1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \shorttitle{VLA and VLBA Observations of the $z=6.12$ QSO J1427+3312}
4: \shortauthors{Momjian et al.}
5:
6: \begin{document}
7:
8: \title{VLA and VLBA Observations of the Highest Redshift Radio-Loud QSO J1427+3312 at $z = 6.12$}
9:
10: \author{Emmanuel Momjian\altaffilmark{1}}
11: \affil{NAIC, Arecibo Observatory, HC 3, Box 53995, Arecibo, PR 00612}
12: \email{emomjian@naic.edu}
13:
14: \author{Christopher L. Carilli}
15: \affil{National Radio Astronomy Observatory, P. O. Box O, Socorro, NM, 87801}
16: \email{ccarilli@nrao.edu}
17:
18: \author{Ian D. McGreer}
19: \affil{Department of Astronomy, Columbia University, 550 West 120th Street, New York, NY 10027}
20: \email{mcgreer@astro.columbia.edu}
21:
22: \altaffiltext{1}{now at: National Radio Astronomy Observatory, P. O. Box O, Socorro, NM, 87801, emomjian@nrao.edu}
23: \begin{abstract}
24:
25: We present 8.4~GHz VLA A-array and 1.4~GHz VLBA results on the radio continuum
26: emission from the highest redshift radio-loud quasar known to date, the $z=6.12$ QSO J1427+3312.
27: The VLA observations show an unresolved steep spectrum source with a flux density of
28: $250 \pm 20$~${\mu}$Jy at 8.4~GHz and a spectral index value of $\alpha^{8.4}_{1.4}=-1.1$.
29: The 1.4~GHz VLBA images reveal several continuum components with a total flux density of
30: $1.778 \pm 0.109$~mJy, which is consistent with the flux density measured with the VLA at 1.4~GHz.
31: Each of these components is resolved with sizes of a few milliarcseconds, and intrinsic brightness
32: temperatures on the order of $10^7$ to $10^8$~K. The physical characteristics as revealed in these
33: observations suggest that this QSO may be a Compact Symmetric Object, with the two dominant components
34: seen with the VLBA, which are separated by 31 mas (174 pc) and have intrinsic sizes of $\sim 22-34$pc,
35: being the two radio lobes that
36: are confined by the dense ISM. If indeed a CSO, then the estimated kinematic age of this radio AGN
37: is only $10^3$ yr.
38:
39:
40: \end{abstract}
41:
42: \keywords{galaxies: individual (J1427+3312) --- galaxies: active ---
43: galaxies: high-redshift --- radio continuum: galaxies --- techniques: interferometric}
44:
45: \section{INTRODUCTION}
46:
47: Optical surveys such as the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS; \citet{YOR00})
48: and the Digitized Palomar Sky Survey \citep{DJO99} have revealed large samples
49: of quasi-stellar objects out to $z \sim 6$. Studies by \citet{FAN02,FCK06}
50: have shown that at such a high redshift we are approaching the epoch of
51: reionization, the edge of the ``dark ages'', when the first stars and massive
52: black holes were formed.
53: Eddington limit arguments suggests that
54: the supermassive black holes at the center of these QSOs are on the order of
55: $10^9~M{_\odot}$. If the correlation between bulge and black hole masses \citep{GEB00,FEME00,KU07}
56: also holds at these high redshifts, then these sources have associated spheroids
57: with masses on the order of $\sim 10^{12}~M_\odot$. It is challenging to explain the formation
58: of such massive structures in relatively short timescales {($<$~1~Gyr; e.g. \citet{LI07})}.
59: \citet{WL02} estimate that almost one third of known quasars at $z\sim6$
60: ought to be lensed by galaxies along the line of sight. If these quasars are indeed
61: gravitationally lensed, the estimated masses of their associated spheroids could be smaller
62: by up to an order of magnitude; this would allow a less efficient assembly process. However,
63: \citet{KU07} derived black hole masses in a sample of $z\sim6$ quasars using
64: the widths of the Mg {\footnotesize II} and C {\footnotesize IV} lines.
65: The resulting mass values were comparable and in agreement with those derived by assuming
66: that the quasars emit at their Eddington luminosity, implying that the
67: quasars are not likely to be strongly lensed \citep{KU07}.
68:
69: High resolution radio observations of high-redshift radio-loud quasars
70: can be used to test for strong gravitational lensing by looking for
71: multiple imaging on scales from tens of milliarcseconds (mas) to
72: arcseconds. Also, Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) observations of
73: core-jet radio sources in
74: quasars over a large range in redshift have been used to constrain the
75: cosmic geometry, under the assumption that such sources are (roughly)
76: `standard rulers' \citep{GKF99}. In general, the high resolution of the VLBI
77: observations permit a more detailed look at the physical structures in the most
78: distant cosmic sources on scales unreachable with any other technique (mas).
79:
80: To date, several radio-quiet and radio-loud quasars with redshifts $z > 4$
81: have been imaged using
82: VLBI \citep{FRE97,FRE03,MOM04,MOM05,MOM07}. Of these, only two
83: were radio-loud quasars at redshifts $z > 5$, namely J0913$+$5919 at
84: $z=5.11$ \citep{MOM04}, and J0836$+$0054
85: at $z=5.82$ \citep{FRE03}.
86: Furthermore, and until recently, all known $z > 6$ QSOs were radio-quiet. However,
87: \citet{MCG06} reported the discovery of the first radio-loud QSO at a
88: redshift greater than 6, namely the QSO J1427+3312 at $z=6.12$, by
89: matching VLA's FIRST survey \citep{BWH95} with the NOAO Deep
90: Wide Field Survey (NDWFS; \citet{JD99}) and the FLAMINGOS
91: EXtragalactic Survey (FLAMEX; \citet{ELS06}).
92:
93: In this paper we present 8.4~GHz Very Large Array (VLA) and 1.4~GHz Very Long Baseline
94: Array (VLBA)
95: observations of the highest redshift radio-loud quasar known to date, J1427+3312 at $z=6.12$.
96: At the redshift of the source, observing frequencies of 1.4 and 8.4~GHz correspond to rest frequencies of 10 and 60~GHz, respectively.
97:
98: The source J1427+3312 is classified as a Broad Absorption Line Quasar
99: (BALQSO; \citet{MCG06}), and has a radio flux density of
100: 1.73~mJy at 1.4 GHz \citep{BWH95}.
101: This QSO is not detected in the {\it Chandra} XBo\"{o}tes survey \citep{MUR05}, implying
102: an upper limit in the 0.5-7 KeV band of $4 \times 10^{-15}$~erg~cm$^{-1}$~s$^{-1}$.
103:
104: Spectra obtained with the Keck II telescope reveal two strong Mg II absorption systems, one
105: at $z=2.1804$ and another at $z=2.1997$ \citep{MCG06}. The
106: presence of these absorption systems in the line-of-sight raises the
107: possibility that the QSO is being gravitationally lensed.
108:
109:
110: Throughout this paper, we assume a flat cosmological model with
111: $\Omega_{m}=0.3$, $\Omega_\Lambda=0.7$, and
112: ${H_{0}=71}$~km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$. In this model, at the distance of J1427+3312,
113: 1~mas corresponds to 5.6~pc.
114:
115: \section{OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION}
116:
117:
118: \subsection{VLA Observations}
119: The QSO J1427+3312 was observed with the Very Large Array (VLA) of the
120: NRAO\footnote{The National Radio Astronomy
121: Observatory is a facility of the National Science Foundation operated under
122: cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc.} in A configuration on
123: 2007 July 9. The frequency of the observations was 8.4~GHz and the total bandwidth was
124: 100~MHz in both right and left-hand circular polarizations.
125: The source 3C286 was used as the primary flux calibrator, and J1416+3444 as the phase calibrator.
126: The total time was 6 hours with 23 antennas participating in the observations.
127: The VLA data was reduced using standard Astronomical Image
128: Processing System (AIPS) routines.
129: Table~1 summarizes the parameters of the VLA observations.
130:
131: \subsection{VLBA Observations}
132: The VLBI observations of J1427+3312 were carried out at 1.4~GHz on 2007 June 11 and 12,
133: using the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA)
134: of the NRAO. Eight adjacent 8~MHz
135: baseband channel pairs were used in the observations, both with right and
136: left-hand circular polarizations, and sampled at two bits. The data were
137: correlated at the VLBA correlator in Socorro, NM, with 2~s correlator
138: integration time. The total observing time was 12~hr.
139: Table~2 summarizes the parameters of the VLBA observations.
140:
141: The VLBA observations employed nodding-style phase referencing, using the calibrator
142: J1422+3223 ($S_{\rm 1.4~GHz}=0.4$~Jy), with a cycle time of 4~min, 3~min on the
143: target source and 1~min
144: on the calibrator. The angular separation between the target source and the phase
145: calibrator is $1.4^{\circ}$.
146: A number of test cycles were also included to monitor the
147: coherence of the phase referencing. These tests involved switching between two
148: calibrators, the phase calibrator J1422+3223 and the phase-check calibrator
149: J1416+3444 ($S_{\rm 1.4~GHz}=1.9$~Jy), using a similar cycle time to that used for
150: the target source. The angular separation between the phase calibrator and the
151: phase-check calibrator is $2.7^{\circ}$.
152:
153: The accuracy of the phase calibrator position is important in phase-referencing
154: observations \citep {WAL99}, as this determines the accuracy of the absolute
155: position of the target source and any associated components. Phase referencing,
156: as used here, is known to preserve absolute astrometric positions to better
157: than $\pm 0\rlap{.}^{''}01$ \citep{FOM99}.
158:
159: Data reduction and analysis were performed using AIPS of the NRAO.
160: After applying {\it a priori} flagging, amplitude
161: calibration was performed using measurements of the antenna gain and system
162: temperature for each station. Ionospheric corrections were applied using the
163: AIPS task ``TECOR''. The phase calibrator J1422+3223 was self-calibrated in
164: both phase and amplitude and imaged in an iterative cycle.
165:
166: Images of the phase-check calibrator, J1416+3444, were deconvolved using two
167: different approaches: (a) by applying the phase and the amplitude
168: self-calibration solutions of the phase reference source J1422+3223
169: (Figure~1{\it{a}}), and (b) by self calibrating J1416+3444 itself, in both
170: phase and amplitude (Figure~1{\it{b}}). The peak surface brightness ratio of
171: the final images from the two approaches gives a measure of the effect of
172: residual phase errors after phase referencing, i.e., `the coherence' due to
173: phase referencing \citep{MV95}. At all times, the coherence was found to be better than
174: 99\%.
175:
176: The self-calibration solutions of the phase calibrator, J1422+3223 (Fig.~2), were
177: applied on the target source, J1427+3312, which was then deconvolved and imaged.
178:
179: \section{RESULTS \& ANALYSIS}
180:
181: Figure~3 is a uniformly weighted image of the $z=6.12$ QSO J1427+3312 obtained with the
182: VLA A-array at 8.4~GHz and 0$\rlap{.}^{''}$19 (1.1~kpc) resolution. The
183: detected radio source is unresolved and the measured total flux density is $250 \pm 20$~${\mu}$Jy.
184: No other continuum features were found on scales of several arcseconds.
185:
186: Comparing the 8.4~GHz flux density with previous 1.4 GHz measurements \citep{BWH95,CP99}
187: shows that this QSO is a steep spectrum source with a spectral index of $\alpha^{8.4}_{1.4}=-1.1$.
188:
189: Figure~4 is a naturally weighted image of the target source at the full resolution of the
190: VLBA, which is
191: $11.6 \times 7.8$~mas ($65 \times 42$~pc, PA=$2^{\circ}$). The rms noise level in this image is
192: $28~\mu$Jy~beam$^{-1}$.
193:
194: Table~3 lists the Gaussian fitting parameters of the compact
195: continuum sources seen in the VLBA image (Fig.~4) derived using the
196: AIPS task JMFIT. Gaussian components provide a convenient parameterization of source
197: structure even if they do not necessarily represent discrete physical structures.
198: Columns (2) and (3) are the coordinates of the sources, and column (4)
199: is the relative positions of the these sources with respect to the strongest component.
200: Column (5) lists the surface
201: brightnesses of these sources, and column (6) their
202: integrated flux densities. Column (7) gives the nominal deconvolved
203: sizes of the Gaussian components at FWHM as given by JMFIT, and
204: column 8 lists the position angles of the fitted Gaussians.
205: The corresponding intrinsic brightness temperatures of these compact sources are on
206: the order of $10^7$ to $10^8$~K, and are listed in column 9.
207:
208: Based on the VLBA results, the source is composed of two dominant
209: structures separated by $\sim 31$~mas. The stronger of these is consistent with two
210: Gaussians (components 1 and 3 in Table~3), while the second dominant source is represented by one
211: Gaussian (component 2 in Table~3). Including a possible faint component to the
212: east (component 4 in Table~3), gives a total flux density of $1.778 \pm
213: 0.109$~mJy. This value is consistent with the $1.73 \pm 0.13$~mJy obtained with the VLA FIRST
214: survey \citep{BWH95}, and with the $1.816 \pm 0.021$~mJy obtained with the VLA ELAIS survey
215: \citep{CP99}.
216: The 1.4 GHz flux densities measured with the VLA in 1995 and
217: 1997 \citep{BWH95,CP99} and the VLBA in 2007 (this paper) are equal to better than 5\%,
218: implying that this source is not highly variable on time scales of years.
219:
220: We have also synthesized larger images ($2'' \times 2''$) using the VLBA and found no
221: other radio components at $\ge 5\sigma$ level ($140~\mu$Jy~beam$^{-1}$) in the field
222: other than those seen in Figure~4 and listed in Table~3.
223:
224: \section{DISCUSSION}
225:
226: We have detected the $z=6.12$ QSO J1427+3312 at 8.4~GHz with the VLA A-array and at 1.4~GHz
227: with the VLBA. The source is unresolved as seen in the 8.4~GHz VLA results, and has a steep
228: spectrum with a spectral index value of $\alpha^{8.4}_{1.4}=-1.1$.
229:
230: At mas resolution, the VLBA
231: observations show that this QSO is comprised of two dominant continuum components
232: separated by 31 mas (174 pc; Table~3) with a flux density ratio of $\sim 3:1$.
233: The Gaussian fitting suggests that both components are resolved with sizes of $\sim 4-6$~mas
234: ($22-34$~pc).
235:
236: The physical properties observed in this source suggest that this high-$z$ QSO could be
237: a Compact Symmetric Object (CSO) with two distinct, steep spectra, radio lobes that are confined by
238: a dense ISM in the host galaxy \citep{CO02}.
239: CSOs are radio sources that have sizes on scales of 1~pc to 1~kpc, and are
240: thought to be very young ($\leq 10^4$~yr; \citet{RTXPWP96,OC98}). Moreover, because CSOs are highly confined
241: sources, they are thought to have higher
242: conversion efficiency of jet kinetic energy to radio luminosity.
243:
244: For J1427+3312, the radio lobes would be the two dominant components seen in the 1.4~GHz
245: VLBA results, which are separated by 174~pc.
246: In this model, the core, which would have an inverted or flat spectrum \citep{TRP96},
247: would be faint and below our detection threshold. In CSOs, any radio component that is
248: coincident with the central engine is comparatively weak, with flux densities of only a few
249: percent of the total flux density \citep{RTXPWP96}.
250:
251: Classifying this source as a CSO, where the radio lobes are confined by a dense ambient medium,
252: is also consistent with its being a BALQSO \citep{MCG06}. This is in agreement with recent X-ray observations
253: which suggest that the presence of massive, highly ionized, and high-velocity outflows in BALQSOs may be providing
254: significant feedback to the surrounding gas \citep{CH07}.
255: In general, the higher average gas densities expected in the earliest galaxies might lead
256: to a higher fraction of CSO sources.
257:
258: Multi-epoch and multi-frequency VLBI observations carried out by \citet{TMPR00} on three
259: CSOs have shown typical advance speeds of $\sim 0.3c$. Adopting this value for J1427+3312,
260: and assuming equal speeds for the two radio lobes, we derive a kinematic age of $\sim 10^3$~yr,
261: indicating that the $z=6.12$ QSO is a very young radio source.
262:
263: With overwhelming majority of CSOs ($\geq$ 80\%) showing HI 21~cm absorption lines with optical depth
264: levels between 4\% and 40\% and line widths ranging between about 50 and 500~km~s$^{-1}$
265: \citep{PECK00}, the $z=6.12$ QSO J1427+3312, which is believed to be near the Epoch of Reionization,
266: would be an excellent candidate for HI absorption experiments to detect the
267: neutral IGM in its host galaxy \citep{FL02}.
268: Such a search is currently underway using the
269: Giant Meterwave Radio Telescope (GMRT). Knowledge of source
270: structure, as presented herein, is critical for both identifying
271: potential candidates for HI 21~cm absorption searches and for
272: subsequent interpretation of the results.
273:
274: The high resolution radio imaging presented here sets constraints on the hypothesis that
275: J1427+3312 has undergone strong gravitational lensing resulting in multiple images.
276: The VLA 8.4~GHz imaging rules out multiple images separated by $ > 0\rlap{.}^{''}2$ and with a
277: flux ratio $< 8:1$. The VLBA 1.4~GHz imaging sets similar constraints down to the mas scale.
278: The expected lensing system for a $z \sim 6$ quasar is a singular isothermal ellipsoid (SIE),
279: with image pairs having separations $\lesssim 1''$ and flux ratios $< 10:1$
280: \citep{TOG84}. The typical lens system
281: is thus ruled out, and only a high magnification or small separation lensing
282: event is allowed by the images obtained from these radio observations.
283:
284: On the other hand, the possible faint component in the VLBA image to the east (component 4)
285: has a separation of $\sim 0\rlap{.}^{''}1$
286: from the strongest component and a flux ratio of $\sim 7:1$. While it is highly unlikely
287: that an SIE lens would result in such a small image separation, lensing by a spiral galaxy might.
288: However, spirals are expected to contribute only 10\%$-$20\% of gravitational lenses
289: \citep{TOG84,KK98}, and $< 5\%$ of spiral lenses would produce image separations
290: $\sim 0\rlap{.}^{''}1$ \citep{BL98}. Thus the a priori likelihood that components
291: 4 and 1 represent a lensed image pair is quite low. Future sensitive VLBI observations
292: at multiple frequencies are needed to measure the spectral energy distribution of the
293: various components seen in the VLBA image and determine whether they have identical
294: physical characteristics.
295:
296: We also cannot rule out that the continuum features seen in this QSO are core-jet
297: structures. The above mentioned sensitive VLBI observations will be able to address this
298: possibility as well. Furthermore, multi epoch VLBI observations can lead to determine
299: the proper motion of the components seen in J1427+3312, and provide a more accurate
300: estimate of the advance speeds of the radio lobes and the kinematic age of the source,
301: assuming that this $z=6.12$ is indeed a CSO, or the proper motion of the jet with
302: respect to the core, if the continuum VLBA results were of core-jet structures.
303:
304:
305: \section{ACKNOWLEDGMENTS}
306:
307: The Arecibo Observatory is part
308: of the National Astronomy and Ionosphere Center, which is operated by Cornell
309: University under a cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.
310: C.~L.~C. acknowledges support from the Max-Planck Society
311: and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation through the Max-Planck
312: Forshungspreise 2005.
313:
314:
315: \begin{thebibliography}{}
316: \bibitem[Bartelmann \& Loeb(1998)]{BL98}Bartelmann, M., \&
317: Loeb, A.\ 1998, \apj, 503, 48
318: \bibitem[Becker, White, \& Helfand(1995)]{BWH95}Becker R. H., White, R. L.,
319: \& Helfand, D. J. 1995, \apj, 450, 559
320: \bibitem[Chartas et al.(2007)]{CH07}Chartas, G., Brandt, W. N., Gallagher, S. C., \& Proga, D. 2007, \apj, 133, 1849
321: \bibitem[Ciliegi et al.(1999)]{CP99}Ciliegi, P., et al. 1999, \mnras, 302, 222
322: \bibitem[Conway(2002)]{CO02}Conway, J. 2002, NewA Rev., 46, 263
323: \bibitem[Djorgovski et al.(1999)]{DJO99}Djorgovski, S.G. et al. 1999, in {\sl
324: Wide Field Surveys in Cosmology}, ed. S. Colombi \& Y. Mellier, (Paris:
325: Editions Frontiers), 89
326: \bibitem[Elston et al.(2006)]{ELS06}Elston, R. J., et al. 2006, \apj, 639, 816
327: \bibitem[Fan et al.(2002)]{FAN02}Fan, X., Narayanan, V. K., Strauss, M. A.,
328: White, R. L., Becker, R.H., Penericci, L., \& Rix, H.-W. 2002, \aj, 123, 1247
329: \bibitem[Fan et al.(2006)]{FCK06}Fan, X., Carilli, C. L., \&
330: Keating, B. 2006, \araa, 44, 415
331: \bibitem[Ferrarese \& Merritt(2000)]{FEME00}Ferrarese, L., \& Merritt, D. 2000, \apjl, 539, L9
332: \bibitem[Fomalont(1999)]{FOM99}Fomalont, E. B. 1999, in Synthesis Imaging in
333: Radio Astronomy II, ed. G. B. Taylor, C. L. Carilli, \& R. A. Perley (San
334: Francisco: ASP), 301
335: \bibitem[Frey et al.(1997)]{FRE97}Frey, S., Gurvits, L. I., Kellermann, K. I.,
336: Schilizzi, R. T., \& Pauliny-Toth, I. I. K. 1997, \aap, 325, 511
337: \bibitem[Frey et al.(2003)]{FRE03}Frey, S., Mosoni, L., Paragi, Z., \& Gurvits,
338: L. I. 2003, \mnras, 343, L20
339: \bibitem[Furlanetto \& Loeb(2002)]{FL02}Furlanetto, S., \& Loeb, A. 2002, \apj, 579, 1
340: \bibitem[Gebhardt et al.(2000)]{GEB00}Gebhardt, K., et al. 2000, \apjl, 539, L13
341: \bibitem[Gurvits, Kellermann, \& Frey(1999)]{GKF99} Gurvits, L. I., Kellermann, K. I., \& Frey, S. 1999, A\& A, 342, 378
342: \bibitem[Jannuzi \& Dey(1999)]{JD99}Jannuzi, B. T., \& Dey, A. 1999, in ASP Conf. Ser. 191,
343: Photometric Redshifts and the Detection of High Redshift Galaxies, ed. R. Weymann et al. (San Francisco: ASP), 111
344: \bibitem[Keeton \& Kochanek(1998)]{KK98} Keeton, C. R., \&
345: Kochanek, C. S. 1998, \apj, 495, 157
346: \bibitem[Kurk et al.(2007)]{KU07}Kurk, J. D., et al. 2007, \apj, 669, 32
347: \bibitem[Li et al.(2007)]{LI07}Li, Y., et al. 2007, \apj, 665, 187
348: \bibitem[McGreer et al.(2006)]{MCG06}McGreer, I. D., Becker, R. H., Helfand, D. J.,
349: \& White, R. L. 2006, \apj, 652, 157
350: \bibitem[Momjian et al.(2004)]{MOM04}Momjian, E., Petric, A. O., \&
351: Carilli, C. L. 2004, \aj, 127, 587
352: \bibitem[Momjian et al.(2005)]{MOM05}Momjian, E., Carilli, C. L.,
353: Petric, A. O. 2005, \aj, 129, 1809
354: \bibitem[Momjian et al.(2007)]{MOM07}Momjian, E., Carilli, C. L., Riechers, D., \&
355: Walter, F., 2007, \aj, 134, 694.
356: \bibitem[Moran \& Dhawan(1995)]{MV95}
357: Moran J. M., \& Dhawan , V. 1995, in Very Long Baseline Interferometry and the
358: VLBA, eds. J. A. Zensus, P. J. Diamond, and P.J. Napier (San Francisco: ASP), 161
359: \bibitem[Murray et al.(2005)]{MUR05}Murray, S. S., et al. 2005, \apjs, 161, 1
360: \bibitem[Owsianik \& Conway(1998)]{OC98}Owsianik, I., \& Conway, J. E. 1998, \aap, 337, 69
361: \bibitem[Peck et al.(2000)]{PECK00}Peck, A. B., Taylor, G. B., Fassnacht, C. D.,
362: Readhead, A. C. S., \& Vermeulen, R. C. 2000, \apj, 534, 104
363: \bibitem[Readhead et al.(1996)]{RTXPWP96}Readhead, A. C. S., Taylor, G. B., Xu, W.,
364: Pearson, T. J., Wilkinson, P. N., \& Polatidis, A. G. 1996, \apj, 460, 612
365: \bibitem[Taylor, Readhead, \& Pearson(1996)]{TRP96}Taylor, G. B., Readhead, A. C. S., \&
366: Pearson, T. J. 1996, \apj, 463, 95
367: \bibitem[Taylor et al.(2000)]{TMPR00}Taylor, G. B., Marr, J. M., Pearson, T. J.,
368: \& Readhead, A. C. S. 2000, \apj, 541, 112
369: \bibitem[Turner et al.(1984)]{TOG84} Turner, E. L., Ostriker,
370: J. P., \& Gott, J. R., III 1984, \apj, 284, 1
371: \bibitem[Walker(1999)]{WAL99}Walker, C. R. 1999, in Synthesis Imaging in Radio
372: Astronomy II, ed. G.B. Taylor, C. L. Carilli, \& R. A. Perley (San Francisco:
373: ASP), 433
374: \bibitem[Wyithe \& Loeb(2002)]{WL02}Wyithe, J. S. \& Loeb, A. 2002, \nat, 417, 923
375: \bibitem[York et al.(2000)]{YOR00}York, D. G., et al. 2000, \aj, 120, 1579
376: \end{thebibliography}
377:
378: \begin{figure}
379: \epsscale{0.7}
380: \plotone{f1.ps}
381: \figcaption{VLBA continuum images of the phase-check
382: calibrator J1416+3444 at 1.4~GHz: a) obtained by applying the phase
383: and the amplitude self-calibration solutions of the phase reference
384: source J1422+3223, b) obtained by self calibrating J1416+3444
385: itself, in both phase and amplitude. The restoring beam size in both
386: images is $10.9 \times 7.8$~mas in position angle $3^{\circ}$. The
387: contour levels are at $-3$, 3, 6, 12, $\ldots$, 92 times the rms
388: noise level in the phase-referenced image (a), which is
389: 7.1~mJy~beam$^{-1}$. The gray-scale range is indicated by the step
390: wedge at the right side of each image.
391: \label{f1}}
392: \end{figure}
393:
394: \begin{figure}
395: \epsscale{1}
396: \plotone{f2.ps}
397: \figcaption{VLBA continuum image of the phase
398: calibrator J1422+3223 at 1.4~GHz.
399: The restoring beam size is $11.9 \times 8.0$~mas in position angle $5^{\circ}$. The
400: contour levels are at $-3$, 3, 6, 12, $\ldots$, 6144 times the rms
401: noise level, which is
402: 54~$\mu$Jy~beam$^{-1}$. The gray-scale range is indicated by the step
403: wedge at the right side of the image.
404: \label{f2}}
405: \end{figure}
406:
407:
408: \begin{figure}
409: \epsscale{1}
410: \plotone{f3.ps}
411: \figcaption{Uniformly weighted VLA A-array continuum image of the $z=6.12$ QSO J1427+3312
412: at 8.4~GHz.
413: The restoring beam size is $192 \times 188$~mas in position angle $-51^{\circ}$.
414: The contour levels are at $-2$, 2, 4, 8, 16 times the rms
415: noise level, which is 12.3~$\mu$Jy~beam$^{-1}$. The gray-scale range is indicated by the step
416: wedge at the right side of the image.
417: \label{f3}}
418: \end{figure}
419:
420: \clearpage
421: \begin{figure}
422: \epsscale{1}
423: \plotone{f4.ps}
424: \figcaption{Naturally weighted VLBA continuum
425: image of the $z=6.12$ QSO J1427+3312 at 1.4~GHz and $11.6 \times
426: 7.8$~mas resolution (P.~A.=$2^{\circ}$). The peak flux density is
427: 953~$\mu$Jy~beam$^{-1}$, and the contour levels are at $-3$, 3, 6, 12, 24
428: times the rms noise level, which is
429: 28~$\mu$Jy~beam$^{-1}$. The gray-scale range is indicated by the
430: step wedge at the right side of the image.
431: The reference point (0, 0)
432: is $\alpha(\rm{J2000.0})= 14^{\rm h}27^{\rm m}38\rlap{.}^{\rm s}5858$,
433: $\delta(\rm{J2000.0})=+33^{\circ}12^{'}41\rlap{.}^{''}927$.
434: \label{f4}}
435: \end{figure}
436:
437: \clearpage
438:
439: \begin{deluxetable}{lc}
440: \tablenum{1}
441: \tablecolumns{6}\tablewidth{0pc}
442: \tablecaption{P{\footnotesize ARAMETERS} {\footnotesize OF THE} VLA
443: O{\footnotesize BSERVATIONS} {\footnotesize OF} J1427+3312}
444: \tablehead{\colhead{Parameters} & \colhead{Values}}
445: \startdata
446: Observing Date \dotfill & 2007 July 9 \\
447: Total observing time (hr)\dotfill & 6 \\
448: Primary flux calibrator\dotfill & 3C286 \\
449: Phase calibrator\dotfill & J1416+3444 \\
450: Frequency (GHz)\dotfill & 8.4 \\
451: Total bandwidth (MHz)\dotfill & 100 \\
452: Theoretical noise level ($\mu$Jy~beam$^-1$)\dotfill & 9\tablenotemark{a}\\
453: Image R.M.S. noise level ($\mu$Jy~beam$^-1$)\dotfill & 12\\
454: \enddata
455: \tablenotetext{a}{Assumes natural weighting.}
456: \end{deluxetable}
457:
458: \clearpage
459: \begin{deluxetable}{lc}
460: \tablenum{2}
461: \tablecolumns{6}\tablewidth{0pc}
462: \tablecaption{P{\footnotesize ARAMETERS} {\footnotesize OF THE} VLBA
463: O{\footnotesize BSERVATIONS} {\footnotesize OF} J1427+3312}
464: \tablehead{\colhead{Parameters} & \colhead{Values}}
465: \startdata
466: Observing Dates \dotfill & 2007 June 11 \& 12 \\
467: Total observing time (hr)\dotfill & 12 \\
468: Phase calibrator\dotfill & J1422+3223 \\
469: Phase-referencing cycle time (min)\dotfill & 4 \\
470: Frequency (GHz)\dotfill & 1.4 \\
471: Total bandwidth (MHz)\dotfill & 64\\
472: Theoretical noise level ($\mu$Jy~beam$^-1$)\dotfill & 24\tablenotemark{a}\\
473: Image R.M.S. noise level ($\mu$Jy~beam$^-1$) & 28\\
474: \enddata
475: \tablenotetext{a}{Assumes natural weighting.}
476: \end{deluxetable}
477:
478: \clearpage
479: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccccc}
480: \rotate
481: \tablenum{3}
482: \tablecolumns{8}
483: \tablewidth{0pc}
484: \tablecaption{G{\footnotesize AUSIAN} F{\footnotesize ITTING} P{\footnotesize ARAMETERS}
485: {\footnotesize OF THE} C{\footnotesize ONTINUUM} F{\footnotesize EATURES} {\footnotesize IN}
486: F{\footnotesize IGURE} 4}
487: \tablehead{
488: \colhead{Source}
489: & \colhead{R.~A.~(J2000)}
490: & \colhead{Decl.~(J2000)}
491: & \colhead{Relative Position\tablenotemark{a}}
492: & \colhead{Peak\tablenotemark{b}}
493: & \colhead{Total}
494: & \colhead{Deconvolved Size\tablenotemark{c}}
495: & \colhead{P.A.}
496: & \colhead{$T_{\rm b} \times 10^{7}$ } \\
497: \colhead{}
498: & \colhead{}
499: & \colhead{}
500: & \colhead{(mas)}
501: & \colhead{(mJy~beam$^{-1}$)}
502: & \colhead{(mJy)}
503: & \colhead{(mas)}
504: & \colhead{($^{\circ}$)}
505: & \colhead{(K)} \\
506: \colhead{(1)}
507: & \colhead{(2)}
508: & \colhead{(3)}
509: & \colhead{(4)}
510: & \colhead{(5)}
511: & \colhead{(6)}
512: & \colhead{(7)}
513: & \colhead{(8)}
514: & \colhead{(9)}}
515: \startdata
516: 1\dotfill
517: & $14^{\rm h} 27^{\rm m} 38\rlap{.}^{\rm s} 5857$
518: & $+33^{\circ} 12' 41\rlap{.}'' 928$
519: & 0, 0
520: & $0.958 \pm 0.028$
521: & $1.089 \pm 0.053$
522: & $4.5~\times 2.7 $
523: & 173
524: & 38.6 \\
525: 2\dotfill
526: & $14^{\rm h} 27^{\rm m} 38\rlap{.}^{\rm s} 5850$
527: & $+33^{\circ} 12' 41\rlap{.}'' 899$
528: & 8.8W, 29S
529: & $0.262 \pm 0.028$
530: & $0.343 \pm 0.058$
531: & $7.3~\times 3.8 $
532: & 175
533: & 5.3 \\
534: 3\dotfill
535: & $14^{\rm h} 27^{\rm m} 38\rlap{.}^{\rm s} 5866$
536: & $+33^{\circ} 12' 41\rlap{.}'' 927$
537: & 11.3E, 1S
538: & $0.162 \pm 0.028$
539: & $0.168 \pm 0.050$
540: & $2.2 \times 1.5 $
541: & 2
542: & 21.9 \\
543: 4\dotfill
544: & $14^{\rm h} 27^{\rm m} 38\rlap{.}^{\rm s} 5933$
545: & $+33^{\circ} 12' 41\rlap{.}'' 918$
546: & 95.4E, 10S
547: & $0.143 \pm 0.028$
548: & $0.178 \pm 0.056$
549: & $6.0~\times 2.3 $
550: & 56
551: & 4.4 \\
552: \enddata
553: \tablenotetext{a}{With respect to source 1.}
554: \tablenotetext{b}{Higher than $5\sigma=140\mu$Jy~beam$^{-1}$.}
555: \tablenotetext{c}{At half maximum.}
556: \end{deluxetable}
557:
558: \end{document}
559:
560: