283&K0~III & 5.73& 4883& 2.59& 1.37& $-$0.17& 9.4& 0.08& 0.00& +0.59& $-$0.30& 1.79& 2.29& 8.93& 2.72& \\
1669: 99648&G8~II-III& 4.95& 5002& 2.40& 1.63& $-$0.01& 5.2& 0.16& 0.02& $-$1.47& $-$0.26& 2.59& 4.21& 8.15& 2.22& \\
1670: 100615&K0~III & 5.63& 4827& 2.60& 1.34& $-$0.12& 7.9& 0.08& 0.00& +0.13& $-$0.32& 1.98& 2.57& 8.79& 2.56& \\
1671: 100696&K0~III & 5.19& 4833& 2.32& 1.35& $-$0.33& 13.5& 0.04& 0.00& +0.84& $-$0.32& 1.69& 2.01& 9.01& 2.74& \\
1672: 100920&G9~III & 4.30& 4835& 2.47& 1.32& $-$0.19& 18.3& 0.05& 0.02& +0.59& $-$0.32& 1.79& 2.23& 8.97& 2.69& \\
1673: 101484&K1~III & 5.26& 4893& 2.70& 1.24& +0.03& 14.0& 0.06& 0.04& +0.96& $-$0.30& 1.64& 2.38& 8.83& 2.89& \\
1674: 102070&G8~III & 4.71& 4992& 2.60& 1.51& +0.03& 9.3& 0.09& 0.21& $-$0.66& $-$0.26& 2.27& 3.42& 8.40& 2.45& \\
1675: 103462&G8~III & 5.26& 4903& 2.26& 1.39& $-$0.60& 11.1& 0.06& 0.19& +0.29& $-$0.30& 1.90& 2.14& 8.90& 2.58& \\
1676: 103484&K0~III: & 5.58& 5008& 3.18& 1.13& $-$0.01& 19.4& 0.04& 0.03& +1.99& $-$0.26& 1.21& 1.83& 9.18& 3.25& \\
1677: 104979&G8~III & 4.12& 4871& 2.48& 1.37& $-$0.45& 19.1& 0.04& 0.00& +0.52& $-$0.31& 1.82& 2.12& 9.00& 2.65& \\
1678: 104985&G9~III & 5.78& 4679& 2.47& 1.40& $-$0.35& 9.8& 0.05& 0.00& +0.74& $-$0.39& 1.76& 2.12& 8.94& 2.64& PHS \\
1679: 106057&K0~II-III& 5.60& 4956& 2.64& 1.35& $-$0.10& 6.7& 0.11& 0.06& $-$0.32& $-$0.28& 2.14& 3.06& 8.52& 2.52& \\
1680: 106714&K0~III & 4.93& 4933& 2.57& 1.37& $-$0.18& 13.1& 0.07& 0.05& +0.47& $-$0.28& 1.82& 2.50& 8.79& 2.74& \\
1681: 107383&G8~III & 4.72& 4841& 2.51& 1.38& $-$0.28& 9.0& 0.10& 0.05& $-$0.55& $-$0.32& 2.25& 3.14& 8.49& 2.38& PHS (BD) \\
1682: 107950&G7~III & 4.76& 5171& 2.60& 1.63& +0.01& 8.3& 0.07& 0.04& $-$0.68& $-$0.21& 2.26& 3.36& 8.42& 2.52& \\
1683: 108225&G8~III-IV& 5.01& 4969& 2.71& 1.27& +0.04& 14.3& 0.04& 0.04& +0.75& $-$0.27& 1.71& 2.50& 8.77& 2.87& \\
1684: 109272&G8~III/IV& 5.58& 5104& 3.22& 1.13& $-$0.26& 20.6& 0.04& 0.13& +2.02& $-$0.23& 1.19& 1.79& 9.16& 3.29& \\
1685: 109317&K0~IIICN.& 5.42& 4866& 2.61& 1.38& $-$0.05& 12.3& 0.06& 0.07& +0.79& $-$0.31& 1.71& 2.41& 8.82& 2.81& \\
1686: 109379&G5~II & 2.65& 5145& 2.56& 1.62& $-$0.01& 23.3& 0.03& 0.10& $-$0.61& $-$0.22& 2.23& 3.31& 8.44& 2.53& \\
1687: 110646&G8~IIIp & 5.91& 5067& 3.05& 1.21& $-$0.45& 14.3& 0.05& 0.00& +1.68& $-$0.24& 1.33& 1.81& 9.12& 3.14& \\
1688: 111028&K1~III-IV& 5.65& 4881& 3.27& 1.03& $-$0.05& 22.4& 0.04& 0.00& +2.40& $-$0.30& 1.06& 1.41& 9.53& 3.24& \\
1689: 113095&K0~III & 5.97& 4961& 2.68& 1.37& $-$0.07& 8.1& 0.10& 0.07& +0.45& $-$0.27& 1.83& 2.59& 8.73& 2.76& \\
1690: 113226&G8~IIIvar& 2.85& 5044& 2.63& 1.41& +0.07& 31.9& 0.03& 0.02& +0.35& $-$0.25& 1.86& 2.70& 8.68& 2.78& \\
1691: 114256&K0~III & 5.79& 4858& 2.68& 1.34& +0.04& 9.3& 0.08& 0.06& +0.57& $-$0.31& 1.80& 2.51& 8.77& 2.74& \\
1692: 114946&G8~III/IV& 5.31& 5066& 3.32& 1.08& $-$0.33& 25.9& 0.03& 0.09& +2.29& $-$0.24& 1.08& 1.62& 9.28& 3.34& \\
1693: 115202&K1~III & 5.21& 4826& 3.11& 1.07& $-$0.02& 25.7& 0.03& 0.09& +2.17& $-$0.32& 1.16& 1.45& 9.50& 3.12& \\
1694: 115659&G8~III & 2.99& 5019& 2.47& 1.47& $-$0.06& 24.7& 0.03& 0.10& $-$0.15& $-$0.25& 2.06& 2.94& 8.57& 2.60& \\
1695: 116292&K0~III & 5.36& 4884& 2.49& 1.30& $-$0.09& 10.2& 0.07& 0.20& +0.20& $-$0.30& 1.94& 2.64& 8.72& 2.63& \\
1696: 116957&K0~III: & 5.88& 4898& 2.63& 1.33& $-$0.10& 9.1& 0.07& 0.02& +0.66& $-$0.30& 1.75& 2.39& 8.87& 2.78& \\
1697: 117566&G2.5~IIIb& 5.74& 5496& 3.34& 1.37& +0.05& 11.2& 0.04& 0.00& +0.98& $-$0.13& 1.56& 2.29& 8.88& 3.15& \\
1698: 117818&K0~III & 5.21& 4811& 2.31& 1.34& $-$0.34& 12.4& 0.06& 0.17& +0.50& $-$0.33& 1.83& 2.05& 9.06& 2.60& \\
1699: 118219&G6~III & 5.70& 4831& 2.34& 1.33& $-$0.34& 8.8& 0.09& 0.17& +0.25& $-$0.32& 1.93& 2.51& 8.74& 2.60& \\
1700: 119126&G9~III & 5.63& 4796& 2.33& 1.34& $-$0.12& 10.1& 0.08& 0.07& +0.59& $-$0.34& 1.80& 2.38& 8.85& 2.69& \\
1701: 119605&G1~IV/V & 5.55& 5456& 1.96& 1.95& $-$0.31& 4.2& 0.17& 0.36& $-$1.70& $-$0.15& 2.64& 4.04& 8.19& 2.31& \\
1702: 120048&G9~III & 5.92& 5014& 2.79& 1.22& +0.11& 8.1& 0.08& 0.10& +0.36& $-$0.26& 1.86& 2.71& 8.66& 2.77& \\
1703: 120084&G7~III: & 5.91& 4892& 2.71& 1.31& +0.09& 10.2& 0.05& 0.00& +0.96& $-$0.30& 1.64& 2.39& 8.82& 2.89& \\
1704: 120420&K0~III & 5.61& 4791& 2.63& 1.26& $-$0.20& 10.5& 0.06& 0.10& +0.61& $-$0.34& 1.79& 2.25& 8.90& 2.68& \\
1705: 120787&G3~V & 5.97& 4843& 2.31& 1.34& $-$0.38& 8.3& 0.07& 0.00& +0.55& $-$0.32& 1.81& 2.02& 9.08& 2.63& \\
1706: 125454&G9~III & 5.14& 4848& 2.56& 1.39& $-$0.10& 11.9& 0.08& 0.10& +0.42& $-$0.32& 1.86& 2.47& 8.82& 2.67& \\
1707: 126218&K0~III & 5.34& 5025& 2.50& 1.58& +0.12& 8.2& 0.11& 0.26& $-$0.36& $-$0.25& 2.15& 3.15& 8.48& 2.55& \\
1708: 127243&G3~IV & 5.58& 4893& 2.21& 1.48& $-$0.77& 10.6& 0.06& 0.01& +0.69& $-$0.30& 1.74& 1.92& 9.08& 2.69& \\
1709: 129312&G8~IIIvar& 4.86& 4993& 2.53& 1.62& +0.01& 5.7& 0.14& 0.05& $-$1.43& $-$0.26& 2.58& 4.20& 8.15& 2.23& \\
1710: 129336&G8~III & 5.55& 4901& 2.54& 1.33& $-$0.25& 8.5& 0.10& 0.05& +0.14& $-$0.30& 1.96& 2.68& 8.67& 2.62& \\
1711: 129944&K0~III & 5.80& 4892& 2.50& 1.32& $-$0.26& 8.9& 0.11& 0.25& +0.30& $-$0.30& 1.90& 2.59& 8.70& 2.66& \\
1712: 129972&K0~III & 4.60& 4976& 2.69& 1.43& $-$0.01& 14.5& 0.05& 0.05& +0.35& $-$0.27& 1.87& 2.68& 8.69& 2.74& \\
1713: 130952&G8... & 4.93& 4750& 2.34& 1.35& $-$0.40& 15.1& 0.07& 0.08& +0.74& $-$0.36& 1.75& 1.85& 9.10& 2.62& \\
1714: 131530&G7~III & 5.78& 4962& 2.72& 1.33& +0.00& 8.9& 0.11& 0.26& +0.28& $-$0.27& 1.90& 2.72& 8.67& 2.71& \\
1715: 132146&G5~III: & 5.72& 5012& 2.29& 1.60& $-$0.06& 5.3& 0.15& 0.05& $-$0.72& $-$0.26& 2.29& 3.45& 8.39& 2.44& \\
1716: 133002&F9~V & 5.63& 5532& 3.56& 1.11& $-$0.34& 23.1& 0.02& 0.00& +2.45& $-$0.14& 0.98& 1.49& 9.37& 3.56& \\
1717: 133208&G8~III & 3.49& 5001& 2.35& 1.61& $-$0.07& 14.9& 0.04& 0.06& $-$0.70& $-$0.26& 2.29& 3.42& 8.40& 2.44& \\
1718: 133392&G8~III: & 5.52& 4903& 2.69& 1.32& +0.09& 11.8& 0.05& 0.10& +0.79& $-$0.29& 1.70& 2.49& 8.77& 2.85& \\
1719: 134190&G8~III & 5.24& 4841& 2.28& 1.40& $-$0.41& 12.5& 0.04& 0.06& +0.67& $-$0.32& 1.76& 2.03& 8.99& 2.68& \\
1720: 136512&K0~III & 5.51& 4749& 2.34& 1.39& $-$0.29& 11.9& 0.06& 0.05& +0.84& $-$0.36& 1.71& 2.13& 8.93& 2.72& \\
1721: 136956&G8~III & 5.72& 5031& 2.61& 1.54& +0.08& 5.4& 0.14& 0.44& $-$1.05& $-$0.25& 2.42& 3.78& 8.27& 2.36& \\
1722: 138716&K1~IV & 4.61& 4830& 3.14& 1.05& +0.00& 34.5& 0.02& 0.07& +2.23& $-$0.32& 1.14& 1.44& 9.51& 3.15& \\
1723: 138852&K0~III-IV& 5.74& 4900& 2.55& 1.36& $-$0.22& 10.2& 0.05& 0.06& +0.73& $-$0.30& 1.73& 2.21& 8.98& 2.77& \\
1724: 138905&K0~III & 3.91& 4822& 2.56& 1.27& $-$0.30& 21.4& 0.04& 0.11& +0.45& $-$0.33& 1.85& 2.15& 9.01& 2.61& \\
1725: 139641&G8~III-IV& 5.25& 4907& 2.75& 1.16& $-$0.53& 20.0& 0.03& 0.09& +1.67& $-$0.30& 1.35& 1.43& 9.50& 2.96& \\
1726: 141680&G8~III & 5.21& 4770& 2.32& 1.34& $-$0.24& 12.4& 0.06& 0.19& +0.49& $-$0.35& 1.85& 2.17& 8.95& 2.60& \\
1727: 142091&K0~III-IV& 4.79& 4877& 3.21& 1.04& +0.10& 32.1& 0.02& 0.03& +2.29& $-$0.30& 1.11& 1.51& 9.43& 3.22& PHS \\
1728: 142198&K0~III & 4.13& 4760& 2.35& 1.39& $-$0.27& 20.0& 0.04& 0.25& +0.39& $-$0.35& 1.88& 2.13& 9.02& 2.55& \\
1729: 142531&G8~III: & 5.81& 4961& 2.78& 1.37& +0.05& 9.1& 0.06& 0.13& +0.47& $-$0.27& 1.82& 2.64& 8.70& 2.77& \\
1730: 143553&K0~III: & 5.82& 4805& 2.85& 1.17& $-$0.23& 13.6& 0.06& 0.18& +1.31& $-$0.33& 1.51& 1.75& 9.20& 2.85& \\
1731: 144608&G6/G8~III& 4.31& 5266& 2.54& 1.60& $-$0.09& 12.3& 0.07& 0.38& $-$0.62& $-$0.19& 2.22& 3.27& 8.45& 2.57& \\
1732: 145001&G8~III & 5.00& 5119& 2.90& 1.57& +0.04& 8.4& 0.15& 0.07& $-$0.45& $-$0.22& 2.17& 3.17& 8.49& 2.56& \\
1733: 146791&G8~III & 3.23& 4931& 2.69& 1.34& $-$0.07& 30.3& 0.03& 0.09& +0.55& $-$0.28& 1.79& 2.52& 8.78& 2.77& \\
1734: 147677&K0~III & 4.86& 4978& 2.90& 1.28& +0.10& 17.8& 0.04& 0.07& +1.04& $-$0.27& 1.59& 2.36& 8.83& 2.96& \\
1735: 147700&K0~III & 4.48& 4843& 2.48& 1.31& $-$0.11& 18.3& 0.05& 0.27& +0.52& $-$0.32& 1.82& 2.35& 8.89& 2.69& \\
1736: 148387&G8~III & 2.73& 5055& 2.82& 1.34& $-$0.04& 37.2& 0.01& 0.03& +0.55& $-$0.24& 1.78& 2.55& 8.74& 2.84& \\
1737: 148604&G5~III/IV& 5.66& 5120& 2.90& 0.98& $-$0.16& 12.2& 0.08& 0.44& +0.65& $-$0.23& 1.73& 2.48& 8.76& 2.89& \\
1738: 148786&G8/K0~III& 4.29& 5110& 2.69& 1.52& +0.17& 15.5& 0.05& 0.36& $-$0.11& $-$0.23& 2.03& 2.96& 8.55& 2.66& \\
1739: 150030&G8~II & 5.83& 4850& 2.10& 1.81& $-$0.09& 3.7& 0.14& 0.10& $-$1.42& $-$0.32& 2.59& 4.02& 8.22& 2.14& \\
1740: 150997&G8~III-IV& 3.48& 5045& 2.79& 1.26& $-$0.15& 29.1& 0.02& 0.05& +0.75& $-$0.25& 1.70& 2.41& 8.80& 2.89& \\
1741: 152815&G8~III & 5.39& 4859& 2.43& 1.35& $-$0.21& 12.8& 0.06& 0.07& +0.86& $-$0.31& 1.68& 2.19& 8.93& 2.80& \\
1742: 154084&G7~III: & 5.76& 4862& 2.62& 1.41& $-$0.16& 8.8& 0.07& 0.07& +0.42& $-$0.31& 1.86& 2.39& 8.89& 2.66& \\
1743: 154779&K0~III & 5.98& 5064& 2.75& 1.44& +0.12& 8.1& 0.11& 0.33& +0.20& $-$0.24& 1.92& 2.79& 8.63& 2.74& \\
1744: 156874&K0~III & 5.68& 4982& 2.85& 1.32& +0.00& 10.2& 0.06& 0.10& +0.63& $-$0.27& 1.75& 2.53& 8.76& 2.83& \\
1745: 156891&G7~III: & 5.97& 4981& 2.95& 1.30& +0.13& 10.2& 0.05& 0.10& +0.91& $-$0.27& 1.64& 2.44& 8.79& 2.93& \\
1746: 157527&K0~III & 5.82& 5090& 2.96& 1.30& +0.07& 10.8& 0.09& 0.25& +0.74& $-$0.23& 1.70& 2.49& 8.77& 2.92& \\
1747: 158974&G8~III & 5.63& 4901& 2.32& 1.43& $-$0.07& 8.7& 0.06& 0.13& +0.19& $-$0.30& 1.94& 2.74& 8.66& 2.65& \\
1748: 159181&G2~II & 2.79& 5153& 1.50& 2.69& $-$0.15& 9.0& 0.05& 0.10& $-$2.53& $-$0.22& 3.00& 4.65& 8.09& 1.91& \\
1749: 159353&K0~III: & 5.68& 4919& 2.76& 1.32& +0.00& 10.2& 0.08& 0.37& +0.35& $-$0.29& 1.88& 2.69& 8.69& 2.71& \\
1750: 160781&G7~III & 5.97& 4593& 2.10& 1.62& $-$0.02& 2.6& 0.30& 0.69& $-$2.62& $-$0.43& 3.12& 4.99& 8.00& 1.62& \\
1751: 161178&G9~III & 5.87& 4766& 2.33& 1.32& $-$0.20& 10.2& 0.05& 0.04& +0.87& $-$0.35& 1.69& 2.14& 8.94& 2.74& \\
1752: 162076&G5~IV & 5.69& 5018& 2.98& 1.24& +0.04& 13.0& 0.05& 0.09& +1.18& $-$0.25& 1.53& 2.27& 8.89& 3.02& \\
1753: 163532&G9~III & 5.44& 4689& 2.17& 1.44& $-$0.06& 7.7& 0.09& 0.53& $-$0.67& $-$0.39& 2.32& 3.17& 8.55& 2.26& \\
1754: 163917&K0~III & 3.32& 4928& 2.63& 1.46& +0.13& 21.4& 0.04& 0.16& $-$0.19& $-$0.28& 2.09& 3.04& 8.52& 2.56& \\
1755: 165760&G8~III-IV& 4.64& 4962& 2.52& 1.41& $-$0.01& 13.7& 0.06& 0.25& +0.08& $-$0.27& 1.98& 2.82& 8.63& 2.65& \\
1756: 167042&K1~III & 5.97& 4943& 3.28& 1.07& +0.00& 20.0& 0.03& 0.01& +2.47& $-$0.28& 1.02& 1.50& 9.45& 3.32& PHS \\
1757: 167768&G3~III & 5.99& 4895& 2.13& 1.44& $-$0.70& 9.9& 0.08& 0.39& +0.58& $-$0.30& 1.79& 2.07& 8.90& 2.68& \\
1758: 168656&G8~III & 4.85& 5045& 2.66& 1.30& $-$0.06& 12.1& 0.07& 0.29& $-$0.02& $-$0.25& 2.00& 2.86& 8.60& 2.66& \\
1759: 168723&K0~III-IV& 3.23& 4972& 3.12& 1.17& $-$0.18& 52.8& 0.01& 0.06& +1.78& $-$0.27& 1.30& 1.84& 9.14& 3.15& \\
1760: 170474&K0~III & 5.38& 4978& 2.83& 1.29& +0.02& 13.8& 0.06& 0.30& +0.78& $-$0.27& 1.70& 2.47& 8.78& 2.88& \\
1761: 171391&G8~III & 5.12& 5057& 2.79& 1.23& $-$0.02& 11.2& 0.07& 0.37& +0.01& $-$0.24& 1.99& 2.84& 8.62& 2.67& \\
1762: 174980&K0~II-III& 5.25& 5008& 2.71& 1.41& +0.10& 9.7& 0.05& 0.02& +0.17& $-$0.26& 1.94& 2.81& 8.62& 2.70& \\
1763: 176598&G8~III & 5.62& 5018& 2.83& 1.21& +0.03& 10.4& 0.04& 0.02& +0.68& $-$0.25& 1.73& 2.52& 8.76& 2.86& \\
1764: 176707&G8~III & 6.32& 4777& 2.27& 1.38& $-$0.29& 7.5& 0.07& 0.03& +0.68& $-$0.35& 1.77& 2.01& 9.03& 2.64& \\
1765: 177241&K0~III & 3.76& 4906& 2.70& 1.36& +0.01& 23.5& 0.03& 0.13& +0.48& $-$0.29& 1.83& 2.63& 8.71& 2.75& \\
1766: 177249&G5~IIbCN.& 5.51& 5251& 2.55& 1.65& +0.00& 6.6& 0.07& 0.04& $-$0.44& $-$0.19& 2.15& 3.12& 8.51& 2.62& \\
1767: 180540&K0~III & 4.88& 4951& 2.34& 1.76& $-$0.08& 6.1& 0.14& 0.46& $-$1.66& $-$0.28& 2.67& 4.34& 8.11& 2.14& \\
1768: 180711&G9~III & 3.07& 4885& 2.62& 1.38& $-$0.13& 32.5& 0.01& 0.01& +0.62& $-$0.30& 1.77& 2.32& 8.91& 2.74& \\
1769: 181276&K0~III & 3.80& 4986& 2.78& 1.32& +0.04& 26.5& 0.02& 0.01& +0.90& $-$0.27& 1.65& 2.41& 8.81& 2.92& \\
1770: 182694&G6.5~IIIa& 5.85& 5067& 2.63& 1.37& $-$0.04& 8.1& 0.06& 0.06& +0.32& $-$0.24& 1.87& 2.67& 8.69& 2.77& \\
1771: 182762&K0~III & 5.14& 4872& 2.57& 1.34& $-$0.07& 13.8& 0.05& 0.10& +0.74& $-$0.31& 1.73& 2.42& 8.82& 2.80& \\
1772: 183491&K0~III & 5.82& 4901& 2.63& 1.40& +0.11& 6.7& 0.11& 0.20& $-$0.24& $-$0.29& 2.11& 3.07& 8.51& 2.53& \\
1773: 184010&K0~III-IV& 5.89& 5011& 3.17& 1.16& $-$0.14& 16.9& 0.04& 0.10& +1.93& $-$0.26& 1.23& 1.82& 9.16& 3.22& \\
1774: 185018&G0~Ib & 5.98& 5467& 1.85& 2.31& $-$0.10& 2.9& 0.29& 0.71& $-$2.45& $-$0.14& 2.94& 4.76& 8.06& 2.08& \\
1775: 185194&G8~IIIvar& 5.67& 4978& 2.44& 1.54& +0.03& 6.9& 0.10& 0.19& $-$0.33& $-$0.27& 2.14& 3.09& 8.52& 2.53& \\
1776: 185351&K0~III & 5.17& 5006& 3.16& 1.15& +0.00& 24.6& 0.02& 0.02& +2.11& $-$0.26& 1.16& 1.76& 9.23& 3.28& \\
1777: 185467&K0~III & 5.97& 4937& 2.70& 1.45& +0.13& 7.9& 0.12& 0.28& +0.17& $-$0.28& 1.95& 2.83& 8.61& 2.67& \\
1778: 185758&G0~II & 4.39& 5535& 2.39& 1.87& +0.01& 6.9& 0.10& 0.19& $-$1.61& $-$0.13& 2.60& 4.11& 8.18& 2.38& \\
1779: 185958&G8~II & 4.39& 4876& 2.22& 2.08& +0.02& 7.0& 0.10& 0.19& $-$1.58& $-$0.30& 2.65& 4.33& 8.11& 2.13& \\
1780: 186675&G8~III & 4.89& 4953& 2.46& 1.47& $-$0.08& 11.7& 0.04& 0.04& +0.19& $-$0.28& 1.93& 2.74& 8.66& 2.67& \\
1781: 187739&K0~III & 5.88& 4771& 2.71& 1.03& $-$0.19& 10.5& 0.09& 0.29& +0.69& $-$0.35& 1.76& 2.01& 9.08& 2.64& \\
1782: 188310&K0~III & 4.71& 4802& 2.72& 1.42& $-$0.18& 16.0& 0.06& 0.10& +0.63& $-$0.33& 1.78& 2.29& 8.89& 2.69& PHS \\
1783: 188650&Fp & 5.79& 5450& 1.79& 2.17& $-$0.67& 2.1& 0.24& 0.95& $-$3.53& $-$0.16& 3.38& 4.64& 8.07& 1.63& \\
1784: 188947&K0~IIIvar& 3.89& 4866& 2.69& 1.35& +0.07& 23.4& 0.02& 0.09& +0.65& $-$0.31& 1.76& 2.56& 8.74& 2.78& \\
1785: 189127&G9~III & 6.10& 4760& 2.28& 1.41& $-$0.22& 7.1& 0.07& 0.04& +0.30& $-$0.35& 1.92& 2.31& 8.92& 2.55& \\
1786: 192787&K0~III & 5.70& 5025& 2.86& 1.25& $-$0.07& 10.9& 0.05& 0.20& +0.68& $-$0.25& 1.73& 2.47& 8.77& 2.86& \\
1787: 192879&G8~III & 5.86& 4886& 2.62& 1.37& $-$0.09& 9.6& 0.09& 0.31& +0.45& $-$0.30& 1.84& 2.47& 8.83& 2.70& \\
1788: 192944&G8~III & 5.30& 4981& 2.48& 1.48& $-$0.06& 6.9& 0.09& 0.18& $-$0.68& $-$0.27& 2.28& 3.41& 8.40& 2.44& \\
1789: 192947&G6/G8~III& 3.58& 5046& 2.90& 1.32& +0.03& 30.0& 0.03& 0.12& +0.85& $-$0.25& 1.66& 2.43& 8.80& 2.93& \\
1790: 194013&G8~III-IV& 5.30& 4906& 2.63& 1.32& $-$0.07& 13.2& 0.06& 0.05& +0.86& $-$0.29& 1.67& 2.36& 8.84& 2.86& \\
1791: 194577&G6~III & 5.68& 5028& 2.68& 1.34& $-$0.02& 6.0& 0.12& 0.20& $-$0.63& $-$0.25& 2.25& 3.35& 8.43& 2.47& \\
1792: 196857&K0~III & 5.79& 4878& 2.55& 1.44& $-$0.27& 9.9& 0.11& 0.15& +0.62& $-$0.31& 1.77& 2.15& 9.01& 2.70& \\
1793: 199665&G6~III: & 5.51& 4985& 2.84& 1.19& $-$0.05& 13.7& 0.05& 0.04& +1.15& $-$0.27& 1.55& 2.25& 8.90& 2.99& PHS \\
1794: 200039&G5~III & 5.99& 4965& 2.67& 1.36& $-$0.13& 7.5& 0.07& 0.02& +0.35& $-$0.27& 1.87& 2.62& 8.70& 2.72& \\
1795: 201381&G8~III & 4.50& 4951& 2.77& 1.30& $-$0.04& 19.9& 0.04& 0.07& +0.93& $-$0.28& 1.64& 2.35& 8.85& 2.91& \\
1796: 203222&G7~III: & 5.87& 5067& 2.78& 1.29& $-$0.02& 9.7& 0.09& 0.11& +0.69& $-$0.24& 1.72& 2.49& 8.77& 2.89& \\
1797: 203387&G8~III & 4.28& 5244& 3.07& 1.26& +0.07& 15.1& 0.05& 0.08& +0.10& $-$0.19& 1.94& 2.79& 8.63& 2.78& \\
1798: 204381&K0~III & 4.50& 5100& 2.84& 1.33& $-$0.06& 18.2& 0.05& 0.09& +0.71& $-$0.23& 1.71& 2.47& 8.78& 2.90& \\
1799: 204771&K0~III & 5.22& 4967& 2.93& 1.26& +0.09& 14.6& 0.04& 0.16& +0.88& $-$0.27& 1.66& 2.44& 8.79& 2.91& \\
1800: 205072&G6~III: & 5.97& 4995& 2.72& 1.34& $-$0.14& 9.2& 0.05& 0.02& +0.76& $-$0.26& 1.70& 2.41& 8.80& 2.87& \\
1801: 205435&G8~III & 3.98& 5114& 3.00& 1.20& $-$0.10& 26.2& 0.02& 0.09& +0.98& $-$0.23& 1.60& 2.33& 8.85& 2.99& \\
1802: 206356&K0~III & 5.24& 4938& 2.80& 1.28& +0.11& 13.2& 0.06& 0.16& +0.68& $-$0.28& 1.74& 2.55& 8.74& 2.83& \\
1803: 206453&G8~III & 4.72& 5038& 2.43& 1.48& $-$0.38& 11.2& 0.07& 0.13& $-$0.16& $-$0.25& 2.07& 2.97& 8.53& 2.61& \\
1804: 209396&K0~III & 5.55& 4999& 2.81& 1.30& +0.04& 12.0& 0.07& 0.12& +0.83& $-$0.26& 1.67& 2.46& 8.79& 2.90& \\
1805: 210354&G6~III: & 5.58& 4793& 2.36& 1.39& $-$0.22& 11.5& 0.06& 0.05& +0.84& $-$0.34& 1.70& 1.92& 9.12& 2.70& \\
1806: 210434&K0~III-IV& 5.98& 4949& 2.93& 1.36& +0.12& 11.6& 0.07& 0.13& +1.17& $-$0.28& 1.54& 2.29& 8.87& 2.99& \\
1807: 210702&K1~III & 5.93& 4967& 3.19& 1.10& +0.01& 17.9& 0.04& 0.05& +2.14& $-$0.27& 1.15& 1.68& 9.28& 3.25& PHS \\
1808: 210807&G8~III & 4.79& 5071& 2.58& 1.57& $-$0.10& 8.6& 0.05& 0.28& $-$0.81& $-$0.24& 2.32& 3.50& 8.37& 2.44& \\
1809: 211391&G8~III-IV& 4.17& 4909& 2.57& 1.36& +0.09& 17.0& 0.04& 0.10& +0.23& $-$0.29& 1.92& 2.78& 8.64& 2.68& \\
1810: 211434&G6~III & 5.75& 5082& 2.70& 1.37& $-$0.26& 9.6& 0.09& 0.14& +0.51& $-$0.24& 1.79& 2.53& 8.73& 2.83& \\
1811: 211554&G8~III & 5.88& 5043& 2.41& 1.63& +0.05& 4.5& 0.12& 0.69& $-$1.55& $-$0.25& 2.62& 4.26& 8.12& 2.21& \\
1812: 212271&K0~IIICN.& 5.53& 5002& 2.90& 1.21& +0.10& 12.0& 0.06& 0.16& +0.77& $-$0.26& 1.70& 2.50& 8.76& 2.89& \\
1813: 212320&G6~V & 5.92& 5075& 2.59& 1.46& $-$0.11& 7.1& 0.13& 0.17& +0.01& $-$0.24& 1.99& 2.84& 8.61& 2.68& \\
1814: 212430&K0~III & 5.76& 4954& 2.56& 1.39& $-$0.17& 6.0& 0.13& 0.17& $-$0.52& $-$0.28& 2.22& 3.17& 8.49& 2.45& \\
1815: 212496&G9~III & 4.42& 4710& 2.43& 1.22& $-$0.33& 19.2& 0.03& 0.17& +0.67& $-$0.38& 1.78& 1.85& 9.12& 2.57& \\
1816: 213789&G6~III & 5.88& 5010& 2.73& 1.37& $-$0.06& 7.3& 0.12& 0.07& +0.14& $-$0.26& 1.95& 2.77& 8.64& 2.69& \\
1817: 213930&G8~III-IV& 5.72& 5011& 2.87& 1.34& +0.12& 9.6& 0.06& 0.34& +0.29& $-$0.26& 1.89& 2.75& 8.65& 2.75& \\
1818: 213986&K1~III & 5.97& 4928& 2.83& 1.27& +0.08& 9.7& 0.09& 0.14& +0.75& $-$0.29& 1.72& 2.50& 8.76& 2.85& \\
1819: 214567&G8~II & 5.84& 4989& 2.69& 1.33& $-$0.21& 8.6& 0.09& 0.09& +0.41& $-$0.27& 1.84& 2.57& 8.71& 2.75& \\
1820: 214878&B8~V & 5.94& 5041& 2.85& 1.29& +0.04& 9.5& 0.06& 0.34& +0.49& $-$0.25& 1.80& 2.62& 8.71& 2.82& \\
1821: 215030&G9~III & 5.93& 4731& 2.41& 1.25& $-$0.49& 10.1& 0.06& 0.06& +0.89& $-$0.37& 1.69& 1.83& 9.24& 2.67& \\
1822: 215373&K0~III & 5.11& 5007& 2.69& 1.39& +0.10& 11.9& 0.05& 0.05& +0.44& $-$0.26& 1.83& 2.66& 8.69& 2.79& \\
1823: 215721&G8~III & 5.24& 4829& 2.23& 1.39& $-$0.48& 12.3& 0.07& 0.10& +0.58& $-$0.33& 1.80& 1.95& 9.07& 2.62& \\
1824: 215943&G8~III: & 5.82& 4878& 2.68& 1.33& $-$0.04& 9.0& 0.08& 0.06& +0.52& $-$0.30& 1.81& 2.45& 8.84& 2.72& \\
1825: 216131&M2~III & 3.51& 5000& 2.69& 1.24& $-$0.05& 27.9& 0.03& 0.06& +0.68& $-$0.26& 1.73& 2.49& 8.77& 2.85& \\
1826: 217264&K1~III: & 5.43& 4946& 2.80& 1.27& +0.12& 11.6& 0.08& 0.07& +0.69& $-$0.28& 1.74& 2.55& 8.74& 2.84& \\
1827: 217703&K0~III & 5.97& 4890& 2.91& 1.16& $-$0.17& 13.0& 0.06& 0.10& +1.44& $-$0.30& 1.44& 1.98& 9.05& 3.00& \\
1828: 218527&G8~IV & 5.42& 4935& 2.57& 1.33& $-$0.34& 11.6& 0.11& 0.07& +0.68& $-$0.29& 1.74& 2.11& 9.03& 2.75& \\
1829: 219139&G5~III: & 5.85& 4860& 2.50& 1.38& $-$0.19& 9.7& 0.08& 0.07& +0.72& $-$0.31& 1.74& 2.29& 8.88& 2.76& \\
1830: 219615&G7~III & 3.70& 4802& 2.25& 1.37& $-$0.62& 24.9& 0.04& 0.06& +0.62& $-$0.34& 1.79& 1.67& 9.20& 2.55& \\
1831: 219945&K0~III & 5.44& 4874& 2.61& 1.36& $-$0.10& 9.9& 0.06& 0.18& +0.25& $-$0.31& 1.92& 2.57& 8.77& 2.63& \\
1832: 221345&K0~III & 5.22& 4813& 2.63& 1.43& $-$0.24& 13.1& 0.05& 0.13& +0.67& $-$0.33& 1.76& 2.20& 8.93& 2.70& \\
1833: 222093&K0~III & 5.66& 4853& 2.56& 1.38& $-$0.12& 11.5& 0.08& 0.10& +0.86& $-$0.31& 1.68& 2.28& 8.89& 2.81& \\
1834: 222387&G8~III & 5.98& 5055& 2.81& 1.22& $-$0.11& 7.8& 0.08& 0.31& +0.12& $-$0.24& 1.95& 2.79& 8.63& 2.70& \\
1835: 222574&G2~Ib/II & 4.82& 5523& 1.99& 2.20& +0.04& 5.1& 0.16& 0.10& $-$1.75& $-$0.13& 2.65& 4.23& 8.13& 2.34& \\
1836: 223252&G8~III & 5.49& 5031& 2.72& 1.34& $-$0.03& 11.2& 0.08& 0.10& +0.63& $-$0.25& 1.75& 2.52& 8.76& 2.85& \\
1837: 224533&G9~III & 4.88& 5030& 2.73& 1.28& $-$0.01& 14.6& 0.06& 0.10& +0.60& $-$0.25& 1.76& 2.54& 8.75& 2.84& \\
1838: \end{longtable}
1839:
1840: \end{document}
1841: