1: \documentclass{emulateapj}
2:
3: \begin{document}
4:
5: \shortauthors{Luhman \& Muench}
6: \shorttitle{Low-Mass Members of Chamaeleon~I}
7:
8: \title{New Low-Mass Stars and Brown Dwarfs with Disks in the Chamaeleon~I
9: Star-Forming Region\altaffilmark{1}}
10:
11: \author{
12: K. L. Luhman\altaffilmark{2} \& A. A. Muench\altaffilmark{3}}
13:
14: \altaffiltext{1}
15: {Based on observations performed with the Magellan Telescopes
16: at Las Campanas Observatory and the {\it Spitzer Space Telescope}.
17: }
18:
19: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, The Pennsylvania
20: State University, University Park, PA 16802; kluhman@astro.psu.edu.}
21:
22: \altaffiltext{3}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge,
23: MA 02138.}
24:
25: \begin{abstract}
26:
27: We have used images obtained with the Infrared Array Camera and the
28: Multiband Imaging Photometer onboard the {\it Spitzer Space Telescope}
29: to search for low-mass stars and brown dwarfs with circumstellar disks
30: in the Chamaeleon~I star-forming region.
31: Through optical spectroscopy of sources with red colors in these data,
32: we have identified seven new disk-bearing members of the cluster.
33: Three of these objects are probably brown dwarfs according to their spectral
34: types (M8, M8.5, M8-L0).
35: Three of the other new members may have edge-on disks based on the shapes of
36: their infrared spectral energy distributions.
37: One of the possible edge-on systems has a steeply rising slope from
38: 4.5 to 24~\micron, indicating that it could be a class~I source
39: (star+disk+envelope) rather than a class~II source (star+disk).
40: If so, then it would be one of the least massive known class~I protostars
41: (M5.75, $M\sim0.1$~$M_\odot$).
42:
43: \end{abstract}
44:
45: \keywords{accretion disks --- planetary systems: protoplanetary disks --- stars:
46: formation --- stars: low-mass, brown dwarfs --- stars: pre-main sequence}
47:
48: \section{Introduction}
49: \label{sec:intro}
50:
51:
52: Observations of circumstellar accretion disks around young stars provide
53: fundamental constraints on the processes of star and planet formation.
54: Such studies are facilitated by the identification of large, representative
55: samples of disk-bearing members of star-forming regions.
56: The most obvious signature of a disk around a young star is the presence
57: of emission at infrared (IR) wavelengths in excess above that expected
58: from a stellar photosphere.
59: One approach to applying this diagnostic has been to obtain mid-IR photometry
60: ($\lambda\sim5$-20~\micron) for known members of star-forming regions
61: \citep{kh95}. However, the resulting sample of stars is
62: biased by the selection criteria that were originally used to discover
63: those objects. For instance, stars that are heavily obscured by edge-on disks,
64: protostellar envelopes, or molecular clouds are mostly
65: absent from optically-selected samples of young stars.
66: Alternatively, wide-field mid-IR images of star-forming regions can be used
67: to search for stars with disks in a relatively unbiased fashion.
68: The feasibility of such surveys has steadily improved over the past two
69: decades with advances in IR telescopes and detectors.
70: The {\it Infrared Astronomical Satellite} ({\it IRAS}) imaged most of the sky
71: in four mid- and far-IR bands, producing the first comprehensive census of
72: disks around young stars. However, because of its low spatial resolution,
73: {\it IRAS} was capable of resolving young stellar populations only
74: in low-density regions like Taurus \citep{bei86,ken90}.
75: The better resolution and sensitivity of the
76: {\it Infrared Space Observatory} ({\it ISO}) allowed it to extend
77: mid-IR surveys to denser clusters and lower stellar
78: masses, including a few brown dwarfs \citep{per00,com98,com00,nt01,pas03}.
79: Ground-based cameras equipped with large-format IR detector arrays have
80: offered even higher spatial resolution \citep{lada00,hai01}, but are
81: restricted to the shortest IR bands where excess emission from disks is
82: smaller ($\lambda\sim1$-4~\micron).
83:
84:
85: The {\it Spitzer Space Telescope} \citep{wer04} offers the best available
86: combination of field of view, sensitivity, spatial resolution, and
87: wavelength coverage for identifying young stars with disks
88: \citep{all04,gut04,meg04,muz04}.
89: The unique capabilities of {\it Spitzer} have been applied to a
90: large number of star-forming regions \citep[][references therein]{luh08cha}.
91: One of the primary objectives of these surveys is the extension of
92: previous samples of disk-bearing stars to lower stellar masses.
93: In an attempt to reach the lowest possible masses, {\it Spitzer} data have
94: been used to search for new low-mass stars and brown dwarfs with disks
95: in the nearest molecular clouds, including
96: Taurus \citep{luh06tau2}, Perseus \citep{mue07}, Lupus \citep{all07},
97: Chamaeleon, and Ophiuchus \citep{allers06,allers07,luh05cha,luh08cha}.
98: We have continued this work by performing optical spectroscopy on
99: candidate low-mass objects in Chamaeleon~I
100: \citep[$d=160$-170~pc,][]{whi97,wic98,ber99}.
101: In this paper, we describe the selection of these candidates from
102: {\it Spitzer} images (\S~\ref{sec:select}) and measure their optical
103: spectral types
104: (\S~\ref{sec:spectra}). We then characterize the stellar parameters,
105: spatial distribution, and spectral energy distributions of the confirmed
106: members (\S~\ref{sec:prop}) and
107: summarize their notable properties (\S~\ref{sec:disc}).
108: In the Appendix, we present measurements of {\it Spitzer}
109: photometry for all known members of Chamaeleon~I that appear in
110: the latest images of the region.
111:
112:
113:
114: \section{Selection of Candidate Members of Chamaeleon~I}
115: \label{sec:select}
116:
117:
118: To search for new disk-bearing members of Chamaeleon~I, we
119: use images at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and 8.0~\micron\ obtained with
120: {\it Spitzer}'s Infrared Array Camera \citep[IRAC;][]{faz04} and
121: images at 24~\micron\ obtained with the Multiband Imaging Photometer for
122: {\it Spitzer} \citep[MIPS;][]{rie04}.
123: We consider all observations of this kind that have been performed in
124: Chamaeleon~I, most of which were reduced and analyzed by \citet{luh08cha}.
125: The photometric catalog produced by \citet{luh08cha} is used for this study.
126: The remaining observations of Chamaeleon~I that were not examined by
127: \citet{luh08cha} were obtained through the {\it Spitzer} Legacy program of
128: L. Allen, which has a program identification of 30574.
129: The Astronomical Observation Request (AOR) identifications are
130: 19986432, 19992832, 20006400, 20012800, 20014592, and 20015104 for the
131: IRAC observations and
132: 19978496, 19979264, 20010240, and 20011008 for the MIPS observations.
133: The IRAC and MIPS images were collected on 2007 May 15-17 and 2007 April 5
134: and were processed with the Spitzer Science Center (SSC) S16.1.0 and
135: S16.0.1 pipelines, respectively.
136: We combined the images produced by the SSC pipeline into mosaics
137: using R. Gutermuth's WCSmosaic IDL package. We then identified all point
138: sources appearing in the resulting mosaics using the IRAF task STARFIND and
139: measured aperture photometry for them using the IRAF task PHOT. The details
140: of these procedures are the same as those described by \citet{luh08cha}.
141: The total exposure times for the IRAC and MIPS images at a given
142: position were 41.6 and $\sim$30~s, respectively.
143: The boundaries of the IRAC and MIPS mosaics are indicated in the maps
144: of Chamaeleon~I in Figure~\ref{fig:map}.
145: In a given filter, the three IRAC mosaics cover areas of 0.10, 0.20, and
146: 0.31~deg$^2$. The two MIPS mosaics at 24~\micron\ encompass 1.4 and
147: 0.71~deg$^2$. The IRAC and MIPS photometric measurements from these
148: images for known members of Chamaeleon~I are presented in the Appendix.
149:
150: \citet{luh08cha} identified eight promising candidate members of Chamaeleon~I
151: in the {\it Spitzer} images that they analyzed. Those sources exhibit
152: red IRAC and MIPS colors that are indicative of circumstellar disks and
153: are located in the vicinity of known members of the star-forming region.
154: The candidacy of one of these objects, 2MASS~J11025374$-$7722561,
155: is also supported by its optical and near-IR colors \citep{lm04,luh07cha}.
156: To assess their membership, we selected for spectroscopy the six candidates
157: that are bright enough for optical spectroscopy, consisting of
158: 2MASS J11020610$-$7718079, 2MASS J11025374$-$7722561,
159: Cha J11062854$-$7618039, 2MASS J11085367$-$7521359, \\
160: 2MASS J11100336$-$7633111 (also known as OTS~32), and 2MASS J11291470$-$7546256.
161: We also performed spectroscopy on 2MASS~J11095493$-$7635101, which was not
162: discussed by \citet{luh08cha}. It is a promising candidate because of its
163: red {\it Spitzer} colors and its close proximity to young stars in the
164: Cederblad~112 reflection nebula.
165: Using the new {\it Spitzer} data from program 30574 that we have reduced
166: in this work, we searched for possible young stars with disks with the same
167: criteria that were employed by \citet{luh08cha}, namely
168: $[3.6]-[4.5]>0.15$, $[5.8]-[8.0]>0.3$, and errors less than 0.1~mag in
169: all four bands. From the resulting candidates, we selected
170: 2MASS J10533978$-$7712338 and Cha J11122701$-$7715173 for spectroscopy.
171: Finally, we included in our spectroscopic sample 2MASS J11091297$-$7729115,
172: which is the remaining bright candidate member appearing
173: in the optical and near-IR color-magnitude diagrams from \citet{luh07cha}.
174:
175:
176:
177: \section{Spectroscopy of Candidates}
178: \label{sec:spectra}
179:
180: \subsection{Observations}
181:
182: We obtained long-slit optical spectra of the 10 candidate members of
183: Chamaeleon~I that were selected in \S~\ref{sec:select} using the
184: Low Dispersion Survey Spectrograph (LDSS-3) on the Magellan~II Telescope
185: on the nights of 2007 December 17 and 18.
186: The spectra were taken through a 1.1$\arcsec$ slit.
187: The instrument was operated with the VPH All and VPH Red grisms on
188: the first and second nights, respectively, resulting in
189: spectral resolutions of 10 and 5.5~\AA\ at 7500~\AA.
190: All data were obtained with the slit rotated to the parallactic angle.
191: After bias subtraction and flat-fielding, the spectra were extracted and
192: calibrated in wavelength with arc lamp data. The spectra were then corrected
193: for the sensitivity functions of the detectors, which were measured from
194: observations of a spectrophotometric standard star.
195:
196:
197: \subsection{Spectral Classification}
198:
199:
200: We now examine the LDSS-3 spectra for the evidence of youth that is
201: expected for members of Chamaeleon~I.
202: The spectrum of 2MASS~J11291470$-$7546256 exhibits emission lines that
203: are indicative of a galaxy. Although the signal-to-noise ratio of its
204: data is low, we conclude that Cha~J11122701$-$7715173 is probably a
205: background source rather than a low-mass member of the cluster based on
206: the relatively blue slope and absence of late-type spectral features
207: in its spectrum.
208: The remaining eight candidates do show spectral signatures
209: of young objects, such as strong H$\alpha$ emission and weak
210: Na~I and K~I absorption lines. We also detect He~I emission at 6678~\AA\ from
211: 2MASS~J11085367$-$7521359 and Ca~II emission from OTS~32 and
212: Cha~J11062854$-$7618039.
213: Therefore, we classify these eight objects as members of Chamaeleon~I.
214: The evidence of youth and membership is compiled in Table~\ref{tab:new}.
215: When these new members are combined with the membership lists from
216: \citet{luh07cha} and \citet{luh08cha}, the resulting census of Chamaeleon~I
217: contains 237 sources.
218:
219:
220: To measure spectral types for the eight new members, we have compared
221: their spectra to data for late-type members of
222: Chamaeleon~I and other star-forming regions \citep{luh04cha,luh07cha},
223: which were originally classified at optical wavelengths through comparison
224: to averages of dwarfs and giants \citep{luh99}.
225: The resulting classifications are presented in Table~\ref{tab:new}.
226: The spectra are shown in order of spectral type in Figure~\ref{fig:spec}.
227: The spectral type for Cha~J11062854$-$7618039 is more uncertain than
228: those of the other objects. A reasonable match to its spectrum is produced
229: by both M8 with $A_V\sim3$ and L0 with $A_V\sim1$.
230: The latter agrees somewhat better
231: with the data, but a spectrum with a higher signal-to-noise ratio in
232: the TiO band near 7200~\AA\ is needed for a definitive classification.
233: A spectral type of L0 would make Cha~J11062854$-$7618039 tied with
234: Cha J11070768$-$7626326 \citep{luh08cha} as the coolest known member of
235: Chamaeleon~I.
236:
237:
238: \section{Properties of New Members}
239: \label{sec:prop}
240:
241: \subsection{Stellar Parameters}
242: \label{sec:par}
243:
244: To examine the properties of the eight new members of Chamaeleon~I,
245: we begin by estimating their extinctions, effective temperatures,
246: bolometric luminosities, and masses.
247: Extinctions were derived from the optical spectra during the process
248: of spectral classification \citep{luh04cha,luh07cha}.
249: We have converted our spectral types to effective temperatures with the
250: temperature scale from \citet{luh03ic}.
251: Luminosities have been estimated from $J$-band photometry in the manner
252: described by \citet{luh07cha}. Because near-IR data are unavailable
253: for Cha~J11062854$-$7618039, we have estimated its $J$ magnitude by
254: combining its 3.6~\micron\ measurement with the average value of
255: $J-[3.6]$ for late-type members of Chamaeleon~I that do not have mid-IR excess
256: emission \citep{luh08cha}. By doing so, we are assuming that the disk emission
257: at 3.6~\micron\ is negligible compared to the stellar photosphere, which
258: is true for most brown dwarfs with disks \citep{luh05cha}.
259: The uncertainties in $A_J$, $J$, BC$_J$, and the distance modulus
260: ($\sigma\sim0.13$, 0.05, 0.1, 0.13) correspond to total uncertainties
261: of $\pm0.09$ in log~$L_{\rm bol}$.
262: The extinctions, temperatures, and luminosities for the
263: new members of Chamaeleon~I are listed in Table~\ref{tab:new}.
264: We also include the available near-IR photometry for these objects.
265:
266: The temperatures and luminosities of the new members are plotted on a
267: Hertzsprung-Russell (H-R) diagram in Figure~\ref{fig:hr}. For comparison,
268: we also show the previously known low-mass members of Chamaeleon~I
269: \citep{luh07cha,luh08cha} and the predictions of theoretical evolutionary
270: models \citep{bar98,cha00}.
271: The positions of the three coolest new members in Figure~\ref{fig:hr}
272: are within the sequence of known members and are indicative of substellar
273: masses. As discussed by \citet{luh08cha}, the precise value of the
274: mass estimate for a young late-type object depends on whether
275: it is derived from the temperature, the luminosity, or both.
276: The five other new members have masses ranging from 0.1 to 0.55~$M_\odot$
277: according to the data and models in Figure~\ref{fig:hr}. However, three of
278: these objects, OTS~32, 2MASS J11095493$-$7635101, and
279: 2MASS J10533978$-$7712338, appear below the cluster sequence.
280: The resulting isochronal ages ($\tau>30$~Myr) are unrealistically old
281: considering that these sources exhibit clear signatures of youth
282: ($\tau<10$~Myr). These anomalously low
283: luminosities may indicate that the stars are seen primarily in scattered light
284: (e.g., edge-on disks) at the shorter wavelengths from which the luminosities
285: were estimated. Indeed, we find that extended emission surrounds
286: 2MASS~J11095493$-$7635101 in the near-IR images of Chamaeleon~I
287: obtained by \citet{luh07cha}, supporting this hypothesis.
288: The nature of these sources is investigated further using their
289: spectral energy distributions in \S~\ref{sec:sed}.
290: We note that OTS~32 was originally identified as a possible member of
291: Chamaeleon~I through the detection of $K$-band excess emission
292: \citep{ots99,per99}. The faint near-IR magnitudes of this object were
293: suggestive of a substellar mass, but as we have shown, it is probably
294: a low-mass star based on its mid-M spectral type.
295:
296:
297:
298:
299: \subsection{Spatial Distribution}
300:
301:
302: The spatial positions of some of the new members of Chamaeleon~I merit
303: discussion.
304: Two of these objects, OTS~32 and 2MASS~J11095493$-$7635101, are within
305: the group of young stars toward the Cederblad~112 reflection nebula,
306: as shown in the optical and IR images in Figure~\ref{fig:image}.
307: All of the 24~\micron\ sources within that $5\arcmin\times5\arcmin$ field
308: are spectroscopically confirmed members of the cluster.
309: Two of the new members, 2MASS~J11085367$-$7521359 and 2MASS~J10533978$-$7712338,
310: are relatively far from the bulk of the stellar population of Chamaeleon~I.
311: The former is $1\arcdeg$ north of the cloud complex
312: and is separated by $2\arcmin$ from the proper motion members
313: RX~J1108.8$-$7519A and RX~J1108.8$-$7519B \citep{alc95,cov97,luh08cha}
314: and the latter is projected against a small cloudlet on the
315: western edge of Chamaeleon~I.
316: Finally, 2MASS~J11091297$-$7729115 is only $4\arcsec$ from T39A and T39B.
317: Thus, these stars may comprise a triple system.
318:
319:
320:
321:
322: \subsection{SED Classifications}
323: \label{sec:sed}
324:
325:
326: All but one of the new members of Chamaeleon~I were selected for spectroscopy
327: in \S~\ref{sec:select} based on red mid-IR colors that suggested the
328: presence of circumstellar disks. We now examine the IR spectral energy
329: distributions (SEDs) of these sources in more detail.
330: To construct these SEDs, we use $I$-band photometry from \citet{lm04},
331: the Third Release of the Deep Near-Infrared Survey of the Southern Sky
332: \citep[DENIS,][]{ep99}, and the Magellan IMACS images obtained by
333: \citet{luh07cha}, near-IR photometry from 2MASS and
334: \citet[][see Table~\ref{tab:new}]{luh07cha},
335: and mid-IR measurements from IRAC and MIPS that are listed in Table~6
336: from \citet{luh08cha} and in the Appendix.
337: The resulting SEDs for the new members are plotted in Figure~\ref{fig:sed}.
338: To determine if long-wavelength excess emission is present, we compare each
339: SED to an estimate of the SED of the stellar photosphere, which is
340: composed of the average colors of diskless stars near the spectral
341: type in question \citep{luh08cha}. The photospheric SEDs are reddened
342: according to the extinctions in Table~\ref{tab:new} and the reddening
343: laws from \citet{rl85} and \citet{fla07} and are normalized to the
344: $J$-band fluxes of the new members, except for 2MASS J11020610$-$7718079
345: and Cha~J11062854$-$7618039.
346: Because the available near-IR magnitudes of the former have large uncertainties,
347: the normalization is performed with the average of the $J$, $H$, and $K_s$
348: data. For Cha~J11062854$-$7618039, only IRAC and MIPS measurements are
349: available. Therefore, we scale its photospheric template to the flux at
350: 3.6~\micron. The emission from brown dwarfs with disks
351: at this wavelength is usually dominated by the photosphere, as
352: discussed in \S~\ref{sec:par} and illustrated in the SEDs for the other
353: late-type objects in Figure~\ref{fig:sed}.
354:
355: As expected, the seven IR-selected members exhibit significant excess
356: emission at long wavelengths relative to stellar photospheres.
357: The remaining member, 2MASS~J11091297$-$7729115, was identified as a
358: candidate through optical and near-IR color-magnitude diagrams \citep{luh07cha}.
359: Its SED agrees well with that of a stellar photosphere and shows no evidence
360: of disk emission.
361: To characterize the SEDs quantitatively, we use spectral slopes defined as
362: $\alpha= d$~log$(\lambda F_\lambda)/d$~log$(\lambda)$ \citep{lw84,adams87}.
363: As in \citet{luh08cha}, we compute slopes between four pairs of bands,
364: 2.2-8, 2.2-24, 3.6-8, and 3.6-24~\micron. We deredden these slopes
365: using the extinctions from Table~\ref{tab:new} and the reddening law
366: from \citet{fla07}.
367: The resulting values of $\alpha_{2-8}$, $\alpha_{2-24}$, $\alpha_{3.6-8}$,
368: and $\alpha_{3.6-24}$ are presented in Table~\ref{tab:alpha}.
369: We also include the equivalent widths of the H$\alpha$ emission line measured
370: from our spectra.
371: We classify each object as class~I, flat-spectrum, class~II, or class~III
372: by applying the thresholds from \citet{luh08cha} to the spectral
373: slopes, which follows the standard classification scheme for SEDs of
374: young stars \citep{lada87,gre94}.
375:
376: The SED classifications produced by $\alpha_{2-8}$, $\alpha_{2-24}$,
377: $\alpha_{3.6-8}$, and $\alpha_{3.6-24}$ agree with each other
378: for five sources, but not for OTS~32, 2MASS~J11095493$-$7635101,
379: and 2MASS~J10533978$-$7712338.
380: For the latter three objects, the SEDs become redder with longer wavelengths
381: such that the slopes ending at 8 and 24~\micron\ indicate class~II
382: and flat/class~I, respectively.
383: The distinctive behavior of these SEDs is indicative of stars that
384: are occulted by circumstellar material, such as edge-on disks
385: \citep{luh08cha}, which is consistent with the anomalously faint near-IR
386: magnitudes of these objects (\S~\ref{sec:par}). Indeed, the shape of
387: the SED of OTS~32 closely resembles that of 2MASS~J04381486+2611399,
388: which is a young brown dwarf in Taurus that has an edge-on disk
389: \citep{luh07edgeon}. Thus, we tentatively classify OTS~32 and
390: 2MASS~J10533978$-$7712338 as class~II sources with edge-on disks.
391: Because 2MASS~J11095493$-$7635101 exhibits a more steeply rising SED
392: at 24~\micron, it could be a class~I source.
393: The absence of excess emission at $\lambda<5$~\micron\ relative to
394: our estimate for its stellar photosphere may indicate the presence of an
395: inner cavity in its disk and envelope. Our SED classifications for
396: the new members are provided in Table~\ref{tab:alpha}.
397: Because the new class~I and class~II objects were identified as possible
398: members based on evidence of disks, they should
399: not be used in disk fraction measurements for Chamaeleon~I unless they
400: are encompassed by the completeness limits of another survey for members
401: that is unbiased in terms of disks.
402:
403:
404:
405:
406:
407: \section{Discussion}
408: \label{sec:disc}
409:
410:
411:
412: We conclude with a few remarks concerning notable aspects of
413: the eight new members of Chamaeleon~I that we have identified.
414: Three of the new members have spectral types later than M6, and thus
415: are likely to be brown dwarfs. The current census of Chamaeleon~I
416: now contains 33 known members later than M6.
417: One of the new late-type members is classified as M8-L0; a type of L0 would
418: make it one of the two coolest known members of the cluster and one of the
419: least massive objects known to harbor a circumstellar disk.
420: Additional optical spectroscopy
421: of this object is needed for a more definitive spectral classification.
422: Seven of our new members were identified as possible members based on
423: red mid-IR colors that indicated the presence of disks.
424: As noted in \S~\ref{sec:intro}, a sensitive mid-IR survey
425: of this kind is capable of finding disk-bearing young stars that are heavily
426: obscured. For instance, because stars with edge-on disks are seen primarily
427: in scattered light, they appear subluminous in optical color-magnitude
428: diagrams and thus can be overlooked by optical surveys.
429: Indeed, three of the new members exhibit properties that are indicative
430: of edge-on disks. High-resolution images and mid-IR spectroscopy are needed
431: to determine if edge-on disks are present \citep{luh07edgeon}.
432: One of the possible edge-on systems has a mass near the hydrogen burning mass
433: limit according to its M5.75 spectral type and could be in
434: the class~I stage based on its rising SED from 4.5 to 24~\micron.
435: In comparison, the coolest known class~I candidates prior to this work
436: were IRAS~04158+2805, IRAS~04248+2612, and IRAS~04489+3042 in Taurus
437: \citep{kh95,whi04}, which have optical spectral types of M5.25, M4.5, and M4,
438: respectively \citep{luh06tau1}\footnote{These spectral types were derived in
439: the same manner as the one for the new class~I source in Chamaeleon~I.
440: Slightly later spectral types for these three Taurus objects were reported by
441: \citet{whi04}.}. Thus, this new object in Chamaeleon~I may be one of the least
442: massive known class~I sources.
443:
444:
445: \acknowledgements
446:
447: K.~L. was supported by grant AST-0544588 from the National Science Foundation.
448: This publication makes use of data products from 2MASS, which
449: is a joint project of the University of Massachusetts and the Infrared
450: Processing and Analysis Center/California Institute of Technology, funded
451: by NASA and the NSF.
452:
453: \appendix
454:
455: \section{{\it Spitzer} Photometry for Known Members of Chamaeleon I}
456: \label{sec:app}
457:
458: \citet{luh08cha} presented {\it Spitzer} photometry for all members of
459: Chamaeleon~I that were known at that time and for a sample of candidate
460: members.
461: Those data were measured from all IRAC and MIPS 24~\micron\ images
462: within $3\arcdeg$ of the star-forming region, with the exception of
463: program 30574. As described in \S~\ref{sec:select}, we have reduced the
464: data from program 30574 and used them to search for new members.
465: In Table~\ref{tab:mem}, we present our IRAC and MIPS measurements for all
466: known members appearing in those data.
467: Five of the objects that we have confirmed as new members were presented
468: as candidates by \citet{luh08cha}. Thus, their {\it Spitzer} photometry is
469: provided in that study. One of the new members was identified in the
470: images from program 30574, and therefore is in Table~\ref{tab:mem}.
471: The remaining new members, 2MASS J11091297$-$7729115 and
472: 2MASS J11095493$-$7635101, were not in the lists of members and candidates in
473: \citet{luh08cha}.
474: We include all available {\it Spitzer} measurements for these objects
475: in Table~\ref{tab:mem}. The IRAC data for 2MASS J11091297$-$7729115
476: were obtained on 2004 June 10 and the IRAC and MIPS data for
477: 2MASS J11095493$-$7635101 were obtained on 2004 July 4 and 2004 April 11,
478: respectively. Table~\ref{tab:mem} and the tables in
479: \citet{luh08cha} represent a compilation of all IRAC and MIPS
480: 24~\micron\ measurements for all known members of Chamaeleon~I.
481:
482:
483: We briefly summarize the implications of the new {\it Spitzer} photometry
484: in Table~\ref{tab:mem} for our knowledge of the disk population in Chamaeleon~I.
485: Combining the data from \citet{luh08cha} and in Table~\ref{tab:mem},
486: IRAC and MIPS 24~\micron\ photometry has been measured for 208 and 166
487: members, respectively. Only eight of the 237 known members are outside
488: of all of the IRAC and MIPS images of this region.
489: Table~\ref{tab:mem} provides the first {\it Spitzer} photometry for
490: eleven previously known members. As a result, the SEDs of these objects
491: were not classified by \citet{luh08cha}. Based on our new photometry,
492: we classify T3A, T4, T5, T7, T8, T16, and T56 as class~II and
493: 2MASS~J11052272$-$7709290, Hn~7, Cam~2-42, and CHXR~57 as class~III.
494: \citet{luh08cha} did not compute spectral slopes like the ones in
495: Table~\ref{tab:alpha} for T6, T27, and CHXR~54 because they were outside of the
496: 8 and 24~\micron\ images considered in that study. As a result, they were
497: classified using the IRAC data that were available at shorter wavelengths.
498: Those classifications are confirmed by the full sets of IRAC and MIPS
499: photometry for these stars that we now have in Table~\ref{tab:mem}.
500: T54 was outside of the IRAC images considered by \citet{luh08cha},
501: and was classified as class~II based on a 24~\micron\ measurement alone.
502: Our new IRAC data for this star from Table~\ref{tab:mem}
503: do not exhibit excess emission and
504: instead are consistent with emission from a stellar photosphere.
505: This kind of SED in which excess emission suddenly appears at long
506: IR wavelengths is a signature of a disk with an inner hole, otherwise
507: known as a transitional disk \citep{cal02,cal05,dal05,esp07a,esp07b,fur07}.
508: The presence of a transitional disk has been confirmed through
509: through spectroscopy with the {\it Spitzer} Infrared Spectrograph
510: (Furlan et al., in preparation).
511: Finally, we find that T14A, ISO~91, T23, T35, and T47 have exhibited
512: significant variability (0.2-0.5~mag) between the IRAC and MIPS images from
513: 2004 that were analyzed by \citet{luh08cha} and the data from 2007 that are in
514: Table~\ref{tab:mem}. In general, the magnitude change is similar among all
515: of the IRAC bands for a given object and pair of epochs.
516: All of these variable stars are class~I or class~II, which provides
517: additional evidence that stars with disks exhibit greater mid-IR variability
518: than diskless stars \citep{liu96,bar05,luh08cha}.
519:
520:
521:
522:
523:
524:
525: \begin{thebibliography}{}
526:
527: \bibitem[Adams et al.(1987)]{adams87}
528: Adams, F. C., Lada, C. J., \& Shu, F. H. 1987, \apj, 571, 378
529:
530: \bibitem[Alcal\'a et al.(1995)]{alc95}
531: Alcal\'a, J. M., Krautter, J., Schmitt, J. H. M. M., Covino, E., Wichmann, R.,
532: \& Mundt, R. 1995, \aaps, 114, 109
533:
534: \bibitem[Allen et al.(2004)]{all04}
535: Allen, L. E., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 363
536:
537: \bibitem[Allen et al.(2007)]{all07}
538: Allen, P. R., et al. 2007, \apj, 657, 511
539:
540: \bibitem[Allers et al.(2006)]{allers06}
541: Allers, K. N., Kessler-Silacci, J. E., Cieza, L. A., \& Jaffe, D. T. 2006,
542: \apj, 644, 364
543:
544: \bibitem[Allers et al.(2007)]{allers07}
545: Allers, K. N., et al. 2007, \apj, 657, 511
546:
547: \bibitem[Baraffe et al.(1998)]{bar98}
548: Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F., \& Hauschildt, P. H. 1998, \aap, 337, 403
549:
550: \bibitem[Barsony et al.(2005)]{bar05}
551: Barsony, M., Ressler, M. E., \& Marsh, K. A. 2005, \apj, 630, 381
552:
553: \bibitem[Beichman et al.(1986)]{bei86}
554: Beichman, C. A., Myers, P. C., Emerson, J. P., Harris, S., Mathieu, R.,
555: Benson, P. J., \& Jennings, R. E. 1986, \apj, 307, 337
556:
557: \bibitem[Bertout et al.(1999)]{ber99}
558: Bertout, C., Robichon, N., \& Arenou, F. 1999, \aap, 352, 574
559:
560:
561: \bibitem[Calvet et al.(2002)]{cal02}
562: Calvet, N., D'Alessio, P., Hartmann, L., Wilner, D., Walsh, A., \& Sitko, M.
563: 2002, \apj, 568, 1008
564:
565: \bibitem[Calvet et al.(2005)]{cal05}
566: Calvet, N., et al. 2005, \apj, 630, L185
567:
568: \bibitem[Cambr\'esy et al.(1997)]{cam97}
569: Cambr\'esy, L., Epchtein, N., Copet, E., de Batz, B., Kimeswenger, S.,
570: Le Bertre, T., Rouan, D., \& Tiphene, D. 1997, \aap, 324, L5
571:
572: \bibitem[Chabrier et al.(2000)]{cha00}
573: Chabrier, G., Baraffe, I., Allard, F., \& Hauschildt, P. 2000, \apj, 542, L119
574:
575: \bibitem[Comer\'{o}n et al.(2000)]{com00}
576: Comer\'{o}n, F., Neuh\"{a}user, R., \& Kaas, A. A. 2000, \aap, 359, 269
577:
578: \bibitem[Comer\'{o}n et al.(1998)]{com98}
579: Comer\'{o}n, F., Rieke, G. H., Claes, P., Torra, J., \& Laureijs, R. J.
580: 1998, \aap, 335, 522
581:
582: \bibitem[Covino et al.(1997)]{cov97}
583: Covino, E., Alcal\'a, J. M., Allain, S., Bouvier, J., Terranegra, L., \&
584: Krautter, J. 1997, \aap, 328, 187
585:
586: \bibitem[D'Alessio et al.(2005)]{dal05}
587: D'Alessio, P., et al. 2005, \apj, 621, 461
588:
589:
590:
591: \bibitem[Epchtein et al.(1999)]{ep99}
592: Epchtein, N., et al. 1999, \aap, 349, 236
593:
594: \bibitem[Espaillat et al.(2007a)]{esp07a}
595: Espaillat, C., et al. 2007a, \apj, 664, L111
596:
597: \bibitem[Espaillat et al.(2007b)]{esp07b}
598: Espaillat, C., et al. 2007b, \apj, 670, L135
599:
600: \bibitem[Fazio et al.(2004)]{faz04}
601: Fazio, G. G., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 10
602:
603:
604:
605: \bibitem[Flaherty et al.(2007)]{fla07}
606: Flaherty, K. M., Pipher, J. L., Megeath, S. T., Winston, E. M.,
607: Gutermuth, R. A., Muzerolle, J., Allen, L. E., \& Fazio, G. G. 2007, \apj, 663,
608: 1069
609:
610: \bibitem[Furlan et al.(2007)]{fur07}
611: Furlan, E., et al. 2007, \apj, 644, 1176
612:
613:
614: \bibitem[Greene et al.(1994)]{gre94}
615: Greene, T. P., Wilking, B. A., Andr\'{e}, P., Young, E. T., \& Lada, C. J.
616: 1994, \apj, 434, 614
617:
618: \bibitem[Gutermuth et al.(2004)]{gut04}
619: Gutermuth, R. A., Megeath, S. T., Muzerolle, J., Allen, L. E., Pipher, J. L.,
620: Myers, P. C., \& Fazio, G. G. 2004, \apjs, 154, 374
621:
622: \bibitem[Haisch, Lada, \& Lada(2001)]{hai01}
623: Haisch, K. E., Lada, E. A., \& Lada, C. J. 2001, \apj, 553, L153
624:
625:
626: \bibitem[Kenyon \& Hartmann(1995)]{kh95}
627: Kenyon, S. J., \& Hartmann, L. 1995, \apjs, 101, 117
628:
629: \bibitem[Kenyon et al.(1990)]{ken90}
630: Kenyon, S. J., Hartmann, L. W., Strom, K. M., \& Strom, S. E. 1990, \aj, 99, 869
631:
632: \bibitem[Lada(1987)]{lada87}
633: Lada, C. J. 1987, in IAU Symp. 115, Star Forming Regions, ed. M. Peimbert \&
634: J. Jugaku (Dordrecht: Reidel), 1
635:
636: \bibitem[Lada et al.(2000)]{lada00}
637: Lada, C. J., Muench, A. A., Haisch, K. E., Lada, E. A., Alves, J. F.,
638: Tollestrup, E. V., \& Willner, S. P. 2000, \apj, 120, 3162
639:
640:
641: \bibitem[Lada \& Wilking(1984)]{lw84}
642: Lada, C. J., \& Wilking, B. A. 1984, \apj, 287, 610
643:
644: \bibitem[Liu et al.(1996)]{liu96}
645: Liu, M. C., et al. 1996, \apj, 461, 334
646:
647:
648: \bibitem[L\'opez Mart{\'\i} et al.(2004)]{lm04}
649: L\'opez Mart{\'\i}, B., Eisl\"{o}ffel, J., Scholz, A., \& Mundt, R. 2004, \aap,
650: 416, 555
651:
652: \bibitem[Luhman(1999)]{luh99}
653: Luhman, K. L. 1999, \apj, 525, 466
654:
655:
656: \bibitem[Luhman(2004)]{luh04cha}
657: Luhman, K. L. 2004, \apj, 602, 816
658:
659:
660:
661: \bibitem[Luhman(2006)]{luh06tau1}
662: Luhman, K. L. 2006, \apj, 645, 676
663:
664: \bibitem[Luhman(2007)]{luh07cha}
665: Luhman, K. L. 2007, \apjs, 173, 104
666:
667:
668: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(2005)]{luh05cha}
669: Luhman, K. L., Adame, L., D'Alessio, P., Calvet, N., Hartmann, L., Megeath,
670: S. T., \& Fazio, G. G. 2005, \apj, 635, L93
671:
672:
673:
674:
675:
676: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(2003)]{luh03ic}
677: Luhman, K. L., Stauffer, J. R., Muench, A. A., Rieke, G. H., Lada, E. A.,
678: Bouvier, J., \& Lada, C. J. 2003, \apj, 593, 1093
679:
680: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(2006)]{luh06tau2}
681: Luhman, K. L., Whitney, B. A., Meade, M. R., Babler, B. L., Indebetouw, R.,
682: Bracker, S., \& Churchwell, E. B. 2006, \apj, 647, 1180
683:
684:
685: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(2007)]{luh07edgeon}
686: Luhman, K. L., et al. 2007, \apj, 666, 1219
687:
688: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(2008)]{luh08cha}
689: Luhman, K. L., et al. 2008, \apj, 675, 1375
690:
691:
692:
693: \bibitem[Megeath et al.(2004)]{meg04}
694: Megeath, S. T., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 367
695:
696:
697:
698: \bibitem[Muench et al.(2007)]{mue07}
699: Muench, A. A., Lada, C. J., Luhman, K. L., Muzerolle, J., \& Young, E. 2007,
700: \aj, 134, 411
701:
702:
703:
704: \bibitem[Muzerolle et al.(2004)]{muz04}
705: Muzerolle, J., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 379
706:
707: \bibitem[Natta \& Testi(2001)]{nt01}
708: Natta, A., \& Testi, L. 2001, \aap, 376, L22
709:
710:
711: \bibitem[Oasa et al.(1999)]{ots99}
712: Oasa, Y., Tamura, M., \& Sugitani, K. 1999, \apj, 526, 336
713:
714: \bibitem[Pascucci et al.(2003)]{pas03}
715: Pascucci, I., Apai, D., Henning, Th., \& Dullemond, C. P. 2003, \apj, 590, L111
716:
717:
718: \bibitem[Persi et al.(1999)]{per99}
719: Persi, P., Marenzi, A. R., Kaas, A. A., Olofsson, G., Nordh, L., \& Roth, M.
720: 1999, \aj, 117, 439
721:
722: \bibitem[Persi et al.(2000)]{per00}
723: Persi, P., et al. 2000, \aap, 357, 219
724:
725:
726: \bibitem[Rieke \& Lebofsky(1985)]{rl85}
727: Rieke, G. H., \& Lebofsky, M. J. 1985, \apj, 288, 618
728:
729: \bibitem[Rieke et al.(2004)]{rie04}
730: Rieke, G. H. et al.\ 2004, \apjs, 154, 25
731:
732: \bibitem[Skrutskie et al.(2006)]{skr06}
733: Skrutskie, M., et al. 2006, \aj, 131, 1163
734:
735: \bibitem[Werner et al.(2004)]{wer04}
736: Werner, M. W., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 1
737:
738: \bibitem[White \& Hillenbrand(2004)]{whi04}
739: White, R. J., \& Hillenbrand, L. A. 2004, \apj, 616, 998
740:
741: \bibitem[Whittet et al.(1997)]{whi97}
742: Whittet, D. C. B., Prusti, T., Franco, G. A. P., Gerakines, P. A.,
743: Kilkenny, D., Larson, K. A., \& Wesselius, P. R. 1997, \aap, 327, 1194
744:
745: \bibitem[Wichmann et al.(1998)]{wic98}
746: Wichmann, R., Bastian, U., Krautter, J., Jankovics, I., \& Ruci\'nski, S. M.
747: 1998, \mnras, 301, L39
748:
749: \end{thebibliography}
750:
751: \clearpage
752:
753: \begin{deluxetable}{lllllllll}
754: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
755: \tablewidth{0pt}
756: \tablecaption{New Members of Chamaeleon I\label{tab:new}}
757: \tablehead{
758: \colhead{} &
759: \colhead{} &
760: \colhead{$T_{\rm eff}$\tablenotemark{b}} &
761: \colhead{} &
762: \colhead{$L_{\rm bol}$} &
763: \colhead{Membership} &
764: \colhead{} &
765: \colhead{} &
766: \colhead{} \\
767: \colhead{Name} &
768: \colhead{Spectral Type\tablenotemark{a}} &
769: \colhead{(K)} &
770: \colhead{$A_J$} &
771: \colhead{($L_\odot$)} &
772: \colhead{Evidence\tablenotemark{c}} &
773: \colhead{$J$\tablenotemark{d}} &
774: \colhead{$H$\tablenotemark{d}} &
775: \colhead{$K_s$\tablenotemark{d}}}
776: \startdata
777: 2M J10533978$-$7712338 & M2.75 & 3451 & 0.63 & 0.032\tablenotemark{e} & ex,$A_V$ & 13.28$\pm$0.02 & 12.14$\pm$0.03 & 11.58$\pm$0.02 \\
778: 2M J11020610$-$7718079 & M8 & 2710 & 0.56 & 0.0031 & e,ex,NaK & 15.63$\pm$0.08 & 14.81$\pm$0.07 & 14.26$\pm$0.09 \\
779: 2M J11025374$-$7722561\tablenotemark{f} & M8.5 & 2555 & 0.21 & 0.0015 & ex,NaK & 16.05$\pm$0.11 & \nodata & 14.70$\pm$0.13 \\
780: Cha J11062854$-$7618039 & M8-L0 & $\sim$2400 & $\sim$0.3 & $\sim$0.001 & e,ex,NaK & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
781: 2M J11085367$-$7521359\tablenotemark{g} & M1.5 & 3632 & 0.28 & 0.23 & e,ex & 10.98$\pm$0.03 & 10.07$\pm0.03$ & 9.56$\pm$0.03 \\
782: 2M J11091297$-$7729115\tablenotemark{h} & M3 & 3415 & 0.14 & 0.16 & NaK & 11.00$\pm$0.04 & 10.27$\pm$0.03 & 9.98$\pm$0.03 \\
783: 2M J11095493$-$7635101 & M5.75 & 3024 & 0.42 & 0.0014\tablenotemark{e} & e,ex,NaK,$A_V$ & 16.34$\pm$0.03 & 15.47$\pm$0.02 & 15.13$\pm$0.03 \\
784: 2M J11100336$-$7633111\tablenotemark{i} & M4$\pm$1 & 3270 & 1.7 & 0.0025\tablenotemark{e} & e,ex,$A_V$ & 17.06$\pm$0.02 & 15.29$\pm$0.02 & 14.01$\pm$0.02 \\
785: \enddata
786: \tablenotetext{a}{Uncertainties are $\pm0.25$ subclass unless noted otherwise.
787: These uncertainties represent the precision within the optical
788: classification scheme adopted in this work \citep{luh99}.}
789: \tablenotetext{b}{Converted from the spectral types using the temperature
790: scale from \citet{luh03ic}. In addition to the errors in the spectral type,
791: these temperature estimates are subject to a systematic uncertainty
792: in the temperature scale \citep{luh08cha}, which is probably at least
793: $\pm100$~K.}
794: \tablenotetext{c}{Membership in Chamaeleon is indicated by $A_V\gtrsim1$ and
795: a position above the main sequence for the distance of Chamaeleon (``$A_V$"),
796: strong emission lines (``e"), Na~I and K~I strengths intermediate
797: between those of dwarfs and giants (``NaK"), or IR excess emission (``ex").}
798: \tablenotetext{d}{From the ISPI images of \citet{luh07cha} for
799: 2M~J11095493$-$7635101 and 2M~J11100336$-$7633111 and from the
800: Point Source Catalog of the Two-Micron All-Sky Survey \citep[2MASS,][]{skr06}
801: for the remaining sources.}
802: \tablenotetext{e}{This star may have an edge-on disk. If so, this luminosity
803: estimate is not reliable.}
804: \tablenotetext{f}{[LES2004] 424.}
805: \tablenotetext{g}{$2\arcmin$ from RX~J1108.8$-$7519A and RX~J1108.8$-$7519B.}
806: \tablenotetext{h}{$4\arcsec$ from T39A and T39B.}
807: \tablenotetext{i}{OTS 32. $18\arcsec$ from Hn 11.}
808: \end{deluxetable}
809:
810: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrrr}
811: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
812: \tablewidth{0pt}
813: \tablecaption{H$\alpha$ and Spectral Slopes for New Members of Chamaeleon I\label{tab:alpha}}
814: \tablehead{
815: \colhead{} &
816: \colhead{$W_{\lambda}$(H$\alpha$)} &
817: \colhead{} &
818: \colhead{} &
819: \colhead{} &
820: \colhead{} &
821: \colhead{} \\
822: \colhead{Name} &
823: \colhead{(\AA)} &
824: \colhead{$\alpha$(2-8~\micron)} &
825: \colhead{$\alpha$(2-24~\micron)} &
826: \colhead{$\alpha$(3.6-8~\micron)} &
827: \colhead{$\alpha$(3.6-24~\micron)} &
828: \colhead{SED Class}
829: }
830: \startdata
831: 2M J10533978$-$7712338 & 8$\pm$1 & $-$1.58 & $-$0.50 & $-$0.90 & 0.06 & II \\
832: 2M J11020610$-$7718079 & $\sim$100 & $-$1.49 & $-$1.09 & $-$1.64 & $-$1.04 & II \\
833: 2M J11025374$-$7722561 & $\sim$10 & $-$1.65 & $-$1.01 & $-$1.87 & $-$0.94 & II \\
834: Cha J11062854$-$7618039 & $>$100 & \nodata & \nodata & $-$1.67 & $-$1.04 & II \\
835: 2M J11085367$-$7521359 & 82$\pm$3 & $-$1.68 & $-$1.14 & $-$2.01 & $-$1.14 & II \\
836: 2M J11091297$-$7729115 & 6.3$\pm$0.3 & $-$2.77 & \nodata & $-$3.00 & \nodata & III \\
837: 2M J11095493$-$7635101 & 40$\pm$10 & $-$0.31 & 0.88 & 1.06 & 1.76 & I or II \\
838: 2M J11100336$-$7633111 & $\sim$20 & $-$0.64 & 0.36 & $-$0.61 & 0.62 & II \\
839: \enddata
840: \end{deluxetable}
841:
842: \begin{deluxetable}{lllllll}
843: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
844: \tablewidth{0pt}
845: \tablecaption{{\it Spitzer} Photometry for Known Members of
846: Chamaeleon I\label{tab:mem}}
847: \tablehead{
848: \colhead{2MASS\tablenotemark{a}} &
849: \colhead{Name} &
850: \colhead{[3.6]} &
851: \colhead{[4.5]} &
852: \colhead{[5.8]} &
853: \colhead{[8.0]} &
854: \colhead{[24]}
855: }
856: \startdata
857: J10533978$-$7712338 & \nodata & 11.49$\pm$0.02 & 11.09$\pm$0.02 & 10.60$\pm$0.03 & 9.76$\pm$0.04 & 5.28$\pm$0.04 \\
858: J10555973$-$7724399 & T3A & out & out & out & out & 2.37$\pm$0.04 \\
859: J10563044$-$7711393 & T4 & 8.31$\pm$0.02 & out & 7.58$\pm$0.03 & out & 3.25$\pm$0.04 \\
860: J10574219$-$7659356 & T5 & 8.74$\pm$0.02 & out & 8.07$\pm$0.03 & out & 4.35$\pm$0.04 \\
861: J10580597$-$7711501 & \nodata & out & out & out & out & 7.21$\pm$0.05 \\
862: J10581677$-$7717170 & T6 & out & out & out & out & 1.94$\pm$0.04 \\
863: J10590108$-$7722407 & T7 & out & out & out & out & 3.45$\pm$0.04 \\
864: J10590699$-$7701404 & T8 & out & out & out & out & 1.78$\pm$0.04 \\
865: J11013205$-$7718249 & ESO H$\alpha$ 554 & 13.08$\pm$0.02 & out & 12.92$\pm$0.04 & out & \nodata \\
866: J11020610$-$7718079 & \nodata & 13.43$\pm$0.02 & out & 12.81$\pm$0.04 & out & 9.49$\pm$0.22 \\
867: J11025374$-$7722561 & [LES2004] 424 & out & out & out & out & 9.65$\pm$0.18 \\
868: J11025504$-$7721508 & T12 & out & out & out & out & 5.88$\pm$0.04 \\
869: J11034764$-$7719563 & Hn 2 & 9.70$\pm$0.02 & out & 9.53$\pm$0.03 & out & 9.41$\pm$0.18 \\
870: J11035682$-$7721329 & CHXR 12 & out & out & out & out & 9.31$\pm$0.15 \\
871: J11042275$-$7718080 & T14A & 10.59$\pm$0.02 & 9.79$\pm$0.02 & 8.95$\pm$0.03 & 7.71$\pm$0.04 & 3.40$\pm$0.04 \\
872: J11044258$-$7741571 & ISO 52 & out & 9.81$\pm$0.02 & out & 9.01$\pm$0.04 & out \\
873: J11045701$-$7715569 & T16 & 9.80$\pm$0.02 & 9.57$\pm$0.02 & 9.18$\pm$0.04 & 8.63$\pm$0.04 & 6.11$\pm$0.04 \\
874: J11051467$-$7711290 & Hn 4 & 9.26$\pm$0.02 & 9.16$\pm$0.02 & 9.12$\pm$0.03 & 9.18$\pm$0.04 & 8.92$\pm$0.11 \\
875: J11052272$-$7709290 & \nodata & 11.48$\pm$0.02 & 11.39$\pm$0.02 & 11.38$\pm$0.03 & 11.37$\pm$0.04 & \nodata \\
876: J11054300$-$7726517 & CHXR 15 & out & out & out & out & 9.09$\pm$0.14 \\
877: J11061540$-$7721567 & Ced 110-IRS2/T21 & 6.25$\pm$0.02 & out & 6.14$\pm$0.03 & out & 5.58$\pm$0.07 \\
878: J11062942$-$7724586 & \nodata & out & out & out & out & 8.70$\pm$0.20 \\
879: \nodata & Cha-MMS1 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 8.94$\pm$0.15 \\
880: J11063799$-$7743090 & Cha H$\alpha$ 12 & out & 11.21$\pm$0.02 & out & 11.14$\pm$0.03 & out \\
881: J11064346$-$7726343 & T22 & out & out & out & out & 8.86$\pm$0.17 \\
882: J11064510$-$7727023 & CHXR 20 & out & out & out & out & 4.41$\pm$0.04 \\
883: J11064658$-$7722325 & Ced 110-IRS4 & 10.91$\pm$0.05 & out & 9.23$\pm$0.04 & out & 2.02$\pm$0.04 \\
884: J11065803$-$7722488 & ISO 86 & 10.22$\pm$0.02 & out & 8.27$\pm$0.03 & out & 3.66$\pm$0.04 \\
885: J11065906$-$7718535 & T23 & 9.76$\pm$0.02 & 9.41$\pm$0.02 & 8.96$\pm$0.03 & 7.99$\pm$0.04 & 5.07$\pm$0.04 \\
886: J11070369$-$7724307 & \nodata & out & out & out & out & 7.30$\pm$0.05 \\
887: J11070919$-$7723049 & Ced 110-IRS6 & 8.00$\pm$0.02 & out & 6.39$\pm$0.03 & out & 1.64$\pm$0.04 \\
888: J11070925$-$7718471 & ISO 91 & 10.56$\pm$0.02 & 10.15$\pm$0.02 & 9.76$\pm$0.03 & 8.98$\pm$0.04 & 5.35$\pm$0.04 \\
889: J11071148$-$7746394 & CHXR 21 & out & 9.25$\pm$0.02 & out & 9.24$\pm$0.04 & out \\
890: J11071622$-$7723068 & ISO 97 & 9.42$\pm$0.02 & out & 8.24$\pm$0.03 & out & 4.00$\pm$0.04 \\
891: J11072142$-$7722117 & B35 & 9.55$\pm$0.02 & out & 8.30$\pm$0.03 & out & 3.55$\pm$0.04 \\
892: J11072825$-$7652118 & T27 & 9.06$\pm$0.02 & 8.74$\pm$0.02 & 8.47$\pm$0.03 & 7.63$\pm$0.04 & 4.53$\pm$0.04 \\
893: J11073832$-$7747168 & ESO H$\alpha$ 560 & 10.66$\pm$0.02 & out & 10.56$\pm$0.03 & out & out \\
894: J11075588$-$7727257 & CHXR 28 & out & out & out & out & 7.29$\pm$0.04 \\
895: J11075730$-$7717262 & CHXR 30B & 8.16$\pm$0.02 & 7.56$\pm$0.02 & 7.21$\pm$0.03 & 6.82$\pm$0.04 & 3.95$\pm$0.04 \\
896: J11075993$-$7715317 & ESO H$\alpha$ 561 & 10.73$\pm$0.02 & 10.57$\pm$0.02 & 10.54$\pm$0.03 & 10.55$\pm$0.03 & \nodata \\
897: J11080002$-$7717304 & CHXR 30A & 8.49$\pm$0.02 & 8.28$\pm$0.02 & 7.97$\pm$0.03 & 7.32$\pm$0.03 & 5.44$\pm$0.11 \\
898: J11082570$-$7716396 & \nodata & 13.56$\pm$0.02 & 13.08$\pm$0.02 & 12.73$\pm$0.04 & 12.14$\pm$0.04 & 9.44$\pm$0.18 \\
899: J11082650$-$7715550 & ISO 147 & 11.58$\pm$0.02 & 11.22$\pm$0.02 & 10.91$\pm$0.03 & 10.27$\pm$0.03 & 7.63$\pm$0.05 \\
900: J11083905$-$7716042 & T35 & 8.71$\pm$0.02 & 8.45$\pm$0.02 & 8.27$\pm$0.03 & 8.21$\pm$0.04 & 4.75$\pm$0.04 \\
901: J11085464$-$7702129 & T38 & 8.58$\pm$0.02 & 8.09$\pm$0.02 & 7.73$\pm$0.03 & 7.20$\pm$0.03 & 3.96$\pm$0.04 \\
902: J11090512$-$7709580 & Hn 7 & 10.67$\pm$0.02 & 10.55$\pm$0.02 & 10.61$\pm$0.03 & 10.57$\pm$0.03 & \nodata \\
903: J11091297$-$7729115 & \nodata & 9.80$\pm$0.08 & 9.77$\pm$0.08 & 9.64$\pm$0.10 & 9.91$\pm$0.12 & \nodata \\
904: J11092913$-$7659180 & [LES2004] 602 & 11.75$\pm$0.02 & 11.62$\pm$0.02 & 11.56$\pm$0.03 & 11.53$\pm$0.04 & \nodata \\
905: J11093777$-$7710410 & Cam 2-42 & 8.69$\pm$0.02 & 8.55$\pm$0.02 & 8.41$\pm$0.03 & 8.43$\pm$0.03 & 7.94$\pm$0.07 \\
906: J11094260$-$7725578 & C7-1 & out & out & out & out & 6.55$\pm$0.04 \\
907: J11094742$-$7726290 & B43 & out & out & out & out & 4.41$\pm$0.04 \\
908: J11094866$-$7714383 & ISO 209 & 11.28$\pm$0.02 & 10.82$\pm$0.02 & 10.46$\pm$0.03 & 9.85$\pm$0.03 & 7.25$\pm$0.04 \\
909: J11095336$-$7728365 & ISO 220 & out & out & out & out & 7.25$\pm$0.05 \\
910: J11095493$-$7635101 & \nodata & 15.00$\pm$0.13 & 14.43$\pm$0.23 & \nodata & 11.59$\pm$0.08 & 5.30$\pm$0.20 \\
911: J11100785$-$7727480 & ISO 235 & out & out & out & out & 6.36$\pm$0.04 \\
912: J11102852$-$7716596 & Hn 12W & 10.37$\pm$0.02 & 10.25$\pm$0.02 & 10.26$\pm$0.03 & 10.22$\pm$0.04 & \nodata \\
913: J11103481$-$7722053 & [LES2004] 405 & 9.65$\pm$0.02 & 9.52$\pm$0.02 & 9.42$\pm$0.03 & 9.48$\pm$0.03 & 9.06$\pm$0.11 \\
914: J11103644$-$7722131 & ISO 250 & 10.15$\pm$0.02 & 10.07$\pm$0.02 & 9.98$\pm$0.03 & 9.94$\pm$0.04 & 9.61$\pm$0.12 \\
915: J11104141$-$7720480 & ISO 252 & 11.45$\pm$0.02 & 11.02$\pm$0.02 & 10.59$\pm$0.03 & 9.75$\pm$0.03 & 7.00$\pm$0.04 \\
916: J11104959$-$7717517 & T47 & 8.92$\pm$0.02 & 8.35$\pm$0.02 & 7.76$\pm$0.03 & 6.63$\pm$0.04 & 3.00$\pm$0.04 \\
917: J11105076$-$7718031 & ESO H$\alpha$ 568 & 10.38$\pm$0.02 & 10.28$\pm$0.02 & 10.22$\pm$0.03 & 10.17$\pm$0.03 & \nodata \\
918: J11105359$-$7725004 & ISO 256 & 9.67$\pm$0.02 & out & 8.70$\pm$0.03 & out & 4.90$\pm$0.04 \\
919: J11105597$-$7645325 & Hn 13 & out & 9.10$\pm$0.02 & out & 8.02$\pm$0.03 & out \\
920: J11112260$-$7705538 & ISO 274 & 10.43$\pm$0.02 & 10.35$\pm$0.02 & 10.29$\pm$0.03 & 10.30$\pm$0.03 & \nodata \\
921: J11120288$-$7722483 & \nodata & 12.10$\pm$0.02 & 12.00$\pm$0.02 & 11.92$\pm$0.03 & 11.94$\pm$0.04 & \nodata \\
922: J11120351$-$7726009 & ISO 282 & 10.83$\pm$0.02 & out & 10.13$\pm$0.03 & out & 6.87$\pm$0.05 \\
923: J11122250$-$7714512 & \nodata & 13.89$\pm$0.02 & out & 13.55$\pm$0.05 & out & \nodata \\
924: J11123099$-$7653342 & [LES2004] 601 & 12.59$\pm$0.02 & 12.47$\pm$0.02 & 12.39$\pm$0.04 & 12.36$\pm$0.05 & \nodata \\
925: J11124210$-$7658400 & CHXR 54 & 9.41$\pm$0.02 & 9.43$\pm$0.02 & 9.35$\pm$0.03 & 9.36$\pm$0.03 & 9.35$\pm$0.11 \\
926: J11124268$-$7722230 & T54 & 7.81$\pm$0.02 & 7.83$\pm$0.02 & 7.75$\pm$0.03 & 7.66$\pm$0.03 & 4.85$\pm$0.04 \\
927: J11124861$-$7647066 & Hn 17 & out & out & out & out & 7.01$\pm$0.04 \\
928: J11132012$-$7701044 & CHXR 57 & 9.79$\pm$0.02 & out & 9.74$\pm$0.03 & out & 9.33$\pm$0.15 \\
929: J11173700$-$7704381 & T56 & out & out & out & out & 4.22$\pm$0.04 \\
930: \enddata
931: \tablecomments{Entries of ``$\cdots$" and ``out"
932: indicate measurements that are absent because of non-detection
933: and a position outside the field of view of the filter for the observations
934: in program 30574, respectively, except for 2MASS J11091297$-$7729115.
935: For this star, the non-detection at 24~\micron\ refers to images from
936: program 37 obtained on 2005 February 27.}
937: \tablenotetext{a}{2MASS Point Source Catalog.}
938: \end{deluxetable}
939:
940: \clearpage
941:
942: \begin{figure}
943: \epsscale{1}
944: \plotone{f1.eps}
945: \caption{
946: Fields in the Chamaeleon~I star-forming region that have been imaged
947: with IRAC ({\it left}) and MIPS ({\it right}) in {\it Spitzer} program 30574.
948: The known members of the cluster are indicated ({\it points}).
949: The contours represent the extinction map of \citet{cam97} at intervals
950: of $A_J=0.5$, 1, and 2.
951: }
952: \label{fig:map}
953: \end{figure}
954:
955: \begin{figure}
956: \epsscale{1}
957: \plotone{f2.eps}
958: \caption{
959: Optical spectra of new members of Chamaeleon~I.
960: The spectra have been corrected for extinction, which is quantified in
961: parentheses by the magnitude difference of the reddening
962: between 0.6 and 0.9~\micron\ ($E(0.6-0.9)$).
963: The data are displayed at a resolution of 18~\AA\ and are normalized at
964: 7500~\AA.
965: }
966: \label{fig:spec}
967: \end{figure}
968:
969: \begin{figure}
970: \epsscale{1}
971: \plotone{f3.eps}
972: \caption{
973: H-R diagram for all known low-mass stars and brown dwarfs in Chamaeleon~I
974: \citep[{\it points}]{luh07cha,luh08cha}. The sources classified as new members
975: through spectroscopy in Figure~\ref{fig:spec} are indicated ({\it circled
976: points}). These data are shown with the theoretical evolutionary models of
977: \citet{bar98} ($0.1<M/M_\odot\leq1$) and \citet{cha00} ($M/M_\odot\leq0.1$),
978: where the mass tracks ({\it dotted lines}) and isochrones ({\it solid lines})
979: are labeled in units of $M_\odot$ and Myr, respectively.
980: }
981: \label{fig:hr}
982: \end{figure}
983:
984: \begin{figure}
985: \epsscale{0.8}
986: \plotone{f4.eps}
987: \caption{
988: Optical and IR images of the region surrounding the Cederblad~112
989: reflection nebula in Chamaeleon~I ($5\arcmin\times5\arcmin$).
990: All known members of the star-forming region within this area are labeled.
991: OTS~32 and 2MASS J11095493$-$7635101 have been classified as new members
992: through the spectra in Figure~\ref{fig:spec}.
993: }
994: \label{fig:image}
995: \end{figure}
996:
997: \begin{figure}
998: \epsscale{0.65}
999: \plotone{f5.eps}
1000: \caption{
1001: SEDs for new members of Chamaeleon~I ({\it points}).
1002: Each object is compared to the SED of a stellar photosphere at the same
1003: spectral type ({\it circled points}).
1004: The photospheric SEDs have been reddened according to the extinction
1005: estimates in Table~\ref{tab:new} and have been scaled to the $J$-band
1006: fluxes of the new members, except for 2MASS J11020610$-$7718079 and
1007: Cha~J11062854$-$7618039,
1008: for which the photospheres are scaled to $JHK_s$ and 3.6~\micron, respectively.
1009: }
1010: \label{fig:sed}
1011: \end{figure}
1012:
1013: \end{document}
1014: