1: %% 2008. April 19
2: % final revised version
3: % V445 Pup
4:
5: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
6: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
7:
8: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
9: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
10: %% any data that comes before this command.
11:
12: %% The command below calls the preprint style
13: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
14: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
15: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
16:
17: % \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
18:
19: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
20:
21: % \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
22:
23: \documentclass[manuscript]{emulateapj}
24:
25: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
26:
27: % \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
28:
29: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}
30:
31: \usepackage{apjfonts}
32:
33: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
34: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
35: %% the \begin{document} command.
36: %%
37: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
38: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
39: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
40: %% for information.
41:
42: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
43: \newcommand{\myemail}{hachisu@chianti.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp}
44:
45: %%%%%\newcommand{\object}[1]{#1}
46:
47: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
48:
49: %\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
50: %\slugcomment{submitted to the Astrophysical Journal}
51: \slugcomment{to appear in the Astrophysical Journal}
52:
53: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
54: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
55: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
56: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
57: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters. Running heads
58: %% will not print in the manuscript style.
59:
60: \shorttitle{Light Curve Model of V445 Pup }
61: \shortauthors{Kato et al.}
62:
63: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
64: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
65:
66: \begin{document}
67:
68: \title{HELIUM NOVA ON A VERY MASSIVE WHITE DWARF -- A LIGHT
69: CURVE MODEL OF V445 PUPPIS (2000) REVISED }
70:
71: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
72: %% author and affiliation information.
73: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
74: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
75: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
76: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.
77:
78: \author{Mariko Kato}
79: \affil{Department of Astronomy, Keio University,
80: Hiyoshi, Kouhoku-ku, Yokohama 223-8521, Japan}
81: \email{mariko@educ.cc.keio.ac.jp}
82:
83:
84: \author{Izumi Hachisu}
85: \affil{Department of Earth Science and Astronomy,
86: College of Arts and Sciences, University of Tokyo,
87: Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan}
88: \email{hachisu@ea.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp}
89:
90: \author{Seiichiro Kiyota}
91: \affil{4-405-1003 Matsushiro, Tsukuba 305-0035, Japan}
92: \email{skiyota@nias.affrc.go.jp}
93:
94: \and
95:
96: \author{Hideyuki Saio}
97: \affil{Astronomical Institute, Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University,
98: Sendai 980-8578, Japan}
99: \email{saio@astr.tohoku.ac.jp}
100:
101:
102: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
103: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
104: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
105: %% affiliation.
106:
107: %\altaffiltext{1}{Visiting Astronomer, Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory.
108: %CTIO is operated by AURA, Inc.\ under contract to the National Science
109: %Foundation.}
110: %\altaffiltext{2}{Society of Fellows, Harvard University.}
111: %\altaffiltext{3}{present address: Center for Astrophysics,
112: % 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138}
113: %\altaffiltext{4}{Visiting Programmer, Space Telescope Science Institute}
114: %\altaffiltext{5}{Patron, Alonso's Bar and Grill}
115:
116:
117: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
118: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
119: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
120: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
121: %% editorial office after submission.
122:
123: \begin{abstract}
124: V445 Pup (2000) is a unique object identified as a helium nova.
125: Color indexes during the outburst are consistent with those of
126: free-free emission. We present a free-free emission dominated
127: light curve model of V445 Pup on the basis of the optically thick wind theory.
128: Our light curve fitting shows that (1) the white dwarf (WD) mass
129: is very massive ($M_{\rm WD} \gtrsim 1.35 ~M_\sun$), and
130: (2) a half of the accreted matter remains on the WD, both of which
131: suggest that the increasing WD mass. Therefore, V445 Pup is a strong candidate of
132: Type Ia supernova progenitor. The estimated distance to V445 Pup is
133: now consistent with the recent observational suggestions,
134: $3.5 \lesssim d \lesssim 6.5$ kpc. A helium star companion is consistent with the
135: brightness of $m_{\rm v}=14.5$ mag just before the outburst, if it is
136: a little bit evolved hot ($\log T ~(K) \gtrsim 4.5$) star with
137: the mass of $M_{\rm He} \gtrsim 0.8 ~M_\sun$. We then emphasize
138: importance of observations in the near future quiescent phase
139: after the thick circumstellar dust dissipates away, especially
140: its color and magnitude to specify the nature of the companion star.
141: We have also calculated helium ignition masses for helium shell flashes
142: against various helium accretion rates and discussed the recurrence period
143: of helium novae.
144: \end{abstract}
145:
146:
147: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
148: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
149: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
150: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
151:
152: \keywords{binaries: close --- novae, cataclysmic variables ---
153: stars: individual (V445 Pup) --- stars: mass loss ---
154: white dwarfs}
155:
156: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
157: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
158:
159: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
160: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
161: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
162: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
163: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
164: %% each reference.
165:
166: \section{Introduction}
167:
168: The outburst of V445 Pup was discovered on 30 December 2000 by Kanatsu
169: \citep{kan00}. The outburst shows unique properties such as
170: absence of hydrogen, unusually strong carbon emission lines as well as
171: strong emission lines of Na, Fe, Ti, Cr, Si, Mg etc. \citep{ash03,iij08}.
172: The spectral features resemble those of classical slow novae except
173: absence of hydrogen and strong emission lines of carbon \citep{iij08}.
174: The development of the light curve is very slow (3.3 mag decline
175: in 7.7 months) with a small outburst amplitude of 6 mag.
176: From these features, this object has been
177: suggested to be the first example of helium novae \citep{ash03,kat03}.
178:
179:
180: In our earlier work \citep{kat03} we presented a theoretical light curve
181: model with the assumption of blackbody emission from the photosphere,
182: which resulted in the best fit model of a very massive white dwarf (WD)
183: ($M_{\rm WD} \gtrsim 1.3 ~M_{\odot}$) and a relatively short distance
184: of $d \lesssim 1$ kpc. However, \citet{iij08} recently showed that
185: there are absorption lines of Na I D1/2 at the velocities of 16.0 and
186: 73.5 km~s$^{-1}$, suggesting that V445 Pup is located in or beyond
187: the Orion arm and its distance is as large as $3.5 - 6.5$ kpc.
188: \citet{wou08} also suggested a large distance of $4.9$ kpc. Moreover,
189: color indexes during the outburst are consistent with those of
190: free-free emission. With these new observational aspects we have revised
191: the light curve model of V445 Pup.
192:
193: Helium novae were theoretically predicted by \citet{kat89} as a
194: nova outburst caused by a helium shell flash on a white dwarf.
195: Such helium novae have long been a theoretical object
196: until the first helium nova V445 Pup was discovered in 2000.
197: \citet{kat89} assumed two types of helium accretion: one is
198: helium accretion from a helium star companion, and the other is
199: hydrogen-rich matter accretion with a high accretion rate and,
200: beneath the steady hydrogen burning shell, ash helium accumulates
201: on the WD. The latter case is divided into two kinds of systems
202: depending on whether hydrogen shell burning is steady (stable) or not.
203: To summarize, helium accretion onto a WD occurs in three types
204: of systems: (1) helium accretion from a helium star companion;
205: (2) steady hydrogen accretion with a rate high enough to keep
206: steady hydrogen shell burning such as supersoft X-ray sources, e.g.,
207: RX J0513.9-6951 \citep[e.g.,][]{hac03kb, mcg06}
208: and CAL 83 \citep[e.g.,][]{sch06},
209: (3) hydrogen accretion with a relatively low rate resulting in
210: a recurrent nova such as RS Oph \citep[e.g.,][]{hac07kl}
211: and U Sco \citep[e.g.,][]{hkkm00}.
212: In the present paper, we regard that V445 Pup is Case (1), because
213: no hydrogen lines were detected \citep{iij08}.
214:
215: In helium novae, mass loss owing to optically thick wind is relatively
216: weak compared to hydrogen novae, and a large part of the accreted
217: helium burns into carbon and oxygen and accumulates on the WD
218: \citep{kat99,kat04}.
219: Our previous model indicated that V445 Pup contains
220: a massive WD ($M_{\rm WD} \gtrsim 1.3 ~M_{\odot}$) and the WD mass is
221: increasing through helium shell flashes.
222: Therefore, V445 Pup is
223: a strong candidate of Type Ia supernova progenitors.
224: Although there are two known evolutional paths of the single
225: degenerate scenario toward Type Ia supernova \citep[e.g.,][]{hkn99},
226: helium accreting WDs such as V445 Pup do not belong to either of them.
227: Therefore, it may indicate the third path to Type Ia supernovae.
228: If various binary parameters of V445 Pup are determined,
229: they provide us important clues to binary evolutions to Type Ia supernovae.
230:
231:
232: In the next section we introduce our multi-band photometric
233: observations, which indicates that free-free emission dominates
234: in optical and near infrared. In \S 3 we present
235: our free-free emission dominated light curve model and its
236: application to V445 Pup. Then we discuss brightness
237: in quiescence in \S 4.
238: Discussion and conclusions follow in \S 5 and \S 6, respectively.
239:
240:
241: %% In this section, we use the \subsection command to set off
242: %% a subsection. \footnote is used to insert a footnote to the text.
243:
244: %% Observe the use of the LaTeX \label
245: %% command after the \subsection to give a symbolic KEY to the
246: %% subsection for cross-referencing in a \ref command.
247: %% You can use LaTeX's \ref and \label commands to keep track of
248: %% cross-references to sections, equations, tables, and figures.
249: %% That way, if you change the order of any elements, LaTeX will
250: %% automatically renumber them.
251:
252: %% This section also includes several of the displayed math environments
253: %% mentioned in the Author Guide.
254:
255: %% The equation environment will produce a numbered display equation.
256:
257: %% The \notetoeditor{TEXT} command allows the author to communicate
258: %% information to the copy editor. This information will appear as a
259: %% footnote on the printed copy for the manuscript style file. Nothing will
260: %% appear on the printed copy if the preprint or
261: %% preprint2 style files are used.
262:
263: %% The eqnarray environment produces multi-line display math. The end of
264: %% each line is marked with a \\. Lines will be numbered unless the \\
265: %% is preceded by a \nonumber command.
266: %% Alignment points are marked by ampersands (&). There should be two
267: %% ampersands (&) per line.
268:
269: %% Putting eqnarrays or equations inside the mathletters environment groups
270: %% the enclosed equations by letter. For instance, the eqnarray below, instead
271: %% of being numbered, say, (4) and (5), would be numbered (4a) and (4b).
272: %% LaTeX the paper and look at the output to see the results.
273:
274: %% This section contains more display math examples, including unnumbered
275: %% equations (displaymath environment). The last paragraph includes some
276: %% examples of in-line math featuring a couple of the AASTeX symbol macros.
277:
278: %% The displaymath environment will produce the same sort of equation as
279: %% the equation environment, except that the equation will not be numbered
280: %% by LaTeX.
281:
282:
283: \section{Observation}
284:
285: Shortly after the discovery of V445 Pup outburst, one of us (S.K.)
286: started multi-band photometry with a 25.4 cm telescope
287: [focal length $=1600$~mm, CCD camera $=$ Apogee AP-7 (SITE SIA502AB
288: of $512 \times 512$ pixels)]. $V$ and $R_{\rm c}$ magnitudes are
289: obtained from January 4 to May 6, 2001, and $I_{\rm c}$ from
290: January 4, 2001 to January 15, 2007, with the comparison star,
291: TYC 6543-2917-1 ($V=8.74$, $B-V=0.304$). All of our data can be taken
292: from the data archive of Variable Star Observers League in Japan
293: (VSOLJ)\footnote{http://vsolj.cetus-net.org/}.
294:
295: %%% Fig.1
296: %\placefigure{lightobs.only}
297:
298: \begin{figure}
299: \epsscale{1.15}
300: %\plotone{light.obs.only.epsi}
301: \plotone{f1.color.epsi}
302: %%%\plotone{f1.epsi}
303: \caption{
304: $V$ and $I_{\rm c}$ light curves of V445 Pup (large open circles).
305: The $I_{\rm c}$ data are shifted up by one magnitude in order to
306: separate it from the $V$ light curve. Open triangles denote
307: $V$ magnitudes (IAUC No. 7552,
308: 7553, 7557, 7559, 7569, 7620). Small open circles and downward arrows
309: are taken from AAVSO to show very early and later phases of the outburst.
310: Large downward arrows show an upper limit observation of
311: $I_{\rm c} > 16.2$ (this work), $V > 20$ and $I > 19.5$ \citep{hen01}.
312: Straight lines indicate the average decline rates of
313: $1.9 ~{\rm mag} / 130 $~days $= 0.0146 ~{\rm mag}~{\rm day}^{-1}$ and
314: $3.3 ~{\rm mag} / 230$ days $= 0.0143 ~{\rm mag}~{\rm day}^{-1}$
315: for $I_{\rm c}$ and $V$, respectively.
316: }
317: % source: light.obs.only.wip
318: \label{lightobs.only}
319: \end{figure}
320:
321:
322: Figure \ref{lightobs.only} shows our $V$ and $I_{\rm c}$ magnitudes
323: as well as other observations taken from literature.
324: These two light curves show very slow evolution
325: ($\sim 0.014$ mag day$^{-1}$) followed by an oscillatory behavior
326: in the $V$ magnitude before it quickly darkened by dust blackout
327: on about JD 2452100, i.e., 7.5 months after the discovery
328: \citep{hen01, wou02, ash03}.
329: Here, we assume the decline rate of the light curves as shown
330: in Figure \ref{lightobs.only} ignoring the later oscillatory phase
331: (JD 2452040 -- 2452100) because we assume steady-state in the
332: nova envelope as mentioned below and, as a result, our theoretical
333: light curve cannot treat unsteady oscillations.
334:
335:
336: %Fig.2
337: %\placefigure{VmIc}
338:
339: \begin{figure}
340: \epsscale{1.15}
341: %\plotone{VmIc.epsi}
342: \plotone{f2.epsi}
343: \caption{
344: Color indexes of $V-I_{\rm c}$ and $V-R_{\rm c}$ as well as $I_{\rm c}$
345: and $V$. Open circles: this work. Open triangles: Gilmore
346: (IAUC 7559, 7569) and Gilmore \& Kilmartin (IAUC 7620).
347: The horizontal dashed lines indicate the mean values of
348: $V-R_{\rm c}=0.5$ and $V-I_{\rm c}=1.12$.
349: }
350: % source : VmIc.wip
351: \label{VmIc}
352: \end{figure}
353:
354:
355:
356:
357:
358: Figure \ref{VmIc} shows evolution of color indexes $V-I_{\rm c}$ and
359: $V-R_{\rm c}$ as well as $V$ and $I_{\rm c}$ themselves.
360: We can see that both of $V-I_{\rm c}$ and $V-R_{\rm c}$ are
361: almost constant with time, i.e., $\approx 1.12$ and $\approx 0.5$,
362: respectively, during our observation. This means that the three
363: light curves of $V$, $I_{\rm c}$, and $R_{\rm c}$ are almost parallel
364: and each light curve shape is independent of wavelength. These
365: are the characteristic properties of free-free emission dominated
366: light curves as explained below.
367:
368: The flux of optically thin free-free emission is inversely proportional to the
369: square of wavelength, i.e., $F_\lambda \propto \lambda^{-2}$.
370: This spectrum shape is unchanged with time although the electron
371: temperature rises during nova outburst because the emission
372: coefficient depends only very slightly on the electron temperature
373: \citep[e.g.,][]{bro70}.
374: Therefore, the color indexes of free-free emission dominated
375: light curves are unchanged with time. On the other hand,
376: the color indexes change with time if blackbody emission dominates
377: because the photospheric temperature rises with time in nova outbursts.
378: Figures \ref{lightobs.only} and \ref{VmIc} indicate
379: that the emission from V445 Pup is dominated by free-free emission
380: rather than by blackbody emission.
381:
382:
383: %Fig.3
384: %\placefigure{magnitude_calibration}
385:
386: \begin{figure}
387: \epsscale{1.15}
388: %\plotone{magnitude_calibration1.epsi}
389: \plotone{f3.epsi}
390: \caption{
391: Color indexes against wavelength. Our observational color indexes
392: of V445 Pup, $V-R_{\rm c}$ and $V-I_{\rm c}$, are plotted
393: for individual data (dots) and their mean values of 0.5 and 1.12
394: (open squares). The color indexes of V1500 Cyg are added
395: for $y$ magnitude instead of $V$ (filled triangles)
396: \citep[taken from][]{hac07kc}. Arrows indicate the effective
397: wavelength of six bands of $V$, $R$, $I$, $J$, $H$, and $K$.
398: Solid curves denote color indexes of free-free
399: emission for $E(B-V)=0$ and 0.5. }
400: % source: v445pup/color/magnitude_calibration1.wip
401: \label{magnitude_calibration}
402: \end{figure}
403:
404:
405: The color index of free-free emission is calculated from
406: $\lambda F_\lambda \propto \lambda^{-1}$.
407: When the reddening is known, the reddened color is obtained as
408: \begin{equation}
409: m_V - m_\lambda = (M_V - M_\lambda)_0 + c_\lambda E(B-V),
410: \label{color_reddening_relation}
411: \end{equation}
412: where $(M_V - M_\lambda)_0$ is the intrinsic color and
413: $c_\lambda$ is the reddening coefficient
414: (these values are tabulated in Table 4 in \citet{hac07kc}
415: for five colors of $V-R$, $V-I$, $V-J$, $V-H$, and $V-K$).
416: Figure \ref{magnitude_calibration} shows the color indexes relative
417: to $V$ for two cases of reddening, i.e., $E(B-V)=0$ and 0.5.
418:
419:
420: For comparison, we have added four relative colors of V1500 Cyg
421: \citep{hac06} because its continuum flux is known to be that of
422: free-free emission \citep{gal76} except for the first few days
423: after the optical peak. Here we use Str\"omgren $y$ magnitude
424: instead of $V$, because the intermediate-wide $y$ band
425: is almost emission-line free.
426: Three ($y-I$, $y-H$, and $y-K$) of four color indexes are consistent
427: with those of color indexes with $E(B-V)=0.5$ \citep{fer77, hac06}.
428: The $J$ band is strongly contaminated with strong emission lines
429: of \ion{He}{1} \citep[e.g.][]{bla76, kol76, she76}.
430: This is the reason why the $y-J$ color index deviates from
431: that of free-free emission \citep*[see][for more details]{hac07kc}.
432:
433: Our observed color indexes are shown in Figure \ref{magnitude_calibration}.
434: The open squares are centered at the mean values of $V-R_{\rm c}=0.5$ and
435: $V-I_{\rm c}=1.12$, whereas dots represent individual observations.
436: In V445 Pup, no strong emission lines dominate the continuum
437: in $V$, $R$, and $I$ bands \citep{kam02, iij08}. Therefore we conclude
438: that the color indexes of V445 Pup are consistent with those of
439: free-free emission with the reddening of $E(B-V)=0.51$ \citep{iij08}.
440:
441:
442: \section{Modeling of Nova Light Curves}
443: \label{model_nova_outburst}
444:
445: \subsection{Basic Model}
446: After a thermonuclear runaway sets in on the surface of a WD,
447: the envelope expands to a giant size and the optical luminosity
448: reaches its maximum. Optically thick winds occur and
449: the envelope reaches a steady state. Using the same method
450: and numerical techniques as in \citet{kat94h,kat03},
451: we have followed evolution of a nova by connecting steady state
452: solutions along the sequence of decreasing envelope mass.
453: We have solved the equations of motion, continuity, radiative diffusion,
454: and conservation of energy, from the bottom of the helium envelope
455: through the photosphere.
456: The winds are accelerated deep inside the photosphere.
457: Updated OPAL opacities are used \citep{igl96}.
458: As one of the boundary conditions for our numeral code, we assume that
459: photons are emitted at the photosphere as a blackbody with a photospheric
460: temperature, $T_{\rm ph}$. \citet{kat03} calculated the visual magnitude
461: $M_V$ on the basis of blackbody emission and constructed the light curves.
462: In the present work, we calculate free-free emission dominated
463: light curves. The envelope structure, wind mass loss rate,
464: photospheric temperature, and photospheric radius of the WD envelope
465: are essentially the same as those in the previous model.
466:
467: The flux of free-free emission from the optically thin region outside
468: the photosphere dominates in the continuum flux of optical and
469: near infrared wavelength region and is approximated by
470: \begin{equation}
471: F_\nu \propto \int N_e N_i d V
472: \propto \int_{R_{\rm ph}}^\infty {\dot M_{\rm wind}^2
473: \over {v_{\rm wind}^2 r^4}} r^2 dr
474: \propto {\dot M_{\rm wind}^2 \over {v_{\rm ph}^2 R_{\rm ph}}},
475: \label{free-free-wind}
476: \end{equation}
477: where $F_\nu$ is the flux at the frequency $\nu$, $N_e$ and $N_i$
478: are the number densities of electrons and ions, respectively,
479: $V$ is the volume, $R_{\rm ph}$ is the photospheric radius,
480: $\dot M_{\rm wind}$ is the wind mass loss rate, and $v_{\rm ph}$ is
481: the photospheric velocity \citep{hac06, hac07kc}.
482:
483: The proportionality constant in equation (\ref{free-free-wind}) cannot be
484: determined a priori because we do not calculate radiative transfer
485: outside the photosphere: These proportionality constant are determined
486: by fitting with observational data \citep{hac06, hac07k, hac07kc}.
487:
488:
489: \subsection{Free-free Light Curve and WD Mass}
490: We have calculated free-free emission dominated light curves of V445 Pup
491: for WD masses of 1.2, 1.3, 1.33, 1.35, 1.37, and $1.377 ~M_{\odot}$.
492: The last one is the upper limit of the mass-accreting WDs \citep{nom84}.
493: The adopted WD radius and chemical composition are listed in Table
494: \ref{composition}. Here we assume that chemical composition is constant
495: throughout the envelope.
496:
497: %Table 1
498: %\placetable{composition}
499:
500: \begin{deluxetable}{llll}
501: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
502: %%%%\rotate
503: \tablecaption{Model Parameters\tablenotemark{a}
504: \label{composition}}
505: \tablewidth{0pt}
506: \tablehead{
507: \colhead{$M_{\rm WD}$} & \colhead{$\log R_{\rm WD}$} & \colhead{$Y$} &
508: \colhead{$X_{\rm C+O}$} \cr
509: \colhead{($M_{\odot}$)} & \colhead{($R_{\odot}$)} & \colhead{}
510: & \colhead{}
511: }
512: \startdata
513: 1.2 & -2.193 & 0.68 & 0.3 \cr
514: 1.3 & -2.33 & 0.48 & 0.5 \cr
515: 1.33 & -2.417 & 0.38 & 0.6 \cr
516: 1.35 & -2.468 & 0.38 & 0.6 \cr
517: %
518: 1.37 & -2.535 & 0.58 & 0.4 \cr
519: 1.37 & -2.535 & 0.38 & 0.6 \cr
520: 1.37 & -2.535 & 0.18 & 0.8 \cr
521: 1.377 & -2.56 & 0.38 & 0.6
522: \enddata
523: \tablenotetext{a}{The heavy element content is assumed to be $Z=0.02$
524: that includes carbon and oxygen by the solar ratio.
525: }
526: %%\tablenotetext{b}{HD 162215 = TYC2 5094.283.1}
527: \end{deluxetable}
528:
529:
530:
531: %
532: %Fig.4
533: %\placefigure{lightcurve}
534:
535: \begin{figure}
536: \epsscale{1.15}
537: %\plotone{lightcurve.freefree.epsi}
538: \plotone{f4.epsi}
539: \caption{
540: Free-free emission dominated light curves for various WD masses.
541: The chemical composition is assumed to be $Y=0.38$,
542: $X_{\rm C+O}= 0.6$, and $Z=0.02$
543: throughout the envelope. The WD mass is attached to each curve.
544: The dashed and dotted curves denote $M_{\rm WD}=1.37 ~M_\sun$ model
545: but with different chemical composition of $X_{\rm C+O}= 0.4$ and 0.8,
546: respectively. Small open circles denote the starting points of
547: light curve fitting in Fig. \ref{lightcurve_fitting}:
548: upper and lower points of $M_{\rm WD}= 1.37 ~M_\sun$ (solid
549: line) correspond to Models 4 and 3
550: and those of 1.377 $M_\odot$ correspond to Models 8 and 7, respectively.
551: A short solid line indicates the decline rate of observed $V$ data in Fig.
552: \ref{lightobs.only} (3.3 mag / 230 days).
553: }
554: % source lightcurve.freefree.wip
555: \label{lightcurve}
556: \end{figure}
557:
558:
559: Figure \ref{lightcurve} shows the calculated free-free light curves.
560: More massive WDs show faster decline. This is mainly because
561: the more massive WDs have the less massive envelope and the smaller
562: mass envelope is quickly taken off by the wind.
563: The figure also shows two additional models of $M_{\rm WD}= 1.37
564: ~M_\sun$ with different compositions of $X_{\rm C+O} =0.4$ and 0.8.
565: These models show almost similar decline rates to that of
566: $M_{\rm WD}= 1.37 ~M_\sun$ with $X_{\rm C+O}=0.6$.
567:
568: The starting point of our model light curve depends on the initial
569: envelope mass. When an initial envelope mass is given,
570: our nova model is located somewhere on the light curve.
571: For a more massive ignition mass, it starts from an upper point of
572: the light curve. Then the nova moves rightward with the decreasing
573: envelope mass due to wind mass loss and nuclear burning.
574:
575: The development of helium shell flashes is much slower than that of
576: hydrogen shell flashes mainly because of much larger envelope masses
577: of helium shell flashes \citep{kat94h}.
578: The short straight solid line in Figure \ref{lightcurve} represents
579: the decline rate of $V$ light curve in Figure \ref{lightobs.only}.
580: The length of the line indicates the observed period which is relatively
581: short because of dust blackout 230 days after the optical maximum.
582: We cannot compare the entire evolution period of the light curve
583: with the observational data so that fitting leaves some ambiguity
584: in choosing the best fit model.
585: Even though, we may conclude that WDs with masses of
586: $M_{\rm WD} \lesssim 1.33 ~M_\sun$ are very unlikely
587: because their light curves are too slow to be comparable with
588: the observation.
589:
590: %Table 2
591: %\placetable{fitting_parameter}
592:
593: %%%\begin{deluxetable}{lllllllllr}
594: \begin{deluxetable*}{lllllllllr}
595: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
596: %%%%\rotate
597: \tablecaption{Parameters of Fitted Model
598: \label{fitting_parameter}}
599: \tablewidth{0pt}
600: \tablehead{
601: \colhead{model } & \colhead{$M_{\rm WD}$} & \colhead{$Y$}
602: & \colhead{$X_{\rm C+O}$} &
603: \colhead{$\Delta M_{\rm He,ig}$\tablenotemark{a}}
604: & \colhead{$\Delta M_{\rm ej}$\tablenotemark{b}}
605: & \colhead{$\eta_{\rm He}$\tablenotemark{c}}& \colhead{Distance}
606: & \colhead{$\dot M_{\rm He}$\tablenotemark{d}} & \colhead{$\tau_{\rm rec}$\tablenotemark{d}} \cr
607: \colhead{No. } & \colhead{($M_\sun$)} & \colhead{} & \colhead{}
608: &\colhead{($M_{\odot}$)} &\colhead{($M_{\odot}$)} & \colhead{}
609: & \colhead{(kpc)} & \colhead{($M_\sun$~yr$^{-1}$)}
610: & \colhead{(yr)}
611: }
612: \startdata
613: 1& 1.35 & 0.38 & 0.6 &3.3E-4 &1.8E-4 & 0.45 & 6.6 & 6.E-8 & 5000 \cr
614: %
615: 2& 1.37 & 0.58 & 0.4 & 1.6E-4 &9.2E-5 & 0.42 &5.0 &7.E-8 &2000 \cr
616: %
617: 3& 1.37 & 0.38 & 0.6 &1.9E-4 &8.7E-5 & 0.53 & 4.8 & 6.E-8 & 3000 \cr
618: %
619: 4& 1.37 & 0.38 & 0.6 &2.1E-4 &1.1E-4 & 0.49 & 5.5 & 5.E-8 & 4000 \cr
620: %
621: 5& 1.37 & 0.18 & 0.8 &3.5E-4 &1.2E-4 &0.64 & 6.0 & 4.E-8 & 9000\cr
622: %
623: 6& 1.37 & 0.18 & 0.8 &3.8E-4 &1.5E-4 &0.61 & 6.9 &4.E-8 &10000 \cr
624: %
625: 7& 1.377 & 0.38 & 0.6 &1.8E-4 &7.4E-5 & 0.60 & 4.8 & 5.E-8 & 4000\cr
626: 8& 1.377 & 0.38 & 0.6 &2.2E-4 &9.6E-5 & 0.56 & 5.2 & 4.E-8 & 5000 \cr
627: \enddata
628: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before
629: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark
630: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.
631: %%\tablecomments{Table \ref{tbl-1} is published in its entirety in the
632: %%electronic edition of the {\it Astrophysical Journal}. A portion is
633: %%shown here for guidance regarding its form and content.}
634: \tablenotetext{a}{Envelope mass at ignition is assumed to be equal to the
635: mass at the optical peak, which we assume as JD 2451872
636: (28 days before the discovery).}
637: \tablenotetext{b}{Total mass ejected by the wind}
638: \tablenotetext{c}{Mass accumulation efficiency}
639: \tablenotetext{d}{estimated from Fig. \ref{dMenvMacc}}
640: \end{deluxetable*}
641: %%%\end{deluxetable}
642:
643:
644:
645: Figure \ref{lightcurve_fitting} represents the light curve fitting
646: with observational data. Here, the model light curves of $I_{\rm c}$
647: are identical to those of $V$ but are lifted up by 1.12 mag,
648: which is the mean value of $V-I_{\rm c}$ obtained in Figure \ref{VmIc}.
649: It should be noted that, in this figure, these light curves are further
650: lifted up by 1.0 mag because of $I_c - 1$.
651:
652:
653: %Fig.5
654: %\placefigure{lightcurve_fitting}
655:
656: \begin{figure}
657: \epsscale{1.15}
658: %\plotone{light.fitting2.epsi}
659: \plotone{f5.epsi}
660: \caption{
661: Our model light curves are fitted with the observation.
662: Dotted line: Model 1. Thin dashed line: Model 2. Thin solid line: Model 3.
663: Thick solid line: Model 4. Dash-three dotted line: Model 5.
664: Thin dash-dotted line: Model 6. Dashed line: Model 7.
665: Dash-dotted line: Model 8.
666: Our model $I_{\rm c}$ light curves are
667: identical with those of $V$ but are lifted up by 1.12 mag
668: (and further shifted up by 1 mag for $I_{\rm c} - 1$).
669: The ordinate on the right vertical axis represents
670: the absolute magnitude of Model 4.
671: For the other models, the model light curves are shifted down
672: by 0.4 mag (Model 1), up by 0.2 mag (Model 2) up by 0.3 mag (Models
673: 3 and 7), down by 0.2 mag (Model 5), down by 0.5 mag (Model 6),
674: up by 0.1 mag (Model 8).
675: The observational data are same as those
676: in Fig. \ref{lightobs.only}.
677: }
678: % source: light.fitting.f.wip
679: \label{lightcurve_fitting}
680: \end{figure}
681:
682:
683: These light curves are a part of the model light curves
684: in Figure \ref{lightcurve}.
685: In the early phase of the outburst the light curve declines almost
686: linearly so that fitting is not unique. We can fit any part of
687: our model light curve if its decline rate is the same as
688: $\approx 0.014-0.015 ~{\rm mag}~{\rm day}^{-1}$, for example,
689: either top or middle part of the same light curve of $1.377 ~M_\sun$
690: WD in Figure \ref{lightcurve}. In such a case we show two
691: possible extreme cases, i.e., the earliest starting point and
692: the latest one by open circles, as shown in Figure \ref{lightcurve}.
693: These model parameters are summarized in Table \ref{fitting_parameter},
694: where we distinguish the model by model number.
695:
696: Thus we have selected several light curves which show a reasonable
697: agreement with the observation.
698: However, we cannot choose the best fit model among them because
699: the observed period is too short to discriminate a particular
700: light curve from others because the difference among them
701: appears only in a late stage.
702:
703: For relatively less massive WDs of $M_{\rm WD} \lesssim 1.33 ~M_{\odot}$,
704: we cannot have reasonable fits with the observation for any part of
705: the model light curves. Among relatively more massive WDs
706: of $M_{\rm WD} \gtrsim 1.35 ~M_{\odot}$ in Table \ref{fitting_parameter},
707: Model 1 shows slightly slower decline. Therefore, the
708: $1.35 ~M_{\odot}$ WD may be the lowest end for the WD mass.
709: Thus we may conclude that V445 Pup contains a very massive
710: WD of $M_{\rm WD} \gtrsim 1.35 ~M_{\odot}$.
711:
712:
713:
714: \subsection{Mass Accumulation Efficiency}
715:
716: During helium nova outbursts, a part of the helium envelope is blown
717: off in winds, while the rest accumulates on the WD. We define the mass
718: accumulation efficiency, $\eta_{\rm He}$, as the ratio of the envelope
719: mass that remains on the WD after the helium nova outburst to the helium
720: envelope mass at ignition, $\Delta M_{\rm He,ig}$ \citep{kat04}.
721:
722: The mass accumulation efficiency is estimated as follows.
723: We have calculated the mass lost by winds during the outburst,
724: $\Delta M_{\rm ej}$. Note that $\Delta M_{\rm ej}$ is the calculated
725: total ejecta mass which is ejected during the wind phase,
726: and not the mass ejected during the observing period which may be
727: shorter than the wind phase.
728:
729: The ignition mass is approximated by the envelope mass at the optical
730: peak, i.e., $\Delta M_{\rm He,ig} \approx \Delta M_{\rm He,peak}$.
731: Since the exact time of the optical peak is unknown, we assume
732: that the optical peak is reached on JD 2451872, i.e., the earliest
733: prediscovery observation in the brightest stage reported to IAU Circular
734: No. 7553, 28 days earlier than the discovery.
735: The envelope mass at the optical peak is estimated from our
736: wind solution and is listed as $\Delta M_{\rm He,ig}$
737: in Table \ref{fitting_parameter}.
738: The resultant accumulation efficiency,
739: \begin{equation}
740: \eta_{\rm He} \equiv {{\Delta M_{\rm He,peak}-\Delta M_{\rm ej}}
741: \over {\Delta M_{\rm He,peak}}},
742: \end{equation}
743: is also listed in Table \ref{fitting_parameter}.
744: The efficiencies are as high as $\sim 50$\%.
745: The WD of V445 Pup is already very massive
746: ($ M_{\rm WD} \gtrsim 1.35 ~M_{\odot}$) and its mass has increased
747: through helium nova outbursts. Therefore, V445 Pup is a strong
748: candidate of Type Ia supernova progenitors.
749:
750:
751:
752: \section{Quiescent Phase}
753: Before the 2000 outburst, there was a 14.5 mag star
754: at the position of V445 Pup (taken from the archive of
755: VSNET\footnote{http://vsnet.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp/vsnet/}),
756: but no bright star has been observed since the dust blackout.
757: We may regard that 14.5 mag is the preoutburst magnitude of the binary.
758: There are two possible explanations for this quiescent phase luminosity,
759: one is the accretion disk luminosity and the other is the luminosity of
760: bright companion star. In the following subsections, we discuss how
761: these possible sources contribute to the quiescent luminosity.
762:
763:
764:
765: \subsection{Accretion Disk}
766: In some nova systems, an accretion disk mainly contributes to the brightness
767: in their quiescent phase. If the preoutburst luminosity of V445 Pup
768: comes from an accretion disk, its absolute magnitude is approximated by
769: \begin{eqnarray}
770: M_V {\rm (obs)}&=& -9.48 -{5\over 3}\log\left({M_{\rm WD}\over M_\sun}
771: {{\dot M_{\rm acc}}\over {M_\sun ~{\rm yr}^{-1}}} \right) \cr
772: & & -{5\over 2} \log(2\cos i),
773: \label{accretion-disk-Mv}
774: \end{eqnarray}
775: where $M_{\rm WD}$ is the WD mass, $\dot M_{\rm acc}$ the mass accretion
776: rate, and $i$ the inclination angle \citep[equation (A6) in][]{web87}.
777: Assuming that $M_{\rm WD}= 1.37 ~M_{\odot}$ and $i=80$\arcdeg
778: \citep{wou08}, we have $M_V =1.4$, 2.3, and 3.1 for the accretion rates
779: of $1 \times 10^{-6}$, $3 \times 10^{-7}$,
780: and $1 \times 10^{-7} ~M_{\odot}$~yr$^{-1}$, respectively.
781:
782: The apparent magnitude of the disk is calculated from
783: \begin{equation}
784: m_V-M_V = A_V + 5 \log D_{10},
785: \label{distance-modulus}
786: \end{equation}
787: where $D_{10}$ is the distance divided by 10 pc.
788: With the absorption of $A_V = 1.6$ and the distance of 3 kpc,
789: the apparent magnitude is estimated to be $m_V= 15.4$, 16.3 and 17.1,
790: for the above accretion rates,
791: respectively. For the distance of 6.5 kpc,
792: we obtain brightnesses of $m_V = 17.1$, 18.0, and 18.8,
793: respectively. All of these values are much fainter than 14.5 mag.
794: Therefore, it is very unlikely that an accretion disk mainly
795: contributes to the preoutburst luminosity.
796:
797:
798: %Fig.6
799: %\placefigure{hestarevolution}
800:
801: \begin{figure}
802: \epsscale{1.15}
803: %\plotone{Hestarevol.epsi}
804: \plotone{f6.color.epsi}
805: %%%\plotone{f6.epsi}
806: \caption{
807: Evolutional tracks of helium stars with masses of $M_{\rm He}= 0.6$,
808: 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0 (thick line), 1.2, 1.4, 1.6, 1.8, 2.0 (thick line),
809: 2.5, and $3.0 ~M_\sun$ in the H-R diagram.
810: The 0.6 and $0.7~M_\sun$ stars evolve
811: blueward and do not become red giants. We stopped calculation when
812: carbon ignites at the center for 2.5 and $3.0 ~M_\sun$ stars.
813: Open circles and squares denote stars with a 14.5 mag
814: brightness at the distance of 6.5 kpc and 4.9 kpc, respectively, for
815: $A_V=1.6$.
816: }
817: % source : /saio/Hestarevol.wip
818: \label{hestarevolution}
819: \end{figure}
820:
821:
822:
823:
824:
825: \subsection{Helium Star Companion}
826: Another possible source of the preoutburst brightness is
827: a helium star companion. Figure \ref{hestarevolution} shows
828: evolutional tracks of helium stars with masses between 0.6 and
829: $3.0 ~M_\sun$ from the helium main-sequence to the red giant stage
830: in the H-R diagram. We use OPAL opacities and an initial
831: chemical composition of $X=0.0$, $Y=0.98$ and $Z=0.02$.
832: The numerical method and input physics are the same as those
833: in \citet{sai95}.
834:
835: As shown in Figure \ref{hestarevolution},
836: low mass helium stars do not evolve to a red giant.
837: In our new calculation, the $0.8 ~M_{\odot}$ helium
838: star evolves to a red giant, but the 0.6 and $0.7 ~M_{\odot}$ helium
839: stars evolve toward blueward. \citet{pac71} showed that stars of
840: $M_{\rm He} \gtrsim 1.0 ~M_{\odot}$ evolve to a red giant while 0.5,
841: 0.7, and $0.85 ~M_{\odot}$ do not. Our calculations are essentially the
842: same as those of \citet{pac71} and the difference is attributed
843: mainly to the difference between the adopted opacities.
844:
845: Figure \ref{hestarevolution} also shows locations of stars
846: whose apparent magnitudes are $m_V= 14.5$ for $A_V= 1.6$.
847: Here, the distance is assumed to be 4.9 (open squares) or 6.5 kpc
848: (open circles). For example, a star of (temperature, luminosity)
849: $= (\log T_{\rm ph} ~({\rm K})$, $\log L_{\rm ph}/L_\sun) =$
850: (4.2, 2.81), (4.4, 3.25), and (4.6, 3.75) could be observed as a 14.5 mag
851: star for 6.5 kpc and $(\log T_{\rm ph} ~(K)$,
852: $\log L_{\rm ph}/L_\sun) =$ (4.2, 2.57), (4.4, 3.0),
853: and (4.6, 3.51) for 4.9 kpc. Therefore, the observed 14.5 mag is
854: consistent with the luminosities and temperatures of
855: slightly evolved helium stars of $M_{\rm He} \gtrsim 0.8 ~M_\sun$
856: if the companion is a blue star of $\log T_{\rm ph} \gtrsim 4.5$.
857:
858: On the other hand, if the companion is redder than $\log T_{\rm ph}
859: \lesssim 4.4$, there is no corresponding evolution track
860: in the low luminosity region of the H-R diagram as shown in Figure
861: \ref{hestarevolution}. In such a case the preoutburst luminosity
862: cannot be attributed to a helium star companion.
863: Kato (2001)\footnote{http://www.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp/vsnet/Mail/alert5000/msg00493.html}
864: suggested that preoutburst color of V445 Pup was
865: much bluer than that of symbiotic stars (which have a red giant companion)
866: but rather close to that of cataclysmic variables (main-sequence or
867: little bit evolved companion). This argument is consistent with
868: our estimate of relatively high surface temperature
869: $\log T_{\rm ph} \gtrsim 4.5$ (see Fig. \ref{hestarevolution}).
870:
871:
872:
873: \section{Discussions}
874:
875:
876: \subsection{Distance}
877: As explained in \S\S 3.1 and 3.2, we do not solve energy transfer outside
878: the photosphere and, thus, we cannot determine the proportionality
879: constant in equation (\ref{free-free-wind}). Therefore, we cannot
880: determine the distance to V445 Pup directly from the comparison of
881: theoretical absolute magnitude with the observational apparent magnitude.
882: Instead, we can approximately estimate the distance by assuming
883: that the free-free flux is larger than the blackbody flux during
884: the observing period. This assumption gives a lower limit to
885: the distance. We expect that the distance estimated thus is
886: close to the real value. The 8th column of Table \ref{fitting_parameter}
887: lists the distance estimated for each model. These distances are
888: consistent with the observational estimates of $3.5 \lesssim d \lesssim 6.5$ kpc
889: \citep{iij08} and $\sim 4.9$ kpc \citep{wou08}.
890:
891:
892:
893: \subsection{Helium Ignition Mass and Recurrence Period}
894:
895: %Fig.7
896: %\placefigure{dMenvMacc}
897:
898: \begin{figure}
899: \epsscale{1.15}
900: %\plotone{dMenvMacc.epsi}
901: \plotone{f7.color.epsi}
902: %%%\plotone{f7.epsi}
903: \caption{
904: The helium ignition mass, $\Delta M_{\rm He, ig}$, of helium-accreting
905: WDs is plotted against the helium accretion rate, $\dot M_{\rm He}$.
906: The WD mass is attached to each curve. Straight dashed lines indicates
907: the recurrence period. The open square indicates
908: the ignition mass of each model in Table \ref{fitting_parameter}.
909: }
910: % source saio/dMenvMacc.wip
911: \label{dMenvMacc}
912: \end{figure}
913:
914:
915: We have calculated evolution of C+O white dwarfs accreting helium
916: at various rates until the ignition of a helium shell flash.
917: Chemical compositions assumed are $X_{\rm C}=0.48$ and
918: $X_{\rm O}=0.50$ for the WD core, and $X=0.0$ and $Y=0.98$ for
919: the accreted envelope.
920: The initial model adopted for a given core mass and accretion rate is
921: a steady-state model in which the heating due to the accretion is balanced
922: with the radiative energy flow.
923: Adopting such an initial model is justified because the WD has accreted
924: matter from the companion for a long time and experienced many
925: shell flashes.
926:
927: As the helium accretion proceeds, the temperature at the bottom of
928: the envelope gradually increases.
929: When the temperature becomes high enough the
930: triple-alpha reaction causes a shell flash.
931: The mass of the helium envelope at the ignition depends on the
932: WD mass and the accretion rate as shown in Figure~\ref{dMenvMacc}.
933: The envelope mass required to ignite a shell flash tends
934: to be smaller for a higher accretion rate and for a larger WD mass.
935: Helium flashes are weaker for higher accretion rates and lower WD masses.
936: In particular they are very weak for accretion rates higher than
937: $\sim 10^{-6} M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$.
938:
939: The envelope mass at the ignition depends also on the core temperature.
940: If the core temperature
941: of the initial WD is lower than that of the steady state model
942: employed for our calculations, the envelope mass at the ignition
943: would be larger.
944:
945: The recurrence period, $\Delta M_{\rm He,ig}/{\dot M}_{\rm He}$, is
946: also plotted in Figure~\ref{dMenvMacc} by dashed lines.
947: The recurrence period corresponding to the ignition mass of our
948: fitted models are listed in Table \ref{fitting_parameter}.
949:
950:
951: \subsection{Mass Transfer from Helium Star Companion}
952:
953: We have estimated the mean accretion rate ${\dot M}_{\rm He}$
954: of the WD as in Table \ref{fitting_parameter}.
955: The companion star feeds its mass to the WD via the Roche lobe overflow
956: or by winds depending on whether it fills the Roche lobe or not.
957: Here we examine if this accretion rate is comparable to the mass
958: transfer rates of the Roche lobe overflow from a helium star
959: companion. We followed stellar evolutions of helium stars from
960: the main sequence assuming that the star always fills its effective
961: Roche lobe of which radius is simply assumed to be $1.5 ~R_\sun$.
962: The resultant mass loss rates are shown in Figure \ref{Hestar.dmdt}
963: for stars with initial masses of 1.2, 1.0 and $0.8 ~M_\sun$.
964: These results are hardly affected even if we change the Roche lobe
965: radius.
966:
967: The mass loss rate decreases with the companion mass almost
968: independently of the initial value. Except for
969: the short initial and final stages, these rates are
970: as large as $\dot M_{\rm He} \sim 10^{-6} ~M_\sun$~yr$^{-1}$
971: and much larger than the mass accretion rate estimated from our
972: fitted models in Table \ref{fitting_parameter}.
973: Since almost all of the mass lost by the companion accretes
974: onto the WD in the case of Roche lobe overflow,
975: the accretion may result in very weak shell flashes
976: for such high rates as $10^{-6} M_\sun$~yr$^{-1}$.
977: A strong shell flash like V445 Pup is realized only when
978: the final stages of mass-transfer in which the mass transfer rate
979: quickly drops with time. This rare case may correspond to a
980: final stage of binary evolution after the WD had grown up in mass to
981: near the Chandrasekhar limit from a less massive one and the companion
982: had lost a large amount of mass via Roche lobe overflow.
983: Such information will be useful for modeling a new path of
984: binary evolution scenario that will lead to a Type Ia supernova.
985:
986:
987: %Fig.8
988: %\placefigure{Hestar.dmdt}
989:
990: \begin{figure}
991: \epsscale{1.15}
992: %\plotone{saio0711dmdt.eps}
993: %\plotone{HecompML.epsi}
994: \plotone{f8.epsi}
995: \caption{
996: Mass loss rate of a helium star that fills its Roche lobe of the radius
997: $1.5 ~R_\sun$. The initial stellar mass is 1.2, 1.0 (dotted line), and
998: $0.8 ~M_\sun$. Time goes on from left to right. See the text for more detail.
999: }
1000: % source :saio/Hecomp_ML/HecompML.wip
1001: \label{Hestar.dmdt}
1002: \end{figure}
1003:
1004:
1005:
1006: \subsection{Comparison with Other Observation}
1007: The mass of the dust shell can be estimated from infrared continuum flux
1008: with the assumption that the emission originated from warm dust.
1009: With infrared 10 $\mu$m spectrum, \citet{lyn04b} estimated the dust
1010: mass to be $2 \times 10^{-6} M_{\odot}$ for a distance of 3 kpc.
1011: This value would be increased if we adopt a larger distance
1012: instead of 3 kpc, but still consistent with our estimated
1013: ejecta mass $\Delta M_{\rm ej}\sim (0.7-1.8) \times 10^{-4}
1014: M_{\odot}$ in Table \ref{fitting_parameter},
1015: because the dust mass is a small part of the ejected mass.
1016:
1017: \citet{lyn04a} reported the absence of He II or coronal lines on
1018: their near IR spectra and suggested that the ionizing source was
1019: not hot enough on 2004 January 14 and 16 (1146 days after
1020: the optical maximum). \citet{lyn05} also reported,
1021: from their near IR observation on 2005 November 16
1022: that the object had faded and the thermal dust emission
1023: had virtually disappeared. They suggested that the dust had
1024: cooled significantly until that date (1818 days). This suggestion
1025: may constrain the WD mass of V445 Pup because
1026: Figure \ref{lightcurve} shows the outburst lasts more than
1027: 1800 days for less massive WDs ($ \lesssim 1.33 ~M_\sun$).
1028: If the WD had cooled down until the above date we may exclude
1029: less massive WD models ($ \lesssim 1.33 ~M_\sun$) because
1030: these WDs evolve slowly and their hot surfaces emit high energy photons
1031: at least until 1800 days after the optical peak.
1032:
1033:
1034: We have shown that the WD mass of V445 Pup is increasing with time.
1035: When the WD continues to grow up to the Chandrasekhar limit,
1036: central carbon ignition triggers a Type Ia supernova explosion
1037: if the WD consists of carbon and oxygen. We regards the star as
1038: a CO WD instead of an O-Ne-Mg WD because no indication of neon
1039: were observed in the nebula phase spectrum \citep{wou05}. Therefore,
1040: we consider that V445 Pup is a strong candidate of Type Ia supernova.
1041:
1042: When a binary consisting of a massive WD and a helium star
1043: like V445 Pup becomes a Type Ia supernova, its spectrum may more or less
1044: show a sign of helium. The search for such helium associated with
1045: a Type Ia supernova has been reported for a dozen Type Ia supernovae
1046: \citep{mar03, mat05}, but all of them are negative detection.
1047: It may be difficult to find such a system because this type of
1048: Type Ia supernovae are very rare.
1049:
1050: The binary seems to be still deeply obscured by the optically thick
1051: dust shell even several years after the outburst. This blackout period
1052: is much longer than that of the classical novae such as OS And ($\sim 20$
1053: days), V705 Cas ($\sim 100$ days), and DQ Her ($\sim 100$ days).
1054: As the ejected mass estimated in Table \ref{fitting_parameter} is
1055: not much different from those of classical novae, the difference of
1056: the blackout period may be attributed to a large amount of dust in
1057: the extremely carbon-rich ejecta of a helium nova.
1058: Moreover, observed low ejection velocities of $\sim 500$ km~s$^{-1}$
1059: \citep{iij08} is not much larger than the escape velocity of
1060: the binary with a relatively massive total mass [e.g., $1.35 ~M_\sun
1061: + (1 - 2) ~M_\sun$]. Both of these effects lengthen the dust
1062: blackout period. When the dust obscuration will be cleared
1063: in the future the period of blackout provides useful information on
1064: the dust shell.
1065:
1066:
1067: \section{Conclusions}
1068: Our main results are summarized as follows:
1069:
1070: 1. We have reproduced $V$ and $I_{\rm c}$ light curves
1071: using free-free emission dominated light curves calculated on the
1072: basis of the optically thick wind theory.
1073:
1074: 2. From the light curve analysis we have estimated the WD mass
1075: to be as massive as $M_{\rm WD} \gtrsim 1.35~M_\sun$.
1076:
1077: 3. Our light curve models are now consistent with a longer distance
1078: of $3.5 \lesssim d \lesssim 6.5$ kpc \citep{iij08} and 4.9 kpc \citep{wou08}.
1079:
1080: 4. We have estimated the ejecta mass as the mass lost by optically
1081: thick winds, i.e., $\Delta M_{\rm wind} \sim 10^{-4} M_\odot$.
1082: This amounts to about a half of the accreted helium matter so that
1083: the accumulation efficiency reaches $\sim 50$\%.
1084:
1085: 5. The white dwarf is already very close to the Chandrasekhar mass,
1086: i.e., $M_{\rm WD} \gtrsim 1.35~M_\sun$, and the WD mass had increased
1087: after the helium nova. Therefore, V445 Pup is a strong candidate
1088: of Type Ia supernova progenitors.
1089:
1090: 6. We emphasize importance of observations after the dense
1091: dust shell will disappear, especially observations of the color and
1092: magnitude, orbital period, and inclination angle of the orbit.
1093: These are important to specify companion nature.
1094:
1095: %% If you wish to include an acknowledgments section in your paper,
1096: %% separate it off from the body of the text using the \acknowledgments
1097: %% command.
1098:
1099: %% Included in this acknowledgments section are examples of the
1100: %% AASTeX hypertext markup commands. Use \url without the optional [HREF]
1101: %% argument when you want to print the url directly in the text. Otherwise,
1102: %% use either \url or \anchor, with the HREF as the first argument and the
1103: %% text to be printed in the second.
1104:
1105:
1106: \acknowledgments
1107: M.K. and I.H. are grateful to people at the Astronomical Observatory of
1108: Padova and at the Department of Astronomy of the University of Padova, Italy,
1109: for their warm hospitality. Especially we thank Takashi Iijima for
1110: fruitful discussion on V445 Pup, which stimulated us to start this work.
1111: The authors thank Masaomi Tanaka for information on the helium detection
1112: in Type Ia supernovae. We also thank the anonymous referee for
1113: useful comments to improve the manuscript. Thanks are also due to
1114: the American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO)
1115: for the photometric data of V445 Pup and Taichi Kato for introducing us
1116: the discussion in VSNET. This research has been supported
1117: in part by the Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (16540211, 20540227)
1118: from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
1119:
1120:
1121:
1122: %% Appendix material should be preceded with a single \appendix command.
1123: %% There should be a \section command for each appendix. Mark appendix
1124: %% subsections with the same markup you use in the main body of the paper.
1125:
1126: %% Each Appendix (indicated with \section) will be lettered A, B, C, etc.
1127: %% The equation counter will reset when it encounters the \appendix
1128: %% command and will number appendix equations (A1), (A2), etc.
1129:
1130: %%%%\appendix
1131:
1132: %%%%\section{Appendicial material}
1133:
1134:
1135: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.
1136: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.
1137: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of
1138: %% curly braces. If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error
1139: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".
1140: %%
1141: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite
1142: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a
1143: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds
1144: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).
1145: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the
1146: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain
1147: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in
1148: %% place of the \cite commands.
1149:
1150: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.
1151: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.
1152: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.
1153:
1154: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly
1155: %% different from previous examples. The natbib system solves a host
1156: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly
1157: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.
1158: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.
1159:
1160:
1161: %\clearpage
1162: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1163: \bibitem[Ashok \& Banerjee (2003)]{ash03}
1164: Ashok, N. M., \& Banerjee, D. P. K. 2003, \aap,409, 1007
1165:
1166: \bibitem[Black \& Gallagher (1976)]{bla76}
1167: Black, J. H., \& Gallagher, J. S. 1976, \nat, 261, 296
1168: %-298. The infrared spectrum of Nova Cygni 1975
1169:
1170: \bibitem[Brown and Mathews (1970)]{bro70} Brown, R. L., \& Mathews, W. G.
1171: 1970, \apj, 160, 939
1172: % -946 theoretical continuous spectra of gaseous nebulae: emissivity
1173: % of free-free
1174:
1175: \bibitem[Ferland (1977)]{fer77}
1176: Ferland, G. J. 1977, \apj, 215, 873
1177: %-876. The interstellar reddening and distance of Nova Cygni 1975/V1500 Cygni
1178:
1179: \bibitem[Gallagher \& Ney (1976)]{gal76}
1180: Gallagher, J. S., \& Ney, E. P. 1976, \apj, 204, L35
1181: %-L39. The early infrared development of Nova Cygni 1975.
1182:
1183: \bibitem[Hachisu \& Kato (2003)]{hac03kb}
1184: Hachisu, I., \& Kato, M. 2003, \apj, 590, 445
1185: %-459. RX J0513.9-6951: The First Example of Accretion Wind Evolution,
1186: %a Key Evolutionary Process to Type Ia Supernovae
1187:
1188: %\bibitem[Hachisu \& Kato (2003b)]{hac03kc}
1189: %Hachisu, I., \& Kato, M. 2003b, \apj, 598, 527
1190: %-544. A Limit Cycle Model For Long-Term Optical Variations of V Sagittae:
1191: % The Second Example of Accretion Wind Evolution
1192:
1193: \bibitem[Hachisu \& Kato (2006)]{hac06}
1194: Hachisu, I., \& Kato, M. 2006, \apjs, 167, 59
1195: %(Paper I)
1196: %-80. A Universal Decline Law of Classical Novae
1197:
1198: \bibitem[Hachisu and Kato (2007)]{hac07k}
1199: Hachisu, I.,\& Kato, M. 2007, \apj, 662, 552
1200: % A Universal Decline Law of Classical Novae. II.
1201: % GK Persei 1901 and Novae in 2005
1202:
1203: \bibitem[Hachisu et al. (2007)Hachisu, Kato, \& Cassatella]{hac07kc}
1204: Hachisu, I., Kato, M., \& Cassatella, A. 2007, \apj, submitted
1205: % Universal decline law No3, GQ Mus (free-free emission)
1206:
1207: \bibitem[Hachisu et al. (2000)]{hkkm00}
1208: Hachisu, I., Kato, M., Kato, T., \& Matsumoto, K. 2000,
1209: \apjl, 528, L97 %(HKKM00) (U Sco outburst)
1210: %-L100 (HKKM00)
1211: %A theoretical light curve model for the 1999 outburst of U Scorpii
1212:
1213: \bibitem[Hachisu et al. (2007)Hachisu, Kato \& Luna]{hac07kl}
1214: Hachisu, I.,Kato, M., Luna, G.J.M., \apj, 2007, 659, L153
1215: %-L156 Supersoft X-ray Light Curve of RS Ophiuchi (2006)
1216:
1217: \bibitem[Hachisu, Kato \& Nomoto(1999)Hachisu et al.]{hkn99}
1218: Hachisu, I., Kato, M., \& Nomoto, K. 1999a, \apj, 522, 487 %(HKN99)
1219: %Hachisu, I., Kato, M. \& Nomoto, K. A wide symbiotic channel to
1220: %Type Ia supernovae. {\it Astrophys. J.} {\bf 522}, 487
1221:
1222: \bibitem[Henden et al. (2001)Henden, Wagner, \& Starrfield]{hen01}
1223: Henden, A. A., Wagner, R. M., \& Starrfield, S. G., 2001, \iaucirc, 7730
1224:
1225: %\bibitem[Howell \& Kerr (2002)]{how02}
1226: %Howell, S. B., \& Kerr, T., 2002, UKIRT Newsletter No. 10
1227: %
1228: \bibitem[Iglesias \& Rogers (1996)]{igl96}
1229: Iglesias, C. A., \& Rogers, F. J. 1996, \apj, 464, 943
1230: %-953. Updated Opal Opacities
1231:
1232: \bibitem[Iijima \& Nakanishi (2007)]{iij08}
1233: Iijima,T., \& Nakanishi, H. 2008, \aap, in press
1234:
1235: \bibitem[Kamath \& Anupama (2002)]{kam02}
1236: Kamath, U. S., \& Anupama, G. C. 2002, Bull. Astr. Soc. India, 30, 679
1237: %-681 Optical Spectroscopy of V445 Pup
1238:
1239: %\bibitem[Kato (1997)]{kat97} % CN light curve
1240: %Kato, M. 1997, \apjs, 113, 121
1241: %
1242: %\bibitem[Kato (1999)]{kat99rn} % RN light curve
1243: %Kato, M. 1999, \pasj, 51, 525
1244:
1245: \bibitem[Kato \& Hachisu (1994)]{kat94h}
1246: Kato, M., \& Hachisu, I. 1994, \apj, 437, 802
1247:
1248: \bibitem[Kato \& Hachisu (1999)]{kat99}
1249: Kato, M., \& Hachisu, I. 1999, \apj, 513, L41
1250:
1251: \bibitem[Kato \& Hachisu (2003)]{kat03}
1252: Kato, M., \& Hachisu, I. 2003, \apj, 598, L107
1253: %-110 V445 Pup: Helium nova on a massive WD
1254:
1255: \bibitem[Kato \& Hachisu (2004)]{kat04}
1256: Kato, M. \& Hachisu, I. 2004, \apj, 613, L129
1257:
1258: \bibitem[Kato et al. (1989)Kato, Saio, \& Hachisu]{kat89}
1259: Kato, M., Saio, H., \& Hachisu, I. 1989, \apj, 340, 509
1260:
1261: %\bibitem[Kato (2001)]{kat01} Kato, T. 2001, in venet-alert,
1262: %http://www.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp/vsnet/Mail/alert5000/msg00493.html
1263: %
1264:
1265: \bibitem[Kato \& Kanatsu (2000)]{kan00}
1266: Kato, T., \& Kanatsu, K., 2000, IAU Circ. 7552
1267:
1268: %\bibitem[Kawai et al. (1988)]{kaw88}
1269: %Kawai, Y., Saio, H., \& Nomoto, K. 1988, \apj, 328, 207
1270: %-212. Steady state models of white dwarfs accreting helium or
1271: % carbon/oxygen-rich matter
1272:
1273: \bibitem[Kolotilov \& Liberman (1976)]{kol76}
1274: Kolotilov, E. A., \& Liberman, A. A. 1976, Soviet Astron. Lett., 2, 37
1275: %-38. Infrared observations of Nova CYG 1975 II.
1276: % Spectra in the 0.6-1.1 MU range.
1277:
1278: %\bibitem[Krautter et al. (1984)]{kra84}
1279: %Krautter, J. et al. 1984, \aap, 37, 307
1280: %Krautter, J., Beuermann, K., Leitherer, C., Oliva, E., Moorwood, A. F. M.,
1281: %Deul, E., Wargau, W., Klare, G., Kohoutek, L., van Paradijs, J.,
1282: %\& Wolf, B. 1984, \aap, 37, 307
1283: %-326. Observations of Nova MUSCAE 1983 from 1200 A-10 micron
1284: % during its early decline stage
1285:
1286: %\bibitem[Lynch et al. (2001) Lynch, Russell, \& Sitko]{lyn01}
1287: %Lynch, D. K., Russell, R. W., \& Sitko, M. L. 2001, \aj, 122, 3313
1288:
1289: \bibitem[Lynch et al. (2004a) Lynch, Rudy, Mazuk, \& Venturini]{lyn04a}
1290: Lynch, D. K., Rudy, R.J., Mazuk, .S, \& Venturini, C.C.
1291: 2004a, \iaucirc, No. 8278
1292:
1293: \bibitem[Lynch et al. (2004b) Lynch, Rudy, Mazuk, \& Venturini]{lyn04b}
1294: Lynch, D. K., Rudy, R.J., Mazuk, .S, \& Venturini, C.C. 2004b, \aj,
1295: 128, 2962
1296: %-2964 Late appearance of He I in V445 Pup
1297:
1298: \bibitem[Lynch et al. (2005)]{lyn05}
1299: Lynch, D. K., Rudy,R. J., Venturini, C. C., Mazuk, S.,Puetter,
1300: R.C., Perry, R. B., \& Walp, B. 2005, \iaucirc. No. 8642
1301: % V445 Pup IR faded away
1302:
1303: \bibitem[Marion et al. (2001) Marion, H\"oflich, Vacca \& Wheeler]{mar03}
1304: Marion, G.H., H\"oflich, P., Vacca, W.D., \& Wheeler, J.C. 2003, \apj, 591, 316
1305: %-333 Near IR observation of 13 Type Ia SNe: No detection of H, He, and C
1306:
1307: %\bibitem[Masi (2001)]{mas01}
1308: %Masi, G. 2001, \iaucirc, No. 7554
1309:
1310: \bibitem[Mattila et al (2005)]{mat05}
1311: Mattila, S., Lundqvist, P., Sollerman, J.,
1312: Kozma, C., Baron,E., Fransson,C., Leibundgut, B., \& Nomoto, K. 2005, \aap,
1313: 443, 649
1314: %662 VLT spectroscopy of SN 2001el no detection of H, and He
1315:
1316: \bibitem[McGowan et al. (2006)]{mcg06}
1317: McGowan, K. E.,Charles, P. A., Blustin, A. J., Livio, M., O'Donoghue, D.,
1318: \& Heathcote, B. 2006, \mnras, 364, 462
1319: %-474. XMM spectroscopy of the transient supersoft source RXJ0513.9 - 6951:
1320: % probing the dynamic white dwarf photosphere
1321:
1322: %\bibitem[Nomoto (1982)]{nom82}
1323: %Nomoto, K., 1982, \apj, 257, 780
1324: %
1325: %\bibitem[Nomoto \& Kondo (1991)]{nom91}
1326: %Nomoto, K., \& Kondo, Y. 1991, \apj, 367, L19
1327: %
1328: \bibitem[Nomoto et al. (1984)Nomoto, Thielemann, \& Yokoi]{nom84}
1329: Nomoto, K., Thielemann, F., \& Yokoi, K. 1984, \apj, 286, 644
1330: %
1331:
1332: \bibitem[Paczy\'nski (1971)]{pac71}
1333: Paczy\'nski, B. 1971, Acta. Astron., 21, 1
1334:
1335: %\bibitem[Rieke \& Lebofsky (1985)]{rie85}
1336: %Rieke, G. H., \& Lebofsky, M. J. 1985, \apj, 288, 618
1337: %-621, The interstellar extinction law from 1 to 13 microns
1338:
1339: \bibitem[Saio(1995)]{sai95}
1340: Saio, H. 1995, \mnras, 277,1393
1341:
1342: %\bibitem[Schandl et al. (1997)Schandl, Meyer-Hofmeister, \& Meyer]{sch97}
1343: %Schandl, S., Meyer-Hofmeister, E., \& Meyer, F. 1997 \aap, 318, 73
1344: %-80. Visual light from the eclipsing supersoft X-ray source CAL 87.
1345:
1346: \bibitem[Schmidtke \& Cowley (2006)]{sch06}
1347: Schmidtke, P. C. \& Cowley, A. P. 2006, \aj, 131, 600
1348: %-602. X-Ray Pulsations in the Supersoft X-Ray Binary CAL 83
1349:
1350: \bibitem[Shenavrin \& Moroz (1976)]{she76}
1351: Shenavrin, V. I., \& Moroz, V. I. 1976, Soviet Astron. Lett., 2, 39
1352: %-39. Infrared observations of Nova CYG 1975 .
1353: % III. Spectra in the 0.6-2.5 MU range.
1354:
1355: %\bibitem[Solheim \& Yungelson (2005)]{sol05}
1356: %Solheim, J.-E., \& Yungelson, L.,
1357: %R., 2005, in 4th European Workshop on White Dwarfs,
1358: %(San Francisco: ASP), Vol. 334
1359: %Ed. Koester D. \& Moehler, S. p.387
1360:
1361: %\bibitem[Taam (1980)]{tam80}
1362: %Taam, R.E., 1980, \apj, 237, 142
1363:
1364: \bibitem[Webbink et al.(1987)]{web87}
1365: Webbink, R.F., Livio, M., Truran, J.W., \& Orio, M. 1987 \apj, 314, 653
1366:
1367: \bibitem[Woudt \& Steeghs (2005)]{wou05}
1368: Woudt, P.A., \& Steeghs, D. 2005, in ASP Conf. Ser.,
1369: The Astrophysics of Cataclysmic Variables and Related Objects,
1370: ed. J.M. Hameury \& J.P. Laota (San Francisco: ASP), 330, 451
1371:
1372: \bibitem[Woudt (2002)]{wou02}
1373: Woudt, P.A., 2002, \iaucirc, No.7955
1374:
1375: \bibitem[Woudt \& Steeghs (2008)]{wou08}
1376: Woudt, P.A., \& Steeghs, D., 2008, in ASP Conf. Ser.,
1377: Hydrogen-Deficient Stars, Ed. K. Werner, \& T. Rauch
1378: (San Francisco: ASP), in press
1379: %
1380: \end{thebibliography}{}
1381:
1382:
1383:
1384:
1385: %% In this first example, note that the \tabletypesize{}
1386: %% command has been used to reduce the font size of the table.
1387: %% Note also that the \label command needs to be placed
1388: %% inside the \tablecaption.
1389:
1390:
1391: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before
1392: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark
1393: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.
1394:
1395: %% If you use the table environment, please indicate horizontal rules using
1396: %% \tableline, not \hline.
1397: %% Do not put multiple tabular environments within a single table.
1398: %% The optional \label should appear inside the \caption command.
1399:
1400: %% If the table is more than one page long, the width of the table can vary
1401: %% from page to page when the default \tablewidth is used, as below. The
1402: %% individual table widths for each page will be written to the log file; a
1403: %% maximum tablewidth for the table can be computed from these values.
1404: %% The \tablewidth argument can then be reset and the file reprocessed, so
1405: %% that the table is of uniform width throughout. Try getting the widths
1406: %% from the log file and changing the \tablewidth parameter to see how
1407: %% adjusting this value affects table formatting.
1408:
1409: %% In this example, we have used the optional * argument to \\ to
1410: %% instruct LaTeX to keep rows together on the same page. (See the
1411: %% lines following the \cutinhead.) Using \\* to group together table
1412: %% rows on the same page affects how the table breaks. Try taking
1413: %% the *'s out and LaTeXing again to see the difference.
1414:
1415: %% You can append references to a table using the \tablerefs command.
1416:
1417: %% Tables may also be prepared as separate files. See the accompanying
1418: %% sample file table.tex for an example of an external table file.
1419: %% To include an external file in your main document, use the \input
1420: %% command. Uncomment the line below to include table.tex in this
1421: %% sample file. (Note that you will need to comment out the \documentclass,
1422: %% \begin{document}, and \end{document} commands from table.tex if you want
1423: %% to include it in this document.)
1424:
1425:
1426: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
1427: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
1428:
1429: %% If you are not including electronic art with your submission, you may
1430: %% mark up your captions using the \figcaption command. See the
1431: %% User Guide for details.
1432: %%
1433: %% No more than seven \figcaption commands are allowed per page,
1434: %% so if you have more than seven captions, insert a \clearpage
1435: %% after every seventh one.
1436:
1437:
1438: %% Tables should be submitted one per page, so put a \clearpage before
1439: %% each one.
1440:
1441: %% Two options are available to the author for producing tables: the
1442: %% deluxetable environment provided by the AASTeX package or the LaTeX
1443: %% table environment. Use of deluxetable is preferred.
1444: %%
1445:
1446: %% Three table samples follow, two marked up in the deluxetable environment,
1447: %% one marked up as a LaTeX table.
1448:
1449:
1450: %Table 1
1451:
1452:
1453: %Table 2
1454:
1455:
1456:
1457:
1458:
1459: %Fig.1
1460:
1461:
1462: %Fig.2
1463:
1464:
1465: %Fig.3
1466:
1467:
1468: %Fig.4
1469:
1470:
1471: %Fig.5
1472:
1473:
1474: %Fig.6
1475:
1476:
1477: %Fig.7
1478:
1479:
1480: %Fig.8
1481:
1482:
1483: %% The following command ends your manuscript. LaTeX will ignore any text
1484: %% that appears after it.
1485:
1486: \end{document}
1487:
1488:
1489: