1: % Entomogenic Climate Change: ITC version for Leonardo special issue
2: % jpc: 12/01/06, 5/14/08, 5/18/08
3: % ddd: 12/01/06
4:
5: \documentclass[pre,numbers,sort,twocolumn,showpacs,superscriptaddress,preprintnumbers,floatfix]{revtex4}
6:
7: % Packages
8: %\usepackage{natbib}
9:
10: \usepackage{dcolumn}
11: \usepackage{url}
12: \usepackage{amsmath}
13: \usepackage{amssymb}
14: \usepackage{graphicx}
15: \usepackage{bm} % bold math
16: \usepackage{bbm}
17: \usepackage{verbatim}
18: \usepackage{stmaryrd}
19: %\usepackage{theorem}
20: \usepackage{amsthm}
21: \newcommand\degrees[1]{\ensuremath{#1^\circ}}
22:
23: \begin{document}
24:
25: \title{Entomogenic Climate Change}
26:
27: \author{David Dunn}
28: \email{artscilab@comcast.net}
29: \affiliation{Art and Science Laboratory, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501}
30:
31: \author{James P. Crutchfield}
32: \email{chaos@cse.ucdavis.edu}
33: \affiliation{Complexity Sciences Center \& Physics Department,
34: University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616}
35: \affiliation{Art and Science Laboratory, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501}
36:
37: \date{\today}
38:
39: %\bibliographystyle{unsrt}
40:
41: % ************************* ABSTRACT *************************
42: \begin{abstract}
43: Rapidly expanding insect populations, deforestation, and global climate change
44: threaten to destabilize key planetary carbon pools, especially the Earth's
45: forests which link the micro-ecology of insect infestation to climate. To the
46: extent mean temperature increases, insect populations accelerate deforestation.
47: This alters climate via the loss of active carbon sequestration by live trees
48: and increased carbon release from decomposing dead trees. A positive feedback
49: loop can emerge that is self-sustaining---no longer requiring independent
50: climate-change drivers. Current research regimes
51: and insect control strategies are insufficient at present to cope with the
52: present regional scale of insect-caused deforestation, let alone its likely
53: future global scale. Extensive field recordings demonstrate that bioacoustic
54: communication plays a role in infestation dynamics and is likely to be a critical
55: link in the feedback loop. These results open the way to novel detection and
56: monitoring strategies and nontoxic control interventions.
57: \end{abstract}
58:
59: \pacs{
60: % 05.45.Tp % Time series analysis
61: % 89.75.Kd % Complex Systems: Patterns
62: % 02.50.-r % Probability theory, stochastic processes, and statistics
63: % 43.35.-c % Ultrasonics, quantum acoustics, and physical effects of sound
64: % 43.35.Wa % Biological effects of ultrasound, ultrasonic tomography
65: % 43.35.Yb % Ultrasonic instrumentation and measurement techniques
66: % 43.50.Rq % Environmental noise, measurement, analysis, statistical characteristics
67: 43.80.-n % Bioacoustics
68: % 43.80.Cs % Acoustical characteristics of biological media: molecular species, cellular level tissues
69: % 43.80.Ev % Acoustical measurement methods in biological systems and media
70: 43.80.Ka % Sound production by animals: mechanisms, characteristics, populations, biosonar (see also 43.30.Nb and 43.64.Tk)
71: 43.80.Lb % Sound reception by animals: anatomy, physiology, auditory capacities, processing (see also 43.64.Tk, 43.66.Gf)
72: % 87.23.-n % Ecology and evolution
73: % 87.23.Cc % Population dynamics and ecological pattern formation
74: % 87.23.Kg % Dynamics of evolution
75: % 87.50.Kk % Sound and ultrasound
76: % 87.80.Tq % Biological signal processing and instrumentation
77: % 92.70.-j % Global change
78: % 92.70.Aa % Abrupt/rapid climate change
79: % 92.70.Bc % Land/atmosphere interactions
80: 92.70.Mn % Impacts of global change; global warming (see also 92.30.Np—in geophysics appendix)
81: % 92.70.St % Land cover change
82: }
83: %
84:
85: \preprint{Santa Fe Institute Working Paper 08-05-XXX}
86: \preprint{arxiv.org/q-bio.PE/0805XXX}
87:
88: \maketitle
89:
90: % ****************************************************************
91: \tableofcontents
92: % ************************* INTRODUCTION *************************
93:
94: \section{Introduction}
95:
96: Forest ecosystems result from a dynamic balance of soil, plants, insects, animals, and
97: climate. The balance, though, can be destabilized by outbreaks of tree-eating insects.
98: These outbreaks in turn are sensitive to climate, which controls precipitation. Drought
99: stresses trees, rendering them vulnerable to insect predation. The net result is increased
100: deforestation driven by insects and modulated by climate.
101:
102: For their part, many species of predating insects persist only to the extent that they
103: successfully reproduce by consuming and living within trees. Drought-stressed trees
104: are easier to infest compared to healthy trees, which have more robust defenses
105: against attack. To find trees suitable for reproduction, insects track relevant
106: environmental indicators, including chemical signals and, probably, bioacoustic
107: ones emitted by stressed trees. At the level of insect populations, infestation dynamics
108: are sensitive to climate via seasonal temperatures. Specifically, insect populations
109: increase markedly each year when winters are short and freezes less severe. The net
110: result is rapidly changing insect populations whose dynamics are modulated by climate.
111:
112: Thus, via temperature and precipitation, climate sets the context for tree growth and
113: insect reproduction and also for the interaction between trees and insects. At the largest
114: scale, climate is driven by absorbed solar energy and controlled by relative fractions
115: of atmospheric gases. The amount of absorbed solar energy is determined by cloud and ground
116: cover. Forests are a prime example, as an important ground cover that absorbs, uses, and
117: re-radiates solar energy in various forms. At the same time forests are key moderators of
118: atmospheric gases. Trees exhaust oxygen and take up carbon dioxide in a process that
119: sequesters in solid form carbon from the atmosphere. As plants and trees evolved, in fact,
120: they altered the atmosphere sufficiently that earth's climate, once inhospitable, changed
121: and now supports a wide diversity of life.
122:
123: There are at least three stories here: the trees', the insects', and the climate's. They
124: necessarily overlap since the phenomena and interactions they describe co-occur in space
125: and in time. Their overlap hints at an astoundingly complicated system, consisting of many
126: cooperating and competing components; the health of any one depending on the health of
127: others. (Figure \ref{fig:Interactions} gives a schematic view of the components and
128: interactions that we consider in the following; cf. \textcite{Fiel95a}.)
129: How are we to understand the individual views as part of a larger whole? In particular,
130: what can result from interactions between the different scales over which insects, trees,
131: and climate adapt?
132:
133: Taking the stories together, we have, in engineering parlance, a \emph{feedback loop}: Going
134: from small to large scale, one sees that insects reproduce by feeding on trees; forests affect
135: regional solar energy uptake and atmospheric gas balance; and, finally, energy and carbon
136: storage and atmospheric gases affect climate. Simultaneously, the large scale (climate)
137: sets the context for dynamics on the small scale: temperature modulates insect
138: reproduction and precipitation controls tree growth. The feedback loop of insects, trees,
139: and climate means that new kinds of behavior can appear---dynamics not due to any
140: single player, but to their interactions. Importantly, such feedback loops can maintain
141: ecosystem stability or lead to instability that amplifies even small effects to large scale.
142:
143: \begin{figure}
144: \begin{center}
145: \resizebox{!}{2.50in}{\includegraphics{Interactions.eps}}
146: \end{center}
147: \caption{Insect, tree, and climate interactions discussed here; compare Net Primary
148: Production \protect\citep{Fiel95a}.
149: }
150: \label{fig:Interactions}
151: \end{figure}
152:
153: Here we give a concrete example of the dynamic interaction between insects, trees, and climate.
154: We focus on the role that bark beetles (Scolytidae or, more recently, Curculionidae: Scolytinae)
155: play in large-scale deforestation and consequently in climate change. Bark beetles are emblematic
156: of many different insect species that now participate in rapid deforestation. Likewise, we
157: primarily focus on the North American boreal forests for their unique characteristics but also
158: as representative of the vulnerability of all types of forest ecosystems. And so, the picture we
159: paint here is necessarily incomplete \footnote{An expanded discussion can be found at
160: \textcite{Dunn06c}.}.
161:
162: Nonetheless, their cases serve to illustrate the complex
163: of interactions that are implicated in the feedback loop and also the current limits to human
164: response. Although they are not alone, bark beetles appear to be an example of a novel
165: player in climate change. Unlike the climatic role that inanimate greenhouse gases are
166: predicted to play in increasing global temperature over the next century, bark beetles
167: represent a biotic agent that actively adapts on the time scale of years but that, despite the
168: short time scale, still can cause effects, such as deforestation, at large spatial scales. To
169: emphasize the specificity and possible autonomy of this kind of biological, non-human agent,
170: we refer to the result as \emph{entomogenic climate change}.
171:
172: A detailed analysis of the problem of entomogenic climate change leads us to make a
173: number of constructive suggestions for increased attention to relatively less familiar
174: domains of study, including micro-ecological symbiosis and its nonlinear population
175: dynamics, and insect social organization. Here we emphasize in particular the role that
176: bark beetle bioacoustic behavior must have in their evolving multiple survival
177: adaptations which, it appears, fill in significant gaps in the explanatory model of
178: infestation dynamics. One goal is to stimulate interdisciplinary research that is
179: appropriate to the complex of interactions implicated in deforestation and appropriate
180: to discovering effective control strategies.
181:
182: \section{Forest Health and Climate}
183:
184: The Earth's three great forest ecosystems---tropical, temperate, and boreal---are of
185: irreplaceable importance to its self-regulating balance. Their trees help to regulate its
186: climate, provide essential timber resources, and create a diversity of habitat and nutrients
187: that support other forms of life, including millions of people. Forests contribute to global
188: climate dynamics through a carbon cycle in which atmospheric carbon dioxide is converted
189: into an immense carbon pool. At any one point in time, the Earth's forest ecosystems together
190: hold a majority of the terrestrial Earth's carbon stocks with the boreal forests comprising
191: 49 percent of
192: the total carbon pool contained within these three types of forest ecosystems \citep{Malh99a}.
193: That carbon is then slowly released back into the atmosphere through complicated decomposition
194: processes.
195:
196: All forms of deforestation, human and natural, directly impact climatic conditions by
197: attenuating or delaying the carbon cycle. In concert with well documented greenhouse
198: gas effects that drive global atmospheric change, the potential loss of large areas of
199: these forests, combined with accelerating deforestation of tropical and temperate regions,
200: may have significant future climate impacts beyond already dire predictions. Ice core
201: studies reveal that the Earth's climate has varied cyclically over the past 450,000 years.
202: Temperatures have been closely tied to variations in atmospheric carbon dioxide in a
203: cyclic change that recurs
204: on the time scale of millennia. Vegetation has been forced to adapt. The boreal forests are,
205: in fact, highly vulnerable to these climate shifts. Examination of fossil pollen and other
206: fossil records shows that, in response to temperature variations over the past millennia,
207: North American boreal forests have radically changed many times \citep{Lind02a}. The unique
208: sensitivity of these forests' tree species to temperature suggests that the predicted warmer
209: climate will cause their ecological niches to shift north faster than the forests can migrate.
210:
211: One major consequence of boreal deforestation is increasing fire risk. Over the next
212: half-century, the Siberian and Canadian boreal forests will most likely see as much as a
213: 50 percent increase in burnt trees \citep{Smit00a}. One of the major sources fueling these
214: fires will be dead and dying trees killed by various opportunistic insect species and their
215: associated microorganisms.
216:
217: Paralleling concerns about the boreal forests, in recent years there has been a growing
218: awareness of extensive insect outbreaks in various regional forests throughout the
219: western United States. As consecutive summers of unprecedented forest fires consumed the dead
220: and dying trees a new concern emerged: insect-driven deforestation is a threat connected to
221: global climate change. In fact, climate experts, forestry personnel, and biologists, have all
222: observed that these outbreaks are an inevitable consequence of a climatic shift to warmer
223: temperatures \citep{Smit00a}.
224:
225: Biologists now regularly voice concern that the problem exceeds any of the earlier
226: projections \citep{Kurz08a}. Evidence from diverse research sources suggests we are entering an
227: unprecedented planetary event: forest ecology is rapidly changing due to exploding
228: plant-consuming (\emph{phytophagous}) insect populations. In 2004, NASA's Global Disturbances
229: project analyzed nineteen years of satellite data ending in 2000. It revealed rapid
230: defoliation over a brief period (1995 to 2000) of a vast region that extends from the
231: US-Canadian border in western Canada to Alaska. The conclusion was that the
232: devastation resulted from two different insects, the mountain pine beetle (\emph{Dendroctonus
233: ponderosae}) and the western spruce budworm (\emph{Choristoneura occidentalis})
234: \citep{Pott05a}.
235:
236: Now, four years later we know of even further damage. In Alaska, spruce bark beetles
237: (\emph{Dendroctonus rufipennis}) have killed 4.4 million acres of forest in just a
238: decade \citep{Berg06a}. This damage results from only one such insect. Climate warming
239: has also allowed the mountain pine beetle to expand its range into formerly unsuitable
240: habitats. The recent range expansion of the mountain pine beetle in British Columbia
241: has resulted in commercial timber losses of 435 million m$^3$, with additional losses
242: outside the commercial forests. The cumulative area of beetle outbreak was 130,000
243: km$^2$ by the end of 2006. This is an outbreak of unprecedented severity at a magnitude
244: larger in area than all previous recorded outbreaks \citep{Kurz08a}.
245:
246: Jesse Logan (USDA Forest Service) and James Powell (Utah State University, Logan)
247: discussed the serious implications that a continuing warming trend will have on the
248: range expansion of the mountain pine beetle into both higher elevations and more
249: northern latitudes \citep{Loga01a}. At the time, one concern was that the beetles would breach the
250: Canadian Rockies and expand into the great boreal forests of Canada. Historically, these
251: forests have been immune to mountain pine beetles due to predictably severe winter conditions
252: that decimate beetle populations. Since much of Canada has seen mean winter
253: temperature increases as high as $\degrees{4}$C in the last century, and even faster changes
254: recently, the conditions for the beetles are improving rapidly.
255:
256: It is now well established that mountain pine beetles have slipped through mountain
257: passes from the Peace River country in northern British Columbia to Alberta, the most
258: direct corridor to the boreal forests \citep{Carr06a}. If the beetle is successful at adapting
259: to and colonizing Canada's jack pine, there will be little to stop it moving through the immense
260: contiguous boreal forest, all the way to Labrador and the North American east coast. It
261: then will have a path down into the forests of eastern Texas. Entomologist Jesse Logan
262: \citep{Loga01a} describes this as ``a potential geographic event of continental scale with
263: unknown, but potentially devastating, ecological consequences.''
264:
265: Continental migration aside, if the beetles infest the high-elevation conifers, the so-called
266: five-needle pines, of the western United States, this will reduce the snow-fence effect that
267: these alpine forests provide. Snow fences hold windrows of captured snow that are crucial to
268: the seasonal conservation and distribution of water from the Rocky Mountains. This is
269: one of the primary origins of water that sources several major river systems in North
270: America \citep{Loga01a}.
271: Every western state is contending with various rates of unprecedented insect infestation
272: not only by many different species of Scolytidae, but also by other plant-eating insects.
273:
274: These and other rising populations of
275: phytophagous insects are now becoming recognized as a global problem and one of the
276: most obvious and fast emerging consequences of global climate change. Over the past
277: fifteen years there have been reports of unusual and unprecedented outbreaks occurring
278: on nearly every continent.
279:
280: \section{What Drives Infestations?}
281:
282: Several well-understood factors underlie how climate change impacts insect populations.
283: The two dominant environmental factors are changes in temperature and moisture.
284: Changing insect-host relationships and nonhost species impacts, such as predation and
285: disease, also play essential roles.
286:
287: Since insects are cold-blooded, they are extremely sensitive to
288: temperature, being more active at higher temperatures. As winter temperatures increase,
289: there are fewer freezing conditions that keep insect populations in check than in the past.
290: Shortened winters, increasing summer temperatures, and fewer late-spring frosts correlate
291: to increased insect feeding, faster growth rates, and rapid reproduction \citep{Lomb00a}.
292:
293: Moisture availability and variability are also major determinants of insect habitat---forest
294: health and boundaries. Drought creates many conditions that are favorable to increased
295: insect reproduction. Many drought-induced plant characteristics are attractive to insects.
296: Higher plant surface temperatures, leaf yellowing, increased infrared reflectance, biochemical
297: changes, and stress-induced cavitation acoustic emissions, may all be
298: positive signals to insects of host vulnerability. Drought also leads to increased food
299: value in plant tissues through nutrient concentration, while reducing defensive
300: compounds. These last factors may in turn increase the efficacy of insect immune
301: systems and therefore enhance their ability to detoxify remaining plant defenses. Higher
302: temperatures and decreased moisture may also decrease the activity of insect diseases and
303: predator activity while optimizing conditions for mutualistic microorganisms that benefit
304: insect growth \citep{Matt87a}.
305:
306: One of the most frequently noted impacts of global climate change is the desynchronization
307: of biotic developmental patterns---such as the inability of forests to migrate as quickly
308: as their ecological niches---that have remained coherent for millennia. This decoupling
309: between various elements of an ecosystem is one of the most unpredictable and disruptive
310: results of abrupt climate change.
311:
312: Unfortunately, insects respond to changes in their thermal environment much faster than
313: their hosts, either through migration (days), adaptation (seasonal), or evolution (centuries).
314: Under the stress of abrupt climate change the only short-term limit on their increasing
315: populations may be their near total elimination of suitable hosts. In short, trees only
316: adapt slowly (centuries) to changing conditions, while insects can disperse widely and
317: adapt much faster to abrupt environmental changes.
318:
319: \section{The Tree's Perspective}
320:
321: While it is clear that under extreme conditions phytophagous insects and their associated
322: microorganisms can quickly gain the advantage against host trees, it is also true that trees
323: have evolved effective defense mechanisms. For example, in their defense against bark
324: beetles there are two recognized components: the \emph{preformed resin system} and the \emph{induced
325: hypersensitivity response}. Once a beetle bores through the outer tree bark into the inner
326: tissues, resin ducts are severed and its flow begins. A beetle contends with the resin flow
327: by removing resin from its entrance hole. Trees that are sufficiently hydrated often
328: manage to ``pitch-out'' the invader through sufficient flow of resin. In some conifer
329: species with well defined resin-duct systems, resin is stored and available for beetle
330: defense. The \emph{monoterpenes} within the resin also have antibiotic and repellent properties
331: to defend against beetle-associated fungi \citep{Nebe93a}.
332:
333: The induced hypersensitivity response is usually a secondary defense system; it is also
334: known as \emph{wound response}. It produces secondary resinosis, cellular dessication, tissue
335: necrosis, and wound formation---essentially a tree's attempt to isolate and deprive
336: nutrition to an invading organism. In species without well-defined resin-duct systems it is
337: often a primary defense mechanism. In both cases these defense strategies are very
338: susceptible to variations in temperature and available moisture. Their efficacy also varies
339: with different beetle species \citep{Nebe93a}.
340:
341: Since winter survivability and the number of eggs laid by bark beetles is directly correlated
342: to ambient temperature \citep{Lomb00a}, it is no surprise that increases in
343: yearly beetle population cycles have been observed throughout the western states and
344: provinces as warming and local drought conditions have persisted \citep{Loga01a}.
345: The relative time scales for increased infestation rates, and subsequent adaptive tree
346: response, can put host trees at a serious disadvantage with regard to even the short-term
347: effects of climatic warming.
348:
349: \section{Pioneer Beetle: Infestation Linchpin}
350:
351: An attack begins with the pioneer beetle that locates, by means not yet elucidated, and lands
352: on a suitable host. Others join this beetle, all soon boring through the outer bark into
353: the phloem and cambium layers where eggs are laid after mating. Within the resulting
354: galleries that house the adult beetles and their eggs, the larvae hatch, pupate, and undergo
355: metamorphosis into adulthood. In this way, they spend the largest fraction of their life-cycle
356: (anywhere between 2 months to two years depending on species and geographic location) inside
357: a tree. This new generation emerges from the bark and flies away to seek new host trees.
358:
359: The widely held view is that the pioneer attracts other beetles to the host through a
360: pheromone signal. Like many other insects, bark beetles manufacture communicative pheromones
361: from molecular constituents that they draw from host trees \citep{Agos92a}. In some species
362: the pioneer is male and, in others, female. Each new beetle that is attracted to the host
363: subsequently contributes to the general release of an \emph{aggregation} pheromone. It is
364: also theorized that the aggregation pheromone has an upper limit beyond which attracted beetles
365: will land on adjacent trees rather than the initial host, since high concentrations would indicate
366: over-use of the available host resources.
367:
368: One hope has been that understanding bark beetle chemical ecology would lead to its
369: manipulation and eventually to a viable forestry management tool. Much to our loss,
370: nothing of the sort has been forthcoming. This largely derives from the sheer complexity
371: of the insect-tree micro-ecology and how far away we are from a sufficient understanding
372: of mechanisms and interactions. The two major contributions of chemical ecology
373: research to control measures have been those of pesticides and pheromone trapping. Most
374: biologists appreciate that pesticides have a very limited role in controlling insect
375: infestations at the scales in question. Pheromone traps are one of the essential tools of
376: field research in entomology, but adapting them for large-scale control has been
377: controversial at best; see \textcite{Bord97a} for an overview.
378:
379: An underlying assumption of chemical ecology is that pheromones are the primary
380: attractant for beetles seeking new hosts, but this remains a hypothesis. While many
381: researchers believe that attraction is olfactory, others propose that visual cues are key for
382: some species \citep{Camp06a}. Importantly, forestry management policy is based largely on the
383: chemical ecology hypothesis that olfaction is dominant. It has never been definitively
384: proven, however, and, for a number of reasons, it is unlikely to be. Stated simply, foraging
385: insects most likely use whatever cues are the most accurate and easily assessed under varying
386: circumstances. To assume otherwise is to go against the common logic that living
387: systems evolve multiple survival strategies to cope with environmental complexity.
388:
389: In short, key mechanisms in infestation dynamics remain unknown: the pioneer beetle's
390: ability to find a suitable host and then to facilitate organizing others to attack.
391:
392: \section{The Bioacoustic Ecology Hypothesis}
393:
394: One of the more under-appreciated research domains regarding bark beetles concerns their
395: remarkable bioacoustic abilities. The sound producing mechanism in many bark beetles is
396: a \emph{pars stridens} organ that functions as a friction-based grating surface.
397: In \emph{Ips confusus} beetles it is located on the back of the head and stroked by
398: a \emph{plectrum} on the under side of the dorsal anterior edge of the prothorax.
399: In other species (\emph{Dendroctonus}) the pars stridens is located on the surface
400: under the elytra and near the apices and sutural margins. Another is found in some
401: species on the underside of the head. All three of these sound generating organs
402: produce a variety of chirps that range from simple single-impulse clicks to a range
403: of different multi-impulse chirps. These also differ between genders of the same
404: species and between different species probably due to subtle differences in the
405: sound producing mechanisms. Collectively, all of the sounds and their associated
406: mechanisms are referred to as \emph{stridulation}, the most common form of sound
407: production made by various forms of beetle \citep{Barr69a}.
408:
409: Past research suggested that sound making and perception in bark beetles was secondary
410: compared to their use of chemical-signaling mechanisms. Most studies addressing acoustic
411: behavior concentrated on sound generation and only in its relationship to chemical signaling.
412: These include the role stridulation sound-making has in controlling attack spacing between
413: entry points in the host \citep{Byer89a} or the triggering of pheromone release between genders
414: \citep{Rudi76a}. The resulting view is that bark beetles use a combination of chemical and
415: acoustic signals to regulate aggression, attack on host trees, courtship, mating behavior,
416: and population density.
417:
418: While the dual behavioral mechanisms of scent and sound are largely inseparable, it is
419: usually assumed that bark beetles use chemical messages for communication at a distance
420: while reserving acoustic signals for close-range communication. However, this distinction
421: remains hypothetical. We do not yet have a
422: clear understanding of how far either their pheromones or sound signals can travel,
423: let alone a full appreciation of the diverse forms of acoustic signaling that they may
424: employ. We do know that both communication mechanisms are used after beetles have
425: aggregated on a host and that one form of signaling can evoke the other.
426:
427: An emphasis on pheromone-based communication may very well have led to a lack of follow-up
428: on the possibility that host trees themselves produce acoustic cues that attract pioneer
429: beetles. Perhaps the earliest proposal dates to 1987, when William Mattson and Robert Haack
430: (USDA, Forest Service) speculated that cavitation events in trees might produce acoustic
431: signals audible to plant-eating insects \citep{Matt87a,Haac88a}. Cavitation occurs in trees by
432: breaking of the water columns in the conducting xylem tissue of leaves, stems, and trunks.
433: The assumption has been that the sounds are vibrations coming from individual cells
434: collapsing, which is due to gradual dehydration and prolonged water stress. While
435: cavitation produces some acoustic emissions in the audible range (20 Hz - 20 kHz), most occur
436: in the ultrasound range (20 - 200 kHz and above). In fact, counting ultrasonic acoustic emissions
437: from cavitating xylem
438: tissues is a widely accepted monitoring practice used by botanists to measure drought
439: stress in trees. Despite its common usage in botany, there has been very little study as to
440: the actual generating mechanism. For the most part, it is merely a statistical measuring
441: tool and the correlation between the incidence of cavitations and drought stress, an
442: accepted fact \citep{Jack96a}.
443:
444: Recent fieldwork by one of us (DDD) focused on sound production by the pinion engraver
445: beetle (\emph{Ips confuses}). Sounds were recorded within the interior phloem layer of
446: the pinion trees, often adjacent to beetle nuptial chambers. A rich and varied acoustic ecology
447: was documented---an ecology that goes beyond the previously held assumptions about
448: the role of sound within this species \citep{Dunn06a}. Another important observation was
449: that much of the sound production by this species has a very strong ultrasonic component.
450: Since communication systems seldom evolve through investing substantial resources into a
451: portions of the frequency spectrum that an organism cannot both generate and perceive
452: \citep{Dunn06b}, this raised the question of whether or not bark beetles have a complementary
453: ultrasonic auditory capability. Recent laboratory investigations by Jayne Yack
454: (Biology, Carleton University) have also revealed ultrasound components in some bark beetle
455: signals and indirect evidence that beetles possess sensory organs for hearing airborne sounds
456: \citep{Yack06a}.
457:
458: One possible implication that arises from the combination of these laboratory and field
459: observations is that various bark beetle species may possess organs capable of hearing
460: ultrasound for conspecific communication. If so, these species would be preadpated for
461: listening to diverse auditory cues from trees.
462:
463: In turn, this raises an important issue not addressed by previous bark beetle
464: bioacoustic research. A very diverse range of sound signaling persists well after
465: the putatively associated behaviors---host selection, coordination of attack, courtship,
466: territorial competition, and nuptial chamber excavations---have all taken place. In
467: fully colonized trees the stridulations, chirps, and clicks can go on continuously for
468: days and weeks, long after most of these other behaviors will have apparently run their
469: course. These observations suggest that these insects have a more sophisticated social
470: organization than previously suspected---one that requires ongoing communication
471: through sound and substrate vibration.
472:
473: The above acoustic fieldwork led us to conclude that there must be a larger range of
474: forms of insect sociality and so means of organizational communication. More precise
475: understanding of these forms of social organization may improve our ability to design
476: better control systems, whether these are chemical, acoustic, or biological.
477:
478: The results in both bioacoustics and chemical ecology strongly suggest bark beetle
479: communication is largely multimodal and that both pheromone and mechanical signaling
480: are interwoven. A growing appreciation in many fields of biology has emerged that
481: animal signals often consist of multiple parts within or across sensory modalities. Insects
482: are not only an example of this observation, but they possess some of the most surprising
483: examples of multicomponent and multimodal communication systems \citep{Skal05a}.
484:
485: \section{Conclusion: Closing the Loop}
486:
487: The eventual impact that insect-driven deforestation and global climate change will have
488: on the Earth's remaining forests ultimately depends on the rate at which temperatures
489: increase. The impacts will be minimized if that rate is gradual, but increasingly disruptive
490: if the change is abrupt. Unfortunately, most climate projections now show that a rapid
491: temperature increase is more likely \citep{Wats01a}. The current signs of increasing insect
492: populations at this early stage of warming does not portend well for forest health in the
493: near future. The concern is exacerbated, since we have limited countermeasures under
494: development.
495:
496: One conclusion appears certain. Extensive deforestation by insects will convert the essential
497: carbon pool provided by the Earth's forests into atmospheric carbon dioxide. Concomitantly,
498: the generation of atmospheric oxygen and sequestration of carbon by trees will decrease
499: \citep{Kurz08a}.
500:
501: Most immediately, though, as millions of trees die, they not only cease to participate in the
502: global carbon cycle, but become potential fuel for more frequent and increasingly
503: large-scale fire outbreaks. These fires will release further carbon dioxide into the
504: atmosphere and do so more rapidly than the natural cycle of biomass decay. The interactions
505: between these various components and their net effect are complicated at best---a theme
506: running throughout the entire feedback loop.
507:
508: An example of this is how boreal forest fires affect climate \citep{Rand06a}. A
509: constellation of substantially changed components (lost forest, sudden release of gases,
510: and the like) leads, it is claimed, to no net climate impact. The repeated lesson of
511: complex, nonlinear dynamical systems, though, is that the apparent stability of any part
512: can be destabilized by its place in a larger system. Thus, one needs to evaluate the lack of
513: boreal fire-climate effects in the context of the entire feedback loop.
514:
515: Taken alone, the potential loss of forests is of substantial concern to humans. When
516: viewing this system as a feedback loop, though, the concern is that the individual
517: components will become part of an accelerating positive feedback loop of sudden
518: climatic change. Such entomogenic change, given the adaptive population dynamics of a
519: key player (insects), may happen on a very short time scale. This necessitates a shift in
520: the current characterization of increasing insect populations as merely symptomatic of
521: global climate change to a concern for insects as a significant generative agent.
522:
523: In addition to concerted research in bioacoustics, micro-ecological symbiosis and
524: dynamics, and insect social organizations, these areas, in conjunction with the field of
525: chemical ecology, must be integrated into a broader view of multiscale population,
526: evolutionary, and climate dynamics. In this sense, the birth of chemical ecology serves as
527: an inspiration. It grew out of an interdisciplinary collaboration between biology and
528: chemistry. It is precisely this kind of intentional cooperation between disciplines---but
529: now over a greater range of scales---that will most likely lead to new strategies for
530: monitoring and defense against what seems to be a growing threat to the world's forests
531: and ultimately to humanity itself.
532:
533: \section*{Acknowledgments}
534:
535: The authors thank Dawn Sumner, Jim Tolisano, Richard Hofstetter, Jayne Yack,
536: Reagan McGuire, and Bob Harrill for helpful discussions. This work was partially
537: supported by the Art and Science Laboratory via a grant from the Delle Foundation
538: and the Network Dynamics Program, funded by Intel Corporation, at UCD and the
539: Santa Fe Institute.
540:
541: \bibliography{ref}
542:
543: \section*{Biography: James P. Crutchfield}
544:
545: Jim Crutchfield teaches nonlinear physics at the University of California, Davis, directs
546: its Complexity Sciences Center, and promotes science interventions in nonscientific settings.
547: He's mostly concerned with what patterns are, how they are created, and how intelligent agents
548: discover them; see \url{cse.ucdavis.edu/~chaos}.
549:
550: \section*{Biography: David D. Dunn}
551:
552: David Dunn is a composer who rarely presents concerts or installations, preferring to lecture and
553: engage in site-specific interactions or research-oriented activities. Much of his current work
554: focuses on the development of strategies and technologies for environmental sound monitoring in
555: both aesthetic and scientific contexts.
556:
557: \end{document}
558: