1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \shorttitle{Composition and Precursor for Crab Nebula}
3: \shortauthors{MacAlpine et al.}
4: \received{2008 June}
5: \begin{document}
6:
7: \title{THE CRAB NEBULA'S COMPOSITION\\ AND PRECURSOR STAR MASS}
8:
9: \author{Gordon M. MacAlpine and Timothy J. Satterfield}
10: \affil{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Trinity University, San Antonio, TX 78212}
11:
12: \begin{abstract}
13: We present results of new photoionization calculations for investigating
14: gaseous regions that represent potentially expected stages of nuclear
15: processing in the Crab Nebula supernova remnant. In addition to gas resulting
16: from CNO-processing and oxygen-burning, as previously reported,
17: a large component of the nebula appears to be carbon-rich.
18: These results suggest that the precursor star had an initial mass $\gtrsim$~9.5~M$_{\odot}$.
19: \end{abstract}
20:
21: \keywords{ISM: individual (Crab Nebula)---nuclear reactions, nucleosynthesis, abundances---
22: supernovae: individual (SN 1054)---supernova remnants}
23:
24: \section{INTRODUCTION}
25:
26: The Crab Nebula (M1~=~NGC1952) is generally recognized as the remnant
27: of the core-collapse supernova SN1054. Estimates of the precursor star's initial mass have been
28: in the range $8-12$~M$_{\odot}$
29: (see Davidson \& Fesen 1985 and references therein). The visible remnant contains at least $1-2$~M$_{\odot}$
30: of He-rich line-emitting gas (MacAlpine \& Uomoto 1991)\footnote{Fesen et al. 1997 used global line photometry
31: to suggest a higher nebular mass, approaching that once postulated by MacAlpine et al. 1989. However, as
32: discussed in MacAlpine \& Uomoto 1991, large spatial variations in the He/H ratio cause spuriously large mass
33: estimates based on global line photometry. More accurate emitting gas estimates should take into account
34: spatially resolved line photometry in order to allow for the effects of helium abundance variations on
35: N(S)/N(H), which is used along with $[$S~II$]$ line intensities to estimate the amount of neutral gas present.},
36: the neutron star probably has about 1.4~M$_{\odot}$,
37: and the outer layers of the precursor may have left in a pre-supernova wind (Nomoto et al. 1982)
38: or a shockwave (e.g., Chevalier 1977; Davidson \& Fesen 1985).
39:
40: Knowledge of the chemical composition of the remnant is vitally important for a better understanding
41: of the precursor star's initial mass and associated details of the core-collapse event. According to
42: Nomoto et al. (1982), an $8-9.5$~M$_{\odot}$ star would likely have undergone an O-Ne-Mg core collapse
43: following electron capture, whereas a star more massive than 9.5~M$_{\odot}$ would have developed an Fe-rich
44: core. A distinguishing factor between these two possible scenarios would be the nebular
45: carbon abundance. As pointed out by Nomoto (1985), for a precursor with initial mass less than about 9.5~M$_{\odot}$,
46: high N and low C mass fractions (compared with solar) would exist from CNO-cycle processing in the He-rich gas.
47: On the other hand, for precursor mass $>$~9.5~M$_{\odot}$, helium-burning and nitrogen-processing via
48: $^{14}$N($\alpha$,$\gamma$)$^{18}$F($\beta$$^{-}$$\nu$)$^{18}$O($\alpha$,$\gamma$)$^{22}$Ne ought to have
49: produced high C and low N. In addition, models for a roughly 10~M$_{\odot}$ precursor (Woosley et al. 1980;
50: Woosley \& Weaver 1986) have suggested the existence of off-center neon and oxygen flashes just prior
51: to the core collapse, whereas such events may not be expected in lower mass stars (Hillebrandt et al. 1984;
52: Nomoto 1984).
53:
54: The necessary chemical composition information should be obtainable. Because of its young age
55: and location roughly 180~pc from
56: the Galactic plane, the Crab Nebula is relatively uncontaminated by interstellar material.
57: In addition, its line-emitting gas is ionized and heated primarily by locally-generated synchrotron
58: radiation (rather than shock heating), so the ionization, thermal, and
59: chemical characteristics of the gas can be accurately analyzed using numerical photoionization codes.
60:
61: Although there has been a long history of observational and theoretical investigations aimed at understanding
62: abundances in the Crab Nebula, to some extent the results have been inconclusive or contradictory.
63: As summarized by Henry (1986), Henry and MacAlpine (1982) and Pequignot and Dennefeld (1983)
64: compared measured line-intensity data available at the time with photoionization calculations.
65: In both studies, the deduced C and N mass fractions were roughly solar or below, but there were problems
66: with interpretation of near-infrared $[$C~I$]$ emission lines (see below).
67: Davidson et al. (1982) and Blair et al. (1992) also obtained satellite observations of the ultraviolet
68: C~IV and $[$C~III$]$ lines for certain locations, and they concluded no definitive evidence for a carbon excess,
69: although the latter study left open the possibility. More recently, using extensive
70: long-slit spectroscopy covering much of the nebula, MacAlpine et al. (1996) deduced high nitrogen
71: mass fractions in some filamants and also high abundances for products of oxygen-burning,
72: such as sulfur and argon, at other locations. All of the above results, taken together, have generally been
73: interpreted as suggestive of a precursor in the $8-9.5$~M$_{\odot}$ range, although high sulfur and argon abundances
74: would appear to argue for a more massive star.
75:
76: In this paper, we report on the results of new photoionization computations (summarized by MacAlpine et al. 2007b),
77: which were developed using new line-intensity measurements
78: which extend to 1~\micron\ (MacAlpine et al. 2007a, hereinafter Paper~1). These calculations suggest that
79: strong $[$N~II$]$~$\lambda$$\lambda$6548,6583 emission lines measured at many locations by MacAlpine et al.
80: (1996, 2007a) do {\it not} necessarily imply high nitrogen abundances, while strong measured $[$C~I$]$~$\lambda$9850
81: emission {\it can} be interpreted as indicative of high carbon mass fractions. In addition, high mass fractions
82: for S and Ar in some locations are confirmed. These results argue {\it consistently} for a precursor star
83: initial mass $\gtrsim$~9.5~M$_{\odot}$.
84:
85: \section{PHOTOIONIZATION COMPUTATIONS AND NUCLEAR PROCESSING REGIONS}
86:
87: Photoionization models were produced using the numerical code Cloudy, version 06.02
88: (described in Ferland, G. J. et al. 1998). Guided by line-intensity measurements and correlations in Paper~1,
89: we developed plane-parallel computations for a range of physical conditions and chemical abundances
90: in efforts to investigate gaseous regions that may represent expected stages of nuclear
91: processing for relevant stellar models (e.g., Woosley \& Weaver 1995).
92:
93: At least three nuclear processing domains may be inferred from the observations in Paper~1.
94: Figure~1 of this paper (reproduced from Figure~4 of Paper~1) shows the correlation between
95: measured, H$\alpha$-normalized, reddening-corrected $[$N~II$]$$\lambda$6583 and $[$S~II$]$$\lambda$6731
96: line intensities for 180 widely-distributed nebular locations. It was suggested in Paper~1
97: that the strongest nitrogen emission may represent gas which has progressed
98: no further than the CNO-cycle, whereas the apparent majority of measurements (e.g., with normalized $[$N~II$]$$\lambda$6583
99: over the range 1 to 2.5) could represent material in which some helium-burning has taken place and nitrogen has been
100: converted into neon. The strongest sulfur emission was postulated to represent more advanced processing
101: through oxygen-burning. In this paper, these regions of Figure~1 will be called nuclear processing ``Domains 1, 2, and 3,''
102: respectively.
103:
104: \subsection{DOMAIN~2 (HELIUM-BURNING AND NITROGEN DEPLETION)}
105:
106: We begin by discussing details of our analysis for Domain~2 because it involves the most prevalent nebular gas.
107: In addition, the relevant photoionization models also help to understand the other domains.
108:
109: First, we developed a representative ``median observed spectrum'' for Domain~2. This involved a subset of 19 spectra
110: for which we have both optical and near-infrared measurements (see Paper~1) and for which
111: the H$\alpha$-normalized $[$N~II$]$$\lambda$6583 emission lies in the range 1--2.5. For each emission-line measurement,
112: we identified a median value and combined those into a ``median spectrum,'' as given in Table~1.
113: Then we adjusted photoionization model input parameters and chemical abundances in order to obtain
114: a satisfactory fit to the observed data.
115:
116: Following considerable experimentation, all models presented here employ the ionizing synchrotron radiation
117: spectrum given by Davidson \& Fesen (1985), with added points across the unobserved ultraviolet range
118: as suggested in the documentation which accompanies the Cloudy code.
119: In addition, we employed a constant hydrogen density of 3000~cm$^{-3}$
120: and log ionization parameter~=~-3.2. The ionization parameter is defined as
121: U~=~$\Phi$/cN, where $\Phi$ is the flux of photons more energetic than 1~Rydberg striking the face of a cloud,
122: c is the speed of light, and N is the total density of hydrogen. The ionizing spectrum did a good job of
123: producing typically observed HeII/HeI line ratios (e.g., MacAlpine et al. 1989), the adopted
124: hydrogen density led to calculated electron densities in S$^+$ zones comparable with those measured
125: by Fesen \& Kirshner (1982), and the log~U was necessary to obtain a consistent overall
126: emission line spectrum that matches the observations, in particular the
127: $[$S~III$]$$\lambda$9069/$[$S~II$]$$\lambda$6731 ratio.
128:
129: The ionization parameter employed here is almost a factor of 10 lower than that which is necessary
130: to account for far-ultraviolet C~IV and $[$C~III$]$ lines (see Blair~et~al.~1992). Henry and MacAlpine (1982)
131: noted similar ionization parameter differences when comparing photoionization calculations that
132: could match optical and ultraviolet observations separately. We do not consider this to be a problem.
133: As shown convincingly by Blair et al., much of the
134: ultraviolet line emission probably comes from lower-density, more diffuse gas, compared
135: with the gas in optical line-emitting filaments being analyzed here.
136:
137: For our Domain~2 model, the helium abundance was set at 89\%
138: by mass fraction, consistent with some stellar model expectations (Woosley \& Weaver 1995)
139: for a region with partial helium-burning and also with numerous observations of He~I$\lambda$5876 emission
140: (e.g., Uomoto \& MacAlpine 1987; MacAlpine et al. 1989; Paper~1).
141:
142: Figure~2 presents the computed Domain~2 hydrogen and helium ionization fractions as a function of depth into
143: an emitting gas cloud, with ionizing radiation entering from the left. We note that the He$^{+2}$
144: and He$^{+}$ zones do not extend far into the cloud. Because of the high helium abundance,
145: ionizing photons more energetic than 54.4~ev (the ionization potential of He$^{+}$)
146: and 24.6~ev (the ionization potential of He$^{0}$) are absorbed before they can penetrate
147: a substantial distance. The hydrogen ionized depth is about 10$^{16}$~cm, which is consistent
148: with observations for Crab Nebula filaments (see Davidson \& Fesen 1985).
149:
150: Figure~3 shows the computed electron temperature and density, plotted as a function of distance into the cloud.
151: The electron density is roughly 8000~cm$^{-3}$ where helium is ionized, drops to 3000~cm$^{-3}$ through
152: the H$^{+}$ zone, and then falls to 400-800~cm$^{-3}$. The temperature peaks near
153: 1.2$\times$10$^{4}$~K, is about 6-8$\times$10$^{3}$~K through the H$^{+}$ zone, and then remains
154: above about 6000~K to the depth plotted.
155:
156: Figure~4 gives the modeled carbon and nitrogen ionization. Because the C$^{+}$
157: ionization potential is comparable with that for He$^{+}$, and the C$^{0}$ ionization potential
158: is below that for H$^{0}$, the dominant ionization stage for carbon is C$^{+}$,
159: all the way from the He$^{+}$ zone to where the calculations were stopped at a depth of approximately seven times
160: the hydrogen ionization zone thickness.
161: In addition, because the N$^{+}$ and N$^{0}$ ionization potentials are slightly above (within 5~ev of)
162: those for He$^{0}$ and H$^{0}$, respectively, N$^{+}$ occupies an extensive, very proficient
163: ``$[$N~II$]$ emitting zone,'' in which the temperature and electron density effectively support collisional excitation.
164:
165: Figure~5 presents an expanded view of the lower 10\% of the vertical scale from Figure~4.
166: This illustrates how a relatively small, but significant amount of C$^{0}$ exists in the zones
167: where helium and hydrogen are ionized. Progressing from left to right in the figure,
168: there is a small peak in the C$^{0}$ fraction where the electron density is highest due to ionized helium.
169: Then there is a gradual C$^{0}$ increase as the temperature declines, and finally there is essentially
170: no C$^{0}$ beyond the hydrogen ionization edge where the electron density becomes very low.
171: These distribution characteristics for C$^{0}$ are consistent what would be expected from
172: C$^{+}$$\rightarrow$C$^{0}$ recombination.
173:
174: Figure~6 shows selected, computed line emissivities for this model, as a function of depth into the cloud.
175: First, we note that $[$N~II$]$~$\lambda$6584 is ``off the chart'' because of electron collisional
176: excitation in the warm, high-electron-density $[$N~II$]$ emitting zone.
177: H~I~$\lambda$6563 illustrates what would be expected from recombination, and $[$C~I$]$~$\lambda$9850
178: shows a similar distribution. As discussed above, the latter results from C$^{+}$$\rightarrow$C$^{0}$ recombination
179: followed by electron collisional excitation. The $[$O~I$]$~$\lambda$6300 line arises from collisional
180: excitation of O$^{0}$, and it is primarily important in the neutral hydrogen region because of
181: charge exchange processes between hydrogen and oxygen.
182:
183: Previously, high nitrogen mass fractions for many locations were deduced from observations of strong
184: $[$N~II$]$~$\lambda$$\lambda$6548,6583 emission and models using the Cloudy code in MacAlpine et al. (1996).
185: However, those models did not adequately take into account very high helium abundance
186: and its effect on broadening the $[$N~II$]$ emitting zone.
187: The helium mass fraction over most of the nebula ranges from about 75\% to greater than 90\% (Uomoto \& MacAlpine 1987).
188: For such helium-rich regions, strong $[$N~II$]$ lines
189: would {\it not} necessarily imply nitrogen mass fractions greater than solar.
190:
191: It has been known for decades that $[$C~I$]$~$\lambda$9850 emission is very strong in parts
192: of the Crab Nebula (Dennefeld \& Andrillat 1981; Henry et al. 1984).
193: Pequignot \& Dennefeld (1983) tried to match the observed strengths of this line by postulating
194: a high dielectronic recombination rate, and Henry et al. (1984) postulated that collisional excitation
195: by H$^{0}$ could play an important role.
196: Neither group was successful in using $[$C~I$]$~$\lambda$9850 for reliable carbon abundance estimates.
197: Therefore, difficult measurements
198: of the ultraviolet $[$C~III$]$ and C~IV emission were attempted as noted previously.
199: However, production of those lines may not be well understood either, in the sense that model
200: predictions can be wrong by as much as a factor of two depending on how He~II~L$\alpha$ absorption
201: is treated (Eastman et al. 1985). In the present calculations, we understand the production of
202: $[$C~I$]$~$\lambda$9850 emission as being due to thermal electron collisional excitation.
203: This $^{1}$D$_{2}$$\rightarrow$$^{3}$P$_{2}$ transition is an analog of the $[$O~III$]$~$\lambda$5007 line.
204: Making use of effective collision strengths
205: given by Pequignot \& Aldrovandi (1976), we manually calculated emissivities at various locations
206: and matched the model-computed emissivities exactly.
207:
208: Predicted relative emission-line intensities from this model are shown in Table~1, where it may be seen
209: that there is a reasonable match with the Domain~2 median spectrum for element mass fractions
210: given in Table~2. The deduced Domain~2 nitrogen mass fraction is less than half of its solar value.
211: We also note that the carbon mass fraction required to produce the observed median $[$C~I$]$$\lambda$9850 emission
212: in Domain~2 is roughly 6 times its solar value, and the deduced oxygen mass fraction is very close to solar.
213: A surprising result is the sulfur mass fraction necessary to acount for the observed $[$S~II$]$$\lambda$6731
214: and $[$S~III$]$$\lambda$9069 emission, which is less than a third of its solar value.
215:
216: \subsection{DOMAIN~1 (STRONGEST NITROGEN EMISSION)}
217:
218: The photoionization calculations for Domain~1 gas employed the same ionizing spectrum, hydrogen density,
219: and ionization parameter as discussed above; and the model characteristics are similar to those
220: in Figures~2-6. The median measured spectrum and computed line intensities are shown in Table~1.
221: The measured, normalized $[$N~II$]$$\lambda$6583 values for Domain~1
222: range from 3.1 to 5.6, and the adopted median is 4.5. Unfortunately, the subset
223: of near-infrared data with measurable $[$C~I$]$$\lambda$9850 did not include any nebular locations
224: with $[$N~II$]$$\lambda$6583~$>$~2.5 (see Figure~10 of Paper~1). Therefore, no $[$S~III$]$ or $[$C~I$]$
225: line values are given for this domain in Table~1.
226:
227: As may be seen in Table~2, the helium mass fraction required to match the observed He~1$\lambda$5876 line
228: is again 89$\%$ for Domain~1, which is consistent with expectations from stellar models in a zone
229: containing largely CNO-processed material. However, we note that the inferred nitrogen mass fraction is only solar,
230: because $[$N~II$]$$\lambda$6583 arises so effectively in the $[$N~II$]$ emitting zone discussed above
231: and illustrated in Figures~4 and 6. This implies some gas mixing or helium-burning. The deduced
232: oxygen mass fraction is solar, while the data indicate that
233: sulfur is significantly less than solar, as in Domain~2. The carbon mass fraction input
234: to the Domain~1 model was {\it assumed} to be 0.5~solar. A lower-than-solar carbon mass fraction
235: would be consistent for a region in which CNO-processing has taken place.
236:
237: \subsection{DOMAIN~3 (STRONGEST SULFUR EMISSION)}
238:
239: The measured spectrum and computed line intensities for Domain~3 are also shown in Table~1.
240: By combining optical data for locations with measured $[$S~II$]$$\lambda$6731 over the range 3-5.9
241: (see Figure~1) together with a subset of near-infared data, we derived a representative median
242: spectrum for this domain. The best-fit photoionization model was similar to that for Domains~1 and 2,
243: except it was necessary in this case to lower log~U to -3.5 to match the
244: $[$S~III$]$$\lambda$9069/$[$S~II$]$$\lambda$6731 ratio.
245:
246: As seen in Table~2, the adopted helium mass fraction to match observed median He~I~$\lambda$5876
247: is still 89\% for Domain~3, which would seem to imply gas mixing for regions
248: in which significant processing beyond helium-burning has taken place. As expected, the nitrogen mass fraction
249: is now well below solar. The deduced carbon and oxygen mass fractions are both about 10 times solar.
250: We note that the $[$O~I$]$~$\lambda$6300 line emissivity plotted in Figure~6 illustrates that it arises
251: in a different region from $[$C~I$]$~$\lambda$9850, so the inferred, correlated carbon and oxygen mass fractions
252: are not the result of high-optical-depth regions in the emitting gas. This also supports the idea that the
253: $[$C~I$]$~$\lambda$9850:$[$O~I$]$~$\lambda$6300 line correlations in Figure~9 of Paper~1
254: result from carbon and oxygen abundances having been produced together by nuclear processing.
255:
256: The sulfur mass fraction is roughly 4 times solar in this domain where it is hypothesized that
257: oxygen-burning has taken place. Further support for oxygen-burning comes from the high inferred argon
258: mass fraction in this domain, as well as Figure~6 of Paper~1,
259: which shows a very tight correlation
260: between $[$Ar~III$]$ and $[$S~II$]$ emission, supporting the idea that sulfur and argon are produced
261: together by the same process.
262: Finally, a correlation shown in Figure~8 of Paper~1 is consistent with the hypothesis that iron-peak nuclei
263: like nickel are produced by ``alpha-rich freeze out'' (see Woosley \& Weaver 1995; Jordan et al. 2003)
264: in Domain~3 regions containing enhanced silicon-group elements from oxygen-burning.
265:
266:
267: \section {SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION}
268:
269: The photoionization calculations presented here, compared with emission-line measurements
270: from Paper~1, are suggestive of three nuclear processing ``domains'' for gas in the Crab Nebula.
271:
272: 1. Gas with the strongest $[$N~II$]$ lines has roughly solar nitrogen and oxygen mass fractions, probably a carbon
273: mass fraction less than solar, and significantly less-than-solar sulfur and argon mass fractions.
274: This domain with 89\% helium may be largely CNO-cycle processed gas in which modest helium-burning and
275: nitrogen depletion have taken place.
276:
277: 2. The majority of the emitting nebular gas, with $[$N~II$]$$\lambda$6583/H$\alpha$ in the range 1--2.5, also has
278: $\sim$~89\% helium implied by its median observed spectrum. For this domain, the deduced nitrogen
279: mass fraction is depleted to less than half its solar value. In addition, the carbon
280: mass fraction is about 6 times solar, while oxygen is solar, and sulfur and argon
281: have approximately a third to half of their solar values. It is postulated that this domain
282: represents gas in which significant helium-burning has taken place.
283:
284: 3. The third domain examined here has the highest $[$S~II$]$$\lambda$6731 measured line intensities.
285: We find that the inferred helium mass fraction is still comparable with the other domains,
286: and the nitrogen mass fraction is about a fourth of solar. The carbon and oxygen mass fractions
287: are roughly 10 times solar, while the sulfur and argon mass fractions are about 4-6 times solar.
288: This is considered to be a domain in which oxygen-burning has occurred and some mixing has taken place.
289:
290: Gas resulting from the CNO-cycle and gas with products of oxygen-burning
291: were noted previously (MacAlpine et al. 1996), where the former was assumed to be the primary
292: component due to strong observed nitrogen emission throughout most of the nebula.
293: However, the current computations indicate that strong $[$N~II$]$$\lambda$$\lambda$6548,6583
294: emission does {\it not} necessarily imply high nitrogen abundance,
295: whereas strong $[$C~I$]$$\lambda$$\lambda$9823,9850 emission from much of the gas {\it does}
296: imply high carbon abundance.
297:
298: The finding of high carbon mass fraction throughout much of the Crab Nebula gas is particularly
299: significant because it suggests that the supernova precursor star had an initial mass $\gtrsim$~9.5~M$_{\odot}$.
300: However, it is important to consider whether the near-infrared emission-line measurements
301: presented in Paper~1, and used here, may be biased toward high $[$C~I$]$$\lambda$9850 emission.
302: As discussed in Paper~1, the near-infrared data were obtained during non-optimal seeing, and
303: $[$C~I$]$ measurements were made only where potentially useful $[$S~III$]$ or $[$C~I$]$ line-emission
304: could be identified in the two-dimensional, near-infrared spectral images. To investigate the possibility
305: of consequent biasing, we compared the current measurements with $[$C~I$]$$\lambda$$\lambda$9823,9850
306: emission reported by Henry et al. (1984).
307: The ranges of measured $\lambda$9850 from that study and this one are comparable, with marginally
308: lower and higher values in the larger data set used here. However, we still suspect that the current
309: median spectrum for Domain~2 may be biased toward stronger $[$C~I$]$ in view of how
310: the measured positions were selected. That having been said, we note that the {\it primary} reason
311: for the current finding of high carbon mass fractions is a photoionization calculation whereby we can derive potentially
312: useful carbon abundances from $[$C~I{$]$ emission. Furthermore, even though our $\lambda$9850 {\it median}
313: values may bias the inferred carbon mass fraction for a domain, the individual measurements
314: do imply that carbon-rich gas exists at numerous loctions in the nebula. In any case, a more extensive
315: set of near-infrared spectra would be very useful for understanding the overall nebular carbon.
316:
317: We should also reflect here on the fact that the photoionization code gave results for plane-parallel
318: geometrical situations, whereas line-emitting gas in the Crab Nebula may be immersed in ionizing
319: synchrotron radiation from all directions. Therefore, we developed algorithms for converting the
320: plane-parallel results to what would be expected for convex cylindrical and spherical clouds.
321: Potentially noteworthy changes in H$\alpha$-normalized lines occurred for only $[$S~II$]$$\lambda$6731
322: and $[$O~I$]$$\lambda$6300 emission. In going from plane-parallel to spherical geometry, the computed
323: $\lambda$6731/H$\alpha$ could be reduced by as much as 30\%, and $\lambda$6300/H$\alpha$
324: could be reduced by about 40\%.
325:
326: Because adopted ionization parameters for the photoionization calculations
327: involved matching the observed $[$S~III$]$$\lambda$9069/$[$S~II$]$$\lambda$6731 ratio, an employed
328: ionization parameter could be slightly lower for a convex spherical geometry. However,
329: we investigated this possibility and found that it would probably not
330: have a significant effect on the conclusions presented here. We also considered whether
331: convex spherical or cylindrical clouds might affect our deduced low sulfur mass fractions for Domains~1 and 2.
332: By using a spherical gometry, we could increase a sulfur mass fraction by perhaps 30\%,
333: but it (and that for argon) would still be low in these domains. Finally, we note that Henry \& MacAlpine (1982)
334: also reported lower-than-solar sulfur for particular filaments. We believe the low sulfur mass fractions
335: in Domains~1 and 2 to be valid results of this investigation.
336:
337:
338: \acknowledgments
339:
340: This work was supported by Trinity University and by an endowment from the late
341: Mr. Gilbert Denman.
342:
343: \begin{thebibliography} {}
344:
345: \bibitem[Blair et al. (1992)] {bla92} Blair, W. P., Long, K. S., Vancura, O., Bowers, C. W., Conger, S.,
346: Davidsen, A. F., Kriss, G. A., \& Henry, R. B. C. 1992, ApJ, 399, 611
347:
348: \bibitem[Chevalier (1977)] {che77} Chevalier, R. A. 1977, in Supernovae, ed. D. N. Schramm (Dordrecht: Reidel), 53
349:
350: \bibitem[Davidson \& Fesen (1985)] {dav85} Davidson, K., \& Fesen, R. A. 1985, ARA\&A, 23, 119
351:
352: \bibitem[Davidson et al. (1982)] {dav82} Davidson, K., Gull, T. R., Maran, S. P., Stecher, T. P., Fesen, R. A.,
353: Parise, R. A., Harvel, C. A., Kafatos, M., \& Trimble, V. L. 1982, ApJ, 253, 696
354:
355: \bibitem[Dennefeld \& Andrillat (1981)] {den81} Dennefeld, M., \& Andrillat, Y. 1981, A\&A, 103, 44
356:
357: \bibitem[Eastman et al. (1985)] {eas85} Eastman, R. G., MacAlpine, G. M., Kirshner, R. P., \& Henry, R. B. C. 1985,
358: in The Crab Nebula and Related Supernova Remnants, ed. M. Kafatos \& R. B. C.
359: Henry (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 19
360:
361: \bibitem[Ferland et al. (1998)] {fer98} Ferland, G. J., Korista, K. T., Verner, D. A., Ferguson, J. W.,
362: Kingdon, J. B., \& Verner, E. M. 1998, PASP, 110, 761
363:
364: \bibitem[Fesen \& Kirshner (1982)] {fes82} Fesen, R. A., \& Kirshner, R. P. 1982, ApJ, 258, 1
365:
366: \bibitem[Fesen et al. (1997)] {fes97} Fesen, R. A., Shull, J. M., \& Hurford, A. P. 1997,
367: AJ, 113, 354
368:
369: \bibitem[Henry (1986)] {hen86} Henry, R. B. C. 1986, PASP, 98, 1044
370:
371: \bibitem[Henry \& MacAlpine (1982)] {hen82} Henry, R. B. C., \& MacAlpine, G. M. 1982, ApJ, 258, 11
372:
373: \bibitem[Henry et al. (1984)] {hen84} Henry, R. B. C., MacAlpine, G. M., \& Kirshner, R. P. 1984, ApJ, 278, 619
374:
375: \bibitem[Hillebrandt et al. (1984)] {hil84} Hillebrandt, W., Nomoto, K., \& Wolff, R. G. 1984, A\&A, 133, 175
376:
377: \bibitem[Jordan et al. (2003)] {jor03} Jordan, G. C., Gupta, S. S., \& Meyer, B. S. 2003, Phys. Rev. C., 68, 065801
378:
379: \bibitem[MacAlpine et al. (2007a)] {mac07a} MacAlpine, G. M., Ecklund, T. C., Lester, W. R., Vanderveer, S. J.,
380: \& Strolger, L.-G. 2007, AJ, 133, 81 (Paper~1)
381:
382: \bibitem[MacAlpine et al. (1996)] {mac96} MacAlpine, G. M., Lawrence, S. L., Sears, R. L., Sosin, M. S.,
383: \& Henry, R. B. C. 1996, ApJ, 463, 650
384:
385: \bibitem[MacAlpine et al. (1989)] {mac89} MacAlpine, G. M., McGaugh, S. S., Mazzzarella, J. M., \& Uomoto, A.
386: 1989, ApJ, 342, 364
387:
388: \bibitem[MacAlpine et al. (2007b)] {mac07b} MacAlpine, G. M., Satterfield, T., \& Vanderveer, S. 2007,
389: BAAS, 39, 915
390:
391: \bibitem[MacAlpine \& Uomoto (1991)] {mac91} MacAlpine, G. M., \& Uomoto, A. 1991, AJ, 102, 218
392:
393: \bibitem[Nomoto (1984)] {nom84} Nomoto, K. 1984, ApJ, 277, 791
394:
395: \bibitem[Nomoto (1985)] {nom85} Nomoto, K. 1985, in The Crab Nebula and Related Supernova Remnants,
396: ed. M. Kafatos \& R. B. C. Henry (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 97
397:
398: \bibitem[Nomoto et al. (1982)] {nom82} Nomoto, K., Sparks, W. M., Fesen, R. A., Gull, T. R., Miyaji, S.,
399: \& Sugimoto, D. 1982, Nature, 299, 803
400:
401: \bibitem[Pequignot \& Aldrovandi (1976)] {peq76} Pequignot, D., \& Aldrovandi, S. M. V. 1976, A\&A, 50, 141
402:
403: \bibitem[Pequignot \& Dennefeld (1983)] {peq83} Pequignot, D., \& Dennefeld, M. 1983, A\&A, 120, 249
404:
405: \bibitem[Uomoto \& MacAlpine (1987)] {uom87} Uomoto, A., \& MacAlpine, G. M. 1987, AJ, 93, 1511
406:
407: \bibitem[Woosley \& Weaver (1986)] {woo86} Woosley, S. E. \& Weaver, T. A. 1986,
408: in Nucleosynthesis and Its Implications on Nuclear and Particle Physics,
409: ed. J. Audouze \& N. Mathieu (Dordrecht: Reidel), 145
410:
411: \bibitem[Woosley \& Weaver (1995)] {woo95} Woosley S. E., \& Weaver, T. A. 1995, ApJS, 101, 181
412:
413: \bibitem[Woosley et al (1980)] {woo80} Woosley S. E., Weaver, T. A., \& Tamm, R. E. 1980,
414: in Type I Supernovae, ed. J. C. Wheeler (Austin: Univ. Texas), 96
415:
416:
417: \end{thebibliography}
418:
419: \clearpage
420:
421: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrrr}
422: \tablewidth{0pt}
423: \tablecaption{Measured And Computed Line Intensities\tablenotemark{a}
424: \label{tab1}}
425: \tablecolumns{7}
426: \tablehead{
427: \colhead{} &\multicolumn{2}{c}{Domain 1} &\multicolumn{2}{c}{Domain 2} &\multicolumn{2}{c}{Domain 3} \\
428: \colhead{Line} &\colhead{Measured} &\colhead{Computed} &\colhead{Measured} &\colhead{Computed} &\colhead{Measured} &\colhead{Computed}
429: }
430: \startdata
431: He~I~$\lambda$5876 & 0.26 & 0.27 & 0.28 & 0.26 & 0.28 & 0.25 \\
432: $[$O~I$]$~$\lambda$6300 & 0.40 & 0.41 & 0.32 & 0.34 & 0.58 & 0.44 \\
433: $[$N~II$]$~$\lambda$6583 & 4.5 & 4.8 & 1.6 & 1.9 & 0.50 & 0.52 \\
434: $[$S~II$]$~$\lambda$6731 & 0.64 & 0.66 & 0.85 & 0.82 & 4.0 & 3.6 \\
435: $[$Ar~III$]$~$\lambda$7136 & 0.05 & 0.05 & 0.11 & 0.10 & 0.45 & 0.35 \\
436: $[$S~III$]$~$\lambda$9069 & --- & 0.22 & 0.26 & 0.27 & 0.83 & 0.90 \\
437: $[$C~I$]$~$\lambda$9850 & --- & 0.04 & 0.45 & 0.45 & 0.74 & 0.70 \\
438:
439: \enddata
440: \tablenotetext{a}{Normalized to H$\alpha$.}
441:
442: \end{deluxetable}
443:
444: \clearpage
445:
446: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrr}
447: \tablewidth{0pt}
448: \tablecaption{Deduced Element Mass Fractions
449: \label{tab2}}
450: \tablecolumns{4}
451: \tablehead{
452: \colhead{} &\colhead{Domain 1} &\colhead{Domain 2} &\colhead{Domain 3} \\
453: \colhead{Element} &\colhead{Mass Fraction} &\colhead{Mass Fraction} &\colhead{Mass Fraction}
454: }
455: \startdata
456: Helium & 89$\%$ & 89$\%$ & 89$\%$ \\
457: Nitrogen & solar & 0.35 solar & 0.28 solar \\
458: Carbon & 0.50 solar & 6 $\times$ solar & 11 $\times$ solar \\
459: Oxygen & solar & solar & 10 $\times$ solar \\
460: Sulfur & 0.21 solar & 0.28 solar & 4.2 $\times$ solar \\
461: Argon & 0.24 solar & 0.55 solar & 6.0 $\times$ solar \\
462: \enddata
463:
464: \end{deluxetable}
465:
466: \clearpage
467:
468: \begin{figure}
469: \epsscale{1.0}
470: \plotone{f1.eps}
471: \caption{Correlation between H$\alpha$-normalized $[$N~II$]$$\lambda$6583 and $[$S~II$]$$\lambda$6731
472: measured line intensities from Figure~4 of Paper~1.
473: \label{fig1}}
474: \end{figure}
475: \clearpage
476:
477: \begin{figure}
478: \epsscale{1.0}
479: \plotone{f2.eps}
480: \caption{Domain~2 hydrogen and helium ionization fractions as a function of distance into a cloud.
481: \label{fig2}}
482: \end{figure}
483: \clearpage
484:
485: \begin{figure}
486: \epsscale{1.0}
487: \plotone{f3.eps}
488: \caption{Domain~2 temperature and electron density as a function of distance into a cloud.
489: \label{fig3}}
490: \end{figure}
491: \clearpage
492:
493:
494: \begin{figure}
495: \epsscale{1.0}
496: \plotone{f4.eps}
497: \caption{Domain~2 carbon and nitrogen ionization fractions as a function of distance into a cloud.
498: \label{fig4}}
499: \end{figure}
500: \clearpage
501:
502: \begin{figure}
503: \epsscale{1.0}
504: \plotone{f5.eps}
505: \caption{Expanded view of carbon and nitrogen ionization fractions below the value 0.1 on the vertical axis of
506: Figure 4.
507: \label{fig5}}
508: \end{figure}
509: \clearpage
510:
511: \begin{figure}
512: \epsscale{1.0}
513: \plotone{f6.eps}
514: \caption{Selected Domain~2 line emissivities as a function of distance into a cloud.
515: \label{fig6}}
516: \end{figure}
517: \clearpage
518:
519: \end{document}
520: