1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \usepackage[usenames,dvips]{color}
3: \newcommand{\Linemail}{lhlin@asiaa.sinica.edu.tw}
4: \newcommand{\Yuanemail}{yuan@asiaa.sinica.edu.tw}
5: \newcommand{\Butaemail}{buta@sarah.astr.ua.edu}
6: \slugcomment{}
7: \shorttitle{Hydrodynamical Simulations of NGC 6782
8: } \shortauthors{Lien-Hsuan Lin et al.}
9:
10:
11:
12: \begin{document}
13:
14: \title{Hydrodynamical Simulations of the Barred Spiral Galaxy NGC 6782}
15: \author{Lien-Hsuan Lin\altaffilmark{a,b}}
16: \affil{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University. No 1, Sec 4, Roosevelt Road, Taipei 10617, Taiwan, R.O.C.}
17: \author{Chi Yuan\altaffilmark{b}}
18: \affil{Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica. P.O. Box 23-141, Taipei 10617, Taiwan, R.O.C.}
19: \author{R. Buta\altaffilmark{c}}
20: \affil{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Alabama, Box 870324, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487,
21: U.S.A.}
22:
23: \altaffiltext{a}{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University. No 1, Sec 4, Roosevelt Road, Taipei 10617, Taiwan, R.O.C.}
24: \altaffiltext{b}{Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica.
25: P.O. Box 23-141, Taipei 10617, Taiwan, R.O.C.}
26: \altaffiltext{c}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Alabama, Box 870324, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, U.S.A.}
27:
28: \begin{abstract}
29: NGC 6782 is an early-type barred spiral galaxy exhibiting a rich and complex morphology with multiple
30: ring patterns. To provide a physical understanding of its structure and kinematical properties,
31: two-dimensional hydrodynamical simulations have been carried out. Numerical calculations reveal that the
32: striking features in NGC 6782 can be reproduced provided that the gas flow is governed by the gravitational
33: potential associated with a slowly rotating strong bar. In particular, the response of the gaseous disk to
34: the bar potential leads to the excitation of spiral density waves at the inner Lindblad resonance giving
35: rise to the appearance of a nearly circular nuclear ring with a pair of dust lanes.
36: For a sufficiently strong bar potential, the inner 4:1 spiral density waves are also excited.
37: The interaction of the higher harmonic waves with the waves
38: excited at the inner Lindblad resonance and confined by the outer Lindblad resonance results in the
39: observed diamond-shaped (or pointy oval) inner ring structure. The overall gas morphology and kinematical features are both well
40: reproduced by the model provided that the pattern speed of the bar is $\sim 25$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$.
41: \end{abstract}
42:
43: \keywords{galaxies: individual(NGC 6782) --- galaxies: kinematics and dynamics --- galaxies: spiral --- galaxies: structure --- galaxies: evolution}
44:
45: \section{Introduction}
46:
47: It has long been recognized that a periodic potential, such as a rotating bar, can drive density waves
48: in a differentially rotating disk. A linear inviscid theory of the excitation and propagation
49: of these waves in such disks was described in the seminal work of Goldreich \& Tremaine (1979, 1980).
50: Subsequently, Yuan (1984) showed that the gravitational potential associated with a rotating bar can
51: effectively excite nonlinear density waves with high radial streaming velocities at the outer Lindblad
52: resonance (OLR) in the limit that self-gravity in the gas disk could be neglected. The excitation and
53: wave propagation with self-gravity was later considered in the linear and nonlinear approximation by
54: Yuan \& Cheng (1989, 1991). Further progress was achieved by the development of a nonlinear asymptotic
55: theory by Yuan \& Kuo (1997), who explicitly included the effects of gas pressure, viscosity, and
56: self-gravitation in the formulation. However, the theory's applicability was somewhat limited as
57: it was derived only in the vicinity of the resonances. Building upon this study, an improved nonlinear
58: asymptotic global theory of spiral density waves was developed by Yuan \& Yang (2006) to theoretically
59: examine the nearby grand-design spiral galaxy NGC 5248.
60:
61: Although these nonlinear asymptotic theories can be useful in addressing the structure of disk galaxies,
62: they do not provide insight on the time-dependent evolution of the structure in gas disks in response
63: to a rotating bar potential. To examine this phase, a full hydrodynamic description must be
64: obtained via numerical simulations. To this end, early numerical investigations of the evolution of disk
65: galaxies driven by a rotating bar potential were carried out by Huntley et al. (1978) and Sanders
66: \& Tubbs (1980). An excellent description of the general properties of gas flows in galaxies with bars
67: can be found in the investigation by Athanassoula (1992). Simulations designed for direct comparisons
68: with the observed morphology and velocity fields of specific galaxies have been published by England
69: (1989) and Lindblad \& Kristen (1996) for NGC 1300 and by Lindblad et al. (1996) for NGC 1365.
70:
71: Building on this approach, we report on a quantitative comparison between observations of the barred
72: spiral NGC
73: 6782 and detailed two-dimensional hydrodynamical simulations in order
74: to probe the underlying properties of the
75: rotating bar. In the next section, observational data on the structure of NGC 6782 based on ground-based and HST images, and an H$\alpha$ Fabry-Perot
76: velocity field, are summarized. The numerical technique for solving
77: the governing hydrodynamic equations as well as the description of the initial set-up of the calculations are
78: described in \S 3. Procedures adopted for theoretically modeling the observational data are outlined in
79: \S 4 and the comparisons of the numerical results with the data are presented in \S 5. Finally, a discussion is presented in \S 6 and conclusions in \S 7.
80:
81: \section{Observational Data}
82:
83: \subsection{Optical Imaging}
84:
85: NGC 6782 is an extremely interesting case, as shown by the images in Figures~\ref{images} and ~\ref{hubble}.
86: The type of the galaxy is (R$_1$R$_2^{'}$)SB(r)a in the system of the de Vaucouleurs
87: Atlas of Galaxies (Buta et al. 2007), implying a multi-ringed early-type barred spiral galaxy.
88: The upper panel images were obtained with a TEK2 CCD attached to the CTIO 1.5m telescope
89: in 1992 August. These include a $B$-band image and a $B-I$ color index map coded such
90: that blue features are dark while red features are light. A $V$-band image was also obtained,
91: and the exposure times were 600s in $B$, and 300s each in $V$ and $I$. The lower panel images
92: are 1200s exposure red continuum and H$\alpha$+[NII] images obtained in 1993 August also with
93: the CTIO 1.5m
94: but with a TEK1 CCD (Crocker et al. 1996). For both CCDs used, the readout noise was
95: 3-5$e^-$ and the gain was
96: 1.6$e^-$/ADU. The pixel scale was 0\rlap{.}$^{\prime\prime}$435 in each case.
97: All of these images were processed using standard routines in IRAF.\footnote{IRAF is
98: distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatories, which is operated by AURA, Inc.,
99: under contract with the National Science Foundation.}
100: The redshift of NGC 6782 is 0.012982$\pm$0.000137 (de Vaucouleurs et al. 1991).
101: We choose the value of the Hubble constant to be 100 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$.
102: As a result, we have here adopted a distance of 38.95 Mpc, yielding a scale of 10$\arcsec$ = 1.89 kpc.
103: However, the exact distance is not important in this particular investigation.
104:
105: The images show that NGC 6782 has a nearly circular bright nuclear ring connected with a pair of almost straight dust lanes,
106: the other ends of which attach to a diamond-shaped (or pointed-oval) inner ring. Two faint arms in turn
107: extend from the two tips of the inner ring to the outermost parts of the galaxy, forming a faint double
108: outer ring-pseudoring morphology (Buta \& Crocker 1991) where the R$_1$ component is stronger. Each ring feature is a
109: zone of enhanced blue colors, consistent with active star formation. The pointed-oval shape of
110: the inner ring is an unusual feature of the galaxy and is not commonly seen. As noted by Crocker et al. (1996), the
111: H$\alpha$+[NII] emission is concentrated in arcs around the major axis of the inner ring, which coincides
112: with the bar axis. This is seen mainly in inner rings having a significant intrinsic elongation
113: along the bar axis. We address this concentration with our model in this paper. According to
114: Grouchy et al. (2008), 24\% of the total H$\alpha$+[NII] flux comes from the inner ring,
115: while 54\% comes from the nuclear ring and central source. The same paper gives the star formation
116: rate in the inner ring as 0.84 M$_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$. It is noteworthy that virtually all of
117: the recent star formation in NGC 6782 is found in its three main ring features.
118:
119: Figure~\ref{hubble} shows a Hubble Heritage image of NGC 6782 that reveals finer
120: details of the star formation and dust in the inner regions of the galaxy. Individual
121: star clusters are detectable near the pointy ends of the inner ring. The weakness of
122: the northwest portion of the nuclear ring in the H$\alpha$+[NII] image
123: is due mainly to a strong dust lane. The bar
124: itself is very prominent in this image as a feature largely made of old stars. In addition
125: to the strong leading dust lanes, the image reveals very much weaker dust lanes near the
126: trailing sides of the bar.
127:
128: Figure~\ref{profiles} shows azimuthally-averaged surface brightness and color index profiles of NGC 6782, based only on the CTIO images. The
129: surface brightness scales were calibrated from observations of Landolt (1992)
130: standard stars. The three rings (whose radii are from Buta \& Crocker 1993)
131: cause the $B$-band profile to have significant humps and the color index profiles to have
132: significant dips.
133: The $B-V$ and $V-I$ colors decrease at the location of each main ring as expected
134: from the color index map in Figure~\ref{images}.
135: These profiles are typical of early-type barred galaxies.
136:
137: Table 1 summarizes some of the basic parameters of NGC 6782 derived from the 1992 broadband
138: images and the profiles in Figure~\ref{profiles}. The isophotal dimensions, total magnitude,
139: and total colors are RC3-style (de Vaucouleurs et al. 1991) global parameters that can
140: improve on the previously published values. For our adopted distance, the total apparent
141: magnitude implies an absolute blue magnitude brighter than $-$20,
142: indicating that NGC 6782 is a high luminosity early-type system.
143: Various published classifications indicate that
144: the galaxy is an SB0/a-SBa type with multiple rings. The photometric orientation
145: parameters are based on ellipse fits to $BVI$ outer isophotes beyond the main ring features.
146: These parameters are well-defined and indicate a system inclined only about 27$^{\circ}$ to the
147: line of sight in position angle 35$^{\circ}$. These parameters are in agreement with those
148: based on analysis of the observed velocity field (section 2.2). Table 1 also includes the
149: deprojected diameters, axis ratios, and relative bar-ring position angles for the nuclear,
150: inner, and outer R$_1$ rings based on these adopted orientation parameters. The rings were
151: mapped visually from the $B$-band image on a TV monitor, and an ellipse was fitted to the
152: mappings by least squares. The inner ring
153: has an extreme intrinsic axis ratio (0.69) compared to the average, 0.81$\pm$0.06, found
154: for SB inner rings by Buta (1995). Within the uncertainties of the visual mapping, the inner
155: ring is aligned almost exactly parallel to the bar. The outer R$_1$ ring is also found to
156: be intrinsically elongated with an axis ratio of 0.79, and is aligned almost perpendicular
157: to the bar. Buta (1995) found that R$_1$ rings on average have an intrinsic axis ratio of
158: 0.74$\pm$0.08. The ratio of the outer and inner ring diameters is 2.44, somewhat larger
159: than the median of 2.13 found by Buta (1995) for 532 SB galaxies.
160: The nuclear ring deprojects into a nearly circular shape, and no bar-ring
161: position angle is given.
162:
163: NGC 6782 is well-known as a double-barred galaxy (Buta \& Crocker 1993; Erwin 2004), with the primary bar
164: crossing the inner ring and the secondary bar crossing the nuclear ring. The secondary
165: bar is most prominent in the red continuum image in Figure~\ref{images}, and has an orientation
166: tipped 29$^{\circ}$ behind the primary bar (if the spiral arms are trailing). Neither
167: bar looks exceptionally strong, and in fact the primary bar is classified as SAB
168: by Corwin et al. (1985). The position angle of the primary bar is 177$^\circ$
169: (Crocker et al. 1996). The inner ring of NGC 6782 is so highly elongated that it also
170: must be considered bar-like.
171:
172: \subsection{Optical Fabry-Perot Interferometry}
173:
174: The optical velocity field of NGC 6782 was obtained on
175: 1997 July 27 (UT) with the (now decommissioned)
176: Rutgers Fabry-Perot (RFP) interferometer
177: attached to the CTIO 4-m telescope.
178: The broad etalon with a full width at half maximum (FWHM)
179: of 2.3$\AA$ was used for the observations, and
180: H$\alpha$ was the only emission line used for the
181: radial velocity measurements. The instrumental velocity
182: dispersion is 44 km s$^{-1}$.
183:
184: Owing to the relatively low inclination,
185: only 16 frames were needed to cover the full velocity
186: range of NGC 6782. Frames ranging from 6642$\AA$ (3620 km s$^{-1}$)
187: to 6656$\AA$ (4260 km s$^{-1}$) were taken in 1$\AA$
188: steps. Each frame was exposed for 600s.
189: Using local position standards from the
190: STScI Guide Star Catalog, the scale of the frames was
191: measured to be 0\rlap{.}$^{\prime\prime}$349 $\pm$
192: 0\rlap{.}$^{\prime\prime}$001 pix$^{-1}$.
193: The same stars showed that the images had to be rotated counterclockwise by
194: 90\rlap{.}$^{\circ}$50 to get north to the top and east to the left.
195: Although the observations were obtained during strongly variable
196: cloudiness, the CTIO 4-m control system had a transparency
197: monitoring capability that allowed us to stop and restart
198: the integrations as needed when the transparency improved.
199: The full width at half maximum of the point spread function
200: on the images was 4.4 pixels (1\rlap{.}$^{\prime\prime}$5).
201:
202: The main steps in the reduction of the images and the calibration of
203: radial velocities are described already by
204: Buta et al. (2001), and we refer interested readers to that paper
205: for details. The process gave line, continuum, radial velocity, and
206: velocity dispersion maps with values for more than 26,000 pixels. The H$\alpha$
207: line map is similar to the H$\alpha$+[NII] image shown in Figure~\ref{images}, except that
208: it lacks the nuclear source. This source must be dominated by [NII] emission.
209:
210: The resulting heliocentric velocity field is shown with false
211: colors in Figure~\ref{vfield}. The dotted partial circle indicates the boundary of the
212: actual field of view, which is 2\rlap{.}$^{\prime}$8 in angular
213: diameter. Part of the velocity field is cut-off on the northeast
214: side due to this boundary, but the bulk of the galaxy's ionized gas
215: is covered. The velocity field immediately reveals a line of nodes
216: inconsistent with the major axes of the inner or outer R$_1$ rings.
217: These features are intrinsically elongated if in the same plane, as
218: is likely. At the position of the nuclear ring, two spots of high
219: velocity relative to the nucleus are seen. These spots are symmetrically placed around the
220: center and are in a position angle of 31$^{\circ}$.
221:
222: Analysis of the velocity field in terms of deprojected circular motion
223: (Warner et al. 1973) gave a rotation center close (within 1$^{\prime\prime}$)
224: to the position of the nucleus and
225: a systemic velocity of 3921$\pm$3 km s$^{-1}$, in excellent agreement
226: with the HI Parkes All-Sky Final Survey Catalog value of
227: 3920$\pm$14 km s$^{-1}$ (NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database). The
228: line of nodes for circular rotation was found to be in position angle
229: 37\rlap{.}$^{\circ}$5 by the Warner et al. (1973) method, but because
230: the inclination is low, the method did not strongly favor a particular
231: value, giving similar quality fits over a range of at least 15$^{\circ}$-30$^{\circ}$. As a check,
232: we also used AIPS\footnote{Astronomical Image Processing
233: System, managed by NRAO, a facility of the National Science Foundation operated
234: under cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc.} routine GAL, which
235: fits an exponential rotation curve to the projected velocity field.
236: This gave a line of nodes position angle of 32\rlap{.}$^{\circ}$9 and
237: an inclination of 22\rlap{.}$^{\circ}$5. This latter value is close
238: enough to the photometric inclination of 27$^{\circ}$ that we have
239: adopted 27$^{\circ}$$\pm$5$^{\circ}$ for our subsequent analysis. For the line of
240: nodes we adopted a position angle of 35$^{\circ}$$\pm$2$^{\circ}$, also
241: consistent with the photometric value.
242:
243: Kinematic parameters are collected in Table 1. Figure~\ref{rotc} shows the
244: receding and approaching halves of the rotation
245: curve based only on points within 30$^{\circ}$
246: of the line of nodes. Considerable symmetry is seen,
247: including a very rapid rise to a maximum rotation velocity of
248: $\approx$250 km s$^{-1}$ at the radius of the nuclear ring. There
249: is also an indication of a slightly falling rotation curve at large
250: radii, again seen on both sides of the major axis. Rubin et al.
251: (1985) showed that the average Sa galaxy rotation curve is either flat or
252: slightly rising for the luminosity of NGC 6782. Since the emission
253: from NGC 6782 is confined to rings, two of which are intrinsically
254: significantly elongated, the details of the rotation curve must be
255: viewed with caution. To further highlight the kinematics, we show
256: in Figure~\ref{vpadiagrams} mean radial velocity versus position
257: angle every 5$^{\circ}$ for each ring defined by the indicated
258: ranges of sky-plane radii. If the rotation were perfectly circular,
259: these curves would be symmetric, but subtle asymmetries, especially
260: for the inner ring, indicate the presence of noncircular motions.
261: Fits of circular rotation to these diagrams confirm a declining
262: rotation velocity, from 264 km s$^{-1}$ in the nuclear ring to 209
263: km s$^{-1}$ in the outer ring/pseudoring.
264:
265: The outputted velocity dispersion map showed a relatively quiescent
266: velocity field with low dispersions throughout most of the disk.
267: Within the same ranges of sky-plane radii as used in Figure~\ref{vpadiagrams},
268: we find $<\sigma>$=33$\pm$6 km s$^{-1}$ for the nuclear ring and
269: 11$\pm$13 km s$^{-1}$ for the inner and outer rings, where the
270: errors are standard deviations.
271: Dispersions are significantly higher in the nuclear ring,
272: indicating greater gas turbulence in that region.
273:
274: \section{Numerical Method}
275:
276: The simulations are performed with a high-order Godunov code (Antares), in which the calculation of
277: hydrodynamic fluxes on zone interfaces is obtained from the exact Riemann solution (Yuan \& Yen 2005).
278: Although the physical problem is naturally described using polar coordinates in cylindrical symmetry,
279: there are advantages in using Cartesian coordinates in the present computations. In particular, one
280: can avoid the need to impose an artificial inner boundary condition to handle the coordinate singularity
281: at the origin. Moreover, the very short time steps resulting from small grid cells near the origin
282: in the azimuthal direction can be avoided in using Cartesian coordinates. At the outer boundary,
283: radiation boundary conditions are imposed. That is, wave characteristic decomposition is performed
284: in each boundary cell, allowing waves to propagate outward, but suppressing incoming waves. In this
285: treatment, reflection is not permitted at the boundary.
286:
287: We consider the evolution of the gaseous disk in the isothermal approximation. The equations governing
288: the flow corresponding to mass conservation and motion are given as:
289: \begin{eqnarray}
290: \frac{\partial \sigma}{\partial t}+\nabla \cdot (\sigma \textbf{\textit{v}}) =0, \\
291: \frac{\partial \textbf{\textit{v}}}{\partial t}+\textbf{\textit{v}}\cdot \nabla \textbf{\textit{v}}
292: =-\frac{\nabla P}{\sigma}-\nabla V,
293: \end{eqnarray}
294: where $\sigma$ denotes the surface density of the disk and $\textbf{\textit{v}}$ denotes the velocity
295: vector. Here, $P$ is the gas pressure integrated in the $z$-direction. For an isothermal gas,
296: \begin{equation}
297: P = a^2\sigma,
298: \end{equation}
299: where $a$ is the sound speed. The total gravitational potential, $V$, is composed of three components:
300: \begin{equation}
301: V = V_0+V_1+V_g.
302: \end{equation}
303: The first term, $V_0$, is a central potential supporting a uniform, differentially rotating disk, i.e.,
304: \begin{equation}
305: \frac{dV_0}{dr}=r\Omega^2(r),
306: \end{equation}
307: where the angular speed $\Omega(r)$ is determined from the observed rotation curve.
308: The second term, $V_1$, is the rotating non-axisymmetric potential of interest. For the purpose in this
309: paper, we adopt a stellar bar rotating as a rigid body:
310: \begin{equation}
311: V_1(R,\phi,t)=\Phi(R)\cos[2(\phi-\Omega_pt)],
312: \end{equation}
313: where $\Omega_p$ is the angular speed of the bar and only the first non-vanishing harmonic term is included.
314: Note that the axisymmetric part of the bar potential is already contained in $V_0$.
315: A simplified functional form for the amplitude is adopted as:
316: \begin{equation}
317: \Phi(R)=-\Phi_0\frac{R^2}{(A^2_1+R^2)^2},
318: \end{equation}
319: where $A_1 \equiv a_1/r_s$ , $R \equiv r/r_s$, and $r_s$ = 1.0 kpc. $A_1$ and $R$ are both dimensionless.
320: The functional dependence on the radial coordinate, $R$, is chosen to preserve the asymptotic behavior of the potential. It is
321: proportional to $R^2$ as $R\rightarrow 0$ and approaches $R^{-2}$ for large $R$. Thus, the force of the
322: bar at $R=0$ is zero, while it behaves as $R^{-3}$ when $R$ is large. The parameter $a_1$ denotes the radial distance for which the
323: bar potential is a minimum. Finally, $V_g$, the last term of $V$, represents the self-gravitational
324: potential of the gaseous disk.
325:
326: The hydrodynamic code is coupled to a fast Fourier Transform (FFT) Poisson solver to include the
327: self-gravitation of the disk in the calculation. The Poisson equation for the disk is intrinsically
328: 3-dimensional, however, the complete potential function problem is not solved. In contrast the force is
329: calculated in the plane of the disk by integration where the force can be written as a double summation
330: of the product of surface density and a kernel, which is in the form of a convolution. The
331: computational demand associated with the convolution of two vectors of length $N$ is reduced from
332: $O$($N^2$) to $O$($N$ln$N$) with the FFT. As a result, the entire force computation has a demand of
333: $O$($N^2$(ln$N$)$^2$). Since the FFT is only used to accelerate the computation, our Poisson solver
334: does not require the periodic boundary condition.
335:
336: \subsection{Computational Setup}
337:
338: The initial surface density distribution of the gas is taken to be an exponential law of the form
339: \begin{equation}
340: \sigma=\sigma_0e^{-(\frac{r}{r_0})^2},
341: \end{equation}
342: where $\sigma_0$ is the initial surface density at the center, taken to have a value of 10 $M_\odot/pc^{2}$.
343: The value of $r_0$ is specified by requiring $\sigma$ = (1/100)$\sigma_0$ at $r$ = 15 kpc.
344: The actual values of the densities are unimportant, as long as the self-gravity of the gas is
345: neglected, since they can be normalized without affecting Eqs. (1) and (2).
346:
347: For the axisymmetric background force, we use the representation of the rotation curve of
348: NGC 6782 illustrated in Figure~\ref{meanrotc}. Here the points from Figure~\ref{rotc} have
349: been folded around the center. Since
350: it is likely that the derived rotation curve is affected by noncircular perturbations resulting from
351: the spiral arms and rings, we use a least-squares approximation to fit the data points, instead of
352: interpolating between them, in the form of a nearly flat rotation curve, which is written as
353: \begin{equation}
354: v(r)=v_0(\frac{r}{r+\epsilon})^{1/2},
355: \end{equation}
356: with $\epsilon$ = 0.01. The optimal value of $v_0$ is found to be 224 km s$^{-1}$. The corresponding
357: precession frequency curves are shown in Figure~\ref{pfreqs}. The horizontal line represents the pattern speed of the bar,
358: $\Omega_p$. The intersection of $\Omega_p$ with the $\Omega\pm\kappa/2$ and $\Omega\pm\kappa/4$ curves,
359: determine the location of the inner Lindblad resonance (ILR) and outer Lindblad resonance (OLR) as well
360: as the inner and outer 4:1 resonances. Here, $\kappa$ is the epicyclic frequency.
361:
362: At the start of the simulation the gas is placed on circular orbits with rotational velocities given
363: by the rotation curve. These velocities are adjusted to take account of pressure gradients caused by
364: the gradient in the density distribution to ensure that the gas is initially in a state of equilibrium.
365: In order to reduce numerical noise, the amplitude of the bar potential, $\Phi_0$, is increased gradually,
366: growing linearly from zero to the full value during one rotational period of the bar. This amount of
367: time was found to be necessary to avoid the formation of transients resulting from the growth of the
368: perturbing potential.
369:
370: To complete the specification of the input parameters, we adopt a sound speed, $a$, for the gaseous disk
371: of 10 km s$^{-1}$ (Lindblad \& Kristen 1996). Provided that the sound speed is within reasonable limits,
372: 5$\sim$15 km s$^{-1}$, the gaseous response is not very sensitive to its value.
373:
374: All the calculations presented in this paper are performed with a 1024 $\times$ 1024 uniform grid. The
375: computational domain corresponds to a physical region of 40 kpc $\times$ 40 kpc, resulting in a cell size
376: of 39 $\times$ 39 pc$^{2}$ (or 0.195$\arcsec \times$0.195$\arcsec$).
377:
378: \section{Modeling Procedure}
379: \subsection{Requirements for a Successful Model}
380: The appearance of NGC 6782 is bisymmetrical, and the selection criteria of a successful model
381: are based on the following requirements which are similar to those used by Lindblad \& Kristen (1996):
382:
383:
384: 1. The nearly circular bright nuclear ring should be reproduced.
385:
386: 2. The gas lanes in the model should have approximately the same shape and position as the
387: observed dust lanes.
388:
389: 3. The diamond-shaped (or pointed oval) inner ring should be reproduced.
390:
391: 4. The faint double outer ring-pseudoring should be reproduced.
392:
393: 5. The characteristics in the observed velocity field, e.g. the circular rotating central disk and
394: the bent isovelocity curves on the diamond-shaped ring, should be reproduced.
395:
396: We judge our models by visual inspection of the model density and velocity maps overlaid on the
397: observed ones instead of adopting a quantitative method, e.g. $\chi^2$, which can be misleading
398: if the strong density features or steep velocity gradients present in the models do not exactly
399: overlap their observed counterparts. Such comparisons would be sufficient in the context of our
400: simple model.
401:
402: \subsection{Parameter Estimations}
403:
404: As pointed out by Yuan \& Kuo (1997), the spiral waves excited at the outer inner Lindblad resonance
405: (OILR), where the epicyclic frequency, $\kappa$, of the fluid is twice the angular frequency in the
406: rotating frame of the bar, propagate inward. The negative angular momentum carried by these waves will be
407: deposited over the annular region through which they propagate. The disk material within these regions,
408: after losing angular momentum, would flow toward the center. While their theory applies only to
409: the vicinity of the resonance, the results from the global nonlinear asymptotic theory of spiral density
410: waves (see Yuan \& Yang 2006) reveal that the wavelength of the density waves decreases as they propagate
411: inward from the OILR. Thus, the spiral arms become more tightly wound and take the appearance of a ring
412: around the center.
413: We note however that these results are all based on steady-state solutions and do not describe the
414: morphology after material has been swept by the waves and accreted to the center. By carrying out
415: numerical simulation experiments, we find the quasi-steady state of a bar-driven gaseous disk with
416: an OILR is characterized by an "eye-shape" morphology which includes a pair of open, strongly shocked
417: spiral arms in the outer depleted region and a pair of tightly wound spiral arms embedded in a more
418: widespread ring in the circumnuclear region. Based on these experimental results, an OILR is required
419: in order to simulate the nuclear ring and the gas dust lanes, confirming the results obtained by
420: Athanassoula (1992).
421:
422: An additional test used to validate our numerical simulations is to consider the case when the OLR and OILR simultaneously
423: exist. For this test, a proper angular speed for the bar is chosen such that the locations of the
424: OLR and the OILR are in the appropriate range. If the strength of the bar is weak,
425: waves excited at the OLR propagate outward and those at the OILR propagate inward and no waves are
426: excited in between, as predicted by linear theory. By increasing the strength of the bar, the
427: evanescent (wave-forbidden) region between the OLR and OILR narrows in extent and the inner 4:1
428: higher harmonic spiral density waves between them are excited. Their interaction with the waves
429: excited at the OILR form a shape similar to the diamond-shaped inner ring seen in NGC 6782. Based
430: on this test and the observations, the values for the angular pattern speed, the location of the
431: potential minimum, and the strength of the bar potential can be obtained.
432:
433: \subsection{Parameter Space}
434:
435: The pattern speed $\Omega_p\,$ controls the positions of the resonances and thus the morphology of
436: the spirals. According to the images of NGC 6782 and the results of our simulation tests, $\Omega_p$
437: takes values between 25 $\leq \Omega_p \leq$ 38 km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$, corresponding to a radial
438: interval for the radius of the OLR of 10 kpc $\leq$ R$_{OLR}$ $\leq$ 15.3 kpc.
439:
440: The location of the minimum and the strength of the bar potential can also be determined. In particular,
441: our test results show that the nuclear ring forms inside the location of the minimum and that the
442: stronger the bar potential, the smaller the ring. Considering both factors simultaneously, the
443: location of the minimum of the bar potential, a$_1$ in Eq.7, is taken in the range 2.3 $\leq$ a$_1
444: \leq$ 3.2 kpc. To parameterize the strength of the bar potential, we denote by B the ratio of the
445: effective radial force exerted on the disk by the rotating bar (Yuan \& Kuo 1997) to the force for
446: the circular motion from the rotation curve at the location of OLR. This choice is motivated by the
447: fact that the waves are excited at the resonances. It is found that B should lie between 3\% and 10\%.
448:
449: \section{Numerical Results}
450: \subsection{Comparisons with the Observations}
451: In order to quantitatively compare our theoretical results with the observations, the plane of the
452: theoretical disk must be oriented with respect to the line of sight. From the analysis of the 2D
453: Fabry-Perot velocity field, the P.A. of the line of nodes and the inclination of NGC 6782 are
454: 35$^\circ$ and 27$^\circ$ respectively. The P.A. of the major bar of the galaxy is 177$^\circ$.
455:
456: The best-fit values of the parameters to the observations are $\Omega_p$ = 25 km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$,
457: a$_1$ = 3.2 kpc, and B = 5\%. The inferred value of $\Omega_p$ implies the positions of the
458: inner/outer Lindblad resonances (ILR/OLR), the inner 4:1 ultraharmonic
459: resonance (UHR), and the corotation resonance (CR)
460: are located at R$_{ILR}$ = 2.61 kpc,
461: R$_{UHR}$ = 5.78 kpc, R$_{CR}$ = 8.92 kpc, and R$_{OLR}$ = 15.3 kpc. These
462: locations are shown relative to the galaxy's morphology in Figures~\ref{resonances} and ~\ref{resonances1}. In Figure~\ref{resonances}, the circles are superposed on a
463: deprojected $B$-band image where the bar axis has been rotated to a horizontal
464: orientation. The inner ring is confined between ILR and UHR,
465: while the outer R$_1$ ring lies between CR and OLR,
466: close to
467: the {\it outer} 4:1 UHR at R = 12.1 kpc (where $\Omega_p=\Omega+\kappa/4$)
468: according to Figure 8. The positioning of the R$_1$ ring is very
469: similar to what Treuthardt et al. (2008) found for the
470: barred spiral galaxy NGC 1433 using sticky particle
471: simulations.
472: The nuclear ring is
473: well inside ILR. Figure~\ref{resonances1} shows the same circles superposed
474: on a contour plot of six $B$-band isophotes. In this plot, the horizontal
475: line indicates the extent of the bar as estimated by Rautiainen et al.
476: (2005). The plot shows that the isophotes of NGC 6782 continue to be
477: oval and nearly aligned with the bar all the way to CR.
478:
479: The projected surface density distribution for the best-fit is illustrated in Figure~\ref{surfdens2}a. Its
480: superimposition onto the optical multicolor image and the $B$-band image are shown in Figures~\ref{surfdens2}c and
481: ~\ref{surfdens2}e, respectively. Specifically, Figure~\ref{surfdens2}c shows that the location and shape of the bright nuclear ring,
482: the dust lanes, as well as the pointy oval inner ring are reproduced by the simulations.
483: At the northwestern outer arm in Figure~\ref{images}, upper left panel, there are two
484: faint branches near the tip of the inner
485: ring, which are also reproduced by our simulation (see Figure~\ref{surfdens2}e).
486: We note, however, that the fit is not without deviations since the simulation cannot fit the
487: outer part of the outer arms. Observationally, the arms extend almost one half of a revolution, but
488: those in our simulation only extend one fourth revolution and are much broader.
489: This is because only the gas response is considered in the simulation and the stellar response has not been taken into account.
490: Although it is possible to produce longer spiral arms in the simulation by
491: adding a weak spiral potential (Lindblad et al 1996, Lindblad \& Kristen 1996), we have chosen
492: not to do so in this paper. The imposition of a spiral potential can generate waves by the
493: resonant excitation as well as by forced oscillation (Wang 2006). These two types of waves may
494: interact, thereby complicating the morphology. Since the main features in the images of NGC 6782 are
495: well delineated and smooth, we seek to use a simple model to reproduce these features as much as
496: possible in order to gain a fundamental understanding of their formation and evolution.
497:
498: The evolution of the density features has been followed in the simulation to gain insight into their
499: formation. Initially, spiral waves excited at the ILR appear first. As the strength of the bar
500: potential is increased, the spiral waves intensify eventually leading to the formation of a shock.
501: Subsequently, the inner parts of the spirals become straighter along the major axis of the bar and
502: waves propagate inward. Simultaneously, the waves excited at the inner 4:1 resonance appear, growing
503: stronger and propagating inward. Their propagation leads to their interaction with the waves excited
504: at the ILR to connect with the straight gas lanes
505: to form the pointy oval inner ring. This evolution is consistent with Schwarz's (1984) suggestion that
506: inner rings are connected to the inner 4:1 resonance located just inside the CR. The straight gas
507: lanes propagating inward become more tightly wound and gradually form a nuclear ring. A quasi-steady
508: state is reached after one and three fourths revolutions of the bar, or 430 Myr. The sequential
509: images are shown in Figure~\ref{gasdisk}.
510:
511: The general result concerning the formation of a nuclear ring is similar to that found by Piner,
512: Stone \& Teuben (1995) in their numerical simulations of barred galaxies. The nuclear ring has a rich
513: structure and resembles a tightly wrapped spiral. This is consistent with the result presented
514: here, but the requirements necessary for its formation differ in detail. Specifically, Piner et al.
515: (1995) require that their model galaxy must have two inner Lindblad resonances and the extrema of the $\Omega - \kappa/2$ curves along the major and minor axes between
516: the resonances must be at the same radial position. In contrast, only one inner Lindblad resonance
517: exists in our model galaxy. As the density waves excited at the ILR propagate inward, their wavelength
518: decreases, evolving to a more tightly wound structure about the center (Yuan \& Yang 2006). As the
519: galaxy evolves, mass is continuously accreted into the central region. The tightly wound spirals
520: become more dense and a ring is formed.
521:
522: The existence of strong inner rings, offset dust lanes, and circumnuclear rings has also been
523: found in the N-body simulation study by Byrd et al. (1994). Some of their numerical results
524: resemble NGC 6782 provided that the pattern speed of NGC 6782 is slow such that both an inner
525: second harmonic resonance and an inner Lindblad resonance are allowed.
526:
527: The isovelocity contours from the simulation velocity field are plotted on top of both the simulation
528: density map and the observed Fabry-Perot velocity field in Figures~\ref{isovels}a and b respectively. For these
529: comparisons, we have smoothed the simulation velocity field to the same spatial resolution as that
530: of the observation. Strong velocity gradients across the
531: dust lanes are seen in Figure~\ref{isovels}a.
532: Across the dust lanes, matter collides with the arm from the concave (or inner)
533: side and is deflected by the shock, resulting in mass inflow to fuel the nuclear star formation ring.
534: It is noteworthy in Figure~\ref{isovels}b that at the southeastern part of the pointy inner ring, the velocity
535: contours bend outwards along the spiral arms in both the simulation and observation. This is
536: one of the distinct features for the density waves excited at the ILR and is an important diagnostic.
537: Based upon this comparison, the inner ring is directly related to the ILR.
538:
539: The outward bending of the curves is caused by the same mechanism that produces the sharp velocity gradients across the dust lanes.
540: From the amount of bending of the isovelocity curves at the respective positions,
541: it is inferred that the shock in the dust lanes is stronger than that in the pointy inner ring.
542: Since the deflection of the isovelocity curves across the dust lanes is very large, the amount of
543: shear is so high that it is likely that a cloud at the shock loci will be sheared out before collapsing.
544: Therefore, the absence of HII regions or signs of recent star formation in these dust lanes can be
545: naturally understood. On the other hand, clouds located at the position of the density enhancements
546: in the inner ring, which undergo compression upon passage through the shock, will have sufficient
547: time to collapse before being sheared out. As a result, the inner ring shows clear signs of
548: recent star formation. This is consistent with Athanassoula's (1992) result, according to which
549: these features should exist in strongly barred galaxies. Although the ratio of the effective radial
550: force to the force for the circular motion is 5\% at OLR, it is 21\% at ILR. Since almost all
551: the important features of our simulation lie inside the CR, we conclude that the force associated
552: with the rotating bar in our simulation for NGC 6782 is strong. For comparison, Laurikainen
553: et al. (2004) used a near-infrared image from the Ohio State University Bright Galaxy Survey
554: (Eskridge et al. 2002) to estimate the maximum relative torque in NGC 6782. Their value,
555: $Q_g$ = 0.165$\pm$0.008, located at r = 24.4 arcsecs (equal to 4.61 kpc), indicates only a moderate bar strength characteristic of
556: SAB galaxies (see also Buta \& Block 2001).
557: The value of $Q_g$ in our model for the best fit case, which is located at a different distance, r = 3.2 kpc, is found to be 0.135.
558:
559: \subsection{HII Regions in the Pointy Inner Ring}
560:
561: As noted in the paper by Crocker et al. (1996) and shown again in Figure~\ref{images}, the HII regions in the pointy inner ring
562: of NGC 6782 are bright around the cusps and mostly concentrated in the vicinity of the ring major axis.
563: In their sample of 32 ringed galaxies, not only NGC 6782 but also IC 1438 and UGC 12646 exhibit most of
564: their emission near the ring major axis with very little emission near the ring minor axis. This is
565: similar to NGC 1433 (Buta et al. 2001) and NGC 3081 (Buta et al. 2004), but there is more emission near the minor axes in these two cases.
566: An explanation for this phenomenon has been suggested by Contopoulos (1979; see also Byrd et al. 2006) involving the relative particle
567: motions within the CR region. In particular, particles would remain longer at the apocentra of their orbits
568: than at the pericentra, which would enhance the density along the major axis of all orbits within the CR.
569: Thus, near the true major axis of an elongated inner ring which lies inside CR, HII regions are expected
570: to be concentrated.
571:
572: In our fully hydrodynamical simulation, the high density region around the two tips of the pointy inner ring is
573: explained in terms of the interaction of the gas with the curved shocks. To see this, we present the flow
574: pattern in a reference frame rotating with the bar in Figure~\ref{gasflows}. Here, the arrows represent the velocity
575: vectors at a given point overlaid on the face-on surface density map of the gas. Since we seek to
576: understand the existence and spatial distribution of the HII regions in the inner ring, the area in
577: Figure~\ref{gasflows}
578: lies inside the CR, and we only plot the flow lines related to the inner ring. Note that since the gas
579: flow field in our simulation is not steady, but only quasi-steady we use flow lines rather than
580: streamlines to demonstrate their instantaneous directions.
581: In order to see clearly how flow lines bunch up, we only plot them for
582: less than one revolution. Flow lines start from a number of equidistant
583: points along the direction of the bar semimajor axis along the x-axis. Focusing on the left side of
584: Figure~\ref{gasflows},
585: it can be seen that they hit the shock on the upper left and are deflected and bunched up to compress the
586: gas there. The compressed gas may trigger star formation and then move along the flow lines. A moment later,
587: the gas hits the shock on the lower left and the same process repeats itself. From the velocity vectors,
588: it can be seen that the gas around the tips of the pointy inner ring is moving more slowly than that near
589: the ring minor axis, implying that the gas remains for a longer time near the ring major axis, consistent
590: with Contopoulos' result (1979). As a result, the HII regions in the pointy inner ring would be expected to be
591: present around the cusps.
592:
593: \subsection{Self-gravitation of the Gas Disk}
594:
595: Simulations carried out with and without self-gravitation produce similar morphologies with the same
596: overall shapes. The primary quantitative differences are the radii of the nuclear rings. In particular,
597: the nuclear ring in the simulation with self-gravitation is larger in extent than in the case without
598: the inclusion of self-gravity effects. This result is consistent with the asymptotic solutions in Yuan
599: \& Cheng (1989) and Yuan \& Kuo (1997) who showed that the self-gravity will affect the radial location
600: and orientation of the spiral pattern, but not its overall shape. This result follows from the fact that
601: self-gravitational effects will shift the Q-barrier to move toward the corotation region. As a result, the entire
602: spiral pattern is shifted toward corotation, inward for the OLR and outward for the ILR. Since the
603: spiral pattern in NGC 6782 lies inside the corotation point, the effect of self-gravity should move the spiral
604: pattern outward and increase its extent. For stronger self-gravity, the effect is greater and it would
605: be manifested most clearly on the dense nuclear ring in the simulation result.
606:
607: \section{Discussion}
608:
609: Our findings on NGC 6782 may be compared with other recent studies. Patsis et al. (2003)
610: analyzed the shapes of inner SB rings from the point of view of two- and three-dimensional
611: periodic orbits in a potential consisting of a Miyamoto disk, a Plummer bulge, and a 3D Ferrers
612: bar, and considered the case of NGC 6782 as an example. They concluded that the pointed-oval
613: inner ring of NGC 6782 can be interpreted in terms of 2D 6:1 orbits of the ``$s$ family"
614: and two associated groups of stable 3D families. No orbits of the bar-supporting $x_1$
615: family were needed to explain the shape and location of the ring.
616:
617: Rautiainen et al. (2005) used near-infrared images to infer gravitational potentials
618: in 38 galaxies, including NGC 6782,
619: and then to evolve a cloud-particle disk in these potentials until the
620: simulated morphology matches the $B$-band morphology. The goal was to measure the ratio
621: of the corotation radius ($R_{CR}$) to the bar radius ($R_{bar}$)
622: and compare it with model expectations for
623: fast and slow bars. For NGC 6782, the best-fitting simulation gave a corotation radius
624: of 37\rlap{.}$^{\prime\prime}$1, compared to 47\rlap{.}$^{\prime\prime}$2 in our model.
625: With a measured bar radius of 31\rlap{.}$^{\prime\prime}$3, Rautiainen et al. derived
626: $R_{CR}/R_{bar}$=1.2, in the ``fast bar" domain of Debattista \& Sellwood (2000). For our
627: value of $R_{CR}$, the ratio is 1.5, which would be in the ``slow bar" domain. As we
628: have shown, NGC 6782 has an oval zone that almost fills the minor axis dimension of the
629: outer R$_1$ ring. Our CR radius fully encompasses this feature which extends well
630: beyond the ends of the main bar.
631:
632: Quillen \& Frogel (1997) focussed on the shape of the outer R$_1$ ring in NGC 6782 as a means
633: of deducing the mass-to-light ratio of the bar. For our adopted orientation parameters,
634: we have shown that the deprojected position angle of the R$_1$ ring relative to the bar
635: is 74$^{\circ}$$\pm$3$^{\circ}$, while Buta (1995) derived a mean orientation of
636: 90$^{\circ}$$\pm$9$^{\circ}$ for R$_1$ rings. On the assumption that the ring is actually aligned
637: perpendicular to the bar, Quillen \& Frogel (1997) concluded that the inclination of
638: the galaxy must lie in the range 35$^{\circ}$ $<$ $i$ $<$ 45$^{\circ}$. To reproduce the
639: morphology of the ring for an inclination of 41$^{\circ}$, Quillen \& Frogel deduced that
640: the bar mass-to-light ratio must be greater than 70\% of that required for a maximal disk.
641: This study lacked the rotation information that we have available in our paper.
642:
643: Romero-Gomez et al. (2006) have considered an alternative interpretation
644: of the rings in a galaxy like NGC 6782. They focussed on what they referred
645: to as "rR$_1$" rings, a combination of an inner ring and an R$_1$ outer ring
646: like that seen in NGC 6782. Instead of specific resonances, this pattern
647: is attributed to what the authors call ``invariant manifolds" of periodic
648: orbits associated with the L$_1$ and L$_2$ Lagrangian points in the potential
649: of a rotating bar. The manifolds can account for a highly elongated,
650: pointed-oval inner ring aligned with the bar and an R$_1$ outer ring which
651: dips in at its minor axis. Romero-Gomez et al. (2007) further show that
652: the variety of ring types, such as R$_1$R$_2^{\prime}$ and R$_2^{\prime}$,
653: as well as open spirals such as is seen in NGC 1365,
654: can also be explained by these manifolds.
655:
656: \section{Conclusions}
657:
658: We have performed two dimensional modeling of the barred spiral galaxy NGC 6782 using the Antares
659: hydrodynamic code in the isothermal approximation within the framework
660: of a simple model based on a nearly flat rotation curve (Eq. (9)), which is fit from the observations.
661: For a perturbing bar potential (Eqs. (6) and (7)) described by the angular speed, the location of the
662: potential minimum, and the strength of the bar, we show that the primary density and velocity features
663: of the galaxy can be reproduced provided that the parameters are in the range,
664: $\Omega_p$ = 25 km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$,
665: a$_1$ = 3.2 kpc, and B = 5\%.
666: Specifically, the observed shapes and positions of the bright nuclear ring, offset gas lanes, and the
667: pointy oval inner ring are well reproduced in our model. In addition, our simulation results
668: also reproduce the two faint branches near the tip of the inner ring at the northwestern outer arm in
669: the $B$-band image.
670:
671: Based on the time-dependent evolution of the gas disk, the formation of the primary features has been
672: examined. In particular, it has been found that the pointy inner ring is formed via the interaction
673: between the density waves excited at the ILR and the 4:1 higher harmonic density waves under the
674: gravitational influence of a slowly rotating strong bar. The nuclear ring, on the other hand, is
675: initially a pair of tightly wound spirals which gradually evolve into a ring after matter has continuously
676: accreted into the central region.
677:
678: Upon comparison with the observed velocity field, the numerical simulations provide an understanding for
679: the origin of the outward bending of the isovelocity contours along the spiral arms at the southeastern part of the pointy inner ring.
680: This feature is caused by gas colliding with the spiral arm from the interior (concave side). Finally,
681: the existence of cuspy HII regions in the pointy oval inner ring can also be naturally explained by the
682: concentration of gas flow lines around the tips of the inner ring.
683:
684: In the future, high resolution observations are desirable in order to discern the strong velocity gradients
685: across the dust lanes seen in our simulation to provide further confirmation of the model presented in
686: this paper.
687:
688: \acknowledgments
689: We thank Ted Williams for assistance with the Fabry-Perot observations of NGC 6782,
690: and we also thank Guy B. Purcell and Ted Williams for the programs used for reducing
691: the data.
692: We are grateful to Ronald E. Taam and Paul T.P. Ho for many valuable comments.
693: R.B. acknowledges the support of NSF Grant AST-0507140 to the University of Alabama.
694: L.-H.L. and C.Y. acknowledge the support of National Science Council, Taiwan, NSC96-2752-M-001-002-PAE.
695: \begin{thebibliography}{}
696: \bibitem[Athanassoula (1992)]{Athanassoula} Athanassoula, E. 1992, MNRAS, 259, 345
697: \bibitem[Buta (1995)]{Buta1995} Buta, R. 1995, ApJS, 96, 39
698: \bibitem[Buta \& Block (2001)]{ButaBlock} Buta, R. \& Block, D. L. 2001, ApJ, 550, 243
699: \bibitem[Buta et al. (1991)] {Buta1991} Buta, R. \& Crocker, D. A. 1991, AJ, 102, 1715
700: \bibitem[Buta et al. (1993)] {Buta1993} Buta, R. \& Crocker, D. A. 1993, AJ, 105, 1344
701: \bibitem[Buta et al. (2001)]{Buta2001} Buta, R., Ryder, S. D., Madsen, G. J., Wesson, K., Crocker, D. A., \& Combes, F. 2001, AJ, 121, 225
702: \bibitem[Buta et al. (2004] {Buta2004} Buta, R., Byrd, G., \& Freeman, T. 2004, AJ, 127, 1982
703: \bibitem[Buta et al. (2007)]{Buta2007} Buta, R., Corwin, H. G., \& Odewahn, S. C. 2007, The de Vaucouleurs Atlas of Galaxies, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
704: \bibitem[Byrd et al. (2006)]{Byrd2006} Byrd, G., Freeman, T., \& Buta, R. 2006, AJ, 131, 1377
705: \bibitem[Byrd et al. (1994)]{Byrd} Byrd, G., Rautiainen, P., Salo, H., Buta, R., \& Crocker, D. A. 1994, AJ, 108, 476
706: \bibitem[Contopoulos (1979)]{Contopoulos} Contopoulos, G. 1979, in Photometry, Kinematics, and Dynamics of Galaxies, ed. D. S. Evans (Austin: Univ. of Texas Dept. of Astronomy), 425
707: \bibitem[Corwin et al. (1985)]{Corwin} Corwin, H. G., de Vaucouleurs, A., \& de Vaucouleurs, G.
708: 1985, Southern Galaxy Catalogue, Univ. Texas Mono. in Astr. No. 4
709: \bibitem[Crocker et al. (1996)]{Crocker} Crocker, D. A., Baugus, P. D., \& Buta, R. 1996, ApJS, 105, 353
710: \bibitem[Debattista \& Sellwood (2000)]{Debattista} Debattista, V. \& Sellwood, J. 2000, ApJ, 543, 704
711: \bibitem[de Vaucouleurs et al. (1991)]{de Vaucouleurs} de Vaucouleurs, G., de Vaucouleurs, A., Corwin, H. G., Buta, R. J., Paturel, G., \& Fouqu\'e, P. 1991, Third Reference Catalogue of Bright Galaxies,
712: New York, Springer
713: \bibitem[England (1989)]{England} England, M.N. 1989, ApJ, 344, 669
714: \bibitem[Eskridge et al. (2002)]{Eskridge} Eskridge, P. et al. 2002, ApJS, 143, 73
715: \bibitem[Goldreich (1979)]{Goldreich1979} Goldreich, P., \& Tremaine, S. 1979, ApJ, 233, 857
716: \bibitem[Erwin 2004]{Erwin} Erwin, P. 2004, A\&A, 415, 941
717: \bibitem[Grouchy et al. (2008)]{Grouchy} Grouchy, R., Buta, R., Salo, H., \& Laurikainen, E. 2008, in preparation
718: \bibitem[Huntley et al. (1978)]{Huntley} Huntley, J. M., Sanders, R. H., \& Roberts, W. W. 1978, ApJ, 221, 521
719: \bibitem[Landolt (1992)]{Landolt}Landolt, A. U. 1992, AJ, 104, 340
720: \bibitem[Laurikainen et al. (2004)]{Lauri} Laurikainen, E., Salo, H., Buta, R., \& Vasylyev, S.
721: 2004, MNRAS, 355, 1251
722: \bibitem[Lindblad et al. (1996a)]{Lindblad1996a} Lindblad, P. A. B., Lindblad, P. O., \& Athanassoula, E. 1996, A\&A, 313, 65
723: \bibitem[Lindblad (1996b)]{Lindblad1996b} Lindblad, P. A. B., \& Kristen, H. 1996, A\&A, 313, 733
724: \bibitem[Patsis et al. 2003]{Patsis} Patsis, P. A., Skokos, Ch., \& Athanassoula, E. MNRAS, 346, 1031
725: \bibitem[Piner et al. (1995)]{Piner} Piner, B. G., Stone, J. M., \& Teuben, P. J. 1995, ApJ, 449, 508
726: \bibitem[Quillen \& Frogel (1997)]{Quillen} Quillen, A. C. \& Frogel, J. A.
727: 1997, ApJ, 487, 603
728: \bibitem[Rautiainen et al. (2005)]{Rautiainen} Rautiainen, P., Salo, H., \&
729: Laurikainen, E. 2005, ApJ, 631, L129
730: \bibitem[Romero-Gomez et al. (2006)]{Romero1} Romero-Gomez, M., Masdemont, J. J.,
731: Athanassoula, E., \& Garcia-Gomez, C. 2006, A\&A, 453, 39
732: \bibitem[Romero-Gomez et al. (2007)]{Romero2} Romero-Gomez, M.,
733: Athanassoula, E., Masdemont, J. J., \& Garcia-Gomez, C. 2006, A\&A, 472, 63
734: \bibitem[Rubin et al. (1985)]{Rubin} Rubin, V., Burstein, D., Ford, W. K., \&
735: Thonnard, N. 1985, ApJ, 289, 81
736: \bibitem[Sanders (1980)]{Sanders} Sanders, R. H., \& Tubbs, A. D. 1980, ApJ, 235, 803
737: \bibitem[Schwarz (1984)]{Schwarz} Schwarz, M. P. 1984, MNRAS, 209, 93
738: \bibitem[Treuthardt (2008)]{Treuthardt} Treuthardt, P., Salo, H., Rautiainen, P., \& Buta, R. 2008, arXiv:0804.3356 (astro-ph)
739: \bibitem[Wang (2006)]{Wang} Wang, H.-H. 2006, Ms. Thesis, National Taiwan University
740: \bibitem[Warner et al. (1973)]{Warner} Warner, P. J., Wright, M. C., \& Baldwin, J. E.
741: 1973, MNRAS, 163, 163
742: \bibitem[Yuan (1984)]{Yuan1984} Yuan, C. 1984, ApJ, 281, 600
743: \bibitem[Yuan (1989)]{Yuan1989} Yuan, C., \& Cheng, Y. 1989, ApJ, 340, 216
744: \bibitem[Yuan (1991)]{Yuan1991} Yuan, C., \& Cheng, Y. 1991, ApJ, 376, 104
745: \bibitem[Yuan (1997)]{Yuan1997} Yuan, C., \& Kuo, C.-L. 1997, ApJ, 486, 750
746: \bibitem[Yuan (2005)]{Yuan2005} Yuan, C., \& Yen, D. C.-C. 2005, JKAS, 38, 197
747: \bibitem[Yuan (2006)]{Yuan2006} Yuan, C., \& Yang, C.-C. 2006, ApJ, 644, 180
748:
749:
750: \end{thebibliography}
751:
752: \clearpage
753:
754: \begin{deluxetable}{ll}
755: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
756: \tablewidth{0pc}
757: \tablecaption{Global Optical Characteristics of NGC 6782}
758: \tablehead{
759: \colhead{Parameter} &
760: \colhead{Value}
761: }
762: \startdata
763: $\alpha(1950)$\tablenotemark{a} & 19$^h$ 19$^m$ 35\rlap{.}$^s$1\\
764: $\delta(1950)$\tablenotemark{a} & $-$60$^{\circ}$ 01$^{\prime}$ 12$^{\prime\prime}$\\
765: SGC type\tablenotemark{b} & (R)SAB(r)a \\
766: CSRG type\tablenotemark{c} & (R$_1^{\prime}$)SB(r)0/a \\
767: de Vaucouleurs Atlas type\tablenotemark{d} & (R$_1$R$_2^{\prime}$)SB(r)a \\
768: logD$_{25}$ (0\rlap{.}$^{\prime}$1) & 1.355 \\
769: logR$_{25}$ & 0.050 \\
770: $\phi_{25}$ & 52\rlap{.}$^{\circ}$5 (1950) \\
771: $B_T$ & 12.85 \\
772: $(B-V)_T$ & 0.91 \\
773: $(V-I)_T$ & 1.22 \\
774: Photometric axis ratio $<q_p>$ (70$^{\prime\prime}$ $\leq$ $r$ $\leq$ 89$^{\prime\prime}$) & 0.894 $\pm$ 0.002 \\
775: Photometric major axis $<\phi_p>$ (70$^{\prime\prime}$ $\leq$ $r$ $\leq$ 89$^{\prime\prime}$) & 34\rlap{.}$^{\circ}$9 $\pm$ 0\rlap{.}$^{\circ}$5 (1950) \\
776: Photometric inclination $i_p$\tablenotemark{e} & 27\rlap{.}$^{\circ}$2$\pm$0\rlap{.}$^{\circ}$2 \\
777: Kinematic inclination $i_k$ & 27$^{\circ}$$\pm$5$^{\circ}$ \\
778: Kinematic line of nodes position angle $\phi_k$\tablenotemark{f} & 35$^{\circ}$$\pm$2$^{\circ}$\\
779: Heliocentric systemic radial velocity $V_s$ & 3921$\pm$3 km s$^{-1}$ \\
780: Deprojected nuclear ring major axis diameter & 9\rlap{.}$^{\prime\prime}$9$\pm$0\rlap{.}$^{\prime\prime}$2 \\
781: Deprojected nuclear ring axis ratio & 0.94$\pm$0.02 \\
782: Deprojected inner ring major axis diameter & 53\rlap{.}$^{\prime\prime}$2$\pm$0\rlap{.}$^{\prime\prime}$2 \\
783: Deprojected inner ring axis ratio & 0.687$\pm$0.004 \\
784: Deprojected bar-inner ring position angle & 1\rlap{.}$^{\circ}$8$\pm$1\rlap{.}$^{\circ}$1 \\
785: Deprojected outer R$_1$ ring major axis diameter & 130$^{\prime\prime}$$\pm$1$^{\prime\prime}$ \\
786: Deprojected outer R$_1$ ring axis ratio & 0.79$\pm$0.01 \\
787: Deprojected bar-outer R$_1$ ring position angle & 74$^{\circ}$$\pm$3$^{\circ}$ \\
788: \enddata
789: \tablenotetext{a}{de Vaucouleurs et al. (1991)}
790: \tablenotetext{b}{Corwin et al. (1985)}
791: \tablenotetext{c}{Buta (1995)}
792: \tablenotetext{d}{Buta et al. (2007)}
793: \tablenotetext{e}{Based on $<q_p>$ and assuming the outer isophotes represent an oblate spheroid having an intrinsic flattening of 0.2}
794: \tablenotetext{f}{Assuming pure circular motion}
795: \end{deluxetable}
796:
797: \clearpage
798:
799:
800: \begin{figure}
801: \figurenum{1}
802: \epsscale{1.0}
803: \plotone{f1.eps}
804: \caption{Optical groundbased images of NGC 6782. {\it Upper left}: $B$-band image in units of mag arcsec$^{-2}$;
805: {\it Upper right}: $B-I$ color index map coded such that blue features ($B-I$ $\approx$ 1.0-1.5) are dark and red features ($B-I$ $\approx$ 2.5) are light.
806: {\it Lower left}: Red continuum image of NGC 6782 in units of mag arcsec$^{-2}$;
807: {\it Lower right}: H$\alpha$+[NII] image of NGC 6782 in intensity units. Both of
808: these latter images are from Crocker, Baugus, \& Buta (1996). North is at the top
809: and east is to the left in each case.}
810: \label{images}
811: \end{figure}
812:
813: \begin{figure}
814: \figurenum{2}
815: \epsscale{0.75}
816: \plotone{f2.eps}
817: \caption{Hubble Heritage image of NGC 6782, rotated to have north at the top and
818: east to the left.}
819: \label{hubble}
820: \end{figure}
821:
822: \begin{figure}
823: \figurenum{3}
824: \epsscale{0.75}
825: \plotone{f3.eps}
826: %\vspace{2.5truecm}
827: \caption{Azimuthally-averaged surface brightness and color index profiles for NGC 6782.
828: The averages were taken within fixed elliptical annuli having the mean disk axis ratio
829: and position angle listed in Table 1. The locations of the nuclear ring (nr), inner ring (r),
830: and outer ring (R$_1$) are indicated.}
831: \label{profiles}
832: \end{figure}
833:
834: \begin{figure}
835: \figurenum{4}
836: \epsscale{0.75}
837: \plotone{f4.eps}
838: \caption{H$\alpha$ Fabry-Perot velocity field of NGC 6782. The velocity range displayed is
839: from 3790 to 4060 km s$^{-1}$, and is color-coded such that receding gas is red while approaching
840: gas is blue. The red dotted circle shows the boundary of the instrument field and has a
841: diameter of 2\rlap{.}$^{\prime}$8. North is at the top and east is to the left.}
842: \label{vfield}
843: \end{figure}
844:
845: \begin{figure}
846: \figurenum{5}
847: \epsscale{0.75}
848: \plotone{f5.eps}
849: \vspace{3.5truecm}
850: \caption{Unfolded rotation curve of NGC 6782. The receding half of the galaxy is
851: to the southwest, while the approaching half is to the northeast.}
852: \label{rotc}
853: \end{figure}
854:
855: \begin{figure}
856: \figurenum{6}
857: \epsscale{0.7}
858: \plotone{f6.eps}
859: \vspace{3.5truecm}
860: \caption{Mean heliocentric radial velocity versus position angle around the
861: three ring features of NGC 6782. The means are taken every 5$^{\circ}$ within
862: the indicated ranges of sky-plane radii, and the error bars are standard deviations.
863: The $V_c$ values are based on fits of circular rotation to these curves.
864: The vertical dashed lines indicate the line of nodes position angle of 35$^{\circ}$
865: (approaching) and 215$^{\circ}$ (receding).}
866: \label{vpadiagrams}
867: \end{figure}
868:
869: \begin{figure}
870: \figurenum{7}
871: \epsscale{1.0}
872: \plotone{f7.eps}
873: \caption{Adopted representation of the rotation curve of NGC 6782 ($solid \ line$) for the
874: axisymmetric
875: force in our model. The dots are the observational data points marked with their error bars, fitted
876: by a nearly flat rotation curve (eq. (9)).}.\label{meanrotc}
877: \end{figure}
878:
879: \begin{figure}
880: \figurenum{8}
881: \epsscale{1.0}
882: \plotone{f8.eps}
883: \caption{Angular speed (precession frequency) curves as a function of radius derived from the nearly flat rotation
884: curve for an angular pattern speed of the bar $\Omega_p$ = 25 km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$. $\Omega$ and
885: $\kappa$ are the circular angular speed and the radial epicyclic frequency, respectively.
886: Also shown are the
887: locations of corotation and the inner and outer Lindblad resonances.}.\label{pfreqs}
888: \end{figure}
889:
890: \begin{figure}
891: \figurenum{9}
892: \epsscale{1.0}
893: \plotone{f9.eps}
894: \caption{Locations of resonances in NGC 6782 superposed on a deprojected $B$-band
895: image rotated such that the bar axis is horizontal. In order of increasing radius, the circles
896: are ILR, UHR (inner 4:1), CR, and OLR.}
897: \label{resonances}
898: \end{figure}
899:
900:
901: \begin{figure}
902: \figurenum{10}
903: \epsscale{0.8}
904: \plotone{f10.eps}
905: \vspace{3.5truecm}
906: \caption{The same resonance radii ({\it dashed circles}) as in Figure~\ref{resonances} superposed on
907: a contour map of $B$-band isophotes at 19.2, 21.0 22.2, 22.8, 24.0, and 25.00 mag arcsec$^{-2}$.
908: The solid horizontal line indicates the extent of the bar estimated by Rautiainen et al. (2005).
909: This plot shows that CR in our model lies well beyond the bar ends, but fully encompasses an
910: extended oval only slightly misaligned with the main bar.}
911: \label{resonances1}
912: \end{figure}
913:
914:
915:
916: \begin{figure}
917: \figurenum{11}
918: \epsscale{1.0}
919: \plotone{f11.eps}
920: \caption{(a) The projected density distribution of the simulation result. The color map denotes the surface
921: density distribution in logarithmic scale. The frame is
922: taken after 2.16 revolutions of the bar, or 532 Myr.
923: (b) Replica of Figure~\ref{hubble} with the brightness of the pointed-oval inner ring enhanced.
924: (c) Superposition of Figure~\ref{surfdens2}a and Figure~\ref{surfdens2}b. The bright nuclear ring, off-centered gas lanes, as well
925: as the pointy oval inner ring in our model exhibit the same shapes and positions as the observation.
926: (d) Replica of the $B$-band image in Figure~\ref{images} with the brightness enhanced except for the central part.
927: (e) Superposition of Figure~\ref{surfdens2}a and Figure~\ref{surfdens2}d. The two faint branches near the tip of the inner ring
928: at the northwestern outer arm in the $B$-band image are also reproduced in our simulation result.
929: (f) A close-up of the inner regions of Figure~\ref{surfdens2}c. Except Figure~\ref{surfdens2}f, all panels in this figure are of the same scale.}\label{surfdens2}
930: \end{figure}
931:
932: \begin{figure}
933: \figurenum{12}
934: \epsscale{0.6}
935: \plotone{f12.eps}
936: \caption{Evolution of the bar-driven gaseous disk. The eight panels are arranged in counterclockwise
937: order with increasing time. The individual times are 123, 154, 194, 237, 289, 341, 400, 532 Myr. The bar is in horizontal orientation in each frame. The color map denotes the surface density distribution in logarithmic scale.}.
938: \label{gasdisk}
939: \end{figure}
940:
941:
942: \begin{figure}
943: \figurenum{13}
944: \epsscale{1.0}
945: \plotone{f13.eps}
946: \caption{Isovelocity curves from the simulation velocity field are plotted on top of the simulation density map (a)(left) and the observed Fabry-Perot velocity field (b)(right).}.\label{isovels}
947: \end{figure}
948:
949: \begin{figure}
950: \figurenum{14}
951: \epsscale{1.0}
952: \plotone{f14.eps}
953: \caption{Gas flow lines and velocity vectors in a reference frame in which the bar is
954: at rest superposed on the surface density map.}.\label{gasflows}
955: \end{figure}
956:
957: \end{document}
958: