1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% TSN20 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2:
3: \documentclass[12pt, preprint]{emulateapj}
4:
5: \newcommand\arcpt{${{\lower3pt\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$}}\atop{\raise4pt\hbox{.}}}$}
6: \newcommand\msun{$M_\odot$}
7: \newcommand\arcyear{$\hbox{{$^{\prime\prime}$} yr{$^{-1}$}}$}
8: \usepackage{lscape} % For landscape tables
9: \usepackage{longtable} % My preference table package.
10: %\usepackage{subfloat}
11:
12: %\received{}
13: %\accepted{}
14: %\journalid{}{}
15: %\articleid{}{}
16:
17: \slugcomment{to appear in the {\it Astronomical Journal}}
18:
19: \shorttitle{The Solar Neighborhood.\ XX.}
20: \shortauthors{Subasavage et al.}
21:
22: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
23:
24: \begin{document}
25:
26: \title{The Solar Neighborhood. XX. Discovery and Characterization
27: of 21 New Nearby White Dwarf Systems}
28:
29: \author{John P. Subasavage\altaffilmark{1}, Todd
30: J. Henry\altaffilmark{1}}
31:
32: \affil{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Georgia State University,
33: Atlanta, GA 30302-4106}
34:
35: \email{subasavage@chara.gsu.edu}
36: \email{thenry@chara.gsu.edu}
37:
38: \author{P. Bergeron}
39:
40: \affil{D\'{e}partement de Physique, Universit\'{e} de Montr\'{e}al,
41: C.P. 6128, Succ. Centre-Ville, Montr\'{e}al, Qu\'{e}bec H3C 3J7,
42: Canada}
43:
44: \email{bergeron@astro.umontreal.ca}
45:
46: \author{P. Dufour}
47:
48: \affil{Department of Astronomy and Steward Observatory, University of
49: Arizona, 933 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA}
50:
51: \email{dufourpa@as.arizona.edu}
52:
53: \and
54:
55: \author{Nigel C. Hambly}
56:
57: \affil{Scottish Universities Physics Alliance (SUPA), Institute for
58: Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill,
59: Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, Scotland, UK}
60:
61: \email{nch@roe.ac.uk}
62:
63: \altaffiltext{1}{Visiting astronomer, Cerro Tololo Inter-American
64: Observatory, National Optical Astronomy Observatory, which are
65: operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy,
66: under contract with the National Science Foundation.}
67:
68: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
69: % {Abstract}
70: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
71:
72: \begin{abstract}
73:
74: We present medium resolution spectroscopy and multi-epoch $VRI$
75: photometry for 21 new nearby ($<$ 50 pc) white dwarf systems brighter
76: than $V \sim$ 17. Of the new systems, ten are DA (including a wide
77: double degenerate system with two DA components), eight are DC, two
78: are DZ, and one is DB. In addition, we include multi-epoch $VRI$
79: photometry for eleven known white dwarf systems that do not have
80: trigonometric parallax determinations. Using model atmospheres
81: relevant for various types of white dwarfs (depending on spectral
82: signatures), we perform spectral energy distribution modeling by
83: combining the optical photometry with the near-infrared $JHK_S$ from
84: the Two Micron All-Sky Survey to derive physical parameters (i.e.,
85: $T_{\rm eff}$ and distance estimates). We find that twelve new and
86: six known white dwarf systems are estimated to be within the NStars
87: and Catalog of Nearby Stars horizons of 25 pc. Coupled with identical
88: analyses of the 56 white dwarf systems presented in Paper XIX of this
89: series, a total of 20 new white dwarf systems and 18 known white dwarf
90: systems are estimated to be within 25 pc. These 38 systems of the 88
91: total studied represent a potential 34\% increase in the 25 pc white
92: dwarf population (currently known to consist of 110 systems with
93: trigonometric parallaxes of varying qualities). We continue an
94: ongoing effort via CTIOPI to measure trigonometric parallaxes for the
95: systems estimated to be within 25 pc to confirm proximity and further
96: fill the incompleteness gap in the local white dwarf population.
97: Another 38 systems (both new and known) are estimated to be between 25
98: and 50 pc and are viable candidates for ground-based parallax efforts
99: wishing to broaden the horizon of interest.
100:
101:
102:
103: \end{abstract}
104:
105: \keywords{solar neighborhood --- stars: distances ---
106: stars: evolution --- stars: statistics --- white dwarfs}
107:
108: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
109: \section{Introduction}
110: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
111:
112: Given that all stars less than $\sim$8 \msun\ will eventually become
113: white dwarfs (WDs), the study of this class of objects is vital to
114: understanding our Galaxy. In particular, WD research addresses
115: questions concerning stellar structure and evolution, Galactic
116: components (i.e., thin disk, thick disk, halo), and even dark matter.
117: The oldest (i.e., coolest and least luminous) WDs help to constrain
118: the age of the Galactic components (particularly the thick disk) but
119: shine feebly and are only visible and easily characterized if they are
120: in our solar neighborhood. A complete volume-limited sample provides
121: accurate statistics that can be reliably applied to the rest of the
122: Galaxy to infer the WD mass fraction, contribution to the halo
123: population, and WD number density within the disk. Interesting
124: candidates can be targeted and more thoroughly scrutinized to identify
125: unusual and astrophysically compelling systems.
126:
127: In a continuing effort to further complete the nearby WD sample, we
128: present spectra, optical and near-infrared photometry, as well as
129: modeled physical parameters for 21 new WD systems in the southern
130: hemisphere brighter than $V \sim$ 17. Of these, 12 are estimated to
131: be within 25 pc, the horizon of the Catalog of Nearby Stars
132: \citep[CNS,][]{1991adc..rept.....G} and the NStars Database
133: \citep{2003fst3.book..111H}. In addition, six previously known WDs
134: without trigonometric parallaxes are estimated to be within 25 pc.
135:
136:
137:
138: %Combined with the first publication of results from this effort
139: %\citep[][ hereafter referred to as Paper XIX]{2007AJ....134..252S}, a
140: %total of 20 new systems and 18 known systems are estimated to be
141: %within 25 pc. Should these distance estimates hold true, the number
142: %of WDs within 25 pc (currently 110 systems with trigonometric
143: %parallaxes of varying qualities) will increase by a third (34\%).
144: %These systems are currently being observed by our southern hemisphere
145: %parallax program known as the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory
146: %Parallax Investigation \citep[CTIOPI,][]{2005AJ....129.1954J,
147: %2005AJ....130..337C, 2006AJ....132.1234C, 2006AJ....132.2360H}. Once
148: %these nearby WDs are confirmed, focused efforts can yield crucial WD
149: %masses and permit companionship assessments.
150:
151: %Finally, the nature of WD spectral signatures (i.e., few broad
152: %absorption lines, if any) prohibits any comprehensive search for
153: %planets using radial velocity techniques that currently have been the
154: %most effective at identifying extra-solar planets. Thus, no planets
155: %have been found orbiting WDs to date. Astrometric techniques (i.e.,
156: %photocentric shifts) are the most viable current option for revealing
157: %planets but depend on the system's distance. As a system's distance
158: %increases, its photocentric shift diminishes linearly, thus
159: %emphasizing that the nearest WDs are the best candidates for detecting
160: %extra-solar planets.
161:
162: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
163: \section {Candidate Selection}
164: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
165: \label{sec:candidates}
166:
167: We conducted a southern hemisphere proper motion search using
168: digitized scans of the SuperCOSMOS Sky Survey (SSS), adopting a faint
169: magnitude limit of $R_{\rm 59F} =$ 16.5, called the SuperCOSMOS-RECONS
170: (SCR) survey. The first wave of the survey adopted a lower proper
171: motion limit of 0.40\arcyear~with new discoveries published in
172: \citet{2004AJ....128..437H}, \citet{2004AJ....128.2460H}, and
173: \citet{2005AJ....129..413S, 2005AJ....130.1658S}. A second effort
174: conducted by \citet{2007AJ....133.2898F} surveyed objects with proper
175: motions from 0.18-0.40\arcyear~and covered declinations $-$47$^\circ$
176: to $-$90$^\circ$. The WD candidate selection effort also adopted the
177: lower proper motion limit of 0.18\arcyear, yet reached farther north
178: to declination $=$ 00$^\circ$. Thus, this effort covered 92\% of the
179: southern sky, avoiding a few regions near the Galactic plane and the
180: Magellanic Clouds \citep[see Figure 1 of][]{2005AJ....130.1658S}. A
181: full discussion of the search methodology can be found in
182: \citet{2004AJ....128..437H}. Briefly, each of the four plate scans
183: used ($B_J, R_{\rm ESO}, R_{\rm 59F}, I_{\rm IVN}$) were positionally
184: mapped to a common coordinate system. Any object that appeared on all
185: four plates and had a proper motion less than the lower limit was
186: discarded. Objects that remained were then searched out to a radius
187: defined by a proper motion of 10.00\arcyear~and over 360$^\circ$ for
188: any other unpaired objects. After a series of automated sifts for
189: false pairings, the remaining objects were cross-referenced with
190: previous proper motion catalogs to identify new and known objects.
191:
192: \begin{figure}
193: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=85mm]{redpromo.eps}
194: \figcaption[redpromo.eps]{Reduced proper motion diagram used to select
195: WD candidates for spectroscopic follow-up. Plotted are the 306 new
196: high proper motion objects from \citet{2005AJ....129..413S,
197: 2005AJ....130.1658S} for which both $R_{\rm 59F}$ and $J$ magnitudes
198: were available. The line is a somewhat arbitrary boundary between the
199: WDs (below) and the subdwarfs (just above). Main sequence dwarfs fall
200: above and to the right of the subdwarfs, although there is significant
201: overlap. Asterisks indicate the 23 new WDs reported here. The six
202: filled triangles in the WD region are confirmed WDs from the SCR
203: survey and were published in \citet{2007AJ....134..252S}. The
204: encircled point labeled ``sd'' is a confirmed subdwarf contaminant in
205: the WD region.
206: \label{rpm}}
207: \end{figure}
208:
209: Near-infrared $JHK_S$ magnitudes were extracted from 2MASS for all
210: real objects (new and known) and a reduced proper motion (RPM) diagram
211: using the $R_{\rm 59F} - J$ color was generated (see Figure
212: \ref{rpm}). RPM (in this case, designated by $H_{R_{\rm 59F}}$
213: because the $R_{\rm 59F}$ magnitude was used) is a quantity similar to
214: absolute magnitude and is defined by
215: \begin{equation}
216: H_{R_{\rm 59F}} = R_{\rm 59F} + 5 + 5 \log (\mu)
217: \end{equation}
218: where $\mu$ is proper motion. It serves to relate two observed
219: quantities, apparent magnitude and proper motion, with two intrinsic
220: quantities, luminosity (absolute magnitude) and tangential velocity.
221: The advantages of using the $R_{\rm 59F} - J$ color is that all SCR
222: detections have an $R_{\rm 59F}$ magnitude (defined by the survey).
223: Given that WDs are relatively blue, the likelihood of registering a
224: near-infrared magnitude in the 2MASS database is greatest at $J$
225: because its limiting magnitude is $\sim$1.0 mags fainter than $K_S$.
226: Also, this color incorporates both optical plate and near-infrared
227: magnitudes that minimize the intrinsic uncertainties with plate
228: magnitudes (e.g., non-linearity). Both new SCR discoveries and known
229: recoveries fell within the WD region of the RPM diagram. Most of the
230: known objects had already been classified as WDs by previous
231: researchers. Yet, a significant number of known high proper motion
232: (HPM) objects within this region were not classified as WDs. It is
233: likely that they escaped identification because of the poor plate
234: magnitudes previously available. For instance, all plate magnitudes
235: fainter than $m_{\rm pg} =$ 10.0 in the classic Luyten Half-Second
236: (LHS) Catalogue \citep{1979lccs.book.....L} and the New Luyten
237: Two-Tenths (NLTT) Catalogue \citep{nltt} are by-eye estimates
238: determined by \citet{1979lccs.book.....L}. Rigorous calibrations
239: performed by the SSS team yield high quality plate magnitudes that
240: reveal a number of new, relatively bright, WDs.
241:
242: \begin{figure}
243: \plotone{mvjk.eps} \figcaption[mvjk.eps]{Plot of infrared $J - K_S$
244: color \citep[transformed from the CIT system to the 2MASS system using
245: the transformation equations of][]{2001AJ....121.2851C} vs.~$M_V$ for
246: WDs within 25 pc \citep{2001ApJS..133..413B} and late-type subdwarfs
247: within 60 pc (W.-C. Jao 2008, private communication). Note how this
248: particular color is less than 0.5 ({\it vertical dashed line}) over
249: all $M_V$ and is degenerate for the WDs. Numbered points are
250: discussed in the text.
251: \label{mvjk}}
252: \end{figure}
253:
254: As an additional constraint, especially for objects near the arbitrary
255: boundary that delineates the subdwarfs and the WDs, a $J - K_S$ color
256: sift was implemented. As is evident in Figure \ref{mvjk}, this color
257: is degenerate for WDs (i.e., there is no unique absolute magnitude for
258: a given color) and is always less than 0.5 mag (for single WDs). In
259: contrast, subdwarfs near the boundary typically have $J - K_S \sim$
260: 0.6 or larger and thus there exists a significant color gap to
261: distinguish between the two luminosity classes. Indeed, four new WDs
262: were spectroscopically identified that are found in the subdwarf
263: region of the RPM diagram. Two exceptional points in the WD region
264: are: (1) WD 0548$-$001, which is a DQ WD \citep[discussed
265: in][]{dufour05} that has a magnetic field of $\sim$10 MG
266: \citep{2007ApJ...654..499K}; (2) WD 2251$-$070, which is a DZ WD
267: \citep[discussed in][]{dufour07} that is heavily line blanketed
268: \citep[][ Figure 11]{1993PASP..105..761W}.
269:
270: Before the candidates were targeted for spectroscopic follow-up
271: observations, the basic linear plate relation of
272: \citet{2001Sci...292..698O} was used to estimate distances to
273: candidates, assuming they were WDs. Only those candidates whose
274: distance estimates were within $\sim$30 pc were selected for
275: spectroscopic observations \citep[this step was omitted from the
276: procedures resulting in the new WD discoveries presented in][
277: hereafter referred to as Paper XIX]{2007AJ....134..252S}. This
278: constraint favored cooler, nearby stars so that even though the sample
279: size of new systems presented here is smaller than that of Paper XIX
280: (21 vs.~33), more systems are estimated to be within 25 pc (twelve
281: vs.~eight). A total of 21 new WD systems (containing 22 WDs) were
282: spectroscopically confirmed and are hereafter referred to as the ``new
283: sample''. Optical photometry observations were obtained to improve
284: distance estimates (discussed in $\S$ \ref{subsec:SED}).
285:
286: Eleven known WDs without trigonometric parallaxes (hereafter referred
287: to as the ``known sample'') were also targeted for optical photometry
288: observations to improve their distance estimates. The known sample
289: includes nine objects that previous authors predicted to be nearby
290: \citep[i.e.,][]{1993AJ....105.1033A, 2002ApJ...571..512H,
291: 2008AJ....135.1225H, 2004AJ....127.1702K, 2007ApJ...654..499K,
292: 2006AA...447..173P,2003ApJ...586L..95V} as well as two objects found
293: via RPM that were known WDs but whose distances had not yet been
294: estimated.
295:
296:
297: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
298: \section {Data and Observations}
299: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
300:
301: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
302: \subsection {Astrometry and Nomenclature}
303: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
304:
305: In keeping with the traditional naming convention for WDs, which uses
306: the object's epoch 1950 equinox 1950 coordinates, 2MASS coordinates
307: (when available, otherwise SSS coordinates were used) for the new
308: systems presented here were extracted and adjusted for proper motion
309: from the epoch of observation to epoch 2000 equinox 2000. The
310: coordinates were then precessed to equinox 1950 using the IRAF task
311: {\it precess} and again adjusted for proper motion (opposite in
312: direction) to yield epoch 1950 equinox 1950 coordinates.
313:
314: Proper motions for both the new and known samples were taken primarily
315: from the SCR proper motion survey, but in a few cases from elsewhere
316: in the literature. The Appendix contains the proper motions used for
317: coordinate adjustment, as well as J2000.0 coordinates and alternate
318: names.
319:
320: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
321: \subsection {Spectroscopy}
322: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
323:
324: \begin{figure}[!t]
325: \plotone{dahot.eps}
326: \figcaption[dahot.eps]{Spectral plots of the hot ($T_{\rm eff}$ $\ge$
327: 10000 K) DA WDs from the new sample, plotted in descending $T_{\rm
328: eff}$ as derived from the SED fits to the photometry. Spectra have
329: been normalized at 5200 \AA~and offset by integer amounts. The
330: inclusion of the spectrum of known object WD 2133$-$135 in this plot
331: is discussed in $\S$ \ref{subsec:individual}.
332: \label{dahot}}
333: \end{figure}
334:
335: Spectroscopic observations were taken during two runs in May and
336: December 2006 at the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory (CTIO)
337: 1.5 m telescope as part of the Small and Moderate Aperture Research
338: Telescope System (SMARTS) Consortium. The Ritchey-Chr{\'e}tien
339: spectrograph and Loral 1200 $\times$ 800 CCD detecter were used with
340: grating 09 (in first order), providing 8.6 \AA~resolution and
341: wavelength coverage from 3500 to 6900 \AA. A slit width of 6$\arcsec$
342: was used and prevented the preferential light loss, at either the blue
343: or the red end, encountered in the data presented in Paper XIX.
344: Observations consisted of two exposures (typically 20-30 minutes each)
345: to permit cosmic ray rejection, followed by a comparison HeAr lamp
346: exposure to calibrate wavelength for each object. Bias subtraction,
347: dome/sky flat-fielding, and extraction of spectra were performed using
348: standard IRAF packages.
349:
350: Spectroscopic flux standards (two or three) were observed each night
351: to calibrate the response of the CCD across the dispersion axis.
352: However, because the selected flux standards are bright, neutral
353: density filters of either 2.5 or 5.0 magnitudes extinction were used.
354: Thus, the resulting science spectra are relatively flux calibrated
355: (i.e., the slopes are correct) but not on an absolute flux scale
356: (i.e., erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ \AA$^{-1}$). All spectra are normalized
357: at 5200 \AA~for the sake of plotting.
358:
359: Spectra for the new DA WDs with $T_{\rm eff} \ge$ 10,000 K are plotted
360: in Figure \ref{dahot}, while spectra for new DA WDs with $T_{\rm eff}
361: <$ 10,000 K are plotted in Figure \ref{dacool}. Spectra for the new
362: featureless DC WDs are plotted in Figure \ref{dc}. Spectra, as well
363: as model fits, for two new calcium-rich DZs, the hottest DA, and a
364: helium-rich DB are shown in Figures \ref{dz} and \ref{dadb} and are
365: described in $\S$ \ref{subsec:SED}.
366:
367: \begin{figure}
368: \plotone{dacool.eps}
369: \figcaption[dacool.eps]{Spectral plots of cool ($T_{\rm eff}$ $<$
370: 10000 K) DA WDs from the new sample, plotted in descending $T_{\rm
371: eff}$ as derived from the SED fits to the photometry. Spectra have
372: been normalized at 5200 \AA~and offset by integer amounts. The
373: asymmetry in the H$\alpha$ feature in the spectrum of WD 2009$-$471 is
374: the result of a cosmic ray landing just redward of H$\alpha$ that
375: could not be reliably removed.
376: \label{dacool}}
377: \end{figure}
378:
379: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
380: \subsection {Photometry}
381: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
382:
383: Optical Johnson-Kron-Cousins $VRI$\footnote{The central wavelengths
384: for $V_J$, $R_{\rm KC}$, and $I_{\rm KC}$ are 5475, 6425, and 8075
385: \AA, respectively.} photometry for the new and known WDs was obtained
386: at the CTIO 0.9 m telescope during several observing runs from January
387: 2006 through March 2008 as part of the SMARTS Consortium. The 2048
388: $\times$ 2046 Tektronix CCD camera was used with the Tex 2 $VRI$
389: filter set. Standard stars from \citet{1982PASP...94..244G} and
390: \citet{1992AJ....104..340L, 2007AJ....133.2502L} were taken nightly
391: through a range of airmasses to calibrate fluxes to the
392: Johnson-Kron-Cousins system and to calculate extinction corrections.
393: Bias subtraction and flat-fielding (using calibration frames taken
394: nightly) were performed using standard IRAF packages. When possible,
395: an aperture of 14$\arcsec$ in diameter \citep[consistent
396: with][]{1992AJ....104..340L} was used to determine stellar flux. If
397: cosmic rays fell within this aperture, they were removed before flux
398: extraction. In cases of crowded fields or nearby companions, aperture
399: corrections were applied and ranged from 4$\arcsec$ to 12$\arcsec$ in
400: diameter using the largest aperture possible without including
401: contamination from neighboring sources. Uncertainties in the optical
402: photometry are $\pm$ 0.03 mag in each band and incorporate both
403: internal (night-to-night variations) and external (fits to the
404: standard stars) uncertainties\footnote{A complete discussion of the
405: error analysis can be found in \citet{2004AJ....128.2460H}.}. The
406: final optical magnitudes are listed in Table \ref{photometry}, as well
407: as the number of nights each object was observed.
408:
409: \begin{figure}[!t]
410: \plotone{dc.eps}
411: \figcaption[dc.eps]{Spectral plots of featureless DC WDs from the new
412: sample, plotted in descending $T_{\rm eff}$ as derived from the SED
413: fits to the photometry. Spectra have been normalized at 5200 \AA~and
414: offset by integer amounts.
415: \label{dc}}
416: \end{figure}
417:
418: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
419: \section {Analysis}
420: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
421: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
422: \subsection {Modeling of Physical Parameters}
423: \label{subsec:SED}
424: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
425:
426: A detailed description of the model atmospheres used to model the WDs
427: can be found in Paper XIX and references within. Briefly, the optical
428: $VRI$ and 2MASS near-infrared $JHK_S$ magnitudes are converted into
429: observed fluxes and compared to the resulting SEDs predicted by the
430: model atmospheres calculations. The observed flux, $f_{\lambda}^m$,
431: is related to the model flux by the equation
432:
433: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% TABLE1: PHOTOMETRY OF NEW WHITE DWARFS %%%%%%%%%%%
434: \setcounter{footnote}{0}
435: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\alph{footnote}}
436: %\begin{landscape}
437: %\hspace{-10pt}
438: \begin{table*}[htp]
439: \centering
440: \begin{minipage}{170mm}
441: \tiny
442: \caption{Optical and Infrared
443: Photometry, and Derived Parameters for New and Known White Dwarfs.}
444: \begin{tabular}[c]{p{0.75in}rrrcrrrrrrr@{$\pm$}rlr@{$\pm$}lll}
445: %\begin{deluxetable}{p{0.75in}rrrcrrrrrrr@{$\pm$}rlr@{$\pm$}lll}
446: %\tabletypesize{\tiny}
447: %\tablewidth{170mm}
448:
449: \hline
450: \hline\\
451:
452: \multicolumn{1}{c}{} &
453: \multicolumn{1}{c}{} &
454: \multicolumn{1}{c}{} &
455: \multicolumn{1}{c}{} &
456: \multicolumn{1}{c}{No.} &
457: \multicolumn{1}{c}{} &
458: \multicolumn{1}{c}{} &
459: \multicolumn{1}{c}{} &
460: \multicolumn{1}{c}{} &
461: \multicolumn{1}{c}{} &
462: \multicolumn{1}{c}{} &
463: \multicolumn{2}{c}{$T_{\rm eff}$} &
464: \multicolumn{1}{c}{} &
465: \multicolumn{2}{c}{Dist.} &
466: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Spec.} &
467: \multicolumn{1}{c}{} \\
468:
469: \multicolumn{1}{c}{WD Name} &
470: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$V_{\rm J}$} &
471: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$R_{\rm KC}$} &
472: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$I_{\rm KC}$} &
473: \multicolumn{1}{c}{of Obs.} &
474: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$J$} &
475: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\sigma_J$} &
476: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$H$} &
477: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\sigma_H$} &
478: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$K_S$} &
479: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\sigma_{K_S}$} &
480: \multicolumn{2}{c}{(K)} &
481: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Comp.} &
482: \multicolumn{2}{c}{(pc)} &
483: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Type} &
484: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Notes} \\[4pt]
485:
486: \hline\\
487: %\endfirsthead
488: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
489: %\caption[]{continued}\\[-12pt]
490: %\hline
491: %\hline\\[-3pt]
492:
493: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{} &
494: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{} &
495: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{} &
496: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{} &
497: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{No.} &
498: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{} &
499: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{} &
500: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{} &
501: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{} &
502: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{} &
503: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{} &
504: %\multicolumn{2}{c}{$T_{\rm eff}$} &
505: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{} &
506: %\multicolumn{2}{c}{Dist.} &
507: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{Spec.} &
508: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{} \\
509: %
510: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{WD Name} &
511: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{$V_{\rm J}$} &
512: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{$R_{\rm KC}$} &
513: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{$I_{\rm KC}$} &
514: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{of Obs.} &
515: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{$J$} &
516: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{$\sigma_J$} &
517: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{$H$} &
518: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{$\sigma_H$} &
519: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{$K_S$} &
520: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{$\sigma_{K_S}$} &
521: %\multicolumn{2}{c}{(K)} &
522: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{Comp.} &
523: %\multicolumn{2}{c}{(pc)} &
524: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{Type} &
525: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{Notes} \\[4pt]
526: %
527: %\endhead
528: %\endfoot
529: %
530: %\\[-1.8ex] \hline \hline
531: %\endlastfoot
532:
533: %\tablehead{\colhead{} &
534: % \colhead{} &
535: % \colhead{} &
536: % \colhead{} &
537: % \colhead{No.} &
538: % \colhead{} &
539: % \colhead{} &
540: % \colhead{} &
541: % \colhead{} &
542: % \colhead{} &
543: % \colhead{} &
544: % \multicolumn{2}{c}{$T_{\rm eff}$} &
545: % \colhead{} &
546: % \colhead{Dist$_{SED}$} &
547: % \multicolumn{2}{c}{Dist.} &
548: % \multicolumn{2}{c}{Dist$_{EMP}$} &
549: % \colhead{\#} &
550: % \colhead{Spec.} &
551: % \colhead{} \\
552:
553: % \colhead{WD Name} &
554: % \colhead{$V_{\rm J}$} &
555: % \colhead{$R_{\rm KC}$} &
556: % \colhead{$I_{\rm KC}$} &
557: % \colhead{of Obs.} &
558: % \colhead{$J$} &
559: % \colhead{$\sigma_J$} &
560: % \colhead{$H$} &
561: % \colhead{$\sigma_H$} &
562: % \colhead{$K_S$} &
563: % \colhead{$\sigma_{K_S}$} &
564: % \multicolumn{2}{c}{(K)} &
565: % \colhead{Comp.} &
566: % \multicolumn{2}{c}{(pc)} &
567: % \multicolumn{2}{c}{(pc)} &
568: % \colhead{Colors} &
569: % \colhead{Type} &
570: % \colhead{Notes}}
571:
572: \vspace{0pt}\\[-10pt]
573: \multicolumn{18}{c}{New Spectroscopically Confirmed White Dwarfs} \\[4pt]
574: %\vspace{-45pt}\\
575: \hline
576: \vspace{0pt}\\[-3pt]
577:
578: 0011$-$721\dotfill & 15.17 & 14.87 & 14.55 & 3 & 14.21 & 0.03 & 13.97 & 0.04 & 13.92 & 0.05 & 6439 & 152 & H & 17.8 & 2.9 & DA8.0 & \tablenotemark{a} \\%
579: 0102$-$579\dotfill & 16.35 & 16.17 & 15.98 & 2 & 15.67 & 0.07 & 15.57 & 0.16 & 15.76 & Null & 7866 & 375 & H & 44.4 & 7.5 & DA6.5 & \tablenotemark{b} \\%
580: 0123$-$460\dotfill & 16.30 & 15.94 & 15.57 & 3 & 15.11 & 0.04 & 14.84 & 0.06 & 14.91 & 0.10 & 5898 & 161 & H & 24.9 & 4.1 & DA8.5 & \tablenotemark{a} \\%
581: 0134$-$177\dotfill & 15.19 & 15.22 & 15.17 & 3 & 15.34 & 0.04 & 15.26 & 0.07 & 15.20 & 0.14 & 11329 & 560 & H & 47.7 & 8.4 & DA4.5 & \tablenotemark{c} \\%too blue for relations
582: 0149$-$723\dotfill & 16.33 & 16.10 & 15.86 & 2 & 15.65 & 0.05 & 15.64 & 0.12 & 15.42 & 0.18 & 6972 & 298 & He & 36.2 & 5.8 & DC & \\%
583: 0311$-$649\dotfill & 13.27 & 13.34 & 13.36 & 2 & 13.45 & 0.02 & 13.46 & 0.03 & 13.57 & 0.05 & 11945 & 557 & H & 21.0 & 3.7 & DA4.0 & \tablenotemark{d} \\%too blue for relations
584: 0431$-$360\dotfill & 17.03 & 16.55 & 16.08 & 2 & 15.48 & 0.06 & 15.17 & 0.08 & 15.23 & 0.18 & 5153 & 154 & H & 25.2 & 4.1 & DA10.0 & \tablenotemark{a} \\%
585: 0431$-$279\dotfill & 16.80 & 16.34 & 15.89 & 2 & 15.37 & 0.05 & 15.11 & 0.07 & 14.92 & 0.12 & 5330 & 146 & H & 24.7 & 4.0 & DC & \\%
586: 0620$-$402\dotfill & 16.20 & 15.89 & 15.60 & 2 & 15.27 & 0.04 & 15.13 & 0.09 & 15.24 & 0.17 & 5919 & 278 & He(+Ca) & 25.3 & 4.0 & DZ & \\%
587: 0651$-$398A\dotfill & 15.46 & 15.23 & 14.98 & 2 & 14.71 & 0.04 & 14.55 & 0.05 & 14.49 & 0.11 & 7222 & 219 & H & 25.1 & 4.3 & DA7.0 & \tablenotemark{e} \\%
588: 0651$-$398B\dotfill & 16.07 & 15.76 & 15.44 & 2 & 15.10 & 0.05 & 14.90 & 0.08 & 14.71 & 0.13 & 6450 & 220 & H & 26.9 & 4.5 & DA8.0 & \tablenotemark{a} \\%WT0201 87.2'' @ 317.4 degrees
589: 0655$-$390\dotfill & 15.11 & 14.81 & 14.48 & 3 & 14.15 & 0.03 & 13.88 & 0.04 & 13.89 & 0.07 & 6415 & 162 & H & 17.2 & 2.8 & DA8.0 & \tablenotemark{a} \\%
590: 0708$-$670\dotfill & 16.22 & 15.72 & 15.21 & 3 & 14.71 & 0.03 & 14.65 & 0.05 & 14.47 & 0.07 & 5108 & 74 & He & 17.5 & 2.7 & DC & \\%
591: 0709$-$252\dotfill & 14.38 & 14.36 & 14.34 & 2 & 14.39 & 0.03 & 14.39 & 0.04 & 14.49 & 0.09 & 10708 & 356 & H & 30.5 & 5.3 & DA4.5 & \tablenotemark{f} \\%
592: 0751$-$252\dotfill & 16.27 & 15.78 & 15.31 & 4 & 14.75 & 0.03 & 14.47 & 0.03 & 14.30 & 0.09 & 5159 & 107 & H & 17.8 & 2.9 & DC & \tablenotemark{g} \\%cpm LTT2976 @ 19.5pc
593: 0816$-$310\dotfill & 15.43 & 15.21 & 15.05 & 3 & 14.92 & 0.04 & 14.73 & 0.07 & 14.83 & 0.12 & 6631 & 345 & He(+Ca) & 23.8 & 3.8 & DZ & \\%
594: 0856$-$007\dotfill & 16.33 & 15.85 & 15.39 & 3 & 14.83 & 0.04 & 14.58 & 0.05 & 14.69 & 0.13 & 5309 & 126 & H & 19.3 & 3.2 & DC & \\%
595: 1116$-$470\dotfill & 15.52 & 15.20 & 14.86 & 3 & 14.45 & 0.03 & 14.37 & 0.06 & 14.35 & 0.09 & 5856 & 140 & He & 17.9 & 2.8 & DC & \\%
596: 1817$-$598\dotfill & 16.85 & 16.30 & 15.80 & 3 & 15.20 & 0.05 & 15.01 & 0.10 & 14.91 & 0.14 & 4960 & 145 & H & 20.9 & 3.4 & DC & \\%
597: 1916$-$362\dotfill & 13.60 & 13.69 & 13.77 & 2 & 14.10 & 0.03 & 14.22 & 0.04 & 14.21 & 0.07 & 24105 & 8797 & He & 41.7 & 7.7 & DB & \tablenotemark{h} \\%
598: 2009$-$471\dotfill & 16.53 & 16.16 & 15.79 & 2 & 15.38 & 0.05 & 15.00 & 0.05 & 15.08 & 0.12 & 5827 & 162 & H & 27.0 & 4.5 & DA8.5 & \tablenotemark{a} \\%
599: 2118$-$388\dotfill & 16.55 & 16.09 & 15.65 & 2 & 15.16 & 0.04 & 14.92 & 0.07 & 15.05 & 0.12 & 5244 & 102 & He & 22.0 & 3.5 & DC & \\[4pt]%
600:
601:
602: \hline
603: \vspace{0pt}\\[-2pt]
604: \multicolumn{18}{c}{Known White Dwarfs (without Trigonometric Parallaxes)} \\[4pt]
605: \hline
606: \vspace{0pt}\\[-3pt]
607:
608: 0233$-$242\dotfill & 15.94 & 15.43 & 14.93 & 3 & 14.45 & 0.03 & 14.34 & 0.05 & 14.12 & 0.07 & 5093 & 78 & He & 15.3 & 2.4 & DC & \tablenotemark{i} \\
609: 0707$-$320\dotfill & 15.61 & 15.57 & 15.49 & 2 & 15.49 & 0.06 & 15.43 & 0.11 & 15.38 & 0.20 & 9900 & 440 & H & 47.8 & 8.2 & DA5.0 & \\%
610: 1223$-$659\dotfill & 14.02 & 13.82 & 13.62 & 3 & 13.33 & 0.04 & 13.26 & 0.06 & 13.30 & 0.06 & 7690 & 220 & H & 14.5 & 2.5 & DA6.5 & \tablenotemark{j} \\
611: 1241$-$798\dotfill & 16.18 & 15.80 & 15.45 & 3 & 15.03 & 0.05 & 14.83 & 0.07 & 14.60 & 0.12 & 5618 & 143 & He & 22.1 & 3.5 & DC/DQ & \\
612: 2007$-$219\dotfill & 14.40 & 14.33 & 14.25 & 3 & 14.20 & 0.02 & 14.20 & 0.04 & 14.26 & 0.08 & 9556 & 242 & H & 25.7 & 4.4 & DA5.5 & \tablenotemark{k} \\
613: 2133$-$135\dotfill & 13.68 & 13.63 & 13.55 & 3 & 13.60 & 0.03 & 13.58 & 0.04 & 13.69 & 0.06 & 10182 & 281 & H & 20.4 & 3.5 & DA5.0 & \tablenotemark{l} \\%
614: 2159$-$754\dotfill & 15.04 & 14.92 & 14.80 & 2 & 14.72 & 0.04 & 14.67 & 0.07 & 14.55 & 0.10 & 8944 & 289 & H & 30.5 & 5.3 & DA5.5 & \tablenotemark{m} \\
615: 2216$-$657\dotfill & 14.55 & 14.47 & 14.41 & 2 & 14.54 & 0.04 & 14.50 & 0.06 & 14.53 & 0.09 & 10611 & 567 & He & 30.1 & 5.1 & DZ & \tablenotemark{n} \\
616: 2306$-$220\dotfill & 13.75 & 13.83 & 13.89 & 2 & 14.13 & 0.03 & 14.18 & 0.05 & 14.33 & 0.07 & 16285 & 1273 & H & 33.3 & 6.1 & DA3.0 & \tablenotemark{o} \\
617: 2336$-$079\dotfill & 13.28 & 13.27 & 13.24 & 4 & 13.34 & 0.03 & 13.34 & 0.02 & 13.35 & 0.03 & 10946 & 304 & H & 18.9 & 3.3 & DA4.5 & \tablenotemark{p} \\
618: 2351$-$335\dotfill & 14.52 & 14.38 & 14.19 & 2 & 13.99 & 0.11 & 13.86 & 0.25 & 13.73 & 0.11 & 8068 & 401 & H & 20.1 & 3.5 & DA6.0 & \tablenotemark{q} \\[4pt]
619: \hline
620: \footnotetext[\tiny a]{\tiny Too cool for a reliable spectroscopic fit (i.e., minimal Balmer line absorption).}
621: \footnotetext[\tiny b]{\tiny Spectral fit yielded a $T_{\rm eff} =$ 8228 $\pm$ 138 K and log $g =$ 8.19 $\pm$ 0.12. Common proper motion companion to NLTT 3566 (see $\S$ \ref{subsec:individual}).}
622: \footnotetext[\tiny c]{\tiny Spectral fit yielded a $T_{\rm eff} =$ 11613 $\pm$ 192 K and log $g =$ 8.14 $\pm$ 0.06.}
623: \footnotetext[\tiny d]{\tiny Spectral fit yielded a $T_{\rm eff} =$ 12632 $\pm$ 300 K and log $g =$ 7.63 $\pm$ 0.06 (see $\S$ \ref{subsec:individual}).}
624: \footnotetext[\tiny e]{\tiny Spectral fit yielded a $T_{\rm eff} =$ 7214 $\pm$ 135 K and log $g =$ 7.68 $\pm$ 0.19. Common proper motion companion to WD 0651$-$398B (see $\S$ \ref{subsec:individual}).}
625: \footnotetext[\tiny f]{\tiny Spectral fit yielded a $T_{\rm eff} =$ 11208 $\pm$ 180 K and log $g =$ 8.12 $\pm$ 0.06.}
626: \footnotetext[\tiny g]{\tiny Common proper motion companion to LTT 2976 (see $\S$ \ref{subsec:individual}).}
627: \footnotetext[\tiny h]{\tiny Spectral fit yielded a $T_{\rm eff} =$ 27830 $\pm$ 1050 K and log $g =$ 7.97 $\pm$ 0.07 (see $\S$ \ref{subsec:individual} and Figure \ref{dadb}).}
628: \footnotetext[\tiny i]{\tiny \citet{2003ApJ...586L..95V} estimate a distance of 15 pc.}
629: \footnotetext[\tiny j]{\tiny \citet{2002ApJ...571..512H} estimate a distance of 10.79 pc. \citet{2008AJ....135.1225H} estimate a distance of 12.05 pc.}
630: \footnotetext[\tiny k]{\tiny \citet{2002ApJ...571..512H} estimate a distance of 18.22 pc.}
631: \footnotetext[\tiny l]{\tiny Spectral fit yielded a $T_{\rm eff} =$ 10357 $\pm$ 158 K and log $g =$ 7.99 $\pm$ 0.07. \citet{2006AA...447..173P} estimate a distance of 23.3 pc.}
632: \footnotetext[\tiny m]{\tiny \citet{2007ApJ...654..499K} estimate a distance of 14 pc. \citet{2008AJ....135.1225H} estimate a distance of 14.24 pc.}
633: \footnotetext[\tiny n]{\tiny \citet{1993AJ....105.1033A} estimate a distance of 28 pc.}
634: \footnotetext[\tiny o]{\tiny \citet{2004AJ....127.1702K} estimate a distance of 33 pc.}
635: \footnotetext[\tiny p]{\tiny \citet{2002ApJ...571..512H} estimate a distance of 15.6 pc. \citet{2008AJ....135.1225H} estimate a distance of 17.45 pc.}
636: \footnotetext[\tiny q]{\tiny \citet{2002ApJ...571..512H} estimate a distance of 12.41 pc.}
637: \end{tabular}
638: \label{photometry}\\[-4pt]
639: \end{minipage}
640: \normalsize
641: \end{table*}
642: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\arabic{footnote}}
643: \setcounter{footnote}{3}
644: %\begin{center}
645: %\begin{table*}
646: %\begin{tabular}{p{0.15in}l}
647: %
648: %~~~~~~~~$^{\rm a}$ & Too cool for a reliable spectroscopic fit (i.e., minimal Balmer line absorption).\\
649: %~~~~~~~~$^{\rm b}$ & Spectral fit yielded a $T_{\rm eff} =$ 8228 $\pm$ 138 K and a log $g =$ 8.19 $\pm$ 0.12. Common proper motion companion to NLTT 3566 (see $\S$ \ref{subsec:individual}).\\
650: %~~~~~~~~$^{\rm c}$ & Spectral fit yielded a $T_{\rm eff} =$ 11613 $\pm$ 192 K and a log $g =$ 8.14 $\pm$ 0.06.\\
651: %~~~~~~~~$^{\rm d}$ & Spectral fit yielded a $T_{\rm eff} =$ 12632 $\pm$ 300 K and a log $g =$ 7.63 $\pm$ 0.06 (see $\S$ \ref{subsec:individual}).\\
652: %~~~~~~~~$^{\rm e}$ & Spectral fit yielded a $T_{\rm eff} =$ 7214 $\pm$ 135 K and a log $g =$ 7.68 $\pm$ 0.19. Common proper motion companion to WD 0651$-$398B (see $\S$ \ref{subsec:individual}).\\
653: %~~~~~~~~$^{\rm f}$ & Spectral fit yielded a $T_{\rm eff} =$ 11208 $\pm$ 180 K and a log $g =$ 8.12 $\pm$ 0.06.\\
654: %~~~~~~~~$^{\rm g}$ & Common proper motion companion to LTT 2976 (see $\S$ \ref{subsec:individual}).\\
655: %~~~~~~~~$^{\rm h}$ & Spectral fit yielded a $T_{\rm eff} =$ 27830 $\pm$ 1050 K and a log $g =$ 7.97 $\pm$ 0.07 (see $\S$ \ref{subsec:individual} and Figure \ref{dadb}).\\
656: %~~~~~~~~$^{\rm i}$ & \citet{2003ApJ...586L..95V} estimate a distance of 15 pc.\\
657: %~~~~~~~~$^{\rm j}$ & \citet{2002ApJ...571..512H} estimate a distance of 10.79 pc. \citet{2008AJ....135.1225H} estimate a distance of 12.05 pc.\\
658: %~~~~~~~~$^{\rm k}$ & \citet{2002ApJ...571..512H} estimate a distance of 18.22 pc.\\
659: %~~~~~~~~$^{\rm l}$ & Spectral fit yielded a $T_{\rm eff} =$ 10357 $\pm$ 158 K and a log $g =$ 7.99 $\pm$ 0.07. \citet{2006AA...447..173P} estimate a distance of 23.3 pc.\\
660: %~~~~~~~~$^{\rm m}$ & \citet{2007ApJ...654..499K} estimate a distance of 14 pc. \citet{2008AJ....135.1225H} estimate a distance of 14.24 pc.\\
661: %~~~~~~~~$^{\rm n}$ & \citet{1993AJ....105.1033A} estimate a distance of 28 pc.\\
662: %~~~~~~~~$^{\rm o}$ & \citet{2004AJ....127.1702K} estimate a distance of 33 pc.\\
663: %~~~~~~~~$^{\rm p}$ & \citet{2002ApJ...571..512H} estimate a distance of 15.6 pc. \citet{2008AJ....135.1225H} estimate a distance of 17.45 pc.\\
664: %~~~~~~~~$^{\rm q}$ & \citet{2002ApJ...571..512H} estimate a distance of 12.41 pc.\\
665: %
666: %\end{tabular}
667: %\end{table*}
668: %\end{center}
669:
670: \begin{equation}
671: f_{\lambda}^m= 4\pi~(R/D)^2~H_{\lambda}^m
672: \end{equation}
673: \noindent
674: where $R/D$ is the ratio of the radius of the star to its distance
675: from Earth, and $H_{\lambda}^m$ is the Eddington flux (dependent on
676: $T_{\rm eff}$, $\log g$, and atmospheric composition), properly
677: averaged over the corresponding filter bandpass. We consider only
678: $T_{\rm eff}$ and the solid angle [$\pi(R/D)^2$] to be free
679: parameters, and the uncertainties of both parameters are obtained
680: directly from the covariance matrix of the fit. In this study, we
681: simply assume a value of $\log g=8.0$ for each star. As discussed in
682: \citet{BRL, 2001ApJS..133..413B}, the main atmospheric constituent ---
683: hydrogen or helium --- is determined by comparing the fits obtained
684: with both compositions, or by the presence of H$\alpha$ in the optical
685: spectra. The derived values for $T_{\rm eff}$ for each object are
686: listed in Table \ref{photometry}. For the two new DZ stars,
687: spectroscopic modeling of metal lines as well as the photometry was
688: used to constrain $T_{\rm eff}$ (see below).Also listed are the
689: spectral types for each object determined based on their spectral
690: features. The DAs have been assigned a half-integer temperature index
691: as defined by \citet{1999ApJS..121....1M}, where the temperature index
692: equals 50,400/$T_{\rm eff}$.
693:
694: Our grids of model atmospheres and synthetic spectra for DA and DB
695: stars are described respectively in \citet{liebert2005} and
696: \citet{beauchamp96}. The atmospheric parameters -- $T_{\rm eff}$,
697: log $g$ (and hydrogen abundance for the DB stars) -- are determined
698: from the optical spectra using the so-called spectroscopic technique
699: \citep[see, e.g.,][]{1992ApJ...394..228B}, which relies on a
700: detailed comparison between synthetic and observed normalized line
701: profiles. The model spectra (convolved with a Gaussian instrumental
702: profile) and the optical spectrum are first normalized to a continuum
703: set to unity. The calculation of $\chi^2$ is then carried out in
704: terms of these normalized line profiles only, and the best fitting
705: solution is obtained using the nonlinear least-squares method of
706: Levenberg-Marquardt \citep{pressetal92}, which is based on a steepest
707: descent method. Spectroscopically derived values of $T_{\rm eff}$ and
708: log $g$ are given in the footnotes of Table \ref{photometry} for the
709: DA and DB stars.
710:
711: For the DZ stars' spectra in Figure \ref{dz}, we rely on the procedure
712: outlined in \citet{dufour07}. We obtain a first estimate of the
713: atmospheric parameters by fitting the photometric SED with an assumed
714: value of the metal abundances (assuming solar abundance ratios). We
715: then fit the optical spectrum to measure the metal abundances, and use
716: these values to improve our atmospheric parameters from the
717: photometric SED. This procedure is iterated until a self-consistent
718: photometric and spectroscopic solution is achieved. In the cases of
719: the two DZ stars presented here, a slight abundance of hydrogen was
720: included [log (H/He) = $-$3] in the modeled fits. As shown in
721: \citet{dufour07}, the Ca line widths and depths are affected by the
722: presence of hydrogen even if the abundance is not significant enough
723: to produce spectral signatures. Our spectra were best fit with the
724: inclusion of hydrogen. The values of $T_{\rm eff}$ listed in Table
725: \ref{photometry} for the new DZ stars were derived using this
726: additional spectroscopic modeling constraint [i.e., ``He($+$Ca)'' in
727: the composition column]; whereas, the known DZ (WD 2216$-$657) was
728: modeled using only photometry assuming a pure He atmosphere (i.e.,
729: ``He'' in the composition column).
730:
731: \begin{figure}
732: \plotone{dz.eps}
733: \figcaption[dz.eps]{Spectral plots of the two DZ WDs from the new
734: sample. The inset plots display the spectra ({\it thin lines}) in the
735: regions to which the models ({\it thick lines}) were fit.
736: Spectroscopic best fit physical parameters are listed below.
737: Prominent lines from Ca ({\it vertical lines}), Mg ({\it open
738: circles}), and Fe ({\it filled circles}) are labeled. Both modeled
739: fits incorporated a slight hydrogen abundance of log (H/He) $=$ $-$3
740: (see $\S$ \ref{subsec:SED}).
741: \label{dz}}
742: \end{figure}
743:
744: \begin{figure}
745: \plotone{dadb.eps} \figcaption[dadb.eps]{{\it Top}: Spectral plot of
746: the DA (hydrogen-rich) WD 0311$-$649 with the model fit ({\it thick
747: line}) overplotted. Spectroscopic best fit physical parameters are
748: listed below. {\it Bottom}: Spectral plot of the DB (helium-rich) WD
749: 1916$-$362. The inset plot displays the spectrum ({\it thin line}) in
750: the region to which the model ({\it thick line}) was fit.
751: Spectroscopic best fit physical parameters are listed below. Note
752: that the sharp absorption feature at $\sim$4100 \AA~is an artifact
753: produced by a cosmic ray that could not be reliably removed because of
754: its proximity to a true spectral feature.
755: \label{dadb}}
756: \end{figure}
757:
758: Once the effective temperature and the atmospheric composition were
759: determined, we calculated the absolute visual magnitude using a
760: procedure identical to that outlined in Paper XIX \citep[i.e.,
761: combined the new photometric calibration of][~with evolutionary
762: models\footnote{See
763: http://www.astro.umontreal.ca/$\sim$bergeron/CoolingModels/.}]{holberg06}.
764: We then compared the absolute magnitude to the apparent $V$ magnitude
765: observed to derive a distance estimate for each star (reported in
766: Table \ref{photometry}). Errors on the distance estimates incorporate
767: the errors of the photometry values as well as an error of 0.25 dex in
768: log {\it g}, which is the measured dispersion of the observed
769: distribution using spectroscopic determinations \citep[see Figure 9
770: of][]{1992ApJ...394..228B}.
771:
772:
773: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
774: \subsection {Comments on Individual Systems}
775: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
776: \label{subsec:individual}
777:
778: {\bf WD 0102$-$579:} A new HPM object discovered during the SCR proper
779: motion survey ($\mu =$ 0.239\arcyear~at position angle 91.1$^\circ$,
780: \citealt{2007AJ....133.2898F}). It is likely a common proper motion
781: companion to a previously known HPM object, the red dwarf NLTT 3566
782: ($\mu =$ 0.257\arcyear~at position angle 87.5$^\circ$), separated by
783: 110.6$\arcsec$ at position angle 206.6$^\circ$. The {\it Hipparcos}
784: parallax for NLTT 3566 is 19.51 $\pm$ 3.13 mas \citep[distance = 51.3
785: $\pm$ 9.8 pc,][]{2007hnrr.book.....V} -- entirely consistent with our
786: distance estimate for the WD of 44.4 $\pm$ 7.5 pc.
787:
788: {\bf WD 0311$-$649:} The hottest DA WD in the new sample ($T_{\rm eff}
789: =$ 11,945 $\pm$ 557 K). The Balmer lines of our high S/N spectrum are
790: best fit to a spectral fitting model with $T_{\rm eff} =$ 12,632 $\pm$
791: 300 K and log $g =$ 7.63 $\pm$ 0.06 (see Figure \ref{dadb}),
792: significantly less than the assumed value of log $g =$ 8.0 in the
793: photometric analysis. This would imply that the object is low mass
794: ($M =$ 0.42 $\pm$ 0.03 \msun) and more luminous thereby making it more
795: distant ($\sim$28 pc). Given the age of our Galaxy, the lowest mass
796: WD that could have formed is $\sim$0.47
797: \msun~\citep{1984PhR...105..329I}. If the mass is correct, it is
798: extremely unlikely that this object formed through single-star
799: evolution and thus is likely a multiple system. Trigonometric
800: parallax measurements are underway to confirm the luminosity and hence
801: the mass via our Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory Parallax
802: Investigation \citep[CTIOPI,][]{2005AJ....129.1954J,
803: 2005AJ....130..337C, 2006AJ....132.1234C, 2006AJ....132.2360H}.
804:
805: {\bf WD 0620$-$402:} A new DZ WD whose modeled physical parameters
806: place this object in a lower temperature realm where high atmospheric
807: pressure effects exist that are not included in the Ca-rich (DZ)
808: models described in $\S$ \ref{subsec:SED}. Thus, the model fit is
809: likely inaccurate for this object, so that the physical parameters
810: derived are not well constrained (especially given the low S/N of the
811: spectrum, see Figure \ref{dz}).
812:
813: {\bf WD 0651$-$398AB:} A widely separated (87.2$\arcsec$ at position
814: angle 317.4$^\circ$) HPM double degenerate system discovered during
815: the SCR proper motion survey. The A component ($\mu =$
816: 0.229\arcyear~at position angle 344.7$^\circ$) has $T_{\rm eff} =$
817: 7222 $\pm$ 219 K and the B component ($\mu =$ 0.227\arcyear~at
818: position angle 344.4$^\circ$) has $T_{\rm eff} =$ 6450 $\pm$ 220 K. A
819: third object, WT 204, is separated by 59.3$\arcmin$ at position angle
820: 67.2$^\circ$ and has a similar proper motion of 0.213\arcyear~at
821: position angle 341.9$^\circ$. We have obtained spectra and optical
822: photometry, which indicate a spectral type of M3.0V and $V_J =$ 13.17,
823: $R_{\rm KC} =$ 12.03, $I_{\rm KC} =$ 10.60. Using the main-sequence
824: distance relations of \citet{2004AJ....128.2460H}, we obtain a
825: distance estimate of 19.8 $\pm$ 3.1 pc, which is entirely consistent
826: with the distance estimates to the A and B components, 25.1 $\pm$ 4.3
827: pc and 26.9 $\pm$ 4.5 pc, respectively. While highly unlikely that
828: this is a bound system (the third component's separation is $\sim$
829: 90,000 AU), it is possible that they are part of a moving group.
830:
831: {\bf WD 0751$-$252:} A new HPM object discovered during the SCR proper
832: motion survey ($\mu =$ 0.426\arcyear~at position angle 300.2$^\circ$,
833: \citealt{2005AJ....130.1658S}). Its proper motion is similar to a
834: previously known HPM object, LTT 2976 ($\mu =$ 0.361\arcyear~at
835: position angle 303.8$^\circ$). The distance estimate for the WD (17.8
836: $\pm$ 2.9 pc) is consistent with the {\it Hipparcos} parallax of 51.53
837: $\pm$ 1.46 mas (distance = 19.41 $\pm$ 0.57 pc,
838: \citealt{2007hnrr.book.....V}) for LTT 2976. Thus, these two objects
839: likely form a system with a separation of 6.6$\arcmin$ ($\sim$ 8000
840: AU) at position angle 208.9$^\circ$.
841:
842: {\bf WD 0816$-$310:} A new DZ WD whose spectrum has been reliably
843: reproduced using the methods appropriate for DZs described in $\S$
844: \ref{subsec:SED} (see Figure \ref{dz}). The inset plot extends down
845: to 3700 \AA~(rather than 3800 \AA~for all other spectral plots) to
846: illustrate the validity of assuming solar abundance ratios (at least
847: for Ca, Mg, and Fe) given the quality of the fit.
848:
849: {\bf WD 1916$-$362:} The only DB WD in the new sample. The
850: photometric temperature ($T_{\rm eff} =$ 24,105 $\pm$ 8797 K) agrees
851: reasonably well with the spectroscopic temperature ($T_{\rm eff} =$
852: 27,830 $\pm$ 1050 K) assuming a pure helium composition given that no
853: hydrogen features are visible in the spectrum. At these temperatures,
854: trace amounts of hydrogen may be present without showing any spectral
855: signatures and would serve to reduce the spectroscopic temperature.
856: In fact, hydrogen would go unnoticed spectroscopically until at least
857: log (H/He) = $-$3.5 was included. If we assume a log (H/He) = $-$4.5
858: (i.e., not spectrally visible), we obtain a spectroscopic solution
859: with $T_{\rm eff} =$ 25,800 K, slightly more consistent with the
860: photometric temperature. It is possible that trace amounts of
861: hydrogen are present, however, without additional information (i.e., a
862: trigonometric parallax), we have chosen to adopt the spectroscopic
863: result assuming a pure helium composition.
864:
865: We note that the photometric temperature is far more uncertain. The
866: optical photometry used to fit the SED is rather insensitive to
867: effective temperature because the magnitudes fall largely on the
868: Rayleigh-Jeans tail of the SED for such a hot object. Therefore, the
869: spectroscopically determined effective temperature is significantly
870: better constrained (spectrum and fit are plotted in Figure
871: \ref{dadb}).
872:
873: %For the DB star, we first assume a pure helium composition based on
874: %the lack of any H$\alpha$ absorption feature in our optical spectrum;
875: %this yields $T_{\rm eff}=27,830$~K and $\log g=7.97$. Models with a
876: %small trace of hydrogen of $\log N({\rm H})/N({\rm He}=-3.5}$ produces
877: %a weak H$\alpha$ absorption feature and a best fit at $T_{\rm
878: %eff}=23,680$~K and $\log g=8.17$. We thus adopt a final solution of
879: %$T_{\rm eff}=25,800\pm2000$~K, $\log g=8.07\pm0.10$, and $\log N({\rm
880: %H})/N({\rm He}=-4.5\pm1.0$.
881:
882:
883: {\bf WD 2133$-$135:} A DA WD that was uncovered during our sift of the
884: SSS database. It is also included in \citet{2006AA...447..173P}
885: (labeled HE 2133$-$1332 in that work), in which they analyzed spectra
886: of 398 DA WDs to determine kinematic properties of the sample as part
887: of the SN Ia Progenitor surveY (SPY). The authors state that their
888: sample was generated from databases of known WDs; however, we
889: performed a thorough search for a previous spectroscopic confirmation
890: of this object's WD status and were unsuccessful\footnote{Resources
891: searched include the WD database of \citet{1999ApJS..121....1M} (the
892: current Web-based catalog can be found at
893: http://heasarc.nasa.gov/W3Browse/all/mcksion.html) as well as a
894: previous WD publication using data from the Hamburg/ESO (HE) survey
895: \citep[i.e.,][]{2001A&A...366..898C}.}. We have confirmed that this
896: object was selected to be observed by the SPY project using data taken
897: from the Hamburg/ESO (HE) survey in which there was no previous
898: confirmation spectrum but rather a high confidence in this object's
899: luminosity class (R. Napiwotzki 2008, private communication). Thus,
900: \citet{2006AA...447..173P} is the first publication to confirm this
901: object's WD status (hence, it is a member of the known sample) yet
902: this publication is the first to present a confirmation spectrum (see
903: Figure \ref{dahot}). The authors estimate a spectroscopic distance of
904: 23.3 pc, consistent with our distance estimate of 20.4 $\pm$ 3.5 pc.
905:
906: {\bf WD 2159$-$754:} A known DA WD that has been analyzed
907: spectroscopically by \citet{2007ApJ...654..499K} for which they
908: determine the spectroscopic $T_{\rm eff} =$ 9040 $\pm$ 80 K,
909: moderately consistent with our photometric $T_{\rm eff} =$ 9556 $\pm$
910: 242 K. In addition, they conclude that this object has a large
911: surface gravity (log $g =$ 8.95 $\pm$ 0.12) and hence a large mass
912: (1.17 $\pm$ 0.04 \msun). Thus, their estimated distance (14 pc) is
913: significantly closer than our estimated distance (30.5 $\pm$ 5.3 pc)
914: based on an assumed log $g =$ 8.0. Trigonometric parallax
915: measurements are underway to confirm its luminosity and hence its
916: mass.
917:
918: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
919: \section {Discussion}
920: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
921:
922: We continue to fill in the nearby WD sample with the discovery of 21
923: new WD systems brighter than $V \sim$ 17. While the sample size is
924: smaller than the number of new WDs presented in Paper XIX, the number
925: of new systems estimated to be within 25 pc is larger (eight reported
926: in Paper XIX vs.~twelve reported here for a total of 20 new WDs), due
927: largely to the revised criteria set for candidates to be targeted for
928: follow-up spectroscopic observations (see $\S$ \ref{sec:candidates}).
929: In addition, of the known samples evaluated in this effort, a total of
930: 18 WDs are estimated to be within 25 pc (twelve reported in Paper XIX
931: and six reported here). Combining the new and known samples from both
932: publications, we have found a total of 38 WDs estimated to be within
933: 25 pc -- a volume that currently contains 110 WD systems disregarding
934: any quality constraints on the parallaxes.\footnote{This sample of WDs
935: was compiled using parallaxes, both for the WDs as well as for
936: additional components if the WD is part of a multiple system, from the
937: Yale Parallax Catalog \citep{1995gcts.book.....V}, {\it Hipparcos}
938: \citep{1997A&A...323L..49P, 2007hnrr.book.....V}, and other recent
939: efforts involving trigonometric parallaxes
940: \citep[e.g.,][]{2003A&A...404..317S, 2004ApJS..150..455G,
941: 2007A&A...470..387D}. A comprehensive list, including weighted mean
942: parallaxes when multiple parallaxes are avaible for a system, is
943: included as an electronic supplement to this publication and can also
944: be found at http://www.DenseProject.com.} Trigonometric parallax
945: determinations are underway to confirm membership to the 25 pc sample
946: but should the distance estimates prove accurate, the local sample of
947: WDs will be increased by 34\%. Once these nearby WDs are confirmed,
948: focused efforts can yield crucial WD masses and permit companionship
949: assessments.
950:
951: To ensure a reliable sample, we have begun to adopt the quality
952: constraint that the trigonometric parallax error cannot be greater
953: than 10\% of the parallax. Given the precision of ground-based
954: trigonometric parallaxes ($\sim$2.0 mas or better), this constraint is
955: entirely reasonable (even for a system at the 25 pc horizon, the 10\%
956: constraint amounts to an error of 4.0 mas). With the constraint in
957: place, thirteen systems (five in the north and eight in the south) are
958: eliminated from the known 25 pc WD sample (now with a total of 97
959: systems). To better constrain their distances, we are currently
960: measuring trigonometric parallaxes for seven of these systems in the
961: southern hemisphere (one system, WD 1043$-$188 is too close to a
962: companion whose brightness exceeds the bright limit of the 0.9m at
963: CTIO). We would encourage northern hemisphere parallax programs to do
964: the same for the five systems in the north (WD 0644$+$025, WD
965: 0955$+$247, WD 1309$+$853, WD 1919$+$145, and WD 2117$+$539).
966:
967: If we separate new and known samples from Paper XIX and this work by
968: proper motion, we see that the majority of added WD neighbors
969: estimated to be within 25 pc is found at lower proper motions. Table
970: \ref{diststats} breaks down this complete sample into proper motion
971: bins of 0.2\arcyear~below 1.0\arcyear~(the first value in each column
972: corresponds to the systems presented in Paper XIX while the second
973: value corresponds to those systems reported here). A quick summation
974: shows the number of systems with $\mu \ge$ 0.6\arcyear~(12) is dwarfed
975: by the number of systems with $\mu <$ 0.6\arcyear~(26), including five
976: that have $\mu <$ 0.2\arcyear~(of which, four have $\mu$ between
977: 0.18-0.2\arcyear). These results support the notion that a
978: significant number of nearby WDs may still be found at very low proper
979: motions.
980:
981: Other recent efforts have focused on the local WD population. In
982: particular, \citet{2008AJ....135.1225H} have targeted the 20 pc sample
983: determined by trigonometric parallaxes as well as
984: photometric/spectroscopic parallaxes. The authors estimate the local
985: WD density based on the 13 pc WD sample using the assumption that the
986: 13 pc sample is largely complete. Paper XIX contained two objects (WD
987: 0821$-$669 and WD 1202$-$232) previously unknown to be nearby, whose
988: distance estimates as well as unpublished trigonometric parallaxes
989: (Subasavage et al. 2008, in preparation) placed them within 13 pc.
990: These have been included by \citet{2008AJ....135.1225H} in their
991: updated estimate of the local WD density. Given that none of the new
992: WD discoveries in this publication have distance estimates within 13
993: pc, the notion that the 13 pc WD sample is largely complete is
994: supported. The sample of \citet{2008AJ....135.1225H} includes five
995: new WD discoveries from Paper XIX whose distance estimates lie within
996: 20 pc (WD 0121$-$429, WD 0344$+$014, WD 0821$-$669, WD 2008$-$600, WD
997: 2138$-$332) as well as one from this paper (WD 0751$-$252, see $\S$
998: \ref{subsec:individual}). The authors estimate that the 20 pc sample
999: is $\sim$80 \% complete and that $\sim$33 $\pm$ 13 WDs remain to be
1000: discovered between 13 and 20 pc (again, assuming the 13 pc sample is
1001: complete). Five systems reported here (not including WD 0751$-$252)
1002: are estimated to lie within 20 pc. Thus, we are filling the
1003: incompleteness gap.
1004:
1005: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% TABLE2: DISTANCE ESTIMATES %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1006: %
1007: %\tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
1008: \begin{table}[t]
1009: \caption{Distance Estimate Statistics for New and Known White Dwarf Systems$^{\rm a}$.}
1010: \begin{tabular}{p{1.5in}r@{ + }lr@{ + }lr@{ + }l}
1011: \label{diststats}\\
1012: %\tablewidth{85mm}
1013: \hline
1014: \hline\\
1015:
1016: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Proper motion}&
1017: \multicolumn{2}{c}{d $\leq$ 10}&
1018: \multicolumn{2}{c}{10 $<$ d $\leq$ 25}&
1019: \multicolumn{2}{c}{d $>$ 25} \\
1020:
1021: \multicolumn{1}{c}{(arcsec yr$^{-1}$)}&
1022: \multicolumn{2}{c}{(pc)}&
1023: \multicolumn{2}{c}{(pc)}&
1024: \multicolumn{2}{c}{(pc)} \\[4pt]
1025:
1026: \hline\\[-3pt]
1027: %\endfirsthead
1028: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1029: %\hline
1030: %\hline\\
1031: %
1032: % \multicolumn{1}{c}{Proper motion}&
1033: % \multicolumn{2}{c}{d $\leq$ 10}&
1034: % \multicolumn{2}{c}{10 $<$ d $\leq$ 25}&
1035: % \multicolumn{2}{c}{d $>$ 25} \\
1036: %
1037: % \multicolumn{1}{c}{(arcsec yr$^{-1}$)}&
1038: % \multicolumn{2}{c}{(pc)}&
1039: % \multicolumn{2}{c}{(pc)}&
1040: % \multicolumn{2}{c}{(pc)} \\
1041:
1042:
1043: $\mu$ $\geq$ 1.0\dotfill & 1 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
1044: 1.0 $>$ $\mu$ $\geq$ 0.8\dotfill & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\
1045: 0.8 $>$ $\mu$ $\geq$ 0.6\dotfill & 0 & 0 & 2 & 2 & 2 & 1 \\
1046: 0.6 $>$ $\mu$ $\geq$ 0.4\dotfill & 0 & 0 & 6 & 4 & 11 & 2 \\
1047: 0.4 $>$ $\mu$ $\geq$ 0.2\dotfill & 0 & 0 & 4 & 7 & 20 & 11 \\
1048: 0.2 $>$ $\mu$ $\geq$ 0.0\dotfill & 0 & 0 & 1 & 4 & 2 & 0 \\
1049: %\tableline
1050: {~~~~}Total\dotfill & 1 & 0 & 19 & 18 & 36 & 14 \\[4pt]
1051:
1052: \hline\\[-2pt]
1053: \parbox{250pt}{
1054: $^{\rm a}$~~~ The first number is from Paper XIX, and the second
1055: number is from this paper}
1056: \end{tabular}
1057: \end{table}
1058:
1059: A star's mass is one of its most important characteristics that, when
1060: coupled with composition and luminosity, defines several fundamental
1061: properties of that star such as its internal structure, future
1062: evolution, and total lifetime. The same is true for WDs; however,
1063: only four WDs have measured astrometric mass determinations better
1064: than 5\% \citep[Sirius B, Procyon B, 40 Eri B, and Stein 2051
1065: B,][]{1998ApJ...494..759P}. The identification of WDs in binaries, in
1066: particular, double degenerate systems, may increase the number of
1067: accurate astrometric masses of WDs if the system were resolvable using
1068: high-precision astrometric techniques (e.g., speckle, adaptive optics,
1069: or interferometry via {\it Hubble Space Telescope}'s Fine Guidance
1070: Sensors). Of course, the nearer the system is to the Sun, the greater
1071: its projected separation and more likely it is to be resolved, all
1072: else being equal. A sizable sample of accurate WD masses will help
1073: constrain and revise WD models, while comprehensive searches for
1074: companions in a volume-limited sample will allow an accurate
1075: multiplicity fraction to be determined.
1076:
1077: We continue to measure trigonometric parallaxes with good precision
1078: from the ground ($\sim$1.1 milliarcsecond errors on average,
1079: Subasavage et al. 2008, in preparation) for the nearby WD sample as
1080: part of the CTIOPI program. In addition, nearly all WDs within 15 pc
1081: in the southern hemisphere (including those we have presented in Paper
1082: XIX and here) have been targeted for long-term astrometric monitoring
1083: in search of perturbations from unseen companions. This effort is an
1084: extension of the Astrometric Search for Planets Encircling Nearby
1085: Stars \citep[ASPENS,][]{2003AAS...203.4207K} that targets all red and
1086: white dwarfs within 10 pc in the southern hemisphere. Because of the
1087: spectral signatures of WDs (broad absorption lines or no lines at
1088: all), astrometry is currently the only practical method for detecting
1089: sub-stellar/planetary companions to WDs. Unlike radial velocity
1090: variations used to detect planetary systems, astrometric signatures
1091: are linearly related to the distance to the system (the farther the
1092: system, the smaller the astrometric signature). Thus, a careful
1093: evaluation of the nearest WDs provides the highest probability for
1094: detecting astrometric signatures of companions to WDs.
1095:
1096: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1097: \section {Acknowledgments}
1098: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1099:
1100: We wish to thank the referee of this manuscript for helpful comments
1101: that improved the clarity of this publication. The RECONS team at
1102: Georgia State University wishes to thank the NSF (grant AST 05-07711),
1103: NASA's Space Interferometry Mission, the Space Telescope Science
1104: Institute (grant HST-GO-10928.01-A), and GSU for their continued
1105: support of our study of nearby stars. We also thank the members of
1106: the SMARTS Consortium, who enable the operations of the small
1107: telescopes at CTIO where all of the data in this work were collected.
1108: J.~P.~S.~is indebted to Wei-Chun Jao for the use of his photometry
1109: reduction pipeline. P.~B.~is a Cottrell Scholar of Research
1110: Corporation and would like to thank the NSERC Canada and the fund
1111: FQRNT (Qu\'ebec) for their support. N.~C.~H.~would like to thank
1112: colleagues in the Wide Field Astronomy Unit at Edinburgh for their
1113: efforts contributing to the SSS effort; particular thanks go to Mike
1114: Read, Sue Tritton, and Harvey MacGillivray. This work has made use of
1115: the SIMBAD, VizieR, and Aladin databases, operated at the CDS in
1116: Strasbourg, France. We have also used data products from the Two
1117: Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the University of
1118: Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center, funded
1119: by NASA and NSF.
1120:
1121: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1122: \section{Appendix}
1123: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1124:
1125: In order to ensure correct cross-referencing of names for the new and
1126: known WD systems presented here, Table \ref{alternate} lists
1127: additional names found in the literature. Objects for which there is
1128: an NLTT designation also have the corresponding L or LP designation
1129: found in the NLTT catalog. These L or LP names are listed here
1130: because the NLTT designations were not published in the original
1131: catalog, but rather are the record numbers in the electronic version
1132: of the catalog and have been adopted out of necessity.
1133:
1134: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% REFS %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1135:
1136: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1137:
1138: \bibitem[Aannestad et al.(1993)]{1993AJ....105.1033A} Aannestad, P.~A.,
1139: Kenyon, S.~J., Hammond, G.~L., \& Sion, E.~M.\ 1993, \aj, 105, 1033
1140:
1141: \bibitem[Beauchamp et al.(1996)]{beauchamp96} Beauchamp, A., Wesemael, F.,
1142: Bergeron, P., Liebert, J., \& Saffer, R. A. 1996, in ASP
1143: Conf. Ser. Vol. 96, Hydrogen-Deficient Stars, ed. S. Jeffery \&
1144: U. Heber (San Francisco: ASP), 295
1145:
1146: \bibitem[Bergeron et al.(2001)]{2001ApJS..133..413B} Bergeron, P., Leggett,
1147: S.~K., \& Ruiz, M.~T.\ 2001, \apjs, 133, 413
1148:
1149: \bibitem[Bergeron et al.(1997)]{BRL} Bergeron, P., Ruiz, M. T., \& Leggett,
1150: S. K. 1997, \apjs, 108, 339
1151:
1152: \bibitem[Bergeron et al.(1992)]{1992ApJ...394..228B} Bergeron, P., Saffer,
1153: R.~A., \& Liebert, J.\ 1992, \apj, 394, 228
1154:
1155: \bibitem[Carpenter(2001)]{2001AJ....121.2851C} Carpenter, J.~M.\ 2001, \aj,
1156: 121, 2851
1157:
1158: \bibitem[Christlieb et al.(2001)]{2001A&A...366..898C} Christlieb, N.,
1159: Wisotzki, L., Reimers, D., Homeier, D., Koester, D., \& Heber, U.\
1160: 2001, \aap, 366, 898
1161:
1162: \bibitem[Costa et al.(2005)]{2005AJ....130..337C} Costa, E., M{\'e}ndez,
1163: R.~A., Jao, W.-C., Henry, T.~J., Subasavage, J.~P., Brown, M.~A., Ianna,
1164: P.~A., \& Bartlett, J.\ 2005, \aj, 130, 337
1165:
1166: \bibitem[Costa et al.(2006)]{2006AJ....132.1234C} Costa, E.,
1167: M{\'e}ndez, R.~A., Jao, W.-C., Henry, T.~J., Subasavage, J.~P., \&
1168: Ianna, P.~A.\ 2006, \aj, 132, 1234
1169:
1170: \bibitem[Ducourant et al.(2007)]{2007A&A...470..387D} Ducourant, C.,
1171: Teixeira, R., Hambly, N.~C., Oppenheimer, B.~R., Hawkins, M.~R.~S.,
1172: Rapaport, M., Modolo, J., \& Lecampion, J.~F.\ 2007, \aap, 470, 387
1173:
1174: \bibitem[Dufour et al.(2005)]{dufour05} Dufour, P., Bergeron, P., \&
1175: Fontaine, G.\ 2005, \apj, 627, 404
1176:
1177: \bibitem[Dufour et al.(2007)]{dufour07} Dufour, P., et al.\
1178: 2007, \apj, 663, 1291
1179:
1180: \bibitem[Finch et al.(2007)]{2007AJ....133.2898F} Finch, C.~T., Henry,
1181: T.~J., Subasavage, J.~P., Jao, W.-C., \& Hambly, N.~C.\ 2007, \aj, 133,
1182: 2898
1183:
1184: %\bibitem[Fontaine et al.(2001)]{fon01} Fontaine, G., Brassard, P., \&
1185: %Bergeron, P. 2001, \pasp, 113, 409
1186:
1187: \bibitem[Gliese \& Jahrei{\ss}(1991)]{1991adc..rept.....G} Gliese, W., \&
1188: Jahrei{\ss}, H.\ 1991, On: The Astronomical Data Center CD-ROM: Selected
1189: Astronomical Catalogs, Vol.~I; L.E.~Brotzmann, S.E.~Gesser (eds.),
1190: NASA/Astronomical Data Center, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD
1191:
1192: \bibitem[Graham(1982)]{1982PASP...94..244G} Graham, J.~A.\ 1982, \pasp, 94,
1193: 244
1194:
1195: \bibitem[Gould \& Chanam{\'e}(2004)]{2004ApJS..150..455G} Gould, A., \&
1196: Chanam{\'e}, J.\ 2004, \apjs, 150, 455
1197:
1198: \bibitem[Hambly et al.(2004)]{2004AJ....128..437H} Hambly, N.~C., Henry,
1199: T.~J., Subasavage, J.~P., Brown, M.~A., \& Jao, W.-C.\ 2004, \aj, 128, 437
1200:
1201: \bibitem[Henry et al.(2003)]{2003fst3.book..111H} Henry, T.~J., Backman,
1202: D.~E., Blackwell, J., Okimura, T., \& Jue, S.\ 2003, The Future of Small
1203: Telescopes In The New Millennium.~Volume III - Science in the Shadow of
1204: Giants, 111
1205:
1206: \bibitem[Henry et al.(2006)]{2006AJ....132.2360H} Henry, T.~J., Jao, W.-C.,
1207: Subasavage, J.~P., Beaulieu, T.~D., Ianna, P.~A., Costa, E., \& M{\'e}ndez,
1208: R.~A.\ 2006, \aj, 132, 2360
1209:
1210: \bibitem[Henry et al.(2004)]{2004AJ....128.2460H} Henry, T.~J., Subasavage,
1211: J.~P., Brown, M.~A., Beaulieu, T.~D., Jao, W., \& Hambly, N.~C.\ 2004, \aj,
1212: 128, 2460
1213:
1214: \bibitem[Holberg et al.(2006)]{holberg06} Holberg, J. B., \& Bergeron, P.
1215: 2006, \aj, 132, 1223
1216:
1217: \bibitem[Holberg et al.(2002)]{2002ApJ...571..512H} Holberg, J.~B., Oswalt,
1218: T.~D., \& Sion, E.~M.\ 2002, \apj, 571, 512
1219:
1220: \bibitem[Holberg et al.(2008)]{2008AJ....135.1225H} Holberg, J.~B.,
1221: Sion, E.~M., Oswalt, T., McCook, G.~P., Foran, S., \& Subasavage,
1222: J.~P.\ 2008, \aj, 135, 1225
1223:
1224: \bibitem[Iben \& Renzini(1984)]{1984PhR...105..329I} Iben, I., \& Renzini,
1225: A.\ 1984, \physrep, 105, 329
1226:
1227: \bibitem[Jao et al.(2005)]{2005AJ....129.1954J} Jao, W.-C., Henry, T.~J.,
1228: Subasavage, J.~P., Brown, M.~A., Ianna, P.~A., Bartlett, J.~L., Costa, E.,
1229: \& M{\'e}ndez, R.~A.\ 2005, \aj, 129, 1954
1230:
1231: \bibitem[Kawka et al.(2007)]{2007ApJ...654..499K} Kawka, A., Vennes, S.,
1232: Schmidt, G.~D., Wickramasinghe, D.~T., \& Koch, R.\ 2007, \apj, 654, 499
1233:
1234: \bibitem[Kawka et al.(2004)]{2004AJ....127.1702K} Kawka, A., Vennes, S.,
1235: \& Thorstensen, J.~R.\ 2004, \aj, 127, 1702
1236:
1237: \bibitem[Koerner et al.(2003)]{2003AAS...203.4207K} Koerner, D.~W., Henry,
1238: T.~J., Fuhrman, L.~A., Parker, C.~C., Kaplan, I.~J., Wei-Chun, J.,
1239: \& Subasavage, J.\ 2003, Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 35, 1272
1240:
1241: \bibitem[Landolt(1992)]{1992AJ....104..340L} Landolt, A.~U.\ 1992,
1242: \aj, 104, 340
1243:
1244: \bibitem[Landolt(2007)]{2007AJ....133.2502L} Landolt, A.~U.\ 2007, \aj,
1245: 133, 2502
1246:
1247: \bibitem[Liebert et al.(2005)]{liebert2005} Liebert, J., Bergeron, P.,
1248: \& Holberg, J.B. 2005, \apjs, 156, 47
1249:
1250: \bibitem[Luyten(1979a)]{1979lccs.book.....L} Luyten, W.~J.\ 1979, LHS
1251: Catalogue (2nd ed.; Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press)
1252:
1253: \bibitem[Luyten(1979b)]{nltt} Luyten, W.~J.\ 1979, New
1254: Luyten Catalogue of Stars with Proper Motions Larger than Two Tenths
1255: of an Arcsecond (Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press)
1256:
1257: \bibitem[McCook \& Sion(1999)]{1999ApJS..121....1M} McCook, G.~P., \& Sion,
1258: E.~M.\ 1999, \apjs, 121, 1
1259:
1260: \bibitem[Oppenheimer et al.(2001)]{2001Sci...292..698O} Oppenheimer,
1261: B.~R., Hambly, N.~C., Digby, A.~P., Hodgkin, S.~T., \& Saumon, D.\
1262: 2001, Science, 292, 698
1263:
1264: \bibitem[Pauli et al.(2006)]{2006AA...447..173P} Pauli, E.-M.,
1265: Napiwotzki, R., Heber, U., Altmann, M., \& Odenkirchen, M.\ 2006,
1266: \aap, 447, 173
1267:
1268: \bibitem[Perryman et al.(1997)]{1997A&A...323L..49P} Perryman,
1269: M.~A.~C., et al.\ 1997, \aap, 323, L49
1270:
1271: \bibitem[Press et al.(1992)]{pressetal92} Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A.,
1272: Vetterling, W. T., \& Flannery, B. P. 1992, Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN,
1273: 2nd edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 644
1274:
1275: \bibitem[Provencal et al.(1998)]{1998ApJ...494..759P} Provencal, J.~L.,
1276: Shipman, H.~L., Hog, E., \& Thejll, P.\ 1998, \apj, 494, 759
1277:
1278: \bibitem[Smart et al.(2003)]{2003A&A...404..317S} Smart, R.~L., et al.\
1279: 2003, \aap, 404, 317
1280:
1281: \bibitem[Subasavage et al.(2007)]{2007AJ....134..252S} Subasavage, J.~P.,
1282: Henry, T.~J., Bergeron, P., Dufour, P., Hambly, N.~C., \& Beaulieu, T.~D.\
1283: 2007, \aj, 134, 252 (Paper XIX)
1284:
1285: \bibitem[Subasavage et al.(2005a)]{2005AJ....129..413S} Subasavage, J.~P.,
1286: Henry, T.~J., Hambly, N.~C., Brown, M.~A., \& Jao, W.\ 2005, \aj, 129, 413
1287:
1288: \bibitem[Subasavage et al.(2005b)]{2005AJ....130.1658S} Subasavage, J.~P.,
1289: Henry, T.~J., Hambly, N.~C., Brown, M.~A., Jao, W.-C., \& Finch, C.~T.\
1290: 2005, \aj, 130, 1658
1291:
1292: \bibitem[van Altena et al.(1995)]{1995gcts.book.....V} van Altena,
1293: W.~F., Lee, J.~T., \& Hoffleit, E.~D.\ 1995, New Haven, CT: Yale
1294: University Observatory, |c1995, 4th ed., completely revised and
1295: enlarged,
1296:
1297: \bibitem[van Leeuwen(2007)]{2007hnrr.book.....V} van Leeuwen, F.\
1298: 2007, Hipparcos, the New Reduction of the Raw Data.~By Floor van
1299: Leeuwen, Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK
1300: Series: Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol.~ 350 20 Springer
1301: Dordrecht
1302:
1303: \bibitem[Vennes \& Kawka(2003)]{2003ApJ...586L..95V} Vennes, S., \&
1304: Kawka, A.\ 2003, \apjl, 586, L95
1305:
1306: \bibitem[Wesemael et al.(1993)]{1993PASP..105..761W} Wesemael, F.,
1307: Greenstein, J.~L., Liebert, J., Lamontagne, R., Fontaine, G., Bergeron, P.,
1308: \& Glaspey, J.~W.\ 1993, \pasp, 105, 761
1309:
1310: \end{thebibliography}
1311:
1312: \clearpage
1313:
1314: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% TABLE A1: ALTERNATE DESIGNATIONS FOR NEW WDS %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1315: %\tiny
1316:
1317: %\tablenum{A1}
1318: %\tablewidth{0pt}
1319: %\tablehead{\colhead{WD Name} &
1320: \begin{longtable}[c]{p{0.75in}ccccll}
1321: \caption{Astrometry and Alternate Designations for New and Known White Dwarfs.}
1322: \label{alternate}\\
1323: \hline
1324: \hline\\
1325:
1326: \multicolumn{1}{c}{WD Name} &
1327: \multicolumn{1}{c}{RA} &
1328: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Dec} &
1329: \multicolumn{1}{c}{PM} &
1330: \multicolumn{1}{c}{PA} &
1331: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Ref} &
1332: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Alternate Names} \\
1333:
1334: \multicolumn{1}{c}{} &
1335: \multicolumn{1}{c}{(J2000.0)} &
1336: \multicolumn{1}{c}{(J2000.0)} &
1337: \multicolumn{1}{c}{(arcsec yr$^{-1}$)} &
1338: \multicolumn{1}{c}{(deg)} &
1339: \multicolumn{1}{c}{} &
1340: \multicolumn{1}{c}{} \\[4pt]
1341:
1342: \hline\\
1343: %\endfirsthead
1344: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1345: %\hline
1346: %\hline\\
1347:
1348: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{WD Name} &
1349: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{RA} &
1350: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{Dec} &
1351: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{PM} &
1352: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{PA} &
1353: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{Ref} &
1354: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{Alternate Names} \\
1355: %
1356: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{} &
1357: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{(J2000.0)} &
1358: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{(J2000.0)} &
1359: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{(arcsec yr$^{-1}$)} &
1360: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{(deg)} &
1361: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{} &
1362: %\multicolumn{1}{c}{} \\[4pt]
1363:
1364: %\tableline\\
1365: %\endhead
1366: % \colhead{RA} &
1367: % \colhead{Dec} &
1368: % \colhead{PM} &
1369: % \colhead{PA} &
1370: % \colhead{Ref} &
1371: % \colhead{Alternate Names} \\
1372: %
1373: % \colhead{} &
1374: % \colhead{(J2000.0)} &
1375: % \colhead{(J2000.0)} &
1376: % \colhead{(arcsec yr$^{-1}$)}&
1377: % \colhead{(deg)} &
1378: % \colhead{} &
1379: % \colhead{}}
1380:
1381:
1382: \vspace{0pt}\\[-12pt]
1383: \multicolumn{7}{c}{New Spectroscopically Confirmed White Dwarfs} \\[4pt]
1384: \hline
1385: \vspace{0pt}\\[-5pt]
1386:
1387: % Name
1388: 0011$-$721\dotfill & 00 13 49.91 & $-$71 49 54.2 & 0.326 & 141.3 & S & NLTT 681, LP 50-73 \\
1389: 0102$-$579\dotfill & 01 04 12.14 & $-$57 42 48.6 & 0.239 & 091.1 & S & SCR 0104$-$5742 \\
1390: 0123$-$460\dotfill & 01 25 18.03 & $-$45 45 31.1 & 0.759 & 137.8 & S & SCR 0125$-$4545 \\
1391: 0134$-$177\dotfill & 01 37 15.16 & $-$17 27 22.6 & 0.319 & 189.3 & S & NLTT 5424, LP 768-192 \\
1392: 0149$-$723\dotfill & 01 50 38.49 & $-$72 07 16.7 & 0.334 & 223.9 & S & SCR 0150$-$7207 \\
1393: 0311$-$649\dotfill & 03 12 25.68 & $-$64 44 10.8 & 0.190 & 105.6 & S & WT 106, LEHPM 1-3159 \\
1394: 0431$-$360\dotfill & 04 32 55.87 & $-$35 57 28.9 & 0.301 & 084.1 & S & LEHPM 2-1182 \\
1395: 0431$-$279\dotfill & 04 33 33.58 & $-$27 53 24.8 & 0.403 & 092.4 & S & NLTT 13532, LP 890-39, LEHPM 2-405 \\
1396: 0620$-$402\dotfill & 06 21 41.64 & $-$40 16 18.7 & 0.379 & 166.0 & S & LEHPM 2-505 \\
1397: 0651$-$398A\dotfill & 06 53 30.21 & $-$39 54 29.1 & 0.227 & 344.4 & S & WT 202 \\
1398: 0651$-$398B\dotfill & 06 53 35.34 & $-$39 55 33.3 & 0.229 & 344.7 & S & WT 201 \\
1399: 0655$-$390\dotfill & 06 57 05.90 & $-$39 09 35.7 & 0.340 & 242.6 & S & NLTT 17220, L 454-9, LTT 2692 \\
1400: 0708$-$670\dotfill & 07 08 52.28 & $-$67 06 31.4 & 0.246 & 246.3 & S & SCR 0708$-$6706 \\
1401: 0709$-$252\dotfill & 07 11 14.39 & $-$25 18 15.0 & 0.223 & 334.4 & S & SCR 0711$-$2518 \\
1402: 0751$-$252\dotfill & 07 53 56.61 & $-$25 24 01.4 & 0.426 & 300.2 & S & SCR 0753$-$2524 \\
1403: 0816$-$310\dotfill & 08 18 40.26 & $-$31 10 20.3 & 0.842 & 162.6 & S & SCR 0818$-$3110 \\
1404: 0856$-$007\dotfill & 08 59 12.91 & $-$00 58 42.9 & 0.202 & 125.8 & S & NLTT 20690, LP 606-32 \\
1405: 1116$-$470\dotfill & 11 18 27.20 & $-$47 21 57.0 & 0.322 & 275.1 & S & SCR 1118$-$4721 \\
1406: 1817$-$598\dotfill & 18 21 59.54 & $-$59 51 48.5 & 0.365 & 194.9 & S & SCR 1821$-$5951 \\
1407: 1916$-$362\dotfill & 19 20 02.83 & $-$36 11 02.7 & 0.208 & 132.0 & S & SCR 1920$-$3611 \\
1408: 2009$-$471\dotfill & 20 12 48.75 & $-$46 59 02.5 & 0.244 & 136.3 & S & WT 689 \\
1409: 2118$-$388\dotfill & 21 22 05.59 & $-$38 38 34.7 & 0.186 & 113.5 & S & SCR 2122$-$3838 \\
1410:
1411: \vspace{-0pt}\\[-5pt]
1412: \hline
1413: \vspace{-0pt}\\[-3pt]
1414: \multicolumn{7}{c}{Known White Dwarfs (without Trigonometric Parallaxes)} \\[4pt]
1415: \hline
1416: \vspace{-05pt}\\[-2pt]
1417:
1418: 0233$-$242\dotfill & 02 35 21.80 & $-$24 00 47.3 & 0.620 & 189.5 & S & LHS 1421, NLTT 8435, LP 830-14 \\
1419: 0707$-$320\dotfill & 07 09 25.07 & $-$32 05 07.3 & 0.551 & 338.2 & L & LHS 1898, NLTT 17486, LP 896-18 \\
1420: 1223$-$659\dotfill & 12 26 42.02 & $-$66 12 18.5 & 0.190 & 182.0 & L & NLTT 30737, LP 104-2, GJ 2092 \\
1421: 1241$-$798\dotfill & 12 44 52.70 & $-$80 09 27.8 & 0.578 & 306.3 & L & LHS 2621, NLTT 31694, LP 38-80 \\
1422: 2007$-$219\dotfill & 20 10 17.51 & $-$21 46 45.6 & 0.311 & 158.0 & L & NLTT 48815, LP 870-43 \\
1423: 2133$-$135\dotfill & 21 36 16.38 & $-$13 18 34.5 & 0.297 & 120.2 & S & NLTT 51636, Ross 203, HE 2133-1332 \\
1424: 2159$-$754\dotfill & 22 04 20.84 & $-$75 13 26.1 & 0.523 & 277.6 & S & LHS 3752, NLTT 52728, LP 48-15 \\
1425: 2216$-$657\dotfill & 22 19 48.31 & $-$65 29 17.6 & 0.660 & 160.1 & L & LHS 3794, NLTT 53489, LP 119-34 \\
1426: 2306$-$220\dotfill & 23 08 40.78 & $-$21 44 59.6 & 0.350 & 109.0 & S & NLTT 55932, LP 877-69 \\
1427: 2336$-$079\dotfill & 23 38 50.74 & $-$07 41 19.9 & 0.034 & 126.6 & Su & GD 1212 \\
1428: 2351$-$335\dotfill & 23 54 01.14 & $-$33 16 30.3 & 0.500 & 216.5 & L & LHS 4040, NLTT 58330, LP 936-12 \\[3pt]
1429:
1430: \hline\\[-22pt]
1431: \end{longtable}
1432: \begin{center}
1433: \footnotesize
1434: \parbox{420pt}{
1435: %\tablenotetext{~}{
1436: References. ---
1437: (L) ~\citealt{1979lccs.book.....L, nltt};
1438: %(Le)~\citealt{2003AJ....126..921L}, ~\citealt{2005ApJ...633L.121L},
1439: %(O) ~\citealt{2001Sci...292..698O},
1440: %(P) ~\citealt{2004A&A...421..763P},
1441: (S) ~\citealt{2005AJ....129..413S, 2005AJ....130.1658S, 2007AJ....133.2898F}, this work;
1442: (Su)~Subasavage et al. 2008, in preparation
1443: }
1444:
1445: \end{center}
1446:
1447: %\tablenotetext{a}{Too cool for a reliable spectroscopic fit (i.e., minimal Balmer line absorption).}
1448: %\tablenotetext{b}{Spectral fit yielded a $T_{\rm eff} =$ 8228 $\pm$ 138 K and a log $g =$ 8.19 $\pm$ 0.12. Common proper motion companion to NLTT 3566 (see $\S$ \ref{subsec:individual}).}
1449: %\tablenotetext{c}{Spectral fit yielded a $T_{\rm eff} =$ 11613 $\pm$ 192 K and a log $g =$ 8.14 $\pm$ 0.06.}
1450: %\tablenotetext{d}{Spectral fit yielded a $T_{\rm eff} =$ 12632 $\pm$ 300 K and a log $g =$ 7.63 $\pm$ 0.06 (see $\S$ \ref{subsec:individual}).}
1451: %\tablenotetext{e}{Spectral fit yielded a $T_{\rm eff} =$ 7214 $\pm$ 135 K and a log $g =$ 7.68 $\pm$ 0.19. Common proper motion companion to WD 0651$-$398B (see $\S$ \ref{subsec:individual}).}
1452: %\tablenotetext{f}{Spectral fit yielded a $T_{\rm eff} =$ 11208 $\pm$ 180 K and a log $g =$ 8.12 $\pm$ 0.06.}
1453: %\tablenotetext{g}{Common proper motion companion to LTT 2976 (see $\S$ \ref{subsec:individual}).}
1454: %\tablenotetext{h}{Spectral fit yielded a $T_{\rm eff} =$ 27830 $\pm$ 1050 K and a log $g =$ 7.97 $\pm$ 0.07 (see $\S$ \ref{subsec:individual} and Figure \ref{scr1920}).}
1455: %\tablenotetext{i}{\citet{2003ApJ...586L..95V} estimate a distance of 15 pc.}
1456: %\tablenotetext{j}{\citet{2002ApJ...571..512H} estimate a distance of 10.79 pc. \citet{2008AJ....135.1225H} estimate a distance of 12.05 pc.}
1457: %\tablenotetext{k}{\citet{2002ApJ...571..512H} estimate a distance of 18.22 pc.}
1458: %\tablenotetext{l}{Spectral fit yielded a $T_{\rm eff} =$ 10357 $\pm$ 158 K and a log $g =$ 7.99 $\pm$ 0.07. \citet{2006A&A...447..173P} estimate a distance of 23.3 pc}
1459: %\tablenotetext{m}{\citet{2007ApJ...654..499K} estimate a distance of 14 pc. \citet{2008AJ....135.1225H} estimate a distance of 14.24 pc.}
1460: %\tablenotetext{n}{\citet{1993AJ....105.1033A} estimate a distance of 28 pc.}
1461: %\tablenotetext{o}{\citet{2004AJ....127.1702K} estimate a distance of 33 pc.}
1462: %\tablenotetext{p}{\citet{2002ApJ...571..512H} estimate a distance of 15.6 pc. \citet{2008AJ....135.1225H} estimate a distance of 17.45 pc.}
1463: %\tablenotetext{q}{\citet{2002ApJ...571..512H} estimate a distance of 12.41 pc.}
1464: %
1465: %\end{landscape}
1466:
1467:
1468:
1469: \clearpage
1470:
1471:
1472: \end{document}
1473:
1474: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1475: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1476: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1477: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% THE END %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1478: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1479: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1480: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1481: