1: %% \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %% \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{/home/luisfr/aastex/aastex52/aastex}
3: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
4: %% \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
5: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
6: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
7: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
8: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
9: %% \documentclass{emulateapj}
10:
11: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
12: %\usepackage{epsfig}
13: %\usepackage{lscape}
14: %\slugcomment{To be submitted to The Astronomical Journal}
15:
16:
17: %\received{}
18: %\accepted{}
19: \shorttitle{Proper Motions of Radio Sources in Orion}
20: \shortauthors{G\'omez et al.}
21:
22:
23: \begin{document}
24:
25: \title{Monitoring the Large
26: Proper Motions of Radio Sources in the Orion BN/KL Region}
27:
28: \author{Laura G\'omez\altaffilmark{1},
29: Luis F. Rodr\'\i guez, Laurent Loinard, and Susana Lizano}
30: \affil{Centro de Radioastronom\'\i a y Astrof\'\i sica, UNAM,
31: Apdo. Postal 3-72,\\
32: Morelia, Michoac\'an, 58089 M\'exico\\
33: {l.gomez, l.rodriguez, l.loinard, s.lizano@astrosmo.unam.mx}}
34:
35: \author{Christine Allen and Arcadio Poveda}
36: \affil{Instituto de Astronom\'\i a, UNAM,
37: Apdo. Postal 70-264, M\'exico, D. F., 04510 M\'exico
38: {chris@astroscu.unam.mx, poveda@servidor.unam.mx}}
39:
40: \and
41:
42: \author{Karl M. Menten}
43: \affil{Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Radioastronomie, Auf
44: dem H\"ugel 69, D-53121 Bonn, Germany
45: {kmenten@mpifr-bonn.mpg.de}}
46:
47:
48: \altaffiltext{1}{Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Radioastronomie, Auf
49: dem H\"ugel 69, D-53121 Bonn, Germany, E-mail: lgomez@mpifr-bonn.mpg.de}
50:
51: \begin{abstract}
52: We present absolute astrometry of four radio sources
53: in the Becklin-Neugebauer/Kleinman-Low (BN/KL)
54: region, derived from archival data (taken in
55: 1991, 1995, and 2000) as well as from new observations (taken in 2006). All
56: data consist of 3.6 cm continuum emission and were
57: taken with the Very Large Array in its highest
58: angular resolution A configuration.
59: We confirm the large
60: proper motions of the BN object, the radio source
61: I (GMR I) and the radio counterpart of the infrared source n
62: (Orion-n), with values from 15 to 26 km s$^{-1}$.
63: The three sources are receding from a point
64: between them from where they seem to have been ejected about
65: 500 years ago, probably via the disintegration of a multiple
66: stellar system. We present simulations of very compact
67: stellar groups that provide a plausible dynamical scenario
68: for the observations. The radio source Orion-n appeared as a double in the
69: first three epochs, but as single in 2006. We discuss
70: this morphological change. The fourth source in the region, GMR D,
71: shows no statistically significant proper motions. We also present new,
72: accurate relative astrometry between BN and radio source I that
73: restrict possible dynamical scenarios for the region.
74: During the 2006 observations,
75: the radio source GMR A, located about $1{'}$ to the NW of the BN/KL region,
76: exhibited an increase in its flux density
77: of a factor of $\sim$3.5 over a timescale of one hour.
78: This rapid variability at cm wavelengths is similar to that previously found
79: during a flare at millimeter wavelengths that took place in 2003.
80:
81:
82: \end{abstract}
83:
84: \keywords{astrometry --- ISM: individual (\objectname{Orion}) ---
85: radio continuum: stars --- stars: flare --- stars: pre-main sequence}
86:
87: \section{Introduction}
88:
89: The Orion BN/KL region is at the center of a remarkable,
90: fast (30--100 km s$^{-1}$),
91: and massive ($\sim 10~M_\odot$) outflow,
92: with a kinetic energy of order
93: $4 \times 10^{47}$ ergs, which Kwan \& Scoville (1976)
94: ascribe to an explosive event and which also manifests itself as shock
95: excited molecular hydrogen (H$_2$) emission at near infrared
96: wavelengths (Beckwith et al. 1978).
97: Observations with higher angular resolution showed that
98: this molecular outflow is bipolar and weakly
99: collimated, with its blueshifted lobe toward the northwest
100: and its redshifted lobe to the southeast
101: (Erickson et al. 1982; Rodr\'\i guez-Franco, Mart\'\i n-Pintado, \&
102: Wilson 1999). This outflow was later resolved into ``fingers''
103: of H$_2$ emission, most probably
104: tracing shocked gas, that point away from the BN/KL region to the
105: northwest and southeast (Allen \& Burton 1993; Stolovy et al. 1998;
106: Schultz et al. 1999; Salas et al. 1999; Kaifu et al. 2000).
107: These observations indicate that a powerful ejection occurred
108: in the BN/KL region recently.
109: The H$_2$ ``finger'' system consists of over 100 individual bow shocks,
110: which delineate a wide-angle bipolar outflow along a position angle
111: of about $135^\circ$. The proper motions of the H$_2$ knots suggest that
112: the explosion took place less than about 1,000 yr ago
113: (Lee \& Burton 2000; Doi et al. 2002; Nissen et al. 2007).
114:
115: The cause of this remarkable outflow remains unknown.
116: Recently, Rodr\'\i guez et al. (2005) and G\'omez et al. (2005)
117: reported large proper motions (equivalent to velocities of the order of
118: a few tens of km s$^{-1}$) for the radio sources associated with the infrared sources
119: BN (the ``Becklin-Neugebauer object'')
120: and n, as well as for the radio source I. All three objects
121: are located at the core of the BN/KL region and appear
122: to be moving away from a common center where they must all have been
123: located about 500 years ago. This suggests that all three sources
124: were originally part of a multiple massive stellar system that
125: recently disintegrated as a result
126: of a close dynamical interaction. Bally \& Zinnecker (2005) have suggested
127: that, given the uncertainty in the age of the explosion traced by
128: the high velocity gas that could have experienced deceleration, this
129: phenomenon could have taken place simultaneously with
130: the close dynamical interaction possibly traced by the proper motions
131: of the three radio sources. However, a detailed model that connects the two
132: events is still lacking.
133:
134: In this paper we report new radio observations of the BN/KL region that
135: monitor and confirm the previously reported
136: large proper motions of source BN, I, and n.
137: In particular, we present very accurate relative astrometry between the sources
138: BN and I that restricts the past history of the motions of
139: these sources. We also report the flux variability of
140: objects in the zone. Finally, we propose a dynamical scenario that accounts for
141: the observed high velocity of the stellar objects.
142:
143:
144: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
145:
146: We have used 3.6 cm data from the VLA in its most extended A configuration
147: to measure
148: the proper motions of radio sources in the Orion BN/KL
149: region. Observations of this region
150: were available in the VLA archives for 1991
151: September 06, 1995 July 22, and 2000 November 13. We obtained
152: new observations on 2006 May 12.
153:
154: The data were analyzed in the standard manner using the AIPS package
155: and the calibrated visibilities were imaged using weights intermediate
156: between natural and uniform (with the ROBUST parameter set to 0).
157: The data were also self-calibrated in phase and amplitude for
158: each epoch. To diminish the effects of extended emission, we used
159: only visibilities with baselines longer than 100 k$\lambda$,
160: suppressing the emission from structures larger than 2$''$.
161:
162: The VLA observations for 1995, 2000, and 2006
163: were all made with the same phase calibrator,
164: 0541-056 (located at only $1\rlap.^\circ6$ from the core of Orion),
165: and this provides very reliable absolute astrometry. In contrast, the
166: observations made in 1991 September 06 used
167: as phase calibrator the source 0501-019
168: (located at $9\rlap.^\circ1$ from the core of Orion).
169: The astrometric error grows with the angular separation
170: between the phase calibrator and the source
171: (e. g. Pradel, Charlot, \& Lestrade 2006). To improve
172: the astrometry of the 1991 image, we used the 2000
173: positions of nine bright and compact radio sources in the core
174: of the Trapezium region, with no significant proper motions
175: in the study of G\'omez et al. (2005) to compare with the positions
176: in the 1991 image.
177: The average shift of the 2000 epoch positions with respect
178: to the 1991 epoch positions is
179: $\Delta \alpha = - 0\rlap.^s0007 \pm 0\rlap.^s0009$ and
180: $\Delta \delta = - 0\rlap.{''}035 \pm 0\rlap.{''}011$.
181: The shift in right ascension is not statistically significant but
182: we do find a systematic shift in declination between the
183: two epochs, implying that the 1991 declinations should be
184: corrected by $\Delta \delta = - 0\rlap.{''}035$.
185:
186: \section{Results}
187:
188: We have used these multiepoch VLA observations
189: taken over 15 years (1991-2006) to study the proper motions of
190: the four persistent and compact radio sources clearly detectable in the
191: BN/KL region (Tabs. 1 and 2 and Figs. 1 and 2). The positions of
192: the sources at each epoch were determined using a linearized
193: least-squares fit to a Gaussian ellipsoid function
194: (task JMFIT of AIPS).
195:
196: The source proper motions were then obtained by adjusting their
197: displacements over the celestial sphere with a linear fit (Tab.\ 2).
198: The proper motions of all four sources are consistent within 1-$\sigma$
199: with the results of G\'omez et al. (2005). At a distance of
200: 414 pc (Menten et al. 2007), 1 $mas~yr^{-1}$ is equivalent
201: to 2.0 km s$^{-1}$ and the proper motions of BN, I, and n are in the
202: range of 15 to 26 km s$^{-1}$. We have thus confirmed the large
203: proper motions of the radio sources I, BN, and Orion-n found by
204: Rodr\'{\i}guez et al. (2005) and G\'omez et al. (2005).
205: The fourth source in the region, GMR D (Garay et al. 1987),
206: shows no statistically significant proper motions.
207: During the 2006 observations we detected a transient radio source
208: associated with the Orion G7 star Parenago 1839
209: (labeled in Fig. 2), that was not detected in the three previous
210: epochs and for which we cannot derive a proper motion.
211: The absolute proper motions
212: of these sources are shown in Figure 2, after been corrected for the
213: mean absolute proper motions of 35 radio sources located in a region
214: with a radius of about 0.1 pc centered at the core of Orion
215: (G\'omez et al. 2005),
216: $\mu_{\alpha}~ cos \delta = +0.8 \pm 0.2~mas~yr^{-1};$
217: $\mu_{\delta} = -2.3 \pm 0.2 ~mas~yr^{-1}.$
218: Sandstrom et al. (2007) have noted that the mean
219: absolute proper motions of these 35 radio sources
220: differ at the 1-2 mas yr$^{-1}$ level from those given
221: by Kharchenko et al. (2005) from astrometry (made also with respect to
222: the frame of remote quasars)
223: of 12 optical stars in the Orion cluster distributed over a region with
224: radius of 0.4 pc,
225: $\mu_{\alpha}~ cos \delta = +1.96 \pm 0.31~mas~yr^{-1};$
226: $\mu_{\delta} = -0.77 \pm 0.46 ~mas~yr^{-1}.$
227: At present it is unclear if these non-coincident values are due to
228: a real difference in the mean absolute proper motions of the
229: two populations of objects studied by G\'omez et al. (2005) and by
230: Kharchenko et al. (2005), or to another cause.
231: We have used the values of G\'omez et al. (2005) that appear more appropriate
232: for embedded radio sources in Orion.
233:
234: \section{A Dynamical Scenario for the Region}
235:
236: The mass of BN is estimated to be $8~ M_\odot < M_{BN} < 12.6~ M_\odot$
237: (Scoville et al. 1983, Rodr\'\i guez et al. 2005). Since source $n$ is
238: moving with the largest proper motion, for simplicity we assume that
239: it has a smaller mass than sources BN and I and neglect its
240: contribution in the conservation of linear momentum and
241: energy. Using the observed proper motions in Table 2, conservation of
242: linear momentum along the direction of motion of BN implies that the mass of
243: source I is $M_I \simeq 1.5 \, M_{BN}$, i.e., $12~ M_\odot < M_I < 19~ M_\odot$.
244: We identify source I with a close binary formed by dynamical
245: interactions that has the negative binding energy of the system.
246: Energy conservation implies that the semimajor axis of the binary is
247: given by $a/{\rm AU} = 25 f (1-f)(M_{BN}/ 13~ M_\odot)$, where $f$ is the
248: mass fraction of the primary. Thus, the maximum possible binary
249: separation, for $f=1/2$ (equal masses), is $a/{\rm AU} = 6 (M_{BN}/ 13~ M_\odot)$.
250: These estimates have taken into account the total velocities
251: corrected for the radial velocities of each source (Rodr\'\i guez et al. 2005) that give
252: 25 km s$^{-1}$ for BN and 15 km s$^{-1}$ for I.
253: Finally,
254: conservation of linear momentum in the direction perpendicular to the
255: motion of BN implies that the mass of source n is $M_n = 0.16 \, M_I$,
256: i.e., $2~ M_\odot < M_n < 3~ M_\odot$.
257:
258: Using the masses estimated above,
259: the kinetic energy involved in the three kinematically peculiar objects, BN, I
260: and n, is of order $10^{47} {\rm ergs}$.
261: To accelerate these objects to their
262: observed velocities from the typical small random motions of recently formed stars
263: (1--2 km s$^{-1}$),
264: one can invoke very close encounters in a multiple star system, as first
265: proposed by Poveda et al. (1967). We have recently updated these computations,
266: using the chain-regularization N-body code of Mikkola \& Aarseth (1993). The results
267: illustrated in Poveda et al. (1967) were exactly
268: reproduced by the new computations.
269:
270: For the new examples, we
271: simulated compact multiples composed of 5 stars of different masses (ranging
272: from 8 to 20 $M_\odot$), densely packed within radii of 400 AU ($\sim$0.0019 pc) and with a
273: velocity dispersion corresponding to the thermal velocity at a temperature of 10 K.
274: The stellar density required is thus $1.6 \times 10^{8}$ stars pc$^{-3}$, which appears to be
275: very large, since the largest stellar densities found observationally
276: in the Galaxy on scales of
277: 0.01 -- 0.1 pc are in the range $1-4 \times 10^{5}$ stars pc$^{-3}$
278: (Figer et al. 2002; Megeath et al. 2005; Beuther et al. 2007). However, in our case
279: we are dealing with much smaller physical scales, of order 0.001 pc, and there is
280: at least one observational example of a very young stellar system
281: where the required stellar densities are reached on these
282: small scales. In the surroundings of the protostar Cep A HW2 the results of
283: Curiel et al. (2002) and Mart\'\i n-Pintado et al. (2005) imply the presence of at least
284: four embedded young
285: stellar objects within a projected area of $\sim 0\rlap.{''}8 \times 0\rlap.{''}8$
286: ($600 \times 600~ AU^2$). If we assume that the physical depth of the region
287: equals its projected extent, we obtain a stellar density of
288: $1.6 \times 10^{8}$ stars pc$^{-3}$. Thus, the
289: initial conditions of our simulation, a small group of a few stars
290: in a region with dimensions of a few hundred AU, are consistent with the observations of
291: the Cep A HW2 region. An additional example of high stellar densities can be
292: found in the $\theta^1$ B Ori group. This more evolved system is composed of five
293: stars within about 1${''}$ of each other (Close et al. 2003), which, at
294: the distance of Orion, corresponds to about 400 AU. The stellar
295: density in this group is similar to that of the Cep A HW2
296: region.
297: %Yet another example of a high stellar density region is
298: %afforded by the objects we are studying, namely, the BN/KL group. When
299: %we extrapolate backwards in time the velocities determined for these
300: %objects we find that 500 years ago at least four stars : BN, I (a
301: %double from dynamical arguments) and n were contained in a volume of
302: %radius of about 500 AU (Gomez et al. 2005).
303:
304: Preliminary results of the first 100 five-body cases fully confirm our
305: earlier findings. We find that a sizable fraction of such compact
306: configurations produces one or more escapers with large
307: velocities (greater than about 30 km s$^{-1}$, i. e.,
308: runaway stars), after only about 2
309: crossing times. The positive energy carried away
310: by the high velocity escapers is
311: compensated by the formation of a tight binary or
312: multiple. In over 70\% of the
313: cases the binary was composed of the two most
314: massive stars. To illustrate the
315: dynamical evolution of such compact multiple systems we plot in Figs. 3 and 4
316: final positions and velocities (after 2.2 crossing times, corresponding to
317: about 650 years) for two five-body examples. The similarity of these examples
318: to the observed configuration of the BN system (Fig. 2; see also Fig. 3 in
319: G\'omez et al. 2005) is evident, if one takes into account
320: the uncertainties in the estimated masses.
321: Nevertheless, these simulations are just an illustration of the physical
322: process and explore a small range of the possible parameters.
323: %Based on arguments of conservation of momentum
324: %(see also Rodr\'\i guez et al. 2005)
325: %and taking the mass of BN as 18 $M_\odot$ (Plambeck et al. 1995) we can
326: %argue that
327: %the mass of infrared source I should be about 40 solar masses. If we
328: %tentatively identify source I with a close binary (of 20 + 20 $M_\odot$) formed
329: %by dynamical interactions, we can estimate the binding energy necessary to
330: %compensate the positive energy of its own motion as well as that of BN and
331: %possibly n. The resulting major semiaxis turns out to be $a$ = 17 AU ($0\rlap.{''}04$
332: %at the distance of Orion). The theoretical value of the semimajor axis coincides with the
333: %average value of the binaries formed in the simulations.
334: A forthcoming paper will present results of many more N-body realizations of
335: several variants of the initial configurations
336: (Allen \& Poveda, in preparation). We emphasize that the initial
337: conditions we chose were not the result of
338: ``integrating backwards" the observed
339: positions and velocities of BN, I and n, but were taken to simulate
340: very dense stellar
341: conditions such as those observed in some small scale
342: (hundreds of AUs)
343: regions of massive star formation.
344:
345: \section{How close BN and source I were in the past?}
346:
347: As we will see below, it is important to estimate how close were BN and source I in the past,
348: during their minimum separation
349: in the plane of the sky.
350: Fortunately, this minimum separation can be estimated accurately
351: using relative astrometry between BN and source I.
352:
353: We define $x(t)$ and $y(t)$ as the separations in
354: right ascension and declination of BN with respect to source I
355: as a function of epoch $t$. If we assume that their proper motions are
356: linear, the displacements will be given by
357:
358: $$x(t) = x(2000.0) + \mu_x~ (t-2000.0),$$
359:
360: \noindent and
361:
362: $$y(t) = y(2000.0) + \mu_y~ (t-2000.0),$$
363:
364: \noindent where $x(2000.0)$ and $y(2000.0)$ are the displacements
365: in right ascension and declination for epoch 2000.0,
366: and $\mu_x$ and $\mu_y$ are the proper motions in
367: right ascension and declination. These constants and their
368: errors can be determined very accurately
369: from the relative astrometry.
370:
371: The separation of the sources as a function of time, $s(t)$, will then be
372: given by:
373:
374: $$s(t) = (x^2(t) + y^2(t))^{1/2}.$$
375:
376: Differentiating and equaling to 0, we find that
377: this minimum separation takes place at an epoch $t_{min}$ given by
378:
379: $$t_{min} = -{{x(2000.0) \mu_x + y(2000.0) \mu_y} \over { \mu_x^2 + \mu_y^2}},$$
380:
381: \noindent and that this minimum
382: separation is
383:
384: $$s_{min} = {{|x(2000.0) \mu_y - y(2000.0) \mu_x|} \over {(\mu_x^2 + \mu_y^2)^{1/2}}}.$$
385:
386: The least squares fit to 14 data points from the VLA archive (shown in
387: Table 3 and Figure 5) gives
388: $x(2000.0) = -5.94 \pm 0.21$ arcsec, $\mu_x = -0.0125 \pm 0.0004$ arcsec yr$^{-1}$,
389: $y(2000.0) = 7.73 \pm 0.22$ arcsec, and $\mu_y = 0.0144 \pm 0.0004$ arcsec yr$^{-1}$.
390: These values give a total proper motion of $\mu_{tot} = 0.0191 \pm 0.0004$ arcsec yr$^{-1}$
391: at a P.A. of $-41\rlap.^\circ0 \pm 1\rlap.^\circ2$.
392: The proper motions are consistent within error, but more accurate, than those
393: reported by Tan (2004) and Rodr\'\i guez et al. (2005).
394: With these new values, we obtain:
395:
396: $$t_{min} = 1490 \pm 11,$$
397:
398: $$s_{min} = 0\rlap.{''}55 \pm 0\rlap.{''}16,$$
399:
400: \noindent where the errors were calculated
401: using standard propagation error theory (Wall \& Jenkins 2003).
402: We conclude that, about 500 years ago,
403: BN and source I were within $\sim$230$\pm$70 AU from each other
404: in the plane of the sky.
405:
406: \section{Was BN ejected from $\theta^1$ C Ori?}
407:
408: An alternative origin for the proper motions of BN has
409: been proposed by Tan (2004). In his scenario, the ejection of BN took
410: place from the $\theta^1$ C Ori binary system. While this model is attractive
411: because $\theta^1$ C Ori is a massive, hard, and eccentric binary as
412: required by such a
413: dynamical event, our accurate relative astrometry seems to rule
414: out a close encounter between BN and $\theta^1$ C Ori in the past.
415:
416: Tan (2004) made a comparison between the proper motions of BN (determined
417: relatively to source I), $\mu_{\alpha}~ cos \delta = -11.1 \pm 2.2~mas~yr^{-1};$
418: $\mu_{\delta} = +14.3 \pm 2.2 ~mas~yr^{-1}$, and the optical proper motions of
419: $\theta^1$ C Ori determined by van Altena et al. (1988),
420: $\mu_{\alpha}~ cos \delta = +1.4 \pm 0.17~mas~yr^{-1};$
421: $\mu_{\delta} = -1.8 \pm 0.16 ~mas~yr^{-1}$.
422: We note that the proper motions determined by
423: van Altena et al. (1988) are not in an absolute reference frame
424: (their system is defined by the average proper motions of their
425: reference stars)
426: and the reliability of the comparison is uncertain.
427: Tian et al. (1996) have discussed the different reference frames for the
428: proper motions of stars in Orion obtained by five different
429: groups and find that they differ at the $\sim$1 mas yr$^{-1}$
430: level. Furthermore, none of these reference frames is absolute
431: in the sense of being referred to the remote quasars.
432: In any case, for the sake of discussion,
433: we have followed the steps made by Tan (2004) to compare the
434: proper motions of BN and of $\theta^1$ C Ori and used
435: our relative astrometry for the
436: proper motions of BN with respect to source I
437: (consistent, but about 5 times
438: more accurate than those of Tan), as well as the proper
439: motions of
440: van Altena et al. (1988) for $\theta^1$ C Ori. Making the same analysis as
441: the one made in the previous section for the motions of BN with respect to source I, we obtain
442: $x(2000.0) = -35.2 \pm 0.2$ arcsec, $\mu_x = -0.0139 \pm 0.0004$ arcsec yr$^{-1}$,
443: $y(2000.0) = 60.2 \pm 0.2$ arcsec, and $\mu_y = 0.0162 \pm 0.0004$ arcsec yr$^{-1}$
444: for the relative proper motions between BN and $\theta^1$ C Ori.
445: With these values, we obtain:
446:
447: $$t_{min} = -1216 \pm 62,$$
448:
449: $$s_{min} = 12\rlap.{''}5 \pm 1\rlap.{''}0,$$
450:
451: \noindent that is, the minimum separation between BN and $\theta^1$ C Ori took
452: place about 3,200 years ago, but this minimum separation was
453: large, more than 10-$\sigma$ away from
454: the close approach required in the model of Tan (2004).
455: These proper motions are shown in Figure 6.
456: This serious discrepancy can be alleviated if one is willing to
457: accept that the errors in the proper motions of $\theta^1$ C Ori
458: with respect to BN are larger. Adding in quadrature an
459: error of 1 mas yr$^{-1}$, the proper motions of $\theta^1$ C Ori
460: determined by van Altena et al. (1988)
461: become $\mu_{\alpha}~ cos \delta = +1.4 \pm 1.0~mas~yr^{-1};$
462: $\mu_{\delta} = -1.8 \pm 1.0 ~mas~yr^{-1}$.
463: Under this assumption, the minimum separation
464: becomes $s_{min} = 12\rlap.{''}5 \pm 2\rlap.{''}4$,
465: about 5-$\sigma$ away from
466: the close approach required in the model of Tan (2004).
467: This may be more tolerable, but then the proper motion
468: of $\theta^1$ C Ori has a position angle with a large
469: error, PA = $142^\circ \pm 25^\circ$,
470: and the argument of the antiparallel alignment between the proper
471: motions of BN and $\theta^1$ C Ori is not compelling anymore.
472:
473: One possible way to realign the proper motions of BN with respect
474: to $\theta^1$ C Ori in this scenario is to take into account that during
475: its close passage near source I, BN may have suffered a
476: gravitational deflection of several degrees (Tan 2004).
477: In any case, the possibility that a moving massive star passes close
478: another massive star is very low.
479: BN appears projected at about 70$''$ from $\theta^1$ C Ori
480: in the plane of the sky. This corresponds to a physical separation
481: of $l \sim 4.3 \times 10^{17}$ cm. Within a sphere with this radius centered
482: on $\theta^1$ C Ori there are of the order of 10 massive stars.
483: This gives a local density of massive stars of
484: $N_* \sim 8.9 \times 10^{2}$ pc$^{-3}$.
485: The probability of an encounter between two stars at a
486: minimum separation of $R$ = 200 AU
487: (as derived from the relative astrometry between BN and source I),
488: is
489:
490: $$p \simeq N_* \pi R^2 l \simeq 3.7 \times 10^{-4}.$$
491:
492: \section{Possible Difficulties with the Cluster Disintegration Model}
493:
494: Tan (2008) has pointed two possible difficulties with the model
495: of the disintegrating cluster originally located between BN and source I
496: proposed by Rodr\'\i guez et al. (2005) and G\'omez et al. (2005).
497: The first difficulty is related with the fact that in some molecular tracers
498: (for example, the silicate line-of-sight extinction image of Gezari et al. 1998),
499: source I appears located close to the peak, suggesting it is stationary with
500: respect to the dense gas in the region.
501:
502: However, other tracers show a different
503: picture. The OH masers observed by
504: Cohen et al. (2006; see their Figs. 1 and 8)
505: clearly are distributed between source I and BN.
506: These authors suggest that these masers trace shock fronts in a trail
507: produced by the passage of the moving sources.
508: Part of the OH masers show a torus morphology approximately centered at
509: the position proposed by us to be the center of the BN, I, and n
510: ejection.
511:
512: It is also relevant that in many tracers
513: source I is not engulfed (this is, surrounded
514: in all directions) in dust and molecular gas
515: (Beuther et al. 2004; Wilson et al. 2000),
516: but that these emissions peak mostly to the SE of I.
517: This may be consistent with the motion of source I,
518: ``clearing" molecular gas in its path to the SE.
519:
520: The second possible difficulty pointed by Tan (2008) is related with
521: the fact that if source I and source n are moving at velocities of
522: 15 to 26 km s$^{-1}$, why are then they able to retain the gas associated
523: with them at the 100 AU scale?
524: In our interpretation, this gas is the result of
525: supersonic (hundreds of km s$^{-1}$) ejections from the
526: associated stars and
527: we do not expect it to be affected by their motion
528: at velocities an order of magnitude smaller with
529: respect to the surrounding medium.
530: However, if the new interpretation of Reid et al. (2007) of source
531: I as an ionized disk is correct, there is a problem in that it will
532: be hard to understand how a source that had a close encounter in the
533: recent past (500 years ago with source I) has managed to rebuild and retain
534: its circumstellar disk.
535:
536: Finally, we note that also BN has associated
537: ionized gas at the 100 AU scale. The observed deconvolved size
538: of BN at 3.6 cm is $\sim 0\rlap.{''}17 \times 0\rlap.{''}08$
539: (see Table 1)
540: or $\sim$70 AU $\times$ 30 AU at a distance of 414 pc.
541: The explanation
542: for this gas is usually in terms of a hypercompact
543: HII region, although other possible explanations
544: have been discussed by Scoville et al. (1983).
545: In Figure 7 we show a high angular resolution, high sensitivity
546: 7 mm image of BN, produced from the same dataset that Reid et al. (2007)
547: used to study the radio source I.
548: The total flux density of the source at this wavelength is
549: 26.4$\pm$0.7 mJy and its deconvolved dimensions are
550: $0\rlap.{''}075 \pm 0\rlap.{''}003 \times 0\rlap.{''}042\pm 0\rlap.{''}002; PA = 56^\circ \pm 2^\circ.$
551: The larger flux density and smaller angular dimensions observed at
552: 7 mm with respect to 3.6 cm (see Table 1) are consistent with those
553: expected for a region of ionized in which the electron density
554: decreases as a function of radius (Reynolds 1986).
555:
556: But, if BN is moving, why we do not see a clear ``tail"
557: of recombining gas as expected for a star that moves in a stationary medium
558: (Raga et al. 1997)?
559: The solution is probably in the very fast recombination time
560: of BN as compared with the time it takes BN to displace by a distance equal
561: to its own diameter.
562: Along the axis of motion, BN has an angular size of about 80 mas (30 AU
563: at a distance of 414 pc).
564: Moving at 10.8 mas yr$^{-1}$, we expect that the source will displace
565: a distance comparable with its size in a time of order
566: 7 years. For the recombining ``tail" not to be detectable
567: we need for the ionized gas in BN to have a recombination time
568: much shorter than 7 years. From the 7 mm observations of Rodr\'\i guez et al.
569: (2008, in preparation) and from Moran et al. (1983) and Scoville et al. (1983),
570: we estimate an electron density of
571: $2 \times 10^7$ cm$^{-3}$, that implies a very fast recombination time of only
572: a few days. Then, we do not expect to see much of a recombining tail
573: as BN moves in the surrounding medium.
574:
575:
576: \section{Comments on Individual Sources in the BN/KL Region}
577:
578: \subsection{Orion-n}
579:
580: This infrared source, detected by
581: Lonsdale et al. (1982),
582: has recently been studied at mid-IR wavelengths
583: by Greenhill et al.
584: (2004a) who infer a luminosity of order 2,000 $L_\odot$ for it.
585: The associated radio source was first reported by Menten \& Reid (1995;
586: their source ``L"), who found it to be double in their VLA 3.6 cm image
587: taken in 1994. Our data (see Fig. 8) shows that in the 1991, 1995, and 2000 images
588: the source has remained
589: double, with a north-south separation of about $0\rlap.{''}35$.
590: Remarkably, in the 2006 image
591: Orion-n appears as a single radio source. We believe that this morphological
592: change is real and not a consequence of different angular resolutions
593: since all the data analyzed have very similar angular resolution.
594: This result suggests that an alternative explanation could be
595: that the source has no real proper motions and that the apparent motion is a result
596: of the southern component becoming much brighter than the northern one over the
597: time baseline of the observations. However, the positions fitted
598: (using the AIPS task JMFIT) to the
599: 1991, 1995, and 2000 images assuming that two Gaussians are present
600: (see Fig. 1) show a progressive shift in the position of the two components
601: whose average
602: extrapolates well to the position of the single component used to fit
603: the 2006 image.
604:
605: The positions of the individual components of the double
606: radio source for 1991, 1995, and 2000
607: as well as that of the single source in 2006 are shown in Fig. 1.
608: The northern and
609: southern components of the double source
610: for the first three epochs have been fitted with dashed lines,
611: while all components have been fitted to a solid line.
612: This figure shows that the single source observed in 2006 is the
613: centroid of the double source seen in the other epochs
614: and not one of the components that became dominant.
615:
616: Greenhill et al. (2004a) and
617: Shuping, Morris, \& Bally (2004) have analyzed
618: their mid-infrared images of Orion-n and conclude that it is slightly elongated
619: (at the arc sec scale) in the east-west direction, suggesting that it may trace
620: a disk-like structure approximately perpendicular to the axis joining the double
621: radio source. From submillimeter observations of
622: the dust emission from this source,
623: Beuther et al. (2004)
624: estimate a mass of about 0.27 $M_\odot$ for the associated gaseous
625: structure, a value consistent with that
626: expected for the disk of a massive
627: young star. Under this interpretation, the radio emission from source n would
628: be tracing an ionized outflow, or thermal jet. Although not frequent in
629: bipolar ionized outflows, the change from double-peaked to single-peaked source
630: and viceversa,
631: has been observed in a handful of sources (Cohen, Bieging, \& Schwartz
632: 1982; Bieging, Cohen, \& Schwartz 1984; Rodr\'\i guez et al. 2007;
633: Loinard et al. 2007), and is possibly caused by the ejection of
634: clumps of ionized gas.
635: However, the reason for the morphological change observed in the radio counterpart
636: to Orion-n is unclear, and additional observations are required to
637: understand it.
638:
639: Despite the dramatic changes in its morphology, the total 3.6-cm flux
640: density of source n does not appear to have undergone very
641: large changes over the four epochs of the observations, ranging from
642: 1.5 to 2.2 mJy. The total 3.6 cm flux density measured in 1994 by Menten \& Reid
643: (1995), 2.0 mJy, also falls in this range.
644: The position shifts
645: observed in this source could potentially be due to morphological
646: changes. Nevertheless, the systematic displacement of the positions
647: over four epochs favors the more straightforward interpretation of true
648: proper motions.
649:
650: \subsection{GMR I}
651:
652: Greenhill et al.\ (2004b) and Reid et al. (2007), based on the
653: interpretation of the SiO and H$_2$O
654: emission observed around source I, proposed a model with a rotating disk and
655: a wide angle outflow pointing in the NE-SW direction. This model
656: is proposed to replace that of
657: Greenhill et al.\ (1998) in which the SiO masers were
658: proposed to form in the
659: limbs of a high velocity bi-conical outflow projected along a
660: NW-SE axis. Clearly, this source needs to be observed in even
661: greater detail to elucidate its nature and to determine its mass.
662:
663: \subsection{BN}
664:
665: Grosso et al. (2005) have discussed the presence of two X-ray sources near
666: BN: COUP 599a and COUP 599b. They conclude that neither source is BN itself,
667: but most probably deeply embedded
668: lower mass stars, either unrelated or companions to BN.
669:
670: \subsection{GMR D}
671:
672: This radio source is associated with an X-ray source
673: from the Chandra Orion Ultradeep Project Census
674: (Source COUP 662 in Grosso et al. 2005),
675: but it has no optical or near-infrared
676: counterpart. The association with X-ray emission suggests it
677: could be a T Tau star. It shows no statistically significant proper motions.
678: We confirm its known variability at radio wavelengths (e. g. Zapata et al. 2004),
679: since we observe
680: its flux density to vary between 0.7 and 4.2 mJy
681: over the four epochs.
682:
683: \subsection{The Transient Radio Source}
684:
685: During the 2006 observations we detected an unresolved radio source
686: at position $\alpha(J2000) = 05^h~ 35^m~ 14\rlap.^s6565;$
687: $\delta(J2000) = -05^\circ~ 22'~ 33\rlap.{''}731$, with total flux density of 1.3$\pm$0.1 mJy.
688: The radio source is located within $0\rlap.{''}1$
689: of the K7 star Parenago 1839 and we propose they are the same
690: object. The source is also associated within $1{''}$ with the
691: X-ray source COUP J053514.6-052233.
692: Unfortunately, the radio emission was not detected in the previous
693: three epochs and we do not have a proper motion for this source.
694: To our knowledge, this is the first radio detection of this source,
695: marked in Figure 2 as Parenago 1839.
696:
697: \section{Conclusions}
698:
699: We have confirmed the large proper motions, with values
700: from 15 to 26 km s$^{-1}$, found for the radio sources associated with
701: the BN object, the radio source I, and the infrared source Orion-n.
702: All three sources appear to be diverging from a point in between them, from where
703: they were apparently ejected about 500 years ago, probably via the disintegration of
704: a compact multiple stellar system.
705: We present simulations of the dynamical evolution of very compact groups of
706: stars that illustrate the physical process. These theoretical results imply that
707: these stars were part of a very dense young compact group
708: ($\sim 10^8$ stars pc$^{-3}$), like those observed
709: today in small regions associated with Cep A HW2 and $\theta^1$ B Ori.
710:
711: The radio source associated with the infrared source n shows a large
712: morphological change in the 2006 image, where after being observed as double
713: for many years, it appears as a single source. We believe that this
714: behavior is consistent with an interpretation in terms of a thermal jet.
715:
716: Finally, in an Appendix we report a rapid centimeter flare during the 2006
717: observations in the source GMR A, of similar
718: characteristics than that observed at millimeter wavelengths in
719: 2003.
720:
721:
722: \acknowledgments
723:
724: CA thanks S. Aarseth for illuminating discussion about
725: his N-body codes. AP and CA thank A. Hern\'andez-Alc\'antara for
726: computational assistance.
727: LFR acknowledges the support from COECyT, Michoac\'an, M\'exico.
728: SL and LL are grateful to CONACyT, M\'exico and DGAPA, UNAM for
729: their support. The National Radio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO) is a
730: facility of the National Science Foundation operated under cooperative
731: agreement by Associated Universities, Inc.
732:
733: \appendix
734:
735: \section{Rapid Variability in GMR A}
736:
737: The GMR A source is a strongly variable radio source (Garay et al. 1987;
738: Felli 1993a, 1993b), a bright near-infrared point source (No. 573;
739: Hillenbrand \& Carpenter 2000), and a variable X-ray source (No. 297;
740: Feigelson et al.\ 2002). Bower et al.\ (2003a) reported the
741: serendipitous discovery of a giant flare at 86 GHz from this radio
742: source with the Berkeley-Illinois-Maryland Array (BIMA) on
743: 2003 January 20, with a flux density that increased by a factor
744: of more than 5 on a
745: timescale of hours. The follow-up observations of Bower et al.
746: (2003b) with BIMA and the VLA and of
747: Furuya et al. (2003) with
748: the Nobeyama Millimeter Array showed that the source decayed within
749: days of the outburst. These authors found GMR A to be highly
750: variable at 15 and 22 GHz on a timescale of hours to days during the period of the
751: mm flare, and the source is well known to be variable
752: at cm wavelengths, at least in the timescale of weeks to years
753: (Felli et al. 1993b; Zapata et al. 2004).
754:
755: During the 2006 run, we found a rapid flux density increase by a
756: factor of $\sim$3.5 over a timescale of
757: about one hour (see Fig. 9). The flare observed at centimeter wavelengths
758: is remarkably similar to that observed previously in the millimeter.
759: The increase is in both cases in the order of a few and the rise timescale
760: is of order one hour. Furthermore, the circular polarization
761: (see Fig. 9) was in both cases of order (V/I) $\simeq$ $-$5 to $-$10\%
762: before the flare and, as emphasized by Bower et al. (2003b)
763: in the case of the millimeter flare,
764: no circular polarization is detected near the peak of the flare.
765: We also note that the variations in the flux density of the source
766: are larger before than during the flare (see Fig. 8).
767:
768: This source is $\sim 1'$ to the NW of the phase center of the observations and
769: its astrometry is not as reliable as that of the four sources
770: previously discussed.
771: We have assumed that the real error associated with its positions is
772: twice that given by the formal fit.
773: From our data, we derive proper motions of
774: $\mu_{\alpha} cos \delta = +4.8 \pm 1.8~mas~yr^{-1};$
775: $\mu_{\delta} = -1.6 \pm 2.1 ~mas~yr^{-1}$,
776: that are consistent at the 2-$\sigma$ level
777: with the values reported
778: by G\'omez et al. (2005), Sandstrom et al. (2007), and Menten et al.
779: (2007). The values of Sandstrom et al. (2007) and Menten et al.
780: (2007) were obtained from VLBI observations and should be very accurate.
781:
782: A similar flare was reported recently by Forbrich et al. (2008) at 1.3 cm toward the
783: Orion radio source ORBS J053514.67-052211.2.
784:
785: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.
786: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.
787: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of
788: %% curly braces. If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error
789: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".
790: %%
791: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite
792: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a
793: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds
794: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).
795: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the
796: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain
797: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in
798: %% place of the \cite commands.
799:
800: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.
801: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.
802: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.
803:
804: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly
805: %% different from previous examples. The natbib system solves a host
806: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly
807: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.
808: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.
809:
810:
811:
812: \begin{thebibliography}{}
813:
814: \bibitem[]{al93} Allen, D. A., \& Burton, M. G. 1993, Nature, 363, 54
815:
816: \bibitem[]{ba05} Bally, J., \& Zinnecker, H. 2005, AJ, 129, 2281
817:
818: \bibitem[Beckwith et al.(1978)]{1978ApJ...223..464B} Beckwith, S., Persson,
819: S.~E., Neugebauer, G., \& Becklin, E.~E.\ 1978, \apj, 223, 464
820:
821: \bibitem[Beuther et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...616L..31B} Beuther, H., et al.\
822: 2004, \apjl, 616, L31
823:
824: \bibitem[]{be07} Beuther, H., Zhang, Q., Bergin, E. A., Sridharan, T. K.,
825: Hunter, T. R., \& Leurini, S. 2007, A\&A, 468, 1045
826:
827: \bibitem[]{bi84} Bieging, J. H., Cohen, M., \& Schwartz, P. R. 1984,
828: ApJ, 282, 699
829:
830: \bibitem[]{bo03a} Bower, G. C., Plambeck, R. L., \& Bolatto, A.\ 2003a, IAU Circ. 8055
831:
832: \bibitem[]{bo03b} Bower, G. C. et al.\ 2003b, ApJ, 598, 1140
833:
834: \bibitem[]{cl03} Close, L. M. et al. 2003, ApJ, 599, 537
835:
836: \bibitem[]{co82} Cohen, M., Bieging, J. H., \& Schwartz, P. R. 1982,
837: ApJ, 253, 707
838:
839: \bibitem[]{co06} Cohen, R. J., Gasiprong, N., Meaburn, J., \&
840: Graham, M. F. 2006, MNRAS, 367, 541
841:
842: \bibitem[]{cu02} Curiel, S., et al. 2002, ApJ, 564, L35
843:
844: \bibitem[]{do02} Doi, T., O'Dell, C. R., \& Hartigan, Patrick
845: 2000, AJ, 124, 445
846:
847: \bibitem[]{er82} Erickson, N. R., Goldsmith, P. F., Snell, R. L.,
848: Berson, R. L., Huguenin, G. R.,
849: Ulich, B. L., \& Lada, C. J. 1982,
850: ApJ, 261, L103
851:
852: \bibitem[]{fe02} Feigelson, E. D., et al.\ 2002, ApJ, 574, 258
853:
854: \bibitem[]{fe93a} Felli, M., Churchwell, E., Wilson, T. L., \& Taylor, G. B.\ 1993a, A\&AS, 98, 137
855:
856: \bibitem[]{fe93b} Felli, M., Taylor, G. B., Catarzi, M., Churchwell, E., \& Kurtz, S.\ 1993b, A\&AS, 101, 127
857:
858: \bibitem[]{fi02} Figer, D. F., et al. 2002, ApJ, 581, 258
859:
860: \bibitem[Forbrich et
861: al.(2008)]{2008A&A...477..267F} Forbrich, J., Menten, K.~M., \& Reid, M.~J.\ 2008, \aap, 477, 267
862:
863: \bibitem[]{fu03} Furuya, R. S., Shinnaga, H.,
864: Nakanishi, K., Momose, M., \& Saito, M. 2003, PASJ, 55, L83
865:
866: \bibitem[]{ga87} Garay, G., Moran, J.M., \& Reid, M.J.\ 1987, ApJ, 314, 535
867:
868: %\bibitem[Genzel
869: %\& Stutzki(1989)]{1989ARA&A..27...41G} Genzel, R., \& Stutzki, J.\ 1989, \araa, 27, 41
870:
871: \bibitem[Gezari et al.(1998)]{1998ApJ...509..283G} Gezari, D.~Y., Backman,
872: D.~E., \& Werner, M.~W.\ 1998, \apj, 509, 283
873:
874: \bibitem[]{go05} G\'omez, L., Rodr\'{\i}guez, L.F., Loinard, L.,
875: Poveda, A., Lizano, S., \& Allen, C.\
876: 2005, ApJ, 635, 1166
877:
878: \bibitem[]{gr98} Greenhill, L. J., Gwinn, C. R., Schwartz, C., Moran, J. M., \& Diamond, P. J.\ 1998, Nature, 396, 650
879:
880: \bibitem[]{gr04a} Greenhill, L. J., Gezari, D. Y., Danchi, W. C., Najita, J., Monnier, J. D., \& Tuthill,
881: P. G. 2004a, ApJ, 605, L57
882:
883: \bibitem[Grosso et al.(2005)]{2005ApJS..160..530G} Grosso, N., et al.\
884: 2005, \apjs, 160, 530
885:
886: \bibitem[]{gr04b} Greenhill, L. J., Reid, M. J., Chandler, C. J., Diamond, P.
887: J., \& Elitzur, M.\ 2004b, in IAU Symp., ed. M. Burton, R. Jayawardhana, \& T. Bourke, 155
888:
889: \bibitem[]{hi00} Hillenbrand, L. A., \& Carpenter, J. M.\ 2000, ApJ, 540, 236
890:
891: \bibitem[]{ka00} Kaifu, N. et al. 2000, PASJ, 52, 1
892:
893: \bibitem[]{kh05} Kharchenko, N. V., Piskunov, A. E.,
894: Röser, S., Schilbach, E., \& Scholz, R. D. 2005, A\&A, 438, 1163
895:
896: %\bibitem[Kraus et
897: %al.(2007)]{2007A&A...466..649K} Kraus, S., et al.\ 2007, \aap, 466, 649
898:
899: \bibitem[]{kw76} Kwan, J. \& Scoville, N. 1976, ApJ, 210, L39
900:
901: \bibitem[]{le00} Lee, J.-K., \& Burton, M. G. 2000, MNRAS, 315, L11
902:
903: \bibitem[]{lo07} Loinard, L. et al. 2007, ApJ, 670, 1353
904:
905: \bibitem[]{lo82} Lonsdale, C. J., Becklin, E. E., Lee, T. J., \&
906: Stewart, J. M. 1982, AJ, 87, 1819
907:
908: \bibitem[]{ma05} Mart\'\i n-Pintado, J., Jim\'enez-Serra, I., Rodr\'\i guez-Franco, A.,
909: Mart\'\i n, S., \& Thum, C. 2005, ApJ, 628, L61
910:
911: \bibitem[]{me05} Megeath, S. T., Wilson, T. L., \& Corbin, M. R. 2005, ApJ, 622, L141
912:
913: %\bibitem[Menten
914: %\& Reid(1990)]{1990BAAS...22.1269M} Menten, K.~M., \& Reid, M.~J.\ 1990, \baas, 22, 1269
915:
916: \bibitem[]{me07} Menten, K. M., Reid, M. J., Forbrich, J., \& Brunthaler, A.
917: 2007, A\&A, 474, 515
918:
919: \bibitem[]{mi93} Mikkola, S. \& Aarseth, S. J., 1993, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy,
920: 57, 439
921:
922: \bibitem[Moran et al.(1983)]{1983ApJ...271L..31M} Moran, J.~M., Garay, G.,
923: Reid, M.~J., Genzel, R., Wright, M.~C.~H.,
924: \& Plambeck, R.~L.\ 1983, \apjl, 271, L31
925:
926: \bibitem[]{ni07} Nissen, H. D., Gustafsson, M., Lemaire, J. L.,
927: Cl\'enet, Y., Rouan, D., \& Field, D. 2007, A\&A, 466, 949
928:
929: %\bibitem[]{pl95} Plambeck, R. L., Wright, M. C. H., Mundy, L. G., \& Looney, L. W.
930: %1995, ApJ, 455, L189
931:
932: \bibitem[]{po67} Poveda, A., Ruiz, J., \& Allen, C., 1967, Bol. Obs. Tonantzintla y
933: Tacubaya, 4, 86 (http://www.astrosmo.unam.mx/\verb"~"luisfr/Poveda67.pdf)
934:
935: \bibitem[]{pr06} Pradel, N., Charlot, P., \& Lestrade, J.-F. 2006, A\&A,
936: 452, 1099
937:
938: \bibitem[Raga et al.(1997)]{1997RMxAA..33...73R} Raga, A.~C.,
939: Noriega-Crespo, A., Cant{\'o}, J., Steffen, W., van Buren, D., Mellema, G.,
940: \& Lundqvist, P.\ 1997, Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica, 33, 73
941:
942:
943: \bibitem[]{re07} Reid, M. J., Menten, K. M., Greenhill, L. J., \&
944: Chandler, C. J.\ 2007, ApJ, 664, 950
945:
946: \bibitem[]{re86} Reynolds, S. P. 1986, ApJ, 304, 713
947:
948: \bibitem[]{ro05} Rodr\'{\i}guez, L. F., Poveda, A., Lizano, S., \& Allen, C.
949: 2005, ApJ, 627, L65
950:
951: \bibitem[]{ro07} Rodr\'{\i}guez, L. F., G\'omez, Y., \& Tafoya, D. 2007,
952: ApJ, 663, 1083
953:
954: \bibitem[]{ro99} Rodr\'\i guez-Franco, A., Mart\'\i n-Pintado, J., \&
955: Wilson, T. L. 1999, A\&A, 351, 1103
956:
957: \bibitem[]{sa99} Salas, L. et al. 1999, ApJ, 511, 822
958:
959: \bibitem[]{sa07} Sandstrom, K. M., Peek, J. E. G., Bower, G. C., Bolatto, A. D., \&
960: Plambeck, R. L. 2007, ApJ, 667, 1161
961:
962: \bibitem[]{sc99} Schultz, A. S. B. et al. 1999,
963: ApJ, 511, 282
964:
965: \bibitem[Scoville et al.(1983)]{1983ApJ...275..201S} Scoville, N.,
966: Kleinmann, S.~G., Hall, D.~N.~B., \& Ridgway, S.~T.\ 1983, \apj, 275, 201
967:
968: \bibitem[]{sh04} Shuping, R. Y., Morris, M., \& Bally, J. 2004, AJ, 128, 363
969:
970: \bibitem[]{st98} Stolovy, S. R. et al. 1998, ApJ, 429, L151
971:
972: \bibitem[Tan(2004)]{2004ApJ...607L..47T} Tan, J.~C.\ 2004, \apjl, 607, L47
973:
974: \bibitem[Tan(2008)]{2008arXiv0801.4950T} Tan, J.~C.\ 2008, ArXiv e-prints,
975: 801, arXiv:0801.4950
976:
977: \bibitem[Tian et
978: al.(1996)]{1996A&AS..118..503T} Tian, K.~P., van Leeuwen, F., Zhao, J.~L., \& Su, C.~G.\ 1996, \aaps, 118, 503
979:
980: \bibitem[van Altena et al.(1988)]{1988AJ.....95.1744V} van Altena, W.~F.,
981: Lee, J.~T., Lee, J.-F., Lu, P.~K., \& Upgren, A.~R.\ 1988, \aj, 95, 1744
982:
983: \bibitem[Wall \& Jenkins(2003)]{2003psa..book.....W}
984: Wall, J.~V., \& Jenkins, C.~R.\ 2003, Practical Statistics for Astronomers
985: (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press),
986: Princeton Series in Astrophysics, vol. 3
987:
988: \bibitem[Wilson et al.(2000)]{2000ApJ...538..665W} Wilson, T.~L., Gaume,
989: R.~A., Gensheimer, P., \& Johnston, K.~J.\ 2000, \apj, 538, 665
990:
991: \bibitem[]{za04} Zapata, L. A., Rodr\'{\i}guez, L. F., Kurtz, S. E., \& O'Dell,
992: C. R.\ 2004, AJ, 127, 2252
993:
994:
995:
996:
997: \end{thebibliography}
998:
999: \clearpage
1000:
1001: \begin{table}
1002: \begin{center}
1003: %\scriptsize
1004: \small
1005: \caption{Parameters of the 3.6 cm Sources in Orion BN/KL$^a$\label{tbl-1}}
1006: \begin{tabular}{lcccc}
1007: \tableline\tableline
1008: &\multicolumn{2}{c}{Position$^b$} & Total Flux
1009: & \\
1010: \cline{2-3}
1011: Source & $\alpha$(J2000) & $\delta$(J2000) & Density (mJy) &
1012: Deconvolved Angular Size$^c$ \\
1013: \tableline
1014: BN object & 05 35 14.1099 & -05 22 22.741 & 4.8$\pm$0.1 &
1015: $0\rlap.{''}17\pm0\rlap.{''}01\times 0\rlap.{''}08\pm0\rlap.{''}03;~+63^\circ
1016: \pm 7^\circ$ \\%
1017: Orion$-$n & 05 35 14.3546 & -05 22 32.776 & 2.2$\pm$0.2 &
1018: $0\rlap.{''}50\pm 0\rlap.{''}04 \times \leq 0\rlap.{''}09 ;~+20^\circ
1019: \pm 3^\circ$ \\%
1020: GMR I & 05 35 14.5141 & -05 22 30.556 & 1.2$\pm$0.1 &
1021: $0\rlap.{''}19\pm 0\rlap.{''}05 \times \leq 0\rlap.{''}15 ;~+136^\circ
1022: \pm 23^\circ$ \\%
1023: GMR D & 05 35 14.8963 & -05 22 25.390 & 0.7$\pm$0.1 &
1024: $\leq 0\rlap.{''}20$ \\%
1025: \tableline
1026: \end{tabular}
1027: %% Any table notes must follow the \end{tabular} command.
1028: \tablenotetext{a}{The positions, flux densities and deconvolved sizes reported here are from
1029: the May 12, 2006 observations.}
1030: \tablenotetext{b}{Units of right
1031: ascension are hours, minutes, and seconds
1032: and units of declination are degrees, arcminutes, and arcseconds. Positional accuracy
1033: is estimated to be $\sim 0\rlap.{''}01$.}
1034: \tablenotetext{c}{Major axis $\times$ minor axis; position angle of major axis.}
1035: %\tablecomments{We can also attach a long-ish paragraph of explanatory
1036: %material to a table.}
1037: \end{center}
1038: \end{table}
1039:
1040: \clearpage
1041:
1042:
1043: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrr}
1044: \tablewidth{13.5cm}
1045: \tablecaption{Absolute Proper Motions of the Radio Sources\tablenotemark{a}}
1046: \tablehead{
1047: \colhead{} &
1048: \colhead{$\mu_{\alpha} \cos \delta$} &
1049: \colhead{$\mu_{\delta}$} &
1050: \colhead{$\mu_{total}$} &
1051: \colhead{P.A.} \\%
1052: \colhead{Source} &
1053: \colhead{(mas yr$^{-1}$)} &
1054: \colhead{(mas yr$^{-1}$)} &
1055: \colhead{(mas yr$^{-1}$)} &
1056: \colhead{($^\circ$)} \\%
1057: } \startdata
1058:
1059:
1060: BN object & $-$5.3 $\pm$ 0.9 & 9.4 $\pm$ 1.1 & 10.8 $\pm$ 1.0 & $-$29 $\pm$ 5 \\%
1061: Orion$-$n\tablenotemark{b} & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.9 & $-$13.0 $\pm$ 1.2 & 13.0 $\pm$ 1.2 & 180 $\pm$ 4\\%
1062: GMR I & 4.5 $\pm$ 1.2 & $-$5.7 $\pm$ 1.3 & 7.3 $\pm$ 1.2 & 142 $\pm$ 10 \\%
1063: GMR D & $-$0.4 $\pm$ 1.3 & $-$1.8 $\pm$ 1.6 & 1.8 $\pm$ 1.6 &$-$166 $\pm$ 42 \\%
1064:
1065: \enddata
1066: \tablenotetext{a }{The errors quoted in this Table are 1--$\sigma$. At a distance of
1067: 414 pc (Menten et al. 2007), 1 $mas~yr^{-1}$ is equivalent
1068: to 2.0 km s$^{-1}$.}
1069: \tablenotetext{b }{See text for the proper motions reported here.}
1070: \end{deluxetable}
1071:
1072: \clearpage
1073:
1074:
1075: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccc}
1076: \tablewidth{18.5cm}
1077: \tablecaption{VLA Data Used for the Determination of the Relative Proper Motions
1078: between BN and source I}
1079: \small
1080: \tablehead{
1081: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{$\lambda$}
1082: & \colhead{Synthesized Beam} & $\Delta \alpha$\tablenotemark{b} &
1083: $\Delta \delta$\tablenotemark{b} \\
1084: \colhead{Epoch} & \colhead{Project} & \colhead{(cm)}
1085: & \colhead{($\theta_M \times \theta_m; PA$)\tablenotemark{a}} & (seconds) & (arcsecs) \\
1086: }
1087: \startdata
1088: 1985 Jan 19 (1985.04) & AM143 & 1.3 & $0\rlap.{''}095\times0\rlap.{''}088;-7^\circ$ &
1089: -0.38540$\pm$0.00079 & 7.5123$\pm$0.0128 \\
1090: 1985 Jan 19 (1985.04) & AM143 & 2.0 & $0\rlap.{''}159\times0\rlap.{''}131;+32^\circ$ &
1091: -0.38550$\pm$0.00074 & 7.5105$\pm$0.0110 \\
1092: 1986 Apr 28 (1986.32) & AC146 & 2.0 & $0\rlap.{''}154\times0\rlap.{''}144;+10^\circ$ &
1093: -0.38678$\pm$0.00096 & 7.5202$\pm$0.0133 \\
1094: 1991 Sep 02 (1991.67) & AM335 & 1.3 & $0\rlap.{''}104\times0\rlap.{''}095;-16^\circ$&
1095: -0.39143$\pm$0.00074 & 7.5919$\pm$0.0110 \\
1096: 1994 Apr 29 (1994.33) & AM442 & 3.6 & $0\rlap.{''}227\times0\rlap.{''}198;+1^\circ$ &
1097: -0.39408$\pm$0.00070 & 7.6425$\pm$0.0108 \\
1098: 1995 Jul 22 (1995.56) & AM494 & 3.6 & $0\rlap.{''}262\times0\rlap.{''}320;+32^\circ$ &
1099: -0.39422$\pm$0.00079 & 7.6768$\pm$0.0116 \\
1100: 1996 Nov 21 (1996.89) & AM543 & 3.6 & $0\rlap.{''}324\times0\rlap.{''}253;+0^\circ$ &
1101: -0.39541$\pm$0.00073 & 7.6988$\pm$0.0117 \\
1102: 1997 Jan 11 (1997.03) & AM543 & 3.6 & $0\rlap.{''}329\times0\rlap.{''}246;-10^\circ$ &
1103: -0.39471$\pm$0.00078 & 7.7066$\pm$0.0122 \\
1104: 2000 Nov 10 (2000.86) & AM668 & 0.7 & $0\rlap.{''}059\times0\rlap.{''}046;-25^\circ$ &
1105: -0.39839$\pm$0.00068 & 7.7309$\pm$0.0102 \\
1106: 2000 Nov 13 (2000.87) & AM668 & 3.6 & $0\rlap.{''}244\times0\rlap.{''}223;+3^\circ$ &
1107: -0.39898$\pm$0.00078 & 7.7282$\pm$0.0121 \\
1108: 2002 Mar 31 (2002.25) & AG622 & 0.7 & $0\rlap.{''}047\times0\rlap.{''}025;+25^\circ$ &
1109: -0.40002$\pm$0.00079 & 7.7541$\pm$0.0131 \\
1110: 2004 Nov 06 (2004.85) & AB1135 & 3.6 & $0\rlap.{''}229\times0\rlap.{''}202;+1^\circ$ &
1111: -0.40249$\pm$0.00077 & 7.8079$\pm$0.0120 \\
1112: 2006 May 12 (2006.36) & AR593 & 3.6 & $0\rlap.{''}262\times0\rlap.{''}217;-2^\circ$ &
1113: -0.40426$\pm$0.00077 & 7.8142$\pm$0.0119 \\
1114: 2007 Dec 14 (2007.95) & AR635 & 0.7 & $0\rlap.{''}213\times0\rlap.{''}180;+20^\circ$ &
1115: -0.40410$\pm$0.00069 & 7.8365$\pm$0.0105 \\
1116:
1117: \enddata
1118: \tablenotetext{a}{Major axis$\times$minor axis in arcsec; PA in degrees}
1119: \tablenotetext{b}{Positional offsets of BN with respect to source I in
1120: right ascension and declination.}
1121:
1122: %% You can append references to a table using the \tablerefs command.
1123: \end{deluxetable}
1124:
1125: \clearpage
1126:
1127: \begin{figure}
1128: \epsscale{0.7}
1129: \plotone{f1.eps}
1130: \caption{Proper motions for the four persistent
1131: radio sources in the Orion BN/KL region.
1132: The solid lines are the least-squares fits to the data.
1133: The proper motions of source Orion-n are described in the text.
1134: \label{fig1}}
1135: \end{figure}
1136:
1137:
1138: \clearpage
1139:
1140: \begin{figure}
1141: %\epsscale{1.0}
1142: \plotone{f2.eps}
1143: \caption{VLA contour image at 8.46 GHz toward
1144: the Orion BN/KL region
1145: for epoch 2006.36.
1146: The first contour is 300
1147: $\mu$Jy beam$^{-1}$ and increments are in units
1148: of 150 $\mu$Jy beam$^{-1}$.
1149: The angular resolution of the image is
1150: $0\rlap.{''}26 \times 0\rlap.{''}22$; PA = $-2^\circ$.
1151: The individual radio sources are identified.
1152: The arrows indicate the direction and proper motion displacement for
1153: 200 years, in the rest frame of the Orion radio sources (G\'omez
1154: et al. 2005). The dashed angles indicate the error in the
1155: position angles of the proper motions.
1156: At a distance of
1157: 414 pc (Menten et al. 2007), 1 $mas~yr^{-1}$ is equivalent
1158: to 2.0 km s$^{-1}$
1159: \label{fig2}}
1160: \end{figure}
1161:
1162: \clearpage
1163:
1164: \begin{figure}
1165: %\epsscale{0.7}
1166: \epsscale{0.6}
1167: \plotone{f3.eps}
1168: \caption{Example 1. Positions and velocities on the plane XZ for 5 stars
1169: after 2.2 crossing times (650 years). The center
1170: of mass in marked by a cross. The Y component of the velocity vector
1171: of the runaway star (star 4) is small compared to
1172: the XZ components. The space
1173: velocities of the BN-I system lie mostly on the plane of the sky and are
1174: observed as transverse velocities. Thus, this figure is directly comparable to
1175: Figure 2 of the BN system in the present paper. In this
1176: example $V_{xz}(4)$ = 40 km s$^{-1}$, $V_{xz}(1+5)$ = 8.4 km s$^{-1}$,
1177: the major semiaxis of binary $a$(1+5) = 13.6 AU,
1178: and the binding energy of this binary is
1179: $E$(1+5)= $-2 \times 10^{47}$ ergs. The individual masses are $M(1) = M(2) =
1180: 16 M_\odot$, $M(3) = M(4) = 8M_\odot$, $M(5) = 20 M_\odot$. The total kinetic energy of
1181: stars 4, 2 and 3 plus that of the
1182: center of mass of the binary (1+5) is $1.9 \times 10^{47}$
1183: ergs. The runaway star (star 4)
1184: has reached a projected distance of 2879 AU from the center of mass, and the
1185: binary (1+5) a projected distance of 704 AU.
1186: \label{fig3}}
1187: \end{figure}
1188:
1189: \clearpage
1190:
1191:
1192:
1193: \begin{figure}
1194: %\epsscale{0.8}
1195: \epsscale{0.8}
1196: \plotone{f4.eps}
1197: \caption{Example 99. Similar to Figure 3, but on the plane YZ. In this
1198: example, $V_{yz}(5)$ = 30 km s$^{-1}$, $V_{yz}(1+2)$ = 18.7 km s$^{=1}$, $a$(1+2) = 7.6 AU,
1199: $E$(1+2) = $-3 \times 10^{47}$ ergs, and the total kinetic energy of stars 3,4 and 5 plus that of
1200: the center of mass of the binary (1+2) is $2.6 \times 10^{47}$ ergs. The runaway star
1201: (star 5) has reached a projected distance of 1163
1202: AU from the center of mass, and the binary (1+2)
1203: a projected distance of 557 AU.
1204: \label{fig4}}
1205: \end{figure}
1206:
1207: \clearpage
1208:
1209: \begin{figure}
1210: \epsscale{0.5}
1211: \plotone{f5.eps}
1212: \caption{Relative proper motions of BN with respect to source I.
1213: The data used for this graph is listed in Table 3. The dashed line
1214: is the weighted least-squares fit to the data points.
1215: The relative proper motions in right ascension and
1216: declination are $\mu_x = -0.0125 \pm 0.0004$ arcsec yr$^{-1}$
1217: and $\mu_y = 0.0144 \pm 0.0004$ arcsec yr$^{-1}$, respectively.
1218: \label{fig5}}
1219: \end{figure}
1220:
1221: \clearpage
1222:
1223: \begin{figure}
1224: \epsscale{1.0}
1225: \plotone{f6.eps}
1226: \caption{The Orion BN/KL and Trapezium region is
1227: shown in this figure. The sources BN and I are
1228: indicated (empty squares), as well as the componens A, B, C, and D
1229: of the Trapezium (filled squares). The proper motion of BN with respect to source I
1230: is shown with an arrow that starts in BN and points
1231: to the NW.
1232: The dashed lines that start in BN and point to the
1233: SE indicate the past cone of uncertainty of the motions of BN.
1234: The arrow and dashed lines that start in $\theta^1$ C Ori
1235: mark the proper motion and past cone of uncertainty of the motions of
1236: this source, respectively, taken from van Altena et al. (1988).
1237: In the arrows, one arcsec represents 0.5 mas yr$^{-1}$.
1238: \label{fig6}}
1239: \end{figure}
1240:
1241: \clearpage
1242:
1243: \begin{figure}
1244: \epsscale{1.0}
1245: \plotone{f7.eps}
1246: \caption{VLA contour image at 7 mm
1247: of BN, made from the dataset of Reid et al. (2007).
1248: Contours are -3, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48
1249: times the rms noise of the image (0.17 mJy beam$^{-1}$).
1250: The half power contour of the restoring beam, with diameter of
1251: $0\rlap.{''}041$, is shown in the top right corner.
1252: \label{fig7}}
1253: \end{figure}
1254:
1255:
1256:
1257: \clearpage
1258:
1259: \begin{figure}
1260: \epsscale{1.0}
1261: \plotone{f8.eps}
1262: \caption{VLA contour images at 8.46 GHz
1263: of the source Orion-n for the four epochs discussed.
1264: Contours are -4, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10 ,12 and 15
1265: times the rms noise of the images
1266: (99, 90, 55, and 58 $\mu$Jy beam$^{-1}$ for the 1991.68,
1267: 1995.56, 2000.87, and 2006.36 epochs, respectively).
1268: The half power contour of the synthesized beams
1269: ($0\rlap.{''}26 \times 0\rlap.{''}25$; PA = $-54^\circ$,
1270: $0\rlap.{''}26 \times 0\rlap.{''}22$; PA = $+34^\circ$,
1271: $0\rlap.{''}24 \times 0\rlap.{''}22$; PA = $+3^\circ$, and
1272: $0\rlap.{''}26 \times 0\rlap.{''}22$; PA = $-2^\circ$,
1273: for the 1991.68,
1274: 1995.56, 2000.87, and 2006.36 epochs, respectively)
1275: are shown in the bottom left corner of each panel
1276: as a filled ellipse. The dashed line is intended
1277: to guide the eye for the approximate proper motions over the years.
1278: \label{fig8}}
1279: \end{figure}
1280:
1281:
1282: \clearpage
1283:
1284: \begin{figure}
1285: \epsscale{0.6}
1286: \plotone{f9.eps}
1287: \caption{Stokes I (top) and percentage of
1288: circular polarization (bottom) for the source GMR A
1289: during the 2006 May 12 flare.
1290: \label{fig9}}
1291: \end{figure}
1292:
1293:
1294: \end{document}
1295:
1296: