1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \def\chan{$\it{Chandra}$}
4: \def\g292{G292.2$-$0.5}
5: \def\j1119{PSR~J1119$-$6127}
6:
7: \received{2007 October 1}
8: \begin{document}
9: \title{
10: Using $Chandra$ to Unveil the High-Energy Properties of the High-Magnetic Field Radio Pulsar J1119$-$6127}
11:
12: \author{Samar Safi-Harb\altaffilmark{1,2}, Harsha S. Kumar\altaffilmark{1}}
13:
14: \altaffiltext{1}{Physics and Astronomy Department, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2, Canada}
15:
16: \altaffiltext{2}{Canada Research Chair; samar@physics.umanitoba.ca}
17:
18:
19: \begin{abstract}
20: PSR J1119$-$6127 is a high magnetic field (B=4.1$\times$10$^{13}$~Gauss),
21: young ($\leq$1,700 year old), and slow (P=408 ms) radio pulsar associated
22: with the supernova remnant (SNR) G292.2$-$0.5.
23: In 2003, $Chandra$ allowed the detection of the X-ray counterpart of the radio pulsar,
24: and provided the first evidence for a compact and faint pulsar wind nebula (PWN).
25: We here present new $Chandra$ observations
26: which allowed for the first time an imaging and spectroscopic study
27: of the pulsar and PWN independently of each other.
28: The PWN is only evident in the hard band (above $\sim$2 keV) and consists
29: of jet-like structures extending to at least 7$^{\prime\prime}$ from the pulsar, with
30: the southern `jet' being longer than the northern `jet'.
31: The spectrum of the PWN is described by a power law with a photon index $\Gamma$$\sim$1.1
32: for the compact PWN and $\sim$1.4 for the southern long jet (at a fixed column
33: density $N_H$=1.8$\times$10$^{22}$~cm$^{-2}$),
34: and a total luminosity $L_x$(0.5--7.0 keV)$\sim$4$\times$10$^{32}$~ergs~s$^{-1}$,
35: at an assumed distance of 8.4 kpc.
36: The pulsar's spectrum is clearly softer than the PWN's spectrum.
37: We rule out a single blackbody model for the pulsar, and present the first
38: evidence of non-thermal (presumably magnetospheric)
39: emission that dominates above $\sim$3~keV.
40: A two-component model consisting of a power law component (with photon index $\Gamma$$\sim$1.5--2.0)
41: plus a thermal component provides the best fit.
42: The thermal component accounts for the soft emission and
43: can be fit by either a blackbody model with a temperature $kT$$\sim$0.21~keV,
44: or a neutron star atmospheric model with a temperature $kT$$\sim$0.14~keV.
45: The efficiency of the pulsar in converting its rotational power, $\dot{E}$,
46: into non-thermal X-ray emission from the pulsar and PWN is $\approx$5$\times$10$^{-4}$,
47: comparable to other rotation-powered pulsars with a similar $\dot{E}$.
48: We discuss our results in the context of the X-ray manifestation of high-magnetic field radio pulsars
49: in comparison with rotation-powered pulsars and magnetars.
50: \end{abstract}
51:
52: \keywords {ISM: individual (\g292) --- pulsars: individual (PSR J1119$-$6127) ---
53: supernova remnants --- X-rays: ISM}
54:
55: \section{Introduction}
56: A pulsar wind nebula (PWN) is a bubble of relativistic particles and magnetic field,
57: powered by the rotational energy of a young energetic pulsar.
58: The PWN's non-thermal emission arises from synchrotron radiation of the high-energy particles injected by
59: the pulsar and accelerated at the site where the relativistic pulsar wind
60: is decelerated by the confining medium.
61: % (supernova material or interstellar medium).
62: As such, PWNs represent an ideal laboratory to study the physics of neutron stars,
63: particle acceleration, and relativistic shocks.
64:
65: The Crab nebula has been viewed for almost three decades as the
66: canonical example of how a fast rotation-powered pulsar dumps
67: its energy into its surroundings.
68: However, the past several years have witnessed a synergy of
69: high-energy observations pointing to
70: a growing class of compact objects which manifest
71: themselves differently from the Crab. These include
72: the anomalous X-ray pulsars (AXPs) and the soft gamma-ray repeaters (SGRs),
73: commonly believed to be highly magnetized neutron stars, or
74: magnetars ($B$$\sim$10$^{14}$--10$^{15}$~G),
75: powered by magnetic field decay rather than by rotation,
76: and characterized by relatively slow periods (5--12 seconds; see Woods and Thompson 2006 for a review).
77: So far, there is no evidence of PWNs surrounding these objects.
78: Furthermore, they were believed to be radio quiet, however
79: recently radio emission has been observed from the transient magnetar
80: XTE J1810$-$197 (Halpern et al. 2005, Camilo et al. 2006)
81: and 2-second radio pulsations have been discovered
82: from a new magnetar (1E 1547.0$-$5408, Camilo et al. 2007).
83:
84:
85: Interestingly, there are about half a dozen radio pulsars with spin and magnetic field properties
86: intermediate between the `classical' Crab-like pulsars\footnote{A Crab-like pulsar here refers
87: to a rotation-powered pulsar powering a PWN}
88: and the magnetars:
89: their spin periods range from a fraction of a second to $\sim$7~seconds, and
90: their magnetic field\footnote{the magnetic field is derived
91: assuming magnetic dipole radiation and is related to the spin period,
92: $P$, and the spin-down period derivative, $\dot{P}$, as:
93: $B$=3.2$\times$10$^{19}$$\left(P \dot{P}\right)^{1/2}$ Gauss}
94: is close to the QED value of 4.4$\times$10$^{13}$ Gauss
95: (the field at which the electron's rest mass energy equals its
96: cyclotron energy).
97: %above which radio emission is expected to be suppressed according to some models (Baring \& Harding 1998).
98: The question whether these pulsars should display more magnetar-like or Crab-like properties is
99: still under debate (see e.g. the references in Table~3). X-ray observations targeted to
100: study these objects offer the best window to address
101: this question and better understand their emission properties.
102: The search for and study of any associated PWN should in particular shed light on the nature of their high-energy emission in comparison with the other pulsars.
103:
104: PSR~J1119$-$6127 is a member of this small, yet growing, class of objects.
105: It was discovered in the Parkes multi-beam pulsar survey (Camilo et al. 2000).
106: It has a rotation period $P$ of 408~ms, a large period derivative $\dot{P}$ of 4$\times$10$^{-12}$,
107: a characteristic age $\frac{P}{2\dot{P}}$ of 1600~yrs,
108: a surface dipole magnetic field $B$ of 4.1$\times$10$^{13}$~G,
109: a spin-down luminosity $\dot{E}$ of 2.3$\times$10$^{36}$ ergs~s$^{-1}$,
110: and a braking index of 2.9 implying an upper limit on its age of 1,700 years
111: (under standard assumptions of simple spindown).
112: No radio PWN was detected around the pulsar despite its youth (Crawford et al. 2001).
113: %(Camilo et al. 2006).
114: The pulsar was found within the supernova remnant (SNR) G292.2$-$0.5
115: of 15$^{\prime}$ in diameter, discovered with the
116: Australia Telescope Compact Array (ATCA) (Crawford et al. 2001),
117: and subsequently detected with X-ray observations acquired with the
118: $ROSAT$ satellite and the Advanced Satellite for Cosmology and Astrophysics, $ASCA$ (Pivovaroff et al. 2001).
119:
120: The X-ray counterpart to the radio pulsar was first resolved with
121: $Chandra$, which also revealed for the first time evidence for
122: a compact (3$^{\prime\prime}$$\times$6$^{\prime\prime}$) PWN
123: (Gonzalez \& Safi-Harb, 2003; hereafter GSH03). The pulsar was subsequently
124: detected with \textit{XMM-Newton} and was found to exhibit thermal emission
125: with an unusually high pulsed fraction of 74$\pm$14\% in the 0.5--2.0 keV range (Gonzalez et al. 2005).
126: The \textit{XMM-Newton}-derived temperature was also unusually high, in comparison with other pulsars
127: of similar age or even younger, like the pulsar in the SNR 3C~58 (Slane et al. 2002).
128:
129:
130: While a spectrum of the pulsar has been obtained with the previous $Chandra$ and $XMM$-$Newton$ observations, the $Chandra$ spectrum suffered from poor statistics and it wasn't possible to extract a spectrum from the PWN; and the $XMM$-$Newton$ spectrum of the pulsar was contaminated by the PWN's spectrum due to the large point spread function (PSF) of $XMM$-$Newton$.
131:
132: In this paper, we present new observations of the pulsar obtained with
133: $Chandra$ and targeted to constrain the properties of the pulsar and associated PWN.
134: In a follow-up paper, we present the study of the associated SNR,
135: to complement the previous study of the western side of the remnant by Gonzalez \& Safi-Harb (2005).
136:
137: The distance to the pulsar was determined to be in the 2.4--8.0 kpc range (Camilo et al. 2000).
138: Using the fitted X-ray column density to the pulsar and that to its associated SNR,
139: GSH03 estimated a distance in the 4.0--12.6 kpc range, but the location of the source
140: with respect to the Carina spiral arm (Camilo et al. 2000) puts an upper limit on the distance
141: of $\sim$8~kpc. The Cordes-Lazio Galactic free electron density model (NE2001, Cordes \& Lazio 2002)
142: suggests a much larger distance of 16.7~kpc, while Caswell et al. (2004) estimate a distance of 8.4 kpc using neutral hydrogen absorption measurements to the SNR. In this work, we adopt the distance to the SNR of 8.4~kpc, and scale all derived
143: quantities in units of $d_{8.4}$=$\frac{D (kpc)}{8.4kpc}$.
144:
145: The paper is organized as follows. In \S2, we summarize the $Chandra$ observations.
146: In \S\S 3 and 4, we present our imaging and spectroscopic results, respectively.
147: Finally, in \S5 we present our discussion and conclusions.
148:
149: \section{Observations and Data Analysis}
150: PSR~J1119$-$6127 was observed with \chan\ in cycle 5 on 2004 November 2--3 (obsid 6153), and October 31--November 1 (obsid 4676). We combine these new data with the observation conducted during cycle 3 (obsid 2833, GSH03) in order to improve on the statistics. All three observations were positioned at the aimpoint of the back-illuminated S3 chip of the Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS). X-ray photon events were acquired in the timed-exposure readouts, at a CCD temperature of $-$120$\degr$C and a frame readout time of 3.2 sec, and telemetered to the ground in the `Very Faint' mode.
151: The roll angles were chosen such as the AO-3 data covered the western side of the SNR and the
152: AO-5 data covered the eastern side (see Fig.~1).
153: The data were then reduced using standard CIAO~4.0
154: routines\footnote{http://cxc.harvard.edu/ciao}.
155: We have created a cleaned events file by retaining events with
156: the standard ASCA grades 02346 and rejecting hot
157: pixels.
158: %\footnote{http://cxc.harvard.edu/ciao/ahelp/acis_process_events.html}.
159: As well, the data were filtered for good time intervals,
160: removing periods with high background rates or unstable aspect.
161: The resulting effective exposure time was 56.8~ksec for obsid 2833,
162: 60.5~ksec for obsid 4676, and 18.9~ksec for obsid 6153,
163: yielding a total effective exposure time for the 3 combined observations
164: covering the field around the pulsar of 136.2~ksec.
165:
166: \section{Imaging results}
167:
168: \subsection{G292.2-0.5}
169:
170: Figure~1 shows the $Chandra$ cycle 3 (covering the western side of the remnant) and cycle 5 (covering the eastern side of the remnant) observations overlayed on the $ASCA$ hard band (2--10 keV) image, and with the radio extent of the SNR shown as a black circle overlayed.
171: The central circle denotes the position of the pulsar.
172: The image illustrates the power of $Chandra$ in resolving the X-ray emission
173: and shows the overlap between the $Chandra$ observations leading to a deep
174: exposure of the pulsar and central regions of the SNR.
175: The pulsar and surrounding region will be the focus of this paper. The properties of the diffuse
176: emission from the SNR
177: will be presented in a separate paper.
178:
179: Figure~2 shows the combined $Chandra$ tri-color image, zoomed on the pulsar region, and obtained as follows:
180: the data were firstly divided into individual images in the soft
181: (0.5--1.15 keV, red), medium (1.15--2.3 keV, green), and hard (2.3--10.0 keV, blue) bands
182: (the energy boundaries were chosen to match those in GSH03).
183: Individual background images were then obtained from the blank-sky data sets available in CIAO.
184: For each observation, background images were reprojected to match the corresponding events file. The background images were then divided into the same energy bands mentioned above, and then subtracted from their corresponding
185: source+background image. The resulting images were subsequently
186: adaptively smoothed\footnote{the `csmooth' CIAO tool is based on the
187: `asmooth' algorithm (Ebeling et al. 2006) which has the advantage of
188: visually enhancing extended features in noise-dominated regions. We note
189: that the compact PWN and the southern jet display a similar morphology
190: using a simple Gaussian smoothing.} using a Gaussian with $\sigma$=$1''$
191: for significance of detection $>$5 and up to $\sigma$=$5''$ for
192: significance down to 2. The individual background-subtracted images were
193: then combined to produce the image shown in Figure~2.
194: As in our previous X-ray study (GSH03), the X-ray emission can be resolved into several X-ray sources
195: (tabulated in Table~2 of Gonzalez \& Safi-Harb 2005), surrounded by diffuse emission from the SNR interior. As well, the pulsar and associated PWN immediately stand out as a hard (blue in color) source.
196:
197: \subsection{PSR~J1119$-$6127 and its PWN}
198: The peak of the X-ray emission from the pulsar is positioned at: $\alpha_{J2000}$=11$^h$19$^m$14$\fs$26, $\delta_{J2000}$ =
199: $-$61$\degr$27$^{\prime}$49$\farcs$3, which match within error
200: the radio coordinates of the pulsar:
201: $\alpha$$_{J2000}$ = 11$^{h}$19$^{m}$14$\fs$3 and $\delta$$_{J2000}$ = $-$61$\degr$27$^\prime$49$\farcs$5 (with 0.3$^{\prime\prime}$ error).
202:
203:
204: In order to compare the source's spatial characteristics with $Chandra$'s PSF,
205: we performed a two-dimensional spatial fit to the new $Chandra$
206: data using the SHERPA software\footnote{http://cxc.harvard.edu/sherpa/}.
207: We created images of the source in the soft (0.5-1.15 keV), medium (1.15-2.3 keV),
208: and hard (2.3-10 keV) bands. We subsequently created normalized PSF images
209: at the energies characteristic of the
210: source's energy histogram. These images were then
211: used as convolution kernels when fitting.
212: The soft band image yielded a FWHM value of 0.8$^{\prime\prime}$ consistent
213: with a point source, the
214: medium band image gave a slightly higher value of 0.9$^{\prime\prime}$,
215: while the hard band was best
216: described by an elliptical Gaussian function with FWHM 0.9$^{\prime\prime}$$\times$1.2$^{\prime\prime}$,
217: confirming the extended nature of the PWN in the hard band,
218: a result that is consistent with GSH03.
219:
220: In Figures 3 and 4, we show zoomed in images of the PWN.
221: Figure~3 shows the raw soft band (0.5--2 keV) and hard band (2--10 keV) images centered on
222: the pulsar, and Figure~4 shows
223: the same images adaptively smoothed using a Gaussian with $\sigma$=1$^{\prime\prime}$ for
224: a significance of detection greater than 5 and up to $\sigma$=3$^{\prime\prime}$ for a
225: significance of detection down to 2.
226: As mentioned earlier, the PWN structures (further discussed below) are also visible using a simple Gaussian smoothing.
227: We verified that they are also evident in the hard band images for the individual observations.
228: %, although as expected with less significance.
229: % are evident in the individual observations, although as expected with
230: %less significance (e.g. for the southern jet, we detect $\sim$54$\pm$16 photons from obsid~2833
231: %and 44$\pm$17 photons from obsid~4676).
232: Furthermore, using the $celldetect$ CIAO routine, we did not find any point sources within
233: the PWN, thus ruling out the contamination of the PWN structures by background sources.
234:
235:
236: The images clearly show that the PWN is harder than the pulsar
237: and can be resolved into elongated `jet'-like
238: structures extending to at least 7$^{\prime\prime}$ north and south of the pulsar.
239: This confirms the evidence of a hard PWN associated with this
240: high-magnetic field pulsar (GSH03) but also shows that the PWN is larger than originally thought.
241: The PWN is elongated in the north-south direction, with the northern extension (which we refer to as a `jet') appearing tilted to $\sim$30$\degr$ west of north, and the southern jet being more elongated and
242: $\sim$2$\times$ brighter than the northern `jet'.
243: In Figure~5, we highlight the first evidence for a more extended ($\gtrsim$20$^{\prime\prime}$)
244: faint and hard jet-like structure southwest of the pulsar.
245: %We note that we obtain a similar morphology using other non-adaptive smoothing techniques,
246: %such as a Gaussian smoothing.
247: We accumulate 100$\pm$23 background-subtracted source counts from this region, which on top of
248: 99$\pm$21 background counts (normalized to the source area),
249: imply a $\sim$7$\pm$2$\sigma$ detection (0.5--7.0 keV).
250: It is not clear whether this structure is
251: an extension of the southern compact jet seen closer to the pulsar or
252: an SNR filament.
253: However, its morphology (in particular its knotty structure which is similar to
254: Vela's long jet, Kargaltsev et al. 2003) and spectrum (see \S4.2) suggest an association with
255: \j1119's PWN, a result that can be confirmed with a deeper exposure.
256: We note that while the \textit{XMM-Newton} MOS2 image shows a hint of a southern extension,
257: the large and distorted PSF of the MOS2 camera does not allow a confirmation of
258: this jet (M. Gonzalez 2008, private communication).
259:
260:
261: In the following, we refer to the PWN region shown in Figure~4, right (size $\sim$6$^{\prime\prime}$ in the east-west
262: direction by $\sim$15$^{\prime\prime}$ in the north-south direction )
263: as the `compact PWN', and to the extended jet-like structure southwest
264: of the pulsar (size $\sim$6$^{\prime\prime}$$\times$20$^{\prime\prime}$, see Fig.~5) as the `southern jet'.
265: We note here that it's possible that the compact PWN corresponds to a torus viewed edge-on.
266: However, the southern extension (if proven to be a jet associated with the pulsar) would falsify this
267: interpretation as the jets are expected to be perpendicular to the torus.
268: We further discuss these features in \S4.2 and \S5.2.
269:
270: \section{Spatially resolved spectroscopy}
271: The spectral analysis was performed using the X-ray spectral fitting package,
272: XSPEC v12.4.0\footnote{http://xspec.gsfc.nasa.gov},
273: and constrained to the 0.5--7.0 keV band as the spectra provided little useful information outside this range.
274: The pulsar's spectrum was grouped with a minimum of 20~counts per bin, while the PWN's spectrum was binned using a minimum of 10 counts~per~bin.
275: Errors are at the 90\% confidence level throughout the paper.
276:
277: \subsection{PSR~J1119$-$6127}
278: The spectrum of \j1119 was extracted using a circle centered at the position of the pulsar (\S3)
279: %11:19:14.3,-61:27:49.4
280: and with a radius of 2.5$^{\prime\prime}$, thus encompassing 90\% of the encircled energy\footnote{http://cxc.harvard.edu/proposer/POG/html/ACIS.html}. The background was extracted from a ring centered at the pulsar, and extending from 3$^{\prime\prime}$ to 4$^{\prime\prime}$. This has the advantage of minimizing contamination by the PWN.
281: We note however that the PWN contamination is negligible as its surface brightness is nearly two orders
282: of magnitude smaller than the pulsar's, and so the spectral results are practically
283: independent of the background subtraction region (see e.g. Safi-Harb 2008 for a preliminary analysis of the pulsar's spectrum
284: using a source-free background region taken from the S3 chip\footnote{The tabulated values in Safi-Harb (2008)
285: correspond to binning the data with a minimum of 10 counts per bin, whereas the data here are binned by a minimum of 20 counts per bin.}).
286: The background-subtracted pulsar count rate is
287: (5.2$\pm$0.3)$\times$10$^{-3}$ counts~s$^{-1}$ for the 2833 observation,
288: (5.8$\pm$0.3)$\times$10$^{-3}$ counts~s$^{-1}$ for the 4676 observation, and
289: (3.7$\pm$0.5)$\times$10$^{-3}$ counts~s$^{-1}$ for the 6153 observation,
290: thus accumulating $\sim$715$\pm$27 total counts from the pulsar.
291: To model the emission from the pulsar, we used
292: a blackbody model to account for any surface thermal emission from the neutron star
293: and a power law to account for any magnetospheric emission.
294: A power law model yields a column density $N_H$=(1.2$^{+0.4}_{-0.3}$)$\times$10$^{22}$~cm$^{-2}$, a steep photon index $\Gamma$=3.0$\pm$0.5, and an unabsorbed flux of
295: (1.7$^{+1.3}_{-0.7}$)$\times$10$^{-13}$~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$,
296: with a reduced chi-squared value $\chi^2_{\nu}$=1.356 ($\nu$=31 dof).
297: A blackbody model does not yield an acceptable fit
298: ($\chi^2_{\nu}$=2.166, $\nu$=31 dof); and as
299: shown in Figure~6, it does not account for the emission above $\sim$3~keV.
300: Adding a power law component to the blackbody model improves the fit significantly,
301: and yields an excellent fit with the following parameters:
302: $N_H$=(1.8$^{+1.5}_{-0.6}$)$\times$10$^{22}$~cm$^{-2},
303: \Gamma$=1.9$^{+1.1}_{-0.9}$, $kT$=0.21$\pm$0.01~keV, $\chi^2_{\nu}$=0.948 ($\nu$=29 dof),
304: with the luminosity of the power law component representing $\sim$30\% of the luminosity
305: of the blackbody component (or $\sim$23\% of the total pulsar's luminosity)
306: in the 0.5--7.0 keV range.
307: Figure~7 shows the blackbody+power law model fit, and Table~1 summarizes the best fit parameters.
308:
309: The thermal and soft component is equally well fit with a neutron star magnetized (B=10$^{13}$~G)
310: atmospheric model (the NSA code in XSPEC, Zavlin et al. 1996). The parameters for the blackbody and atmospheric model
311: are however different, and as expected the NSA model yields a lower temperature than the
312: blackbody model. Both models require a hard photon index ($\Gamma$$\sim$1.5--2.0)
313: for the power law component.
314: As shown in Table~1, the
315: non-thermal unabsorbed flux amounts to $\sim$30--35\% of the thermal flux.
316: In the NSA model, the distance was fixed to 8.4~kpc.
317: We attempted to fit for this distance, however we
318: find that it is poorly constrained (ranging from 2.6 to 30 kpc).
319: The best fit parameters are:
320: $N_H$=1.6$\times$10$^{22}$~cm$^{-2}$,
321: $\Gamma_{PL}$=1.5, $T_{NSA}$=1.6$\times$10$^6$~K, and $D$=8.4~kpc.
322: Therefore we restrict our discussion below to the fit with the fixed and reasonable distance of 8.4~kpc.
323:
324:
325: \subsection{The PWN}
326: The compact PWN's spectrum was extracted from the elongated nebula ($\sim$6$^{\prime\prime}$$\times$15$^{\prime\prime}$ )(see Fig.~4, right) with the pulsar region removed.
327: The background was extracted from a nearby source-free region.
328: The total number of background-subtracted counts accumulated from the PWN is only $\sim$103$\pm$17~counts in the 0.5--7.0 keV range,
329: therefore restricting our ability to constrain the spectral parameters or to perform a spatially resolved spectroscopy of the northern and southern extensions. However, fixing the column density
330: to 1.8$\times$10$^{22}$~cm$^{-2}$ (the best fit value for the pulsar in the BB+PL fit, Table~1),
331: we find that a power law model yields a hard photon index $\Gamma$=1.1$^{+0.9}_{-0.7}$,
332: $\chi^2_{\nu}$=1.23 ($\nu$=17 dof), and a luminosity
333: $L_x$(0.5--7.0 keV)$\sim$(1.6$^{+2.3}_{-0.9}$)$\times$10$^{32}$~$d_{8.4}^2$ ergs~s$^{-1}$.
334: Allowing $N_H$ to vary between (1.2--3.3)$\times$10$^{22}$~cm$^{-2}$ (the range allowed by the PL+BB model fit to the pulsar), the PWN's index is $\Gamma$=0.6--2.9, typical of PWNs.
335:
336: We subsequently extracted a spectrum from the southern `jet' (region shown in Fig.~5)
337: and used the same background region as for the compact PWN.
338: As mentioned earlier, we accumulated a total of $\sim$100$\pm$23 source counts
339: from this region in the 0.5--7.0 keV range, again too small to constrain the parameters or
340: perform a spatially resolved spectroscopy along this feature. Fixing the column density
341: to 1.8$\times$10$^{22}$~cm$^{-2}$, the power law model yields a photon index of $\Gamma$=1.4$^{+0.8}_{-0.9}$, $\chi^2_{\nu}$=1.16 ($\nu$=17 dof), and a luminosity of
342: $L_x$(0.5--7.0 keV)$\sim$(2.1$^{+3.3}_{-1.2}$)$\times$10$^{33}$~$d_{8.4}^2$ ergs~s$^{-1}$.
343: These values are not unusual for PWN structures.
344: A thermal bremsstrahlung model is rejected based on the unrealistically high temperature ($kT$$\geq$10~keV).
345: Experimenting with
346: two-component models was not possible given the insufficient number of counts.
347: In Table~2, we summarize the best fit power law model results.
348:
349: \section{Discussion}
350:
351: \subsection{The pulsar}
352:
353: For the first time, we have resolved the pulsar's spectrum and determined its properties independently of the PWN. We note here that the hard X-ray component in the \textit{XMM-Newton} spectrum has been attributed entirely to the emission from the PWN (Gonzalez et al. 2005). We believe that this component is contaminated by the hard X-ray emission from the pulsar as \textit{XMM}'s PSF does not allow resolving both components. In fact, an on-off pulse spectroscopic analysis of the \textit{XMM}'s spectrum shows evidence of pulsed power law emission at the 2$\sigma$ level (M. Gonzalez 2008, private communication).
354:
355: The single blackbody model is rejected (see \S4.1 and Fig.~6). As shown in Table~1,
356: the best fit model requires two components: a thermal component
357: described by a BB or NSA model, and a power law component with a photon index $\Gamma$$\sim$1.5--2.0.
358: The column density is model dependent.
359: GSH03 derived an $N_H$=(9$^{+5}_{-3}$)$\times$10$^{21}$~cm$^{-2}$ for the pulsar.
360: Using \textit{XMM}, Gonzalez et al. (2005) derived a higher $N_H$ in the (1.3--2.7)$\times$10$^{22}$~cm$^{-2}$ range
361: (depending on the model used). Our best fit
362: two-component models shown in Table~1, which adequately account for the hard (above 3 keV) emission,
363: yield a column density of (1.4--1.8)$\times$10$^{22}$~cm$^{-2}$ in the NSA+PL model, and
364: (1.2--3.3)$\times$10$^{22}$~cm$^{-2}$ in the PL+BB model. These ranges bracket the value
365: derived using HEASARC's $N_H$ tool\footnote{this tool calculates the
366: weighted average measurement of the
367: total Galactic column density towards the source's coordinates based on the Dickey \& Lockman (1990) \ion{H}{1} map.} and overlap
368: with the values derived previously with $Chandra$ and \textit{XMM}.
369:
370: Using the thermal model in the two-component fits tabulated in Table~1, we now estimate the
371: thermal properties of the pulsar. In the blackbody fit, the radius is inferred from equating the
372: isotropic luminosity (4$\pi$$D^2$$F$, where $D$ is the distance to the pulsar and $F$ is the
373: unabsorbed flux, tabulated in Table~2) with the surface emission from the neutron star
374: (4$\pi$$R^2$$\sigma$$T_{eff}$$^4$, where $\sigma$ is the Stefan Boltzmann constant), yielding
375: $R$=2.7$\pm$0.7~km,
376: suggesting polar cap emission with a temperature of
377: $T_{eff}$=0.21$\pm$0.01~keV=(2.46$\pm$0.12)$\times$10$^6$~K.
378: The inferred radius is however larger than the conventional polar cap radius: $R_{pc}$(km)$\simeq$0.5$\left(\frac{P}{0.1s}\right)^{-1/2}$=0.25 km (for $P$=408 ms).
379: The pulsar's thermal luminosity (assuming isotropic emission) is $L_x$(0.5--7.0
380: keV)=(1.87$^{+0.8}_{-0.4}$)$\times$10$^{33}$$d_{8.4}^2$ ergs~s$^{-1}$.
381:
382: In the atmospheric (NSA) model, the temperature is $T_{eff}$=(1.59$^{+0.35}_{-0.23}$)$\times$10$^6$~K, implying a temperature as seen by an observer of $T_{eff}^{\infty}$=$g_r$$T_{eff}$=(1.22$^{+0.27}_{-0.18}$)$\times$10$^6$~K;
383: where $g_r$ is the redshift parameter given by $g_r$=(1-2.952$\times$$\frac{M}{R}$)$^{0.5}$=0.766 for a neutron star of mass $M$=1.4 solar masses and radius $R$=10 km. The pulsar's bolometric luminosity as seen by an observer and assuming thermal emission from the entire neutron star's surface is $L_{bol}$$^{\infty}$(0.5--7.0 keV) = $g_r^2$$\times$(4$\pi$$R^2$$\sigma$$T_{eff}^4$)=(2.67$\pm$1.9)$\times$10$^{33}$$d_{8.4}^2$ ergs~s$^{-1}$.
384: These estimates differ from the values inferred by Gonzalez et al. (2005),
385: mainly because the distance was fixed here at 8.4~kpc, while it was fit for with \textit{XMM}.
386: Our values for both the blackbody and NSA model are however consistent with those derived independently by Zavlin (2007a).
387:
388:
389: The thermal emission from the pulsar was already discussed by Gonzalez et al. (2005) and
390: Zavlin (2007a) who point out that the large pulsed fraction detected in the soft band is hard to
391: interpret in either the blackbody or the NSA model (assuming uniform surface emission).
392: The large pulsed fraction indicates that the thermal emission
393: is intrinsically anisotropic and that the effective temperature derived in the NSA model
394: should be used as the mean surface temperature (Zavlin et al. 2007b).
395: We here point out to a puzzle related to the interpretation of the hard non-thermal pulsar emission, seen for the
396: first time with the $Chandra$ observations presented here. The non-thermal emission
397: is presumably magnetospheric emission as seen in other young active pulsars.
398: Such an emission is expected to be pulsed. As mentioned earlier, \textit{XMM} could
399: not resolve the pulsar's emission from the PWN, however an on-off pulse
400: spectroscopic study of the \textit{XMM} spectrum shows a hint of
401: pulsed power law emission from the pulsar.
402: A long observation with $Chandra$ in the timing mode and/or a deeper \textit{XMM-Newton} observation will confirm and constrain the pulsed component in the hard band.
403:
404:
405: \subsection{The PWN}
406:
407:
408: The PWN is well described by a power law model with a hard photon index
409: $\sim$1.1 for the compact PWN, and $\sim$1.4 for the southern extended `jet' (for a column density
410: fixed at 1.8$\times$10$^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$),
411: and with a total X-ray luminosity of
412: $\approx$4$\times$10$^{32}$$D_{8.4}^2$ ergs~s$^{-1}$ (0.5--7 keV). This
413: represents $\lesssim$20\% of the pulsar's luminosity, and
414: $\lesssim$0.02\% of $\dot{E}$, implying an efficiency which is
415: comparable to PSR B1800$-$21 and other Vela-like pulsars (Kargaltsev et al. 2007).
416:
417: PWNs have been observed to have axisymmetric morphologies, including a toroidal structure
418: and jets along the pulsar's spin axis. The emission from the torus is commonly attributed to
419: synchrotron emission from the relativistic pulsar wind in the presence of a toroidal magnetic
420: field in the equatorial plane and downstream of the shock.
421: Jet-like structures on the other hand are attributed to magnetically collimated winds along
422: the pulsar's rotation axis.
423: The collimation and acceleration of the jets is strongly dependent on the pulsar's wind magnetization $\sigma$, defined
424: as the ratio of electromagnetic to particles flux.
425: At higher magnetization, equipartition is reached in the close vicinity of the termination shock, and most of the plasma is diverted and collimated into a jet along the polar axis.
426: Therefore the morphology of the PWN sheds light on the geometry of the pulsar and the
427: intrinsic parameters of the pulsar wind (see e.g. Gaensler \& Slane 2006 and Bucciantini 2008 for reviews).
428:
429: The jet-like structures seen north and south of PSR~J1119$-$6127 could be interpreted as collimated outflows along the pulsar's polar axis, in which case a torus could be expected in the east-west direction. A torus-like structure is however barely resolved and the PWN emission is mostly evident in the form of elongated jets (see Figs.~3--5), suggesting a high-$\sigma$ wind.
430: In the following, we use the spectral properties of the PWN to infer its intrinsic properties
431: such as the termination shock, magnetic field, and $\sigma$.
432:
433: The termination shock site ($r_s$) is estimated by equating the thrust of the pulsar, $\frac{\dot{E}}{4\pi r^2_s c \Omega}$, with the pressure in the nebula, $P$$\approx$$\frac{B_n^2}{4\pi}$; where $\Omega$ is the pulsar's wind solid angle which accounts for a non-isotropic wind, and $B_n$ is the nebular magnetic field which can be approximated from its equipartition value $B_{eq}$.
434: To estimate $B_{eq}$, we use the non-thermal properties of the compact PWN (see Table~3), and
435: assume the emission region to be a cylinder with radius $r_n$$\leq$3$^{\prime\prime}$=0.12 $d_{8.4}$ pc and length of $l$$\sim$15$^{\prime\prime}$=0.61 $d_{8.4}$~pc, resulting in an emitting volume of
436: $V$$\sim$8.4$\times$10$^{53}$~$f$$d_{8.4}^3$~cm$^3$; where $f$ is the volume filling factor.
437: Using a luminosity of $L_x$(0.5--7.0 keV)$\sim$2$\times$10$^{32}$~$d_{8.4}^2$~ergs~s$^{-1}$
438: and assuming a ratio of 100 for the baryon to electron energy density, we estimate a magnetic
439: field of $B_{eq}$$\geq$4.5$\times$10$^{-5}$$(f d_{8.4})^{-2/7}$~Gauss.
440: The corresponding nebular pressure is 1.6$\times$10$^{-10}$~$(f d_{8.4})^{-4/7}$~ergs~cm$^{-3}$
441: and the termination shock is at a radius $r_s$$\sim$0.06~$(f d_{8.4})^{2/7}$$\Omega^{-1/2}$~pc
442: (or 1.5$^{\prime\prime}$ at 8.4 kpc), comparable to B1800-21 other PWNs (Kargaltsev et al. 2007).
443:
444: We can further check the above estimate by using the thermal pressure from the interior of the remnant ($\sim$2$n_{e}kT$) as the pressure confining the PWN. Using the $kT$ and $n_{e}t$ values derived from our spectral fits to the SNR interior (to be presented in our follow up SNR paper), we derive an SNR internal thermal pressure of $\sim$2.9$\times$10$^{-9}$ ergs~cm$^{-3}$. The resulting shock radius is $r_{s}$$\sim$0.015~pc, smaller than our estimate above, but consistent for
445: $(f d_{8.4})^{2/7}$$\Omega^{-1/2}$=0.25.
446: At a distance of 8.4~kpc, a termination shock radius of 0.015--0.06 pc translates to a radius of
447: $r_s$=0$\farcs$4--1$\farcs$5~$d_{8.4}$, which explains
448: the lack of resolvable wisp-like structures as seen in other (nearby) PWNs.
449:
450:
451: Using the basic Kennel \& Coroniti (1984) model developed for the Crab nebula, we can further infer
452: a rough value for the magnetization parameter $\sigma$$\sim$$\left(\frac{r_s}{r_n}\right)^2$$\sim$0.02--0.25. This value is larger than that inferred for Crab-like PWNs (see e.g. Petre et al. 2007),
453: but supports the picture for strong collimation of jets. We caution however that this estimate
454: should not be taken at face value and should be only considered as evidence for
455: a highly magnetized wind, as it was inferred using the simple model of Kennel \& Coroniti (1984) which
456: assumes an isotropic energy flux in the wind. More recent calculations however show
457: that if hoop stresses are at work in the mildly relativistic flow, jet collimation can occur in the post shock region and estimates of $\sigma$ using the Kennel and Coroniti model can be overestimated (see e.g. Bucciantini 2008 and references therein for a review).
458:
459:
460: The corresponding synchrotron lifetime of a photon with an energy of $E$(keV) is roughly
461: $\tau_{syn}$$\approx$36$B_{-4}^{3/2}$$E^{1/2}$~$d^{-3/7}_{8.4}$ yr,
462: where $B_{-4}$ is the nebular magnetic field in units of 10$^{-4}$ Gauss;
463: %or 87 years for a 2~keV photon and B=4.4e-5G,
464: yielding an average velocity for the high-energy electrons to
465: reach the edge of the southern jet of
466: $\sim$0.093$c$~$B_{-4}^{-3/2}$$E^{-1/2}$~$d^{3/7}_{8.4}$.
467: %0.033$c$~$D^{-4/7}_{8.4}$ for the 2 keV photons to reach the edge of the southern `jet'.
468: This velocity is not unusual and is smaller than the typical shocked wind velocity
469: of $\sim$0.3$c$.
470:
471:
472: We interpreted the elongated structures to the north and south of the pulsar as jets that could be aligned with the rotation axis of the pulsar. The northern extension is shorter in length and is approximately twice as faint as the southern jet. Assuming that these elongated features represent an approaching (south) and receding (north) jet with similar intrinsic surface brightness and outflow velocities, we can use relativistic Doppler boosting to account for the observed difference in brightness (Mirabel \& Rodriguez 1999). For the observed brightness ratio of $\sim$2 and an energy spectral index $-\alpha$$\sim$0.1--0.4 (Table~2), assuming a continuous jet, we estimate a velocity $v\cos\theta$$\sim$0.14--0.16$c$, where $\theta$ is the inclination angle of the flow axis with respect
473: to our line of sight.
474: Since $\cos\theta$$\leq$1 for all inclination angles, this represents a lower limit for the intrinsic velocity of these features, a result that is consistent with our estimate of the average velocity above.
475:
476: Elongated jets have been observed in other PWNs, e.g. PSR B1509$-$58 powers a 4$^{\prime}$-long jet (6~pc at a distance of 5.2 kpc), and Vela powers a 100$^{\prime\prime}$-long jet (0.14~pc at a distance of 300 pc). Furthermore, velocities of $>$0.2$c$ have been also inferred from X-ray studies of these jets: $v_j$$>$0.2$c$ for B1509$-$58 (Gaensler et al. 2002) and $v_j$$\sim$(0.3--0.6)$c$ for Vela (Kargaltsev et al. 2003).
477:
478: \subsection{Comparison of \j1119 to other rotation-powered pulsars and magnetars}
479:
480: There are currently 7 pulsars including PSR~J1119$-$6127 with magnetar-strength fields
481: (B$\gtrsim$B$_c$=4.4$\times$10$^{13}$ G, see Table~3), but which have not been identified as magnetars, except for PSR~J1846$-$0258 which most recently revealed itself as a magnetar (Kumar \& Safi-Harb 2008, Gavriil et al. 2008). One would ask then whether all other pulsars belonging to this class should be related to magnetars (e.g. by being quiescent magnetars), or whether they represent a distinct population of rotation-powered pulsars. To address this open issue, we compare the known properties of \j1119 to magnetars and to the `classical' rotation-powered pulsars:
482:
483: \begin{itemize}
484: \item{
485: Unlike magnetars (even in quiescence) and like the classical rotation-powered pulsars, PSR~J1119$-$6127 and its PWN are powered by rotation ($L_x$ is much smaller than its $\dot{E}$) and the pulsar powers a hard PWN. As well its infrared properties resemble more the rotation-powered pulsars than the magnetars
486: (Mignani et al. 2007) -- the latter are known to be more efficient IR
487: emitters.}
488: \item{
489: Like magnetars and some rotation-powered pulsars (see more below), J1119$-$6127 is described by a two-component (blackbody+power law) model.
490: %with a relatively high temperature and a bright thermal flux with a large pulsed fraction of
491: %74\%$\pm$14\% in the 0.5--2.0 keV band (Gonzalez et al. 2005).
492: PSR~J1119$-$6127's thermal temperature ($kT$$\sim$0.21 keV in the BB+PL model and 0.14 keV in the NSA+PL model) is intermediate between
493: that of magnetars ($kT_{BB}$$\sim$0.41--0.67 keV, Woods \& Thompson 2006)
494: and that of the Vela-like, rotation-powered, pulsars with a thermal component dominating at energies $E$$\leq$2~keV (see Fig.~5 of Zavlin 2007b).
495: The relatively high temperature of PSR~J1119$-$6127 (in comparison with the rotation-powered pulsars) can be accounted for by a neutron star cooling model with proton
496: superfluidity in its core and a neutron star mass of $\sim$1.5 M$_{\sun}$ (see Fig.~5 of Zavlin 2007b).
497: Its photon index (1.0--2.9 in the BB+PL model and 0.7--2.3 in the NSA+PL model, see Table~1) appears relatively hard in comparison to that of most
498: AXPs in quiescence (see Table~14.1 of Woods \& Thompson 2006) and consistent with that expected from
499: the rotation-powered pulsars; but also similar to that of three
500: spectrally-hard magnetars in their quiescent state (SGR~1806$-$20,
501: SGR~1900+14, and AXP 1E~1841$-$045 having PL indices of 2.0, 1.0--2.5, and 2.0, respectively; Woods \& Thompson 2006).}
502: %however no firm conclusion can be reached about comparing it to that of magnetars because a) of the
503: %large errorbars on the photon index and b) 3 magnetars
504: %
505: %However unlike magnetars (except for those in quiescence), no significant pulsed power-law emission has been detected (so far) from the pulsar.
506: %A deep search for pulsed emission from PSR~J1119$-$6127 in the hard X-ray band is warranted to compare to magnetars' pulsed fractions.}
507: \item{\j1119's X-ray properties are most similar to two young `Vela-like' pulsars with a similar $\dot{E}$: PSR~B1800$-$21 and PSR~J1357$-$6429's, rotation-powered pulsars with a more `typical' magnetic field (see Table~3 and references therein). Most notably, both pulsars power compact and hard PWNe and display an $\frac{L_x}{\dot{E}}$ value comparable to \j1119's.
508: Furthermore, like \j1119, the spectrum of PSR~J1357$-$6429 has a thermal component
509: that dominates the total flux at energies below 2~keV ($\sim$72\% for PSR~J1357$-$642 versus $\sim$87\% for \j1119)
510: and is strongly pulsed
511: % contributes $\sim$72\% of the total flux at energies below 2 keV and that is strongly pulsed,
512: %with a large pulsed fraction ($\geq$50\%),
513: despite its lower B-field.
514: Such a high pulsed fraction ($\geq$50\% at E$\leq$2~keV, Zavlin 2007b) could be explained by intrinsic anisotropy of the thermal
515: emission formed in a magnetized neutron star atmosphere coupled with a
516: strong non-uniformity of the surface temperature and magnetic field
517: distributions (V. E. Zavlin 2008, private communication; Zavlin 2007b).
518: Such an interpretation can also be applied to \j1119 whose thermal spectrum
519: is also well fitted with a neutron star atmospheric model
520: (see Table~1 and \S5.1; V. E. Zavlin 2008, private communication, Zavlin 2007a).}
521: \item{
522: Among the high-B pulsars, PSR~J1119$-$6127 has spin properties (i.e.
523: $P$, $B$) most similar to those of PSR~J1846$-$0258 (the Kes~75 pulsar).
524: Both pulsars are also now believed to be at about the same distance of
525: $\sim$6~kpc. However PSR~J1846$-$0258 is a non-thermal X-ray pulsar
526: characterized by a hard power-law index\footnote{we
527: note here that the column density towards PSR~J1846$-$0258 is at least
528: twice as high as that towards PSR~J1119$-$6127, thus possibly
529: hindering the significant detection of any soft blackbody component
530: (Kumar \& Safi-Harb 2008).} ($\Gamma$$\leq$2) and is much more efficient at powering a
531: bright PWN ($\frac{L_x}{\dot{E}}$(PWN)$\sim$2\%, see Kumar \& Safi-Harb 2008), so their X-ray properties are very different. Furthermore, PSR~J1846$-$0258 has recently revealed itself as a magnetar as magnetar-like X-ray bursts were detected with $RXTE$ and
532: its spectrum softened as its flux brightened by a factor of $\sim$6
533: (Gavriil et al. 2008, Kumar \& Safi-Harb 2008).
534: PSR~J1119$-$6127 appears to have a stable spectrum between 2002 (obsid 2833) and 2004 (obsid 4676) with a count rate of $\sim$5.5$\times$10$^{-3}$~counts~s$^{-1}$ (\S4.1).
535: Obsid 6153 yields a smaller count rate for the pulsar ($\sim$70\% the average count rate) suggesting variability; however if real, we believe that it is not significant within error and given that 1) obsid 6153 was relatively short and taken the day following obsid~4676, and 2) magnetar outbursts normally cause a much brighter enhancement in the X-ray flux.
536: It is possible however that \j1119 will one day reveal itself as a magnetar after an occasional burst
537: driven by its high B-field, just like PSR~J1846$-$0258 recently did.
538: Monitoring \j1119 and the other high-B pulsars in the radio and X-ray
539: bands are needed to address this possibility.
540: }
541: \end{itemize}
542:
543: Given the close resemblance of \j1119 to the other rotation-powered
544: pulsars with `typical' B-fields and a similar $\dot{E}$,
545: we conclude that the global X-ray properties of PSR~J1119$-$6127 are not (at least not entirely) determined by the high B value\footnote{One should also keep in mind that the actual magnetic field strength can be a factor of few off from the spin-down value, and so pulsars with comparable B may have substantially different actual fields (see Camilo 2008 and references therein.)}; and that $\dot{E}$ in particular, and likely
546: the environment which should confine the PWN and therefore would affect its morphology and brightness, play a significant role
547: in determining its properties.
548: % (see \S4.2 of Kumar \& Safi-Harb 2008 for more details).
549: %This conclusion is supported by Gotthelf (2004)'s study of other young and rotation-powered pulsars,
550: %which suggests that all pulsars with $\dot{E}$$>$3.4$\times$10$^{36}$~ergs~s$^{-1}$ should
551: %power bright PWNs. \j1119's $\dot{E}$ falls just below this critical value.
552: Whether \j1119 is a quiescent magnetar that's currently mainly powered by its $\dot{E}$, but
553: that will one day reveal a magnetar-like identity, remains to be seen.
554:
555: Finally, our study further suggests that \j1119 is characterized by a highly magnetized wind, possibly explaining the evidence for a small torus and prominent jets. The deep search for X-ray emission and PWNs around the other high-B pulsars is warranted to address the question whether these pulsars are similarly characterized by highly magnetized winds. Given the small $\dot{E}$ of most known high-B pulsars (Table~3), very long exposures will be needed to be sensitive to PWNs of luminosity $\approx$10$^{-4}$--10$^{-3}$$\dot{E}$.
556:
557:
558:
559: \acknowledgments
560: S. Safi-Harb acknowledges support by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and the Canada
561: Research Chairs program. This research made use of NASA's Astrophysics Data System, the High-Energy Astrophysics Science
562: Archive Center operated by NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, and the ATNF pulsar
563: database\footnote{http://www.atnf.csiro.au/research/pulsar/psrcat/}. We thank the anonymous referee and F. Camilo for a detailed reading of the manuscript and for useful comments.
564:
565: \begin{thebibliography}{}
566: %\bibitem[]{499} Baring, M. G. \& Harding, A. K. 1998, \apj, 507, L55
567:
568: \bibitem[]{501} Bucciantini, N. 2008, Advances in Space Research, 41, 491
569: %, \textit{preprint} astro-ph/0702084
570:
571: \bibitem[]{} Camilo, F. 2008, Nature Physics, 4, 353
572:
573: \bibitem[]{375} Camilo, F. et al. 2000, \apj, 541, 367
574:
575:
576: \bibitem[]{507} Camilo, F., Ransom, S. M., Halpern, J. P., Reynolds, J., Helfand, D. J., Zimmerman, N., \& Sarkissian, J. 2006,
577: Nature, 442, 892
578:
579: \bibitem[]{510} Camilo, F., Ransom, S. M. , Halpern, J. P., \& Reynolds, J. 2007, \apj, 666, L93
580:
581: \bibitem[]{512} Cordes, J. M., \& Lazio, T. J. W. 2002, preprint
582: (arXiv:0207156)
583:
584: \bibitem[]{376} Crawford, F. et al. 2001, \apj, 554, 152
585:
586: \bibitem[]{516} Ebeling, H., White, D. A., Rangarajan, F. V. N. 2006, \mnras, 368, 65
587:
588: \bibitem[]{518} Gaensler, B. M., \& Slane, P. O. 2006, \araa, 44, 17
589:
590: \bibitem[]{520} Gaensler, B. M. et al. 2002, \apj, 569, 878
591:
592: \bibitem[]{522} Gavriil, F. P., Gonzalez, M. E., Gotthelf, E. V., Kaspi, V. M., Livingstone, M. A., \& Woods, P. M. 2008, Science, 319, 1802
593: % in press, \textit{preprint} arXiv:0802.1704 (astro-ph)
594:
595: \bibitem[]{525} Gonzalez, M. E., \& Safi-Harb, S. 2003, \apj, 591, L143 (GSH03)
596:
597: \bibitem[]{527} Gonzalez, M. E., \& Safi-Harb, S. 2005, \apj, 619, 856
598:
599: \bibitem[]{529} Gonzalez, M. E., Kaspi, V. M., Camilo, F., Gaensler, B. M., Pivovaroff, M. J. 2005, 630, 489
600:
601: %\bibitem[]{531} Gotthelf, E. V. 2004 in:
602: %in IAU Symp. 218, Young Neutron Stars and Their Environments, ed. F. Camilo, \& B. M. Gaensler (San Francisco: ASP), 225, \textit{preprint} arXiv:0610376 (astro-ph)
603:
604: \bibitem[]{534} Halpern, J. P., Gotthelf, E. V., Becker, R. H., Helfand, D. J., White, R. L. 2005,
605: \apj, 632, L29
606:
607: \bibitem[]{537} Kargaltsev, O. Y., Pavlov, G. G., Teter, M. A., \& Sanwal, D. 2003, New Astronomy
608: Reviews, 47, 487
609:
610: \bibitem[]{540} Kargaltsev, O., Pavlov, G. G., \& Garmire, G. P. 2007, \apj, 660, 1413
611:
612: \bibitem[]{542} Kaspi, V. M., \& McLaughlin, M. A. 2005, \apj, 618, L41
613:
614: \bibitem[]{380_01} Kennel, C. F. \& Coroniti, F. V. 1984, \apj, 283, 694
615:
616: \bibitem[]{380_02} Kumar, H. S., \& Safi-Harb, S. 2008, \apjl,
617: 678, L43
618: %in press, \textit{preprint} arXiv:0802.1242 (astro-ph)
619:
620: \bibitem[]{548} McLaughlin, M. A. et al. 2003, \apj, 591, L135
621:
622: \bibitem[]{550} Mignani, R. P. et al. 2007, A\&A, 471, 265
623:
624: \bibitem[]{552} Mirabel, I. F., \& Rodriguez, L. F. 1999, \araa, 37, 409
625:
626: \bibitem[]{554} Morris, D. J. et al. 2002, MNRAS, 335, 275
627:
628: \bibitem[]{556} Petre, R., Hwang, U., Holt, S. S., Safi-Harb, S., \& Williams, R. M. 2007, \apj, 662, 988
629:
630: \bibitem[]{558} Pivovaroff, M. J., Kaspi, V. M., \& Camilo, F. 2000, \apj, 535, 379
631:
632: \bibitem[]{386_01} Pivovaroff, M. J., Kaspi, V. M., Camilo, F., Gaensler, B. M., \& Crawford, F. 2001, \apj, 554, 161
633:
634:
635: \bibitem[]{} Reynolds, S. P. et al. 2006, 639, L71
636:
637: \bibitem[]{562} Safi-Harb, S. 2008, in: 40 Years of Pulsars, Millisecond Pulsars, Magnetars and More.
638: AIP Conference Proceedings, Volume 983, pp. 213-215
639:
640: \bibitem[]{386_02} Slane, P. O., Helfand, D. J., \& Murray, S. S. 2002, \apj, 571, 45
641:
642: %\bibitem[]{388} Townsley, L. K., Broos, P. S., Garmire, G. P., \& Nousek, J. A. 2000, \apj, 534, L139
643:
644: \bibitem[] {} Woods, P. \& Thompson, C. 2006 in Compact stellar X-ray sources. Eds W. Lewin \& M. van der Klis.
645: Cambridge Astrophysics Series, No. 39. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, p. 547 - 586
646:
647: \bibitem[]{572} Zavlin, V. E., Pavlov, G. G., \& Shibanov, Y. A. 1996, A\&A, 315, 141
648:
649: \bibitem[]{574} Zavlin, V. E. 2007a, preprint (arXiv:0702426)
650:
651: \bibitem[]{576} Zavlin, V. E. 2007b, \apj, 665, L143
652:
653: \end{thebibliography}
654:
655:
656: \clearpage
657:
658:
659: \begin{table*}[ht]
660: \begin{tabular}{l l l l}
661: \hline
662: %\hline
663: Parameter & PL & BB+PL & NSA+PL\tablenotemark{a} \\
664: \hline
665: $ N_{\rm H}~(10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$) & 1.2$_{-0.3}^{+0.4}$ &
666: 1.8$_{-0.6}^{+1.5}$ & 1.6$\pm$0.2 \\
667:
668: $\Gamma$ & 3.0$_{-0.5}^{+0.5}$ & 1.9$_{-0.9}^{+1.1}$ & 1.5$\pm$0.8\\
669:
670: Norm.\tablenotemark{b} (PL)& 5.7$_{-2.3}^{+4.2}\times10^{-5}$ &
671: 1.5$_{-0.9}^{+2.3}\times10^{-5}$ & 8.4$_{-5.5}^{+1.5}\times10^{-6}$ \\
672:
673: $kT_{\rm eff}$(keV) & \nodata & 0.21$\pm$0.01 & 0.14$_{-0.02}^{+0.03}$ \\
674:
675: Norm.\tablenotemark{b} (BB)& \nodata & 3.5$_{-0.8}^{+1.5}\times10^{-6}$ &
676: 1.42$\times10^{-8}$ (frozen)\\
677:
678:
679: $F_{\rm unabs}(PL)$\tablenotemark{c} & 1.7$_{-0.7}^{+1.3}\times10^{-13}$ &
680: 6.7$_{-2.2}^{+0.7}\times10^{-14}$ & 6.1$_{-3.5}^{+3.2}\times10^{-14}$ \\
681:
682: $F_{\rm unabs}$\tablenotemark{c} (thermal) &\nodata & 2.2$_{-0.5}^{+0.9}\times10^{-13}$ &
683: 1.8$_{-1.5}^{+1.9}\times10^{-13}$ \\
684:
685: $L_{\rm X}$\tablenotemark{d} 10$^{33}$ergs~s$^{-1}$ & 1.4$^{+1.1}_{-0.6}$ &
686: 2.4$^{+0.8}_{-0.5}$& 2.1$^{+0.8}_{-0.6}$ \\
687:
688: $\chi_{\rm \nu}^2$~(dof) & 1.356 (31) & 0.948 (29)& 0.977 (30) \\
689:
690: \hline
691:
692: \end{tabular}
693: \caption{Spectral fits to the pulsar. All models are modified by interstellar absorption
694: with a column density $N_{H}$. PL denotes a power-law model, BB denotes a blackbody,
695: and NSA refers to the neutron star H atmospheric model in XSPEC version 12.4.0.}
696: \tablenotetext{a}{The NSA model assumes a magnetic field
697: of 10$^{13}$ Gauss, a neutron star radius of 10 km and mass
698: of 1.4 $M_{\sun}$. The distance is also fixed at 8.4~kpc (thus the normalization of 1.4$\times$10$^{-8}$). }
699: \tablenotetext{b}{PL normalization at 1 keV in units of photons~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~keV$^{-1}$.
700: BB normalization in units of $L_{39}$/$D_{10}^2$ where $L_{39}$ is the
701: luminosity in units of 10$^{39}$~ergs~s$^{-1}$ and $D_{10}$ is the distance in units of 10 kpc.}
702: \tablenotetext{c}{0.5--7.0 keV unabsorbed flux (ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$).}
703: \tablenotetext{d}{0.5-7.0 keV total luminosity (assuming isotropic emission).}
704: \end{table*}
705:
706: \clearpage
707:
708: \begin{table}[tbh]
709: \begin{tabular}{l l l}
710: %|c|c|c|}
711: \hline
712: %\hline
713: Parameter/PWN Region & Compact PWN & Southern `Jet' \\
714: \hline
715: $\Gamma$ & 1.1$^{+0.9}_{-0.7}$ & 1.4$^{+0.8}_{-0.9}$\\
716: Norm.\tablenotemark{a} & (2.2$^{+2.8}_{-1.2}$)$\times$10$^{-6}$ & (3.5$^{+5.6}_{-1.9}$)$\times$10$^{-6}$ \\
717: $\chi_{\rm \nu}^2$ (dof) & 1.23 (17) & 1.16 (17) \\
718: $f_{\rm unabs}$ (0.5--7 keV) ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$ & (1.9$^{+2.7}_{-1.0}$)$\times$10$^{-14}$ & (2.5$^{+3.9}_{-1.4}$)$\times$10$^{-14}$\\
719: \hline
720: \end{tabular}
721: \caption{Power law spectral fits to the PWN. The compact PWN refers to the ~6$^{\prime\prime}$$\times$15$^{\prime\prime}$ structure elongated in the north--south direction (see Fig.~4).
722: The southern `jet' corresponds to the new faint and extended
723: jet-like structure ($\sim$6$^{\prime\prime}$$\times$20$^{\prime\prime}$) shown
724: in Fig.~5. $N_H$ is frozen to 1.8$\times$10$^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$. Errors are 2$\sigma$.}
725: \tablenotetext{a}{Normalization at 1 keV in units of photons~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~keV$^{-1}$.}
726: \end{table}
727:
728:
729: \clearpage
730:
731: \begin{table}
732: \begin{tabular}{l l l l l l}
733: %{|c|c|c|c|c|c|}
734: \hline
735: %\hline
736: Pulsar (PSR) & $\dot{E}$ (ergs~s$^{-1}$) & $B$ (10$^{13}$ G) & PWN? & $\frac{L_x (psr+pwn)}{\dot{E}}$ & Reference\\
737: \hline
738: J1846$-$0258 & 8.0$\times$10$^{36}$ & 4.9 & Y (X) & 0.018--0.0325\tablenotemark{a} $d_{6}^2$ & Kumar \& Safi-Harb (2008)\\
739: J1119$-$6127 & 2.3$\times$10$^{36}$ & 4.1 & Y (X) & 5$\times$10$^{-4}$$d_{8.4}^2$ & this work\\
740: J1734$-$3333 & 5.6$\times$10$^{34}$ & 5.2 & -- & -- & Morris et al. (2002)\\
741: J1718$-$3718 & 1.5$\times$10$^{33}$ & 7.4 & -- & 0.013--4.0$d_{4.5}^2$ & Kaspi \& McLaughlin
742: (2005) \\
743: J1814$-$1744 & 4.7$\times$10$^{32}$ & 5.5 & -- & $<$1340\tablenotemark{b} $d_{10}^2$ & Pivovaroff et al. (2000)\\
744: J1819$-$1458\tablenotemark{c} & 2.9$\times$10$^{32}$ & 5.0 & -- & $\sim$12$d_{3.6}^2$ & Reynolds et al. (2006)\\
745: J1847$-$0130 & 1.7$\times$10$^{32}$ & 9.4 & -- & $<$18--47\tablenotemark{d} $d_8^2$ & McLaughlin et al. (2003)\\ \hline
746: B1800$-$21 & 2.2$\times$10$^{36}$ & 0.4 & Y(X) & 10$^{-4}$$d_4^2$ & Kargaltsev et al. (2007)\\
747: J1357$-$6429 & 3.1$\times$10$^{36}$ & 0.8 & Y(X) & 6.5$\times$10$^{-5}$$d_{2.5}^2$ & Zavlin et al. (2007b)\\
748: \hline
749: \end{tabular}
750: \caption{The high-magnetic field pulsars sorted in order of decreasing spin-down power. We used the ATNF pulsar catalog in compiling the pulsar properties and only selected pulsars with $B$$\gtrsim$4$\times$10$^{13}$ G (the QED value) (B is defined in footnote\#4, but see footnote\#13). The last two pulsars, shown only for comparison with \j1119,
751: are rotation-powered pulsars with a `typical'
752: magnetic field, but with $\dot{E}$ and
753: X-ray properties almost identical to PSR~J1119$-$6127. The 4th column refers to the presence (Y) or absence of a PWN in X-rays (X). Except for PSR~J1846$-$0258, none of these pulsars has a radio PWN associated with it.
754: The 5th column refers to the ratio of the non-thermal X-ray luminosity of the combined pulsar and associated PWN (when detected in X-rays) to the pulsar's spin down power,
755: scaled to the distance given in units of $d_x$,
756: where $x$ is the adopted distance to the pulsar in units of kpc.}
757: \tablenotetext{a}{the lower (upper) range corresponds to the 2000 (2006) $Chandra$ data; the pulsar has brightened by a factor
758: of $\sim$6 in 2006.}
759: \tablenotetext{b}{only an upper limit on the X-ray luminosity was estimated using the spectral properties of 1E~2259+586 (an AXP) as a template.}
760: \tablenotetext{c}{pulsar classified as a rotating radio transient; the
761: X-ray luminosity of the pulsar is uncertain by an order of magnitude.}
762: \tablenotetext{d}{only an upper limit was estimated using AXPs 4U0142+61 or 1E 2259+586 as templates.}
763: \end{table}
764:
765: \clearpage
766:
767:
768: \begin{figure}
769: \epsscale{0.75}
770: \centerline {\plotone{f1.ps}}
771: \caption{\label{1_01} 2.0--10.0 keV $\it{ASCA}$ image of SNR \g292,
772: smoothed with a Gaussian with $\sigma$=45$^{\prime\prime}$, with the
773: black circle showing the radio boundary (15$^{\prime}$ in diameter).
774: The superimposed squares mark the locations of
775: the 8$^{\prime}$$\times$8$^{\prime}$ \chan's S3 chip during
776: AO-3 (right) and AO-5 (left), covering the western and eastern sides of
777: the remnant, respectively, with the grayscale image showing the
778: raw 0.5--10 keV emission seen with $Chandra$. The central
779: circle marks the position of
780: PSR J1119$-$6127. North is up and east is to the left.}
781: \epsscale{1.0}
782: \end{figure}
783:
784:
785: \begin{figure}
786: \epsscale{0.75}
787: \centerline {\plotone{f2.eps}}
788: \caption{\label{1_02} The tri-color energy image of \j1119
789: and associated PWN.
790: The image is 2.4$^{\prime}$$\times$2.3$^{\prime}$ in size
791: and is exposure corrected.
792: Red, green, and blue correspond to 0.5--1.15 keV, 1.15--2.3 keV, and
793: 2.3--10.0 keV, respectively (see \S3.1 for details).}
794: \epsscale{1.0}
795: \end{figure}
796:
797:
798:
799: \begin{figure}
800: \plottwo{f3a.eps}{f3b.eps}
801: \caption{The raw soft (0.5--2.0 keV) and hard (2.0--10 keV) images of PSR~J1119$-$6127
802: and associated nebula. These images were not background-subtracted.}
803: \end{figure}
804:
805:
806:
807: \begin{figure}
808: \plottwo{f4a.eps}{f4b.eps}
809: \caption{ The same images as in Fig.~3, adaptively smoothed (with `csmooth') using a Gaussian with $\sigma$=1$^{\prime\prime}$ for
810: a significance of detection greater than 5 and up to $\sigma$=3$^{\prime\prime}$ for a
811: significance of detection down to 2. The PWN and its elongated morphology in the north-south direction is evident in the hard band image. Contours are overlayed on a linear scale, chosen to highlight the emission from the jets, and ranging from 2.5 to 17 counts per pixel in steps of 2 for the soft band image, and from 2.5 to 7 counts per pixel in steps of 0.75 for the hard band image. }
812: \end{figure}
813:
814:
815:
816: \begin{figure}
817: \centerline{\plotone{f5.eps}}
818: \caption{\label{1_03} The 2--10 keV image of PSR J1119$-$6127 displaying the extended jet-like feature southwest of the pulsar. The image has been background-subtracted and smoothed as the previous figure. The overlaid contours range from 1.4 to 10 counts per pixel in steps of 1 in linear scale and are
819: chosen to highlight the structure of the elongated jet.}
820: \end{figure}
821:
822: \begin{figure}
823: \plotone{f6.ps}
824: \caption{The spectrum of PSR J1119$-$6127 fitted with the blackbody model,
825: illustrating the excess of emission above $\sim$3~keV unaccounted for by the blackbody model.
826: The lower panel shows the ratio of data to plotted model.
827: The 3 colors refer to the 3 observations used in our analysis ($obsid$ 2833 in black, 4676 in red, and 6153 in green).}
828: \end{figure}
829:
830:
831: \begin{figure}
832: \plotone{f7.ps}
833: \caption{The spectrum of PSR J1119$-$6127 fitted with the BB+PL model shown in Table~1. The lower panel shows the ratio of data to plotted model. The dotted lines show the contributions of the blackbody (soft) and power law (hard) components to the spectrum. The 3 colors refer to the 3
834: observations used in our analysis ($obsid$ 2833 in black, 4676 in red, and 6153 in green).}
835: \end{figure}
836:
837: \end{document}
838: