1: \documentclass[prl,aps,groupedaddress,showpacs,preprintnumbers,twocolumn,%
2: nofootinbib,superscriptaddress]{revtex4}%
3: \usepackage{graphicx}
4: \usepackage{amsmath}
5: \usepackage{bm}
6: \usepackage{epsfig}
7: \usepackage{amssymb}
8:
9: \newcommand{\slsh}{\!\!\!\slash}
10:
11: \setlength\arraycolsep{2pt}
12:
13: \begin{document}
14: \title{Factorization theorems for exclusive heavy-quarkonium production}
15: \author{Geoffrey~T.~Bodwin}
16: \affiliation{High Energy Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory,\\
17: 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA}
18: \author{Xavier \surname{Garcia i Tormo}}
19: \affiliation{High Energy Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory,\\
20: 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA}
21: \author{Jungil~Lee}
22: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea}
23:
24: \date{\today}
25:
26: \preprint{ANL-HEP-PR-08-28}
27: \pacs{12.38.-t, 12.38.Bx, 14.40.Gx}
28:
29: \begin{abstract}
30: We outline the proofs of the factorization theorems for exclusive
31: two-body charmonium production in $B$-meson decay and $e^+e^-$
32: annihilation to all orders in perturbation theory in quantum
33: chromodynamics. We find that factorized expressions hold up to
34: corrections of order $m_c/m_b$ in $B$-meson decay and corrections of
35: order $m_c^2/s$ in $e^+e^-$ annihilation, where $m_c$ is the charm-quark
36: mass, $m_b$ is the bottom-quark mass, and $\sqrt{s}$ is the $e^+e^-$
37: center-of-momentum energy.
38: \end{abstract}
39:
40: \maketitle
41:
42: The exclusive decays of $B$ mesons into a light meson plus a charmonium
43: are significant tools for understanding the weak interactions. For
44: example, they could provide new constraints on the
45: Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix and enhance our understanding of
46: the origins of CP violation.
47: However, the effects of the strong interactions are significant in such
48: processes and present an obstacle to achieving reliable theoretical
49: calculations of the process rates. The exclusive production of
50: double-charmonium in $e^+e^-$ annihilation provides an
51: arena in which to explore the mechanisms of charmonium production
52: and the interplay between the perturbative and nonperturbative regimes
53: of quantum chromodynamics (QCD). However, measurements of the cross
54: sections for double-charmonium production by the Belle \cite{Abe:2004ww}
55: and BABAR \cite{Aubert:2005tj} Collaborations have spurred a
56: re-examination of the theoretical predictions for those cross sections
57: \cite{Bodwin:2007ga}.
58:
59: In theoretical computations of the rates for the exclusive decays of $B$
60: mesons into a light meson plus a charmonium and of the rates for
61: the exclusive production of double-charmonium in $e^+e^-$
62: annihilation, a crucial step is the separation of the effects of the
63: strong interactions into short-distance, perturbatively calculable
64: contributions and long-distance, inherently nonperturbative
65: contributions. Such separations are usually embodied in factorization
66: theorems. In the case of the exclusive decays of $B$ mesons into a light
67: meson plus a charmonium, several factorization theorems have been
68: posited \cite{Beneke:2000ry,Chay:2000xn,Bobeth:2007sh}. In the case of
69: the exclusive production of double-charmonium in $e^+e^-$
70: annihilation, factorization conjectures have generally been formulated
71: in terms of nonrelativistic QCD (NRQCD) \cite{Bodwin:2007ga}. In this
72: letter, we outline the proofs of the factorization theorems for these
73: processes in QCD to all orders in perturbation theory.
74:
75: We wish to show that the amplitudes for these processes can be written
76: in a factorized form. The meaning of this statement, for the case of
77: exclusive decays of $B$ mesons into a light meson plus a charmonium,
78: is that the decay amplitude is decomposed into the sum of
79: products of a $B$-meson-to-light-meson form factor and an amplitude for a
80: charm-quark-antiquark ($c\bar c$) pair to be produced at short-distances
81: in a color-singlet state and evolve into a charmonium. The form
82: factor contains a term that can be decomposed into a convolution of a
83: hard-scattering amplitude with $B$-meson and light-meson light-cone amplitudes
84: and a term that cannot be decomposed further. (These two terms are
85: analogous to the two terms in the factorization formula in Eq.~(4) of
86: Ref.~\cite{Beneke:2000ry} for the case of decays to two light mesons.)
87: The $c\bar c$-to-charmonium amplitudes can
88: be further decomposed into a sum of products of long-distance NRQCD
89: matrix elements times short-distance coefficients. We argue that this
90: factorized form holds up to corrections of relative order $m_c/\sqrt{s}$,
91: where $s=m_b^2$. This result was suggested previously in
92: Ref.~\cite{Beneke:2000ry}. For the case of the exclusive production of
93: double-charmonium in $e^+e^-$ annihilation, factorization means
94: that the production amplitude decomposes into a sum of products of a
95: short-distance amplitude and two amplitudes for a $c\bar c$ pair to be
96: produced at short-distances in a color-singlet state and evolve into a
97: charmonium. Again, the $c\bar c$-to-charmonium amplitudes can be
98: further decomposed into a sum of products of long-distance NRQCD matrix
99: elements times short-distance coefficients. We argue that this
100: factorized form holds up to corrections of relative order $m_c^2/s$,
101: where $\sqrt{s}$ is the center-of-momentum (CM) energy of the $e^+e^-$
102: pair. Although our analyses are for the specific cases of $B$ decay and
103: $e^+e^-$ annihilation, the techniques that we describe should apply to
104: other exclusive quarkonium production processes and may also shed
105: light on factorization in inclusive quarkonium production. We note that,
106: because we consider exclusive two-body decays, we avoid the issues raised in
107: Ref.~\cite{Nayak:2005rt} concerning light particles co-moving with the
108: charmonium and the issues raised in Ref.~\cite{Nayak:2007mb} concerning
109: an additional heavy quark co-moving with the charmonium.
110:
111: We carry out our analyses in the $B$-meson rest frame and in the CM
112: frame of the $e^+e^-$ pair, choosing the three-momentum of the light
113: meson or one of the charmonia to be in the negative $3$ direction and
114: choosing the three-momentum of the other charmonium to be in the
115: positive $3$ direction. For a momentum $k$, we define light-cone
116: momentum components $k^{\pm}=(k^0\pm k^3)/\!\sqrt{2}$, $\bm{k}_\perp$.
117: We model the $B$ meson as an on-shell active bottom quark, which
118: participates in the electroweak interaction, and an on-shell
119: spectator light antiquark, which does not participate in the
120: electroweak interaction. We take the quark and antiquark to be in a
121: color-singlet state. We take the bottom quark to have momentum $p_b$,
122: with $p_b^0=m_b$ and all other components of momentum zero. We take the
123: spectator quark to have momentum $p_l$, with
124: $p_{l\,\mu}\!\sim\!\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$, the QCD scale. We neglect
125: $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$ and the difference between $m_b$ and the $B$-meson
126: mass in comparison with $m_b$. Similarly, we model the light meson as an
127: on-shell active light quark and an on-shell spectator light antiquark,
128: with the quark and antiquark in a color-singlet state. We take the
129: active-quark momentum to be $p_{k_1}\!=\!yp_k+q_k$ and the
130: spectator-quark momentum to be
131: $p_{k_2}\!\!=\!\!(1\!\!-\!\!y)p_k-q_k$, where $p_k$ is the
132: light-meson momentum. $p_k^-\!\sim\!m_b$, $q_{k}^-=0$, $p_{k\perp}=0$,
133: $q_{k\perp}\sim \Lambda_{\rm QCD}$, and
134: $p_k^+\!\sim\!q_k^+\!\sim\!\Lambda_{\rm QCD}^2/m_b$.
135: Finally, we model a charmonium as an on-shell $c\bar c$ pair in a
136: color-singlet state, with the momentum of the $c$ ($\bar{c}$) equal to
137: $p_i$ ($\bar p_i$). We take $p_i=P_i/2+q_i$ and $\bar{p}_i=P_i/2-q_i$,
138: where $P_i$ is the charmonium momentum and $P_i\cdot q_i=0$. In the
139: charmonium rest frame, $q_i$ has only spatial components, whose
140: magnitudes are of order $m_cv$, where $v$ is the typical charm-quark
141: velocity in the charmonium rest frame ($v^2\approx 0.3$). In the
142: $e^+e^-$ CM frame or $B$-meson rest frame, $P_1^+\sim P_2^-\sim Q$,
143: $P_{1\perp}=P_{2\perp}=0$, and $P_1^-\sim P_2^+\sim m_c^2/Q$, where
144: $Q=\sqrt{s}$ is the large momentum scale. One can think of the on-shell
145: amplitude that we use in our model as the on-shell perturbative QCD
146: amplitude that is matched to
147: a soft-collinear-effective-theory amplitude
148: in the case of the light meson, a heavy-quark-effective-theory
149: amplitude in the case of the $B$ meson, and an NRQCD amplitude in the
150: case of the charmonia.
151:
152: The next step is to identify the regions of loop momenta that give
153: contributions that are leading in powers of $Q$ when we dress the
154: lowest-order decay and production amplitudes in these models with
155: additional gluons. These leading momentum regions correspond to
156: particular Feynman-diagram topologies
157: \cite{Sterman:1978bi,Sterman:1978bj}, which we describe below.
158: The identification
159: of leading regions has been discussed in detail in
160: Ref.~\cite{Collins:1989gx}. For a loop momentum $k$, the leading regions
161: are the {\it hard region}, in which $k_\mu\sim Q$; the {\it
162: collinear-to-plus} ({\it minus}) {\it region}, in which $|k^+|\!\gg\!
163: |k^-|$ ($|k^-|\!\gg\! |k^+|$), $k^+k^-\!\sim\! \bm{k}_\perp^2\!\ll\!
164: Q^2$, and the {\it soft region}, in which $k^+\!\sim\! k^-\!\sim\!
165: \!|\bm{k}_\perp|\! \ll\! Q$. The collinear regions correspond to the
166: directions of the momenta of the final-state light meson and charmonia.
167: We note that, in the case of $B$-meson decays, there is also a
168: ``semi-hard region'' in which propagators are off shell by an amount of
169: order $m_b\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$. We treat this semi-hard region as part of
170: the hard region.
171: The ``Glauber'' region is
172: also leading in power counting \cite{Bodwin:1981fv,Bodwin:1984hc}. In
173: this region, $|k^+|\!\ll\! |k_\perp|$, $|k^-|\!\ll\! |k_\perp|$,
174: $k_\perp^2\!\ll\! Q^2$. However, for the exclusive processes we are
175: considering here, the contours of integration of loop momenta are not
176: pinched in the Glauber region, and it is possible to deform them out of
177: it on a diagram-by-diagram basis. This is in contrast with the situation
178: in, for instance, the Drell-Yan process, for which such a
179: diagram-by-diagram contour deformation is not possible
180: \cite{Bodwin:1984hc,Collins:1985ue,Collins:1989gx}. Therefore, we
181: ignore the Glauber region in the remainder of our discussion.
182: Contributions from the hard (semi-hard) region involve propagator
183: denominators that are of order $s$ ($m_b\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$) and can be
184: calculated in perturbation theory. Integrations of gluon momenta over
185: the soft region or a collinear region that is associated with a massless
186: particle encounter singularities in propagator denominators that result
187: in logarithmic divergences. [The soft singularities are at $k_\mu=0$, and
188: the collinear singularities are at $k^-=0$, $\bm{k}_\perp=0$ ($k^+=0$,
189: $\bm{k}_\perp=0$) for the collinear-to-plus (to-minus) region.] Thus,
190: contributions from the soft region and the collinear regions that are
191: associated with a massless particle cannot be computed reliably in
192: perturbation theory. The essence of the proofs of the factorization
193: theorems that we consider here is to show that these contributions
194: cancel or can be absorbed into the $B$-meson-to-light-meson form factor
195: or the nonperturbative NRQCD matrix elements. When a gluon three-momentum
196: becomes parallel to the three-momentum of a charm quark or charm
197: antiquark, the potential collinear singularity is shielded by $m_c$.
198: Hence, the contributions from such collinear regions can be computed
199: reliably in perturbation theory. Nevertheless, it is important for the
200: arguments that we will make below to treat these regions separately
201: from $H$. As we shall see, the contributions from these regions cancel.
202:
203: \begin{figure}
204: \epsfig{file=regions.eps,width=8cm}
205: \vspace*{8pt}
206: \caption{\label{fig:regions}%
207: Leading regions for the decay of a $B$ meson to a light meson and a
208: charmonium.
209: }
210: \end{figure}
211: \begin{figure}
212: \epsfig{file=regionsdc.eps,width=4cm}
213: \vspace*{8pt}
214: \caption{\label{fig:regionsdc}%
215: Leading regions for double-charmonium production in $e^+e^-$
216: annihilation. The wavy line represents the virtual photon.
217: }
218: \end{figure}
219:
220: Now let us specify the diagrammatic topologies that correspond to the
221: leading regions. We work in the Feynman gauge. There are two
222: distinct topologies in the case of $B$-meson decays: one in which the
223: $B$-meson and light-meson spectators participate in the hard interaction
224: and another in which they do not. These topologies are shown in
225: Figs.~\ref{fig:regions}(a) and \ref{fig:regions}(b), respectively.
226: After one has achieved factorization, the contribution from the first
227: topology can be decomposed into an expression that contains the
228: convolution of a hard-scattering amplitude with $B$-meson and
229: light-meson light-cone amplitudes, while the contribution from the
230: second topology cannot be decomposed further. The topology for the case
231: of double-charmonium production is represented in
232: Fig.~\ref{fig:regionsdc}. The components of the topologies are as
233: follows: a $B$
234: meson ($B$); jet sub-diagrams for each of the collinear regions,
235: corresponding to a charmonium ($J_1$) and a light meson ($J_2$) in
236: Fig.~\ref{fig:regions} and the two charmonia ($J_1$ and $J_2$) in
237: Fig.~\ref{fig:regionsdc}; a hard sub-diagram ($H$) that includes the
238: lowest-order annihilation or production process; and a soft sub-diagram
239: ($S$). In $H$, all propagator denominators are of order $s$ or
240: $m_b\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$. $J_i$ contains the active- and
241: spectator-quark lines for a given meson or charmonium, as well as
242: gluons and loops involving quarks and ghosts with momenta collinear to
243: the meson or charmonium. $J_i$ attaches to $H$ through the active- and
244: spectator-quark lines in the topology of Fig.~\ref{fig:regions}(a),
245: through the active-quark lines in the topology of
246: Fig.~\ref{fig:regions}(b) and through any number of gluons. $S$ includes
247: gluons with soft momenta and loops involving quarks and ghost with soft
248: momenta. $S$ attaches to $J_i$ and to the $B$-meson quark and
249: antiquark lines through any number of soft gluon lines. Recall that the
250: $B$-meson spectator antiquark itself carries a soft momentum. In
251: Fig.~\ref{fig:regions}(b), the light-antiquark-spectator line carries
252: a momentum with minus component of order $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$. Such a
253: momentum can arise either through an endpoint contribution, in which
254: $p_{k_2}^-\sim \Lambda_{\rm QCD}$ \cite{Beneke:2000ry,Chernyak:1990ag},
255: or through the soft-collinear-messenger mechanism \cite{Becher:2003qh},
256: in which an emitted gluon carries away most of $p_{k_2}$.
257:
258: At this point we can outline the proof of factorization. Suppose that a
259: gluon from $J_i$ enters $H$. Then we can apply a collinear
260: approximation to that gluon
261: \cite{Bodwin:1984hc,Collins:1985ue,Collins:1989gx}. Specifically, we
262: replace $g_{\mu\nu}$ in the gluon-propagator numerator with $k_\mu \bar
263: n_{i\nu}/k\cdot \bar n_i$, where $k$ is the gluon momentum, $\bar n_1$
264: ($\bar n_2$) is a unit light-like vector in the minus (plus) direction.
265: The index $\mu$ corresponds to the attachment of the gluon to $H$, and
266: the index $\nu$ corresponds to the attachment of the gluon to $J_i$. For
267: $k$ in the collinear region, the collinear approximation is valid at
268: leading order in $Q$. Having made the collinear approximation, one can
269: use the factor $k_\mu$ and the diagrammatic Ward identity (Feynman
270: identity) for fermion lines $k\cdot\gamma=[(q+k)\cdot
271: \gamma+m]-[q\cdot\gamma+m]$ and its generalizations to non-Abelian gauge
272: theories to show that the gluons with collinear momenta decouple from
273: $H$ \cite{Bodwin:1984hc,Collins:1985ue,Collins:1989gx}. In
274: general, the decoupled gluons attach to light-like eikonal lines (path
275: integrals of the gauge field) that
276: connect to the point at which an active parton enters $H$. However,
277: in our case these eikonal lines cancel because the light meson
278: and the charmonia are color-singlet states. Now suppose that a gluon
279: from $S$ attaches to a jet sub-diagram at a line with momentum
280: $p$. We can apply a soft approximation to that gluon
281: \cite{Collins:1981uk}. Specifically, we replace $g_{\mu\nu}$ in the
282: gluon-propagator numerator with $k_\mu p_\nu/k\cdot p$, where $k$ is the
283: gluon momentum, the index $\mu$ corresponds to the attachment of the
284: gluon to $J_i$ and the index $\nu$ corresponds to the attachment of the
285: gluon to $S$. We would like to use the factor $k_\mu$ in the soft
286: approximation and the diagrammatic Ward identities to decouple the soft
287: gluons. However, in general, the momentum $p$ is different for every
288: line to which the soft gluon attaches. That is, the soft approximation,
289: unlike the collinear approximation, is not independent of the line to
290: which the $\mu$ end of the gluon attaches. Nevertheless, we can
291: apply the same soft approximation to all lines in the
292: collinear-to-light-meson jet, since they are all proportional to the
293: same light-like vector (up to corrections of order $\Lambda_{\rm
294: QCD}/m_b$). For the constituents of each charmonium, we can also apply
295: the same soft approximation up to corrections of order $m_c/Q$. The
296: reason for this is that, in going from the rest frame of the charmonium
297: to the $e^+e^-$ CM frame or $B$-meson rest frame, the momenta of
298: constituents of the charmonium undergo boosts that render all of the
299: momenta nearly parallel. When we explicitly consider those boosts, it
300: follows that, for the charmonium with momentum $P_1$ ($P_2$), the plus
301: (minus) components are boosted by a factor of order $Q/m_c$ and the
302: minus (plus) components are boosted by a factor of order $m_c/Q$, while the
303: transverse components are unchanged. Thus, all of the momenta of the
304: constituents of the charmonium with momentum $P_1$ ($P_2$) are dominated
305: by the plus (minus) component, up to corrections of order $m_c/Q$. This
306: result holds provided that all of the components are of approximately
307: the same size in the charmonium rest frame. This is the case for $P_i$,
308: $q_i$, but it is also true for other momenta that characterize the
309: charmonium in its rest frame, such as a typical potential-gluon momentum
310: (which has spatial components of order $m_cv$ and a temporal component
311: of order $m_cv^2$) or a typical rest-frame soft-gluon momentum (which
312: has all components of order $m_cv$). Therefore, we use a modified soft
313: approximation for the constituents of the charmonium in the jet $J_i$ in
314: which we replace $g_{\mu\nu}$ in the gluon-propagator numerator with
315: $k_\mu n_{i\nu}/k\cdot n_i$, where $n_1$ ($n_2$) is a vector with unit
316: component in the plus (minus) direction and all other components equal
317: to zero. This modified soft approximation differs from the standard soft
318: approximation for each constituent of a quarkonium by terms that are
319: suppressed as $m_c/Q$. Hence, it accounts for all soft (logarithmic)
320: singularities, up to terms that are suppressed as $m_c/Q$. We can use
321: the modified soft approximation, plus the diagrammatic Ward identities
322: to decouple the gluons with soft momenta from the charmonium jets,
323: relying on the fact that the $c$ and $\bar c$ in each charmonium are in
324: a color-singlet state
325: \cite{Collins:1981uk,Collins:1985ue,Collins:1988ig}. Once the gluons
326: with momenta collinear to the jet have been decoupled from $H$ and the
327: gluons with soft momenta have been decoupled from the charmonium jets,
328: there remain gluons with momenta collinear to the jet that begin and end
329: within the jet. In the rest frame of the charmonium, these gluons
330: correspond to soft and potential gluons. The contributions from regions
331: of momentum of order $m_cv$ or less that arise from these gluons
332: (including infrared divergences) can be absorbed into nonperturbative
333: NRQCD matrix elements \cite{Bodwin:1994jh}. The associated NRQCD
334: short-distance coefficients then contain only contributions involving
335: momenta of order $m_c$. The NRQCD short-distance coefficients couple to
336: the production process only through the active $c$ and $\bar c$ lines.
337: Thus, we have arrived at the factorized form.
338:
339: As we have mentioned, the modified soft approximation allows us to
340: decouple gluons with soft momentum from the charmonium jets, up to
341: corrections that are suppressed as $m_c/Q$. Thus, in general, one
342: would expect corrections to the factorized form to appear at order $m_c/Q$.
343: However, in the case of double-charmonium production in $e^+e^-$
344: annihilation, $S$ decouples from both the collinear-to-plus charmonium
345: jet and the collinear-to-minus charmonium jet. Each decoupling holds up
346: to corrections of order $m_c/Q$, and, so, the overall decoupling holds up
347: to corrections of order $m_c^2/s$. In perturbation theory, the
348: factorization-violating corrections may be enhanced by logarithms of
349: $s/m_c^2$. Furthermore, they are infrared divergent. In reality, these
350: infrared divergences are cut off by nonperturbative effects associated
351: with confinement. Our analysis does not determine the size of these
352: factorization-violating corrections: it shows only that they are
353: proportional to one or two powers of $m_c/Q$. The constant of
354: proportionality might be determined through experiment and/or lattice
355: calculations.
356:
357: At the lowest order in $\alpha_s$ and $v$, the decoupling of soft
358: gluons from each charmonium is exact. At the lowest order in $\alpha_s$,
359: the charmonium has only the $c$ and $\bar c$ as constituents. At the
360: lowest order in $v$, one sets $q_i=0$, and the $c$ and $\bar c$ momenta
361: become equal. Then, one can apply the same soft approximation for both
362: the $c$ and $\bar c$ in the charmonium. Since, at the lowest order in
363: $\alpha_s$, there is, at most, one soft gluon, the soft decoupling in
364: double-charmonium production is exact if either charmonium is treated at
365: the lowest order in $v$.
366: An explicit calculation of the
367: one-loop corrections to $S$-wave charmonium production in $B$-meson
368: decays at the lowest order in $v$ \cite{Chay:2000xn} and an explicit
369: calculation of the one-loop corrections to $\sigma[e^+e^- \to
370: J/\psi+\chi_{cJ}]$, in which the $J/\psi$ is treated at lowest order in
371: $v$ \cite{Zhang:2008gp}, confirm our expectation that these corrections
372: should be free of infrared divergences. $P$-wave charmonium production in
373: $B$-meson decays was considered at the one-loop level in
374: Ref.~\cite{Song:2003yc} within the factorization framework of
375: Ref.~\cite{Beneke:2000ry}. When we use the light-cone distribution
376: amplitudes that are specified in Ref.~\cite{Beneke:2000ry}, we obtain
377: agreement with the calculations in Ref.~\cite{Song:2003yc}, which yield
378: only infrared divergences that are suppressed as $m_c^2/s$. As we have
379: discussed, we find more generally that the violations of factorization
380: are suppressed as $m_c/\sqrt{s}$. At higher orders in $v$, we expect the
381: soft cancellation for each charmonium to hold only up to corrections of
382: order $m_c/\sqrt{s}$, even in the case of $S$-wave charmonium production.
383: Similarly, in relative order $\alpha_s^2$ and beyond, we expect the soft
384: cancellation for each charmonium to hold only up to corrections of order
385: $m_c/\sqrt{s}$, even at the lowest order in $v$.
386:
387: \begin{acknowledgments}
388: We thank Kuang-Ta Chao, Jianwei Qiu, George Sterman, and Yu-Jie Zhang
389: for helpful discussions. The work of G.T.B. and X.G.T. was supported
390: by the U.S. Department of Energy,
391: Division of High Energy Physics, under contract DE-AC02-06CH11357.
392: J.L. was supported by KOSEF under contract R01-2008-000-10378-0.
393: \end{acknowledgments}
394:
395: \begin{thebibliography}{}
396: \bibitem{Abe:2004ww}
397: K.~Abe {\it et al.} [Belle Collaboration],
398: %``Study of double charmonium production in e+ e- annihilation at s**(1/2)
399: %approx. 10.6-GeV,''
400: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 70}, 071102 (2004).
401: % [arXiv:hep-ex/0407009].
402: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D70,071102;%%
403:
404: \bibitem{Aubert:2005tj}
405: B.~Aubert {\it et al.} [BABAR Collaboration],
406: %``Measurement of double charmonium production in $e^+e^-$ annihilations at
407: %$\sqrt{s}=10.6$ GeV,''
408: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 72}, 031101 (2005).
409: % [arXiv:hep-ex/0506062].
410: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D72,031101;%%
411:
412: %\cite{Bodwin:2007ga}
413: \bibitem{Bodwin:2007ga}
414: For a discussion of the current status of the theoretical predictions
415: that are based on the NRQCD factorization approach, see
416: G.~T.~Bodwin, J.~Lee, and C.~Yu,
417: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 77}, 094018 (2008).
418: %``Resummation of Relativistic Corrections to e+ e- -> J/psi+eta_c,''
419: %arXiv:0710.0995 [hep-ph].
420: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0710.0995;%%
421:
422: \bibitem{Beneke:2000ry}
423: M.~Beneke {\it et al.}, %G.~Buchalla, M.~Neubert and C.~T.~Sachrajda,
424: %``QCD factorization for exclusive, non-leptonic B meson decays: General
425: %arguments and the case of heavy-light final states,''
426: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 591}, 313 (2000).
427: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0006124].
428: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B591,313;%%
429:
430: \bibitem{Chay:2000xn}
431: J.~Chay and C.~Kim,
432: %``Analysis of the QCD-improved factorization in B --> J/psi K,''
433: arXiv:hep-ph/0009244.
434: %%CITATION = HEP-PH/0009244;%%
435:
436: \bibitem{Bobeth:2007sh}
437: C.~Bobeth, B.~Grinstein, and M.~Savrov,
438: %``Decay b -> (c\bar{c}) s in the Leading Logarithm approximation,''
439: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 77}, 074007 (2008).
440: % arXiv:0712.1953 [hep-ph].
441: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0712.1953;%%
442:
443: %\cite{Nayak:2005rt}
444: \bibitem{Nayak:2005rt}
445: G.~C.~Nayak, J.~W.~Qiu, and G.~Sterman,
446: %``Fragmentation, NRQCD and NNLO factorization analysis in heavy quarkonium
447: %production,''
448: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 613}, 45 (2005); Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 72}, 114012 (2005).
449: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0501235] [arXiv:hep-ph/0509021]
450: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D72,114012;%%
451: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B613,45;%%
452:
453: \bibitem{Nayak:2007mb}
454: G.~C.~Nayak, J.~W.~Qiu, and G.~Sterman,
455: %``Color Transfer in Associated Heavy-Quarkonium Production,''
456: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 99}, 212001 (2007); Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 77}, 034022 (2008).
457: % [arXiv:0707.2973 [hep-ph]] [arXiv:0711.3476 [hep-ph]]
458: %%CITATION = PRLTA,99,212001;%%
459: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D77,034022;%%
460:
461: \bibitem{Sterman:1978bi}
462: G.~Sterman,
463: %``Mass Divergences In Annihilation Processes. 1. Origin And Nature Of
464: %Divergences In Cut Vacuum Polarization Diagrams,''
465: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 17}, 2773 (1978).
466: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D17,2773;%%
467:
468: %\cite{Sterman:1978bj}
469: \bibitem{Sterman:1978bj}
470: G.~Sterman,
471: %``Mass Divergences In Annihilation Processes. 2. Cancellation Of
472: %Divergences In Cut Vacuum Polarization Diagrams,''
473: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 17}, 2789 (1978).
474: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D17,2789;%%
475:
476: \bibitem{Collins:1989gx}
477: J.~C.~Collins, D.~E.~Soper, and G.~Sterman,
478: %``Factorization of Hard Processes in QCD,''
479: Adv.\ Ser.\ Direct.\ High Energy Phys.\ {\bf 5}, 1 (1988).
480: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0409313].
481: %%CITATION = 00319,5,1;%%
482:
483: \bibitem{Bodwin:1981fv}
484: G.~T.~Bodwin, S.~J.~Brodsky, and G.~P.~Lepage,
485: %``Initial State Interactions And The Drell-Yan Process,''
486: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 47}, 1799 (1981).
487: %%CITATION = PRLTA,47,1799;%%
488:
489: \bibitem{Bodwin:1984hc}
490: G.~T.~Bodwin,
491: %``Factorization Of The Drell-Yan Cross-Section In Perturbation Theory,''
492: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 31}, 2616 (1985)
493: [Erratum-ibid.\ D {\bf 34}, 3932 (1986)].
494: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D31,2616;%%
495:
496: \bibitem{Collins:1985ue}
497: J.~C.~Collins, D.~E.~Soper, and G.~Sterman,
498: %``Factorization For Short Distance Hadron - Hadron Scattering,''
499: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 261}, 104 (1985).
500: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B261,104;%%
501:
502: \bibitem{Chernyak:1990ag}
503: V.~L.~Chernyak and I.~R.~Zhitnitsky,
504: %``B Meson Exclusive Decays Into Baryons,''
505: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 345}, 137 (1990).
506: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B345,137;%%
507:
508: \bibitem{Becher:2003qh}
509: T.~Becher, R.~J.~Hill, and M.~Neubert,
510: %``Soft-collinear messengers: A new mode in soft-collinear effective
511: %theory,''
512: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69}, 054017 (2004).
513: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0308122].
514: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D69,054017;%%
515:
516: \bibitem{Collins:1981uk}
517: J.~C.~Collins and D.~E.~Soper,
518: %``Back-To-Back Jets In QCD,''
519: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 193}, 381 (1981)
520: [Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 213}, 545 (1983)].
521: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B193,381;%%
522:
523: %\cite{Collins:1988ig}
524: \bibitem{Collins:1988ig}
525: J.~C.~Collins, D.~E.~Soper, and G.~Sterman,
526: %``Soft Gluons and Factorization,''
527: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 308}, 833 (1988).
528: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B308,833;%%
529:
530: \bibitem{Bodwin:1994jh}
531: G.~T.~Bodwin, E.~Braaten, and G.~P.~Lepage,
532: %``Rigorous QCD analysis of inclusive annihilation and production of heavy
533: %quarkonium,''
534: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 51}, 1125 (1995)
535: [Erratum-ibid.\ D {\bf 55}, 5853 (1997)].
536: % [arXiv:hep-ph/9407339].
537: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D51,1125;%%
538:
539: \bibitem{Zhang:2008gp}
540: Y.~J.~Zhang, Y.~Q.~Ma, and K.~T.~Chao,
541: %``Factorization and NLO QCD correction in e^+ e^- \to J/\psi (\psi(2S))+
542: %\chi_{c0} at B Factories},''
543: arXiv:0802.3655 [hep-ph].
544: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0802.3655;%%
545:
546: \bibitem{Song:2003yc}
547: Z.~Z.~Song {\it et al.}, %C.~Meng, Y.~J.~Gao and K.~T.~Chao,
548: %``Infrared divergences of B meson exclusive decays to P-wave charmonia in
549: %QCD factorization and nonrelativistic QCD,''
550: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69}, 054009 (2004).
551: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0309105].
552: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D69,054009;%%
553:
554: \end{thebibliography}
555:
556:
557: \end{document}
558: