1: %%
2: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3:
4: % Reference formatting commands
5: \bibliographystyle{astron}
6:
7: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
8: \newcommand{\myemail}{karen@mso.anu.edu.au}
9:
10: \slugcomment{Submitted to the The Astrophysical Journal Letters}
11:
12: \shorttitle{Detecting Moons of Pulsar Planets} \shortauthors{Lewis,
13: Sackett \& Mardling}
14:
15: \begin{document}
16:
17: \title{Possibility of Detecting Moons of Pulsar Planets Through Time-of-Arrival Analysis}
18:
19: \author{Karen M. Lewis}
20: \affil{School of Mathematical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton,
21: Victoria 3800, Australia; karen.lewis@sci.monash.edu.au}
22: \author{Penny D. Sackett}
23: \affil{Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Australian
24: National University, Mt. Stromlo Observatory, Cotter Road, Weston,
25: ACT 2611, Australia; Penny.Sackett@anu.edu.au}
26: \and
27: \author{Rosemary A. Mardling}
28: \affil{School of Mathematical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton,
29: Victoria 3800, Australia; rosemary.mardling@sci.monash.edu.au}
30:
31: \begin{abstract}
32: The perturbation caused by planet-moon binarity on the
33: time-of-arrival signal of a pulsar with an orbiting planet is
34: derived for the case in which the orbits of the moon and the planet-moon
35: barycenter are both circular and coplanar. The signal consists of
36: two sinusoids with frequency $(2n_p - 3n_b )$ and $(2n_p - n_b )$,
37: where $n_p$ and $n_b$ are the mean motions of the planet and
38: moon around their barycenter, and the planet-moon system around the host, respectively.
39: The amplitude of the signal is equal to the fraction $\sin I[9(M_p M_m)/16(M_p + M_m)^2] [r/R]^5$
40: of the system crossing time $R/c$, where $M_p$ and $M_m$ are the the masses of the planet and moon,
41: $r$ is their orbital separation, $R$ is the distance between the host pulsar and planet-moon barycenter, $I$ is the inclination of the orbital plane of the planet, and $c$ is the speed of light. The analysis is
42: applied to the case of PSR~B1620-26~b, a pulsar planet, to constrain
43: the orbital separation and mass of any possible moons. We find that a stable moon orbiting this pulsar planet could be detected, if the moon had a separation of about one fiftieth of that of the orbit of the planet around the pulsar, and a mass ratio to the planet of $\sim$ 5\% or larger.
44:
45: \end{abstract}
46:
47: \keywords{planetary systems --- pulsars: general --- pulsars:
48: individual(PSR~B1620-26) --- stars: oscillations}
49:
50: \section{Introduction to Extra-solar Moons}
51:
52: In the past decade and a half, over two hundred and fifty
53: extra-solar planets have been discovered\footnote{See, for example,
54: http://exoplanet.eu/catalogue.php}. With the data expected to be
55: produced by satellites such as COROT \citep{Auvergneetal2003} and
56: Kepler \citep*{Basrietal2005}, it will not only be possible to find
57: smaller planets, but moons of those planets as well
58: \citep{Szaboetal2006}. As a result, the detectability of extra-solar
59: moons is starting to be explored in terms of their effect on
60: planetary microlensing \citep{Hanetal2002} and transit lightcurves
61: \citep{Sartorettietal1999, Szaboetal2006}. Upper limits
62: have already been placed on the mass and radius of putative moons of
63: the planets HD~209458~b \citep{Brownetal2001}, OGLE-TR-113 b \citep{Gillonetal2006} and
64: HD~189733~b \citep{Pontetal2007}.
65:
66: While the limitations of microlensing and the transit technique for
67: detecting moons have been discussed and used in the literature, the
68: limitations of other techniques such as the time-of-arrival (TOA)
69: technique have not. This technique involves determining the
70: variations in line-of-sight position to the host star, usually a
71: pulsar, using the observed time of periodic events associated with
72: that host. The aim of this analysis is to explore exactly what the
73: TOA signal of a planet-moon pair is, and relate it to the planetary
74: systems that can give the most precise timing information, the
75: systems around millisecond pulsars.
76:
77: \section{Review of Planetary Detection Around Millisecond Pulsars}
78:
79: The first planetary system outside the Solar System was detected
80: around the millisecond pulsar PSR~1257+12 \citep{Wolszczanetal1992}.
81: This detection was made by investigating periodic variations in the
82: time of arrival of its radio pulses using a timing model. An example timing model for the case in which the planet's orbit around the pulsar is circular is:
83: \begin{equation}\label{TOA_example}
84: \left(t_N - t_0\right) = \left(T_N - T_0\right) + \Delta T_{corr}
85: + TOA_{pert,p}(M_s, M_p, R, I, \phi_{b}(0)),
86: \end{equation}
87: where $t_0$ and $t_N$ are the
88: times at which the initial and $N^{th}$ pulses are emitted in the pulsar's
89: frame, $T_0$ and $T_N$ are the times the initial and $N^{th}$ pulses
90: are received in the observatory's frame, and the term $\Delta
91: T_{corr}$ acts to change the frame of reference from the
92: observatory on Earth to the barycenter of the pulsar system \citep[see][for a more complete discussion of the components of $\Delta T_{corr}$]{Backer1993}. The final term represents the effect of a planet on the motion of the pulsar, where $R$ is the planet-pulsar distance, $I$ is the angle between the normal of the planet-pulsar orbit and the line-of-sight and $\phi_b(0)$ is the initial angular position of the planet measured from the $x$-axis, about the system barycenter. In addition, $M_s$ and $M_p$ are the mass of the pulsar and the planet, respectively.
93:
94: Currently, four planets around two millisecond pulsars have been
95: discovered, three around PSR~1257+12
96: \citep{Wolszczanetal1992,Wolszczan1994} and one around PSR~B1620-26
97: \citep*{Backeretal1993}. These four planets include one with mass
98: $~0.02$ Earth masses, the lowest mass extra-solar planet known. This
99: low-mass detection threshold, in addition to measurements of orbital
100: perturbations \citep[e.g., the 2:3 orbital resonance between
101: PSR~1257+12c and PSR~1257+12d,][]{Konackietal2003}, demonstrate
102: the sensitivity of the TOA technique. Indeed, as a result of their
103: high rotation rate (and thus large number of sampled pulses) and
104: low level of noise activity, millisecond pulsars make optimal
105: targets for high precision TOA work \citep[see e.g.,][]{Cordes1993}.
106:
107: \section{What is the TOA Perturbation Caused by a Moon?}
108:
109: \begin{figure}[tb]
110: \begin{center}
111: \includegraphics[height=2.28in,width=3.84in]{f1.png}
112: \caption{Coordinate system used in the analysis of the TOA perturbation
113: caused by a moon. The subscripts s, b, p and m refer to the pulsar,
114: planet-moon barycenter, planet and moon, respectively. The diagram on the left shows the quantities used to describe the position of the three bodies in their mutual orbital
115: plane, while the diagram on the right shows the relationship between
116: this orbital plane and the observer.}
117: \label{CoordSystem}
118: \end{center}
119: \end{figure}
120:
121: In order to investigate the perturbation caused by planet-moon binarity, the
122: timing model presented in equation~(\ref{TOA_example}) must be
123: updated to include effects due to the presence of the moon. For simplicity, we consider here only systems in which both the orbit of the planet and moon around their common barycenter, and the orbit of the planet-moon barycenter around the pulsar, are both circular and lie in the same plane.
124: An example model taking this assumption into account is:
125: \begin{eqnarray}
126: \left(t_N - t_0\right) = \left(T_N - T_0\right) &+& \Delta T_{corr}
127: + TOA_{pert,p}(M_s, M_p+M_m, R, I, \phi_{b}(0)) \nonumber\\
128: &+&
129: TOA_{pert,pm}(M_s, M_p, M_m, r, R, I, \phi_{b}(0),\phi_{p}(0)).\label{TOA_example_m}
130: \end{eqnarray}
131: We have explicitly modified $TOA_{pert,p}$ to indicate that it
132: depends on the combined planet-moon mass, and included another term,
133: $TOA_{pert,pm}$, to account for planet-moon binarity. Here $M_m$ is
134: the mass of the moon, $r$ is the distance between the planet and the moon, and $\phi_p(0)$ is the initial angular position of the planet measured from the planet-moon barycenter. The quantities $R$, $r$, $I$, $\phi_b$ and $\phi_p$ are shown in Figure \ref{CoordSystem}. The functional form of $TOA_{pert,pm}$ can be derived from $\mathbf{R}_s$, the vector between the system barycenter and the pulsar, using:
135: \begin{equation}
136: \frac{1}{c}\int_0^t\int_0^{t'} \mathbf{\ddot{R}}_s \cdot \mathbf{n} dt'' dt' =
137: TOA_{pert,p} + TOA_{pert,pm},\label{TOA-TOApertpmdef}
138: \end{equation}
139: where $c$ is the speed of light and $\mathbf{n}$ is a unit vector pointing along the line of sight, the only direction along which quantities can be measured.
140:
141: The governing equation for $\mathbf{R_s}$ can be written as the sum of the zeroth order term, which describes $TOA_{pert,p}$, and the tidal terms, which describe $TOA_{pert,pm}$:
142: \begin{eqnarray}
143: \frac{d^2\mathbf{R}_s}{dt^2} &=& \frac{G (M_p +
144: M_m)}{R^3}\mathbf{R} \nonumber\\
145: &+& \left[- \frac{G (M_p + M_m)}{R^3}\mathbf{R} + \frac{G M_p}{\left|\mathbf{R}
146: + \mathbf{r}_p\right|^3}(\mathbf{R}
147: + \mathbf{r}_p) + \frac{G M_m}{\left|\mathbf{R} +
148: \mathbf{r}_m\right|^3}(\mathbf{R} + \mathbf{r}_m)\right],\label{TOA-d2Rs}
149: \end{eqnarray}
150: where the tidal terms have been collected into square brackets and noting that $\mathbf{R}_s = - (M_p + M_m)/(M_s + M_p + M_m)\mathbf{R}$, $\mathbf{r}_p = - M_m/(M_p + M_m)\mathbf{r}$ and $\mathbf{r}_m =
151: M_p/(M_p + M_m)\mathbf{r}$, and where the vectors $\mathbf{R}_s$, $\mathbf{R}$, $\mathbf{r}_p$, $\mathbf{r}_m$ and $\mathbf{r}$ are also shown in Figure \ref{CoordSystem}. Using
152: the coordinate system in Figure \ref{CoordSystem}, it can be
153: seen after some algebra that:
154: \begin{eqnarray}
155: \label{TOA-Vec-Rm} \mathbf{R} + \mathbf{r}_m &=& \left[ R\cos
156: \phi_b - \frac{M_p}{M_p+M_m}r \cos \phi_p\right]\mathbf{i}
157: + \left[R\sin \phi_b - \frac{M_p}{M_p+M_m}r \sin \phi_p
158: \right]\mathbf{j}\\
159: \label{TOA-Vec-Rp} \mathbf{R} + \mathbf{r}_p &=& \left[R\cos
160: \phi_b + \frac{M_m}{M_p+M_m}r \cos \phi_p\right]\mathbf{i}
161: + \left[R \sin \phi_b + \frac{M_m}{M_p+M_m}r \sin \phi_p
162: \right]\mathbf{j}
163: \end{eqnarray}
164: where $\mathbf{i}$ and $\mathbf{j}$ are defined in Figure
165: \ref{CoordSystem}, and $\mathbf{i}$ is the direction to the
166: line-of-sight, projected onto the plane of the orbit.
167:
168: As the orbits are both circular and coplanar, we have that
169: $\phi_b(t) = n_b t + \phi_b(0)$, and $\phi_p(t) = n_p t + \phi_p(0)$ where
170: $n_b$ and $n_p$ are the constant mean motions of the two respective orbits. Substituting
171: equations~(\ref{TOA-Vec-Rm}) and (\ref{TOA-Vec-Rp}) into the
172: coefficients of the last two terms of equation~(\ref{TOA-d2Rs}),
173: assuming $r \ll R$ and using the binomial expansion to
174: order $r^2/R^2$ gives:
175: \begin{eqnarray}
176: \frac{G M_m}{\left|\mathbf{R} +
177: \mathbf{r}_m\right|^3} & = & \frac{G M_m}{R^3}\left[1 +
178: 3\frac{M_p}{(M_m + M_p)}\frac{r}{R}\cos(\phi_b -
179: \phi_p) \right. \nonumber \\
180: && \left. + \frac{M_p^2}{(M_m +
181: M_p)^2}\frac{r^2}{R^2} \left(-\frac{3}{2} + \frac{15}{2}
182: \cos^2(\phi_b - \phi_p)\right)\right]
183: \label{TOA-expnd-ms}
184: \end{eqnarray}
185: \begin{eqnarray}
186: \frac{G M_p}{\left|\mathbf{R} +
187: \mathbf{r}_p\right|^3} &=& \frac{G M_p}{R^3}\left[1 -
188: 3\frac{M_m}{(M_m + M_p)}\frac{r}{R}\cos(\phi_b - \phi_p) \right. \nonumber\\
189: && \left.+ \frac{M_m^2}{(M_m + M_p)^2}\frac{r^2}{R^2}
190: \left(-\frac{3}{2} + \frac{15}{2} \cos^2(\phi_b -
191: \phi_p)\right)\right]\label{TOA-expnd-ps}.
192: \end{eqnarray}
193: Substituting equations~(\ref{TOA-Vec-Rm}), (\ref{TOA-Vec-Rp}),
194: (\ref{TOA-expnd-ms}) and (\ref{TOA-expnd-ps}) into (\ref{TOA-d2Rs})
195: gives, after simplification:
196: \begin{eqnarray}
197: \frac{d^2\mathbf{R}_s}{dt^2} &=& \frac{G (M_p +
198: M_m)}{R^3}\mathbf{R} + \frac{G M_p M_m}{(M_m +
199: M_p)}\frac{r^2}{R^4} \left[\left(
200: -\frac{3}{2} + \frac{15}{2}
201: \cos^2(\phi_b - \phi_p)\right) \right.
202: \nonumber\\
203: && \Biggl. \times \left(\cos \phi_b\mathbf{i} + \sin
204: \phi_b\mathbf{j}\right) - 3\cos(\phi_b - \phi_p) \left(\cos \phi_p\mathbf{i} + \sin
205: \phi_p\mathbf{j}\right)\Biggr]
206: .\label{TOA-d2Rs2}
207: \end{eqnarray}
208: From Figure~\ref{CoordSystem} it can be seen that:
209: \begin{equation}
210: \mathbf{n} = \sin I \mathbf{i} + \cos I \mathbf{k}.\label{TOA-ndef}
211: \end{equation}
212: Substituting equations~(\ref{TOA-d2Rs2}) and (\ref{TOA-ndef}) into equation~(\ref{TOA-TOApertpmdef}), gives:
213: \begin{eqnarray}
214: TOA_{pert,pm} &=& \frac{- \sin I \ G M_p M_m}{c (M_m +
215: M_p)}\frac{r^2}{R^4} \left[ \frac{3}{4 n_b^2}\cos \phi_b +
216: \frac{3}{8(n_b - 2n_p)^2} \cos(\phi_b - 2\phi_p) \right. \nonumber\\
217: && \left.+ \frac{15}{8(3n_b - 2n_p)^2} \cos(3\phi_b - 2\phi_p) \right]
218: .\label{TOA-pert1}
219: \end{eqnarray}
220: The $\cos \phi_b$ term in equation~(\ref{TOA-pert1}) has the same
221: frequency as the signal of a lone planet and it can be shown that it acts to increase the measured value of $M_p +M_m$ derived from $TOA_{pert,p}$ by $(3/4)(r^2/R^2)(M_pM_m/(M_p+M_m))$. Consequently, this term can be neglected as it will be undetectable as a separate signal. Also, the edge of the
222: stability region for a prograde satellite of the low-mass component
223: of a high-mass binary can be approximated by $0.36r_H$ for the case
224: of circular orbits, where $r_H =
225: R\left[(M_p)/(3M_s)\right]^{1/3}$ is the secondary's Hill
226: radius \citep{Holmanetal1999}. When $r$ is equal to this
227: maximum stable radius $n_p \approx 8n_b$. As $n_b \ll n_p$ is likely, we have that the denominators of the $\cos(\phi_b - 2\phi_p)$ and $\cos(3\phi_b - 2\phi_p)$ terms will never approach zero. This, in addition to the assumption of zero eccentricities, means that resonance effects can be neglected. Consequently, equation~(\ref{TOA-pert1}) can be simplified
228: by neglecting $n_b$ in the denominators, giving:
229: \begin{equation}
230: TOA_{pert,pm} = \frac{- \sin I G M_p M_m}{c (M_m +
231: M_p)}\frac{r^2}{R^4}\left[\frac{3}{32n_p^2} \cos(\phi_b -
232: 2\phi_p) + \frac{15}{32n_p^2} \cos(3\phi_b - 2\phi_p) \right]
233: .\label{TOA-pert2}
234: \end{equation}
235: Writing $n_p$ in terms of $r$, using Kepler's law, gives:
236: \begin{equation}
237: TOA_{pert,pm} = - \sin I\frac{M_p M_m}{(M_m +
238: M_p)^2}\frac{R}{c}\left(\frac{r}{R}\right)^5 \left[\frac{3}{32}
239: \cos(\phi_b - 2\phi_p) + \frac{15}{32} \cos(3\phi_b - 2\phi_p)
240: \right] .\label{TOA-pert}
241: \end{equation}
242:
243: From equation~(\ref{TOA-pert}), we have that the size of the
244: perturbation varies as $[M_mM_p/(M_m + M_p)^2][r/R]^5$ times the system crossing time, $R/c$. So, the best hope of a
245: detectable signal occurs when the planet-moon pair are close to the
246: parent pulsar, widely separated from each other, both quite massive, and very accurate
247: timing data is available.
248:
249: Our result is consistent with a similar study done by \citet{Schneideretal2006}, who calculated the radial velocity perturbation on one component of a binary star system for the case in which the other component was an unresolved pair. Converting their radial velocity perturbation to a timing perturbation, setting the mass of the planet and moon equal to each other, as in the case investigated by \citet{Schneideretal2006}, and noting that $r$ in this work is equivalent to their $2a_A$, our formula and that of \citet{Schneideretal2006} agree.
250:
251: \section{Is is Possible to Detect Moons of Planets Orbiting Millisecond Pulsars?}
252:
253: To investigate whether or not it is possible to detect moons of
254: pulsar planets, we simplify equation~(\ref{TOA-pert}) by summing the
255: amplitudes of the sinusoids, giving the maximum possible amplitude:
256: \begin{equation}\label{ApproxTOAPert}
257: max\left(TOA_{pert,pm}\right) = \frac{9\sin I}{16}\frac{M_m M_p}{(M_m +
258: M_p)^2}\frac{R}{c}\left(\frac{r}{R}\right)^5.
259: \end{equation}
260: Thus, for a given $r/R$, the maximum amplitude increases linearly with $R$. So,
261: for planet-moon pairs that are far from each other and their parent
262: pulsar, detection may be possible. For example, a 0.1AU
263: Jupiter-Jupiter binary located 5.2AU from a host pulsar would
264: produce a $TOA_{pert,pm}$ of amplitude 960ns, which compares well
265: with the 130ns residuals obtained from one of the most stable
266: millisecond pulsars, PSR J0437-4715 \citep{vanStratenetal2001}.
267:
268: To demonstrate this method, the expected maximum signals from a moon
269: orbiting each of the four known pulsar planets was explored. It was
270: found that in the case of PSR~B1620-26~b, signals that are in
271: principle detectable could confirm or rule out certain
272: configurations of moon mass and orbital parameters (see
273: Figure~\ref{PulsarPlanetMoon}).
274:
275: In the particular case of PSR~B1620-26~b, the perturbation signal
276: will not exactly match the signal shown in equation~(\ref{TOA-pert})
277: due to the effect of its white dwarf companion.
278: The effect of this companion was investigated as a side project and
279: it was found that its effect was to introduce additional
280: perturbations on top of the $TOA_{pert,p}$ and $TOA_{pert,pm}$
281: calculated. Consequently, the detection threshold represents an
282: upper limit to the minimum detectable signal and thus the analysis
283: is still valid.
284:
285: \begin{figure}[tb]
286: \begin{center}
287: \includegraphics[height=3in,width=3.84in]{f2.png}
288: \caption{The
289: regions of parameter space containing detectable (shaded) and stable
290: (cross-hatched) moons of the planet PSR~B1620-26 b are shown as a function of planet-moon separation and moon mass. The total mass and the
291: distance of the planet-moon pair from the parent pulsar were assumed
292: to be 2.5 Jupiter masses and 23AU respectively
293: \citep{Sigurdssonetal2003}, while it was assumed that $\sin I = 1$.
294: The mass of the host was set at 1.7 solar masses (the sum of the
295: mass of the pulsar and its white dwarf companion). The $3 \sigma$
296: detection threshold was calculated assuming the $\sim 40\mu s$
297: timing residuals given in \citet{Thorsettetal1999} are uncorrelated
298: and that similar accuracy TOA measurements of PSR~B1620-26 continue
299: to the present day. The stability region was estimated as 0.36
300: times the Hill sphere of the planet. }
301: \label{PulsarPlanetMoon}
302: \end{center}
303: \end{figure}
304:
305: Unfortunately, there are practical limits to the applicability of
306: this method. They include discounting other systems that could
307: produce similar signals, sensitivity limits due to intrinsic pulsar
308: timing noise, and limits imposed by moon formation and stability.
309:
310: First, other systems that could produce similar signals need to be
311: investigated. Possible processes include pulsar precession
312: \citep*[see e.g.,][]{Akgunetal2006}, periodic variation in the
313: ISM \citep{Schereretal1997}, gravitational waves
314: \citep{Detweiler1979}, unmodelled interactions between planets
315: \citep{Laughlinetal2001} and other small planets. To help
316: investigate the last two options, we plan on completing a more
317: in-depth analysis of the perturbation signal of an extra-solar moon,
318: including the effects of orbital inclination and orbital
319: eccentricity.
320:
321: Second, the noise floor of the system needs to be examined. The
322: suitability of pulsars for signal detection is limited by two main
323: noise sources, phase jitter and red timing noise \citep[for
324: example,][]{Cordes1993}. Phase jitter is error due to pulse-to-pulse
325: variations and leads to statistically independent errors for each TOA
326: measurement. Phase jitter decreases with increasing rotation rate
327: (decreasing $P$) due to the resultant increase in the number of
328: pulses sampled each integration. Red timing noise refers to noise
329: for which neigbouring TOA residuals are correlated. Red timing noise has
330: been historically modeled as a random walk in phase, frequency or
331: frequency derivative \citep[for
332: example,][]{Boyntonetal1972,Groth1975,Cordes1980,Kopeikin1997}. Red
333: noise is strongly dependent on $\dot{P}$. This relationship can be
334: understood from the theoretical standpoint that red noise is due to
335: non-homogeneous angular momentum transport either between components
336: within the pulsar \citep[e.g.][]{Jones1990} or between it
337: and its environment \citep[e.g.][]{Cheng1987}. To illustrate
338: the effect of these two noise sources on TOA accuracy, an estimate
339: of their combined residuals as a function of $P$ and $\dot{P}$ is
340: shown in Figure~\ref{PulsarPlot}. For comparison, the values of $P$
341: and $\dot{P}$ of every pulsar as of publication are also included.
342: The ATNF Pulsar
343: Catalogue\footnote{http://www.atnf.csiro.au/research/pulsar/psrcat/}
344: \citep{Manchesteretal2005} was used to provide the pulsar data for
345: this plot.
346:
347: \begin{figure}[tb]
348: \begin{center}
349: \includegraphics[height=3in,width=3.84in]{f3.png}
350: \caption{Contour plot of
351: predicted timing noise as a function of pulsar rotation period and
352: period derivative. For comparison, all known pulsars as of
353: publication are overplotted. This plot is based on Figure 9 from
354: \citet{Cordes1993}. Consequently, the functions and assumptions used
355: to generate the contours are the same as given in
356: \citet{Cordes1993}, noting that that each TOA integration is 1000
357: seconds long. As the correlated timing noise measured for individual
358: pulsars can vary from the predicted values by two orders of
359: magnitude \citep[see e.g.,][]{Arzoumanianetal1994}, this plot is
360: meant to demonstrate global pulsar properties, not predict
361: individual pulsar noise characteristics. }
362: \label{PulsarPlot}
363: \end{center}
364: \end{figure}
365:
366: Third, whether or not moons will be discovered depends on whether or
367: not they \emph{exist} in certain configurations, which depends on
368: their formation history and orbital stability. Recent research
369: suggests that there are physical mass limits for satellites of both
370: gas giants \citep{Canupetal2006} and terrestrial planets
371: \citep{Wadaetal2006}. Also, tidal and three-body effects can
372: strongly affect the longevity of moons
373: \citep*{Barnesetal2002,Domingosetal2006,Atobeetal2007}.
374:
375: Finally, while this method was investigated for the specific case of
376: a pulsar host, this technique could also be applied to planets
377: orbiting other clock-like hosts such as pulsating giant stars
378: \citep{Silvottietal2007} and white dwarfs \citep*{Mullallyetal2006}.
379:
380: \acknowledgments
381:
382: We are grateful to D. Yong for informing us of planet searches
383: around pulsating stars. K. Lewis acknowledges the support of ANU/RSAA where the majority of this work was undertaken.
384:
385: \begin{thebibliography}{}
386:
387: \bibitem[Akg\"un et al.(2006)Akg\"un, Link \& Wasserman]{Akgunetal2006} Akg\"un T.,
388: Link B., Wasserman I., 2006, \mnras, 365, 653
389: \bibitem[Arzoumanian et al.(1994)]{Arzoumanianetal1994} Arzoumanian Z.,
390: Nice D. J., Taylor J. H. \& Thorsett S. E., 1994, \apj, 422, 671
391: \bibitem[Atobe \& Ida(2007)]{Atobeetal2007} Atobe K.,
392: \& Ida S., 2007, \icarus, 188, 1
393: \bibitem[Auvergne et al.(2003)]{Auvergneetal2003} Auvergne M.,
394: et al., 2003, \procspie, 4854, 170
395: \bibitem[Backer(1993)]{Backer1993} Backer, D. C., 1993, \pasp, 36, 11
396: \bibitem[Backer et al.(1993)Backer, Foster \& Sallmen]{Backeretal1993}
397: Backer D. C., Foster R. S., \& Sallmen S., 1993, \nat, 365, 817
398: \bibitem[Barnes \& O'Brien(2002)]{Barnesetal2002} Barnes J. W.
399: \& O'Brien D. P., 2002, \apj, 575, 1087
400: \bibitem[Basri et al.(2005)Basri, Borucki \& Kock]{Basrietal2005} Basri G.,
401: Borucki W. J., \& Kock D., 2005, \nar, 49, 478
402: \bibitem[Boynton et al.(1972)]{Boyntonetal1972} Boynton, P. E.,
403: Groth, E. J., Hutchinson, D. P., Nanos, G. P., Jr., Partridge,
404: R. B., \& Wilkinson, D. T., 1972, \apj, 175, 217
405: \bibitem[Brown et al.(2001)]{Brownetal2001} Brown T. M., Charbonneau
406: D., Gilliland R. L., Robert L., Noyes R. W. \& Burrows A.,
407: 2001, \apj, 552, 699
408: \bibitem[Canup \& Ward(2006)]{Canupetal2006} Canup R. M. \& Ward W. R.,
409: 2006, \nat, 441, 834
410: \bibitem[Cheng(1987)]{Cheng1987} Cheng K. S., 1987, \apj, 321, 805
411: \bibitem[Cordes(1980)]{Cordes1980} Cordes J. M., 1980, \apj, 237,
412: 216
413: \bibitem[Cordes(1993)]{Cordes1993} Cordes J. M., 1993, \pasp, 36, 43
414: \bibitem[Detweiler(1979)]{Detweiler1979} Detweiler, S., 1979, \apj, 234, 1100
415: \bibitem[Domingos et al.(2006) Domingos, Winter \& Yokohama]{Domingosetal2006}
416: Domingos R. G., Winter O. C. \& Yokohama T., 2006, \mnras, 373, 1227
417: \bibitem[Gillon et al.(2006)]{Gillonetal2006} Gillon M., Pont F.,
418: Moutou C., Bouchy F., Courbin F., Sohy S. \& Magain P., 2006, \aap, 459,
419: 249
420: \bibitem[Groth(1975)]{Groth1975} Groth, E. J., 1975, \apjs, 29, 443
421: \bibitem[Han \& Han(2002)]{Hanetal2002} Han C., \&
422: Han W., 2002, \apj, 580, 490
423: \bibitem[Holman \& Wiegert(1999)]{Holmanetal1999} Holman M. J.
424: \& Wiegert P. A., 1999, \aj, 117, 621
425: \bibitem[Jones(1990)]{Jones1990} Jones P. B., 1990, \mnras, 246, 364
426: \bibitem[Kopeikin(1997)]{Kopeikin1997} Kopeikin S. M., 1997, \mnras,
427: 288, 129
428: \bibitem[Konacki \& Wolszczan(2003)]{Konackietal2003} Konacki M., \&
429: Wolszczan A., 2003, \apj, 591, L147
430: \bibitem[Laughlin \& Chambers(2001)]{Laughlinetal2001} Laughlin G., \&
431: Chambers J. E., 2001, \apj, 551, L109
432: \bibitem[Manchester et al.(2005)]{Manchesteretal2005} Manchester
433: R. N., Hobbs G. B., Teoh A., \& Hobbs M., 2005, \apj, 129, 1993
434: \bibitem[Mullally et al.(2006)Mullally, Winget \& Kepler]{Mullallyetal2006}
435: Mullally F., Winget D. E., \& Kepler S. O., 2006, \pasp, 352, 265
436: \bibitem[Pont et al.(2007)]{Pontetal2007} Pont F. et al., 2007,
437: \aap, 476, 1347
438: \bibitem[Sartoretti \& Schneider(1999)]{Sartorettietal1999}
439: Sartoretti P., \& Schneider J., 1999, \apss, 134, 553
440: \bibitem[Scherer et al.(1997)]{Schereretal1997} Scherer K.,
441: Fichtner H., Anderson J. D., \& Lau E. L., 1997, Science, 278,
442: 1919
443: \bibitem[Schneider \& Cabrera(2006)]{Schneideretal2006} Schneider J.
444: \& Cabrera J., 2006, \aap, 445, 1159
445: \bibitem[Sigurdsson et al.(2003)]{Sigurdssonetal2003} Sigurdsson S.,
446: Richer H., Hansen B., Stairs I. \& Thorsett S., 2003, Science,
447: 301, 193
448: \bibitem[Silvotti et al.(2007)]{Silvottietal2007} Silvotti et al., 2007,
449: \nat, 449, 189
450: \bibitem[Szab\'{o} et al.(2006)]{Szaboetal2006} Szab\'{o} Gy. M.,
451: Sz\'{a}tmary K., Div\'{e}ki Zs., \& Simon A., 2006, \aap, 450, 395
452: \bibitem[Thorsett et al.(1999)]{Thorsettetal1999} Thorsett S. E., Arzoumanian
453: Z., Camilo F., Lyne A. G., 1999, \apj, 523, 763
454: \bibitem[van Straten et al.(2001)]{vanStratenetal2001} van Straten
455: W., Bailes M., Britton M., Kulkarni S. R., Anderson S. B.,
456: Manchester R. N., \& Sarkissian J., 2001, \nat, 412, 158
457: \bibitem[Wada \& Kokubo(2006)]{Wadaetal2006} Wada K.,
458: \& Kokubo E., 2006, \apj, 638, 1180
459: \bibitem[Wolszczan(1994)]{Wolszczan1994} Wolszczan A.,
460: 1994, Science, 264, 538
461: \bibitem[Wolszczan \& Frail(1992)]{Wolszczanetal1992} Wolszczan A.,
462: \& Frail D. A., 1992, \nat, 355, 145
463:
464:
465:
466:
467:
468: \end{thebibliography}
469:
470: \end{document}
471: