1: \section{BS wave functions of the O(3) $\sigma$--model}

2: 

3: In this section we will give a quantitative discussion of 

4: BS wave functions and their associated potentials in the O(3)

5: non--linear sigma model in two dimensions. 

6: The O($n$) sigma model has long served as a favorite laboratory 

7: for testing ideas concerning asymptotically free theories 

8: \cite{Wolff90,HasMagNie,HasNie,LuWo,JanosMax}.

9: Unfortunately there is in this case

10: no exact expression known for correlation functions of any local operators. 

11: However for the case $n=3$ the 

12: multi--particle form factors (FF) (defined in Eq.~(\ref{sigFF})) 

13: can be obtained recursively (although they become extremely complicated

14: for higher particle states), and so one can often obtain excellent

15: approximations to correlation functions in a wide range of energies

16: by saturation with a low number of intermediate states. 

17: 

18: The spectrum is considered to contain an O($n$) vector multiplet of

19: particles of mass $M$ and to have no bound states.

20: The two-particle S--matrix established by Zamolodchikov and  

21: Zamolodchikov \cite{ZZ} is given by:

22: \be

23: S_{ab;cd}(\beta)=\sum_{I=0}^2 S_I(\beta)P_I(ab|cd)\,,

24: \label{Smatrix}

25: \end{equation}

26: where $\beta$ is the rapidity difference of the incoming particles

27: and $P_I$ are ``isospin" projectors given by

28: \footnote{Note

29: $\sum_{e,f}P_I(ab|ef)P_J(ef|cd)=\delta_{IJ}P_I(ab|cd)\,,$

30: and for $n=3$ one has $\sum_{a,b}P_I(ab|ab)=2I+1\,.$}

31: \begin{eqnarray}

32: P_0(ab\vert cd)&=&\frac{1}{n}\delta_{ab}\delta_{cd}\,,\\

33: P_1(ab\vert cd)&=&

34: \frac{1}{2}\delta_{ac}\delta_{bd}-\frac{1}{2}\delta_{ad}\delta_{bc}\,,\\

35: P_2(ab\vert cd)&=&

36: \frac{1}{2}\delta_{ac}\delta_{bd}+\frac{1}{2}\delta_{ad}\delta_{bc}

37: -\frac{1}{n}\delta_{ab}\delta_{cd}\,,\\

38: \nonumber

39: \end{eqnarray}

40: and

41: \begin{equation} 

42: S_I(\beta)=-(-1)^I\rme^{2i\delta_I(\beta)}\,.

43: \end{equation}

44: For the special case $n=3$ the phase shifts are simply given by

45: \ba

46: \delta_0(\beta)&=&-\arctan\left(\frac{\beta}{2\pi}\right)\,,

47: \\

48: \delta_2(\beta)&=&\arctan\left(\frac{\beta}{\pi}\right)\,,

49: \\

50: \delta_1(\beta)&=&\delta_0(\beta)+\delta_2(\beta)\,.

51: \ea

52: 

53: We define BS wave functions as in the last section by

54: \begin{equation} 

55: \Psi_{ab;cd}(x_1,\theta)=\langle0\vert\sigma^a(0,x_1)\sigma^b(0,0)\vert

56: c,\theta;d,-\theta\rangle^{{\rm in}},\qquad\qquad\theta>0\,.

57: \end{equation}

58: The spin field $\sigma^a(x)$ is an interpolating

59: field for the massive particle and we fix the normalization by

60: \be

61: \langle 0|\sigma^a(0)|b,\theta\rangle=\delta^{ab}\,.

62: \end{equation}

63: Translation invariance and locality implies

64: \begin{equation} 

65: \Psi_{ab;cd}(-x_1,\theta)=\Psi_{ba;dc}(x_1,\theta).

66: \label{loc}

67: \end{equation}

68: 

69: Introducing isospin components $T_I$ for all tensors $T_{ab;cd}\,$:

70: \begin{equation} 

71: T_I=\frac{1}{2I+1}P_I(ab\vert cd) T_{ab;cd}\,,

72: \end{equation}

73: Eq.~(\ref{loc}) now implies

74: \begin{equation} 

75: \Psi_I(-x_1,\theta)=(-1)^I\Psi_I(x_1,\theta)\,.

76: \label{loc2}

77: \end{equation}

78: 

79: As before the BS wave function can be expressed as an expansion over 

80: $s$--particle contributions:

81: \begin{equation} 

82: \Psi_{ab;cd}(x_1,\theta)=\sum_{s{\rm\,\,odd}}\Psi^{(s)}_{ab;cd}(x_1,\theta)\,,

83: \end{equation}

84: and these can further be organized in contributions having specific large

85: distance behavior. Since the computation is rather technical we relegate 

86: the details to Appendix~C and here just summarize the result.

87: Firstly it is convenient to introduce the modified wave function

88: \begin{equation} 

89: \widetilde\Psi_I(r,\theta)=\frac{i}{\tanh\theta}\rme^{-i\delta_I(2\theta)}

90: \Psi_I(r/M,\theta)\,,

91: \label{Psitilde}

92: \end{equation}

93: since as shown in Appendix~C $\widetilde\Psi$ becomes real (for real arguments).

94: This WF has a (large distance) expansion which is naturally

95: expressed in the form

96: \begin{equation}

97: \widetilde\Psi_I(r,\theta)=\sum_{m{\rm \ odd}} \left\{

98: A^{(m)}_I(r,\theta)+B^{(m)}_I(r,\theta)\right\}\,,

99: \label{exp1}

100: \end{equation}

101: where $A^{(m)}_I(r,\theta)\sim\rmO(\rme^{-mr})$

102: and $B^{(m)}_I(r,\theta)\sim\rmO(\rme^{-(m-1)r})$ for large $r$.

103: Their explicit expressions are given in Eqs.~(\ref{AIm}),(\ref{BIm})

104: and involve integrals over products of the generalized form factors

105: \be

106: \langle0|\sigma^a(0)|b_1,\beta_1;\dots;b_s,\beta_s\rangle^{\rm in}

107: ={\cal F}^a_{b_1\dots b_s}(\beta_1,\dots,\beta_s)

108: \,,\,\,\beta_1>\beta_2>\dots\beta_s\,.

109: \label{sigFF}

110: \end{equation}

111: From the connectivity properties of the matrix elements built of

112: these form factors it follows 

113: that the $s$--particle contribution ($s\ge3$) contributes

114: not only to $A^{(s)}$ and $B^{(s)}$ but also to $A^{(s-2)}$. 

115: The leading term is

116: \begin{equation} 

117: B^{(1)}_I(r,\theta)=\frac{2}{\tanh\theta}(-1)^I\sin\left\{r\sinh\theta

118: +\delta_I(2\theta)\right\}\,.

119: \end{equation}

120: 

121: %\input{tables_O3}

122: We have numerically computed the first 5 terms in the expansion

123: for the three isospin values (in the case of O(3)) and a range of small 

124: ($\le1.0$) rapidities.

125: As for the case of the Ising model, we find that inclusion of

126: sufficient number of terms in the long distance expansion gives

127: a good description of the full wave function down to quite small distances.

128: This is illustrated in Tables~\ref{O3I0wavefn0.3}--\ref{O3I2wavefn0.3}

129: in Appendix~D where we give results for $\theta=0.3$. 

130: Although the individual terms diverge at short distances it seems

131: that their sums are tending to zero in each channel see

132: Figs~\ref{fig3}--\ref{fig5}. Exactly how

133: the limit is reached can however not be read off from this approximation

134: and we require a detailed OPE analysis which we will present 

135: in the next subsection.

136: 

137: 

138: \begin{figure}

139: \begin{center}

140: \psfig{figure=O3_wf_I0.eps,width=10cm}

141: \end{center}

142: \caption{\footnotesize Contributions to the O(3) wave function in the 

143: $I=0$ channel for $\theta=0.3$. 

144: The dotted curve is $B_0^{(1)}(r,0.3)$, the dashed curve is 

145: $A_0^{(1)}(r,0.3)$, the dot-dashed curve is $B_0^{(3)}(r,0.3)$,

146: and the solid curve is the sum of the first 5 contributions in the 

147: long distance expansion.}

148: \label{fig3}

149: \end{figure}

150: 

151: \begin{figure}

152: \begin{center}

153: \psfig{figure=O3_wf_I1.eps,width=10cm}

154: \end{center}

155: \caption{\footnotesize As in Fig.~\ref{fig3} but for $I=1$.}

156: \label{fig4}

157: \end{figure}

158: 

159: \begin{figure}

160: \begin{center}

161: \psfig{figure=O3_wf_I2.eps,width=10cm}

162: \end{center}

163: \caption{\footnotesize As in Fig.~\ref{fig3} but for $I=2$.}

164: \label{fig5}

165: \end{figure}

166: 

167: As in the case of the Ising models the BS wave functions and

168: their corresponding potentials are only

169: weakly varying with the rapidity (for moderate rapidities)

170: in the short to intermediate distance range.

171: 

172: Note for the zero energy WF we have

173: \begin{equation} 

174: B^{(1)}_I(r,0)=2(-1)^I\left\{r+a_I\right\}\,,

175: \end{equation}

176: where

177: \begin{equation} 

178: a_0=-\frac{1}{\pi},\qquad\quad

179: a_1=\frac{1}{\pi},\qquad\quad

180: a_2=\frac{2}{\pi}\,.

181: \end{equation}

182: For large $r$ the potentials fall exponentially to zero; in particular

183: for the zero energy potentials:

184: \ba

185: V_0(r)&=&\phantom{-}\frac{1}{18}\sqrt{\frac{2\pi^3}{r^3}}\left[1-0.615r^{-1}

186: +\rmO(r^{-2})\right]\rme^{-r}\,,

187: \\

188: V_1(r)&=&-\frac{1}{36}\sqrt{\frac{2\pi^3}{r^3}}\left[1-0.056 r^{-1}

189: +\rmO(r^{-2})\right]\rme^{-r}\,,

190: \\

191: V_2(r)&=&\phantom{-}\frac{1}{18}\sqrt{\frac{2\pi^3}{r^3}}\left[1-1.570r^{-1}

192: +\rmO(r^{-2})\right]\rme^{-r}\,.

193: \ea

194: 

195: \subsection{Operator product expansion}

196: 

197: Consider the operator product 

198: \begin{equation} 

199: D^{ab}_I(y)=P_I(ab\vert cd) \left(\sigma^c(y)\sigma^d(0)\right)\,,

200: \label{OPE}

201: \end{equation}

202: for general $n\ge3$. Using asymptotic freedom, we can show that its 

203: leading short distance expansion is of the form

204: \begin{equation} 

205: \begin{split}

206: D^{ab}_2(y)&\approx \alpha(\vert y\vert)\, t^{ab}(0)+\dots,\\

207: D^{ab}_1(y)&\approx \beta(\vert y\vert)\,y^\mu J^{ab}_\mu(0)+\dots,\\

208: D^{ab}_0(y)&\approx \frac{\delta^{ab}}{n}\Big\{\gamma_0(\vert y\vert)

209: +\vert y\vert^2\gamma_1(\vert y\vert)\Theta(0)

210: +y^\mu y^\nu\gamma_2(\vert y\vert)\widehat T_{\mu\nu}(0)\Big\}+\dots\\

211: \label{OPEofD}

212: \end{split}

213: \end{equation}

214: Here $t^{ab}$ is a traceless iso--tensor operator of dimension 0, 

215: $J^{ab}_\mu$ is the Noether current and $\Theta$ and $\widehat T_{\mu\nu}$ is 

216: the (Lorentz) trace and traceless part of the energy--momentum tensor 

217: $T_{\mu\nu}$:

218: \begin{equation} 

219: \Theta=T^\mu_{\phantom{\mu}\mu},\qquad\quad

220: T_{\mu\nu}=\widehat T_{\mu\nu}+\frac{1}{2}\eta_{\mu\nu}\Theta,

221: \end{equation}

222: $\eta_{00}=-\eta_{11}=1$. Finally the leading short distance behavior of 

223: the functions $\alpha(|y|),\beta(|y|),\gamma_j(|y|)$ appearing in

224: (\ref{OPEofD}) can be computed

225: in the framework of renormalized perturbation theory as discussed below.

226: 

227: Sandwiching the operator product between the vacuum and a two-particle

228: state we have

229: \begin{equation} 

230: \langle0\vert D^{ab}_I(y)\vert c,\theta;d,-\theta\rangle^{\rm in}=

231: P_I(ab\vert cd)\Psi_I(r,\theta)\,,

232: \end{equation}

233: where $r=M\vert y\vert$.

234: 

235: Let us recall \cite{CLUS} the two--particle form factors of the operators

236: occurring in the above short distance expansion:

237: \begin{equation} 

238: \langle0\vert t^{ab}(0)\vert c,\alpha;d,\beta\rangle^{\rm in}=

239: (\alpha-\beta-i\pi)\tanh\left(\frac{\alpha-\beta}{2}\right)P_2(ab\vert cd)\,,

240: \label{FF2}

241: \end{equation}

242: \begin{equation} 

243: \langle0\vert J^{ab}_\mu(0)\vert c,\alpha;d,\beta\rangle^{\rm in}=

244: -i\pi^2\epsilon_{\mu\nu}q^\nu\psi(\alpha-\beta)P_1(ab\vert cd)\,,

245: \end{equation}

246: 

247: \begin{equation} 

248: \langle0\vert T_{\mu\nu}(0)\vert a,\alpha;b,\beta\rangle^{\rm in}=

249: \frac{\pi^2}{2}\delta^{ab}(q^2\eta_{\mu\nu}-q_\mu q_\nu)

250: \frac{\psi(\alpha-\beta)}{\alpha-\beta-i\pi}\,.

251: \end{equation}

252: Here

253: \begin{equation} 

254: q^0=M(\cosh\alpha+\cosh\beta),\qquad\qquad

255: q^1=M(\sinh\alpha+\sinh\beta)\,,

256: \end{equation}

257: $\epsilon_{01}=-\epsilon_{10}=1$ and

258: \begin{equation} 

259: \psi(\theta)=\frac{\theta-i\pi}{\theta(2\pi i-\theta)}\tanh^2\left(

260: \frac{\theta}{2}\right)\,.

261: \label{psidef}

262: \end{equation}

263: Eq.~(\ref{FF2}) fixes the normalization of $t^{ab}$, which is otherwise

264: undetermined.

265: 

266: Using these form factors, the leading short distance expansion

267: of the isospin invariant wave functions are given as

268: \begin{equation} 

269: \begin{split}

270: \Psi_2(r,\theta)&\approx \alpha(r)(2\theta-i\pi)\tanh\theta\,,\\

271: \Psi_1(r,\theta)&\approx r\beta(r)\frac{i\pi^2\sinh\theta\tanh\theta}

272: {2\theta(i\pi-\theta)}(2\theta-i\pi)\,,\\

273: \Psi_0(r,\theta)&\approx (r\pi)^2[2\gamma_1(r)-\gamma_2(r)]

274: \frac{\sinh^2\theta}{4\theta(i\pi-\theta)}\,,\\

275: \end{split}

276: \end{equation}

277: which in terms of the redefined (real) field $\widetilde{\Psi}$ 

278: in (\ref{Psitilde}) read:

279: \begin{equation} 

280: \begin{split}

281: \widetilde\Psi_2(r,\theta)&\approx \alpha(r)\sqrt{\pi^2+4\theta^2}\,,\\

282: \widetilde\Psi_1(r,\theta)&\approx 

283: r\beta(r)\frac{\pi^2\sinh\theta}{2\theta}

284: \sqrt{\frac{\pi^2+4\theta^2}{\pi^2+\theta^2}}\,,\\

285: \widetilde\Psi_0(r,\theta)&\approx (r\pi)^2[2\gamma_1(r)-\gamma_2(r)]

286: \frac{\sinh2\theta}{8\theta}\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi^2+\theta^2}}\,.\\

287: \end{split}

288: \end{equation}

289: 

290: We now outline the information which can be gained from 

291: perturbative field theory; for any undefined notation we refer the

292: reader to \cite{DIS}. We start with the short distance expansion

293: \begin{equation} 

294: \Delta^{ab}_I(y)=\frac{1}{g_0^2}P_I(ab\vert cd)S^c(y)S^d(0)\approx

295: \sum_\omega K^{(\omega)}_I(g_0,y){\cal B}^{(\omega)ab}_I(0)+\dots,

296: \label{OPEbare}

297: \end{equation}

298: where ${\cal B}^{(\omega)ab}_I$ are (bare) local operators and the

299: $K^{(\omega)}_I$ are coefficient functions (which can, in principle,

300: be calculated in perturbation theory). The operator product (\ref{OPE})

301: differs by a (non--perturbative) rescaling from the renormalized version

302: of (\ref{OPEbare}):

303: \begin{equation} 

304: \begin{split}

305: \Omega_n^{-2}D^{ab}_I(y)=\Delta^{ab}_{I(R)}(y)&=

306: P_I(ab\vert cd) S^c_{(R)}(y)S^d_{(R)}(0)\\

307: &\approx \sum_\omega k^{(\omega)}_I(g,\mu,y){\cal B}^{(\omega)ab}_{I(R)}(0)\,,\\

308: \end{split}

309: \end{equation}

310: written in terms of renormalized operators ${\cal B}^{(\omega)ab}_{I(R)}$

311: and finite coefficient functions $k^{(\omega)}_I$. The latter satisfies

312: the renormalization group (RG) equation

313: \begin{equation}

314: \left\{{\cal D}+\gamma(g)+\gamma^{(\omega)}_I(g)\right\}k^{(\omega)}_I=0\,, 

315: \label{RGeq}

316: \end{equation}

317: where the RG $\gamma$--function

318: \begin{equation} 

319: \gamma^{(\omega)}_I(g)=\gamma^{(\omega)}_{I0}g^2+\dots

320: \end{equation}

321: is related to the operator renormalization constant (in dimensional 

322: regularization) by

323: \begin{equation} 

324: Z^{(\omega)}_I=1-\frac{\gamma^{(\omega)}_{I0}g^2}{\varepsilon}+\dots,

325: \end{equation}

326: corresponding to the operator ${\cal B}^{(\omega)ab}_I\,$. 

327: 

328: In particular, for $I=2$ we have only one operator

329: \begin{equation} 

330: {\cal B}_2^{ab}=\tilde\tau^{ab}=\frac{1}{g_0^2}\left(S^aS^b-\frac{1}{n}

331: \delta^{ab}\right)\,,

332: \end{equation}

333: which has renormalization constant \cite{DIS}

334: \begin{equation} 

335: Z_2=Z_{\tilde\tau}=1+\frac{g^2}{\pi\varepsilon}+\dots

336: \end{equation}

337: and coefficient function 

338: \begin{equation} 

339: K_2(g_0,y)=1+\rmO(g_0^2)\,.

340: \end{equation}

341: Similarly, for $I=1$ we have

342: \begin{equation} 

343: B^{ab}_{1\mu}=J^{ab}_\mu\,,

344: \end{equation}

345: with $Z_1=1$ and

346: \begin{equation}

347: K^\mu_1(g_0,y)=-\frac{1}{2}y^\mu+\rmO(g_0^2)\,. 

348: \end{equation}

349: Finally for $I=0$ we have the two operators

350: \begin{equation}

351: {\cal B}_0^{(1)ab}=\frac{\delta^{ab}}{n}\Theta,\qquad\qquad

352: {\cal B}_{0\mu\nu}^{(2)ab}=\frac{\delta^{ab}}{n}\widehat T_{\mu\nu} 

353: \end{equation}

354: with $Z_0^{(\omega)}=1$ ($\omega=1,\,2$) and coefficient functions

355: \begin{equation} 

356: K_0^{(1)}=C_{10}\vert y\vert^2+\rmO(g_0^2),\qquad\qquad

357: K_0^{(2)\mu\nu}=-\frac{1}{2}y^\mu y^\nu+\rmO(g_0^2)\,.

358: \end{equation}

359: Since $\Theta$ vanishes at tree level, the corresponding numerical 

360: coefficient $C_{10}$ can only be determined by a one--loop calculation.

361: 

362: The equation (\ref{RGeq}) can be solved by standard RG methods. Introducing

363: the running coupling function $\lambda(r)$ as the solution of

364: \begin{equation} 

365: \frac{1}{\lambda(r)}+\chi\ln\lambda(r)=-\ln r\,, 

366: \label{lambda}

367: \end{equation}

368: with $\chi=1/(n-2)$ we find

369: \begin{equation} 

370: \begin{split}

371: \alpha(r)&\approx \alpha_0\,\lambda^\chi\left\{1+\rmO(\lambda)\right\}\,,\\

372: \beta(r)&\approx -\frac{1}{2}D_n\,(2\pi\chi\lambda)^{-\chi}

373: \left\{1+\rmO(\lambda)\right\}\,,\\

374: \gamma_1(r)&\approx C_{10}D_n\,(2\pi\chi\lambda)^{-\chi}

375: \left\{1+\rmO(\lambda)\right\}\,,\\

376: \gamma_2(r)&\approx -\frac{1}{2}D_n\,(2\pi\chi\lambda)^{-\chi}

377: \left\{1+\rmO(\lambda)\right\}\,.\\

378: \end{split}

379: \end{equation}

380: The constant occurring in the coefficient $\alpha$ cannot be calculated

381: since we do not know the relative normalization of the operator $\tilde

382: \tau^{ab}_{(R)}$ with respect to $t^{ab}$ whose normalization is fixed 

383: non-perturbatively by (\ref{FF2}). We also do not know the numerical value

384: of the non-perturbative constant $D_n$ for general $n$. However, we do know

385: \cite{DIS} $D_3=4/\pi$ and this enables us to write for $n=3$ (and, for 

386: simplicity, at zero energy):

387: \begin{equation} 

388: \begin{split}

389: \widetilde\Psi_0(r,0)&\approx 

390: \frac{r^2}{\pi\lambda}\left(C_{10}+\frac{1}{4}

391: \right)

392: \left\{1+c_0^{(1)}\lambda+\dots\right\}\,,\\

393: \widetilde\Psi_1(r,0)&\approx -\frac{r}{2\lambda}

394: \left\{1+c_1^{(1)}\lambda+\dots\right\}\,,\\

395: \widetilde\Psi_2(r,0)&\approx \alpha_0\pi\,\lambda 

396: \left\{1+c_2^{(1)}\lambda+\dots\right\}\,.\\

397: \end{split}

398: \label{3.46}

399: \end{equation}

400: Here the $\rmO(\lambda)$ (and higher) corrections can in principle be

401: calculated in higher orders of perturbation theory. The number

402: $C_{10}$ can also be obtained by a one--loop calculation. However, as

403: explained above, the coefficient $\alpha_0$ cannot be calculated by

404: presently available methods. 

405: 

406: Fortunately, the overall normalization cancels from the potential defined

407: by

408: \begin{equation} 

409: V_I(r)=\frac{\widetilde\Psi^{\prime\prime}_I(r,0)}{\widetilde\Psi_I(r,0)}\,,

410: \end{equation}

411: and we find

412: \begin{equation} 

413: \begin{split}

414: V_0(r)&\simeq \ \ \, 

415: \frac{2}{r^2}\left\{1-\frac32\lambda+\rmO(\lambda^2)\right\}\,,\\

416: V_1(r)&\simeq-\frac{\lambda}{r^2}

417: \left\{1+\left[1-c_1^{(1)}\right]\lambda+\rmO(\lambda^2)

418: \right\}\,,\\

419: V_2(r)&\simeq-\frac{\lambda}{r^2}

420: \left\{1-\left[1-c_2^{(1)}\right]\lambda+\rmO(\lambda^2)

421: \right\}\,.\\

422: \end{split}

423: \label{VOPE}

424: \end{equation}

425: Note that for $I=0$ we can calculate the first correction in

426: $\lambda(r)$ without knowledge of the $\rmO(\lambda)$ correction in 

427: (\ref{3.46}).

428: 

429: \begin{table}[h] 

430: \centering 

431: \begin{tabular}[t]{l|l|l|l|l} 

432: \hline 

433: $r$&$0.01$&$0.05$&$0.1$&$0.2$\\[1.0ex] 

434: \hline  

435: $\lambda$&$0.154$&$0.222$&$0.280$&$0.393$\\[1.0ex] 

436: \hline 

437: \end{tabular} 

438: \caption{\footnotesize Values of $\lambda(r)$.}  

439: \label{rtolambda} 

440: \end{table}

441: 

442: In Fig.~\ref{fig6} we plot $r^2$ times the potentials in the

443: $I=1,2$ channels obtained from the sum of the first 5 leading 

444: terms in the long distance (LD) expansions, together with the leading 

445: behavior (\ref{VOPE}) obtained from the OPE. They are plotted 

446: with respect to the variable $\lambda$ defined in (\ref{lambda})

447: (with $\chi=1$); in Table~\ref{rtolambda} we give  

448: some pairs of values $(r,\lambda(r))$. We also plot the curve

449: $-\lambda+2\lambda^2$ to illustrate that 

450: (``quite reasonable") higher order expressions

451: in the OPE expansion could be found to make smooth meetings

452: with the LD approximations. We think that 

453: the 5--term LD approximation is accurate down to $\lambda\sim 0.2$ 

454: (which already corresponds to quite short distances) 

455: in the $I=1$ channel and even to smaller distances in the $I=2$ channel. 

456: This can be monitored by studying the stability of successive 

457: LD approximations, including only 3 terms, 4 terms and 5 terms 

458: respectively. This is illustrated in Fig.~\ref{fig6a} for $I=1$.

459: Alternativey one can appreciate the situation by inspecting

460: Table~\ref{O3zeropot} in Appendix~D where we give the double derivatives

461: of the separate contributions times $r^2$ in the various channels.

462: 

463: \begin{figure}

464: \begin{center}

465: \psfig{figure=ZeroPotI12.eps,width=10cm}

466: \end{center}

467: \caption{\footnotesize ``Long distance approximation" to $r^2V_1(r)$ 

468: (solid) and $r^2V_2(r)$ (dashed). The lower dotted line is the

469: leading short distance behavior $-\lambda$ and the upper dotted line

470: is $-\lambda+2\lambda^2$.}

471: \label{fig6}

472: \end{figure}

473: 

474: \begin{figure}

475: \begin{center}

476: \psfig{figure=potI1approach.eps,width=10cm}

477: \end{center}

478: \caption{\footnotesize Successive LD approximations to $r^2V_1(r)$; 

479: The dotted, dashed and solid lines correspond to approximations using

480: 3,4,5 terms repectively.}

481: \label{fig6a}

482: \end{figure}

483: 

484: Fig.~\ref{fig7} shows the zero-energy potential in the $I=0$ channel.

485: Here the LD breaks down already larger distances, in fact 

486: there is no stability in the sense described above even at $r=0.1$.

487: The figure however suggests that our 5--term approximation may still be 

488: quite good there, but it would need computation of higher order terms 

489: to confirm this. Never the less it is plausible that the approximation

490: joins smoothly to the OPE expansion where again higher

491: order terms are required to improve the quantitative picture.

492: 

493: \begin{figure}

494: \begin{center}

495: \psfig{figure=ZeroPotI0.eps,width=10cm}

496: \end{center}

497: \caption{\footnotesize LD approximation to $r^2V_0(r)$ (solid). 

498: The upper dotted line is the leading short distance behavior 

499: and the lower dotted line is $2-3\lambda-8\lambda^2$.}

500: \label{fig7}

501: \end{figure}

502: 

503: 

504: 

505: \vfill

506: \eject

507: 

508: 

509:                       

510: