1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\slugcomment{2008.05.26}
3: %\usepackage{color}
4:
5: \shorttitle{Strong Blueshifts Observed with {\it Hinode}/EIS}
6: \shortauthors{Asai et al.}
7:
8: \begin{document}
9:
10: \title{Strongly Blueshifted Phenomena Observed with {\it Hinode}/EIS
11: in the 2006 December 13 Solar Flare}
12:
13: \author{
14: Ayumi Asai\altaffilmark{1,2,3},
15: Hirohisa Hara\altaffilmark{2,3},
16: Tetsuya Watanabe\altaffilmark{2,3},
17: Shinsuke Imada\altaffilmark{2}, \\
18: Taro Sakao\altaffilmark{4},
19: Noriyuki Narukage\altaffilmark{4},
20: J. L. Culhane\altaffilmark{5}, and
21: G. A. Doschek\altaffilmark{6}}
22:
23: \email{asai@nro.nao.ac.jp}
24: \altaffiltext{1}{Nobeyama Solar Radio Observatory, National Astronomical
25: Observatory of Japan,
26: Minamimaki, Minamisaku, Nagano, 384-1305, JAPAN}
27:
28: \altaffiltext{2}{National Astronomical Observatory of Japan,
29: Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8588, JAPAN}
30:
31: \altaffiltext{3}{The Graduate University for Advanced Studies
32: (SOKENDAI), Hayama, Miura, Kanagawa, 240-0193, JAPAN}
33:
34: \altaffiltext{4}{Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Japan
35: Aerospace Exploration Agency, Yoshinodai, Sagamihara, Kanagawa,
36: 229-8510, JAPAN}
37:
38: \altaffiltext{5}{Mullard Space Science Laboratory, University College
39: London, Holmbury St. Mary, Dorking, Surrey, RH5 6NT, U.K.}
40:
41: \altaffiltext{6}{Naval Research Laboratory, E.O. Hulburt Center for
42: Space Research, Washington DC 20375-5320, U.S.A.}
43:
44: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
45:
46: \begin{abstract}
47: We present a detailed examination of strongly blueshifted emission lines
48: observed with the EUV Imaging Spectrometer on board the {\it Hinode}
49: satellite.
50: We found two kinds of blueshifted phenomenon associated with the X3.4
51: flare that occurred on 2006 December 13.
52: One was related to a plasmoid ejection seen in soft X-rays.
53: It was very bright in all the lines used for the observations.
54: %, and
55: %recorded a drift velocity of about 50~km~s$^{-1}$ along the slit and
56: %the Doppler velocity of about 250~km~s$^{-1}$.
57: The other was associated with the faint arc-shaped ejection seen in soft
58: X-rays. %, and showed a drift velocity of about 450~km~s$^{-1}$.
59: %The blueshifted components in these features showed very broadened
60: %spectra and the Doppler velocity of the peaks was about
61: %100~km~s$^{-1}$.
62: The soft X-ray ejection is thought to be an MHD fast-mode shock wave.
63: This is therefore the first spectroscopic observation of an MHD
64: fast-mode shock wave associated with a flare.
65: \end{abstract}
66:
67: \keywords{Sun: corona --- Sun: flares --- Sun: transition region ---
68: Sun: UV radiation --- Sun: X-rays, gamma rays}
69:
70:
71: \section{Introduction}
72: %%%
73: Solar flares are very spectacular, and they are accompanied by a variety
74: of plasma motions.
75: For example, many ejection phenomena, such as filament/prominence
76: eruptions are seen in the H$\alpha$ line and in the extreme ultraviolet
77: (EUV), while plasmoid ejections seen in soft X-ray (SXR) have been
78: observed in association with solar flares.
79: They have attracted attention, since they could play a key role in
80: triggering fast reconnection.
81: In the plasmoid-induced reconnection model, which was suggested by
82: \citet{Shiba99} and \citet{Shiba01} as an extension of the classical
83: CSHKP model \citep{Car64,Stur66,Hira74,Kop76}, plasmoids generated in
84: current sheets near reconnection points are ejected, when strong energy
85: releases occur.
86: The ejections of plasmoids trigger further reconnections, since they
87: make the current sheet thinner.
88: We often observe that plasmoids/filaments are strongly accelerated
89: during bursts of nonthermal emissions in hard X-ray (HXR) and in radio
90: \citep{Kah88,Shiba95,Tsu97,Ohya98,Mori03,Ster04,Ster05}.
91: %ejections of plasmoids are strongly related with the fast
92: %reconnection and the strong energy release, and
93: Therefore, the correlations between plasmoid ejections and HXR bursts
94: support a plasmoid-induced reconnection model.
95: A good review of the correlation between plasmoid ejections and HXR
96: emission is given in \citet{Asch02}.
97:
98: Flare-associated waves and the related plasma motions have also been
99: studied.
100: Moreton waves \citep{More60,Smi71} are observed to propagate across the
101: solar disk in H$\alpha$ with speeds of 500 -- 1500~km~s$^{-1}$
102: (e.g., \cite{Eto02,War04a,War04b}).
103: They are often associated with type II radio bursts, and thought to be
104: due to the intersection of a coronal MHD fast-mode shock wave and the
105: chromosphere \citep{Uchi68,Uchi70,Uchi73}.
106: X-ray waves discovered with the Soft X-ray Telescope (SXT; \cite{Tsu91})
107: on board {\it Yohkoh} \citep{Oga91} are the wavelike disturbances
108: travelling in the solar corona associated with flares
109: \citep{Kha00,Kha02,Hud03}.
110: The simultaneous observation of Moreton waves and X-ray waves suggest
111: that both of these wavelike disturbances are generated with the MHD
112: fast-mode shock \citep{Kha02,Naru02}.
113: Furthermore, the Solar X-Ray Imager on board {\it GOES} has also
114: observed wavelike disturbances in X-rays \citep{War05a}.
115: Coronal EIT waves observed with the Extreme-Ultraviolet Imaging
116: Telescope (EIT; \cite{Dela95}) on board the {\it Solar and Heliospheric
117: Observatory} ({\it SOHO}; \cite{Dom95}) are another coronal disturbance
118: (e.g., \cite{Thom00}).
119: However, these coronal disturbances have rarely been observed
120: spectroscopically in EUV and in SXR.
121: Therefore, spectroscopic observations of wavelike ejections with high
122: spatial and spectral resolution are required to clarify the relation
123: with the MHD fast-mode shock.
124:
125: These plasma motions can be observed as phenomena accompanied by line
126: shifts (Doppler shifts) in spectroscopic observations.
127: The EUV Imaging Spectrometer (EIS; \cite{Cul07}) is one of the three
128: scientific instruments on board {\it Hinode} \citep{Kosu07}.
129: EIS uses an off-axis parabolic primary mirror and a toroidal diffraction
130: grating in a normal incidence optical layout, and has sensitivity for
131: two wavelength ranges, 170 -- 210 and 250 -- 290~{\AA} (see
132: \cite{Kore06} and \cite{Lang06}, for more details).
133: These wavelength ranges are simultaneously observed with two CCDs, which
134: are called CCD-A (for longer wavelength range) and CCD-B (for shorter
135: wavelength range), respectively.
136: The two dimensional EUV images were obtained with the narrow slit in a
137: raster observation by a pivot rotation of the primary mirror in the
138: east-west direction.
139: EIS enables us to study in detail the plasma in the solar corona and
140: upper transition region with temperature of $8\times10^4$~K to
141: $2\times10^7$~K.
142:
143: We found strongly blueshifted phenomena, which were associated with an
144: intense flare that occurred 2006 December 13 observed with EIS.
145: In this paper we examined the phenomena, and discuss the relation with
146: plasmoid ejections and/or coronal waves.
147: In \S 2 we describe the observational data.
148: In \S 3 we examine the detailed features of the strongly blueshifted
149: line emission.
150: In \S 4 we present a summary and conclusions.
151:
152:
153: \section{Observations}
154: %%%
155: An intense solar flare, which was X3.4 on the GOES scale, started at
156: 02:14~UT, 2006 December 13, in NOAA Active Region 10930 (S06$^{\circ}$,
157: W22$^{\circ}$).
158: It was the first X-class flare that {\it Hinode} observed (see also
159: \cite{Kubo07}, \cite{Su07}, \cite{Ima07}, \cite{Isobe07}).
160: The top panel of Figure~1 shows time profiles of the flare (from 02:10
161: UT to 03:00 UT, 2006 December 13), in SXR obtained with the GOES 1.0 --
162: 8.0 (top) and 0.5 -- 4.0 {\AA} (bottom) channels.
163: The Nobeyama Radio Polarimeters (NoRP; \cite{Torii79,Shiba79,Naka85})
164: also observed this flare.
165: The bottom panel of Figure~1 shows the time profiles of the total radio
166: fluxes taken in NoRP~17 GHz (black line) and 35~GHz (gray line)
167: channels.
168:
169: EIS performed a wide raster scan from 01:12 to 05:41~UT, and the
170: following nine lines were chosen to observe the flare:
171: Fe {\sc x} (184.5 {\AA}), Fe {\sc viii} (185.2 {\AA}),
172: Fe {\sc xi} (188.2 {\AA}), Ca {\sc xvii} (192.8 {\AA}),
173: Fe {\sc xii} (195.1 {\AA}), Fe {\sc xiii} (202.0 {\AA}),
174: He {\sc ii} (256.3 {\AA}), Fe {\sc xiv} (274.2 {\AA}), and
175: Fe {\sc xv}(284.2 {\AA}).
176: Information on these lines is summarized in Table~1.
177: We used a narrow slit of 1$^{\prime\prime}$ width.
178: For each emission line, we set the observation window on the CCDs with a
179: height of 256 pixels along the slit and a width of 24 pixels in the
180: wavelength direction.
181: These correspond to 256$^{\prime\prime}$ and 0.54~{\AA}, respectively.
182: We show the raster images in the He~{\sc ii} and Fe~{\sc xv} lines in
183: the bottom panels of Figure~2.
184: The field of view (FOV) of CCD-A is displaced southward in the slit
185: direction by about 18$^{\prime\prime}$, compared with that of CCD-B.
186: In this work we have corrected for this displacement.
187: The absolute positions of the FOVs are determined with the EUV images
188: observed with other instruments as will be described below.
189:
190: We are focusing on the strongly blueshifted feature observed with EIS.
191: In the impulsive phase two kinds of feature are observed.
192: One is located about $120^{\prime\prime}$ south of the disk center,
193: which is just south of the flare core region.
194: This is bright in all lines, and drifts southward with a velocity of
195: about 50~km~s$^{-1}$.
196: The small box drawn with black dotted lines in the bottom right panel of
197: Figure~2 shows the position of this feature.
198: The other blueshifted feature appears farther from the flare core site
199: and is located $200^{\prime\prime}$ south of the disk center.
200: This very faint feature is seen only in high-temperature lines, and
201: moves southward with high velocity.
202: We call these features ``BS1'' and ``BS2'', and they are discussed in
203: more detail in the next section.
204: %more detail in the sections 3 and 4, respectively.
205:
206: The imaging observation of this flare in EUV was performed with the
207: Transition Region and Coronal Explorer (TRACE; \cite{Hand99,Sch99})
208: although the impulsive phase was unfortunately missed.
209: We show the 195~{\AA} images of the flare taken by TRACE at 02:05:25~UT
210: (left) and 02:47:20~UT (right) in the top panels of Figure~2.
211: We can see a dark filament lying horizontally (i.e., in the east-west
212: direction) in the western part of the active region.
213: It can also be seen in the EIS raster images until 02:20~UT.
214: The dark filament disappeared after the flare started.
215: SOHO/EIT also observed the eruption of the filament in the 195~{\AA}
216: images, travelling in the southwest direction.
217: We co-aligned the EUV images obtained with EIS, TRACE, and EIT, by using
218: the 195~{\AA} data.
219: In particular, the EIS raster image was fitted with the TRACE preflare
220: (02:05:25~UT) image, by using the common features seen from 02:00 to
221: 02:10~UT.
222: The accuracy of the co-alignment between the EIS and TRACE data for the
223: time range is about 1$^{\prime\prime}$, which is comparable to the pixel
224: sizes of the data.
225:
226: The Solar Optical Telescope (SOT; \cite{Tsu07}) and X-Ray Telescope
227: (XRT; \cite{Gol07}) on board {\it Hinode} also observed this flare.
228: The Ca~{\sc ii} (H-line) images obtained every 2 minutes with SOT
229: clearly show the two-ribbon structure (see the top panels of Figure~4).
230: XRT obtained the SXR images of this flare every 1 minute with the
231: Thin-Be filter.
232: In the SXR images we can see some ejections of bright plasmoids (see
233: the bottom panel of Figure~4).
234: We can also see a faint arc-shaped ejection (see the bottom panels of
235: Figure~5).
236: We will discuss these in the following section.
237: We co-aligned the SOT and XRT data with the TRACE data. % by our eyes.
238: For the co-alignment, we used common features, such as flare kernels.
239: The accuracy of the co-alignment is also about 1$^{\prime\prime}$, and
240: therefore, we expect that the EIS data are co-aligned with the SOT and
241: XRT data with an accuracy of about 2$^{\prime\prime}$.
242:
243:
244: \section{Blueshifted Features}
245: \subsection{The Northern Feature -- BS1}
246: %%%
247: %First, we examine the nature of BS1.
248: This strong blueshifted feature associated with BS1 appeared from
249: 02:23:46~UT to 02:26:24~UT in the EIS FOV, which corresponds to the
250: first impulsive radio burst observed with NoRP (see Fig.~1).
251:
252: The top panels of Figure~3 show the clipped spectra of BS1 in the
253: He~{\sc ii} (left panel) and Fe~{\sc xv} (right panel) lines.
254: The vertical axis is the extent along the slit (the solar north is up),
255: and the size is 224$^{\prime\prime}$ ($\sim 1.6\times10^{5}$~km).
256: The horizontal axis shows the wavelength direction (blue is to the
257: left), and the width is 24 pixels in the CCDs of EIS, which corresponds
258: to about 0.54~{\AA} in the wavelength range.
259: The spectra are taken at (A) 02:24:49~UT, (B) 02:25:21~UT, (C)
260: 02:25:52~UT, (D) 02:26:24~UT, and (E) 02:26:56~UT, respectively.
261: The flare core site is seen as very bright horizontal bands in the
262: spectra, and it is saturated in the He~{\sc ii} line.
263: BS1 is located just south of the flare core region, and it drifts in the
264: slit direction (southward) with a velocity of about 50~km~s$^{-1}$.
265: The flare cores are seen as blob-like bright features in all the lines
266: used for the raster.% (Table~1).
267:
268: The bottom panels of Figure~3 show the spectra of the blueshifted
269: regions in the He~{\sc ii} (left) and Fe~{\sc xv} (right) windows.
270: The histograms shown with the solid lines are the observed spectra
271: integrated over the blueshifted region sandwiched between the two white
272: horizontal lines in the top panels for each emission line.
273: The spectra are normalized with their maximum intensities.
274: We fitted the spectra with Gaussian functions.
275: For each window, the spectrum is divided into a main component (dotted
276: line) and a blueshifted component (solid line).
277: The black thin and thick arrows point to the peaks of the main and
278: blueshifted components, respectively.
279: The Doppler velocity is determined by the displacement between the
280: blueshifted and the main components.
281: Although the main components themselves show displacements compared to
282: the profiles of a quiet region (e.g., the bottom part of the FOVs) of
283: less than 5~km~s$^{-1}$, they are small compared with the blueshifted
284: phenomena, and therefore, we do not take them into the following
285: considerations.
286: The He~{\sc ii} and Fe~{\sc xv} lines recorded Doppler velocities of
287: about 280 and 240~km~s$^{-1}$, respectively.
288: For BS1, the blueshifted components are brighter than the main
289: components.
290:
291: We compared the features with the SOT data to investigate the relation
292: between BS1 and the flare kernels.
293: We often observe upflow motion, associated with chromospheric
294: evaporation \citep{Neu68,Hira74,Anti78,Anto82,Can85}, at the footpoints
295: of flare loops.
296: They result from sudden pressure enhancement due to bombardment by
297: nonthermal particles and/or conduction from the coronal flare kernels.
298: %%%
299: \citet{Milli06} reported that the upflows of about 110~km~s$^{-1}$ in
300: the Fe~{\sc xix} line (log$T$ $\approx$ 6.9) were observed with the {\it
301: Reuven Ramaty High-Energy Solar Spectroscopic Imager} ({\it RHESSI}:
302: \cite{Lin02})at the flare kernels.
303:
304: The top panels of Figure~4 show the Ca~{\sc ii} (H-line) images.
305: We can see a two-ribbon structure that shows an inverse S-shape in the
306: east-west direction.
307: The crosses in the panels ($\times$) point to the positions of BS1
308: observed with EIS.
309: The X-coordinate corresponds to the slit position at that time, and the
310: Y-coordinate is the front position (i.e., the southern end) of BS1 seen
311: in the Fe~{\sc xv} line.
312: We cannot see any correspondences between BS1 and the bright features
313: seen in the SOT images, such as the flare ribbons.
314: Therefore, BS1 is not related to the evaporation flow.
315:
316: We compared the EIS data with the SXR images obtained with XRT.
317: The bottom panels of Figure~4 show these images.
318: As we mentioned, we can see a plasmoid ejection as marked with arrows.
319: It lies horizontally, and is ejected from the flare core site in the
320: southwest direction.
321: The crosses in the panels again indicate the front positions of BS1
322: determined with the Fe~{\sc xv} window.
323: We can see a remarkable correspondence in all the frames between
324: the positions of BS1 and those of the plasmoid ejection.
325: The ejected plasmoid travels in the XRT images with a velocity of about
326: 90~km~s$^{-1}$, which is roughly consistent with the drift speed of BS1.
327: Therefore, we conclude that BS1 originates from the plasmoid ejection.
328:
329: As we mentioned above, the timing of BS1 just corresponds to the first
330: impulsive radio burst observed with NoRP, which supports the
331: plasmoid-induced reconnection model.
332: BS1 showed Doppler and drift velocities of about 240 -- 280 and 50 --
333: 90~km~s$^{-1}$, respectively, which indicates that the combined velocity
334: was about 250 -- 300~km~s$^{-1}$.
335: This value is consistent with the velocities that have been previously
336: reported (e.g., \citet{Shiba95} examined eight X-ray plasmoid ejections
337: observed with {\it Yohkoh}, and found that the apparent velocity was 50
338: -- 400~km~s$^{-1}$).
339:
340:
341: \subsection{The Southern Feature -- BS2}
342: %%%
343: The top panels of Figure~5 show time sequences of the spectra in the
344: Fe~{\sc xv} and Ca~{\sc xvii} windows.
345: Solar north is up and shorter wavelength (i.e., blueward) is to the left.
346: The size of each spectrum is 224$^{\prime\prime}$ along the slit
347: (vertical), and 24 pixels in the EIS CCDs (horizontal).
348: The displacement between the CCD-A and CCD-B was corrected.
349: The times of the spectra are taken at (a) 02:22:11~UT, (b) 02:22:43~UT,
350: (c) 02:23:14~UT, (d) 02:23:46~UT, and (e) 02:24:18~UT, respectively.
351:
352: The flare core site is seen as two very bright bands in these spectra.
353: BS2 appeared from 02:22:11~UT to 02:24:18~UT, and went out of the EIS
354: FOV just before the first impulsive radio burst was observed with NoRP
355: (see Figure~1).
356: They started to appear at $200^{\prime\prime}$ south of the disk center,
357: which is about $100^{\prime\prime}$ south of the flare core region.
358: They travel along the slit, i.e., southward, with a velocity of about
359: 450~km s$^{-1}$.
360: Furthermore, as seen in the top panels of Figure~5, these blueshifted
361: features broaden widely in the blue wings of the lines.
362: These features were observed only in the Fe~{\sc xv} and Ca~{\sc xvii}
363: windows, which are the two hottest lines contained in the raster.
364: Therefore, the plasma generating BS2 must be heated more than about
365: 2~MK.
366:
367: The middle panels of Figure~5 show the spectra of the blueshifted
368: regions in the Fe~{\sc xv} and Ca~{\sc xvii} windows.
369: The histograms shown with solid lines are the observed spectra
370: integrated over the region sandwiched between the two white lines in the
371: top panels for each line.
372: The spectra are normalized with the maximum intensities.
373: We fitted the spectra and divided them into several components.
374: We assumed that all the components follow Gaussian functions.
375:
376: For the Fe~{\sc xv} window, the spectrum is divided into Fe~{\sc xv}
377: main component (dotted line) and the blueshifted component (solid line).
378: The black thin and thick arrows point to the peaks of the main and
379: blueshifted components, respectively.
380: The Ca~{\sc xvii} window (the middle right panel) contains Fe~{\sc xi}
381: and O~{\sc v} lines as well as the target Ca~{\sc xvii} line.
382: We can see Fe~{\sc xi} and O~{\sc v} lines discretely in the quiet
383: region, while we can see the blended emission with the Ca~{\sc xvii}
384: lines in the BS2 region.
385: Therefore, we have to remove those components, before we discuss the
386: blueshift component of the Ca~{\sc xvii} line.
387: First, we do not take the O~{\sc v} component into consideration, since
388: we cannot see the component at all for the blueshifted region.
389: The line is sensitive to the low temperature plasma (log$T$ is 5.4), and
390: the absence is consistent with the fact that BS2 is hot.
391: Secondly, we estimate the Fe~{\sc xi} component in the Ca~{\sc xvii}
392: window.
393: Since the Fe~{\sc xi} emission line in the Ca~{\sc xvii} window
394: (192.8~{\AA}) and the left peak (i.e., the peak with the shorter
395: wavelength) of the Fe~{\sc xi} doublet (188.2~{\AA}) are a density
396: insensitive line pair, we can estimate the intensity and the line shift
397: compared to the quiet region from the profile of the Fe~{\sc xi} lines
398: in the Fe~{\sc xi} window.
399: In the middle right panel of Figure~5 we show them with the gray dashed
400: line.
401: The Fe~{\sc xi} component also do not show blueshift at all.
402: The gray arrows point to the peak positions of the Fe~{\sc xi} in the
403: Ca~{\sc xvii} window.
404: Then, after the subtraction of the Fe~{\sc xi} component, we divided the
405: spectrum into Ca~{\sc xvii} main component (dotted line) and the
406: blueshifted component (solid line).
407: The black thin and thick arrows again point to the peaks of the Ca~{\sc
408: xvii} main and the blueshifted components, respectively.
409:
410: The peaks of the BS2 components shifted 0.089~{\AA} for the Fe~{\sc xv}
411: line, and 0.099~{\AA} for the Ca~{\sc xvii} line, which correspond to
412: Doppler velocities of about 90 and 150~km~s$^{-1}$, respectively.
413: The blueshifted components of both lines broaden widely, and have wide
414: FWHM of about 0.24~{\AA} for the Fe~{\sc xv} line and about 0.21~{\AA}
415: for the Ca~{\sc xvii} line.
416: The very wide FWHM of the blueshifted components indicates that BS2 has
417: a large velocity field along the line of sight.
418: These features in the spectra are very different from those of BS1.
419:
420: We compared BS2 with the coronal features seen in the XRT images.
421: We expect plasma motion in the XRT images at the same position as BS2,
422: since XRT is sensitive to high temperature plasma observed with the EIS
423: Fe~{\sc xv} and Ca~{\sc xvii} spectra.
424: The bottom three panels of Figure~5 show the XRT Thin-Be filter images
425: of the flare.
426: The arrows point to the front of the XRT arc-shaped ejection, which is
427: travelling in the southeast direction with a velocity of about
428: 650~km~s$^{-1}$.
429: This ejection was faint compared with the other ejections seen in the
430: XRT and TRACE images.
431: The shape and the travelling direction are also different from the others
432: which showed the rod-shaped structure and traveled in the southwest
433: direction, similar to that associated with BS1.
434: These features of the ejection resemble the X-ray waves discovered with
435: {\it Yohkoh}/SXT, and this disturbance is possibly generated by the MHD
436: fast-mode shock.
437: %%%
438: We roughly estimated the Alfv\'{e}nic Mach number of BS2, using the same
439: method as \citet{Naru02}, and found it to be about 1.4.
440: This result indicates that the XRT wavelike phenomena and BS2 might be a
441: weak MHD fast-mode shock.
442: The detailed analysis and theoretical treatment of the shock is beyond
443: the scope of this paper.
444: The observational confirmation of the density and temperature jumps
445: caused by the passage of the shock waves will be discussed in a future
446: paper.
447:
448: The crosses in the panels show the position of BS2.
449: The horizontal positions (X-coordinate) correspond to the EIS slit
450: position.
451: We can clearly see the correspondence between BS2 and the ejection as
452: part of a coronal shock wave, and therefore, we conclude that BS2 is
453: associated with the wavelike phenomenon.
454: %%%
455: Furthermore, a Halo-type coronal mass ejection (CME) associated with the
456: flare was observed with the Large Angle Spectrometric Coronagraph
457: (LASCO) on board the {\it Solar and Heliospheric Observatory} ({\it
458: SOHO}: see the {\it SOHO}/LASCO CME online catalog\footnote{See
459: http://cdaw.gsfc.nasa.gov/CME\_list/.}; \cite{Yashi04}).
460: The EIT wave travels in almost all direction from the flare site, and
461: the clearest disturbance is seen travelling with a speed of about 570
462: $\pm$ 150 km s$^{-1}$in the southeast direction, which is almost the
463: same as that of the XRT wave.
464: Figure~6 shows the running differences of the EIT images.
465: The 02:24:33~UT image (bottom left panel) suffered from scattered light
466: in the telescope, and therefore, the wave-front is unclear.
467: In the XRT image (top left panel) the front of the XRT wave is indicated
468: by the solid line, and the wave is estimated to reach the dashed line
469: position at 02:36~UT.
470: In the 02:36:01~UT image (bottom right panel) the expected position of
471: the XRT wave is also shown by the dashed line, and we can see that the
472: front of the EIT wave is located slightly inside of the XRT wave
473: position (dashed line).
474:
475: BS2 recorded a Doppler velocity of about 100~km~s$^{-1}$ while the drift
476: velocity along the slit is about 450~km~s$^{-1}$.
477: This implies that BS2 was travelling with a velocity of about
478: 460~km~s$^{-1}$ and with an elevation angle of 13 degree from the plane
479: of sky, although the Doppler velocity (100~km~s$^{-1}$) was derived only
480: from two points of measurement.
481: The velocity of 460~km~s$^{-1}$ is slower than the typical velocity of
482: Moreton waves and/or X-ray waves.
483: This is because the slit direction (north-south) is different from the
484: direction of the arc-shaped ejection.
485:
486:
487:
488: \section{Summary and Conclusions}
489: %%%
490: We found two kinds of strongly blueshifted feature that were observed
491: with {\it Hinode}/EIS to be associated with the 2006 December 13 flare.
492:
493: BS1 was bright in all observed lines used for the raster, and drifted
494: southward, that is along the slit, at a velocity of about
495: 50~km~s$^{-1}$.
496: The Doppler velocity is about 250~km~s$^{-1}$.
497: They are associated with the plasmoid ejection seen in XRT, while there
498: are no corresponding flare ribbons in the Ca~{\sc ii} (H-line) images
499: obtained with SOT.
500: Therefore, we concluded that BS1 is the ejected plasma, and is not an
501: evaporation flow.
502: Moreover, BS1 appears at the time of the first radio burst, which
503: supports the plasmoid-induced reconnection model that shows the
504: correlation between acceleration of plasmoids/filaments and bursts of
505: nonthermal emissions.
506:
507: BS2, on the other hand, was very faint, and showed spectra that
508: broaden in the wavelength space.
509: The center of the blueshifted component recorded a Doppler velocity of
510: about 100~km~s$^{-1}$, the drift velocity along the slit is about
511: 450~km~s$^{-1}$.
512: These components are observed only in the hottest lines of the raster
513: observation (Fe~{\sc xv} and Ca~{\sc xvii}), and therefore, the plasmas
514: must be heated to more than 2~MK.
515: The BS2 region corresponds to the propagation of the coronal wavelike
516: ejection seen in XRT images.
517: The ejection is thought to be a MHD fast-mode shock wave, and it is the
518: first successful spectroscopic observation of such a shock wave
519: associated with a flare.
520:
521:
522: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
523: \acknowledgments
524:
525: We first acknowledge an anonymous referee for her/his useful comments
526: and suggestions.
527: %%%
528: {\it Hinode} is a Japanese mission developed and launched by ISAS/JAXA,
529: collaborating with NAOJ as domestic partner and NASA and STFC (U.K.) as
530: international partners.
531: Scientific operation of the {\it Hinode} mission is conducted by the
532: {\it Hinode} science team organized at ISAS/JAXA.
533: This team mainly consists of scientists from institutes in the partner
534: countries.
535: Support for the post-launch operation is provided by JAXA and NAOJ
536: (Japan), STFC (U.K.), NASA, ESA, and NSC (Norway).
537: %%%
538: This work was partly carried out at the NAOJ Hinode Science Center,
539: which is supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Creative Scientific Research
540: ''The Basic Study of Space Weather Prediction'' from MEXT, Japan
541: (17GS0208, Head Investigator: K. Shibata), generous donations from Sun
542: Microsystems, and NAOJ internal funding.
543: JLC acknowledges the award of a Leverhulme Emeritus Fellowship.
544:
545: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
546: \begin{thebibliography}{}
547:
548: \bibitem[Antiochos \& Sturrock(1978)]{Anti78}
549: Antiochos, S. K., \& Sturrock, P. A. 1978, \apj, 220, 1137
550:
551: \bibitem[Antonucci et al.(1982)]{Anto82}
552: Antonucci, E., et al. 1982, \solphys, 78, 107
553:
554: \bibitem[Asai et al.(2004)]{Asa04}
555: Asai, A., Yokoyama, T., Shimojo, M., Masuda, S., Kurokawa, H., Shibata, K.
556: 2004, \apj, 605, L77
557: % downflow
558:
559: \bibitem[Aschwanden(2002)]{Asch02}
560: Aschwanden, M. J. 2002, Space, Sci., Rev., 101, 1
561: %% HXR - plasmoid
562:
563: \bibitem[Canfield \& Gunkler(1985)]{Can85}
564: Canfield, R. C., \& Gunkler, T. A. 1985, \apj, 288, 353
565:
566: \bibitem[Carmichael(1964)]{Car64}
567: Carmichael, H. 1964, in The Physics of Solar Flares, ed. W. N. Hess
568: (NASA SP-50), 450
569: %CSHKP
570:
571: \bibitem[Culhane et al.(2007)]{Cul07}
572: Culhane, J. L., et al. 2007, \solphys, 243, 19
573: % EIS
574:
575: \bibitem[Delaboudini\'{e}re et al. (1995)]{Dela95}
576: Delaboudini\'{e}re, J.-P., et al. 1995, \solphys, 162, 291
577: % EIT
578:
579: \bibitem[Domingo et al.(1995)]{Dom95}
580: Domingo, V., Fleck, B., \& Poland, A. I. 1995, \solphys, 162, 1
581: % SOHO
582:
583: \bibitem[Eto et al.(2002)]{Eto02}
584: Eto, S., et al. 2002, \pasj, 54, 481
585: % Moreton wave
586:
587: \bibitem[Golub et al.(2007)]{Gol07}
588: Golub, L., et al. 2007, \solphys, 243, 63
589:
590: \bibitem[Handy et al.(1999)]{Hand99}
591: Handy, B. N., et al. 1999, \solphys, 187, 229
592: % TRACE
593:
594: \bibitem[Hirayama(1974)]{Hira74}
595: Hirayama, T. 1974, \solphys, 34, 323
596:
597: \bibitem[Hudson et al.(2003)]{Hud03}
598: Hudson, H. S., Khan, J. I., Lemen, J. R., Nitta, N. V., Uchida, Y.
599: 2003, \solphys, 212, 121
600: % X-ray wave
601:
602: \bibitem[Imada et al.(2007)]{Ima07}
603: Imada, S., et al. 2007, \pasj, 59, S793
604: % 2006-12-13 flare
605:
606: \bibitem[Isobe et al.(2007)]{Isobe07}
607: Isobe, H., et al. 2007, \pasj, 59, S807
608:
609: \bibitem[Kahler et al.(1988)]{Kah88}
610: Kahler, S. W., Moore, R. L., Kane, S. R., Zirin, H. 1988, \apj, 328, 824
611: % HXR - plasmoid
612:
613: \bibitem[Khan \& Hudson(2000)]{Kha00}
614: Khan, J. I., \& Hudson, H. S. 2000, \grl, 27, 1083
615: % X-ray wave
616:
617: \bibitem[Khan \& Aurass(2002)]{Kha02}
618: Khan, J. I., \& Aurass, H. 2002, \aap, 383, 1018
619: % X-ray wave \& Moreton wave
620:
621: \bibitem[Kopp \& Pneuman(1976)]{Kop76}
622: Kopp, R. A., \& Pneuman, G. W. 1976, \solphys, 50, 85
623: %CSHKP
624:
625: \bibitem[Korendyke et al.(2006)]{Kore06}
626: Korendyke, C. M., et al. 2006, \ao, 45, 8674
627: % EIS-instrument
628:
629: \bibitem[Kosugi et al.(2007)]{Kosu07}
630: Kosugi, T., et al. 2007, \solphys, 243, 3
631: % Hinode
632:
633: \bibitem[Kubo et al.(2007)]{Kubo07}
634: Kubo, M., et al. 2007, \pasj, 59, S779
635: %
636:
637: \bibitem[Lang et al.(2006)]{Lang06}
638: Lang, J., et al. 2006, \ao, 45, 8689
639: % EIS-instrument
640:
641: \bibitem[Lin et al.(2002)]{Lin02}
642: Lin, R. P., et al. 2002, \solphys, 210, 3
643: % RHESSI
644:
645: \bibitem[Milligan et al.(2006)]{Milli06}
646: Milligan, R. O., Gallagher, P. T., Mathiudakis M., Keenan, F. P.
647: 2006, \apj, 642, L169
648:
649: \bibitem[Moreton(1960)]{More60}
650: Moreton, G. E. 1960, \aj, 65, 494
651: % Moreton wave
652:
653: %\bibitem[Morimoto \& Kurokawa(2003a)]{Mori03a}
654: %Morimoto, T. \& Kurokawa H. 2003, \pasj, 55, 505
655: %% Ha filament - HXR
656:
657: \bibitem[Morimoto \& Kurokawa(2003)]{Mori03}
658: Morimoto, T. \& Kurokawa H. 2003, \pasj, 55, 1141
659: % Ha filament - HXR
660:
661: \bibitem[Nakajima et al.(1985)]{Naka85}
662: Nakajima, H., et al. 1985, \pasj, 37, 163
663: % NoRP
664:
665: \bibitem[Narukage et al.(2002)]{Naru02}
666: Narukage, N., et al. 2002, \apj, 572, L109
667: % Moreton wave
668:
669: \bibitem[Neupert(1968)]{Neu68}
670: Neupert, W. M. 1968, \apj, 153, L59
671:
672: \bibitem[Ogawara et al.(1991)]{Oga91}
673: Ogawara, Y., et al. 1991, \solphys, 136, 1
674: % Yohkoh
675:
676: %\bibitem[Ohyama \& Shibata(1997)]{Ohya97}
677: %Ohyama, M., Shibata, K. 1997, \pasj, 49, 249
678: %% plasmoid ejection
679:
680: \bibitem[Ohyama \& Shibata(1998)]{Ohya98}
681: Ohyama, M., Shibata, K. 1998, \apj, 499, 934
682: % plasmoid ejection
683:
684: \bibitem[Schrijver et al.(1999)]{Sch99}
685: Schrijver, C. J., et al. 1999, \solphys, 187, 261
686: % TRACE
687:
688: \bibitem[Shibasaki et al(1979)]{Shiba79}
689: Shibasaki, K., Ishiguro, M., \& Enome, S. 1979,
690: Proc. Res. Inst. Atmos., 26, 117
691: % NoRP
692:
693: \bibitem[Shibata et al.(1995)]{Shiba95}
694: Shibata, K., Masuda, S., Shimojo, M., Hara, H., Yokoyama, T., Tsuneta, S.,
695: Kosugi, T., Ogawara, Y. 1995, \apj, 451, L83
696: % plasmoid ejection
697:
698: \bibitem[Shibata(1999)]{Shiba99}
699: Shibata, K., 1999, \apss, 264, 129
700: % Magnetic reconnection model
701:
702: \bibitem[Shibata \& Tanuma(2001)]{Shiba01}
703: Shibata, K., Tanuma, S. 2001, Earth Planets Space, 53, 473
704: % Magnetic reconnection model
705:
706: \bibitem[Smith \& Harvey(1971)]{Smi71}
707: Smith, S. F., \& Harvey, K. L. 1971, in Physics of the Solar Corona,
708: ed. C. J. Macris (Dordrecht: Reidel), 156
709: % Moreton wave
710:
711: \bibitem[Sterling \& Moore(2004)]{Ster04}
712: Sterling, A. C., Moore, R. L. 2004, \apj, 613, 1221
713:
714: \bibitem[Sterling \& Moore(2005)]{Ster05}
715: Sterling, A. C., Moore, R. L. 2005, \apj, 630, 1148
716:
717: \bibitem[Sturrock(1966)]{Stur66}
718: Sturrock, P. A. 1966, \nat, 211, 695
719: %CSHKP
720: \bibitem[Su et al.(2007)]{Su07}
721: Su, Y., et al., 2007, \pasj, 59, S785
722:
723: \bibitem[Thompson et al.(2000)]{Thom00}
724: Thompson, B. J., et al. 2000, \apj, 193, 161
725: % EIT wave
726:
727: \bibitem[Torii(1979)]{Torii79}
728: Torii, C., Tsukiji, Y., Kobayashi, S., Yoshimi, N., Tanaka, H., \&
729: Enome, S. 1979, Proc. Res. Inst. Atmos., 26, 129
730: % NoRP
731:
732: \bibitem[Tsuneta et al.(1991)]{Tsu91}
733: Tsuneta, S., et al. 1991, \solphys, 136, 37
734: % SXT
735:
736: \bibitem[Tsuneta(1997)]{Tsu97}
737: Tsuneta, S. 1997, \apj, 483, 507
738: % plasmoid ejection
739:
740: \bibitem[Tsuneta et al.(2007)]{Tsu07}
741: Tsuneta, S., et al. 2007, \solphys, in press
742: % XRT
743:
744: \bibitem[Uchida(1968)]{Uchi68} Uchida, Y.
745: 1968, \solphys, 4, 30
746: % Moreton wave - theory I
747:
748: \bibitem[Uchida(1970)]{Uchi70} Uchida, Y.
749: 1970, \pasj, 22, 341
750: % Moreton wave - theory II
751:
752: \bibitem[Uchida et al.(1973)]{Uchi73}
753: Uchida, Y., Altschuler, M. D., Newkirk, G. Jr.
754: 1970, \solphys, 28, 495
755: % Moreton wave - theory III
756:
757: \bibitem[Yashiro et al.(2004)]{Yashi04}
758: Yashiro, S., Gopalswamy, N., Michalek, G., St.Cyr, O. C.,
759: Plunkett, S. P., Rich, N. B., and Howard, R. A.
760: 2004, \jgr, 109, A07105, doi:10.1029/2003JA010282
761:
762: \bibitem[Warmuth et al.(2004a)]{War04a}
763: Warmuth, A., Vr\v{s}nak, B., Magdaleni\'{c}, J., Hanslmeier, A.,
764: Otruba, W. 2004, \aap, 418, 1110
765:
766: \bibitem[Warmuth et al.(2004b)]{War04b}
767: Warmuth, A., Vr\v{s}nak, B., Magdaleni\'{c}, J., Hanslmeier, A.,
768: Otruba, W. 2004, \aap, 418, 1117
769:
770: \bibitem[Warmuth et al.(2005)]{War05a}
771: Warmuth, A., Mann, G., Aurass, H. 2005, \apj, 626, L121
772:
773: \bibitem[Warmuth \& Mann(2005)]{War05b}
774: Warmuth, A., Mann, G. 2005, \aap, 435, 1123
775:
776: \end{thebibliography}
777:
778: \clearpage
779:
780: \begin{table}
781: \begin{center}
782: Table 1 \\
783: Line list used of the raster observation\\
784: \begin{tabular}{lllc} \tableline\tableline
785: Target Ion & Center wavelength ({\AA}) & CCD & log$T$ \\ % log $T_{\rm max}$ \\
786: \tableline
787: Fe {\sc x} & 184.5 & CCD-B & 6.0 \\
788: Fe {\sc viii}& 185.2 & CCD-B & 5.6 \\
789: Fe {\sc xi} & 188.2 & CCD-B & 6.1 \\
790: Ca {\sc xvii}& 192.8 & CCD-B & 6.8 \\
791: Fe {\sc xii} & 195.1 & CCD-B & 6.2 \\
792: Fe {\sc xiii}& 202.0 & CCD-B & 6.2 \\
793: He {\sc ii} & 256.3 & CCD-A & 4.9 \\
794: Fe {\sc xiv} & 274.2 & CCD-A & 6.2 \\
795: Fe {\sc xv} & 284.2 & CCD-A & 6.4 \\
796: \tableline
797: \end{tabular}
798: \end{center}
799: \end{table}
800:
801: \begin{figure}
802: \epsscale{0.5}
803: \plotone{f1.eps}
804: \caption{
805: Overview of the 2006 December 13 flare.
806: Temporal variations of the GOES SXR flux in the 1.0 -- 8.0~{\AA} and 0.5
807: -- 4.0 channels ({\it top}) and radio time profiles (17 and 35~GHz)
808: obtained with NoRP ({\it bottom}).
809: The time ranges of BS1 and BS2 seen in the EIS field of view are marked
810: with BS1 and BS2, respectively.}
811: \label{fig:2}
812: \end{figure}
813:
814: \begin{figure}
815: \epsscale{.75}
816: \plotone{f2.eps}
817: \caption{
818: EUV (195 {\AA}) images taken with TRACE ({\it top}) and raster images of
819: He {\sc ii} (256~{\AA}: {\it bottom left}) and in Fe {\sc xv}
820: (284~{\AA}: {\it bottom right}) lines.
821: Solar north is up, and west is to the right.
822: The horizontal and vertical axes give the distance from the disk center
823: in arcseconds as shown in the top panels.
824: For the EIS raster images, the horizontal axis below the panels shows
825: the times.
826: The small box with the dotted line in the bottom right panel points to
827: the BS1 region.}
828: \label{fig:2}
829: \end{figure}
830:
831: \begin{figure}
832: \epsscale{.75}
833: \plotone{f3.eps}
834: \caption{
835: Northern blueshift (BS1).
836: {\it Top}: Time sequenced spectra of He~{\sc ii} (left) and Fe~{\sc xv}
837: (right) windows observed with {\it Hinode}/EIS.
838: The time of each panel is (A) 02:24:49~UT, (B) 02:25:21~UT, (C)
839: 02:25:52~UT, (D) 02:26:24~UT, and (E) 02:26:56~UT.
840: Solar north is up and blue is to the left.
841: The size of each window is 224$^{\prime\prime}$ along the EIS slit
842: (vertical) and 24 pixels in the CCDs of EIS, which corresponds to
843: 0.54~{\AA} in the wavelength scale (horizontal).
844: {\it Bottom}: Normalized spectra at BS1 in He~{\sc ii} (left) and
845: Fe~{\sc xv} (right) windows.
846: The solid histograms show the spectra averaged over the region
847: sandwiched between the two horizontal white lines in the top panels.
848: The dotted and solid lines are the fitting results that represent the
849: main and the blueshift components of the line.
850: The peaks of each line are shown with thin and thick arrows.}
851: \label{fig:3}
852: \end{figure}
853:
854: \begin{figure}
855: \epsscale{.50}
856: \plotone{f4.eps}
857: \caption{
858: {\it Top}: Ca~{\sc ii} (H-line) images taken with {\it Hinode}/SOT.
859: {\it Bottom}: Soft X-ray images obtained with the {\it Hinode}/XRT
860: (negative images).
861: Solar north is up, and west is to the right.
862: The horizontal and vertical axes give the distance from the disk center
863: in arcseconds as shown in the top and the left.
864: The cross signs ($\times$) point to the positions of BS1.
865: The arrows in the bottom right panel follows the plasmoid ejection seen
866: in XRT.
867: The vertical line in the bottom right panel shows the position of the
868: EIS slit.
869: The slit extends from $y=-233$ to $-9$ arcseconds.}
870: \label{fig:4}
871: \end{figure}
872:
873: \begin{figure}
874: \epsscale{.75}
875: \plotone{f5.eps}
876: \caption{
877: Southern blueshift (BS2).
878: {\it Top}: Time sequenced spectra of Fe~{\sc xv} ({\it left}) and
879: Ca~{\sc xvii} ({\it right}) windows observed with {\it Hinode}/EIS.
880: The time of each panel is (a) 02:22:11~UT, (b) 02:22:43~UT,
881: (c) 02:23:14~UT, (d) 02:23:46~UT, and (e) 02:24:18~UT.
882: Solar north is up and blue is to the left.
883: The size of each window is 224$^{\prime\prime}$ along the EIS slit
884: (vertical) and 24 pixels in the CCDs of EIS, which corresponds to 0.54
885: {\AA} in the wavelength scale (horizontal).
886: The displacement between the CCD-A and CCD-B was corrected.
887: {\it Middle}: Normalized spectra at BS2 in Fe~{\sc xv} (left) and Ca
888: {\sc~xvii} (right) windows.
889: The solid histograms show the spectra averaged over the region
890: sandwiched between the two horizontal white lines in the top panels.
891: The dotted and solid black lines are the fitting results that represent
892: the main and the blueshift components of the line.
893: The peaks of each line are shown with thin and thick arrows.
894: The gray dashed line in the right panel show Fe~{\sc xi} component, and
895: the peaks are indicated by gray thin arrows.
896: {\it Bottom}: Soft X-ray negative images taken with the {\it
897: Hinode}/XRT.
898: The arrows show the front of the wavelike ejection.
899: Crosses ($\times$) represent BS2 determined by the Fe~{\sc xv} line.
900: The vertical line in the bottom right panel shows the position of the
901: EIS slit.}
902: \label{fig:5}
903: \end{figure}
904:
905:
906: \begin{figure}
907: \epsscale{.75}
908: \plotone{f6.eps}
909: \caption{
910: An XRT image (top left panel) and running differences of EIT images (the
911: others).
912: The top right panel shows the image at 02:12~UT with that of 02:00~UT
913: subtracted.
914: Differencing is continued in the remaining panels.
915: The white oval region in the bottom left panel is mainly due to
916: scattered light in the telescope.
917: In the top left panel the XRT arc-shaped ejection is indicated by the
918: solid line, and it is estimated to reach at the dashed line at
919: 02:36~UT.
920: The estimated position is indicated in the bottom right panel.}
921: \label{fig:6}
922: \end{figure}
923:
924:
925: \end{document}
926: