1: \documentclass{emulateapj}
2: \usepackage{natbib}
3:
4: \newcommand\etal{et al.}
5: \newcommand\ie{i.e.}
6: \newcommand\eg{e.g.}
7: \newcommand\rvec{{\bf r}}
8: \newcommand\vvec{{\bf v}}
9: \newcommand\vrad{v_r}
10: \newcommand\vphi{v_\phi}
11: \newcommand\erad{{\bf e}_r}
12: \newcommand\ephi{{\bf e}_\phi}
13: \newcommand\ez{{\bf e}_z}
14: \newcommand\nhat{{\bf n}}
15: \newcommand\vlos{v_{\rm los}}
16: \newcommand\ri{r_{\rm i}}
17: \newcommand\ro{r_{\rm o}}
18: \newcommand\phii{\phi_{\rm i}}
19: \newcommand\phio{\phi_{\rm o}}
20: \newcommand\vi{v_{\rm i}}
21: \newcommand\vki{v_{\rm K,i}}
22: \newcommand\vo{v_{\rm o}}
23: \newcommand\vko{v_{\rm K,o}}
24: \newcommand\emin{E_{\rm min}}
25: \newcommand\romin{r_{\rm o, min}}
26: \newcommand\vlosmax{v_{\rm los, max}}
27: \newcommand\msun{{\rm M_\odot}}
28: \newcommand\cf{cf.}
29: \newcommand\kms{\ifmmode{\rm km\ s^{-1}}\else$\rm km\ s^{-1}$\fi}
30: \newcommand\sound{c_{\rm s}}
31: \newcommand\rhoe{\rho_{\rm e}}
32: \newcommand\gvec{{\bf g}}
33: \newcommand\avec{{\bf a}}
34: \newcommand\cdrag{C_{\rm D}}
35: \newcommand\reynolds{{\rm Re}}
36: %\def\plotthree#1#2#3{\centering \leavevmode
37: %\epsfxsize=.33\columnwidth \epsfbox{#1}
38: %\epsfxsize=.33\columnwidth \epsfbox{#2}
39: %\epsfxsize=.33\columnwidth \epsfbox{#3}}
40: \def\eps@scaling{1.0}
41: \newcommand\plotthree[3]{{
42: \typeout{Plotthree included the files #1 #2 #3}
43: \centering
44: \leavevmode
45: \columnwidth=.31\columnwidth
46: \includegraphics[width={\eps@scaling\columnwidth}]{#1}
47: \includegraphics[width={\eps@scaling\columnwidth}]{#2}
48: \includegraphics[width={\eps@scaling\columnwidth}]{#3}
49: }}
50:
51:
52: \shorttitle{M86 FROM CHANDRA}
53: \shortauthors{RANDALL ET AL.}
54: %\slugcomment{Draft version of \today}
55: \slugcomment{Astrophysical Journal, submitted}
56:
57: \begin{document}
58:
59: \title{Chandra's View of the Ram Pressure Stripped Galaxy M86}
60:
61: \author{S.\ Randall\altaffilmark{1}, P.\ Nulsen\altaffilmark{1}, W.\ R.\ Forman\altaffilmark{1}, C.\ Jones\altaffilmark{1}, M.\
62: Machacek\altaffilmark{1}, S.\ S.\ Murray\altaffilmark{1} and B. Maughan\altaffilmark{2}
63: }
64:
65: \altaffiltext{1}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60
66: Garden St., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA}
67: \altaffiltext{2}{Astrophysics Group, Bristol University, Tyndall
68: Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1TL, UK}
69:
70: \begin{abstract}
71: We present results from a mosaic of nine {\it Chandra} observations of
72: M86 and the surrounding field. We detect three main diffuse
73: components: the Virgo ICM at $\sim$2.4~keV, the extended halo of M86 at
74: $\sim$1.2~keV, and the cooler central and stripped gas of M86 at
75: $\sim$0.8~keV. The most
76: striking feature is a long tail of emission, which consists of
77: a plume $\sim$ 4\arcmin north of M86 and two main extensions emanating
78: from the plume.
79: Based on the morphology and temperature structure of the tail, we
80: conclude that it is formed
81: by ram pressure stripping of M86 as it falls into
82: the Virgo cluster and
83: interacts with the Virgo ICM, in agreement with earlier work.
84: The tail is 150~kpc in projection,
85: and a simple estimate gives a lower limit on the true length of the
86: tail of 380~kpc, making this the longest ram
87: pressure stripped tail presently known.
88: The total gas mass in the plume ($\sim 7 \times 10^8 \, {\rm
89: M_\odot}$) and tail ($\sim 1 \times 10^9 \, {\rm
90: M_\odot}$) is about three times that in the core of M86, which
91: supports the scenario where most of the gas was stripped rapidly and recently.
92: The projected position of the
93: plume can be understood if M86 has an aspherical potential, as
94: suggested by optical isophotes. Ram pressure stripping from an
95: aspherical potential can also explain the split ``double tails'' seen
96: in M86 and in other Virgo cluster galaxies in the field.
97: The large line-of-sight
98: velocity of M86 (1550~\kms with respect to M87), its position
99: relative to the Virgo cluster, and the orientation of the tail tightly constrain its orbital
100: parameters.
101: The data are inconsistent with a radial orbit, and imply
102: inner and outer turning radii of $\ri \approx 300$~kpc and $\ro \ga
103: 8.8$~Mpc, indicating that M86 is, at best, only weakly bound to the Virgo cluster.
104: \end{abstract}
105:
106: \keywords{galaxies: clusters: general --- galaxies: clusters: individual
107: (Virgo) --- magnetic fields --- X-rays: galaxies --- galaxies: individual
108: (NGC4406) --- galaxies: individual (M86)}
109:
110: \section{Introduction} \label{sec:intro}
111:
112: M86 (NGC~4406) is a bright elliptical (E3/S0) galaxy in the Virgo
113: cluster of galaxies. It is the dominant member of one of the larger
114: subgroups within Virgo (Binggeli \etal\ 1993; B\"ohringer \etal\ 1994;
115: Schindler \etal\ 1999).
116: Its line-of-sight velocity relative to M87, the dominant member of the
117: Virgo cluster, is -1550~km~s$^{-1}$, much higher than the average
118: cluster velocity dispersion (Smith et al.\ 2000). The X-ray surface brightness
119: distribution is unusual, with a large ``plume'' extending to the
120: northwest from M86, which was first noticed as part of a survey of
121: Virgo cluster
122: galaxies undertaken with the {\it Einstein Observatory} (Forman et al. 1979).
123: The galaxy has an optical asymmetry that extends in a direction
124: similar to the direction of the plume (Nulsen \& Carter 1987; Mihos
125: \etal\ 2005).
126: Several authors have interpreted this plume as arising from ram
127: pressure stripping due to strong interactions with the Virgo ICM
128: (Forman \etal\ 1979; Fabian \etal\ 1980; Takeda \etal\ 1984; Knapp
129: \etal\ 1989; Bregman \&
130: Roberts 1990; White \etal\ 1991; Rangarajan \etal\ 1995). Elmegreen
131: \etal\ (2000) find dust streamers in the core of M86 that connect to
132: the nucleated dwarf galaxy VCC~882, and suggest a recent interaction
133: between the pair that may have contributed to the asymmetry of M86's
134: optical isophotes.
135:
136: At X-ray energies, M86 has been observed by {\it Einstein} (Forman \etal\
137: 1979; White \etal\ 1991), {\it Ginga} (Takano
138: \etal\ 1989), {\it EXOSAT} (Edge 1990), {\it ASCA} (Matsushita \etal\
139: 1994), and {\it ROSAT} (B\"{o}hringer \etal\ 1994; Rangarajan \etal\
140: 1995).
141: %and {\it XMM-Newton} (Finoguenov \etal\ 2004).
142: %Rangarajan \etal\ (1995) derived temperature and abundance
143: %measurements from {\it ROSAT} PSPC and HRC
144: %observations. They report on four main features: the X-ray plume to
145: %the northwest, a smaller northeastern arm, a southern extension from
146: %M86, and a ``hole'' to the northeast. From the detected structures
147: %and abundance measurements they conclude that the
148: %Virgo cluster ICM is ram pressure stripping the ISM of M86. More
149: Recently, Finoguenov \etal\ (2004) presented {\it XMM-Newton}
150: observations of M86 and concluded that its unusual morphology is
151: due to an interaction with an X-ray filament rather than the Virgo
152: ICM. However, their conclusions were based on the large
153: separation between M86 and M87 along the line of sight of $2.4 \pm 1.4$~Mpc reported
154: by Neilsen \& Tsvetanov (2000), which is inconsistent with the more
155: recent result from Mei \etal\ (2007) who find a separation of $0.4\pm
156: 0.8$~Mpc.
157:
158: We report here on a mosaic of nine {\it Chandra} observations of M86
159: and the surrounding field, totaling 240~ksec of exposure.
160: The observations and data reduction techniques are described in
161: \S~\ref{sec:obs}. The X-ray image is presented in \S~\ref{sec:img},
162: and results on temperature and abundance structure from spectral
163: analysis are given in \S~\ref{sec:spec}. In \S~\ref{sec:discuss}, we
164: discuss some of the more interesting features of M86, and place
165: constraints on its orbit. In particular, we give new results
166: on the extent of the stripped tail, and measure the density profile of
167: an X-ray brightness edge seen to the southeast. Our results are
168: summarized in \S~\ref{sec:summary}.
169:
170: We assume a distance to the Virgo cluster of 16 Mpc throughout,
171: consistent with the latest results from Mei et al.\ (2007), which
172: gives a scale of 0.08 kpc/\arcsec\ for $\Omega_0 = 0.3$,
173: $\Omega_{\Lambda} = 0.7$,
174: and $H_0 = 70$~km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$. All error ranges are 90\% confidence
175: intervals, unless otherwise stated.
176:
177: \section{Observations and Data Reduction} \label{sec:obs}
178:
179: Table~\ref{tab:obs} summarizes the nine {\it Chandra} observations of
180: M86, which completely cover
181: the center of the galaxy, as well as the plume and long tail.
182: All data were reprocessed from the level 1 events files using the latest
183: calibration files (as of {\sc CIAO3.3}). CTI and time-dependent
184: gain corrections were applied
185: where applicable. {\sc LC\_CLEAN} was
186: used to remove background
187: flares\footnote{\url{http://asc.harvard.edu/contrib/maxim/acisbg/}}.
188: After periods with obvious flares were removed, the
189: mean rate was calculated for some observed quiescent
190: time interval, and the program was re-run, forcing the global mean to
191: equal this quiescent rate.
192: For observations without obvious flares, time bins that were not
193: within 3$\sigma$ of the mean were discarded. The final cleaned
194: exposure times are given in column~(5) of Table~\ref{tab:obs}.
195:
196: The emission from M86 and the surrounding Virgo cluster fills the
197: image field of view for each observation. We therefore used the
198: standard {\sc CALDB\footnote{\url{http://cxc.harvard.edu/caldb/}}}
199: blank sky background files appropriate for each observation,
200: normalized to our observations in the 10-12 keV energy band. We
201: combined background maps
202: for each pointing separately, and
203: generated exposure maps to account for the pointing offsets and the
204: different CCD responses. To generate exposure maps, we assumed a MEKAL
205: model with $kT = 1$~keV, Galactic absorption, and abundance of 30\%
206: solar at a redshift $z = 0$, which is consistent with typical results from
207: detailed spectral fits (see \S~\ref{sec:spec}).
208:
209: \section{The X-ray Image} \label{sec:img}
210:
211: The exposure corrected, background
212: subtracted, smoothed mosaic image is shown in
213: Figure~\ref{fig:fullimg}.
214: Several patches of diffuse emission are seen
215: in M86, as is an impressive tail extending to the northwest.
216: To enhance the visibility of the diffuse emission we created an image with
217: bright point sources removed.
218: For each {\it Chandra} pointing, regions containing point sources were ``filled in'' using a Poisson distribution whose mean was equal to
219: that of a local annular background region.
220: The resulting smoothed image (Figure~\ref{fig:smoimg}) shows:
221: \begin{itemize}
222:
223: \item
224: a long tail extending to the NW, first detected by Forman \etal\
225: (1979). The tail is bifurcated at its base, with
226: %with two extensions from the large region of bright diffuse emission
227: %located roughly 3.4\arcmin\ (16.3~kpc) north of M86.
228: the brighter (northern)
229: extension at a position angle of $305^{\circ}$ (measured from north
230: to east) and the shorter extension at $285^{\circ}$. At 18.4\arcmin\
231: (88.4~kpc) from the center of the bright
232: emission at the base of the tail (or 21.1\arcmin\ (101.5~kpc) from
233: the center of M86), the tail turns
234: directly north for 6.8\arcmin\ (32.5~kpc). It then curves to the
235: west at 26.7\arcmin ~(128.1~kpc) from M86, and finally is no longer detected at
236: 30.6\arcmin\ (150~kpc). There is evidence for a fainter, parallel tail
237: along the northeastern edge of the tip of the bright tail, discussed below.
238:
239: \item
240: a large plume of emission, directly north of M86, at the root of the
241: long tail (noted previously by Forman et al. 1979). The
242: tail emanates from this clump, rather than from M86
243: itself as one would expect for a continuous stripping process.
244:
245: \item
246: a sharp boundary along the northeastern edge of the tail, and an
247: apparent ``void'' in the diffuse emission just north of the tail. This
248: is in stark contrast to the southwestern edge of the tail, where the
249: surface brightness falls off smoothly. Rangarajan \etal\ (1995) first
250: noted this void, and suggested that it is an evacuated Mach cone left
251: from M86's passage through the outer regions of the Virgo ICM.
252:
253: \item
254: an extended halo of X-ray emission associated with M86 with an edge
255: 13\arcmin\ (62.4~kpc) to the southeast. This edge also is visible in
256: {\it ROSAT} observations (see Figure~\ref{fig:rosat}).
257:
258: \item
259: an asymmetry in the diffuse emission near the core of M86, with an
260: extension to the south. Rangarajan \etal\ (1995) suggest that this is
261: a high pressure region, formed as the leading edge of M86 plows into
262: the Virgo ICM.
263:
264: \item
265: several nearby galaxies. The elliptical galaxy M84, west of M86,
266: shows complicated
267: structure in the diffuse emission in the core related to the radio
268: outburst, and a tail extending to
269: the south (Finoguenov \& Jones 2002). Also
270: visible are NGC~4388 (south-southwest of M86; Beckmann et al.\ 2004)
271: and NGC~4438 (east of M86; Machacek et al.\ 2004; Vollmer et al.\
272: 2005). Both also
273: have diffuse tails, which likely indicate their projected direction of
274: motion with respect to the Virgo ICM. Most tails split
275: into two main streams. A small patch of faint emission
276: also can be seen in the region of the disk galaxy NGC~4402 (Crowl et
277: al.\ 2005).
278: \end{itemize}
279:
280: For comparison, the (heavily binned) {\it Chandra} mosaic image is
281: plotted alongside the {\it ROSAT} and {\it DSS} images in
282: Figure~\ref{fig:rosat}. The {\it ROSAT} image clearly shows the
283: distribution of diffuse emission on larger scales. In particular, the
284: contribution from the M87 halo is seen in the southeast, as is
285: a large halo of diffuse emission around M86 itself, outside the
286: brightest central regions. These components are individually
287: analyzed in our detailed spectral fits (see \S~\ref{sec:dspec}).
288: Results from these fits indicate that the extended M86 halo is
289: composed of group gas associated with M86, at a temperature of
290: $kT \approx 1.2$~keV.
291:
292: A close up view of the stripped tail, with scaling and binning chosen
293: to show its structure more clearly, is presented in Figure~\ref{fig:tail}.
294: The twisting and curving of the tail at the faint tip may be caused by
295: turbulence or similar ``weather'' in the Virgo ICM.
296: The tail is clearly bifurcated
297: at its base. Additionally, a fainter
298: tail, split from the first, is barely visible along the
299: northern edge of the faint end of the main tail. To test the significance of this
300: feature, we extracted
301: the total count rate in evenly spaced bins across the width of the box
302: shown in Figure~\ref{fig:tail}. Figure~\ref{fig:tailproj} shows two distinct peaks. If we take an average count rate from the highest three
303: bins in each peak and compare it with the average count rate from the
304: lowest two bins in the gap, we find that the gap is significant at
305: about 2.5$\sigma$.
306: As described below in \S~\ref{sec:displace}, these double streams, as
307: seen clearly at the base of the tail and possibly at the faint end of
308: the tail, as well as in other Virgo cluster galaxies in the field, may
309: be explained as stripping from an inclined aspherical potential.
310:
311: \section{Spectral Analysis} \label{sec:spec}
312:
313: In summary, the X-ray images show
314: three diffuse emission components: the Virgo ICM (centered on
315: M87), the extended M86 halo, and the core and tail of M86. We generate a
316: temperature map as a guide for detailed spectral fitting to
317: disentangle the various components.
318: We assume a galactic absorption of
319: $N_H = 2.62\times 10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$ throughout. Allowing the
320: absorption to vary did not significantly improve any of the spectral fits.
321:
322: \subsection{Temperature Map} \label{sec:tmap}
323:
324: The temperature map was derived using a method employed
325: by O'Sullivan et al.\ (2005) and Maughan et
326: al.\ (2006). For each temperature map pixel
327: (19.7\arcsec/pix), we extracted a spectrum from a circular region
328: containing 1000 net counts
329: (after subtracting the blank sky
330: background and a component to account for emission from M87, see
331: \S~\ref{sec:dspec}), up to a maximum radius of 3.3\arcmin\ (on the order of the chip size).
332: This large maximum
333: radius was used to obtain sufficient source counts to extend the
334: temperature map to faint regions of the tail.
335: The resulting spectrum was
336: fit in the 0.6 -- 2.0~keV range with an absorbed APEC model using {\sc
337: XSPEC}.
338: Data from back-side- (BI) and front-side-illuminated (FI) CCDs
339: were treated as separate data groups for each
340: observation.
341: For each fit, the abundance was fixed at 26\% solar (consistent with
342: most of the detailed
343: spectral fits; see Table~\ref{tab:spectra}). The
344: resulting temperature map is shown in Figure~\ref{fig:tmap} (middle). Regions
345: that did not have at least 1000 source counts within the maximum
346: 3.3\arcmin\ radius were excluded from the map, as were regions
347: in the southeast that were dominated by Virgo cluster emission.
348: For comparison, we also show the tessellated temperature map in
349: Figure~\ref{fig:tmap}. Each bin was fit using only counts from that
350: area, so the extraction regions are well-defined. The bins were
351: generated using the algorithm provided by Diehl \& Statler (2006),
352: which is a generalization of Cappellari \& Copin's (2003) Voronoi
353: binning algorithm, and requiring roughly 1100 net counts per bin.
354: Each bin was fit with a single APEC model, without a component to
355: model the Virgo ICM background, in contrast to the ``smoothed''
356: temperature map. The size of the bins roughly indicate the size of
357: the extraction regions for the smoothed temperature map pixels in the
358: same area. The tessellated and smoothed temperature maps are in good
359: agreement, except in the regions far from M86 where the contribution
360: from the Virgo cluster is more important.
361:
362: In these temperature maps, the remarkably sharp
363: boundary between the cool galaxy gas and that of the cluster on the
364: northern edge of the tail is apparent (Figure~\ref{fig:tmap}). At least four
365: distinct cold clumps can be seen: one centered
366: on M86, one 1.41\arcmin\ (6.8~kpc) south
367: of M86, one
368: elongated clump 2.45\arcmin\ (11.7~kpc) east of M86, and a larger cool
369: plume 3.63\arcmin\ (17.4~kpc) to the north.
370: Each clump corresponds to a bright peak in the X-ray image.
371: Additionally, the cooler tail extends to the northwest.
372: To the southeast, in the region of the brightness edge discussed in
373: \S~\ref{sec:halo}, the gas is somewhat hotter ($\sim0.25$~keV) in the
374: southern half of this feature than in the
375: northeastern half at the same distance from M86. This temperature difference
376: is detected in spectra from non-overlapping regions in these two
377: areas, indicating that the difference is not an artifact of the
378: technique used to generate the temperature map. More detailed fits are
379: discussed in \S~\ref{sec:dspec}.
380:
381:
382: \subsection{Detailed Spectra} \label{sec:dspec}
383:
384: Based on the derived temperature map and the X-ray image, we
385: defined 23 regions for detailed spectral analysis (see
386: Figure~\ref{fig:regmap}).
387: To include data from a particular observation in the spectral
388: analysis, we required that it contribute at least 200 counts (each
389: data group was binned such that there were
390: at least 40 counts per bin).
391: A summary of the regions and spectral model for each
392: region are given in Table~\ref{tab:spectra}.
393: R1~-~R4 are centered on the individual clumps of emission near
394: M86, while R5~-R10 trace the long tail
395: NW of M86 (hereafter regions will be labeled as 'R\#', with the
396: number defined by column~1 of Table~\ref{tab:spectra}).
397: R11 roughly corresponds to the ``shocked region'' indicated by
398: Finoguenov et al.\ (2004; see their figure~7). There are several
399: regions to either side of the M86 tail. R17, R18, R19,
400: \& R23 measure the large scale diffuse components from
401: M86 and M87, outside the central region where the cool gas is observed (note
402: that R23 is a combination of five disjoint regions, see Figure~\ref{fig:regmap}).
403: Finally, R14~-~R16 contain M84 and its tail of diffuse emission.
404: Each region was initially fit with an
405: absorbed APEC model over the 0.6-5.0 keV range, with an additional
406: APEC component to model emission from the Virgo ICM as in \S~\ref{sec:tmap},
407: with the abundance allowed to vary.
408: Additional components were added, as needed, to improve the fits (see
409: Table~\ref{tab:spectra}. For
410: example, a single temperature model gave large residuals at high
411: energies when fit to the regions corresponding to the cores
412: of M86 and M84 (R1 and R14, respectively). Since each of these regions is expected to have a
413: contribution from unresolved X-ray point sources, a power law component
414: was added to the model, which greatly improved the fits
415: (and gave a photon index consistent with $\Gamma \approx 1.5$, as
416: expected, see e.g. Sarazin et al.\ 2003).
417: For regions where this power law component could not
418: be well-constrained, we fixed the photon index at $\Gamma = 1.5$.
419: Nine regions
420: showed an improved fit when another APEC model was added (in such
421: cases the abundances of each component were constrained to vary together).
422: Data from each pointing were treated as
423: separate data groups, with normalizations for each pointing allowed to
424: vary independently. As an example, the two
425: temperature plus power law fit to the
426: spectra for the core of M86 (R1) is shown in Figure~\ref{fig:m86spec}.
427:
428: Each of the three main
429: components of the diffuse emission (the Virgo ICM, M86 group gas,
430: and the cooler central M86 gas) was
431: detectable in some subset of the regions shown in
432: Figure~\ref{fig:regmap}. In R13 it was possible to
433: fit all three components simultaneously. The Virgo and M86 halos cover
434: most, if not all of the FOV. It was therefore necessary to include
435: these components when doing detailed spectral fits, even in regions
436: where they could not be modeled directly due to inadequate statistics.
437: To account for the varying Virgo contribution, we took the
438: normalizations of the best fit APEC models
439: to R18 and R23 and linearly interpolated across the field
440: based on the distance from the center of M87.
441: Although this only gives a rough estimate, we note that it does not
442: affect our results significantly. For regions closer to M87 (e.g.,
443: R19) the interpolation gives a value very close to that measured
444: from R18, which is an appropriate local background. Similarly,
445: regions near the faint end of the M86 tail (e.g., R10)
446: have normalizations close to that of R23, which again, is an
447: appropriate local background for this area. For most regions of
448: interest,
449: M86 is bright enough that the contribution from Virgo is negligible, and
450: the accuracy of interpolating is therefore sufficient.
451:
452: A similar approach was used to
453: model the contribution from the halo around M86. Although, in
454: general, the normalization of this component decreased with distance
455: from the core of M86, the variation across the field was more
456: complicated than for Virgo, which is expected since this gas is in the
457: process of being stripped from M86. We included
458: a fixed component, with $kT = 1.2$~keV, abundance set equal to that of
459: the main component, and variable normalization, in
460: regions where the M86 halo temperature could not be determined
461: directly (see column~2 of Table~\ref{tab:spectra}). The effects of
462: accounting for this component can be seen, for example, by comparing
463: lines~1~\&~2 in Table~\ref{tab:spectra}. Including the hotter 1.2~keV
464: component results in a lower best-fit temperature for the cooler gas,
465: and gives a better statistical fit to the data. In general, our
466: results are consistent with Finoguenov \etal\
467: (2004), who derive X-ray temperatures and abundances for the central
468: region, including M86 and the plume from {\it
469: XMM-Newton} observations.
470:
471:
472: We note that for the cores of M86 and M84 (R1 and R14 in
473: Table~\ref{tab:spectra}) the abundances are poorly
474: determined, despite the large number of net counts.
475: Using a VAPEC model to allow for non-solar abundance ratios did not
476: improve the fits.
477: The failure of these models may be due to
478: abundance variations within the defined regions. For instance, the
479: abundance map given by Finoguenov et al.\ (2004) shows significant
480: variation near the core of M86, even on relatively small scales.
481: Additionally, the models do not allow for multiphase gas, although the
482: temperature most likely varies significantly in the cores.
483:
484: Using the detailed spectra, we can derive the approximate mass in
485: cool gas for the base of the tail (the ``plume'') and the core of
486: M86. Using the temperature and abundance measured in R4, and
487: assuming a prolate spheroid geometry with major and minor axis lengths of
488: 12.3~kpc and 7.9~kpc, we find a density of $n_{\rm plume} \approx 8.2
489: \times 10^{-3}$~cm$^{-3}$ and a mass $M_{\rm plume} \approx 7.4 \times
490: 10^8 \, {\rm M_\odot}$. Similarly, in the core of M86, we find
491: $n_{\rm core} \approx 6.2 \times 10^{-3}$~cm$^{-3}$ and $M_{\rm core}
492: \approx 7.4 \times 10^8 \, {\rm M_\odot}$ within a sphere of
493: radius 9.6~kpc.
494: Assuming a
495: cylindrical geometry for the tail, and considering only the cool
496: gas components in R5 - R9, we find a typical
497: density
498: of $n_{\rm tail} \approx 1.5 \times 10^{-3}$~cm$^{-3}$ and a
499: total gas mass of $M_{\rm tail} \approx 1.7 \times
500: 10^9 \, {\rm M_\odot}$.
501: The mass in stripped gas is therefore more than three times
502: the gas mass in the core, which supports the scenario where
503: a significant fraction of the M86 ISM is removed rapidly due to
504: ram pressure
505: stripping (Takeda \etal\ 1984). Rangarajan \etal\ (1995) find similar results for the plume
506: and the core.
507: However, we find consistent abundance values in the core and in
508: the plume within the errors, while Rangarajan \etal\ (1995)
509: find a higher abundance in the plume.
510: This disagreement is likely due to
511: the multiphase model we use, which includes a separate
512: component for the 1.2~keV M86 halo emission.
513:
514: \section{Discussion} \label{sec:discuss}
515:
516: \subsection{The Ram Pressure Stripped Tail of M86} \label{sec:tail}
517:
518: The most striking feature in Figure~\ref{fig:smoimg} is the long tail
519: of emission extending to
520: the NW from M86. M86 has a line-of-sight velocity of -244$\pm
521: 5$~km~s$^{-1}$, while M87's
522: is 1307$\pm 7$~km~s$^{-1}$ (Smith et al.\ 2000).
523: Therefore, M86 is traversing the Virgo cluster at
524: $v_{\rm M86} > 1550$~km~s$^{-1}$ (about Mach 2 for $kT = 3$~keV).
525: The tail naturally forms due to ram pressure stripping of the M86
526: corona by the Virgo
527: cluster ICM.
528: Finoguenov \etal\ (2004) suggested that the tail formed due to
529: interactions with a filament rather than the Virgo ICM, though their
530: result was based on
531: older distance measurements that placed M86 outside the virial radius
532: of the Virgo cluster.
533: If we assume that M86 is bound to
534: the Virgo cluster, its large line-of-sight relative velocity allows us
535: to constrain the separation between M86
536: and M87.
537: Using the M87 mass profile detailed in \S~\ref{sec:orbit},
538: %Using the empirical mass profile of Schindler et al. (1999),
539: we find that a free-fall
540: velocity of 1500~km~s$^{-1}$ corresponds to a separation from M87 of 0.5~Mpc
541: (the projected separation is 0.35~Mpc).
542: This is an upper-limit, since the total
543: relative velocity must be at least as large as the line-of-sight
544: relative velocity.
545: This separation is consistent with recent surface brightness
546: fluctuation distances of Virgo cluster galaxies,
547: which give a distance between M86 and M87 of $0.4\pm 0.8$~Mpc (Mei et al.\
548: 2007).
549:
550: We also can place a lower-limit on the
551: length of the long stripped tail using the mass profile of M87 and the
552: line-of-sight velocity. The maximum free-fall velocity of M86 from infinity
553: at the projected separation of 0.35~Mpc
554: is about 1680~km~s$^{-1}$. Using this as an upper-limit on its current
555: 3D velocity, we find that the angle between the direction of motion of
556: M86 and the line-of-sight is $\theta \la 23^{\circ}$. Assuming that the
557: stripped tail is aligned with M86's current direction of motion, and
558: given that the
559: length of the tail in the plane of the sky is 150~kpc
560: (0.51$^{\circ}$), we find a
561: lower-limit on the actual length of the tail of $L_{\rm tail} \ga
562: 380~$kpc, making this the longest ram pressure stripped tail
563: presently known.
564:
565: %(Figure~\ref{fig:orbit}{\it need figure or plot data from Paul}). In order to
566: %reproduce the observed line of sight relative velocity (1550~km~s$^{-1}$) at
567: %the observed separation (0.36~Mpc), M86 must have approached from the
568: %SE, directly {\it opposite} the direction of long stripped tail. A
569: %possible solution to this apparent paradox is found by considering the
570: %geometry of the merger. When M86 first enters Virgo's atmosphere, a
571: %shock is driven through the M86 halo {\it Paul: do we want to put in
572: % some numbers to show that it's plausible to have a shock?}. The shock will
573: %propagate perpendicular to the interface between the M86 and Virgo
574: %atmospheres, which, as can be seen in Figure~\ref{fig:orbit}, is {\it
575: % not} parallel to M86's trajectory. The shock will therefore push
576: %the stripped gas away from the orbital path of M86, up and to the left
577: %in Figure~\ref{fig:orbit}. An observer looking along the direction of
578: %motion of M86, oriented such that it has approached from the SE, would
579: %see the stripped gas tail pushed to the NW, similar to what is seen in
580: %Figure~\ref{fig:smoimg}. This scenario also accounts for the sharp
581: %boundary along the northern edge of the tail, as compared to the
582: %south. As the shock passes through the stripped tail material is
583: %swept up, creating the apparent void NE of the tail and the extended
584: %emission to the SW.
585:
586: The long stripped tail originates in the plume of diffuse
587: emission located directly north of M86. For a continuous stripping
588: process, one would expect the tail to extend from M86 itself. This
589: separation between M86 and the plume can be explained by
590: rapid recent stripping, in which a significant fraction of the
591: remaining gas in M86 is
592: rapidly stripped when the ram pressure stripping condition is met. A
593: detailed discussion of this process is given in \S~\ref{sec:displace}
594:
595:
596: As seen from Figure~\ref{fig:regmap} and Table~\ref{tab:spectra}, the
597: stripped tail shows a general trend of cooler gas in and near the
598: plume (with temperatures in the 0.8--0.85~keV range) and warmer gas at
599: the tip (in the 0.9--1.2~keV range). The temperature structure of the
600: tail is consistent with a ram pressure stripping model, where, as
601: M86 falls into the Virgo cluster, the hotter, higher entropy group gas is
602: stripped first due to interactions with the Virgo ICM, followed by the
603: cooler, lower entropy M86 ISM, which is removed rapidly once the
604: stripping condition is met.
605:
606:
607: \subsection{The Extended M86 Halo} \label{sec:halo}
608:
609: The {\it Chandra} and {\it ROSAT} X-ray images
610: (Figure~\ref{fig:rosat}) show an
611: extended halo associated with M86, with a sharp
612: brightness edge to the southeast in the direction of
613: M87.
614: Since M86 is traversing the Virgo cluster supersonically (see
615: \S~\ref{sec:tail}) we expect a shock to be driven in the Virgo ICM,
616: possibly producing a brightness edge similar to that seen in the
617: southeast.
618: We attempted to measure the density jump associated with the shock in
619: the following way.
620: We extracted the {\it Chandra} 0.5--2.0 keV
621: surface brightness profile of this edge in two roughly equal sectors
622: since the morphology of this feature is irregular in the south
623: (see Figure~\ref{fig:rosat}), and since the gas temperature differs
624: in these two regions (see \S~\ref{sec:tmap}). The emission
625: measure profile for
626: the northern sector is shown in Figure~\ref{fig:nedge}. Distance is
627: measured from the center of curvature of the apparent edge, which is
628: 10~kpc (2.16\arcmin) east of M86. This profile was fit with a
629: spherical gas density model consisting of two power laws. The free
630: parameters were the normalization, the inner ($\alpha$) and outer
631: ($\beta$) slopes, the
632: position of the density discontinuity ($r_{\rm break}$), and the
633: amplitude of the jump ($A$). We assumed that the gas is isothermal with
634: $kT = 1$~keV and that the abundance is constant at 30\% solar,
635: consistent with results from spectral fits (see \S~\ref{sec:spec}).
636: For the best fit model (see Figure~\ref{fig:nedge}), we find $\alpha =
637: 0.49^{+1.14}_{-0.71}$, $\beta = -0.81^{+0.14}_{-0.12}$, $r_{\rm
638: break} = 52^{+5}_{-6}$~kpc, and
639: $A = 1.3^{+0.3}_{-0.4}$. Similar results are found from the southern
640: sector, but
641: with larger errors. The lack of a well-defined edge is consistent
642: with our findings for the orbit of M86 (see \S~\ref{sec:orbit}).
643: In particular, for all of the likely orbits, M86 is moving to the southeast,
644: such that our
645: lines of sight pass through the Mach cone. To see a sharp edge, our
646: line of sight must be tangent to the shock front.
647:
648:
649:
650: \subsection{Constraints on the Orbit of M86} \label{sec:orbit}
651:
652: Knowing the orbit of M86 is the key to understanding its interaction
653: with the Virgo cluster. The ram pressure stripped tail reveals the
654: motion of the galaxy on the sky.
655: The length and direction of the tail, together with the large
656: line-of-sight speed of M86, constrain its orbit. The large luminosity
657: of M86 suggests that it dominates the associated in-falling subgroup
658: (Schindler \etal\ 1999). In the following, we assume M86 is
659: bound to the Virgo cluster. For the purpose of calculation, the
660: gravitational potential of the
661: Virgo cluster is treated as a spherical NFW potential (Navarro, Frenk
662: \& White 1997), with a virial radius of 1.3 Mpc (Evrard, Metzler \&
663: Navarro 1996) and a concentration parameter of 4.5 (Neto et al.\
664: 2007), appropriate for a $\sim 3$ keV cluster.
665: The gravitating mass was normalized to match the total mass within 320
666: kpc of $4.4\times10^{13}\ {\rm M_\odot}$ (Schindler \etal\
667: 1999; scaled to a distance of 16 Mpc). For this potential, the escape
668: speed from a radius of 351 kpc (the projected separation of M86 from
669: M87) is 1677 $\rm km\ s^{-1}$, not much larger than M86's line-of-sight
670: speed of 1550 $\rm km\ s^{-1}$ relative to M87. The empirical mass
671: distribution of Schindler (1999) gives the same escape speed at 351~kpc
672: as our model potential. We note that the gravitational potential of
673: the Virgo cluster is not well
674: constrained at distances from the cluster center comparable to or
675: greater than its virial radius. Furthermore, the truncated NFW
676: potential is highly simplified, ignoring mass beyond the virial
677: radius, departures from spherical symmetry, and the dynamic state of
678: the cluster due to continuing in-fall. Since some of the limits we derive here
679: are sensitive to the poorly known potential at large radii, they
680: should be treated as indicative rather than quantitative (outside the
681: context of the model).
682: The material in this section is supplemented
683: by a more detailed discussion in Appendix~\ref{ap:orbit}.
684:
685:
686: We consider radial orbits first, as suggested by previous studies (e.g.,
687: Forman \etal\ 1979; White \etal\ 1991).
688: In order for the gas tail to point away
689: from the cluster center, the galaxy must be inbound.
690: It can easily be shown that the line-of sight velocity, $\vlos$, is
691: maximized for some radius $r$ greater than the observed separation $s$
692: (see Appendix~\ref{ap:orbit}).
693: For a marginally bound (zero energy) radial orbit in the potential
694: described above, the maximum value of $|\vlos|$ occurs when M86 is
695: close to twice its projected distance from the cluster center, giving
696: $|\vlos| = 1205\ \kms$, less than the observed value of $1550\ \kms$.
697: Thus, unless M86 is significantly unbound
698: from the Virgo cluster (or the potential is incorrect), its
699: line-of-sight speed is inconsistent with radial and nearly radial orbits.
700:
701: It is convenient to specify more general orbits in terms of their
702: inner and outer turning radii, $\ri$ and $\ro$, respectively.
703: We constrain the possible orbits of M86 by placing limits on these
704: parameters. Coarse limits can be placed on these radii by considering
705: energy arguments alone.
706: Assuming that M86 is bound to the Virgo cluster, we
707: find $\ri \la 489$~kpc and $\ro \ga
708: 3.5$~Mpc, or $\simeq 2.7$ times the virial radius of the Virgo cluster
709: (see Appendix~\ref{ap:orbit}). These limits can be further restricted
710: by considering the range of possible viewing directions for each point
711: on an orbit. There can be zero, two, or four possible
712: viewing directions that would place M86 at the observed separation
713: from the cluster and give it the observed line-of-sight velocity (see
714: Appendix~\ref{ap:orbit}). Figure~\ref{fig:mb} shows a range of marginally
715: bound orbits ($\ro = \infty$), with regions that meet these conditions
716: marked in color. The range of an orbit where these conditions are
717: met shrinks as $\ro$ decreases, \ie, as the orbit becomes more
718: tightly bound. For the marginally bound orbits, the full range of
719: $\ri$ for which $\vlos$ can attain its observed value is $247 < \ri < 395$
720: kpc (the range represented in Figure~\ref{fig:mb}). For more tightly
721: bound orbits, the acceptable range of $\ri$ is reduced.
722:
723:
724: The lower limit on $\ro$ is increased if we consider the extent of the
725: ram pressure stripped tail. The projected orbit must extend to at
726: least the distance ($\sim 100$~kpc) that the tail projects beyond M86
727: in the direction away from the cluster center. Locations on the orbits where
728: the line-of-sight speed can attain $-1550\ \kms$ and these conditions
729: also are met are shown in red in Figure~\ref{fig:mb}. We see that the
730: range of possible locations for M86 on these orbits is tightly constrained.
731: We repeated this analysis for a number of values for the
732: outer turning radius. The range of potential orbits and locations for
733: M86 shrinks with decreasing $\ro$ and no orbits were found to meet
734: these criteria for $\ro \lesssim 8.2$ Mpc (6.3 virial radii).
735:
736: Figure~\ref{fig:projmb} shows projections onto the sky of the marginally
737: bound orbits (corresponding to the midpoints of the red regions of
738: Figure~\ref{fig:mb}) overlaid on the {\it Chandra} 0.5 -- 2
739: keV image, with M86 at the representative location for each orbit.
740: It is evident that the possible orbits for M86 can be pruned further.
741: For example, the orbit on the lower right in Figure~\ref{fig:projmb}
742: does not reach far enough north to produce the remote part of the gas
743: tail. At the other limit, the position angle of M87 measured from
744: M86 is $116^\circ$ (east from north), generally eastward of these
745: orbits. Overdense stripped gas tends to fall towards the cluster
746: center, in that direction, so that some stripped gas can reasonably
747: lie to the east of the orbit. Stripped
748: gas cannot lie west of the orbit. Thus the orbits that cross the
749: region to the east of the tail and north of M86, where there is
750: no sign of stripped gas, are unlikely candidates for the orbit of
751: M86.
752:
753: Note that the orbits in Figure~\ref{fig:projmb} are not simply
754: related to their inner turning radii. The orbit corresponding to the
755: smallest value of the inner turning radius appears second from the
756: right at the top of the figure. At first, orbits for increasing
757: values of $\ri$ lie to the left of this, but at a value of $\ri$
758: approaching (but less than) $s$, the acceptable viewing direction
759: flips from outward to inward (\ie, the acceptable sign of $a'$
760: changes, see Appendix~\ref{ap:orbit}). At this point, the projected
761: position of the orbit shifts
762: from leftmost to rightmost at the top of Figure~\ref{fig:projmb}.
763: Whereas the apparent location where the orbit passes through the
764: virial radius was moving outward, it now moves inward as $\ri$
765: increases, coming into the field of view for the largest values of
766: $\ri$ here. This results in disjoint ranges of possible orbits for
767: M86. Thus the marginally
768: bound orbits with inner turning radii close to $\ri \simeq 260$ kpc and
769: those with inner turning radii in the range $330 \la \ri \la 380$~kpc
770: are best suited to model the orbit of M86.
771:
772:
773: Applying the same criteria to the more tightly bound orbits yields
774: the collection of possible orbits shown in Figure~\ref{fig:m86orb}. We
775: have not attempted to be highly selective or exhaustive, since that
776: requires a well defined model for the formation of the gas trail. For
777: values of the outer turning radius in the lower end of the acceptable
778: range, the shrinking range of possible orbits and locations excludes
779: orbits with inner turning radii $\ri > s$. All of the acceptable
780: orbits for M86 are weakly bound to the Virgo cluster, with the most
781: tightly bound having outer turning radii at $\simeq 8.8$ Mpc. All of
782: the possible locations for M86 lie only a little farther from M87 than
783: M86 does in projection. All are close to the plane of the sky,
784: ranging from 167 kpc closer than M87 to 263 kpc farther than M87 from
785: the Sun at the extremes. M86 must also be close to the pericenter of
786: its orbit. The direction of motion of M86 is close to our line of
787: sight, within $16^\circ$ -- $23^\circ$ of it, for all of the cases
788: illustrated.
789:
790: M86 is traversing the Virgo cluster supersonically ($\vlos =
791: -1550$~\kms\ alone is
792: almost twice the sound speed $\sound$, which is taken to be 850 \kms).
793: Therefore, we expect a shock to be driven in the Virgo ICM.
794: For the orbits we derive, the angle of inclination is smaller than the
795: opening angle of
796: the Mach cone ($\simeq 33^\circ$) and we should not expect shock
797: fronts to be visible on the plane of the sky (\cf\ Rangarajan
798: \etal\ 1995).
799: This is illustrated in Figure~\ref{fig:mach}, which shows
800: the marginally bound orbit with $\ri = 376$~kpc. Each
801: circle is drawn centered
802: on a point where M86 was at a time $\delta t$ in the past,
803: with a radius of $\sound \, \delta t$. This is
804: done at equally spaced times to indicate the shape of the Mach cone.
805: The absence of caustics in Figure~\ref{fig:mach} shows that we would not
806: see the shock front in projection. (While this statement is accurate,
807: except possibly in the small region where the shock front is highly
808: supersonic, the diagram is schematic. For example, if M86 were coming
809: directly towards the Earth, radii of sections of the Mach cone would
810: be $(1 - \sound^2/v^2)^{-1/2} \simeq 1.20$ larger than drawn.) Our
811: lines of sight through the compressed gas behind the shock are
812: longest where the circles pile up to the southeast of M86, consistent
813: with the enhancement in X-ray surface brightness seen $\sim3'$
814: southeast of M86 (Figure~\ref{fig:mach}).
815:
816:
817: \subsection{Displacement of Stripped Gas}\label{sec:displace}
818:
819: The prominent plume of gas lying 3\arcmin -- 4\arcmin ($\sim 16$ kpc) north of
820: M86, noted previously (\eg, Forman et al. 1979), appears to be
821: physically separated from the dense gas remaining in
822: the galaxy and it is centered some distance east of the orbits
823: illustrated in Figure~\ref{fig:m86orb}.
824: The removal of a significant fraction of the ISM in a single blob is
825: expected from rapid ram pressure stripping (Takeda \etal\ 1984).
826: A highly simplified model for
827: ram pressure stripping treats the plume as a single particle subject to
828: gravity and drag due to its motion through the surrounding gas.
829: Allowing for buoyancy, the net force on the plume due to gravity is
830: $(\rho - \rhoe) V \gvec$, where $\rho$ is its density, $V$ is its
831: volume, $\rhoe$ is the density of the ambient ICM, and $\gvec$ is the
832: local acceleration due to gravity. The drag force on the plume is
833: $-\cdrag A \rhoe v \vvec$, where $\cdrag$ is the drag coefficient, $A$
834: is the plume cross section, $\vvec$ is its velocity, and $v = |\vvec|$.
835: Thus, the net acceleration of the plume is $\avec = [1 - \rhoe/\rho]
836: \gvec - [\cdrag\rhoe A / (\rho V)] v \vvec$. Two of the main
837: parameters of this model are the density contrast, $\rhoe/\rho$, and
838: the factor $\cdrag A / V$. For the density of the ICM, $\rhoe$, we
839: use the beta model of Schindler \etal\ (1999; $\beta = 0.47$, core
840: radius $= 2.7'$). On the grounds that the density of the plume is
841: likely to be lower now (due to its stripping and ejection from the
842: confining potential of M86), we set its density contrast at the
843: projected radius of M86 to be 18 (\cf\ $\sim 16$ from the numbers
844: above, see \S~\ref{sec:dspec}) and treat
845: the density of the plume as constant. The other
846: factor is determined by treating the plume as a sphere with a constant
847: radius of 10 kpc, with $\cdrag = 0.75$. As above, this radius is a
848: little larger than the observed radius. To simulate stripping, a gas
849: blob is placed at the location and velocity of M86 at the time it
850: is released from the cluster virial radius. The orbit of the blob is
851: followed, subject to the gravitational acceleration of the cluster and
852: the moving galaxy.
853:
854: This model cannot account for the current
855: location of the plume if the gravitational potential of M86 is
856: spherical. The path
857: of the blob is determined by the competition between gravity and drag.
858: If the drag is large, the blob is ejected from M86 early on its orbit,
859: and slows quickly until it is falling towards the cluster center at
860: its terminal speed, and ultimately lies farther away from M86 than observed. Its
861: early ejection also
862: leaves it too far back along the orbit of M86. Reducing the relative
863: significance of the drag causes the blob to be ejected later, bringing
864: it closer to its observed position
865: but not far enough from the orbit in the
866: direction of the cluster center.
867:
868: This issue can be resolved if the gravitational potential of M86 is
869: aspherical. Consider a small gas blob in an aspherical galaxy moving
870: at an inclined angle through the ICM, illustrated schematically in
871: Figure~\ref{fig:inclined}. While ram pressure is insufficient to
872: eject the blob, it is driven to an equilibrium position where ram
873: pressure is balanced by gravity. Since the direction of the
874: gravitational field must oppose the drag, the external flow must be
875: perpendicular to the equipotential surface. The
876: equilibrium position therefore lies at a location away from the axis
877: passing through the center of the galaxy and parallel to the flow
878: (\eg, near the point labeled ``equipotential'' in
879: Figure~\ref{fig:inclined}). As the drag starts to overwhelm gravity and
880: displaces the blob in the direction of the flow, the equipotentials
881: the blob encounters tilt, so that it is subject to a component of the
882: gravitational force directed away from the axis. Because forces
883: in the direction of the flow are nearly balanced, this off-axis
884: component of gravity drives the blob
885: farther away from the axis of the flow. Thus, a blob stripped from
886: such a galaxy tends to emerge away from the axis of the flow.
887: Treating the gas as a fluid, interstellar
888: gas that is pushed inward by ram pressure along the leading edge of
889: the galaxy flows out preferentially along the long axis of the
890: potential, in the direction of the weakest gravitational force.
891:
892: The model for the aspherical gravitational potential of M86 used here
893: has the form $\Phi (\rvec) = F (w)$, where $F(w) = \psi \ln [(1 + w /
894: c) / (1 + w)] / w$ is a minor modification of the standard NFW form
895: ($\psi \ln [1 / (1 + w)] / w$ in the same notation). The extra factor
896: of $1 + w / c$, where $c$ is the concentration parameter, makes the
897: total mass converge, avoiding the need to truncate the mass
898: distribution at the virial radius (which would create problems for our
899: fourth order integrator). The coordinate $w = \sqrt{(x^2 + y^2)/a^2 +
900: z^2/b^2 + 1}$, where $a$ is the NFW
901: potential scale length and $b$ is chosen to give the desired
902: ellipticity. The
903: additional 1 under the square root flattens the potential at small
904: $r$, providing a better model for the gravitational force on an
905: extended gas blob (of size comparable to $a$) when it is close to the
906: center of the galaxy. This modification also makes the integrator
907: behave better near the center of the galaxy. The virial radius of M86
908: was set to 100 kpc and its concentration parameter to 8, roughly the
909: values expected for a massive galaxy. The normalizing factor, $\psi$,
910: was expressed as $\psi = 9 \sigma^2$, so that $\sigma$ is a rough
911: measure of the line-of-sight velocity dispersion for M86. The value
912: used below is $\sigma = 185\ \kms$. We note that for the model what
913: matters is the ratio of the drag force on the blob to the binding force
914: of the M86 potential, allowing for a trade off between the choice of
915: potential and the density ratio and size of the blob. As a result, the
916: choice of potential is not very critical.
917:
918: The two remaining parameters are the axial ratio, $a/b$, and the
919: orientation of M86. Consistent with its S0/E3 classification, optical
920: images show that M86 is highly flattened on scales comparable to the
921: projected distance of the plume (e.g. $a/b \simeq 1.56$ for the
922: isophote with $a\simeq 4.5'$ in the deep image of Nulsen \& Carter
923: 1987). Based on the discussion above, the potential of M86 would need
924: to have a long axis pointing roughly northward from our line-of-sight.
925: Therefore, we assume it is oblate, using $a/b = 2$. The orientation
926: of M86 is then determined by the
927: direction of its minor axis. From the optical images, this has a
928: position angle of $\simeq 35^\circ$ on the sky. However, its tilt
929: with respect to the plane of the sky is unknown. We have set the
930: minor axis to point towards us in the north, at an angle of $45^\circ$
931: from the plane of the sky. This is roughly
932: the orientation that maximizes the transverse displacement of the
933: blob. Figure~\ref{fig:blob} shows the path of the blob on the sky for
934: this set of model parameters for the orbit with $\ro$ = 9.1~Mpc and
935: $\ri$ = 314~kpc. In this model, the blob is currently slower than M86 by 355~\kms\
936: along our line of sight and trails it by 38~kpc.
937:
938: Around the edges of the gas halo in M86, where the shear in the external
939: flow is strong (Figure~\ref{fig:inclined}), if the effective viscosity
940: is high, viscous stresses pull the interstellar gas out of the galaxy.
941: Alternatively, if the viscosity is low, shear instabilities mix the
942: interstellar gas with the ICM, also stripping it from the galaxy
943: (Nulsen 1982). This stripping is aided by the low
944: pressure due to the Bernoulli effect around the edges of the galaxy, which
945: tends to pull gas into the path of the flow. This process works
946: around all edges of the inclined galaxy, as seen from the
947: direction of the flow. However, it is expected to be greatest at the
948: leading and trailing edges. The shear in the external flow is expected to
949: be greatest near the leading edge, favoring stripping there. The
950: large ram pressure at the leading edge displaces the edge of the
951: interstellar gas deeper into the potential of the galaxy, pushing it
952: towards the trailing edge of the galaxy, where the pressure is lower.
953: Thus, gas at the trailing edge sits higher in the gravitational
954: potential of the galaxy, favoring its removal from the galaxy. This
955: may account for the apparent double streams of gas seen trailing
956: M86 and several other galaxies in the composite image. ``Viscous''
957: stripping from
958: the main body of M86 as well as the plume can explain the broad
959: features of the gas trail, though modeling the finer features, such
960: as the smaller blobs of gas lying to the east of the galaxy, requires a
961: more detailed treatment of the gas dynamics (e.g., numerical
962: simulations) and is beyond the scope of this paper.
963:
964: The proton
965: mean free path due to Coulomb collisions is given approximately by
966: $\lambda \simeq 150 (kT)^2 n_{-3}^{-1}$ pc, where $kT$ is the gas
967: temperature in keV and the electron density is $10^{-3}
968: n_{-3}\rm\ cm^{-3}$. In terms of this, the Reynolds number is
969: $\reynolds \simeq v L / (s \lambda)$, where $v$ is the flow speed, $s$
970: is the sound speed, and $L$ is a relevant length scale. Taking $v =
971: 1550\ \kms$ and $L = 10$ kpc gives $\reynolds \simeq 20$ in the 2.4
972: keV ICM, but $\reynolds \simeq 3000$ for the gas in the 0.77~keV plume (and
973: interstellar gas) if it is exposed directly to the external flow.
974: These values suggest that the external flow can be
975: largely laminar, while the flow in the cool interstellar gas is
976: relatively turbulent. Further complicating matters, the effective
977: mean free path may be significantly smaller than the Coulomb mean free
978: path (e.g., Schekochinin \etal\ 2007). The Reynolds number for this
979: flow is therefore not well defined, due to the range in gas
980: temperature and uncertainty in the mean free path.
981:
982:
983:
984: \section{Summary} \label{sec:summary}
985:
986: We have argued that the plume and long tail of M86 formed due to ram pressure
987: stripping forces generated as M86 falls into the Virgo cluster.
988: Several studies have found a similar interpretation for the
989: formation of this feature (e.g., Forman et al.\ 1979; Fabian et al.\
990: 1980; Rangarajan et al. 1995, however see Bregman \& Roberts 1990;
991: Finoguenov et al.\ 2004).
992: We concentrate on these main results:
993:
994: \begin{itemize}
995:
996: \item
997: the plume and long tail observed in the diffuse emission are created
998: by ram pressure stripping as M86 falls into
999: the Virgo cluster. The tail is 150~kpc in projection (a simple
1000: estimate, which assumes free-fall velocity for M86 and an NFW potential for
1001: M87, gives a lower-limt on the true length of the tail of 380~kpc),
1002: making this the longest ram pressure stripped tail
1003: presently known.
1004:
1005: \item
1006: based on the X-ray spectra, we
1007: detect three distinct components associated with the M86/Virgo cluster
1008: system: the Virgo ICM, with $kT \sim 2.4$~keV; the extended halo of M86,
1009: with $kT \sim 1.2$~keV; and the cooler central and stripped gas of
1010: M86, with $kT \sim 0.8$~keV. The temperature structure of
1011: the tail is consistent with ram pressure stripping, where the higher entropy
1012: M86 halo gas is stripped first and deposited in the tip of the tail,
1013: and the lower entropy M86 ISM is stripped more recently, constituting the
1014: base of the tail and the plume.
1015:
1016: \item
1017: the large line-of-sight velocity of M86, and its position
1018: relative to the Virgo cluster, tightly constrain its orbit,
1019: especially if it is assumed that the gas tail traces the
1020: orbit. In particular, the observations are inconsistent with a
1021: radial orbit. We show that M86 is at best only marginally bound
1022: to the Virgo cluster, with an inner turning radius on the order of
1023: 300~kpc as expected from its recent in-fall. Our best-fitting orbital
1024: model requires that M86 be
1025: close to M87, less than 167~kpc closer than or 263~kpc
1026: farther than M87 along our line of sight, which is consistent with the
1027: most recent distance
1028: estimates based on surface brightness fluctuations (Mei et al.\ 2007)
1029: which give a line-of-sight separation of $0.4\pm0.8$~Mpc.
1030:
1031:
1032: \item
1033: the prominent plume of gas lying 3\arcmin -- 4\arcmin north of M86
1034: appears to have been rapidly driven from M86 by ram pressure
1035: stripping. The projected position of the
1036: plume, which does not lie directly on our best-fit model orbit for M86,
1037: can be understood if M86 has an aspherical potential (as
1038: suggested by optical isophotes). If M86 moves through the Virgo
1039: ICM at an inclination angle relative to the local flow, the gas at
1040: the trailing edge is more easily stripped, thereby displacing the gas
1041: from the nominal orbit of M86 itself. This model may also explain the
1042: apparent double streams of gas seen trailing M86, as well as those in
1043: other Virgo galaxies.
1044:
1045: \item
1046: the apparent brightness edge to the southeast seen in {\it ROSAT}
1047: observations is also seen in the {\it Chandra} images. The edge is well
1048: fit with a two power law gas density model, with an abrupt jump in
1049: density by a factor of $ 1.3^{+0.3}_{-0.4}$ at the edge (consistent
1050: with no jump). Assuming that this brightness edge
1051: is the shock generated as M86 supersonically falls into the Virgo
1052: cluster, the lack of a well-defined density jump is consistent
1053: with what is expected from our orbital model, which suggests that the
1054: orientation of the Mach cone would make it difficult to detect the
1055: shock edge.
1056:
1057:
1058: \end{itemize}
1059:
1060:
1061:
1062: %An interesting feature of the temperature structure, as shown in
1063: %Figure ~\ref{fig:regmap}, is that the regions along the southern edge
1064: %of the arm (R11, R12, and R22) prefer a two phase plasma fit to
1065: %their spectra. R11 roughly corresponds to the ``shocked
1066: %region'' given by Finoguenov et al.\ (2004) in their Figure~7. They
1067: %also find a two temperature fit to the emission in this area, with
1068: %temperatures and abundances that are consistent with our results, and
1069: %argue that this is a shock seen in projection. The shock is driven by
1070: %an interaction with a possible filament, reported by B\"ohringer et
1071: %al.\ (1994) from an analysis of RASS data. {\it what else to say,
1072: % don't fully understand their model}
1073:
1074: \acknowledgments
1075:
1076: The financial support for this
1077: work was provided by NASA contracts NAS8-39073, NAS8-38248,
1078: NAS8-01130, NAS8-03060, the Chandra Science Center, and the
1079: Smithsonian Institution.
1080:
1081: \begin{references}
1082:
1083: \reference{}
1084: Beckmann, V., Gehrels, N., Favre, P., Walter, R., Courvoisier,
1085: T. J.-L., Petrucci, P.-O., \& Malzac, J. 2004, ApJ, 614, 641
1086:
1087: Binggeli, B., Popescu, C. C., \& Tammann, G. A. 1993, A\&AS, 98, 297
1088:
1089: \reference{}
1090: Birzan, L., Rafferty, D. A., McNamara, B. R., Wise, M. W., \& Nulsen,
1091: P. E. J. 2004, ApJ, 607, 800
1092:
1093: \reference{}
1094: B\"ohringer, H., Briel, U. G., Schwarz R. A., Voges, W., Hartner, G.,
1095: \& Tr\"umper, J. 1994, Nature, 368, 828
1096:
1097: \reference{}
1098: Bregman, J. N., \& Roberts, M. S. 1990, ApJ, 362, 468
1099:
1100: \reference{}
1101: Cappellari, M., \& Copin, Y. 2003, MNRAS, 342, 345
1102:
1103: \reference{}
1104: Crowl, H. H., Kenney, J. D. P., van Gorkom, J. H., \& Vollmer,
1105: B. 2005, AJ, 130, 65
1106:
1107: \reference{}
1108: Diehl, S., \& Statler, T. S. 2006, MNRAS, 368, 497
1109:
1110: \reference{}
1111: Edge, A. C. 1990, PhD Thesis, Univ. Leicester
1112:
1113: \reference{}
1114: Fabian, A. C., Schwarz, J., \& Forman, W. 1980, MNRAS, 192, 135
1115:
1116: \reference{}
1117: Finoguenov, A., \& Jones, C. 2002, ApJ, 574, 74
1118:
1119: \reference{}
1120: Finoguenov, A., Pietsch, W., Aschenbach, B., \& Miniati, F. 2004,
1121: A\&A, 415, 415
1122:
1123: \reference{}
1124: Forman, W., Schwarz, J., Jones, C., Liller, W., \& Fabian, A. C. 1979,
1125: ApJ, 234, L27
1126:
1127: \reference{}
1128: Machacek, M. E., Jones, C., \& Forman, W. R. 2004, ApJ, 610, 183
1129:
1130: \reference{}
1131: Matsushita, K. \etal\ 1994, ApJL, 436, 41
1132:
1133: \reference{}
1134: Maughan, B. J., Ellis, S. C., Jones, L. R., Mason, K. O., Córdova,
1135: F. A., \& Priedhorsky, W. 2006, ApJ, 640, 219
1136:
1137: \reference{}
1138: Mei, S., et al.\ 2007, ApJ, 655, 144
1139:
1140: \reference{}
1141: Mihos, C., Harding, P., Feldmeier, J., \& Morrison, H. 2005; ApJL,
1142: 631, 41
1143:
1144: \reference{}
1145: Navarro, J. S., Frenk, C. S., \& White, S. D. M. 1995, MNRAS, 275, 720
1146:
1147: \reference{}
1148: Neilsen, E. H., \& Tsvetanov, Z. I. 2000, ApJ, 536, 255
1149:
1150: \reference{}
1151: Neto \etal\ 2007, MNRAS, 381, 1450
1152:
1153: \reference{}
1154: Nulsen, P. E. J. 1982, MNRAS, 198, 1007
1155:
1156: \reference{}
1157: Nulsen, P. E. \& Carter, D. 1987, MNRAS, 225, 939
1158:
1159: \reference{}
1160: O'Sullivan, E., Vrtilek, J. M., Kempner, J. C., David, L. P., \&
1161: Houck, J. C. 2005, MNRAS, 357, 1134
1162:
1163: \reference{}
1164: Rangarajan, F. V. N., White, D. A., Ebeling, H., \& Fabian,
1165: A. C. 1995, MNRAS, 277, 1047
1166:
1167: \reference{}
1168: Sarazin, C. L., Kundu, A., Irwin, J. A., Sivakoff, G. R., Blanton,
1169: E. L., \& Randall, S. W. 2003, ApJ, 595, 743
1170:
1171: \reference{}
1172: Schekochinin, A. A., Cowley, S. C., R. M. Kulsrud R. M., Rosin, M. S.,
1173: \& Heinemann, T. 2007, preprint (astro-ph/0709.3828)
1174:
1175: \reference{}
1176: Schindler, S., Binggeli, B., \& B\"ohringer, H. 1999, A\&A, 343, 420
1177:
1178: \reference{}
1179: Smith, R. J., Lucey, J. R., Hudson, M. J., Schlegel, D.J., \&
1180: Davies. R. L. 2000, MNRAS, 313, 469
1181:
1182: \reference{}
1183: Takano, S., Awaki, H., Koyama, K., Kunieda, H., Tawara, Y. 1989,
1184: Nautre, 340, 289
1185:
1186: \reference{}
1187: Takeda, H., Nulsen, P. E. J., \& Fabian, A. C. 1984, MNRAS, 208, 261
1188:
1189: \reference{}
1190: Vollmer, B., Braine, J., Combes, F., Sofue, Y. 2005, A\&A, 441, 473
1191:
1192: \reference{}
1193: White, D. A., Fabian, A. C., Forman, W., Jones, C., \& Stern, C. 1991,
1194: ApJ, 375, 35
1195:
1196: \end{references}
1197:
1198: \clearpage
1199:
1200: \clearpage
1201: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}
1202: \tablewidth{6.25truein}
1203: \tablecaption{Observation Details \label{tab:obs}}
1204: \tablehead{
1205: \colhead{Obs ID}&
1206: \colhead{Date Obs}&
1207: \colhead{Target}&
1208: \colhead{Active CCDs}&
1209: \colhead{Cleaned Exposure\tablenotemark{a}}\\
1210: \colhead{}&
1211: \colhead{}&
1212: \colhead{}&
1213: \colhead{}&
1214: \colhead{(ksec)}
1215: }
1216: \startdata
1217: 318&2000-04-07&M86 &S3, S2, I2, I3&12.964\\
1218: 803&2000-05-19&M84 &S3, S2, I2, I3&26.699\\
1219: 963&2000-04-07&M86 &S3, S1, S2, I2, I3&13.220\\
1220: 1619&2001-06-08&NGC4388 &S3, S2, I2, I3&19.705\\
1221: 2882&2002-01-29&NGC4438 &S3, S2, I2, I3&24.891\\
1222: 5908&2005-05-01&M84 &S3, S1, S2, I2, I3&36.299\\
1223: 5912&2005-03-09&SE of M86 &I0, I1, I2, I3, S2&31.370\\
1224: 5913&2005-03-19&M86 Tail Tip &I0, I1, I2, I3, S2&34.744\\
1225: 6131&2005-11-07&M84 &S3, S1, S2, I2, I3&37.855\\
1226: \enddata
1227: \tablenotetext{a}{Total cleaned exposure is $\sim$238 ksec.}
1228: \end{deluxetable}
1229:
1230: \clearpage
1231: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccc}
1232: \tablewidth{7.0truein}
1233: \tablecaption{Spectral Fits\tablenotemark{a} \label{tab:spectra}}
1234: \tablehead{
1235: \colhead{Region \#}&
1236: \colhead{$kT$}&
1237: \colhead{Abund.}&
1238: \colhead{$\Gamma$}&
1239: \colhead{$\chi^2$/dof}&
1240: \colhead{Net Cnts.}\\
1241: \colhead{}&
1242: \colhead{(keV)}&
1243: \colhead{(solar)}&
1244: \colhead{}&
1245: \colhead{}&
1246: \colhead{}
1247: }
1248: \startdata
1249: 1&0.724$^{+0.013}_{-0.014}$//(2.4)&0.42$^{+1.55}_{-0.13}$&1.71$^{+0.51}_{-0.68}$&108/91=1.18&6235\\
1250: 1&0.677$^{+0.025}_{-0.021}$/1.291$^{+0.406}_{-0.263}$/(2.4)&0.64$^{+0.56}_{-0.18}$&(1.5)&90/89=1.01&6235\\
1251: 2&0.697$^{+0.038}_{-0.033}$/(1.2)/(2.4)&0.31$^{+0.15}_{-0.10}$&&56/57=0.98&3086\\
1252: 3&0.653$^{+0.016}_{-0.023}$/(1.2)/(2.4)&0.50$^{+0.90}_{-0.16}$&(1.5)&88/83=1.06&4273\\
1253: 4&0.773$^{+0.013}_{-0.013}$/(1.2)/(2.4)&0.47$^{+0.17}_{-0.12}$&&109/84=1.29&8630\\
1254: 5&0.854$^{+0.026}_{-0.031}$/(1.2)/(2.4)&0.40$^{+0.19}_{-0.09}$&&94/93=1.01&4461\\
1255: 6&0.849$^{+0.064}_{-0.043}$/(1.2)/(2.4)&0.31$^{+0.13}_{-0.10}$&&89/88=1.01&5059\\
1256: 7&0.860$^{+0.061}_{-0.048}$/(1.2)/(2.4)&0.43$^{+0.39}_{-0.20}$&&87/74=1.18&2843\\
1257: 8&0.785$^{+0.074}_{-0.130}$/(1.2)/(2.4)&0.45$^{+0.42}_{-0.17}$&&44/40=1.09&1749\\
1258: 9&0.924$^{+0.116}_{-0.285}$/(1.2)/(2.4)&0.50$^{+2.50}_{-0.27}$&&30/29=1.03&1043\\
1259: 10&1.191$^{+0.127}_{-0.134}$/(2.4)\tablenotemark{b}&0.42$^{+0.86}_{-0.25}$&&20/25=0.73&739\\
1260: 11&0.865$^{+0.105}_{-0.047}$/1.290$^{+0.240}_{-0.118}$/(2.4)&0.55$^{+0.27}_{-0.15}$&&163/176=0.92&8795\\
1261: 12&0.871$^{+0.103}_{-0.025}$/1.176$^{+0.235}_{-0.143}$/(2.4)&0.62$^{+0.28}_{-0.19}$&&240/187=1.29&8914\\
1262: 13&0.675$^{+0.111}_{-0.187}$/1.256$^{+0.134}_{-0.232}$/2.723$^{+0.744}_{-0.506}$&0.72$^{+0.48}_{-0.18}$&&343/293=1.17&11033\\
1263: 14&0.625$^{+0.008}_{-0.010}$/(1.2)/(2.4)&1.17$^{+0.78}_{-0.10}$&1.82$^{+0.11}_{-0.12}$&459/327=1.40&42002\\
1264: 15&0.790$^{+0.055}_{-0.106}$/(1.2)/(2.4)&0.60$^{+0.48}_{-0.18}$&&93/90=1.03&3666\\
1265: 16&1.355$^{+0.178}_{-0.065}$/(2.4)\tablenotemark{b}&0.49$^{+0.38}_{-0.17}$&&57/59=0.96&1746\\
1266: 17&1.091$^{+0.271}_{-0.159}$/2.422$^{+3.328}_{-0.490}$\tablenotemark{b}&0.40$^{+0.41}_{-0.20}$&&53/45=1.18&3054\\
1267: 18&1.085$^{+0.628}_{-0.297}$/2.107$^{+???}_{-0.297}$\tablenotemark{b}\tablenotemark{c}&0.22$^{+0.14}_{-0.12}$&&118/120=0.98&4643\\
1268: 19&0.651$^{+0.077}_{-0.143}$/1.065$^{+0.197}_{-0.188}$/(2.4)&0.25$^{+0.21}_{-0.09}$&&147/128=1.15&7325\\
1269: 20&1.319$^{+0.276}_{-0.225}$/(2.4)\tablenotemark{b}&0.39$^{+0.78}_{-0.25}$&&30/23=1.29&1087\\
1270: 21&1.023$^{+0.043}_{-0.048}$/(2.4)\tablenotemark{b}&0.22$^{+0.10}_{-0.07}$&&147/105=1.39&2912\\
1271: 22&0.881$^{+0.065}_{-0.042}$/1.236$^{+0.156}_{-0.101}$/(2.4)&0.32$^{+0.15}_{-0.10}$&&77/75=1.03&2646\\
1272: 23&1.186$^{+0.217}_{-0.160}$/2.712$^{+1.003}_{-0.537}$\tablenotemark{b}&0.45$^{+0.34}_{-0.19}$&&214/236=0.91&5193\\
1273: \enddata
1274: \tablenotetext{a}{
1275: Each region contained up to three thermal APEC components: a low
1276: temperature, a mid-range temperature, and a high temperature.
1277: Temperatures are given, in that order, in column~2. The high
1278: temperature component models background Virgo ICM emission. Where
1279: this component could not be accurately measured its temperature was
1280: fixed at 2.4~keV (see text for discussion).
1281: Similarly, the mid-range temperature component models M86 halo
1282: emission, and where the temperature could not be measured it was
1283: fixed at 1.2~keV. The abundance for this component was tied to the
1284: abundance of the cooler fitted component. A power law
1285: component was included when necessary, presumably for unresolved
1286: point sources.
1287: Galactic absorption was assumed throughout.}
1288: \tablenotetext{b}{No low temperature component was included.}
1289: \tablenotetext{c}{Upper bound of 90\% confidence interval could not be
1290: determined.}
1291: \end{deluxetable}
1292:
1293: % FIGURES
1294:
1295: \begin{figure}
1296: \plotone{fullimg.3.ps}
1297: \caption{Exposure corrected, background subtracted 0.5--2 keV mosaic image of
1298: the {\it Chandra} observations in the region of M86. The image has
1299: been smoothed with a 6\arcsec\
1300: radius gaussian.
1301: For each pointing, regions with less than
1302: 10\% of the total exposure for that observation were omitted.
1303: Complex structure in the diffuse emission is
1304: observed near and in the stripped tail of M86. Directly to the
1305: west of M86, M84 is
1306: visible, which, aside form showing complicated structure in the
1307: core, shows a tail of diffuse emission to the south. Also visible
1308: are NGC~4388, to the south of M86 and M84, and NGC~4438, directly
1309: east of M86, both of which show structure in their diffuse emission.
1310: \label{fig:fullimg}}
1311: \end{figure}
1312:
1313: \begin{figure}
1314: \plotone{smoimg.3.ps}
1315: \caption{Same as Figure~\ref{fig:fullimg}, but with different scaling
1316: and a larger smoothing kernel (9\arcsec) to highlight the structure
1317: at the low surface brightness end of the M86 tail and to
1318: show the faint M84 tail more clearly. Point sources
1319: have been removed (see text for
1320: details). The main M86 tail, after turning
1321: from northwest to north, appears to turn back to the west near the very tip.
1322: \label{fig:smoimg}}
1323: \end{figure}
1324:
1325: \begin{figure}
1326: \plotone{rosat.ps}
1327: \caption{
1328: (left) {\it ROSAT} PSPC view of M86. Diffuse emission from M87/Virgo is
1329: clearly visible in the southeast, as is an extended halo of diffuse
1330: emission associated with M86. Also shown are the {\it Chandra}
1331: (center) and {\it DSS} (right) images of the same region.
1332: \label{fig:rosat}}
1333: \end{figure}
1334:
1335: \begin{figure}
1336: \plotone{tail.ps}
1337: \caption{
1338: Close up view of the long stripped tail, in the 0.5--2~keV band and
1339: smoothed with
1340: a 16\arcsec\ radius gaussian. The tail clearly turns from
1341: a NW direction to the north, and back directly east at the very tip.
1342: Furthermore, there appears to be a faint secondary tail along the
1343: northern edge of the faint end of the main tail, which traces its
1344: path. The red box indicates the region used to generate the plot in
1345: Figure~\ref{fig:tailproj}.
1346: \label{fig:tail}}
1347: \end{figure}
1348:
1349: \begin{figure}
1350: \plotone{2fingers.ps}
1351: \caption{Plot of the total count rate in evenly-spaced binned regions
1352: taken across the width of the box shown in Figure~\ref{fig:tail}.
1353: The x-axis gives the R.A. of each bin on the southern edge of the box.
1354: \label{fig:tailproj}}
1355: \end{figure}
1356:
1357: \begin{figure}
1358: \plotthree{tmap-a.ps}{tmap-b.ps}{tmap-c.ps}
1359: \caption{
1360: {\it Left Panel:} A closer view of the central region of
1361: Figure~\ref{fig:smoimg}, with scaling chosen to highlight structure in
1362: the central region and nearby diffuse emission. The region used to
1363: extract the temperature map is overlain. {\it Center Panel:} Derived
1364: temperature map of the same region. The contribution from the Virgo
1365: ICM has been taken out.
1366: Zero-valued pixels indicate
1367: areas that required regions larger than the selected maximum area in
1368: order to
1369: include the minimum net counts (see \S~\ref{sec:tmap}).
1370: Pixels in faint regions which gave an anomalous fitted temperature
1371: were also removed. The colorbar under the right panel gives the
1372: temperature in keV. {\it Right Panel:} Tessellated temperature map.
1373: Each bin contains roughly 1100 net counts. The counts in each bin
1374: were fit with a single APEC model. The contribution from the Virgo
1375: ICM has {\it not} been taken out, leading to higher temperatures farther
1376: from M86 as compared to the center panel. The size of the bins
1377: roughly indicate the size of the extraction region for each pixel in
1378: the center panel.
1379: \label{fig:tmap}}
1380: \end{figure}
1381:
1382:
1383: \begin{figure}
1384: \plotone{regmap.2.ps}
1385: \caption{
1386: Same as Figure~\ref{fig:smoimg}, but with the regions used for
1387: extracting spectra overlain.
1388: Single regions for spectral fitting are
1389: shown in green, while the regions shown in white are fit as one combined
1390: region. Table~\ref{tab:spectra} gives the region number and the
1391: best-fit temperature(s).
1392: \label{fig:regmap}}
1393: \end{figure}
1394:
1395: \begin{figure}
1396: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=\linewidth]{m86_spec.ps}
1397: \caption{
1398: Data (crosses) and fitted model (histogram) for the core of M86,
1399: R1 in Table~\ref{tab:spectra}. The model is a two-temperature thermal
1400: plasma with fitted temperatures and abundance (given in the second row
1401: of Table~\ref{tab:spectra}), plus an unresolved
1402: power law
1403: component with photon index of 1.5 and a fixed thermal plasma
1404: component to model emission from the Virgo ICM, all with Galactic absorption.
1405: The data are from two S3
1406: observations, OBS-IDs 318 and 963 (see Table~\ref{tab:obs}).
1407: \label{fig:m86spec}}
1408: \end{figure}
1409:
1410:
1411:
1412: %\begin{figure}
1413: %\plotone{profile.ps}
1414: %\caption{
1415: %Surface brightness profile across the bright edge seen in the extended
1416: %group emission SE of M86 (shown most clearly in the {\it ROSAT} image
1417: %shown in the left panel of Figure~\ref{fig:rosat}). The x-axis gives
1418: %the radius from the apparent
1419: %center of curvature defined by the feature (which is close to the core
1420: %of M86).
1421: %\label{fig:edge}}
1422: %\end{figure}
1423:
1424: \begin{figure}
1425: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=\linewidth]{north_full_emfit.ps}
1426: \caption{
1427: Emission measure profile of the northern half of the bright edge seen in the extended
1428: group emission southeast of M86 (shown most clearly in the {\it ROSAT} image
1429: in the left panel of Figure~\ref{fig:rosat}). The x-axis gives
1430: the radius from the apparent center of curvature defined by the
1431: feature. The best fit two power law density jump model is given by the
1432: solid line.
1433: \label{fig:nedge}}
1434: \end{figure}
1435:
1436: \clearpage
1437:
1438: \begin{figure}
1439: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{m86mbmnew.ps}
1440: \caption{Possible marginally bound orbits for M86. Orbits are plotted
1441: for inner turning radii in the range 247 -- 395 kpc. The direction
1442: of motion is right to left. The dotted circle shows points 351 kpc
1443: from the cluster center. The colored regions (dash-dot and solid lines) show where on each
1444: orbit the galaxy could be viewed at a projected distance of 351 kpc
1445: from the cluster center, with a line-of-sight speed of 1550
1446: \kms\ towards us. Locations on the orbits where the past orbit
1447: would also appear to project 100 kpc outside the current position of
1448: M86 are shown in red (solid lines; the midpoint of each of these regions is
1449: marked with an asterisk). Both regions shrink for orbits with smaller
1450: outer turning radii. As plotted, all orbits pass through the virial
1451: radius at $x=1300$ kpc on the $+x$ axis.}
1452: \label{fig:mb}
1453: \end{figure}
1454: %------------------------------------------------------------
1455:
1456: \clearpage
1457:
1458:
1459: %-------------------- FIG ----------------------------------------
1460: \begin{figure}
1461: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{orbitsmb.2.ps}
1462: \caption{Candidate marginally bound orbits for M86.
1463: An orbit is
1464: shown projected onto the smoothed 0.5 -- 2 keV image of M86 for
1465: each of the
1466: midpoints of the red regions shown in Figure~\ref{fig:mb}
1467: (marked with an asterisk).
1468: Orbits are
1469: plotted from the point where they cross the virial radius (sometimes
1470: outside the field shown).}
1471: \label{fig:projmb}
1472: \end{figure}
1473: %------------------------------------------------------------
1474:
1475: \clearpage
1476:
1477:
1478: %-------------------- FIG ----------------------------------------
1479: \begin{figure}
1480: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{m86orbits.2.ps}
1481: \caption{Possible orbits for M86. As in Figure~\ref{fig:projmb}, one
1482: representative orbit is shown projected onto the smoothed 0.5 -- 2
1483: keV image of M86 for
1484: the remaining plausible orbits. Colors indicate the outer turning
1485: radius as follows: $\ro = 8.76$ Mpc, yellow; $\ro = 9.11$ Mpc, blue;
1486: $\ro = 19.3$ Mpc, green; $\ro = \infty$, red.}
1487: \label{fig:m86orb}
1488: \end{figure}
1489: %------------------------------------------------------------
1490:
1491: \clearpage
1492:
1493:
1494: %-------------------- FIG ----------------------------------------
1495: \begin{figure}
1496: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{mushroom.2.ps}
1497: \caption{Illustration of the Mach cone for M86. Shown in yellow is
1498: the marginally bound orbit with $\ri = 376$ kpc, one of the better
1499: candidates for the orbit of M86. Centered on the orbit, at equally
1500: spaced times, circles are plotted on the plane of the sky with radii
1501: $c_{\rm s} \, \delta t$, where $\delta t$ is the time before the present
1502: when M86 was at that location and $c_{\rm s}$ is the sound speed
1503: ($850\rm\ km\ s^{-1}$).}
1504: \label{fig:mach}
1505: \end{figure}
1506: %------------------------------------------------------------
1507:
1508: \clearpage
1509: %-------------------- FIG ----------------------------------------
1510: \begin{figure}
1511: \includegraphics[width=0.9\linewidth]{inclinedflow.eps}
1512: \caption{Stripping from an aspherical galaxy. Schematic diagram of an
1513: inclined, aspherical galaxy moving supersonically to the left
1514: through an external medium. The solid ellipse represents an
1515: equipotential of the galaxy, the dotted line represents the shock
1516: front and the dashed line represents the outer boundary of the
1517: interstellar gas. The ram pressure is maximized near the leading
1518: edge of the galaxy, where the shock is normal to the external gas
1519: flow, and lower on inclined sections of the shock front. The gas
1520: flow is fastest around the edges of the galaxy, causing local minima
1521: in pressure that pull gas out sideways from the galaxy. Gas
1522: displaced by ram pressure from the leading edge of the galaxy piles
1523: up along the trailing side and edge.}
1524: \label{fig:inclined}
1525: \end{figure}
1526: %------------------------------------------------------------
1527:
1528: \clearpage
1529:
1530:
1531: %-------------------- FIG ----------------------------------------
1532: \begin{figure}
1533: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{blobm86.ps}
1534: \caption{Model orbit for ram pressure stripped blob. The orbit of M86
1535: is shown in white and the (coarsely sampled) orbit of the blob is
1536: shown in yellow. Note that the path of the blob follows a trail of
1537: denser gas.}
1538: \label{fig:blob}
1539: \end{figure}
1540: %------------------------------------------------------------
1541:
1542:
1543: \clearpage
1544: \appendix
1545: \section{Constraining M86's Orbit} \label{ap:orbit}
1546:
1547: In cylindrical polar coordinates, with the origin at the cluster
1548: center and the orbit (instantaneously) in the $x$ -- $y$ plane, the
1549: position of M86 can be expressed as $\rvec = r \erad$ and its velocity
1550: as $\vvec = \vrad \erad + \vphi \ephi$, where $\erad$, $\ephi$, $\ez$
1551: are the coordinate basis vectors. When M86 is viewed along the unit
1552: vector, $\nhat$, its location projected onto the plane of the sky is
1553: $\rvec - \nhat \cdot \rvec \nhat$. Expressing $\nhat$ in terms of the
1554: coordinate vectors as $\nhat = a' \erad + b' \ephi + c' \ez$, the
1555: projected separation, $s$, of M86 from the cluster center is given by
1556: $s^2 = (\rvec - \nhat \cdot \rvec \nhat)^2 = r^2 (1 - a'^2)$, which
1557: requires $a' = \pm \sqrt{1 - s^2/r^2}$ (and $r > s$). Since $\nhat$ is
1558: a unit vector, $a'^2 + b'^2 + c'^2 = 1$, further requiring $b' =
1559: \pm\sqrt{s^2/r^2 - c'^2}$. The remaining parameter, $c'$, is the cosine
1560: of the polar angle of the viewing direction (\ie, the orbit
1561: inclination). With the two values of $a'$ above, the parametrization
1562: $(b', c') = (\cos\xi, \sin\xi) s/r$, for $0 \le \xi < 2\pi$, specifies
1563: the complete range of viewing directions that project M86 at the
1564: observed distance from the cluster center. In this notation, the
1565: velocity of M86 along our line-of sight is $\vlos = \nhat \cdot \vvec
1566: = a' \vrad + b' \vphi$. For radial orbits with M86 inbound ($\vrad < 0$), $\vlos = a \vrad = \sqrt{1 - s^2 / r^2} \vrad < 0$. This
1567: vanishes for $r \to s$ (where a radial orbit must be perpendicular to
1568: our line-of-sight), while the radial speed, $|\vrad|$, decreases with
1569: increasing $r$, so that $|\vlos|$ is maximized for some $r > s$.
1570:
1571: The inner and outer turning radii, $\ri$ and $\ro$, respectively, are related to the specific energy of an orbit by $E = (\ro^2 \phio -
1572: \ri^2 \phii) / (\ri^2 - \ro^2)$, where $\phii = \phi(\ri)$ is the
1573: gravitational potential at $\ri$ and $\phio$ is that at $\ro$. The
1574: specific angular momentum of the orbit, $\ell$, is given by $\ell^2 =
1575: 2 \ri^2 \ro^2 (\phio - \phii) / (\ro^2 - \ri^2)$. If M86 is bound to
1576: the Virgo cluster, then, since $r \ge \ri$ and its speed, $v \ge
1577: |\vlos|$, $0 > E = v^2/2 + \phi(r) \ge \vlos^2/2 + \phii$, which
1578: requires $\phii < - \vlos^2/2$. Taking $\vlos = -1550\ \kms$, this
1579: gives an upper limit on the inner turning radius of $\ri < 489$ kpc.
1580: To obtain a lower limit on $\ro$, note that $\partial E/\partial\ro =
1581: (\vko^2 - \vo^2) \ro / (\ro^2 - \ri^2)$, where the Kepler speed at
1582: $\ro$ is given by $\vko^2 = \left. r\, d\phi/dr \right|_{r = \ro}$ and
1583: the speed at the outer turning radius is $\vo^2 = \ell^2/\ro^2 = 2 (E
1584: - \phio)$. The net acceleration at the outer turning radius is
1585: inward, requiring $\vo < \vko$, so that $E$ is an increasing function
1586: of $\ro$. Interchanging $\ri$ and $\ro$ in this argument and noting
1587: that the net acceleration is outward at the inner turning radius
1588: ($\vki < \vi$) shows that $E$ is also an increasing function of $\ri$.
1589: Since $dE = \partial E / \partial \ri \, d\ri + \partial E/\partial
1590: \ro \, d\ro$, for a fixed energy, maximizing $\ri$ minimizes $\ro$.
1591: For M86, $v \ge |\vlos|$ and $r \ge s$, so that its energy $E \ge
1592: \emin = \vlos^2 / 2 + \phi(s)$. To obtain $E = \emin$ with $\ri = s$
1593: requires $\ro = \romin \simeq 3.5$ Mpc, or $\simeq 2.7$ times the
1594: virial radius of the cluster. For values of $\ri$ larger than $s$,
1595: the total energy would need to match or exceed $\vlos^2 / 2 + \phii >
1596: \emin$. The value of $\ro$ required to
1597: attain this energy is an increasing function of $\ri$, unless the mean
1598: density of the cluster increases with radius. Thus, $\romin$ provides
1599: a lower limit on the outer turning radius of M86's orbit.
1600:
1601: At a fixed point on an orbit, the requirement $\vlos = a' \vrad + b'
1602: \vphi$ determines the possible viewing directions, if any, that could
1603: model M86. For each of the two solutions $a' = \pm\sqrt{1 - s^2/r^2}$,
1604: the requirement $\vlos = a' \vrad + b' \vphi$ gives $b'
1605: = (\vlos - a' \vrad)
1606: / \vphi$. If either of these gives $b'$ in the range $[-s/r, s/r]$,
1607: then it corresponds to two possible viewing directions, with $c' = \pm
1608: \sqrt{s^2/r^2 - b'^2}$ (symmetrically placed above and below the plane
1609: of the orbit). Thus, for each point on an orbit, there can be zero,
1610: two, or four potential viewing directions that would place M86 at the
1611: observed separation from the cluster center and give it the observed
1612: line-of-sight velocity. Figure~\ref{fig:mb} shows a range of marginally
1613: bound orbits ($\ro = \infty$), with regions that meet these conditions
1614: marked in color. Since $|\vlos| < \vlosmax = \sqrt{1 - s^2/r^2}
1615: |\vrad| + s/r |\vphi|$, which is an increasing function of $\ro$ for
1616: fixed $r$ and $\ri$, the range of an orbit where these conditions are
1617: met shrinks as $\ro$ decreases, \ie, as the orbit becomes more
1618: tightly bound.
1619:
1620: If the trail of stripped gas lies along the orbit of M86, then the
1621: past orbit must project away from the cluster center at least as far
1622: as the gas tail extends. From above, $(\rvec - \nhat \cdot \rvec
1623: \nhat) / s$ is a unit vector in the plane of the sky that points from
1624: the cluster center towards M86. For each potential location of M86 on
1625: an orbit, we have computed $d(\rvec') = \rvec' \cdot (\rvec - \nhat
1626: \cdot \rvec \nhat) / s$ for values of $\rvec'$ ranging over the past
1627: orbit. If stripping is to account for the location of the gas tail,
1628: $d(\rvec')$ must increase initially as $\rvec'$ moves backward along
1629: the orbit and the maximum value of $d(\rvec') - s$ must exceed the
1630: distance, $\sim 100$ kpc, that the tail projects beyond M86 in the
1631: direction away from the cluster center. Locations on the orbits where
1632: the line-of-sight speed can attain $-1550\ \kms$ and these conditions
1633: are also met are shown in red in Figure~\ref{fig:mb}.
1634:
1635:
1636: \end{document}
1637: