1: %

2: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

3: 

4: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}

5: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}

6: 

7: \shorttitle{OVI in Elliptical Galaxies}

8: \shortauthors{Bregman et al.}

9: 

10: %% This is the end of the preamble.  Indicate the beginning of the

11: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.

12: 

13: \begin{document}

14: 

15: \title{Mass Loss From Evolved Stars in Elliptical Galaxies}

16: 

17: \author{Joel R. Parriott and Joel N. Bregman}

18: 

19: \affil{Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109}

20: \email{jbregman@umich.edu}

21: 

22: \begin{abstract}

23: Most of the X-ray emitting gas in early-type galaxies probably 

24: originates from red giant mass loss and here we model the interaction 

25: between this stellar mass loss and the hot ambient medium.  Using 

26: two-dimensional hydrodynamic simulations, we adopt a temperature 

27: for the ambient medium of $3 \times 10^6 $ K along with a range of 

28: ambient densities and stellar velocities.  When the stellar velocity 

29: is supersonic relative to the ambient medium, a bow shock occurs, 

30: along with a shock driven into the stellar ejecta, which heats only 

31: a fraction of the gas.  Behind the bow shock, a cool wake develops 

32: but the fast flow of the hot medium causes Kelvin-Helmholtz 

33: instabilities to grow and these fingers are shocked and heated (without 

34: radiative cooling).  Along with the mixing of this wake material 

35: with the hot medium, most of the stellar ejecta is heated to 

36: approximately the temperature of the hot ambient medium within 2 pc 

37: of the star.  With the addition of radiative cooling, some wake 

38: material remains cool ($< 10^5$ K), accounting for up to 25\% of 

39: the stellar mass loss.  Less cooled gas survives when the ambient 

40: density is lower or when the stellar velocity is higher than in our 

41: reference case. These results suggest that some cooled gas should 

42: be present in the inner part of early-type galaxies that have a hot 

43: ambient medium.  These calculations may explain the observed 

44: distributed optical emission line gas as well as the presence of 

45: dust in early-type galaxies.

46: 

47: \end{abstract}

48: 

49: \keywords{galaxies: ISM ---- cooling flows ---- X-rays: galaxies ---- stars: mass loss}

50: 

51: \section{Introduction}

52: 

53: The observed metallicities of hot gas in early-type galaxies disagree with

54: elementary predictions.  The source of the hot galactic gas is expected to

55: be the mass lost by evolved stars.  The main contribution to the gas mass

56: is from giant stars and planetary nebulae and this gas initially has the

57: velocity of the parent star.  As this material collides with the mass lost

58: from other stars or with the hot ambient medium within the galaxy, the

59: mass loss material is shocked to a temperature corresponding to the

60: velocity dispersion of the stars in the galaxy (review by \citealt{math03}).  

61: If this were the only heating

62: mechanism, the gas would have the velocity dispersion temperature and a

63: metallicity of the stars.  The metallicity of early-type galaxies have been

64: measured, and for galaxies near L$_{*}$, the metallicity is approximately solar

65: within R$_e$/2 \citep{trag00a}.

66: 

67: However, there is a second source of metals, due to the occurrence of

68: Type Ia supernovae in these galaxies \citep{tcb94}.  The mass of Fe from

69: these supernovae is many times greater than that in the mass lost from

70: giant stars, so the net result is that the Fe abundance of the hot ISM in

71: early-type galaxies should be 3-10 times the solar value \citep{renz93,brig05}.  The other

72: prediction is that the heating by the supernovae should raise the gas

73: temperature above that due only to the velocity dispersion of the stars. 

74: While the gas temperature is indeed elevated above the velocity

75: dispersion temperature (e.g., \citealt{bb98}), the metallicities are far from these predicted

76: values, lying near the Solar value in the more X-ray luminous early-type

77: galaxies \citep{athey03,hump06}.

78: 

79: One modification to the model is that gas from the surrounding

80: environment has fallen into the galaxy, diluting the metallicity of the gas \citep{math03}. 

81: This might predict a sharp radial metallicity gradient, with more dilution

82: in the outer parts and less in the inner part of the galaxy, where there is a

83: lower ratio of the stellar mass loss rate to the density of the group or

84: cluster medium.  Such a gradient is not generally detected in the X-ray

85: observations of the hot gas \citep{athey03,hump06}.

86: 

87: The issue of external gas accretion should be relatively unimportant in

88: galaxies that are thought to be driving galactic winds.  Partial or total

89: galactic winds are the leading explanation for the X-ray poor early-type

90: galaxies, whose gas content is an order of magnitude less than their X-ray

91: bright counterparts.  In these systems, the supernova heating may be

92: enhanced, thereby driving the galactic wind.  In this picture, \citet{david06}

93: estimate that the Fe abundance would be an order of magnitude

94: above the Solar value.  However, observations of X-ray faint early-type

95: galaxies shows that the Fe abundance in the hot gas is lower than the 

96: X-ray bright ellipticals, with typical values that are 0.3 of the Solar value \citep{irwin06}. 

97: Evidently, there is a metallicity problem: the metals in the mass lost by

98: stars is not effectively mixed into the host ISM of these galaxies.

99: 

100: This metallicity problem has been recognized for over a decade (e.g.,

101: \citealt{fuji96,fuji97}) and a resolution to the problem may be that

102: the metals do not fully mix into the ISM \citep{math90,brig05}.  One aspect of 

103: this is that not all stars have the same metallicity.  As these authors 

104: point out, higher metallicity gas radiates more effectively, so it might

105: cool to T $\leq$ 10$^{{\rm 4}}$ K if the cooling time is shorter than the heating and

106: mixing timescale.  This would produce a bias against high-metallicity gas

107: becoming part of the hot ISM.  Estimations for the magnitude of the

108: effect have been calculated, which involve spherically symmetric bubbles and

109: shocks that propagate into the mass lost from stars.  However,

110: the more realistic situation will have some important differences.  For the

111: typical condition where the star is losing mass as it moves through the

112: ambient ISM at a few hundred km s$^{-1}$, there will be a bow shock in front of

113: the star.  As the shocked gas flows by the stellar mass loss, it will create a

114: wake with strong velocity gradients.  Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities are

115: likely to develop between the rapidly flowing shocked gas and the stellar

116: mass loss, and this will lead to shocking of the cooler gas and mixing

117: between the two components.  These processes are difficult to estimate

118: accurately, so we have undertaken a series of numerical fluid dynamical

119: calculations to study the process by which stellar mass loss interacts with

120: the hot ambient medium.

121: 

122: \section{Computational Methodology}

123: 

124: The gas dynamics code used in this work is based upon the highly accurate

125: Piecewise Parabolic Method (PPM) of \citet{cole84}.  

126: The choice of PPM as the numerical scheme for these simulations is based upon 

127: the hydrodynamics that are expected to be important in our physical problem.

128: PPM is robust, and its high spatial and temporal accuracy (discontinuity 

129: capturing) capabilities make it a natural choice, since vortex mixing and 

130: shock heating are expected to be the key mechanisms for transforming the 

131: cold stellar ejecta into hot ambient gas.

132: The implementation of PPM used here \citep{blond93} contains improvements 

133: that make it more suitable for the geometry and boundary conditions found 

134: in our problem.  The PPM scheme of \citet{cole84}

135: was written to operate on a grid defined by the volume $V(r)$ rather than

136: the position $r$ (remap step) or mass coordinate $m$ (Lagrangian step),

137: thus rendering the interpolation Cartesian in $V$. 

138: In this way, curvilinear geometry can be incorporated without having to

139: correct for coordinate singularities.  However, a volume-based interpolation

140: does not accurately capture the solution on a reflecting symmetry boundary,

141: where the velocity $u$ is generally linear in $r$, not $V(r)$.  So even

142: though the original PPM scheme can account for curvilinear geometries, the

143: cumulative truncation error for advection of a velocity interpolated on

144: the volume coordinate near a symmetry axis is first-order in $\Delta r/r$.

145: \citet{blond93} demonstrated that the PPM-LR scheme retains greater

146: accuracy near coordinate singularities when using interpolations in $r$

147: (or $\theta$) instead of $V(r)$.

148: Three relatively simple modifications to the original scheme are required

149: for improved accuracy in both the radial and azimuthal coordinates.

150: 

151: We began with the serial version of the code of \citet{blond93}, known as 

152: VH-1 and written for distribution by the Virginia Institute of Theoretical 

153: Astrophysics (VITA) Numerical Astrophysics Group.  This is a two-dimensional

154: code that we use in spherical polar coordinates.  The VH-1 code

155: implements PPM as a Lagrangian hydrodynamic step coupled with a remap

156: onto the original fixed Eulerian grid (referred to as PPM-LR).  This scheme

157: combines the advantages of Lagrangian and Eulerian methods by solving the

158: fluid equations in Lagrangian mode and then remapping the dynamical variables

159: back to the fixed Eulerian grid. Because the physics and the

160: coordinate transformation are solved for separately.  If the remap and the 

161: Lagrangian scheme are each third order, the entire solution will be third order.

162: 

163: The original VH-1 code was modified in a few significant ways before it could

164: be used to address our problem.  First, we introduced optically thin radiative

165: losses, which was implemented by the operator splitting method outside of the Riemann

166: solver after each full time step; for further discussion of the VH-1 code and

167: the modifications, see \citet{parr98}.  While this represents a loss of

168: self-consistency with the gas dynamics, it is a much used and validated

169: method of including heating and/or cooling.  We use the local, time-independent

170: collisional ionization equilibrium cooling function, $\Lambda_{N}(T)$, of

171: \citep{sd93}.  These tables cover a temperature range of $10^{4} K - 10^{8.5} K$,

172: and a large metallicity range of $[Fe/H] = -3.0 - +0.5$.

173: 

174: The routine employs an implicit scheme, the secant method, to

175: calculate the energy (or equivalently, the pressure) lost in one time step.

176: The computational

177: load incurred by an implicit method is justified by its ability to minimize

178: the small errors introduced when removing energy from the system.  In practice,

179: the code uses interpolated values from a table of radiative cooling function

180: values as a function of temperature, and iterates toward a value for the

181: change in temperature for each cell.  The iteration is carried out a maximum

182: of twelve times, or until the fractional temperature change is less than

183: one part in a thousand, $\Delta T/T < 10^{-3}$.  A new temperature is

184: calculated for each cell, and the pressure is changed accordingly (in this

185: case via the ideal gas equation of state):

186: 

187: \beq

188: \label{eq:elost}

189: \Delta p = \frac{\rho\,k_b \Delta T}{\mu m_p}\:,\;{\rm where}\;\; \Delta T = \left( \frac{\gamma - 1}{4 \mu m_{p} k_b} \right) \Lambda_{N} \rho\, \Delta t \,.

190: \eeq

191: 

192: Finally, we tested the output of the cooling routine

193: using a flat cooling function and a single temperature grid with no inflow or

194: outflow.  The temperature drop over the time taken by $N$ time steps had to

195: exactly match analytical expectations.

196: 

197: The second change was to the computational grid.

198: We maintained the regular nature of the 2D spherical polar grid,

199: but created an unequal spacing of grid cells.  

200: The outermost radius is 25 pc and at the innermost radius, 0.01 pc,

201: the stellar surface is not resolved.  The radial length of the

202: cells increase by a factor of 1.01 per cell, which creates much higher radial

203: resolution in the inner grid.  This growth dictates an outermost cell

204: $\approx 36$ times longer than the innermost cell when using 360 radial cells.  

205: This inner resolution is important since it is

206: the region where the instabilities begin to grow.  We also found it important

207: in helping the lower energy density material flow into the grid from the

208: inner boundary without encountering non-physical negative pressures in several

209: cells near the boundary.  Because most of the important structure develops

210: in the wake along the downstream symmetry polar axis, we also increased the azimuthal

211: resolution by a factor of 10 for the cells in that region (Figure~\ref{fig:mesh}).  This is

212: accomplished by calculating a beginning angular cell size, decreasing

213: that size by an order of magnitude and forming 100 azimuthal cells at that

214: resolution.  The remaining cells fill in the rest of the $\pi$ radians to

215: complete the grid.

216: 

217: The third modification concerns the boundary procedures for the 2D axisymmetric

218: spherical polar domain.  The outer boundary of the grid needed to have an

219: inflow boundary condition on the left side for the hot, fast ambient wind,

220: and an outflow only condition on the right side for the gas to leave the grid.

221: Since the public VH-1 code treats the entire outer boundary as one boundary

222: with one condition, we split the boundary in half.  A particular 1D radial

223: sweep uses the inflow condition if its angular theta value lies in the second

224: quadrant ($cos(\theta) < 0$), or uses the outflow condition if its theta is in

225: the first quadrant ($cos(\theta) \geq 0$).  The inflow boundary condition

226: was set by zero-gradient fixed values for the pressure, density, velocity,

227: and derived total energy of the hot, fast ambient wind.

228: We also used a zero-gradient

229: outflow condition, but added a pressure condition which set the minimum

230: pressure of the outflow ghost zones at the fixed inflow pressure value.  While

231: this change is unnecessary for supersonic flows, it helps to reduce the influence

232: of sound waves hitting the boundary for sub-sonic flows, and prevents any

233: pressure buildup near the outflow boundary.  A dissertation on boundary 

234: procedures for fluid dynamics found that

235: boundary conditions, no matter how well-conceived and physically elegant, can 

236: never eliminate all of the problems incurred at outer boundaries, and one should

237: make the boundary as far away as practically possible (\citealt{body92}).

238: 

239: The boundaries along the upwind and downwind symmetry axis were implemented 

240: with reflecting boundary conditions.  The density and pressure gradients are 

241: set to zero at the boundary, and the sign of the velocity is changed.

242: 

243: The inner boundary adjacent to the upstream symmetry axis was troublesome in

244: that a small amount of material representing the stellar

245: outflow could work its way upstream further than the bulk of the ram pressure

246: confined stellar wind (see Figure~\ref{fig:leakage}).

247: Although VH-1 includes the non-Cartesian improvements to the spatial

248: interpolation routine, it does not 

249: completely eliminate the errors \citep{blond93}.  The restriction of 

250: axisymmetry makes this axis a favorable place for such errors to grow,

251: even though the improved interpolation is implemented (\citealt{bpriv98}).  

252: This behavior in VH-1 was noted by \citet{dinge97}, where it occurred 

253: in his simulations of proto-globular cluster clouds.

254: After a number of attempts to fix this problem, we conclude that it

255: is difficult to remove without moving to a three-dimensional code.  

256: However, the error that it introduces does not appear to affect the 

257: behavior and evolution of the wake, which is orders of magnitude more

258: massive and energetically important.

259: 

260: The final change to the serial version of VH-1 involved a test and correction 

261: if the pressure of a given cell becomes negative during the remap step.  

262: This happens when the kinetic

263: energy $u^2$ and thermal energy $NkT$ of a cell are similar in magnitude, so 

264: that small errors in the velocity can drive the derived thermal pressure 

265: negative ($p_{derived} \propto \rho (E_{thermal} - E_{kinetic})$).  We repair

266: the problem cell by computing a new pressure from the average temperature of

267: the adjacent two cells in the direction of the current sweep.  We are injecting

268: energy into the grid using this method, but the amounts of energy are very small,

269: so the effects on the general flow are minor.

270: 

271: The public version of VH-1 was a serial code, which for our problem, 

272: would have taken too long to produce results for the computers 

273: available at the time of this work.  Consequently, we carried out a significant

274: programming effort to produce a parallel implemention of VH-1, the details of

275: which were a significant part of a doctoral dissertation \citep{parr98}.

276: The parallel implementation and code testing are also described in the dissertation.

277: 

278: 

279: \section{Simulations of Stellar Mass Loss in a Hot Galactic Medium}

280: 

281: There are certain common properties of all of the simulations, which

282: involve a hot, fast ambient medium gas 

283: flowing past a mass-losing star that is fixed at the origin of the

284: axisymmetric grid. The hot, fast ambient medium gas flows from left

285: to right across the grid with velocity $v_{amb} = \sigma_{\star}$, density 

286: $n_{amb}$, and temperature $T_{amb}$.  The pressure is determined from the ideal

287: gas law.  The outer boundaries have fixed inflow procedures on the left and 

288: fixed outflow procedures on the right with a check to make sure that the outflow

289: pressure does not exceed the inflow pressure.  The inner boundary represents a 

290: surface beyond the actual stellar surface with fixed inflow procedures.  The 

291: gas inflow from this boundary is the cold, slowly moving stellar wind, with a

292: strictly outward radial velocity of $v_{ejecta}$, density, $n_{ejecta}$, and 

293: temperature $T_{ejecta}$.  The mass loss rate that this corresponds to will be

294: a constant value for all runs, and for all time.  The exception to this is

295: a non-steady state simulation of a planetary nebula-like mass loss 

296: episode (to be discussed elsewhere). The axial grid boundaries implement a simple

297: reflecting boundary condition.  A cartoon of this scenario, after a bow shock

298: and wake have formed, is shown in Figure~\ref{fig:cartoon}.  Every simulation

299: is run from a physical time of 0 years to $3 \times 10^{6}$ years.  The 

300: calculated wake flow time of $\sim 8 \times 10^{5}$ years, so we

301: conservatively allow one million years for the flow to become 

302: quasi-steady-state.  Any steady-state averaging is done for simulation

303: times between one and three million years.  There are 10 runs:  five in the

304: 2-D parameter space of ($v_{amb}$, $n_{amb}$), and five more at the 

305: same $v_{amb}$ and $n_{amb}$ with radiative cooling turned on.

306: 

307: \subsection{The Fiducial Simulation}

308: 

309: We find it useful to define a reference or fiducial simulation, against which

310: other simulations are compared.  

311: The parameters used for the fiducial simulation represent average physical

312: quantities near the effective radius for a typical intermediate luminosity elliptical 

313: galaxy.  This first simulation does not include the effects of radiative cooling.  

314: We will examine in detail the important physical processes that

315: drive the heating and cooling of the stellar ejecta, given a particular

316: set of input parameters.  Once we have established our analysis for this

317: fiducial run, it will serve as a reference point for examining the influence

318: of varying the ambient conditions, and radiative cooling.

319: The parameters for this (FDFV) and subsequent simulations are shown in 

320: Table 1.  Each simulation is run with a single metallicity

321: radiative cooling routine turned off and on.

322: A particular model is designated by a series of four or five letters, where F stands

323: for the fiducial values, so for the range of density, fiducial density 

324: conditions are designated FD, high density regions HD, and low density

325: regions as LD.  This is followed by two letters describing the flow velocity,

326: where the fiducial velocity is FV, high velocity is HV, and low velocity is LV.  

327: The detailed densities and velocities associated with these runs are given in Tables 1, 2.

328: Simulations that also have cooling are designated with a C as the last character.

329: So a simulation with the higher density, with the fiducial velocity and with radiative

330: cooling is designated HDFVC.

331: 

332: In this fiducial simulation, the hot gas velocity is $v_{amb} = 350$ km s$^{-1}$, which corresponds to a

333: one-dimensional velocity dispersion $\sigma_{\star} \approx 200$ km s$^{-1}$ from

334: the relationship $v = \sqrt{3}\,\sigma$.   This velocity dispersion is 

335: representative of a low to intermediate luminosity galaxy (\citealt{cft87};

336: \citealt{mkatlm97}).  The density of the gas is $n_{amb} = 10^{-3}\,{\rm cm}^{-3}$, 

337: which is a typical value for the galaxy.  Since we have used values

338: typical of intermediate $L_{X}$ galaxies, we set the temperature of the

339: X-ray gas $T_{amb} = 3 \times 10^{6}\,{\rm K} \approx 0.3\,{\rm keV}$.

340: These parameters lead to a gas moving slightly supersonically, with a

341: Mach number $M \approx 1.4$ for $\gamma = 5/3$, and a pressure 

342: $n T = 3 \times 10^{3}\,{\rm K cm}^{-3}$.  This pressure is

343: typical of the gas in the middle to outer regions of an elliptical galaxy.

344: 

345: The stellar mass loss rate that we use here 

346: ($\dot{M}_{star} \approx 10^{-7} M_{\odot} yr^{-1}$), and for the other 

347: simulations, is a time-weighted average value for the red giant and 

348: asymptotic giant branch stages of stellar evolution for a solar-type star

349: \citep{r75,fbr90}.  The input parameters for

350: the ejecta inflow boundary that result in this rate are $v_{ejecta} = 35$ km s$^{-1}$,

351: and $n_{ejecta} = 1\,{\rm cm}^{-3}$, with a temperature 

352: $T_{ejecta} = 10^{4}\,{\rm K}$.  These are all average quantities for a

353: stellar wind at $r = 0.1$ pc.  A simple mass flux estimate at 

354: $r = 0.1\,{\rm pc}$ gives $\dot{M}_{star} \approx 4.8 \times 10^{-8} M_{\odot} yr^{-1}$.

355: This mass loss rate is half the rate that we want from the

356: inner boundary, but given these input values we obtain an actual calculated 

357: mass flux near $\dot{M}_{star} \approx 10^{-7} M_{\odot} yr^{-1}$.  This is due to high

358: pressure gradients near the boundary that affect the inflow.

359: 

360: As material begins to flow into the ambient medium from the boundary

361: representing the stellar outflow, a contact discontinuity

362: and bow shock are formed.  The ambient flow

363: imparts momentum to the stellar ejecta that pushes it into a downstream wake

364: that is in pressure equilibrium with the ambient gas.  

365: There are a few fluid instabilities that occur in this situation.

366: When a shock wave impulsively accelerates a density interface, small

367: amplitude perturbations grown and, in the non-linear regime, one fluid

368: component penetrates the other.  The conditions appropriate for this 

369: Richtmyer-Meshkov instability appear to occur at the forward contact

370: surface of the bow shock, a situation common for all simulations.

371: Further downstream in the flow, there is a cool wake with a relatively

372: rapidly flowing hotter and lower density medium.  This situation is 

373: unstable to the growth of Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities.  

374: As these instabilities travel down the wake, vortices are formed, further

375: mixing the two gases.  In addition, cool material that extends or detaches

376: from the wake or head region can collide and shock with the fast low-density

377: material flowing by.  Within these interactions, the conditions for Rayleigh-

378: Taylor instabilities are sometimes established, and this instability also helps

379: to mix the wake gas with the ambient material.

380: Because of these processes, the amount of cold ($T \leq 10^4$ K) gas is greatly 

381: reduced by the time the wake exits the grid in this non-radiative cooling run.

382: The entire grid for this simulation after a quasi-steady state flow has been

383: established with a fully formed bow shock and complex wake is shown in 

384: Figure~\ref{fig:full}.

385: 

386: A bow shock is formed upstream from the stellar inflow boundary since the 

387: ambient gas is mildly supersonic.  The standoff distance between the inner 

388: boundary and the vertex of the bow shock and contact discontinuity is consistent with 

389: theoretical expectations.  The standoff distance from a mass losing star is found

390: by balancing the ram pressures of the ambient medium and stellar wind,

391: $\rho_{amb} v_{amb}^2 = \rho_{ej} v_{ej}^2$, where 

392: $\rho_{amb},\;v_{amb},\:\rho_{ej},\;{\rm and}\;v_{ej}$ are the

393: mass density and velocity of the ambient medium and ejecta at the contact, 

394: respectively.  

395: Solving for the standoff distance from the center of the star $r_0$ given 

396: that $\rho_{ej} \propto r^{-2}$, yields \citep{bkk71,dyson75,wilkin96}:

397: 

398: \beq

399: \label{eq:standoff}

400: r_0 = \left( \frac{\dot{M}_{star}\,v_{ej}}{4 \pi\,\rho_{amb}\,v_{amb}^2} \right)^{1/2}\:.

401: \eeq

402: 

403: \noindent The simulation typically places the contact discontinuity near 

404: $r_0 \approx 0.4$ pc (see Figure~\ref{fig:khdtheadl}), which is almost precisely

405: the calculated value of $r_0 \approx 0.4$ pc, given input values of

406: $\dot{M}_{star} = 10^{-7} M_{\odot} yr^{-1},\:v_{amb} = 350\:{\rm km\,s}^{-1}, 

407: \rho_{amb} = 2 \times 10^{-27}\,{\rm g\,cm}^{-3},\;

408: v_{ej} = 35\:{\rm km\,s}^{-1}$ which are for a boundary at $r = 0.1$ pc.  The 

409: precise location of the shocks varies

410: with time as large instabilities peel off the contact and present an ejecta

411: region with a temporarily larger effective cross-section.

412: 

413: The main function of the bow shock is to thermalize the ambient gas 

414: as the ambient flow imparts momentum to the ejecta, pushing it into a wake.  

415: The early formation of this bow shock is shown in Figure~\ref{fig:initbow}.  

416: Shock heating from the bow shock and contact discontinuity is the 

417: mechanism invoked by the standard theory to locally thermalize $100\%$ of the 

418: stellar material to the velocity dispersion temperature.  

419: However, the simulation makes it clear that these shocks are not heating all the 

420: ejecta, and do not appear to be the main heating mechanism.

421: 

422: \subsection{The Role of Kelvin-Helmholtz Instabilities}

423: 

424: The relative tangential velocity difference between the stellar mass loss and

425: the ambient medium causes Kelvin-Helmholtz (hereafter KH) instabilities to

426: develop.  In the linear regime the growth rate of the KH instability 

427: $\sigma_{KH}$, with the wave number $k = 2 \pi / \lambda$, is given by 

428: (e.g., \citealt{lamb45}):

429: 

430: \beq

431: \label{eq:khrate}

432: \sigma_{KH} = k \left[ \frac{\rho_{amb}\,\rho_{ej}}{(\rho_{amb} + \rho_{ej})^2}

433: (v_{amb} - v_{ej})^2 \right]^{1/2}\:,

434: \eeq

435: 

436: \noindent where $\rho_{amb},\;v_{amb},\:\rho_{ej},\;{\rm and}\;v_{ej}$ are now

437: the mass density and {\em tangential} velocity of the shocked ambient 

438: medium and ejecta, respectively.  

439: The e-folding growth time $\tau_{KH} \simeq 1/\sigma_{KH}$ of

440: modes for the present case with $\rho_{amb} \ll \rho_{ej}$ and 

441: $v_{amb} \gg v_{ej}$ is approximately given by:

442: 

443: \beq

444: \label{eq:khapptime}

445: \tau_{KH} \approx \left( \frac{\rho_{ej}}{\rho_{amb}} \right)^{1/2}\:

446: \frac{\lambda}{2 \pi v_{amb}}\:,

447: \eeq

448: 

449: \noindent where $\lambda$ is the length scale of growing mode.

450: 

451: In considering the growth of KH modes, we note that modes with $\lambda$ below the numerical 

452: resolution of the grid and algorithm are suppressed.  The grid

453: resolution at the contact surface at the head of the flow is 

454: $\Delta r \approx \Delta \theta \approx 0.01$ parsecs, while the elongated cells 

455: half the distance down the high-resolution wake region are

456: $\Delta r \approx 0.1$ parsecs, $\Delta \theta \approx 0.01$ parsecs.  These

457: modes might be important in the evolution of the wake material, but we cannot 

458: address them.  We will calculate e-folding growth times for typical

459: conditions present in the contact discontinuity and wake, where KH instabilities

460: are seen to form and grow.  These times will be shown to typically be 100 times

461: shorter than the flow time (i.e. the time for the wake to be advected off the

462: grid).  Since the flow is quasi-steady state after roughly $8 \times 10^5$ years,

463: we assume that any results from times later than this are typical of the 

464: flow evolution.  The numbers used for the current analysis were taken from

465: the grid state at a simulation time of $10^6$ years.

466: 

467: We will first examine the conditions for the contact discontinuity at the

468: leading edge of the ejecta-ambient collision.  Figure~\ref{fig:khdtheadl} shows

469: mass density and temperature contours for the region including the vertex of 

470: the bow shock,

471: the main contact discontinuity, and the first growing KH instabilities.  The

472: temperature map also shows the upstream leakage of a small amount of cold gas 

473: along the reflecting symmetry axis due to unavoidable numerical errors (see 

474: above).  Since we are interested in the steady state

475: wake flow, the influence of this axis error should be minimal.  The

476: bow shock is not visible on the density map since the density drop across it 

477: is very small, but its location is indicated by the short white line.  The

478: black arrow represents the line where the data were extracted to make the

479: density and velocity plots in Figure~\ref{fig:khheaddat}.  

480: The data were extracted from this line because

481: the velocities ambient gas and the ejecta are almost totally parallel to each

482: other and tangential to the discontinuity at this point, which is a

483: necessary condition for the velocities in Equation~\ref{eq:khapptime}.

484: After substituting what appears to be a typical base length for some beginning

485: instabilities as the length scale $\lambda \sim 0.2$ pc, and the other

486: relevant values ($\rho_{amb} \sim 3 \times 10^{-27}\,{\rm g\,cm}^{-3},\;

487: \rho_{ej} \sim 5 \times 10^{-25} {\rm g\,cm}^{-3},\;{\rm and}\;

488: v_{amb} \sim 155\:{\rm km\,s}^{-1}$) into the linear 

489: Equation~\ref{eq:khapptime}, we obtain $\tau_{KH} \approx 3000$ years for 

490: the leading edge flow.  It should be noted that the ``ambient'' values used here 

491: were actually the post-shock gas values since that is the fluid actually at 

492: the contact discontinuity (inner shock).  The flow time is simply found

493: by dividing the radius of the grid by the speed of the wake $v_{ej}$, so that

494: $\tau_{flow,wake} \approx 8 \times 10^5$ years.  As stated above, $\tau_{KH} \ll

495: \tau_{flow,wake}$, so there is ample time for these instabilities to form.

496: It should be noted that the modes that form do so with a very high 

497: degree of spatial and temporal accuracy, given an inner cell size of order 

498: $0.01$ pc on a side, and a Courant time step that is typically 

499: $t_{Courant} \approx 5$ years.  The longer modes will take longer to form

500: and we see that the larger instabilities present themselves further

501: downstream, and these less frequent modes appear to do a great deal of wake 

502: mixing.

503: 

504: The second KH instability measurements are from a typical region in the 

505: downstream wake from at the same simulation time.  Instead of the clear 

506: two-shock structure seen in the head region, the wake consists of the

507: cold ejecta material with significant mixing taking place through the many KH 

508: instabilities and

509: the vortices that they form.  This unstable colder material is in pressure

510: equilibrium with the ambient medium, but it is still separated from the

511: hot gas by a more broad discontinuity that we will call a shear layer.

512: Figure~\ref{fig:khdtwake} shows mass density and temperature contours for this 

513: region of the wake, as well as the line where data were extracted.  As stated 

514: above, since the flow is quasi-steady state, we can assume that the place where 

515: we have extracted data to be average and typical for the wake flow.  The mass

516: density and velocity profiles are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:khwakedat}. 

517: The data used in the KH time calculations are taken on each size of the full

518: shear layer.  Since the wake and ambient flows are almost entirely in the 

519: X-direction, with the exception of vortices, the velocity in that direction 

520: is appropriate for the KH calculations.  The density contrast between

521: the wake and the hot gas is not as large as at the head contact discontinuity,

522: so we need to use Equation~\ref{eq:khrate} to find KH growth times rather 

523: than using Equation~\ref{eq:khapptime}.

524: Substituting the relevant wake parameters for the ejecta values 

525: ($\rho_{amb} \sim 2 \times 10^{-27}\,{\rm g\,cm}^{-3},\;

526: \rho_{wake} \sim 3 \times 10^{-26} {\rm g\,cm}^{-3},\;{\rm and}\;

527: v_{amb} \sim 300\:{\rm km\,s}^{-1}\;,

528: v_{wake} \sim 30\:{\rm km\,s}^{-1}$), and with a longer empirically determined

529: length scale of 

530: $\lambda \sim 1$ pc, we obtain $\tau_{KH} \approx 3000$ years for 

531: the wake region.  The longer length scales in the wake region compensate for

532: the smaller density contrasts compared to the head region, so that $\tau_{KH}$ 

533: is approximately the same for both regions.  This time scale is

534: over 100 times shorter than the flow time, so the instabilities have plenty

535: of time to grow before they are advected off the grid.  The long modes take

536: a longer time to form, and we see large instabilities in the wake that

537: we do not see in the head region, presumably because they do not have time to

538: form before being advected downstream.

539: 

540: These simulations show that Kelvin-Helmholtz (KH) instabilities have ample time and

541: resolution to grow in all areas of the ejecta-ambient gas interface.  The

542: instabilities, and the vortices that form directly downwind of them, are

543: the primary mechanisms for heating by mixing the cold ejecta into the hot 

544: ambient gas.  There also seems to be a characteristic scale for instabilities, 

545: but a full modal analysis would be necessary understand its origin.

546: 

547: The Kelvin-Helmholtz (KH) instabilities discussed in the previous section

548: are the main cause of mixing in the wake.  If a large wavelength mode

549: grows under pressure equilibrium near the head of the flow, its presence 

550: creates a much larger effective

551: collision cross-section for the ambient medium.  The ambient medium imparts

552: momentum to these large KH ``fingers,'' and very effectively heats them and

553: advects them downstream above the main wake zone.  Occasionally large pieces 

554: become completely detached from the wake, and mix even more with the 

555: ambient gas.

556: Figure~\ref{fig:tkhshocks} shows growing modes from the initial contact

557: discontinuity that form long fingers that are bent and advected downstream.

558: These colder pieces are continuously shocked by the ambient gas as they move

559: down the wake.

560: 

561: Although many smaller KH instabilities grow and advect down the flow, the 

562: mixing (heating) effects of the largest ``fingers'' are far greater, since 

563: they can dredge up more inner wake material.  We can calculate

564: the location in the wake where we expect these large modes to present themselves

565: by multiplying their growth time by the wake flow speed.  A KH mode with a

566: wavelength of five parsecs that begins growing near the head of the flow will

567: have an approximate growth time of $\sim 7.5 \times 10^4$ years.  Given an 

568: outer wake flow speed of $50$ km s$^{-1}$, this mode should be growing large by 

569: about four parsecs downstream, which is consistent with the simulations.

570: 

571: Now that we have established that the location of these modes agrees with

572: predictions, we will examine their considerable influence on the dynamics of

573: the wake.  The large blobs and their accompanying vortices 

574: move down the wake creating alternating large zones of relatively low and high 

575: pressure in the wake.  This effect is shown by the pressure map in 

576: Figure~\ref{fig:paltfull}, which also designates three horizontal lines along

577: which pressure profiles were extracted and plotted.  These pressure profiles, 

578: taken at increasing distance from the symmetry axis, show the dramatic 

579: alternating changes in pressure that occur down the wake.  The pressure gradient

580: of some of the pressure jumps suggest significant shocks traveling downstream

581: {\em within} the wake in conjunction with these fingers.  A temperature

582: map of the same region would only show shocks occurring where the large fingers

583: continue to reach out in the ambient gas.  The common peaks in these curves

584: seem to suggest characteristic ``wavelengths'' for the flow on the order of

585: $\sim 5$ pc.  They are spreading apart as they travel downstream because the

586: wake experiences a slight acceleration downstream due to the constant influence

587: of the fast ambient flow.

588: The other main effect of the KH instabilities, regardless of wavelength,

589: comes from the vortices that always form downstream from a growing mode,

590: with the longer modes having larger-scale vortices.

591: These vortices help to create weak shocks as they 

592: mix ambient gas into the interior of the wake.  This suggests that they play a

593: more important role in heating the stellar ejecta than the initial bow shock

594: and contact discontinuity.

595: 

596: \subsection{Cumulative Heating}

597: 

598: The discussion of heating mechanisms has been necessarily quite qualitative,

599: but we can obtain an estimate for the cumulative heating by calculating the amount

600: of stellar mass loss that remains cold as a function of distance downstream in the 

601: wake.  We do this by computing the time-averaged mass flux, $4 \pi r^2 \rho v$, 

602: through shells of increasing radius for increasing temperature cutoffs.  

603: Time-averaging is possible once a quasi-steady state flow has

604: been established.  If the mass flux for the colder temperature cutoff bins 

605: decreases significantly (i.e. by one or two orders of magnitude) before reaching

606: the edge of the grid, then we will consider that gas as being heated.  Both this

607: overall decline in mass flux and the nature of the profile are important,

608: since the profile will tell us something of the mechanism primarily responsible

609: for heating that gas.  A slow steady decline in the amount of cool material suggests wake vortex and shock

610: heating as the gas is advected downstream.  A sharp decline near the head of 

611: the flow is due to a strong bow shock and the contact discontinuity heating upon

612: initial contact with the ambient medium.

613: 

614: We calculate these time-averaged mass fluxes during a 

615: post-processing step that takes grid data for a given time, computes

616: the fluxes as a function of radius, and then averages them with every other 

617: output between the time when the quasi-steady state flow is established

618: and the end of the simulation.  Since the wake flow time is roughly

619: $8 \times 10^5$ years, we conservatively use grid outputs for simulation

620: times between $10^6$ years and $3 \times 10^6$ years, when the simulation ends.

621: For each preset temperature cutoff, we step through increasing radii 

622: ($0.1 - 25$ pc), and compute the combined mass flux for each angular cell i

623: ($0 - \pi$ rad) at that radius with an average temperature at or below the 

624: current cutoff value.  If a cell has radial velocity that is negative 

625: (i.e. not flowing out through the shell), we do not include it in the sum.

626: The outward mass flux for a single cell is given by:

627: 

628: \beq

629: \label{eq:mfluxcalc}

630: \dot{M}(r,\theta) = 2 \pi r^2 \Delta\theta\:\rho \max(v_r, 0)\:, 

631: \eeq

632: 

633: \noindent where $\Delta\theta$ is the angular extent of the outer cell

634: boundary, $r = 0.1$ pc defines the inner boundary, and $\theta = 0$ corresponds

635: to the downstream symmetry axis.  Since we sum $\dot{M}(r,\theta)$ for 

636: $\theta = 0 - \pi$ radians at a given $r$, the total area of the shell

637: is the full $4 \pi r^2$ cm$^2$.  Also, since we only count gas flowing outward 

638: through these shells (via the $\max(v_r, 0)$ term), the only material included 

639: for $\theta > \pi/2$ is the stellar wind before it reaches the contact 

640: discontinuity around $r = 0.4$ pc.  Without this condition, the large negative

641: mass flux effects of the hot wind for $\theta > \pi/2$ would obscure all of 

642: the other mass flux data in which we are interested.  This condition on the 

643: cell velocity direction will not include material flowing backward due to 

644: vortices, but such an effect should be averaged out over time as the vortices 

645: are steadily advected downstream.

646: 

647: The mass flux profiles are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:mffidnc}, where the 

648: five cumulative temperature cutoffs are at

649: three increasing fractions of the ambient temperature $T_{amb}$, at $T_{amb}$,

650: and for all temperatures (to include shocked gas).  Each 

651: profile includes all the gas with a temperature at or below the cutoff value.

652: Heating of any gas below $T_{amb}$ is indicated by that profile falling

653: below the stellar inflow rate of $10^{-7} M_{\odot} yr^{-1}$.  A steep decline suggests

654: a high heating rate.

655: Because of the definition of the mass flux $\dot{M}(r)$, if there were no mass

656: loss from a star, $\dot{M}(r) \propto r^{-2}$ , and the ``All Temps'' line

657: would follow this form exactly.  The ``All Temps'' and $T_{amb}$ curves would be

658: identical.  In the simulations with stellar mass loss,

659: the ``All Temps'' curve quickly approaches the $\dot{M}(r) \propto r^{-2}$ form

660: as the ambient mass flux exceeds the mass flux from the star.

661: 

662: The mass flux near $r = 0.1$ pc is constant in the stellar wind regime and equal to the 

663: stellar mass loss rate $\dot{M}_{star} = 10^{-7} M_{\odot} yr^{-1}$.  Also, the gap between

664: the ``All Temps'' and $T_{amb} = 3 \times 10^6$ K line is caused by the 

665: gas that is shock heated above the ambient temperature.  The profile that

666: includes every temperature rises rapidly at first, suggesting that the initial 

667: bow shock and contact discontinuity are the cause.  Both this profile and

668: the $T_{amb} = 3 \times 10^6$ K profile continue to rise from this point 

669: because the hot ambient flow accounts for the bulk of the mass flux at larger

670: radii as the surface area of the shell increases as $r^2$.

671: However, it is the fate of the cooler stellar ejecta that is of greatest interest here.

672: If the stellar ejecta did not interact with the hot ambient medium, the stellar

673: ejecta mass flux would be a horizontal line at the contant value of 

674: $10^{-7} M_{\odot} yr^{-1}$ and with a temperature below $10^5$ K.

675: 

676: The new information provided by this analysis comes from the behavior of the

677: profiles for cumulative temperatures at and below half the ambient value.

678: Each of these profiles steadily falls below the initial stellar mass loss 

679: rate.  The mass flux in the lowest temperature bin, $T = 10^5$ K, decreases by three orders of

680: magnitude, suggesting significant heating of the coldest stellar ejecta before

681: it exits the grid.   The first result is found in the changing slope of the profiles as they 

682: steadily decrease with increasing distance downstream.  As mentioned above, 

683: such a steady decrease suggests that the gradual vortex mixing and shocking 

684: in the wake are responsible for most of the heating rather than the initial bow shock and 

685: contact discontinuity.  The other important point is 

686: that all of the cold gas should eventually be heated, and at a fairly 

687: significant rate given the slope of the profiles.

688: 

689: Now that we have discussed the nature of the interaction in the fiducial case

690: without cooling, and detailed our analysis of the heating processes, we will

691: examine simulations that include the effects of radiative cooling on the flow.

692: 

693: \section{The Fiducial Simulation with Radiative Cooling}

694: 

695: For a system in equilibrium, the cooling of the hot gas as a result of 

696: optically thin radiation at X-ray energies is the mechanism opposing 

697: the heating effects discussed above.  It is precisely this radiation that

698: lead to the initial discovery of the hot gas in elliptical galaxies.  We

699: are concerned with how the addition of radiative cooling will effect the

700: dynamics of interaction, and we would expect the key parameter to be

701: the ratio of the cooling time $\tau_{cool}$ to the time for the

702: wake to be heated and mixed in the absence of heating (we will refer to this

703: as the flow time of the ambient medium, $\tau_{flow,amb}$).  

704: These properties of the ambient medium will 

705: determine the properties of the cold gas since the wake tries to achieve pressure 

706: equilibrium with the surrounding medium.  If the cooling time is much longer

707: than the flow time, we would expect very little to change with the addition of 

708: the radiative loses.  In the discussion of the rest of the simulations, we 

709: will examine the nature of the interaction as we change the value of this

710: ratio.

711: 

712: Although the optically thin radiative cooling function $\Lambda_{N}(T)$ can be 

713: approximated by a power law over limited ranges in temperatures, here

714: we used the full calculated cooling function of \citet{sd93} for a solar

715: metallicity plasma.

716: The cooling function is dominated by collisional metal lines for the

717: temperature range appropriate for our calculations, and so the magnitude of the

718: function varies roughly linearly with metallicity:  $\Lambda_{N} \propto Z$.

719: The actual functional change of $\Lambda_{N}$ with metallicity is shown

720: in \citet{sd93}, where this roughly linear gradient can be clearly seen.

721: 

722: The key parameter for the simulations 

723: with radiative losses is the ratio of the cooling time to the flow time of the 

724: ambient gas.  Since the cooling rate per unit volume is $n^2 \Lambda_{N}(T)$,

725: we can change the cooling strength and thereby the cooling time by adjusting 

726: the density $n$, the temperature $T$, or the metallicity.  The wider range of expected

727: density and its higher power dependence makes density the more attractive 

728: parameter to vary, and so we will keep the gas metallicity constant by using only the solar 

729: cooling function.

730: 

731: In order to demonstrate that cooling should affect the dynamics of the flow,

732: we can calculate some typical cooling times for the ambient gas in pressure

733: equilibrium with the wake.  The instanteous isochoric cooling time for a 

734: fully ionized $90\%$ hydrogen, $10\%$ helium (by mass) gas is given by

735: 

736: \beq

737: \label{eq:tcool}

738: \tau_{cool} = \frac{4}{\gamma - 1}\:\frac{\mu m_{p} k_{b} T}{\Lambda_{N}(T) \rho}\:,

739: \eeq

740: 

741: \noindent where $\gamma$ is the ratio of specific heats, $\mu$ is the mean 

742: molecular weight, $m_{p}$ is the proton mass, $k_{b}$ is Boltzmann's constant, 

743: and $\rho$ is the mass density.  We will always use $\gamma = 5/3$ and

744: $\mu = 0.62$ in this work.

745: In order to calculate this cooling time for the flow, we use average values of the 

746: physical parameters for several regions of the flow.

747: As expected, the cooling time for the undisturbed tenuous hot ambient medium is 

748: very long, $\sim 10^9$ years.  However, the cooling times for the

749: post-shock gas in the head and wake of the flow are $\sim 6 - 10 \times 10^4$ 

750: years, which are less than the flow time of $\sim 3 \times 10^5$ years.

751: Therefore, we can expect cooling to be important since these times are of the 

752: same order.

753: 

754: There are three obvious differences between the cooling (FDFVC) and non-cooling

755: (FDFV) simulations at the same simulation time

756: (e.g., Figure~\ref{fig:fidcompfull}):  the bow shock, the Kelvin-Helmholtz

757: instability behavior, and the wake entrainment.  The large mode instabilities

758: moving downstream are similar to those in the non-cooling case, and this is 

759: shown in Figure~\ref{fig:paltfullcool}.

760: 

761: First, the bow shock is stronger and more pronounced than the simulations

762: without cooling.  Although the contact 

763: discontinuity is in the same location for both cases, the cooling bow shock 

764: stands roughly $40\%$ further away from the inner boundary.  This is because

765: a large instability finger in the cooling case protrudes an entire 

766: parsec further into the ambient material than the in the non-cooling case. 

767: Therefore, the ejecta in the cooling case is presenting the ambient gas with an 

768: effective interaction cross-section area ($\pi R^2$) that is about four times

769: larger than the in non-cooling run.  This feature is not time-stationary, and

770: these gaseous fingers occur cyclically, developing because a large 

771: clockwise-rotating vortex immediately downstream from the head transports material

772: and pushes it out into the flow directly above the head.  

773: These fingers are quickly advected downstream and

774: broken up, but this vortex continues to dredge up cold wake gas.  The 

775: disruption of the cold finger generates small globules that have the distinct 

776: appearance of Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities (the familiar mushroom cap shape)

777: on the side finger facing the ambient wind.  

778: As the finger is bent to the right, it becomes unstable to Kelvin-Helmholtz 

779: instabilities as the cold gas moves parallel with the hot gas that is

780: flowing by (see Figure~\ref{fig:rtkh}).  The appearance of Rayleigh-Taylor 

781: instabilities is entirely reasonable because the deceleration of the hot gas as it encounters

782: the cold blob acts as an effective gravitational field in a direction normal to 

783: the interface.  In the frame of the cold blob, the effective gravitational force

784: is opposite in direction to the movement of the hot gas.  Therefore, the

785: classical Rayleigh-Taylor condition for instability is met because a dense gas

786: (the cold blob) lies above a tenuous gas (the hot ambient flow).  An illustration

787: of this is shown in the bottom panel of Figure~\ref{fig:rtkh}.

788: Upon averaging over time, simulations with cooling have a stronger and more pronounced bow shock.

789: A direct consequence is that more momentum is imparted to the ejecta material 

790: than in the non-cooling case.  Whereas Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities were

791: also identified in the non-cooling case, they are more common in this 

792: simulation with cooling.

793: 

794: A second important difference between simulations is that the Kelvin-Helmholtz

795: instabilities are structurally different from those in the non-cooling case.

796: The interaction in the cooling case generally seems more chaotic and

797: unstable than in the non-cooling case.

798: The ``fingers'' that grow near the head of the flow in the cooling case 

799: typically grow more quickly and extend further into the ambient gas 

800: than in the non-cooling case. However, if we compare the KH growth time scales 

801: for the initial contact discontinuity in both cases, we do not find

802: any significant differences.  The cooling case does appear to

803: grow long mode instabilities while damping out most smaller modes

804: in the wake.  Another aspect is that the cooling has damped out the 

805: numerical artifact along the upstream axis that is seen in the non-cooling simulations.    

806: Both of these effects in the head region can be seen in Figure~\ref{fig:fidcompclose}.

807: 

808: The third important difference is that the wake is much more narrow 

809: in the cooling case (Figure~\ref{fig:fidcompfull}, Figure~\ref{fig:fidcompclosewake}).  

810: There is almost no vortex mixing going on in this part of the wake in 

811: the cooling case, with the exception of the widely spaced large KH modes

812: that survived from the initial contact region.  There are also fewer small

813: scale internal wake shocks generated as these larger modes move downstream.

814: 

815: Finally, there is a significant difference in the amount of mass that cools.

816: We calculate the mass flux in different temperature ranges, as 

817: discussed above (Figure~\ref{fig:mffidc}). The simulations show that most 

818: of the heating of the cold stellar ejecta takes place within the first few 

819: parsecs of the interaction.  The more unstable Richtmyer-Meshkov and Kelvin-

820: Helmholtz growth near the head of the flow 

821: leads to a greater momentum transfer and shocking from the ambient medium,

822: and prompt mixing and heating of the gas.  In the wake, radiative cooling causes

823: the damping of all but the largest modes that survive the trip downstream.  

824: The wake is largely devoid of small scale vortex mixing and shocking.   

825: Cold material that survives the initial contact region resides

826: in the very narrow and stable inner wake.

827: The fractional mass flux that remains cold is greater than in the non-cooling

828: simulation, and that fractional amount is increasing as it approaches the

829: outflow boundary of the simulation, presumably due to continued radiative cooling.

830: At the outflow boundary, the fractional amount of gas cooler than 10$^5$ K is 

831: about 10$^{-3}$ for the non-cooling case, but it is 0.15 when radiative cooling

832: is included.  Evidently, radiative cooling leads to a significant (but not dominant) 

833: fraction of the stellar ejecta remaining cool.

834: 

835: \section{The Influence of Ambient Gas Density}

836: The ambient gas density used for the fiducial simulations was chosen to be the

837: typical value in an elliptical galaxy.  However, the ambient gas density varies

838: by over an order of magnitude from the center to outer part, so here we 

839: investigate the consequences for the evolution of the stellar ejecta when the

840: density is an order of magnitude lower and half an order of magnitude greater than 

841: the values used in the fiducial runs.

842: 

843: \subsection{High Ambient Density Simulation}

844: \label{ssec-HDFV}

845: 

846: We consider the effects of increasing the ambient density to a value 

847: that is a reasonable average for the inner 5 kpc region of a typical galaxy

848: (e.g., \citealt{vtc88,dfj91}), where 

849: $n_{amb} = 3.33 \times 10^{-3}\,{\rm cm}^{-3}$ (see Table 1; simulation HDFV).

850: Because the stellar wake is in pressure equilibrium with the surrounding

851: medium, increasing the ambient density by 3.33 increases the pressure of the entire

852: system since both the wake and ambient gas temperatures have not changed.

853: 

854: The higher ambient pressure present in this simulation (HDFV) causes the

855: wake to be more narrow than in the fiducial simulation (FDFV).  If we assume that 

856: the wake temperature is constant for both simulations, the size of the

857: wake should be reduced by a factor of $3.33^{-1/3} \approx 0.7$ when the

858: density is increased by a factor of 3.33 over the fiducial density:

859: $n_{wake} \propto h_{wake}^{-3} \propto p_{system},\;{\rm if}\; T = const$.

860: In agreement with this approximate scaling relationship, we find that the width

861: of the wake is reduced by roughly $\sim 60\%$ compared to the FDFV.  The initial contact 

862: discontinuity is also closer to the inner boundary because the relatively 

863: stronger ram pressure of the ambient gas balances that of the stellar ejecta at 

864: a smaller standoff distance $r_0$.  Also, this 

865: leads to a less pronounced bow shock.  A typical set of grid temperature maps

866: comparing this simulation with the fiducial one are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:hdfvfull}.  

867: 

868: While the wake may occupy a smaller volume in the high density simulation, it is

869: equally complex as in the fiducial run (Figure~\ref{fig:hdfvfull}).  

870: There are many large and small mode Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities in the wake, 

871: along with the vortices and shocks that accompany them.  

872: This output time shows two large KH fingers and continuing shocks 

873: from the ambient gas that survived to large distances downstream.  

874: The theoretical KH growth time-scale is $\tau_{KH} \approx 3 - 4 \times 10^3$ yrs. 

875: The flow time $\tau_{flow}$ continues to be two orders of magnitude longer, so

876: we expect the flow to be unstable to the KH instabilities as it clearly the case.  

877: 

878: We would expect the heating of the gas to be relatively significant in

879: this simulation despite the reduced collision cross-section of the

880: flow, because the wake is highly KH unstable.  The internal mixing 

881: and shocking make the wake very complex, more so than in the fiducial simulation.

882: In the downstream direction, the cold stellar mass loss is heated more

883: efficiently than in the fiducial case.  The mass fraction of gas cooler than $10^5$ K

884: falls to three orders of magnitude below $\dot{M}_{star}$ in roughly 

885: half the downstream distance when compared to the fiducial simulation.

886: This is probably due partly to the higher thermal energy content of the

887: ambient medium.

888: 

889: The addition of radiative cooling (simulation HDFVC) has a very strong effect on the flow, 

890: especially on the fraction of cool gas in the downstream region.

891: Although the initial heating occurs more rapidly than in the fiducial case, the increase in the

892: pressure leads to a yet larger increase in the radiative cooling rate.

893: Because the volume cooling rate depends on the square of the density, this simulation should

894: have a cooling rate about ten times higher ($(3.33)^2$) than in the fiducial case.

895: The instantaneous cooling time for a typical region near the wake is 

896: $\tau_{cool} \sim 2 - 5 \times 10^4$ years, which is about 2 - 6 times less

897: than the fiducial density cooling time, and about half the flow time.

898: 

899: As in the non-radiative case, most of the heating occurs quickly near the 

900: head of the flow.

901: Also, the narrowing of the wake is similar to the fiducial case when radiative

902: cooling was introduced (FDFVC).

903: Proceeding downstream, one finds a striking separation between temperature states

904: of the mass loss (Figure~\ref{fig:mfhdfvc}).  Gas cooler than $1.5 \times 10^6$ K

905: has cooled below $10^5$ K so that it has effectively become cold gas and will not

906: become part of the hot ambient medium.  This cooled gas is about one-quarter of the

907: mass lost from the star, and as this value does not change significantly through

908: the last 10 pc of the wake, it appears to be well-defined.

909: 

910: \subsection{Low Ambient Density Simulation}

911: \label{ssec-LDFV}

912: 

913: In this set of simulations (LDFV and LDFVC), the ambient density is reduced by factor of ten to

914: $n_{amb} = 10^{-4}\,{\rm cm}^{-3}$, which is representative of the outer regions 

915: of an elliptical galaxy. 

916: The lower pressure and momentum flux causes the contact discontinuity standoff 

917: distance to be about a factor of four larger than in the fiducial run.

918: The ram pressure of the ambient flow has been reduced by

919: an order of magnitude, and the bow shock is correspondingly less effective at 

920: heating and transferring momentum to the stellar ejecta.  

921: The RM, KH and RT instabilities do not develop rapidly enough to dredge 

922: up the inner parts of the expanded wake.

923: Consequently, relatively more heating occurs in the wake region.

924: 

925: For the case without radiative cooling (LDFV), the wake continues to be unstable to KH modes,

926: and RT fingers reach far into the ambient medium.  The lower system

927: pressure allows the cold wake material to fill a much larger volume,

928: and it does not appear that there are any KH modes of large enough amplitude to 

929: dredge up the inner wake along the axis.  So despite surface instabilities and

930: occasional gas parcels that break off from the wake, the central part of the 

931: downstream wake is less disturbed.  

932: The absence of instabilities large enough to dredge up the inner wake

933: suggest that they do not have enough time to grow because the 

934: preferred scale for the instability wavelengths and the growth times 

935: have been increased because of the lower density of the simulation.

936: Relative to the fiducial run, a larger fraction (0.11) of the gas cooler than $10^5$ K

937: remains when the wake exits the grid.  Since the mass fraction at this temperature

938: has not reached an asymptotic value, we expect that it would continue to decrease

939: had the grid been larger.

940: 

941: When radiative cooling is added (LDFVC), the cooling times are $\tau_{cool} \sim 0.3 - 3 

942: \times 10^6$ years, depending on the location in the flow.

943: The geometric mean of the cooling time is about 10 times longer than in 

944: the fiducial case and about 10 times longer than the flow time.

945: Consequently, the influence on the dynamics of the flow are not great and the

946: width of the wake is similar in the simulation with and without radiative cooling.

947: Since the relative heating and mixing rate is relatively greater than the 

948: radiative cooling rate, we expected more of the stellar mass loss to be converted

949: into the hot ambient medium.

950: However, the mass flux of the gas cooler than $10^5$ K is reaching an asmyptotic

951: value in the final 5 pc of the flow at 0.2 of the initial mass 

952: loss rate(Figure~\ref{fig:mfldfvc-nc}).

953: In the last half of the flow, the cooling time in the cool wake is less than the flow time.

954: 

955: \section{The Influence of the Star's Velocity}

956: \label{sec-starvel}

957: 

958: Another important parameter that we consider is the velocity of the star

959: relative to the ambient medium.  To study this effect, we consider stellar 

960: velocities that are larger and smaller than the fiducial velocity by 125 km s$^{-1}$.

961: We anticipated that changes in the relative velocity would alter the heating

962: and cooling properties in the sense that the higher velocity simulations would

963: produce hotter shocked gas that has a significantly longer cooling time compared to the fiducial

964: case.  The reverse was expected for the lower velocity case, which also has an 

965: important difference from the other runs in that the stellar velocity is subsonic

966: compared to the sound speed of the ambient material.

967: Compared to our expectations, the simulations led to some surprising results

968: in that the efficiency of gas heating was different than initial expectations.

969: This is because a fraction of the gas is driven into a wake and the heating of

970: the wake occurs through the excitation KH instabilities of preferred wavelengths,

971: which appear to depend on the flow properties.  

972: As the heating rate of the cool wake depends on flow conditions, simulations are

973: the only approach to quantifying the efficiency with which stellar mass loss is

974: converted into hot ambient gas.

975: We simulate the different stellar space velocities by choosing different ambient 

976: gas velocities.  We continue to use the fiducial values of

977: the ambient density and temperature, as well as same stellar mass loss rate.

978: 

979: \subsection{High Stellar Velocity Simulation}

980: \label{ssec-FDHV}

981: 

982: In this simulation (FDHV), the Mach number is $M \approx 1.8$, compared to the value 

983: in the fiducial run of 1.3.  This leads to a higher ram pressure, a smaller 

984: standoff distance for the contact discontinuity, and a much more oblique bow shock 

985: that is closer to the contact discontinuity.

986: 

987: In the non-radiative simulation (FDHV), the KH modes begin to grow into filaments but they

988: become disrupted by the faster shocked ambient materia, so the filaments

989: do not grow as large as in the fiducial run.

990: The wake occupies roughly the same cross-section as in the fiducial case and it 

991: also contains instabilities, vortices, and internal shocks, but the faster flow 

992: prevents the growth of the large finger structures seen in the previous adiabatic 

993: wakes.  

994: The flow is unstable to Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities, but few structures

995: develop due to the more rapid disruption of the KH filaments.

996: In turn, this prevents large-scale mixing of the inner wake by these 

997: modes.  Most of the mixing occurs through relatively smaller modes.  

998: Another difference in the wake flow near the head is that a secondary shock typically forms

999: roughly four parsecs downstream (Figure~\ref{fig:hvcoolcomp}).

1000: Due to the difference in the excitation of KH modes, one would expect 

1001: a reduction in the cumulative heating rate of this non-cooling fast flow 

1002: simulation relative to the fiducial case.  That expectation is verified by

1003: the simulation, but the heating rate is still sufficient to reduced the 

1004: mass flux of gas cooler than 10$^5$ K by two orders of magnitude at the point

1005: where it exits the grid.

1006: 

1007: The inclusion of radiative cooling (run FDHVC) makes several dramatic differences in the

1008: results, especially in the unstable modes that are excited.  

1009: Instabilities produce cool fingers near the head of the wake, which are 

1010: excited and grow more rapidly than in the non-cooling case (Figure~\ref{fig:hvrtc}).

1011: Further downstream, the wake is also more unstable and larger modes develop

1012: before interacting with the fast surrounding flow (Figure~\ref{fig:hvcoolcomp}).

1013: This change appears to be related to the width of the wake, which is narrower due 

1014: to the loss of thermal energy through radiative losses.  In a more slender wake, the 

1015: size of the most rapidly growing modes has changed, where larger and cooler fingers 

1016: develop.

1017: 

1018: As with the other flows that include radiative cooling, most of the heating occurs 

1019: near the head of the flow.  This heating is hastened by the more easily excited 

1020: instabilities, which undergo mixing and shocks.  The greater relative flow velocity

1021: of the star leads to slightly more heating within the first few parsecs of the star

1022: (relative to the fiducial run), but further down the wake, the higher velocity 

1023: leads to a larger conversion of cold gas to hot gas (Figure~\ref{fig:mffdhv-fvc}).  

1024: As the gas exits the grid, the remaining fraction of gas below 10$^5$ K is 

1025: 0.057 and the value is still decreasing.

1026: The higher velocities produce higher temperature gas that cools more slowly, relative

1027: to the fiducial case.

1028: The effect of a higher stellar velocity is a more efficient conversion of the 

1029: stellar mass lost into the hot ambient medium by at least a factor of three.

1030: 

1031: \subsection{Low Stellar Velocity Simulation}

1032: \label{ssec-FDLV}

1033: 

1034: In this simulation (FDLV), the lower stellar velocity of $v_{amb} = 225$ km s$^{-1}$ results 

1035: in a subsonic ambient flow with Mach number $M \approx 0.87$ (we will term this 

1036: simulation the  subsonic case, although the ambient gas is still supersonic 

1037: with respect to the stellar ejecta). 

1038: The subsonic stellar velocity leads to the absence of a bow shock, which was present

1039: in all other simulations (Figure~\ref{fig:lvfdcompfull}).

1040: If the mass-losing star were replaced with a solid body, laminar flow around the object

1041: would be described by potential flow without any shocks.  However, the interaction

1042: between the mass loss from the star and the flow around it is not steady in time as

1043: the two regions interact to produce a wake and create KH instabilities.

1044: These differences relative to the flow around a solid body lead to the development of 

1045: weak shocks in a flow where the Mach number is close to unity.

1046: 

1047: In simulations with or without radiative cooling (FDLVC and FDLV), 

1048: weak shocks develop nearly 10 pc upstream.  

1049: Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities grow rapidly, being especially prominent in the 

1050: several parsec downstream region (Figure~\ref{fig:lvcoolcomp}).

1051: In the non-cooling case, this leads to efficient heating so that when the wake

1052: exits the simulation, the gas cooler than 10$^5$ K is about 0.005 of the initial

1053: mass flux (Figure~\ref{fig:mffdlvc-nc}).

1054: When radiative cooling is introduced (FDLVC), there is more active development of KH

1055: instabilities that peel off near the head of the flow and in the 10 pc region

1056: downstream in the wake (Figure~\ref{fig:lvcoolcomp}).  Another difference,

1057: also common with other radiative simulations, is that the cool wake is 

1058: thinner as cool material is more easily compressed.  This modifies the axial

1059: ratio of the wake, and evidently, the dominant KH growth modes.

1060: 

1061: An expectation of this lower velocity flow was that the heating would be less

1062: effective than in the fiducial run, so more gas would remain cool when radiatives

1063: losses were included (run FDLVC).  However, calculations fail to support this expectation and

1064: the amount of cooled gas is not greater than in the fiducial run and may be slightly

1065: less.  In the last 10 pc before the gas leaves the grid, the mass flux of cooled gas

1066: has reached asyptotic values at 0.14 of the initial mass flux for gas cooler than

1067: either 10$^5$ K or $7.5 \times 10^5$ K.  Even including gas cooler than 

1068: $1.5 \times 10^6$ K does not raise the fraction above 0.2 of the initial mass flux.

1069: This decrease in the cool mass flux, relative to the fiducial run, is most likely

1070: due to the more effective mixing and small-scale shocks that occur in this subsonic

1071: simulation.

1072: 

1073: \section{Discussion and Conclusions}

1074: 

1075: We have, for the first time, calculated in detail the interaction between 

1076: stellar mass loss and the hot interstellar medium in elliptical galaxies using

1077: accurate two-dimensional numerical hydrodynamics simulations.  The

1078: ultimate fate of the stellar ejecta has significant implications for the 

1079: standard theory of the interstellar medium in elliptical galaxies, because this

1080: mass loss is the primary origin of the $\sim 1$ keV X-ray gas in these galaxies.

1081: We examined whether the optically thin radiative cooling of the gas

1082: will prevent some stellar ejecta from being shock heated to the local

1083: velocity dispersion temperature and entering the ambient flow.

1084: Simple calculations suggest that the fraction of stellar mass loss 

1085: that remains cool might depend strongly 

1086: the density of the surrounding and the velocity of the star relative to 

1087: the hot ambient interstellar medium (Table 2).

1088: For the simulations of this process, we calculated a reference (fiducial) case against

1089: which changes in density and stellar velocity were compared.  

1090: Different ambient densities are naturally encountered in early-type galaxies,

1091: where the density is considerably larger in the inner part compared to the

1092: outer region.  Variations in the stellar velocity occur in the orbit of every star.

1093: For each set of initial conditions, two simulations were calculated, 

1094: one with and one without radiative losses.

1095: The gas exiting the grid may have a mean temperature larger or smaller than the 

1096: initial ambient temperature.  It will have either greater or less entropy than

1097: the surroundings, and in pressure equilibrium with its surroundings, will be 

1098: positively bouyant and rise outward in the galaxy, or flow inward.

1099: We will not consider this complication here, as it occurs on a timescale longer

1100: than the flow time of the calculations.

1101: 

1102: For the runs where the stellar velocity was supersonic, it had a Mach number

1103: of $M = 1.3 - 1.8$, and this led to a bow shock in the ambient medium at about 

1104: the theoretically expected standoff distance, $\sim 1$ pc upstream.

1105: Whereas the stellar mass loss is also shocked, this is not the event that

1106: is the primary heating mechanism for the cool gas, although most of the heating 

1107: occurs in the region near the star, within $\sim 3$ pc downstream.

1108: The initial interaction of the streaming ambient ISM with the stellar ejecta 

1109: imparts momentum to the ejecta that begins to drive it downstream.

1110: The flow past the cold ejecta is Kelvin-Helmholtz unstable, and fingers

1111: of material are drawn out perpendicular to the intial flow axis.  

1112: This greatly increases the cross section of the stellar ejecta, leading

1113: to heating by shocks that are driven into the cooler material by the rapidly flowing ambient

1114: medium.  The other important mechanism is the mixing between the fast-flowing

1115: hot gas and the stellar ejecta, which occurs through the presence of vortices

1116: and the development of Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities.

1117: These instabilities and the related heating occur further down the wake as well,

1118: and in the absence of radiative cooling, nearly all of the gas has been heated

1119: and will eventually become part of hot ambient medium.  We constructed our

1120: fixed grid so that nearly all of the important processes occur before the 

1121: flow exits the grid (25 pc downstream from the star).  

1122: The timescales proved to be longer for the low-density run

1123: (LDFV, LDFVC), where the cool material is still decreasing as the gas exits the grid.

1124: 

1125: When radiative cooling is included, and when the cooling time of the gas is 

1126: small enough to be dynamically important, there is an increase in the

1127: upstream mixing and heating of the ejecta by instabilities, but any material 

1128: that is not promptly heated near the head of the interaction condensed into cold 

1129: blobs or flowed onto the central wake.

1130: There continues to be instabilities between the cold wake and the hotter and

1131: faster flow, which produces a net heating rate.  There is also a radiative

1132: cooling rate associated with the wake and if the evolution of the wake

1133: depends strongly upon whether this is larger or smaller than the heating process.

1134: Also, the heating due to shocks and mixing decreases with downstream distance,

1135: so the two can eventually balance or the cool component in the wake can even

1136: grow if it cools the hotter material as it mixes in.

1137: This appears to be the case in the fiducial run, where $15\%$ of the gas 

1138: is cold ($ < 10^5$ K) when it exits the grid.  However, as the flow approaches

1139: the last 10 pc of the grid, the mass flux fraction below $10^5$ K is rising

1140: as the fraction of gas in the $10^5$ - $1.5 \times 10^6$ K range is falling.

1141: Most of the gas in the $10^5$ - $1.5 \times 10^6$ K range appears to be heated

1142: and join the hot ambient medium, but some fraction grows onto the wake.

1143: We estimate that about $20\%$ of the gas might remain cold if the simulation could

1144: be extended to larger radii.

1145: 

1146: We expected the density of the ambient medium to be crucial in determining

1147: the amount of stellar ejecta that remained cool.  This is because the

1148: wake material tries to approach pressure equilibrium with the hot ambient

1149: flow.  Consequently, a higher ambient density gives rise to an increased density

1150: in the cooler wake, and at a given temperature, the radiative cooling rate 

1151: increases as the square of the density.  However, the higher density simulation shows that

1152: while a high density (pressure) entrains the wake more, it also

1153: magnifies the strength of the Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities as they mix

1154: and shock the inner wake material.  This leads to an increased heating

1155: rate that partly offsets the increased cooling rate.

1156: The simulations show that there is an increase in the amount of stellar ejecta

1157: that remains cool, but that increase is rather modest.  Where the flow exits

1158: the grid, $25\%$ of the initial stellar mass loss is cold ($ < 10^5$K), $5-10\%$

1159: more than in the fiducial run.  Even in the low-density run, there appears

1160: to be some cold material remaining, although those mass flux values have not reached

1161: stable asymptotic limits and appear to be decreasing.  We regard the nominal

1162: mass flux for the cold gas of $19\%$ as an upper limit and not a reliable value.

1163: 

1164: Variation of the stellar velocity naturally changes the temperature of the 

1165: shocked material, where higher stellar velocities produce gas at a higher temperature.

1166: For the higher velocity case, we expected greater heating and shorter growth times

1167: for the KH instability, as the instability is inversely proportional to the relative flow velocity.

1168: These combined effects led to significantly less cool gas remaining in the wake,

1169: where $5.7\%$ of the initial stellar mass loss remained cold ($ < 10^5$K) as it exited

1170: the grid, but this fractional amount is still slowly declining.  

1171: Compared to the fiducial case, faster moving stars have their mass loss more 

1172: efficiently heated to the ambient gas temperature.

1173: 

1174: The opposite expectation, that more gas will remain cool for lower velocity stars,

1175: was not supported by simulations.  The lower stellar velocity, 225 km s$^{-1}$, has a Mach

1176: number slightly below unity, so a bow shock is not produced.  However, the interaction

1177: with the stellar mass loss leads to time-dependent structures that produce shocks in

1178: the stellar mass loss as well as in the ambient hot gas.  For the runs without radiative

1179: cooling, there is more rapid heating of the stellar mass loss through shocks and mixing,

1180: compared to the fiducial case.  For the runs with radiative cooling, most of the heating

1181: occurs even more rapidly within 2 pc of the star, but for distances further downstream,

1182: radiative cooling exceeds heating for the remaining cool gas ($ < 10^5$K).

1183: The final amount of cool gas exiting the grid is similar to, but slightly less than 

1184: the amount in the fiducial run.

1185: 

1186: 

1187: One of the surprises of the simulations is that there are dominant modes in the 

1188: growth of Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities.  The classical calculation has no

1189: preferred wavelength, so the smallest modes grow first, as they have the fastest growth rate.

1190: However, that calculation assumes the the two fluids have an infinite size and 

1191: issues such as radiative cooling are not present.

1192: In these calculations, the wake that is produced has a characteristic size and 

1193: for the radiative flows, there is a characteristic cooling time as well.

1194: \citet{hard97} studied the related situation of radiatively cooling jets and

1195: found the growth of preferred modes arising from Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities \citep{xu2000}.

1196: The preferred growth modes found in our simulations may arise from the same

1197: physical basis and we will analyze this aspect in an upcoming work.

1198: 

1199: There are a number of shortcomings in these simulations and various issues that 

1200: still need to be addressed.  One improvement 

1201: would be to employ a full three-dimensional geometry.  This

1202: will eliminate the numerical problems that accompany an axisymmetric

1203: geometry.  Also, the number of possible instability modes is likely to

1204: increase in three dimensions, which would affect the mixing of the wake 

1205: and the amount of gas that would ultimately remain cool (\citealt{brmfmr98}),

1206: although experience has show that it can be difficult predicting the 

1207: outcome of moving to three-dimensional calculations with any accuracy.

1208: Another improvement would be to extend the grid and better resolve regions of

1209: enhanced activity through subgridding.

1210: 

1211: A third possible improvement is the inclusion of magnetic fields.  

1212: The inner regions of elliptical galaxies have small 

1213: magnetic field strengths of $B \sim 1 \mu{\rm G}$ \citep{mb97}, and the 

1214: standard argument against

1215: considering magnetic fields in simulations such as ours is that the kinetic

1216: energy density of the gas is several orders of magnitudes larger than the

1217: magnetic energy density:  $U_{KE}/U_{B} \sim 10^{3}$.  Most studies of magnetic

1218: fields in elliptical galaxies concern possible dynamo mechanisms to create

1219: the stronger $\sim 50 \mu{\rm G}$ fields seen in galactic halos \citep{lb90,ms96,mb97}.  

1220: However, work by \citet{jones97} on the

1221: role of very weak magnetic fields in the evolution of vortices generated

1222: by Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities indicates that the dissipative influence

1223: of magnetic fields on such instabilities should not be ignored.  

1224: It is clear that the twisting and compression of fields in the stellar wind

1225: can make magnetic fields important.  The general effect

1226: of magnetic fields would be to stabilize the wake against instabilities, 

1227: thereby reducing the degree of heating and mixing.

1228: The strength and topology of magnetic fields will help determine the importance of 

1229: conduction and viscosity.  Given the complicated mixing flows, the downstream

1230: magnetic field is likely to be tangled, which supresses conduction.

1231: 

1232: Another parameter that should be investigated is the metallicity of the 

1233: mass lost from the star.  The metallicity of the gas is important for the

1234: radiative cooling in this temperature range, as most of the cooling is due to

1235: atomic lines.  Higher metallicity leads to shorter cooling times and presumably

1236: a greater fraction of the stellar mass lost remains cool.  This would lead to

1237: lower metallicity gas preferentially being added to the hot medium.

1238: 

1239: Provided that more sophisticated calculations do not change the basic result of

1240: this work, our simulations imply that there would be small amounts of cool gas 

1241: distributed around a galaxy.  There would be a preference for such material to

1242: be more common in regions of higher ambient gas density, which occurs in the inner

1243: parts of the galaxy.  For a given ambient density, the cooled gas would preferentially

1244: originate from stars with elevated metallicities and that are not on the high 

1245: velocity part of the Maxwellian distribution.

1246: One implication is that there would be cool gas available for photoionization

1247: by the UV-rising branch of the spectral energy distribution of early-type galaxies.

1248: Warm ionized gas is frequently detected from early-type galaxies, and in 

1249: many cases, the spatial distribution is similar to that of the stars, consistent

1250: with the predictions from our simulations \citep{caon00}.

1251: Although the distribution of the optical emission line gas is consistent with our

1252: expectations, the velocity structure is often different than expected.

1253: We would predict that the cooled gas should have the same rotational velocity 

1254: axis, yet some fraction of the galaxies show the gas to be counter-rotating

1255: when compared to the stars.  At least in those galaxies, an external origin for 

1256: the gas seems more likely \citep{caon00}.

1257: 

1258: Our calculations follow the wakes during their initial heating and cooling stages, 

1259: but the cooled wakes lack the buoyancy of the hotter gas, so they will eventually

1260: sink inward.  The interaction of the wakes with their surroundings during this

1261: inflow stage is beyond the scope of our calculations.  The material may ultimately

1262: be heated and mixed into the ambient medium, or act as nucleation sites

1263: for further cooling.

1264: Gas and dust are seen in the inner parts of early-type galaxies and this could be

1265: the end result of cooled wake material that has flowed inward \citep{temi07}.

1266: 

1267: A complementary process is that there is a fraction of the hot ambient gas that is

1268: heated above its initial value.  This hotter gas will be buoyant and rise outward in the

1269: galaxy.  This heating of the ambient gas may be one of the sources that leads

1270: to the ambient gas being above the velocity dispersion temperature of the galaxy.

1271: 

1272: There is a bias in that the mass loss from higher velocity stars is more readily 

1273: heated.  As a consequence, the temperature of the hot ambient medium would be

1274: greater than the velocity dispersion temperature, even in the absence of any

1275: supernova heating.  Extrapolating from our results, this would cause the ambient

1276: temperature to lie $\sim 10\%$ above the velocity dispersion temperature.

1277: 

1278: Finally, there are two modes of mass loss that were not considered here:  

1279: planetary nebulae and supernovae.  A planetary nebulae is an event that is more 

1280: discrete in time, so it presents different challenges to numerical modeling.  

1281: We have worked on this issue and it will be presented in a future work.

1282: We have no plans to study numerically the evolution of supernovae in the hot

1283: environment found in an early-type galaxy.

1284: 

1285: \acknowledgements

1286: JRP would like to give special thanks to Philip Hughes and Hal Marshall for their

1287: valuable advice and comments during code development, simulations, and on the

1288: content of my PhD Thesis.  Also, thanks are due to Gus Evrard and Douglas Richstone

1289: for serving on JRP's thesis committee and for providing timely support and advice.

1290: Financial support is gratefully acknowledged and was provided to JRP through

1291: a Department of Energy Computational Science Graduate Fellowship and to JNB through

1292: a Long Term Space Astrophysics Grant from NASA.

1293: 

1294: \begin{thebibliography}{}

1295: 

1296: \bibitem[Athey(2003)]{athey03} Athey, A.E. 2003, Ph.D. Thesis,

1297: University of Michigan.

1298: 

1299: \bibitem[Baranov, Krasnobaev, \& Kulikovskii(1971)]{bkk71}

1300: 	Baranov, V. B., Krasnobaev, K. V., \& Kulikovskii, A. G. 1971,

1301: 	Sov. Phys. Dokl., 15, 791

1302: 

1303: \bibitem[Blondin \& Lufkin(1993)]{blond93} Blondin, J.~M., \& 

1304: Lufkin, E.~A.\ 1993, \apjs, 88, 589 

1305: 

1306: \bibitem[Blondin(1998)]{bpriv98}

1307: 	Blondin, J. M. 1998,

1308: 	private communication

1309: 

1310: \bibitem[Bodo et al.(1998)]{brmfmr98}

1311:         Bodo, G., Rossi, P., Massaglia, S., Ferrari, A., Malagoli, A., \&

1312:         Rosner, R. 1998,

1313:         \aap, 333, 1117

1314: 

1315: \bibitem[Body(1992)]{body92} 

1316: 	Body, K. M. 1992, 

1317: 	Univ. of Michigan Ph.D. thesis

1318: 

1319: \bibitem[Brighenti \& Mathews(2005)]{brig05} Brighenti, F., \& 

1320: Mathews, W.~G.\ 2005, \apj, 630, 864 

1321: 

1322: \bibitem[Brown \& Bregman(1998)]{bb98}

1323: 	Brown, B. A, \& Bregman, J. N. 1998,

1324: 	\apj, 495, L75

1325: 

1326: \bibitem[Canizares, Fabbiano, \& Trinchieri(1987)]{cft87}

1327: 	Canizares, C. R., Fabbiano, G., \& Trinchieri, G. 1987,

1328: 	\apj, 312, 503

1329: 

1330: \bibitem[Caon et al.(2000)]{caon00} Caon, N., Macchetto, D., 

1331: \& Pastoriza, M.\ 2000, \apjs, 127, 39 

1332: 

1333: \bibitem[Colella \& Woodward(1984)]{cole84} Colella, P., \& 

1334: Woodward, P.~R.\ 1984, Journal of Computational Physics, 54, 174 

1335: 

1336: \bibitem[David, Forman, \& Jones(1991)]{dfj91}

1337: 	David, L. P., Forman, W., \& Jones, C. 1991,

1338: 	\apj, 369, 121

1339: 

1340: \bibitem[David et al.(2006)]{david06} David, L.~P., Jones, C., 

1341: Forman, W., Vargas, I.~M., \& Nulsen, P.\ 2006, \apj, 653, 207 

1342: 

1343: \bibitem[Dinge(1997)]{dinge97} 

1344: 	Dinge, D. 1997, 

1345: 	\apj, 479, 792

1346: 

1347: \bibitem[Dyson(1975)]{dyson75}

1348: 	Dyson, J. E. 1975,

1349: 	\apss, 35, 299

1350: 

1351: \bibitem[Frank, Balick, \& Riley(1990)]{fbr90}

1352: 	Frank, A., Balick, B., \& Riley, J. 1990,

1353: 	\aj, 100, 1903

1354: 

1355: \bibitem[Fujita et al.(1996)]{fuji96} Fujita, Y., Fukumoto, 

1356: J., \& Okoshi, K.\ 1996, \apj, 470, 762 

1357: 

1358: \bibitem[Fujita et al.(1997)]{fuji97} Fujita, Y., Fukumoto, 

1359: J., \& Okoshi, K.\ 1997, \apj, 488, 585 

1360: 

1361: \bibitem[Hardee \& Stone(1997)]{hard97} Hardee, P.~E., \& 

1362: Stone, J.~M.\ 1997, \apj, 483, 121 

1363: 

1364: \bibitem[Humphrey \& Buote(2006)]{hump06} Humphrey, P.~J., \& 

1365: Buote, D.~A.\ 2006, \apj, 639, 136 

1366: 

1367: \bibitem[Irwin et al.(2006)]{irwin06} Irwin, J., Sivakoff, 

1368: G.~R., Sarazin, C.~L., Ji, J., Bregman, J.~N., \& Mathews, W.~G.\ 2006, 

1369: American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, 209, \#04.14 

1370: 

1371: \bibitem[Jones et al.(1997)]{jones97}

1372: 	Jones, T. W., Gaalaas, J. B., Ryu, D., \& Frank, A. 1997,

1373: 	\apj, 482, 230

1374: 

1375: \bibitem [Lamb(1945)]{lamb45}

1376: 	Lamb, H., Sir 1945,

1377: 	Hydrodynamics (6th ed., New York: Dover), 373

1378: 

1379: \bibitem[Lesch \& Bender(1990)]{lb90}

1380: 	Lesch, H., \& Bender, R. 1990,

1381: 	\aap, 233, 417

1382: 

1383: \bibitem[Mathews(1990)]{math90}

1384: 	Mathews, W. G. 1990,

1385: 	\apj, 354, 468

1386: 

1387: \bibitem[Mathews \& Brighenti(1997)]{mb97}

1388: 	Mathews, W. G., \& Brighenti, F. 1997,

1389: 	\apj, 488, 595

1390: 

1391: \bibitem[Mathews \& Brighenti(2003)]{math03} Mathews, W.~G., 

1392: \& Brighenti, F.\ 2003, \araa, 41, 191 

1393: 

1394: \bibitem[Matsumoto et al.(1997)]{mkatlm97}

1395: 	Matsumoto, H., Koyama, K., Awaki, H., Tsuru, T., Loewenstein, M.,

1396: 	\& Matsushita, K. 1997,

1397: 	\apj, 482, 133

1398: 

1399: \bibitem[Moss \& Shukurov(1996)]{ms96}

1400: 	Moss, D., \& Shukurov, A. 1996,

1401: 	\mnras, 279, 229

1402: 

1403: \bibitem[Parriott(1998)]{parr98} Parriott, J.R.\ 1998, Ph.D. Thesis,

1404: University of Michigan.

1405: 

1406: \bibitem[Reimers(1975)]{r75}

1407: 	Riemers, D. 1975,

1408: 	in Problems in Stellar Atmospheres and Envelopes, eds. B. Baschek,

1409: 	W. H. Kegel, \& G. Traving (Berlin: Springer Verlag), 229

1410: 

1411: \bibitem[Renzini et al.(1993)]{renz93} Renzini, A., Ciotti, 

1412: L., D'Ercole, A., \& Pellegrini, S.\ 1993, \apj, 419, 52 

1413: 

1414: \bibitem[Sutherland and Dopita(1993)]{sd93} 

1415: 	Sutherland, R. S., \& Dopita, M. A. 1993, 

1416: 	\apjs, 88, 253

1417: 

1418: \bibitem[Temi et al.(2007)]{temi07} Temi, P., Brighenti, F., 

1419: \& Mathews, W.~G.\ 2007, \apj, 660, 1215 

1420: 

1421: \bibitem[Trager et al.(2000)]{trag00a} Trager, S.~C., Faber, 

1422: S.~M., Worthey, G., \& Gonz{\'a}lez, J.~J.\ 2000, \aj, 120, 165 

1423: 

1424: \bibitem[Turatto, Cappellaro, \& Benetti(1994)]{tcb94} 

1425: 	Turatto, M., Cappellaro, E., \& Benetti, S. 1994, 

1426: 	\aj, 108, 202

1427: 

1428: \bibitem[Vedder, Trester, \& Canizares(1988)]{vtc88}

1429: 	Vedder, P. W., Trester, J. J., \& Canizares, C. R. 1988,

1430: 	\apj, 332, 725

1431: 

1432: \bibitem[Wilkin(1996)]{wilkin96}

1433: 	Wilkin, F. P. 1996,

1434: 	\apj, 459, L31

1435: 

1436: \bibitem[Xu et al.(2000)]{xu2000} Xu, J., Hardee, P.~E., \& 

1437: Stone, J.~M.\ 2000, \apj, 543, 161

1438: 

1439: \end{thebibliography}

1440: 

1441: \clearpage

1442: 

1443: \begin{deluxetable}{rcccccc}

1444: \tablecolumns{7}

1445: \tablewidth{0pc}

1446: \tablecaption{Simulation Input Parameters}

1447: \tablehead{

1448:    \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{Ambient Medium} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{Stellar Ejecta} & \colhead{}\\

1449:    \colhead{Model} & \colhead{n} & \colhead{v} & \colhead{T} 

1450:    & \colhead{n} & \colhead{v} & \colhead{T}                   \\

1451:    \colhead{} & \colhead{($10^{-3}$ cm$^{-3}$)} & \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{($10^6$ K)} 

1452:       & \colhead{($10^{-3}$ cm$^{-3}$)} & \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{($10^6$ K)} }

1453: \startdata

1454: FDFV & 1 & 350 & 3 & 1 & 35 & 1 \\

1455: HDFV & 3.33 & 350 & 3 & 1 & 35 & 1 \\

1456: LDFV & 0.1 & 350 & 3 & 1 & 35 & 1 \\

1457: FDHV & 1 & 475 & 3 & 1 & 35 & 1 \\

1458: FDLV & 1 & 225 & 3 & 1 & 35 & 1 \\ 

1459: \enddata

1460: \tablecomments{(F)iducial, (H)igh, (L)ow, (D)ensity, (V)elocity} 

1461: \end{deluxetable}

1462: 

1463: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccc}

1464: \tablecolumns{5}

1465: \tablewidth{0pc}

1466: \tablecaption{Fraction of Cold and Ward Mass Ejecta Remaining}

1467: \tablehead{

1468:    \colhead{} & \colhead{Non-radiative} & \colhead{Non-radiative} & \colhead{Radiative} & \colhead{Radiative} \\

1469:    \colhead{Model} & \colhead{$T \leq 10^5$ K} & \colhead{$T \leq 7.5 \times 10^5$ K}

1470:     & \colhead{$T \leq 10^5$ K} & \colhead{$T \leq 7.5 \times 10^5$ K} \\ }

1471: \startdata

1472: FDFV & $1.4 \times 10^{-3}$ & $0.40$ & $0.15$ & $0.19$ \\

1473: HDFV & $0$ & $0.18$ & $0.25$ & $0.26$ \\

1474: LDFV & $0.11$ & $0.59$ & $0.19$ & $0.58$ \\

1475: FDHV & $1.1 \times 10^{-2}$ & $0.62$ & $5.7 \times 10^{-2}$ & $0.16$ \\

1476: FDLV & $4.6 \times 10^{-3}$ & $0.10$ & $0.14$ & $0.14$ \\

1477: \enddata

1478: \end{deluxetable}

1479: 

1480: \clearpage

1481: 

1482: \begin{figure}

1483: \plotone{f1.ps}

1484: \caption[The 2-D axisymmetric spherical polar grid mesh]%

1485:         {The 2-D axisymmetric spherical polar grid mesh used for every 

1486: 	simulation in this work.  The resolution, determined by the spacing of 

1487: 	the radial and angular cells, is highest near the center and in the 

1488: 	downstream wake region.  For clarity, this figure only shows 

1489: 	the radial and angular cells in 20-cell increments (there are 

1490: 	360 radial cells and 240 angular cells).  The polar axis is horizontal

1491: 	in this figure; further details are given in the text.}

1492: \label{fig:mesh}

1493: \end{figure}

1494: 

1495: \begin{figure}

1496: \plotone{f2.eps}

1497: \caption[Example of stellar wind upstream symmetry axis errors]%

1498:         {Example of upstream extension of gas along symmetry axis, shown

1499: 	with the temperature map.  This small amount of material is

1500: 	found $0.04$ parsecs further upstream than the contact discontinuity 

1501: 	for the stellar wind.}

1502: \label{fig:leakage}

1503: \end{figure}

1504: 

1505: \begin{figure}

1506: \plotone{f3.eps}

1507: \caption[Cartoon of the simulation]%

1508:         {Cartoon of the simulation.  The hot ambient medium flows from left

1509: 	to right across the grid past the fixed star, encounters the cold 

1510: 	stellar ejecta and a bow shock is formed.  Momentum transfer pushes 

1511: 	the ejecta into a wake behind the star that is full of internal shocks 

1512: 	and vortices.  The contact surface between the ejecta and ambient

1513: 	medium is unstable to Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities.  The grid boundary

1514: 	conditions are also shown.}

1515: \label{fig:cartoon}

1516: \end{figure}

1517: 

1518: \begin{figure}

1519: \plotone{f4.eps}

1520: \caption[Temperature map of the fully developed quasi-steady state flow]%

1521:         {Temperature map of the fully developed quasi-steady state flow in 

1522: 	pressure equilibrium with the surrounding medium at a simulation time of

1523: 	$10^6$ years.  This is the fiducial run without cooling, FDFV. The bow shock and unstable 

1524: 	wake are fully formed.  Numerous Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities are 

1525: 	formed along the contact surface of the wake.  The velocity field 

1526: 	is shown by the arrows, with the magnitude set by the reference vector 

1527: 	at the right.}

1528: \label{fig:full}

1529: \end{figure}

1530: 

1531: \begin{figure}

1532: \epsscale{0.75}

1533: \plotone{f5.eps}

1534: \caption[Contour maps of the leading edge collision]%

1535:         {Temperature maps of the leading edge collision between the stellar wind

1536: 	and the ambient flow, with density shown in the top panel, and 

1537: 	temperature in the bottom panel (for the fiducial run FDFV).  The black arrow shows the line where

1538: 	data were extracted to make the plots in Figure~\ref{fig:khheaddat}.

1539: 	The maps show the bow shock and contact discontinuity, as well as a

1540: 	developed KH instability that is peeling off to produce a larger

1541: 	effective area for the ambient medium to shock heat.  The small leakage

1542: 	along the upstream reflecting symmetry axis that is caused by numerical

1543: 	error is also shown.  The white

1544: 	line on the density map marks the location of the bow shock.  The

1545: 	velocity field is shown by the smaller black arrows.}

1546: \label{fig:khdtheadl}

1547: \end{figure}

1548: 

1549: \clearpage

1550: 

1551: \begin{figure}

1552: \epsscale{1.0}

1553: \plotone{f6.eps}

1554: \caption[Temperature contours showing the initial bow shock formation]%

1555:         {The temperature map showing the initial bow shock formation in

1556: 	the $M \approx 1.4$ flow, due to the inflow from the inner boundary (run FDFV).

1557: 	A large eddy formed on the immediate downstream side of the outflow

1558: 	can also be seen.  The velocity field is shown by the arrows, with

1559: 	the magnitude set by the reference vector at the right.}

1560: \label{fig:initbow}

1561: \end{figure}

1562: 

1563: \begin{figure}

1564: \epsscale{0.8}

1565: \plotone{f7.eps}

1566: \caption[Selected profiles of the leading shock zone]%

1567: 	{Selected profiles of the leading shock zone from data taken along the 

1568: 	line designated in Figures~\ref{fig:khdtheadl}, run FDFV.

1569: 	(a) Mass density profile, with the contact discontinuity and bow

1570: 	shock designated.  The abscissa gives the distance in parsecs along

1571: 	the line, beginning at the inner grid boundary.  Region specifications: 

1572: 	i) the undisturbed stellar wind, $r^{-2}$ adiabatic expansion; ii) 

1573: 	post-shock region from the contact discontinuity shock; iii) post-shock 

1574: 	zone from the bow shock; iv) unaffected $M = 1.4$ hot ambient medium.

1575: 	(b) Velocity profiles, with the same specifications as the mass density

1576: 	profile.  The X-direction, Y-direction, and combined velocities are

1577: 	shown.  The extraction line was chosen to cross the contact 

1578: 	discontinuity at a place where the ``ambient'' and wind velocity vectors

1579: 	were aligned (see text),  so ${\rm U}_{{\rm Total}}$ was used for the 

1580: 	velocities in the KH growth time calculations.}

1581: \label{fig:khheaddat}

1582: \end{figure}

1583: 

1584: \begin{figure}

1585: \epsscale{0.75}

1586: \plotone{f8.eps}

1587: \caption[Contour maps of a typical wake region]%

1588:         {Temperature maps of a typical wake region, with density shown in the top 

1589: 	panel, and

1590:         temperature in the bottom panel (run FDFV).  The vertical black arrow shows the line where

1591:         data were extracted to make the plots in Figure~\ref{fig:khwakedat}.

1592: 	The discontinuity interface here is a much wider shear layer, but

1593: 	KH instabilities still grow.

1594:         The maps show a very unstable and complex wake with numerous KH

1595: 	``fingers'' and accompanying vortices being advected along the wake.

1596: 	The velocity field, shown by the smaller black arrows, shows the

1597: 	mixing taking place, as alternating areas of

1598: 	high and low density (pressure) between KH eddys.}

1599: \label{fig:khdtwake}

1600: \end{figure}

1601: 

1602: \begin{figure}

1603: \epsscale{0.75}

1604: \plotone{f9.eps}

1605: \caption[Selected profiles of the leading shock zone]%

1606:         {Selected profiles of the leading shock zone from data taken along the

1607:         line designated in Figure~\ref{fig:khdtwake} (run FDFV).

1608:         (a) Mass density profile, with the wide shear zone designated.

1609:  	The abscissa gives the vertical distance in parsecs, beginning at the 

1610: 	bottom edge of the grid.  Region specifications:  i) more dense and

1611: 	fast wake material, which could be partially numerical in origin;

1612: 	ii) the main wake area filled with instabilities and vortices; iii) the

1613: 	wide mixing shear zone between the wake and hot medium; iv) relatively

1614: 	unaffected ambient material, with the exception of an occasional

1615: 	disruption by large advected KH ``finger.''}

1616: \label{fig:khwakedat}

1617: \end{figure}

1618: 

1619: \begin{figure}

1620: \epsscale{1.0}

1621: \plotone{f10.eps}

1622: \caption[Temperature map of growing KH ``fingers'']%

1623:         {Temperature map of growing KH ``fingers'' that are advected downstream,

1624: 	and continuously shocked and bent by the ambient gas (run FDFV).  The largest modes

1625: 	can reach quite far into the surrounding gas, and even become detached

1626: 	from the wake altogether.}

1627: \label{fig:tkhshocks}

1628: \end{figure}

1629: 

1630: \begin{figure}

1631: \epsscale{0.75}

1632: \plotone{f11.eps}

1633: \caption[Pressure map and profiles for the entire wake]%

1634: 	{Pressure map and profiles for the entire wake, with the horizontal black lines

1635: 	on the map designating the locations where data were extracted

1636: 	to make the profiles in the lower panel (run FDFV).  These profiles were taken

1637: 	at increasing distance away from the symmetry axis 

1638: 	($Y = 0.18,\;1.08,\;3.20$ pc), and show the complex nature of the wake

1639: 	compared to the region dominated by the ambient flow.  The common peaks

1640: 	seem to suggest characteristic ``wavelengths'' for the flow on the

1641: 	order of $\sim 5$ pc.  The dip in the $Y = 0.18$ profile occurs because 

1642: 	it passes through the pure

1643: 	stellar wind region near the inner inflow boundary.}

1644: \label{fig:paltfull}

1645: \end{figure}

1646: 

1647: \begin{figure}

1648: \epsscale{1.0}

1649: \plotone{f12.eps}

1650: \caption[Mass fluxes for the fiducial simulation without cooling]%

1651: 	{Mass fluxes for the fiducial simulation without cooling (run FDFV), as a function

1652: 	of radius.  The difference between the ``All Temps'' line and the

1653: 	$T_{amb} = 3 \times 10^6$ K line represents gas shock heated to above

1654: 	the ambient temperature.  As expected, the value near the inner boundary 

1655: 	equals the 

1656: 	stellar mass loss rate, which is constant for the pure wind region 

1657: 	corresponding to zone (i) in Figure~\ref{fig:khdtheadl}.  All of the

1658: 	profiles for temperature cutoffs at or below $T_{amb}/2$ experience a

1659: 	steadily decreasing mass flux, with the $10^5$ K profile steadily 

1660: 	dropping to a value roughly three orders of magnitude lower than 

1661: 	$\dot{M}_{star}$.  These profiles suggest constant heating of the cold 

1662: 	gas as it flows downstream.}

1663: \label{fig:mffidnc}

1664: \end{figure}

1665: 

1666: \clearpage

1667: 

1668: \begin{figure}

1669: \epsscale{0.75}

1670: \plotone{f13.eps}

1671: \caption[Typical maps for cooling vs non-cooling fiducial runs]%

1672:         {Typical maps for cooling vs non-cooling fiducial runs taken 

1673: 	at a simulation time of $3 \times 10^6$ years.  The simulation without

1674: 	cooling is in the top panel (run FDFV), and the 

1675: 	run with the addition of radiative losses is in the bottom panel (run FDFVC). These 

1676: 	temperature maps, using the same scales, show significant differences

1677: 	in the bow shock, in KH instability behavior, and in the concentration

1678: 	of the wake.}

1679: \label{fig:fidcompfull}

1680: \end{figure}

1681: 

1682: \begin{figure}

1683: \epsscale{0.75}

1684: \plotone{f14.eps}

1685: \caption[Pressure map and profiles for the entire wake]%

1686:         {Pressure map and profiles for the entire wake, with the black lines

1687:         on the map designating the locations where data were extracted

1688:         to make the profiles in the lower panel (run FDFVC).  As for the non-cooling case, these profiles were taken

1689:         at increasing distance away from the symmetry axis

1690:         ($Y = 0.20,\;1.10,\;3.25$ pc), and while the wake is less complex in

1691: 	this case, there are still large KH modes moving downstream that cause 

1692: 	the pressure fluctuations.}

1693: \label{fig:paltfullcool}

1694: \end{figure}

1695: 

1696: \begin{figure}

1697: \epsscale{1.0}

1698: \plotone{f15.eps}

1699: \caption[Rayleigh-Taylor and Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities]%

1700: 	{Rayleigh-Taylor and Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities are both seen

1701: 	forming as this cold blob is dredged up and thrust into the ambient

1702: 	flow (run FDFVC).  The RT occurs because an effective gravitational force is

1703: 	set up in the opposite direction of the flow, and the KH occurs

1704: 	because the ambient flow is slipping past the cold blob.  The bottom

1705: 	panel shows a cartoon of this situation for a single blob.}

1706: \label{fig:rtkh}

1707: \end{figure}

1708: 

1709: \begin{figure}

1710: \epsscale{0.75}

1711: \plotone{f16.eps}

1712: \caption[Closeup maps showing the difference in KH instability growth]%

1713: 	{Closeup maps showing the difference in KH instability growth at a

1714: 	simulation time of $2 \times 10^6$ years (run FDFVC).  The difference in the

1715: 	general stability of the flow near the head of the interaction can be

1716: 	clearly seen in these temperature maps.  Cooling is shown in

1717: 	the bottom panel, with non-cooling in the top panel.  The velocity

1718: 	field is shown by the black arrows.}

1719: \label{fig:fidcompclose}

1720: \end{figure}

1721: 

1722: \begin{figure}

1723: \epsscale{0.75}

1724: \plotone{f17.eps}

1725: \caption[Closeup temperature maps showing the difference in wake entrainment]%

1726:         {Closeup temperature maps showing the difference in wake entrainment at a

1727:         simulation time of $2 \times 10^6$ years.  The wake in the cooling 

1728: 	simulation (bottom panel; run FDFVC) is much more narrow and entrained than

1729: 	in the more unstable non-cooling case (top panel; run FDFV).  The velocity field 

1730: 	is shown by the black arrows.}

1731: \label{fig:fidcompclosewake}

1732: \end{figure}

1733: 

1734: \clearpage

1735: 

1736: \begin{figure}

1737: \epsscale{1.0}

1738: \plotone{f18.eps}

1739: \caption[Mass fluxes for the fiducial simulation with cooling]%

1740:         {Mass fluxes for the fiducial simulation with cooling (run FDFVC), as a function

1741:         of radius.  The data are arranged as in

1742: 	Figure~\ref{fig:mffidnc}.  The cold gas is promptly heated near the head of the flow in

1743: 	the first five parsecs, then remains at this level for the rest

1744: 	of the flow.  The cold gas fraction of the wake grows slightly 

1745: 	between 10 and 20 pc.  These profiles suggest heating of the cold gas by the

1746: 	bow shock and instabilities before it flows downstream.

1747: 	Once the cold gas settles into the more narrow wake, further net

1748: 	heating is effectively supressed by the radiative cooling.}

1749: \label{fig:mffidc}

1750: \end{figure}

1751: 

1752: \begin{figure}

1753: \epsscale{0.75}

1754: \plotone{f19.eps}

1755: \caption[Temperature maps showing the influence of higher ambient density]%

1756:         {Temperature maps showing the influence of higher ambient density, at a

1757:         simulation time of $3 \times 10^6$ years.  The flow in the higher density 

1758:         simulation (bottom panel; run HDFV) occupies a smaller effective cross-section

1759: 	due to a higher ambient pressure,

1760: 	but the wake is as complex as in the fiducial (FDFV) simulation (top panel).}

1761: \label{fig:hdfvfull}

1762: \end{figure}

1763: 

1764: \begin{figure}

1765: \epsscale{1.0}

1766: \plotone{f20.eps}

1767: \caption[Mass fluxes for the high density simulation with cooling]%

1768:         {Mass fluxes for the high density simulation with cooling (run HDFVC), as a

1769:         function of radius.  Most of the

1770:         profiles for temperature cutoffs at or below $T_{amb}/2$ quickly 

1771: 	approach an asymptotic mass flux level roughly five times smaller than

1772: 	the stellar input value.  The bulk of the heating that is 

1773: 	accomplished by the strong bow shock and instabilities near the head

1774: 	of the flow.  Any colder gas that survives from this region 

1775: 	remains cool because of radiative cooling.}

1776: \label{fig:mfhdfvc}

1777: \end{figure}

1778: 

1779: \begin{figure}

1780: \plotone{f21.eps}

1781: \caption[LDFV mass flux with and without cooling]%

1782:         {The mass flux with and without cooling for the low density simulations,

1783:          LDFV and LDFVC.  The long cooling

1784: 	times due to the low ambient density and system pressure lead to 

1785: 	ineffectual cooling, so the curves should be quite similar.  

1786:         However, the gas below 10$^5$ K appears to be approaching

1787:         an steady value of about one-fifth of the initial stellar mass loss rate.}

1788: \label{fig:mfldfvc-nc}

1789: \end{figure}

1790: 

1791: \begin{figure}

1792: \epsscale{0.75}

1793: \plotone{f22.eps}

1794: \caption[Temperature maps showing the influence of cooling on FDHV]%

1795:         {Temperature maps showing the influence of cooling on simulations with

1796:         the fiducial density but high velocity (FDHV and FDHVC), at a

1797:         simulation time of $2 \times 10^6$ years.   The cooled flow (top panel)

1798: 	is more unstable than the adiabatic wake (bottom panel).  Although the

1799: 	cooled wake is more narow as expected, the narrower

1800: 	large instabilities in the cooled case are also able to 

1801: 	survive longer against the fast wind.  This in turns increases mixing.}

1802: \label{fig:hvcoolcomp}

1803: \end{figure}

1804: 

1805: \clearpage

1806: 

1807: \begin{figure}

1808: \epsscale{1.0}

1809: \plotone{f23.eps}

1810: \caption[Cooled Rayleigh-Taylor fingers in the fastwind]%

1811: 	{Cooled Rayleigh-Taylor fingers in the higher flow velocity simulation

1812: 	(FDHVC), at a simulation time of $2 \times 10^6$ years.  

1813: 	Condensed cooled blobs have become extended 

1814: 	and become separated due to the flow of the fast low-density material.  These classical

1815: 	Rayleigh-Taylor fingers and the prompt mixing that accompanies them

1816: 	are very similar to those seen in Figure~\ref{fig:rtkh}.}

1817: \label{fig:hvrtc}

1818: \end{figure}

1819: 

1820: \begin{figure}

1821: \plotone{f24.eps}

1822: \caption[Mass flux for cooled FDHV and FDFV]%

1823: 	{Mass flux for the fiducial and high flow velocity simulations with 

1824: 	radiative cooling (FDHVC and FDFVC).  For gas with a

1825: 	temperature below $3 \times 10^5$ K, the high velocity profiles (solid)

1826: 	lie below the fiducial velocity ones (dotted), suggesting

1827: 	the shock cooling time of the higher velocity case is indeed

1828: 	longer, and so the cooling is less efficient at lower temperatures.  

1829: 	This difference in efficiency does not seem to apply for higher 

1830: 	temperature gas.  Also, the lack of an asymptotic

1831: 	convergence for the colder FDHVC profiles indicates that the accretion

1832: 	of warmer gas onto the narrow central cooled wake is occurring

1833: 	more slowly, indicating less efficient cooling.}

1834: \label{fig:mffdhv-fvc}

1835: \end{figure}

1836: 

1837: \begin{figure}

1838: \epsscale{0.75}

1839: \plotone{f25.eps}

1840: \caption[Temperature maps showing the influence of a low stellar velocity]%

1841:         {Temperature maps showing the influence of a low stellar velocity, at a

1842:         simulation time of $2 \times 10^6$ years (runs FDFV and FDLV).   

1843:         The flow in the FDLV case

1844:         (bottom panel) has similar large mode instability properties as the 

1845: 	fiducial case (top panel; FDFV), but there are fewer small

1846: 	modes to aid in the wake mixing.  The prominent bow shock

1847: 	is absent.}

1848: \label{fig:lvfdcompfull}

1849: \end{figure}

1850: 

1851: \begin{figure}

1852: \epsscale{0.75}

1853: \plotone{f26.eps}

1854: \caption[Temperature maps showing the influence of cooling on FDLV]%

1855:         {Temperature maps showing the influence of cooling on the low velocity

1856:         simulations (FDLVC and FDLV), at a

1857:         simulation time of $2 \times 10^6$ years.   The cooled flow (top panel)

1858:         is more unstable than the adiabatic wake (bottom panel).  The prompt

1859: 	mixing by instabilities near the head of the cooled flow is once again

1860: 	seen in this case.  The cooled wake is more narrow, as expected.}

1861: \label{fig:lvcoolcomp}

1862: \end{figure}

1863: 

1864: \begin{figure}

1865: \epsscale{1.0}

1866: \plotone{f27.eps}

1867: \caption[FDLV mass flux with and without cooling]%

1868:         {The mass fluxes in the low velocity simulations with and without 

1869:         radiative cooling (FDLVC and FDLV).  This is very

1870: 	similar to the fiducial comparison.  The cooled flow appears more

1871: 	unstable, but any stellar ejecta that escapes the heating near the head 

1872: 	of the flow is locked into cold blobs and the narrow

1873: 	wake.  The adiabatic wake is continuously mixed and heated in the

1874: 	wake as it flows downstream.  The small gap between the ambient and all 

1875: 	temperature profiles

1876: 	indicates that a relatively small amount of bow shock heating occurs.}

1877: \label{fig:mffdlvc-nc}

1878: \end{figure}

1879: 

1880: \end{document}

1881: