1: Dear Dr. Federman:
2:
3: Here is our response to the referee's report (MS 74460):
4:
5: We are very pleased with the report, and we thank the referee for providing us with helpful comments. We address the points raised in the report in what follows.
6:
7: Point 1.
8:
9: "DR21(OH) is an interesting and appropriate source for this investigation. Indeed, no centimeter-wave continuum sources have been detected, but there are water and methanol masers associated with the source. In fact, as the authors note, there are two dense condensations within their beam, MM1 and MM2, both of which show water maser emission. Water masers are always associated with outflow; stars must exist in the cores. Most of the lines here seem centered at ~-4 km/s, the velocity of MM1; MM2 at VLSR~-0.7 km/s seems to contribute little. It is MM1 which shows the higher excitation emission in formaldehyde also (Mangum and Wootten 1993 ApJ Supp 89, 123); these authors find Tex>80K for a <10" region centered on the source. The source clearly has a complex structure; it is not clear to me that a single 20K temperature is the best choice. Adaptation of a range of temperatures might lead to a better understanding of parameter dependencies.
10: With so many molecules involved, one might wonder if the assumption of LTE for all of them is well-justified. "
11:
12: We agree with the referee. DR21(OH) is indeed associated with water and methanol masers and has a complex structure. We have made the following changes in the paper to clarify our analysis:
13:
14:
15: a) In Section 5, we added a paragraph after item (c) as follows:
16:
17: "d) DR21(OH) is known to harbor water and methanol masers (associated with the MM1 and MM2 continuum sources), being an indication of the presence of outflows within the source. Magnum et al. (1991, 1992) observed this source using the VLA and found an excitation temperature above 80 K within a region of ² 10" centered on MM1 (V_LSR ~ -4.1 km/s). Gas associated with such regions would understandably have different physical characteristics compared to the more extended, relatively quiescent regions probed with our observations. It is the latter that dominates the region we observed with our larger telescope beam (~20" to ~30"). Nevertheless, previous studies have established that this star-forming region possesses a complex structure owing to the presence of deeply embedded sources, and the detection of molecular masers further supports this conclusion. One could thus question our assignment of a single kinetic temperature of 20 K for DR21(OH). But since we obtained a narrow range of temperatures (12 - 22 K) for all the molecular species we observed, we believe that our aforementioned chosen value is justified for the spatial resolution attained with our observations. Incidentally, this narrow range of temperatures for all species is also consistent with the use of the LTE approximation for this study."
18:
19:
20: Point 2.
21:
22: "To what gas density do the authors suppose their measurement of Xe and the cosmic ray ionization rate applies? Dense gas screens out the lower energy cosmic rays and in very dense gas one expects to measure a lower rate than in very diffuse gas, such as for instance the H3+-containing gas measured by McCall and coworkers. One might think one could use the 'characteristic density', equating collisional excitation with radiative deexcitation for the transitions studied. But since the radiative rates vary widely, this value is much less for some transitions (notoriously, those of CO) than for others (e.g. J=4-3 HCN). These biases should be discussed."
23:
24:
25: In response to this comment, we added another paragraph in Section 5 following the paragraph starting with "Provided the above assumptions are met...":
26:
27: "Moreover, it is not straightforward to precisely determine the density for which our values of the ionization fraction and cosmic ray ionization rate apply when one considers that our array of observations involves molecules with a vast range of critical densities (e.g., from ~ 10^{3} cm^{-3} for CO to ~ 10^{8} cm^{-3} for HCN). We had to assume that all observed species are coexistent within DR21(OH) in order to carry our program; however, this is probably not strictly accurate. This is especially the case for CO and its isotopologues, because of their lower critical densities, and this brings a further uncertainty in our determination of chi_{e} and zeta_{H_2}. Unfortunately, it is difficult to evaluate the magnitude of this bias with our existing data. On the other hand, the good alignment of spectral peak intensities and the relative agreement on excitation temperatures is consistent with our coexistence approximation."
28:
29: Other minors changes:
30:
31: - We corrected for the typo and wrong dates for a few references mentioned in the report
32: - We corrected for C. Vastel's address on the first page to: "Centre d'Etude Spatiale des Rayonnements, 9 avenue du colonel Roche BP 44346, 31028 Toulouse Cedex 4, FRANCE".
33: - We removed the extra 7 from equation (6)
34: - In the third paragraph of section 1, we added :
35: This important molecule is created via cosmic ray ionization of the H_{2} molecule, and is highly reactive with "ELECTRONS AND" neutral species present in such clouds.
36:
37: We hope that these changes will be satisfactory to the referee.
38:
39: Best regards,
40:
41: T. Hezareh, M. Houde, C. McCoey, C. Vastel and R. Peng
42:
43: ________________________________________________________________________________
44:
45: This is a resubmission (version 2) of MS 74460, "Simultaneous Determination of the Cosmic Ray Ionization Rate and Fractional Ionization in DR21(OH)" The submitted tar file contains the main tex file (ms.tex) and three figures, as well as this cover letter.
46:
47: Main file: ms.tex
48: Figures: f1.eps
49: f2.eps
50: f3.eps
51:
52: Corresponding author:
53:
54: Talayeh Hezareh
55: Department of Physics and Astronomy
56: The University of Western Ontario
57: London, Ontario N6A 3K7
58: Canada
59: Tel: (519) 661-2111 x. 86711
60: FAX: (519) 661-2033
61: E-mail: houde@astro.uwo.ca
62:
63: Other authors:
64:
65: Martin Houde
66: Department of Physics and Astronomy
67: The University of Western Ontario
68: London, Ontario N6A 3K7
69: Canada
70: Tel: (519) 661-2111 x. 86711
71: FAX: (519) 661-2033
72: E-mail: houde@astro.uwo.ca
73:
74: Carolyn McCoey
75: Department of Physics and Astronomy,
76: University of Waterloo,
77: 200 University Avenue W.,
78: Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1
79: E-mail : cmccoey@astro.uwaterloo.ca
80:
81: Charlotte Vastel
82: Centre d'Etude Spatiale des Rayonnements,
83: 9 avenue du colonel Roche BP 44346,
84: 31028 Toulouse Cedex 4, FRANCE
85: E-mail : Charlotte.Vastel@cesr.fr
86:
87: Ruisheng Peng
88: Caltech Submillimeter Observatory,
89: 111 Nowelo Street, Hilo, HI 96720
90: E-mail : peng@submm.caltech.edu
91:
92:
93: