1: %% LyX 1.5.2 created this file. For more info, see http://www.lyx.org/.
2: %% Do not edit unless you really know what you are doing.
3: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
4: %\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
5: %\setcounter{tocdepth}{3}
6: %\usepackage{amssymb}
7:
8: %\makeatletter
9: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% User specified LaTeX commands.
10: \slugcomment{}
11: \shorttitle{}
12: \shortauthors{}
13: %%\usepackage{amsmath}
14: \newcommand{\me}{\mathrm{e}}
15: \newcommand{\erf}{\mathrm{erf}}
16: \newcommand{\dif}{\mathrm{d}}
17: \renewcommand{\vec}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath$#1$}}
18: %\usepackage{babel}
19: %\makeatother
20:
21: \begin{document}
22:
23: \title{Simultaneous Determination of the Cosmic Ray Ionization Rate and
24: Fractional Ionization in DR21(OH)}
25:
26:
27: \author{Talayeh Hezareh\altaffilmark{1},}
28: \email{hezareh@astro.uwo.ca}
29: \author{Martin
30: Houde\altaffilmark{1}, Carolyn M$^{\mathrm{c}}$Coey \altaffilmark{1,2},
31: Charlotte Vastel\altaffilmark{3}, \and Ruisheng Peng\altaffilmark{4}}
32:
33: \altaffiltext{1}{The Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 3K7}
34:
35: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue W., Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1}
36: \altaffiltext{3}{Centre d'Etude Spatiale des Rayonnements, 9 avenue du colonel Roche BP 44346, 31028 Toulouse Cedex 4, FRANCE}
37: \altaffiltext{4}{Caltech Submillimeter Observatory, 111 Nowelo Street, Hilo, HI 96720}
38:
39: \begin{abstract}
40: We present a new method for the simultaneous calculation of the cosmic
41: ray ionization rate, $\zeta_{\mathrm{H}_{2}}$, and the ionization
42: fraction, $\chi_{\mathrm{e}}$, in dense molecular clouds. A simple
43: network of chemical reactions dominant in the creation and destruction
44: of HCNH$^+$ and HCO$^+$ is used in conjunction with observed pairs
45: of rotational transitions of several molecular species in order to
46: determine the electron abundance and the H$_{3}$$^{+}$ abundance.
47: The cosmic ray ionization rate is then calculated by taking advantage
48: of the fact that, in dark clouds, it governs the rate of creation
49: of H$_{3}$$^{+}$. We apply this technique to the case of the star-forming
50: region DR21(OH), where we successfully detected the ($J=3 \rightarrow 2$)
51: and ($J=4 \rightarrow 3$) rotational transitions of HCNH$^+$. We
52: also determine the C and O isotopic ratios in this source to be $^{12}\mathrm{C/^{13}\mathrm{C}}=63\pm4$
53: and $^{16}\mathrm{O/^{18}\mathrm{O=318\pm64}}$, which are in good
54: agreement with previous measurements in other clouds. The significance
55: of our method lies in the ability to determine $N(\mathrm{H_{3}^{+}})$
56: and $\chi_{\mathrm{e}}$ directly from observations, and estimate
57: $\zeta_{\mathrm{H}_{2}}$ accordingly. Our results, $\zeta_{\mathrm{H}_{2}}=3.1\times10^{-18}\:\mathrm{s}^{-1}$
58: and $\chi_{\mathrm{e}}=3.2\times10^{-8}$, are consistent with recent
59: determinations in other objects.
60: \end{abstract}
61:
62: \keywords{ISM: cloud --- ISM: molecules --- ISM: cosmic rays}
63:
64:
65: \section{Introduction}
66:
67: The ionization fraction (or the electron abundance), $\chi_{\mathrm{e}}\equiv\mathrm{\mathit{n}(e)/\mathit{n}(H_{2})}$,
68: where $n(\mathrm{e})$ is the electron number density and $\mathit{n}(\mathrm{H_{2}})$
69: the hydrogen molecule number density, plays a key role in the chemistry
70: and dynamics of dense molecular clouds. Due to the low temperatures
71: within dense clouds, the chemistry is dominated by reactions between
72: ions and neutral species. Furthermore, if a magnetic field permeates
73: the cloud, the ions interact directly with the field through the Lorentz
74: force, while the rate of collisions between the ions and the neutral
75: species determines the degree with which the neutral gas couples to
76: the magnetic field. The ionization fraction therefore determines the
77: strength of this coupling, and hence the ambipolar diffusion timescale
78: in a molecular cloud, which is a measure of the stability of the cloud
79: against gravitational collapse \citep{shu}. Moreover, determination
80: of the fractional ionization can be essential in precisely estimating
81: the magnetic strength in molecular clouds \citep{li}.
82:
83: In order to determine the ionization fraction in a cloud, it is important
84: to identify the main ionization processes in the region under study.
85: Star formation occurs in dense cores, which are regions of high extinction
86: where self-shielding prevents the UV photo-ionization of H$_{2}$.
87: It is also expected that X-ray ionization is only significant in the
88: vicinity of strong X-ray sources such as active galactic nuclei \citep{mccall}
89: and OB stars. Therefore, cosmic ray ionization is believed to dominate
90: photo-ionization in dense cores \citep{mckee}.
91:
92: Cosmic rays also heat the interstellar gas and drive interstellar
93: chemistry in dense molecular clouds. Direct determination of the cosmic
94: ray ionization rate, $\zeta_{\mathrm{H}_{2}}$, is achievable by studying
95: the abundance of H$_{3}$$^{+}$ due to the relative simplicity of
96: its chemistry \citep{mccall}. This important molecule is created
97: via cosmic ray ionization of the H$_{2}$ molecule, and is highly
98: reactive with electrons and neutral species present in such clouds. For example,
99: it reacts with HCN, CO and N$_{2}$ to form HCNH$^{+}$, HCO$^{+}$
100: and N$_{2}$H$^{+}$, respectively. The resulting ions react with different
101: neutral molecules, producing other ionic or neutral species. For this
102: study, we assume that H$_{3}$$^{+}$ is mainly produced by cosmic
103: rays.
104:
105: Various techniques have been developed in the past to estimate the
106: ionization fraction and cosmic ray ionization rate. For the prior,
107: there have been studies that based its determination on measurements
108: of the degree of deuterium fractionation through DCO$^{+}$ and HCO$^{+}$
109: abundance ratios (e.g., \citealt{caselli}). The application of this
110: technique in cold clouds is limited, since the freeze-out of molecules
111: onto the grain surfaces affects the degree of deuterium fractionation
112: independently of the ionization fraction \citep{caselli}. Observations
113: of H$_{3}$$^{+}$ absorption lines \citep{mccall} together with
114: appropriate chemical models have been used for the determination of
115: $\zeta_{\mathrm{H}_{2}}$ in diffuse clouds and envelopes of molecular
116: clouds \citep{vanDer,indriolo}. However, this method is not applicable
117: to cold starless cores since H$_{3}$$^{+}$ has no electric dipole
118: moment; it cannot be used to trace such regions.
119:
120: In dense cores, typical values for $\zeta_{\mathrm{H}_{2}}$ are estimated
121: to be $(1-5)\times10^{-17}$ s$^{-1}$ \citep{dalgarno}, while the
122: fractional ionization is found to lie within a small range, $10^{-7.3}\lesssim\chi_{\mathrm{e}}\lesssim10^{-6.9}$
123: \citep{bergin}. However, some recent studies have found lower values
124: for these parameters in dark clouds. For example, \citet{maret} obtained
125: a fractional ionization of $5\times10^{-9}$ with respect to H nuclei
126: corresponding to a cosmic ray ionization of $(1-6)\times10^{-18}$
127: s$^{-1}$ in the Barnard 68 prestellar core, while \citet{flower}
128: reported $n_{\mathrm{e}}/n_{\mathrm{H}}=1\times10^{-8}$ and $\zeta_{\mathrm{H}_{2}}=2\times10^{-18}$
129: s$^{-1}$ in TMC-1. Since the two parameters are interdependent, one
130: is usually determined by restricting the other through fitting theoretical
131: models to observations (see for example, \citealt{wootten}; \citealt{plume}).
132:
133: In this work we show that it is possible to estimate the cosmic ray
134: ionization rate and fractional ionization simultaneously, using observational
135: spectroscopic data together with a simple network of chemical reactions
136: that involve H$_{3}$$^{+}$ and the electron abundance. These reactions
137: are responsible for the formation and destruction of well-studied
138: molecular species that co-exist in dense molecular clouds. Accordingly,
139: we chose to study HCNH$^{+}$ and HCO$^{+}$ and applied this technique
140: to the star-forming region DR21(OH).
141:
142: We explain the observational procedure in $\S 2$ and present our
143: technique in $\S 3$. Our numerical calculations and results are described
144: in $\S 4$, followed by a discussion and summary in $\S 5$.
145:
146:
147:
148:
149: \section{Observations}
150:
151:
152: \subsection{Source description}
153:
154: DR21(OH) ($\alpha=20^{\mathrm{h}}39^{\mathrm{m}}01^{\mathrm{s}}$
155: and $\delta=42^{\circ}22^{'}37.7^{''}$, J2000) is located about $3\arcmin$
156: to the north of DR21, a well-known massive star formation site in
157: the Cygnus X region that lies at a distance of approximately $3$
158: kpc \citep{genzel}. Also known as W75S, it is made up of several
159: compact sources, namely DR21(OH)Main, DR21(OH)N, DR21(OH)S and DR21(OH)W,
160: which are all active star-forming regions \citep{curran}. This work
161: is focused on the brightest component, DR21(OH)Main. Continuum studies
162: have detected two dense cores, MM1 and MM2, with a total mass of about
163: $125\mathrm{\: M}_{\odot}$ in the center of DR21(OH)Main \citep{Woody}.
164: This source has been extensively studied in the infrared and also
165: mapped in CO (\citealt{dickel}; \citealt{magnum}), and no young
166: stars with strong radiation fields have been observed around it \citep{davis}.
167: Also, no centimeter-wavelength continuum sources have been detected
168: within the source, suggesting a lack of HII regions \citep{johnston},
169: implying that it is in an early stage of evolution and thus suitable
170: for our analysis.
171:
172:
173: \subsection{Spectroscopic data}
174:
175: We obtained all observations at the Caltech Submillimeter Observatory
176: (CSO), located on Mauna Kea, Hawaii. In Table \ref{ta:data}, we list
177: the detections of different rotational transitions from the molecular
178: species that form the main creation and destruction routes for HCNH$^+$
179: and HCO$^+$ (see $\S 3$). Among these molecules, HCO$^{+}$, CO,
180: HCN and HNC were optically thick, and therefore not suitable for our
181: analysis. Instead, we observed the optically thin isotopologues H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$,
182: H$^{13}$CN and HN$^{13}$C, as well as $^{12}$C$^{18}$O, $^{13}$C$^{18}$O,
183: and $^{13}$C$^{16}$O in order to determine the $^{12}$C/$^{13}$C
184: and $^{16}$O/$^{18}$O isotopic ratios needed for the calculation
185: of the abundance of the main species from their observed isotopologues.
186:
187: In October 2006, we detected HCNH$^+$ in the $J=3\rightarrow2$ and
188: $J=4\rightarrow3$ transitions in DR21(OH)Main using the 200-300 GHz
189: receiver. For these observations, standard telescope efficiencies
190: of 66 \% at 222 GHz (beam width $\sim $33$''$) and 60 \% at 296 GHz
191: (beam width $\sim$ 25$''$) were used. Data were taken in a position
192: switching mode and the pointing was checked regularly using scans
193: on Uranus. H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ and H$^{13}$CN were observed during
194: the months of October, November and December 1999, using the 200-300
195: GHz and 300-400 GHz receivers. These spectra were calibrated using
196: scans made on planets available during that period (Mars, Jupiter
197: and Saturn). The telescope efficiencies were $\sim70$ \% for the
198: 200-300 GHz receiver (beam width of $\sim32\arcsec$) and $\sim60$
199: \% for the 300-400 GHz receiver (beam width of $\sim20\arcsec$) \citep{houde}.
200:
201: We obtained the final set of observational data required for this
202: analysis in October and November 2007. During that period, the $^{12}$C$^{18}$O,
203: $^{13}$C$^{18}$O, and $^{13}$C$^{16}$O molecular species were
204: detected in two rotational transitions ($J=2\rightarrow1$ and $J=3\rightarrow2$)
205: towards the center position of DR21(OH). We also attempted to detect
206: H$_{3}$O$^{+}$ in $J=3_{0}\rightarrow2_{0}$ and $J=3_{2}\rightarrow2_{2}$
207: transitions at 396 GHz and 364 GHz, respectively. Although we were
208: successful in detecting the 364 GHz transition, we did not record
209: an acceptable detection for the 396 GHz transition. Standard telescope
210: efficiencies were also used for these sets of data (i.e., $\sim66$
211: \% at 200-300 GHz with a beam width of $\sim33\arcsec$, and $\sim58$
212: \% at 300-400 GHz with a beam width of $\sim22\arcsec$). Figure \ref{fig1}
213: shows the spectra for HCNH$^{+}$ and H$_{3}$O$^{+}$. The spectra
214: for the $J=3\rightarrow2$ and $J=4\rightarrow3$ transitions of H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$,
215: H$^{13}$CN and HN$^{13}$C are shown in Figure \ref{fig2}, while
216: the detections of the CO isotopologues are presented in Figure \ref{fig3}.
217: All the data reduction was carried out using the GILDAS%
218: \footnote{URL: http://iram.fr/IRAMFR/GILDAS/%
219: } and CASSIS%
220: \footnote{URL: http://cassis.cesr.fr/%
221: } software packages.
222:
223: DR21(OH) is well known to have a multiply peaked structure, suggesting
224: that the cloud is in an early stage of massive star formation \citep{Richardson1}.
225: Therefore, it is important to determine whether or not the emission
226: from the molecules under study arises from the same volume of gas
227: along the line of sight. In order to confirm the coexistence of the
228: molecular species along each line of sight, it is useful to obtain
229: velocity maps and analyze them together with line profiles. However,
230: velocity mapping, especially for the faint lines of HCNH$^{+}$ and
231: H$_{3}$O$^{+}$, required a longer integration time than was available
232: to us. Nevertheless, consideration of the spectra in Figures \ref{fig1},
233: \ref{fig2} and \ref{fig3} shows an alignment of the peak velocities
234: of the detected lines near -3 km s$^{-1}$. Therefore, to a good approximation,
235: the observed molecular species are coexistent in the region along
236: our line of sight. Notable exceptions are the $J=4\rightarrow3$ transition
237: of HN$^{13}$C and $J=3\rightarrow2$ transition of $^{12}$C$^{18}$O
238: in Figure \ref{fig2} and \ref{fig3}, respectively. The corresponding
239: observations are, therefore, not used in our analysis.
240:
241: \placetable{ta:data}
242:
243:
244: \section{Method}
245:
246: In this section, we describe the main creation and destruction paths
247: of HCNH$^{+}$ and HCO$^{+}$ in dense clouds and the method used
248: to calculate $n(\mathrm{e})$, $n(\mathrm{H_{3}^{+}})$ and $\zeta_{\mathrm{H_{2}}}$.
249: In dense clouds, the chemistry is dominated by ion-neutral reactions
250: and the main formation reactions for HCNH$^{+}$ are as follows \citep{schilke}
251:
252: \begin{eqnarray}
253: \mathrm{H}_{3}^{+}+\mathrm{HCN}\left(\mathrm{HNC}\right) & \longrightarrow & \mathrm{HCNH}^{+}+\mathrm{H}_{2}\label{eq:my1}\\
254: \mathrm{HCO}^{+}+\mathrm{HCN}\left(\mathrm{HNC}\right) & \longrightarrow & \mathrm{HCNH}^{+}+\mathrm{CO}\label{eq:my2}\\
255: \mathrm{H}_{3}\mathrm{O}^{+}+\mathrm{HCN}\left(\mathrm{HNC}\right) & \longrightarrow & \mathrm{HCNH}^{+}+\mathrm{H}_{2}\mathrm{O}.\label{eq:my3}
256: \end{eqnarray}
257:
258:
259: \noindent Likewise, in dark clouds, HCO$^{+}$ is mainly formed by
260: the reaction of H$_{3}$$^{+}$ with CO (\citealt{herbst,watson})
261:
262: \begin{equation}
263: \mathrm{H_{3}^{+}+CO\longrightarrow HCO^{+}+H_{2}}.\label{eq:my4}\end{equation}
264:
265:
266: \noindent Both HCNH$^{+}$ and HCO$^{+}$ are mainly removed through
267: dissociative recombination with electrons (\citealt{schilke}; \citealt{plume})
268:
269: \begin{eqnarray}
270: \mathrm{HCNH^{+}+e^{-}} & \longrightarrow & \mathrm{HCN+H}\label{eq:hcnh+}\\
271: & \longrightarrow & \mathrm{HNC+H}\nonumber \\
272: & \longrightarrow & \mathrm{CN+2H}\nonumber \\
273: \mathrm{HCO^{+}+e^{-}} & \longrightarrow & \mathrm{CO+H}\label{eq:hco2}
274: \end{eqnarray}
275:
276:
277: \noindent The rate coefficients of the above reactions are taken
278: from the UMIST database \citep{Woodall} and are listed in Table \ref{ta:ki}.
279: The kinetic temperature in dark molecular clouds is usually between
280: 10 to 40 K; we follow \citet{wilson} in adopting a kinetic temperature
281: of $20$ K for DR21(OH) to evaluate these rate coefficients.
282:
283: \placetable{ta:ki}
284:
285: There are several other reactions that can contribute to the creation
286: and destruction of HCNH$^{+}$ and HCO$^{+}$ in dense clouds, but
287: they can safely be neglected due to their low rate coefficients and/or
288: the relatively low abundance of the molecules involved (e.g., reactions
289: involving C$_{2}$H$_{2}$$^{+}$, H$_{2}$O$^{+}$, H$_{2}$CO$^{+}$,
290: HNO$^{+}$, C$_{2}$$^{+}$, and H$_{2}$S$^{+}$).
291:
292: We can use the aforementioned reactions to equate the rates of formation
293: and destruction of HCNH$^{+}$ (equations (\ref{eq:my1})-(\ref{eq:my3}),
294: and (\ref{eq:hcnh+})) and HCO$^{+}$ (equations (\ref{eq:my4}) and
295: (\ref{eq:hco2})) to obtain the following expressions for the electron
296: and H$_{3}$$^{+}$ abundances
297:
298: \begin{equation}
299: \mathrm{\mathit{n}(\mathrm{\mathit{\mathrm{e}}})=\frac{[\mathit{n}(\mathrm{HCN})+\mathit{n}(\mathrm{HNC})][\mathit{\mathrm{\mathit{n}(H_{3}^{+})\mathit{k_{1}}+}n}(HCO^{+})\mathit{k_{2}+\mathrm{\mathit{n}(H_{3}O^{+})\mathit{k_{3}}}}]}{\mathit{n}(HCNH^{+})\mathit{k_{5}}}},\label{eq:n(e)1}\end{equation}
300:
301:
302: \begin{equation}
303: n(\mathrm{H}_{3}^{+})=\frac{n(\mathrm{HCO^{+}})n(\mathrm{\mathit{\mathrm{e}}})k_{6}}{n(\mathrm{CO})k_{4}}\:.\label{eq:h3+}\end{equation}
304:
305:
306: \noindent Since we have obtained all the observations necessary to
307: determine the abundance of the HCN, HNC, HCO$^{+}$, H$_{3}$O$^{+}$,
308: HCNH$^{+}$, and CO molecular species, we are left with a set of two
309: equations and two unknowns (i.e., $n$(H$_{3}$$^{+}$) and $n$(e)).
310: It will therefore be straightforward to simultaneously determine $n$(H$_{3}$$^{+}$)
311: and $n$(e) using equations (\ref{eq:n(e)1}) and (\ref{eq:h3+})
312: and our spectroscopic data.
313:
314: The cosmic ray ionization rate can be obtained directly from the abundance
315: of H$_{3}$$^{+}$, which forms as follows (\citealt{solomon}; \citealt{bowers})
316:
317: \begin{eqnarray}
318: \mathrm{H_{2}+CR} & \longrightarrow & \mathrm{H}_{2}^{+}+\mathrm{e}^{-}\label{eq:h3+1}\\
319: \mathrm{H_{2}^{+}}+\mathrm{H}_{2} & \longrightarrow & \mathrm{H_{3}^{+}+H}\:.\label{eq:h3+2}
320: \end{eqnarray}
321:
322:
323: The reaction between $\mathrm{H_{2}^{+}}$ and $\mathrm{H}_{2}$ proceeds
324: very rapidly \citep{solomon} and is limited by the abundance of $\mathrm{H_{2}^{+}}$.
325: The rate of formation of H$_{3}$$^{+}$ is therefore governed by
326: the ionization of $\mathrm{H}_{2}$ by cosmic rays.
327:
328: The main destruction path for H$_{3}$$^{+}$ in dense cores is through
329: reactions with CO \citep{mccall}, due to the high reaction rate and
330: the fact that the latter has the highest fractional abundance with
331: respect to $\mathrm{H}_{2}$ in molecular clouds. Furthermore, H$_{3}$$^{+}$
332: is also destroyed by dissociative recombination with electrons through
333:
334: \begin{eqnarray}
335: \mathrm{H_{3}^{+}+e^{-}} & \longrightarrow & \mathrm{H_{2}+H}\label{eq:h3}\\
336: & \longrightarrow & \mathrm{H+H+H.}\nonumber
337: \end{eqnarray}
338:
339:
340: Although the overall rate for this reaction is an order of magnitude
341: lower than that involving CO (see equation (\ref{eq:my4})), we still
342: include it in what follows for completeness. Again, assuming statistical
343: equilibrium between the formation and destruction rate of H$_{3}$$^{+}$,
344: we obtain
345:
346: \begin{equation}
347: \zeta_{\mathrm{H}_{2}}=\frac{n(\mathrm{H}_{3}^{+})n(\mathrm{CO})k_{4}+n(\mathrm{H}_{3}^{+})n(\mathrm{e})k_{11}}{n(\mathrm{H}_{2})}\:.\label{eq:zeta}\end{equation}
348:
349:
350: The main advantage of our method is that it enables us to calculate
351: $\chi_{\mathrm{e}}$ and $\zeta_{\mathrm{H}_{2}}$ simultaneously
352: through equations (\ref{eq:n(e)1}), (\ref{eq:h3+}) and (\ref{eq:zeta}),
353: without the need to consider more extensive chemical networks for
354: each molecular species involved. As mentioned before, this is because
355: the required abundances are determined directly from observations.
356: This feature differentiates ours from previous techniques.
357:
358:
359: \section{Results}
360:
361: The expressions for $\chi_{\mathrm{e}}$ and $\zeta_{\mathrm{H}_{2}}$
362: in the previous section are couched in terms of abundance but could
363: equivalently be written in terms of column density, which is a more
364: natural quantity to use when analyzing observation. We calculated
365: the excitation temperature of every observed molecular species (or
366: at least for one of its isotopologues) that appears in equations (\ref{eq:n(e)1})
367: and (\ref{eq:h3+}) in order to calculate its column density. The
368: C and O isotopic ratios in the cloud were determined with observations
369: of the $^{12}\mathrm{C}^{18}\mathrm{O}$, $^{13}\mathrm{C}^{18}\mathrm{O}$
370: and $^{13}\mathrm{C}^{16}\mathrm{O}$ molecular species, and were
371: used to evaluate the column density of the common molecular species
372: (more below).
373:
374:
375: \subsection{Excitation temperatures and column densities}
376:
377: We determined the excitation temperatures and column densities of
378: the observed molecules using a LTE approach. For this purpose, we
379: detected two transitions for each molecular species and obtained the
380: ratio of their integrated intensities (\citealt{blake}; \citealt{emerson}).
381: The brightness temperature of a source can be written as (\citealt{kutner})
382:
383: \begin{equation}
384: T_{b}(\nu)=T_{0}\biggl[\frac{1}{e^{(T_{0}/T_{ex})}-1}-\frac{1}{e^{(T_{0}/T_{\mathrm{CMB}})}-1}\biggr](1-e^{-\tau(\nu)}),\label{eq:Tb}\end{equation}
385:
386:
387: \noindent where $T_{ex}$ is the excitation temperature, $T_{\mathrm{CMB}}$
388: the cosmic microwave background brightness temperature (2.7 K), $\tau(\nu)$
389: the optical depth, and $T_{0}=h\nu/k$, with $\nu$ the frequency.
390: The term involving the background brightness temperature is insignificant
391: compared to the other term and is therefore neglected. The mean optical
392: depth can be written as a function of column density as
393:
394: \begin{eqnarray}
395: \tau\Delta v & \equiv & \int\tau(v)dv\label{eq:tau}\\
396: & = & \frac{A_{ul}c^{3}N_{u}}{8\pi\nu^{3}}(e^{(T_{0}/T_{ex})}-1),\nonumber
397: \end{eqnarray}
398:
399:
400: \noindent where $\Delta v$ is the extent of the spectral line, $A_{ul}$
401: is the Einstein coefficient for spontaneous emission (listed in Table
402: \ref{ta:data}) and $N_{u}$ is the column density of the upper level
403: of a transition, which, in turn, can be written as a function of the
404: integrated brightness temperature and mean optical depth of the line
405: as
406:
407: \begin{equation}
408: N_{u}=\frac{8\pi k\nu^{2}}{hc^{3}A_{ul}}\Bigl(\frac{\tau}{1-e^{-\tau}}\Bigr)\int T_{b}dv,\label{eq:nu/gu}\end{equation}
409:
410:
411: \noindent where the term $\int T_{b}dv$ is the integrated intensity
412: of the spectral line profile and the term $\tau/(1-e^{-\tau})$ (hereafter
413: abbreviated by $\beta$) is the optical depth correction factor \citep{lp93}.
414: For optically thin lines, where $\tau\ll1$, $\beta$ approaches unity.
415: Within the LTE approximation, the population of the levels is assumed
416: to be thermalized and the total column density of the molecular species
417: along the observer's line of sight, $N_{tot}$, can be expressed as
418:
419: \begin{equation}
420: N_{tot}=\frac{8\pi k\nu^{2}U(T_{ex})}{hc^{3}A_{ul}g_{u}}e^{(E_{u}/kT_{ex})}\beta\int T_{b}dv,\label{eq:Nt}\end{equation}
421:
422:
423: \noindent where $U(T_{ex})$ is the partition function at the excitation
424: temperature $T_{ex}$, while $g_{u}$ and $E_{u}$ are the upper state
425: degeneracy and energy, respectively.
426:
427: In order to obtain the excitation temperature of a molecular species
428: that exhibits optically thin line profiles, we obtained the ratio
429: of the integrated intensities of its two observed transitions using
430: equation (\ref{eq:Nt}). For such molecules, we adopted $\beta=1$
431: for the corresponding spectral lines and solved for $T_{ex}$, assuming
432: it to be the same for both transitions. The optical depths of the
433: lines were subsequently calculated using equation (\ref{eq:tau}).
434: For example, in the case of H$^{13}$CN we obtained a $T_{ex}$ of
435: $13$ K and opacities of $0.09$ and $0.06$ for the $J=3\rightarrow2$
436: and $J=4\rightarrow3$ transitions, respectively. The optical depths
437: for all transitions thus calculated are listed in Table \ref{ta:data}.
438: This method could not be used for $^{12}$C$^{18}$O and $^{13}$C$^{16}$O,
439: as their transitions are not optically thin.
440:
441: Inspection of the $^{12}$C$^{18}$O spectra in Figure \ref{fig3}
442: reveals that the line profiles are slightly saturated. Furthermore,
443: the peak velocity of the $J=3\rightarrow2$ transition is clearly
444: blue-shifted from the $J=2\rightarrow1$ transition and the vast majority
445: of the other observed lines rendering it unsuitable for this analysis,
446: since it possibly arises from a different region. Therefore, care
447: had to be taken toward the determination of the excitation temperature
448: and optical depth of this molecule. Since the line profile for the
449: $J=2\rightarrow1$ transition is relatively symmetric and of appropriate
450: shape, we fitted it with a Gaussian profile. We then used the equation
451: for a Gaussian line from \citet{vastel} and Newton's method to numerically
452: solve the equation
453:
454: \begin{equation}
455: N_{u}-\frac{8\pi k\nu^{2}}{hc^{3}A_{ul}}\Bigl(\frac{\tau(N_{u})}{1-e^{-\tau(N_{u})}}\Bigr)T_{b}\delta v=0\label{eq:newton}\end{equation}
456: \noindent for $N_{u}$ and subsequently for $\tau(N_{u})$ for a
457: very narrow velocity interval $\delta v$ centered on $v$. The dependency
458: of the mean optical depth on $N_{u}$ follows from equation (\ref{eq:tau}).
459: This way, we obtained the optical depth in different parts of the
460: line profile to model the spectrum using a range of excitation temperatures
461: ($10<T_{ex}<25$). Every optical depth value was converted to a brightness
462: temperature using equation (\ref{eq:Tb}) and consequently, assuming
463: a beam filling factor of 1, to an antenna temperature through $T_{A}^{*}=\eta T_{b}$,
464: where $\eta$ is the telescope efficiency at the appropriate frequency.
465: The excitation temperature of $^{12}$C$^{18}$O was taken to be the
466: temperature of the best fit to the $J=2\rightarrow1$ spectrum. The
467: line profiles of H$_{3}$O$^{+}$ ($J=3_{2}\rightarrow2_{2}$) and
468: HN$^{13}$C ($J=3\rightarrow2$) were modelled in a similar fashion
469: to obtain their excitation temperatures, since these were the only
470: credible transitions detected for these molecules.
471:
472: The $^{13}$C$^{16}$O lines are optically thick, as is made clear
473: from their self-absorbed profiles (see Figure \ref{fig3}). In order
474: to obtain the excitation temperature for $^{13}$C$^{16}$O, we took
475: the ratio of the integrated intensities in the wings of the line profiles,
476: where the line optical depth is small ($\beta\sim1$) and applied
477: the method described above.
478:
479: Finally, the column densities of all molecules, except $^{13}$C$^{16}$O
480: and $^{12}$C$^{16}$O, were calculated using equation (\ref{eq:Nt})
481: and the values of $\tau$ and $T_{ex}$ as explained above. These
482: results are summarized in Table \ref{ta:tex} (the cases of $^{13}$C$^{16}$O
483: and $^{12}$C$^{16}$O are considered in the next section). The excitation
484: temperatures obtained for the different species fall in a narrow range
485: of 12 to 22 K, which is consistent with the assumption of LTE and
486: the kinetic temperature of 20 K discussed in $\S 3$.
487:
488: \placetable{ta:tex}
489:
490:
491: \subsection{C and O isotopic ratios}
492:
493: The $^{12}$C/$^{13}$C isotopic ratio was directly determined from
494: the ratio of the column density of $^{12}$C$^{18}$O to that of $^{13}$C$^{18}$O.
495: The observation of these relatively low-abundance species has the
496: advantage of probing denser regions over the observation of more abundant
497: isotopologues such as $^{12}$C$^{16}$O and $^{13}$C$^{16}$O.
498:
499: For the carbon isotopic ratio, we obtain
500:
501: \begin{equation}
502: \frac{^{12}\mathrm{C}}{^{13}\mathrm{C}}\equiv\frac{N_{tot}(\mathrm{^{12}C^{18}O})}{N_{tot}(\mathrm{^{13}C^{18}O})}=63\pm4,\label{eq:c12/c13}\end{equation}
503:
504:
505: \noindent which is consistent with the results of \citet{lp93} in
506: other clouds.
507:
508: In order to determine the $^{16}$O/$^{18}$O isotopic ratio, it was
509: necessary to compare the abundance of $^{13}$C$^{16}$O with that
510: of $^{13}$C$^{18}$O. Since the $^{13}$C$^{16}$O profiles show
511: self-absorption, we took the intensity ratio, $R$, of the $J=2\rightarrow1$
512: transitions of $^{13}$C$^{16}$O and $^{12}$C$^{18}$O in a common
513: velocity interval in the wings, where the line opacities are relatively
514: small (we included the optical depth correction, $\beta$, for $^{13}$C$^{16}$O
515: in this ratio). There is an uncertainty in the obtained value for
516: the column density of $^{13}$C$^{16}$O, since $R$ may vary over
517: the line profile. Nevertheless, we examined this ratio in two different
518: parts of each wing in order to check its consistency. The $^{16}$O/$^{18}$O
519: isotopic ratio is determined to be
520:
521: \begin{equation}
522: \frac{^{16}\mathrm{O}}{^{18}\mathrm{O}}\equiv\beta R\Bigl(\frac{^{12}\mathrm{C}}{^{13}\mathrm{C}}\Bigr)=318\pm64,\label{eq:o16/o18}\end{equation}
523:
524:
525: \noindent which is in agreement with previous studies in other clouds
526: (\citealt{penzias}; \citealt{Polehampton}).
527:
528: The column densities of the species listed in Table \ref{ta:tex}
529: were then calculated from their isotopologues using the obtained C
530: and O isotopic ratios. We determined the column density of $^{13}$C$^{16}$O
531: and $^{12}$C$^{16}$O and estimated the column density of molecular
532: hydrogen in DR21(OH) to be \citep{stahler}
533:
534: \begin{equation}
535: N\mathrm{(H}_{2})\simeq3.8\times10^{5}N(^{13}\mathrm{CO)}\simeq1.1\times10^{23}\:\mathrm{cm^{-2}}.\label{eq:N_H2}\end{equation}
536:
537:
538:
539: \subsection{Fractional ionization and cosmic ray ionization rate}
540:
541: We determined the H$_{3}$$^{+}$ and electron abundances for DR21(OH)
542: using the column density equivalent of equations (\ref{eq:n(e)1})
543: and (\ref{eq:h3+}), and equation (\ref{eq:N_H2}). For the fractional
544: ionization and H$_{3}$$^{+}$ column density we report $\chi_{\mathrm{e}}=3.2\times10^{-8}$
545: and $N(\mathrm{H}_{3}^{+})=5.5\times10^{13}\:\mathrm{cm^{-2}}$, respectively.
546: \citet{mccall} detected absorption lines of H$_{3}$$^{+}$ in several
547: dense molecular clouds, and estimated $N(\mathrm{H}_{3}^{+})$ to
548: be $(1-5)\times10^{14}$$\:\mathrm{cm^{-2}}$. We find our calculated
549: value for $N(\mathrm{H}_{3}^{+})$ lower than theirs. Our result for
550: $\chi_{\mathrm{e}}$ agrees well with previous findings in other sources
551: \citep{bergin,flower}. Moreover, we estimate the cosmic ray ionization
552: rate for DR21(OH)Main to be $\zeta_{\mathrm{H_{2}}}=3.1\times10^{-18}\:\mathrm{s}^{-1}$
553: through equation (\ref{eq:zeta}), which agrees with recent results
554: for other clouds (e.g., \citealt{flower}).
555:
556: It should be noted that the rate coefficients for the chemical reactions
557: are either calculated or measured in laboratories, and have uncertainties
558: ranging from $25$$\%$ up to a factor of 2 \citep{Woodall}. The
559: OSU database has historically been used for chemical modelling of
560: dark clouds; however, the latest release of the UMIST database contains
561: dipole reactions with fits specific for low temperatures and is well-suited
562: to this type of modelling. The difference in the rate coefficients
563: between the two databases are within a factor of two and, in order
564: to investigate the effect of this, we repeated our calculations using
565: the rate coefficients from the OSU database. We find an increase in
566: the ionization fraction and the cosmic rate ionization rate by a factor
567: of two, which is commensurate with the uncertainties in the rate coefficients
568: mentioned above.
569:
570: The cloud size along the line of sight is needed for the calculation
571: of the molecular number densities, and can be approximately estimated
572: through the inspection of extended emission maps of molecules in the
573: cloud. But the uncertainty in the distance of the source adds to the
574: inaccuracy in the determination of the cloud size. We estimated the
575: cloud size from the HCN ($J=4\rightarrow3$) map by \citet{richardson2}
576: to be 1.7 pc. Finally, the column density of molecular hydrogen in
577: dense clouds is usually calculated using standard ratios of CO/H$_{2}$
578: or through extinction measurements. All the uncertainties in the aforementioned
579: parameters cause $\zeta_{\mathrm{H_{2}}}$ to be uncertain by a factor
580: of a few.
581:
582:
583: \section{Discussion and Summary}
584:
585: We have presented a simple yet novel method to simultaneously estimate
586: the ionization fraction and cosmic ray ionization rate of H$_2$ in
587: dense molecular clouds. These parameters were determined in DR21(OH)
588: using ancillary observational data pertaining to the formation and
589: destruction reactions of HCNH$^+$ and HCO$^+$, which involve the
590: H$_3$$^+$ and electron abundance. We have made a number of assumptions
591: regarding this method, which will be discussed here.
592:
593: a) The primary assumption in this method is that cosmic rays are the
594: dominant means of ionization in DR21(OH). As mentioned earlier, there
595: has been no detection of HII regions in DR21(OH), which implies there
596: are no actively photo-ionizing stars in the cloud. \citet{gibb} mapped
597: the DR21/DR21(OH) region at 3 mm, 850 $\mu\mathrm{m}$ and 450 $\mu\mathrm{m}$
598: and identified several submillimeter sources within the region, which
599: only suggest the existence of deeply embedded young protostars in
600: the source. We note that the value we obtain for the ionization fraction
601: is consistent with our assumption.
602:
603: b) We selected the most significant formation and destruction routes
604: for HCNH$^+$ and HCO$^+$ by identifying the reactions that had the
605: largest rate coefficients and involved significantly abundant molecules.
606: There are other ionic and neutral species such as CO$^+$, C$^+$,
607: HCN$^+$, and H$_2$O that take part in the HCNH$^+$ and HCO$^+$
608: chemistry. These species are abundant in photon dominated regions
609: \citep{savage}, but can safely be neglected here given the lack of
610: photo-ionizing sources in DR21(OH), as noted above.
611:
612: c) For our calculations, we have assumed chemical equilibrium within
613: the region under study. \citet{lintott} argue that in a rapidly evolving
614: cloud, the dynamical timescale may be shorter than the chemical timescale,
615: and hence chemical equilibrium will not be established until the cloud
616: has reached a quiescent stage, i.e., passed its initial collapse phase.
617: They mention this timescale to be on the order of $10^{6}$ years.
618: If chemical equilibrium is not met in DR21(OH), then $\zeta_{\mathrm{H_{2}}}$
619: will be overestimated by a factor of $2-3$ \citep{lintott}. This
620: uncertainty is comparable with the uncertainties in the rate coefficients,
621: observational calibrations, and measurements of cloud size and molecular
622: hydrogen abundance.
623:
624: d) DR21(OH) is known to harbor water and methanol masers (associated with the MM1 and MM2 continuum sources), being an indication of the presence of outflows within the source. \citet{magnum, magnum2} observed this source using the VLA and found an excitation temperature above 80 K within a region of ² $\sim10\arcsec$ centered on MM1 (VLSR $\sim$ -4.1 km s$^{-1}$). Gas associated with such regions would understandably have different physical characteristics compared to the more extended, relatively quiescent regions probed with our observations. It is the latter that dominates the region we observed with our larger telescope beam ($\sim20\arcsec$ to $\sim30\arcsec$). Nevertheless, previous studies have established that this star-forming region possesses a complex structure owing to the presence of deeply embedded sources, and the detection of molecular masers further supports this conclusion. One could thus question our assignment of a single kinetic temperature of 20 K for DR21(OH). But since we obtained a narrow range of temperatures (12 - 22 K) for all the molecular species we observed, we believe that our aforementioned chosen value is justified for the spatial resolution attained with our observations. Incidentally, this narrow range of temperatures for all species is also consistent with the use of the LTE approximation for this study.
625:
626: Provided the above assumptions are met, our method will be very useful
627: for the calculation of $\chi_{\mathrm{e}}$ and $\zeta_{\mathrm{H_{2}}}$
628: in dense molecular clouds without the need for detailed chemical models.
629: However, the application of this technique can be limited due to the
630: likely difficulty in detecting HCNH$^+$. For example, we attempted
631: to observe HCNH$^+$ in other molecular clouds such as W3(OH), AFGL2591
632: and AFGL490 but could not record any credible detection. For these
633: situations, other molecules such as HCS$^+$, whose formation and
634: destruction follow a similar chemistry and could be coexistent with
635: HCO$^+$ may be taken into consideration.
636:
637: Moreover, it is not straightforward to precisely determine the density for which our values of the ionization fraction and cosmic ray ionization rate apply when one considers that our array of observations involves molecules with a vast range of critical densities (e.g., from $\sim$ 10$^{3}$ cm$^{-3}$ for CO to $\sim$ 10$^{8}$ cm$^{-3}$ for HCN). We had to assume that all observed species are coexistent within DR21(OH) in order to carry our program; however, this is probably not strictly accurate. This is especially the case for CO and its isotopologues, because of their lower critical densities, and this brings a further uncertainty in our determination of $\chi_{\mathrm{e}}$ and $\zeta_{\mathrm{H_{2}}}$. Unfortunately, it is difficult to evaluate the magnitude of this bias with our existing data. On the other hand, the good alignment of spectral peak intensities and the relative agreement on excitation temperatures is consistent with our coexistence approximation.
638:
639: Although our method does not take account of gas-grain interactions
640: or deuterated species, which may be important for clouds at very low
641: temperatures (e.g. \citealt{flower}), its simplicity and reliance
642: on observations render it a powerful tool for the simultaneous calculation
643: of $\chi_{\mathrm{e}}$ and $\zeta_{\mathrm{H_{2}}}$. Moreover, this
644: method enables us to indirectly estimate the column density of H$_{3}$$^{+}$
645: in dense molecular clouds. This is important, since the low abundance
646: of H$_{3}$$^{+}$ makes its absorption lines difficult to observe,
647: and it is not at all detectable in the submillimeter regime. Furthermore,
648: the obtained values for $\chi_{\mathrm{e}}$ and $\zeta_{\mathrm{H_{2}}}$
649: are applicable in the calculations of ambipolar diffusion timescale
650: and the magnitude of the mean magnetic field in the cloud, which will
651: be addressed in a future paper.
652:
653:
654: \acknowledgements{The authors thank the anonymous referee for a careful reading and insightful comments, and also D. Johnstone and J. Di Francesco for helpful
655: discussions and suggestions. M. H.'s research is funded through the NSERC
656: Discovery Grant, Canada Research Chair, Canada Foundation for Innovation,
657: Ontario Innovation Trust, and Western's Academic Development Fund
658: programs. The Caltech Submillimeter Observatory is funded through
659: the NSF grant AST 05-40882 to the California Institute of Technology. }
660:
661: \begin{thebibliography}{van der Tak \& van Dishoeck(2000)}
662: \bibitem[Bergin et al.(1999)]{bergin}Bergin, E. A., Plume, R., Williams,
663: J. P., \& Myers, P. C. 1999, \apj, 512, 724
664:
665: \bibitem[Blake et al.(1987)]{blake}Blake, G. A., Sutton, E. C., Masson
666: C. R., \& Phillips T. G. 1987, \apj, 315, 621
667:
668: \bibitem[Bowers et al.(1969)]{bowers}Bowers, M. T., Elleman, D. D.,
669: \& King, J. 1969, \jcp, 50, 4787
670:
671: \bibitem[Caselli et al.(1998)]{caselli}Caselli, P., Walmsley, C.
672: M., Terzieva, R., \& Herbst, E. 1998, \apj, 499, 234
673:
674: \bibitem[Curran et al.(2005)]{curran}Curran, R. L., Collett, J. L.,
675: Atkinson, J. W., Chrysostomou, A., \& Aitken, D. K. 2005, Protostars
676: and Planets V, 8160
677:
678: \bibitem[Dalgarno(2006)]{dalgarno}Dalgarno, A. 2006, PNAS, 103, 33,
679: 12269
680:
681: \bibitem[Davis et al.(2007)]{davis}Davis, C. J., Kumar, M. S. N.,
682: Sandell, G., Froebrich, D., Smith, M. D., \& Currie, M. J. 2007, \mnras,
683: 374, 29
684:
685: \bibitem[Dickel et al.(1978)]{dickel}Dickel, H., Dickel, J., \& Wilson,
686: W. 1978, \apj, 223, 840
687:
688: \bibitem[Emerson(1996)]{emerson}Emerson, D. 1996, Interpreting Astronomical
689: Spectra (Chichester: Wiley), 301
690:
691: \bibitem[Flower et al.(2007)]{flower}Flower, D. R., Pineau des Forets,
692: G., \& Walmsley, C. M. 2007, A\&A, 474, 923
693:
694: \bibitem[Genzel \& Downes(1977)]{genzel}Genzel, R., \& Downes, D.
695: 1977, A\&AS, 30, 145
696:
697: \bibitem[Gibb et al.(2005)]{gibb}Gibb, A. G., Thompson, M. A., Wyrowski,
698: F., \& Hatchell, J. 2005, Protostars and Planets V, 8194
699:
700: \bibitem[Herbst \& Klemperer(1973)]{herbst}Herbst, E., \& Klemperer,
701: W. 1973, \apj, 185, 505
702:
703: \bibitem[Houde et al.(2000)b]{houde}Houde, M., Peng, R., Phillips
704: T. G., Bastien, P., \& Yoshida, H. 2000, \apj, 537, 245
705:
706: \bibitem[Indriolo et al.(2007)]{indriolo}Indriolo. N., Geballe, T.
707: R., Oka, T., \& McCall, B. J. 2007, \apj, 671, 1736
708:
709: \bibitem[Johnston et al.(1984)]{johnston}Johnston K. J., Heinkel,
710: C., \& Wilson, T. L. 1984, \apj, 285, L85
711:
712: \bibitem[Kutner \& Ulich(1981)]{kutner}Kutner, M. L., \& Ulich, B.
713: L. 1981, \apj, 250, 341
714:
715: \bibitem[Langer \& Penzias(1990)]{lp90}Langer, W. D., \& Penzias,
716: A. A. 1990, \apj, 357, 477
717:
718: \bibitem[Langer \& Penzias(1993)]{lp93}Langer, W. D., \& Penzias,
719: A. A. 1993, \apj, 408, 539
720:
721: \bibitem[Li \& Houde(2008)]{li}Li, H., \& Houde, M., 2008, astro-ph/0801.2757
722:
723: \bibitem[Lintott \& Rawlings(2006)]{lintott}Lintott, C. J., \& Rawlings
724: J. M. C. 2006, A\&A, 448, 425
725:
726: \bibitem[Magnum et al.(1991)]{magnum}Mangum, J. G., Wootten, A.,
727: \& Mundy, L. G. 1991. \apj, 378, 576
728:
729: \bibitem[Magnum et al.(1992)]{magnum2}Mangum J. G., Wooten A., \&
730: Mundy L. G. 1992, \apj, 388, 467
731:
732: \bibitem[Maret \& Bergin(2007)]{maret}Maret, S., \& Bergin, E. A.
733: 2007, \apj, 664, 956
734:
735: \bibitem[McCall et al.(1999)]{mccall}McCall, B. J., Geballe, T. R.,
736: Hinkle, K. H., \& Oka, T. 1999, \apj, 522, 338
737:
738: \bibitem[McKee(1989)]{mckee}Mckee, C. F. 1989, \apj, 345, 782
739:
740: \bibitem[Penzias(1981)]{penzias}Penzias, A. A. 1981, \apj, 249,
741: 518
742:
743: \bibitem[Plume et al.(1998)]{plume}Plume, R., Bergin, E. A., Williams,
744: J. P., \& Myers, P. C. 1998, in Chemistry and Physics of Molecules
745: and Grains in Space, Faraday Discussions, 109, 47
746:
747: \bibitem[Polehampton et al.(2005)]{Polehampton}Polehampton, E. T.,
748: Baluteau, J. P., \& Swinyard, B. M. 2005, A\&A, 437, 957
749:
750: \bibitem[Richardson et al.(1994)]{Richardson1}Richardson, K. J.,
751: Sandell, G., Cunningham C. T., Bastien, P., \& Davies, S. R. 1994,
752: A\&A, 286, 555
753:
754: \bibitem[Richardson et al.(1986)]{richardson2}Richardson, K. J.,
755: White, G. J., \& Phillips J. P. 1986, \mnras, 219, 167
756:
757: \bibitem[Savage \& Ziurys(2004)]{savage}Savage, C., \& Ziurys, L.
758: M. 2004, \apj, 616, 966
759:
760: \bibitem[Schilke et al.(1991)]{schilke}Schilke, P., Walmsley, C.
761: M., Millar, T. .J., \& Henkel, C. 1991, A\&A, 247, 487
762:
763: \bibitem[Shu(1992)]{shu}Shu, F. H. 1992, Physics of Astrophysics,
764: Vol. II (Sausalito: University Science Books), 360
765:
766: \bibitem[Solomon \& Werner(1971)]{solomon}Solomon, P. M., \& Werner,
767: M. W. 1971, \apj, 165, 41
768:
769: \bibitem[Stahler \& Palla(2004)]{stahler}Stahler, S. W., \& Palla,
770: F. 2004, The Formation of Stars (Weinheim: Wiley-VCH), 170
771:
772: \bibitem[van der Tak \& van Dishoeck(2000)]{vanDer}van der Tak, F.
773: F. S., \& van Dishoeck, E. F. 2000, A\&A, 358, L79
774:
775: \bibitem[Vastel(2006)]{vastel} Vastel, C. 2006, URL : http://www.submm.caltech.edu/\textasciitilde{}vastel/CASSIS/
776:
777: \bibitem[Watson(1974)]{watson}Watson, W. D. 1974, \apj, 188, 35
778:
779: \bibitem[Wilson \& Mauersberger(1990)]{wilson}Wilson, T. L. \& Mauersberger,
780: R. 1990, A\&A, 239, 305
781:
782: \bibitem[Woodall et al.(2007)]{Woodall}Woodall, J., Agundez, M.,
783: Markwick-Kemper, A. J., \& Millar, T. J. 2007, A\&A, 466, 1197
784:
785: \bibitem[Woody et al.(1989)]{Woody}Woody, D. P., Scott, S. L., Scoville,
786: N. Z., Mundy, L. G., Sargent, A. I., Padin, S., Tinney, C. G., \&
787: Wilson, C. D. 1989, \apj, 337, L41
788:
789: \bibitem[Wootten et al.(1979)]{wootten}Wootten, A., Snell, R., \&
790: Glassgold, A. E. 1979, \apj, 234, 876
791:
792: \end{thebibliography}
793:
794:
795:
796:
797: \clearpage
798:
799: \begin{deluxetable}{lclrrrrr}
800:
801: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
802:
803: \tablecaption{Data for the observed molecular transitions \label{ta:data}}
804:
805: \tablecolumns{8}
806:
807: \tablewidth{0pt}
808:
809: \tablehead{
810:
811: %\colhead{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Coordinates (1950)} &
812:
813: %\colhead{$v$} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$\langle$ratio$\rangle$} \\
814:
815: %\cline{2-3} \cline{5-6}
816:
817: \colhead{Molecular transition} & \colhead{Frequency} &
818:
819: \colhead{A$_{ul}$} & \colhead{T$_{peak}$} & \colhead{V$_{peak}$} & \colhead{$\int TdV$} & \colhead{Velocity range} &\colhead{$\tau$} \\
820:
821: \colhead{} & \colhead{GHz} & \colhead{s$^{-1}$}&\colhead{K} & \colhead{km s$^{-1}$} & \colhead{K km s$^{-1}$} & \colhead{km s$^{-1}$} &\colhead{} \\
822:
823: }
824:
825: \startdata
826:
827: HCNH$^{+}$ (3-2) & 222.329 & 4.61$\times$10$^{-6}$ & 0.062 & -3.13 & 0.32 $\pm$ 0.02 &(-6.1, 0.3) & 0.003 \\
828:
829: HCNH$^{+}$ (4-3) & 296.433 & 1.13$\times$10$^{-5}$ & 0.064 & -3.27 & 0.29 $\pm$ 0.02 & (-6.1, -1.3) & 0.004 \\
830:
831: H$_{3}$O$^{+}$ (3$_{2}$-2$_{2}$) & 364.797 & 2.79$\times$10$^{-4}$ & 0.16 & -3.16 & 1.38 $\pm$ 0.08 &(-6.2, 1.2) & 0.02 \\
832:
833: HN$^{13}$C (3-2) & 261.263 & 6.48$\times$10$^{-4}$ & 0.38 & -3.07 & 2.99 $\pm$ 0.03 &(-6.7, 1.1)& 0.06\\
834:
835: HN$^{13}$C (4-3)\tablenotemark{a} & 348.340 & 1.59$\times$10$^{-3}$ & 0.66 & -3.81 & 6.14 $\pm$ 0.08 &(-10.0, 1.0)& \nodata\\
836:
837: H$^{13}$CN (3-2) & 259.011 & 7.72$\times$10$^{-4}$ & 0.96 & -2.84 & 8.67 $\pm$ 0.03 &(-9.4, 3.8)& 0.09\\
838:
839: H$^{13}$CN (4-3) & 345.339 & 1.9$\times$10$^{-3}$ & 0.39 & -2.70 & 4.17 $\pm$ 0.02 &(-7.6, 3.5)& 0.06\\
840:
841: H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ (3-2) & 260.255 & 1.34$\times$10$^{-3}$ & 1.02 & -2.94 & 8.37 $\pm$ 0.03 &(-7.4, 2.1)& 0.09\\
842:
843: H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ (4-3) & 346.998 & 3.29$\times$10$^{-3}$ & 0.56 & -2.70 & 4.89 $\pm$ 0.02 &(-7.2, 1.8)& 0.07\\
844:
845: $^{13}$C$^{18}$O (2-1) & 209.419 & 5.23$\times$10$^{-6}$ & 0.20 & -3.00 & 0.91 $\pm$ 0.06 &(-6.1, 0.0)& 0.01\\
846:
847: $^{13}$C$^{18}$O (3-2) & 314.119 & 1.89$\times$10$^{-6}$ & 0.22 & -3.14 & 0.90 $\pm$ 0.03 &(-5.9, -0.9)& 0.01\\
848:
849: $^{12}$C$^{18}$O (2-1) & 219.560 & 6.01$\times$10$^{-7}$ & 6.60 & -3.14 & 41.44 $\pm$ 0.07 &(-7.0, 1.7)& 2.19\tablenotemark{c}\\
850:
851: $^{12}$C$^{18}$O (3-2)\tablenotemark{a} & 329.330 & 2.17$\times$10$^{-6}$ & 6.06 & -3.70 & 40.28 $\pm$ 0.12 &(-7.0, 0.6)& \nodata\\
852: $^{13}$C$^{16}$O (2-1)\tablenotemark{b} & 220.398 & 6.07$\times$10$^{-7}$ & \nodata & \nodata & 92.70 $\pm$ 0.14 &(-8.2, 2.8) & \nodata\\
853: $^{13}$C$^{16}$O (3-2)\tablenotemark{b} & 330.587 & 2.19$\times$10$^{-6}$ & \nodata & \nodata & 40.45 $\pm$ 0.32 &(-7.8, 1.9) & \nodata\\
854:
855: \enddata
856:
857: %\tablenotetext{a}{T$_{peak}$ in mK}
858:
859: \tablenotetext{a}{Not used in the analysis due to shifted V$_{peak}$.}
860:
861: \tablenotetext{b}{Two velocity components, shows strong self-absorption.}
862:
863: \tablenotetext{c}{optical depth in the center of the line.}
864: \end{deluxetable}
865:
866:
867:
868: \clearpage
869:
870: \begin{deluxetable}{cll}
871:
872: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
873:
874: \tablecaption{Rate coefficients\tablenotemark{a} of the reactions for H$_{3}$$^{+}$, HCNH$^{+}$ and HCO$^{+}$ \label{ta:ki}}
875:
876: \tablecolumns{3}
877:
878: \tablewidth{0pt}
879:
880: \tablehead{
881:
882: %\colhead{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Coordinates (1950)} &
883:
884: %\colhead{$v$} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$\langle$ratio$\rangle$} \\
885:
886: %\cline{2-3} \cline{5-6}
887:
888: \colhead{Index\tablenotemark{b} (i)} & \colhead{reaction} & \colhead{k$_{i}$ (cm$^{3}$ s$^{-1}$)} \\
889:
890: }
891:
892: \startdata
893:
894: 1 & H$_{3}$$^{+}$ + HCN(HNC) $\longrightarrow$ HCNH$^{+}$ + H$_{2}$ & 8.1$\times$10$^{-9}$(T/300 K)$^{-0.5}$ \\
895:
896: 2 & HCO$^{+}$ + HCN(HNC) $\longrightarrow$ HCNH$^{+}$ + CO & 3.1$\times$10$^{-9}$(T/300 K)$^{-0.5}$ \\
897:
898: 3 & H$_{3}$O$^{+}$ + HCN(HNC) $\longrightarrow$ HCNH$^{+}$ + H$_{2}$O & 4.0$\times$10$^{-9}$(T/300 K)$^{-0.5}$ \\
899:
900: 4 & H$_{3}$$^{+}$ + CO $\longrightarrow$ HCO$^{+}$ + H$_{2}$& 1.7$\times$10$^{-9}$ \\
901:
902: 5\tablenotemark{c} & HCNH$^{+}$ + e$^{-}$ $\longrightarrow$ (HCN + H) or (HNC + H) or (CN + H + H) & 2.8$\times$10$^{-7}$(T/300 K)$^{-0.65}$ \\
903:
904: 6 & HCO$^{+}$ + e$^{-}$ $\longrightarrow$ CO + H & 2.4$\times$10$^{-7}$(T/300 K)$^{-0.69}$ \\
905:
906: 10 & H$_{2}$$^{+}$ + H$_{2}$ $\longrightarrow$ H$_{3}$$^{+}$ + H & 2.1$\times$10$^{-9}$ \\
907: 11\tablenotemark{c} & H$_{3}$$^{+}$ + e$^{-}$ $\longrightarrow$ (H$_{2}$ + H) or (H + H + H) & 6.7$\times$10$^{-8}$(T/300 K)$^{-0.52}$\\
908:
909: \enddata
910:
911: \tablenotetext{a}{All the rate coefficients are taken from the UMIST database.}
912: \tablenotetext{b}{The index follows the equation number where the corresponding reaction first appears in the text.}
913: \tablenotetext{c}{The overall rate coefficient of this reaction is the sum of the rates of all the given branch reactions.}
914:
915: \end{deluxetable}
916:
917:
918:
919: \clearpage
920:
921: \begin{deluxetable}{lcr}
922:
923: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
924:
925: \tablecaption{Excitation temperatures and column densities \label{ta:tex}}
926:
927: \tablecolumns{6}
928:
929: \tablewidth{0pt}
930:
931: \tablehead{
932:
933: %\colhead{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Coordinates (1950)} &
934:
935: %\colhead{$v$} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$\langle$ratio$\rangle$} \\
936:
937: %\cline{2-3} \cline{5-6}
938:
939: \colhead{Molecular Species} & \colhead{T$_{ex}$(K)} & \colhead{N$_{tot}$(cm$^{-2}$)} \\
940:
941: }
942:
943: \startdata
944:
945: HCNH$^{+}$ & 22 & 3.2$\times$10$^{13}$ \\
946:
947: H$_{3}$O$^{+}$ & 16 & 1.3$\times$10$^{16}$ \\
948:
949: HN$^{13}$C & 12 & 4.4$\times$10$^{12}$ \\
950:
951: H$^{13}$CN & 13 & 9.8$\times$10$^{12}$ \\
952:
953: H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ & 15 & 4.8$\times$10$^{12}$ \\
954:
955: $^{13}$C$^{18}$O & 20 & 9.0$\times$10$^{14}$ \\
956:
957: $^{12}$C$^{18}$O & 16 & 5.7$\times$10$^{16}$ \\
958:
959: $^{13}$C$^{16}$O & 18 & 2.9$\times$10$^{17}$ \\
960: $^{12}$C$^{16}$O & \nodata & 1.8$\times$10$^{19}$ \\
961:
962:
963: \enddata
964:
965: %\tablenotetext{a}{From the ratio of HCO$^{+}$ to HCN line width in table \ref{ta:widths}.}
966:
967: %\tablenotetext{b}{From the root mean square of ratios of H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ to H$^{13}$CN line width in %table \ref{ta:widths}.}
968:
969: \end{deluxetable}
970:
971: \clearpage
972:
973: %
974: \begin{figure}
975: \epsscale{0.7}\plotone{f1.eps}\caption{\label{fig1} The spectra for the HCNH$^{+}$ transitions $J=4\rightarrow3$
976: and $J=3\rightarrow2$, and para H$_{3}$O$^{+}$ ($J=3_{2}\longrightarrow2_{2}$)
977: and ortho H$_{3}$O$^{+}$ ($J=3_{0}\longrightarrow2_{0}$) towards
978: the center position of DR21(OH). }
979:
980:
981:
982: \end{figure}
983:
984:
985: %
986: \begin{figure}
987: \epsscale{0.7}\plotone{f2.eps}
988:
989: \caption{\label{fig2} The spectra for the $J=4\rightarrow3$ and $J=3\rightarrow2$
990: transitions of H$^{13}$CN, HN$^{13}$C, and H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ towards
991: the center position of DR21(OH). }
992:
993:
994:
995: \end{figure}
996:
997:
998: %
999: \begin{figure}
1000: \epsscale{0.7}\plotone{f3.eps}
1001:
1002: \caption{\label{fig3} The spectra for the $J=3\rightarrow2$ and $J=2\rightarrow1$
1003: transitions of $^{13}$C$^{18}$O, $^{12}$C$^{18}$O, and $^{13}$C$^{16}$O
1004: towards the center position of DR21(OH). }
1005:
1006: \end{figure}
1007:
1008: \end{document}
1009: