1: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
2: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3:
4:
5: \shorttitle{$^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1) Imaging of Seyfert 1 Galaxy NGC 1097}
6:
7:
8: \shortauthors{Hsieh et al.}
9:
10:
11: \begin{document}
12:
13: \title{Interferometric $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1) image of
14: the Nuclear Region of Seyfert 1 Galaxy NGC 1097}
15:
16: \author{
17: Pei-Ying Hsieh\altaffilmark{1,2},
18: Satoki Matsushita\altaffilmark{2},
19: Jeremy Lim\altaffilmark{2},
20: Kotaro Kohno\altaffilmark{3},
21: Satoko Sawada-Satoh\altaffilmark{2,4}
22: \\pyhsieh@asiaa.sinica.edu.tw}
23:
24: \affil{$^1$ Institute of Astrophysics, National Taiwan University,
25: No.1 Sec. 4 Roosevelt Road, Taipei 10617, Taiwan, R.O.C.}
26: \affil{$^2$ Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and
27: Astrophysics, P.O. Box 23-141, Taipei 10617, Taiwan, R.O.C.}
28: \affil{$^3$ Institute of Astronomy, The University of Tokyo,
29: 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-0015, Japan}
30: \affil{$^4$ Department of Physics, Faculty of Science,
31: Yamaguchi Univerity, 1677-1 Yoshida, Yamaguchi-City,
32: Yamaguchi 752-8512 JAPAN}
33:
34:
35:
36: \begin{abstract}
37: We have mapped the central region of the Seyfert 1 galaxy NGC 1097 in
38: $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1) with the Submillieter Array (SMA).
39: The $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1) map shows a central concentration and a
40: surrounding ring, which coincide respectively with the Seyfert
41: nucleus and a starburst ring.
42: The line intensity peaks at the nucleus, whereas in a previously
43: published $^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0) map the intensity peaks at the
44: starburst ring.
45: The molecular ring has an azimuthally averaged
46: $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1)/(J = 1 -- 0) intensity ratio ($R_{21}$) of
47: about unity, which is similar to those in nearby active star forming
48: galaxies, suggesting that most of the molecular mass in the ring is
49: involved in fueling the starburst.
50: The molecular-gas-to-dynamical mass ratio in the starburst ring shows
51: a somewhat lower value than that found in nearby star forming
52: galaxies, suggesting that the high $R_{21}$ of unity may be caused by
53: additional effects, such as shocks induced by gas infall along the
54: bar.
55: The molecular gas can last for only about $1.2\times10^{8}$
56: years without further replenishment assuming a constant star formation
57: rate and a perfect conversion of gas to stars.
58: The velocity map shows that the central molecular gas is rotating
59: with the molecular ring in the same direction, while its velocity
60: gradient is much steeper than that of the ring.
61: This velocity gradient of the central gas is similar to what is
62: usually observed in some Seyfert 2 galaxies.
63: To view the active nucleus directly in the optical, the central
64: molecular gas structure can either be a low-inclined disk or torus
65: but not too low to be less massive than the mass of the host galaxy
66: itself, be a highly-inclined thin disk or clumpy and thick torus, or
67: be an inner part of the galactic disk.
68: The $R_{21}$ value of $\sim1.9$ of the central molecular gas component, which
69: is significantly higher than the value found at the molecular gas
70: ring, indicates that the activity of the Seyfert nucleus may have a
71: significant influence on the conditions of the molecular gas in the
72: central component.
73:
74: \end{abstract}
75:
76:
77: \keywords{galaxies: individual (NGC 1097), galaxies: active,
78: galaxies: Seyfert, galaxies: nuclei, galaxies: ISM}
79:
80:
81:
82: \section{INTRODUCTION}
83: \label{sect-intro}
84:
85: NGC 1097 \citep[SB(s)b;][]{dev91} is a nearby, inclined
86: \citep*[46$\degr$;][]{ondre89}, barred spiral galaxy
87: at a distance of D = 14.5 Mpc \citep[1\arcsec = 70 pc;][]{tully}.
88: It hosts a Seyfert 1 nucleus, which is surrounded by a circumnuclear
89: starburst ring with a radius of $10\arcsec$ (0.7 kpc).
90: NGC 1097 was originally identified as a LINER \citep{keel}, but over
91: the past two decades has shown Seyfert 1 activity as evidenced by the
92: presence of broad double-peaked Balmer emission lines
93: \citep*[FWHM $\thickapprox$ 7500 km s$^{-1}$;][]{SB93}.
94: The starburst ring is rich in molecular gas
95: \citep[$1.3\times10^{9}$ M$_{\odot}$;][]{ger88}, and exhibits a high
96: star formation rate of 5 M$_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$ as estimated from its
97: extinction-corrected H$\alpha$ luminosity \citep*{hum87}.
98: A network of dusty spiral features connects the starburst ring with
99: the nucleus \citep*{barth,pri05}.
100: Optical spectroscopic imaging observations show evidence for radial
101: streaming motions associated with the spiral structures leading to
102: the unresolved nucleus \citep{fat06}.
103:
104: \citet{koh03} have previously mapped the central $\sim1\arcmin$ of
105: NGC 1097 in $^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0) and HCN(J = 1 -- 0) with the
106: Nobeyama Millimeter Array (NMA).
107: Their $^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0) map shows a ring-like structure consisting
108: of several bright knots located at the starburst ring, and this
109: molecular gas ring structure is similar to that revealed by the
110: single dish $^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0) observations \citep{ger88}.
111: The interferometric $^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0) map also revealed a
112: relatively weak central concentration coincident with the nucleus.
113: Their HCN(J = 1 -- 0) map shows similar knots in the starburst
114: ring, but in contrast to their $^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0) map
115: a relatively bright central concentration of the HCN emission
116: coincides with the nucleus.
117: This implies that the molecular gas associated with the nucleus is
118: relatively dense ($n_{\rm H_2} \ge 10^{4}$ cm$^{-2}$).
119: Similar dense central gas concentrations have been reported in
120: NGC 1068 \citep{jac93}, M51 \citep{koh96}, and NGC 6951
121: \citep{kri07}, all of which are type 2 Seyferts.
122: In all these cases, the dense central gas concentrations have been
123: attributed to a highly inclined circumnuclear molecular torus invoked
124: by AGN unification models \citep[e.g.,][]{ant93} to obscure the
125: central engine from direct view in the optical.
126: This is the first time, however, that such a dense central gas
127: concentration has been seen in a Seyfert 1 galaxy, warranting
128: observations at higher angular resolutions to determine whether it is
129: a good candidate for the hypothesized circumnuclear molecular torus.
130:
131: In this paper, we study the central region of NGC 1097 in
132: $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1) using the Submillimeter Array
133: \citep[SMA;][]{ho04}.
134: While the previous HCN(J = 1 -- 0) and $^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0)
135: interferometric observations are suitable for tracing density
136: variations in the molecular gas, they are not suitable for studying
137: variations in the gas temperature.
138: If the $^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0) line is optically thin, the intensity ratio
139: between the $^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0) line and the higher-J lines
140: provides constraints on the gas temperature (and density)
141: \citep*[e.g.,][]{mat04}.
142: In addition, we observe the $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1) line at a factor of
143: 2 -- 3 higher angular resolution than the previous observations in
144: $^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0) and HCN(J = 1 -- 0), allowing us to examine for
145: the first time the spatial-kinematic structure of the central gas
146: concentration.
147:
148:
149:
150: \section{OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION}
151: \label{sect-obs}
152:
153: We observed the central region of NGC 1097 in the
154: $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1) line (rest frequency of 230.538~GHz)
155: with the SMA, which has a primary beam of 52\arcsec~(3.6~kpc)
156: at this frequency.
157: The receivers were turned to observe the $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1)
158: line at the upper side band.
159: The observations were performed on 2004 July 23 and October 1
160: with eight 6-m antennas in the compact configuration.
161: The 225 GHz zenith opacity of the two observations
162: are $\sim$0.15 and $\sim$0.3, and the ${T_{\rm sys, DSB}}$
163: are $\sim200$ K and $\sim350$ K respectively.
164: We placed the phase center at
165: $\alpha_{2000}$ = 02h46m18$\fs$96 and
166: $\delta_{2000}$ = -30${\degr}$16${\arcmin}$28${\farcs}$897,
167: which corresponds to the position of the AGN defined by the
168: intensity peak of the 6-cm continuum emission \citep{hum87}.
169: The SMA correlator has a total bandwidth of 2~GHz, and was configured
170: to provide frequency resolution of 0.8125~MHz ($\sim1$ km s$^{-1}$)
171: and 3.25~MHz (4.2 km s$^{-1}$) for the July 23 and October 1
172: observations respectively.
173: We observed Uranus for bandpass and absolute flux calibrations.
174: We used J0132--169 and J0423--013 for complex gain calibrations.
175: J0132--169 is weaker but closer to the source ($21\fdg5$ away), and
176: was used for phase calibration only; J0423--013 is stronger but
177: further from the source ($37\degr$ away), and used for amplitude
178: calibration.
179: The absolute flux accuracy and the positional accuracy have been
180: estimated as $\sim$15\% and $0\farcs1$, respectively, in these
181: observations.
182:
183: The observation on July 23 was binned to the same velocity
184: resolutions as that on October 1 (3.25~MHz), and then combined with
185: each other.
186: The data were calibrated with the Owens Valley Radio Observatory
187: software package MIR, which was modified for the SMA.
188: The images were CLEANed using the NRAO software package AIPS, and
189: with natural weighting have an angular resolution of
190: $4\farcs1\times3\farcs1$ (290~pc $\times$ 220~pc) at a position angle
191: (P.A.) of $168\degr$.
192: The rms noise level of the individual channel maps is
193: 75 mJy beam$^{-1}$.
194: We used the ``MOMNT'' task in AIPS to make the integrated intensity
195: and the intensity-weighted mean-velocity maps.
196: The line free channels were binned to create a continuum map with a
197: rms noise level of 4.4 mJy beam$^{-1}$;
198: no significant emission was detected in this map.
199:
200:
201:
202: \section{RESULTS}
203: \label{sect-res}
204:
205: We detected the $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1) line spanning a total line
206: width of $\sim570$ km s$^{-1}$ at the $3\sigma$ detection threshold
207: in the channel maps.
208: The line width is comparable to that measured in the single-dish
209: observation \citep{pet03} of $\sim550$ km s$^{-1}$ using the JCMT,
210: which has a primary beam of $21\arcsec$, although the integrated
211: line intensity in our map is only $60\pm13\%$ of that measured in
212: this single-dish observation (see Sect.~\ref{sect-r21}) including
213: uncertainties of the flux in both observations.
214:
215:
216: \subsection{Spatial Distribution}
217: \label{sect-dist}
218:
219: We show the $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1) integrated intensity map in
220: Figure~\ref{fig-intmap}(a).
221: A relatively strong molecular concentration (hereafter, central
222: component) is detected at the very center in a region of a diameter
223: of 350~pc ($5\arcsec$), surrounded by a weaker molecular ring of
224: a diameter of 1.4~kpc ($20\arcsec$).
225: The centroid of the central molecular gas component is shifted by
226: $\sim0\farcs7$ from that of the radio continuum core at 6~cm, which
227: presumably marks the location of the AGN \citep{hum87}.
228: We shall return to this positional difference in
229: Section~\ref{sect-kin}.
230:
231: The molecular ring coincides with the starburst ring, consistent with
232: the previous $^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0) maps \citep{ger88,koh03}.
233: Unlike the tightly-wound spiral structure seen in optical maps
234: \citep[e.g.,][]{rick,barth}, the molecular ring traces a complete
235: circle as seen in the $J-K_{S}$ color map of \citet{pri05}.
236: The molecular ring is composed of several knots that closely
237: resembles the 1.5 GHz continuum map of \citet{hum87}.
238: In addition, we detected weak molecular emission extending from the
239: NE and SW of the molecular ring, coinciding with dust lanes along the
240: large stellar bar (indicated by the two straight lines in
241: Fig.~\ref{fig-intmap}a).
242:
243: In Figure~\ref{fig-intmap}(b), we show the $^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0) map
244: made by \citet{koh03} with the NMA.
245: As can be seen, the molecular ring is more clearly discernible and
246: also more clearly separated in our $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1) map than in
247: the $^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0) map.
248: The intensity peak in the $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1) map is
249: located at the nucleus, whereas that in the $^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0)
250: map is located at the NE part of the ring.
251: The SW side of the ring is brighter than the NE side in the
252: $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1) map, but the reverse is true in the
253: $^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0) map.
254: Both of the molecular gas peaks at the NE and SW sides of the ring
255: are located at the regions where the dust lanes connect with the
256: ring, and these molecular gas peaks are often seen in barred spiral
257: galaxies, which are known as the twin-peak morphology
258: \citep[e.g.,][]{ken92}.
259:
260:
261: \subsection{Kinematics}
262: \label{sect-kin}
263:
264: In Figure~\ref{fig-pvmom1}(a), we show the intensity-weighted
265: $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1) mean-velocity map.
266: Both the central component and molecular ring show an overall
267: velocity gradient in the NE to SE direction along a P.A.\ of
268: $135\degr$, that is similar to the major kinematic axis of the
269: large-scale galactic disk \citep{ondre89}.
270: The emission is blueshifted on the northwestern side of center, and
271: redshifted on the southeastern side of center with respect to the
272: systemic velocity of 1254 km s$^{-1}$ for NGC 1097 \citep{koh03}.
273: The gas motion in the molecular ring appears to be dominated by
274: circular motion (i.e., isovelocity contours perpendicular to major
275: axis), whereas in the $^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0) velocity map of
276: \citet{koh03} the isovelocity contours
277: have a symmetric S-shape with the end of the S-shape nearly parallel
278: to the dust lanes along the large stellar bar.
279: This non-circular motion is not as prominent in our
280: $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1) map perhaps because the aforementioned dust
281: lanes are not as strongly detected in $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1), along
282: with the fact that they are closer to the edge of our primary beam
283: than in the $^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0) observations of \citet{koh03}.
284:
285: A position-velocity diagram (hereafter p-v diagram) of the
286: $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1) emission along its major kinematical axis
287: (P.A.\ = $135\degr$) is shown in Figure~\ref{fig-pvmom1}(b).
288: Positive and negative velocities correspond to redshifted and
289: blueshifted velocities, respectively, relative to the systemic
290: velocity.
291: The rapidly rising part of the rotation curve corresponds to the
292: central component, and the flat part to the molecular ring.
293: The rotation curve is symmetric on both sides of the center, rising
294: steeply to $\pm235$ km s$^{-1}$ at $\pm2\farcs5$ ($\pm175$~pc) and
295: flattening outside $\pm2\farcs5$.
296: This indicates that the size of the central component is about 350~pc
297: in diameter.
298: As can be seen in Figure~\ref{fig-pvmom1}(b), the emission from the
299: central component is stronger on the redshifted southeastern part,
300: causing the centroid of the emission to be shifted by $0\farcs$7
301: towards the southeast as mention in Section~\ref{sect-dist} (and
302: shown in Fig.~\ref{fig-intmap}a).
303: The velocity gradient of the central component is
304: $1.31\pm0.14$ km s$^{-1}$ pc$^{-1}$ (Fig.~\ref{fig-intmap}b), which
305: is similar with that derived in the optical from ionized gas
306: \citep*[$\sim$ 1.1 km s$^{-1}$ pc$^{-1}$;][]{sto96}.
307:
308:
309: \subsection{$^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1)/(J = 1 -- 0) Line Ratios}
310: \label{sect-r21}
311:
312: Our $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1) map detected about $60\%$ of the flux
313: measured with the JCMT \citep{pet03}.
314: The shortest projected baseline in our SMA observations is
315: 4.8~k$\lambda$ ($\sim6$~m), and so the largest structure we can
316: detect is $\sim$52$\arcsec$, comparable in size to the SMA primary
317: beam.
318: We therefore assume that the molecular gas resolved out in our map
319: is uniformly distributed in space and in velocity over the entire
320: line width, and have corrected for $\sim40\%$ of the missing flux.
321: We applied a primary beam correction to both the
322: $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1) and $^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0) maps, and convolved
323: the derived moment maps to the same angular resolution of
324: $6\farcs5\times3\farcs5$ with P.A.\ of $0\degr$.
325: These moment maps were then used to derive the
326: $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1)/$^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0) line ratios.
327: Note that we also calculated the line ratios with $uv$-matched data,
328: and the ratios are consitent with the missing flux corrected line
329: ratios within errors.
330: To derive the molecular gas column densities and masses, we need to
331: use the missing flux corrected data (see Sect.~\ref{sect-phys}).
332: To make consistency within this paper, we use the missing flux
333: corrected data for the following calculations.
334:
335: In Figure~\ref{fig-ratioaz}, we show the azimuthally averaged
336: radial intensity distributions of the $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1) (dashed
337: line) and $^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0) (dotted line) lines, and the
338: azimuthally averaged $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1)/$^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0) line
339: intensity ratio ($R_{21}$)(solid line).
340: The radial intensity profile in both $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1) and
341: $^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0) peak at the center, corresponding to the
342: central component, and exhibit a secondary peak at a radius of
343: $10\arcsec$, corresponding to the molecular ring.
344: The line ratio $R_{21}$ exhibits a similar behavior, peaking at the
345: central component and exhibiting a secondary peak at the molecular
346: ring.
347: At the nucleus, $R_{21}$ is derived as $1.9\pm0.2$ at a beam size of
348: $6\farcs5\times3\farcs5$, which corresponds to the approximate
349: angular extent of the central component along its major kinematic
350: axis.
351: In the molecular ring, the azimuthally averaged value between radii
352: of 8$\arcsec$ and 12$\arcsec$ is $R_{21} = 1.3\pm0.2$.
353:
354: The averaged $R_{21}$ at the molecular ring is similar to or somewhat
355: larger than the global $R_{21}$ in spiral galaxies of $\sim0.7-0.9$
356: \citep{bra93,lav99,haf03}.
357: The $R_{21}$ at giant molecular clouds (GMCs) in the nearby star
358: forming region Orion \citep{sak94} or GMC-scale $R_{21}$ in the
359: nearby starburst galaxy M82 \citep{wei01} also shows similar $R_{21}$
360: of about unity.
361: On the other hand, the $R_{21}$ at the central component is about
362: twice as high as those in the abovementioned sources, and consistent
363: with the ratio reported in the Seyfert 2 galaxy NGC 1068
364: \citep{baker98,sch00}.
365: The $R_{21}$ at the central component is also similar to that found at
366: active star forming regions or at the interfaces of molecular clouds
367: and ionized gas in the nearby barred spiral galaxy IC 342
368: \citep*{tur93,mei00}.
369: Galactic objects, such as molecular outflows from young stellar
370: objects \citep[e.g.,][]{ric85,cha96} or molecular gas around
371: supernova remnants \citep*{van93,set98} also show $R_{21}\gtrsim2$.
372: Note however that the high value of $R_{21}$ are not always seen in
373: active galaxies; for instance, interferometric observations of
374: NGC 3227 \citep*[Seyfert 1;][]{sch2000},
375: NGC 3718 \citep[LINER/Seyfert 1;][]{kri05}, and
376: NGC 6574 \citep[Seyfert 2;][]{lindt08} show $R_{21}$ of around unity.
377:
378:
379: \subsection{Physical Properties of the Molecular Gas}
380: \label{sect-phys}
381:
382: We derived the column density of the molecular gas in the central
383: component and molecular ring assuming the standard Galactic
384: conversion factor of
385: $3.0\times10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$ (K km s$^{-1}$)$^{-1}$ between the
386: $^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0) line intensity and column density of molecular
387: hydrogen gas \citep{sco87,sol87}.
388: The $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1) integrated intensity at the center (beam
389: size of $3\farcs1\times4\farcs1$) is 376.7$\pm$7.2 K km s$^{-1}$.
390: Assuming the same line ratios derived from a beam size of
391: $6\farcs5\times3\farcs5$, namely, $R_{21} = 1.9\pm0.2$ for the
392: central component, we derive a column density for this component of
393: $(5.9\pm0.6)\times10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$, and the molecular hydrogen gas
394: mass of $(6.5\pm0.7)\times10^{7}~{\rm M_{\odot}}$.
395: In the molecular ring, the azimuthally averaged $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1)
396: integrated intensity between the radii of $8\arcsec$ and $12\arcsec$
397: is $135.7\pm7.2$ K km s$^{-1}$.
398: With $R_{21} = 1.3\pm0.2$, the azimuthally averaged column density at
399: the molecular ring is therefore $(3.0\pm0.3)\times10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$,
400: and the molecular hydrogen gas mass is
401: $(5.8\pm0.6)\times10^{8}~{\rm M_{\odot}}$.
402: Here we compare our estimated molecular gas mass of the ring with
403: that estimated using the single-dish data.
404: We re-calculated the gas mass inside 20$\arcsec$ in radius derived by
405: \citet{ger88} using the conversion factor mentioned above, and it is
406: calculated as $1.1\times10^{9}~{\rm M_{\odot}}$.
407: We then subtract the gas mass of the center from this gas mass.
408: The gas mass of the center is calculated as
409: $2.4\times10^{8}~{\rm M_{\odot}}$ using the central position data
410: with a $T_{\rm b}$ of $\sim$32 K km s$^{-1}$
411: (Fig.~3 of \citet{ger88}).
412: The gas mass of the ring is therefore calculated as
413: $\sim$$8.6\times10^{8}~{\rm M_{\odot}}$.
414: This value is somewhat larger than ours, and this may be due to their
415: larger radius of 20$\arcsec$, and therefore their results may be
416: detecting emission outside the ring.
417:
418: To determine the temperature and density of the molecular gas, we use
419: the LVG method \citep{gold74}.
420: We assume a one zone model, which assumes that both the
421: $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1) and $^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0) emissions originate
422: from the same region.
423: The collision rates for CO are taken from \citet{flo85} for the
424: temperature regime T = $10-250$~K, and \citet{lvg-h-t} for
425: T = $500-1000$~K.
426: We first assume a standard $Z(^{12}$CO)/(d$v$/d$r$) of
427: $5.0\times10^{-5}$ (km s$^{-1}$ pc$^{-1}$)$^{-1}$, where
428: $Z(^{12}$CO) = [$^{12}$CO]/[H$_{2}$] is the abundance ratio and
429: d$v$/d$r$ is the velocity gradient of the molecular gas.
430:
431: We then compute from the LVG model the line ratio $R_{21}$ and
432: $^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0) opacity as a function of molecular hydrogen
433: number density $n_{\rm H_2}$ and kinetic temperature $T_{\rm k}$ as
434: shown in Figure~\ref{fig-tknh2}(a).
435: The result for $R_{21}=1.9\pm0.2$ as inferred for the central
436: component indicates that $T_{\rm k}\ge400$~K, and
437: $n_{\rm H_2}\sim3\times10^{4\pm1}$~cm$^{-3}$, and
438: $^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0) opacity below unity.
439: The density estimation is consistent with the detection of
440: HCN(J = 1 -- 0) line from the central component \citep{koh03}, which
441: indicates the molecular gas density as high as
442: $n_{\rm H_2}\approx10^{4}$~cm$^{-3}$.
443: Note that the estimated kinetic temperature is highly dependent on
444: the assumed $Z(^{12}$CO)/(d$v$/d$r$), namely highly dependent on the
445: [$^{12}$CO]/[H$_{2}$] relative abundance, on the velocity gradient,
446: or on both.
447: Fixing $n_{\rm H_2}=1\times10^{4}$~cm$^{-3}$, we plot $R_{\rm 21}$ as
448: a function of $T_{\rm k}$ and $Z(^{12}$CO)/(d$v$/d$r$) in
449: Figure~\ref{fig-tknh2}(b).
450: As can be seen, $R_{21}$ increases roughly linearly with
451: $Z(^{12}$CO)/(d$v$/d$r$), and around the standard
452: $Z(^{12}$CO)/(d$v$/d$r$) of $\approx$10$^{-5}$
453: (km s$^{-1}$ pc$^{-1}$)$^{-1}$, we find that a kinetic temperature of
454: at least 100~K is required to reach $R_{\rm 21}$ of $1.9\pm0.2$.
455: If on the other hand $Z(^{12}$CO)/(d$v$/d$r$) is an order of
456: magnitude lower than the standard value (i.e., order of 10$^{-6}$),
457: the kinetic temperature would be in the range of
458: $T_{\rm k}$ $\approx$ $30-250$~K, which is comparable with the
459: temperature range normally found in molecular clouds.
460:
461: For the molecular ring, which has an average $R_{21}=1.3\pm0.2$,
462: $T_{\rm k}\gtrsim100$~K and
463: $n_{\rm H_2}\sim1\times10^{4\pm1}$~cm$^{-3}$
464: assuming the standard $Z(^{12}$CO)/(d$v$/d$r$).
465: Again, these values are sensitive to the assumed
466: $Z(^{12}$CO)/(d$v$/d$r$), and if this value decreases, $T_{\rm k}$
467: and $n_{\rm H_2}$ also decrease.
468:
469:
470:
471: \section{DISCUSSIONS}
472: \label{sect-dis}
473:
474: \subsection{Molecular Gas in the Starburst Ring}
475: \label{sect-dis-ring}
476:
477: The average $R_{21}$ of about unity in the molecular ring suggests
478: that the overall properties of the molecular gas in the starburst
479: ring is optically thick and thermalized.
480: As mentioned in Section~\ref{sect-r21}, this value is similar to that
481: of the global $R_{21}$ of other spiral galaxies or that in the
482: active star forming GMCs.
483: Similarity of the molecular gas ratios between the molecular gas
484: in the ring and the molecular clouds at active star forming regions
485: indicates that the molecular gas in the ring is closely related to
486: the starburst activities occurring in the ring.
487: This is also supported by the high
488: HCN(J = 1 -- 0)/$^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0) of 0.16 \citep{koh03}.
489: Since stars form from molecular gas, we believe that this molecular
490: gas is actually fueling the starburst activities in the ring.
491: The gas mass content in the starburst ring is, on the other hand, not
492: as high as star forming galaxies, about $8\%$ of the dynamical mass;
493: the dynamical mass within the radius of $8\arcsec$ -- $12\arcsec$
494: (560 -- 840~pc; roughly corresponds to the width of the molecular
495: ring) can be estimated as $(6.9\pm0.2)\times10^{9}~{\rm M}_\odot$,
496: using the rotational velocity of 235 km s$^{-1}$
497: (Sect.~\ref{sect-kin}) and assuming the inclination of the molecular
498: ring is the same as that of the host galaxy of $46\degr$
499: \citep{ondre89}.
500: The molecular gas mass in the ring is $5.8\times10^{8}~{\rm M}_\odot$
501: (Sect.~\ref{sect-phys}), so that the molecular gas mass to dynamical
502: mass ratio is calculated as $(8\pm1)\%$.
503: This value is a bit lower than the threshold to have star formation
504: activities at nuclei of $\sim10\%$ suggested by \citet{sak99}.
505: One reason for the discrepancy between high $R_{21}$ and
506: HCN(J = 1 -- 0)/$^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0) ratios and low molecular gas
507: mass to dynamical mass ratio may be that \citet{sak99} are taking
508: mass ratios within 500~pc in radius, but we are taking the mass ratio
509: in a certain range of radius.
510: Another possibilities is that the gas in the staburst ring is highly
511: affected by shock induced by the gas infall along the bar, so that
512: the high intensity ratios may not tracing the star formation
513: activities, but tracing shocked gas.
514:
515: The upper limit of the mass of newly formed (1.5~Gyr old) stars in
516: the star-forming ring is $\sim10^{9}~{\rm M}_\odot$ \citep{qui95},
517: which is roughly comparable to or somewhat larger than the mass of
518: molecular gas ($5.8\times10^{8}~{\rm M}_\odot$).
519: This implies that a large fraction of the molecular gas has already
520: turned into stars within a timescale of 1.5~Gyr.
521: We can estimate the molecular gas consumption timescale with
522: considering the star formation rate (SFR) and the molecular gas mass
523: of the ring.
524: The SFR in the molecular ring is about 5~M$_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$
525: \citep{hum87}.
526: Without further replenishment, the molecular gas in the ring can last
527: for only about $(1.2\pm0.1)\times10^{8}$ years assuming a constant SFR
528: and a perfect conversion of gas to stars.
529: This value is roughly an order of magnitude lower than the value
530: derived by \citet{ger88}, which is due to their somewhat larger
531: molecular gas mass, inclusion of atomic hydrogen gas mass assuming it
532: has the same amount as the molecular gas mass, and using lower SFR of
533: $\sim2$~M$_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$.
534: In addition to the gas consumption by star formation, the amount of
535: molecular gas in the ring also decreases by the infall toward the
536: nucleus.
537: As mentioned in Section~\ref{sect-intro}, the gas infalling motion has
538: been observed from the ring to the nucleus.
539: The value for the mass infall rate is not known, but this effect
540: obviously decreases the lifetime of the molecular ring.
541: On the other hand, gas replenishment by the infall along the large
542: scale bar from the outer part of the galaxy to the molecular ring
543: increases the lifetime.
544: The value for the mass infall rate is again not known, so the
545: lifetime of the molecular ring is decided by the balance between
546: these effects.
547:
548:
549: \subsection{Nature of the Nuclear Component}
550: \label{sect-dis-nature}
551:
552: Our $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1) results show that the molecular gas
553: located at the center is spatially coincident with the AGN, which is
554: consistent with the previous interferometric maps of the
555: $^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0) and HCN(J = 1 -- 0) lines \citep{koh03}.
556: In addition, the central component is kinematically symmetric at the
557: center with steep velocity gradient, suggesting that the molecular
558: gas is rotating around the AGN.
559: Here we discuss the relation between the central component and the
560: AGN activities based on the line ratios of the central component and
561: its physical conditions, which were derived using the LVG analysis
562: results presented in the previous section.
563:
564: The $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1) map peaks at the nucleus, different from
565: the $^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0) map, and the $R_{21}$ shows $1.9\pm0.2$.
566: This value is significantly higher value than the global $R_{21}$ of
567: spiral galaxies or $R_{21}$ in star forming GMCs in Orion or M82, but
568: similar to the $R_{21}$ of molecular gas at jets, at supernova
569: remnants, or at the surface between molecular gas and ionized gas
570: (Sect.~\ref{sect-r21}).
571: These results suggest that the high $R_{21}$ in molecular gas can be
572: related to irradiation of UV photons from star forming regions, shock
573: caused by interaction between molecular gas and outflowing or
574: expanding materials, but not to the global galactic characteristics
575: or activities.
576: Hence similar activities can be the cause of high $R_{21}$ in the
577: central region of NGC 1097.
578: However, other activities that cannot be seen in star forming
579: galaxies or in our Galaxy can also be the cause of high $R_{21}$,
580: such as strong X-ray radiation from the Seyfert 1 nucleus
581: \citep*[e.g.,][]{lepp96,koh01,usero04,koh05,mei07}.
582:
583: From LVG analysis, high temperature ($\gtrsim400$~K) and high density
584: ($\sim3\times10^{4\pm1}$~cm$^{-3}$) conditions are derived for the
585: central component, assuming a standard $Z(^{12}$CO)/(d$v$/d$r$).
586: As mentioned in Section~\ref{sect-phys}, the density is consistent
587: with the centrally peaked HCN(1 -- 0) map \citep{koh03}.
588: Furthermore, these conditions are supported by results from infrared
589: observations:
590: Strong molecular hydrogen line, H$_{2}$ 1 -- 0 S(1), is detected
591: toward the nucleus without any detection of Br$\gamma$ line, and the
592: $JHK$ images show red colors toward the nucleus, suggesting that the
593: presence of hot dust coexisting with the dense molecular gas
594: \citep{kot00}.
595: Such high density and high temperature conditions for molecular gas
596: around Seyfert nuclei are also derived in other galaxies, such as
597: the Seyfert 2 nucleus of M51 \citep{mat98,mat04} or NGC 1068
598: \citep{rot91,tac94}, but not
599: for the molecular gas in non-active galaxies such as IC 342 or our
600: Galaxy \citep{mat98}.
601: These physical values are, however, sensitive to
602: $Z(^{12}$CO)/(d$v$/d$r$), namely to the $^{12}$CO abundances, to
603: the velocity gradient, or to both.
604: As shown in Section~\ref{sect-phys},
605: lower $Z(^{12}$CO)/(d$v$/d$r$) makes the derived temperature lower.
606: This is because the opacity is linearly related to
607: $Z(^{12}$CO)/(d$v$/d$r$), and it will decrease if
608: $Z(^{12}$CO)/(d$v$/d$r$) decreases.
609: Under low $Z(^{12}$CO)/(d$v$/d$r$) conditions, if the temperature
610: rises,
611: the $^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0) line can easily be optically thin, and easier
612: to have high $R_{21}$ at lower temperature than the normal
613: $Z(^{12}$CO)/(d$v$/d$r$) condition.
614: In either case, the molecular gas around Seyfert nuclei seems to have
615: different properties from other normal environment, which seems to be
616: largely related to the Seyfert activities.
617: Combined with the spatial and kinematical information, we suggest
618: that the central component is kinematically and physically related to
619: the Seyfert nucleus.
620:
621:
622: \subsection{Is the Circumnuclear Gas the Hypothetical Circumnuclear
623: Torus?}
624: \label{sect-dis-torus}
625:
626: Given that the central component is closely related to the AGN, is
627: this then the circumnuclear molecular torus predicted by AGN unified
628: models?
629: Since NGC 1097 hosts a Seyfert 1 AGN, we expect that the rotating
630: circumnuclear gas is in a nearly face-on configuration to provide an
631: essentially unobscured view to the broad-line region (BLR),
632: if we apply the general unified model for AGNs
633: \citep[e.g.,][]{ant93}.
634: Kinematics of the central component we observed are, however, similar
635: to what is usually observed in other Seyfert 2 galaxies, such as
636: NGC 1068 \citep{jac93,sch00} or M51 \citep{koh96,sco98}; the central
637: component shows steep velocity gradient that can be explained by
638: edge-on disk or torus rotating around the Seyfert nucleus.
639: In addition, we derived a molecular hydrogen column density
640: ($N_{\rm H_2}$) toward the nucleus of
641: $(5.9\pm0.6)\times10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$ (Sect.~\ref{sect-phys}), or
642: $1.2\times10^{23}$ cm$^{-2}$ in atomic hydrogen column density
643: ($N_{\rm H}$), which is about two orders of magnitudes larger than
644: $N_{\rm H}$ derived from X-ray spectra of
645: $1.3\times10^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$ \citep{iyo96,tera02}.
646:
647: From these ``inconsistent'' results between our molecular gas
648: observations and other observations at different
649: wavelengths/frequencies, the structure of the central component can
650: have two basic configurations; one is a nearly face-on disk-, ring-,
651: or torus-like structure with a very fast rotation velocity, and
652: another is a nearly edge-on disk-, ring-, or torus-like structure
653: with a thin or clumpy structure.
654: Due to our large synthesized beam size, we could not distinguish
655: these two possibilities observationally, and also could not evaluate
656: the thickness of the structure.
657: Here we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both
658: possibilities.
659:
660: The former molecular gas configuration has a nearly face-on
661: structure, so the direct view to the BLR is secured.
662: But since the observed rotational velocity width has
663: 470 km s$^{-1}$, the inclination corrected rotational velocity width
664: for this configuration has to be $470\sin(i)$, where $i$ is the
665: inclination ($0\degr$ corresponds to a face-on configuration).
666: The nearly face-on configuration therefore leads to a high rotational
667: velocity (e.g., 940 km s$^{-1}$ even for the inclination angle of
668: $30\degr$).
669: Note that this rotation is rigid rotation, and it is rare to see
670: rigid rotation velocity of $>500$ km s$^{-1}$ in other galaxies
671: \citep*[e.g.,][]{rubin1,rubin2,sofue}.
672: In addition, assuming the inclination angles as $30\degr$, $10\degr$,
673: and $5\degr$, the dynamical mass within the central gas, namely
674: within the radius of 2$\farcs$5 (175~pc), can be estimated to be
675: $8.8\times10^{9}$$~{\rm M_{\odot}}$,
676: $7.3\times10^{10}$$~{\rm M_{\odot}}$, and
677: $2.9\times10^{11}~{\rm M_{\odot}}$, respectively.
678: The total dynamical mass of NGC 1097 within a radius of 7$\farcm$5
679: (31.5~kpc) estimated from the large-scale atomic hydrogen
680: observations is $(5.0\pm0.8)\times10^{11}~{\rm M_{\odot}}$
681: \citep{hig03}.
682: A disk with the inclination angle of $5\degr$ is impossible, since
683: the dynamical mass of the central gas is almost the same with
684: the mass of the whole galaxies.
685: A disk with the inclination angle of $10\degr$ is still too large,
686: since more than one tenth of the total mass is concentrated within
687: a thousandth of radius.
688: A disk with the inclination angle of $30\degr$ can be possible.
689: We therefore think that this face-on configuration can be possible,
690: only if the inclination angle is $\sim30\degr$ or larger.
691:
692: The latter molecular gas configuration has an edge-on structure,
693: so the structure should have thin disk- or ring-like structure,
694: or it can be torus-like structure but has to have a clumpy internal
695: structure to expose the BLR at the center.
696: Such clumpy structure is suggested theoretically \citep{wad02}, and
697: with their model, the column density of $\sim10^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$ is
698: possible even with the inclination angle of $\sim60\degr$.
699: Under this model, the difference of the column density derived from
700: our CO data and from the X-ray data can be explained;
701: the spatial resolution of our observation is about 250~pc, which
702: smears all the internal clumpy structures, and therefore the derived
703: column density will be the average value and higher than that
704: derived from X-ray observations, which only trace very narrow column
705: densities
706: due to the very small size scale of the X-ray emitting region
707: ($<1$~pc).
708: Under these nearly edge-on configurations, the rotational velocity is
709: in the typical values for other galaxies ($<500$ km s$^{-1}$), and
710: therefore we do not need to invoke any special conditions.
711:
712: Of course, there is another possibility that the central component is
713: nothing related to the hypothetical torus, namely the central
714: component we observed is just a part of the galactic disk gas.
715: This is supported by the similar trend and the smooth connection of
716: the molecular gas kinematics at the nucleus and the ring.
717: Since the infalling motion exists from the ring to the nucleus along
718: the nuclear bar or spiral \citep{pri05,fat06}, it is natural to pile
719: up the gas around the nucleus with similar kinematics as that of the
720: ring.
721: In this case, gas will rotate around the nucleus with similar
722: inclination as the outer disk or the ring, and it is natural not to
723: cover the line-of-sight toward the AGN, namely the gas configuration
724: will be similar to the Seyfert 1 nucleus.
725: In addition, if the molecular gas piles up at the diameter smaller
726: than our beam size of 200--300~pc, the discrepancy of the column
727: density estimated from our data and the X-ray data can also be
728: explained.
729: Here we briefly estimate the necessary gas infall rate to create the
730: central component with gas infall from the molecular ring.
731: The H$_{2}$ masses of the central component is
732: $6.5\times10^{7}~{\rm M_{\odot}}$, so that the mass infall rate
733: of 0.5 M$_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$ is required to create this component
734: within the molecular ring gas consumption timescale of
735: $1.2\times10^{8}$ years (Sect.~\ref{sect-dis-ring}).
736: Note that the line ratio of the central component is obviously
737: different from that in other regions or other galaxies, and this can
738: be explained either by the shock caused by the gas inflow along the
739: nuclear bar or nuclear spiral, or by AGN activities, such as
740: irradiation of strong X-ray emission to the central component.
741:
742: In summary, the central component can be the hypothetical
743: circumnuclear disk or torus with nearly edge-on ($\gtrsim60\degr$)
744: clumpy structure, or less likely nearly face-on ($\gtrsim30\degr$)
745: disk/torus.
746: The central component can also be nothing related to the hypothetical
747: disk/torus, and possibly created by the gas inflow from the molecular
748: ring.
749: The physical conditions of the central component are different from
750: that of molecular gas in other regions, so that even it is not the
751: hypothetical disk/torus, it should be highly related to the AGN
752: activities or gas inflow toward the nucleus.
753:
754:
755:
756: \section{SUMMARY}
757:
758: We successfully imaged the central component and the molecular ring,
759: which is spatially coincident with the AGN and the starburst ring,
760: toward the central region of the Seyfert 1 galaxy NGC 1097 using the SMA
761: in the $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1) line.
762: Here are the summary for the nature of the central component we
763: observed:
764: \begin{enumerate}
765: \item We found that the $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1) map shows an intensity
766: peak at the central component, and different from the
767: $^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0) map, which shows the intensity peak at the
768: molecular ring.
769: \item The $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1)/$^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0) line intensity
770: ratio for the central component is $1.9\pm0.2$, which is
771: different from the global values in GMCs or in spiral galaxies of
772: about unity or less.
773: From the LVG analysis, we estimated that the central component is
774: warmer ($T_{\rm K}\ga400$~K) and denser
775: ($n_{\rm H_2}\sim3\times10^{4}$~cm$^{-3}$) than that of the
776: normal molecular clouds assuming a normal
777: $Z(^{12}$CO)/(d$v$/d$r$).
778: These values depend highly on the $Z(^{12}$CO)/(d$v$/d$r$), and
779: lower $Z(^{12}$CO)/(d$v$/d$r$) for about an order of magnitude
780: decreases the temperature and density of about an order of
781: magnitude.
782: The effect of intense star formation and/or AGN activities, such
783: as shocks induced by numerous supernova explosions or strong
784: X-ray radiation from AGN are presumably the causes of the unusual
785: line ratio.
786: \item Faster rotation feature of the central gas is observed in
787: NGC 1097, which is similar results as observed in other Seyfert 2
788: galaxies.
789: We interpret this feature as a highly-inclined clumpy disk/torus
790: or thin disk to explain the fast rotation and the difference
791: between the column density derived from CO and X-ray
792: observations.
793: A low-inclined ($i\sim30\degr$) thick disk is possible, but lower
794: inclination than this value is less likely since it is rare to
795: see a velocity $\ge500~{\rm km s}^{-1}$ in nearby galaxies, and
796: the total mass of central disk turns to be too large compared
797: with the total mass of the galaxy.
798: On the other hand, the central component can also be interpret as
799: just an inner extention of the galactic disk, possibly created by
800: the gas inflow from the molecular ring.
801: \item Combining kinematical and spatial information with the physical
802: conditions, we suggest that the central gas is related to the
803: Seyfert activities or gas inflow.
804: \end{enumerate}
805: Here are the summary for the nature of the molecular ring we observed:
806: \begin{enumerate}
807: \item The $R_{21}$ of the molecular ring is $1.3\pm0.2$, which shows
808: a similar properties to the star forming GMCs in our Galaxy or
809: nearby starburst galaxies.
810: In addition, since the molecular ring shows a good spatial
811: coincident with the starburst ring, so we expect that the
812: molecular ring is actually fueling the starburst activities.
813: The molecular gas mass content with respective to the dynamical
814: mass, on the other hand, shows somewhat low value, so that high
815: $R_{21}$ may not be related to star formation activities, but
816: to other activities, such as shock induced by gas infall along
817: the bar.
818: Without further replenishment, it can last for only about
819: 1.2$\times~10^{8}$ years, but since there seems to have gas flows
820: from the dust lane along the large-scale bar toward the molecular
821: ring, and from the molecular ring toward the nucleus, this
822: timescale is highly uncertain.
823: \end{enumerate}
824:
825:
826:
827: \acknowledgements
828:
829: We would like to acknowledge the anonymous referee for the
830: valuable discussions and comments.
831: We also thank for the SMA staff for maintaining the operation of the array.
832: The Submillimeter Array is a joint project between the Smithsonian
833: Astrophysical Observatory and the Academia Sinica Institute of
834: Astronomy and Astrophysics and is funded by the Smithsonian
835: Institution and the Academia Sinica. This work is supported by
836: the National Science Council (NSC) of Taiwan,
837: NSC 96-2112-M-001-0095.
838:
839:
840: \clearpage
841:
842:
843: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
844:
845: \bibitem[Antonucci(1993)]{ant93} Antonucci, R. 1993, \araa, 31, 473
846: \bibitem[Barth et al.(1995)]{barth} Barth, A. J., Ho, L. C.,
847: Filippenko, A. V., \& Sargent, W. L. 1995, \aj, 110, 1009
848: \bibitem[Braine et al.(1993)]{bra93} Braine, J., Combes, F.,
849: Casoli, F., Dupraz, C., Gerin, M., Klein, U., Wielebinski, R.,
850: \& Brouillet, N. 1993, \aaps, 97, 887
851: \bibitem[Baker \& Scoville(1998)]{baker98} Baker, A. J. \& Scoville, N. Z. 1998
852: , IAUS, 184, 221
853: \bibitem[Chandler et al.(1996)]{cha96} Chandler, C. J., Terebey, S.,
854: Barsony, M., Moore, T. J. T., \& Gautier, T. N. 1996, \apj,
855: 471, 308
856: \bibitem[de Vaucouleurs et al.(1991)]{dev91} de Vaucouleurs, G.,
857: de Vaucouleurs, A., Corwin, H. G., Jr., Buta, R. J.,
858: Paturel, G., \& Fouqu\'e, P. 1991, Third Reference
859: Catalogue of Bright Galaxies (New York: Springer-Verlag)
860: \bibitem[Fathi et al.(2006)]{fat06} Fathi, K., Storchi-Bergmann, T.,
861: Riffel, R. A., Winge, C., Axon, D. J., Robinson, A.,
862: Capetti, A., \& Marconi, A. 2006, \apjl, 641, L25
863: \bibitem[Flower \& Launay(1985)]{flo85} Flower, D. R.,
864: \& Launay, J. M. 1985, \mnras, 241, 271
865: \bibitem[Gerin et al.(1988)Gerin, Nakai, \& Combes]{ger88}
866: Gerin, M., Nakai, N., \& Combes, F. 1988, \aap, 203, 44
867: \bibitem[Goldreich \& Kwan(1974)]{gold74} Goldreich, P.,
868: \& Kwan, J. 1974, \apj, 189, 441
869: \bibitem[Hafok \& Stutzki(2003)]{haf03} Hafok, H.,
870: \& Stutzki, J. 2003, \aap, 398, 959
871: \bibitem[Ho et al.(2004)Ho, Moran, \& Lo]{ho04} Ho, P. T. P.,
872: Moran, J. M., \& Lo, F. 2004, \apj, 616, L1
873: \bibitem[Higdon \& Wallin(2003)]{hig03}
874: Higdon, J. L. \& Wallin, J. F. 2003, \apj, 585, 281
875: \bibitem[Hummel et al.(1987)Hummel, van der Hulst, \& Keel]{hum87}
876: Hummel, E., van der Hulst, J. M., \& Keel, W. C. 1987,
877: \aap, 172, 32
878: \bibitem[Iyomoto et al.(1996)]{iyo96} Iyomoto, N., Makishima, K.,
879: Fukazawa, Y., Tashiro, M., Ishisaki, Y., Nakai, N.,
880: \& Taniguchi, Y. 1996, \pasj, 48, 231
881: \bibitem[Jackson et al.(1993)]{jac93} Jackson, M., Paglione, T. A. D.,
882: Ishizuki, S., \& Nguyen-Q-Rieu 1993, \apjl, 418, L13
883: \bibitem[Keel(1983)]{keel} Keel, W. C. 1983, \apj, 269, 466
884: \bibitem[Kenney et al.(1992)]{ken92} Kenney, J. D. P., Wilson, C. D.,
885: Scoville, N. Z., Devereux, N. A., Young, J. S. 1992,
886: \apj, 395, 79
887: \bibitem[Kohno et al.(1996)]{koh96} Kohno, K., Kawabe, R., Tosaki T.,
888: \& Okumura S. K. 1996, \apjl, 461, L29
889: \bibitem[Kohno et al.(2001)]{koh01} Kohno, K., Matsushita, S.,
890: Vila-Vilar\'o, B., Okumura, S. K., Shibatsuka, T., Okiura, M.,
891: Ishizuki, S., \& Kawabe, R. 2001, in ASP Conf. Ser. 249,
892: The Central Kiloparsec of Starbursts and AGN: The La Palma
893: Connection, ed. J. H. Knapen, J. E. Beckman, I. Shlosman,
894: \& T. J. Mahoney (San Francisco: ASP), 672
895: \bibitem[Kohno(2005)]{koh05} Kohno, K. 2005, AIP Conf. Proc. 783,
896: The Evolution of Starbursts: The 331st Wilhelm and Else Heraeus
897: Seminar, ed. S. H\"uttemeister, E. Manthey, D. Bomans, \&
898: K. Weis, 203
899: \bibitem[Kohno et al.(2003)]{koh03} Kohno, K., Ishizuki, S.,
900: Matsushita, S., Vila-Vilar\'o, B., \& Kawabe, R. 2003,
901: \pasj, 55, L1
902: \bibitem[Kotilainen et al.(2000)]{kot00} Kotilainen, J. K.,
903: Reunanen, J., Laine, S., \& Ryder, S. D. 2000, \aap, 353, 834
904: \bibitem[Krips et al.(2005)]{kri05} Krips, M., Eckart, A., Neri, R., Pott, J. U.
905: , Leon, S., Combes, F., Garc$\acute{\i}$a-Burillo S., Hunt, L. K.,
906: Baker, A. J. , Tacconi, L. J., Englmaier, P., Schinnerer, E.,
907: \& Boone, F. 2005, \apj, 442, 479
908: \bibitem[Krips et al.(2007)]{kri07} Krips, M., Neri, R.,
909: Garc$\acute{\i}$a-Burillo S.,Combes, F., Schinnerer, E.,
910: Baker, A. J., Eckart, A., Boone, F., Hunt, L., Leon, S., \&
911: Tacconi, L. J. 2007, \aap, 468, L63
912: \bibitem[Lavezzi et al.(1999)]{lav99} Lavezzi, T. E., Dickey, J. M.,
913: Casoli, F., \& Kaz\`es, I. 1999, \aj, 117, 1995
914: \bibitem[Lepp \& Dalgarno(1996)]{lepp96} Lepp, S. \& Dalgarno, A.,
915: 1996, \aap, 306, L21
916: \bibitem[Lindt-Krieg et al.(2008)]{lindt08} Lindt-Krieg, E., Eckart, A., Neri, R.
917: , Krips, M., Pott, J.-U., Garc$\acute{\i}$a-Burillo S.,Combes, F. 2008,
918: \apj, 479, 377
919: \bibitem[Matsushita et al.(1998)]{mat98} Matsushita, S., Kohno, K.,
920: Vila-Vilar\'o, B., Tosaki, T., \& Kawabe, R. 1998, \apj,
921: 495, 267
922: \bibitem[Matsushita et al.(2004)]{mat04} Matsushita, S., Sakamoto, Kazushi,
923: Kuo, Cheng-Yu, Hsieh, Pei-Ying, Dinh-V-Trung, Mao, Rui-Qing,
924: Iono, Daisuke, Peck, Alison B., Wiedner, Martina C., Liu, Sheng-Yuan,
925: Ohashi, Nagayoshi, \& Lim, Jeremy 2004, \apjl, 616, L55
926: \bibitem[Mckee et al.(1982)] {lvg-h-t} McKee, C. F., Storey, J. W. V.,
927: Watson, D. W., \& Green, S. 1982, \apj, 259, 647
928: \bibitem[Meier et al.(2000)Meier, Turner, \& Hurt]{mei00}
929: Meier, D. S., Turner, J. L., \& Hurt, R. L. 2000, \apj,
930: 531, 200
931: \bibitem[MeiJerink et al.(2007) Meijerink, Spaans, \& Israel]{mei07}
932: Meijerink, R., Spaans, M., \& Israel, F. P. 2007, \aap, 461, 793
933: \bibitem[Ondrechen et al.(1989)Ondrechen, van der Hulst, \& Hummel]{ondre89}
934: Ondrechen, M. P., van der Hulst, J. M., \& Hummel, E. 1989,
935: \apj, 342, 39
936: \bibitem[Petitpas \& Wilson(2003)]{pet03} Petitpas, G. R.,
937: \& Wilson, C. D. 2003, \apj, 587, 649
938: \bibitem[Prieto et al.(2005)Prieto, Maciejewski, \& Reunanen]{pri05}
939: Prieto, M. A., Maciejewski, W. \& Reunanen, J. 2005, \apj,
940: 130, 1472
941: \bibitem[Quillen et al.(1995)]{qui95} Quillen, A. C., Frogel, J. A.,
942: Kuchinski, L. E., \& Terndrup D. M. 1995, \aj, 110, 156
943: \bibitem[Rickard(1975)]{rick} Rickard, J. J. 1975, \aap, 40, 339
944: \bibitem[Richardson et al.(1985)]{ric85} Richardson, K. J.,
945: White, G. J., Avery, L. W., Lesurf, J. C. G.,
946: \& Harten, R. H. 1985, \apj, 290, 637
947: \bibitem[Rotaciuc et al.(1991)]{rot91} Rotaciuc, V., Krabbe, A.,
948: Cameron, M., Drapatz, S., Genzel, R., Sternberg, A., Storey,
949: \& J. W. V., 1991, \apj, 370, 23
950: \bibitem[Rubin et al.(1980)Rubin, Thonnard, \& Ford]{rubin1}
951: Rubin, V. C., Thonnard, N., \& Ford, W. K., Jr. 1980, \apj,
952: 238, 471
953: \bibitem[Rubin et al.(1982)]{rubin2} Rubin, V. C., Ford, W. K., Jr.,
954: Thonnard, N., \& Burstein, D. 1982, \apj, 261, 439
955: \bibitem[Sakamoto et al.(1994)]{sak94} Sakamoto, S., Hayashi, M.,
956: Hasegawa, T., Handa, T., \& Oka, T. 1994, \apj, 425, 641
957: \bibitem[Sakamoto et al.(1999)]{sak99} Sakamoto, K., Okumura, S. K.,
958: Ishizuki, S., \& Scoville, N. Z. 1999, \apj, 525, 691
959: \bibitem[Schinnerer et al.(2000) Schinnerer, Eckart, \& Tacconi]{sch2000}
960: Schinnerer
961: , E., Eckart, A. \& Tacconi, L. J. 2000, \apj, 533, 826
962: \bibitem[Schinnerer et al.(2000)]{sch00} Schinnerer, E., Eckart, A.,
963: Tacconi, L. J., Genzel, R., \& Downes, D. 2000, \apj, 533, 850
964: \bibitem[Scoville et al.(1987)] {sco87} Scoville, N. Z., Yun, M. S.,
965: Clemens, D. P., Sanders, D. B., \& Waller, W. H. 1987,
966: \apjs, 63, 821
967: \bibitem[Scoville et al.(1998)]{sco98} Scoville, N. Z., Yun, M. S.,
968: Armus, L., \& Ford, H. 1998, \apjl, 493, L63
969: \bibitem[Seta et al.(1998)]{set98} Seta, M.,Hasegawa, Tetsuo, Dame, T. M.
970: ,Sakamoto, Seiichi, Oka, Tomoharu, Handa, Toshihiro, Hayashi, Masahiko,
971: Morino, Jun-Ichi, Sorai, Kazuo, \& Usuda, Kumiko S. 1998, \apj, 505, 286
972: \bibitem[Sofue et al.(1999)]{sofue} Sofue, Y., Tutui, Y., Honma, M., Tomita,
973: A., Takamiya, T., Koda, J., \& Takeda, Y. 1999, \apj, 523, 136
974: \bibitem[Solomon et al.(1987)]{sol87} Solomon, P. M., Rivilo, A. R.,
975: Barrett, J., \& Yahil, A. 1987, \apj, 319, 730
976: \bibitem[Storchi-Bergmann et al.(1993)Storchi-Bergmann, Baldwin, \& Wilson]
977: {SB93} Storchi-Bergmann, T., Baldwin, J. A.,
978: \& Wilson, A. S. 1993, \apj, 410, L11
979: \bibitem[Storchi-Bergmann et al.(1996)Storchi-Bergmann, Wilson, \& Baldwin]
980: {sto96} Storchi-Bergmann, T., Wilson, A. S.,
981: \& Baldwin, J. A. 1996, \apj, 460, 252
982: \bibitem[Tacconi et al.(1994)]{tac94} Tacconi, L. J., Genzel, R.,
983: Blietz, M., Cameron, M., Harris, A. I., \& Madden, S.,
984: 1994, \apj, 426, 77
985: \bibitem[Terashima et al.(2002)]{tera02} Terashima, Y., Iyomoto, N.,
986: Ho, L. C., \& Ptak, A. F. 2002, \apjs, 139, 1
987: \bibitem[Tully(1988)]{tully} Tully 1988, Nearby Galaxies Catalog
988: (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)\
989: \bibitem[Turner et al.(1993)Turner, Hurt, \& Hudson]{tur93}
990: Turner, J. L., Hurt, R. L., \& Hudson, D. Y. 1993, \apjl,
991: 413, L19
992: \bibitem[Usero et al.(2004)]{usero04} Usero, A., Garc$\acute{\i}$a-Burillo,
993: S. Fuente, A. Mart$\acute{\i}$n-Pintado, J., \&
994: Rodr$\acute{\i}$guez-Fern$\acute{\rm a}$ndez, N.~J., 2004, \aap,
995: 419, 897
996: \bibitem[van Dishoek et al.(1993)van Dishoeck, Jansen, \& Phillips]{van93}
997: van Dishoeck, E. F., Jansen, D. J., \& Phillips, T. G. 1993,
998: \aap, 279, 541
999: \bibitem[Wada \& Norman(2002)]{wad02} Wada, K.,
1000: \& Norman, C. A. 2002, \apjl, 566, L21
1001: \bibitem[Weiss et al.(2001)]{wei01} Weiss, A., Neininger, N.,
1002: H\"uttemeister, S., \& Klein, U. 2001, \aap, 365, 571
1003:
1004: \end{thebibliography}
1005:
1006: \clearpage
1007:
1008:
1009:
1010: \begin{figure}
1011: \epsscale{0.5}
1012: \plotone{f1.ps}
1013:
1014: \caption[]{(a) $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1) integrated
1015: intensity (moment 0) map of the central region of NGC 1097.
1016: The contour levels are (2.5, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50) $\times$
1017: 3.7 Jy beam$^{-1}$ km s$^{-1}$, where 1$\sigma$ is 3.7
1018: Jy beam$^{-1}$ km s$^{-1}$.
1019: The synthesized beam is $3\farcs1\times4\farcs1$ with a P.A.\ of
1020: $168\degr$, which is shown in the bottom-left corner of the map.
1021: The large white circle is the primary beam size ($52\arcsec$) of the
1022: SMA.
1023: (b) $^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0) integrated intensity map.
1024: The contour levels are (2.5, 5, 7, 9, and 11) $\times$
1025: 3.9 Jy beam$^{-1}$ km s$^{-1}$, where 1$\sigma$ is
1026: 3.9 Jy beam$^{-1}$ km s$^{-1}$.
1027: The synthesized beam is $6\farcs0\times3\farcs0$ with a P.A.\ of
1028: $0\degr$, which is shown in the bottom-left corner.
1029: The large white circle is the primary beam size ($63\arcsec$) of the
1030: NMA.
1031: In both images, the central crosses mark the peak of the 6~cm
1032: continuum \citep{hum87}, the small red circles at a radius of
1033: $10\arcsec$ mark the radius of the molecular ring, and the two red
1034: lines mark the positions of the dust lanes.
1035: \label{fig-intmap}}
1036: \end{figure}
1037:
1038: \begin{figure}
1039: \epsscale{0.4}
1040: \plotone{f2.ps}
1041:
1042: \caption[]{(a) Intensity-weighted mean velocity
1043: (moment 1) map of $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1). Large and small circles
1044: are marked as the primary beam size of the SMA ($52\arcsec$) and the
1045: size of starburst ring (radius of $10\arcsec$), respectively.
1046: The systemic velocity \citep[1254 km s$^{-1}$;][]{koh03} is marked.
1047: The contour interval is 15 km s$^{-1}$.
1048: Dotted and solid curves are the blueshifted and redshifted
1049: velocities, respectively.
1050: The solid line labeled as ``A'' represents the direction of the major
1051: axis (P.A.\ is 135$\degr$) of NGC 1097 \citep{hum87}.
1052: The nuclear gas is rotating with the molecular ring in the same
1053: sense, while it is rotating faster than the ring.
1054: (b) Position-velocity diagram of the $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1) emission
1055: cut along the major axis (represented as ``A'' in the above figure).
1056: Contour levels are 3, 5, 10, 15, and $20\sigma$, where
1057: $1\sigma$ = 75 mJy beam$^{-1}$.
1058: The zero velocity corresponds to the systemic velocity of
1059: 1254 km s$^{-1}$ marked as horizontal solid lines.
1060: The offset of $0\arcsec$ corresponds to the galactic center, and the
1061: LSR velocity of 0 km s$^{-1}$ corresponds to the systemic velocity.
1062: The fitted velocity gradient (1.31 km s$^{-1}$) of the
1063: nuclear component is marked as a dash line.
1064: Note that the inclination of the galactic disk is not corrected.}
1065: \label{fig-pvmom1}
1066: \end{figure}
1067:
1068:
1069: \begin{figure}
1070: \epsscale{1}
1071: \plotone{f3.ps}
1072:
1073: \caption[]{Azimuthally averaged radial intensity distributions of
1074: the $^{12}$CO(J = 2 -- 1) (dashed line) and $^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0)
1075: (dotted line) lines in brightness temperature scale.
1076: The temperature scale is shown in the left-hand side of the
1077: vertical axis. Azimuthally averaged radial distribution of
1078: $R_{21}$ is marked as a solid line. The ratio scale is shown
1079: in the right-hand side of the vertical axis.}
1080: \label{fig-ratioaz}
1081: \end{figure}
1082:
1083: \begin{figure}
1084: \epsscale{0.65}
1085: \plotone{f4.ps}
1086:
1087: \caption[]{(a) $R_{21}$ is plotted as a function of kinetic
1088: temperature $T_{\rm k}$ and H$_{2}$ number density $n_{\rm H_2}$ at a
1089: standard $Z(^{12}$CO)/(d$v$/d$r$) of
1090: $5.0\times10^{-5}$ (km s$^{-1}$ pc$^{-1}$)$^{-1}$.
1091: Solid lines are the $R_{21}$ of the nuclear component (1.9$\pm$0.2)
1092: and the molecular ring (1.3$\pm$0.2).
1093: Opacity for $^{12}$CO(J = 1 -- 0) is marked as dashed lines.
1094: (b) $R_{21}$ of the nuclear component is plotted as a function of
1095: $T_{\rm k}$ and $Z(^{12}$CO)/(d$v$/d$r$).
1096: Solid lines are the observed $R_{21}$ of the nuclear component with
1097: $n_{\rm H_2}$ fixed at a value of $1.0\times10^{4}$ cm$^{-3}$.
1098: \label{fig-tknh2}}
1099: \end{figure}
1100:
1101: \end{document}
1102: