1: %\documentstyle[10pt,preprint2]{/home/hjmo/Macros/}
2: \documentclass{emulateapj}
3:
4: %\documentclass[apj]{emulateapj}
5:
6:
7: %\tighten
8:
9: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
10:
11: %\newcommand{\etal}{{et al.~}}
12: %\newcommand{\msunh}{\>h^{-1}\rm M_\odot}
13: %\newcommand{\Msun}{\>{\rm M_\odot}}
14: %\newcommand{\Lsunhh}{\,h^{-2}\rm L_\odot}
15: %\newcommand{\Lsun}{\>{\rm L_{\odot}}}
16: %\newcommand{\mpch}{\>h^{-1}{\rm {Mpc}}}
17: %\newcommand{\kms}{\>{\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}}
18: %\newcommand{\calC}{{\cal C}}
19: %\newcommand{\rmag}{\>^{0.1}{\rm M}_r-5\log h}
20: %\newcommand{\gmag}{\>^{0.1}{\rm M}_g-5\log h}
21: %
22: \def\gtsima{$\; \buildrel > \over \sim \;$}
23: \def\ltsima{$\; \buildrel < \over \sim \;$}
24: \def\prosima{$\; \buildrel \propto \over \sim \;$}
25: \def\gsim{\lower.7ex\hbox{\gtsima}}
26: \def\lsim{\lower.7ex\hbox{\ltsima}}
27: \def\simgt{\lower.7ex\hbox{\gtsima}}
28: \def\simlt{\lower.7ex\hbox{\ltsima}}
29: \def\simpr{\lower.7ex\hbox{\prosima}}
30: \def\la{\lsim}
31: \def\ga{\gsim}
32: \def\lta{\la}
33: \def\gta{\ga}
34:
35: %%\usepackage{graphicx}
36:
37:
38:
39:
40: \newcommand{\Mpc}{$h^{-1}$\thinspace Mpc}
41: \newcommand{\hmpc}{$h$\thinspace Mpc$^{-1}$}
42: \newcommand{\etal}{{\rm et al.~}}
43: \newcommand{\nus}{{\nu_{\rm \sigma}}}
44: \newcommand{\nuf}{{\nu_{\rm f}}}
45: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
46: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
47:
48: \def\apj{ApJ}
49: \def\apjl{ApJL}
50: \def\apjs{ApJS}
51: \def\aj{AJ}
52: \edef\aap{A\&A}
53: \def\mnras{MNRAS}
54:
55:
56:
57: \begin{document}
58:
59: \shorttitle{Rich superclusters}
60: \shortauthors{Einasto et al.}
61:
62: \title{Toward understanding rich superclusters}
63:
64:
65: \author{ M. Einasto\altaffilmark{1},
66: E. Saar\altaffilmark{1},
67: V.J. Mart\'{\i}nez\altaffilmark{2},
68: J. Einasto\altaffilmark{1},
69: L. J. Liivam\"agi\altaffilmark{1},
70: E. Tago\altaffilmark{1},
71: J.-L. Starck\altaffilmark{3},
72: V. M\"uller\altaffilmark{4},
73: P. Hein\"am\"aki\altaffilmark{5},
74: P. Nurmi\altaffilmark{5},
75: S. Paredes\altaffilmark{6},
76: M. Gramann\altaffilmark{1},
77: G. H\"utsi\altaffilmark{1}
78: }
79:
80: \altaffiltext{1}{Tartu Observatory, EE-61602 T\~oravere, Estonia}
81: \altaffiltext{2}{Observatori Astron\`omic, Universitat de Val\`encia, Apartat
82: de Correus 22085, E-46071 Val\`encia, Spain}
83: \altaffiltext{3}{CEA-Saclay, DAPNIA/SEDI-SAP, Service d'Astrophysique, F-91191
84: Gif
85: sur Yvette, France}
86: \altaffiltext{4}{Astrophysical Institute Potsdam, An der Sternwarte 16,
87: D-14482 Potsdam, Germany}
88: \altaffiltext{5}{Turku University,
89: Tuorla Observatory, V\"ais\"al\"antie 20, Piikki\"o, Finland}
90: \altaffiltext{6}{Departamento de Matem\'atica Aplicada y Estad\'{\i}stica,
91: Universidad Polit\'ecnica de Cartagena,
92: 30203 Cartagena, Spain}
93:
94:
95:
96: \begin{abstract}
97:
98: We present a morphological study of the two richest superclusters from the
99: 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey (SCL126, the Sloan Great Wall, and SCL9, the
100: Sculptor supercluster). We use Minkowski functionals, shapefinders, and
101: galaxy group information to study the substructure of these superclusters as
102: formed by different populations of galaxies. We compare the properties of
103: grouped and isolated galaxies in the core region and in the outskirts of
104: superclusters.
105:
106: The fourth Minkowski functional $V_3$ and the morphological signature
107: $K_1$- $K_2$ show a crossover from low-density morphology (outskirts
108: of supercluster) to high-density morphology (core of supercluster) at
109: mass fraction $m_f \approx 0.7$. The galaxy content
110: and the morphology of the galaxy populations
111: in supercluster cores and outskirts is different.
112: The core regions contain a larger fraction of early type, red galaxies,
113: and richer groups than the outskirts of superclusters.
114: In the core and outskirt regions the fine structure of the two prominent
115: superclusters as delineated by galaxies from different populations
116: also differs.
117: The values of the fourth Minkowski functional $V_3$ show that
118: in the supercluster SCL126 the population of early type, red galaxies is
119: more clumpy than the population of late type, blue galaxies, especially in
120: the outskirts of the supercluster. In the contrary, in the supercluster
121: SCL9, the clumpiness of the spatial distribution of galaxies of different
122: type and color is quite similar in the outskirts of the supercluster,
123: while in the core region the clumpiness of the late type, blue galaxy
124: population is larger than the clumpiness of the early type, red galaxy
125: population.
126:
127: Our results suggest that both local
128: (group/cluster) and global (supercluster) environments are important
129: in forming galaxy morphologies and colors (and determining the star formation
130: activity).
131:
132: The differences
133: between the superclusters indicate that these superclusters have
134: different evolutional histories.
135:
136: \end{abstract}
137:
138:
139: \keywords{cosmology: large-scale structure of the Universe -- clusters
140: of galaxies; cosmology: large-scale structure of the Universe --
141: Galaxies; clusters: general}
142:
143:
144: \section{Introduction}
145: \label{sec:intro}
146:
147:
148:
149: Huge superclusters which may contain several tens of
150: rich (Abell) clusters are the largest coherent systems in the Universe with
151: characteristic dimensions of up to 100~\Mpc.
152: \footnote{$h$ is the Hubble constant in units of 100~km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$.}
153: As they are very large, and dynamical evolution takes place at a slower rate
154: for larger scales, superclusters have retained memory of the initial conditions
155: of their formation, and of the early evolution of structure
156: \citep{kofman87}.
157:
158: While we might be able to explain the structure and properties of most
159: (average) superclusters, explaining rich superclusters is still a
160: challenge. To start with, even their existence is not well explained by the
161: main contemporary structure modeling tool, numerical simulations. There is a
162: number of rich superclusters in our close cosmological neighbourhood -- we
163: shall list them in a moment -- but the comparison of the
164: luminosity functions of observed and simulated (Millennium)
165: superclusters shows that the fraction of
166: really rich superclusters in simulations is much lower than in
167: observed smaples
168: \citep{e06}. The extreme cases of observed objects usually
169: provide the most stringent tests for theories; this motivates the need for a
170: detailed understanding of the richest superclusters.
171:
172: The richest relatively close superclusters are the Shapley Supercluster
173: \citep[][and references therein]{proust06} and the Horologium--Reticulum
174: Supercluster \citep{rose02,fleenor05,e2003}. The two superclusters studied in
175: this paper, the Sloan Great Wall and the Sculptor supercluster, belong also to
176: this category of very rich superclusters.
177:
178: The formation of rich superclusters had to begin earlier than smaller
179: structures; they are sites of early star and galaxy formation
180: \citep[e.g.][]{mob05}, and the first places where systems of galaxies form
181: \citep[e.g.][]{ven,ouch}. Thus future deep surveys like the ALHAMBRA Deep survey
182: \citep{moles05} are likely to detect (core) regions of rich superclusters at
183: very high redshifts. The supercluster environment affects the properties of
184: groups and clusters located there \citep{e2003,pl04}. Rich superclusters contain
185: high density cores which are absent in poor superclusters \citep[][hereafter
186: Paper III]{e2007a}. The fraction of X-ray clusters in rich superclusters is
187: larger than in poor superclusters \citep[][hereafter E01]{e2001}, and the core
188: regions of the richest superclusters may contain merging X-ray clusters
189: \citep{rose02,bar00}. The richest superclusters are more filamentary, less
190: compact and more asymmetrical than poor superclusters \citep[][hereafter Paper
191: II]{e07b}. Moreover, as we noted above, the fraction of very rich superclusters
192: in observed catalogues is larger than models predict \citep{e06}.
193:
194: In the present paper we continue the study of superclusters selected on the
195: basis of the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey. Our paper is devoted to a detailed
196: study of the two richest superclusters in the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey. We
197: chose them from the catalogue of superclusters of the 2dFGRS by
198: \citet[][hereafter Paper I]{e07c}. These are: the supercluster SCL126 in the
199: Northern sky, and the supercluster SCL9 (the Sculptor supercluster) in the
200: Southern sky (see Fig.~\ref{fig:silvestre}).
201:
202: \begin{figure*}[ht]
203: \centering
204: \resizebox{0.9\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f1.eps}}
205: \caption{The nearest, almost complete part of the 2dF GRS survey (up to
206: 400 \Mpc). The two richest superclusters in this survey are shown.
207: The disk showing the orientation of the galactic plane helps to allocate
208: the 2dF survey in space;
209: SCL 126 is located towards the Galactic North pole (left, red color),
210: SCL 9 is at the right side of the figure (blue color).
211: }
212: \label{fig:silvestre}
213: \end{figure*}
214:
215: The supercluster SCL126 is the most prominent supercluster defined by Abell
216: clusters in the Northern 2dFGRS (SCL126 in the catalog of superclusters by
217: E01, N152 in Paper I) in the direction of the Virgo constellation. This
218: supercluster has also been called the Sloan Great Wall
219: \citep{hoyle02,vogeley04,gott05,nichol06}. The presence of this supercluster
220: affects the measurements of the correlation function \citep{croton04}, and of
221: the genus and Minkowski functionals of the SDSS and 2dF redshift surveys
222: \citep{park05,saar06}. The ``meatball'' shift in the measurements of the
223: topology in the SDSS data is partly due to this supercluster \citep{gott06}.
224:
225: The Sculptor supercluster, the most prominent supercluster in the Southern
226: strip of the 2dFGRS, is among the three richest superclusters in E01; it
227: contains 25 Abell clusters, six of these are also X-ray
228: clusters. \citet{zap04} found evidence about the presence of warm-hot diffuse
229: gas there, which is associated with the inter-cluster galaxy distribution in
230: this supercluster.
231:
232: In a recent paper \citep[][hereafter RI]{e07d} we studied the morphology of rich
233: superclusters (their shape and internal structure), using Minkowski functionals
234: and shapefinders. Our calculations in RI showed that the morphology of the
235: richest superclusters from the 2dFGRS is different from each other: the
236: supercluster SCL126 resembles a very rich filament (wall) with a high density
237: core region, while the supercluster SCL9 can be described as a collection of
238: spiders (a multi-spider), consisting of a large number of cores connected by
239: relatively thin filaments.
240:
241:
242: The main aim of the present paper is to understand whether the differences in
243: the overall morphology of these two rich superclusters under study are also
244: reflected by their fine structure as determined by the distribution of galaxies
245: of different luminosity, color and spectral type in core region and in
246: outskirts of superclusters.
247:
248: The first study to show that in a supercluster early and late type galaxies
249: trace the structure of the supercluster in a different manner was performed by
250: \citet{gio86} who demonstrated that in the Perseus supercluster, elliptical
251: galaxies are mainly located along the central body of the supercluster, while
252: spiral galaxies are distributed in the outer regions of the supercluster. The
253: presence of a large-scale segregation of galaxies of different type in nearby
254: superclusters was shown also by \citet{e87}. In Paper III we showed that rich
255: superclusters have a larger fraction of red, non-star-forming galaxies
256: than poor superclusters. Recently, galaxy populations have been studied in core
257: regions of some very rich superclusters (\citet{hai06} -- in the Shapley
258: supercluster, \citet{pr05} -- in the Pisces-Cetus supercluster). These studies
259: showed that rich clusters in the core regions of superclusters contain a large
260: fraction of passive galaxies, while actively star forming galaxies are located
261: between the clusters.
262:
263: Thus studies of rich superclusters which contain a large variety of
264: environments and possibly a variety of evolutionary phases give us a
265: possibility to study the properties of cosmic structures and the
266: properties of galaxies therein in a consistent way, helping us to
267: understand the role of environment in galaxy evolution.
268:
269:
270: One method to quantify the structure of superclusters is to use the Minkowski
271: functionals. This type of study has been called morphometry by \citet{hik03}.
272: Minkowski functionals, genus and shapefinders, defined on the basis of Minkowski
273: functionals have been used earlier to study the 3D topology of the large scale
274: structure from 2dF and SDSS surveys \citep{saar06,hik03,park05,gott06,jam06} and
275: to characterize the morphology of superclusters \citep{sah98,sheth03,
276: sss04,bpr01,kbp02,bas03,bas06} from observations and simulations. These studies
277: concern only the ``outer'' shapes of superclusters and do not treat their
278: substructure. We expanded this approach in Paper RI by using the Minkowski
279: functionals and shapefinders to analyze the full density distribution in
280: superclusters, at all density levels.
281:
282:
283: The fourth Minkowski functional $V_3$ (the Euler characteristic) gives us the
284: number of isolated clumps (or voids) in the region \citep{saar06}, meaning that
285: we can use it to study the clumpiness of the galaxy distribution inside
286: superclusters -- the fine structure of superclusters. We calculate the fourth
287: Minkowski functional $V_3$ for galaxies of different populations in
288: superclusters for a range of threshold densities, starting with the lowest
289: density used to determine superclusters, up to the peak density in the
290: supercluster core. This analysis shows how the fourth Minkowski functional can
291: be used in studies of the fine structure of superclusters as delineated by
292: different galaxy populations. This study is of an exploratory nature since this
293: is the first time when this method are used for studies of the fine structure of
294: galaxy populations of individual superclusters. Employing Minkowski
295: functionals, we can see in detail how the morphology of superclusters is traced
296: by galaxies of different type.
297:
298: In our analysis we use also the shapefinders calculated on the basis of the
299: Minkowski functionals. In addition, we compare the galaxy content of groups of
300: different richness in core regions and in outskirts of superclusters.
301:
302:
303: The paper is composed as follows. In Section 2 we describe the galaxy data,
304: the supercluster catalogue and the data on the richest superclusters. In
305: Sect. 3 we compare the overall galaxy content of the superclusters. In Sect. 4
306: we describe the use of the fourth Minkowski functional (the Euler
307: characteristic) to study the fine structure of the superclusters as delineated
308: by different galaxy populations. In Sect. 5 we study the galaxy content in the
309: core regions and in the outskirts of the superclusters, and compare galaxy
310: populations in groups of various richness. In the last sections (6 and 7) we
311: discuss our results and give the conclusions. In the Appendix we give a
312: definition of the Minkowski functionals and shapefinders, and describe
313: different kernels used to calculate the density fields of superclusters.
314:
315:
316: \section{Data}
317:
318:
319: \subsection{Rich supercluster data}
320:
321: We used the 2dFGRS final release \citep{col01,col03}, and the catalogue of
322: superclusters of galaxies from the 2dF survey (Paper I), applying a redshift
323: limit $z\leq 0.2$. When calculating (comoving) distances we used a flat
324: cosmological model with the standard parameters, the matter density $\Omega_m
325: = 0.3$, and the dark energy density $\Omega_{\Lambda} = 0.7$ (both in units of
326: the critical cosmological density). Galaxies were included in the 2dF GRS, if
327: their corrected apparent magnitude $b_j$ lied in the interval from $b_1 =
328: 13.5$ to $b_2 = 19.45$. We used weighted luminosities to calculate the
329: luminosity density field on a grid of the cell size of 1~\Mpc\, smoothed with
330: an Epanechnikov kernel of the radius 8~\Mpc; this density field was used to
331: find superclusters of galaxies. We defined superclusters as connected
332: non-percolating systems with densities above a certain threshold density; the
333: actual threshold density used was 4.6 in units of the mean luminosity
334: density. A detailed description of the supercluster finding algorithm can be
335: found in Paper I.
336:
337: In our analysis we also used the data about groups of galaxies from the 2dFGRS
338: \citep[][hereafter T06]{tago06}. Groups in this catalogue were determined
339: using the Friend-of-Friend (FoF) algorithm in which galaxies are linked
340: together into a system if they have at least one neighbor at a distance less
341: than the linking length. For details about the group finding algorithm and the
342: analysis of the selection effects see T06. The catalogues of groups and
343: isolated galaxies can be found at
344: \texttt{http://www.aai.ee/$\sim$maret/2dfgr.html}, the catalogues of observed
345: and model superclusters -- at
346: \texttt{http://www.aai.ee/$\sim$maret/2dfscl.html}.
347: We present additional information about
348: the morphology of the richest superclusters at
349: \texttt{http://www.aai.ee/$\sim$maret/richscl.html} and
350: \texttt{http://www.aai.ee/$\sim$maret/rich2.html}.
351:
352:
353:
354: For the present analysis we select the richest superclusters from the
355: catalogue of the 2dF superclusters. The data on these superclusters are given in
356: Table~\ref{tab:1}. In this Table we give the central coordinates,
357: redshifts
358: and distances of the
359: superclusters, the numbers of galaxies, groups and Abell and X-ray clusters in
360: the superclusters, the mean values of the luminosity density within
361: superclusters and their total luminosities (from Paper II). In our
362: morphological analysis we use volume-limited samples of galaxies from these
363: superclusters. The luminosity limits for each supercluster sample are also
364: given in Table~\ref{tab:1}. We plot the sky distribution of galaxies, and
365: Abell and X-ray clusters in Fig.~\ref{fig:radecx}; the location of these
366: superclusters in space can be seen in Fig.~\ref{fig:silvestre}.
367:
368:
369: {\scriptsize
370: \begin{table*}[ht]
371: \caption{Data on rich superclusters }
372: \scriptsize
373: \begin{tabular}{lrrrrrrrrrrrcc}
374: \hline
375: ID & R.A. & Dec & Dist & $z$ & $N_{gal}$ &$M_{lim}$ & $N_{vol}$ & $N_{cl}$
376: &$N_{gr}$ &$N_{ACO}$&$N_X$ & $\delta_m$ & $L_{tot}$ \\
377: & deg & deg & \Mpc & & && & & & & \\
378: \hline
379: SCL126 (N152)& 194.71 & -1.74& 251.2 & 0.085 & 3591 & -19.25&1308 &18 & 40,2 & 9
380: & 4 & 7.7 & 0.378E+14 \\
381: SCL9 (N34) & 9.85& -28.94& 326.3 & 0.113 & 3175 & -19.50&1176 &24 & 26,9 & 12
382: (25) & 2(6) & 8.1 & 0.497E+14\\
383: \label{tab:1}
384: \end{tabular}
385:
386: \normalsize
387: \tablecomments{
388: The supercluster ID after Einasto et al. (2001) with the ID of Paper I in
389: parenthesis; equatorial coordinates, the comoving distance $D$ for our
390: cosmology; redshift $z$,
391: the number of galaxies $N_{gal}$ in the supercluster,
392: the magnitude limit $M_{lim}$ and the number of galaxies $N_{vol}$ for
393: the volume limited supercluster.
394: $N_{cl}$ and $N_{gr}$ are the numbers of the density field
395: clusters and groups according to paper I.
396: $N_{ACO}$ gives the number of Abell clusters in this part of
397: the supercluster that is covered by the 2dF survey; the number inside
398: parenthesis is the total number of Abell clusters in this
399: supercluster, by Einasto et al. (2001) list.
400: $N_X$ is the number of X-ray clusters,
401: $\delta_m$ is the mean value of the luminosity density
402: in the supercluster (in units of the mean survey density),
403: and $L_{tot}$ is the total luminosity of the supercluster (in Solar units).
404: }
405: \end{table*}
406: }
407:
408:
409:
410: \begin{figure*}[ht]
411: \centering
412: \resizebox{0.45\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f2a.eps}}
413: \resizebox{0.45\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f2b.eps}}
414: \caption{The sky distribution of galaxies, and Abell and X-ray clusters
415: in the superclusters SCL126 (left) and SCL9 (right).
416: Filled gray circles: galaxies from the core region ($D1$, see sect. 5),
417: empty gray circles: galaxies from the outskirt region ($D2$),
418: triangles: Abell clusters, yellow stars: X-ray clusters.
419: }
420: \label{fig:radecx}
421: \end{figure*}
422:
423:
424:
425: The most prominent Abell supercluster in the Northern 2dF survey is the
426: supercluster SCL126 that lies in the direction towards the Virgo
427: constellation
428: at a redshift $z = 0.085$ (Paper I).
429: This supercluster contains 7 Abell clusters: A1620, A1650,
430: A1651, A1658, A1663, A1692, A1750. Of these clusters, A1650, A1651, A1663, and
431: A1750 are X-ray clusters. The supercluster SCL126 is almost completely covered
432: by the 2dF survey volume; only a small part of it lies outside the survey
433: \citet{e2003}. All Abell and X-ray clusters from this superclusters (9 and 6,
434: correspondingly) are located in the region of the survey.
435:
436: The richest supercluster in the Southern Sky is the Sculptor
437: supercluster
438: at a redshift $z = 0.113$ (Paper I).
439: This supercluster contains
440: also several X-ray clusters, and the largest number of Abell clusters in
441: our supercluster sample, 25. However, only 12 of them are located within the
442: region covered by the 2dF supercluster S34. These are: A88, A122,
443: A2751, A2759, A2778, A2780, A2794, A2798, A2801, and A2844, and two X-
444: ray clusters, A2811 and A2829.
445:
446: If we assume that the mean mass-to-light ratio is about 400 (in solar units),
447: then we can estimate the masses of the richest superclusters of our sample,
448: using the estimates of the total luminosity of the superclusters
449: (Table~\ref{tab:1}): $M_{SCL9} = 2 \times 10^{16} h^{-1} M_{\sun}$,
450: $M_{SCL126} = 1.5 \times 10^{16} h^{-1} M_{\sun}$. These estimates are lower
451: limits only, since the 2dF survey does not fully cover these
452: superclusters. These masses are of the same order as the masses of other known
453: very rich superclusters. For example, \citet{proust06} estimate that the total
454: mass of the Shapley supercluster is at least $M_{tot} = 5\times 10^{16} h^{-1}
455: M_{\sun}$. \citet{fleenor05} give the same estimate for the total mass of the
456: Horologium--Reticulum supercluster. \citet{pr05} estimated that the total mass
457: of the Pisces-Cetus supercluster is at least $M_{tot} = 1.5 \times 10^{16}
458: h^{-1} M_{\sun}$. Thus our two superclusters have total masses similar to
459: other rich superclusters.
460:
461:
462:
463: \subsection{Populations of galaxies used in the present analysis}
464:
465: We characterize galaxies by
466: their luminosity, the spectral parameter $\eta$ and by the color index
467: $col$ \citep{ma02} and \citep{ma03a,depr03,cole05} as follows.
468:
469: We divided galaxies into the populations of bright (B )and faint (F) galaxies,
470: using an absolute magnitude limit $M_{bj} = -20.0$ (here and in the following,
471: we give absolute magnitudes for $h=1, \quad H=100$ km/sec/Mpc; for any other
472: value of $h$, the absolute magnitude $M=M_{h=1}+5\log h$). We chose this limit
473: close to the characteristic luminosity $M^*$ of the Schechter luminosity
474: function. The value of $M^\star$ is different for different galaxy populations
475: \citet{ma03a,depr03,cr05}, having values from $-19.0$ to $-20.9$. We used an
476: absolute magnitude limit $M_{bj} = -20.0$ as a compromise between the different
477: values.
478:
479: The absolute magnitude limits for the faintest galaxies in our superclusters
480: (volume limited samples, $M_{lim}$) are given in Table~\ref{tab:1}.
481: Actually, our faint galaxy population is brighter
482: than the faint galaxies analysed in several other
483: superclusters, e.g. in the Shapley supercluster,
484: \citep{mercurio06,hai06}, in the supercluster A2199 (a part
485: of the Hercules supercluster SCL160 in E01 list) in \citet{h219906},
486: and in the supercluster A901/902 \citep{gray04}.
487:
488: We used the spectral parameter $\eta$ to divide galaxies into the
489: populations of early (E) and late (S) type. We used for this purpose the
490: spectral parameter limit $\eta = -1.4$: $\eta \leq -1.4$ for early type
491: galaxies, and $\eta > - 1.4$ for late type galaxies, and excluded
492: galaxies with uncertain determination of $\eta$. More detailed
493: morphological types were defined as follows: Type 1 \citep{ken92}: $\eta
494: < -1.4$; Type 2: $-1.4 \leq \eta < 1.1$; and Type 3: $1.1 \leq \eta$.
495:
496: Moreover, the spectral parameter $\eta$ is correlated with the equivalent width
497: of the $H_{\alpha}$ emission line, thus being an indicator of the star formation
498: rate in galaxies.
499: \citet{ma03b} calls galaxies with $\eta > -1.4$ (late type galaxies) as "generally
500: star-forming". Thus the spectral parameter gives us
501: information on the types and star formation activity of galaxies.
502:
503: {\scriptsize
504: \begin{table}[ht]
505: \caption{
506: The superclusters SCL126 and SCL9:
507: the number of galaxies in different galaxy populations,
508: for the whole supercluster (volume limited samples), and
509: for the core region ($D1$) and for the outskirts of the superclusters
510: (D2)
511: }
512:
513: \begin{tabular}{rllllllll}
514: \hline
515: (1)&(2)&(3)&(4)& &(5)&(6)&(7)& (8) \\
516: \hline
517: & \multispan3 SCL126 & & & \multispan3 SCL9 \\
518: Region & All& $M_{bj} \leq -19.50$ & $D1$ & $D2$ & & All & $D1$ & $D2$ \\
519: \\
520: N$_{gal}$ &1308 & 932& 488 & 820 & &1176& 342 & 834 \\
521: N$gr_{10}$ & 405 & 308& 227 & 181 & & 247& 137 & 108 \\
522: N$gr_2$ & 576 & 410& 172 & 410 & & 576& 137 & 442 \\
523: ~N$ig$ & 327 & 214& 89 & 229 & & 353& 68 & 284 \\
524: \\
525: $E$ & 809 & 603& 340 & 469 & & 772& 236 & 536 \\
526: $S$ & 490 & 322& 145 & 345 & & 393& 102 & 291 \\
527: \\
528: $r$ & 937 & 685& 377 & 560 & & 835& 251 & 584 \\
529: $b$ & 371 & 247& 111 & 260 & & 341& 91 & 250 \\
530: \\
531: $B$ & 400 & 400& 144 & 256 & & 556& 168 & 388 \\
532: $F$ & 908 & 532& 344 & 564 & & 620& 174 & 446 \\
533: \label{tab:s1269d1d2ngal}
534: \end{tabular}
535: \tablecomments{
536: Columns in the Table are as follows:
537: \noindent column 1: Population ID (Sec. 2.2),
538: N$_{gal}$ -- the number of galaxies in a given
539: density region, N$gr_2$ -- the number of galaxies in poor groups
540: with 2--9 member galaxies, N$gr_{10}$ -- the number of galaxies
541: in rich groups with at least 10 member galaxies.
542: N$ig$ -- the number of galaxies which do not belong to groups.
543: \noindent Columns 2--4 and 6--8: the numbers of galaxies
544: in a given population, in the superclusters SCL126 and SCL9, correspondingly.
545: }
546: \end{table}
547: }
548:
549:
550: We used the rest-frame color index, $col = (B - R)_0$, to divide galaxies
551: into the populations of red galaxies (r), $col \geq 1.07$,
552: and blue galaxies (b), $col < 1.07$
553: \citep{cole05,wild05}. \citet{wild05} suggest that red galaxies
554: are mostly passive, and blue galaxies -- actively star forming.
555: However, since there exist also red galaxies showing
556: signs of star formation \citep{wolf05,haines07} we name our populations as red
557: and blue.
558:
559: In the next section we will analyse the relationship between
560: the spectral parameters and color
561: indexes of galaxies in our superclusters in more detail.
562:
563:
564: In our analysis we use following ratios:
565: $E/S$ -- the ratio of the numbers of early and late type galaxies,
566: $r/b$ -- the ratio of the numbers of red and blue galaxies, and
567: $B/F$ -- the ratio of the numbers of bright
568: ($M_{bj}\leq -20.0$) and faint ($M_{bj} > -20.0$) galaxies.
569:
570:
571:
572: \section{Galaxy content of rich superclusters}
573:
574: First we study an overall galaxy content of the rich superclusters (see Table~\ref{tab:s1269d1d2ngal}) . We plot
575: the differential luminosity functions, and the distributions of the spectral
576: parameter $\eta$ and the color index $col$ for galaxies from superclusters
577: SCL126 and SCL9 in Fig.~\ref{fig:r2all}.
578: For comparison we plot also the distribution of the spectral
579: parameter $\eta$ and the color index $col$ for field galaxies, chosen from the same
580: redshift interval as our two superclusters, and having the same absolute magnitude
581: limit ($M_{bj} = -19.50$, see below). There are 1975 galaxies
582: in the Northern field sample, $N(field)$, and 2927 in the Southern field
583: sample, $S(field)$. The number of galaxies in field samples is rather small
584: due to absolute magnitude limit used here, since, in general, galaxies
585: in the field are fainter than in superclusters (Paper III).
586: The comparison with field galaxies shows whether the possible differences between
587: the distributions of spectral parameters and colors may be due to redshift
588: differences between the two superclusters.
589:
590:
591: \begin{figure*}[ht]
592: \centering
593: \resizebox{0.30\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f3a.eps}}
594: \resizebox{0.30\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f3b.eps}}
595: \resizebox{0.30\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f3c.eps}}
596: \caption{The distribution of the absolute magnitude (left panel),
597: the spectral parameter $\eta$ (middle panel) and
598: the color index $col$ (right panel) of galaxies
599: in the supercluster SCL126 (solid line), and in SCL9 (dashed line),
600: both for the absolute magnitude limit $M_{bj}\leq -19.50$).
601: }
602: \label{fig:r2all}
603: \end{figure*}
604:
605: All the distributions (probability
606: densities) shown in this paper have been obtained using the R environment
607: \citep{ig96}, \texttt{http://www.r-project.org} (the 'stats' package).
608: This package does not provide the customary error limits; we discuss these
609: limits in the appendix and show that they are small (about 4--5\%).
610:
611:
612: In Table~\ref{tab:r2overall} we give the ratios of the numbers of galaxies of
613: different type in the superclusters; for SCL126 for two magnitude limits, the
614: original (Table ~\ref{tab:1}), and the SCL9 magnitude limit $M_{bj} = -19.50$,
615: in order to compare these ratios with those calculated for the supercluster
616: SCL9.
617:
618: The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Fig.~\ref{fig:r2all}, and
619: Table~\ref{tab:r2overall} show differences in the overall
620: galaxy content of the two richest 2dFGRS superclusters.
621:
622: The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test shows that the probability that
623: the distributions of luminosities of the two superclusters
624: are drawn from the same parent sample is 0.135,
625: having marginal statistical significance. The most important difference
626: between the luminosities of the galaxies of two superclustes is that
627: the brightest galaxies in SCL126 are brighter than those in SCL9.
628: In Sect. 5 we show that there are also other differences in the distribution
629: of the brightest galaxies in the two superclusters under study.
630:
631:
632:
633: {\scriptsize
634: \begin{table}[ht]
635: \caption{The galaxy content of the superclusters SCL126 and SCL9. }
636: \begin{tabular}{lrrr}
637: \hline
638: Sample & \multispan2 SCL126 & SCL9\\
639: & & & \\
640: \hline
641: (1)&(2)&(3)&(4)\\
642: \hline
643: $M_{bj^{lim}}$ & -19.25& -19.50& -19.50\\
644: N$_{gal}$ & 1308 & 932 & 1176\\
645: F$gr_{10}$ & 0.31 & 0.33 & 0.21\\
646: F$gr_2$ & 0.44 & 0.44 & 0.49\\
647: F$ig$ & 0.25 & 0.23 & 0.30\\
648: ~~$E/S$ & 1.65 & 1.87 & 1.96\\
649: ~~$r/b$ & 2.53 & 2.77 & 2.45\\
650: ~~$B/F$ & 0.44 & 0.75 & 0.90\\
651: \label{tab:r2overall}
652: \end{tabular}
653: \tablecomments{
654: The columns in the Table are as follows:
655: \noindent column 1: Population ID and number ratio type.
656: N$_{gal}$ -- the number of galaxies, F$gr_{10}$ -- the fraction of galaxies
657: in rich groups with at least 10 member galaxies,
658: F$gr_2$ -- the fraction of galaxies in poor groups with 2--9 member galaxies,
659: F$ig$ -- the fraction of galaxies which do not belong to any group.
660: \noindent Columns 2--3: absolute magnitude limits and
661: the ratio of the numbers of galaxies
662: in given populations (Sec. 2.2) in the supercluster SCL126. $-19.25$ --
663: galaxies brighter than $M_{bj}\leq -19.25$,
664: $-19.50$ -- galaxies brighter than $M_{bj}\leq -19.5$.
665: Column 4: the same ratios
666: in similar populations in the supercluster SCL9.
667: }
668: \end{table}
669: }
670:
671:
672:
673: Next, Table~\ref{tab:r2overall} shows that the ratio of
674: the numbers of red and blue galaxies ($r/b$)
675: is slightly larger in the supercluster
676: SCL126, but the peak value of the color index of galaxies in this
677: supercluster is smaller than in SCL9.
678: The distributions of the spectral parameter $\eta$ and the
679: color index $col$ both show large differences in the early type (red) galaxy
680: content of the richest superclusters -- in the supercluster SCL9, galaxies
681: have larger color index values and smaller spectral parameter values than in
682: supercluster SCL126.
683:
684: According to the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, the difference between the
685: distributions of the spectral parameter $\eta$ and the color index $col$
686: of the two superclusters is highly significant.
687: However, the comparison with the field galaxies of the same distance interval
688: and absolute magnitude limit as the galaxies from superclusters, shows that the
689: main reason for the differences of spectral parameters and colors is the
690: difference in their distances (Fig.~\ref{fig:r2all}).
691: This effect is difficult to quantify exactly, as the color distributions
692: for supercluster and field galaxies differ in detail, but are close in the
693: average. We illustrate their similarity by comparing in
694: Table~\ref{tab:r2red} the quartiles
695: for the distributions of the spectral parameter $\eta$ and the color
696: index $col$,
697: for parameter intervals which correspond to early type and red galaxies ($\eta \le
698: -1.4 $ and $col \geq 1.07$, correspondingly), for the absolute magnitude limit
699: $M_{bj} = -19.50$. These quartiles are very similar for the supercluster
700: and field galaxies.
701:
702:
703:
704: {\scriptsize
705: \begin{table}[ht]
706: \caption{The early type and red galaxy content of the superclusters
707: SCL126 and SCL9. }
708: \begin{tabular}{lrrrr}
709: \hline
710: SCL & $N{gal}$ & lower quartile & median & upper quartile\\
711: \hline
712: (1)&(2)&(3)&(4)&(5)\\
713: \hline
714: $\eta < -1.4 $& & & & \\
715: SCL126 & 603 & -2.72 & -2.49 & -2.19 \\
716: N(Field) & 1053 & -2.80 & -2.47 & -2.05 \\
717: \\
718: SCL9 & 772 & -3.08 & -2.78 & -2.30 \\
719: S(Field) & 1583 & -3.08 & -2.71 & -2.11 \\
720: \\
721: $col > 1.07$ & & & & \\
722: SCL126 & 685 & 1.23 & 1.32 & 1.37 \\
723: N(Field) & 1235 & 1.19 & 1.30 & 1.37 \\
724: \\
725: SCL9 & 835 & 1.27 & 1.39 & 1.47 \\
726: S(Field) & 1862 & 1.21 & 1.36 & 1.45 \\
727:
728: \label{tab:r2red}
729: \end{tabular}
730: \tablecomments{
731: The columns in the Table are as follows:
732: \noindent column 1: Population ID.
733: \noindent Column 2: The number of galaxies in a given population.
734: \noindent Columns 3--5: The 1st quartile value, the median and upper
735: quartile values of the spectral parameter for the $\eta$
736: interval $\eta < -1.4 $ and of the color index $col$ for
737: the interval $col > 1.07$ in the superclusters SCL126 and SCL9.
738: }
739: \end{table}
740: }
741:
742:
743:
744:
745:
746: These differences, however, do not affect our calculations of
747: the Minkowski functionals for individual superclusters.
748: So there is no need to
749: correct the colors and spectral parameters for this effect.
750:
751: Next we present the color-magnitude diagrams for our two superclusters under
752: study (Fig.~\ref{fig:r2cm}). Interestingly, this figure shows that there is no
753: correlation between the color and magnitude
754: among the red galaxies in our superclusters. In this respect
755: the color-magnitude diagrams for the superclusters SCL126 and SCL9
756: are different from those for some other
757: superclusters, e.g., for the supercluster A901/902 \citep{gray04} and for the
758: core of the Shapley superclusters \citep{hai06}.
759: The reasons for that are probably the use of total magnitudes in our study
760: \citep[see also][]{cross01}, in this case the color-magnitude relation is
761: almost flat \citep{scodeggio01}, and the use of the data about relatively
762: bright galaxies only.
763: The studies by \citep{gray04,hai06} include
764: much fainter galaxies than those used in our study; for fainter galaxies
765: the slope of the color-magnitude diagram is larger
766: than for bright galaxies \citep[see also][]{metcalfe94}
767: even when using total magnitudes, as mentioned by \citet{scodeggio01}.
768: Thus Fig.~\ref{fig:r2cm}
769: suggests that we can use galaxy colors for classification without further
770: corrections.
771:
772:
773:
774:
775: \begin{figure*}[ht]
776: \centering
777: \resizebox{0.45\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f4a.eps}}
778: \resizebox{0.45\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f4b.eps}}
779: \caption{The color-magnitude diagrams for the superclusters
780: SCL126 (left panel) and SCL9 (right panel).
781: }
782: \label{fig:r2cm}
783: \end{figure*}
784:
785: Finally, we take a closer look to the classification of galaxies by their
786: spectral parameters and colors. For that we plot in Fig.~\ref{fig:r2etacol} the
787: joint distribution of the spectral parameter $\eta$ and the color index $col$ for
788: the superclusters SCL126 and SCL9, in analogy to Fig. 2 in \citet{wild05}.
789: We see that most galaxies populate an area at the lower right quadrant,
790: where the galaxies have spectra characteristic to early type galaxies
791: (with no star
792: formation) and have red colors. The upper left quadrant of this Figure
793: is populated by late type, blue galaxies. But there are
794: also galaxies, which have spectra characteristic to late type ("generally
795: star forming") galaxies, and in the same time have red colors. The number of
796: these galaxies is small -- 161 in the supercluster SCL126, and 114 in the
797: supercluster SCL9.
798: There are also galaxies with blue colors and spectra characteristic to
799: early type galaxies (41 in SCL126 and 62 in SCL9).
800: A detailed analysis of the properties of these galaxies is beyond the scope
801: of the present paper, but below we discuss where
802: these galaxies are located in superclusters and whether the differences between
803: the populations of early type and red galaxies (and late type and blue galaxies)
804: influence the calculation of the Minkowski functionals.
805:
806:
807:
808: \begin{figure*}[ht]
809: \centering
810: \resizebox{0.45\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f5a.eps}}
811: \resizebox{0.45\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f5b.eps}}
812: \caption{The distribution of
813: the spectral parameter $\eta$ and
814: the color index $col$ of galaxies
815: in the supercluster SCL126 (left panel), and in SCL9 (right panel).
816: The solid lines separate early and late-type galaxies
817: ($\eta = -1.4$), and red and blue galaxies ($col = 1.07$).
818: }
819: \label{fig:r2etacol}
820: \end{figure*}
821:
822:
823:
824:
825: \section{Minkowski Functionals }
826: \subsection{Method}
827:
828: The supercluster geometry (morphology) is given by their outer
829: (limiting) isodensity surface, and its enclosed volume. When
830: increasing the density level over the outer threshold overdensity
831: $\delta=4.6$ (sect. 2.1), the isodensity surfaces move into the
832: central parts of the supercluster. The morphology and topology of the
833: isodensity contours is (in the sense of global geometry) completely
834: characterized by the four Minkowski functionals \mbox{$V_0$--$V_3$}.
835:
836:
837: For a given surface the four Minkowski functionals (from the first to the
838: fourth) are proportional to: the enclosed volume $V$, the area of the surface
839: $S$, the integrated mean curvature $C$, and the integrated Gaussian curvature
840: (or Euler characteristic) $\chi$. The Euler characteristic describes the
841: topology of the surface; at high densities it gives the number of isolated
842: clumps (balls) in the region, at low densities -- the number of cavities
843: (voids) \citep[see, e.g.][]{saar06}. This is the functional we shall use in
844: this paper (see Appendix for details).
845:
846: We calculate also the shapefinders $H_{1}$ (thickness), $H_{2}$ (width), and
847: $H_{3}$ (length), which have dimensions of length, and dimensionless
848: shapefinders $K_1$ (planarity) and $K_2$ (filamentarity) (see Appendix for
849: definitions). In paper RI we showed that in the $K_1$-$K_2$ shapefinder plane
850: the morphology of superclusters is described by a curve which is
851: characteristic of multi-branching filaments; we call it a morphological
852: signature.
853:
854: In order to estimate the Minkowski functionals, we have to ensure that the
855: mean density is constant throughout the volume we study. This is the main
856: reason why we use volume limited samples of supercluster galaxies. This also means
857: that we have to recalculate the (luminosity) density field; the field used to
858: select superclusters was calculated on the basis of the full sample.
859:
860: To obtain the density field for estimating the Minkowski functionals, we used
861: a kernel estimator with a $B_3$ box spline as the smoothing kernel, with the
862: total extent of 16~\Mpc\
863: \citep[for a detailed description see][and Paper RI]{saar06}.
864: This kernel covers exactly the 16~\Mpc\ extent of the Epanechnikov
865: kernel, used to obtain the original density field, but it is smoother and
866: resolves better density field details (its effective width is about 8~\Mpc).
867: The density field for both superclusters is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:juhan}.
868:
869:
870:
871:
872: \begin{figure*}[ht]
873: \centering
874: \resizebox{0.45\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f6a.eps}}
875: \resizebox{0.45\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f6b.eps}}
876: \caption{The luminosity density distribution in the two superclusters.
877: Left panel: SCL126, right panel: SCL9. The isosurfaces show the outer border of
878: a supercluster and the density level for $m_f=0.7$. Dots show individual
879: galaxies.
880: Darker regions: core (D1), lighter regions - outskirts (D2).}
881: \label{fig:juhan}
882: \end{figure*}
883:
884:
885: As the argument labeling the isodensity surfaces, we chose the (excluded) mass
886: fraction $m_f$ -- the ratio of the mass in regions with density {\em lower}
887: than the density at the surface, to the total mass of the supercluster. When
888: this ratio runs from 0 to 1, the iso-surfaces move from the outer limiting
889: boundary into the center of the supercluster, i.e. the fraction $m_f=0$
890: corresponds to the whole supercluster, and $m_f=1$ to its highest density
891: peak. This is the convention adopted in all papers devoted to the morphology
892: of the large-scale galaxy distribution.
893:
894: At small mass fractions the isosurface includes the whole supercluster and the
895: value of the 4th Minkowski functional $V_3 = 1$. As we move to higher mass
896: fractions, the isosurface includes only the higher density parts of
897: superclusters. Individual high density regions in a supercluster, which at low
898: mass fractions are joined together into one system, begin to separate from each
899: other, and the value of the fourth Minkowski functional ($V_3$) increases. At a
900: certain density contrast (mass fraction) $V_3$ has a maximum, showing the
901: largest number of isolated clumps in a given supercluster. At still higher
902: density contrasts only the high density peaks contribute to the supercluster and
903: the value of $V_3$ decreases again.
904:
905:
906: In Paper RI we showed that according to Minkowski functionals, the
907: supercluster SCL126 resembles a multibranching filament with a high density
908: core at a mass fraction $m_f \approx 0.95$. The maximum value of the fourth
909: Minkowski functional, $V_3$, in this supercluster is 9. The main body of this
910: filament is seen in Fig.~\ref{fig:radecx} (region $D1$, see below for
911: definition).
912:
913: The supercluster SCL9 can be described as a multispider rather than a
914: rich filament, i.e. this supercluster consists of a large number of
915: relatively isolated clumps or cores connected by relatively thin
916: filaments, in which the density of galaxies is too low to contribute to
917: the higher density parts of this supercluster. The maximum value of the
918: fourth Minkowski functional, $V_3$, in this supercluster is 15, i.e.
919: this supercluster is more clumpy than the supercluster SCL126. The main
920: cores of this supercluster are seen in Fig.~\ref{fig:radecx} as region
921: $D1$.
922:
923: Now we shall find the Minkowski functional $V_3$ and morphological signature
924: $K_1$-$K_2$ for rich superclusters separately for galaxies from different
925: populations, as marked by their luminosity, the spectral parameter $\eta$ and
926: the color index $col$ (Figs.~\ref{fig:v3k12s126} and ~\ref{fig:v3k12s9}). To
927: understand better the morphological signature we show the shapefinders $H_1$,
928: $H_2$ and $H_3$ (Fig.~\ref{fig:h13}). To not to overcrowd the paper with
929: Figures we show the shapefinders for the supercluster SCL126 for bright and
930: faint galaxies only.
931:
932:
933:
934: \begin{figure*}[ht]
935: \centering
936: \resizebox{0.28\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f7a.eps}}
937: \resizebox{0.28\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f7b.eps}}
938: \resizebox{0.28\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f7c.eps}}
939: \hspace*{2mm}\\
940: \resizebox{0.28\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f7d.eps}}
941: \resizebox{0.28\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f7e.eps}}
942: \resizebox{0.28\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f7f.eps}}
943: \caption{The supercluster SCL126. Upper panels:
944: the Minkowski functional $V_3$ (the Euler characteristic)
945: vs the mass fraction $m_f$ for bright (B, $M \leq -20.0$) and
946: faint (F, $M > -20.0$) galaxies (left panel), for early and late
947: type galaxies (middle panel) and for red and blue galaxies
948: (right panel). Lower panels: the morphological signatures
949: $K_{1}$ (planarity) -- $K_{2}$ (filamentarity) for the same populations.
950: Triangles show the values of $K_1,~K_2$,
951: where the mass fraction $m_f = 0.0$ (the whole supercluster),
952: and filled circles -- the values of $K_1,~K_2$, which correspond to
953: the $m_f = 0.7$.
954: In the left panels we also plot the $V_3$ and $K_1,~K_2$ curves for the whole
955: supercluster (light grey line).
956: }
957: \label{fig:v3k12s126}
958: \end{figure*}
959:
960:
961:
962: \begin{figure*}[ht]
963: \centering
964: \resizebox{0.28\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f8a.eps}}
965: \resizebox{0.28\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f8b.eps}}
966: \resizebox{0.28\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f8c.eps}}
967: \hspace*{2mm}\\
968: \resizebox{0.28\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f8d.eps}}
969: \resizebox{0.28\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f8e.eps}}
970: \resizebox{0.28\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f8f.eps}}
971: \caption{ The supercluster SCL9. Upper panels:
972: the Minkowski functional $V_3$ (the Euler characteristic)
973: vs the mass fraction $m_f$ for bright (B, $M \leq -20.0$) and
974: faint (F, $M > -20.0$) galaxies (left panel), for early and late
975: type galaxies (middle panel) and for red and blue galaxies
976: (right panel). Lower panels: the morphological signatures
977: $K_{1}$ (planarity) - $K_{2}$ (filamentarity) for the same populations.
978: Symbols as in Fig.~\ref{fig:v3k12s126}.
979: }
980: \label{fig:v3k12s9}
981: \end{figure*}
982:
983:
984: \begin{figure*}[ht]
985: \centering
986: \resizebox{0.28\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f9a.eps}}
987: \resizebox{0.28\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f9b.eps}}
988: \resizebox{0.28\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f9c.eps}}
989: \caption{From left to right: the shapefinders
990: $H_{1}$ (thickness), $H_{2}$ (width), and $H_{3}$ (length) (in \Mpc)
991: for the supercluster SCL126, for bright (B, $M \leq -20.0$) and
992: faint (F, $M > -20.0$) galaxies.
993: }
994: \label{fig:h13}
995: \end{figure*}
996:
997:
998: \subsection{SCL126}
999:
1000: Fig.~\ref{fig:v3k12s126} (upper left panel) shows the $V_3$ curves for bright
1001: and faint galaxies in the supercluster SCL126. At small values of the
1002: mass fraction $m_f$ the values of $V_3$ are small. At a mass fraction
1003: $m_f \approx 0.4$ the values of $V_3$ of both bright and faint galaxies
1004: increase rapidly which shows that at this density level the supercluster
1005: is splitted into several clumps. For bright galaxies the $V_3$ curve has
1006: some small plateaus at $m_f \approx 0.6$ and $m_f \approx 0.7$, this
1007: curve reaches maximum value of about 15 at mass fraction $m_f \approx
1008: 0.9$.
1009:
1010: For faint galaxies the value of $V_3$ increases at mass fraction
1011: $m_f \approx 0.4$. In the whole
1012: mass fraction interval the values of $V_3$ for faint galaxies are
1013: smaller than those for bright galaxies, about 5. This indicates that the
1014: overall distribution of bright galaxies is clumpy, while the
1015: distribution of faint galaxies is more homogeneous. The peaks of $V_3$
1016: values at very high mass fractions where the maximum value of
1017: $V_3$ for faint galaxies is 10, are due to high - density cores in
1018: this supercluster.
1019: The $V_3$ curve for the full supercluster is very similar to that of
1020: $V_3$ curve for faint galaxies showing faint galaxies trace the structure
1021: of the supercluster rather well.
1022:
1023:
1024: Fig.~\ref{fig:v3k12s126} (lower left panel) shows the shapefinders $K_1$
1025: (planarity) and $K_2$ (filamentarity) for bright and faint galaxies. They are
1026: calculated on the basis of shapefinders $H_{1}$-$H_{3}$
1027: (Fig.~\ref{fig:h13}). Of these, the shapefinder $H_{1}$ is the smallest and
1028: characterizes the thickness of superclusters. The shapefinder $H_{2}$ is an
1029: analogy of the width of a supercluster, but it contains information about both
1030: the area and curvature of an isodensity surface. The shapefinder $H_{3}$ is the
1031: largest and describes the length of the superclusters. This is not the
1032: real length of the supercluster, but a measure of the integrated curvature of
1033: the surface.
1034:
1035: Fig.~\ref{fig:h13} shows that at all mass fractions, the thickness $H_1$ and
1036: the width $H_2$ of the supercluster as determined using data about bright galaxies
1037: are smaller than those calculated using data about faint galaxies. Thus, at all
1038: density levels the distribution of bright galaxies is more compact than the
1039: distribution of faint galaxies (which is also less clumpy). However, the
1040: shapefinder $H_{3}$ which is calculated as $H_3=C/4\pi$ (the integrated mean
1041: curvature C) reflects the clumpiness of a population, and since the distribution
1042: of bright galaxies is much more clumpy (according to $V_3$), the value of
1043: $H_{3}$ for bright galaxies is larger than this value for faint galaxies
1044: (Fig.~\ref{fig:h13}, right panel). This makes also the filamentarity $K_2$ for
1045: bright galaxies to be larger than the filamentarity of faint galaxies. As a
1046: result, in the morphological signature (Fig.~\ref{fig:v3k12s126}, lower left
1047: panel) the values of $K_2$ for bright galaxies are larger. The morphological
1048: signature of faint galaxies is similar to that of the whole supercluster, this is
1049: another indication that faint galaxies trace the structure of the supercluster
1050: well.
1051:
1052: In this Figure we marked the value of $K_1$ and $K_2$ at the mass fraction $m_f
1053: \approx 0.7$. Interestingly, we see that at this mass fraction (density level)
1054: the characteristic morphology of supercluster changes, as seen from the change
1055: of the morphological signature.
1056:
1057: The values of the fourth Minkowski functional, $V_3$, for galaxies of
1058: different type (Fig.~\ref{fig:v3k12s126}, upper middle panel,
1059: cassified by the spectral
1060: parameter $\eta$) show that the clumpiness of early type galaxies starts to
1061: increase at low values of the mass fraction, $m_f \approx 0.2 - 0.3$. At the
1062: mass fraction value $0.5$ the value of $V_3$ has a small peak followed by a
1063: minimum; at the mass fraction $m_f \approx 0.7$ the value of $V_3$ increases
1064: again, and has a peak value about 10 at the mass fraction of about 0.9.
1065:
1066: The distribution of late-type galaxies in this supercluster is much
1067: less clumpy, as show the values of $V_3$. The number of isolated clumps
1068: of these galaxies grows only at rather high mass fraction values, $m_f >
1069: 0.6$ ($V_3 = 6$), and has a peak at $m_f \approx 0.9$ (here $V_3 = 12$).
1070: The largest differences in the clumpiness of the spatial distribution of
1071: galaxies of different type are,
1072: according to the fourth Minkowski functional, at mass fractions $m_f <
1073: 0.6$, which describe the outer (lower density) region of the
1074: supercluster.
1075:
1076: Fig.~\ref{fig:v3k12s126} (lower middle panel) shows the morphological
1077: signature for galaxies of different type. The value of $K_2$ (filamentarity)
1078: that contains information both about the spatial extent and clumpiness of the
1079: data, is larger for late-type galaxies. In this figure an important feature is
1080: that, again, at the mass fraction (density level) $m_f \approx 0.7$ the
1081: characteristic morphology of supercluster changes.
1082:
1083: The curves of the fourth Minkowski functional for red galaxies are
1084: rather similar to those of early type galaxies (Fig.~\ref{fig:v3k12s126},
1085: upper right panel, the color index $col$). Here we again see an increase of the
1086: values of $V_3$ at the mass fractions $m_f \approx 0.4$ and $m_f \approx 0.6$, and
1087: a maximum at $m_f \approx 0.9$ ($V_3 = 10$).
1088:
1089: This panel shows that blue galaxies form a few isolated
1090: clumps already at relatively low mass fraction values, but those clumps have
1091: low density, and at higher mass fractions some of them do not
1092: contribute to the supercluster any more; the value of $V_3$ decreases (being
1093: smaller than 6) and then increases again at mass fractions $m_f \approx
1094: 0.6-0.7$. At this mass fraction the clumpiness of the blue
1095: galaxy distribution becomes comparable to that of red galaxies.
1096: At very high values
1097: of the mass fraction, $m_f > 0.9$, blue galaxy clumps are not seen, and the
1098: value of $V_3$ decreases rapidly. The value of $V_3$ for red galaxies is
1099: larger than for blue galaxies at almost all density levels (mass fraction
1100: values).
1101:
1102: At the mass fraction $m_f \approx 0.7$ (Fig.~\ref{fig:v3k12s126}, lower right
1103: panel) the characteristic morphology of the supercluster, as described by
1104: red and blue galaxies, changes.
1105:
1106: Thus Fig.~\ref{fig:v3k12s126} shows that the differences in clumpiness
1107: between galaxies of different type and color (and star formation rate) in
1108: the supercluster SCL126 are the largest, according to the fourth Minkowski
1109: functional, at mass fractions $m_f < 0.7$, which describe the outer (lower
1110: density) regions of the supercluster. In outer parts of this supercluster, the
1111: distribution of late type and blue galaxies is much less clumpy
1112: (more homogeneous) that the distribution of early type, red galaxies.
1113:
1114: The fourth Minkowski functional $V_3$ for early type galaxies
1115: (Fig.~\ref{fig:v3k12s126}, middle panel) has a small peak at mass
1116: fractions of about $0.4 < m_f < 0.6$ where the value of $V_3 = 10$. This
1117: indicates that at this intermediate density level early type galaxies
1118: form some isolated clumps which at still higher density level (mass
1119: fraction) do not contribute to supercluster any more, and the value of
1120: $V_3$ decreases again. At the same mass fractions $V_3$ for red galaxies
1121: (right panel) has a value $V_3 = 7$ with no peak. Therefore, these
1122: additional isolated clumps are due to early type blue galaxies. The
1123: galaxies that are classified as late type but have red colors are
1124: located in intermediate density filaments which connect clumps of early
1125: type galaxies to the main body of the supercluster.
1126:
1127:
1128:
1129: \subsection{SCL9}
1130:
1131:
1132: Next let us study the values of $V_3$ for galaxies of different
1133: populations in the supercluster SCL9 (Fig.~\ref{fig:v3k12s9}, upper
1134: right panel). Here we see that the $V_3(m_f)$ curve is rather different
1135: from that for SCL126: at small mass fractions, the values of $V_3$ for
1136: bright and faint galaxies (left panel) are small, but at a mass fraction
1137: value of about 0.4, the values of $V_3$ increase. This increase is more
1138: rapid for bright galaxies than for faint galaxies. The values of $V_3$
1139: for bright galaxies reach a maximum at a mass fraction $m_f
1140: \approx 0.7$, and the maximum values of $V_3$ are larger than in the
1141: supercluster SCL126, about 18. For faint galaxies the $V_3$ curve
1142: reaches the maximum value, 15, at the mass fraction $m_f \approx 0.7$. The
1143: clumpiness of both the bright and faint galaxy distribution
1144: in the supercluster SCL9 is
1145: larger than that in the supercluster SCL126. Also in this supercluster
1146: the $V_3$ curve for the full supercluster is very similar to that of
1147: the $V_3$ curve for faint galaxies showing that faint galaxies trace the
1148: structure of the supercluster well.
1149:
1150:
1151: In the middle right panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:v3k12s9} ($V_3$ for early and late
1152: type galaxies, defined by the spectral parameter $\eta$) we see a continuous
1153: increase of the number of isolated clumps as delineated by galaxies of
1154: different type. Interestingly, up to mass fractions of about $m_f = 0.7$ the
1155: $V_3$ curves for galaxies of different type almost coincide ($V_3 = 12)$, which
1156: is opposite to what we saw in SCL126. Then the number of clumps in the
1157: distribution for late type galaxies increases rapidly and reaches the maximum
1158: value, 20, at mass fractions between 0.7 and 0.8. The distribution of late
1159: type galaxies in the core region of the supercluster SCL9 is even more clumpy
1160: than the distribution of early type galaxies.
1161:
1162: The curves for $V_3$ for red and blue
1163: galaxies (divided using the color index $col$, upper left
1164: panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:v3k12s9}) are
1165: quite similar to those we saw above. Up to the mass fractions $m_f \approx
1166: 0.7$ (the outer regions of the supercluster) the $V_3$ curves for galaxies of
1167: different color almost coincide. In the core region of the supercluster the
1168: distribution of blue galaxies is very clumpy, the maximum
1169: number of clumps is 17, while the maximum number of isolated clumps in the
1170: distribution of red galaxies is 12. Larger values of $V_3$ for blue
1171: galaxies suggest again that in this supercluster, blue
1172: galaxies are located in numerous clumps, while the distribution of red galaxies
1173: is smoother.
1174:
1175: This figure shows that at intermediate mass fractions, $0.4 < m_f < 0.6$,
1176: the values of $V_3$ for blue galaxies show a small
1177: peak not seen in the $V_3$ curve for
1178: the late type galaxies. This peak is generated by those galaxies that
1179: have blue colors, but spectra characteristic to early type galaxies.
1180: This is consistent with the overall large clumpiness of blue galaxies in
1181: this supercluster.
1182:
1183:
1184:
1185: In Fig.~\ref{fig:v3k12s9} (lower panels) we plot the morphological signature for
1186: galaxies of different populations in SCL9. These figures show that also in
1187: this supercluster the filamentarity of bright galaxies is larger than the
1188: filamentarity
1189: of faint galaxies. The morphological signature of faint galaxies is similar to
1190: that of the whole supercluster. The filamentarity $K_2$
1191: for late type, blue galaxies
1192: is larger than that for early type (and red)
1193: galaxies due
1194: to their larger clumpiness. However, we see in these figures again that at the
1195: mass fraction $m_f \approx 0.7$ the morphology of the supercluster
1196: changes.
1197:
1198:
1199: \subsection{Summary}
1200:
1201: The differences in the distribution of galaxies from different populations in the
1202: superclusters SCL126 and SCL9 are related to different overall morphology of
1203: these superclusters. In particular, in the supercluster SCL126 at mass
1204: fractions $m_f < 0.7$ the differences in the fine structure formed by galaxies of
1205: different populations are large:
1206: here the maximum values of $V_3$ are, correspondingly, 8 for red galaxies and 5
1207: for blue galaxies, showing that the distribution
1208: of blue, late type galaxies is more homogeneous than the distribution
1209: of red, early type galaxies.
1210: At mass fractions $m_f > 0.7$ the clumpiness of the distribution of galaxies of
1211: different type and color in the supercluster SCL126 is similar. In the contrary,
1212: in the supercluster SCL 9 the clumpiness of galaxy populations
1213: of different type and
1214: color is quite similar in the outskirts of the supercluster
1215: (e.g., the values of $V_3$ are the same, 7--8 both for the early and late type
1216: galaxies). At mass fractions $m_f > 0.7$
1217: in this supercluster, the clumpiness of the late type, blue galaxy population
1218: is larger (the maximum value of $V_3$ is 17) than the clumpiness of the early
1219: type, red galaxy population (for those
1220: galaxies the maximum value is $V_3 = 12$).
1221: Overall, the clumpiness of all galaxy populations
1222: in the supercluster SCL126 is smaller than the clumpiness of galaxy populations
1223: in SCL9.
1224:
1225:
1226:
1227: This shows that in superclusters under study there exists a region of mass
1228: fractions $m_f \approx 0.7$, where we can observe in the behaviour of both the
1229: fourth Minkowski functionals for galaxies of different type and of the
1230: morphological signature a crossover from low- density morphology to high-density
1231: morphology. Based on that, we choose the mass fraction $m_f=0.7$ to delimit the
1232: supercluster cores. In the following analysis we use this density level as
1233: separating the high density core regions of superclusters ($D1$) from their
1234: outer regions with lower densities (outskirts, $D2$), see Fig.~\ref{fig:radecx}.
1235:
1236: The density level $m_f = 0.7$ approximately corresponds to region where the
1237: luminosity density contrast $\delta = 10$ (Papers I and III). In Paper III we showed
1238: that high density cores with $\delta > 10.0$ are characteristic to rich
1239: superclusters. Typical densities in poor superclusters are lower, $\delta <
1240: 10.0$, comparable to densities in the outskirts of rich superclusters.
1241:
1242: In both superclusters, about 3/4 of late type galaxies with red colors, as well
1243: as those galaxies showing blue colors and early type spectra, are located
1244: at intermediate densities in the outskirt regions.
1245: Fig.~\ref{fig:v3k12s126} and Fig.~\ref{fig:v3k12s9} show that although
1246: due to these galaxies
1247: the values of the fourth Minkowski functional $V_3(m_f)$ for galaxies of
1248: different type and color differ in some details,
1249: the overall shapes of $V_3(m_f)$ curves show no systematic differences.
1250:
1251:
1252: Fig.~\ref{fig:radecx} shows the main body of the supercluster SCL126 as a rich
1253: filament (region $D1$; paper RI). The main core of the supercluster at
1254: R.A. about 195 deg contains four Abell clusters (three of them are also X- ray
1255: sources). This region has a diameter of about 10~\Mpc\ \citep{e2003}. The
1256: X-ray cluster at R.A. about 203 deg is Abell 1750, a merging binary cluster
1257: \citep{don,bel}.
1258:
1259:
1260: In the supercluster SCL9 the regions of highest density form several separate
1261: concentrations of galaxies (a "multispider", Fig.~\ref{fig:radecx} and RI).
1262: One of them, the main center of SCL9, contains 5 Abell clusters and one X-ray
1263: cluster. There are Abell clusters also in outskirts of this supercluster. In
1264: this supercluster the total number of Abell clusters is larger than in the
1265: supercluster SCL126, but they do not form such a high concentration of Abell
1266: and X-ray clusters that is observed in the core region of SCL126.
1267:
1268: In the following section we study the distribution of galaxies from various
1269: populations in the core region and in outskirts of superclusters, using
1270: additionally the information about the group membership for galaxies from
1271: different populations.
1272:
1273: We mention here that the values of $V_3(m_f)$ reflect the distribution of
1274: galaxies at scales determined by the width of our smoothing kernel, B3, and this
1275: corresponds to larger scales than the typical scale at which
1276: the relation between galaxy type and local
1277: density applies, i.e. our results do not reflect directly features in
1278: galaxy distribution with characteristic scale less than about 1 - 2 \Mpc.
1279:
1280: Thus the differences in clumpiness of
1281: galaxies of different type at high mass fractions (in supercluster cores)
1282: does not contradict to the presence of the luminosity - density relation at
1283: small scales. At the same time, the brightest galaxies of both early and late
1284: type galaxies are located in high density regions and this is seen also
1285: in $V_3(m_f)$ curves at high mass fraction \citep{h88,e91,park07}.
1286:
1287:
1288:
1289:
1290:
1291: \section{Substructure of superclusters in core region and in outskirts.
1292: Rich and poor groups}
1293:
1294: \subsection{Core and outskirts}
1295:
1296: Groups of galaxies are additional tracers of substructure in superclusters.
1297: The group richness is a local density indicator, if we compare the properties
1298: of galaxies in various local environments (Paper III). We divide groups by
1299: their richness as follows: rich ($N_{gal} \geq 10$) groups and clusters (we
1300: denote this sample as $Gr_{10}$) and poor groups ($N_{gal} < 10$, $Gr_2$). In
1301: Table~\ref{tab:r2overall} we give the fractions of galaxies in these groups
1302: for the whole superclusters.
1303:
1304: Let us study the galaxy content of groups in the cores and in the outskirts
1305: of our superclusters.
1306: We plot the differential luminosity functions and the distributions of the
1307: spectral parameter $\eta$ and the color index $col$ for galaxies in groups of
1308: different richness in Figs.~\ref{fig:scl126d1d2gr}--\ref{fig:scl9d1d2gr}, for
1309: the core regions and outskirts of the superclusters SCL126 and SCL9,
1310: respectively. In Table~\ref{tab:s1269d1d2} we present the ratios of the numbers
1311: of bright and faint galaxies $B/F$ in superclusters, and the ratios of early and
1312: late type galaxies $E/S$, as classified by the spectral parameter $\eta$. We
1313: also calculate the ratio of the numbers of red and blue galaxies, $r/b$,
1314: classified by the color index $col$. We give here the
1315: statistical significance of the differences between the galaxy content in core
1316: regions and in outskirts in these two superclusters according to the
1317: Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.
1318:
1319:
1320:
1321: {\scriptsize
1322: \begin{table}[ht]
1323: \caption{The superclusters SCL126 and SCL9:
1324: the galaxy content in the core region D1 and in the outskirts (region D2),
1325: in rich and poor groups, and of
1326: those galaxies which do not belong to groups.}
1327:
1328: \begin{tabular}{rllllllll}
1329: \hline
1330: (1)&(2)&(3)&(4)& (5)&(6)&(7)&(8)& (9) \\
1331: \hline
1332: & & \multispan2 SCL126 & & \multispan2 SCL9 & \\
1333: Region & $D1$ & $D2$ & \multispan2 Kolmogorov-Smirnov & $D1$ & $D2$ & \multispan2 Kolmogorov-Smirnov\\
1334: & & & \multispan2 \mbox{test results} & & & \multispan2 \mbox{test results} \\
1335: & & & $D$ & $P$ & & & $D$ & $P$ \\
1336: N$_{gal}$ & 488 & 820 & & & 342 & 834 & & \\
1337: F$gr_{10}$ & 0.46 & 0.22 & & & 0.40 & 0.13 & & \\
1338: F$gr_2$ & 0.35 & 0.50 & & & 0.40 & 0.53 & & \\
1339: F$ig$ & 0.18 & 0.28 & & & 0.20 & 0.34 & & \\
1340: $E/S$ &&&&&&&&\\
1341: ~~$All$ & 2.34 & 1.36 & 0.13 & 5.39e-05 & 2.31 & 1.84 & 0.10 & 0.02 \\
1342: ~~$Gr_{10}$& 4.35 & 2.81 & 0.13 & 0.088 & 4.07 & 3.20 & 0.17 & 0.05 \\
1343: ~~$Gr_2$ & 1.68 & 1.40 & 0.08 & 0.452 & 2.05 & 2.07 & 0.06 & 0.77 \\
1344: ~~$IG$ & 1.26 & 0.78 & 0.19 & 0.240 & 1.16 & 1.33 & 0.12 & 0.38 \\
1345:
1346:
1347: $r/b$ &&&&&&&&\\
1348: ~~$All$ & 3.40 & 2.15 & 0.11 & 0.001 & 2.76 & 2.34 & 0.08 & 0.07 \\
1349: ~~$Gr_{10}$& 7.37 & 4.01 & 0.11 & 0.16 & 5.00 & 3.77 & 0.13 & 0.29 \\
1350: ~~$Gr_2$ & 2.46 & 2.36 & 0.06 & 0.79 & 2.34 & 2.61 & 0.06 & 0.84 \\
1351: ~~$IG$ & 1.62 & 1.26 & 0.12 & 0.28 & 1.48 & 1.71 & 0.11 & 0.48 \\
1352: $B/F$ &&&&&&&&\\
1353: ~~$All$ & 0.42 & 0.45 & 0.07 & 0.165 & 0.96 & 0.87 & 0.04 & 0.72 \\
1354: ~~$Gr_{10}$& 0.47 & 0.59 & 0.09 & 0.34 & 1.00 & 0.91 & 0.10 & 0.61 \\
1355: ~~$Gr_2$ & 0.44 & 0.46 & 0.14 & 0.01 & 1.00 & 0.95 & 0.05 & 0.97 \\
1356: ~~$IG$ & 0.27 & 0.35 & 0.09 & 0.66 & 0.81 & 0.75 & 0.06 & 0.99 \\
1357: \label{tab:s1269d1d2}
1358: \end{tabular}
1359: \tablecomments{
1360: The columns in the Table are as follows:
1361: \noindent column 1: Population ID and number ratio type.
1362: N$_{gal}$ -- the number of galaxies in a given
1363: density region,
1364: F$gr_{10}$ -- the fraction of galaxies
1365: in rich groups with at least 10 member galaxies,
1366: F$gr_2$ -- the fraction of galaxies in poor groups
1367: with 2--9 member galaxies,
1368: F$ig$ -- the fraction of galaxies which do not belong to groups.
1369: \noindent Columns 2--3 and 6--7: the ratio of the numbers of galaxies
1370: in the populations from regions $D1$ and $D2$ (sect. 2.2).
1371: Columns 4--5 and 8--9: the maximum difference ($D$) and the probability ($P$) that the
1372: distributions of population parameters are taken
1373: from the same parent distribution.
1374: }
1375: \end{table}
1376: }
1377:
1378: \begin{figure*}[ht]
1379: \centering
1380: \resizebox{0.35\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f10a.eps}}
1381: \resizebox{0.35\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f10b.eps}}
1382: \hspace*{2mm}\\
1383: \resizebox{0.35\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f10c.eps}}
1384: \resizebox{0.35\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f10d.eps}}
1385: \hspace*{2mm}\\
1386: \resizebox{0.35\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f10e.eps}}
1387: \resizebox{0.35\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f10f.eps}}
1388: \caption{The distributions of the absolute magnitude (upper panels),
1389: the spectral parameter $\eta$ (middle panels) and
1390: the color index $col$ (lower panels)
1391: of galaxies in groups of various richness
1392: in the supercluster SCL126. Left panels: the core (region $D1$),
1393: right panels: the outskirts (region $D2$).
1394: The populations are:
1395: $g10$ -- rich groups ($N_{gal} \geq 10$),
1396: $g2$ -- poor groups ($N_{gal} < 10$), and $ig$ -- isolated
1397: galaxies (those galaxies which do not belong to
1398: any group). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test results for the difference of the
1399: distributions are in Table~\ref{tab:s1269d1d2}.
1400: }
1401: \label{fig:scl126d1d2gr}
1402: \end{figure*}
1403:
1404:
1405:
1406: \begin{figure*}[ht]
1407: \centering
1408: \resizebox{0.35\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f11a.eps}}
1409: \resizebox{0.35\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f11b.eps}}
1410: \hspace*{2mm}\\
1411: \resizebox{0.35\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f11c.eps}}
1412: \resizebox{0.35\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f11d.eps}}
1413: \hspace*{2mm}\\
1414: \resizebox{0.35\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f11e.eps}}
1415: \resizebox{0.35\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f11f.eps}}
1416: \caption{The distributions of the absolute magnitude (upper panels),
1417: the spectral parameter $\eta$ (middle panels) and
1418: the color index $col$ (lower panels)
1419: of galaxies in groups of various richness
1420: in the supercluster SCL9. Left panels: the core (region $D1$),
1421: right panels: the outskirts (region $D2$).
1422: The populations are:
1423: $g10$ -- rich groups ($N_{gal} \geq 10$),
1424: $g2$ -- poor groups ($N_{gal} < 10$), and $ig$ -- isolated
1425: galaxies (those galaxies which do not belong to
1426: any group).The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test results for the difference of the
1427: distributions are in Table~\ref{tab:s1269d1d2}.
1428: }
1429: \label{fig:scl9d1d2gr}
1430: \end{figure*}
1431:
1432:
1433:
1434: \subsection{SCL126}
1435:
1436: Fig.~\ref{fig:scl126d1d2gr} (upper row) shows the luminosities of
1437: galaxies in groups of different richness in the supercluster SCL126.
1438: This figure shows that the brightest galaxies reside in rich groups
1439: ($N_{gal} \geq 10$), both in the core region and in the outskirts of the
1440: supercluster. Luminosities of galaxies in poor groups are fainter, and
1441: galaxies which do not belong to groups are the faintest, although in the
1442: core region of the supercluster there are also some rather bright
1443: galaxies among them.
1444:
1445: According to the spectral parameter $\eta$ (Fig.~\ref{fig:scl126d1d2gr}, middle
1446: row), rich groups in the core region of the supercluster SCL126 are populated
1447: mainly with early type, quiescent galaxies (type 1 galaxies, $\eta < -1.4$). The
1448: fraction of late type galaxies in them is very small. The fraction of late type
1449: galaxies increases, as we move to poor groups. In the core region of the
1450: supercluster the fraction of late type galaxies is largest among those galaxies
1451: which do not belong to groups.
1452:
1453: In the outskirts region, $D2$, rich groups are still mainly populated with early
1454: type galaxies, but the fraction of late type galaxies in them is larger
1455: ($E/S = 2.81$) than in rich groups in the core region, where $E/S = 4.35$. The
1456: fraction of late type galaxies in poor groups is larger; the fraction of these
1457: galaxies is the largest among those galaxies which do not belong to any group.
1458: In the supercluster outskirts, the fraction of late type galaxies among those
1459: galaxies which do not belong to groups, is larger than among this population in
1460: the supercluster core.
1461:
1462:
1463: Table~\ref{tab:s1269d1d2} shows that according to the Kolmogorov-Smirnov
1464: test, the differences between the distributions of the
1465: spectral parameter $\eta$ for galaxies in
1466: the core region and in the outskirts have very high statistical significance.
1467: The differences in the galaxy content of groups, and of those galaxies
1468: which do not belong to groups from
1469: the core region $D1$ and in the outskirts $D2$ are smaller, and
1470: their statistical significance is marginal.
1471:
1472:
1473:
1474: The distribution of the color index $col$ for galaxies in the supercluster
1475: SCL126 (Fig.~\ref{fig:scl126d1d2gr}, lower row) shows
1476: that members of rich groups from the core region of the
1477: supercluster are mainly red galaxies, $col > 1.07$. The fraction of blue
1478: galaxies is larger in poor groups, and this fraction is the
1479: largest among those galaxies which do not belong to groups. In the outskirts
1480: region, even in rich groups there is a larger fraction of galaxies having $col
1481: < 1.07$, in comparison with the core region. Mostly, blue galaxies can be
1482: found among those galaxies which do not belong to groups. The differences
1483: between the galaxy content of poor groups from the core region and the outskirts
1484: are smaller.
1485:
1486: The statistical significances of these differences are given in
1487: Table~\ref{tab:s1269d1d2}.
1488: This table shows that according to the Kolmogorov-Smirnov
1489: test, the differences between the distributions of
1490: the color index $col$ for galaxies in
1491: the core region and in the outskirts have very high statistical significance.
1492: Among other populations, the statistical significance of differences is
1493: marginal.
1494:
1495:
1496: In other words, galaxies of different type in the supercluster SCL126 are
1497: segregated: red galaxies are preferentially located in rich groups, and blue
1498: galaxies in poor groups and among those galaxies not in any
1499: group. This is in a good accordance with the results about the fine structure
1500: obtained with the fourth Minkowski functional $V_3$ where we saw that red
1501: galaxies in the supercluster SCL126 are more clumpy, while blue,
1502: galaxies formed a less clumpy populations around them.
1503:
1504:
1505:
1506: \subsection{SCL9}
1507:
1508: The distribution of galaxies from different populations
1509: in the supercluster SCL9 is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:scl9d1d2gr} and
1510: Table~\ref{tab:s1269d1d2}.
1511:
1512: We see, in accordance with the data about
1513: SCL126, that galaxies in rich groups are, in average, brighter than
1514: galaxies in poor groups; galaxies which do not belong to groups are
1515: fainter than group galaxies. The largest difference between the distribution
1516: of galaxies by luminosity in the superclusters SCL126 and SCL9 is that
1517: in the supercluster SCL9 the luminosities of the brightest galaxies
1518: in rich and poor groups are of the same order.
1519:
1520: In the supercluster SCL9 the fraction of early type, red galaxies is again the
1521: largest in rich groups and the smallest among those galaxies which do not
1522: belong to groups. However, in this supercluster rich groups contain also a
1523: large fraction of late type, blue galaxies, especially in the outskirts of
1524: the supercluster. The fraction of blue galaxies in poor groups
1525: of the core region is also relatively large. Thus, in contrast to the
1526: supercluster SCL126, in the supercluster SCL9 early and late type,
1527: and red and blue galaxies reside
1528: together in groups of different richness. This is the same structure that was
1529: shown by the fourth Minkowski functional - blue galaxies form numerous small
1530: clumps.
1531:
1532:
1533: Table~\ref{tab:s1269d1d2} shows that according to the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test,
1534: the differences between the distributions of the spectral parameter $\eta$
1535: for galaxies
1536: in the core region and in the outskirts in the supercluster SCL9 are
1537: statistically
1538: significant. The differences between the distributions of the color index
1539: $col$ for
1540: galaxies in the core region and in the outskirts have a lower statistical
1541: significance.
1542: The differences between the distributions of luminosities for galaxies in the
1543: core region and in the outskirts have a marginal statistical significance only.
1544:
1545:
1546:
1547:
1548:
1549: \subsection{Summary}
1550:
1551: The Table~\ref{tab:s1269d1d2} shows that the overall galaxy
1552: content of supercluster cores and outskirts is different. In the core regions,
1553: the fraction of galaxies located in rich groups is about 0.45, while the
1554: fraction of galaxies in rich groups in the outskirt region is about 0.20.
1555: The fraction of those
1556: galaxies which do not belong to any group in the core region is smaller than in
1557: the outskirt region.
1558:
1559: The core regions contain about 1.5 times more of early type,
1560: red galaxies than the outskirts. The statistical significance of these
1561: differences is high. What we see here is an evidence for a large scale
1562: morphology-density relation in superclusters -- high density cores of
1563: superclusters
1564: contain relatively more early type, red galaxies than the lower density
1565: outer regions.
1566:
1567: Interestingly, the galaxy content of groups in the
1568: superclusters SCL126 and SCL9 is
1569: not similar. In the supercluster SCL126 galaxies of different type are
1570: segregated: red galaxies are preferentially located in rich groups, and blue
1571: galaxies in poor groups and among those galaxies not in any group. In the
1572: supercluster SCL9 early and late type, and red and blue galaxies reside together
1573: in groups of different richness.
1574:
1575: This is in a good accordance with the results about the fine structure
1576: of superclusters delineated by galaxies from different populations
1577: obtained using the fourth Minkowski functional $V_3$.
1578:
1579: In both superclusters, those galaxies classified as late type but
1580: having red colors,
1581: and blue galaxies with early type spectra are mostly located in poor groups
1582: or they do not belong to any group; only about 10\% of them are
1583: located in rich groups.
1584:
1585:
1586: Another important difference between these superclusters is that
1587: in the supercluster SCL126 the brightest galaxies reside in rich groups
1588: while in the supercluster SCL9 the luminosity of the brightest galaxies
1589: in rich and poor groups is the same.
1590:
1591:
1592: In summary, the high-density cores of the superclusters contain relatively more
1593: early-type, quiescent, red galaxies than the lower-density regions, where there
1594: are more blue, star-forming galaxies. In the core regions the fraction of galaxies
1595: in rich groups is larger than this fraction in the outskirts. This shows that both
1596: the local (group/cluster) and the global (supercluster) environments are
1597: important in influencing types, colors and star formation rates of galaxies.
1598:
1599: Earlier studies (\citep[among others]{dg76,d80,e87,phill98,n01,n02,
1600: zehavi02,go03,hogg03,hogg04,balogh04,depr03,depr04,ma03b,cr05,blant04,
1601: blant06} have shown the difference between the galaxy populations in
1602: clusters and in the field. Our results show that this difference exists also
1603: between the core regions and the outer regions of rich superclusters (see also
1604: Paper III).
1605:
1606:
1607:
1608: \section{Discussion}
1609:
1610: \subsection{Selection effects}
1611:
1612: Both rich superclusters, SCl126 and SCL9, are not fully covered by
1613: the survey volume of the 2dFGRS. However, in the case of the
1614: supercluster SCL126 only its small, outer part remains outside the survey
1615: (see references in sect. 2). All rich clusters in this supercluster are
1616: included. Thus, most probably, including the full supercluster may add a
1617: relatively small number of mainly blue galaxies to this supercluster;
1618: this would not change our results about the galaxy content and fine
1619: structure in the supercluster core region and about rich groups in the
1620: outskirts of the supercluster.
1621:
1622: With the supercluster SCL9, the situation is more complicated. The part which
1623: remains outside contains about half of the Abell clusters in this supercluster
1624: (sect. 2). Therefore, including them would increase the maximum values of the
1625: fourth Minkowski functional, $V_3$, since this characteristic counts the
1626: number of isolated clumps in an object under study. Thus, the differences
1627: between the values of $V_3$ for superclusters SCL126 and SCL9 would even
1628: increase. Even in the present analysis we saw that the values of $V_3$ for
1629: blue galaxies for SCL9 are larger than those values for
1630: SCL126. Thus, even if in the remaining part of the supercluster blue
1631: galaxies were distributed homogeneously such as not to increase the present
1632: values of $V_3$ (not a very probable case!) the differences between the $V_3$
1633: values for galaxies of different type would not disappear.
1634:
1635: Similarly, the differences in the galaxy content of groups from the core region
1636: and the outskirts would not disappear unless the distribution and clumpiness of
1637: galaxies in the (excluded) part of the supercluster SCL9 were completely
1638: different from what we see in its 2dFGRS part. Probably we should not expect to
1639: see large variations in the galaxy content of different parts of one
1640: supercluster. Moreover, in paper III we showed that the scatter in galaxy
1641: populations of superclusters is small.
1642:
1643: For a more detailed study we plan to analyse a larger number of rich
1644: superclusters. For that, we started to generate supercluster catalogues using
1645: the SDSS data. In particular, the region of the supercluster SCL126 is covered
1646: by both surveys, therefore giving us a good chance to compare the properties
1647: of this supercluster, enclosed by both data sets.
1648:
1649:
1650: \subsection{Comparison with other very rich superclusters}
1651:
1652: The richest relatively nearby supercluster is the Shapley Supercluster
1653: \citep[and references therein]{proust06} \citep{bar00,qui00}. The main core
1654: of this supercluster contains at least two Abell clusters and two X-ray
1655: groups.
1656: \citet{hai06}
1657: studied the galaxy populations in the core region of this supercluster
1658: using data about galaxies with fainter absolute magnitude limit
1659: than used in our study, thus we can compare their results with ours
1660: qualitatively only. They
1661: demonstrated that the colors of galaxies in the core
1662: region of the Shapley supercluster depend on their environment, with redder
1663: galaxies being located in clusters. They also found a large amount of faint
1664: blue galaxies between the clusters. We found the same trends with
1665: colors, especially
1666: in the core region of the supercluster SCL126. Haines et al. found also
1667: that in the core of the Shapley supercluster there where the fraction of blue
1668: galaxies is the lowest, the X-ray emission is the strongest. As seen above, we
1669: also find that in rich groups, which have X-ray sources, the fraction of blue
1670: galaxies is very small (the core region of SCL126).
1671:
1672: Porter and Raychaudhury studied recently another rich supercluster partly
1673: covered by the 2dF surevy -- the Pisces-Cetus supercluster (SCL10 in E01)
1674: \citep{pr05,pr06}. They used data about Abell clusters, galaxy groups
1675: \citep[by][]{eke04} and galaxies in this supercluster.
1676: Porter and Raychaudhury used the spectral parameter $\eta$ to determine
1677: the star formation rates for galaxies in groups in
1678: this supercluster.
1679: They concluded that
1680: galaxies in rich clusters have lower star formation rates than galaxies in
1681: poor groups in agreement with our results. Porter and
1682: Raychaudhury also demonstrated that in the filament between the clusters in this
1683: supercluster the fraction of star forming galaxies is higher at larger
1684: distance from clusters than close to clusters.
1685:
1686: \citet{gray04} studied the environment of galaxies of different
1687: colors in the supercluster A901/902. They divided galaxies into
1688: red (quiescent) and blue (star-forming) populations, using $(U - V)$ colors
1689: of galaxies brighter than $M_v \approx -14$.
1690: \citet{gray04} obtained
1691: strong evidence that the highest density regions in clusters are populated
1692: mostly with red, quiescent galaxies, while blue, star-forming galaxies dominate in
1693: outer/lower density regions of clusters.
1694: Our samples do not contain very faint galaxies;
1695: for brighter galaxies,
1696: we find qualitatively the same trends in our superclusters.
1697:
1698: \citet{wolf05} showed that in the supercluster A901/902 there exists a
1699: population of dusty red galaxies which show red colors and also signatures of
1700: star formation. In this supercluster these galaxies are located at intermediate
1701: densities. This agrees well with our finding about galaxies with mixed
1702: classification (galaxies with
1703: red colors and spectra typical to late type galaxies):
1704: these galaxies populate mostly intermediate density
1705: regions of superclusters, being members of poor groups
1706: or they do not belong to any group.
1707:
1708:
1709: \citet{hil05} find that the fraction of early spectral type galaxies is
1710: significantly higher in clusters with a high X-ray flux. Several of the X-ray
1711: clusters studied by Hilton et al. belong to the core region of SCL126 (A1650,
1712: A1651, A1663 and A1750), where we also found a high fraction of early type
1713: galaxies. One of the clusters under study by Hilton et al. is located in the
1714: supercluster SCL 9 (A2811).
1715:
1716: \citet{balogh04} compared the populations of star-forming and quiescent
1717: galaxies in groups from the 2dFGRS and SDSS surveys using the strength of the
1718: $H_{\alpha}$ emission line
1719: as star formation indicator. The spectral parameter $\eta$ is correlated with the
1720: equivalent width
1721: of the $H_{\alpha}$ emission line: approximately, early type galaxies
1722: correspond to quiescent galaxies and late type galaxies
1723: to star-forming galaxies.
1724: \citet{balogh04} found that the
1725: relative numbers of star-forming galaxies in groups with high velocity
1726: dispersion is lower than in groups with low velocity dispersion. We found that
1727: rich groups contain a smaller fraction of late type galaxies than poor
1728: groups, qualitatively in accordance with Balogh et al.
1729:
1730:
1731:
1732: \citet{pl04} showed that the dynamical
1733: status of groups and clusters of galaxies depends on their large-scale
1734: environment. Here we show that also the richness of a group and its galaxy
1735: content depend on the large-scale environment. The first of these effects
1736: was described as an environmental enhancement
1737: of group richness in \citet{e03c} and \citet{e05}.
1738:
1739:
1740: Thus,
1741: our present data reveals the dependency of the properties of galaxies in
1742: superclusters on both the local density, in groups, (as shown also by the 2DF
1743: team, e.q. \citep{balogh04} and references therein)
1744: and on the global density (see also Paper III) in
1745: the supercluster environment. Moreover,
1746: we showed that the fine stucture of superclusters as
1747: determined by galaxies from different populations,
1748: differs.
1749:
1750: The differences in the distribution of galaxies from different populations in
1751: individual superclusters are related to a different overall morphology of these
1752: superclusters.
1753:
1754:
1755:
1756: \subsection{Morphology of superclusters and their formation and
1757: evolution}
1758:
1759: We showed that there exist several differences between the morphology of
1760: galaxy populations of individual rich superclusters, which cannot be explained
1761: by selection effects only.
1762:
1763: The supercluster SCL126 has a very high density core with several Abell and X-
1764: ray clusters in a region with dimensions less than 10 \Mpc. Such very high
1765: densities of galaxies have been observed so far only in very few
1766: superclusters. Among them are the Shapley supercluster \citep{bar00}, the
1767: Aquarius supercluster \citep{car02}, and the Corona Borealis supercluster
1768: \citep{small98}. A very small number of such a high density cores of
1769: superclusters is consistent with the results of N-body simulations which show
1770: that such high density regions (the cores of superclusters that may have
1771: started the collapse very early) are rare \citep{gra02}. The fraction of early
1772: type, red galaxies in the core region of the
1773: supercluster SCL126 is very high (higher than in SCL9), both in groups and
1774: among those galaxies which do not belong to groups.
1775:
1776: This, together with the presence of a high density core and overall more
1777: homogeneous structure than in the supercluster SCL9 may be an indication that
1778: the supercluster SCL126 has formed earlier (is more evolved dynamically by the
1779: present epoch) than the supercluster SCL9.
1780:
1781: However, in another part of the core region of the supercluster SCL126 the X-ray
1782: cluster A1750 shows signs of merging, both according to X-ray and optical data
1783: \citep{don,bel}.
1784:
1785: \citet{don} studied this cluster using observational data from ROSAT and ASCA,
1786: and also the velocities of
1787: galaxies in this cluster. Their analysis suggests that we observe
1788: an ongoing merger in this binary cluster.
1789:
1790: Additional evidence about complex merger events in this cluster was provided
1791: by \citet{bel}, who used XMM-Newton data to study in detail the surface
1792: brightness, temperature and entropy distribution in this cluster. Their data
1793: indicate that two components of this binary cluster have
1794: just started to interact. In
1795: addition, their data suggest that there occured another merging event in one
1796: of the clusters, perhaps in the past 1-2 Gy. They relate these merging
1797: events also to the large scale environment of this cluster
1798: (it is a member of a very
1799: rich supercluster, SCL126). In summary, these studies suggest that the
1800: region around the rich cluster A1750 in the supercluster SCL126 may be
1801: dynamically younger than the main core region.
1802:
1803:
1804: This all shows that the formation and evolution history of superclusters
1805: is a complex subject. We can try to model it, but the best way is to
1806: follow their real evolution in time, looking for superclusters in
1807: deep surveys. An especially promising project is the
1808: ALHAMBRA Deep survey by \cite{moles05}
1809: that will provide us with data about (possible) galaxy
1810: systems at very high redshifts which can be searched for and analysed using
1811: morphological methods. Comparing superclusters at different redshifts
1812: will clarify many questions about their evolution.
1813:
1814: In order to have a larger sample of local supercluster templates,
1815: we plan to continue our studies of rich superclusters. We
1816: mentioned above that we plan to use for that
1817: data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey to
1818: extend the sample of relatively nearby superclusters.
1819:
1820: In Paper RI we showed that the richest superclusters in the Millenium
1821: simulation do not describe the large morphological variety of the
1822: observed superclusters. Moreover, Minkowski Functionals show that the
1823: fine structure as delineated by bright and faint galaxies in Millenium
1824: Simulations do not follow the fine structure delineated by galaxies of
1825: different luminosities in observed superclusters. This suggest that the
1826: model does not yet explain all the features of observed superclusters.
1827:
1828: Earlier studies of the Minkowski functional of the whole SDSS survey region
1829: \citep[and references therein]{gott06} also conclude that N-body simulations
1830: with very large volume and more power at large scales are needed to model
1831: structures like the supercluster SCL126 more accurately than present
1832: simulations. Similar conclusions were reached by \citet{e06}. Also the
1833: galaxy formation and its environmental dependence is not yet well understood.
1834: Our present results indicate that the properties of galaxies and their
1835: evolution history have been affected by both local and global densities in
1836: superclusters. The details of these processes have to be modelled in
1837: future simulations.
1838:
1839:
1840:
1841: \section{Conclusions}
1842:
1843: We have presented a morphological study of the two richest superclusters from
1844: the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey. We studied the internal structure and
1845: galaxy populations of these superclusters. Our main conclusions are
1846: the following.
1847:
1848: \begin{itemize}
1849:
1850: \item{}
1851: The values of the fourth Minkowski functional $V_3$, which contain information
1852: about both the local and global morphology, show the fine structure of
1853: superclusters as determined by galaxies from different populations. The fourth
1854: Minkowski functional $V_3$ and the morphological signature $K_1$-$K_2$ show a
1855: crossover from low-density morphology (outskirts of supercluster) to high-
1856: density morphology (core of supercluster) at a mass fraction $m_f \approx 0.7$.
1857:
1858:
1859: \item{} In the supercluster SCL126, the functional
1860: $V_3$ shows that the number of clumps in
1861: the distribution of red galaxies is larger than the number of
1862: clumps determined by blue galaxies, especially in the outer
1863: regions of the supercluster, where
1864: the maximum values of $V_3$ are, correspondingly, 8 for red galaxies and 5
1865: for blue galaxies.
1866: Thus in the outskirts of the supercluster, blue galaxies form a more
1867: homogeneous population than red galaxies. In the core region,
1868: the clumpiness of galaxy populations is of the same order.
1869:
1870: \item{} In the supercluster SCL9, the values of $V_3$ are large for both early
1871: type and red galaxies, and late type and blue galaxies.
1872: In the outskirts of the supercluster the differences between
1873: the clumpiness of galaxy populations are small
1874: (the values of $V_3$ are the same, 7--8 for both early and late type
1875: galaxies), while in the core
1876: region of this supercluster the clumpiness of the late type, blue galaxy
1877: population is larger (the maximum value of $V_3$ is 17)
1878: than the clumpiness of the early type, red galaxy population,
1879: where the maximum $V_3 = 12$.
1880:
1881: \item{}
1882: Our superclusters contain galaxies with mixed classifications:
1883: these galaxies show spectra typical to late type galaxies and red colors,
1884: or they are early type galaxies with blue colors.
1885: These galaxies are mostly located at intermediate densities
1886: in the outskirts of our superclusters, being members of poor groups or
1887: do not belonging to any group. Due to these galaxies,
1888: at intermediate mass fractions
1889: the curves of the fourth Minkowski functional $V_3$ for early type
1890: galaxies and for red galaxies, as well as for late type galaxies and
1891: blue galaxies, differ in some details.
1892:
1893:
1894: \item{} Groups in high-density cores of superclusters are richer than in
1895: lower-density (outer) regions of superclusters. In high-density cores,
1896: groups contain relatively more early-type, red galaxies than the
1897: groups in lower-density regions in superclusters, where there are more
1898: late type, blue galaxies. Therefore, both the richness of a group and its
1899: galaxy content depend on the large scale environment where it resides.
1900:
1901:
1902: \item{}
1903: In cores of superclusters, the fractions of early type, red galaxies
1904: is larger than these fractions in outskirts.
1905: In the supercluster SCL126 the
1906: morphological segregation of red and blue galaxies is stronger
1907: than in the supercluster SCL9. In SCL126, the most luminous galaxies in
1908: rich groups have larger luminosities than most luminous galaxies in poor
1909: groups, while in SCL9 the luminosity of the brightest galaxies in rich and
1910: poor groups is comparable.
1911:
1912:
1913: \item{} The differences in overall morphology, fine structure and galaxy
1914: content of the supercluster suggest that there are differences in their
1915: evolutional history which affect their present-day properties.
1916:
1917: \end{itemize}
1918:
1919: Our study shows the importance of the role of superclusters as a high density
1920: environment that affects the evolution and the present-day properties of their
1921: member galaxies and the groups/clusters of galaxies that constitute the
1922: supercluster.
1923:
1924: The forthcoming Planck satellite observations will determine the anisotropy of
1925: the cosmic background radiation with unprecedented accuracy and angular
1926: resolution. As a by-product, Planck measurements will provide an all-sky
1927: survey of massive clusters via the Sunyaev-Zeldovich (SZ) effect. For the
1928: Planck project, detailed information of supercluster properties is important,
1929: helping to correlate the SZ-signals with the imprints of local superclusters.
1930: As a continuation of the present work, we are
1931: preparing supercluster catalogues for the Planck community.
1932:
1933:
1934: \acknowledgments
1935: We thank the anonymous referee for careful reading of the manuscript and for
1936: many useful comments which helped to improve the paper.
1937: We are pleased to thank the 2dFGRS Team for the publicly available data
1938: releases. The present study was supported by the Estonian Science Foundation
1939: grants No. 6104 and 7146, and by the Estonian Ministry for Education and
1940: Science research project TO 0060058S98. This work has also been supported by
1941: the University of Valencia through a visiting professorship for Enn Saar and
1942: by the Spanish MEC project AYA2006-14056 (including FEDER). J.E. thanks
1943: Astrophysikalisches Institut Potsdam (using DFG-grant 436 EST 17/4/06), and
1944: the Aspen Center for Physics for hospitality, where part of this study was
1945: performed. PH and PN were supported by Planck science in Mets\"ahovi, Academy
1946: of Finland. In this paper we have used R, a language for data analysis and
1947: graphics \citep{ig96}.
1948:
1949:
1950:
1951:
1952: \appendix
1953:
1954: \section{Estimating probability densities}
1955: \label{sec:densities}
1956:
1957: As said in the main text, all the distributions (probability
1958: densities) shown in this paper have been obtained using the R environment
1959: \citep{ig96}, \texttt{http://www.r-project.org} (the 'stats' package).
1960: We do not show the customary error limits in our figures; we explain here why.
1961:
1962: Fig.~\ref{fig:r2bmagerr} shows the differential luminosity function histogram
1963: with Poisson error limits. This Figure shows, first, that Poisson errors are
1964: small, and, secondly, that these errors are not very useful since they are
1965: defined mainly by the bin widths -- the histograms for the different bin
1966: widths clearly do not coincide within the formal error limits, and, therefore,
1967: they cannot represent the true density distribution.
1968: As known for long in statistics
1969: \citep[see, e.g., a good pedagogical presentation by][]{wandjones},
1970: the most important part in probability
1971: density estimation is the right choice of the bin (kernel) width, and
1972: the 'density' command in the 'stats' package does that, minimizing the MISE
1973: (mean integral standard error) of the estimate.
1974: Also, it is long known that kernel estimates
1975: \[
1976: f(x)=\frac1{N}\sum_i^N K(x-x_i;h),
1977: \]
1978: where the data are $\{x_i\},\, i\in[1,N]$, and $K(x;h)$ are suitable kernels
1979: of a width $h$,
1980: are preferred to binning. Both these estimates depend on the bin (kernel)
1981: widths that can be found by optimizing the MISE; but histograms depend,
1982: additionally, on the placing of the bins. Also, the minimum MISE in
1983: case of binning is larger than for kernel estimates.
1984:
1985:
1986:
1987: \begin{figure}[ht]
1988: \centering
1989: \resizebox{0.45\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f12.eps}}
1990: \caption{The differential luminosity function histograms
1991: $F=dN/dM$, where $M$ is the absolute magnitude of a galaxy,
1992: for galaxies in the supercluster SCL126; here the
1993: solid line shows the luminosity function and the dashed lines indicate
1994: the Poisson errors. Black lines show the histogram for the 0.5 magnitude
1995: bins, gray lines -- for the 0.25 magnitude bins.
1996: }
1997: \label{fig:r2bmagerr}
1998: \end{figure}
1999:
2000:
2001:
2002: The MISE is defined as
2003: \begin{eqnarray}
2004: \mbox{MISE}&=&E\int\left(\hat{f}(x)-f(x)\right)^2dx\\
2005: &=&\int\mbox{Var}\left(\hat{f}(x)\right)\,dx+
2006: \int\left[\mbox{Bias}\left(\hat{f}(x)\right)\right]^2dx.
2007: \label{eq:mise}
2008: \end{eqnarray}
2009: The two terms in the last equality depend in a different way on the
2010: kernel width (bandwidth). When we increase this width, the
2011: variance decreases, but the bias increases -- this is what happens when
2012: we take wider bins for Fig.~\ref{fig:r2bmagerr}. The 'stats' package
2013: chooses the optimal bandwidth as that which minimizes the MISE.
2014: We could also try to minimise the local mean standard error MSE($x$),
2015: but this asks for adaptive density estimation (using bandwiths that
2016: depend on $x$), and the procedure is much more complex.
2017:
2018: For a kernel estimate, when binning is replaced by convolution with
2019: a suitable kernel, the minimum MISE is of
2020: the order of $n^{-4/5}$, where $n$ is the size of the sample, and the
2021: optimal kernel width is of the order of $\hat{\sigma}n^{-1/5}$,
2022: where $\hat{\sigma}$ is the estimate of the rms deviation of the data
2023: \citep[see, e.g.][]{silverman}. The expression 'of the order to' can be
2024: mostly read as 'equal to', as the proportionality coefficients are
2025: usually close to unity. This kernel width means that there are about
2026: $n\cdot n^{-1/5}=n^{4/5}$ points per kernel -- we get our accustomed
2027: Poissonian error, but only for the optimal kernel width. However, this
2028: is only a rough estimate, as the local error, the mean standard error
2029: MSE$(x)$ depends on the true density, being larger in the regions where
2030: this density has minima or maxima, and is difficult to estimate.
2031: Thus the 'stats' package does not provide the MSE, and we do not show
2032: error bars in our figures.
2033:
2034: You can compare histograms and kernel densities
2035: in Fig~\ref{fig:testfig}. Here we generated a random sample of 1000
2036: values for a weighted sum of two normal distributions, calculated its
2037: histogram, and applied the R procedure to obtain the optimized kernel
2038: density. The optimal kernel width is 0.36, three times smaller than the bin
2039: width; however, the kernel density follows well the smooth true
2040: density, and recovers the details much better than the histogram does.
2041:
2042:
2043:
2044:
2045: \begin{figure}[ht]
2046:
2047: \centering
2048: \resizebox{0.45\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f13.eps}}
2049: \caption{Comparison of the histogram and kernel density estimates.
2050: The true density is shown by a thin line, and the kernel estimate
2051: obtained by the R 'stats' package for a sample of the size 1000
2052: -- by a thick line. For comparison, we show a histogram (obtained also
2053: by 'R'). It is clearly seen that the histogram is inferior to the
2054: kernel estimate.
2055: }
2056: \label{fig:testfig}
2057: \end{figure}
2058:
2059:
2060:
2061: As the total number of
2062: galaxies in our superclusters is large, the differences
2063: between the estimated and true densities are small.
2064: These differences can be easily estimated. Let us take SCL9 as an example
2065: (SCL126 has more galaxies, and the errors are slightly smaller).
2066: The total number of galaxies in SCL9 is 1176, so the MISE for the distributions
2067: involving the whole supercluster is $\approx0.0035$, and about 0.006 for
2068: separate populations (the corresponding rms errors are 0.06 and 0.08).
2069: The local errors (MSE) are, in average, a few times smaller (by the
2070: ratio of the total range of a random variable to $\hat{\sigma}$).
2071: Our use of a constant width kernel
2072: does not allow us to better estimate the local errors,
2073: but we can always strictly
2074: compare densities, using the full data -- the integral distributions (e.g.,
2075: the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test).
2076:
2077: \section{Spatial densities}
2078: \label{sec:spatial}
2079:
2080: When studying the morphology of superclusters of galaxies, a necessary
2081: step is to convert the spatial positions of galaxies into spatial densities.
2082: The standard approach is to use kernel densities
2083: \citep[see, e.g.][]{silverman}:
2084: \[
2085: \varrho(\mathbf{x})=\sum_i K(\mathbf{x-x}_i;h) m_i,
2086: \]
2087: where the sum is over all galaxies, $\mathbf{x}_i$ are the coordinates
2088: of the $i$-th galaxy, and $m_i$ is its mass (or luminosity, if we are
2089: estimating luminosity densities;
2090: for number densities we set
2091: $m_i\equiv1$). The function $K(\mathbf{x};h)$ is the kernel of the
2092: width $h$, and a suitable choice of the kernel determines the quality
2093: of the density estimate. If the kernel widths depend either on the
2094: coordinate $\mathbf{x}$ or on the position of the $i$-th galaxy, the
2095: densities are adaptive.
2096:
2097: Kernels have to be normalized and symmetrical:
2098: \[
2099: \int K(\mathbf{x};h)dV=1,\qquad \int \mathbf{x}K(\mathbf{x};h)dV=0.
2100: \]
2101:
2102: For the usual case, when densities are calculated for a spatial grid,
2103: good kernels are generated by box splines $B_J$ (usually
2104: used in $N$-body mass assignment). Box splines have compact support
2105: (they are local), and they are interpolating on a grid:
2106: \[
2107: \sum_i B_J(x-i)=1,
2108: \]
2109: for any $x$, and a small number of indices that give non-zero values for
2110: $B_J(x)$. In this paper we restrict us to
2111: the popular $B_3$ splines:
2112: \[
2113: B_3(x)=\frac1{12}\left[|x-2|^3-4|x-1|^3+6|x|^3-4|x+1|^3+|x+2|^3\right]
2114: \]
2115: (this function is different from zero only in the interval $x\in[-2,2]$).
2116: We define the (one-dimensional) $B_3$ box spline kernel
2117: of width $h=N$ as
2118: \[
2119: K_B^{(1)}(x;N)=B_3(x/N)/N.
2120: \]
2121: This kernel preserves the interpolation property (mass conservation)
2122: for all kernel widths that are integer multiples of the grid step, $h=N$.
2123: The 3-D $K_{B}^{(3)}$ box spline kernel we use is given by the direct
2124: product of three one-dimensional kernels:
2125: \[
2126: K_B(\mathbf{x};N)\equiv K_B^{(3)}(\mathbf{x};N)=K_B^{(1)})(x;N)K_B^{(1)}(y;N)
2127: K_B^{(1)}(z;N),
2128: \]
2129: where $\mathbf{x}\equiv\{x,y,z\}$.
2130: Although it is a direct product, it is isotropic to a good degree
2131: (to a few per cent in the outer regions).
2132:
2133: As seen before, the best (optimal) kernel width is usually determined
2134: by minimizing the MISE; in our case this is about 6--8\hmpc.
2135: We have defined (see RI) superclusters as density enhancements of a common
2136: scale of 8\hmpc, so we will use this value.
2137:
2138: \section{Minkowski functionals and shapefinders}
2139: \label{sec:define}
2140:
2141: Consider an
2142: excursion set $F_{\phi_0}$ of a field $\phi(\mathbf{x})$ (the set
2143: of all points where density is larger than a given limit,
2144: $\phi(\mathbf{x}\ge\phi_0$)). Then, the first
2145: Minkowski functional (the volume functional) is the volume of
2146: this region (the excursion set):
2147: \begin{equation}
2148: \label{mf0}
2149: V_0(\phi_0)=\int_{F_{\phi_0}}d^3x\;.
2150: \end{equation}
2151: The second MF is proportional to the surface area
2152: of the boundary $\delta F_\phi$ of the excursion set:
2153: \begin{equation}
2154: \label{mf1}
2155: V_1(\phi_0)=\frac16\int_{\delta F_{\phi_0}}dS(\mathbf{x})\;,
2156: \end{equation}
2157: (but not the area itself, notice the constant).
2158: The third MF is proportional to the \index{integrated mean curvature}
2159: integrated mean curvature
2160: of the boundary:
2161: \begin{equation}
2162: \label{mf2}
2163: V_2(\phi_0)=\frac1{6\pi}\int_{\delta F_{\phi_0}}
2164: \left(\frac1{R_1(\mathbf{x})}+\frac1{R_2(\mathbf{x})}\right)dS(\mathbf{x})\;,
2165: \end{equation}
2166: where $R_1(\mathbf{x})$ and $R_2(\mathbf{x})$
2167: are the principal radii of curvature of the boundary.
2168: The fourth Minkowski functional is proportional to the integrated
2169: Gaussian curvature (the Euler characteristic) \index{Euler!characteristic}
2170: of the boundary:
2171: \begin{equation}
2172: \label{mf3}
2173: V_3(\phi_0)=\frac1{4\pi}\int_{\delta F_{\phi_0}}
2174: \frac1{R_1(\mathbf{x})R_2(\mathbf{x})}dS(\mathbf{x})\;.
2175: \end{equation}
2176: At high (low) densities this functional gives us the number of isolated
2177: clumps (voids) in the sample
2178: \citep{mart05,saar06}.
2179:
2180:
2181: As the argument labeling the isodensity surfaces, we chose the (excluded) mass
2182: fraction $m_f$ -- the ratio of the mass in regions with density {\em lower}
2183: than the density at the surface, to the total mass of the supercluster. When
2184: this ratio runs from 0 to 1, the iso-surfaces move from the outer limiting
2185: boundary into the center of the supercluster, i.e. the fraction $m_f=0$
2186: corresponds to the whole supercluster, and $m_f=1$ to its highest density
2187: peak.
2188:
2189: We use directly only the fourth Minkowski functional in this paper;
2190: the other functionals are used to calculate the shapefinders
2191: \citep{sah98,sss04}.
2192: The shapefinders are defined as a
2193: set of combinations of Minkowski functionals: $H_1=3V/S$ (thickness),
2194: $H_2=S/C$ (width), and $H_3=C/4\pi$ (length). The
2195: shapefinders have dimensions of length and are normalized to give $H_i=R$
2196: for a sphere of radius $R$. For a convex surface, the shapefinders $H_i$
2197: follow the inequalities $H_1\leq H_2\leq H_3$. Oblate ellipsoids (pancakes)
2198: are characterized by $H_1 << H_2 \approx H_3$, while prolate ellipsoids
2199: (filaments) are described by $H_1 \approx H_2 << H_3$.
2200:
2201: \citet{sah98} also defined two dimensionless
2202: shapefinders $K_1$ (planarity) and $K_2$ (filamentarity):
2203: $K_1 = (H_2 - H_1)/(H_2 + H_1)$ and $K_2 = (H_3 -
2204: H_2)/(H_3 + H_2)$.
2205:
2206: In the $(K_1,K_2)$-plane filaments are located near the $K_2$-axis,
2207: pancakes near the $K_1$-axis, and ribbons along the diagonal, connecting
2208: the spheres at the origin with the ideal ribbon at $(1,1)$.
2209:
2210: \subsection{Algorithms}
2211: \label{subsec:algorithms}
2212:
2213: Different algorithms are used to calculate the Minkowski
2214: functionals; here we use a simple grid-based algorithm, based
2215: on integral geometry (Crofton's intersection formula), proposed
2216: by Schmalzing and Buchert (\cite{jens97}).
2217:
2218: To start with, we find the density thresholds for given filling
2219: fractions $f$ by sorting the grid densities. This is a common step
2220: for all grid-based algorithms. Vertexes with higher
2221: densities than the threshold form the excursion set. This set is
2222: characterized by its basic sets of different dimensions -- points
2223: (vertexes), edges formed by two neighbouring points, squares (faces)
2224: formed by four edges, and cubes formed by six faces. The algorithm
2225: counts the numbers of elements of all basic sets, and finds the values of the
2226: Minkowski functionals as
2227: \begin{eqnarray}
2228: \label{crofton}
2229: V_0&=&a^3N_3\;,\nonumber\\
2230: V_1&=&a^2\left(\frac29N_2-\frac23N_3\right)\;,\nonumber\\
2231: V_2&=&a\left(\frac29N_1-\frac49N_2+\frac23N_3\right)\;,\nonumber\\
2232: V_3&=&N_0-N_1+N_2-N_3\;,
2233: \end{eqnarray}
2234: where $a$ is the grid step, $N_0$ is the
2235: number of vertexes, $N_1$ is the number of edges, $N_2$ is the
2236: number of squares (faces), and $N_3$ is the number of basic cubes in
2237: the excursion set.
2238:
2239: \section{Clumpiness: morphological templates}
2240: \label{sec:proto}
2241:
2242: In Paper RI we generated a series of empirical models which served us as
2243: morphological templates to understand the behaviour of shapefinders.
2244: These models showed
2245: that the morphological signature of rich superclusters corresponds to
2246: a multibranched filament; the simplest model for that was a long filament with
2247: short filaments across it. In RI we did not study the fine structure of
2248: superclusters as expressed by their clumpiness. In these models the locations
2249: of points which mimic positions of galaxies were generated randomly. Thus our
2250: empirical models in that paper do not recover completely the inner structure of
2251: superclusters.
2252:
2253: For this appendix, we generated a series of empirical models to
2254: understand better the substructure of superclusters.
2255: These models will also help us to determine how well our methods
2256: distinguish different types of substructure.
2257:
2258: In these models, the overall distribution
2259: of points (which mimic individual galaxies) resembles a thin filament
2260: with a size $10\times 20\times 100$ (in grid units), as in RI. We place
2261: inside this filament a series of clusters, located randomly. Their
2262: richness, number and size varies so that the total number of objects is
2263: always 1000 or 500 (approximately the number of galaxies in superclusters
2264: under study, and in individual galaxy populations).
2265: We used the richness values 5, 10 and 20; the number of clusters is,
2266: correspondingly,
2267: 100, 50 and 25. The size of clusters was 1, 5, and 10 in grid units.
2268: Small clusters mimic real groups and clusters, large clusters --
2269: overdensity regions.
2270: Clusters are located randomly and may overlap, forming additional
2271: overdensity regions, as, for example, in cores of superclusters,
2272: where also galaxy populations are mixed.
2273:
2274: We plot the Euler characteristics and morphological signatures for
2275: these models in Figs.~\ref{fig:clus1}.
2276:
2277: The models used in this figure are as follows. In the first set
2278: the number of clusters is 25, each cluster
2279: has 20 galaxies in it. The sizes of clusters are 1 and 5. In the
2280: third model in this set, these
2281: clusters are combined together. In the latter model clusters have the same centre
2282: coordinates. Thus the model CL125525 (the combined models CL125 and CL525)
2283: mimics the distribution where groups are surrounded by lower density galaxies
2284: (e.g., ellipticals by spirals).
2285:
2286: In the second set the number of clusters is 50, with 10 member galaxies, and
2287: in the combined model, cluster centres again coincide (the models CL150, CL550, and
2288: CL150550). In the third set (CL125150 and CL525150) we added to the models with 25
2289: clusters (sizes 1 and 5) the model CL150, to have a smaller number of rich groups
2290: and a large number of poor groups, but in this case the
2291: centres of groups do not coincide. These models mimic the situation where
2292: different populations of galaxies are located in clumps of different richness
2293: and size, but in separate systems (partly, since clumps may overlap randomly).
2294: We plot here also the curves for a simple filament for comparison.
2295:
2296: We do not show in this figure models with 100 small clusters and those with
2297: cluster size 10; in all these models the values of $V_3$ were smaller than in
2298: real superclusters. In the case of large clusters the value of $K_2$ becomes too
2299: large.
2300:
2301: Fig.~\ref{fig:clus1} shows that, first, the morphological signature
2302: is recovered correctly by our empirical models.
2303: Second, the $V_3(m_f)$ curves for different models are different,
2304: showing that they discriminate well different substructure.
2305:
2306:
2307:
2308:
2309: \begin{figure*}
2310:
2311: \centering
2312: \resizebox{0.28\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f14a.eps}}
2313: \resizebox{0.28\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f14b.eps}}
2314: \resizebox{0.28\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f14c.eps}}\\
2315: \resizebox{0.28\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f14d.eps}}
2316: \resizebox{0.28\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f14e.eps}}
2317: \resizebox{0.28\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{f14f.eps}}
2318: \caption{
2319: The Euler characteristic (upper row)
2320: and the morphological signature $K_1$-$K_2$ (lower row) for
2321: the empirical models.
2322: Left panels:
2323: $N_{cl} = 25$, $N_{gal} = 20$ and the size of the clusters is 1 and 5
2324: (in grid units), and the combined model where the centres of clusters
2325: coincide.
2326: Solid line - model CL125, dashed line - model CL525, and dot-dashed line -
2327: model CL125525.
2328: Middle panels:
2329: $N_{cl} = 50$, $N_{gal} = 10$ and the size of clusters is 1 and 5
2330: (in grid units), and the combined model where the centres of clusters
2331: coincide.
2332: Solid line - model CL150, dashed line - model CL550, and dot-dashed line -
2333: model CL150550.
2334: Right panels:
2335: the combined models where the centres do not coincide.
2336: 'Fil' denotes a simple filament with randomly distributed points.
2337: Solid line - model CL125150, dashed line - model CL525150, and dot-dashed line -
2338: model 'Fil'.
2339: }
2340: \label{fig:clus1}
2341: \end{figure*}
2342:
2343:
2344: These models show that the supercluster SCL126 is better modelled by a small
2345: number of richer/bigger clumps, and the supercluster SCL9 -- by a large number of
2346: smaller clumps. Clusters overlap, thus the maximum values of $V_3$ are smaller
2347: than the original numbers of clusters in the models. The case when any
2348: population of galaxies is located randomly within the supercluster volume does not
2349: correspond to the real distribution of galaxies. Of course, our very simple models
2350: in which clusters of one galaxy population are surrounded by low density "clouds"
2351: of galaxies from another population do not recover well the details of
2352: clumpiness of different galaxy populations of observed superclusters. In real
2353: superclusters, populations of galaxies are more strongly mixed.
2354:
2355:
2356:
2357:
2358:
2359:
2360:
2361: \begin{thebibliography}{}
2362:
2363: \bibitem[Balogh et al. (2004)]{balogh04} Balogh, M., Eke, V., Miller, C., et
2364: al. 2004, MNRAS, 348, 1355
2365:
2366: \bibitem[Bardelli et al. (2000)]{bar00} Bardelli, S., Zucca, E., Zamorani, G.,
2367: Moscardini, L., Scaramella, R., 2000, MNRAS, 312, 540
2368:
2369: \bibitem[Basilakos (2003)]{bas03} Basilakos, S. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 602
2370:
2371: \bibitem[Basilakos et al. (2006)]{bas06} Basilakos, S., Plionis, M., Yepes, G.,
2372: Gottl\"ober, S., Turchaninov, V. 2006, MNRAS, 365, 539
2373:
2374: \bibitem[Basilakos et al. (2001)]{bpr01} Basilakos, S., Plionis, M.,
2375: Rowan-Robinson, M. 2001, MNRAS, 323, 47
2376:
2377: \bibitem[Belsole et al. (2004)]{bel} Belsole, E., Pratt, G.W.,
2378: Sauvageot, J.-L-., Bourdin, H. 2004, A\&A, 415, 821
2379:
2380: \bibitem[Blanton et al. (2004)]{blant04} Blanton, M.R., Eisenstein, D., Hogg,
2381: D.W., et al. 2004, ApJ, 629, 143
2382:
2383: \bibitem[Blanton et al. (2006)]{blant06} Blanton, M.R., Eisenstein, D., Hogg,
2384: D.W., et al. 2006, ApJ, 645, 977
2385:
2386: \bibitem[Caretta et al. (2002)]{car02} Caretta, C.A., Maia, A.G., Kawasaki,
2387: W., \& Willmer, C.N.A. 2002, AJ, 123, 1200
2388:
2389: \bibitem[Cole et al. (2005)]{cole05} Cole, S., Percival, W.J., Peacock, J.A.,
2390: et al. 2005, MNRAS,362, 505
2391:
2392: \bibitem[Colless et al. (2001)]{col01} Colless, M.M., Dalton, G.B., Maddox,
2393: S.J., \etal 2001, MNRAS, 328, 1039
2394:
2395: \bibitem[Colless et al. (2003)]{col03} Colless, M.M., Peterson, B.A., Jackson,
2396: C.A., \etal 2003, (astro-ph/0306581)
2397:
2398: \bibitem[Cross et al. (2001)]{cross01} Cross, N.J.G., Driver, S.P., Couch, W.,
2399: et al. 2001, MNRAS, 324, 825
2400:
2401: \bibitem[Croton et al. (2005)]{cr05} Croton, D.J., Farrar, G.R., Norberg, P.,
2402: et al. 2005, MNRAS, 356, 1155
2403:
2404: \bibitem[Croton et al. (2004)]{croton04} Croton, D.J., Gazta{\~n}aga, E.,
2405: Baugh, C.M., et al. 2004, MNRAS, 352, 1232
2406:
2407:
2408: \bibitem[Davis \& Geller (1976)]{dg76} Davis, M., \& Geller, M.J. 1976, ApJ,
2409: 208, 13
2410:
2411:
2412: \bibitem[De Propris et al. (2003)]{depr03} De Propris, R., \etal (2dF GRS
2413: Team) 2003, MNRAS, 342, 725
2414:
2415: \bibitem[De Propris et al. (2004)]{depr04} De Propris, R., \etal (2dF GRS
2416: Team) 2004, MNRAS, 351, 125
2417:
2418:
2419:
2420: \bibitem[Donelly et al. (2001)]{don} Donelly, R. H., Forman, W., Jones, C.,
2421: et al. 2001, ApJ, 562, 254
2422:
2423: \bibitem[Dressler (1980)]{d80} Dressler, A., 1980, ApJ 236, 351
2424:
2425:
2426: \bibitem[Einasto et al. (2006)]{e06} Einasto, J., Einasto, M., Saar, E. et
2427: al. 2006 A\&A, 459, L1
2428:
2429: \bibitem[Einasto et al. (2007b)]{e07b} Einasto, J., Einasto, M., Saar, E. et
2430: al. 2007b, A\&A, 462, 397 (Paper II)
2431:
2432: \bibitem[Einasto et al. (2007c)]{e07c} Einasto, J., Einasto, M., Tago, E. et
2433: al. 2007a, A\&A, 462, 811 (Paper I)
2434:
2435:
2436: \bibitem[Einasto et al. (2005b)]{e05} Einasto, J., Tago E., Einasto, M., et
2437: al. 2005b, A\&A, 439, 45
2438:
2439: \bibitem[Einasto (1991)]{e91} Einasto, M. 1991, MNRAS, 252, 261
2440:
2441:
2442: \bibitem[Einasto \& Einasto (1987)]{e87} Einasto, M., \& Einasto, J., 1987,
2443: MNRAS, 226, 543 (E87)
2444:
2445:
2446: \bibitem[Einasto et al. (2003b)]{e03c} Einasto, M., Einasto, J., M\"uller, V.,
2447: Hein\"am\"aki, P., Tucker, D.L. 2003b, AA 401, 851
2448:
2449: \bibitem[Einasto et al. (2007a)]{e2007a} Einasto, M., Einasto, J., Tago, E. et
2450: al. 2007c, A\&A, 464, 815 (Paper III)
2451:
2452: \bibitem[Einasto et al. (2001)]{e2001} Einasto, M., Einasto, J., Tago, E.,
2453: M\"uller, V. \& Andernach, H., 2001, AJ, 122, 2222 (E01)
2454:
2455: \bibitem[Einasto et al. (2003a)]{e2003} Einasto, M., Jaaniste, J., Einasto, J.,
2456: et al. 2003, A\&A, 405, 821
2457:
2458: \bibitem[Einasto et al. (2007d)]{e07d} Einasto, M., Saar, E., Liivam\"agi,
2459: L. J. et al., 2007a, A\&A, 476, 697 (RI)
2460:
2461: \bibitem[Einasto et al. (2005a)]{me05} Einasto, M., Suhhonenko, I.,
2462: Hein\"am\"aki, P., Einasto, J., Saar, E. 2005, A\&A, 436, 17
2463:
2464:
2465: \bibitem[Eke et al. (2004)]{eke04} Eke, V. R., Baugh, C. M., Cole, S., \etal
2466: 2004, MNRAS, 348, 866
2467:
2468:
2469: \bibitem[Fleenor et al. (2005)]{fleenor05} Fleenor, M.C., Rose, J.A.,
2470: Christiansen, W.A. et al. 2005, AJ, 130, 957
2471:
2472:
2473: \bibitem[Giovanelli, Haynes \& Chincarini (1986)]{gio86} Giovanelli, R.,
2474: Haynes, M.P., Chincarini, G. L., 1986, ApJ, 300, 77
2475:
2476: \bibitem[Goto et al. (2003)]{go03} Goto, T, Okamura, S., Sekiguchi, M., et
2477: al. 2003, PASJ, 55, 757
2478:
2479: \bibitem[Gott et al. (2008)]{gott06} Gott, J.R., Hambrick, D.C., Vogeley,
2480: M.S. et al. 2008, ApJ, 675, 16
2481:
2482: \bibitem[Gott et al. (2005)]{gott05} Gott, J.R., Juric, M., Schleger, D. et
2483: al. 2005, ApJ, 624, 463
2484:
2485: \bibitem[Gramann \& Suhhonenko (2002)]{gra02} Gramann, M. \& Suhhonenko,
2486: I. 2002, MNRAS, 337, 1417
2487:
2488:
2489: \bibitem[Gray et al. (2004)]{gray04} Gray, M.E., Wolf, C., Meisenheimer, K. et
2490: al. 2004, MNRAS,347, L73
2491:
2492: \bibitem[Haines et al. (2006)]{h219906} Haines, C.P., Barbera, C.P.,
2493: Mercurio, A., et al. 2006, ApJ, 647, L21
2494:
2495: \bibitem[Haines et al. (2006)]{hai06} Haines, C.P., Merluzzi, P., Mercurio,
2496: A., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 55
2497:
2498: \bibitem[Haines, Gargiulo \& Merluzzi (2008)]{haines07} Haines, C.P.,
2499: Gargiulo, A., Merluzzi, P., 2008, MN, in press [astro/ph 0707.2361v1]
2500:
2501: \bibitem[Hamilton (1988)]{h88} Hamilton, A.J.S. 1988, ApJL, 331, L59
2502:
2503: \bibitem[Hikage et al. (2003)]{hik03} Hikage, C., Schmalzing, J., Buchert, T.,
2504: et al. 2003, PASJ55, 911
2505:
2506: \bibitem[Hilton et al. (2005)]{hil05} Hilton, M., Collins, C.,
2507: De Propris, R. et al., MNRAS 363, 661
2508:
2509:
2510: \bibitem[Hogg et al. (2004)]{hogg04} Hogg, D.W., Blanton, M.R., Brinchmann,
2511: J., et al. 2004, ApJ, 601, L29
2512:
2513: \bibitem[Hogg et al. (2003)]{hogg03} Hogg, D.W., Blanton, M.R., Eisenstein,
2514: D.J. et al. 2003, ApJ, 585, L5
2515:
2516: \bibitem[Hoyle et al. (2002)]{hoyle02} Hoyle, F., et al. 2002,
2517: ApJ, 580, 663
2518:
2519:
2520: \bibitem[Ihaka \& Gentleman (1996)]{ig96} Ihaka, R., \& Gentleman, R., 1996,
2521: J. of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 5, 299
2522:
2523: \bibitem[Jaaniste et al. (1998)]{ja98} Jaaniste, J., Tago, E., Einasto, M. et
2524: al. 1998, A\&A, 336, 35
2525:
2526: \bibitem[James, Lewis \& Colless (2007)]{jam06} James, J.B., Lewis, G.F. \&
2527: Colless, M. 2007, MNRAS, 375, 128
2528:
2529: \bibitem[Kennicutt (1992)]{ken92} Kennicutt, R.C., J. 1992, ApJS, 79, 255
2530:
2531: \bibitem[Kofman, Einasto \& Linde (1987)]{kofman87} Kofman, L.A., Einasto, J.,
2532: \& Linde, A.D. 1987, Nature, 326, 48
2533:
2534: \bibitem[Kolokotronis, Basilakos \& Plionis (2002)]{kbp02} Kolokotronis, V.,
2535: Basilakos, S. \& Plionis, M. 2002, MNRAS, 331, 1020
2536:
2537: \bibitem[Madgwick et al. (2002)]{ma02} Madgwick, D.S., et al. (the 2dFGRS
2538: Team), 2002, MNRAS, 333, 133
2539:
2540: \bibitem[Madgwick et al. (2003b)]{ma03b} Madgwick, D.S., Hawkins, E., Lahav,
2541: O., et al., 2003b, MNRAS, 344, 847
2542:
2543: \bibitem[Madgwick et al. (2003a)]{ma03a} Madgwick, D.S., Somerville, R.,
2544: Lahav, O., Ellis, R., 2003a, MNRAS, 343, 871
2545:
2546:
2547: \bibitem[Mart{\'\i}nez et al. (2005)]{mart05} Mart{\'\i}nez, V.J.,
2548: Starck, J.-L., Saar, E., et al., 2005, ApJ, 634, 744
2549:
2550: \bibitem[Mercurio et al. (2006)]{mercurio06} Mercurio, A., Merluzzi, P.,
2551: Haines, C.P., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 368, 109
2552:
2553: \bibitem[Metcalfe, N., Godwin, J.G. \& Peach, J.V., (1994)]{metcalfe94}
2554: Metcalfe, N., Godwin, J.G. \& Peach, J.V., 1994, MNRAS, 267, 431
2555:
2556: \bibitem[Mobasher et al. (2005)]{mob05} Mobasher, B., Dickinson, M., Ferguson,
2557: H.C., et al. 2005, ApJ, 635, 832
2558:
2559: \bibitem[Moles et al. (2005)]{moles05} Moles, M., Ben{\'\i}tez, N., Aguerri,
2560: J. A. L., et al., astro-ph/0504545
2561:
2562: \bibitem[Nichol et al. (2006)]{nichol06} Nichol, R.C., Sheth, R.K., Suto, Y., et
2563: al. 2006, MNRAS, 368, 150
2564:
2565: \bibitem[Norberg et al. (2001)]{n01} Norberg, P., Baugh, C.M., Hawkins, E., et
2566: al. 2001, MNRAS, 328, 64
2567:
2568:
2569: \bibitem[Norberg et al. (2002)]{n02} Norberg, P., Baugh, C.M., Hawkins, E., et
2570: al. 2002, MNRAS, 332, 827
2571:
2572: \bibitem[Ouchi et al. (2005)]{ouch} Ouchi, M., Shimasaku, K., Akiyama, M., et
2573: al. 2005, ApJ Lett, 620, 1
2574:
2575: \bibitem[Park et al. (2005)]{park05} Park, C., Choi, Y.-Y., Vogeley, M.S., et
2576: al. 2005, ApJ, 633, 11
2577:
2578: \bibitem[Park et al. (2007)]{park07} Park, C., Choi, Y.-Y., Vogeley, M.S., et
2579: al. 2007, ApJ, 658, 898
2580:
2581: \bibitem[Phillipps et al. (1998)]{phill98} Phillipps, S., Driver, S.P., Couch,
2582: W.J., Smith, R.M. 1998, ApJL, 498, L119
2583:
2584: \bibitem[Plionis (2004)]{pl04}Plionis, M, 2004, In "Outskirts of
2585: galaxy clusters: intense life in the suburbs".
2586: Proceedings IAU Colloquium No. 195, 2004, ed. A. Diaferio
2587:
2588:
2589: \bibitem[Porter \& Raychaudhury(2005)]{pr05} Porter, S.C. \& Raychaudhury,
2590: S. 2005, MNRAS, 364, 1387
2591:
2592: \bibitem[Porter \& Raychaudhury(2007)]{pr06} Porter, S.C. \& Raychaudhury,
2593: S. 2007, MNRAS, 375, 1409
2594:
2595: \bibitem[Proust et al. (2006)]{proust06} Proust, D., Quintana, H., Carrasco,
2596: E.R. et al. 2006, A\&A, 447, 133
2597:
2598: \bibitem[Quintana et al. (2000)]{qui00} Quintana, H., Carrasco, E.R.,
2599: Reisenegger, A., 2000, AJ, 120, 511
2600:
2601: \bibitem[Rose et al. (2002)]{rose02} Rose, J.A., Gaba, A.E., Christiansen, W.A.,
2602: et al., 2002, AJ, 123, 1216
2603:
2604: \bibitem[Saar et al. (2007)]{saar06}Saar, E., Mart{\'\i}nez, V.J., Starck,
2605: J.-L., Donoho, D.L., 2007, MNRAS, 374, 1030
2606:
2607: \bibitem[Sahni et al. (1998)]{sah98} Sahni V., Sathyaprakash B. S., Shandarin
2608: S. 1998, ApJ, 495, L5
2609:
2610: \bibitem[Schmalzing et al. (1997)]{jens97} Schmalzing , J., \& Buchert, T.,
2611: 1997, ApJ, 482, L1
2612:
2613: \bibitem[Scodeggio (2001)]{scodeggio01} Scodeggio, M., 2001, AN, 121, 2413
2614:
2615: \bibitem[Shandarin et al. (2004)]{sss04} Shandarin, S.F., Sheth, J.V. and
2616: Sahni, V. 2004, MNRAS, 353, 162
2617:
2618: \bibitem[Sheth et al. (2003)]{sheth03} Sheth, J.V., Sahni, V., Shandarin, S.F.,
2619: and Sathyaprakash, B. 2003, MNRAS, 343, 22
2620:
2621: \bibitem[Silverman (1986)]{silverman} Silverman, B.W. Density Estimation for
2622: Statistics and Data Analysis, Chapman \& Hall / CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1986
2623:
2624: \bibitem[Small (1998)]{small98} Small, T.A., Ma, C.-P., Sargent, W.L.W., and
2625: Hamilton, D., 1998, ApJ, 492, 45
2626:
2627:
2628: \bibitem[Tago et al. (2006)]{tago06} Tago, E., Einasto, J., Saar, E. et
2629: al. 2006, AN, 327, 365 (T06)
2630:
2631: \bibitem[Venemans et al. (2004)]{ven} Venemans, B.P, R\"ottgering, H.J.,
2632: Overzier, R.A., et al. 2004, A\&A, 424, L17
2633:
2634:
2635: \bibitem[Vogeley et al. (2004)]{vogeley04} Vogeley, M.S., Hoyle, F., Rojas,
2636: R.R. et al. 2004, In "Outskirts of galaxy clusters: intense life in the
2637: suburbs". Proceedings IAU Colloquium No. 195, 2004, ed. A. Diaferio
2638:
2639: \bibitem[Wand and Jones (1995)]{wandjones} Wand, M. P., and Jones, M. C.
2640: Kernel Smoothing, Chapman \& Hall, London, 1995
2641:
2642: \bibitem[Wild et al. (2005)]{wild05} Wild, V., Peacock, J.A., Lahav, O., et al.
2643: (the 2dFGRS Team) 2005, MNRAS, 356, 247
2644:
2645: \bibitem[Wolf, Gray \& Meisenheimer (2005)]{wolf05} Wolf, C., Gray, M.E.,
2646: Meisenheimer, K. 2005, A\&A, 443, 435
2647:
2648: \bibitem[Zappacosta et al. (2005)]{zap04} Zappacosta, L., Maiolino, R.,
2649: Mannucci, F., Gilli, R., Schuecker, P., 2005, MNRAS, 357, 929
2650:
2651: \bibitem[Zehavi et al. (2002)]{zehavi02} Zehavi, I., Blanton, M. R., Frieman,
2652: J. A., et al. 2002, ApJ, 571, 172
2653:
2654:
2655:
2656:
2657:
2658: \end{thebibliography}
2659: \end{document}
2660:
2661:
2662:
2663:
2664:
2665: