1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: \section{Beyond the standard model}
3: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
4: Beyond the elucidation of the mechanism of electroweak symmetry
5: breaking, there are many compelling and well-motivated models
6: that can be tested at the Tevatron. But what are the CDF and
7: D\O\ Collaborations looking for at Tevatron? By far, the most
8: widely studied theory beyond the {\tt SM} involves new
9: particles predicted by low energy supersymmetry. Searches are
10: therefore often divided into {\tt SUSY} and non-{\tt SUSY}
11: categories. This succinct summary covers the following topics:
12: \begin{itemize}
13: \item[$\bullet$] Extension beyond the Poincar\'{e} group, {\it
14: i.e.}, supersymmetry, such as searches for electroweak
15: gauginos with leptonic decay, and squark and gluino
16: production resulting in multijet+\met\ topologies.
17: \item[$\bullet$] Existence of a new symmetry leading to
18: massive particles with a lifetime comparable to the
19: typical transit time through the detector.
20: \item[$\bullet$] Particle substructure or compositeness,
21: such that history repeats itself, leading to {\it
22: e.g.}, leptoquark particles or excited fermion states.
23: \item[$\bullet$] An enlarged gauge group resulting in
24: exotic $Z'$ or $W'$ bosons.
25: \item[$\bullet$] An increase in the number of spacial
26: dimensions, {\it i.e.}, extra-dimension models with
27: real Kaluza-Klein gravitons produced in association
28: with a jet, or virtual Kaluza-Klein gravitons
29: exchanged in the production of fermion or vector-boson
30: pairs.
31: \item[$\bullet$] A search for an excess in data without a
32: specific model in mind. These are grouped into
33: so-called signature-based searches.
34: \end{itemize}
35:
36: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
37: \section{Charginos and neutralinos}
38: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
39: Charginos and neutralinos are respectively the charged and
40: neutral partners of gauge and Higgs bosons. The primary search
41: modes are pair production of charginos ($\chi^+_1 \chi^-_1$) or
42: associated chargino-neutralino ($\chi^\pm_1 \chi^0_2$)
43: production, where $\chi^\pm_1$ is the lightest chargino and
44: $\chi^0_2$ is the second lightest neutralino. A search for {\tt
45: SUSY} can therefore be performed via the associated production
46: of charginos and neutralinos, where the $\chi^\pm_1$ and
47: $\chi^0_2$ are assumed to decay either via exchange of vector
48: bosons or via sleptons into {\tt SM} fermions while the
49: lightest neutralino remains undetected.
50:
51: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
52: \begin{figure}\begin{center}
53: \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth,height=0.42\textwidth,angle=0]{d0_trilep.eps}
54: %\hfill
55: \caption{\label{fig:D0_trilep} D\O\ 95\% C.L. limits on the total cross section
56: for associated chargino and neutralino production with leptonic final states as a
57: function of the chargino ($\chi_{1}^{\pm}$) mass, in comparison with the
58: expectation for several {\tt SUSY} scenarios using 0.9-1.7 \invfb\ of data \cite{DO_tril_0.9-1.7fb}. The line
59: corresponds to observed minimal {\tt SUGRA} limit. {\tt PDF}
60: and renormalization/factorization scale uncertainties are shown
61: as shaded bands. The lower mass limit at 103.5~\GeV\ is from LEP searches~\cite{LEPSUSY_Chargino}.}
62: \end{center}\end{figure}
63: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
64:
65: The CDF and D\O\ Collaborations have searched in the trilepton
66: final state. Published results are based on 320~\invpb\ for
67: D\O~\cite{DO_pub_trilepton_320pb} and 1.1~\invfb\ for
68: CDF~\cite{CDF_pub_tril_1fb,CDF_pub_dil_1fb,CDF_pub_trilepton_1.1fb}.
69: The $eel$ channel was updated to $1.7~\invfb$ by D\O\ and, in
70: combination with results in four other trilepton search
71: channels based on approximately 1~\invfb\ of data, new limits
72: on the associated production of charginos and neutralinos have
73: been set by the D\O\ Collaboration \cite{DO_tril_0.9-1.7fb}.
74: The CDF results were updated with 2~\invfb\ of
75: data~\cite{CDF_tri_2fb}.
76:
77: The trilepton final state has long been suggested to be one of
78: the most promising channel for discovery of {\tt SUSY} at a
79: hadron collider. However, these searches suffer from a cross
80: section below 0.5~\pb\ with leptons that are difficult to
81: reconstruct due to their low transverse momenta, rendering the
82: analyses challenging. Furthermore, many channels need to be
83: combined to achieve sensitivity. The selection consists of two
84: well identified and isolated electrons ($e$) or muons ($\mu$)
85: with a \pt\ cut above $\approx10$ \GeV. An additional isolated
86: track provides sensitivity to the third lepton ($l$) and, by
87: not requiring explicit lepton identification, efficiency is
88: maximized. The presence of neutrinos and neutralinos in the
89: final state results in some missing transverse energy. Finally,
90: since very few {\tt SM} processes are capable of generating a
91: pair of isolated like-charge leptons, the same analysis is
92: performed with this looser criterion.
93:
94: The results are interpreted in minimal {\tt SUGRA} inspired
95: scenarios ({\tt mSUGRA}) where gravity mediates {\tt SUSY}
96: breaking from the grand unification theory ({\tt GUT}) scale to
97: the electroweak scale. With {\it R}-parity conservation (see
98: section \ref{sec:R-parity}), {\tt mSUGRA} can be completely
99: characterized by five parameters: a common scalar mass ($m_0$),
100: a common gaugino mass ($m_{1/2}$), a common trilinear coupling
101: value ($A_0$), the ratio of the vacuum expectation values of
102: the two Higgs doublets ($\tan \beta$), and the sign of the
103: Higgsino mass parameter ($\mu$). Direct searches at LEP set a
104: lower limit on the mass of the chargino ${\chi^\pm_1}$ at
105: 103.5~\GeV\ for sneutrino masses larger than
106: 200~\GeV~\cite{LEPSUSY_Chargino}.
107:
108: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
109: \begin{figure}
110: \begin{center}
111: \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth,height=0.4\textwidth,angle=0]{cdf_lim_msugra_trileptons_met.eps}
112: \caption{\label{fig:CDF_trileptons_met} \met\ distribution for di-lepton events with
113: invariant mass $76~\GeV < m_{\ell \ell} < 106$~\GeV. This control region is used to test {\tt SM} predictions
114: of the CDF search for charginos and neutralinos using 2~\invfb\ of data~\cite{CDF_tri_2fb}.}
115: \end{center}\end{figure}
116: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
117:
118: As a guideline, D\O\ results are interpreted in this model with
119: chargino $\chi_{1}^{\pm}$ and neutralino ($\chi_{2}^{0},
120: \chi_{1}^{0}$) masses following the relation $m_{\chi_{1}^{\pm}}
121: \simeq m_{\chi_{2}^{0}} \simeq 2m_{\chi_{1}^{0}}$. The leptonic
122: branching fraction of chargino and neutralino depends on the
123: relative contribution from the slepton- and W/Z-exchange
124: graphs, which varies as a function of the slepton masses. Three
125: {\tt mSUGRA} inspired scenarios were used for the
126: interpretation as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:D0_trilep}. Two of
127: them are with enhanced leptonic branching fractions (``heavy
128: squarks'' and ``3$l$-max'' scenarios). For the 3$l$-max
129: scenario, the slepton mass is just above the neutralino mass
130: ($m_{\chi_{2}^{0}}$), leading to maximum branching fraction
131: into leptons. The heavy squark scenario is characterized by
132: maximal production cross section. Finally, the large universal
133: scalar mass parameter ($m_0$) scenario is not yet sensitive
134: because the $W/Z$ exchange dominates. The new D\O\
135: result~\cite{DO_tril_0.9-1.7fb} in the $eel$ channel using
136: $1.7~\invfb$ of data observes no events after final selection,
137: with $1.0 \pm 0.3$ events expected from the {\tt SM} background
138: and between 0.5-0.2 events for the signal. In the dataset
139: corresponding to 1~\invfb, no candidates have been found in the
140: $e\mu\ell$ channel with an expected background of
141: $0.9^{+0.4}_{-0.1}$ events, while two candidates are found in
142: the $\mu\mu\ell$ channel consistent with the background
143: expectation of $0.3^{+0.7}_{-0.1}$ events. In the $ee\ell$
144: channel, no candidates have been found, with an expected
145: background of $0.8\pm0.7$ events. The observation of one event
146: in the data is consistent with the $1.1\pm0.4$ events expected
147: from the background in the $\mu^{\pm}\mu^{\pm}$ channel. Since
148: no evidence for {\tt SUSY} is reported, all results are
149: combined to extract limits on the total cross section, taking
150: into account systematic and statistical uncertainties including
151: their correlations. The D\O\ combination excludes chargino
152: masses below 145~\GeV\ at 95\% C.L. for the 3$l$-max scenario.
153:
154: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
155: \begin{figure}
156: \begin{center}
157: \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth,height=0.4\textwidth,angle=0]{cdf_lim_msugra_trileptons.eps}
158: \caption{\label{fig:CDF_trileptons} CDF 95\% C.L. limits on the total cross section for associated chargino
159: and neutralino production with leptonic final states using 2 \invfb\ of data \cite{CDF_tri_2fb}. The expected limit
160: corresponds to the dashed line, with $\pm 1 \sigma$ and $\pm 2 \sigma$ uncertainty
161: bands shown. The next-to-leading order ({\tt NLO}) production cross section
162: corresponds to an {\tt mSUGRA} model with the universal scalar mass parameter fixed to $m_0=60~\GeV$.}
163: \end{center}\end{figure}
164: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
165:
166:
167: Similar analyses have been performed by CDF but interpreted
168: with slightly different scenarios and with a total integrated
169: luminosity corresponding to $2~\invfb$ of
170: data~\cite{CDF_tri_2fb}. After selecting dilepton events, a
171: control region with $76~\GeV < m_{\ell \ell} < 106$~\GeV\ is
172: used to establish a good understanding of the data and to test
173: the {\tt SM} predictions. The \met\ distribution for this
174: control region is displayed in
175: Fig.~\ref{fig:CDF_trileptons_met}. The low and high invariant
176: mass regions are also explored. The search is splitted into
177: five exclusive channels and optimized for a benchmark signal
178: point in the minimal {\tt SUGRA} scenario, corresponding to
179: $m_0 = 60$~\GeV, $m_{1/2} = 190$~\GeV, $\tan \beta = 3$, $A_0 =
180: 0$, and $\mu>0$. In this case, the masses
181: $m_{\chi_{1}^{\pm}}=119.6$ \GeV, $m_{\chi_{1}^0}=122$~\GeV,
182: $m_{\chi_{2}^0}=67$~\GeV\ have been computed with {\sc
183: isajet}~\cite{ref:isajet} and the corresponding $\chi_{1}^{\pm}
184: \chi_{2}^0$ production cross section 0.327~\pb\ with {\sc
185: prospino-2}~\cite{ref:prospino2}. A total of $0.9 \pm 0.1$
186: background events in the trilepton channels are expected for
187: $4.5\pm0.4$ events from the signal, and $5.5 \pm 1.1$
188: background events for the dilepton+track channels for
189: $6.9\pm0.6$ signal events. CDF observes 1 event in the
190: trilepton channel and 6 events in the dilepton+track channels.
191: No excess is therefore observed and the resulting cross section
192: limit shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:CDF_trileptons} is given as a
193: function of the chargino mass for the benchmark {\tt mSUGRA}
194: scenario defined above but varying $m_{1/2}$. This scenario
195: enhances the branching fraction of chargino and neutralino into
196: leptons, and excludes chargino masses below 140~\GeV\ for a
197: sensitivity (expected limit) of 142~\GeV\ at 95\% C.L. Other
198: models are being investigated for upcoming analyses with
199: increased luminosity.
200:
201: The results between the two experiments cannot be directly
202: compared since the fixed low $m_0$ value leads to a two-body
203: decay for the CDF analysis, while for the D\O\ analysis a
204: sliding window of $m_0$ is used to keep the slepton mass
205: slightly above the ${\chi_{2}^{0}}$ mass which corresponds to a
206: three-body decay.
207:
208:
209:
210: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
211: \section{Squarks and gluinos}
212: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
213:
214: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
215: \subsection{Generic $\tilde{q}$ and $\tilde{g}$ searches}
216: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
217:
218: In $p\bar{p}$ collisions, squarks ($\tilde{q}$) and gluinos
219: ($\tilde{g}$), the superpartners of quarks and gluons, are
220: expected first to be abundantly produced if they are
221: sufficiently light, and second to largely exceed the mass reach
222: achieved at LEP. However, these searches have large background
223: at the Tevatron. The final states are studied within the
224: framework of {\tt mSUGRA} assuming {\it R}-parity conservation.
225: All {\tt SUSY} particles, except the lightest neutralino, are
226: unstable and will therefore decay into their {\tt SM}
227: counterparts right after being produced, leading to a cascade
228: decay with a final state consisting of several jets from the
229: squarks and the gluinos, plus missing transverse energy coming
230: from the neutralinos. Note that to interpret the results of
231: this search, the ten {\tt SUSY} partners of the five light
232: quarks flavors were considered to be degenerate in mass by D\O.
233: In the following, the squark mass is therefore defined as the
234: average mass of all squarks other than the superpartners of the
235: top. The CDF analysis assumes that only the first and second
236: generation masses are degenerated.
237:
238: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
239: \begin{figure}\begin{center}
240: \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth,height=0.46\textwidth,angle=0]{d0_sqgl_2.1fb-n07hf3_color.ps}
241: \caption{\label{fig:D0-SqGl} D\O\ Run~II exclusion plane for squark and gluino masses at 95\% C.L.
242: using 2.1~\invfb\ of Run~II data~\cite{DO_pub_sqgl_2.1fb}, in the mSUGRA framework. The region
243: excluded by previous results and this analysis is shown as the ``D\O\ II'' shaded area. The
244: thick (dotted) line is the limit of the observed (expected) excluded
245: region for the nominal theoretical cross section. The band around these limits
246: shows the effect of the {\tt PDF} choice and of the variation of renormalisation/factorisation scale
247: by a factor of two.}
248: \end{center}\end{figure}
249: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
250:
251:
252: The most constraining direct limits on squark and gluino masses
253: are published by the D\O\ Collaboration
254: \cite{DO_pub_sqgl_2.1fb}, based on an analysis of 2.1~\invfb\
255: of data. A preliminary result with similar sensitivity was
256: shown by CDF~\cite{CDF_conf_sqgl_2fb} during the winter 2008
257: conferences with 2~\invfb\ of data.
258:
259: Three different scenarios have been probed by both CDF and D\O\
260: experiments. The first one corresponds to pair production of
261: squarks, each decaying into a quark and a neutralino
262: ($\tilde{q} \raa q \chi_1^0$), leading to a two jets+\met\
263: final state. This decay channel is dominant if the gluino is
264: heavier than the squark ($m_{\tilde{q}} \ll m_{\tilde{g}}$).
265: The second scenario applies when the squark is heavier than the
266: gluino, leading to a final state with 4 jets and \met\ from
267: $\tilde{g} \raa \tilde{q}^{*} \bar{q} \raa q \bar{q} \chi_1^0$.
268: The third one addresses similar squark and gluino masses, with
269: a final state of three or more jets arising from
270: $\tilde{q}\tilde{g}$ associated production.
271:
272: Table~\ref{Tab:sqgl:cutflow1} from D\O\ illustrates the
273: selection criteria used for these searches. The data show good
274: agreement with {\tt SM} expectations after requiring dedicated
275: multijet+\met\ triggers and tight cuts on \met\ and the scalar
276: \pt\ sum ($\HT$). No signal is seen and cross section upper
277: limits at 95\% C.L. have been obtained for the sets of minimal
278: {\tt SUGRA} parameters considered ($\tan \beta = 5~(3)$, $A_0
279: =0~(-2m_0)$, $\mu <0$ for CDF (D\O)). The two Collaborations
280: show the results translated into the excluded regions in the
281: ($m_{\tilde{g}},m_{\tilde{q}}$) and ($m_0,m_{1/2}$) planes.
282:
283: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
284: \begin{figure}\begin{center}
285: \includegraphics[width=1.1\linewidth,height=0.43\textwidth,angle=0]{cdf_sqgl_2fb_m0_m12_2fb_finescan.ps}
286: \caption{\label{fig:CDF-SqGl} Regions excluded by the squark and gluino analyses at the 95\% C.L.
287: in the ($m_0,m_{1/2}$) plane, in the framework of {\tt mSUGRA} assuming {\it R}-parity conservation, using 2~\invfb\
288: of CDF Run II data \cite{CDF_conf_sqgl_2fb}. The regions excluded by LEP chargino and slepton searches are shown.
289: The nearly horizontal black lines are the iso-mass curves for gluinos corresponding to masses of
290: 150, 300, 450 and 600~\GeV. The other lines are iso-mass curves for squarks, corresponding to
291: masses of 150, 300, 450 and 600~\GeV.}
292: \end{center}\end{figure}
293: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
294:
295:
296: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
297: \begin{table*}
298: \begin{minipage}{0.6\linewidth}
299: \begin{tabular}{cccc}
300: Preselection Cut & \multicolumn{3}{c}{All Analyses} \\
301: \hline
302: $\met$ & \multicolumn{3}{c}{$\geq 40$} \\
303: $|\mathrm{Vertex}\ z\ {\rm pos.}|$ & \multicolumn{3}{c}{$<60$ cm} \\
304: Acoplanarity & \multicolumn{3}{c}{$< 165^\circ$} \\
305: \hline
306: Selection Cut & $\tilde{q}\tilde{q} \raa q \chi_1^0 q \chi_1^0$ & $\tilde{q}\tilde{g} \raa q \chi_1^0 q
307: \bar{q} \chi_1^0$ & $\tilde{g}\tilde{g} \raa q \bar{q}
308: \chi_1^0 q \bar{q} \chi_1^0$ \\
309: \hline
310: Trigger & dijet & multijet & multijet \\
311: ${\rm jet}$ $p_T$ & $\geq 35$ & $\geq 35$ & $\geq 35$ \\
312: \hline
313: Electron veto & yes & yes & yes \\
314: Muon veto & yes & yes & yes \\
315: \hline
316: $\Delta\phi (\met,\mathrm{jet_1})$ & $\geq 90^\circ$ & $\geq 90^\circ$ & $\geq 90^\circ$ \\
317: $\Delta\phi (\met,\mathrm{jet_2})$ & $\geq 50^\circ$ & $\geq 50^\circ$ & $\geq 50^\circ$ \\
318: $\Delta\phi_{\rm{min}}(\met,\mathrm{any\,jet})$ & $\geq 40^\circ$ & $-$ & $-$ \\
319: \hline
320: $\HT$ & $\geq$ 325 & $\geq$ 375 & $\geq$ 400 \\
321: $\met$ & $\geq$ 225 & $\geq$ 175 & $\geq$ 100 \\
322: \hline
323: $N_{\mathrm{backgrd.}}$ & $11.1 \pm 1.2 ^{+2.9}_{-2.3}$ & $10.7 \pm 0.9 ^{+3.1}_{-2.1}$ & $17.7 \pm 1.1 ^{+5.5}_{-3.3}$ \\
324: $N_{\mathrm{sig.}}$ & $ 10.4 \pm 0.6 ^{+1.8}_{-1.8}$ & $ 12.0 \pm 0.7 ^{+2.5}_{-2.3}$ & $ 17.0 \pm 1.2 ^{+3.3}_{-2.9}$ \\
325: $N_{\mathrm{obs.}}$ & 11 & 9 & 20\\
326: \hline
327: \end{tabular}
328: \end{minipage} \hfill
329: \begin{minipage}{0.33\linewidth}
330: \begin{flushleft}
331: \caption{\label{Tab:sqgl:cutflow1} Selection criteria for the
332: three squark and gluino analyses published by the D\O\
333: Collaboration~\cite{DO_pub_sqgl_2.1fb} with 2.1~\invfb\ of data
334: (all energies and momenta in \GeV). $|\mathrm{Vertex}\ z\ {\rm
335: pos.}|$ is the longitudinal position of the interaction
336: collision with respect to the detector center. The acoplanarity
337: is defined as the azimuthal angle between the two leading jets.
338: First and second (third and fourth) jets are also required to
339: be central $|\eta|<0.8$ ($|\eta|<2.5$) with $\pt\geq 35$~\GeV\
340: ($\pt \geq 20$~\GeV\ for the fourth jet). The missing
341: transverse energy and scalar \pt\ sum are denoted \met\ and
342: \HT, respectively. The numbers of events observed and expected
343: from {\tt SM} backgrounds and from signal are given for each
344: analysis (the first uncertainty is statistical and the second
345: is systematic).}
346: \end{flushleft}
347: \end{minipage}
348: \end{table*}
349: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
350:
351:
352: The observed and expected mass limits derived for D\O\ using
353: $2.1~\invfb$ are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:D0-SqGl} as functions
354: of the squark and gluino masses, improving on previous
355: published limits. Lower limits at 95\% C.L. of 379~\GeV\ and
356: 308~\GeV\ on the squark and gluino masses, respectively, are
357: derived in the most conservative hypothesis by D\O. The
358: corresponding expected limits are 377~\GeV\ and 312~\GeV. For
359: the particular case $m_{\tilde{q}} \simeq m_{\tilde{g}}$,
360: squark and gluino masses below 390~\GeV\ are excluded. The
361: observed limit becomes 408~\GeV\ for the {\tt NLO} nominal
362: signal cross section computed with the {\tt CTEQ6.1M} {\tt
363: PDF}~\cite{ref:cteq} and for the renormalization and
364: factorization scale $\mu_{r,f} = Q$, where $Q$ is taken to be
365: equal to $m_{\tilde{g}}$ for $\tilde{g}\tilde{g}$ production,
366: $m_{\tilde{q}}$ for $\tilde{q}\tilde{q}$, and
367: $(m_{\tilde{g}}+m_{\tilde{q}})/2$ for $\tilde{q}\tilde{g}$
368: production. The factor of two on the renormalization and
369: factorization scale reduces or increases the nominal signal
370: cross sections by 15-20\%. The {\tt PDF} and $\mu_{r,f}$
371: effects were added in quadrature to compute minimum and maximum
372: signal cross sections. If one considers the less conservative
373: scenario (maximum signal cross section), the observed lower
374: mass limit for $m_{\tilde{q}} \simeq m_{\tilde{g}}$ is
375: 427~\GeV\ at 95\% C.L.
376:
377: The CDF search with 2~\invfb\ excludes masses up to 392~\GeV\
378: in the region where gluino and squark masses are similar,
379: gluino masses up to 280~\GeV\ for every squark mass, and gluino
380: masses up to 423~\GeV\ for squark masses below 378~\GeV.
381: Figure~\ref{fig:CDF-SqGl} shows the results of this analysis
382: translated into the excluded regions in the {\tt mSUGRA}
383: ($m_0,m_{1/2}$) plane. This search improves on the limit from
384: indirect LEP searches for $m_0$ values between 75 and 250~\GeV\
385: and for $m_{1/2}$ values between 130 and 170~\GeV. However, the
386: LEP Higgs search limits remain more constraining in a purely
387: {\tt mSUGRA} scenario~\cite{LEPSUSY_LSP}.
388:
389: The D\O\ and CDF \ limits use slightly different model
390: parameters and methods to compute the excluded masses. Thus,
391: they are not directly comparable. However, it was verified that
392: similar results hold for a large class of parameter sets.
393:
394: A complementary search for squarks has been performed by D\O\
395: in the topology of multijet events accompanied by large missing
396: transverse energy and at least one tau lepton decaying
397: hadronically using 1~\invfb\ of
398: data~\cite{DO_conf_sqgl_tau_1fb}. Lower limits on the squark
399: mass up to 366~\GeV\ are derived in the framework of {\tt
400: mSUGRA} with parameters enhancing final states with taus. This
401: analysis has the advantage of providing additional sensitivity
402: for squark searches, mainly at large values of $\tan \beta$.
403:
404: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
405: \subsection{Stop and sbottom searches}
406: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
407:
408: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
409: \begin{figure}
410: \begin{center}
411: \includegraphics[width=0.98\linewidth,height=0.48\textwidth,angle=0]{d0_stop_1fb_b08bf10.ps}
412: \caption{\label{fig:D0_stop} D\O\ 95\% C.L. exclusion contours in the stop and neutralino mass plane,
413: assuming a stop branching ratio of 100\% into a charm quark and a neutralino. This search is based on 1~\invfb\
414: of data~\cite{DO_pub_stop_995pb}.}
415: \end{center}\end{figure}
416: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
417:
418: For the third generation, mass unification is broken in many
419: {\tt SUSY} models due to potentially large mixing effects. This
420: can result in a sbottom or stop with much lower mass than the
421: other squarks and gluinos. In addition, the lightest stop quark
422: could well be the lightest of all quarks because of the impact
423: of the large top Yukawa coupling on the renormalization group
424: equations.
425:
426: Dedicated searches are conducted in a general {\tt MSSM}
427: framework assuming the decays $\tilde{t}\to c\tilde{\chi}^0_1$
428: and $\tilde{b}\to b\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ are the only ones
429: kinematically allowed. Despite a much smaller cross section for
430: $\tilde{t}$ and $\tilde{b}$ production compared to previous
431: generic squark searches, heavy-flavor tagging can be used to
432: reduce the important {\tt SM} backgrounds. However, in the mass
433: range of interest, the jets are much softer compared to the
434: generic squark search, and therefore the {\tt QCD} multijet
435: background is much larger, reducing the stop and sbottom masses
436: which can be excluded.
437:
438: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
439: \begin{figure}\begin{center}
440: \includegraphics[width=1.1\linewidth,height=0.53\textwidth,angle=0]{cdf_gluino_4b_1.8fb_mar2008.ps}
441: \caption{\label{fig:CDF_sbottom_gluino_4b_1.8fb} CDF 95\% C.L. exclusion contours in the sbottom
442: and neutralino mass plane, assuming gluino pair production where the gluino decays to $b\tilde{b}$
443: with subsequent sbottom decay to a $b$-quark and the lightest neutralino.
444: This search is based on 1.8~\invfb\ of data~\cite{CDF_sbot_gluino_1.8fb}.}
445: \end{center}\end{figure}
446: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
447:
448: D\O\ has recently submitted for publication an update using
449: 1~\invfb\ of data~\cite{DO_pub_stop_995pb} compared to previous
450: D\O~\cite{DO_pub_stop_360pb} and
451: CDF~\cite{CDF_pub_stop_sbo_295pb} published results with about
452: 300~\invpb\ of the case where the stop decays with a branching
453: ratio of 100\% into a charm quark and a neutralino. Good
454: agreement between the data and the {\tt SM} prediction is
455: obtained. The derived limits at 95\% C.L. on the stop mass are
456: shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:D0_stop}. With the theoretical
457: uncertainty on the $\tilde{t}$ pair production cross section
458: taken into account, the largest limit on $m_{\tilde{t}}$ is
459: 150~\GeV, for $m_{\chi^0_1} = 65~\GeV$.
460:
461: At large values of $\tan \beta$, the mixing can be enhanced in
462: the sbottom sector. The analysis of the decay channel
463: $\tilde{b}\to b\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ is similar to the one applied
464: for the stop except that higher masses can be excluded because
465: heavy-flavor tagging is more efficient for $b$-jets than for
466: $c$-jets. Supersymmetric bottom quark masses up to 193~\GeV\
467: for a neutralino mass of 40~\GeV\ are excluded by CDF with
468: 295~\invpb\ of data~\cite{CDF_pub_stop_sbo_295pb}. For the D\O\
469: analysis~\cite{DO_pub_sbot_310pb} using 310~\invpb, the maximum
470: \MSB\ excluded is 222~\GeV, which is the most restrictive limit
471: on the sbottom mass to date from direct $\tilde{b}$ pair
472: production.
473:
474: The CDF Collaboration also considered the scenario where the
475: sbottom could be produced through the decay of gluinos into
476: bottom and sbottom quarks, yielding a signature consisting of
477: four $b$-jets and two neutralinos from the sbottom decay
478: $\tilde{b}\to b\tilde{\chi}^0_1$. Requiring inclusive double
479: $b$-tagging, CDF observes 4 events where $2.6\pm0.7$ are
480: expected in 156~\invpb\ of Run~II
481: data~\cite{CDF_pub_sbot_gluino_156pb}. Exclusion lower limits
482: have been published on the masses of the gluino and sbottom up
483: to 280 and 240~\GeV, respectively. This result has been
484: recently updated with 1.8~\invfb\ of CDF
485: data~\cite{CDF_sbot_gluino_1.8fb}. At least one $b$-tagged jet
486: was required and two different signal regions were optimized.
487: In the small (large) $\Delta m =
488: m_{\tilde{g}}-m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}$ region, 19 (25) events are
489: observed for $22.0\pm3.6$ ($22.7\pm4.6$) events expected from
490: {\tt SM} processes. The ($m_{\tilde{b}}$,$m_{\tilde{g}}$)
491: exclusion contour plot at 95\% C.L. is shown in
492: Fig.~\ref{fig:CDF_sbottom_gluino_4b_1.8fb}. A lower gluino mass
493: limit $m_{\tilde{g}} > 340$~\GeV\ is set for $m_{\tilde{b}} =
494: 300$~\GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1} =60$~\GeV, and $m_{\tilde{q}}
495: = 500$~\GeV.
496:
497: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
498: \begin{figure}\begin{center}
499: \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth,height=0.47\textwidth,angle=0]{d0_stop_blsnu_1_fb_n61f4.ps}
500: \caption{\label{fig:D0_stop_blsnu} D\O\ 95\% C.L. exclusion contours in the stop and
501: sneutrino mass plane,
502: assuming $\tilde{t} \raa b \ell \tilde{\nu}$ and
503: $\tilde{\nu} \raa \nu \chi^0_1$ decay modes using 1~\invfb\ of data \cite{DO_conf_stop_blsnu_1.1fb}.}
504: \end{center}\end{figure}
505: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
506:
507: The D\O\ Collaboration has searched for a light stop in the
508: lepton+jets channel using two scenarios. The first one uses the
509: stop decay modes $\tilde{t}_1 \raa t \chi_{1}^{0}$ $\raa$ $b
510: W^+ \chi_{1}^{0}$. In this analysis, kinematic differences
511: between stop pair production and the dominant $t\bar{t}$
512: process are used to separate the two possible contributions.
513: The preliminary results~\cite{D0_conf_stop_admixture_1fb} with
514: 1~\invfb\ set upper cross section limits at 95\% C.L. on
515: $\tilde{t}_1\tilde{t}_1$ production that are a factor of about
516: 7-12 higher than expected for the {\tt MSSM} model for stop
517: masses ranging between 145-175~\GeV. The second scenario
518: considers the pair production of the stop decaying into a
519: $b$-quark and the supersymmetric partner of the neutrino,{\it
520: i.e.}, the sneutrino ($\tilde{\nu}$). This decay $\tilde{t}
521: \raa b \ell \tilde{\nu}$ is then followed by the $\tilde{\nu}
522: \raa \nu \chi^0_1$ involving only invisible particles. The
523: ensuing final state consists of two leptons, two $b$-jets and
524: missing transverse energy. The result combines $e\mu$+jets and
525: $\mu\mu$+jets final states and limits are set in the plane
526: ($m_{\tilde{t_1}},m_{\tilde{\nu}}$) as shown in
527: Fig.~\ref{fig:D0_stop_blsnu}. The published
528: result~\cite{DO_pub_stop_blsnu_400pb} with 428~\invpb\ of data
529: has been recently updated~\cite{DO_conf_stop_blsnu_1.1fb} with
530: 1.1~\invfb\ and there is now good agreement between the
531: expected and observed limits.
532:
533:
534: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
535: \begin{figure}\begin{center}
536: \includegraphics[width=0.98\linewidth,height=0.40\textwidth,angle=0]{d0_gmsb_1.1fb_n07ff1-color.ps}
537: \caption{\label{fig:D0_GMSB_MET} D\O\ \met\ distribution in 1.1 \invfb\ of $\gamma\gamma$ data,
538: along with expected background processes \cite{DO_GMSB_pub_1.1fb}.
539: The expected \met\ distribution for {\tt GMSB} {\tt SUSY} signal
540: with $\Lambda = 75~\TeV$ and 90~\TeV\ are presented as dotted and dashed lines, respectively.}
541: \end{center}\end{figure}
542: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
543:
544: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
545: \section{Gauge mediated SUSY breaking}
546: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
547: In gauge mediated {\tt SUSY} breaking models ({\tt GMSB}), the
548: gravitino, with a mass less than few \keV, is the {\tt LSP}.
549: The phenomenology of these models is therefore determined by
550: the nature and the lifetime of the next-to-lightest
551: supersymmetric particle ({\tt NLSP}), which can be either a
552: neutralino or the lightest stau, depending on the choice of
553: model parameters~\cite{theo:SUSY_ref1}.
554:
555: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
556: \subsection{Long-lived final state}
557: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
558:
559: It is possible for a stau {\tt NLSP} in these models to be
560: long-lived~\cite{ref:stau_GMSB_long_live}. Stau pair production
561: has been searched for by D\O\ using 390~\invpb\ of
562: data~\cite{DO_conf_champs_stau_AMSB_396pb}. These long-lived
563: particles loose energy principally by ionization and can
564: traverse the entire detector, registering in the muon
565: detectors. The search is not yet sensitive enough to set a stau
566: lower limit. In anomaly mediated supersymmetry breaking ({\tt
567: AMSB}), or in models that do not have gaugino mass unification,
568: the signature is the same for long-lived charginos that escape
569: the detector~\cite{ref:long_lived_susy_signature}. The larger
570: production cross section allows a preliminary lower limit of
571: 140~\GeV\ on higgsino-like charginos and 174~\GeV\ on
572: gaugino-like charginos, both at the 95\% C.L.
573:
574: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
575: \subsection{Diphoton final state}
576: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
577:
578: Final states with two photons and \met\ can be produced in {\tt
579: GMSB} models. In such a scenario, the lightest neutralino
580: ($\chi_1^0$) decays into a photon and a weakly interacting
581: stable gravitino ($\tilde{G}$). Most of the searches assume the
582: prompt decay $\chi_1^0 \to \gamma \tilde{G}$. The CDF
583: Collaboration, however, also searched in 570~\invpb\ of data
584: for non-prompt decays and a $\chi_1^0$ with a lifetime that is
585: on the order of nanoseconds or
586: more~\cite{CDF_long_lived_photon_570pb}. Two candidate events,
587: consistent with the background estimate of 1.3$\pm$0.7 events,
588: are selected based on the arrival time of the photon at the
589: calorimeter. This result allows for setting both
590: quasi-model-independent cross section limits and for an
591: exclusion region of {\tt GMSB} models in the $\chi_1^0$
592: lifetime versus mass plane ($\tau_{\chi_1^0}$,$m_{\chi_1^0}$),
593: with a mass reach of 101~\GeV\ for $\tau_{\chi_1^0}$ = 5~ns.
594:
595: As for the prompt decay $\chi_1^0 \to \gamma \tilde{G}$, CDF
596: \cite{CDF_GMSB_202pb} and D\O\ \cite{DO_GMSB_263pb} combined
597: their published results based on 200-260~\invpb\ of data. The
598: combined limit~\cite{Tevatron_GMSB_260pb} excludes a chargino
599: mass of less than 209~\GeV, for {\tt GMSB} parameters following
600: the ``Snowmass benchmark scenario''~\cite{ref:snowmass}:
601: messenger mass $m_M = 2\Lambda$ where $\Lambda$ is the
602: effective {\tt SUSY}-breaking scale, $\tan \beta = 15$,
603: $\mu>0$, and the number of messenger fields $N_M = 1$. The D\O\
604: Collaboration recently published an update using 1.1~\invfb\ of
605: data~\cite{DO_GMSB_pub_1.1fb}. The \met\ distribution for the
606: $\gamma\gamma$ sample is given in Fig.~\ref{fig:D0_GMSB_MET}
607: with the expected signal contribution for two different values
608: of the effective energy scale~$\Lambda$. After determination of
609: all backgrounds from data, D\O\ observes no excess of such
610: events and thus sets 95\% C.L. limits: the masses of the
611: lightest chargino and neutralino are found to be larger than
612: 229~\GeV\ and 125~\GeV, respectively. These results represent
613: the most stringent limits to date on this particular {\tt GMSB
614: SUSY} model.
615:
616: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
617: \begin{figure}\begin{center}
618: \includegraphics[width=0.98\linewidth,height=0.40\textwidth,angle=0]{d0_sneutrino_tau_1fb_n07gf1.ps}
619: \caption{\label{fig:D0_sneutrino_tau} Invariant mass of the electron-muon system in
620: 1~\invfb\ of data collected by the D\O\ experiment~\cite{D0_sneutrino_emu_1fb}. The search is performed
621: in the context of {\it R}-parity-violating production and decay.
622: The dashed line indicates the signal hypothesis for a third-generation sneutrino
623: ($\tilde{\nu}_\tau$) with a mass of 100~\GeV\ and $\sigma\times Br$ of 0.057~\pb.}
624: \end{center}\end{figure}
625: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
626:
627: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
628: \section{{\it R}-parity violation}\label{sec:R-parity}
629: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
630: The {\tt MSSM} superpotential is minimal in the sense that it
631: is sufficient to produce a phenomenologically viable model.
632: However, the most general gauge-invariant and renormalizable
633: superpotential would include additional terms like
634: $$W_{\hbox{RPV}} = \lambda_{ijk} L_i L_j \bar{E}_k +
635: \lambda_{ijk}^{'} L_i Q_j \bar{D}_k + \lambda_{ijk}^{''}
636: \bar{U}_i \bar{D}_j \bar{D}_k, $$ where $i = 1,2,3$ are the
637: family indices. The lepton and quark doublet superfields (weak
638: isospin singlet superfields) are denoted $L$ and $Q$ ($E,U$ and
639: $D$), respectively. These terms violate both baryon number (B)
640: and lepton number (L), which is in contradiction with
641: experimental observations. The most obvious experimental
642: constraint comes from the non-observation of proton decay,
643: which would violate both B and L by 1 unit. Therefore, these
644: new couplings in the trilinear terms, if present in nature,
645: must be extremely small. In the {\tt MSSM}, a new symmetry is
646: thus introduced to eliminate the possibility of B and L
647: violating terms in the superpotential. This new symmetry,
648: called {\it R}-parity~\cite{theo:SUSY_ref1}, is a
649: multiplicatively conserved quantum number defined as
650: $P=(-1)^{3(B-L)}$, which takes a value of +1 for {\tt SM}
651: particles and -1 for {\tt SUSY} particles.
652:
653: The CDF and D\O\ Collaborations have considered a number of
654: scenarios under the hypothesis that {\it R}-parity violation
655: ({\tt RPV}) can occur. The experimental consequences are
656: characterized by less missing transverse energy and more
657: leptons and jets in the final states, due to the decay of the
658: {\tt LSP} into {\tt SM} particles. In addition, sparticles may
659: be resonantly produced by {\tt RPV} couplings as single
660: sparticles, by virtue of which the {\tt LSP} cannot be a
661: candidate for dark matter.
662:
663: Searches for gaugino pair production via $\lambda_{121}$ and
664: $\lambda_{122}$ with a signature of at least four charged
665: leptons and two neutrinos are published by
666: CDF~\cite{CDF_RPV_pub_346pb} (D\O~\cite{DO_RPV_pub_360pb})
667: using 346~\invpb\ (360~\invpb) of data. The case in which a
668: $\tau$ appears in the final state via $\lambda_{133}$ coupling
669: has been included in the D\O\ analysis. Using the {\tt mSUGRA}
670: model with $m_0=1~\TeV$, $\tan \beta=5$, and $\mu>0$, D\O\
671: obtains 95\% C.L. lower limits on the $\chi_1^0$ ($\chi_1^{\pm}$)
672: masses of 119, 118, 86 \GeV\ (231, 229, 166 \GeV) for the
673: corresponding $\lambda_{121}$, $\lambda_{122}$, and
674: $\lambda_{133}$ couplings, respectively. For the CDF analysis,
675: the $\chi_1^0$ mass limits range from 98 to 110~\GeV, while the
676: chargino mass limits range from 185 to 203~\GeV\ at 95\% C.L.,
677: depending on the choice of model parameters.
678:
679: A search for pair production of scalar top quarks decaying via
680: the {\it R}-parity-violating $\lambda_{333}^{'}$ coupling to a
681: $\tau$ lepton and a $b$ quark has been presented by the CDF
682: Collaboration based on 322~\invpb\ of
683: data~\cite{CDF_stop_RPV_LQ3}. A lower mass limit
684: $m_{\tilde{t}_1}>151~\GeV$ has been set in the final state of
685: either an electron or a muon from the first $\tau$ decay, a
686: hadronic decay for the second $\tau$, and two or more jets.
687:
688: Resonant slepton production has also been probed at the
689: Tevatron. A single slepton could be produced in hadron
690: collisions by $LQD$ interactions followed by decays into {\tt
691: SM} di-lepton final states via $LLE$ interactions, leading to a
692: high-mass di-lepton resonance. The CDF
693: \cite{D0_sneutrino_emu_344fb} and D\O\
694: \cite{D0_sneutrino_emu_1fb} Collaborations have reported a
695: search for resonant production of sneutrinos decaying into an
696: electron and a muon using 344~\invpb\ and 1~\invfb\ of data,
697: respectively. The invariant mass of the electron-muon system in
698: the D\O\ search is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:D0_sneutrino_tau}.
699: For a sneutrino with mass of 100~\GeV, $\lambda_{311}^{'}>
700: 1.6\times10^{-3}$ is excluded by D\O\ at 95\% C.L. when the
701: $\lambda_{312}$ coupling constant is fixed at 0.01. CDF
702: excludes $\lambda_{311}^{'}$ values above 0.01 for a
703: $\tilde{\nu}_\tau$ mass of 300~\GeV\ and $\lambda_{132}>0.02$.
704: In addition, CDF published sneutrino mass limits depending on
705: the $\lambda^{'}$ and $\lambda$ couplings considered in the
706: other $ee$, $\mu\mu$, $\tau\tau$ final states based on
707: $\approx200$~\invpb~\cite{CDF_sneutrino_ee_mm_200pb,CDF_sneutrino_tautau_195pb}.
708:
709: Results from D\O\ have been published~\cite{D0_slepton_380pb}
710: based on 380~\invpb\ on the production and decay of resonant
711: smuons and muon-sneutrinos in the channels
712: $\tilde{\mu}\to\tilde{\chi}^0_1\,\mu$,
713: $\tilde{\mu}\to\tilde{\chi}^0_{2,3,4}\,\mu$, and
714: $\tilde{\nu}_\mu\to\tilde{\chi}^\pm_{1,2}\,\mu$. A lower limit
715: on the slepton mass $m_{\tilde{l}} \le 363$~\GeV\ is set for
716: $\lambda_{211}^{'}\ge0.10$, $\tan\beta=5$, $A_0=0$ and $\mu<0$.
717:
718:
719: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
720: \begin{figure}\begin{center}
721: \includegraphics[width=.5\textwidth,height=0.40\textwidth,angle=0]{cdf_champ_stop.eps}
722: \caption{\label{fig:D0_CHAMP_stop} Mass distribution measured in 1 \invfb\ of data by the
723: time-flight flight and transverse momentum of tracks in events collected
724: by the CDF experiment using the high transverse momentum muon trigger.
725: The expected contribution from stable stop pair production
726: is shown for a stop mass of 220~\GeV~\cite{CDF_CHAMP_1fb}.}
727: \end{center}\end{figure}
728: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
729:
730: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
731: \section{Long-lived particles}
732: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
733: Although cosmological considerations put strict limits on new
734: particles that are absolutely stable, these restrictions do not
735: apply to particles that live long enough to decay outside the
736: detector~\cite{ref:cosmo_long_lived}. Several models, outlined
737: below, predict charged or neutral long-lived particles decaying
738: inside or outside the detector.
739:
740: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
741: \subsection{Neutral long-lived particles}
742: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
743: The existence of neutral long-lived particles decaying into two
744: leptons that arise from a highly displaced vertex is expected
745: in ``hidden valley'' theories~\cite{ref:hidden_valey} or {\tt
746: SUSY} models with {\it R}-parity
747: violation~\cite{theo:SUSY_ref1}. Motivated by the excess of
748: di-muon events observed by the Fermilab neutrino experiment
749: NuTeV~\cite{ref:NuTeV}, D\O\ has
750: published~\cite{D0_Long_Lived_RPV_mumu_380pb} a search based on
751: 380~\invpb\ of data assuming a benchmark model where the
752: $\chi^0_1$ has traveled at least 5~cm and decays via {\tt RPV}
753: to $\mu^+\mu^-\nu$. The background has been estimated to be
754: about one event and, since no candidates were observed, a 95\%
755: C.L. upper cross section limit of 0.14~\pb\ is set on
756: pair-production of neutral long-lived particles with a mass of
757: 10~\GeV\ and a lifetime of $4\times10^{-11}$.
758:
759: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
760: \subsection{Charged long-lived particles}
761: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
762: If a long-lived particle has a large mass and is charged
763: (CHAMP) \cite{ref:CHAMP}, it will appear in the detector as a
764: slowly moving, highly ionizing particle with large transverse
765: momentum that can be observed in the muon detectors. CDF has
766: performed a model independent search by measuring the
767: time-of-flight of particles from muon triggers in 1~\invfb\ of
768: data~\cite{CDF_CHAMP_1fb}. As shown in
769: Fig.~\ref{fig:D0_CHAMP_stop}, the result is consistent with
770: muon background expectation. Within the context of stable stop
771: pair production, CDF infers an upper mass limit of 250~\GeV\ at
772: 95\%~C.L.
773:
774: The introduction of a fourth generation quark $b^{'}$ provides
775: another possibility for such long-lived
776: particles~\cite{ref:bprim}. The CDF Collaboration
777: reported~\cite{CDF_bprim_163pb} a result, based on 193 \invpb\
778: of data, for such particles using $Z$ boson decays to muons and
779: reconstructing di-muon vertices in the tracker. D\O\ also
780: performed a $b^{'}$ search, using the capability of its
781: detector to reconstruct the direction of electromagnetic
782: showers, and thus enhancing its sensitivity to long-lived
783: particles. Although limits have been set within the framework
784: of the $b^{'}$ model, loose requirements are imposed to limit
785: potentially model-dependent selection. No evidence of such
786: excess is found in 1~\invfb\ of data by
787: D\O~\cite{DO_bprim_1fb}. Limits are set on the production cross
788: section and lifetime of such long-lived particles that decay
789: into a $Z$ boson or any final state with a pair of electrons or
790: photons with mass above 75~\GeV\ at 95\% C.L.
791:
792: In a variant of {\tt SUSY} known as split
793: supersymmetry~\cite{ref:split-susy}, gluino decays into squarks
794: and the neutralino {\tt LSP} are suppressed, leading to a long
795: lived gluino. At the Tevatron, such colorless bound states
796: (R-hadrons) of a gluino and other quarks or gluons could be
797: pair produced through strong interactions. As studied in
798: Ref.~\cite{ref:stopped-gluino}, some charged R-hadrons have the
799: potential to become ``stopped gluinos'', by losing all of their
800: momentum through ionization and come to rest in the
801: calorimeter. No excess is observed above the primary source of
802: background coming from cosmic muons in 410~\invpb\ of D\O\
803: data~\cite{DO_pub_split_susy_410pb}. Their main decay mode is
804: expected to be $\tilde{g} \raa g \chi_1^0$ with a lifetime
805: assumed to be long enough such that the decay of the gluino
806: occurs during a bunch-crossing adequately later than the one
807: which has produced it (about $30~\mu$s). Limits are therefore
808: placed on the gluino cross section times the stopping
809: probability as a function of the gluino and $\chi_1^0$ masses,
810: for gluino lifetimes from $30~\mu$s to 100~hours. This analysis
811: excludes $m_{\tilde{g}}<270~\GeV$ for a $\chi_1^0$ mass of
812: 50~\GeV, assuming a 100\% branching fraction for $\tilde{g}
813: \raa g \chi_1^0$, a gluino lifetime less than 3 hours, and a
814: neutral to charged R-hadron conversion cross section of 3~\mb.
815:
816:
817: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
818: \section{Leptoquarks}
819: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
820: Leptoquarks ($LQ$) are colored bosons that were postulated to
821: explain the parallels between the families of quarks and
822: leptons~\cite{ref:LQ}. They are predicted in many extensions of
823: the standard model, such as SU(5) grand
824: unification~\cite{ref:su5}, superstring~\cite{ref:superstring},
825: and compositeness models~\cite{ref:compositness}.
826: Figure~\ref{fig:LQ} shows mechanisms for leptoquark production
827: and decay in $p\bar{p}$ collisions, where leptoquarks can be
828: pair produced via the strong interaction. Single leptoquark
829: production can also occur in association with a lepton.
830:
831: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
832: \begin{figure}\begin{center}
833: \includegraphics[width=.23\textwidth,height=0.20\textwidth,angle=0]{lq2pairs_fm3.eps}
834: \includegraphics[width=.23\textwidth,height=0.20\textwidth,angle=0]{single-lq_fm3.eps}
835: \caption{\label{fig:LQ} Examples of leading-order Feynman graphs for pair-production (left)
836: and single production (right) of leptoquarks.}
837: \end{center}\end{figure}
838: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
839:
840: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
841: \subsection{LQ pair production}
842: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
843: At the Tevatron, $LQ$ states would be predominately pair
844: produced with larger cross sections predicted for vector (spin
845: 1) than for scalar (spin 0) leptoquarks. They are expected to
846: decay into a quark and a charged lepton with a branching
847: fraction $\beta$, or into a quark and a neutrino with a
848: branching fraction ($1-\beta$). Experimental limits on lepton
849: number violation, on flavor-changing neutral currents, and on
850: proton decay motivate the assumption that there would be three
851: different generations of leptoquarks, where each leptoquark
852: generation couples to only one generation of quarks and
853: leptons.
854:
855: Results have been published by CDF for first generation scalar
856: leptoquarks ($LQ_1$) using about 200 \invpb\ of data. No
857: evidence is observed of such particles in the topologies
858: arising from $LQ_1 \overline{LQ}_1 \raa$ $eqeq$, $LQ_1
859: \overline{LQ}_1 \raa$ $eq\nu q$, and $LQ_1 \overline{LQ}_1
860: \raa$ $q\nu q\nu$ \cite{CDF_LQ1_203pb,CDF_LQ1_2_qvqv_191pb}.
861: Lower mass limits are derived: 236, 205 and 145~\GeV\ for
862: $\beta = 1$, $\beta = 0.5$ and $\beta = 0.1$, respectively. The
863: $LQ_1$ mass limits which are published in the $eqeq$ and $eq\nu
864: q$ final states by D\O\ with 252~\invpb\ of data are 256 and
865: 234~\GeV, for $\beta=1$ and 0.5,
866: respectively~\cite{D0_LQ1_252pb}. In $LQ_1\overline{LQ}_1\raa
867: q\nu q\nu$, D\O\ has published \cite{D0_LQ1_nunuqq_310} a
868: result with 310~\invpb\ and a lower mass limit of 136~\GeV\ is
869: set at the 95\% C.L. Recently, CDF has released a search based
870: on 2~\invfb\ of dijet+\met\ data~\cite{CDF_LQ_nunuqq_2fb}. Two
871: separate analyses are performed. The first one requires two
872: jets with $\pt>30$~\GeV, no third jet with $\pt>15$~\GeV,
873: $\met>80$~\GeV, and $\HT>125$~\GeV. The second one search in
874: the high kinematic region defined by $\HT>225$~\GeV\ and $\met>
875: 100$~\GeV. In both regions, CDF compares the expected {\tt SM}
876: backgrounds with data and no excess is observed. A scalar
877: leptoquark model is used to place a limit of
878: $m_{\overline{LQ}_1}> 177$~\GeV, for $\beta = 0$ at 95\% C.L.
879:
880: Second generation scalar leptoquarks ($LQ_2$) have also been
881: searched for at the Tevatron. The CDF Collaboration has
882: published a result in the dimuons+jets and muon+missing
883: energy+jets topologies using 198 \invpb\ of data
884: \cite{CDF_LQ2_198pb}. Combining the results with those from the
885: \met+jets channel topology~\cite{CDF_LQ1_2_qvqv_191pb}, CDF
886: excludes $LQ_2$ with masses below 226~\GeV\ for $\beta=1$,
887: 208~\GeV\ for $\beta = 0.5$, and 143~\GeV\ for $\beta = 0.1$ at
888: 95\% C.L. The D\O\ Collaboration has published limits in the
889: channel $LQ_2\overline{LQ}_2\raa$ $\mu q \mu q$ using an
890: integrated luminosity of 294~\invpb~\cite{D0_LQ2_290pb}. In
891: combination with previous D\O\ measurements, lower mass limits
892: of $m_{LQ_2}> 251~\GeV$ for $\beta =1$ and $m_{LQ_2}> 204~\GeV$
893: for $\beta=0.5$ are set. The first D\O\ search performed in
894: Run~II in the channel $LQ_2\overline{LQ}_2\raa \mu q \nu q$,
895: which has maximal sensitivity for $\beta=0.5$, is based on
896: 1~\invfb\ of data~\cite{D0_LQ2_muq_nuq}. From this analysis
897: alone, a lower mass limit for scalar second generation
898: leptoquarks of $m_{LQ_2}>214~\GeV$ at $\beta=0.5$ is set at
899: 95\% C.L. Using 2~\invfb\ of dijet+\met\ data, CDF excludes
900: $LQ_2$ masses below 177~\GeV\ at 95\%
901: C.L~\cite{CDF_LQ_nunuqq_2fb}.
902:
903: A search for third generation scalar $LQ_3$ pair production has
904: been performed in the $\tau b \tau b$ channel using 1~\invfb\
905: of data collected at D\O~\cite{D0_LQ3_tau_b_tau_b_1fb}. To
906: increase the search sensitivity, advantage is taken of the
907: presence of heavy-flavor jets in the signal. No evidence of
908: signal has been observed, and limits are set on the production
909: cross section as a function of the leptoquark mass. Assuming
910: $\beta$, the branching fraction of the leptoquark into $\tau
911: b$, equal to 1, the limit on the mass is 180~\GeV\ at 95\% C.L.
912: With a smaller dataset of 0.4~\invfb, assuming a decay into
913: $b\nu$, the limit is 229~\GeV~\cite{D0_LQ3_bnubnu_400pb}. If
914: leptoquark decays into a $\tau$ lepton and a top quark are
915: taken into account, and if equal couplings are assumed, a mass
916: limit of $m_{LQ_3}>221~\GeV$ is set by D\O\ at 95\%
917: C.L.~\cite{D0_LQ3_bnubnu_400pb}. The CDF Collaboration has
918: performed a similar analysis with 322~\invpb\ of data but in
919: the context of vector leptoquarks ($VLQ_3$). Assuming
920: Yang-Mills (minimal) couplings, CDF obtaines the most stringent
921: upper limit on the $VLQ_3$ pair production cross section of
922: 344~fb (493~fb) and lower limit on the $VLQ_3$ mass of
923: 317~\GeV\ (251~\GeV) at 95\%~C.L in $\tau b$
924: decay~\cite{CDF_VLQ3_btaubtau_322pb}. Finally, a mass limit of
925: $m_{\overline{LQ}_3}> 167$~\GeV\ is set for third generation of
926: scalar leptoquark using 2~\invfb\ of CDF dijet+\met\
927: data~\cite{CDF_LQ_nunuqq_2fb}. In this case, the efficiency for
928: third generation events to pass a dijet plus missing \ET\
929: selection criteria is smaller due to lepton rejection
930: requirements, and therefore the mass limits set are lower than
931: those for the first and second generation.
932:
933: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
934: \begin{figure}\begin{center}
935: \includegraphics[width=.55\textwidth,height=0.47\textwidth,angle=0]{cdf_jj_resonances_plot_limit_theory_vs_mass_1.13fb.ps}
936: \caption{\label{fig:CDF_jj_1.13fb} CDF 95\% C.L. limits based on 1.1~\invfb\ of
937: data~\cite{D0_jj_reso_1.13fb} on the Randall-Sundrum graviton ($G\raa q\bar{q},gg$~\cite{ref:ED}),
938: color-octet techni-$rho$ production ($\rho_T \raa q\bar{q},gg$~\cite{ref:techni_rho}), excited quark ($q^{*} \raa
939: qg$~\cite{ref:excited_quark}),
940: axigluon and flavor-universal coloron ($A\raa q\bar{q}$~\cite{ref:axigluon}), and $E_6$ di-quark ($D(D^c)\raa (qq)\bar{q}\bar{q}$~\cite{ref:superstring}), compared with
941: the theoretical predictions for production of these particles.}
942: \end{center}\end{figure}
943: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
944:
945: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
946: \subsection{Single LQ production}
947: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
948: The production of single leptoquarks leads to final states
949: consisting of two leptons and one jet. The D\O\ Collaboration
950: has published a search in the $\mu\mu j$ final state using
951: 300~\invpb\ of data~\cite{D0_single_LQ_300pb}. Compared to the
952: search for leptoquarks which considered only pair-production,
953: the mass limits are improved to $m_{LQ}>274~\GeV$ for $\beta
954: =1$ and $\lambda = 1$, where $\lambda$ is the
955: leptoquark-lepton-quark coupling. For $\beta =0.5$, a lower
956: limit on the mass of a second generation scalar leptoquark
957: $m_{LQ}$ $>226~\GeV$ is set at 95\% C.L.
958:
959: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
960: \section{Compositeness}
961: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
962: In the {\tt SM}, the quarks and leptons are treated as
963: fundamental particles. However, one proposed explanation for
964: the three generations is a compositeness model of the known
965: leptons and quarks~\cite{ref:composit1}.
966:
967:
968: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
969: \subsection{Excited lepton}
970: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
971: Compositeness models comprise a large spectrum of excited
972: states. The CDF \ and \ D\O\ Collaborations have searched for
973: excited electron ($e^*$) in the process $p\bar{p} \raa e^* e$,
974: with the $e^*$ subsequently decaying to an electron plus
975: photon. The agreement observed by D\O\ in 1 \invfb\
976: \cite{D0_estar_1fb} and CDF in 202~\invpb\
977: \cite{CDF_estar_200pb} of data with the {\tt SM} backgrounds
978: are interpreted in the context of a model that describes
979: production by four-fermion contact interactions (CI) and
980: excited electron decay via electroweak processes. Choosing the
981: scale for CI to be $\Lambda = 1~\TeV$, $e^*$ masses below
982: 756~\GeV\ are excluded at 95\% C.L. by the D\O\ analysis. To
983: make a comparison with LEP results, CDF also reinterprets its
984: search in the gauge-mediated model and excludes $126~\GeV <
985: m_{e^*}$ $< 430$ \GeV\ at 95\% C.L. for the phenomenological
986: coupling $f/\Lambda \approx 10^{-2}~\GeV$
987: \cite{CDF_estar_200pb}.
988:
989: Similarly, searches for excited muons ($\mu^*$) subsequently
990: decaying to a muon plus photon have been carried out in a data
991: sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 371 \invpb\
992: for CDF \cite{CDF_mustar_371pb} and 380 \invpb\ for D\O\
993: \cite{D0_mustar_380pb}. CDF excludes in the contact interaction
994: model $107~\GeV < m_{\mu^*} < 853$ \GeV\ for $\Lambda =
995: m_{\mu^*}$ and in the gauge-mediated model $100~\GeV <
996: m_{\mu^*}< 410~\GeV$ for $f/\Lambda \approx 10^{-2}~\GeV$ at
997: 95\% C.L. Choosing the scale for contact interactions to be
998: $\Lambda = 1~\TeV$, masses below 618~\GeV\ are excluded by the
999: D\O\ search.
1000:
1001:
1002: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1003: \subsection{Excited quark}
1004: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1005: The D\O\ Collaboration has published a search within the
1006: framework of a quark substructure model
1007: \cite{ref:excited_quark}. In 370 \invpb\ of data, no indication
1008: for resonances in the $Z$+jet channel has been observed, where
1009: the $Z$ boson is detected via its $Z \raa e^+e^-$ decay mode.
1010: This analysis leads to a mass limit $m_{q^*} > 510~\GeV$ at
1011: 95\% C.L., assuming the decay mode $q^* \raa q + Z$ for the
1012: excited quark~\cite{D0_qstar_370pb}. The CDF preliminary result
1013: based on 1.1~\invfb\ of data excludes the mass region $260~\GeV
1014: < m_{q^{*}} < 870~\GeV$ at 95\%~C.L. assuming the decay mode
1015: $q^{*} \raa qg$~\cite{D0_jj_reso_1.13fb}. The obtained limits
1016: are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:CDF_jj_1.13fb} for various models
1017: corresponding to the production of new particles that decay
1018: into dijet.
1019:
1020: In the same vein, CDF searched for new particles that lead to a
1021: $Z$ boson plus jets but, this time, in the context of a fourth
1022: generation model~\cite{ref:bprim}. In a data sample of
1023: 1~\invfb, the $Z$ boson decays to $ee$ and $\mu\mu$ are used to
1024: set a lower limit on $b^{'}$ quark masses below 268~\GeV\ at
1025: 95\% C.L., assuming the decay mode $b^{'} \raa b +
1026: Z$~\cite{CDF_bprim_resonance_1fb}.
1027:
1028: In 1.9~\invfb\ of lepton+jet data, CDF also investigated the
1029: existence of a massive gluon and set limits on the coupling
1030: strength of this particle as function of its
1031: mass~\cite{CDF_conf_tt_reso_1.9fb}. A search for the heavy top
1032: ($t^{'}$) quark pair production decaying to $Wq$ final states
1033: in 2.3~\invfb\ of CDF lepton+jets data excludes a
1034: fourth-generation $t^{'}$ quark with a mass below 284~\GeV\ at
1035: 95\% C.L~\cite{CDF_tprim_2.3fb}.
1036:
1037: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1038: \begin{figure}\begin{center}
1039: \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth,height=0.47\textwidth,angle=0]{cdf_zprim_mee_2.5fb.ps}
1040: \caption{\label{fig:CDF-Zprim} The dielectron mass measured by CDF and the expected background
1041: in 2.5~\invfb\ of data~\cite{CDF_conf_reso_ee_2.5fb}. A slight excess in the data is observed
1042: in the region $m_{e^+e^-} \approx 240~\GeV$.}
1043: \end{center}\end{figure}
1044: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1045:
1046: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1047: \section{Extra gauge bosons}
1048: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1049: Multiple extensions of the {\tt SM} predict extra gauge bosons.
1050: For instance, $Z^{'}$ are predicted in $E_6$ {\tt GUT}s models
1051: \cite{ref:ExtaBoson}, and $W^{'}$ bosons appear in models such
1052: as left-right-symmetric theories \cite{ref:Left-Right-Sym}. The
1053: new gauge group can comprise a new mixing angle and new
1054: couplings depending on the models considered.
1055:
1056:
1057: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1058: \subsection{$Z^{'}$ bosons}
1059: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1060: The CDF Collaboration has recently released a new preliminary
1061: result in the search for dielectron resonances using
1062: 2.5~\invfb\ of data~\cite{CDF_conf_reso_ee_2.5fb}. The previous
1063: CDF searches have been published with 0.2-1.3 \invfb\ of data
1064: \cite{CDF_sneutrino_ee_mm_200pb,CDF_pub_reso_ee_Zprim_0.45fb,CDF_pub_reso_ee_Z_RS_1.3fb}.
1065: Resonance with dilepton in the final states have always been
1066: leading channels for early discovery searches due to low
1067: backgrounds. In addition, lepton energy and momentum can be
1068: measured precisely by combining calorimeter and tracking
1069: information. The searches are performed by reconstructing the
1070: dielectron mass, as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:CDF-Zprim}. The $Z$
1071: mass peak and the Drell-Yan tail at high mass is well
1072: reproduced by the {\tt SM} background prediction. However, in
1073: the region $m_{e^+e^-} \approx 240~\GeV$, an excess of data
1074: over background of $3.8\sigma$ is observed, with a 0.6\%
1075: probability that it is caused by the background fluctuation,
1076: given that the search probes the mass range 150~\GeV-1~\TeV. A
1077: typical di-electron event is displayed in
1078: Fig.~\ref{fig:CDF-diem_display}.
1079:
1080: By performing a scan for high-mass resonances, CDF sets limits
1081: depending on the model considered. For instance, a lower mass
1082: limit of 966~\GeV\ can be set assuming {\tt SM}-like couplings
1083: of the $Z^{'}$, with a somewhat lower mass limit for $E_6$
1084: $Z^{'}$ bosons with masses below 737/933 \GeV\
1085: (lightest/heaviest) \GeV\ excluded at 95\%~C.L. The D\O\
1086: Collaboration has presented a preliminary
1087: results~\cite{D0_reso_ee_Zprim_0.2fb} with 200~\invpb\ of data
1088: and excludes lower masses for $Z^{'}$ boson with {\tt SM}-like
1089: couplings to fermions of 780~\GeV\ at 95\%~C.L.
1090:
1091: The $e^+e^-$ final state can also easily be reinterpreted in
1092: the context of technicolor models, which predict large amounts
1093: of techniparticle production at the Tevatron
1094: \cite{ref:technicolor_tev}. Degenerated technihadrons
1095: ($\rho_T,\omega_T$) decaying into $e^+e^-$ are excluded for
1096: certain model parameters with masses below 367 \GeV, based on
1097: 200 \invpb\ of D\O\ data \cite{D0_technihadron_200pb}.
1098:
1099: Similar analyses in the dimuon channel have been carried out by
1100: CDF based on 200~\invpb\ of
1101: data~\cite{CDF_sneutrino_ee_mm_200pb} and by D\O\ with
1102: 250~\invpb\ of data~\cite{D0_reso_mumu_Zprim_0.25fb}. The
1103: signal process $Z^{'} \raa \tau^+ \tau^-$ has been searched by
1104: CDF with 195 \invpb\ of data and a lower mass limit of
1105: 399~\GeV\ ({\tt SM} couplings) has been
1106: set~\cite{CDF_sneutrino_tautau_195pb}.
1107:
1108: A general search for resonances decaying to a neutral $e\mu$
1109: final state based on 344~\invpb\ of CDF data has been
1110: interpreted in the context of lepton family number violating
1111: (LFV) $Q^l_{12}$ couplings~\cite{ref:LFV_Z_prim} of the $Z^{'}$
1112: boson and $E_6$-like models of $U(1)^{'}$
1113: symmetry~\cite{ref:E6_U1_prim}.
1114:
1115: A search for a narrow-width heavy resonances decaying into top
1116: quark pairs $X\raa t\bar{t}$ based on 913 \invpb\ has been
1117: submitted for publication by D\O\ \cite{D0_pub_tt_reso_1fb}.
1118: This result was recently updated with 2.1~\invfb\ of data for
1119: the winter 2008 conferences \cite{D0_conf_tt_reso_2.1fb}.
1120: Within a topcolor-assisted technicolor model
1121: \cite{ref:topcolor}, the existence of a leptophobic $Z^{'}$
1122: boson with mass $m_{Z^{'}} < 760~\GeV$ and width
1123: $\Gamma_{Z^{'}} = 0.012m_{Z^{'}}$ are excluded at 95\% C.L.
1124: Similarly, CDF performed several searches for a $t\bar{t}$
1125: resonance in the lepton+jets final state using 680
1126: \invpb~\cite{CDF_conf_tt_reso_680pb} and 1 \invfb\
1127: \cite{CDF_conf_tt_reso_1fb} of data. A leptophobic $Z^{'}$
1128: predicted by the topcolor theory is excluded below 725~\GeV.
1129:
1130: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1131: \begin{figure}\begin{center}
1132: \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth,height=0.4\textwidth,angle=0]{cdf_dielectron_display_dis_pub_cot.ps}
1133: \caption{\label{fig:CDF-diem_display} Event display of a typical dielectron event,
1134: as measured by CDF in Run II~\cite{CDF_conf_reso_ee_2.5fb}.}
1135: \end{center}\end{figure}
1136: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1137:
1138: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1139: \subsection{$W^{'}$ bosons}
1140: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1141: Both CDF~\cite{CDF_pub_Wprim_205pb} and
1142: D\O~\cite{D0_pub_Wprim_1fb} have published results of searches
1143: for a heavy charged vector boson ($W^{'}$) decaying to an
1144: electron-neutrino pair using 205~\invpb\ and 1~\invpb\ of data,
1145: respectively. In the context of a $W^{'}$ with {\tt SM}
1146: coupling to fermions, and for these data samples, the lower
1147: mass limits are 1~\TeV\ for D\O\ and 788~\GeV\ for CDF, at
1148: 95\%~C.L. In a similar analysis that exploits 1.1~\invfb\ of
1149: dijet data, CDF excludes at 95\% C.L. the existence of $W^{'}$
1150: in the mass range $280 < m_{W^{'}} <
1151: 840$~\GeV~\cite{D0_jj_reso_1.13fb}.
1152:
1153: $W^{'}$ bosons that couple to right-handed fermions may not be
1154: able to decay to leptonic final states if the corresponding
1155: right-handed neutrinos ($\nu_R$) are too massive. In this case,
1156: only hadronic decays are possible. To investigate the
1157: possibility of $W^{'}$ decaying into $t\bar{b}$, D\O\ and CDF
1158: have used a similar approach as for their single top searches.
1159: The D\O\ Collaboration has published a result using 230~\invpb\
1160: of data which excludes masses between 200~\GeV\ and 610~\GeV\
1161: for a $W^{'}$ boson {\tt SM} couplings
1162: \cite{D0_pub_Wprim_tb_230pb}. This search has been updated with
1163: approximately 0.9~\invfb\ of data~\cite{D0_pub_Wprim_tb_0.9fb}.
1164: For a left-handed $W^{'}$ boson with {\tt SM} couplings, D\O\
1165: sets a lower mass limit of 731~\GeV. For right-handed $W^{'}$
1166: bosons, the lower mass limits on this hypothetical new particle
1167: at 95\% C.L. are 739~\GeV\ assuming that the $W^{'}$ boson
1168: decays to both leptons and quarks, and 768~\GeV\ if it decays
1169: only to quarks. Assuming {\tt SM} couplings to fermions for the
1170: $W^{'}$, CDF has used 1.9~\invfb\ of data to set limits of
1171: $m_{W^{'}}<800$~\GeV\ when $m_{W^{'}}>m_{\nu_R}$ and
1172: $m_{W^{'}}<825$~\GeV\ when $m_{W^{'}}<m_{\nu_R}$, at 95\% C.L.,
1173: on $W^{'}$ resonances in the $t\bar{b}$ decay
1174: channel~\cite{CDF_Wprim_tb_1.9fb}.
1175:
1176:
1177: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1178: \section{Large extra dimensions}
1179: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1180: Models postulating the existence of large extra spatial
1181: dimensions have been proposed to solve the hierarchy problem
1182: posed by the large difference between the electroweak symmetry
1183: breaking scale at 1~\TeV\ and the Planck scale, at which
1184: gravity is expected to become strong.
1185:
1186: In the original compactified large extra dimensions model of
1187: Arkani-Hamed, Dimopoulos and Dvali ({\tt ADD} \cite{ref:ADD}),
1188: the effect of the extra spatial dimensions is visible as the
1189: presence of a series of quantized energy states referred to as
1190: graviton ($G$) states Kaluza-Klein ({\tt KK}) towers. However,
1191: the visible states are too close in mass to be distinguished
1192: individually and the coupling is small. Thus, it is only due to
1193: their very large number that the Kaluza-Klein gravitons could
1194: be observed. The direct production of gravitons, which
1195: immediately disappear into bulk space, gives rise to an excess
1196: of events with a high transverse energy jet (or photon) and
1197: large missing transverse energy.
1198:
1199: Another way to look for extra dimensions is to search for a
1200: resonance. The first excited graviton mode predicted by the
1201: Randall and Sundrum ({\tt RS}) model \cite{ref:ED} could be
1202: resonantly produced at the Tevatron. The graviton is then
1203: expected to decay to fermion-anti-fermion or diboson pairs.
1204:
1205: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1206: \begin{figure}\begin{center}
1207: \includegraphics[width=0.98\linewidth,height=0.45\textwidth,angle=0]{d0_rs_gamgam_ee_1fb_n07ef4.ps}
1208: \caption{\label{fig:D0-LED} D\O\ 95\% C.L. upper limit on $k/M_{\hbox{\rm Pl}}$
1209: versus graviton mass from 1~\invfb\ of data for the $ee+\gamma\gamma$ final
1210: states combined~\cite{D0_pub_ee_gamgam_RS_1fb}.}
1211: \end{center}\end{figure}
1212: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1213:
1214: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1215: \subsection{Graviton resonances}
1216: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1217: The CDF and D\O\ Collaborations have searched for resonances in
1218: their data in many different final states. Since the graviton
1219: has spin 2, the branching fraction to the diphoton final state
1220: is expected to be twice that of $e^{+}e^{-}$ final states. The
1221: diphoton background is estimated from misidentified
1222: electromagnetic objects and is extracted from the data. Results
1223: have been published by CDF \cite{CDF_sneutrino_ee_mm_200pb}
1224: (D\O\ \cite{D0_pub_ee_gamgam_RS_260pb}) based on 200 \invpb\
1225: (260 \invpb) of data. The combined $ee+\gamma\gamma$ final
1226: states have been recently published by both experiments based
1227: on 1.2-1.3~\invfb\ of
1228: CDF~\cite{CDF_pub_reso_ee_Z_RS_1.3fb,CDF_pub_gamma_gamma_RS_1.2fb}
1229: (D\O~\cite{D0_pub_ee_gamgam_RS_1fb}) data. Limits obtained are
1230: as a function of the graviton mass and the coupling parameter
1231: ($k/M_{Pl}$), as represented in Fig.~\ref{fig:D0-LED} for D\O.
1232: The CDF Collaboration derives a lower limit of 889~\GeV\ on the
1233: graviton mass at the 95\% C.L. for $k/M_{Pl} =$0.1. The D\O\
1234: combined result of both $ee$ and $\gamma\gamma$ channels set
1235: lower masses limits of 300~(900)~\GeV\ at 95\% C.L. for
1236: $k/M_{Pl}$ = 0.01~(0.1)~\cite{D0_pub_ee_gamgam_RS_1fb}.
1237:
1238: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1239: \begin{figure}\begin{center}
1240: \includegraphics[width=0.98\linewidth,height=0.40\textwidth,angle=0]{cdf_led_2fb.ps}
1241: \caption{\label{fig:CDF-LED} Limits on the fundamental Planck scale $M_D$ for various
1242: numbers of extra dimensions from the CDF $q\bar{q} \raa \gamma+G$ and
1243: $q\bar{q} \raa {\rm jets}+G$~\cite{CDF_ADD_2fb}, along with the LEP limit.}
1244: \end{center}\end{figure}
1245: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1246:
1247:
1248: Recently, CDF has released a new result based on 1.1 \invfb\ of
1249: data in the search for a massive object decaying to a pair of Z
1250: bosons, both of which decay to
1251: $ee$~\cite{CDF_RS_ZZ_eeee_1.1fb}. The cross section times
1252: branching fraction for {\tt RS} gravitons that decay to $Z$
1253: bosons is small, leading to about one $G \raa ZZ \raa eeee$
1254: expected event produced in 2~\invfb\ of data. For this
1255: analysis, CDF relaxed the lepton identification requirements to
1256: optimize the signal sensitivity. The relaxed selection admits
1257: more background, which is then rejected by imposing kinematic
1258: requirements on the invariant masses of the two $Z$ boson
1259: candidates. Finally, a sample in data that is kinematically
1260: similar to the signal has been used to estimate backgrounds in
1261: the signal region. No event are observed with $m_{eeee} >
1262: 500$~\GeV\ for an expected background of $0\pm0.02$ in
1263: 1.1~\invfb\ of data. The search is not yet sensitive to {\tt
1264: RS} gravitons, so cross section limits of $\sigma \times Br(G
1265: \raa ZZ \raa eeee) \lesssim 4~\pb$ for $500< m_G < 800$~\GeV\
1266: are set on graviton production, assuming {\tt RS} couplings.
1267:
1268: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1269: \subsection{Jet/$\gamma$+\met}
1270: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1271: At the Tevatron, gravitons can be produced recoiling against a
1272: quark or a gluon jet~\cite{ref:monojet}, leading to an excess
1273: of events with a high \pt\ jet and large \met. The resulting
1274: topology is a monojet. Similarly, gravitons can be produced
1275: directly in processes such as $q\bar{q} \raa \gamma+G$.
1276:
1277: The D\O\ Collaboration has investigated {\tt KK} graviton
1278: production with a photon and missing transverse energy in
1279: 1~\invfb\ of data~\cite{D0_pub_ADD_monophoton_1fb}. At the 95\%
1280: C.L., D\O\ sets limits on the fundamental Planck scale ($M_D$)
1281: from 884~\GeV\ to 778~\GeV\ for 2 to 8 extra dimensions.
1282:
1283: The CDF Collaboration published results based on 368~\invpb\ of
1284: monojet data~\cite{CDF_pub_ADD_monojet_368pb}. Recently, the
1285: Collaboration has released a new result based on up to
1286: 2~\invfb\ of data which combines the jet/$\gamma+\met$ final
1287: states~\cite{CDF_ADD_2fb}. The optimization for the {\tt ADD}
1288: model yields a photon requirement of $\ET
1289: > 90~\GeV$ with $\met>50~\GeV$ and a jet requirement of $\pt>150~\GeV$ with
1290: $\met>150~\GeV$. The dominant {\tt SM} background to the
1291: monojet search consists of $Z$ or $W$ boson plus jet
1292: production, with the $Z$ decaying to a pair of neutrinos, or
1293: the lepton from $W$ decay escaping detection. From the absence
1294: of an excess in the data, limits on $M_D>$1.42 (0.95) are
1295: derived at 95\%~C.L. for the number of extra dimensions $n_D=$2
1296: (6). The results are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:CDF-LED}.
1297:
1298: The D\O\ Collaboration has searched for monojet in 85 \invpb\
1299: of data \cite{D0_ADD_jets_85pb}. The most recent D\O\ search is
1300: in the $q\bar{q} \raa \gamma+G$ final state with 1~\invfb\ of
1301: data~\cite{D0_ADD_gamma_1fb}. This analysis sets limits at 95\%
1302: C.L. on $M_D$ from 884~\GeV\ to 778~\GeV\ for 2 to 8 extra
1303: dimensions.
1304:
1305: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1306: \begin{figure}\begin{center}
1307: \includegraphics[width=0.75\linewidth,height=0.47\textwidth,angle=-90]{cdf_vista_3j_sumpt0-400_deltar_j2_j3_.ps}
1308: \caption{\label{fig:CDF-vista-3j} CDF signature-based search using 2 \invfb\ of
1309: data. The distribution illustrates an example of a shape discrepancy found by
1310: {\sc Vista}~\cite{CDF_vista_sleuth_2fb} in the final
1311: state consisting of exactly three jets with
1312: $|\eta| < 2.5$ and $\pt > 17~\GeV$, and with one of the jets satisfying
1313: $|\eta| < 1$ and $\pt > 40~\GeV$. This distribution illustrates
1314: the effect underlying most of the {\sc Vista} shape discrepancies which were attributed
1315: to modeling parton radiation rather than to new physics.}
1316: \end{center}\end{figure}
1317: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1318:
1319: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1320: \section{CDF signature-based searches}
1321: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1322: Most of the searches presented so far have been optimized for
1323: signatures within a specific {\tt BSM} model. However, it is
1324: also important to search for discrepancies with {\tt SM}
1325: prediction in a model-independent approach, instead of focusing
1326: only on particular new physics scenarios.
1327:
1328: Examples of such searches have been performed by the CDF
1329: Collaboration in the channels $\gamma\gamma+X$, where $X$ could
1330: be an electron, a muon, a photon, a tau, or missing transverse
1331: energy~\cite{CDF_gam_gam_X_1-2fb,CDF_gam_gam_MET_2fb}, or $\ell
1332: \gamma +
1333: \met$~\cite{CDF_pub_l_gam_X_305pb,CDF_pub_l_gam_X_929pb}. Other
1334: preliminary results have been presented for final state such as
1335: $\ell+ \gamma + \met +
1336: b$~\cite{CDF_l_gam_met_b_929pb_new1.9fb}, or $Z$-boson $+X+Y+$
1337: anything, where $X$ and $Y$ can be leptons, photons, missing
1338: energy, or large total transverse
1339: energy~\cite{CDF_z_x_y_929pb}. These searches are based on
1340: 0.3-2.0~\invfb\ of data and nothing striking has been observed
1341: yet. In particular, the \met+photon+lepton final state
1342: analysis~\cite{CDF_pub_l_gam_X_929pb} using 1~\invfb\ of Run~II
1343: data has not confirmed the Run I
1344: event~\cite{CDF_Run-I_l_gam_met}.
1345:
1346: An even more global analysis of CDF Run~II data has also been
1347: carried out to search for indications of new phenomena in
1348: 2~\invfb\ of data~\cite{CDF_vista_sleuth_2fb}. First, a
1349: model-independent approach ({\sc Vista}) focuses on obtaining a
1350: panoramic view of the entire data landscape, and is sensitive
1351: to new large-cross-section physics~\cite{CDF_vista}. It
1352: consists of a standard set of object identification criteria,
1353: which are used to identify isolated and energetic objects
1354: produced in the hard collision. All objects are required to
1355: have $\pt > 17~\GeV$. Events are partitionated into exclusive
1356: final states labelled according to the objects
1357: ($e^\pm,\mu^\pm,\tau^\pm,\gamma,j,b,\met$) and compared to {\tt
1358: SM} prediction. The {\tt SM} prediction is obtained with {\sc
1359: pythia} \cite{ref:pythia} for the generation of inclusive $W,
1360: Z, \gamma\gamma$, $\gamma j, jj, WW, WZ,$ and $ZZ$ production,
1361: while {\sc madevent} \cite{MadEvent} provides events modeling
1362: for $W/Z+n$ jets and {\sc herwig} \cite{ref:herwig} is used for
1363: top quark pair production. Detector response is modelled with
1364: the CDF simulation and a global fit for corrections factors
1365: (such as efficiencies and fake rates) is performed on the data.
1366: In the end, the number of events observed supports the standard
1367: model prediction with few discrepancies (see
1368: Fig.~\ref{fig:CDF-vista-3j}) attributed to modeling the parton
1369: radiation and underlying event in the data. A subset of the
1370: {\sc Vista} comparison is given in Table.~\ref{Tab:CDF-vista}.
1371:
1372: A quasi-model-independent approach
1373: ({\sc Sleuth}) emphasizes the high-\pt\ tails and is
1374: particularly sensitive to new electroweak-scale
1375: physics~\cite{CDF_sleuth}. {\sc Sleuth} is a
1376: quasi-model-independent search technique based on the
1377: assumption that new electroweak-scale physics will manifest
1378: itself as an excess of data over the {\tt SM} expectation in a
1379: particular final state at large summed scalar transverse
1380: momentum ($\sum \pt$). An algorithm has also been developed to
1381: search invariant mass distributions for ``bumps" that could
1382: indicate resonant production of new particles. Here again, this
1383: global search for new physics in 2~\invfb\ of \pp\ collisions
1384: reveals no indication of physics beyond the {\tt SM}.
1385:
1386: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1387: \begin{table*}[p]
1388: \caption{\label{Tab:CDF-vista} A subset of the
1389: model-independent search ({\sc Vista}), which compares CDF
1390: Run~II data with the {\tt SM} prediction in 2~\invfb\ of
1391: data~\cite{CDF_vista_sleuth_2fb}. Events are partitioned into
1392: exclusive final states based on standard CDF particle
1393: identification criteria. Final states are labelled in this
1394: table according to the number and types of objects present, and
1395: are ordered according to decreasing discrepancy between the
1396: total number of events expected and the total number observed
1397: in the data. Only statistical uncertainties on the background
1398: prediction have been included in this Table.}
1399: \includegraphics[width=1.\linewidth,height=1.3\textwidth,angle=0]{cdf_vista_cdf_2fb.ps}
1400: \end{table*}
1401: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1402:
1403: These global searches are complementary to targeted searches
1404: with specific signatures. However, it has been demonstrated
1405: that in order to exploit the data sample fully in term of
1406: sensitivity for a specific model with particularly distinct
1407: kinematic features, targeted searches out-perform these global
1408: approaches. For instance, a 115~\GeV\ {\tt SM} Higgs boson
1409: decaying to two $b$-tagged jets in association with a heavy
1410: electroweak gauge boson is better treated using the $b\bar{b}$
1411: invariant mass resonance rather than using the scalar
1412: transverse momentum sum.
1413: