1: %\newif\ifsubmode

2: %\submodefalse

3: %\submodetrue

4: 

5: \documentclass{emulateapj}

6: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

7: 

8: %\ifsubmode

9: %\else

10: \slugcomment{\today}

11: %\fi

12: 

13: \def\rb{{\bf r}}                   

14: 

15: \def\kms{\hbox{$~$km$~$s$^{-1}$}}

16: \def\Mshift{M_{shift}}                   

17: \def\SNR{S/N}                   

18: \def\FWHM{W}                   

19: \def\tempcompl{{\cal E}_t}                   

20: \newcommand{\lta}{\lesssim}

21: \newcommand{\gta}{\gtrsim}

22: \def\arcdeg{\hbox{$^\circ$}}

23: \def\arcmin{\hbox{$^\prime$}}

24: \def\arcsec{\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$}}

25: \def\fd{\hbox{$.\!\!^{\rm d}$}}

26: \def\fh{\hbox{$.\!\!^{\rm h}$}}

27: \def\fm{\hbox{$.\!\!^{\rm m}$}}

28: \def\fs{\hbox{$.\!\!^{\rm s}$}}

29: \def\h{\hbox{$^{\rm h}$}}

30: \def\m{\hbox{$^{\rm m}$}}

31: \def\s{\hbox{$^{\rm s}$}}

32: \def\fdg{\hbox{$.\!\!^\circ$}}

33: \def\farcm{\hbox{$.\mkern-4mu^\prime$}}

34: \def\farcs{\hbox{$.\!\!^{\prime\prime}$}}

35: \def\snid{\ifmmode{\rm \tt SNID}\else{\tt SNID}\fi}

36: \def\dm15{\ifmmode{\Delta m_{15}}\else{$\Delta m_{15}$}\fi}

37: \def\magarcsec2{\ \rm{mag

38: \ arcsec}^{-2}}

39: 

40: \shorttitle{Light Echoes from Historic Supernovae}

41: \shortauthors{Rest et al.}

42: 

43: \begin{document}

44: 

45: \title{Scattered-Light Echoes from the Historical Galactic Supernovae Cassiopeia  A and Tycho (SN 1572)}

46: 

47: \author{A. Rest\altaffilmark{1,2,3}, D. L. Welch\altaffilmark{4},

48: N. B. Suntzeff\altaffilmark{5}, L. Oaster\altaffilmark{4},

49: H. Lanning\altaffilmark{6,14},K. Olsen\altaffilmark{6},

50: R. C. Smith\altaffilmark{1}, A. C. Becker\altaffilmark{7},

51: M. Bergmann\altaffilmark{8}, P. Challis\altaffilmark{9},

52: A. Clocchiatti\altaffilmark{10}, K. H. Cook\altaffilmark{11},

53: G. Damke\altaffilmark{1}, A. Garg\altaffilmark{2},

54: M. E. Huber\altaffilmark{11,12}, T. Matheson\altaffilmark{6},

55: D. Minniti\altaffilmark{10}, J. L. Prieto\altaffilmark{13},

56: W. M. Wood-Vasey\altaffilmark{9}

57: }

58: 

59: %A. Rest, D. L. Welch, N. B. Suntzeff, L. Oaster, H. Lanning,K. Olsen, R. C. Smith, A. C. Becker, M. Bergmann, P. Challis, A. Clocchiatti, K. H. Cook, G. Damke, A. Garg, M. E. Huber, T. Matheson, D. Minniti, J. L. Prieto, W. M. Wood-Vasey

60: % Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory, Harvard University, McMaster University, Texas A\&M University, National Optical Astronomy Observatory, University of Washington, Gemini Observatory, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics,Pontificia Universidad Cat\'olica de Chile, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Ohio State University

61: 

62: \altaffiltext{1}{Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory (CTIO), Colina el Pino S/N, La Serena, Chile}

63: 

64: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Physics, Harvard University, 17 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138}

65: 

66: \altaffiltext{3}{Goldberg Fellow}

67: 

68: \altaffiltext{4}{Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, McMaster University,

69: Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4M1, Canada}

70: 

71: \altaffiltext{5}{Dept. of Physics, Texas A\&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4242}

72: 

73: \altaffiltext{6}{National Optical Astronomy Observatory, 950 N. Cherry Ave., Tucson, AZ 85719-4933}

74: 

75: \altaffiltext{7}{Dept. of Astronomy, University of Washington, Box 351580, Seattle, WA 98195}

76: 

77: \altaffiltext{8}{Gemini Observatory, Casilla 603, La Serena, Chile}

78: 

79: \altaffiltext{9}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St., 

80: Cambridge, MA 02138.} 

81: 

82: \altaffiltext{10}{Dept. of Astronomy, Pontificia Universidad Cat\'olica de Chile, Casilla 306, Santiago 22, Chile}

83: 

84: \altaffiltext{11}{Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Ave., Livermore, CA 94550}

85: 

86: \altaffiltext{12}{Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218}

87: 

88: \altaffiltext{13}{Dept. of Astronomy,

89: Ohio State University, 140 West 18th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210-1173}

90: 

91: \altaffiltext{14}{Deceased December 20th, 2007}

92: 

93: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

94: %%%%%%%%%%%%   ABSTRACT

95: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

96:  

97: \begin{abstract}

98: We report the discovery of an extensive system of scattered light echo

99: arclets associated with the recent supernovae in the local

100: neighbourhood of the Milky Way: Tycho (SN 1572) and Cassiopeia

101: A. Existing work suggests that the Tycho SN was a thermonuclear

102: explosion while the Cas~A supernova was a core collapse

103: explosion. Precise classifications according to modern nomenclature

104: require spectra of the outburst light. 

105: In the case of ancient SNe, this can only be done with spectroscopy of

106: their light echo, where the discovery of the light echoes from the

107: outburst light is the first step.

108: Adjacent light echo positions suggest

109: that Cas~A and Tycho may share common scattering dust structures. If

110: so, it is possible to measure precise distances between historical

111: Galactic supernovae.  On-going surveys that alert on the development

112: of bright scattered-light echo features have the potential to reveal

113: detailed spectroscopic information for many recent Galactic

114: supernovae, both directly visible and obscured by dust in the Galactic

115: plane.

116: \end{abstract}

117: 

118: \keywords{ISM: individual(Cas A) --- ISM: individual(Tycho) --- supernova:general --- supernova remnants}

119: 

120: \section{Introduction}

121: \label{sec:intro}

122: 

123: The suggestion that historical supernovae might be studied by their

124: scattered light echoes was first made by \cite{Zwicky40} and attempted

125: by \cite{vandenBergh65,vandenBergh75}. Our group pioneered the

126: discovery and study of ancient supernova scattered-light echoes using

127: difference imaging in the LMC field where three echo complexes were

128: found to be associated with 400-900 year-old supernova remnants (SNR)

129: \citep{Rest05b}. We have since obtained a spectrum of one of these

130: echoes which reveals that the echo light is from the class of

131: over-luminous Type Ia supernovae \citep{Rest08,Badenes08} and

132: demonstrating that precise modern supernova classifications are

133: possible for ancient supernovae. These scattered light echoes

134: preserve optical spectral line information from the outburst, and will

135: be useful for future spectroscopic studies of the original SN

136: light. This is in contrast to the moving Cas~A features (sometimes

137: called “infrared echoes”) identified using far-infrared imagery from

138: the Spitzer Space Telescope \citep{Krause05}, which are the result of

139: dust absorbing the outburst light, warming and re-radiating at longer

140: wavelengths.

141: 

142: Echo features similar to those found in the LMC should be detectable

143: within our own Milky Way. The challenge has been to locate them across

144: a much larger solid angle. We have begun a program to find echoes

145: around a sample of 7 certain historical Galactic supernovae recorded

146: in the last 2000 years \citep{Stephenson02} (SN 185 AD/Centaurus, SN

147: 1054 AD/Crab, SN1006 AD/Lupus, SN 1181 AD/Cassiopeia, Tycho, Kepler,

148: Cas~A). Given the well-constrained ages of these historical supernovae

149: and estimated distances, we can improve our chance to find echoes by

150: targeting regions of cold dust at the approximate expected angular

151: distance. We used the reprocessed 100 $\micron$ IRAS images

152: \citep{Miville05} to select fields with lines of sight which contain

153: such dust, choosing fields closer to the Galactic plane than the

154: supernovae in the expectation that dust would be more highly

155: concentrated there.

156: 

157: Tycho in 1572 discovered one of the last two naked eye SNe in the

158: Galaxy, while another nearby supernova, Cassiopeia A, evidently

159: escaped discovery around 1671 \citep{Stephenson02}. Based on the

160: properties of the associated supernova remnants, it is thought that

161: the Tycho SN was a thermonuclear explosion \citep{Ruiz04a,Badenes06}

162: while the Cas~A supernova was a core collapse explosion

163: \citep{Chevalier78}.

164: 

165: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

166: %%%%%%%%%%%%   OBSERVATIONS

167: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

168: \section{Observations \& Reductions}

169: \label{sec:observations}

170: 

171: We obtained images from four observing runs on the Mayall 4m telescope

172: at Kitt Peak National Observatory in the fall of 2006 and 2007.  The

173: Mosaic imager, which operates at the f/3.1 prime focus at an effective

174: focal ratio of f/2.9, was used with the Bernstein VR Broad filter

175: (k1040) which has a central wavelength of 594.5nm and a FWHM of

176: 212.0nm. Images of target fields in Cassiopeia were obtained on UT

177: 2006 Oct 21-23, 2006 Dec 16, 2007 Oct 12-15, and 2007 Dec 13-15.

178: % (see Table~\ref{tab:observations}). 

179: Exposure times were between 120 and 150 seconds. The interval between 

180: the two epochs for a given field is at least 53 days and as much as two 

181: years. We expect echo arclets to have typical apparent motions of 20-40 

182: arcsec yr$^{-1}$, meaning a 3-month baseline is sufficient to resolve 

183: their apparent motion.  Imaging data was kernel- and flux-matched, 

184: aligned, subtracted, and masked using the SMSN

185: pipeline \citep{Rest05a,Garg07,Miknaitis07}. The resulting difference

186: images are remarkably clean of the (constant) stellar background and

187: are ideal for searching for variable sources.

188: 

189: \section{Analysis}

190: \label{sec:analysis}

191: 

192: Using the same techniques developed for the LMC echo

193: searches \citep{Rest05b}, candidate echo arclets, such as those shown

194: in Figure~\ref{fig:leexample}, were identified by visual examination

195: of difference images.

196: % (see Table~\ref{tab:le}). 

197: %

198: \begin{figure}[t]

199: \epsscale{0.9}

200: \plotone{f1.ps}

201: \caption[]{

202: Light echo arclets associated with Tycho from field \#4821. 

203: The orientation is N up and E to the left and the images are 

204: 325 x 250 arcseconds. The upper two panels show the first epoch 

205: image from 20 October 2006 (left), and

206: the second epoch image from 13 December 2007 (right). The lower images

207: are the difference images between the two upper images where white

208: represents the later (October 2006) image and black the earlier

209: December image. Saturated bright stars are masked gray. 

210: In the lower panel, the left image is repeated in the right

211: panel with the motion vectors plotted. Red represents a straight line

212: fit to the arclet, yellow represents the apparent motion of the

213: arclet, and blue shows the reverse vector direction. 

214: The VR surface brightness in the brighter arclets is roughly

215: $~24 \magarcsec2$. The widths of the echoes are resolved, and typically

216: $~10\arcsec$ across.

217: \label{fig:leexample}}

218: \end{figure}

219: 

220: 

221: 

222: %

223: We estimated the arc motion directions by eye and plotted the inverse

224: motion vectors, as shown in panel {\it A} of Figure~\ref{fig:vectors}.

225: Two echo complexes were discovered. In the first, we found six

226: clusters of light echoes with proper motion vectors converging back to

227: the Cas~A SNR, and in the other, six more echo clusters consistent

228: with an origin coincident with the Tycho SNR. No echo arclets were

229: detected for SN 1181 during this search, which also lies within our

230: search area, but in a region of lower 100 micron surface

231: brightness. All light echo features discovered seem to be associated

232: with either Cas~A or Tycho. We have obtained 3rd and 4th epoch images

233: in 2007 for the light echo groups we detected in 2006, and the light

234: echoes were redetected in these images.

235: %

236: \begin{figure}[t]

237: \epsscale{1.0}

238: %\ifsubmode

239: \plotone{f2.ps}

240: %\fi

241: \caption[]{

242: Arclet vector motions in the region of Cas~A and Tycho supernovae. The

243: vectors are plotted on an image reconstructed from IRAS data at

244: $100 \micron$ \citep{Miville05}. The panels are $44\arcdeg \times

245: 25\arcdeg$ with N up and E to the right. The green squares show the

246: Mosaic fields where we have at least two epochs and have been searched

247: for arcs in the difference image. The red circles mark the positions

248: of the three historic SNe SN 1181, Tycho, and Cas~A. There are six

249: clusters of light echoes with apparent motion vectors pointing back to

250: the Cas~A SNR, and six more consistent with an origin coincident with

251: the Tycho SNR. Panel B shows the average vector for each light echo

252: cluster. The apparent positions for the points of origin for the two

253: echo complexes are listed in Table~\ref{tab:results}, and calculated

254: as average of the all the pairs of vector crossings (clipped at

255: 3-sigma) where the large light blue circles denote the standard

256: deviation of the crossings of all vector pairs in each echo

257: complex. The yellow circles are centered on the

258: Table~\ref{tab:results} mean vector crossings and the circle sizes

259: show the error in the mean for the vector crossings. 

260: \label{fig:vectors}}

261: \end{figure}

262: 

263: 

264: %(see column PA(stdev) in

265: %Table~\ref{tab:leaverage}) 

266: For a given light echo cluster, the vectors have a spread in angle of

267: ~10 degrees (see column PA(stdev) in Table~\ref{tab:leaverage}) mainly due to the orientation of the scattering dust: If

268: the reflecting dustsheet or filament is confined to a plane

269: perpendicular to the line of sight, the light echo vector points

270: exactly back to the source. However, if the dustsheet is inclined or

271: warped, then the tangent to the light echo arc may rotate with respect

272: to the perpendicular direction to the remnant position.  Provided that

273: the inclinations of dust filaments in azimuth and in distance are not

274: correlated, the average vector will still point in the direction of

275: the SNR.  For each light echo cluster, we calculate the average

276: vector

277: (see Table~\ref{tab:leaverage}),

278: as shown in panel {\it

279: B} of Figure~\ref{fig:vectors}.  The estimated positions for the

280: points of origin for the two echo complexes are given in

281: Table~\ref{tab:results} as calculated by the average of all pairs of

282: vector crossings (clipped at 3-sigma). The Tycho and Cas~A SNR

283: positions are within the standard deviation of the points of origin

284: and within 3-sigma of the average position.

285: %

286: \input{tab1}

287: \input{tab2}

288: %

289: 

290: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

291: 

292: \section{Discussion \& Conclusions}

293: \label{sec:discussion}

294: 

295: The light echo equation \citep{Couderc39} 

296: %

297: \begin{equation}

298: z = \frac{\rho^2}{2ct} - \frac{ct}{2}

299: \end{equation}

300: %

301: relates the depth coordinate, $z$, the echo-supernova distance

302: projected along the line-of-sight, to the echo distance $\rho$

303: perpendicular to the line of sight, and the time $t$ since the

304: explosion was observed.  Then the distance $r$ from the scattering

305: dust to the SN is $r^2=\rho^2+z^2$, and $\rho$ can be estimated with

306: $\rho \approx D \sin\alpha$, where $D$ is the distance from the

307: observer to the SN, and $\alpha$ is the angular separation between the

308: SN and the scattering dust, which yields the 3-D position of the dust

309: associated with the arclet. In Figure~\ref{fig:z_vs_PA} we see that

310: three of the six Cas~A light echo clusters (field \#2116, \#3024, and

311: \#3117) are at very similar distances at $z \approx 400$ light years in front of

312: Cas~A.  This clustering in $z$ suggests that these three clusters are

313: associated with the same extended dust sheet/filament. Similarly, two

314: other Cas~A light echo clusters (field \#3824 and \#3826) are likely

315: from a single dust structure at $z \approx 2000$ light years. For Tycho a

316: number of arclets (fields \#3325, \#4022, \#4430, and \#4523) are found

317: near $z \approx 100$ light years (relative to the Tycho SNR) and one field

318: \#5717 contains scattering dust at $z \approx 1600$ light years.

319: %

320: \begin{figure}[t]

321: \epsscale{0.85}

322: %\ifsubmode

323: \plotone{f3.ps}

324: %\fi

325: \caption[]{

326: The distance $z$ from the supernova to the scattering cloud projected

327: along our line-of-sight plotted with respect to the position angle

328: from the associated supernova remnant. To calculate $z$, we assume that

329: the distance to Tycho is 2300pc and for Cas~A

330: 3400pc.

331: \label{fig:z_vs_PA}}

332: \end{figure}

333: 

334: 

335: % AR

336: The distance to Tycho and Cas A is estimated to be $2.3 \pm 0.5$kpc

337: and $3.4 \pm 0.5$kpc, respectively

338: \citep{Albinson86,Strom88,Lee04,Reed95}. This implies that Cas A is

339: $3600 \pm 2300$ light years behind Tycho.  For both Cas A and Tycho,

340: there is a clustering of the scattering dust structures in $z$,

341: indicating that there are extended dust structures or sheets, in

342: contrast to small, local dust structures.  The Tycho scattering dust

343: structures cluster around $z=0$, implying that there are also in fron

344: of Cas A. Since Cas A is in close angular proximity to Tycho, it can

345: be expected that dust belonging to this extended dust structure produce

346: light echoes for both Tycho and Cas A. Thus 

347: % AR end

348: we explore the possibility that Cas~A and Tycho share extended

349: scattering dust structures. It is notable that the difference between

350: the outer and the inner dust structures is about 1500-1600 light years

351: for both Cas~A and Tycho. Thus one scenario is that the Tycho light

352: echo groups in field \#3325, \#4022, \#4430, and \#4523 and Cas~A

353: light echo groups in field \#2116, \#3024, and \#3117 belong to the

354: same dust structure, and Tycho \#5717 and Cas~A \#3824 and \#3826 to

355: another dust structure. Since the measured $z$ distance is always

356: relative to its associated SNR, this would then imply that Cas~A is

357: about 300-400 light years farther away than Tycho, which 

358: % AR

359: is not within 1 sigma

360: of the current estimate of $3600 \pm 2300$ light

361: years. 

362: % AR end

363: Another possibility is that the outer Cas~A light echo cluster

364: in fields \#3824 and \#3826 arise from the same extended dust

365: structure which causes the Tycho light echoes in field \#3325, \#4022,

366: \#4430, and \#4523. This association seems more likely due to the

367: close proximity of these two arc groups on the sky.  For this

368: association, Cas~A must be $~1900$ light years more distant than

369: Tycho, 

370: % AR

371: which is within the errors of the current estimates.

372: % AR end

373: 

374: Geometric light echo distance estimates are possible when the

375: scattering angle is known (e.g. \cite{Sparks08} for V838 Mon). A

376: maximum in the linear polarization is expected for an angle of $90

377: \arcdeg$ - when the scattering dust is at the same distance as the

378: supernova. Therefore this method works best with light echoes with 

379: scattering angles spread around $90 \arcdeg$, which corresponds to 

380: distances spread around $z=0$. Such a situation may exist for Tycho

381: (see Figure~\ref{fig:z_vs_PA}). In the worst case, the distance

382: $D_{tycho}$ may be significantly larger than the current estimate of

383: 2300pc \citep{Albinson86,Strom88,Lee04} and a strong lower limit on the distance of Tycho

384: may be set. If Tycho is nearer than the current estimate, a more

385: accurate distance is possible since the distance of the scattering

386: dust will then bracket the supernova distance. For Cas A, none of our

387: detections imply scattering dust behind the SNR (see

388: Figure~\ref{fig:z_vs_PA}).  However, the existence of re-radiated echo

389: light in the infrared \citep{Krause05} suggests that such echoes may

390: yet be detected.

391: 

392: For Cas~A and Tycho, 5\% and 3\% of the fields surveyed with $z<2000$

393: light years contain scattered-light echo arclets, respectively (see

394: upper and middle panels of Figure~\ref{fig:histo}).  Virtually all

395: light echoes are found at $z<2000$ light years, and in particular at

396: $0<z<500$ light years.  No light echoes from SN1181 (3C58) were

397: detected. On first glance this is surprising.  However, the bottom

398: panels reveal that we have searched a smaller fraction of the $0<z<500$

399: light year, forward-scattering region of SN1181 in comparison to Cas A

400: and Tycho.  A combination of fainter surface brightness of the light

401: echoes due to the supernova age and brightness and small number

402: statistics might explain the lack of detections. Deeper surveys of

403: SN1181 region might yet yield light echoes.

404: %

405: \begin{figure}[t]

406: \epsscale{0.85}

407: %\ifsubmode

408: \plotone{f4.ps}

409: %\fi

410: \caption[]{

411: Histograms of the number of fields with two epochs versus their

412: distance z along the line of sight (i.e., how much “in front” or “in

413: back” of the supernova the scattering dust is) to the SNRs Cas~A,

414: Tycho, and SN 1181 from left to right in the upper panels.  The middle

415: panels show the number of light echo groups found in a given $z$ bin.

416: The percentage of fields with light echoes for a given bin is shown

417: above the red bars in percent. The bottom panels show the \% of the

418: total area (i.e. the annulus associated with the given $z$ bin) is

419: covered by the observed fields. 

420: \label{fig:histo}}

421: \end{figure}

422: %

423: Light echoes are expected to be scattered light of the averaged flux

424: around maximum luminosity - the only significant modification of the

425: event outburst light is expected to be due to dust grain size which,

426: in the absence of additional absorption along the echo paths, makes

427: the spectral flux bluer. We have demonstrated that the type of a SN

428: (Ia, II, etc.) and the subtype (luminous, normal, underluminous Type

429: Ia) can be determined centuries after the event by taking a spectrum

430: of the light echo \citep{Rest05b,Rest08}. 

431: 

432: %%%% beginning

433: %Prior to this work, the best technique for typing historical SNe came

434: %from radio and X-ray studies of the associated remnants.  The first

435: %proposed association for Tycho's SN outburst \citep{Hanbury52} was

436: %with a radio source at this position \citep{Bolton48}. Minkowski was

437: %reported to have discovered a ``faint gaseous filament'' lying close

438: %to the radio position and ``moving away from Tycho Brahe's position''

439: %\citep{Baldwin57}. Later observations confirmed the motion of the

440: %filaments associated with the remnant

441: %\citep{vandenBergh71,vandenBergh73}.  Modern X-ray spectra of the

442: %remnant have been interpreted by \cite{Ruiz04b,Ruiz04a,Badenes08} to

443: %be most consistent with a delayed-detonation model of a normal Type Ia

444: %SN.

445: 

446: %The nature of Cas A outburst  has proven much more elusive since 

447: %the outburst itself seems to avoided detection, despite having 

448: %happened in an era when observation of the sky was common 

449: %\citep{Stephenson02}.  A very bright

450: %and localized radio source \citep{Ryle48} in the vicinity of a star

451: %position measured by Flamsteed (but with no counterpart in the sky in

452: %modern times) was once considered to be an attractive candidate for the SN

453: %but the association is now generally discounted \citep{Stephenson02}. 

454: %We use the outburst date $1671.3 \pm 0.9$ determined from proper motions 

455: %of shell and ejecta knots in the Cas~A SNR \citep{Thorstensen01}. 

456: %Ground-based spectroscopy and spectral classification of supernova

457: %type is possible when the surface brightness of the echo light is brighter

458: %than $~22  \magarcsec2$.

459: %%%% end

460: 

461: In the Milky Way Galaxy alone there have been at least 7 historic SNe

462: \citep{Stephenson02} that are good candidates to have produced

463: still-observable light echoes. Other apparently young SNRs identified

464: in radio and x-ray surveys exist in the plane of the Galaxy

465: \citep{Green84,Reynolds08} that have no historical records, most

466: likely because they are obscured by dust. Light echoes of these

467: obscured SNe may be visible since the line-of-sight to scattering dust

468: may be less obscured than direct light. Potentially, dozens of ancient

469: SNe can be typed by the means of light echo spectroscopy as described

470: in \cite{Rest08}.  We note that this is one of the very rare occasions

471: in astronomy that cause and effect of the same astronomical event can

472: be observed, in that we can study the physics of the SNR as it appears

473: now and also the physics of the explosion which produced the SNR as it

474: appeared hundreds of years ago.

475: 

476: The study of scattered-light echoes from galactic SNe provide a host

477: of newly-recognized observational benefits which have only just begun

478: to be exploited including: the capacity to understand the connection

479: between remnant properties and the outburst spectral type, access to

480: observables related to asymmetric explosion properties, and a network

481: of absolute distance differences. 

482: 

483: %\section{Acknowledgments}

484: \acknowledgements

485: We dedicate this paper to Howard Lanning, who passed away December 20,

486: 2007. AR thanks the Goldberg Fellowship Program for its support. DW

487: acknowledges support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering

488: Research Council of Canada (NSERC). SuperMACHO was supported by the HST

489: grant GO-10583 and GO-10903. This work was partially performed under

490: the auspices of the U.S.  Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore

491: National Laboratory in part under Contract W-7405-Eng-48 and in part

492: under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. NBS thanks S. van den Bergh for

493: suggesting in 1995 to search for echoes using CCDs. NOAO is

494: operated by AURA under cooperative agreement with the NSF.

495: 

496: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

497: %%%%%%%%%%%%   BIB

498: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

499: 

500: \bibliographystyle{apj}

501: \bibliography{ms}

502: 

503: 

504: 

505: 

506: 

507: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

508: %%%%%%%%%%%%   TABLES

509: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

510: %\clearpage

511: %\input{tab1}

512: %\input{tab2}

513: %\input{tab3}

514: %\input{tab4}

515: 

516: 

517: 

518: 

519: 

520: \end{document}

521: