1: % last modified by JN 28 May 08
2:
3: %% The command below calls the preprint style
4: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
5:
6: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
7:
8: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
9:
10: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
11:
12: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
13:
14: % \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
15:
16: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
17: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
18: %% use the longabstract style option.
19:
20: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
21:
22: \newcommand{\simbad}{{\sc simbad}}
23: \newcommand{\ein}{{\it Einstein}\, }
24: \newcommand{\einobs}{{\it Einstein Observatory}\, }
25: \newcommand{\fuse}{{\it FUSE\, }}
26: \newcommand{\fuseobs}{{\it Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer (FUSE)\, }}
27: \newcommand{\hst}{{\it HST}\ }
28: \newcommand{\hstobs}{{\it Hubble Space Telescope (HST)\,}}
29: \newcommand{\iue}{{\it IUE}\, }
30: \newcommand{\iueobs}{{\it International Ultraviolet Explorer (IUE)\, }}
31: \newcommand{\orfeus}{{\it ORFEUS-SPAS II\, }}
32: \newcommand{\ros}{{\it ROSAT\, }}
33: \newcommand{\cxo}{{\it Chandra X-Ray Observatory}\, }
34: \newcommand{\kms}{km s$^{-1}$}
35: \newcommand{\es}{erg s$^{-1}$}
36: \newcommand{\ecs}{erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$}
37: \newcommand{\lx}{$L_{\rm X}$}
38: \newcommand{\llx}{log $L_{\rm X}$}
39: \newcommand{\lbol}{$L_{\rm bol}$}
40: \newcommand{\lovi}{$L$(O\,{\sc vi})}
41: \newcommand{\ciii}{$L$(977\AA)}
42: \newcommand{\lya}{Ly\,$\alpha$}
43: \newcommand{\msun}{$M_{\odot}$}
44: \newcommand{\teff}{$T_{\rm eff}$\,}
45: \newcommand{\acep}{$\alpha$~Cep}
46: \newcommand{\iuma}{$\iota$~UMa}
47: \newcommand{\dvel}{$\delta$~Vel}
48: \newcommand{\omeaur}{$\omega$~Aur}
49: \newcommand{\teri}{$\tau^3$~Eri}
50: \newcommand{\icen}{$\iota$~Cen}
51: \newcommand{\bleo}{$\beta$~Leo}
52: \newcommand{\dleo}{$\delta$~Leo}
53: \newcommand{\bari}{$\beta$~Ari}
54: \newcommand{\roct}{$\rho$~Oct}
55: \newcommand{\eeri}{$\epsilon$~Eri}
56:
57: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
58: %%\slugcomment{ }
59:
60: %%\usepackage{graphicx}
61:
62: \shorttitle{{\it FUSE} Observations of A Stars}
63: \shortauthors{Neff \& Simon}
64:
65: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
66:
67: \begin{document}
68:
69: \title{\ion{O}{6} Observations of the Onset of Convection Zones
70: in Main-Sequence A Stars
71: \footnotemark}
72:
73: \author{James E. Neff}
74: \affil{Department of Physics \& Astronomy, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC 29424}
75: \email{ neffj@cofc.edu}
76:
77: \and
78:
79: \author{Theodore Simon\altaffilmark{\dag}}
80: \affil{Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822}
81: \altaffiltext{\dag}{Current Address: Eureka Scientific Inc., 1537 Kalaniwai Place, Honolulu HI 96821}
82: %%\email{}
83:
84: \footnotetext[1]{Based on observations made with the NASA-CNES-CSA
85: {\it Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer (FUSE)}, operated
86: for NASA by the Johns Hopkins University under NASA contract
87: NAS5--32985.}
88:
89: \begin{abstract}
90:
91: If magnetic activity in outer stellar atmospheres is due to an interplay
92: between rotation and subsurface convection, as is generally presumed, then
93: one would not expect to observe indicators of activity in stars with $T_{\rm eff}
94: \gtrsim$ 8300~K. Any X-ray or ultraviolet line emission from hotter stars
95: must be due either to a different mechanism or to an unresolved, active,
96: binary companion. Due to their poor spatial resolution, X-ray instruments
97: have been especially susceptible to source confusion. At wavelengths longward
98: of \lya, the near ultraviolet spectra of stars hotter than this putative dividing line are
99: dominated by photospheric continuum. We have used the \fuseobs to obtain
100: spectra of the subcoronal \ion{O}{6} emission lines, which lie at a wavelength
101: where the photospheric continuum of the mid- and early-A
102: stars is relatively weak. We observed 14 stars spanning a range in $T_{\rm eff}$
103: from 7720 to 10,000~K. Eleven of the 14 stars showed \ion{O}{6} emission lines, including
104: 6 of the 8 targets with $T_{\rm eff} > 8300$~K. At face value, this suggests that activity does
105: not fall off with increasing temperature. However, the emission lines are narrower than
106: expected from the projected rotational velocities of these rapidly-rotating stars, suggesting
107: that the emission could come from unresolved late-type companions. Furthermore, the
108: strength of the \ion{O}{6} emission is consistent with that expected from an unseen active
109: K or M dwarf binary companinon, and the high \lx/\lovi\ ratios observed indicate that this
110: must be the case. Our results are therefore consistent with earlier studies that have shown
111: a rapid drop-off in activity at the radiative/convective boundary expected at $T_{\rm eff}
112: \sim 8300$~K, in agreement with conventional stellar structure models.
113:
114: \end{abstract}
115:
116: \keywords{stars: activity --- stars: chromospheres --- stars: late-type --- ultraviolet: stars}
117:
118:
119: \section{INTRODUCTION}
120:
121: The presence of 1--10 million-K coronae and 10--100 thousand-K chromospheres
122: among all late-type stars, including the Sun, is generally accepted to be the direct result
123: of stellar magnetism. Spatially-resolved observations of the solar surface, in fact,
124: show a nearly linear correlation between X-ray brightness and magnetic flux that
125: spans almost 12 orders of magnitude (Pevtsov et al. 2003). It is only in the case
126: of the Sun, of course, that magnetic fields have actually been seen in ultraviolet (UV)
127: and X-ray images of its outer atmosphere. For every other star, magnetic activity can
128: at present only be inferred from spectral proxies, e.g., by the detection of UV emission
129: lines or coronal X rays. It is also widely agreed that the origin of such activity among
130: the dwarf stars of spectral types late-F through M lies deep within their interiors, through
131: a dynamo process in which rotation interacts in an imperfectly understood way with
132: turbulent convection. The process appears to operate most effectively in very young
133: stars, which tend to rotate much more rapidly than the Sun, in very low-mass stars with
134: very deep convection zones, and in short-period binaries where tidal interactions
135: enforce rapid rotation by synchronizing the spin and orbital motions of the stars.
136:
137: Whether magnetic dynamos of a similar nature operate in early-type stars and are
138: able to power a hot chromosphere and corona in those objects remains an open
139: question. The two most popular mechanisms for heating the outer layers of low-mass
140: stars like the Sun---the dissipation of acoustic or magnetoacoustic waves, and microflaring
141: of dynamo-generated turbulent magnetic fields---both require well-developed subsurface
142: convection zones, which high-mass stars are thought to lack. According to stellar structure
143: models, main-sequence A stars have vigorous convective cores, but the outer envelopes
144: of those stars remain entirely radiative except for thin convective layers in the hydrogen
145: and helium ionization zones at the base of the photosphere (Christensen-Dalsgaard 2000;
146: Browning et al. 2004; Brun et al. 2005). The computational and theoretical challenge,
147: then, is to show that magnetic fields generated by dynamo action within the convective
148: core can rise to the surface on a time scale that is short compared with the main-sequence
149: lifetime of such a star (MacGregor \& Cassinelli 2003; see, however, MacDonald \&
150: Mullan 2004) and that such a process indeed leads to the formation of a hot chromosphere
151: and corona.
152:
153: The possibility of dynamo activity in intermediate-mass and high-mass stars has been
154: addressed by a variety of observations in recent years. Observations by the \iueobs and
155: the \hstobs\,at near-UV wavelengths have detected high-temperature chromospheric
156: emission lines as far up the main sequence as $\bv = 0.16$, among the middle-A stars
157: (Simon \& Landsman 1997). Farther up the main sequence, weak emission in the
158: near-UV lines becomes much more difficult to detect against an increasingly bright
159: stellar continuum. To extend the search to higher masses it is necessary to
160: look to shorter wavelengths where the photosphere of an A star normally appears much
161: darker. Spectra at UV wavelengths shortward of \lya\ have been obtained for a handful
162: of middle- and early-A stars by the \fuseobs spacecraft (Simon et al. 2002). The
163: observations suggest a possible sharp cut-off in chromospheric emission and convection
164: zones close to $\bv = 0.12$, near an effective temperature of $T_{\rm eff}\sim8300$~K.
165: Although based on a small sample of stars,
166: such a finding is entirely consistent with the predictions of theoretical models for the location
167: of the radiative/convective boundary line in main-sequence stars (Ulmschneider et al. 1996;
168: Christensen-Dalsgaard 2000; Kupka \& Montgomery 2002).
169:
170: There are two significant weaknesses of the conventional stellar envelope models that are worth
171: mentioning here. First, the models generally assume that the transfer of energy by convection
172: in stars with shallow convection zones can be described by standard mixing-length theory;
173: and second, although the chemically normal A-type stars may rotate very rapidly (in some
174: cases close to their critical velocity), the models ignore the potential side-effects of axial
175: rotation. In particular, recent interferometric observations of two rapidly rotating, spin-flattened
176: stars, Altair and \acep, provide evidence for a difference of almost 2000~K between the surface
177: temperatures at equatorial latitudes and those at the poles (van Belle et al. 2001, 2006;
178: Peterson et al. 2006). Consequently, the outer envelope of a rapidly rotating star may become
179: substantially convective in its cooler equatorial regions while its hotter polar regions remain
180: completely radiative. Recent theoretical models by MacGregor et al. (2007) show the same
181: sorts of structural effects from rapid rotation, forming a deeper convective envelope with
182: increasing rotation. Thus, the notion of a distinct spectral-type or mass-based ``dividing-line''
183: between the main-sequence stars that have radiative envelopes and those that have convective
184: envelopes may apply (in a statistical sense) only to the stars that rotate below a certain
185: angular-velocity threshold.
186:
187: A small minority of normal A stars in the field and in nearby open clusters have also been
188: identified as coronal soft X-ray sources. Cluster A stars have been detected by \ros in deep
189: surveys
190: of the Pleiades (Stauffer et al. 1994), the Alpha Persei cluster (Prosser et al. 1996), and the
191: Hyades (Stern et al. 1995), in a few instances at luminosities as high as \lx\ $\approx 10^{30}$
192: \es. By comparison, the coronae of most (single) late-type stars in the neighborhood of the Sun,
193: including the Sun itself, radiate much less than $\sim10^{29.3}$ \es\ in soft X rays (Maggio
194: et al. 1987; Schmitt et al. 1995; H\"{u}nsch et al. 1998). Because the majority of cluster A
195: stars are undetected in X rays, the emission of the detected
196: stars could originate not from the A stars themselves, but from hidden late-type binary companions
197: or from unrelated neighboring stars that happen to fall within the X-ray beam. Long pointed
198: observations with \ein and short scans made during the \ros All Sky Survey (RASS) of
199: ostensibly single A stars or late-B stars in the field have also yielded a number of strong
200: detections (Schmitt et al. 1985; Simon et al. 1995; Bergh\"{o}fer et al. 1996, 1997; H\"{u}nsch
201: et al. 1998). Follow-up observations obtained at higher spatial resolution using the HRI
202: camera on \ros (Bergh\"{o}fer \& Schmitt 1994) or the ACIS camera on {\it Chandra} (Stelzer
203: et al. 2003) have confirmed the A or B star is coincident with the X-ray source in some cases,
204: but in other cases have shown that the X~rays come from a nearby star while the A or B star
205: appears totally dark in X rays. We note, of course, that even when the positions of the X-ray
206: source and the A or B star closely agree, the identity of the source may not be determined
207: with complete assurance, since it is normally difficult (if not impossible) to prove from an X-ray
208: image alone that the emission is intrinsic to the A or B star and not from an unknown or
209: unresolved (possibly spectroscopic) binary companion.
210:
211:
212: As one of the central predictions of the stellar structure models, the location along the main
213: sequence where convective envelopes give way to radiative envelopes offers an important
214: observational test of the physical models of main-sequence stars. At present, the two most
215: commonly-used proxies for convection in stars
216: %, chromospheric emission lines at UV wavelengths and coronal X-ray emission,
217: give conflicting results for the location of that transformation, which need to be reconciled:
218: the far-UV observations of chromospheric activity place the transition among the middle-A
219: stars, whereas the X-ray observations of coronal emission place it distinctly farther up the
220: main sequence, among the very early-A or late-B stars. It is essential to determine whether
221: the radiative/convective boundary has been correctly identified by the UV observations or
222: by the X-ray observations. However, observations of the chromospheric lines, which require
223: spectra from {\it FUSE}, have thus far been limited to a very small sample of A stars. The
224: present study was therefore undertaken to extend the previous \fuse survey, and it doubles
225: the size of the sample over the critical range in \bv\ color and effective temperature where
226: convection, and hence both chromospheric and coronal emission, are expected to vanish.
227: Our main observational goal was to measure accurate fluxes for the high-temperature
228: subcoronal emission lines or to set stringent upper limits on the strengths of those lines.
229:
230:
231:
232: \section{OBSERVATIONS AND EMISSION LINE PROFILE MEASUREMENTS}
233:
234: \subsection{Target Selection}
235:
236: Our sample is comprised of 14 main-sequence A stars. All of the stars have \bv\
237: colors in the range from 0.23 to 0.01 and optical spectra that are indicative of normal
238: chemical abundances. A list of the stars observed with \fuse can be found in
239: Table~\ref{tabparam}. A journal of the \fuse observations is provided in Table~\ref{tabobs}.
240: Seven stars from this sample were
241: observed in the cycle 1 Guest Observer (G.O.) program of Simon et al. (2002).
242: Those data, denoted in Table~\ref{tabobs} by the prefix
243: A041, have been reprocessed here with updated calibration software (CalFUSE 3.1.3).
244: The spectrum of $\delta$~Vel was obtained from the cycle 5 G.O.
245: program of Cheng and Neff (Program ID E075). The remaining six stars were observed
246: by us in cycle 3 (Program ID C038) and are reported here for the first time.
247: Following the failure of a reaction
248: wheel on {\it FUSE}, which limited the declination range that could be accessed by the
249: spacecraft, we observed two additional A-type stars, $\sigma$ Ara and $\upsilon$ Lup,
250: which were chosen to replace stars on our original target list. However, the bolometric
251: luminosities of both replacement targets were subsequently determined to be much higher
252: than those of the other 14 stars in our sample, and consequently they are omitted
253: from the discussion that follows.
254:
255: We summarize the relevant parameters of all 14 \fuse targets in Table~\ref{tabparam}.
256: The spectral types, photometry, and parallaxes were extracted from the \simbad\ database. The
257: projected rotational velocities are from the published literature, in most cases from the
258: papers of Abt \& Morrell (1995) and Royer et al. (2002a,b). The rotational velocity of $\alpha$~Cep
259: is from the interferometry analysis of van Belle et al. (2006), which yields a larger value
260: than those given by Abt \& Morrell (1995) and Royer et al. (2002b), who employed a more
261: conventional approach. The effective temperatures cited for each star were derived from
262: four-color photometry using the ``uvbybeta'' procedure from the IDL Astronomy User's
263: Library (Landsman 1993),\footnote{http://idlastro.gsfc.nasa.gov/} which follows the precepts
264: of Moon \& Dworetsky (1985). Our \teff\ estimates are generally within a few hundred
265: kelvins of the values that were derived independently by Allende Prieto \& Lambert
266: (1999) from stellar evolutionary calculations and those that were obtained by Sokolov
267: (1995) from the slope of the Balmer continuum between 3200~\AA\ and 3600~\AA.
268: The dispersion in temperature for individual stars is comparable to the random scatter
269: of approximately $\pm250$~K found by Smalley et al. (2002) in the \teff values that
270: were determined for a select group of A stars by a variety of techniques, including the
271: Infra-Red Flux Method (IRFM), four-color photometry, Balmer spectral line profile fitting,
272: and fundamental measurements.
273:
274: The X-ray luminosities listed in Table~\ref{tabparam} are from the
275: \einobs measurements of Schmitt et al. (1985), the RASS catalog of H\"{u}nsch et al.
276: (1998), and the analysis of a number of pointed observations obtained from the \ros
277: archives by Simon et al. (2002). The \lx\ value for HD\,129791
278: is based on our reductions and XSPEC\footnote{The XSPEC
279: spectral analysis software is available from the High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive
280: Research Center (HEASARC) of the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center at
281: http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/xanadu/xanadu.html} modeling of a 6.3 ks {\it Chandra}
282: observation of that star, which we obtained from the public archives (ObsID 627; J. L.
283: Linsky, Principal Investigator). HD\,129791 is a wide visual binary (CCDM\,14460--4452)
284: with a separation of 35\arcsec\ that is easily resolved by the ACIS camera on-board
285: {\it Chandra}. Both the early-type primary star and its much fainter distant companion
286: (CD-44\arcdeg9590B) were detected in X-rays (the secondary at $L_{\rm X} = 10^{29.54}$
287: \es). The other stars were X-ray selected with an
288: a priori bias toward high activity levels so as to favor the detection of high-temperature
289: emission lines. They were designated as X-ray sources by H\"unsch et al. (1998), who
290: list all of the main-sequence and subgiant stars from the Yale Bright Star Catalog that
291: can be identified with likely X-ray counterparts in the RASS survey. The angular offset
292: between the optical and X-ray positions for each A star is $\lesssim$10\arcsec, which
293: corresponds to less than one-third the instrumental width of the PSPC camera aboard
294: {\it ROSAT}. Thus, the association of the X-ray source with the A star instead of a
295: widely separated companion or a physically unrelated neighbor is very likely, but
296: by no means definitive, as cautionary experience with {\it Chandra} imaging of several
297: \ros detected late-B stars has already shown (Stelzer et al. 2003). The RASS X-ray
298: luminosities, along with the {\it Chandra} luminosity we
299: determined for HD\,129791, \lx~$\gtrsim1\times 10^{30}$ \es, make all of our \fuse
300: target stars much more active in X rays than the Sun (median \lx = 10$^{27.3}$ \es;
301: Judge et al. 2003) and, indeed, more active than every star in the young Hyades
302: cluster but three (Stern et al. 1995).
303:
304: We used \simbad\ as well as the Palomar Sky Survey (POSS) and 2MASS images
305: (Skrutskie et al. 2006) to investigate the binary status of each star in
306: Table~\ref{tabparam}. Our working
307: assumption is that the UV emission of a bright A star should dominate the light in a
308: \fuse spectrum and be less subject to the effects of source confusion from a faint binary
309: companion than is the detection of X-ray emission from an X-ray image. The extent to
310: which that critical assumption is borne out by the \fuse observations is discussed below.
311: Two stars in Table~\ref{tabparam}, HD\,127971 and \bleo, are wide visual binaries, having a faint
312: optical companion that is separated by a large enough distance (35\arcsec\ and 40\arcsec,
313: respectively) to ensure that the secondary falls outside the \fuse science aperture (LWRS:
314: $30\arcsec \times 30\arcsec$). The primaries are thus effectively single.
315: Three other stars in our sample,
316: \omeaur, \dvel, and \iuma, are noted as close visual binaries in the \simbad\ database.
317: In each case, the binary separation is small enough (5\farcs4, 2\farcs6, and 4\farcs5,
318: respectively) and the secondary star is bright enough ($m_v = 8.1, 5.1, \mbox{and } 9.5$
319: mags, respectively) that the companion, if it is active, must be considered a possible
320: source of the observed UV and X-ray emission.
321: Finally, two stars in our sample are noted as spectroscopic binaries in \simbad.
322: \bari\ is a double-lined spectroscopic binary in an eccentric orbit with a 107 day period
323: (Tomkin \& Tran 1987). The spectral type and mass of the secondary component are
324: estimated by Tomkin \& Tran and also by Pan et al. (1990) to be late F or early G and
325: $\sim1.2$~\msun, respectively. The difference in brightness between the primary and
326: secondary is a factor of 15 or more. The other spectroscopic binary in our sample is \iuma.
327: The visual secondary, a tight pair of 10th magnitude dM stars (the B and C components of
328: the optical triple) is the spectroscopic binary in this hierarchical system.
329:
330: \subsection{The \fuse Pointings}
331:
332: The \fuse spacecraft and its instrumentation are described by Moos et al. (2000) and
333: Sahnow et al. (2000). The individual \fuse observations listed in Table~\ref{tabobs} were all
334: acquired in the normal time-tag mode through the LWRS large science aperture. The
335: raw datasets were processed with version 3.1.3 of the CalFUSE calibration software
336: (Dixon et al. 2007), which included screening the photon lists and adjusting the calibrated
337: spectra to compensate for a variety of instrumental signatures (e.g., to exclude the times of
338: burst events). Two integration times are listed for each star, the first for the full exposure,
339: the second for the nighttime portion of the \fuse orbit, which normally experiences a lower
340: level of contamination from terrestrial airglow (Feldman et al. 2001). For each of the four
341: detector segments (LiF\,1A, LiF\,2B, SiC\,1A, and SiC\,2B), we used CalFUSE to extract
342: spectra from the ``good time intervals'' of the individual subexposures.
343: %REVISION:
344: Before co-adding, we compared the subexposures to ensure that there were no ``drop-outs''
345: due to light loss out of the aperture. We also searched for evidence of substantial variation
346: from one subexposure to the next. Finally, we constructed light curves from the time-tagged
347: data to search for flare-like variations of the \ion{O}{6} emission. We found no evidence
348: for flaring in any of the exposures.
349: %
350: The resulting spectra were aligned in wavelength, co-added, and, being highly oversampled in
351: wavelength, rebinned by 3 pixels to a resolution of $\Delta\lambda =0.039$ \AA\ as
352: an aid in measuring the strengths of various emission lines. A coarser binning by 9
353: pixels was also applied to the co-added data in order to construct a broad UV spectral
354: energy distribution (SED) for each star.
355:
356: Figure~\ref{figsed} presents composite spectra for the 14 stars in our full \fuse sample, arranged
357: in order of increasing \teff as determined from the four-color photometry. Shown here
358: are the LiF\,1A and LiF\,2A detector segments, which have been stitched together to display
359: wavelengths from the \ion{O}{6} $\lambda\lambda$ 1032, 1038 doublet to the \ion{C}{3}
360: multiplet at 1176 \AA, except for a small gap in spectral coverage at 1080--1090 \AA.\
361: Apart from \acep, the short pointings for the remaining
362: stars are underexposed in the low-sensitivity SiC channels shortward of the \ion{O}{6}
363: lines, so we have truncated the plots to exclude those wavelengths.
364: The changes in SED from one star to the next are
365: consistent with the ordering in \teff\ established by the optical photometry, despite some
366: discrepancies with the \simbad\ spectral types (notably for HD\,43940, which appears
367: to have too early a spectral type, and HD\,11636, or \bari, which may be assigned
368: a spectral type too late for its effective temperature).
369:
370: The ``cleanest'' high-temperature lines in the \fuse spectra of chromospherically active
371: late-type stars are normally \ion{C}{3} $\lambda$977, \ion{O}{6} $\lambda$1032, and
372: the \ion{C}{3} $\lambda$1176 multiplet. \ion{O}{6} $\lambda$1038, the weaker component
373: of the \ion{O}{6} doublet, can be blended with both a terrestrial airglow feature and the
374: redward component of the stellar \ion{C}{2} $\lambda\lambda$1036, 1037 doublet, as
375: can be seen from inspection of the very high quality spectrum of Capella published by
376: Young et al. (2001). Analysis of a moderately high quality spectrum of the A7 V star
377: Altair (Redfield et al. 2002) suggests similar line blending issues for that star as well.
378: %REVISION:
379: It is quite obvious from Fig.~\ref{figsed} that for most stars the emission in \ion{C}{3}
380: $\lambda$1176 is bound to be overwhelmed by bright photospheric continuum. The
381: photospheric continuum is substantially lower at the \ion{O}{6} lines, and the wings of
382: the \ion{H}{1} Lyman $\beta$ line further enhance the contrast between the emission
383: lines and the continuum, particularly for the highest temperature targets in our program.
384: The usefulness of the short wavelength spectra for the great majority of A-star targets in
385: the present study is compromised by low SNR at the \ion{C}{3} 977 \AA\ line.
386: %
387: Therefore, in the following we focus attention on the \ion{O}{6} features, considering
388: principally the stronger $\lambda$1032 component of the atomic doublet. In solar-type stars,
389: these prominent emission features are thought to form in the transition region at a temperature
390: of $\sim$300,000 K.
391: %
392:
393: \subsection{Measurements of the \ion{O}{6} $\lambda\lambda$1032, 1038 Lines}
394:
395: The integrated \ion{O}{6} line fluxes and their associated 90\% confidence level errors,
396: or the appropriate flux upper limits, were measured for each star by modeling the
397: emission line profile with a single gaussian component and by fitting both linear and
398: quadratic terms to the underlying continuum. The best fit was determined by $\chi^2$
399: minimization. The complete fitting routine was implemented by means of customized
400: software, which was written in the Interactive Data Language (IDL), as described by
401: Neff et al. (1989). Strong emission lines in the \hst spectra and \fuse spectra of late-type
402: stars often show signs of a broad pedestal feature requiring a second gaussian
403: component for a proper fit to the observed line profile (Wood et al. 1997; Ake et al.
404: 2000; Redfield et al. 2002). However, a double gaussian fit demands a much stronger
405: line and a much higher signal-to-noise ratio than was achieved for any of the A stars
406: except \acep, whose spectra (as we are about to show) show no evidence for extended
407: line wings.
408:
409: The results of our measurements are presented in Table~\ref{tabfits}, which
410: lists the integrated line fluxes for both components of the \ion{O}{6} doublet and
411: the \ion{C}{3} line, the luminosity of the
412: $\lambda$1032 line, the normalized ratio of the line luminosity to the bolometric
413: luminosity of the star, and the ratio of the measured HWHM (the half-width at
414: half-maximum brightness) to $v \sin i$.
415: Detailed spectra of the \ion{O}{6} lines are shown in Figure~\ref{figo6}.
416: %REVISION:
417: In all but one case, the integrated fluxes were extracted from the LiF\,1A segment, since
418: the Fine Error Sensor camera in the LiF1 channel (FES-A) was the primary camera that was
419: most often used for guiding on-orbit prior to July 2005. Observations made after that date,
420: however, used the alternative FES-B camera in the LiF2 focal plane assembly to maintain
421: tracking within the science aperture. Consequently, the fluxes of \dvel\ were measured
422: instead from the LiF\,2B segment.
423: %
424: No corrections have been made to the tabulated line fluxes for interstellar extinction, nor
425: should they be needed for such nearby stars.
426:
427: The stronger $\lambda$1032 component of the doublet is clearly detected in 11 of the 14 stars,
428: which range in \teff from 7700 K to as much as 10,000 K. The weaker $\lambda$1038
429: component can be measured with confidence in 10 stars. It is expected to be intrinsically
430: half as strong as the short wavelength component of the \ion{O}{6} pair, yet is typically
431: somewhat stronger than that, in part because it is difficult to make an accurate measurement
432: of weak emission features in such lightly exposed spectra as ours, but also
433: because of possible contamination from the nearby \ion{C}{2} multiplet. The
434: observed line ratio is particularly discrepant for HD\,159312, for which the red component
435: of the doublet is clearly the brighter feature, not only in the LiF\,1A segment but also in
436: the LiF\,2B segment.
437: %REVISION:
438: The emission is distinctly blueshifted with respect to the nominal wavelength of \ion{O}{6}
439: $\lambda$1038 and likely is due to $\lambda$1037 line of \ion{C}{2}. The asymmetric profile
440: of the $\lambda$1038 line of \acep\ (see Fig.~\ref{figo6}) shows unmistakable evidence
441: for extra emission from \ion{C}{2} in that star.
442: %Both $\lambda$1036.34 and $\lambda$1037.02 lines of \ion{C}{2} appear
443: The $\lambda$1037.02 line also appears weakly in emission in the spectrum of \bari.
444: %
445:
446: For three stars (\icen, \bleo, and \dleo) there was no measurable \ion{O}{6} line flux.
447: Upper limits were determined by fitting a constrained Gaussian with its FWHM set to twice the
448: $v \sin i$ of the star, its central peak fixed to match the largest signal in the immediate
449: vicinity of the \ion{O}{6} lines, and a background level set at approximately the lower
450: envelope of fluctuations in the spectrum at nearby wavelengths.
451: These three stars with only upper limits
452: are among the optically brightest stars in our
453: sample and are by no means the most distant ones observed. Furthermore, the 13.3 ks
454: integration time for \icen\ is one of the longest exposures of all the A stars, second only
455: to the 53 ks spent observing \acep. To within the uncertainties, our independent
456: measurements of \ion{O}{6} are in substantial agreement with those of Simon et al.
457: (2002) for the 7 stars that were originally observed by those authors.
458:
459: \subsection{Measurements of the \ion{C}{3} 977 \AA\ Lines}
460:
461: Wherever possible, we measured the \ion{C}{3} 977\AA\ line from the short-wavelength
462: SiC portion of the (orbital night only) \fuse spectra (see Table~\ref{tabfits}).
463: The peak formation
464: temperature of the solar \ion{C}{3} line is $T \sim 80,000$ K, which is appreciably lower
465: than that of \ion{O}{6}. We confirm the previous detections and $\lambda$977 emission line
466: fluxes of Simon et al. (2002) for \acep\ and \teri. However, the flux and emission line
467: luminosity of \ciii $ = 3.0\pm0.2 \times 10^{27}$ \es\ that we obtain for \bari\ are $\sim$40\%
468: higher than the earlier published values.
469: %REVISION:
470: Our \fuse observations contribute three new detections of \ion{C}{3}:
471: HD\,43940, \ciii $ = 9.3\pm2.3 \times 10^{27}$ \es;
472: \omeaur, \ciii $ = 22.8\pm5.7 \times 10^{27}$ \es;
473: and 33~Boo, \ciii $ = 5.3\pm0.9 \times 10^{27}$ \es.
474: The same three stars were also firm detections in \ion{O}{6}.
475: %
476:
477: %REVISION:
478: \subsection{Interstellar and Photospheric Absorption Lines}
479:
480: Although the absolute wavelength scale of \fuse is not well determined, the relative wavelength scale
481: within a particular detector segment of an observation should be accurate to $\pm5$ \kms\
482: (Redfield et al. 2002). In order to determine whether the narrow emission lines fall at the wavelength
483: expected for the target stars, we searched the LiF1A/2B spectra for interstellar absorption lines or
484: photospheric absorption lines that could be used to establish the absolute wavelength scale. A
485: significant offset from the A star's radial velocity would suggest that the emission originates from a
486: companion or foreground star. Because our exposure times were optimized to detect line emission, the
487: continuum was always underexposed (see Fig.~\ref{figsed}). Consequently, in no case were we able
488: to identify suitable photospheric absorption lines in the LiF1A/2B spectra.
489:
490: In several cases, we were able to measure the $\lambda$1036.34 \ion{C}{2} interstellar absorption,
491: but it provided an extra constraint only for $\delta$~Vel. For that star, the measured \ion{C}{2}
492: wavelength was redshifted by 0.09 \AA\ from the laboratory wavelength, while the measured \ion{O}{6}
493: wavelength was redshifted by 0.11 \AA.\ $\delta$~Vel has a measured radial velocity of +2.2~\kms,\
494: and the velocity of the local interstellar cloud in this line of sight is predicted to be +1.8~\kms\
495: (Lallement \& Bertin 1992). Therefore, the \ion{O}{6} emission of $\delta$~Vel is centered
496: within 5 ~\kms\ of the expected wavelength of the A star.
497: %
498:
499:
500: \section{Results}
501:
502: \subsection{Line Flux v. Effective Temperature}
503:
504: A plot of the normalized \ion{O}{6} $\lambda$1032 luminosity, ${\cal R} =$ \lovi/\lbol,
505: versus $T_{\rm eff}$ is shown for the entire sample of A stars in Figure~\ref{figfluxtemp}. The
506: points located below the slant line include the seven A-type stars that were originally observed
507: by Simon et al. (2002) and also the late-A star Altair, which is denoted by the diamond
508: symbol; the points situated above that line are the X-ray selected target stars that we
509: have observed. In the way of comparison, the normalized $\lambda$1032 luminosity
510: of the quiet Sun is ${\cal R}_{\odot} \approx 10^{-7.1}$ (Simon et al. 2002). The vertical
511: dashed line at $T_{\rm eff}=8300$~K represents the radiative/convective boundary line according
512: to the conventional stellar envelope models for main-sequence stars.
513:
514: It is obvious that the two sub-samples exhibit a striking difference in behavior. On the
515: one hand, the sample observed by Simon et al. shows an abrupt fall-off in line emission
516: precisely at the location of the theoretical boundary line. Upper limits on the normalized
517: luminosities of the stars on the high-temperature side of the boundary are 50 times lower
518: than solar, and 20 times lower than the luminosities of A stars on the low-temperature side.
519: On the other hand, in the X-ray selected group we have observed, emission at the solar
520: level is detected up to the earliest spectral type (i.e., A0 V) and the highest \teff (=10,000~K)
521: within our sample. The detection of \ion{O}{6} in the spectrum of HD\,129791, our hottest
522: star, is only moderately significant, a slightly less than $4\sigma$ result. However, as is
523: clear from Fig.~\ref{figo6}, there is no question that \ion{O}{6} emission is present in the spectrum
524: of 33~Boo, which is just slightly later in spectral type (A1~V) and just a bit cooler in \teff
525: (9630~K) than HD\,129791. Moreover, as we noted in the previous section, 33~Boo was
526: also detected in \ion{C}{3} $\lambda$977 (at approximately half the solar normalized
527: \ion{C}{3} luminosity), which confirms the apparent activity of this star.
528:
529: \subsection{UV Flux v. X-Ray Flux}
530:
531: The tight correlation between coronal X-ray emission and the strengths of various
532: chromospheric emission lines is well established among stars with spectral types later
533: than F5 (e.g., Ayres et al. 1981). Similarly, for the early A stars in the present study,
534: Figure~\ref{figfluxflux} shows a strong relationship between the \ion{O}{6} line luminosity and X-ray
535: luminosity, and an equally pronounced trend in the luminosity normalized to \lbol. There is no
536: significant difference in this relationship between the stars with $T_{\rm eff} \le 8300$~K
537: (open circles in Fig.~\ref{figfluxflux}) and those with $T_{\rm eff} > 8300$~K
538: (filled circles in Fig.~\ref{figfluxflux}).
539:
540: \subsection{UV Line Widths v. v sin i}
541:
542: Both Wood et al. (1997) and Redfield et al. (2002) identify the excess broadening of the
543: narrow components in the UV emission line profiles of late-type stars with wave
544: motions or subsonic turbulence in the transition region, and interpret the highly
545: supersonic nonthermal broadening of the wide pedestal features in terms of stellar
546: microflares. The role such mechanisms might play in heating the outer atmosphere
547: remains unclear. A comparison of the decomposition of the \ion{Si}{4} $\lambda$1394
548: line profile of $\alpha$~Cen\, A and the \ion{C}{4} $\lambda$1548 profile of AU~Mic
549: by Wood et al. (1997) with the analysis of the \ion{C}{3} $\lambda$977 and \ion{O}{6}
550: $\lambda$1032 profiles of those same stars by Redfield et al. (2002) demonstrates
551: that it is much more difficult to establish the presence of broad line wings in \fuse
552: spectra than in \hst spectra. The SNR of our A star spectra is far from adequate for
553: that purpose.
554:
555: In contrast with the late-type stars, the widths of the \ion{O}{6} lines of the A stars
556: measured here are generally narrower than the $v \sin i$ values of the stars.
557: All but two of the observed velocity half widths of \ion{O}{6} are less than
558: the $v \sin i$ value (see Table~\ref{tabfits}). If the chromospheric emission
559: covers the star uniformly, we would expect the observed emission line width to be
560: $v \sin i$ (or larger). A line of subrotational width could be produced if the
561: activity were concentated at high latitudes. Large polar spots are commonly observed
562: in Doppler images of magnetically-active stars (e.g. Strassmeier et~al. 2004).
563: On the other hand, we would expect the
564: effective temperature of a rapidly-rotating A star to be
565: higher at high latitudes (e.g. Peterson et~al. 2006).
566: If the emission lines arise in the cooler, low-latitude regions, we would expect
567: to see rotationally-broadened emission lines.
568: The narrow emission lines
569: could also arise from a more slowly-rotating binary companion or foreground
570: late-type star. We further discuss this possibility in later sections.
571:
572: %REVISION:
573: In two cases, \acep\ and \teri, the widths of the observed line profiles are
574: in excess of the rotational broadening, and the profiles are not well fitted with
575: a single gaussian emission component. The fluxes, line widths, and uncertainties
576: given in Table~\ref{tabfits} were determined from a series of multiple gaussian fits
577: and from a numerical integration of the flux above a background fit.
578: %
579: The \ion{O}{6} spectrum of \acep\ shown in Fig.~\ref{figo6} bears a very close resemblance to
580: the \fuse spectrum of Altair ($\alpha$~Aql), which Redfield et al. (2002) interpret as
581: rotationally broadened and limb brightened. The physical parameters of the two stars
582: are also quite similar. As we noted earlier, the prominent blueward asymmetry in the
583: emission profile of $\lambda$1038 is attributable to an added contribution from
584: \ion{C}{2}. A similar distortion can be seen in the high signal-to-noise spectrum of the
585: \ion{O}{6} line of Altair, which Redfield et al. decompose into separate
586: Gaussian components. The box-like shape of the profiles of both stars is reminiscent
587: of their \ion{Si}{3} $\lambda$1206 line in \hst spectra (Simon \&
588: Landsman 1997). The profile of the $\lambda$1032 line of \teri, a somewhat slower
589: rotator than either Altair or \acep, exhibits a narrower width but a similar flat-top shape,
590: although clearly at a much lower SNR.
591:
592: \subsection{Line Flux v. v sin i}
593:
594: UV and X-ray emission of a deeply
595: convective late-type star increases with its axial rotation rate except at the very highest
596: rotation speeds, while the emission of a thinly convective late-A or early-F star is
597: entirely independent of its projected rotation speed (Ayres \& Linsky 1980; Simon
598: \& Fekel 1987; Simon \& Landsman 1991). This difference in the behavior of stars
599: earlier and later than spectral type F5 has led to the suggestion that the activity of
600: these two groups of stars may be produced by different mechanisms (Wolff et al.
601: 1986). The X-ray and \ion{O}{6} luminosities or normalized emission luminosities
602: of the early A stars under investigation here likewise show no dependence on
603: $v \sin i$ (cf Tables~\ref{tabparam} and \ref{tabfits}). Although our sample is relatively small,
604: the range in velocity is fairly wide, from a low value of 70 \kms\
605: to a top value of 280 \kms.
606:
607: Consistent with the outcome of earlier studies, we find that both the coronal X-ray luminosity
608: and the normalized X-ray luminosity of the A stars in this work are independent of the stellar
609: rotation rate, $v \sin i$. The same appears to be true of the UV emission in \ion{O}{6}.
610: Therefore, if rapid rotation has the effect of deepening the outer convection zone of A stars,
611: as suggested by the interferometric observations of Altair and \acep\ (e.g., van Belle et al.
612: 2001, 2006) and also by the stellar models of MacGregor et al. (2007), and of promoting
613: the formation of a convectively heated chromosphere or corona, we can point to no empirical
614: evidence for that effect in the observations presented here. At the same time, if the activity of
615: the A stars is powered by a shear dynamo that operates in the largely radiative portions of the
616: envelopes of these A stars, as proposed by MacDonald \& Mullan (2004) for the
617: O and B stars, we would again expect to find a trend of increasing X-ray and UV emission with
618: increasing rotation rate, which is not evident in our results.
619:
620: \section{Discussion}
621:
622: The possibility remains that the X-ray as well as the UV emission we observe from the A stars
623: is produced by unrecognized and heretofore undetected companion stars. One example of
624: such possible source confusion is provided by the active Hyades F star, 71 Tau (HD\,28052),
625: whose chromospherically active companion was discovered in near-UV emission lines only
626: by virtue of the high spatial resolution of \hst (Simon \& Ayres 2000). Inspection of
627: Fig.~\ref{figo6} and Table~\ref{tabfits} suggests that relatively narrow UV emission lines
628: predominate over the obviously
629: rotationally-broadened profiles of \acep\ and \teri, suggesting that the narrow
630: emission features may originate not from the A stars but from more slowly rotating late-type
631: companions.
632: %REVISION:
633: Consider, for example, the 9 stars with \teff values hotter than 8300~K.
634: \icen\ and \bleo\ lack \ion{O}{6} emission, and the measurement of HD\,159312 is
635: uncertain because only the $\lambda$1032 line of \ion{O}{6}
636: was detected (the $\lambda$1038 line was likely obscured by \ion{C}{2} emission).
637: %
638: Of the remaining 6 stars, only HD\,129791, an extremely rapid
639: rotator like \acep, has broad lines, and in that case the evidence is not definitive because
640: the line emission is weak and the observation is underexposed. The remaining five stars
641: (33~Boo, \omeaur, \dvel, \roct, and \bari) all have narrow UV lines, of which three (\omeaur,
642: \dvel, and \bari) are already known to have close optical or spectroscopic companions.
643:
644: Any hidden low-mass secondary able to produce the powerful coronal emission of the
645: X-ray selected A stars we have observed with {\it FUSE} would have to be
646: counted among the most active late-type stars in the solar neighborhood. For simplicity,
647: we will assume in the following discussion that any such active secondary is a very cool
648: dwarf, either a dK or a dM star. Young, rapidly rotating F and G dwarfs are also known to
649: have X-ray luminosities as high as 10$^{30}$ \es, but owing to their higher mass would
650: most likely have made their presence known by inducing radial velocity variations in the
651: spectrum of the primary. As exemplars of possible active secondaries, we choose AB~Dor,
652: a rapidly rotating early K dwarf ($v \sin i = 80$ \kms; Zuckerman et al. 2004), which is the
653: namesake of the AB Dor Moving Group (L\'{o}pez-Santiago et al. 2006), and AU Mic, a
654: very young, nearby dM1e star with a dusty disk that is a likely member of the $\beta$~Pic
655: Moving Group (Barrado y Navascu\'{e}s et al. 1999). Both stars are luminous X-ray sources
656: (Garc\'{i}a-Alvarez et al. 2005; H\"{u}nsch et al. 1999), with \lx $\approx 10^{30}$ \es, and
657: also strong sources at ultraviolet wavelengths (Wood et al. 1997; Ake et al. 2000; Redfield
658: et al. 2002). The \ion{O}{6} fluxes and emission line luminosities of both stars are listed in
659: Table~\ref{tabfits} (original data from Redfield et al. 2002).
660:
661: The UV emission line luminosities of AB~Dor and AU~Mic
662: are a suitable match to the \lovi\ values of the active A stars that we have observed with \fuse
663: in all but 3 cases. The \lovi\ values for HD\,129791 and \roct\ are unquestionably on the high side,
664: but the SNR in the spectrum of HD\,129791 is quite modest and the detection of its \ion{O}{6}
665: emission is far from the most secure one in our survey.
666: %
667: % Need to remove the following since we've already said we found no evidence of rapid flaring
668: %
669: %Nor would it be surprising if the \ion{O}{6}
670: %fluxes varied over time by factors of 2 or more, since the high-temperature chromospheric lines
671: %in the \iue spectra of active dK/dM stars (e.g, \ion{Si}{4} and \ion{C}{4}) are known for their long-
672: %and short-term variability as a result of flares and the rotation of active regions across the visible
673: %disk of the star.
674: The \ion{O}{6} luminosity of \iuma, a known binary and a star that is on
675: the convective side of the radiative/convective boundary, is considerably weaker than that of
676: either AB~Dor or AU~Mic. Instead, it is much more similar to the luminosity of the moderately
677: active K2~V star \eeri, to which Redfield et al. (2002) assigned a flux that is equivalent to \lovi\
678: $ \approx 5\times 10^{26}$ \es. The X-ray luminosities of the two stars are also very similar,
679: \lx = $10^{28.4}$ \es\ for \iuma\ and \lx = $10^{28.3}$ \es\ for \eeri\ (H\"{u}nsch et al. 1998).
680: There is currently no reason to believe that a star as cool as the A star primary in \iuma\ cannot
681: support a chromosphere as well as a corona, but if the high-energy emission observed in this
682: system does come from a companion star, then the secondary (or the secondaries) needs to be
683: mildly but not excessively active.
684:
685: %TODO:
686: %{\bf [add discussion of chance superpositions; foreground stars]}
687:
688: The foregoing results are summarized in Table~\ref{tabtruth} in the form of a ``truth table.'' A
689: check mark
690: next to the name of a star signifies that the proposition stated at the head of a column is TRUE,
691: otherwise it is FALSE or not determinable from the available data. If we exclude both \acep\ and
692: \teri, for which there is little doubt that the X-ray and UV activity is intrinsic to the A star, the
693: detection of strong X-ray emission that is consistent with an active dK/dM star then appears to
694: be a sufficient condition for the presence of UV emission at an intensity level that is also expected
695: for a dK/dM star; moreover, with but one exception (i.e., \bari, which is a known binary), it is also
696: a necessary condition.
697:
698: The commonality of the narrow UV line widths is suggestive of a binary origin of the observed
699: emission, but is not conclusive. Narrow lines could also arise from a high-latitude distribution
700: of active regions, perhaps related to polar spots often seen in the photospheres of active,
701: late-type stars.
702: A further clue as to the origin of the emission can be found,
703: however, in a comparison of the X-ray luminosity with the \ion{O}{6} luminosity. The ratio of the
704: two, \lx/\lovi, serves as a rough gauge of the differential emission measure between the middle
705: chromosphere and the corona, and is known to be much larger for an extremely active star like
706: AB~Dor or AU~Mic than for a low-activity star like the Sun. For the former the ratio is $\sim$130
707: and $\sim$225, respectively; for the Quiet Sun it is $\sim$5; and for a late A-type star like Altair,
708: which is an example of a higher-than-solar mass star with an ``X-ray deficit'' (Simon \& Drake
709: 1989), it is $\sim$1. Among the 9 hottest stars in our sample of A stars whose effective
710: temperatures formally place them above the radiative/convective dividing line at 8300~K, six
711: have supersolar \lx/\lovi\ ratios in the range of 25--160, only one of them (the double-line
712: spectroscopic binary \bari) has a solar or subsolar ratio, and two (\icen\ and \bleo) have only
713: upper limits in both values and hence an indeterminate X-ray-to-UV luminosity ratio. Among
714: the 5 stars with \teff $<8300$~K, two have supersolar ratios (HD\,43940, 235; \iuma, 30), two
715: others have solar or subsolar ones (\teri\ and \acep), and one has dual upper limits and thus
716: an undefined ratio (\dleo).
717:
718: \section{Conclusions}
719:
720: Of our 14 main-sequence A-type stars, 11 exhibit detectable \ion{O}{6} emission, while
721: restrictive upper limits were determined for the other 3 stars. The stars with
722: \ion{O}{6} span the entire range of $T_{\rm eff}$, including the range
723: above the presumed convective/radiative ``dividing line'' around 8300~K.
724: If this sample is representative, and if the emission indeed arises from the A star,
725: then current models of stellar activity must be revised to explain magnetic activity
726: in stars without a substantial convective zone. However, we present several lines of evidence
727: that lead to the conclusion that the emission from the higher-temperature stars in
728: our sample is more likely due to very active late-type dwarf binary companions.
729: The results of our expanded sample are therefore consistent with the observational
730: findings of Simon et~al. (2002), which demonstrate a pronounced decrease in UV
731: emission at $T_{\rm eff} > 8300$~K, and also with the theoretical predictions of
732: the current standard models of stellar structure.
733:
734: %% If you wish to include an acknowledgments section in your paper,
735: %% separate it off from the body of the text using the \acknowledgments
736: %% command.
737:
738: %% Included in this acknowledgments section are examples of the
739: %% AASTeX hypertext markup commands. Use \url without the optional [HREF]
740: %% argument when you want to print the url directly in the text. Otherwise,
741: %% use either \url or \anchor, with the HREF as the first argument and the
742: %% text to be printed in the second.
743:
744: \acknowledgments
745:
746: This research has made use of the \simbad\ database, operated at {\it CDS}, Strasbourg,
747: France, and is based in part on observations from the public archives of the {\it Chandra
748: X-Ray Observatory}.
749: J.N. acknowledges support by NASA grant NNG04GK80G through
750: the \fuse guest observer program to the College of Charleston.
751: T.S. acknowledges support by NASA grant NAG5-12198 through
752: the \fuse guest observer program to the University of Hawaii.
753:
754: %% To help institutions obtain information on the effectiveness of their
755: %% telescopes, the AAS Journals has created a group of keywords for telescope
756: %% facilities. A common set of keywords will make these types of searches
757: %% significantly easier and more accurate. In addition, they will also be
758: %% useful in linking papers together which utilize the same telescopes
759: %% within the framework of the National Virtual Observatory.
760: %% See the AASTeX Web site at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX
761: %% for information on obtaining the facility keywords.
762:
763: %% After the acknowledgments section, use the following syntax and the
764: %% \facility{} macro to list the keywords of facilities used in the research
765: %% for the paper. Each keyword will be checked against the master list during
766: %% copy editing. Individual instruments or configurations can be provided
767: %% in parentheses, after the keyword, but they will not be verified.
768:
769: {\it Facilities:} \facility{FUSE}, \facility{CXO (ACIS)}.
770:
771:
772: \begin{references}
773:
774: \reference{} Abt, H. A., \& Morrell, N. I. 1995, \apjs 99, 135
775:
776: \reference{} Ake, T. B., et al. 2000, \apjl, 538, L87
777:
778: \reference{} Allende Prieto, C., \& Lambert, D. L. 1999, \aap, 352, 555
779:
780: \reference{} Ayres, T. R., \& Linsky, J. L. 1980, \apj, 241, 279
781:
782: \reference{} Ayres, T. R., Marstad, N. C., \& Linsky, J. L. 1981, \apj, 247, 545
783:
784: \reference{} Barrado y Navascu\'{e}s, D., Stauffer, J. R., Song, I., \& Caillault, J.-P. 1999,
785: \apjl, 520, L123
786:
787: \reference{} Bergh\"{o}fer, T. W., \& Schmitt, J. H. M. M. 1994, \aap, 292, L5
788:
789: \reference{} Bergh\"{o}fer, T. W., Schmitt, J. H. M. M., \& Cassinelli, J. P. 1996,
790: \aaps, 118, 481
791:
792: \reference{} Bergh\"{o}fer, T. W., Schmitt, J. H. M. M., Danner, R., \& Cassinelli, J. P.
793: 1997, \aap, 322, 167
794:
795: \reference{} Browning, M. K., Brun, A. S., \& Toomre, J. 2004, \apj, 601, 512
796:
797: \reference{} Brun, A. S., Browning, M. K., \& Toomre, J. 2005, \apj, 629, 461
798:
799: \reference{} Christensen-Dalsgaard, J. 2000, in ASP Conf. Ser. 210, Delta Scuti and
800: Related Stars, ed. M. Breger \& M. H. Montgomery (San Francisco: ASP), p. 187
801:
802: \reference{} Dixon, W. V., et al. 2007, \pasp, 119, 527
803:
804: \reference{} Feldman, P. D., Sahnow, D. J., Kruk, J. W., Murphy, E. M., \& Moos, H. W.
805: 2001, \jgr~A, 106, 8119
806:
807: \reference{} Garc\'{i}a-Alvarez, D., Drake, J. J., Lin, L. W., Kashyap, V. Y., \& Ball, B. 2005,
808: \apj, 621, 1009
809:
810: \reference{} H\"{u}nsch, M., Schmitt, J. H. M. M., \& Voges, W. 1998, \aaps, 132, 155
811:
812: \reference{} H\"{u}nsch, M., Schmitt, J. H. M. M., Sterzik, M. F., \& Voges, W. 1999, \aaps,
813: 135, 319
814:
815: \reference{} Judge, P. G., Soloman, S. C., \& Ayres, T. R. 2003, \apj, 593, 534
816:
817: \reference{} Kupka, F., \& Montgomery, M. H. 2002, \mnras, 330, L6
818:
819: %REVISION:
820: \reference{} Lallement, R., \& Bertin, P. 1992, \aap, 266, 479
821: %
822:
823: \reference{} Landsman, W. B. 1993, in ASP Conf. Ser. 52, Astronomical Data Analysis
824: Software and Systems II, ed. R. J. Hanisch, R. J. V. Brissenden, \& J. Barnes (San Francisco:
825: ASP), p. 246.
826:
827: \reference{} L\'{o}pez-Santiago, J., Montes, D., Crespo-Chac\'{o}n, I., \&
828: Fern\'{a}ndez-Figueroa, M. J. 2006, \apj, 643, 1160
829:
830: \reference{} MacDonald, J., \& Mullan, D. J. 2004, \mnras, 348, 702
831:
832: \reference{} MacGregor, K. B., \& Cassinelli, J. P. 2003, \apj, 586, 480
833:
834: \reference{} MacGregor, K. B., Jackson, S., Skumanich, A., \& Metcalfe, T. S. 2007,
835: \apj, 663, 560
836:
837: \reference{} Maggio, A., Sciortino, S., Vaiana, G. S., Majer, P., Bookbinder, J., Golub, L.,
838: Harnden, F. R., Jr., \& Rosner, R. 1987, \apj, 315, 687
839:
840: \reference{} Moon, T. T., \& Dworetsky, M. M. 1985, \mnras, 217, 305
841:
842: \reference{} Moos, H. W., et al. 2000, \apjl, 538, L1
843:
844: \reference{} Neff, J. E., Walter, F. M., Rodono, M., \& Linsky, J. L. 1989, \aap, 215, 79
845:
846: \reference{} Pan, X. P., Shao, M., Colavita, M. M., Mozurkewich, D., Simon, R. S., \&
847: Johnston, K. J. 1990, \apj, 356, 641
848:
849: \reference{} Peterson, D. M., et al. 2006, \apj, 636, 1087
850:
851: \reference{} Pevtsov, A. A., et al. 2003, \apj, 598, 1387
852:
853: \reference{} Prosser, C. F., Randich, S., Stauffer, J. R., Schmitt, J. H. M. M., \& Simon, T. 1996,
854: \aj, 112, 1570
855:
856: \reference{} Redfield, S., Linsky, J. L., Ake, T. B., Ayres, T. R., Dupree, A. K., Robinson, R. D., Wood,
857: B. E., \& Young, P. R. 2002, \apj, 581, 626
858:
859: \reference{} Royer, F., Gerbaldi, M., Faraggiana, R., \& Gomez, A. E. 2002a, \aap, 381, 105
860:
861: \reference{} Royer, F., Grenier, S., Baylac, M.-O., Gomez, A. E., \& Zorec, J. 2002b, \aap, 393, 897
862:
863: \reference{} Sahnow, D. J., et al. 2000, \apjl, 538, L7
864:
865: \reference{} Schmitt, J. H. H. M., Fleming, T. A., \& Giampapa, M. S. 1995, \apj, 450, 392
866:
867: \reference{} Schmitt, J. H. M. M., Golub, L., Harnden, Jr., F. R., Maxson, C. W., Rosner, R., \&
868: Vaiana, G. 1985, \apj, 290, 307
869:
870: \reference{} Simon, T., \& Ayres, T. R. 2000, \apj, 539, 325
871:
872: \reference{} Simon, T., Ayres, T. R., Redfield, S., Linsky, J. L. 2002, \apj, 579, 800
873:
874: \reference{} Simon, T., \& Drake, S. A. 1989, ApJ, 346, 303
875:
876: \reference{} Simon, T., Drake, S. A., \& Kim, P. D. 1995, \pasp, 107, 1034
877:
878: \reference{} Simon, T. \& Fekel, F. C., Jr. 1987, \apj, 316, 434
879:
880: \reference{} Simon, T., \& Landsman, W. B. 1991, \apj, 380, 200
881:
882: \reference{} --------------. 1997, \apj, 483, 435
883:
884: \reference{} Skrutskie, M. F., et al. 2006, \aj, 131, 1163
885:
886: \reference{} Smalley, B., Gardiner, R. B., Kupka, F., \& Bessell, M. S. 2002, \aap, 395, 601
887:
888: \reference{} Sokolov, N. A. 1995, \aaps, 110, 553
889:
890: \reference{} Stauffer, J. R., Caillault, J.-P., Gagn\'{e}, M., Prosser, C. F., \& Hartmann,
891: L. W. 1994, \apjs, 91, 625
892:
893: \reference{} Stelzer, B., Hu\'{e}lamo, N., Hubrig, S., Zinnecker, H., \& Micela, G. 2003, \aap,
894: 407, 1067
895:
896: \reference{} Stern, R. A., Schmitt, J. H., M. M., \& Kahabka, P. T. 1995, \apj, 448, 683
897:
898: \reference{} Strassmeier, K.G. 2002, AN, 323, 309
899:
900: \reference{} Tomkin, J., \& Tran, H. 1987, AJ, 94, 1664
901:
902: \reference{} Ulmschneider, P., Theurer, J., \& Musielak, Z. E. 1996, \aap, 315, 212
903:
904: \reference{} van Belle, G. T., Ciardi, D. R., Thompson, R. R., Akeson, R. L., \& Lada, E. L. 2001,
905: \apj, 559, 1155
906:
907: \reference{} van Belle, G. T., et al. 2006, \apj, 637, 494
908:
909: \reference{} Wolff, S. C., Boesgaard, A. M., \& Simon, T. 1986, \apj, 310, 360
910:
911: \reference{} Wood, B. E., Linsky, J. L., \& Ayres, T. R. 1997, \apj, 478, 745
912:
913: \reference{} Young, P.R., Dupree, A. K., Wood, B. E., Redfield, S., Linsky, J. L.,
914: Ake, T. B., \& Moos, H. W. 2001, \apjl, 555, L121
915:
916: \reference{} Zuckerman, B., Song, I., \& Bessell, M. S. 2004, \apjl, 613, L65
917:
918: \end{references}
919:
920: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
921:
922: \clearpage
923: \begin{figure}
924: \epsscale{0.85}
925: \plotone{f1.eps}
926: \caption{ Far-ultraviolet spectral energy distributions of 14 A-type stars.}\label{figsed}
927: \end{figure}
928:
929: \clearpage
930: \begin{figure}
931: \epsscale{0.85}
932: \plotone{f2.eps}
933: \caption{\fuse spectra of the \ion{O}{6} $\lambda\lambda$1032, 1038 doublet, rebinned to a
934: resolution of 0.04\AA\ per pixel. \ion{O}{6} emission was detected in 11 of the 14 stars.
935: Except for HD203280 and HD18978, the \ion{O}{6} emission lines are narrower than expected
936: from the star's $v \sin i$.}\label{figo6}
937: \end{figure}
938:
939: \clearpage
940: \begin{figure}
941: \epsscale{0.95}
942: \plotone{f3.eps}
943: \caption{Measured \ion{O}{6} emission line luminosity, normalized to the bolometric luminosity,
944: plotted as a function of \teff.
945: {\it Filled Circles:} A-type stars observed or re-measured in this survey. Three of these are plotted
946: as upper limits. The circled points lying below the solid line were originally observed by
947: Simon et al. 2002.
948: {\it Diamond:} the A7 star Altair, data from Redfield et al. 2002.
949: The vertical dotted line at $T_{\rm eff}=8300$ is a hypothetical boundary line that separates
950: stars with sub-photospheric convective layers from those with purely radiative outer envelopes.} \label{figfluxtemp}
951: \end{figure}
952:
953: \clearpage
954: \begin{figure}
955: \epsscale{0.95}
956: \plotone{f4.eps}
957: \caption{(a) Correlation between \lx/\lbol\ and \lovi/\lbol.
958: Also plotted are the Sun (circled dot) and Altair (diamond symbol). The open
959: circles denote the stars with $T_{\rm eff}\le 8300$, i.e., those to
960: the right of the dividing line in Fig.~\ref{figfluxtemp}.
961: (b) A similar correlation is seen between \lx\ and \lovi.}\label{figfluxflux}
962: \end{figure}
963:
964: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
965:
966: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
967: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
968: %% To embed the sample graphics in
969: %% the file, uncomment the \plotone, \plottwo, and
970: %% \includegraphics commands
971: %%
972: %% If you need a layout that cannot be achieved with \plotone or
973: %% \plottwo, you can invoke the graphicx package directly with the
974: %% \includegraphics command or use \plotfiddle.
975:
976: %% This example uses \plotone to include an EPS file scaled to
977: %% 80% of its natural size with \epsscale. Its caption
978: %% has been written to indicate that additional figure parts will be
979: %% available in the electronic journal.
980:
981: %%\begin{figure}
982: %%\epsscale{.80}
983: %%\plotone{samplef1.eps}
984: %%\caption{Derived spectra for 3C138 \citep[see][]{heiles03}. Plots for all sources are available
985: %%in the electronic edition of {\it The Astrophysical Journal}.\label{fig1}}
986: %%\end{figure}
987:
988: %%\clearpage
989:
990: %% Here we use \plottwo to present two versions of the same figure,
991: %% one in black and white for print the other in RGB color
992: %% for online presentation. Note that the caption indicates
993: %% that a color version of the figure will be available online.
994: %%
995:
996: %%\begin{figure}
997: %%\plottwo{f2.eps}{f2_color.eps}
998: %%\caption{A panel taken from Figure 2 of \citet{rudnick03}.
999: %%See the electronic edition of the Journal for a color version
1000: %%of this figure.\label{fig2}}
1001: %%\end{figure}
1002:
1003: %% This figure uses \includegraphics to scale and rotate the still frame
1004: %% for an mpeg animation.
1005:
1006: %%\begin{figure}
1007: %\includegraphics[angle=90,scale=.50]{f3.eps}
1008: %%\caption{Animation still frame taken from \citet{kim03}.
1009: %%This figure is also available as an mpeg
1010: %%animation in the electronic edition of the
1011: %%{\it Astrophysical Journal}.}
1012: %%\end{figure}
1013:
1014: %% If you are not including electonic art with your submission, you may
1015: %% mark up your captions using the \figcaption command.
1016: %%
1017: %% No more than seven \figcaption commands are allowed per page,
1018: %% so if you have more than seven captions, insert a \clearpage
1019: %% after every seventh one.
1020:
1021:
1022:
1023: % The Teff are rounded off. May disagree slightly with values on figures.
1024:
1025: \clearpage
1026: \begin{deluxetable}{lrlrccrrccrrcr}
1027: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1028: \rotate
1029: %\tablenum{1}
1030: \tablecaption{Properties of the Stars Observed With {\it FUSE}\label{tabparam}}
1031: \tablewidth{0pt}
1032: \tablecolumns{14}
1033: \tablehead{
1034: \colhead{ Name }& \colhead{ ~HD } & \colhead{ Sp. Ty.~ ~} & \colhead{ $\upsilon\,\sin i$ } &
1035: \colhead{ $V$ } & \colhead{ \bv } & \colhead{ $\pi$ } & \colhead{ $M_v$ } & \colhead{ $L_{\rm bol}/L_{\odot}$ } &
1036: \colhead{ $\beta$ } & \colhead{ $b-y$ } & \colhead{ $T_{\rm eff}$ } & \colhead{\llx} & References \\[-3pt]
1037: & & & \colhead{(\kms)} & & & \colhead{(mas)} & & & & & \colhead{(K)} & \colhead {(\es)} & }
1038: \startdata
1039: %$\upsilon$ Lup\tablenotemark{b} & 136933 & ~A0 sp & 35\phm{XX} & 5.37 & & 8.48 & 0.01 & 182.4 & 2.742 & $-$0.051 & 13,240 & 30.20 & 99, 2 \\
1040: HIP 72192\tablenotemark{a} & 129791 & ~A0 V & 280\phm{XX} & 6.91 & 0.05 & 7.72 & 1.35 & 28.9 & 2.867 & 0.035 & 10,000 & 30.16 & 4, 5, 10 \\
1041: HR 6539 & 159312 & ~A0 V & \nodata\phm{W} & 6.48 & 0.01 & 9.64 & 1.40 & 26.4 & 2.886 & $-$0.005 & 9790 & 29.96 & 2 \\
1042: %$\sigma$ Ara & 159217 & ~A0 V & \nodata\phm{XX} & 4.57 & & 8.46 & $-$0.79 & 194.5\phn & 2.800 & 0.001 & 9660 & 29.66 & 2 \\
1043: 33 Boo & 129002 & ~A1 V & 95\phm{XX} & 5.40 & 0.03 & 16.56 & 1.49 & 23.6 & 2.910 & 0.000 & 9630 & 30.13 & 1, 2, 5 \\
1044: $\omega$ Aur\tablenotemark{b} & 31647 & ~A1 V & 110\phm{XX} & 4.99 & 0.02 & 20.50 & 1.55 & 22.2 & 2.900 & 0.006 & 9570 & 30.22 & 1, 5 \\
1045: $\iota$ Cen & 115892 & ~A2 V & 75\phm{XX} & 2.70 & 0.09 & 55.64 & 1.43 & 24.1 & 2.901 & 0.004 & 9395 & $<$27.11\phm{X} & 3, 8 \\
1046: $\delta$ Vel\tablenotemark{b,\,{\rm d}} & 74956 & ~A1 V & 150\phm{XX} & 1.95 & 0.05 & 40.90 & 0.01 & 87.1 & 2.876 & 0.034 & 9250 & 29.13 & 2, 4, 5 \\
1047: $\beta$ Leo\tablenotemark{a} & 102647 & ~A3 V & 115\phm{XX} & 2.14 & 0.09 & 90.16 & 1.92 & 14.0 & 2.899 & 0.043 & 8645 & $<$26.11\phm{X} & 1, 5, 6 \\
1048: $\rho$ Oct & 137333 & ~A2 V & 150\phm{XX} & 5.58 & 0.11 & 15.02 & 1.46 & 20.9 & 2.887 & 0.072 & 8440 & 30.03 & 2, 3 \\
1049: $\beta$ Ari\tablenotemark{c} & 11636 & ~A5 V & 70\phm{XX} & 2.64 & 0.13 & 54.74 & 1.33 & 23.3 & 2.879 & 0.059 & 8370 & $<$28.57\phm{X} & 1, 5, 7 \\
1050: $\delta$ Leo & 97603 & ~A4 V & 180\phm{XX} & 2.56 & 0.12 & 56.52 & 1.30 & 23.9 & 2.869 & 0.067 & 8300 & $<$26.65\phm{X} & 1, 5, 8 \\
1051: $\tau^3$ Eri & 18978 & ~A4 V & 120\phm{XX} & 4.10 & 0.16 & 37.85 & 1.99 & 12.6 & 2.858 & 0.091 & 8195 & $<$27.93\phm{X} & 1, 5, 7 \\
1052: HR 2265 & 43940 & ~A3 V & 250\phm{XX} & 5.88 & 0.14 & 16.10 & 1.91 & 13.4 & 2.853 & 0.073 & 8155 & 30.27 & 2, 4, 5 \\
1053: $\iota$ UMa\tablenotemark{b,\,{\rm c}} & 76644 & ~A7 V & 140\phm{XX} & 3.10 & 0.23 & 68.32 & 2.29 & \phn9.5 & 2.843 & 0.104 & 8060 & 28.45 & 1, 2, 5 \\
1054: $\alpha$ Cep & 203280 & ~A7 IV--V & 283\phm{XX} & 2.44 & 0.22 & 66.84 & 1.57 & 18.2 & 2.807 & 0.127 & 7720 & 27.33 & 8, 9 \\
1055: \enddata
1056: \tablecomments{(a) Wide binary; (b) Close binary; (c) Spectroscopic binary; (d) Eclipsing binary.}
1057: %\tablenotetext{a}{Wide binary}
1058: %\tablenotetext{b}{Close binary}
1059: %\tablenotetext{c}{Spectroscopic binary}
1060: %\tablenotetext{d}{Eclipsing binary}
1061: \tablerefs{
1062: (1) Abt \& Morrell 1995; (2) H\"{u}nch et al. 1998; (3) Levato 1972; (4) Royer et al. 2002a; (5) Royer et al 2002b; % (99) Uesugi \& Fukuda 1982;
1063: (6) Schmitt 1997; (7) Schmitt et al. 1985; (8) Simon et al. 2002; (9) van Belle et al. 2006; (10) This paper.
1064: }
1065: \end{deluxetable}
1066:
1067:
1068: \clearpage
1069: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccc}
1070: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1071: %\rotate
1072: %\tablenum{2}
1073: \tablecaption{Journal of {\it FUSE}\, Observations \label{tabobs}}
1074: \tablewidth{0in}
1075: \tablecolumns{6}
1076: \tablehead{
1077: \colhead{ Star~~~ } & \colhead{\it FUSE } & \colhead{ UT Date } & \colhead{No. of}
1078: & \colhead{ Exp. Time$^{a}$ } & \colhead{Night Only$^{a}$}\\[-3pt]
1079: \colhead{ } & \colhead{ Dataset } & \colhead{ (yyyy-mm-dd) } & \colhead{Subexp.}
1080: & \colhead{(ks)} & \colhead{ (ks)}}
1081: \startdata
1082: %$\upsilon$ Lup & C0381001000 & 2004-03-28 & 5 & 10.3 & \phn 5.2 \\
1083: HD 129791 & C0380801000 & 2002-04-24 & 2 & \phn6.3 & \phn 3.5 \\
1084: HD 159312 & C0381201000 & 2004-09-11 & 4 & \phn9.8 & \phn 5.6 \\
1085: %$\sigma$ Ara & C0381101000 & 2002-08-13 & 2 & \phn4.0 & \phn 3.2 \\
1086: 33 Boo & C0380301000 & 2002-05-24 & 2 & \phn6.1 & \phn 4.2 \\
1087: $\omega$ Aur & C0380901000 & 2002-10-09 & 5 & \phn3.6 & \phn 2.5 \\
1088: $\iota$ Cen & A0410505000 & 2000-07-09 & 11~ & 13.3 & \phn 8.7 \\
1089:
1090: $\delta$ Vel & E0750102000 & 2006-07-12 & 2 & \phn4.0 & \phn 3.2 \\
1091: $\delta$ Vel & E0750103000 & 2006-07-15 & 4 & \phn8.3 & \phn 4.2 \\
1092: $\beta$ Leo & A0410202000 & 2001-04-17 & 7 & \phn6.8 & \phn 3.9 \\
1093:
1094: % $\rho$ Oct & C0380401000 & 2002-04-18 & 4 & \phn0.0 & \phn 0.0 \\
1095: $\rho$ Oct & C0380402000 & 2002-08-06 & 3 & \phn3.9 & \phn 0.0 \\
1096: $\beta$ Ari & A0410101000 & 2001-09-03 & 9 & 10.3 & \phn 2.8 \\
1097: $\delta$ Leo & A0410303000 & 2000-12-21 & 9 & \phn7.4 & \phn 1.8 \\
1098:
1099: $\tau^3$ Eri & A0410606000 & 2001-08-06 & 4 & 12.6 & \phn 3.0 \\
1100:
1101: HD 43940 & C0380101000 & 2002-11-06 & 2 & \phn5.6 & \phn 3.7 \\
1102: $\iota$ UMa & A0410405000 & 2001-11-04 & 2 & \phn5.7 & \phn 1.7 \\
1103: $\alpha$ Cep~~~ & A0410707000 & 2000-08-12 & 8 & 27.5 & 15.0\\
1104: $\alpha$ Cep~~~ & A0410708000 & 2000-08-12 & 9 & 25.8 & 12.6 \\
1105: \enddata
1106: \tablenotetext{a}{Cumulative accepted exposure times (good time intervals) at the wavelength of O\,{\sc vi}.}
1107: \end{deluxetable}
1108:
1109:
1110: \clearpage
1111: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}
1112: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1113: %\rotate
1114: %\tablenum{3}
1115: \tablecaption{Observed FUV Emission-Line Fluxes \label{tabfits}}
1116: \tablewidth{0in}
1117: \tablecolumns{7}
1118: \tablehead{
1119: % row 1
1120: \colhead{ Star~~~ } & \colhead{$f$(O\,{\sc vi})\tablenotemark{a}}& \colhead{$f$(O\,{\sc vi})\tablenotemark{a}}&
1121: \colhead{$L$(O\,{\sc vi})\tablenotemark{b}} & \colhead{$L$(O\,{\sc vi})/\lbol\tablenotemark{c}} &
1122: \colhead{$f$(C\,{\sc iii})\tablenotemark{a}}& \colhead{HWHM\tablenotemark{d}/} \\ [-3pt]
1123: % row 2
1124: \colhead{} & \colhead{1032\,\AA} & \colhead{1038\,\AA} & \colhead{1032\,\AA} & \colhead{1032\,\AA} &
1125: \colhead{977\,\AA} & \colhead{$v \sin i$}
1126: }
1127: \startdata
1128: HD 129791 & 1.1$\pm$0.3 & \nodata\phn & 22$\pm$6\phn & 2.0$\pm$0.6 & \nodata\phn & 0.36 \\
1129: HD 159312 & 1.3$\pm$0.1 & 1.9$\pm$0.1\tablenotemark{e} & 17$\pm$1\phn & 1.7$\pm$0.1 & \nodata\phn & \nodata\phn \\
1130: 33 Boo & 1.9$\pm$0.1 & 1.1$\pm$0.1 & 8.3$\pm$0.4 & 0.92$\pm$0.05 & 1.2$\pm$0.2 & 0.50 \\
1131: $\omega$ Aur & 4.7$\pm$0.2 & 2.8$\pm$0.2 & 13$\pm$1\phn & 1.6$\pm$0.1 & 8.0$\pm$2.0 & 0.27 \\
1132: $\iota$ Cen & $<0.4$\phn & $<$0.5\phn & $<$0.2\phn & $<$0.02\phn & \nodata\phn & \nodata\phn \\
1133: $\delta$ Vel & 7.3$\pm$0.2 & 3.8$\pm$0.6 & 5.2$\pm$0.1 & 0.16$\pm$0.01 & \nodata\phn & 0.56 \\
1134: $\beta$ Leo & $<0.6$\phn & $<$0.4\phn & $<$0.1\phn & $<$0.02 & \nodata\phn & \nodata\phn \\
1135: $\rho$ Oct & 12.4$\pm$0.6 & 5.6$\pm$0.8 & 66$\pm$3\phn & 8.3$\pm$0.4 & \nodata\phn & 0.43 \\
1136: $\beta$ Ari & 5.2$\pm$0.2 & 2.3$\pm$0.2 & 2.1$\pm$0.1 & 0.22$\pm$0.01 & 7.5$\pm$0.5 & 0.44 \\
1137: $\delta$ Leo & $<0.4$\phn & $<$0.2\phn & $<$0.2\phn & $<$0.02\phn & \nodata\phn & \nodata\phn \\
1138: $\tau^3$ Eri & 1.8$\pm$0.1 & 1.3$\pm$0.2 & 1.5$\pm$0.1 & 0.31$\pm$0.02 & \nodata\phn & 1.40 \\
1139: HD 43940 & 1.7$\pm$0.2 & 1.2$\pm$0.2 & 7.9$\pm$0.9 & 1.5$\pm$0.2 & 2.0$\pm$0.5 & 0.26 \\
1140: $\iota$ UMa & 3.1$\pm$0.2 & 1.6$\pm$0.1 & 0.80$\pm$0.05 & 0.22$\pm$0.01 & \nodata\phn & 0.20 \\
1141: $\alpha$ Cep & 10.7$\pm$0.7\phn & 7.3$\pm$1.3 & 2.87$\pm$0.19 & 0.41$\pm$0.03 & 32.5$\pm$2.0\phn & 1.40 \\ [6pt]
1142: %\tableline
1143: \hline\\[-12pt]
1144: AB Dor\tablenotemark{f} & 44.9$\pm$4.5\phn & $<$25.4\phn & 11.9$\pm$1.2\phn & 81.5$\pm$8.2\phn & \nodata\phn & \nodata\phn \\
1145: AU Mic\tablenotemark{f} & 20.9$\pm$2.4\phn & 10.6$\pm$1.1\phn & 2.5$\pm$0.3 & 53.3$\pm$6.1\phn & \nodata\phn & \nodata\phn \\
1146: \enddata
1147: %\tablecomments
1148: \tablenotetext{a}{Emission line flux in units of 10$^{-14}$ \ecs\ at Earth,
1149: not corrected for interstellar extinction.}
1150: \tablenotetext{b}{Emission-line luminosity in units of 10$^{27}$ \es.}
1151: \tablenotetext{c}{Normalized O\,{\sc vi} $\lambda$1032 luminosity in units of 10$^{-7}$.}
1152: \tablenotetext{d}{Ratio of the half-width at half-maximum of O\,{\sc vi} 1032~\AA,
1153: expressed as a velocity, to the stellar $v \sin i$.}
1154: \tablenotetext{e}{Most of this is likely due to C\,{\sc ii} emission; see text.}
1155: \tablenotetext{f}{\fuse fluxes for AB Dor (K0-1\,IV/V) and AU Mic (M1.6\,Ve) from Redfield et al. 2002.}
1156: \end{deluxetable}
1157:
1158: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1159: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1160:
1161: \clearpage
1162: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}
1163: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1164: %\rotate
1165: %\tablenum{4}
1166: \tablecaption{Comparison of A Stars with Two Active Low-Mass Stars \label{tabtruth}}
1167: \tablewidth{0in}
1168: \tablecolumns{5}
1169: \tablehead{
1170: \colhead{ } & \colhead{ } & \colhead{Known or} & \colhead{ } & \colhead{ } \\[-3pt]
1171: \colhead{ } & \colhead{$T_{\rm eff}$} & \colhead{Possible} &
1172: \colhead{\lx(A$_\star$) $\sim$} & \colhead{L$_{{\rm O}\,VI}$(A$_\star$) $\sim$} \\[-3pt]
1173: \colhead{Star~~~} & \colhead{(K)} & \colhead{Binary} &
1174: \colhead{\lx(dK$_\star$/dM$_\star$)} & \colhead{L$_{{\rm O}\,VI}$(dK$_\star$/dM$_\star$)} }
1175: \startdata
1176: HD 129791 & 10,000\phn & \nodata & $\surd $ & $\surd$ \\
1177: HD 159312 & 9,790 & \nodata & $\surd $ & $\surd$ \\
1178: 33 Boo & 9,630 & \nodata & $\surd $ & $\surd$ \\
1179: $\omega$ Aur & 9,570 & $\surd$ & $\surd $ & $\surd$ \\
1180: $\iota$ Cen & 9.395 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1181:
1182: $\delta$ Vel & 9,250 & $\surd$ & $\surd $ & $\surd$ \\
1183: $\beta$ Leo & 8,645 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1184:
1185: $\rho$ Oct & 8,440 & \nodata & $\surd $ & $\surd$ \\
1186: $\beta$ Ari & 8,370 & $\surd$ & \nodata & $\surd$ \\
1187: $\delta$ Leo & 8,300 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1188: %\tableline
1189: $\tau^3$ Eri & 8,195 & \nodata & \nodata & $\surd$ \\
1190:
1191: HD 43940 & 8,155 & \nodata & $\surd $ & $\surd$ \\
1192: $\iota$ UMa & 8,060 & $\surd$ & \nodata & \nodata \\
1193: $\alpha$ Cep~~ & 7,720 & \nodata & \nodata & $\surd$ \\
1194: \enddata
1195: \tablecomments{The late-type comparison stars are AB Dor (dK; \teff$\approx5200$ K) and AU Mic (dM; \teff$\approx3500$ K).}
1196: \end{deluxetable}
1197:
1198:
1199:
1200:
1201:
1202:
1203:
1204:
1205:
1206:
1207: %% Tables may also be prepared as separate files. See the accompanying
1208: %% sample file table.tex for an example of an external table file.
1209: %% To include an external file in your main document, use the \input
1210: %% command. Uncomment the line below to include table.tex in this
1211: %% sample file. (Note that you will need to comment out the \documentclass,
1212: %% \begin{document}, and \end{document} commands from table.tex if you want
1213: %% to include it in this document.)
1214:
1215: %% \input{table}
1216:
1217: \end{document}
1218: