1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2005 December 5
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21:
22: %% \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
23:
24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
25:
26: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
27:
28: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
29: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
30: %% use the longabstract style option.
31:
32: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
33:
34: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
35: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
36: %% the \begin{document} command.
37: %%
38: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
39: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
40: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
41: %% for information.
42:
43: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
44: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
45:
46: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
47:
48: \slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
49:
50: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
51: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
52: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
53: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
54: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
55: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
56:
57: \shorttitle{The {\it Swift} Discovery of SGR X-ray Afterglows}
58: \shortauthors{Nakagawa et al.}
59:
60: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
61: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
62:
63: \begin{document}
64:
65: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
66: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
67: %% you desire.
68:
69: \title{The {\it Swift} Discovery of X-ray Afterglows Accompanying Short Bursts from SGR\,1900$+$14}
70:
71:
72: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
73: %% author and affiliation information.
74: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
75: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
76: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
77: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
78:
79: \author{
80: Y. E. Nakagawa,\altaffilmark{1,2}
81: T. Sakamoto,\altaffilmark{3,4}
82: G. Sato,\altaffilmark{3}
83: N. Gehrels,\altaffilmark{3}
84: K. Hurley,\altaffilmark{5}
85: AND
86: D. M. Palmer,\altaffilmark{6}
87: }
88:
89: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
90: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
91: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
92: %% affiliation.
93:
94: \altaffiltext{1}{Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Aoyama Gakuin University, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229-8558, Japan}
95: \altaffiltext{2}{Institute of Physical and Chemical Research (RIKEN), 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan}
96: \altaffiltext{3}{NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771}
97: \altaffiltext{4}{University of Maryland, Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250}
98: \altaffiltext{5}{Space Sciences Laboratory, 7 Gauss Way, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-7450}
99: \altaffiltext{6}{Los Alamos National Laboratory, P.O.Box 1663, Los Alamos, NM 87545}
100:
101: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
102: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
103: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
104: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
105: %% editorial office after submission.
106:
107: \begin{abstract}
108: The discovery of X-ray afterglows accompanying two short bursts from SGR\,1900$+$14
109: is presented.
110: The afterglow luminosities at the end of each observation are lower by 30-50\%
111: than their initial luminosities, and decay with power law
112: indices $p \sim $0.2-0.4.
113: Their initial
114: bolometric luminosities are $L \sim 10^{34}$-$10^{35}$\,erg\,s$^{-1}$.
115: We discuss analogies and differences between the X-ray afterglows
116: of SGR short bursts and short gamma-ray bursts.
117: \end{abstract}
118:
119: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
120: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
121: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
122: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
123:
124: \keywords{stars: neutron -- stars: pulsars: individual(\objectname{SGR\,1900$+$14})}
125:
126: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
127: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
128: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
129: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
130: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
131: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
132: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
133: %% each reference.
134:
135:
136: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
137: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so by tagging
138: %% their objects with \objectname{} or \object{}. Each macro takes the
139: %% object name as its required argument. The optional, square-bracket
140: %% argument should be used in cases where the data center identification
141: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper. The text appearing
142: %% in curly braces is what will appear in print in the published paper.
143: %% If the object name is recognized by the data centers, it will be linked
144: %% in the electronic edition to the object data available at the data centers
145: %%
146: %% Note that for sources with brackets in their names, e.g. [WEG2004] 14h-090,
147: %% the brackets must be escaped with backslashes when used in the first
148: %% square-bracket argument, for instance, \object[\[WEG2004\] 14h-090]{90}).
149: %% Otherwise, LaTeX will issue an error.
150:
151: \section{Introduction}
152: Soft gamma repeaters (SGRs) are intriguing sources of
153: very energetic (super-Eddington luminosity) high energy bursts.
154: They exhibit repetitive, sporadic bursting activity
155: with typical burst durations of $\sim100$\,ms \citep[e.g.,][]{woods2006}.
156: %
157: Four have been identified as definite SGRs, three are candidate SGRs,
158: %
159: and the X-ray source AX\,J1818.8$-$1559 is either a candidate SGR
160: or an anomalous X-ray pulsar (AXP) \citep{mereghetti2007, nakagawa2007b}.
161: %
162: Quiescent X-ray emission has been observed from SGRs
163: with a flux which exceeds the Eddington luminosity
164: \citep{nakagawa2007b}.
165: %
166: The energy reservoir for the bursts and the steady emission
167: is generally believed to be magnetic energy dissipation
168: in the framework of the magnetar model
169: %\citep{duncan1992, paczynski1992, thompson1995, thompson1996}.
170: \citep[e.g.,][]{duncan1992}.
171:
172: Among the SGR bursts, there is a minority population with
173: a few seconds duration known as intermediate bursts
174: \citep[e.g.,][]{olive2004}.
175: %
176: Some of the intermediate duration bursts from SGR\,1900$+$14 have
177: an X-ray tail
178: with a duration of a few thousand seconds that is interpreted
179: as a part of the burst itself \citep{lenters2003}.
180: %
181: More rarely, giant flares occur with an initial short, intense spike,
182: several hundred milliseconds long, followed by a long pulsating tail lasting a few hundred seconds;
183: these are the most exotic magnetar phenomena.
184: A large flare from SGR\,1900$+$14 on 2001 April 18
185: displayed an X-ray afterglow
186: lasting about 11 days \citep{feroci2003}.
187: Radio afterglows were observed after the
188: giant flares from SGR\,1900$+$14 on 1998 August 27 and from SGR\,1806$-$20
189: on 2004 December 27 \citep{frail1999, cameron2005}.
190: %
191: Indeed it is possible that some short-duration cosmic gamma-ray bursts (GRBs)
192: could actually be extragalactic giant magnetar flares \citep{hurley2005}.
193: %
194: Radio, optical, and/or X-ray afterglows are a common phenomenon for
195: the long-duration GRBs (typical durations of 2 seconds or more),
196: but they have only been observed for 13 of 20 GRBs of duration less than 2 seconds
197: (hereafter short GRBs).
198: %
199: In addition, a flux
200: increase and a slow decay of the quiescent emission
201: ($F \propto t^{-0.3}$ over 110 days, where $F$ is the
202: flux and $t$ is the time since the burst)
203: has been observed after a short burst from the
204: AXP\,CXOU\,J164710.2-455216
205: %\citep{campana2006a, israel2007, nakagawa2007b}.
206: \citep[e.g.,][]{israel2007, nakagawa2007b}.
207: %
208: A flux increase and a decay having two different components
209: ($F \propto t^{-4.8\pm0.5}$ for $t < 0.5$\,day and
210: $F \propto t^{-0.22\pm0.01}$ for $t \gtrsim 0.5$\,day)
211: has been observed in the quiescent emission
212: after an outburst from AXP\,1E\,2259$+$586 in 2002 \citep{woods2004}.
213:
214: Many bursts from the known SGRs have been detected by {\it Swift} \citep{gehrels2004}
215: because of the very wide field-of-view and excellent sensitivity
216: of the Burst Alert Telescope \citep[BAT;][]{barthelmy2005}.
217: Thanks to the prompt, precise localization by the BAT,
218: and the fast slew capability of {\it Swift}, X-ray follow-up observations
219: by the X-ray Telescope \citep[XRT;][]{burrows2005}
220: have taken place soon after short bursts from SGR\,1900$+$14.
221: In this paper, we report the {\it Swift} discovery of X-ray afterglows
222: from three of these short bursts.
223: We present spectral analyses of the bursts and the X-ray afterglow
224: using BAT and XRT data.
225: We discuss analogies and differences between the short bursts from the SGRs
226: and the short cosmic GRBs.
227: %
228: Despite many satellite and ground-based telescope observations,
229: the distance to SGR\,1900$+$14 still remains very uncertain.
230: In this paper, the distance is assumed to be 10\,kpc \citep{hurley1999, vrba2000}.
231:
232: \section{Data Analysis}
233:
234: \subsection{Observations}
235: Prompt follow-up observations by the {\it Swift} XRT were performed
236: for three short bursts from SGR\,1900$+$14 detected by the {\it Swift} BAT.
237: %
238: They were detected on 2006 April 14 (trigger number 205164),
239: 2006 June 10 (trigger number 214277) and
240: 2006 November 26 (trigger number 240801).
241: Figure \ref{lc_summary} shows their BAT light curves.
242: In this paper, we will call these bursts A, B and C, respectively.
243: Their main properties are summarized in table \ref{trig_summary}.
244: %
245: The $T_{\rm 90}$ durations of these bursts are all $\sim40$\,ms.
246: %
247: Note that the BAT and XRT observations were not simultaneous.
248:
249: \subsection{Data Reduction}\label{data_reductions}
250: We used the standard BAT software (HEASoft 6.3.2) and the latest
251: calibration database (CALDB: 20070924) to process the BAT event data.
252: The burst pipeline script, {\tt batgrbproduct} (v2.39), was used for
253: the processing.
254: Because the bursts were short and weak,
255: {\tt batgrbproduct} failed to find the burst intervals,
256: and we used the time interval determined by the flight software for
257: creating the spectra.
258: {\tt XSPEC 12.3.1} was used to fit the spectrum \citep{arnaud1996}.
259: %
260: The BAT spectral analyses were performed in the 15-100\,keV band.
261:
262: The XRT data were systematically analyzed using the
263: pipeline script.
264: The cleaned event data from the Window Timing (WT) and
265: Photon Counting (PC) modes from the {\it Swift}
266: %Science Data Center (SDC) were used.
267: Science Data Center were used.
268: Although both WT and PC mode data were processed in the pipeline,
269: hereafter we focus only on the PC mode data.
270: The search for the X-ray counterpart, construction
271: of the X-ray light curve, and fitting the X-ray light
272: curve and spectra were performed automatically using the standard
273: XRT softwares and calibration database (HEAsoft 6.3.2 and CALDB: 20070730).
274: The source region was selected to be a circle of 47$\arcsec$ radius.
275: The background region was an annulus of outer
276: radius 150$\arcsec$ and inner radius 70$\arcsec$
277: excluding the background X-ray sources detected by {\tt ximage}.
278: Since the count rate in the PC mode was less than 0.1\,counts\,s$^{-1}$, no pile-up
279: correction was applied in the processing.
280: The light curve was binned based
281: on the number of photons required to meet at least a 10$\sigma$
282: criterion in each bin.
283: The ancillary response function (ARF) files
284: were created by {\tt xrtmkarf} (v0.5.5).
285: The spectra were binned to at least 20 counts in each spectral bin
286: by {\tt grppha}.
287: %
288: The XRT spectral analyses were performed in the 0.3-10\,keV band.
289:
290: \subsection{Spectral Analysis}
291: Since a two blackbody function (2BB) has been suggested as the most
292: acceptable model for the two SGRs 1806$-$20 and 1900$+$14 using HETE-2
293: data \citep{nakagawa2007a},
294: 2BB was used for the spectral analysis of the short bursts from SGR\,1900$+$14
295: detected by the BAT.
296: If reliable spectral parameters were not obtained,
297: a single blackbody model (BB) was used instead.
298: %
299: Because we performed the spectral fits using the energy range
300: above 15\,keV, an absorption model was not applied.
301:
302: The spectral parameters for the SGR short bursts are summarized
303: in table \ref{spec_burst_summary}.
304: The spectra of bursts A and C
305: are well reproduced by the 2BB model, and their spectral parameters are
306: consistent with typical values found previously \citep{nakagawa2007a}.
307: %
308: For burst B, BB gives an acceptable result.
309: %
310: The unabsorbed bolometric luminosities
311: using the spectral parameters for 2BB and BB are
312: also summarized in table \ref{spec_burst_summary}.
313:
314: For spectral analysis of the XRT data,
315: 2BB and a blackbody plus a power law model (BB$+$PL) were used.
316: If reliable spectral parameters were not obtained,
317: BB and a power law model (PL) were also used.
318: Since a reliable value of the absorption model was not determined
319: for some observations, the value was fixed to
320: $1.91 \times 10^{22}$\,cm$^{-2}$, derived from XMM-Newton
321: observations \citep{mereghetti2006}.
322:
323: The results of the XRT spectral analysis
324: are summarized in table \ref{spec_steady_summary}.
325: The decreasing trend of burst A is well reproduced by the 2BB and BB$+$PL models.
326: For bursts B and C, BB and PL give acceptable results.
327:
328: \subsection{Light Curves}\label{light_curves}
329: To derive light curves of the
330: unabsorbed bolometric luminosity,
331: a conversion factor from count rate to
332: luminosity was calculated
333: using the 2BB or BB time-averaged luminosity,
334: and a time averaged XRT count rate.
335: In figure \ref{ag_lc_summary}, the X-ray light curves
336: are shown with the
337: luminosities of their preceding short bursts.
338: Since there are not enough statistics to produce a light curve for burst B,
339: this event is not considered further.
340:
341: As seen in figure \ref{ag_lc_summary}, there is a
342: clear decay in the X-ray emission.
343: The luminosities at the end of each observation
344: are 30-50\% lower than the initial X-ray luminosities.
345: Fitting the light curve with a power law model
346: ($L \propto t^{-p}$, where $L$ is the luminosity,
347: $t$ is the time since the burst,
348: and $p$ is the decay index),
349: the best fit decay index is 0.2$\pm$0.1 for burst A.
350: Since there are only two data points for burst C,
351: we calculate the decay index which passes through the two data points
352: and find 0.4.
353: The slopes are plotted as dashed lines in figure \ref{ag_lc_summary}.
354: %
355: These decreasing trends can be interpreted as the X-ray afterglows
356: following the short SGR bursts.
357:
358: The upper panel in figure \ref{lc_flux_2006_2007} shows
359: the quiescent X-ray light curve during periods when SGR\,1900$+$14
360: was emitting short bursts,
361: while the lower panel presents the burst rates
362: \footnote{The burst rate is derived from http://www.ssl.berkeley.edu/ipn3/sgrlist.txt.}.
363: Note the activity at MJD = 53823 days
364: (2006 March 29); 40 bursts were detected in that one day.
365: %
366: Bursts A, B and C were detected after that active day.
367: %
368: Therefore, we believe that the X-ray emission which we discovered
369: is not related to the enhanced activity of the SGR.
370:
371: \section{Discussion and Conclusions}
372: As shown in figure \ref{ag_lc_summary},
373: the luminosities of the SGR short bursts
374: are two or three orders of magnitude
375: larger than the backwards-extrapolated values from the SGR X-ray afterglows.
376: %
377: This implies that the decreasing SGR X-ray afterglow is not the tail of
378: the short bursts.
379: Therefore this result is different from the X-ray emission accompanying
380: intermediate bursts from SGR\,1900$+$14,
381: which is interpreted as the tail of the burst itself \citep{lenters2003}.
382: %
383: Also, compared with the afterglow of the large flare from SGR\,1900$+$14 \citep{feroci2003},
384: or with the moderate flux
385: %decay of AXP\,CXOU\,J164710.2$-$455216 \citep{campana2006a, nakagawa2007b},
386: decay of AXP\,CXOU\,J164710.2$-$455216 \citep[e.g.,][]{nakagawa2007b},
387: the decay time scale of the afterglow accompanying the SGR short bursts
388: (that is, the time to decrease by a factor of $\sim2$)
389: is shorter by a factor of $\sim3$.
390: %
391: Since the observing period of the SGR X-ray afterglow ($t < 0.5$\,day)
392: is different from that of the moderate flux decay of
393: AXP\,CXOU\,J164710.2$-$455216 ($t \gtrsim 0.5$\,day),
394: the decay indices and time scales are not exactly comparable.
395: %
396: The initial ($t < 0.5$\,day) decay index $p = 4.8\pm0.5$ of AXP\,1E\,2259$+$586
397: is much steeper than that of the SGR X-ray afterglow,
398: despite the fact that the time scale of the
399: flux decay of AXP\,1E\,2259$+$586 \citep{woods2004}
400: is consistent with the decay time scale of the SGR X-ray afterglow
401: (same definition as above).
402: %
403: This suggests that the X-ray afterglows of the short bursts
404: might be a different phenomenon.
405: Note that the decay indeces at 0.5 day after the bursts for
406: the two AXPs CXOU\,J164710.2$-$455216 ($p = -0.3$) and 1E\,2259$+$586 $(p = -0.22)$
407: are both consistent with the decay index of the SGR X-ray afterglow.
408:
409: Here, we discuss the analogies and differences
410: between the X-ray afterglows of short bursts from SGR\,1900$+$14
411: and the X-ray afterglows of short GRBs.
412: %
413: The decay indices of the SGR X-ray afterglows, $p = $0.2-0.4
414: (see $\S$ \ref{light_curves} and table \ref{trig_summary}),
415: are similar to those of the two short GRBs
416: 050724 \citep[$p = 0.6\pm0.2$;][]{campana2006b}
417: and 051221A \citep[$p = 0.04_{-0.21}^{+0.27}$;][]{burrows2006}.
418: On the other hand, the five short GRBs
419: 050509B \citep[$p = 1.10_{-0.53}^{+1.26}$;][]{gehrels2005},
420: 050709 \citep[$p \gtrsim 1$;][]{fox2005},
421: 051210 \citep[$p = 2.58\pm0.11$;][]{parola2007},
422: 060313 \citep[$p = 1.46\pm0.08$;][]{roming2006}
423: and 061201 \citep[$p = 1.90\pm0.15$;][]{stratta2007}
424: have much steeper temporal indices than those of the SGR X-ray afterglows.
425: %
426: The X-ray afterglow luminosities
427: of the SGR short bursts are
428: $L \sim 10^{34}$-$10^{35}$\,erg\,s$^{-1}$.
429: Considering the cosmological distances to the short GRBs,
430: the SGR X-ray afterglow luminosity is lower by a factor of
431: $10^{6}$-$10^{12}$ than the luminosities of the
432: four short GRBs 050509B, 050709, 050724 and 051221A
433: \citep[see the following literature for their redshifts;][]{berger2005, prochaska2005, bloom2006, covino2006}.
434: %
435: For the other three GRBs, secure redshift measurements have
436: not been reported yet.
437: %
438: Thus the indices of the X-ray afterglows of GRBs 050724 and 051221A are
439: similar to those of the SGR X-ray afterglows,
440: while the luminosities are different.
441:
442: Considering the super-Eddington luminosities of the short bursts
443: ($L \gtrsim 10L_{\rm Edd}$ where $L_{\rm Edd} = 1.8 \times 10^{38}$\,erg\,s$^{-1}$ is
444: the Eddington luminosity with $M = 1.4M_{\sun}$ and $R = 10$\,km),
445: one possible explanation for the SGR X-ray afterglows might be
446: a mechanism similar to an external shock in a GRB.
447: That is, the short burst might be generated by a
448: relativistic jet from a neutron star, and an interaction
449: between the jet and an interstellar medium would generate the afterglow.
450: The lower limit to the number density around SGR\,1900$+$14
451: $n \gtrsim 0.6(N_{\rm H}/1.91 \times 10^{22}$\,cm$^{-2})(d/3 \times 10^{22}$\,cm$)^{-1}$\,cm$^{-3}$
452: (where $d$ is the distance to SGR\,1900$+$14)
453: is reasonable to produce the SGR X-ray afterglow considering
454: the number density for GRBs \citep{sari1998}.
455: %
456: We can estimate a bulk Lorentz factor assuming a total released
457: energy $E \sim T_{\rm 90}L \sim 7.6 \times 10^{38}$\,erg for Burst C
458: and $n \sim 1$\,cm$^{-3}$ \citep{fenimore1996}.
459: The velocity of the material which is responsible for the external shock
460: emission might be a weakly relativistic jet with $\gamma \sim 2$ at 1000\,s
461: after the short burst.
462: %
463: Another possibility might be emission
464: from the plasma remaining after the short burst,
465: or an intrinsic quiescent X-ray flux increase.
466: %
467: An alternative simple possibility might be the cooling of the surface
468: heated by the plasma of the short burst \citep{thompson2002}.
469: %
470: Although some models have been proposed to explain the afterglows
471: accompanying giant flares \citep{yamazaki2005, lyutikov2006, cea2006},
472: it is not clear that these models can produce the
473: afterglow emission from short SGR bursts.
474: %
475: The presence of these afterglows may imply that short burst activity
476: is in fact much longer than it appears to be.
477: %
478: Indeed, X-ray afterglow emission accompanying short SGR bursts
479: could be a key to understanding the origin and
480: emission mechanism of these bursts.
481: %
482: Further prompt multi-wavelength observations of these afterglows
483: are needed to understand the radiation process.
484:
485: \acknowledgments
486:
487: We would like to thank Dr. G. L. Israel for useful comments.
488: We would like to thank an anonymous referee for comments and suggestions.
489: YEN is supported by the JSPS Research Fellowships for Young Scientists.
490: This work is supported in part by a special postdoctoral researchers program in RIKEN.
491: KH is grateful for support under the Swift Guest Investigator program, NNG04GQ84G.
492:
493: {\it Facilities:} \facility{Swift (BAT)}, \facility{Swift (XRT)}.
494:
495:
496: \begin{thebibliography}{}
497: \bibitem[Arnaud (1996)]{arnaud1996} Arnaud, K. A. 1996, in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V,
498: eds. G. Jacoby and J. Barnes, ASP Conference Series, 101, 17
499: \bibitem[Barthelmy et al.(2005)]{barthelmy2005} Barthelmy, S. D. et al., 2005, \ssr, 120, 143
500: \bibitem[Berger \& Soderberg(2005)]{berger2005} Berger, E., \& Soderberg, A. M. et al., 2005, GRB Coord. Netw. Circ., 4384
501: \bibitem[Bloom et al.(2006)]{bloom2006} Bloom, J. S. et al., 2006, \apj, 638, 354
502: \bibitem[Burrows et al.(2005)]{burrows2005} Burrows, D. N. et al., 2005, \ssr, 120, 165
503: \bibitem[Burrows et al.(2006)]{burrows2006} Burrows, D. N. et al., 2006, arXiv: astro-ph/0604320
504: \bibitem[Cameron et al.(2005)]{cameron2005} Cameron, P. B. et al., 2005, \nat, 434, 1112
505: %\bibitem[Campana \& Israel(2006)]{campana2006a} Campana, S., \& Israel G. L. 2006, The Astronomer's Telegram, 893
506: \bibitem[Campana et al.(2006)]{campana2006b} Campana, S. et al. 2006, \aap, 454, 113
507: \bibitem[Cea(2006)]{cea2006} Cea, P. 2006, \aap, 450, 199
508: \bibitem[Covino et al.(2006)]{covino2006} Covino, S. et al. 2006, \aap, 447, L5
509: \bibitem[Duncan \& Thompson(1992)]{duncan1992} Duncan, R., \& Thompson, C. 1992, \apj, 392, L9
510: \bibitem[Fenimore et al.(1996)]{fenimore1996} Fenimore, E. E., Madras, C. D., \& Nayakshin, S. 1996, \apj, 473, 998
511: \bibitem[Feroci et al.(2003)]{feroci2003} Feroci, M. et al., 2003, \apj, 596, 470
512: \bibitem[Fox et al.(2005)]{fox2005} Fox, D. B. et al., 2005, \nat, 437, 845
513: \bibitem[Frail et al.(1999)]{frail1999} Frail, D. A., Kulkarni, S. R., \& Bloom, J. S. 1999, \nat, 398, 127
514: \bibitem[Gehrels et al.(2004)]{gehrels2004} Gehrels, N. et al., 2004, \apj, 611, 1005
515: \bibitem[Gehrels et al.(2005)]{gehrels2005} Gehrels, N. et al., 2005, \nat, 437, 1038
516: \bibitem[Hurley et al.(1999)]{hurley1999} Hurley, K. et al., 1999, \apj, 510, L111
517: \bibitem[Hurley et al.(2005)]{hurley2005} Hurley, K. et al., 2005, \nat, 434, 1098
518: \bibitem[Israel et al.(2007)]{israel2007} Israel, G. L. et al., 2007, \apj, 664, 448
519: \bibitem[Lenters et al.(2003)]{lenters2003} Lenters, G. T. et al., 2003, \apj, 587, 761
520: \bibitem[Lyutikov (2006)]{lyutikov2006} Lyutkov, M. 2006, \mnras, 367, 1594
521: \bibitem[Mereghetti et al.(2006)]{mereghetti2006} Mereghetti, S. et al., 2006, \apj, 653, 1423
522: \bibitem[Mereghetti et al.(2007)]{mereghetti2007} Mereghetti, S., Paizis, A.,
523: Gotz, D., Petry, D., Shaw, S., Beck, M., \& Borkowski J. 2007, GRB Coord. Netw. Circ., 6927
524: \bibitem[Nakagawa et al.(2007a)]{nakagawa2007a} Nakagawa, Y. E. et al., 2007a, \pasj, 59, 653
525: \bibitem[Nakagawa et al.(2007b)]{nakagawa2007b} Nakagawa, Y. E., Yoshida, A., Yamaoka, K.,
526: \& Shibazaki, N. 2007b, arXiv: astro-ph/0710.3816
527: \bibitem[Nousek et al.(2006)]{nousek2006} Nousek, J. A. et al., 2006, \apj, 642, 389
528: \bibitem[Olive et al.(2004)]{olive2004} Olive, J.-F. et al., 2004, \apj, 616, 1148
529: %\bibitem[Paczy\'{n}ski(1992)]{paczynski1992} Paczy\'{n}ski, B. 1992, \actaa, 42, 145
530: \bibitem[Parola et al.(2007)]{parola2007} La Parola, V. et al. 2007, arXiv: astro-ph/0701818
531: \bibitem[Prochaska et al.(2005)]{prochaska2005} Prochaska, J. X. et al., 2005, GRB Coord. Netw. Circ., 3700
532: \bibitem[Roming et al.(2006)]{roming2006} Roming, P. W. A. et al., 2006, arXiv: astro-ph/0605005
533: \bibitem[Sari, Piran \& Narayan(1998)]{sari1998} Sari, R., Piran, T., \& Narayan, R. 1998, \apj, 497, L17
534: \bibitem[Stratta et al.(2007)]{stratta2007} Stratta, G. et al., 2007, \aap, 474, 827
535: %\bibitem[Thompson \& Duncan(1995)]{thompson1995} Thompson, C., \& Duncan, R. 1995, \mnras, 275, 255
536: %\bibitem[Thompson \& Duncan(1996)]{thompson1996} Thompson, C., \& Duncan, R. 1996, \apj, 473, 322
537: \bibitem[Thompson et al.(2002)]{thompson2002} Thompson, C., Lyutikov, M., \& Kulkarni, S. R. 2002, \apj, 574, 332
538: \bibitem[Vrba et al.(2000)]{vrba2000} Vrba, F. J., Henden, A. A., Luginbuhl, C. B., Guetter, H. H.,
539: Hartmann, D. H., \& Klose, S. 2000, \apj, 533, L17
540: \bibitem[Woods et al.(2004)]{woods2004} Woods, P. M., et al., 2004, \apj, 605, 378
541: \bibitem[Woods \& Thompson(2006)]{woods2006} Woods, P. M., \& Thompson, C. 2006, in Compact Stellar
542: X-ray Sources, ed. W. Lewin \& M. van der Klis (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press), 547
543: \bibitem[Yamazaki et al.(2005)]{yamazaki2005} Yamazaki, R., Ioka, K., Takahara, F., \&
544: Shibazaki, N., \pasj, 57, L11
545: \end{thebibliography}
546:
547: \clearpage
548:
549:
550: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
551:
552: \begin{table}
553: \begin{center}
554: \caption{Main properties of three short bursts from SGR\,1900$+$14
555: observed by {\it Swift}.\label{trig_summary}}
556: \begin{tabular}{cccccc}
557: \tableline\tableline
558: Burst & TrigNum\tablenotemark{a} & Trigger time (UT) & $T_{\rm 90}$ duration\tablenotemark{b} & XRT Exposure Time (PC) & $p$\tablenotemark{c} \\
559: & & & (ms) & (ks) & \\
560: \tableline
561: A & 205164 & 2006:04:14.04:35:29 & $34\pm9$ & 11.6 & 0.2$\pm$0.1 \\
562: B & 214277 & 2006:06:10.06:53:01 & $38\pm18$ & 1.9 & \nodata \\
563: C & 240801 & 2006:11:26.13:16:08 & $40\pm14$ & 1.6 & 0.4 \\
564: \tableline
565: \end{tabular}
566: \tablenotetext{a}{{\it Swift} trigger number.}
567: \tablenotetext{b}{$T_{\rm 90}$ is the time to accumulate between
568: 5\% and 95\% of the observed photons.}
569: \tablenotetext{c}{$p$ is the X-ray afterglow decay power law index with 90\% confidence level uncertainties.}
570: \end{center}
571: \end{table}
572:
573: \begin{deluxetable}{clcccccc}
574: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
575: \tablecaption{
576: Spectral parameters of three short bursts from SGR\,1900$+$14 observed by the {\it Swift} BAT.\label{spec_burst_summary}
577: }
578: \tablewidth{0pt}
579: \tablehead{
580: \colhead{Burst} & \colhead{Model} &
581: \colhead{$kT_{\rm LT}$\tablenotemark{a} or $kT_{\rm BB}$\tablenotemark{b}} &
582: \colhead{$R_{\rm LT}$\tablenotemark{c} or $R_{\rm BB}$\tablenotemark{b}} & \colhead{$kT_{\rm HT}$\tablenotemark{a}} &
583: \colhead{$R_{\rm HT}$\tablenotemark{c}} &
584: \colhead{$L$\tablenotemark{d}} & \colhead{$\chi^2$ (d.o.f.)} \\
585: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{(keV)} & \colhead{(km)} & \colhead{(keV)} & \colhead{(km)} &
586: \colhead{} & \colhead{}
587: }
588: \startdata
589: A & 2BB & $3.6_{-1.6}^{+2.2}$ & $13_{-9}^{+69}$ & $15_{-3}^{+6}$ & $0.8_{-0.4}^{+0.6}$ & $7.4_{-2.1}^{+10.5}$ & 39 (34) \\
590: B & BB & $9.2_{-2.2}^{+2.7}$ & $2.2_{-0.9}^{+1.6}$ & \nodata & \nodata & $4.4_{-1.1}^{+1.0}$ & 18 (16) \\
591: C & 2BB & $4.9_{-1.2}^{+1.3}$ & $13_{-5}^{+11}$ & $13_{-4}^{+10}$ & $1.3\pm1.0$ & $19.0_{-5.5}^{+4.9}$ & 24 (34) \\
592: \enddata
593: \tablenotetext{a}{$kT_{\rm LT}$ and $kT_{\rm HT}$ denote blackbody temperatures for the 2BB fit with 90\% confidence level uncertainties.}
594: \tablenotetext{b}{$kT_{\rm BB}$ and $R_{\rm BB}$ denote blackbody temperature and radius
595: for the BB fit with 90\% confidence level uncertainties.}
596: \tablenotetext{c}{$R_{\rm LT}$ and $R_{\rm HT}$ denote blackbody radii of the 2BB fit with 90\% confidence level uncertainties.}
597: \tablenotetext{d}{$L$ denotes the bolometric luminosity in units of $10^{39}$\,erg\,s$^{-1}$ with 90\% confidence level uncertainties.}
598: \end{deluxetable}
599:
600: \begin{deluxetable}{clcccccccc}
601: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
602: \tablecaption{
603: Spectral parameters of observations
604: after short bursts from SGR\,1900$+$14 by the {\it Swift} XRT.\label{spec_steady_summary}}
605: \tablewidth{0pt}
606: \tablehead{
607: \colhead{Burst} & \colhead{Model} & \colhead{$N_{\rm H}$\tablenotemark{a}} &
608: \colhead{$kT_{\rm LT}$\tablenotemark{b} or $kT_{\rm BB}$\tablenotemark{c}} &
609: \colhead{$R_{\rm LT}$\tablenotemark{d} or $R_{\rm BB}$\tablenotemark{c}} & \colhead{$kT_{\rm HT}$\tablenotemark{b}} &
610: \colhead{$R_{\rm HT}$\tablenotemark{d}} & \colhead{$\Gamma$\tablenotemark{e}} & \colhead{$L$\tablenotemark{f}} & \colhead{$\chi^2$ (d.o.f.)} \\
611: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{(keV)} & \colhead{(km)} & \colhead{(keV)} & \colhead{(km)} &
612: \colhead{} & \colhead{}
613: }
614: \startdata
615: A & 2BB & 1.91 & $0.5\pm0.1$ & $3\pm1$ & $1.3_{-0.3}^{+0.6}$ & $0.3\pm0.2$ & \nodata & $1.0\pm0.2$ & 28 (34) \\
616: & BB$+$PL & 1.91 & $0.55_{-0.06}^{+0.05}$ & $2.1_{-0.8}^{+0.6}$ & \nodata & \nodata & $1.8_{-1.1}^{+0.5}$ & $5.6_{-4.2}^{+6.2}$ & 31 (35) \\
617: B & BB & 1.91 & $0.7\pm0.1$ & $1.4_{-0.4}^{+0.5}$ & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & $0.8\pm0.1$ & 5 (4) \\
618: & PL & 1.91 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & $2.2\pm0.3$ & $2.4_{-0.8}^{+1.0}$ & 3 (4) \\
619: C & BB & 1.91 & $0.7\pm0.1$ & $1.5_{-0.5}^{+0.6}$ & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & $0.6\pm0.1$ & 2 (5) \\
620: & PL & 1.91 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & $2.5_{-0.5}^{+0.6}$ & $1.2_{-0.6}^{+0.9}$ & 5 (5) \\
621: \enddata
622: \tablenotetext{a}{$N_{\rm H}$ denotes the absorption. The value of $N_{\rm H}$ is fixed to $1.91 \times 10^{22}$\,cm$^{-2}$
623: which is derived from XMM-Newton observations \citep{mereghetti2006}.}
624: \tablenotetext{b}{$kT_{\rm LT}$ and $kT_{\rm HT}$ denote blackbody temperatures of the 2BB fit with 90\% confidence level uncertainties.}
625: \tablenotetext{c}{$kT_{\rm BB}$ and $R_{\rm BB}$ denote blackbody temperature and radius
626: for the BB$+$PL or BB fits with 90\% confidence level uncertainties.}
627: \tablenotetext{d}{$R_{\rm HT}$ and $R_{\rm HT}$ denote blackbody radii of the 2BB fit with 90\% confidence level uncertainties.}
628: \tablenotetext{e}{$\Gamma$ denotes the power law index of the BB$+$PL or PL fits with 90\% confidence level uncertainties.}
629: \tablenotetext{f}{$L$ denotes the bolometric luminosity in units of $10^{35}$\,erg\,s$^{-1}$ with 90\% confidence level uncertainties.}
630: \end{deluxetable}
631:
632: \clearpage
633:
634:
635: \begin{figure}
636: \epsscale{1.}
637: \plotone{f1.eps}
638: \caption{15-100\,keV light curves for the short bursts from SGR\,1900$+$14
639: detected by the {\it Swift} BAT.\label{lc_summary}}
640: \end{figure}
641:
642: \begin{figure}
643: \epsscale{1.}
644: \plotone{f2.eps}
645: \caption{Afterglow light curve luminosity for burst A ({\it left}), B ({\it middle}) and C ({\it right}).
646: The burst luminosities are indicated by the squares.
647: The dashed lines indicate the extrapolation to the time of the burst.
648: Inset: light curve in photons, with no spectral correction.\label{ag_lc_summary}}
649: \end{figure}
650:
651: \begin{figure}
652: \epsscale{1.}
653: \plotone{f3.eps}
654: \caption{Upper panel: Quiescent X-ray emission from SGR\,1900$+$14
655: observed during {\it Swift} XRT pointed observations (black triangles)
656: and X-ray afterglow emission (red circles).
657: Lower panel: Bursting history of SGR\,1900$+$14 in bursts per day.
658: The three events studied here are indicated by A, B and C.\label{lc_flux_2006_2007}}
659: \end{figure}
660:
661:
662:
663: \end{document}
664:
665: %%
666: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
667: