1: \documentclass[a4paper,twoside]{article}
2:
3: \usepackage[top=1.7cm,bottom=1.2cm,left=2.8cm,right=2.3cm,
4: includehead,includefoot]{geometry}% page setup
5: \usepackage{multicol}
6: \usepackage[perpage,symbol*]{footmisc}
7:
8: \bibliographystyle{plain}
9: \newcommand{\upcite}[1]{\textsuperscript{\cite{#1}}} %define upcite
10:
11:
12: \date{}
13:
14: \begin{document}
15:
16: \title{Progress on multi-waveband observations of supernova remnants\footnote{Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No 10673018)}}%10533020 and 10573017
17:
18: \author{Yang Xuejuan$^{1,2}$, Lu Fangjun$^{1}$, Tian Wenwu$^{3,4}$\footnote{To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: tww@bao.ac.cn, tww@iras.ucalgary.ca}}
19:
20: \maketitle
21: \begin{center}
22: 1. Particle Astrophysics Center, Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS, Beijing 100049, P.R. China\\
23: 2. Department of Astronomy, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, P.R. China\\
24: 3. National Astronomical Observatories, CAS, Beijing 100012, P.R. China\\
25: 4. Department of Physics \& Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada\\
26: \end{center}
27: \begin{abstract}
28: A number of observational advances have increased our knowledge
29: about supernova remnants. In this paper we review the main
30: progresses made in the last decade, including new discoveries of
31: supernova remnants and the associated pulsars, nucleosynthesis, the
32: interaction between supernova remnants and molecular clouds, dust in
33: the supernova remnants, shock physics and cosmic ray accelerations.
34:
35: {\bf keywords: Supernova remnant, observations}
36:
37: \end{abstract}
38:
39: Massive stars usually end their lives with supernova (SN)
40: explosions. It's very powerful, with total energy of $\sim 10^{44} J$,
41: to outshine a galaxy at peak. The outer layers of the exploding star
42: are ejected at supersonic speed, resulting in an outward blast wave.
43: Meanwhile, the blast wave is decelerated as expanding into the
44: interstellar medium (ISM), forming a reverse shock propagating
45: inwards.
46: The shocked materials, along with the
47: stellar remnant (if exist) form a supernova remnant (SNR). SNRs are
48: often very bright in the radio and X-ray bands, as the shocks often
49: heat the ISM and ejecta to X-ray emitting temperature and accelerate
50: the electrons to produce synchrotron radiation in radio and/or even
51: X-ray bands. The interaction between an SNR and the nearby molecular
52: clouds (MCs) often trigger emission of molecular lines. The optical
53: emission of an SNR often comes from shocked ejecta, while infrared
54: emission traces the dust around. The polarization observations of SNRs
55: bring new insight to SNR physics\upcite{Xu07}.
56:
57: The SNe are classified as type I and II based on the presence of
58: Hydrogen Balmer lines in their spectra at maximum brightness or not,
59: and each type has sub-types for different properties of spectra or
60: lightcurves (c.f Fig. 1 in Ref\cite{Vink04a}). It's widely accepted
61: that SNe Ia correspond to the thermonuclear disruption of a C-O
62: dwarf in an accreting binary system after its mass appoaches
63: Chandrasecar limit. SN Ib/Ic and SNe II are from core collapses of
64: massive stars, giving birth to neutron stars for progenitor mass in
65: the range of $9M_{\odot} \sim 25M_{\odot}$ or black holes for more
66: massive stars\upcite{Heger03}. SNRs are important for understanding
67: our Galaxy. They heat up the interstellar medium, distribute heavy
68: elements throughout the Galaxy, and accelerate cosmic rays (CRs).
69: The shock wave of an SN injects energy into the interstellar gas,
70: compresses and accelerates it. The interaction between an SNR and
71: molecular clouds may trigger star formation. SNRs are also believed
72: to be the dominant source of Galactic CRs.
73: In the last decade, great progresses have been made in understanding
74: SNRs, thanks to the new generation of telescopes.
75:
76:
77: \section{Supernova explosion and physics}
78: \subsection{Discoveries of SNRs and pulsars associated}
79:
80: This discrepancy between the number of known Galactic SNRs ($\sim
81: 270$) and that predicted by theory ( $>= 1000$ ) has been considered
82: as the result of the selection effects in the current
83: sensitivity-limited radio surveys. This is supported by the
84: discoveries of many new SNRs and candidates in the recent surveys
85: with high sensitivity and spatial resolution at low radio
86: frequencies\upcite{Helfand06, Brogan06, Kothes05}. Some individual
87: SNRs have newly been discovered from multi-band observations, e.g.
88: Tian et al.\upcite{Tian08b} by radio observations, Stupar et
89: al.\upcite{Stupar07} by optical observations, and Funk et
90: al.\upcite{Funk07} by X-ray observations.
91: %In addition, Koo \& Kang (2006) proposed a new method to search the ``missing'' old SNRs by analyzing the 21 cm atomic hydrogen (HI) line images.
92:
93:
94: In addition to the expanding SNRs, some core-collapse SN explosions
95: also produce pulsars. Discoveries of pulsars in SNRs are therefore
96: clues for the classification of the SNe associated. Up to now more
97: than 50 pulsars have been claimed to be likely associated with the
98: SNRs \upcite{Tian07b,Tian06}. New generation of X-ray space
99: observatories, e.g. XMM-Newton and Chandra X-ray observatories, have
100: shown their power in detecting X-ray pulsars. With its sub-second
101: spatial resolution, Chandra has discovered pulsars in core-collapse
102: SNRs G292.0+1.8\upcite{Hughes03}, G54.1+0.3\upcite{Lu02},
103: G21.5-0.9\upcite{Camilo06} and pulsar wind nebula candidates in
104: N23\upcite{Hayato06}, G15.9+0.2\upcite{Reynolds06} and DA
105: 530\upcite{Jiang07}.
106:
107:
108: One of the most exciting progresses about pulsars is the discoveries
109: of ``Anomalous X-ray Pulsars'' (AXPs) and ``Soft $\gamma$-ray
110: Repeaters'' (SGRs), which have very different properties from
111: traditional radio pulsars. AXPs and SGRs cannot be powered by the
112: rotational energy or by accretion of matter from a binary companion
113: star, and have extremely high surface magnetic fields ($B>10^{14}G$,
114: the ``magnetars'', see Ref\cite{Woods04} for a review). Some AXPs
115: and SGRs are associated with SNRs, e.g. Kes 73/AXP 1E 1841-045,
116: G29.6+0.1/AX J1845-0258, CTB 109/AXP 1E 2259+586, N49/SGR 0526-66
117: etc\upcite{Gaensler01,Gaensler03}. The compact object in the center of Cassiopiea A
118: (Cas A) might also be a magnetar\upcite{Krause05}. The newest exciting discovery is from
119: the Fermi Gamma Ray Space Telescope which detects a $\gamma$-ray pulsation, i.e. first $\gamma$-ray-only pulsar with a period of 316.86 ms, near the center of SNR CTA 1\upcite{Abdo08}.
120:
121:
122: The association between SNRs and AXPs/SGRs could be used to
123: constrain the properties of AXPs/SGRs. Vink \& Kuiper\upcite{Vink06}
124: investigated the explosion energies of three SNRs (Kes 73, CTB 109
125: and N49) hosting AXPs/SGRs. They found that these SNRs' energies are
126: close to those of normal SNe and favor the possibility that
127: magnetars descend from progenitors with high magnetic field cores
128: instead of rapidly rotating proto-neutron stars\upcite{Vink06}.
129: However, this was argued against by the 50\% higher explosion
130: energy of Kes 73 \upcite{Tian08a}, which implies either a larger
131: magnetic field decay rate in the magnetar model or a larger accretion
132: rate in accretion-based models. The more high-resolution multi-waveband
133: observations of the AXPs/SGRs-related SNRs will help to constrain their
134: properties, and distinguish from different theoretical models.
135:
136:
137: \subsection{Nucleosynthesis}
138: Numerical calculations\upcite{Woosley95, Thielemann96} predict that
139: the nucleosynthesis during SN explosion is in onion type with
140: dominant elements ordered in shells following their atomic
141: number.
142:
143: In young SNRs, the element stratification might be reserved since
144: the relatively short time of interaction with surroundings. A good
145: icon is the Tycho's SNR. X-ray observations show that Fe K line
146: peaks at a much smaller radius than those of Si, S and Fe
147: L\upcite{Hwang97,Decour01}. Hwang et al.\upcite{Hwang97} find that
148: the Fe K emission in Tycho is from an isolated component with
149: ionization age 100 times smaller than that of Si or S, implying that
150: Fe ejecta may retain some stratification and be located at the inner
151: layers thus reverse shocked more recently. X-ray spectroscopy of
152: G292.0+1.8 shows that it has little evidence of metal (Si, S and Fe)
153: enriched ejecta from explosive nucleosynthesis, suggesting that the
154: ejecta are strongly stratified by composition and that the reverse
155: shock has not propagated to the Si/S- or Fe- rich
156: zones\upcite{Park04}.
157:
158: However, such stratification could be destroyed during the explosion
159: in some cases. For Cas A, the Fe-rich ejecta is located at larger
160: radius than that of Si\upcite{Hughes00, Willingale02}. It is
161: concluded that the ejecta has undergone a spatial inversion, which
162: might be caused by the neutrino-driven convection initiating
163: core-collapse\upcite{Hughes00}.
164:
165: The numerical models have also calculated the nucleosynthesis
166: yield as a function of progenitor mass\upcite{Woosley95, Thielemann96}.
167: By comparing the abundance pattern from both observations and theoretical
168: calculations, the progenitor mass can be estimated\upcite{Ganzalez03}.
169: However, the observational results basically come from the spectra
170: fitting with plasma models, which only contain the relatively abundant
171: elements that show strong emission lines in the spectra. As the increase of the sensitivity
172: of the detectors, some new emission lines have been detected, such Cr, Mn
173: and etc\upcite{Hwang00, Miceli06}, which are not included in all the available
174: plasma models. Since these elements have been included in the numerical
175: calculations, it will be helpful to constrain the properties of the SNe/SNRs
176: including them in the plasma models.
177:
178:
179: \section{SNRs and their environment}
180: \subsection{Interaction with molecular clouds}
181: Core collapse SN explosions are expected to occur in MCs, since
182: their massive progenitors ($\geq 8 M_{\odot}$) are born in MCs and
183: their lifetimes ($\leq 3 \times 10^7$ years) are often shorter than
184: the typical lifetime of an MC\upcite{Chevalier01}. As the SNRs
185: expand, they might interact with MCs.
186:
187: The first clear evidence for this interaction is from IC443 based on
188: observations of shocked CO\upcite{DeNoyer79a} and
189: OH\upcite{DeNoyer79b} emission. Such study became more intense after
190: the realization of OH 1720 MHz maser line emission as a ``signpost''
191: of the interaction\upcite{Frail94} ( see Ref\cite{Wardle02} for a
192: review). Surveys have been done \cite{Frail96,Green97} and \cite{Koralesky98} and several SNRs have been found with such maser emission, including W28, W44,
193: 3C391 etc. These SNRs are mostly mixed-morphology SNRs, which have been suggested to be strongly associated with the OH 1720 MHz maser emission \cite{Yusef03} and \cite{Chen04}. It is predicted that the OH 1720 MHz line will switch off at large OH column density ($N_{OH}$), and the 6049 MHz and 4765 MHz lines will be on instead, with a peak $N_{OH}$ of 3 x $10^{17} cm^{-2}$, and of several times higher, respectively \cite{Wardle07} and \cite{Pihl08}. These lines may serve as a
194: complementary signal of warm, shocked gas when the OH column density
195: is large.
196:
197: Such interaction can also be traced by the shocked emission lines
198: from CO, H$_2$ or other molecules. Using these diagnosis,
199: interactions are identified in G347.3-0.5\upcite{Moriguch05} and
200: HB21\upcite{Byun06} etc.
201:
202: The direct way to identify the
203: interaction is to determine the distances to an SNR and MC system.
204: Based on a new distance-measurement method (Tian-Leahy method by the HI and
205: CO observations), Tian et al.\upcite{Tian07c} suggest the interaction between SNR
206: G18.8+0.3 and a molecular cloud, and give a distance of $\sim$ 12 kpc to the SNR/CO
207: cloud system. A more reliable example is the SNR W41/HESS 1834-087/molecular cloud system.
208: High-precision distance measurements to the system support that the SNR is physically
209: associated with the giant molecular clouds so the SNR/cloud interaction leads to the TeV
210: $\gamma$-ray emission in the cloud material\upcite{Tian07d}. The method is so powerful
211: that an intriguing puzzle on the distance to SNR Kes 75/PWN J1846-0258 system has been solved
212: recently\upcite{Leahy08}. It is worth determining distances to more claimed SNR/could
213: systems by this method so that we could refine current models of SNR/cloud interaction.
214:
215:
216: \subsection{Dust in SNRs}
217: It has been discovered that there is a huge amount of dust ($10^8
218: \sim 10^9 M_{\odot}$) in very high redshifted ($z>6$) galaxies and
219: quasars\upcite{Isaak02, Bertoldi03}, corresponding to the Universe
220: age of 700 million years. The stellar winds at the late time
221: evolution of the stars are thought to be the main sources of dust in
222: galaxies, but they are not able to produce that much in such a short
223: time\upcite{Dwek98}. Type II SNe are potential sources, with a dust
224: production of $0.08 \sim 1 M_{\odot}$ in the ejecta per SN, varying
225: with metallicity and progenitor mass\upcite{Todini01}.
226:
227: Dunne et al.\upcite{Dunne03} report a detection of cold dust of
228: $\sim 2-4M_{\odot}$ in Cas A. They imply that SNe are at least as
229: important as stellar wind in producing dust in our Galaxy and would
230: have been the dominate source of dust at high redshift\upcite{Dunne03}.
231: The optical and mid-infrared observations of SN 2003gd show a total dust amount
232: of 0.02$M_{\odot}$, suggesting that SNe might be major dust
233: factories\upcite{Sugerman06}. However, it is then argued that the
234: dust detected in Cas A may originate from interstellar dust in a
235: molecular cloud complex located in the line of sight between the
236: Earth and the SNR\upcite{Krause04}. The Spitzer observations show
237: that the dust mass in SN 2003gd is only about $4 \times 10^{-5}
238: M_{\odot}$, arguing against the presence of 0.02$M_{\odot}$ of newly
239: formed dust in the ejecta\upcite{Meikle07}. Recently Rho et
240: al.\upcite{Rho07} present a comprehensive analysis of the dust mass
241: in Cas A with the Spitzer observations and show that the total dust
242: mass is sufficient to explain the lower limit of the dust mass in
243: high redshift galaxies. It still remains an open question what's the
244: real total amount of dust in the ejecta of core collapse SNe, and
245: more investigations are required.
246:
247:
248: \section{Shock physics}
249: \subsection{Electron-Ion temperature equilibrium}
250: The shocks in SNRs are often referred to as collisionless shocks as
251: the particle collision length scale is much larger than the typical
252: size of the shock structure.
253: Although the nature of
254: electron and ion heating behind collisionless shocks in SNRs remains
255: an open question, a number of observational advances have increased
256: our knowledge about it.
257:
258: Behind the collisionless shock there can exist a population of cold
259: neutral ions that are not affected by the shock passage. Some of
260: them might be collisionally excited before being destroyed by
261: collisional ionization or charge transfer.
262: They will emit narrow H$\alpha$ and H$\beta$ Balmer lines with widths
263: representing the pre-shock temperatures. Those having charge
264: exchange with shock heated protons will produce broad Balmer lines,
265: whose widths will be given by the temperature of postshock
266: protons.
267: In this case, the broad-to-narrow line ratio can be used to measure the
268: electron-proton temperature ratio ($T_e/T_p$), which represents the
269: equilibration degree. Ghavamian et al.\upcite{Ghavamian01} present
270: observations and theoretical studies of the Cygnus Loop, RCW 86 and
271: Tycho based on this method, and get the equilibration degree of
272: electron/proton temperatures. However, the narrow Balmer lines might
273: be contaminated by emission from a shock precursor, leading to a
274: higher modeled broad-to-narrow ratio, such as for DEM
275: L71\upcite{Ghavamian03}. In such case, the electron temperature
276: can be determined from the X-ray bremsstrahlung emission
277: instead\upcite{Ghavamian03, Rakowski03}.
278:
279: Using the high spectral resolution data from the XMM-Newton
280: observations, Vink et al.\upcite{Vink03a} find a 3.4 eV broadening
281: of O emission line in SN 1006, implying an O temperature of
282: $530\pm150$ keV. The electron temperature from the same observation
283: is about 1.5 keV, suggesting a low degree of equilibration in this
284: remnant. This is consistent with the optical\upcite{Ghavamian02} and
285: ultraviolet\upcite{Laming96} studies. Rakowski\upcite{Rakowski05}
286: compile each method that has been used to measure the equilibration
287: and every SNR on which they have been tested. A negative correlation
288: between the degree of equilibration and the shock velocity is
289: indicated\upcite{Rakowski05}. Such correlation is further studied
290: by Ghavamian et al.\upcite{Ghavamian07}. They find a relationship
291: $(T_e/T_p)_0\propto v_s^{-2}$ that is fully consistent with the observations,
292: where $(T_e/T_p)_0$ represents the electron-proton temperature equilibration
293: at the shock front and $v_s$ the shock velocity. Although such a
294: relationship has been suggested, many questions are remained: What
295: mechanism causes the sharp decrease of temperature equilibrium at
296: small shock speed? Does this relationship hold for collisionless shocks
297: in fully ionized gas? Progress in this developing field depends on accurate
298: modeling of the emission from pre-shock and post-shock gas, as well as
299: evidence from multiple wave-bands, and useful assessments of the cosmic ray
300: production and its effect on the shock.
301:
302: \subsection{Cosmic-Ray acceleration}
303: SNRs are believed to be the dominant source of Galactic CRs, at
304: least for energies up to the ``knee'' of the CR spectrum ($3 \times
305: 10^{15}$ eV). The radio synchrotron emission at the shocks of
306: shell-type SNRs has provided direct evidence for accelerated
307: electrons with energies up to GeV range. It was raised to 10 $\sim$
308: 100 TeV after the first detection of X-ray synchrotron filament in
309: SN1006\upcite{Koyama95}. Such filaments have also been detected in
310: Cas A, RCW 86, Tycho, Kepler, G266.2-1.2, G347.3-0.5 etc (see also
311: Ref\cite{Vink05}).
312:
313: As the development of atmospheric Cerenkov detectors (H.E.S.S,
314: CANGROO series etc), it is able to image SNRs by TeV $\gamma$-ray
315: observations, which play an important role to trace the CR
316: acceleration in SNRs. $\gamma$-ray emissions are detected in several
317: SNRs, including RX J1713.7-3946, RX J0852.0-4622, G0.9+0.1, W41 etc
318: (see Ref\cite{Rowell06} for a H.E.S.S observation review). However,
319: the H.E.S.S observations to SN1006 have no detection of TeV
320: $\gamma$-ray emission from any compact or extended region associated
321: with the remnant\upcite{Aharonian05b}. Using the observed X-ray flux
322: and $\gamma$-ray upper limit, they get a lower limit on the
323: post-shock magnetic field of $B > 25\mu$G\upcite{Aharonian05b}.
324:
325: Various models have been established to account for the overall
326: spectra of nonthermal emission (from radio up to TeV $\gamma$-ray)
327: in SNRs, which can basically categorized as time-dependent and steady
328: ones. Fang et al.\upcite{Fang08} and Zhang et al.\upcite{Zhang07} model the
329: non-thermal emission from old and young supernova remnants under
330: time-dependent frame respectively. These models are applied to the
331: observations of SNRs, and can well represent their multi-wavelength
332: spectra.
333:
334: Although there is a lot of observational evidences for electron
335: acceleration in SNRs, that for proton (dominate component of CRs)
336: acceleration is rare. One example is RX J1713.7-3946, where pions
337: ($\pi^0$) decay (the signature of proton acceleration) was
338: detected\upcite{Enomoto02}.
339:
340: The amplification of magnetic field is potentially the key for
341: accelerating protons and heavier ions up to the ``knee'' of the CR
342: spectrum\upcite{Ballet06, Uchiyama07}. The X-ray synchrotron
343: filaments provide not only evidence of CR acceleration, but also
344: information of the magnetic field at the shock front. Based on the
345: width of the filaments, Vink et al.\upcite{Vink03b} estimated the
346: magnetic field strength to be $0.08 \sim 0.16 mG$ at the shock front
347: of Cas A, much higher than the Galactic average value ($\sim
348: 3\mu$G). X-ray filaments in SN1006\upcite{Bamba03},
349: Tycho\upcite{Hwang02} and Kepler\upcite{Cassam04} indicate similar
350: magnetic field strength in these remnants, which might be evidence
351: for CR induced magnetic field amplification\upcite{Vink05}. Uchiyama
352: et al.\upcite{Uchiyama07} report the discovery of the brightening
353: and decay of X-ray hot spots in RX J1713.7-3946 on a one-year
354: timescale, which might imply that we have witnessed the ongoing
355: shock-acceleration of electrons in real time. They conclude that the
356: rapid variability shows the origin of X-rays to be synchrotron
357: emission of ultrarelativistic electrons, meanwhile the electron
358: acceleration occurs in a strong magnetic field with an amplification
359: factor of more than 100\upcite{Uchiyama07}.
360:
361:
362: \section{Summary and prospectives}
363: In this paper, we review the progresses in the study of SNRs from
364: multi-band observations. More SNRs and (rare type of) pulsars
365: associated are discovered. Using the high spatial and energy
366: resolution data of SNRs, we are able to study the nucleosynthesis
367: process during stellar evolution and SN explosion, and also the
368: interaction between SNRs and their surroundings. As a perfect
369: laboratory of shock physics, we know more about the collisionless
370: shock in SNRs, such as the electron-ion equilibration after shock
371: passage and the cosmic-ray acceleration.
372:
373: Nevertheless, there are still many open questions. The known basic
374: parameters of many SNRs, such as the distances and ages, have large
375: uncertainty. High-precision measurement to these parameters, however,
376: are very important to study not only the SNRs themselves,
377: but also the related pulsars, molecular clouds and so on. This depends on
378: further advances in both observational techniques and measurement methods.
379: Although it's widely believed that SN Ia is from the thermonuclear explosion of a
380: white dwarf, is the explosion mechanism accretion single degenerate
381: or double degenerate? Is the explosion a detonation (supersonic),
382: deflagration (subsonic), or is there transition from deflagration to
383: detonation? By comparing the abundance pattern of SNRs with numerical
384: calculations, some information of the SN explosions has been given,
385: such as the explosion type, progenitor mass. However, the
386: current theoretical calculations are generally simplified with
387: respect to the real SN explosions, and thus often cannot match all
388: the observations. Meanwhile, as the discovery of emission lines from
389: less abundant elements, such as Cr or Mn, plasma models
390: which includes these elements would be required. AXPs/SGRs have been
391: suggested to be neutron stars with very strong magnetic fields (``magnetars'').
392: Do they and high magnetic field radio pulsars different phases of a more
393: uniform class of object? What is their evolutionary sequence? Why are the spin
394: periods of AXPs/SGRs strongly clustered at 5$-$12 s? To answer these questions,
395: it would be helpful to enlarge the sample of this rare type of pulsars and make
396: high-precision observations.
397: SNR shocks can accelerate CRs. But how efficient the acceleration is?
398: What is the maximum energy shocks can accelerated to? How strong is the
399: magnetic field? Is it amplified or just compressed? If the
400: amplification exists, what's the mechanism? The new generation of
401: telescopes will shed new light on these issues.
402:
403: \thanks{We acknowledge support from the Natural Science Foundation of China.
404: We thank Drs. Han Jinling and Chen Yang for their informative comments on the paper.}
405:
406: \begin{thebibliography}{}
407:
408: \bibitem{Xu07} Xu J W, Han J L, Sun X H et al. Polarization observations of SNR G156.2+5.7. 2007, A\&A, 470: 969
409:
410: \bibitem{Vink04a} Vink J. A Review of X-ray Observations of Supernova Remnants. Nuclear Physics B Proceedings Supplements, 2004, 132: 21-30
411:
412: \bibitem{Heger03} Heger A, Fryer C L, Woosley S E, et al. How Massive Single Stars End Their Life. ApJ, 2003, 591: 288-300
413:
414: \bibitem{Helfand06} Helfand D J, Becker R H, White R L, et al. MAGPIS: A Multi-Array Galactic Plane Imaging Survey. AJ, 2006, 131: 2525-2537
415:
416: \bibitem{Brogan06} Brogan C L, Gelfand J D, Gaensler B M, et al. Discovery of 35 New Supernova Remnants in the Inner Galaxy. ApJL, 2006, 639: 25-29
417:
418: \bibitem{Kothes05} Kothes R, Uyanlker B and Reid R I. Two new Perseus arm supernova remnants discovered in the Canadian Galactic Plane Survey. A\&A, 2005, 444: 871-881
419:
420: \bibitem{Tian08b} Tian W W, Leahy D A, Haverkorn M. et al. Discovery of the counterpart of TeV $\gamma$-ray source HESS J1731-347: a new old SNR G353.6-0.7 with radio and X-ray images. ApJ, 2008, 679: L85-88
421:
422: \bibitem{Stupar07} Stupar M, Parker Q A and Filipovi\'c M D. G315.1+2.7: a new Galactic supernova remnant from the AAO/UKST H$\alpha$ survey. MNRAS, 2007, 374: 1441-1448
423:
424: \bibitem{Funk07} Funk S, Hinton J A, Moriguchi Y et al. XMM-Newton observations of HESS J1813-178 reveal a composite Supernova remnant. A\&A, 2007, 470: 249-257
425:
426: \bibitem{Tian07b} Tian W W, Haverkorn M. and Zhang H Y. Characteristics of the supernova remnant G351.7+0.8 and a distance argument against its association with PSR J1721-3532. MNRAS, 2007, 378: 1283-1286
427:
428: \bibitem{Tian06} Tian W W and Leahy D A. The radio SNR G65.1+0.6 and its associated pulsar J1957+2831. A\&A, 2006, 455: 1053-1058
429:
430: \bibitem{Hughes03} Hughes J P, Slane P O, Park S, et al. An X-Ray Pulsar in the Oxygen-rich Supernova Remnant G292.0+1.8. ApJL, 2003, 591: 39-42
431:
432: \bibitem{Lu02} Lu F J, Wang Q D, Aschenbach B, et al. Chandra Observation of Supernova Remnant G54.1+0.3: A Close Cousin of the Crab Nebula. ApJL, 2002, 568: 49-52
433:
434: \bibitem{Camilo06} Camilo F, Ransom S M, Gaensler B M, et al. PSR J1833-1034: Discovery of the Central Young Pulsar in the Supernova Remnant G21.5-0.9. ApJ, 2006, 637: 456-465
435:
436: \bibitem{Hayato06} Hayato A, Bamba A, Tamagawa T, et al. Discovery of a Compact X-Ray Source in the LMC Supernova Remnant N23 with Chandra. ApJ, 2006, 653: 280-284
437:
438: \bibitem{Reynolds06} Reynolds S P, Borkowski K J, Hwang U, et al. A New Young Galactic Supernova Remnant Containing a Compact Object: G15.9+0.2. ApJL, 2006: 652: 45-48
439:
440: \bibitem{Jiang07} Jiang B, Chen Y and Wang Q D. Chandra View of DA 530: A Sub-Energetic Supernova Remnant with a Pulsar Wind Nebula? ApJ, 2007, 670: 1142-1148
441:
442: \bibitem{Woods04} Woods P M and Thompson C. Soft $\gamma$-Ray Repeaters and Anomalous X-ray Pulsars: Magnetar candidates. 2004, astro-ph/0406133
443:
444: \bibitem{Gaensler01} Gaensler B M, Slane P O, Gotthelf E V, et al. Anomalous X-Ray Pulsars and Soft $\gamma$-Ray Repeaters in Supernova Remnants. ApJ, 2001, 559: 963-972
445:
446: \bibitem{Gaensler03} Gaensler B M. Anomalous X-ray pulsars and soft gamma-ray repeaters - the connection with supernova remnants. AsSpR, 2004, 33: 645-653
447:
448: \bibitem{Krause05} Krause O, Rieke G H, Birkmann S M, et al. Infrared Echoes near the Supernova Remnant Cassiopeia A. Nature, 2005, 308: 1604-1606
449:
450: \bibitem{Abdo08} Abdo A A, Ackermann M, Atwood W B, et al. The Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope Discovers the Pulsar in the Young Galactic Supernova Remnant CTA 1. Science, 2008, DOI: 10.1126/science.1165572, arXiv:0810.3562
451:
452: \bibitem{Vink06} Vink J and Kuiper L. Supernova remnant energetics and magnetars: no evidence in favour of millisecond proto-neutron stars. MNRAS, 2006, 370: 14-18
453:
454: \bibitem{Tian08a} Tian W W and Leahy D A. The Distance and Age of the SNR Kes 73 and AXP 1E 1841-045. ApJ, 2008, 677: 292-296
455:
456: \bibitem{Woosley95} Woosley S E and Weaver T A. The Evolution and Explosion of Massive Stars. II. Explosive Hydrodynamics and Nucleosynthesis. ApJ, 1995, 101: 181-235
457:
458: \bibitem{Thielemann96} Thielemann F K, Nomoto K and Hashimoto M. Core-Collapse Supernovae and Their Ejecta. ApJ, 1996, 460: 408-436
459:
460: \bibitem{Hwang97} Hwang U and Gotthelf E V. X-Ray Emission-Line Imaging and Spectroscopy of Tycho's Supernova Remnant. ApJ, 1997, 475: 665-682
461:
462: \bibitem{Decour01} Decourchelle A, Sauvageot J L, Audard M, et al. XMM-Newton observation of the Tycho supernova remnant, ApJ, 2001, 365: 218-224
463:
464: \bibitem{Park04} Park S, Hughes J P, Slane P O, et al. Nucleosynthesis in the Oxygen-rich Supernova Remnant G292.0+1.8 from Chandra X-Ray Spectroscopy. ApJL, 2004, 602: 33-36
465:
466: \bibitem{Hughes00} Hughes J P, Rakowski C E, Burrows D N, et al. Nucleosynthesis and Mixing in Cassiopeia A. ApJL, 2000, 528: 109-113
467:
468: \bibitem{Willingale02}Willingale R, Bleeker J A M, van der Heyden K J, et al. X-ray spectral imaging and Doppler mapping of Cassiopeia A. A\&A, 2002, 381: 1039-1048
469:
470: \bibitem{Ganzalez03} Ganzalez M and Safi-Harb S. New constraints on the energetics, progenitor mass, and age of the supernoava remnant G292.0+1.8 containing PSR J1124-5916. ApJL, 2003, 583: 91-94
471:
472: \bibitem{Hwang00} Hwang U, Petre P and Hughes J P. The X-Ray Line Emission from the Supernova Remnant W49B. ApJ, 2000, 532: 970-979
473:
474: \bibitem{Miceli06} Miceli M, Decourchelle A and Ballet J. The X-ray emission of the supernova remnant W49B observed with XMM-Newton. A\&A, 2006, 453, 567-578
475:
476: \bibitem{Chevalier01} Chevalier R A. Supernova remnants in molecular clouds. AIPC, 2001, 565: 109-118
477:
478: \bibitem{DeNoyer79a} DeNoyer L K. Discovery of shocked CO within a supernova remnant. ApJL, 1979, 232: 165-168
479:
480: \bibitem{DeNoyer79b} DeNoyer L K. Shocked OH within a supernova remnant. ApJL, 1979, 228: 41-43
481:
482: \bibitem{Frail94} Frail D A, Goss W M and Slysh V I. Shock-excited maser emission from the supernova remnant W28. ApJL, 1994, 424: 111-113
483:
484: \bibitem{Wardle02} Wardle M and Yusef-Zadeh F. Supernova Remnant OH Masers: Signposts of Cosmic Collision. Science, 2002, 296: 2350-2354
485:
486: \bibitem{Frail96} Frail D A, Goss W M, Reynoso E M, et al. A Survey for OH(1720 MHz) Maser Emission Toward Supernova Remnants. AJ, 1996, 111: 1651-1659
487:
488: \bibitem{Green97} Green A J, Frail D A, Goss W M, et al. Continuation of a survey of OH (1720 MHz) Maser Emission Towards Supernova Remnants. AJ, 1997, 114: 2058-2067
489:
490: \bibitem{Koralesky98} Koralesky B, Frail D A, Goss W M, Shock-excited Maser Emission from Supernova Remnants: G32.8-0.1, G337.8-0.1, G346.6-0.2, and the HB 3/W3 Complex et al. AJ, 1998, 116: 1323-1331
491:
492: \bibitem{Yusef03} Yusef-Zadeh F, Wardle M and Rho J et al. OH (1720MHz) masers and mixed-morphology supernova semnants, ApJ, 2003, 585: 319–323
493:
494: \bibitem{Chen04} Chen Y, Su Y and Slane P O et al. A Chandra ACIS view of the thermal composite supernova remnant 3C 391, ApJ, 2004, 616: 885–894
495:
496: \bibitem{Wardle07} Wardle M. Collisional excitation of OH(6049 MHz) masers in supernova remnant-molecular cloud interactions, 2007, astro-ph/0703508
497:
498: \bibitem{Pihl08} Pihlstr\"om Y M, Fish V L and Sjouwerman L O et al., Excited-state OH masers and supernova remnants, ApJ, 2008, 676: 371–377
499:
500: \bibitem{Moriguch05} Moriguchi Y, Tamura K, Tawara Y, et al. A Detailed Study of Molecular Clouds toward the TeV $\gamma$-Ray Supernova Remnant G347.3-0.5. ApJ, 2005, 631: 947-963
501:
502: \bibitem{Byun06} Byun, D, Koo B, Tatematsu K, et al. Interaction between the Supernova Remnant HB 21 and Molecular Clouds. ApJ, 2006, 637: 283-295
503:
504: \bibitem{Tian07c}Tian W W, Leahy D A and Wang Q D. Radio and X-ray images of the SNR G18.8+0.3 interacting with molecular clouds. A\&A, 2007, 474: 541-547
505:
506: \bibitem{Tian07d} Tian W W, Li Z, Leahy D, et al. VLA and XMM-Newton Observations of the SNR W41/TeV $\gamma$-Ray Source HESS J1834-087. ApJL, 2007, 657: 25-28
507:
508: \bibitem{Leahy08} Leahy D A and Tian W W. The Distances of the SNR Kes 75 and PWN J1846-0258 system. A\&A Letters, 2008, 480: L25-28
509:
510: \bibitem{Isaak02} Isaak K G, Priddey R S, McMahon R G, et al. The SCUBA Bright Quasar Survey (SBQS): 850-$\mu$m observations of the z $>$ 4 sample. MNRAS, 2002, 329: 149-162
511:
512: \bibitem{Bertoldi03} Bertoldi F, Carilli C L, Cox P, et al. Dust emission from the most distant quasars, A\&A, 2003, 406: 55-58
513:
514: \bibitem{Dwek98} Dwek E. The Evolution of the Elemental Abundances in the Gas and Dust Phases of the Galaxy. ApJ, 1998, 501: 643-665
515:
516: \bibitem{Todini01} Todini P and Ferrara A. Dust formation in primordial Type II supernovae. MNRAS, 2001, 325: 726-736
517:
518: \bibitem{Dunne03} Dunne L, Eales S, Ivison R, et al. Type II supernovae as a significant source of interstellar dust. Nature, 2003, 424: 285-287
519:
520: \bibitem{Sugerman06} Sugerman B E K, Ercolano B, Barlow M J, et al. Massive-Star Supernovae as Major Dust Factories. Science, 2006, 313: 196-200
521:
522: \bibitem{Krause04} Krause O, Birkmann S M, Rieke G H, et al. No cold dust within the supernova remnant Cassiopeia A. Nature, 2004, 432: 596-598
523:
524: \bibitem{Meikle07} Meikle W P S, Mattila S, Pastorello A, et al. A Spitzer Space Telescope Study of SN 2003gd: Still No Direct Evidence that Core-Collapse Supernovae are Major Dust Factories. ApJ, 2007, 665: 608-617
525:
526: \bibitem{Rho07}Rho J, Kozasa T, Reach W T, et al. Freshly Formed Dust in the Cassiopeia A Supernova Remnant as Revealed by the Spitzer Space Telescope. ApJ, 2008, 673, 271
527:
528: \bibitem{Ghavamian01} Ghavamian P, Raymond J, Smith R C, et al. Balmer-dominated Spectra of Nonradiative Shocks in the Cygnus Loop, RCW 86, and Tycho Supernova Remnants. ApJ, 2001, 547: 995-1009
529:
530: \bibitem{Ghavamian03} Ghavamian P, Rakowski C E, Hughes J P, et al. The Physics of Supernova Blast Waves. I. Kinematics of DEM L71 in the Large Magellanic Cloud. ApJ, 2003, 590: 833-845
531:
532: \bibitem{Rakowski03} Rakowski C E, Ghavamian P and Hughes J P. The Physics of Supernova Remnant Blast Waves. II. Electron-Ion Equilibration in DEM L71 in the Large Magellanic Cloud. ApJ, 2003, 590: 846-857
533:
534: \bibitem{Vink03a} Vink J, Laming J M, Gu M F. et al. The Slow Temperature Equilibration behind the Shock Front of SN 1006, ApJ, 2003, 587: 31-34
535:
536: \bibitem{Ghavamian02} Ghavamian P, Winkler P F, Raymond J C, et al. The Optical Spectrum of the SN 1006 Supernova Remnant Revisited. ApJ, 2002, 572: 888-896
537:
538: \bibitem{Laming96} Laming J M, Raymond J C, McLaughlin B M et al. Electron-Ion Equilibration in Nonradiative Shocks Associated with SN 1006. ApJ, 1996, 472: 267-274
539:
540: \bibitem{Rakowski05} Rakowski C E. Electron ion temperature equilibration at collisionless shocks in supernova remnants, AsSpR, 2005, 35: 1017-1026
541:
542: \bibitem{Ghavamian07} Ghavamian P, Laming J M. Rakowski C E. A Physical Relationship between Electron-Proton Temperature Equilibration and Mach Number in Fast Collisionless Shocks, ApJ, 654, 69-72
543:
544: \bibitem{Koyama95} Koyama K, Petre R, Gotthelf E V, et al. Evidence for Shock Acceleration of High-Energy Electrons in the Supernova Remnant SN:1006. Nature, 1995, 378: 255-258
545:
546: \bibitem{Vink05} Vink J. Non-thermal X-ray Emission from Supernova Remnants. AIPC, 2005, 745: 160-166
547:
548: \bibitem{Rowell06} Rowell G (H.E.S.S collaboration). Galactic TeV $\gamma$-ray sources: A summary of H.E.S.S observations. Journals of Physics, 2006, 47: 21-30
549:
550: \bibitem{Aharonian05b}Aharonian F A, Akhperjanian A G, Bazer-Bachi A R, et al. Upper limits to the SN1006 multi-TeV gamma-ray flux from HESS observations. A\&A, 2005, 437: 135-139
551:
552: \bibitem{Fang08} Fang J and Zhang L. Non-thermal emission from old supernova remnants. MNRAS, 2008, 384: 1119-1128
553:
554: \bibitem{Zhang07} Zhang L and Fang J. Hadronic Contributions for TeV $\gamma$-Ray Emission from Young Supernova Remnants. ApJ, 2007, 666: 247-260
555:
556: \bibitem{Enomoto02} Enomoto R, Tanimori T, Naito T, et al. The acceleration of cosmic-ray protons in the supernova remnant RX J1713.7-3946. Nature, 2002, 416: 823-826
557:
558: \bibitem{Ballet06} Ballet J. X-ray synchrotron emission from supernova remnants. AdSpR, 2006, 37: 1902-1908
559:
560: \bibitem{Uchiyama07} Uchiyama Y, Aharonian F A, Tanaka T, et al. Extremely fast acceleration of cosmic rays in a supernova remnant. Nature, 2007, 449: 576-578
561:
562: \bibitem{Vink03b} Vink J and Laming J M. On the Magnetic Fields and Particle Acceleration in Cassiopeia A. ApJ, 2003, 584: 758-769
563:
564: \bibitem{Bamba03} Bamba A, Yamazaki R, Ueno M, et al. Small-Scale Structure of the SN 1006 Shock with Chandra Observations. ApJ, 2003, 589: 827-837
565:
566: \bibitem{Hwang02} Hwang U, Decourchelle A, Holt S S, et al. Thermal and Nonthermal X-Ray Emission from the Forward Shock in Tycho's Supernova Remnant. ApJ, 2002, 581: 1101-1115
567:
568: \bibitem{Cassam04} Cassam-Chena\"i, G, Decourchelle A, Ballet J, et al. XMM-Newton observation of Kepler's supernova remnant. A\&A, 2004, 414: 545-558
569:
570: \end{thebibliography}
571:
572:
573: \end{document}
574: