1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
3: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
4: \documentclass{emulateapj}
5: %\documentclass[apjl]{emulateapj}
6: \usepackage{natbib}
7: \usepackage{lscape}
8: %\usepackage{apjfonts}
9: %\usepackage{mathptmx}
10: %\usepackage{txfonts}
11: %\usepackage{color}
12: %\input epsf.sty
13:
14: \newcommand{\etal}{et~al.}
15: \newcommand{\eg}{e.g., }
16: \newcommand{\ie}{i.e., }
17: \newcommand{\Msun}{M_{\odot}}
18: \newcommand{\kms}{km~s$^{-1}$}
19: \newcommand{\ergs}{erg~s$^{-1}$}
20: \newcommand{\Fefs}{$^{56}$Fe}
21: \newcommand{\Cofs}{$^{56}$Co}
22: \newcommand{\Nifs}{$^{56}$Ni}
23: \newcommand{\Mms}{M_{\rm MS}}
24: \newcommand{\Mej}{M_{\rm ej}}
25: \newcommand{\KE}{E_{\rm K}}
26: \newcommand{\Mni}{M(^{56}{\rm Ni})}
27: \def\gsim{\mathrel{\rlap{\lower 4pt \hbox{\hskip 1pt $\sim$}}\raise 1pt
28: \hbox {$>$}}}
29: \def\lsim{\mathrel{\rlap{\lower 4pt \hbox{\hskip 1pt $\sim$}}\raise 1pt
30: \hbox {$<$}}}
31: \def\pa{\partial}
32: \def\ion#1#2{{\rm #1}~{\sc #2}}
33: \newcommand{\red}{\textcolor{red}}
34:
35:
36: \shorttitle{Broad line Type Ic SN 2007ru}
37: \shortauthors{Sahu et al.}
38:
39: \begin{document}
40: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Title Page begins %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
41:
42: \title{The broad line Type Ic supernova SN 2007ru: Adding to the diversity of
43: Type Ic supernovae }
44: \author{
45: D.K. Sahu\altaffilmark{1},
46: Masaomi Tanaka\altaffilmark{2},
47: G.C. Anupama\altaffilmark{1},
48: Uday K. Gurugubelli\altaffilmark{1,3}, and
49: Ken'ichi Nomoto\altaffilmark{4,2} }
50:
51: \altaffiltext{1}{Indian Institute of Astrophysics, II Block Koramangala,
52: Bangalore 560034, India: dks@iiap.res.in, gca@iiap.res.in, uday@iiap.res.in}
53: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Astronomy, Graduate School of Science,
54: University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan: mtanaka@astron.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp }
55: \altaffiltext{3}{Joint Astronomy Programme, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India}
56: \altaffiltext{4}{Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the
57: Universe, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8582, Japan: nomoto@astron.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp}
58:
59:
60:
61: \begin{abstract}
62: Photometric and spectral evolution of the Type Ic supernova SN 2007ru
63: until around 210 days after maximum are presented.
64: The spectra show broad spectral
65: features due to very high expansion velocity, normally seen in hypernovae.
66: The photospheric velocity is higher than other normal Type Ic supernovae.
67: It is lower than SN 1998bw at $\sim$ 8 days after the explosion, but is comparable
68: at later epochs. The light curve evolution
69: of SN 2007ru indicates a fast rise time of 8$\pm$3 days to $B$ band maximum
70: and post-maximum decline more rapid than other broad-line Type Ic supernovae.
71: With an absolute $V$ magnitude of $-19.06$, SN 2007ru is comparable in
72: brightness with SN 1998bw and lies at the brighter end of the observed Type
73: Ic supernovae. The ejected mass of \Nifs\ is estimated to be $\sim 0.4\Msun$. The
74: fast rise and decline of the light curve and the high expansion velocity
75: suggest that SN 2007ru is an explosion with a high kinetic energy/ejecta mass
76: ratio ($E_{\rm K}/M_{\rm {ej}}$). This adds to the diversity of Type Ic supernovae.
77: Although the early phase spectra are most similar to
78: those of broad-line SN 2003jd, the [OI] line profile in the nebular spectrum of SN 2007ru
79: shows the singly-peaked profile, in contrast to the doubly-peaked profile in SN 2003jd.
80: The singly-peaked profile, together with
81: the high luminosity and the high expansion velocity, may suggest that
82: SN 2007ru could be an aspherical explosion viewed from the polar direction.
83: Estimated oxygen abundance 12 + log(O/H) of $\sim$8.8 indicates that SN 2007ru
84: occurred in
85: a region with nearly solar metallicity.
86: \end{abstract}
87:
88: \keywords{supernovae: general supernovae: individual (SN 2007ru) }
89:
90: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Main%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
91:
92: \section{Introduction}
93: Broad-line Type Ic supernovae (SNe Ic) are a subclass of core collapse
94: SNe Ic that have broad features in their spectra,
95: indicating unusually high expansion velocities reaching close to 0.1$c$
96: at early times. Only a few candidates
97: of this class are known. Some broad-line SNe Ic are associated
98: with Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs)
99: (Galama et al. 1998; Matheson et al. 2003; Malesani et al. 2004),
100: or X-Ray Flash (XRF) (Pian et al. 2006; Modjaz et al. 2006),
101: while some others do not show any clear evidence of being associated
102: with a GRB or an XRF (Kinugasa et al. 2002; Foley et al. 2003; Valenti et al. 2008).
103:
104: %\red{(new paragraph)}
105:
106: The broad-line SNe Ic exhibit diversity in terms of the explosion energy, ejecta
107: mass and mass of $^{56}$Ni produced during the explosion. The photometric and
108: spectral features of SN 1998bw are explained with $\sim 10\,\Msun$
109: ejected with a kinetic energy $2-5\times$10$^{52}$ ergs, producing
110: $0.4 - 0.5 \Msun$ of $^{56}$Ni in the explosion
111: (Iwamoto et al. 1998; Nakamura et al. 2001; Maeda et al. 2006, Tanaka et al. 2007).
112: On the other hand, modelling of nebular spectra of SN 2002ap
113: indicates an ejected mass of $\sim 2.5~\Msun$ with a kinetic
114: energy $\sim 4$$\times$10$^{51}$ ergs and production of $\sim 0.1\,\Msun$
115: of $^{56}$Ni (Mazzali et al. 2007), showing a large range in the
116: physical parameters of broad-line SNe Ic.
117: Among these, SNe with kinetic energy $E_{\rm K} > 10^{52}$ ergs are
118: termed as "hypernovae (HNe)'' (Iwamoto et al. 1998).
119: The broad-line SNe that are not associated with GRBs are found to
120: have smaller values of ejecta mass, explosion energy and lower
121: luminosity as compared to the GRB-associated HNe (Nomoto et al. 2007).
122:
123: SN 2007ru was discovered by Donati \& Ciabattari on
124: November 27.9 and independently by Winslow \& Li with KAIT on November 30.15
125: in the spiral galaxy UGC 12381.
126: There was no evidence of the supernova in the KAIT image taken on
127: November 22.16, down to a limiting magnitude of 18.9 (Donati \& Ciabattari,
128: 2007). Based on a spectrum obtained on December 1, SN 2007ru was classified as
129: peculiar SN Ic at premaximum phase (Chornock et al. 2007).
130: The CaII H \& K and CaII Near Infrared (NIR) triplet absorption troughs were
131: found to be weak compared to other SNe Ic. Further, the OI line at
132: 7774 \AA \ indicated an expansion velocity of 19000 ${\rm km \ sec^{-1}}$, similar to
133: the expansion velocity seen in the broad-line SN Ic SN 2006aj (Pian et al. 2006).
134: A search through the reported discoveries of GRBs during
135: October 15 to November 30, 2007 does not show
136: any possible association of a GRB with this supernova.
137:
138:
139: The results of photometric and spectral monitoring of SN 2007ru until around
140: 210 days after maximum, using the 2m Himalayan Chandra Telescope (HCT)
141: of the Indian Astronomical Observatory (IAO), Hanle, India, are presented in
142: this paper.
143:
144:
145: \section{Observations and data reduction}
146: \subsection{Photometry}
147: SN 2007ru was observed in $UBVRI$ bands during 2007 December 2 (JD 2454437.09)
148: to 2008 July 03 (JD 2454651.35). The observations were carried out with the
149: Himalayan Faint Object Spectrograph Camera (HFOSC) mounted on the HCT. HFOSC is
150: equipped with 2K$\times$4K pixels CCD chip. The central 2K$\times$2K region, with a plate
151: scale of 0.296 arcsec pixel$^{-1}$, covering a field of 10$^{'}$$\times$10$^{'}$, was
152: used for imaging. Gain and readout noise of the CCD camera are 1.22 e$^{-1}$/ADU and
153: 4.87e$^{-1}$, respectively. Further details on the HCT and HFOSC can be obtained from
154: ``http://www.iiap.res.in/centers/iao''.
155:
156: Photometric standard regions (Landolt 1992)
157: were observed on 2007 December 25 and December 26 under photometric sky conditions
158: to calibrate
159: a sequence of secondary standards in the supernova field.
160: Data reduction has been done in the standard manner using various tasks available within
161: Image Reduction and Analysis Facility (IRAF). Aperture photometry was performed on the
162: photometric standard stars and
163: secondary standards, at an aperture radius
164: determined using the aperture growth curve. The secondary standard stars
165: were then calibrated using the average colour terms and the photometric
166: zero points determined on the individual night. A sequence of secondary standards
167: calibrated in this way is marked in Fig. \ref{fig:field} and the $UBVRI$ magnitudes
168: of the secondary standards averaged over the two nights are listed in
169: Table \ref{tab:std_star_mag}.
170: The magnitudes of the
171: supernova and secondary standards were measured using point spread function
172: photometry, with a fitting radius equal to the FWHM of the stellar profile.
173: Supernova magnitudes were calibrated differentially with respect
174: to the local standards. The supernova magnitudes in $U$, $B$, $V$, $R$ and $I$
175: bands have been listed in Table \ref{tab:sn_mag}.
176:
177: \begin{figure}
178: \epsscale{1.0}
179: \plotone{f1.eps}
180: \caption{Identification chart for SN 2007ru. The stars used as local
181: standards are marked as numbers 1-14.
182: \label{fig:field} }
183: \end{figure}
184:
185:
186: \subsection{Spectroscopy}
187:
188: A series of spectra were taken during 2007 December 3 to 2008 June 12,
189: in the wavelength range (3500\AA\ - 7000\AA) and (5200\AA\ - 9200\AA), with a
190: resolution of $\sim$ 7~\AA. The journal of spectroscopic observations is
191: given in Table \ref{tab:spec_log}.
192: The spectrophotometric standard stars were observed
193: on the same night to flux calibrate the supernova spectra.
194: Spectroscopic data reduction
195: was carried out using tasks available within IRAF.
196: The spectra were bias subtracted, flat-fielded and the one
197: dimensional spectra were extracted using the optimal extraction method. The arc lamp
198: spectra of FeAr and FeNe were used for wavelength calibration. The instrumental
199: response correction was effected using the spectroscopic standard spectrum.
200: The spectra in the two different regions were combined, scaled to a weighted
201: mean, to give the final spectrum on a relative flux scale, which were then
202: brought to an absolute flux scale using the $UBVRI$ magnitudes. The supernova
203: spectra were corrected for the host galaxy redshift of $z= 0.01546$
204: (from NED) and dereddened by the total reddening $E(B-V) = 0.27$ as
205: estimated in Section 5.
206:
207: \section{Optical light curves}
208: The $UBVRI$ light curves (LC) of SN 2007ru are shown in
209: Fig. \ref{fig:light}. The unfiltered discovery magnitudes and the pre-discovery
210: limiting magnitude are also included in the figure. The LCs indicate
211: that the maximum occurred earlier in the blue, similar to other broad-line SNe Ic.
212: The date of explosion can be constrained to $\lsim$ 6 days before discovery (November 25,
213: JD 2454430$\pm$3),
214: based on the non-detection on November 22 by KAIT and the subsequent discovery
215: on November 27.9. The rise time to $B$ maximum, which occurred on December 3, is
216: 5-11 (8$\pm$3) days, indicating SN 2007ru is a fast rising SN Ic
217: with a rise time similar to broad-line SNe 2002ap (Foley et al. 2003),
218: and 2006aj (Modjaz et al. 2006), marginally faster than SN 2003jd (Valenti et al. 2008) but
219: considerably faster than the GRB-associated SNe 1998bw and 2003dh (Galama et al. 1998,
220: Matheson et al. 2003).
221:
222: \begin{figure}
223: \epsscale{1.3}
224: \plotone{f2.eps}
225: \caption{The $UBVRI$ \ LCs of SN 2007ru. The LCs have been shifted by the
226: amount indicated in the legend. The unfiltered magnitudes reported by amatures
227: and the pre-discovery limiting magnitudes have been included with $R$ band magnitudes
228: in the figure.
229: \label{fig:light} }
230: \end{figure}
231:
232: The light curves of SN 2007ru are compared with those of broad-line
233: SNe SN 2002ap, SN 2003jd, GRB 980425/SN 1998bw, normal SNe Ic SN 1994I and
234: SN 2004aw in Fig. \ref{fig:fig_comp_lc}.
235: A comparison of the decline in brightness 15 days after maximum
236: light, $\Delta$m$_{15}$ in different bands shows that SN 2007ru has a decline similar to
237: other broad-line supernovae. In fact, the decline of SN 2007ru is faster than SN 1998bw but
238: slower than SNe 2003jd and 2006aj (refer Table \ref{tab:parameters}). The decline
239: rates are estimated to be $\Delta$m$_{15}$($B$)=1.57, $\Delta$m$_{15}$($V$)=0.92,
240: $\Delta$m$_{15}$($R$)=0.69
241: and $\Delta$m$_{15}$($I$)=0.50. The light curves of SN 2007ru decline with
242: decline rates of 0.021 mag day$^{-1}$ in $V$, 0.028 mag day$^{-1}$ in $R$ and
243: 0.030 mag day$^{-1}$ in $I$ bands during days $45-80$. These decline rates
244: are comparable to the light curve decline rates of the broad-line SN 2003jd and
245: marginally faster than SN 1998bw. The decline rate in $B$ cannot be estimated
246: due to a sparse coverage during this period. During the late phases ($>$ 80
247: days after explosion), the $V$ and $R$ band light curves of SN 2007ru decline
248: with decline rates of 0.0152 and 0.0116 mag day$^{-1}$, respectively,
249: slower than both SN 2003jd and SN 1998bw during the corresponding epochs
250: (Fig. \ref{fig:fig_comp_lc}). The decline rate of SN 2007ru during the
251: late phases, is faster than the rate expected due to the radio active decay of
252: $^{56}$Co into $^{56}$Fe. This indicates inefficient trapping of $\gamma$-rays by
253: the ejecta, which suggests a low column density.
254:
255: The peak absolute magnitudes were estimated using
256: the apparent magnitude at maximum in different bands
257: (see \S 5 for reddening and distance estimate).
258: From a comparison of the absolute
259: magnitude, SN 2007ru appears to lie at the brighter end of the observed SNe Ic.
260: With an absolute $V$
261: magnitude of $-19.06\pm0.2$, SN 2007ru is fainter than GRB 031203/SN 2003lw
262: [$M_{V}$=$-19.75\pm0.5$;
263: Malesani et al. 2004], comparable in brightness
264: with SN 1998bw [$M_{V}$=$-19.12\pm0.05$, Galama et al.
265: 1998], and brighter than XRF 060218/SN 2006aj [$M_{V}$=$-18.67\pm0.08$;
266: Modjaz et al. 2006], broad-line SNe 2002ap [$M_{V}$=$-17.37\pm0.05$;
267: Foley et al. 2003, Tomita et al. 2006], 2003jd [$M_{V}$=$-18.9\pm0.3$;
268: Valenti et al. 2008] and normal SNe Ic 1994I
269: [$M_{V}$=$-17.62\pm0.3$; Richmond et al. 1996, Sauer et al. 2006],
270: and 2004aw [$M_{V}$=$-18.02\pm0.3$; Taubenberger et al. 2006].
271:
272: \begin{figure}
273: \epsscale{1.3}
274: \plotone{f3.eps}
275: \caption{Comparison of LCs of SN 2007ru with other Type Ib/c SNe. The LCs of
276: the supernovae in comparison have been shifted arbitrarily to match the date of
277: maximum and magnitude at maximum.
278: \label{fig:fig_comp_lc} }
279: \end{figure}
280:
281:
282: \section{Spectral evolution}
283: The spectral evolution of SN 2007ru is presented in Figure \ref{fig:spec1}.
284: The first spectrum, obtained on 2007 December 3, at $t$ $\sim 8$ days,
285: where $t$ is days after explosion,
286: (the rise time is assumed to be 8 days, see \S 3)
287: shows broad absorption features at $\sim 6000$\AA \ due to SiII
288: (and a possible contamination as discussed by Valenti et al. 2008), at
289: $\sim 7200$\AA \ due to OI and at $\sim 8200$\AA \ due to weak CaII NIR triplet.
290: The spectrum at $t$ $\sim 20$ days shows well developed broad absorptions due to MgII
291: $\lambda$4481, blends of FeII at $\sim$ 4700\AA, SiII $\lambda$6355,
292: OI $\lambda$7774 and CaII NIR triplet. The continuum gets redder by
293: $t$ $\sim 20$ days. No significant evolution is seen in the spectrum taken
294: at $t$ $\sim 41$ days. The last spectrum presented here, obtained $\sim 200$
295: days after explosion indicates the supernova to be in the nebular phase.
296:
297: Comparing the spectrum and its evolution with that of the broad-line SN 2003jd
298: and the 'normal spectrum' Ic supernova SN 2004aw (Fig.\ref {fig:comp_spec1}
299: and Fig.\ref {fig:comp_spec2}),
300: it is seen that SN 2007ru is very similar to the broad-line SN Ic, indicating high
301: expansion velocities. The spectral features continue to remain broad and similar to
302: those of SN 2003jd even at $t$ $\sim 41$ days.
303:
304:
305: \begin{figure}
306: \epsscale{1.3}
307: \plotone{f4.eps}
308: \caption{Optical spectral evolution of SN 2007ru (top
309: panel). The spectra are corrected for the host galaxy redshift. Time in days
310: since the day of explosion (2008 November 25- see text) is indicated for each
311: spectrum. For clarity, the spectra have been displaced vertically. Main
312: spectral features are identified and marked in the spectrum taken $\sim$ 16
313: days after explosion (bottom panel).}
314: \label{fig:spec1}
315: \end{figure}
316:
317: \begin{figure}
318: \epsscale{1.3}
319: \plotone{f5.eps}
320: \caption{Comparison of spectra of SN 2007ru with broad-line type Ic SN 2003jd
321: and normal spectrum type Ic SN 2004aw at different epochs.}
322: \label{fig:comp_spec1}
323: \end{figure}
324:
325: \begin{figure}
326: \epsscale{1.3}
327: \plotone{f6.eps}
328: \caption{Same as figure 5 but at different epochs.}
329: \label{fig:comp_spec2}
330: \end{figure}
331:
332:
333: \subsection{Photospheric velocity}
334: The high velocity of the supernova ejecta usually results in
335: blending of the spectral lines, making direct measurement of
336: the photospheric velocity difficult. The photospheric velocity of
337: SN 2007ru is estimated by fitting a Gaussian profile to the
338: minimum of the absorption trough of Si II 6355\AA \
339: line, in the redshift corrected spectra. In the first spectrum,
340: $\sim$8 days after the explosion, the
341: absorption feature at 6200\AA \ consists of two components, similar to
342: that seen in the premaximum spectra of the broad-line SN 2003jd
343: (Valenti et al. 2008).
344: Assuming the blue component is due to Si II and the red wing is due to possible
345: contamination by other species, the photospheric velocity is estimated to be
346: 20,000 ${\rm km \ sec^{-1}}$. This is consistent with the velocity estimate by Chornock
347: et al. (2007) using OI line in the spectrum.
348:
349: \begin{figure}
350: \epsscale{1.3}
351: %\plotone{vel1.eps}
352: %\plotone{vel_bw.eps}
353: \plotone{f7.eps}
354: \figcaption{Evolution of the photospheric velocity of SN 2007ru and other SNe Ic
355: inferred from Si II $\lambda$ 6355 line. Uncertainty in estimating days since
356: explosion for SN 2007ru due to error in the date of explosion (JD 2454430$\pm$3) is
357: indicated by the horizontal arrow.}
358: \label{fig:phot_vel}
359: \end{figure}
360:
361: The photospheric velocity of SN 2007ru, measured using Si II lines, and its
362: evolution is compared with other SNe Ic in
363: Fig \ref{fig:phot_vel}. The photospheric velocity of SN 2007ru at
364: $\sim$ 8 days after explosion is lower than GRB 980425/SN 1998bw
365: (Patat et al. 2001), but comparable to XRF 060218/SN 2006aj
366: (Pian et al. 2006) and broad-line SN 2002ap (Foley et al. 2003).
367: However, at the later epochs, the photospheric velocity of SN 2007ru
368: is comparable to those of SN 1998bw and SN 2003jd and higher than other
369: SNe Ic in comparison. Except for the early phase ($<$ 15 days after explosion)
370: the photospheric velocity evolution of SN 2007ru is very similar to that of
371: the broad-line SN 2003jd.
372:
373: \subsection{Nebular spectrum}
374: The spectrum of SN 2007ru taken $\sim$ 200 days after explosion
375: (refer Fig \ref {fig:comp_spec_neb}) is dominated by the
376: forbidden emission lines of [OI] $\lambda$$\lambda$6300, 6364 and
377: [CaII] $\lambda$$\lambda$7291, 7323, possibly blended with
378: [OII] $\lambda$$\lambda$7320, 7330 (Taubenberger et al. 2006).
379: These lines show a broad profile.
380: Due to poor signal-to-noise ratio of our spectrum it is difficult to identify
381: other spectral lines in the spectrum. However, narrow lines due to H$\alpha$,
382: [NII] $\lambda$6583, [SII] $\lambda\lambda$6713, 6731, originating from the
383: underlying HII region at the supernova location and superimposed on the
384: spectrum of the supernova, are clearly seen in the spectrum, and are
385: identified in Fig \ref {fig:comp_spec_neb}.
386:
387:
388:
389: A comparison of the nebular spectrum of SN 2007ru is made
390: with those of other SNe Ic in Fig \ref {fig:comp_spec_neb}. The line profile
391: of the [OI] $\lambda$$\lambda$6300, 6364 lines shows a sharp peak, very
392: similar to that seen in SN 1998bw, SN 2004aw and SN 2007ru.
393: Interestingly, despite the spectral similarity between SN 2007ru and SN 2003jd
394: at early phase, the [OI] line profile in the nebular spectra is different:
395: SN 2003jd shows a double peaked structure (see \S 7 for implications).
396: The profile of [CaII] $\lambda$$\lambda$7291, 7323/[OII] $\lambda$$\lambda$7320, 7330
397: line is similar to the [OI] line profile, as seen in SN 2004aw (Taubenberger et al. 2006),
398: but different from the profiles seen in SNe 1998bw and 2003jd, which show a flat topped
399: profile.
400:
401: The [OI] $\lambda$$\lambda$6300, 6364 and [CaII] $\lambda$$\lambda$7291, 7323
402: lines show a blueshift of 2300$\pm$300 ${\rm km \ sec^{-1}}$ and 1200$\pm$200 ${\rm km \ sec^{-1}}$,
403: respectively. This could be due to a kinematic offset (Maeda et al. 2007),
404: optical depth effect (Filippenko et al. 1994),
405: or extinction by the dust formed in the SN ejecta (although there is no strong
406: indication of the dust formation in the light curve (\S 3))
407:
408: The velocities derived from full width at half maximum of [OI] and [CaII] lines
409: are found to be 14000$\pm$2200 ${\rm km \ sec^{-1}}$ and 13500$\pm$1300 ${\rm km \ sec^{-1}}$,
410: respectively. These values are comparable to those seen in SN 1998bw and
411: SN 2003jd. The reddening corrected [OI]/[CaII] flux ratio is found to be
412: $\sim$ 1.6, which is again comparable to the ratios in SN 1998bw and SN 2003jd.
413: Thus,
414: though the profile of the [OI] and [CaII] lines in the the nebular spectrum
415: of SN 2007ru and SN 2003jd differ, other properties like line width and [OI]/[CaII] flux
416: ratio are similar.
417:
418:
419: \begin{figure}
420: \epsscale{1.3}
421: \plotone{f8.eps}
422: \caption{Comparison of the nebular spectrum of SN 2007ru with other Type Ic
423: supernovae.}
424: \label{fig:comp_spec_neb}
425: \end{figure}
426:
427:
428: \section{Bolometric light curve}
429: Direct distance estimates to the host galaxy of SN 2007ru are not available
430: in the literature. The radial velocity of UGC 12381, corrected for Local
431: Group infall onto the Virgo Cluster is 4832 ${\rm km \ sec^{-1}}$ (LEDA). For
432: $H_{0}$ = 72 ${\rm km \ sec^{-1} \ Mpc^{-1}}$, the distance modulus to UGC 12381
433: is $34.15\pm0.10$, where the error is estimated taking into account the
434: errors in HI velocity measurement of the galaxy
435: (Paturel et al. 2003) and the uncertainty in $H_{0}$ .
436:
437:
438: The NaID absorption line is clearly seen in the spectrum with an average
439: equivalent width of 1.67$\pm$0.37 \AA. Based on the equivalent widths
440: of NaID absorption seen in several SNe, Turatto et al. (2003)
441: find two distinct relations between NaID equivalent width and the reddening $E(B-V)$.
442: Using these relations, the observed NaID equivalent width indicates
443: $E(B-V)$ values of 0.85$\pm$0.19 and 0.27$\pm$0.06. The Galactic interstellar
444: reddening in the direction of UGC 12381 is estimated to be 0.26
445: (Schlegel, Finkbeiner \& Davis 1998). The NaID absorption seen in the spectra
446: of SN 2007ru is clearly from the Milky Way galaxy and no component due to
447: the host galaxy is detected. Hence, an $E(B-V)$ value of 0.27 is used for
448: extinction correction.
449:
450:
451:
452:
453: %SN 2007ru appears to be significantly reddened, with
454: % NaI D lines at the rest wavelength,
455: %clearly seen in our spectra. The average equivalent widths of the
456: %Galactic component of NaI D line is 1.67$\pm$0.37 \AA.
457: %Using the relation between equivalent width of NaI D line and reddening
458: %(Turatto et al.\ 2003), we estimate $E(B-V)$=0.27$\pm$0.06 and
459: %$E(B-V)$=0.85$\pm$0.19. The lower value of the reddening
460: %$E(B-V)$=0.27$\pm$0.06 is close to the Galactic interstellar reddening in the
461: %direction of UGC 12381, $E(B-V)$=0.26, reported by Schlegel, Finkbeiner \& Davis (1998).
462: %As the supernova lies at the edge of the outer spiral arm of the galaxy,
463: %significant reddening by the host ISM is not expected. Further,
464: %we do not detect NaI D lines at the galaxy rest frame. Hence $E(B-V)$=0.27
465: %and the Cardelli et al.(1989) law is used for extinction correction.
466:
467: The quasi bolometric LC of SN 2007ru is estimated using the
468: $UBVRI$ magnitudes corrected for reddening with $E(B-V)$=0.27 and the Cardelli et al. (1989)
469: extinction law. The magnitudes were converted to the monochromatic
470: flux, using zero points from Bessell et al. (1998). The fluxes were then spline
471: interpolated and integrated from
472: 3100\AA\ to 1.06$\mu$m. Since $U$ band observations are not available beyond
473: 35 days since $B$ maximum, the bolometric LC is estimated by
474: integrating the $BVRI$ fluxes only. The contribution of $U$ band to the
475: bolometric flux at phases $\sim 35$ days is estimated to be $\lsim 10\%$.
476: In the later phases when only $V$, $R$, $I$ or $V$, $R$ magnitudes are
477: available,
478: the bolometric magnitudes are derived by applying a bolometric correction
479: to the available magnitudes. The bolometric corrections were estimated based
480: on the last four points for which $B$, $V$, $R$ and $I$ measurements are
481: available.
482:
483:
484:
485: The quasi bolometric LC is shown in Fig \ref{fig:light_bol}.
486: Adding a conservative uncertainty of $\pm0.2$, the bolometric
487: magnitude at maximum is estimated as $-18.78\pm0.2$. The quasi bolometric
488: LCs, estimated in a similar manner, for SN 1998bw, SN 2002ap,
489: SN 2004aw and SN 1994I, are also plotted in Fig. \ref{fig:light_bol}.
490: The quasi bolometric LC of SN 2007ru is brighter than the other well studied
491: non-GRB broad-line SN 2002ap and normal SNe Ic,
492: and comparable to SN 1998bw. The decline in the
493: bolometric LC of SN 2007ru is considerably faster than SN 1998bw and comparable
494: to SN 2002ap.
495:
496:
497: Using Arnett's rule (Arnett 1982),
498: the mass of \ \Nifs \ required to power the quasi bolometric LC of SN 2007ru
499: is estimated to be $0.33 \Msun$, whereas it is $0.36 \Msun$ for SN 1998bw
500: (Fig. \ref{fig:light_bol}). It is to be noted here that the contribution due to
501: NIR bands is not included in the bolometric LC. The
502: NIR contribution to bolometric flux for broad-line SNe 2002ap and 1998bw is
503: $\sim 30\%$ (Tomita et al. 2006, Valenti et al. 2008), whereas for SN 1994I it
504: is only $\sim$ 10$\%$, while for SN 2004aw the NIR contribution
505: increases from $\sim$ 31$\%$ to $\sim$ 45$\%$ between +10
506: and +30 days (Taubenberger et al. 2006). Assuming an NIR
507: contribution to the bolometric flux similar to SNe 2002ap and 1998bw ($\sim$ 30$\%$),
508: the mass of \ \Nifs\ for SN 2007ru is estimated to be $\sim$ 0.4 $\Msun$.
509: The total rate of energy production via \ \Nifs -
510: \Cofs \ chain estimated using the analytical formula by Nadyozhin (1994), for
511: different values of mass of \ \Nifs \ synthesized during the explosion and are
512: plotted with the quasi bolometric LC (thin lines) in Fig \ref{fig:light_bol}.
513: The plots indicate a good match of the energy production rate for $0.33 \Msun$
514: of \ \Nifs \ with the initial decline of the quasi-bolometric light curve of SN 2007ru,
515: in agreement with the estimate based on Arnett's rule.
516:
517: \begin{figure}
518: \epsscale{1.0}
519: \plotone{f9.eps}
520: %\plotone{bol_bw.eps}
521: %\plotone{f4.eps}
522: \figcaption{Quasi bolometric light curves of SN 2007ru, SN 1998bw, SN2002ap,
523: SN1994I and SN 2004aw, estimated as explained in text. The lines
524: represent the rate of energy production via
525: \Nifs -- \Cofs \ chain for different values of M(\Nifs).
526: \label{fig:light_bol}}
527: \end{figure}
528:
529: \section{Properties of the host galaxy of SN 2007ru}
530:
531: \subsection{The supernova region}
532: An attempt is made to estimate the metallicity of the region where the
533: supernova exploded, based on the observed [NII]/H$\alpha$ flux ratio, from the
534: underlying HII region, superimposed in the
535: nebular spectrum of the supernova. Following Pettini \& Pagel (2004), the
536: N2 index (log[NII]/H$\alpha$) is estimated to be $-0.36$. Using this, an
537: oxygen abundance of $12 + \log (O/H) = 8.78$ is derived. Another way
538: of deriving oxygen abundance is using the $\log ([NII]/H\alpha)$ diagnostic
539: diagram (Kewley \& Dopita, 2002), which requires an estimate of the ionization
540: parameter $q$ or $U$ ($U =q/c$; $c$ is the speed of light) also. The ionization
541: parameter {\it U} can be estimated from the [SII]/[SIII] ratio following
542: Diaz et al. (1991). The observed flux of [SII] lines $\lambda$$\lambda$6717,
543: 6731 and [SIII] line $\lambda$9069, seen in the nebular spectrum can be used
544: to estimate the ionization parameter, however, our spectrum does not cover the
545: [SIII] $\lambda$9532 region. In the extragalactic HII regions ratio
546: ([SIII]$\lambda$9532/[SIII]$\lambda$9069) is found to vary in the range
547: 1.58 to 3.77 with an observed mean of 2.66$\pm$0.46, against the theoretical
548: value of 2.44 (Diaz et al. 1985, Vilchez et al. 1988, Kennicutt \& Garnett 1996)
549: This indicates that the ionization parameter $q$ can vary in the range
550: $\sim 10^{6}$ to 3$\times10^{6}$. Using the
551: log([NII]/H$\alpha$) diagnostic diagram for the above estimated range of the
552: ionization parameter, the oxygen abundance 12 + {log}(O/H) is found to lie close to
553: 8.8, which is in good agreement with the independent estimate of 12 + {log}(O/H) = 8.78.
554: This indicates the oxygen abundance in region where the supernova SN 2007ru occurred is
555: close to solar.
556:
557: In a recent study Modjaz et al. (2008b) have concluded that the broad-line
558: supernovae associated with GRBs are generally found in metal poor environments as compared
559: to the broad-line supernovae without GRBs. They have shown that, in their
560: sample, the
561: oxygen abundance 12 + log(O/H)$_{KD2}$ = 8.5 can be treated as the boundary
562: between galaxies that have GRBs associated supernovae and
563: those without GRBs. The estimated oxygen abundance of $\sim$ 8.8 at the
564: location of SN 2007ru fits well in the range expected for a broad-line
565: supernova without GRB.
566:
567: \subsection{The nuclear region}
568:
569: The nuclear spectrum of the host galaxy of SN 2007ru (obtained on 2008 October
570: 29) is shown in Fig. \ref{fig:nuc_spec}. The nuclear spectrum shows
571: strong hydrogen lines of the Balmer series, permitted as well as forbidden
572: lines of oxygen, lines due to helium and the calcium NIR triplet
573: (refer Fig. \ref{fig:nuc_spec}). The FWHM velocities of the lines indicate
574: velocities of the order of 500-700 ${\rm km \ sec^{-1}}$. The hydrogen Balmer lines show
575: broad wings, with a noticable asymmetry in the blue wing. Such broad wings are
576: not seen in the forbidden lines. Another interesting feature of the
577: nuclear spectrum of the host galaxy is the presence of numerous FeII lines
578: seen at wavelengths 4400--4600\AA, 4924\AA, 5018\AA \ and 5100--5400\AA,
579: similar to the spectra of Active Galactic Nuclei (Veron-Cetty et al. 2004,
580: Veron-Cetty et al. 2006).
581:
582:
583:
584: \begin{figure}
585: \epsscale{1.0}
586: \plotone{f10.eps}
587: %\plotone{bol_bw.eps}
588: %\plotone{f4.eps}
589: \figcaption{Nuclear spectrum of the host galaxy UGC 12381 of SN 2007ru.
590: \label{fig:nuc_spec}}
591: \end{figure}
592:
593:
594:
595: Using the diagnostic diagram (Ho, Filippenko \&
596: Sargent 1997) based on the line ratio $\log([OIII]\lambda 5007/H\beta)$ versus
597: $\log([OI]\lambda 6300/H\alpha)$ \ and \ $\log([OIII]\lambda5007/H\beta)$
598: versus \ \ $\log([SII]\lambda\lambda6717,6731/H\alpha)$ the nucleus of UGC 12381
599: can be classified as belonging to the HII region class, with very weak [SII] and [NII] lines.
600:
601: %while it occupies a place well away from
602: %the HII region in the diagnostic diagram log([OIII]$\lambda$5007/H$\beta$)
603: %versus log([SII]$\lambda\lambda$6717,6731/H$\alpha$).
604:
605: It thus appears that the host galaxy of SN 2007ru probably hosts a mild
606: AGN with a nuclear HII region, which needs further detailed study.
607:
608:
609:
610: \section{Discussion \& Conclusions}
611:
612: The optical spectra of SN 2007ru presented here show broad spectral features
613: similar to that seen in GRB-associated SN 1998bw, XRF-associated SN 2006aj and the
614: broad-line SN 2003jd. The expansion velocity of the ejecta of SN 2007ru is higher
615: than that of the normal SN Ic SN 1994I and SN 2006aj, but comparable to that of
616: SN 1998bw and SN 2003jd.
617:
618:
619: The maximum luminosity of SN 2007ru is comparable to SN 1998bw.
620: The light curve reaches a peak in only $\sim 8\pm 3$ days, which is remarkably
621: faster than in SN 1998bw ($\sim$ 20 days).
622: The mass of \Nifs\ ejected in SN 2007ru is estimated as $\sim 0.4 \Msun$,
623: which is similar to that estimated for SNe 1998bw and 2003jd,
624: slightly larger than that for SN 2004aw, and
625: much larger than that for the broad-line SNe 2002ap and 2006aj
626: and the normal SN Ic 1994I (Table \ref{tab:parameters}).
627:
628:
629: From the rise time of the light curve ($\tau$) and the expansion velocity ($v$),
630: we estimate mass of SN ejecta ($M_{\rm ej}$) and the kinetic energy of the ejecta
631: ($\KE$). If the optical opacity is assumed to be constant, the timescale of
632: the light curve is expressed as $\tau \propto \Mej^{3/4} \KE^{-1/4}$
633: (Arnett 1982). The expansion velocity is given by
634: $v \propto \Mej^{-1/2} \KE^{1/2}$.
635: The rise time of SN 2007ru ($8 \pm 3$ days) is comparable to that of the
636: well studied SN 1994I, while the expansion velocity ($v = 20,000$ ${\rm km \ sec^{-1}}$ at
637: maximum) is about twice. Assuming $\Mej=1.0 \Msun$ and $\KE=1.0 \times 10^{51}$
638: ergs for SN 1994I (see Table \ref{tab:parameters}), and the observed expansion velocity of
639: SN 2007ru, we estimate $\Mej =1.3^{+1.1}_{-0.8} \Msun$ and
640: $\KE = 5^{+4.7}_{-3.0} \times 10^{51}$ ergs for SN 2007ru. A similar analysis
641: for SN 1998bw, assuming the rise time and the velocity of SN 1998bw to be
642: twice that of SN 1994I, leads to $\Mej \approx 8 \Msun$ and
643: $\KE \approx 30 \times 10^{51}$ergs,
644: qualitatively consistent with the results of detailed modelling
645: (Iwamoto et al. 1998; Nakamura et al. 2001)
646: \footnote{Given the very high
647: $M_{\rm Ni}/M_{\rm ej}$ ratio ($\sim 0.3$), the higher end of
648: the ejecta mass may be preferred ($\Mej \sim 2.4 \Msun$,
649: and $\KE \sim 9.7 \times 10^{51}$ erg).
650: Since the explosion with a larger kinetic energy can produce a larger
651: amount of \Nifs, the large \Nifs\ mass in SN 2007ru may also support this.}.
652: If we take SN 2003jd as a reference (Valenti et al. 2008),
653: $\Mej =1.7^{+1.5}_{-1.0} \Msun$ and
654: $\KE = 8.6^{+7.2}_{-5.2} \times 10^{51}$ ergs are derived for SN 2007ru.
655: It should however be noted, that a
656: detailed modelling is required to derive accurate values of $\Mej$ and $\KE$
657: \footnote{An attempt was made to estimate the mass of the ejecta $\Mej$ and
658: kinetic energy $\KE$ using the width of the light curve. The width is defined
659: as the time from peak of the bolometric light curve to the time when the luminosity
660: is equal to the 1/{\it e} times the peak luminosity, which is equivalent to
661: a decline of 1.1 mag from peak. The derived width is $\sim$~18 days for SN 2007ru.
662: With this value, we have estimated $\Mej$ and $\KE$ in the same manner
663: and derived larger values of $\Mej$ and $\KE$ ($M_{\rm ej} \sim 4.5 \Msun$
664: and $E_{\rm K} \sim 20 \times 10^{51}$ erg). Our conclusion of large E/M is thus not affected.}.
665:
666:
667: SN 2007ru has a large kinetic energy while the ejecta mass is close to that of
668: normal SNe Ic. Studies of SNe Ic (\eg Nomoto et al. 2007) have shown a trend,
669: although weak, wherein SNe having massive ejecta tend to have a larger kinetic
670: energy and eject more \Nifs, connecting normal SNe to GRB-associated SNe.
671: In contrast to this trend, SN 2007ru which resides at the higher energy end has
672: a lower mass ejecta, leading to a higher $E/M$.
673: SN 2007ru thus adds to the diversity of SNe Ic.
674:
675: The spectroscopic properties of SN 2007ru at early phases are
676: most similar to SN 2003jd.
677: Also if we take the higher end of $\Mej$, the ejecta properties
678: of SN 2007ru are also close to those of SN 2003jd
679: (although the estimated $E/M$ is higher for SN 2007ru).
680: However, the [OI] line profiles in the nebular spectra
681: are dissimilar. SN 2007ru shows a single peaked profile while
682: SN 2003jd shows a double-peaked profile.
683: In aspherical explosions, we would expect a single-peaked [OI] profile
684: for the polar-viewed case, and a double-peaked profile for the side-viewed case
685: (Mazzali et al. 2005; Maeda et al. 2008; Modjaz et al. 2008a).
686: Also, the polar-viewed aspherical explosion tends to show a brighter
687: peak (Maeda et al. 2006) and faster velocity (Tanaka et al. 2007).
688: This matches with the properties of SN 2007ru.
689: Thus, we suggest that SN 2007ru could be an aspherical explosion viewed from
690: the polar direction.
691: Detailed multidimensional modelling is required to answer if the high $E/M$
692: derived for SN 2007ru results from the effect of asphericity.
693:
694:
695:
696: The nebular spectrum of SN 2007ru shows narrow emission lines due to H$\alpha$,
697: [NII], [SII] and [SIII], arising from the underlying/neighbouring host
698: galaxy HII region. The flux ratios indicate an oxygen abundance
699: of $\sim$ 8.8 in the region of the supernova. The nearly solar oxygen abundance
700: at the location of the supernova matches
701: well with earlier abundance studies for supernova host galaxies.
702:
703: The nuclear spectrum of the host galaxy of SN 2007ru shows broad hydrogen
704: Balmer lines, with an asymmetric blue wing. Emission lines due to FeII are also
705: fairly prominent. Low ionization emission lines are also present. It appears
706: that the galaxy hosts a mild AGN with nuclear HII region.
707:
708:
709:
710:
711: \acknowledgements
712: We are thankful to the anonymous referee for valuable comments and T.P. Prabhu
713: for useful discussions. This work has
714: been carried out under the INSA (Indian National Science Academy) -
715: JSPS (Japan Society for Promotion of Science) exchange programme.
716: This research was supported in part by the National Science Foundation
717: under Grant No. PHY05-51164, World Premier International
718: Research Center Initiative, MEXT, Japan, and by the Grant-in-Aid
719: for Scientific Research of the JSPS (18104003, 18540231, 20540226)
720: and MEXT (19047004, 20040004). M.T. is supported through the JSPS Research
721: Fellowships for Young Scientists. We thank all the observers of the
722: 2-m HCT (operated by the Indian Institute of Astrophysics), who kindly
723: provided part of their observing time for the supernova observations.
724: This work has made use of the NASA Astrophysics Data System and the NASA/IPAC
725: Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
726: California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National
727: Aeronautics and Space Administration.
728:
729:
730: \begin{thebibliography}{}
731:
732: \bibitem[Arnett (1982)]{arn82} Arnett, W.D. 1982, ApJ, 253, 785
733:
734: \bibitem[Bessell, Castelli \& Plez, (1998)]{bessell98}Bessell, M.S., Castelli, F., Plez, B. 1998, A\&A, 333, 231
735:
736:
737: \bibitem[Cardeli et~al. (1989)]{Cardelli89} Cardelli J.~A., Clayton G.~C., Mathis J.~S., 1989, ApJ, 345, 245
738:
739: \bibitem[Chornock et al. (2007)]{chor07}Chornock, R., Serduke, F. J. D., Wang, X., Filippenko, A. V., Li, W. 2007, CBET, 1151
740:
741: \bibitem[Diaz et al. (1985)]{diaz85} Diaz, A.I., Pagel, B.E.J. \& Terlevich, E. 1985, MNRAS, 214, 41
742:
743: \bibitem[Diaz et al. (1991)] {diaz91} Diaz, A.I., Terlevich, E., Vilchez, J.M., Edmunds, M.G., 1991, MNRAS, 253, 245
744:
745: \bibitem[Donati \& Ciabattari (2007)]{don07}Donati, S., and Ciabattari, F., 2007, CBET 1149
746: \bibitem[Filippenko et al.(1994)] {fil94}Filippenko, A. V., Matheson, T., \& Barth, A. J. 1994, AJ, 108, 2220
747: \bibitem[Foley et al. (2003)]{foley03} Foley, R. J., et al. 2003, PASP, 115, 1220
748:
749: \bibitem[Galama et al. (1998)]{gal98} Galama, T. J., et al. 1998, Nature, 395, 670
750:
751: \bibitem[Ho, Filippenko \& Sargent (1997)]{ho97} Ho, L.C., Filippenko, A.V., Sargent,W.L.W.
752: 1997, ApJSS, 112, 315
753:
754: \bibitem[Iwamoto et al.(1998)]{iwa98} Iwamoto, K., et al. 1998, Nature, 395, 672
755:
756: \bibitem[Kennicutt \& Garnett (1996)]{kenn96} Kennicutt, R.C., Jr \& Garnett, D.R., ApJ, 1996, 456, 504
757:
758: \bibitem[Kewley \& Dopita (2002)]{kew02} Kewley, L.J., \& Dopita, M.A. 2002, ApJSS, 142, 35
759:
760: \bibitem[Kinugasa et al. (2002)]{kin02} Kinugasa, K., et al. 2002, 577, L97
761:
762: \bibitem[Landolt (1992)]{lan92} Landolt, A.U., 1992, AJ, 104, 340
763:
764: \bibitem[Maeda et al. (2006)]{mae06b} Maeda, K., Mazzali, P.A., \& Nomoto, K 2006, ApJ, 546, 1331
765:
766: \bibitem[Maeda et al. (2007)]{mae07} Maeda, K., et al. ApJ, 2007, 666, 1069
767:
768: \bibitem[Maeda et al. (2008)]{mae08} Maeda, K., et al. 2008, Science, 319, 1220
769:
770: \bibitem[Malesani et al. (2004)]{male04} Malesani, D. et al. 2004, ApJ, 609, L5
771:
772: \bibitem[Matheson et al. (2003)]{mat03} Matheson, T. et al. 2003, ApJ, 599, 394
773: .
774: \bibitem[Mazzali et al. (2005)]{maz05} Mazzali, P. A., et al. 2005, Science, 308, 1284
775:
776: \bibitem[Mazzali et al. (2007)]{maz07} Mazzali, P. A., et al. 2007, ApJ, 670, 592
777:
778: \bibitem[Mazzali et al. (2006)]{maz07} Mazzali, P. A., et al. 2006, Nat, 442, 1018
779:
780: \bibitem[Modjaz et al. (2008a)]{mod08a} Modjaz, M., Kirshner, R. P., Blondin, S., Challis, P., Matheson, T. 2008a, ApJ, 687, 9
781:
782: \bibitem[Modjaz et al. (2008b)]{mod08b}Modjaz, M., Kewley, L., Kirshner, R.P., Stanek, K.J. et al. 2008b, AJ, 135, 1136
783:
784: \bibitem[Modjaz et al. (2006)]{mod06} Modjaz, M., et al. 2006, ApJ, 645, 21
785:
786: \bibitem[Nadyozhin(1994)]{nad94} Nadyozhin, D. K. 1994, ApJS, 92, 527
787:
788: \bibitem[Nakamura et al.(2001)]{nak01} Nakamura, T., Mazzali, P. A., Nomoto, K., Iwamoto, K. 2001, ApJ, 550, 991
789:
790: \bibitem[Nomoto et al.(1994)]{nom94} Nomoto, K., et al. 1994, Nature, 371, 227.
791:
792: \bibitem[Nomoto et al.(2007)]{nom07} Nomoto, K., Tominaga, N., Tanaka, M., Maeda, K.,
793: Suzuki, T., Deng, J. S., \& Mazzali, P. A. 2006, SWIFT and GRBs: Unveiling the
794: Relativistic Universe, Il Nuovo Cimento, 121, 1207-1222 (astroph/0702472)
795:
796: \bibitem[Patat et al.(2001)]{pat01} Patat, F., et al. 2001, ApJ, 555, 900
797:
798: \bibitem[Paturel et al. (2003)]{patu03} Paturel, G., Theureau, G., Bottinelli, L., Gouguenheim, L., Coudreau-Durand, N., Hallet, N., Petit, C. 2003, A\&A, 412, 57
799:
800:
801: \bibitem[Pettini \& Pagel (2004)] {pen04} Pettini, M. \& Pagel, B.E., 2004, MNRAS, 348, L59
802:
803: \bibitem[Pian et al. (2006)]{pian06} Pian, E. et al. 2006, Nature, 442, 1011
804:
805: \bibitem[Richmond et al. 1996]{rich96} Richmond, M. W., Treffers, R. R., Filippenko, A. V., Paik, Y., Leibundgut, B., Schulman, E., Cox, C. V. 1996, AJ, 111, 327
806:
807: \bibitem[Sauer et al. (2006)]{sau06} Sauer, D. N., Mazzali, P. A., Deng, J., Valenti, S., Nomoto, K., \& Filippenko, A. V. 2006, MNRAS, 369, 1939
808: \bibitem[Schlegel et~al.{1998}]{Schlegel98} Schlegel D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P. \& Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525
809:
810: \bibitem[Tanaka et al. (2007)]{tan07} Tanaka, M., Maeda, K., Mazzali, P.A., \& Nomoto, K. 2007, ApJ, 668, L19
811:
812: \bibitem[Taubenberger et al. (2006)]{tau06}Taubenberger, S., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 1459
813: \bibitem[Tomita et al. (2006)]{tomita06} Tomita, H., et al. 2006, ApJ, 644, 400
814: \bibitem[Turatto et al. (2003)]{turatto03} Turatto M., Benetti S., Cappellaro E.,
815: 2003, in Hillebrandt W., Leibundgut B., eds, Proceedings to the ESO/MPA/MPE Workshop
816: ``From Twilight to Highlight: The Physics of Supernovae''. Springer, Berlin, p. 200
817:
818: \bibitem[Valenti et al (2008)]{val08}Valenti, S., et al., 2008, MNRAS, 383, 1485
819:
820: \bibitem[Veron-Cetty et al. (2004)]{veron04} Veron-Cetty, M.P., Joly, M. \& Veron, P., 2004, A\&A, 417, 515
821:
822: \bibitem[Veron-Cetty et al. (2006)]{veron06} Veron-Cetty, M.P. et al. 2006, A\&A, 451, 851
823:
824: \bibitem[Vilchez \& Pagel (1988)]{vil88} Vilchez, J.M., \& Pagel, B.E.J., 1988, MNRAS, 231, 257
825:
826: \bibitem[Winslow \& Li (2007)]{win07} Winslow, D. \& Li, W. 2007, CBET 1149
827:
828: \end{thebibliography}
829:
830:
831:
832: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccc}
833: \tablewidth{0pt}
834: \tablecaption{Magnitudes for the sequence of secondary standard stars in
835: the field of SN 2007ru.\tablenotemark{*}}
836: \tablehead{
837: ID & U & B & V & R & I
838: }
839: \startdata
840: 1 & $14.433\pm0.015 $& $14.396\pm0.006 $& $13.877\pm0.005 $& $13.531\pm0.005 $& $13.116\pm0.006 $ \\
841: 2 & $14.918\pm0.017 $& $14.790\pm0.013 $& $14.073\pm0.018 $& $13.618\pm0.016 $& $13.111\pm0.023 $ \\
842: 3 & $15.111\pm0.020 $& $15.020\pm0.016 $& $14.343\pm0.020 $& $13.953\pm0.017 $& $13.488\pm0.024 $ \\
843: 4 & $15.870\pm0.030 $& $15.554\pm0.010 $& $14.714\pm0.021 $& $14.232\pm0.012 $& $13.689\pm0.019 $ \\
844: 5 & $16.105\pm0.030 $& $15.670\pm0.021 $& $14.796\pm0.024 $& $14.317\pm0.002 $& $13.783\pm0.004 $ \\
845: 6 & $15.390\pm0.025 $& $15.339\pm0.014 $& $14.780\pm0.022 $& $14.406\pm0.021 $& $13.995\pm0.021 $ \\
846: 7 & $15.773\pm0.032 $& $15.616\pm0.019 $& $14.869\pm0.024 $& $14.444\pm0.024 $& $13.933\pm0.030 $ \\
847: 8 & $16.138\pm0.030 $& $15.900\pm0.012 $& $15.046\pm0.021 $& $14.550\pm0.023 $& $13.985\pm0.030 $ \\
848: 9 & $16.792\pm0.036 $& $16.136\pm0.018 $& $15.139\pm0.022 $& $14.553\pm0.014 $& $13.951\pm0.025 $ \\
849: 10& $17.312\pm0.045 $& $16.619\pm0.017 $& $15.631\pm0.017 $& $15.066\pm0.014 $& $14.471\pm0.014 $ \\
850: 11& $17.321\pm0.040 $& $16.730\pm0.014 $& $15.739\pm0.025 $& $15.153\pm0.014 $& $14.555\pm0.021 $ \\
851: 12& $17.970\pm0.052 $& $16.954\pm0.019 $& $15.766\pm0.025 $& $15.083\pm0.024 $& $14.362\pm0.031 $ \\
852: 13& $16.552\pm0.045 $& $16.505\pm0.020 $& $15.796\pm0.030 $& $15.368\pm0.026 $& $14.864\pm0.030 $ \\
853: 14& $17.518\pm0.050 $& $16.997\pm0.005 $& $16.045\pm0.018 $& $15.513\pm0.018 $& $14.937\pm0.027 $ \\
854:
855: \enddata
856: \tablenotetext{*}{The stars are identified in Figure. \ref{fig:field}}
857: \label{tab:std_star_mag}
858: \end{deluxetable}
859:
860: %\begin{minipage}{120mm}
861: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccc}
862: %\rotate
863: \tablewidth{0pt}
864: \tablecaption{Photometric observations of SN 2007ru}
865: \tablehead{
866: Date & J.D. & Phase\tablenotemark{*} & U & B & V & R & I\\
867: & 2454000+ & (days) & & & & &}
868: \startdata
869: 02/12/2007& 437.086& -2& $16.318\pm0.021$ & $ 16.562\pm0.016$ & $16.036\pm0.011$ & $ 15.798\pm0.022$ & $ 15.426\pm0.020$\\
870: 04/12/2007& 439.155& 0& $16.299\pm0.029$ & $ 16.533\pm0.120$ & $15.951\pm0.015$ & $ 15.678\pm0.019$ & $ 15.296\pm0.056$\\
871: 10/12/2007& 445.029& 6& $16.943\pm0.034$ & $ 17.036\pm0.008$ & $16.025\pm0.012$ & $ 15.726\pm0.012$ & $ 15.244\pm0.014$\\
872: 11/12/2007& 446.047& 7& $17.211\pm0.045$ & $ 17.172\pm0.019$ & $16.070\pm0.011$ & $ 15.746\pm0.008$ & $ 15.215\pm0.011$\\
873: 12/12/2007& 447.027& 8& $17.346\pm0.067$ & $ 17.296\pm0.019$ & $16.121\pm0.011$ & $ 15.759\pm0.014$ & $ 15.265\pm0.016$\\
874: 18/12/2007& 453.046& 14& & $ 18.078\pm0.039$ & $16.598\pm0.014$ & $ 16.111\pm0.035$ & $ 15.501\pm0.010$\\
875: 19/12/2007& 454.056& 15& & $ 18.114\pm0.019$ & $16.687\pm0.012$ & $ 16.184\pm0.007$ & $ 15.553\pm0.017$\\
876: 22/12/2007& 457.067& 18& & $ 18.430\pm0.024$ & $16.954\pm0.011$ & $ 16.404\pm0.011$ & $ 15.738\pm0.013$\\
877: 24/12/2007& 459.097& 20& & $ 18.540\pm0.090$ & $17.034\pm0.070$ & $ 16.512\pm0.095$ & $ 15.799\pm0.095$\\
878: 25/12/2007& 460.069& 21& & $ 18.596\pm0.017$ & $17.140\pm0.035$ & $ 16.621\pm0.016$ & $ 15.929\pm0.060$\\
879: 26/12/2007& 461.079& 22& $18.889\pm0.040$ & $ 18.681\pm0.021$ & $17.221\pm0.024$ & $ 16.711\pm0.010$ & $ 16.031\pm0.016$\\
880: 30/12/2007& 465.061& 26& $18.990\pm0.038$ & $ 18.902\pm0.032$ & $17.460\pm0.008$ & $ 16.956\pm0.013$ & $ 16.278\pm0.008$\\
881: 31/12/2007& 466.029& 27& $19.118\pm0.060$ & $ 18.902\pm0.036$ & $17.517\pm0.014$ & $ 17.069\pm0.024$ & $ 16.329\pm0.031$\\
882: 04/01/2008& 470.045& 31& $19.241\pm0.069$ & $ 19.057\pm0.021$ & $17.741\pm0.024$ & $ 17.252\pm0.015$ & $ 16.532\pm0.016$\\
883: 21/01/2008& 487.041& 48& & & $18.509\pm0.096$ & $ 17.964\pm0.037$ & $ 17.181\pm0.022$\\
884: 24/01/2008& 490.063& 51& & $ 19.629\pm0.021$ & $18.501\pm0.019$ & $ 18.130\pm0.014$ & $ 17.382\pm0.031$\\
885: 03/02/2008& 500.055& 61& & $ 19.754\pm0.044$ & $18.665\pm0.092$4& $ 18.282\pm0.023$ & $ 17.597\pm0.082$\\
886: 29/02/2008& 526.068& 87& & & $19.300\pm0.026$ & $ 19.075\pm0.050$ & $ 18.395\pm0.109$\\
887: 03/05/2008& 590.431& 151& & & $20.377\pm0.19 $ & $ 20.007\pm0.15 $ & $ 19.506\pm0.164$\\
888: 06/06/2008& 624.400& 185& & & $20.921\pm0.20 $ & $ 20.325\pm0.169$ & \\
889: 17/06/2008& 635.360& 196& & & $21.083\pm0.088$ & $ 20.466\pm0.133$ & \\
890: 03/07/2008& 651.348& 212& & & $21.115\pm0.084$ & $ 20.483\pm0.128$ & \\
891: \enddata
892: \tablenotetext{\rlap{*}}{{ \,Observed phase with respect to the epoch of
893: maximum in $B$ band (JD 2454438.8).}}
894: \label{tab:sn_mag}
895: \end{deluxetable}
896: %\end{minipage}
897:
898: \begin{deluxetable}{lcrc}
899: \tablewidth{0pt}
900: \tablecaption{Log of spectroscopic observations of SN 2007\lowercase{ru}}
901: \tablehead{
902: Date & J.D. & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Phase\rlap{*}} & Range \\
903: & 2454000+ & \multicolumn{1}{c}{(days)} & \AA\ \\
904: }
905: \startdata
906: 03/12/07 & 438.21 & $ +8 $ & 5200-9100 \\
907: 10/12/07 & 445.06 & $ +15 $ & 3500-7000; 5200-9100\\
908: 11/12/07 & 446.07 & $ +16 $ & 3500-7000; 5200-9100\\
909: 15/12/07 & 450.14 & $ +20 $ & 3500-7000; 5200-9100\\
910: 19/12/07 & 454.13 & $ +24 $ & 3500-7000; 5200-9100\\
911: 22/12/07 & 457.09 & $ +27 $ & 3500-7000 \\
912: 04/01/08 & 470.09 & $ +40 $ & 3500-7000; 5200-9100\\
913: 03/02/08 & 500.08 & $ +70 $ & 3500-7000 \\
914: 12/06/08 & 630.38 & $ +200 $ & 5200-9100 \\
915:
916: \enddata
917: \tablenotetext{*}{Relative to the epoch of date of explosion JD = 2454430}
918: \label{tab:spec_log}
919: \end{deluxetable}
920:
921:
922: \begin{deluxetable}{lllllllllll}
923: %\rotate
924: \tablewidth{0pt}
925: \tablecaption{Comparison of parameters of SNe~Ic }
926: \tablehead{
927: & M$_V$ &$\Delta$m$_{15}$(V)& $\gamma_{\rm V}$&$\gamma_{\rm R}$&$\gamma_{\rm I}$&$E_{\rm K} / 10^{51}$ergs & $M_{\rm ej}/M_\odot$ & $M_{\rm N\!i}/M_\odot$ & $E_{\rm K}/M_{\rm ej}$ & References
928: }
929:
930: \startdata
931:
932: SN 1994I & $-17.62$ &1.65 &0.029 &0.028 &0.026 & 1 & 0.9--1 & 0.07(0.07) & $\sim 1$ & 1, 2, 3 \\
933: SN 2004aw & $-18.02$ &0.62 &0.014 &0.017 &0.015 & 3.5--9.0 & 3.5--8.0 & 0.25--0.35(0.2) & $\sim 1$ & 4 \\
934: SN 2003jd & $-18.9$ &1.44 &0.022 &0.022 &0.029 & 7$^{+3}_{-2.0}$ & 3.0$\pm$1.0 & 0.36 & $\sim 2.3$ & 5 \\
935: SN 2002ap & $-17.35$ &0.87 & & & & 4 & 2.5 & 0.1(0.06) & $\sim1.6$ & 6, 7, 8 \\
936: SN 2007ru & $-19.06$ &0.92 &0.021 &0.028 &0.030 & 5$^{+4.7}_{-3.0}$ & 1.3$^{+1.1}_{-0.8}$ & 0.4 & $\sim 3.8$ & This work\\
937: SN 1998bw & $-19.13$ &0.75 &0.020 &0.022 &0.022 & 30 & 10 & 0.40(0.5) & $\sim 3$ & 9, 10, 11\\
938: SN 2006aj & $-18.7$ &1.14 & & & & 2 & 2 & 0.21 & $\sim 1$ & 12, 13\\
939: \enddata
940:
941: %\hline
942: %\end{tabular}
943: %\\[1.6ex]
944: \tablenotetext{*}{$M_{\rm N\!i}$ given in parenthesis are the values estimated using the Arnett's rule (including NIR contribution in the bolometric
945: light curves, see text), $\gamma$ represents the magnitude decline rates (mag/day) between 45 - 80 days}
946: \tablerefs{(1) Richmond et al. 1996; (2) Nomoto et al. 1994; (3) Sauer et al. 2006; (4) Taubenberger et al. 2006; (5) Valenti et al. 2008;
947: (6) Mazzali et al. 2007; (7) Foley et al. 2003; (8) Tomita et al. 2006; (9) Galama et al. 1998; (10) Iwamoto et al. 1998;
948: (11) Nakamura et al. 2001; (12) Modjaz et al. 2006; (13) Mazzali et al. 2006 }
949: \label{tab:parameters}
950: %\end{footnotesize}
951: %\end{center}
952: %\end{table*}
953: \end{deluxetable}
954:
955:
956: \end{document}
957:
958: \begin{figure}
959: \epsscale{1.0}
960: \plotone{f1.eps}
961: \figcaption{Identification chart for SN 2007ru. The stars used as local
962: standards are marked as numbers 1-14.
963: \label{fig:field}}
964: \end{figure}
965:
966: \begin{figure}
967: \epsscale{1.0}
968: \plotone{f2.eps}
969: \figcaption{The $UBVRI$ \ LCs of SN 2007ru. The LCs have been shifted by the
970: amount indicated in the legend. The unfiltered magnitudes reported by amatures
971: and the pre-discovery limiting magnitudes have been included with $R$ band magnitudes
972: in the figure.
973: \label{fig:light} }
974: \end{figure}
975:
976:
977: \begin{figure}
978: \epsscale{1.0}
979: \plotone{f3.eps}
980: \figcaption{Comparison of LCs of SN 2007ru with other Type Ib/c SNe. The LCs of
981: the supernovae in comparison have been shifted arbitrarily to match the date of
982: maximum and magnitude at maximum.
983: \label{fig:fig_comp_lc} }
984: \end{figure}
985:
986: \begin{figure}
987: \epsscale{1.0}
988: \plotone{f4.eps}
989: \figcaption{Optical spectral evolution of SN 2007ru (top
990: panel). The spectra are corrected for the host galaxy redshift. Time in days
991: since the day of explosion (2008 November 25- see text) is indicated for each
992: spectrum. For clarity, the spectra have been displaced vertically. Main
993: spectral features are identified and marked in the spectrum taken $\sim$ 16
994: days after explosion (bottom panel).
995: \label{fig:spec1}}
996: \end{figure}
997:
998: \begin{figure}
999: \epsscale{1.0}
1000: \plotone{f5.eps}
1001: \figcaption{Comparison of spectra of SN 2007ru with broad-line type Ic SN 2003jd
1002: and normal spectrum type Ic SN 2004aw at different epochs.
1003: \label{fig:comp_spec1}}
1004: \end{figure}
1005:
1006: \begin{figure}
1007: \epsscale{1.0}
1008: \plotone{f6.eps}
1009: \figcaption{Same as figure 5 but at different epochs.
1010: \label{fig:comp_spec2}}
1011: \end{figure}
1012:
1013: \begin{figure}
1014: \epsscale{1.0}
1015: %\plotone{vel1.eps}
1016: %\plotone{vel_bw.eps}
1017: \plotone{f7.eps}
1018: \figcaption{Evolution of the photospheric velocity of SN 2007ru and other SNe Ic
1019: inferred from Si II $\lambda$ 6355 line. Uncertainty in estimating days since
1020: explosion for SN 2007ru due to error in the date of explosion (JD 2454430$\pm$3) is
1021: indicated by the horizontal arrow.
1022: \label{fig:phot_vel}}
1023: \end{figure}
1024:
1025: \begin{figure}
1026: \epsscale{1.0}
1027: \plotone{f8.eps}
1028: \figcaption{Comparison of the nebular spectrum of SN 2007ru with other Type Ic
1029: supernovae.
1030: \label{fig:comp_spec_neb}}
1031: \end{figure}
1032:
1033:
1034:
1035:
1036: \begin{figure}
1037: \epsscale{1.0}
1038: \plotone{f9.eps}
1039: %\plotone{bol_bw.eps}
1040: %\plotone{f4.eps}
1041: \figcaption{Quasi bolometric light curves of SN 2007ru, SN 1998bw, SN2002ap,
1042: SN1994I and SN 2004aw, estimated as explained in text. The lines
1043: represent the rate of energy production via
1044: \Nifs -- \Cofs \ chain for different values of M(\Nifs).
1045: \label{fig:light_bol}}
1046: \end{figure}
1047:
1048:
1049: \begin{figure}
1050: \epsscale{1.0}
1051: \plotone{f10.eps}
1052: %\plotone{bol_bw.eps}
1053: %\plotone{f4.eps}
1054: \figcaption{Nuclear spectrum of the host galaxy UGC 12381 of SN 2007ru.
1055: \label{fig:nuc_spec}}
1056: \end{figure}
1057:
1058:
1059:
1060:
1061: \end{document}
1062:
1063:
1064:
1065: Mazzali, P.A., Kawabata, K.S., Maeda, K., Foley, R.J., Nomoto, K., Deng, J., Suzuki, T., Iye, M., et al. 2007, ApJ, 670, 592.
1066:
1067: