1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2004 January 9
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19: %
20: %%% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21: %
22: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
23: %
24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
25: %
26: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
27: %
28: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
29: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
30: %% use the longabstract style option.
31:
32: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
33:
34: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
35: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
36: %% the \begin{document} command.
37: %%
38: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
39: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
40: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
41: %% for information.
42:
43: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
44: \newcommand{\myemail}{acgupta30@gmail.com}
45:
46: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
47:
48: \slugcomment{Accepted for publication to New Astronomy}
49:
50: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
51: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
52: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
53: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
54: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
55: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
56:
57: \shorttitle{Micro-Variability of RQQSOs}
58: \shortauthors{Gupta \& Yuan}
59:
60: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
61: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
62:
63: \begin{document}
64:
65: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
66: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
67: %% you desire.
68:
69: %\title{Essentially Simultaneous Two Bands Optical Micro-variability \\
70: % of Luminous Radio-Quiet QSOs}
71: %
72: \title{Quasi-Simultaneous Two Band Optical Micro-Variability \\
73: of Luminous Radio-Quiet QSOs}
74:
75: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
76: %% author and affiliation information.
77: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
78: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
79: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
80: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
81:
82: \author{Alok C. Gupta\altaffilmark{1,2} and Weimin Yuan\altaffilmark{2}}
83: %\affil{}
84: \altaffiltext{1}{Aryabhatta Research Institute of Observational Sciences (ARIES),
85: Manora Peak, \\
86: \hspace*{0.22in} Nainital $-$ 263129, India.}
87: \altaffiltext{2}{National Astronomical Observatories/Yunnan Observatory, Chinese
88: Academy of \\
89: \hspace*{0.22in} Sciences (CAS), P.O. Box 110, Kunming, Yunnan 650011, China.}
90:
91: %\author{C. D. Biemesderfer\altaffilmark{4,5}}
92: %\affil{National Optical Astronomy Observatories, Tucson, AZ 85719}
93: \email{acgupta30@gmail.com, wmy@ynao.ac.cn \\
94: Phone No. +91 9936683176, Fax No. +91 5942 233439}
95: %
96: %\and
97: %
98: %\author{R. J. Hanisch\altaffilmark{5}}
99: %\affil{Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD 21218}
100:
101: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
102: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
103: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
104: %% affiliation.
105: %
106: %\altaffiltext{1}{National Astronomical Observatories/Yunnan Observatory, Chinese
107: %Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 110, Kunming, Yunnan 650011, China.}
108: %\altaffiltext{1}{Visiting Astronomer, Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory.
109: %CTIO is operated by AURA, Inc.\ under contract to the National Science
110: %Foundation.}
111: %\altaffiltext{2}{Society of Fellows, Harvard University.}
112: %\altaffiltext{3}{present address: Center for Astrophysics,
113: % 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138}
114: %\altaffiltext{4}{Visiting Programmer, Space Telescope Science Institute}
115: %\altaffiltext{5}{Patron, Alonso's Bar and Grill}
116: %
117: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
118: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
119: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
120: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
121: %% editorial office after submission.
122:
123: \begin{abstract}
124: We report the first results of quasi-simultaneous two passband optical monitoring of
125: six quasi-stellar objects to search for micro-variability. We carried out photometric
126: monitoring of these sources in an alternating sequence of R and V passbands, for five
127: radio-quiet quasi-stellar objects (RQQSOs), 0748$+$291, 0824$+$098, 0832$+$251,
128: 1101$+$319, 1225$+$317 and one radio-loud quasi-stellar object (RLQSO), 1410$+$429.
129: No micro-variability was detected in any of the RQQSOs, but convincing micro-variability
130: was detected in the RLQSO on two successive nights it was observed. Using the
131: compiled data of optical micro-variability of RQQSOs till date, we got the duty cycle
132: for micro-variability in RQQSOs is $\sim$ 10\%. The present investigation indicates
133: that micro-variability is not a persistent property of RQQSOs but an occasional
134: incident.
135:
136: {\bf PACS:} 98.54.Cm, 95.85.Kr, 95.75.De, 95.75.Wx
137: \end{abstract}
138:
139: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
140: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
141: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
142: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
143:
144: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
145: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so in the
146: %% subject header. Objects should be in the appropriate "individual"
147: %% headers (e.g. quasars: individual, stars: individual, etc.) with the
148: %% additional provision that the total number of headers, including each
149: %% individual object, not exceed six. The \objectname{} macro, and its
150: %% alias \object{}, is used to mark each object. The macro takes the object
151: %% name as its primary argument. This name will appear in the paper
152: %% and serve as the link's anchor in the electronic edition if the name
153: %% is recognized by the data centers. The macro also takes an optional
154: %% argument in parentheses in cases where the data center identification
155: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper.
156:
157: \keywords{galaxies: active -- radio-quiet quasars, radio-loud quasar: individual --
158: 0748$+$291, 0824$+$098, 0832$+$251, 1101$+$319, 1225$+$317, 1410$+$429: general --
159: photometry: quasars}
160: %(\objectname{NGC 6397},
161: %\object{NGC 6624}, \objectname[M 15]{NGC 7078},
162: %\object[Cl 1938-341]{Terzan 8})}
163:
164: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
165: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
166: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
167: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
168: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
169: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
170: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
171: %% each reference.
172:
173: \section{Introduction}
174:
175: There are two major classes of quasars. The majority of these $\sim$ 85 $-$ 90 \% belong to
176: the radio-quiet class and are thus known as radio-quiet quasars (RQQSOs) and the remaining
177: $\sim$ 10 $-$ 15 \% are in the radio-loud class and are known as radio-loud quasars (RLQSOs).
178: RQQSOs and RLQSOs show, similar optical characteristics, but in RQQSOs the ratio of radio (at
179: frequency $\nu =$ 5 GHz) to optical flux densities (at wavelength $\lambda =$ 4400$\AA$),
180: R $\leq$ 10 (Kellerman et al. 1989), and the radio to X-ray fluxes are 1 to several orders of
181: magnitude lower than those of the RLQSOs (Terashima \& Wilson 2003).
182:
183: Flux variability is a common property of active galactic nuclei (AGNs) and a small subset
184: of radio-loud AGNs show variability on diverse time scales ranging from a few minutes to
185: several years at almost all wavelengths of the EM spectrum, with the emission being strongly
186: polarized. Such AGNs are called blazars, and their radiation at all wavelengths is predominantly
187: nonthermal. Significant variability in brightness over a few minutes to several hours (less than
188: a day) is commonly known as micro-variability, intra-night variability or intra-day variability.
189: Optical micro-variability in blazars have been reported on several occasions in the last
190: two decades using CCD detectors, and is now a well established property of blazars. The first
191: pioneering papers in the field of blazar optical micro-variability using CCD detectors include:
192: Miller, Carini \& Goodrich (1989); Carini et al. (1990, 1991, 1992); Carini \& Miller (1992);
193: Heidt \& Wagner (1996). It is believed that the micro-variability in blazars is a consequence
194: of relativistic beaming by jets (Bregmann 1991). The beaming can amplify intrinsic variations
195: which may or may not originate within the jet. It is also well accepted that many other radio-loud
196: AGNs (non blazars) also exhibit micro-variability (Jang \& Miller 1995, 1997; de Diego et al. 1998;
197: Romero et al. 1999; Stalin et al. 2004, 2005).
198:
199: After about one and a half decades of work, detections of micro-variability in radio-quiet AGNs
200: have been elusive and little is known about their micro-variability. In a recent paper,
201: Carini et al. (2007) compiled the micro-variability results for 117 radio-quiet AGNs to date,
202: and in most of the cases the detected micro-variability is not convincing. Clear detection of
203: micro-variability in a few radio-quiet QSOs have been reported in some recent papers
204: (Gopal-Krishna et al. 2003; Stalin et al. 2004, 2005; Gupta \& Joshi 2005).
205: Gupta \& Joshi (2005) compiled the micro-variability data for different classes of AGNs and have
206: done statistical analysis of micro-variability behavior by dividing
207: the sample into 3 classes viz. radio-loud AGNs (blazars), radio-loud AGNs (non blazars) and
208: radio-quiet AGNs. They found, generally $\approx$ 10\% and 35 $-$ 40\% radio-quiet AGNs and
209: radio-loud AGNs (non blazars) respectively show micro-variability. For any blazar, if
210: observed continuously for less than 6 hours and more than 6 hours, the chances of detection
211: of micro-variability are $\approx$ 60 $-$ 65\% and 80 $-$ 85\% respectively. They also found
212: that the maximum amplitudes of variations are about 10\%, 50\% and 100\% for radio-quiet AGNs,
213: radio-loud AGNs (non blazars) and blazars respectively.
214:
215: So far, for optical micro-variability studies of RQQSOs and RLQSOs, several groups have observed
216: sources continuously in only one optical band (Gupta \& Joshi 2005; Carini et al. 2007 and references
217: therein), and clear detections in a few cases of micro-variability in RQQSOs suggest micro-variation
218: may be caused by a faint jet (Gopal-Krishna et al. 2000; Falcke et al. 1996b; Ulvestad et al. 2005)
219: or optical flares above an accretion disk and/or accretion disk instabilities (Wiita et al. 1992).
220: In the present work, a sample of five RQQSOs and one RLQSO are considered for study. These five
221: RQQSOs have shown optical micro-variability on some occasions in their earlier observations. However,
222: to investigate whether micro-variability is a persistent property of RQQSOs or it is only occasional
223: events, we monitored these sources again. We also included a new radio-loud QSO to search for optical
224: micro-variability. Here we are reporting the quasi-simultaneous continuous observations of these
225: sources in two optical bands (V and R) in an alternating sequence for these sources for the first time.
226: In addition to looking for micro-variability in two optical bands, our observations also give additional
227: information of micro-variation in V$-$R color.
228:
229: Section 2 presents our sample selection criterion; in Section 3, we report the observations
230: and data analysis technique; in Section 4, the results of the present work are presented and
231: in Section 5 our conclusions are given.
232:
233: \section{Sample Selection Criterion}
234:
235: In the present study, we have selected five RQQSOs and one RLQSO from the recent catalog of
236: active galactic nuclei and quasars of Veron-Cetty \& Veron (2006). The detailed information
237: and observation log of the QSOs are given in Table 1. Using the standard cosmological
238: model, we have used the well known relation by Weinberg (1972) for calculating the absolute
239: magnitude of the QSOs (M$_{V}$),
240: \begin{eqnarray}
241: m_{v} - M_{v} = 25 - 5 \rm{log}H_{0} \ \rm(km \ s^{-1} \ Mpc^{-1}) + 5 \rm{logcz} \ \rm(km \ s^{-1})
242: + 1.086 (1-q_{0}) z
243: \end{eqnarray}
244: where m$_{v}$, $z$ are, respectively, the apparent magnitude and redshift of the QSOs, and
245: $c$ the speed of light. We have used the Hubble constant H$_{0}$ = 70 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$ and
246: q$_{0}$ = 0.5.
247:
248: The host galaxy is expected to contribute less than 10\% to the total flux of the luminous QSOs.
249: The host galaxy is also expected to be encompassed within the aperture radius $\sim$ 6 arcsec used
250: for photometry. For a lower ratio of AGNs to galactic light, false indications of variability produced
251: by seeing variations that include different amounts of host galactic light within the photometric
252: aperture become very probable (Cellone et al. 2000). Carini et al. (1991) investigated whether
253: a conspicuous galaxy component produces variations, due to variation in atmospheric seeing or
254: transparency, which are not intrinsic to the source. They showed that, even for sources with
255: significant underlying galaxy components, any spurious variations introduced by fluctuations in
256: atmospheric seeing or transparency are typically smaller than the observational uncertainties.
257: To further reduce this effect, we have selected sources which are optically bright (brighter than
258: M$_{V} < -$24.9 mag) (except one RQQSO namely Ton 52 which has M$_{V} = -$24.3 mag), so that
259: the fluctuations due to the underlying galaxy are minimal; however the modest optical luminosity
260: (M$_{V} \approx -$24.9 mag) lies close to the critical value below which the sources are classified
261: as Seyfert galaxies (Miller et al. 1990).
262:
263: \section{Observations and Data Reductions}
264:
265: The photometric observations of the five radio-quiet QSOs and one radio-loud QSO were
266: carried out in the V and R passbands of the optical filter system of Bessell (1990) using
267: a Loral Lick 3 CCD detector (2048 pixels $\times$ 2048 pixels) mounted
268: at the f/9 Cassegrain focus of the 2.16 meter R-C system optical telescope at the National
269: Astronomical Observatories, Xinglong Station, in China. Observations were carried out
270: using BFOSC (Bao Faint Object Spectrograph and Camera) in an alternating sequence of V and R
271: passbands. The pixel size of the CCD detector is 15 $\mu$m $\times$ 15 $\mu$m and each pixel of the
272: CCD projected on the sky corresponds to 0.305 arcsec in both dimensions. The entire CCD
273: chip covers $\sim$ 10.41 $\times$ 10.41 arcmin$^{2}$ of the sky. Read out noise and gain of
274: the CCD detector were 1.67 electrons and 4 electrons/ADU, respectively. Throughout the observing
275: run, the typical seeing was $\sim$ 2.0 arcsec ranging from 1.5 to 2.5 arcsec. Several bias frames
276: were taken intermittently in each observing night and twilight sky flats were taken in V and R
277: passbands. The observation log is given in Table 1.
278:
279: We constructed median bias, and median flat field images in the V and R passbands for each night
280: which were used for bias and flat field corrections. Image processing or pre processing (bias
281: subtraction, flat-fielding and cosmic rays removal) were done using standard routines in
282: IRAF\footnote{IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatories, which are
283: operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative
284: agreement with the National Science Foundation.} (Image Reduction and Analysis Facility)
285: software. Photometric reduction (instrumental magnitude of the QSOs and local comparison stars
286: in the QSOs fields) of the data were performed by aperture photometric technique using DAOPHOT II
287: (Dominian Astronomical Observatory Photometry) software (Stetson 1987). Aperture photometry was
288: carried out with 4 concentric apertures of radii of $\approx$ 1, 2, 3 and 4 times of the FWHM of
289: stars in the image frames. The data reduced with different aperture radii were found to be in good
290: agreement. However, it was noticed that the best signal to noise ratio (S/N) was obtained with an
291: aperture radius of $\approx$ 3 $\times$ the typical FWHM. In each QSO field, we selected 4 comparison
292: stars and finally used the 2 best non-variable stars for analysis purposes (constructing differential
293: instrumental magnitude light curves). The coordinates and B and R magnitude of the 4 comparison stars
294: in each QSO field are given in Table 2, which are taken from the USNO (United States Naval Observatory)
295: catalog (Monet et al. 2003). The coordinates and V magnitude of comparison stars were taken from STScI
296: (Space Telescope Science Institute) GSC 2.2 (Guide Star Catalog Version 2.2), if stars were not available
297: in the USNO catalog. The positional accuracy in GSC 2.2 is 0.3 arcsec.
298:
299: In the present work, in general, we have got the photometric error in each data point is less
300: than 0.01 magnitude ($\sim$ better than 1\%). If we take 3$\sigma$ detection of micro-variabilty as
301: genuine micro-variability then any variation in magnitude or color is more than 0.03 magnitude
302: ($\sim$ more than 3\%) should be clearly visible. Observations presented here have maximum exposure
303: time of 250 seconds in V band followed by 150 seconds in R band. After including the readout time
304: of the CCD detector, we repeat our observations in V or R band maximum after $\sim$ 10 minutes. So,
305: the data presented here is sensitive for the minimum time scale of 10 minutes and any detected
306: variability with time scale more than 10 minutes should be clearly visible.
307:
308: \section{Results}
309:
310: Differential Light Curves (DLCs) of the five RQQSOs and the RLQSO, are plotted in Figs. 1$-$6. From
311: bottom to top, the panels show the differential instrumental magnitudes of the QSO and two comparison
312: stars in the R band, V band and V-R color. In the figures Q and S represent the QSO and the comparison
313: star, respectively. For generating V$-$R light curves, we have taken an average time for each set of
314: alternate image frames and the R band differential magnitude is subtracted from the corresponding V
315: band differential magnitude. We use offsets to plot the lights curves for clarity in the figures.
316:
317: \subsection{Micro-Variability and Variability Amplitude}
318:
319: Using the aperture photometry of the QSO and two comparison stars in the QSO field,
320: we determined the differential instrumental magnitudes V, R and V$-$R; of the QSO $-$ comparison
321: star A, QSO $-$ comparison star B and comparison star A $-$ comparison star B. We determined the
322: respective observational scatter from; QSO $-$ comparison star A $\sigma$ (QSO - Star A), QSO
323: $-$ comparison star B $\sigma$ (QSO - Star B) and comparison star A $-$ comparison star B
324: $\sigma$ (Star A - Star B). The variability of the target QSO is quantified by the variability
325: parameter, C, introduced by Romero et al. (1999); this variability parameter is expressed as
326: the average of C$_{1}$ and C$_{2}$
327:
328: \begin{eqnarray}
329: C_{1} = \frac {\sigma (QSO - Star A)}{\sigma (Star A - Star B)} \hspace*{0.2in} \rm{and} \hspace*{0.2in}
330: C_{2} = \frac {\sigma (QSO - Star B)}{\sigma (Star A - Star B)}
331: \end{eqnarray}
332: If C $>$ 2.57, the confidence level of variability is 99\%, and we follow most previous authors in
333: adopting this conservative criterion..
334: The value of C by using both comparison stars for all of the five radio-quiet QSOs and one radio-loud QSO
335: for different observing nights are reported in table 3.
336:
337: We use the intra-day variability amplitude defined by Heidt \& Wagner (1996)
338: \begin{eqnarray}
339: A = 100 \times \sqrt {(A_{max} - A_{min})^{2} - 2\sigma^{2}} \hspace*{0.1in}\%
340: \end{eqnarray}
341:
342: where A$_{max}$ and A$_{min}$ are the maximum and minimum in the differential light curve and
343: $\sigma$ the measurement errors.
344: The measured amplitudes are reported in Table 3.
345:
346: \subsection{Notes on Individual Sources}
347:
348: \noindent
349: {\bf 0748$+$291 (QJ 0751$+$2991)}
350:
351: This RQQSO, reported as the brightest new QSO in the first bright QSO survey (Gregg et al.
352: 1996), has been monitored to search for micro-variability in optical bands on several occasions
353: (Gopal-Krishna et al. 2000; Stalin et al. 2004; Gupta \& Joshi 2005). In one night of observations,
354: Gopal-Krishna et al. (2000) reported detection of spikes (brightness excursions of only a single point).
355: Stalin et al. (2004) did not find any micro-variability in the source in their six nights of observations
356: spread over more than three years, but long term variations are clearly seen in their observations. Gupta
357: \& Joshi (2005) reported the clear detection of micro-variation in the source of their monitoring of the
358: source continuously for 8 hours in the V-passband in one night.
359:
360: We observed the source during the night of March 12, 2007. DLCs are plotted in Fig. 1. By using
361: our micro-variability detection test given in equation (2), we found the values of C in V, R and (V-R)
362: are 1.0, 1.9 and 1.2 respectively. These values of C show that this RQQSO did not show any genuine
363: micro-variation in V, R and V-R observations.
364:
365: \noindent
366: {\bf 0824$+$098 (1WGA J0827.6$+$0942)}
367:
368: This RQQSO has been monitored to search for micro-variability in the optical R band on two occasions
369: (Gopal-Krishna et al. 2000; Stalin et al. 2005). Stalin et al. (2005) found 2.2\% micro-variation
370: in the source in 8.2 hours of continuous monitoring over one night (December 27, 1998). In 3.3 hours
371: of observations in one night (February 15, 1999), Gopal-Krishna et al. (2000) reported detection of
372: one spike.
373:
374: We observed the source during the night of March 11, 2007. DLCs are plotted in Fig. 2. We found that
375: the values of C in V, R and (V-R) are 1.2, 1.7 and 1.2 respectively. These values of C show that this
376: RQQSO did not show any genuine micro-variation in V, R and V$-$R. At the end of the light curve in
377: the V band, the source appeared to become $\sim$ 0.05 mag fainter and came back to its the normal
378: magnitude in $\sim$ 20 minutes. This nominal variation in the V band is also transmitted in the
379: V $-$ R color and made a change of $\sim$ 0.05 mag in the same duration of observations. Confirmation
380: of such events require further monitoring of the source for longer durations with similar or better S/N.
381:
382: \noindent
383: {\bf 0832$+$251 (PG 0832$+$251)}
384:
385: This RQQSO was observed in 3 nights in less than one year in a search for micro-variability
386: (Stalin et al. 2005). Micro-variability was detected in the source on one night.
387:
388: We observed the source during the night of March 10, 2007. DLCs are plotted in Fig. 3. We found that
389: the values of C for V, R and V-R are 1.1, 1.0 and 1.1 respectively. These value of C show that this
390: RQQSO did not show any genuine micro-variation in V, R and V$-$R.
391:
392: \noindent
393: {\bf 1101$+$319 (Ton 52)}
394:
395: This RQQSO was observed in 5 nights spread over about 2 years in a search for micro-variability
396: (Stalin et al. 2004; Gupta \& Joshi 2005). Micro-variability was detected in the source on one
397: night and long term variation was also noticed (Stalin et al. 2004).
398:
399: We observed the source during the night of March 11, 2007. DLCs are plotted in Fig. 4. In the
400: DLCs, the last data point in the V band has a comparatively large error bar. In our variability
401: detection test given by equation (2), we omitted this data point and found that the values of C for
402: V, R and (V-R) are 1.3, 1.5 and 1.8 respectively. These values of C show that there was no genuine
403: micro-variation in V, R and V-R for this RQQSO.
404:
405: \noindent
406: {\bf 1225$+$317 (b2 1225$+$317)}
407:
408: This source has only been monitored for one night in the V passband for 6.2 continuous hours
409: in a search for micro-variability (Gupta \& Joshi 2005). There was a possible detection of
410: micro-variability in the source.
411:
412: We observed the source during the night of March 10, 2007. DLCs are plotted in Fig. 5. We found the
413: values of C in V, R and V-R are 1.4, 1.8 and 2.3 respectively. The value of C shows that this RQQSO did
414: not exhibit any micro-variation in the V, R and V-R color.
415:
416: \noindent
417: {\bf 1410$+$429 (RXS J14119$+$4239)}
418:
419: This source is the only radio-loud QSO studied in the present work. So far, this source has not
420: been studied to search for optical micro-variability.
421:
422: We observed the source continuously (UT 19.12 to 21.59 hour) and (UT 18.12 to 21.52 hour) during
423: the nights of March 11 and March 12, 2007 respectively. We obtained the DLCs for both nights of
424: observations and are plotted in Fig. 6. We found the values of C in V, R and V-R and they are 3.0,
425: 3.8 and 4.3 respectively for the March 11 observations. For the observations on March 12, the values
426: of C in V, R and V-R are 2.8, 5.0 and 3.7 respectively. On March 11, one spike was detected in the
427: R band observations which changed the V-R color of the RLQSO. In determination of the values of C,
428: the spike point has been omitted. These values of C show that this RLQSO exhibits clear micro-variation
429: in V, R and V-R on both nights of observation. For the March 11, 2007 observations the amplitudes of
430: variability in V, R and V-R are 4.0\%, 3.5\% and 6.6\%, respectively. For the March 12, 2007 observations
431: the amplitudes of variability in V, R and V-R are 3.9\%, 6.5\% and 13.7\%, respectively. The differential
432: magnitude of the RLQSO shows large error bars because it is $\sim$ 2.0 magnitudes fainter than both
433: comparison stars.
434:
435: \subsection{Duty Cycle of Micro-variability in RQQSOs}
436:
437: Since 1993, there are several attempts to search for optical micro-variability in radio-quiet
438: AGNs by various groups around the globe (e.g. Gupta \& Joshi 2005, Carini et al. 2007 and references
439: therein). But there are only a few occasions on which micro-variability is detected (see the
440: compiled optical micro-variability results in Table 3. of Carini et al. 2007). In last one and half
441: decade observations were carried out in search for optical micro-variability were at non regular
442: time interval, inconsistent observing time duration for different sources, different selection
443: criterion and different data analysis methods of sources by different groups. Here we have taken
444: the compiled data of RQQSOs (not Seyfert Galaxies) from the Table 3 of Carini et al. (2007) and
445: data of the 5 RQQSOs from the present work to calculate the duty cycle of micro-variability in
446: RQQSOs. Here we defined the duty cycle without weighting the number of hours sources have been
447: observed. If $n$ denotes the total number of occasions on which the optical micro-variability
448: have been detected, and $N$ denotes the total number of occasions on which the sources have been
449: observed in search for micro-variability then the duty cycle DC is defined as,
450: \begin{eqnarray}
451: \rm{DC} = {\frac {n}{N}} \time 100\%
452: \end{eqnarray}
453: Till date, 70 RQQSOs are observed at 217 occasions in search for optical micro-variability.
454: Optical micro-variability detected in only 17 RQQSOs on 21 occasions in 88 occasions
455: they have been observed. While 53 RQQSOs have never shown optical micro-variability in their
456: observations on 129 occasions. So, the duty cycle of optical micro-variability detection in
457: RQQSOs is only $\sim$ 10\%.
458:
459: \section{Conclusions}
460:
461: To investigate whether micro-variability is a persistent, or only occasional, property of RQQSOs,
462: we have presented new observations of five luminous radio-quiet QSOs and one radio-loud QSO
463: in a search for quasi-simultaneous optical micro-variability in V and R passbands and V-R color for
464: the first time. The RQQSOs studied here have shown optical micro-variability on some occasions of
465: their earlier observations. We found genuine micro-variations in one radio-loud QSO, (1410$+$429) in
466: V, R and V-R on both nights for which the source was observed. Five radio-quiet QSOs, 0748$+$294,
467: 0824$+$098, 0832$+$251, 1101$+$319 and 1225$+$317 did not show any micro-variation in V, R and V-R.
468: Our observations show that micro-variation in RQQSOs is rather rare. Non detection of
469: micro-variability in any of the RQQSOs in our search is consistent with the other studies (see
470: Table 3 of Carini et al. 2007).
471:
472: The generally accepted model for micro-variation in radio-loud AGNs is the shock-in-jet model (e.g.
473: Blandford \& K$\ddot{o}$nigl 1979; Scheuer \& Readhead 1979; Marscher 1980; Hughes et al. 1985;
474: Marscher 1992; Marscher \& Gear 1985; Valtaoja et al. 1988; Qian et al. 1991), in which the light is
475: seen to fluctuate on time scales of a few minutes to an hour. Other models that can explain the
476: micro-variation in any type of AGNs are optical flares, disturbances or hot spots on the accretion disk
477: surrounding the black hole of the AGNs (e.g. Wiita et al. 1991, 1992; Chakrabarti \& Wiita 1993;
478: Mangalam \& Wiita 1993). The micro-variation detected in V, R and V-R of the RLQSO 1410+429 can be
479: explained by any of these models.
480:
481: After intensive searches of micro-variation in RQQSOs
482: over the last one and half decades, the real cause of micro-variation is still not well known. Possible
483: explanations involve either by shock-in-jet or accretion disk based models (Gupta \& Joshi 2005).
484: It is believed that, in radio-quiet AGNs, due to severe inverse-Compton losses, most jets are probably
485: quenched at the incipient stage (Wilson \& Colbert 1995; Blandford 2000). The weak and rarer evidence
486: of optical micro-variation detection in earlier observations of RQQSOs can be explained with jet models
487: that assume less Doppler boosting than the radio-loud QSOs and much less than the blazars (Gopal-Krishna
488: et al. 2003), which is consistent with unified models of AGN. VLBA and XMM-Newton studies confirm weak
489: jet emissions in radio and X-ray bands from a few radio-quiet QSOs on some occasions. Some evidence
490: of weak radio jets in a small number of RQQSOs have been reported from deep VLA imaging and related
491: studies (Miller et al. 1993; Kellermann et al. 1994; Falcke et al. 1996a,b). There have been some attempts
492: at VLBA imaging at milliarcsecond resolution of the central engines of 12 radio-quiet QSOs by Blundell
493: \& Beasley (1998). They reported 8 of these sources show strong evidence of a jet-producing central
494: engine. In another recent paper, Ulvestad et al. (2005) have done deep VLBA imaging of 5 RQQSOs in which
495: only one source shows a two-sided radio jet and the other 4 are unresolved. In radio monitoring campaigns
496: with VLBA, relativistic jets were found in the RQQSO PG 1407$+$263 and in Seyfert 1 galaxy III Zw 2
497: (Blundell et al. 2003; Brunthaler et al. 2005). Gallo (2006) in a recent paper has reported XMM-Newton
498: observations of a RQQSO PG 1407$+$265 in which the X-ray variable emission apparently originates
499: from a combination of jet and accretion disk processes, and where a relativistic X-ray jet only works
500: intermittently.
501:
502: In a recent paper, Czerny et al. (2008) have done modeling of micro-variability of RQQSOs, using
503: non-simultaneous X-ray and optical data of 10 RQQSOs which have shown optical micro-variability on some
504: occasions. They have discussed that the three possible models for micro-variability in RQQSOs:
505: (i) irradiation of an accretion disc by a variable X-ray flux, (ii) an accretion disc instability,
506: (iii) the presence of weak blazar component, if jet emission is variable. They concluded that the
507: blazar component model is the most promising model to explain the micro-variability in RQQSOs.
508: Future simultaneous multi-color optical and X-ray monitoring observations of a sample of RQQSOs
509: will give insight into the cause of micro-variation in RQQSOs. Micro-variability of RQQSOs
510: is not yet well known and it needs a focused effort which we have plan to do in near future.
511:
512: \acknowledgments
513:
514: We thank the anonymous referees for their helpful suggestions. We are grateful to Prof. P. J. Wiita
515: for careful reading of the manuscript and his comments and suggestions.
516: Dr. R. S. Pokorny is thankfully acknowledged for correcting grammatical mistakes. We are thankful to the
517: 2.16 meter telescope time allocation committee for allocation of observing time for the project. ACG is
518: grateful for hospitality at National Astronomical Observatories, Xinglong Station, China during observing
519: run and to Mr. Jia Junjun for helping in observations. We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from
520: the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 10533050).
521:
522: \begin{thebibliography}{}
523:
524: \bibitem[]{}Antonucci, R., Barvainis, R. \& Alloin, D. 1990, \apj, 353, 416
525: \bibitem[]{}Bessell, M. S. 1990, PASP, 102, 1181
526: \bibitem[]{}Blandford, R. D. \& K$\ddot{o}$nigl, A. 1979, \apj, 232, 34
527: \bibitem[]{}Blandford, R. 2000, Philos Trans. R. Soc. London A, 358, 811
528: \bibitem[]{}Blundell, K. M. \& Beasley, A. J. 1998, \mnras, 299, 165
529: \bibitem[]{}Blundell, K. M., Beasley, A. J. \& Bicknell, G. V. 2003, \apj, 591, L103
530: \bibitem[]{}Bregman, J. N. 1991, in Variability of Active Galactic Nuclei, ed.
531: H. R. Miller \& P. J. Wiita (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 1
532: \bibitem[]{}Brunthaler, A., Falcke, H., Bower, G. C. et al. 2005, A\&A, 435, 497
533: \bibitem[]{}Carini, M. T., Miller, H. R. \& Goodrich, B. D. 1990, \aj, 100, 347
534: \bibitem[]{}Carini, M. T., Miller, H. R., Noble, J. C. \& Sadun, A. C. 1991, \aj, 101, 1196
535: \bibitem[]{}Carini, M. T., Miller, H. R., Noble, J. C. \& Goodrich, B. D. 1992, \aj, 104, 15
536: \bibitem[]{}Carini, M. T. \& Miller, H. R. 1992, \apj, 385, 146
537: \bibitem[]{}Carini, M. T., Noble, J. C., Taylor, R. \& Culler, R. 2007, \aj, 133, 303
538: \bibitem[]{}Cellone, S. A., Romero, G. E. \& Combi, J. A. 2000, \aj, 119, 1534
539: \bibitem[]{}Chakrabati, S. K. \& Wiita, P. J. 1993, \apj, 411, 602
540: \bibitem[]{}Czerny, B., Siemiginowska, A., Janiuk, A. \& Gupta, A. C. 2008, \mnras, 386, 1557
541: \bibitem[]{}de Diego, J. A., Dultzin-Hacyan, D., Ramirez, A. \& Benitez, E. 1998, \apj, 500, 69
542: \bibitem[]{}Falcke, H., Sherwood, W. \& Patnaik, A. R. 1996a, \apj, 471, 106
543: \bibitem[]{}Falcke, H., Patnaik, A. R. \& Sherwood, W. 1996b, \apj, 473, L13
544: \bibitem[]{}Gallo, L. C. 2006, \mnras, 365, 960
545: \bibitem[]{}Gopal-Krishna, Gupta, A. C., Sagar, R., et al. 2000, \mnras, 314, 815
546: \bibitem[]{}Gopal-Krishna, Stalin, C. S., Sagar, R. \& Wiita, P. J., 2003, \apj, 586, L25
547: \bibitem[]{}Gregg, M. D., Becker, R. H., White, R. L., et al. 1996, \aj, 112, 407
548: \bibitem[]{}Gupta, A. C. \& Joshi, U. C. 2005, A\&A, 440, 855
549: \bibitem[]{}Heidt, J. \& Wagner, S. J. 1996, A\&A, 305, 42
550: \bibitem[]{}Hughes, P. A., Aller, H. D., \& Aller, M. F. 1985, \apj, 342, 660
551: \bibitem[]{}Jang, M. \& Miller, H. R. 1995, \apj, 452, 582
552: \bibitem[]{}Jang, M. \& Miller, H. R. 1997, \aj, 114, 565
553: \bibitem[]{}Kellermann, K. I., Sramek, R. A., Schmidt, M., et al. 1989, \aj, 98, 1195
554: \bibitem[]{}Kellermann, K. I., Sramek, R. A., Schmidt, M., et al. 1994, \aj, 108, 1163
555: \bibitem[]{}Mangalam, A. V. \& Wiita, P. J. 1993, \apj, 406, 420
556: \bibitem[]{}Marscher, A. P. 1980, \apj, 239, 296
557: \bibitem[]{}Marscher, A. P. 1992, in Physics of Active Galactic Nuclei, ed. W. J. Duschl \&
558: S. J. Wagner (Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag), 510
559: \bibitem[]{}Marscher, A. P. \& Gear, W. K. 1985, \apj, 298, 114
560: \bibitem[]{} Miller, H. R., Carini, M. T. \& Goodrich, A. C. 1989, Nature, 337, 627
561: \bibitem[]{}Miller, L., Peacock, J. A. \& Mead, A. R. G. 1990, \mnras, 244, 207
562: \bibitem[]{}Miller, P., Rawlings, S. \& Saunders, R. 1993, \mnras, 263, 425
563: \bibitem[]{}Monet, D. J., Levine, S. E., Canzian, B., et al. 2003, \aj, 125, 984
564: \bibitem[]{}Qian, S. J., Quirrenbach, A., Witzel, A., et al. 1991, A\&A, 241, 15
565: \bibitem[]{}Romero, G. E., Cellone, S. A. \& Combi, J. A. 1999, A\&AS, 135, 477
566: \bibitem[]{}Scheuer, P. A. G. \& Readhead, A. C. S. 1979, Nature, 277, 182
567: \bibitem[]{}Stalin, C. S., Gopal-Krishna, Sagar, R. \& Wiita, P. J. 2004, \mnras, 350, 175
568: \bibitem[]{}Stalin, C. S., Gupta, A. C., Gopal-Krishna, et al. 2005, \mnras, 356, 607
569: \bibitem[]{}Stetson, P. B. 1987, \pasp, 99, 191
570: \bibitem[]{}Terashima, Y., \& Wilson, A. S. 2003, \apj, 583, 145
571: \bibitem[]{}Ulvestad, J. S., Antonucci, R. R. J. \& Barvainis, R. 2005, \apj, 621, 123
572: \bibitem[]{}Valtaoja, E., Haarala, S., Lehto, H. et al. 1988, A\&A, 203, 1
573: \bibitem[]{}Veron-Cetty, M.-P. \& Veron, P. 2006, A\&A, 455, 773
574: \bibitem[]{}Weinberg, S. 1972, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications
575: of the General Theory of Relativity, Wiley, New York, p. 324
576: \bibitem[]{}Wiita, P. J., Miller, H. R., Carini, M. T., \& Rosen, A. 1991, in Structure and
577: Emission Properties of Accretion Disks, ed. J. P. Lasota et al. (Editions Frontieres,
578: Gif-sur-Yvette), IAU Colloq., 129, 557
579: \bibitem[]{}Wiita, P. J., Mangalam, A. V., \& Chakrabarti, S. K. 1992, in AIP Conference
580: Proceedings, Vol. 254, p. 251
581: \bibitem[]{}Wilson, A. S. \& Colbert, E. J. M. 1995, \apj, 438, 62
582:
583: \end{thebibliography}
584:
585: \clearpage
586:
587: %\begin{deluxetable}{ccrrrrrrrrcrl}
588: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccccccc}
589: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
590: \rotate
591: \tablecaption{Complete log of V and R bands observations of five RQQSOs and one RLQSO$^{***}$.
592: %\citet{treu03}
593: \label{tbl-1}}
594: \tablewidth{0pt}
595: \tablehead{
596: \colhead{IAU Name$^{*}$} & \colhead{Other Name} & \colhead{$\alpha_{2000.0}$}
597: & \colhead{$\delta_{2000.0}$} & \colhead{z} & \colhead{V} & \colhead{M$_{V}$}
598: & R$^{**}$ & \colhead{Date of Obs.} & \colhead{Data Points} & \colhead{Data Points} \\
599: & &
600: & & & &
601: & & & \colhead{$\times$Exp. Time (V)}& \colhead{$\times$Exp. Time (R)}
602: }
603: \startdata
604: 0748$+$294 & Q J0751$+$2919 & 07 51 12.3 & $+$29 19 38 & 0.912 & 16.21 & $-$27.2 & 0.21
605: & 12. 03. 2007 & 44$\times$120 sec & 44$\times$80 sec \\
606: 0824$+$098 & 1WGA J0827.6$+$0942 & 08 27 40.1 & $+$09 42 10.0 & 0.260 & 15.5 & $-$24.9 & 3.2
607: & 11. 03. 2007 & 40$\times$90 sec & 40$\times$60 sec \\
608: 0832$+$251 & PG 0832$+$251 & 08 35 35.9 & $+$24 59 41.0 & 0.331 & 16.1 & $-$24.9 & 1.26
609: & 10. 03. 2007 & 38$\times$120 sec & 39$\times$80 sec \\
610: 1101$+$319 & Ton 52 & 11 04 07.0 & $+$31 41 11 & 0.440 & 17.30 & $-$24.3 & $<$0.39
611: & 11. 03. 2007 & 22$\times$150 sec & 22$\times$100 sec \\
612: 1225$+$317 & b2 1225$+$317 & 12 28 24.8 & $+$31 28 38 & 2.219 & 15.87 & $-$30.2 & ......
613: & 10. 03. 2007 & 44$\times$120 sec & 44$\times$80 sec \\
614: 1410$+$429 & RXS J14119$+$4239 & 14 11 59.7 & $+$42 39 50.0 & 0.888 & 17.37 & $-$26.0 & $>$155
615: & 11. 03. 2007 & 18$\times$150 sec & 18$\times$100 sec \\
616: 1410$+$429 & RXS J14119$+$4239 & 14 11 59.7 & $+$42 39 50.0 & 0.888 & 17.37 & $-$26.0 & $>$155
617: & 12. 03. 2007 & 20$\times$250 sec & 20$\times$150 sec \\
618: \enddata
619:
620: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before
621: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark
622: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.
623:
624: %\tablecomments{Table \ref{tbl-1}is published in its entirety in the electronic edition of the {\it Astrophysical Journal}. A portion is shown here for guidance
625: %regarding its form and content.}
626: %
627: \tablenotetext{*} {Based on coordinates defined for 1950.0 epoch.}
628: \tablenotetext{**} {The value of R for RQQSOs were taken from Carini et al. (2007).}
629: \tablenotetext{***} {Other parameters of QSOs were taken from the Veron-Cetty \& Veron
630: (2006).}
631: %\tablenotetext{}
632: %\tablenotetext{a}{Sample footnote for table~\ref{tbl-1} that was generated
633: %with the deluxetable environment}
634: %\tablenotetext{b}{Another sample footnote for table~\ref{tbl-1}}
635:
636: \end{deluxetable}
637:
638: \clearpage
639:
640: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccccl}
641: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
642: %\rotate
643: \tablecaption{Coordinates and apparent magnitudes of comparison stars in the field of
644: observed RQQSOs and RLQSO
645: %\citet{treu03}
646: \label{tbl-2}}
647: \tablewidth{0pt}
648: \tablehead{
649: \colhead{IAU Name} & \colhead{Star No.} & \colhead{$\alpha_{2000.0}$}
650: & \colhead{$\delta_{2000.0}$} & \colhead{B (mag)} & \colhead{V (mag)} & \colhead{R (mag)} & \colhead{Remarks}
651: }
652: \startdata
653: 0748$+$291 & 1 & 07 51 09.7 & $+$29 21 05.9 & & 14.6$\pm$0.5 & & \\
654: & 2 & 07 51 02.6 & $+$29 19 23.9 & 16.5 & & 15.0 & \\
655: & 3 & 07 51 09.2 & $+$29 16 19.9 & 17.0 & & 15.5 & \\
656: & 4 & 07 50 59.0 & $+$29 16 49.8 & & 15.3$\pm$0.6 & & \\
657: 0824$+$098 & 1 & 08 27 44.3 & $+$09 45 05.3 & 17.3 & & 15.7 & \\
658: & 2 & & & & & & Not detected in USNO and GSC 2.2 \\
659: & 3 & 08 27 34.6 & $+$09 39 24.6 & 16.1 & & 15.0 & \\
660: & 4 & 08 27 23.5 & $+$09 41 17.5 & & 15.1$\pm$0.6 & & \\
661: 0832$+$251 & 1 & 08 35 24.0 & $+$25 01 04.6 & 16.8 & & 15.1 & \\
662: & 2 & 08 35 12.0 & $+$24 57 12.3 & & 15.4$\pm$0.6 & & \\
663: & 3 & 08 35 44.1 & $+$25 02 52.1 & & 15.2$\pm$0.6 & & \\
664: & 4 & 08 35 47.3 & $+$24 57 19.3 & 16.9 & & 15.4 & \\
665: 1101$+$319 & 1 & 11 04 21.2 & $+$31 47 58.2 & 17.4 & & 16.7 & \\
666: & 2 & & & & & & Not detected in USNO and GSC 2.2 \\
667: & 3 & 11 04 14.1 & $+$31 44 09.1 & 18.5 & & 15.9 & \\
668: & 4 & 11 03 59.5 & $+$31 47 20.7 & 16.7 & & 15.4 & \\
669: 1225$+$317 & 1 & 12 28 11.0 & $+$31 27 18.9 & & 14.6$\pm$0.6 & & \\
670: & 2 & 12 28 30.6 & $+$31 26 33.5 & 16.7 & & 15.6 & \\
671: & 3 & 12 28 18.7 & $+$31 25 19.7 & & 15.3$\pm$0.6 & & \\
672: & 4 & 12 27 55.2 & $+$31 31 53.3 & & 15.3$\pm$0.6 & & \\
673: 1410$+$429 & 1 & 14 11 38.8 & $+$42 44 08.3 & & 14.8$\pm$0.6 & & \\
674: & 2 & 14 11 29.9 & $+$42 43 32.5 & & 14.6$\pm$0.6 & & \\
675: & 3 & 14 11 46.4 & $+$42 43 28.5 & 17.5 & & 16.0 & \\
676: & 4 & 14 11 54.0 & $+$42 41 22.3 & & 15.0$\pm$0.6 & & \\
677: \enddata
678:
679: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before
680: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark
681: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.
682:
683: %\tablecomments{Table \ref{tbl-1}is published in its entirety in the electronic edition of the {\it Astrophysical Journal}. A portion is shown here for guidance
684: %regarding its form and content.}
685: %
686: %\tablenotetext{a}{Sample footnote for table~\ref{tbl-1} that was generated
687: %with the deluxetable environment}
688: %\tablenotetext{b}{Another sample footnote for table~\ref{tbl-1}}
689:
690: \end{deluxetable}
691:
692: \clearpage
693:
694: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccrrrcccl}
695: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
696: \rotate
697: \tablecaption{Results of micro-variability observations of RQQSOs and RLQSO$^{*}$.
698: %\citet{treu03}
699: \label{tbl-3}}
700: \tablewidth{0pt}
701: \tablehead{
702: \colhead{Date} & \colhead{QSO} & \colhead{class} & \colhead{Band} & \colhead{N} & \colhead{Diff. mag} & \colhead{Diff. mag}
703: & \colhead{Diff. mag} & \colhead{Variable} & \colhead{C} & \colhead{A\%} & \colhead{Remarks} \\
704: \colhead{dd.mm.yyyy} & & & & & \colhead{QSQ - S$_{A}$} & \colhead{QSQ - S$_{B}$}
705: & \colhead{S$_{A}$ - S$_{B}$} & & & &
706: }
707: \startdata
708: 12.03.2007 & 0748$+$294 & RQQSO & V & 33 & 0.926$\pm$0.009 & 0.232$\pm$0.009 & $-$0.694$\pm$0.009 & NV & 1.0 & & \\
709: & & & R & 33 & 1.515$\pm$0.010 & 0.576$\pm$0.009 & $-$0.940$\pm$0.005 & NV & 1.9 & & \\
710: & & & V$-$R & 33 & $-$0.589$\pm$0.009 & $-$0.344$\pm$0.010 & 0.245$\pm$0.008 & NV & 1.2 & & \\
711: 11.03.2007 & 0824$+$098 & RQQSO & V & 40 & 1.239$\pm$0.010 & 0.805$\pm$0.009 & $-$0.434$\pm$0.008 & NV & 1.2 & & \\
712: & & & R & 40 & 0.765$\pm$0.010 & 0.546$\pm$0.010 & $-$0.219$\pm$0.006 & NV & 1.7 & & \\
713: & & & V$-$R & 40 & 0.474$\pm$0.012 & 0.259$\pm$0.012 & $-$0.216$\pm$0.010 & NV & 1.2 & & \\
714: 10.03.2007 & 0832$+$251 & RQQSO & V & 38 & 0.296$\pm$0.005 & 0.492$\pm$0.006 & 0.197$\pm$0.005 & NV & 1.1 & & \\
715: & & & R & 39 & 0.382$\pm$0.006 & 0.521$\pm$0.006 & 0.139$\pm$0.006 & NV & 1.0 & & \\
716: & & & V$-$R & 38 & $-$0.087$\pm$0.007 & $-$0.029$\pm$0.008 & 0.058$\pm$0.007 & NV & 1.1 & & \\
717: 11.03.2007 & 1101$+$319 & RQQSO & V & 20 & $-$0.127$\pm$0.009 & 0.806$\pm$0.007 & 0.933$\pm$0.006 & NV & 1.3 & & Last V passband \\
718: & & & R & 21 & 0.424$\pm$0.007 & 0.907$\pm$0.008 & 0.483$\pm$0.005 & NV & 1.5 & & point omitted \\
719: & & & V$-$R & 20 & $-$0.551$\pm$0.012 & $-$0.101$\pm$0.012 & 0.450$\pm$0.007 & NV & 1.8 & & in analysis \\
720: 10.03.2007 & 1225$+$317 & RQQSO & V & 44 & 1.525$\pm$0.006 & 1.140$\pm$0.005 & $-$0.386$\pm$0.004 & NV & 1.4 & & \\
721: & & & R & 44 & 1.555$\pm$0.007 & 1.219$\pm$0.007 & $-$0.336$\pm$0.004 & NV & 1.8 & & \\
722: & & & V$-$R & 44 & $-$0.029$\pm$0.009 & $-$0.079$\pm$0.009 & $-$0.050$\pm$0.004 & NV & 2.3 & & \\
723: 11.03.2007 & 1410$+$429 & RLQSO & V & 18 & 2.028$\pm$0.009 & 2.122$\pm$0.009 & 0.094$\pm$0.003 & ~V & 3.0 & ~4.0 & one point spike in \\
724: & & & R & 17 & 2.231$\pm$0.012 & 2.554$\pm$0.011 & 0.323$\pm$0.003 & ~V & 3.8 & ~3.5 & R passband is removed \\
725: & & & V$-$R & 17 & $-$0.203$\pm$0.017 & $-$0.433$\pm$0.017 & $-$0.229$\pm$0.004 & ~V & 4.3 & ~6.6 & in analysis \\
726: 12.03.2007 & 1410$+$429 & RLQSO & V & 20 & 1.998$\pm$0.010 & 2.110$\pm$0.012 & 0.111$\pm$0.004 & ~V & 2.8 & ~3.9 & \\
727: & & & R & 20 & 2.111$\pm$0.021 & 2.547$\pm$0.019 & 0.336$\pm$0.004 & ~V & 5.0 & ~6.5 & \\
728: & & & V$-$R & 20 & $-$0.213$\pm$0.023 & $-$0.437$\pm$0.021 & $-$0.224$\pm$0.006 & ~V & 3.7 & 13.7 & \\
729: \enddata
730:
731: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before
732: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark
733: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.
734:
735: %\tablecomments{Table \ref{tbl-1}is published in its entirety in the electronic edition of the {\it Astrophysical Journal}. A portion is shown here for guidance
736: %regarding its form and content.}
737: %
738: \tablenotetext{*} {V and NV in the Variable column represent variable and non variable respectively. N represent the
739: number of data points.}
740: %\tablenotetext{a}{Sample footnote for table~\ref{tbl-1} that was generated
741: %with the deluxetable environment}
742: %\tablenotetext{b}{Another sample footnote for table~\ref{tbl-1}}
743:
744: \end{deluxetable}
745:
746: \clearpage
747:
748: \begin{figure}
749: \plotone{fig1.ps}
750: \caption{The V, R and V$-$R light curves of 0748$+$294 on the night of March 12, 2007.
751: In caption S and Q represent star and QSO respectively. For clarity, the DLCs are offseted
752: by the amounts marked on the panels.}
753: \end{figure}
754:
755: \begin{figure}
756: \plotone{fig2.ps}
757: \caption{The V, R and V$-$R light curves of 0824$+$098 on the night of March 11, 2007.
758: In caption S and Q represent star and QSO respectively. For clarity, the DLCs are offseted
759: by the amounts marked on the panels.}
760: \end{figure}
761:
762: \begin{figure}
763: \plotone{fig3.ps}
764: \caption{The V, R and V$-$R light curves of 0832$+$251 on the night of March 10, 2007.
765: In caption S and Q represent star and QSO respectively. For clarity, the DLCs are offseted
766: by the amounts marked on the panels.}
767: \end{figure}
768:
769: \begin{figure}
770: \plotone{fig4.ps}
771: \caption{The V, R and V$-$R light curves of 1101$+$319 on the night of March 11, 2007.
772: In caption S and Q represent star and QSO respectively. For clarity, the DLCs are offseted
773: by the amounts marked on the panels.}
774: \end{figure}
775:
776: \begin{figure}
777: \plotone{fig5.ps}
778: \caption{The V, R and V$-$R light curves of 1225$+$317 on the nights of March 10, 2007.
779: In caption S and Q represent star and QSO respectively. For clarity, the DLCs are offseted
780: by the amounts marked on the panels.}
781: \end{figure}
782:
783: \begin{figure}
784: \plotone{fig6.ps}
785: \caption{The V, R and V$-$R light curves of 1410$+$429 on the nights of March 11 and 12, 2007.
786: In caption S and Q represent star and QSO respectively. For clarity, the DLCs are offseted
787: by the amounts marked on the panels. One point spike seen in R band QSO observations on March 11, 2007
788: which has caused one point dip in V$-$R color is omitted in variability detection test.}
789: \end{figure}
790:
791: \end{document}
792:
793: