1: \documentclass[apj]{emulateapj}
2: %\usepackage{footnpag}
3: \usepackage{apjfonts}
4:
5: %% The command below calls the preprint style
6: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
7: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
8: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
9: %%
10: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
11:
12: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
13:
14: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
15:
16: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
17: %\documentclass{aastex}
18:
19: %\usepackage{amsthm, amssymb}
20:
21: \begin{document}
22:
23: \title{Very-High-Energy $\gamma$-Ray Observations of a Strong Flaring Activity in M\,87 in 2008 February}
24: \shorttitle{Strong Flaring Activity in M\,87 in 2008 February}
25: \shortauthors{The MAGIC Collaboration}
26:
27: % authors 29.4.2008 Format ApJ
28: %
29: \author{
30: J.~Albert\altaffilmark{a},
31: E.~Aliu\altaffilmark{b},
32: H.~Anderhub\altaffilmark{c},
33: L.~A.~Antonelli\altaffilmark{d},
34: P.~Antoranz\altaffilmark{e},
35: M.~Backes\altaffilmark{f},
36: C.~Baixeras\altaffilmark{g},
37: J.~A.~Barrio\altaffilmark{e},
38: H.~Bartko\altaffilmark{h},
39: D.~Bastieri\altaffilmark{i},
40: J.~K.~Becker\altaffilmark{f},
41: W.~Bednarek\altaffilmark{j},
42: K.~Berger\altaffilmark{a},
43: E.~Bernardini\altaffilmark{k},
44: C.~Bigongiari\altaffilmark{i},
45: A.~Biland\altaffilmark{c},
46: R.~K.~Bock\altaffilmark{h,}\altaffilmark{i},
47: G.~Bonnoli\altaffilmark{l},
48: P.~Bordas\altaffilmark{m},
49: V.~Bosch-Ramon\altaffilmark{m},
50: T.~Bretz\altaffilmark{a},
51: I.~Britvitch\altaffilmark{c},
52: M.~Camara\altaffilmark{e},
53: E.~Carmona\altaffilmark{h},
54: A.~Chilingarian\altaffilmark{n},
55: S.~Commichau\altaffilmark{c},
56: J.~L.~Contreras\altaffilmark{e},
57: J.~Cortina\altaffilmark{b},
58: M.~T.~Costado\altaffilmark{o,}\altaffilmark{p},
59: S.~Covino\altaffilmark{d},
60: V.~Curtef\altaffilmark{f},
61: F.~Dazzi\altaffilmark{i},
62: A.~De Angelis\altaffilmark{q},
63: E.~De Cea del Pozo\altaffilmark{r},
64: R.~de los Reyes\altaffilmark{e},
65: B.~De Lotto\altaffilmark{q},
66: M.~De Maria\altaffilmark{q},
67: F.~De Sabata\altaffilmark{q},
68: C.~Delgado Mendez\altaffilmark{o},
69: A.~Dominguez\altaffilmark{s},
70: D.~Dorner\altaffilmark{a},
71: M.~Doro\altaffilmark{i},
72: M.~Errando\altaffilmark{b},
73: M.~Fagiolini\altaffilmark{l},
74: D.~Ferenc\altaffilmark{t},
75: E.~Fern\'andez\altaffilmark{b},
76: R.~Firpo\altaffilmark{b},
77: M.~V.~Fonseca\altaffilmark{e},
78: L.~Font\altaffilmark{g},
79: N.~Galante\altaffilmark{h},
80: R.~J.~Garc\'{\i}a L\'opez\altaffilmark{o,}\altaffilmark{p},
81: M.~Garczarczyk\altaffilmark{h},
82: M.~Gaug\altaffilmark{o},
83: F.~Goebel\altaffilmark{h},
84: M.~Hayashida\altaffilmark{h},
85: A.~Herrero\altaffilmark{o,}\altaffilmark{p},
86: D.~H\"ohne\altaffilmark{a},
87: J.~Hose\altaffilmark{h},
88: C.~C.~Hsu\altaffilmark{h},
89: S.~Huber\altaffilmark{a},
90: T.~Jogler\altaffilmark{h},
91: D.~Kranich\altaffilmark{c},
92: A.~La Barbera\altaffilmark{d},
93: A.~Laille\altaffilmark{t},
94: E.~Leonardo\altaffilmark{l},
95: E.~Lindfors\altaffilmark{u},
96: S.~Lombardi\altaffilmark{i},
97: F.~Longo\altaffilmark{q},
98: M.~L\'opez\altaffilmark{i},
99: E.~Lorenz\altaffilmark{c,}\altaffilmark{h},
100: P.~Majumdar\altaffilmark{h},
101: G.~Maneva\altaffilmark{v},
102: N.~Mankuzhiyil\altaffilmark{q},
103: K.~Mannheim\altaffilmark{a},
104: L.~Maraschi\altaffilmark{d},
105: M.~Mariotti\altaffilmark{i},
106: M.~Mart\'{\i}nez\altaffilmark{b},
107: D.~Mazin\altaffilmark{b,}\altaffilmark{*},
108: M.~Meucci\altaffilmark{l},
109: M.~Meyer\altaffilmark{a},
110: J.~M.~Miranda\altaffilmark{e},
111: R.~Mirzoyan\altaffilmark{h},
112: S.~Mizobuchi\altaffilmark{h},
113: M.~Moles\altaffilmark{s},
114: A.~Moralejo\altaffilmark{b},
115: D.~Nieto\altaffilmark{e},
116: K.~Nilsson\altaffilmark{u},
117: J.~Ninkovic\altaffilmark{h},
118: N.~Otte\altaffilmark{h,}\altaffilmark{w,}\altaffilmark{1},
119: I.~Oya\altaffilmark{e},
120: M.~Panniello\altaffilmark{o,}\altaffilmark{2},
121: R.~Paoletti\altaffilmark{l},
122: J.~M.~Paredes\altaffilmark{m},
123: M.~Pasanen\altaffilmark{u},
124: D.~Pascoli\altaffilmark{i},
125: F.~Pauss\altaffilmark{c},
126: R.~G.~Pegna\altaffilmark{l},
127: M.~A.~Perez-Torres\altaffilmark{s},
128: M.~Persic\altaffilmark{q,}\altaffilmark{x},
129: L.~Peruzzo\altaffilmark{i},
130: A.~Piccioli\altaffilmark{l},
131: F.~Prada\altaffilmark{s},
132: E.~Prandini\altaffilmark{i},
133: N.~Puchades\altaffilmark{b},
134: A.~Raymers\altaffilmark{n},
135: W.~Rhode\altaffilmark{f},
136: M.~Rib\'o\altaffilmark{m},
137: J.~Rico\altaffilmark{y,}\altaffilmark{b},
138: M.~Rissi\altaffilmark{c},
139: A.~Robert\altaffilmark{g},
140: S.~R\"ugamer\altaffilmark{a},
141: A.~Saggion\altaffilmark{i},
142: T.~Y.~Saito\altaffilmark{h},
143: M.~Salvati\altaffilmark{d},
144: M.~Sanchez-Conde\altaffilmark{s},
145: P.~Sartori\altaffilmark{i},
146: K.~Satalecka\altaffilmark{k},
147: V.~Scalzotto\altaffilmark{i},
148: V.~Scapin\altaffilmark{q},
149: T.~Schweizer\altaffilmark{h},
150: M.~Shayduk\altaffilmark{h},
151: K.~Shinozaki\altaffilmark{h},
152: S.~N.~Shore\altaffilmark{z},
153: N.~Sidro\altaffilmark{b},
154: A.~Sierpowska-Bartosik\altaffilmark{r},
155: A.~Sillanp\"a\"a\altaffilmark{u},
156: D.~Sobczynska\altaffilmark{j},
157: F.~Spanier\altaffilmark{a},
158: A.~Stamerra\altaffilmark{l},
159: L.~S.~Stark\altaffilmark{c},
160: L.~Takalo\altaffilmark{u},
161: F.~Tavecchio\altaffilmark{d},
162: P.~Temnikov\altaffilmark{v},
163: D.~Tescaro\altaffilmark{b,}\altaffilmark{*},
164: M.~Teshima\altaffilmark{h},
165: M.~Tluczykont\altaffilmark{k},
166: D.~F.~Torres\altaffilmark{y,}\altaffilmark{r},
167: N.~Turini\altaffilmark{l},
168: H.~Vankov\altaffilmark{v},
169: A.~Venturini\altaffilmark{i},
170: V.~Vitale\altaffilmark{q},
171: R.~M.~Wagner\altaffilmark{h,}\altaffilmark{*},
172: W.~Wittek\altaffilmark{h},
173: V.~Zabalza\altaffilmark{m},
174: F.~Zandanel\altaffilmark{s},
175: R.~Zanin\altaffilmark{b},
176: J.~Zapatero\altaffilmark{g}
177: }
178: \altaffiltext{a} {Universit\"at W\"urzburg, D-97074 W\"urzburg, Germany}
179: \altaffiltext{b} {IFAE, Edifici Cn., Campus UAB, E-08193 Bellaterra, Spain}
180: \altaffiltext{c} {ETH Zurich, CH-8093 Switzerland}
181: \altaffiltext{d} {INAF National Institute for Astrophysics, I-00136 Rome, Italy}
182: \altaffiltext{e} {Universidad Complutense, E-28040 Madrid, Spain}
183: \altaffiltext{f} {Technische Universit\"at Dortmund, D-44221 Dortmund, Germany}
184: \altaffiltext{g} {Universitat Aut\`onoma de Barcelona, E-08193 Bellaterra, Spain}
185: \altaffiltext{h} {Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Physik, D-80805 M\"unchen, Germany}
186: \altaffiltext{i} {Universit\`a di Padova and INFN, I-35131 Padova, Italy}
187: \altaffiltext{j} {University of \L\'od\'z, PL-90236 Lodz, Poland}
188: \altaffiltext{k} {DESY Deutsches Elektr.-Synchrotron, D-15738 Zeuthen, Germany}
189: \altaffiltext{l} {Universit\`a di Siena, and INFN Pisa, I-53100 Siena, Italy}
190: \altaffiltext{m} {Universitat de Barcelona (ICC/IEEC), E-08028 Barcelona, Spain}
191: \altaffiltext{n} {Yerevan Physics Institute, AM-375036 Yerevan, Armenia}
192: \altaffiltext{o} {Inst. de Astrofisica de Canarias, E-38200 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain}
193: \altaffiltext{p} {Depto. de Astrofisica, Universidad, E-38206 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain}
194: \altaffiltext{q} {Universit\`a di Udine, and INFN Trieste, I-33100 Udine, Italy}
195: \altaffiltext{r} {Institut de Cienci\`es de l'Espai (IEEC-CSIC), E-08193 Bellaterra, Spain}
196: \altaffiltext{s} {Inst. de Astrofisica de Andalucia (CSIC), E-18080 Granada, Spain}
197: \altaffiltext{t} {University of California, Davis, CA-95616-8677, USA}
198: \altaffiltext{u} {Tuorla Observatory, Turku University, FI-21500 Piikki\"o, Finland}
199: \altaffiltext{v} {Inst. for Nucl. Research and Nucl. Energy, BG-1784 Sofia, Bulgaria}
200: \altaffiltext{w} {Humboldt-Universit\"at zu Berlin, D-12489 Berlin, Germany}
201: \altaffiltext{x} {INAF/Osservatorio Astronomico and INFN, I-34143 Trieste, Italy}
202: \altaffiltext{y} {ICREA, E-08010 Barcelona, Spain}
203: \altaffiltext{z} {Universit\`a di Pisa, and INFN Pisa, I-56126 Pisa, Italy}
204: \altaffiltext{1} {Now at: University of California, Santa\,Cruz, CA-95064, USA}
205: \altaffiltext{2} {deceased}
206: \altaffiltext{*} {Send offprint requests to: D.~Mazin mazin@ifae.es; D.~Tescaro diegot@ifae.es; R.~M.~Wagner rwagner@mppmu.mpg.de}
207:
208:
209: \begin{abstract}
210: M\,87 is the only known non blazar radio galaxy to emit very high
211: energy (VHE) gamma-rays. During a monitoring program of M\,87, a
212: rapid flare in VHE gamma-rays was detected by the MAGIC telescope
213: in early 2008. The flux was found to be variable above 350\,GeV on
214: a timescale as short as 1 day at a significance level of
215: $5.6\sigma$. The highest measured flux reached 15\% of the Crab
216: Nebula flux. We observed several substantial changes of the flux
217: level during the 13 day observing period. The flux at lower
218: energies (150 -- 350\,GeV), instead, is compatible with being
219: constant. The energy spectrum can be described by a power law with
220: a photon index of $2.30 \pm 0.11_\mathrm{stat} \pm
221: 0.20_\mathrm{syst}$. The observed day-scale flux variability at
222: VHE prefers the M\,87 core as source of the emission and implies
223: that either the emission region is very compact (just a few
224: Schwarzschild radii) or the Doppler factor of the emitting blob is
225: rather large in the case of a non expanding emission region.
226: \end{abstract}
227:
228: \keywords{gamma rays: observations --- galaxies: active --- galaxies: individual
229: (M\,87, NGC\,4486)}
230:
231: \section{Introduction}
232: %
233: M\,87 is a giant elliptical radio galaxy (RG) of
234: Fanaroff-Riley-I-type \citep[FR\,I,][]{FanaroffRiley74} in the
235: Virgo Cluster at a distance of 16\,Mpc \citep{Macri99}. It is
236: powered by a supermassive black hole (BH) of
237: $(3.2\pm0.9)\times10^{9} \mathrm{M}_\odot$ \citep{Macchetto97}.
238: The M\,87 jet was the first-ever observed \citep{Curtis18}, and
239: due to the proximity of M\,87, its morphological substructures can
240: be resolved and a unique view of its innermost regions is
241: possible. The jet, originating from the RG core, extends to 20''
242: (\citealt{Marshall02}; equivalent to a 2\,kpc projected linear
243: distance). Several compact regions (``knots'') along its axis are
244: resolved in the radio, optical, and X-ray regimes.
245: These knots have similar morphologies in all
246: wave bands, although the X-ray knots appear to be tens of pc closer
247: to the core than the optical and radio knots \citep{WilsonYang02}.
248: The variable brightness of the knots may be due to several shock
249: fronts in the jet, being responsible for particle acceleration and
250: non-thermal emission. Superluminal motion of the knots has been
251: observed in the optical \citep{Biretta96} and radio
252: \citep{Forman07} wave bands, constraining the viewing
253: angle of the jet to $<43^{\circ}\pm4^{\circ}$.
254:
255: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
256: % HST-1, core
257: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
258: The innermost resolved bright knot HST-1 is located at 0.82''
259: (64\,pc) from the core and is the most prominent feature of the
260: jet. HST-1 has shown many flares exceeding the luminosity of the
261: M\,87 core emission. Its X-ray brightness has increased by a
262: factor $>50$ from 2000 to 2005 \citep{Harris06}. A
263: correlation between radio, optical, and X-ray luminosity points to
264: a common origin of the emission. The measured superluminal motion
265: in HST-1 is higher than in other knots, suggesting a viewing angle
266: of $<19^{\circ}$ for this part of the jet. The core itself is
267: variable, too, and also shows a correlation between the
268: emission levels from radio frequencies through X-rays
269: \citep{Perlman03}.
270:
271: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
272: % VHE history
273: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
274: M\,87 was not detected by EGRET. The first hint of
275: very high energy (VHE; $>250$\,GeV) $\gamma$-ray emission was
276: reported by \citet{HEGRA-M87}, and later
277: confirmed by \citet{HESS-M87} and
278: \citet{VERITAS-M87}. The emission is variable on a
279: timescale of years.
280: The reported $\approx 2$-day variability \citep{HESS-M87} narrows down
281: the size of the emission region to be on the order of the light-crossing
282: time of the central BH.
283: With its expected low accretion rate, the M\,87
284: core radiation is not strong enough to attenuate significantly TeV
285: $\gamma$-rays even at 5 Schwarzschild radii ($R_S$) away from
286: the BH \citep{na07}. All this implies a production region in the
287: immediate vicinity of the M\,87 core.
288: During later observations, no significant
289: flux variation was found \citep{VERITAS-M87}.
290: An X-ray--VHE $\gamma$-ray correlation is expected in most emission models, but
291: was not unambiguously found so far. Whereas \citet{HESS-M87} claim
292: a hint of a correlation between the soft (0.3--10 keV) X-rays at
293: HST-1 and the VHE $\gamma$-rays, \citet{VERITAS-M87} find a
294: year-by-year correlation between the 2--10 keV X-ray flux of the
295: M\,87 core and the VHE $\gamma$-ray emission instead, but do not
296: observe a correlation between the two energy bands on shorter
297: timescales.
298:
299: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
300: % models
301: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
302: The radio to X-ray emission of the jet is due to non-thermal
303: synchrotron radiation of relativistic electrons in the jet. The
304: observed knots and flares in M\,87 point to a complicated
305: morphology with several shock fronts producing these electrons.
306: While all 23 currently known extragalactic VHE $\gamma$-ray
307: emitters\footnote{See, e.g.,
308: http://www.mppmu.mpg.de/$\sim$rwagner/sources/ for an up-to-date
309: list} are blazars, M\,87 is assumed to be a blazar not aligned to
310: our line of sight \citep{Tsv98}. If the observed VHE emission from
311: M\,87 is associated with the innermost part of its jet, then
312: blazar emission models may hold. In blazars without prominent disk
313: or broad-line features, the VHE emission is explained by inverse
314: Compton processes involving the synchrotron photons and their
315: parent electron population \citep[synchrotron self-Compton models,
316: e.g.][]{Maraschi92}. Alternatively, in hadronic models,
317: interactions of a highly relativistic jet outflow with ambient
318: matter \citep{DarLaor,Beall99}, proton-induced cascades
319: \citep{PIC}, or synchrotron proton radiation
320: \citep{Muecke01,Aharonian00} may produce VHE $\gamma$-rays. In such a
321: scenario, M\,87 might also account for parts of the observed
322: ultra-high-energy cosmic rays \citep{uhecr}. It should be noted,
323: that for M\,87 the location of the VHE emission is still
324: uncertain. Specific emission models for high-energy processes
325: close to the core \citep{gpk05,ghi05,len07,tg08}, in the
326: large-scale jet \citep{sta03,hon07}, or in the vicinity of a BH
327: \citep{na07,riegeraha08} have been developed.
328: %
329: %- Inner jet/core (TeV-Blazar model)
330: % Georganopoulos+05 *
331: % Ghisellini+05
332: % Lenain+07
333: % Tavecchio+Ghisellin07 *
334: %- Large-scale jet
335: % Stawarz+03
336: % Honda+Honda07
337: %- Knots
338: % Sahayanathan08
339: % Liu+Shen07
340: %- BH
341: % Neronov+Aharonian07
342: % Rieger+Aharonian08 *
343: %- Protonic
344: % Reimer+04
345: %- DM
346: % Baltz+00
347:
348: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
349: % MAGIC motivation and observations
350: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
351: The MAGIC collaboration
352: performed monitoring observations of M\,87 starting from 2008 January,
353: sharing the task with the VERITAS and H.E.S.S.\ experiments.
354: Here we report on MAGIC results from a subset of these data,
355: revealing a variability timescale of M\,87 of 1 day. The energy
356: spectrum and light curves are discussed.
357:
358: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
359: % ANALYSIS
360: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
361:
362: \section{Observations and Data Analysis}
363: %
364: The MAGIC telescope is located on the Canary Island of La Palma
365: (2200\,m above sea level, 28$^\circ$45$'$N, 17$^\circ$54$'$W).
366: MAGIC is a stand-alone imaging air Cerenkov telescope (IACT) with
367: a 17~m-diameter tessellated reflector dish.
368: MAGIC has a low energy threshold of $50-60$
369: GeV (trigger threshold at small zenith angles). The accessible
370: energy range extends up to tens of TeV with a typical energy
371: resolution of 20\%--30\%, depending on the zenith angle and energy
372: \citep{crab}.
373:
374: The data set comprises observations from 2008 January 30 to 2008
375: February 11. These were performed in the wobble mode
376: \citep{daum} for 26.7~hr. The zenith angle of the observations
377: ranges from 16$^{\circ}$ to 35$^{\circ}$. After removing runs with unusually
378: low trigger rates, mostly caused by bad weather conditions, the
379: effective observing time amounts to 22.8~hr.
380:
381: The data were analyzed using the MAGIC standard calibration and
382: analysis \citep{crab}. The analysis is based on image parameters
383: \citep{hillas,tescaro07} and the random forest \citep[RF,][]{magicrf} method,
384: which are used to define the so-called hadronness of each event.
385: The cut in hadronness for $\gamma$/hadron separation was optimized on a
386: contemporaneous data set of the Crab Nebula. After this cut the
387: distribution of the angle $ALPHA$, which is the angle between the
388: main image axis and the line between center of gravity of the
389: image and the source position in the camera, is used to determine
390: the signal in the ON-source region. Three background (OFF) sky
391: regions are chosen symmetrically to the ON-source region with
392: respect to the camera center. The final cut $|ALPHA|<5^{\circ}$
393: (Fig.~\ref{fig:alpha}) was also optimized on the Crab Nebula data
394: to determine the number of excess events and the significance of the signal.
395:
396: The energies of the $\gamma$-ray candidates were also estimated
397: using the RF method. To derive a differential energy
398: spectrum, we applied looser cuts than those in
399: Fig.~\ref{fig:alpha} to retain a higher number of $\gamma$-ray
400: candidates and to lower the effective analysis threshold down to
401: 150\,GeV. Looser cuts also reduce systematic uncertainties between
402: data and Monte-Carlo events, which is important for the estimation
403: of the effective collection areas. The derived spectrum was
404: unfolded to correct for the effects of the limited energy
405: resolution of the detector \citep{magicuf}. Finally, the spectrum
406: and the light curves were corrected for trigger inefficiencies due
407: to higher discriminator thresholds during partial moon light and
408: twilight conditions \citep{magicmoon}. These corrections are on
409: the order of 0\%--20\%.
410: %, varying day-by-day.
411: The data were also
412: analyzed with an independent analysis yielding, within statistical
413: errors, the same results.
414:
415: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
416: % RESULTS
417: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
418: %
419: \section{Results}
420: %
421: % Figure 1
422: %
423: \begin{figure}
424: \begin{center}
425: \includegraphics[width=0.875\linewidth]{fig1.eps}
426: \caption{\label{fig:alpha} $|ALPHA|$ distribution for the overall data sample.
427: The background (gray histogram) is estimated using three OFF
428: regions arranged symmetrically to the ON-source region with
429: respect to the camera center. A $\gamma$-ray excess with a
430: significance of 9.9 standard deviations is obtained.}
431: \end{center}
432: \end{figure}
433: %
434:
435:
436: The $|ALPHA|$ distribution after so-called tight cuts is shown in
437: Fig.~\ref{fig:alpha}. The applied cuts are $SIZE > 450$\,photoelectrons
438: and hadronness $h < 0.02$.
439: After the final $|ALPHA|$ cut (resulting in an overall cut
440: efficiency of 37\%), the total signal of 241 events over 349 normalized
441: background events corresponds to an excess with a significance of
442: $9.9\sigma$ along eq. 17 in \citet{LiMa}.
443: The highest flux was observed on
444: 2008 February 1 at a significance of $8.0\sigma$.
445:
446: %
447: % Figure 2a and 2b
448: %
449: \begin{figure}
450: \begin{center}
451: \includegraphics[width=0.875\linewidth]{fig2a.eps}
452: \includegraphics[width=0.875\linewidth]{fig2b.eps}
453: \caption{\label{fig:lc} The night-by-night light curve for M\,87
454: as measured from 2008 January 30 (MJD 54495) to 2008 February 11
455: (MJD 54507). The upper panel shows the flux in the energy bin
456: $150 - 350$\,GeV, being consistent with a constant emission.
457: The lower panel shows the integral flux above 350\,GeV;
458: flux variations are apparent on variability timescales down to 1
459: day. The inlay of the lower panel shows the light curve above 350
460: GeV in a 40 min time binning for the night with the highest flux
461: (2008 February 1).
462: The vertical arrows represent flux upper limits (95\% c.l.)
463: for the nights with negative excesses.}
464: \end{center}
465: \end{figure}
466: %
467:
468: In searching for time variability, the data set was divided into nine
469: subsets, one per observing night. In Fig.~\ref{fig:lc} we show both
470: the light curve above the analysis threshold ($150 - 350$\,GeV) and in
471: the energy range at which MAGIC has the highest sensitivity for a
472: variability search ($>$350\,GeV).
473: The low-energy range shows no significant variability with a
474: $\chi^2_\mathrm{\nu}$ of 12.6/8 (probability of $P=0.13$) for a constant
475: fit. Instead, in the energy range above 350\,GeV clear variability is
476: found. A fit by a constant
477: has a $\chi^2_\mathrm{\nu}$ of 47.8/8 corresponding to
478: $P=1.1\cdot10^{-7}$. The correlation coefficient between the two
479: energy bins is $r = -0.25^{+0.40}_{-0.33}$ (1-$\sigma$ errors),
480: suggesting that there is no significant correlation, but we note
481: rather large error bars in the low energy flux bin. We also
482: investigated a night-by-night variability. There are five pairs of
483: observations on consecutive nights in the total data set. We
484: calculated individual probabilities $S_i$ for these pairs to have
485: the same flux level and the corresponding significances. We then
486: computed a combined significance $S_\mathrm{comb}$
487: %following the prescription given by \citet{bityukov}:
488: \citep{bityukov}:
489: $ S_\mathrm{comb} = \left( {\sum{S_i}} \right) / {\sqrt{n}} $,
490: with $n=5$.
491: We interpret the resulting $S_\mathrm{comb} = 5.6\,\sigma$
492: as a proof that the flux varies on timescales of
493: 1 day or below.
494: Note that the 1 day variability is claimed from this
495: combined analysis rather than from the 2008 February 1 flare alone.
496: We find our statistics not sufficient enough to determine the
497: flare shape. Given the number of the observed changes in the flux
498: level, the data belong to a complex of two, if not three,
499: sub-flares.
500:
501: We also looked for shorter time variability, but in none of the
502: observation nights there is a significant flux variation in the
503: two energy bands. A typical example in a 40 minute binning is
504: shown in the inset in Fig.~\ref{fig:lc} for 2008 February 1.
505:
506: The averaged differential energy spectrum of M\,87
507: (Fig.~\ref{fig:spectot}) extends from $\sim 100$~GeV to $\sim
508: 10$~TeV and can be well approximated by a power law:
509: \[
510: {\frac{\mathrm{d}F}{\mathrm{d}E}}=(2.89\pm0.37)\times10^{-12}\left({\frac{E}{1\,\mathrm{TeV}}}\right)^{-2.30\pm0.11}\,
511: \frac 1 {\mbox{TeV}\,\mbox{cm}^{2}\,\mbox{s}}.
512: \]
513: The errors are statistical only. We estimate an 11\% systematic
514: uncertainty in the normalization and 0.20 for the spectral index
515: \citep{crab}. The measured values are in good agreement with the
516: H.E.S.S.\ (spectral index $\Gamma = -2.2 \pm 0.15$,
517: \citealt{HESS-M87}) and VERITAS ($\Gamma = -2.31 \pm 0.17$,
518: \citealt{VERITAS-M87}) results. The observed spectrum is not
519: significantly affected by the evolving extragalactic background
520: light (EBL) due to the proximity of M\,87 \citep{na07}. To
521: investigate a possible hardening of the spectrum with increasing
522: absolute flux level, we divided the data sample into \textit{high}
523: and \textit{low} state subsamples. The \textit{high} sample
524: comprises the two nights with the highest flux above 350\,GeV
525: (February 1 and 8), while the \textit{low} state comprises the
526: nights of lower-flux data (January 30, February 2, 4, and 11).
527: Both the \textit{high} and \textit{low} state spectra
528: (Fig.~\ref{fig:specHL}) can be well described by a power law:
529: \[
530: {\frac{\mathrm{d}F}{\mathrm{d}E}}= f_0 \left({\frac{E}{1\,\mathrm{TeV}}}\right)^{\Gamma}\,
531: \left[ \frac {10^{-12}} {\mbox{cm}^{2}\,\mbox{s}\,\mbox{TeV}} \right]
532: \]
533: with $f_0^{\mathrm{high}} = (4.81 \pm 0.82)$, $\Gamma^{\mathrm{high}} = (-2.21 \pm 0.18)$
534: and $f_0^{\mathrm{low}} = (2.58 \pm 0.92)$, $\Gamma^{\mathrm{low}} = (-2.60 \pm 0.30)$
535: for the \textit{high} and \textit{low} states, respectively.
536: There is a marginal hardening of the spectral index
537: with the higher flux on the level of $1-2$ standard deviations,
538: depending on the way the significance is calculated.
539: This hardening is not significant, which can be a consequence of
540: the fact that the two flux levels (states) differ by less than a
541: factor of 2.
542:
543: %
544: % Figure 3
545: %
546: \begin{figure}
547: \begin{center}
548: \includegraphics[width=0.875\linewidth]{fig3.eps}
549: \caption{The differential energy spectrum of M\,87 for the total
550: data sample. The horizontal error bars represent width of the energy bins.
551: The best-fit function, assuming a power law, is given
552: by the solid curve. The Crab Nebula spectrum \citep{crab} is given
553: by the dashed curve for reference.} \label{fig:spectot}
554: \end{center}
555: \end{figure}
556: %
557:
558: \clearpage
559:
560:
561: \section{Discussion}
562: %
563: % Figure 4
564: %
565: \begin{figure}
566: \begin{center}
567: \includegraphics[width=0.875\linewidth]{fig4.eps}
568: \caption{Differential energy spectra of M\,87 divided into
569: high (filled circles) and low (open circles) states. See text for the details.
570: The best-fit functions, assuming power laws, are
571: given by the black solid and red dashed-dotted curves,
572: respectively.}
573: \label{fig:specHL}
574: \end{center}
575: \end{figure}
576: %
577:
578: %\clearpage
579: %
580: M87 is the only non blazar radio galaxy known to emit VHE
581: $\gamma$-rays and one of the best-studied extragalactic black-hole
582: systems. To enable long-term studies and assess the variability
583: timescales of M\,87, the H.E.S.S., VERITAS, and MAGIC
584: collaborations established a regular, shared monitoring of M\,87
585: and agreed on mutual alerts in case of a significant detection.
586: During the MAGIC observations, a strong signal of $8\sigma$
587: significance was found on 2008 February 1, triggering the other
588: IACTs as well as {\it Swift} observations. For the first time, we
589: assessed the energy spectrum below 250 GeV, where our observations
590: can be well described by a power law that shows no hint of any
591: flattening.
592:
593: Our analysis revealed a variable (significance: 5.6\,$\sigma$)
594: night-to-night $\gamma$-ray flux above 350 GeV, while no
595: variability was found in the 150--350\,GeV range. We confirm the
596: $E>730\,\mathrm{GeV}$ short-time variability of M\,87 reported by
597: \citet{HESS-M87}.
598: The observed variability timescale is on the order of or even
599: below 1 day, restricting the emission region to a size of $R\leq
600: \Delta t\,c\,\delta = 2.6 \times 10^{15}\,\mathrm{cm} =
601: 2.6\,\delta R_S$. The Doppler factor $\delta$ is only relevant for
602: an emission region not expanding while traversing the jet. In case
603: of an expanding-jet hypothesis, the \textit{initial} radius of the
604: expanding shell is given by $R^* < c\,\Delta t$. The emission can
605: occur very close to the BH, provided that the ambient photon
606: density is low enough as to allow the propagation of VHE $\gamma$
607: rays. Otherwise the emission region must be located farther away
608: from the BH. In the latter case, the variability constraints can
609: be met only if the emitting plasma does not substantially expand
610: while traversing the jet, or if it moves with $\delta \gtrsim 10$.
611: %Note that recently \citet{marscher08} have proposed a model for
612: %BL~Lacertae where the active region is only a fraction of the jet
613: %cross section.
614:
615: There exists no lower limit on the size of HST-1, and thus the
616: flux variability cannot dismiss HST-1 as possible origin of the
617: TeV flux. During the MAGIC observations, however, HST-1 was at a
618: historically low X-ray flux level, whereas at the same time the
619: luminosity of the M\,87 core was at a historical maximum (D.
620: Harris 2008, private communication). This strongly supports the core of M\,87 as
621: the VHE $\gamma$-ray emission region.
622:
623: Our data alone cannot put strong constraints on VHE $\gamma$-ray
624: emission models. The relatively hard VHE spectrum found for M\,87
625: ($\Gamma\approx -2.3$) is not unique among the extragalactic VHE
626: $\gamma$-ray sources if one considers intrinsic spectra, i.e.
627: EBL corrected. Also, we did not measure a high-energy spectral
628: cut-off. The found marginal spectral hardening may be interpreted
629: as a similarity to other blazars detected at VHE, where such
630: hardening has often been observed.
631:
632: Our results show that a dense TeV monitoring, as exercised by
633: ground-based IACTs, has revealed highly interesting rapid flares
634: in M\,87. This fastest variability observed so far in TeV
635: $\gamma$-rays from M\,87 restricts the size of the
636: $\gamma$-emission region to the order of $R_S$ of the central BH of M\,87
637: and suggests the core of M\,87 rather than HST-1 as the origin of
638: the TeV $\gamma$-rays. Results from the entire monitoring
639: campaign, comprising data from other IACTs, will appear in a
640: separate paper.
641:
642: \acknowledgements
643: {We would like to thank the Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias for the
644: excellent working conditions at the Observatorio del Roque de los
645: Muchachos in La Palma. The support of the German BMBF and MPG, the
646: Italian INFN and Spanish MCI is gratefully acknowledged. This work was
647: also supported by ETH Research Grant TH 34/043, by the Polish MNiSzW
648: Grant N N203 390834, and by the YIP of the Helmholtz Gemeinschaft.
649: We thank Dan Harris for providing preliminary results on {\it Chandra}
650: observations.
651: %R.M.W.'s research is supported in part by the DFG
652: %Cluster of Excellence ``Origin and Structure of the Universe''.
653: %D.M's research is supported by a Marie Curie Intra European Fellowship within
654: %the 7th European Community Framework Programme.
655:
656: %{\it Facilities:} \facility{MAGIC ()}
657: }
658:
659: \begin{thebibliography}{10}
660: %
661: \bibitem[Acciari et al.(2008)]{VERITAS-M87} Acciari, V. A., et al. (VERITAS Collab.) \newblock 2008, \apj, 679, 397
662: \bibitem[Aharonian(2000)]{Aharonian00} Aharonian, F. A. \newblock 2000, NewA, 5, 377
663: \bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2003)]{HEGRA-M87} Aharonian, F. A., et al. (HEGRA Collab.) \newblock 2003, \aap, 403, 1
664: \bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2006)]{HESS-M87} Aharonian, F. A., et al. (H.E.S.S. Collab.) \newblock 2006, Science, 314, 1424
665: \bibitem[Albert et~al.(2007)]{magicuf}Albert, J., et al. (MAGIC Collab.) \newblock 2007, Nucl. Instr. Meth., A583, 494
666: \bibitem[Albert et al.(2008a)]{crab} Albert, J., et al. (MAGIC Collab.) \newblock 2008a, \apj, 674, 1037
667: \bibitem[Albert et~al.(2008b)]{magicrf}Albert, J., et al. (MAGIC Collab.) \newblock 2008b, Nucl. Instr. Meth., A558, 424
668: \bibitem[Albert et~al.(2008c)]{magicmoon}Albert, J., et al. (MAGIC Collab.) \newblock 2008c, preprint (arXiv:astro-ph/0702475)
669: \bibitem[Beall \& Bednarek(1999)]{Beall99} Beall, J. H., \& Bednarek, W. \newblock 1999, \apj, 510, 188
670: \bibitem[Biretta(1996)]{Biretta96}Biretta, J.~A. \newblock 1996, ASP Conf. Ser., 100, 187
671: \bibitem[Bityukov et~al.(2006)]{bityukov} Bityukov, S. et al. \newblock 2006, preprint (arXiv:physics/0612178)
672: %\bibitem[Cheung et al.(2007)]{Cheung07}Cheung, C. C., Harris, D. E., \& Stawarz, \L. \newblock 2007, \apj, 663, 65
673: \bibitem[Curtis(1918)]{Curtis18}Curtis, H. D. \newblock 1918, Publications of Lick Observatory, 13, 31
674: \bibitem[Dar \& Laor(1997)]{DarLaor} Dar, A., \& Laor, A. \newblock 1997, \apj, 478, L5
675: \bibitem[Daum et al.(1997)]{daum}Daum, A., et al. (HEGRA Collab.) \newblock 1997, APh, 8, 1
676: %\bibitem[Di Matteo et al.(2003)]{DiMatteo03} Di Matteo, T. et al. \newblock 2003, \apj, 582, 133
677: \bibitem[Fanaroff \& Riley(1974)]{FanaroffRiley74} Fanaroff, B. L., \& Riley, J. M. \newblock 1974, \mnras, 167, 31P
678: \bibitem[Forman et al.(2007)]{Forman07} Forman, W. et al. \newblock 2007., \apj, 665, 1057
679: \bibitem[Georganopoulos et~al.(2005)]{gpk05} Georganopoulos, M., Perlman, E. S., \& Kazanas, D. \newblock 2005, \apj, 634, L33
680: \bibitem[Ghisellini et~al.(2005)]{ghi05} Ghisellini, G., Tavecchio, F., \& Chiaberge, M. \newblock 2005, \aap, 432, 401
681: \bibitem[Harris(2006)]{Harris06} Harris, D. E. \newblock 2006, \apj, 640, 211
682: \bibitem[Honda \& Honda(2007)]{hon07} Honda, M., \& Honda, Y. S. \newblock 2007, \apj, 654, 885
683: \bibitem[Hillas(1985)]{hillas} Hillas, A.~M. \newblock 1985, in {Proc. 19th Int. Cosm. Ray Conf.}, La Jolla, 3, 445
684: \bibitem[Lenain et~al.(2008)]{len07}Lenain, J.-P., Boisson, C., Sol, H., \& {Katarzy{\'n}ski}, K. \newblock 2008, \aap, 478, 111
685: \bibitem[Li \& Ma(1983)]{LiMa}Li, T.-P., \& Ma, Y.-Q. \newblock 1983, \apj, 272, 317
686: \bibitem[Macchetto et al.(1997)]{Macchetto97} Macchetto, F. et al. \newblock 1997, \apj, 489, 579
687: \bibitem[Macri et al.(1999)]{Macri99} Macri, L. M., et al. \newblock 1999, \apj, 521, 155
688: \bibitem[Mannheim(1993)]{PIC} Mannheim, K. \newblock 1993, \aap, 269, 76
689: \bibitem[Maraschi et al.(1992)]{Maraschi92} Maraschi, L., Ghisellini, G. \& Celotti, A. \newblock 1992, \apj, 397, L5
690: %\bibitem[Marscher et al.(2008)]{marscher08} Marscher, A. P., et al. \newblock 2008, \nat, 452, 966
691: \bibitem[Marshall et al.(2002)]{Marshall02} Marshall, H. L. et al. \newblock 2002, \apj, 564, 683
692: \bibitem[M\"ucke \& Protheroe(2001)]{Muecke01} M\"ucke, A. \& Protheroe, R. J. \newblock 2001, APh, 15, 121
693: \bibitem[Neronov \& Aharonian(2007)]{na07}Neronov, A. \& Aharonian, F. A. \newblock 2007, \apj, 671, 85
694: %\bibitem[Nikishov(1962)]{nikishov}Nikishov, A.~I. \newblock 1962, {Sov. Phys. JETP}, 14, 393
695: %\bibitem[Norris et al.(1996)]{norris}Norris, J.~P., et al. \newblock 1996, \apj, 459, 393
696: \bibitem[Perlman et al.(2003)]{Perlman03} Perlman, E. S., Harris, D. E., \& Biretta, J. A. \newblock 2003, \apj, 599, L65
697: \bibitem[Protheroe et al.(2003)]{uhecr} Protheroe, R. J., Donea, A.-C., \& Reimer, A. \newblock 2003, APh, 19, 559
698: \bibitem[Rieger \& Aharonian(2008)]{riegeraha08} Rieger, F. M., \& Aharonian, F. A. \newblock 2008, \aap, 479, L5
699: \bibitem[Stawarz et~al.(2003)]{sta03} Stawarz, \L., Sikora, M., \& Ostrowski, M. \newblock 2003, \apj, 597, 186
700: %\bibitem[Stawarz et~al.(2006)]{Stawarz06} Stawarz, \L. et al. \newblock 2006, \mnras, 370, 981
701: %\bibitem[Stecker et~al.(2006)]{stecker}Stecker, F. W., Malkan, M. A. \& Scully, S. T. \newblock 2006, \apj, 648, 774
702: \bibitem[Tavecchio \& Ghisellini(2008)]{tg08} Tavecchio, F., \& Ghisellini, G. \newblock 2008, \mnras, 385, L98
703: \bibitem[Tescaro et al.(2007)]{tescaro07} Tescaro, D., et al. (MAGIC Collab.) \newblock 2007, in {Proc. 30th Int. Cosm. Ray Conf.}, Merida, preprint (arXiv:0709.1410 [astro-ph])
704: \bibitem[Tsvetanov et al.(1998)]{Tsv98} Tsvetanov, Z. I., et al. \newblock 1998, \apj, 493, L83
705: %\bibitem[Wang et al.(2008)]{Wang08} Wang, J.-M., Li, Y.-R., Wang, J.-C., \& Zhang, S. \newblock 2008, \apj, 676, 109
706: \bibitem[Wilson \& Yang(2002)]{WilsonYang02} Wilson, A. S., \& Yang, Y. \newblock 2002, \apj, 568, 113
707: %
708: \end{thebibliography}
709:
710: %
711:
712: \end{document}
713: