1: 

2: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

3: 

4: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:

5: 

6: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}

7: 

8: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}

9: 

10: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}

11: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.

12: 

13: %\slugcomment{Submitted to ApJ}

14: 

15: \shorttitle{TRIS I} \shortauthors{Zannoni et al.}

16: 

17: \begin{document}

18: 

19: \title{TRIS I : \\ Absolute Measurements of the Sky Brightness Temperature

20:  \\

21:     at 0.6, 0.82 and 2.5 GHz }

22: 

23: \author{M. Zannoni\altaffilmark{1}, A. Tartari, M. Gervasi\altaffilmark{1,2},

24:  G. Boella\altaffilmark{2}, G. Sironi\altaffilmark{1},\\ A. De Lucia and A.

25: Passerini} \affil{Physics Department, University of Milano

26: Bicocca, P.zza della Scienza 3, I20126 Milano Italy}

27: 

28: \author{F. Cavaliere}

29: \affil{Physics Department, University of Milano, via Celoria 16,

30: I20133 Milano Italy} \email{mario.zannoni@mib.infn.it}

31: 

32: \altaffiltext{1}{also Italian National Institute for Astrophysics,

33: INAF, Milano.} \altaffiltext{2}{also Italian National Institute

34: for Nuclear Physics, INFN, Milano-Bicocca.}

35: 

36: 

37: \begin{abstract}

38: At frequencies close to 1 GHz the sky diffuse radiation is a

39: superposition of radiation of Galactic origin, the 3 K Relic or

40: Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation, and the signal produced by

41: unresolved extragalactic sources. Because of their different

42: origin and space distribution the relative importance of the three

43: components varies with frequency and depends on the direction of

44: observation. With the aim of disentangling the components we built

45: TRIS, a system of three radiometers, and studied the temperature

46: of the sky at $\nu =0.6$, $\nu = 0.82$ and $\nu = 2.5$ GHz using

47: geometrically scaled antennas with identical beams (HPBW =

48: $18^{\circ} \times 23^{\circ}$). Observations included drift scans

49: along a circle at constant declination $\delta=+42^{\circ}$ which

50: provided the dependence of the sky signal on the Right Ascension,

51: and absolute measurement of the sky temperature at selected points

52: along the same scan circle. TRIS was installed at Campo Imperatore

53: (lat. = $42^{\circ}~26'$ N, long.= $13^{\circ}~33'$, elevation =

54: 2000 m a.s.l.) in Central Italy, close to the Gran Sasso

55: Laboratory.

56: \end{abstract}

57: 

58: 

59: \keywords{diffuse radiation, galactic emission, cosmic microwave

60: background, unresolved extragalactic sources, sky absolute

61: temperature}

62: 

63: 

64: \section{Introduction} \label{intro}

65: The diffuse radiation from the sky is a superposition of

66: components. At frequencies between few tens of MHz and few tens of

67: GHz, in terms of brightness temperature we can write

68: \begin{equation}

69: T_{sky}(\alpha,\delta,\nu)=T_{gal}(\alpha,\delta,

70: \nu)+T_{CMB}(\nu)+T_{uers}(\nu) \label{eq:Tskygen}

71: \end{equation}

72: \par\noindent where $\alpha$ and $\delta$ are the Right Ascension and

73: declination of the point at which the telescope axis is aimed.

74: $T_{gal}$ is the Galactic contribution: partially polarized,

75: anisotropically distributed, it tracks the Galactic structure. Its

76: frequency spectrum is a power law

77: \begin{equation}

78: T_{gal}(\nu, \alpha, \delta)  = K(\alpha, \delta) ~\nu

79: ^{-\beta({\alpha,\delta})} \label{eq:Tgal}

80: \end{equation}

81: \noindent with spectral index $\beta$ ranging from 2.1 to 3.4

82: depending on the relative weight of thermal and synchrotron

83: emission, on the energy spectrum of the Cosmic Ray Electrons and

84: on the Galactic Magnetic Field. Compared to the other components

85: of the diffuse radiation it is a foreground and dominates the sky

86: at frequencies below $\sim 1$ GHz.

87: 

88: \noindent $T_{CMB}$ is the Cosmic Microwave Background. Relic of

89: the Big Bang, it is substantially unpolarized and isotropically

90: distributed. Its flat frequency spectrum is consistent with the

91: emission of a blackbody with a temperature of $(2.725 \pm 0.001)$

92: K \cite{Fixsen2002}. Compared to the other components it is a true

93: background. At $\nu \geq 1$ GHz $T_{CMB}$ definitely overcomes

94: $T_{gal}$ and dominates the sky up to $\nu \sim 100$ GHz, above

95: which thermal emissions from an irregular distribution

96: of dust with physical temperature $\geq 20$ K, gradually

97: overwhelms the other components.

98: 

99: \noindent $T_{uers}$ is a blend of unresolved extragalactic radio

100: sources isotropically distributed. Its frequency spectrum is a

101: power law

102: \begin{equation}

103: T_{uers} = K_{uers} \nu^{-\gamma_{uers}}  \label{eq:Tex}

104: \end{equation}

105: with $\gamma_{uers} \sim 2.70$ \cite{Gervasi2008b}. \newline

106: \noindent Each of the above components carries important

107: astrophysical and/or cosmological information, particularly at

108: decimetric wavelengths. At these frequencies for instance we can

109: expect a dip in the flat spectrum of $T_{CMB}$, whose detection

110: can provide direct information on $\Omega_b$ \cite{Burigana1991},

111: the Universe baryon density. In this same region the slope of the

112: power law frequency spectrum of $T_{gal}$ changes, revealing

113: perhaps a knee in the energy spectrum of the cosmic ray electrons

114: responsible for the galactic synchrotron radiation. To disentangle

115: these components, coordinated, multifrequency observations of

116: extended areas of sky are necessary. They will form a data base

117: from which the desired information can be extracted modelling the

118: components and optimizing the model parameters. At frequencies

119: close to 1 GHz it is possible to find in literature maps of

120: $T_{sky}$ which cover all the sky or large parts of it (see Table

121: \ref{tab1}). Their accuracy is however insufficient to answer many

122: of the questions put forth by present day astrophysical and

123: cosmological models. These maps have been in fact obtained

124: combining data collected at different sites and/or at different

125: times and frequently show artificial structures, e.g. {\it

126: stripes}. Once {\it destriped} (see for instance

127: \cite{Platania2003}), these maps can be used to extract the

128: spectral index of the galactic signal $T_{gal}$. The accuracy of

129: the zero level of the absolute scale of temperature of the same

130: maps is however still insufficient to disentangle the radiation

131: components with the accuracy today required by cosmology. To

132: overcome this difficulty we made absolute and differential

133: measurements of the diffuse radiation at three frequencies, using

134: a set of three radiometers (therefore the project is said TRIS),

135: at 0.6, 0.82 and 2.5 GHz. In this paper we present results of

136: these observations. In \cite{Gervasi2008a} and \cite{Tartari2008}

137: (from now on cited as Paper II and III), the astrophysical and

138: cosmological implications of TRIS data are discussed.

139: 

140: 

141: 

142: \section{Absolute measurements of temperature}

143: \label{Accabs} Measuring the absolute value of the {\it brightness

144: temperature}, $T_{sky}$, of a patch of diffuse radiation is a

145: conceptually simple but not easy task. Large systematic effects

146: are in fact expected.

147: 

148: A radiometer aimed at the sky gives the {\it antenna temperature},

149: $T_a$, from which we obtain

150: \begin{equation}

151: T_{sky} = \frac{T_a - T_{atm}- T_{env}}{1 - (T_{atm}/T^{0}_{atm})}

152: \label{eq:Target}

153: \end{equation}

154: \par\noindent where $T_{atm}$ and $T_{env}$ are the noise

155: temperatures of the signals from the atmosphere and the

156: environment above and around the radiometer and $T^{0}_{atm}\simeq

157: 240 K$ is the physical temperature of the atmosphere

158: \cite{US_STANDARD_ATMOSPHERE_1976}. References for calculations

159: are presented in the following Section \ref{skytemp}.

160: \newline \noindent Since the diffuse radiation fills the antenna

161: beam, the absolute value of $T_a$ is

162: \begin{equation}

163: T_a = T_{cold}^{eff} + (S_{sky} - S_{cold}) G

164: \label{eq:Tantgen}

165: \end{equation}

166: \noindent where

167: \begin{equation}

168: G = \frac{T_{warm}^{eff}-T_{cold}^{eff}}{S_{warm}-S_{cold}}

169: \label{eq:gain}

170: \end{equation}

171: \par\noindent is the system {\it gain} or {\it conversion factor}

172: and $S_{sky}$, $S_{cold}$ and $S_{warm}$ are the radiometer

173: outputs produced by the sky target and by two known sources ({\it

174: calibrators}), a {\it cold} and a {\it warm} load. $T_x^{eff}$,

175: the {\it effective temperature} of calibrator $x$, is the

176: convolution of the calibrator brightness temperature and the

177: antenna beam pattern. Effects of antenna and receiver properties

178: (gain, bandwidth, physical temperature and attenuation of the

179: components between the antenna mouth and the radiometer output)

180: are included in $G$.

181: 

182: With one important exception \cite{Stankevich1970} astronomical

183: objects have been rarely used as absolute calibrators. In fact

184: unless the source is isolated, it completely fills the antenna

185: beam and its brightness distribution is precisely known, the

186: accuracies of $T^{eff}_x$, $G$ and $T_a$ are poor.  Artificial

187: blackbodies, shaped to fit the antenna aperture, to match the

188: antenna impedance and to fill the antenna beam, are more

189: convenient calibrators, because their effective and brightness

190: temperatures coincide. They have been used \cite{Bensadoun1992} at

191: frequencies $\nu > 1$ GHz ($\lambda < 30~cm$) where the radiation

192: wavelength, the antenna aperture $A_e = \lambda^2/\Omega_a$

193: ($\Omega_a$ is the antenna solid angle), and the blackbody

194: dimensions are reasonably small. Small dimensions make also

195: possible to bring the radiometer in space (e.g. \cite{Mather1994})

196: or at balloon altitudes (e.g. \cite{Kogut2006}) where atmospheric

197: and environmental effects are negligible or absent and $T_a\simeq

198: T_{sky}$ (see \ref{skytemp} and Equation (\ref{eq:Tsky})).

199: 

200: \noindent Below 1 GHz however the antenna dimensions and the

201: wavelength are large and discourage the construction of artificial

202: sources which fit the antenna mouth and fill the antenna beam.

203: Moreover, at these low frequencies observations from space or at

204: balloon altitudes are extremely difficult and calibrations are

205: better made injecting at some point between antenna and receiver,

206: through a multi throw switch, the noise produced by very compact

207: line terminations (the so called {\it dummy loads}) properly

208: cooled or warmed.

209: \newline \noindent

210: In this case the effective temperature of the calibrator is:

211: \begin{equation}

212:  T_{l}^{eff} = \Bigl[T_{l}^0 e^{-\tau_{c}} + \int_{0}^{L} T_{c}^{0}(x)e^{-\tau(x)}({\frac{d\tau}{dx}})dx \Bigr] (1-r^2) + r^2 T_{RX}^{eff}

213:  \label{eq:Teff}

214: \end{equation}

215: where $T_{l}^{0}$ and $T_{c}^{0}(x)$ are the physical temperatures

216: of the load and the transmission line {\em connecting} the load to

217: the switch, $x$ is a coordinate running on the line,

218: $\frac{d\tau}{dx}$ is the specific attenuation (neper per unit

219: length) of the line, $e^{-\tau_{c}}$ is the transmission of the

220: line, $r^2$ the power reflection coefficient of the load seen

221: through the line and $T_{RX}^{eff}$ is the noise temperature

222: radiated by the receiver (see \ref{receiver}).

223: 

224: Usually the accuracy of $G$ is good but $T_a$, being measured at

225: the switch positions, must be corrected (see for instance Equation

226: (\ref{eq:Tant})) for the transmission $e^{-\tau_{lc}}$ and {\it

227: thermal noise}

228: \begin{equation}

229: T_{noise} = \int_0^{\tau_{lc}}{T_{0}(x)e^{-\tau(x)} d\tau} =

230: \overline{T}_{0}(1-e^{-\tau_{lc}}) \label{eq:Tnoise}

231: \end{equation}

232: of the lossy components (LC) at temperature $T_{0}$ distributed

233: along the line between the switch and the antenna mouth. To limit

234: the statistical and systematic uncertainties on $T_{noise}$ the

235: temperature of these components must be low and stable. In fact

236: Equation \ref{eq:Tnoise} gives:

237: \begin{equation}

238: (\delta T_{noise})^2 ~\simeq (T_o ~{\delta

239: \tau_{lc}})^2+(\tau_{lc}~\delta T_0)^2~~~~(\tau_{lc} \ll 1)

240: \label{eq:DeltaTnoise}

241: \end{equation}

242: e.g. $0.3 \leq \delta T_{noise} \leq 3$~K if $T_0 \simeq 300 K$

243: and $10^{-3}\leq \tau_{lc} \leq 10^{-2}$. For the above reasons

244: the values of $T_{sky}$ measured at frequencies close and below 1

245: GHz have been so far less accurate than the values measured at

246: higher frequencies.

247: 

248: Reviews in literature (see for instance \cite{Sironi1999},

249: \cite{Zannoni1999}, \\ \cite{Salvaterra2002} and Table \ref{tab2})

250: show that below 10 GHz the accuracy of $T_{sky}$ rapidly decreases

251: with frequency and it is very poor below 1 GHz. Moreover between 1

252: and 0.5 GHz the large dispersion of the error bars assigned by

253: different observers to their results suggest that sometimes in the

254: past not all the systematic effects were recognized. The frequency

255: dependence of the accuracy of $T_{sky}$ is especially evident in

256: coordinated experiments  like the multifrequency observations made

257: by the White Mt. collaboration \cite{Smoot1985}, the South Pole

258: collaboration \cite{Bersanelli1993} and by Arcade

259: \cite{Kogut2004}. These experiments cover the frequency interval

260: $2 - 100$ GHz and approach the frequency region close to 1 GHz

261: where neither $T_{CMB}$ nor $T_{gal}$ are dominant and the models

262: of $T_{gal}$ and $T_{uers}$ are insufficient to extract with the

263: desired accuracy the cosmological signal. Additional observations

264: at even lower frequencies were subsequently made at 1.4 GHz, 0.82

265: and 0.61 GHz (\cite{Bensadoun1993}, \cite{Sironi1990} and

266: \cite{Sironi1991}). Unfortunately those last observations used

267: different systems and were not coordinated among them nor with

268: previous observations at the same or at higher frequencies. TRIS

269: has been planned to carry on coordinated observations between 0.6

270: and 2.5 GHz with the aim of improving the accuracy of the

271: existing data.

272: 

273: 

274: \section{TRIS} \label{tris}

275: \par TRIS is a set of three absolute radiometers which operate

276: in total power configuration. All the radiometers have the same

277: antenna beam, similar receivers and include an External Calibrator

278: unit and an Internal Calibrator unit (see Figure \ref{F1:block}).

279: 

280: The frequencies of operation (0.6 GHz ($\lambda$= 50 cm), 0.82

281: GHz ($\lambda$= 36 cm) and 2.5 GHz ($\lambda$= 12 cm)) were chosen

282: because they span a frequency region where the ratio $(T_{gal} /

283: T_{CMB})$ is $>1$ at low frequencies and $<1$ at high frequencies

284: and because were used in the past for similar observations.

285: 

286: 

287: \subsection{Antennas} \label{antennas}

288: \par\noindent To have the same beam the three antennas are

289: geometrically scaled (i.e. their linear dimensions are the same in

290: wavelength units). We chose pyramidal rectangular horns with

291: corrugated (thin corrugations) E-plane walls and a corrugated

292: E-plane corona at the mouth (see Table \ref{tab3}) because they

293: have measurable and/or calculable electromagnetic properties.

294: These antennas have a beam solid angle $\Omega_a$ wide enough to

295: dilute the contribution of isolated sources well below the signal

296: produced by the diffuse radiation but capable to keep track of the

297: main features of the radiation spatial distribution. Side and back

298: lobes are low ($\leq -30$ dB, Figure \ref{F2:beam}) to minimize

299: spill-over from the ground and interferences. The e.m. signal is

300: extracted from the antenna through a tunable (five tuning stubs)

301: coaxial - waveguide transition. A prototype of the complete

302: antenna at 8.2 GHz was built and tested in anechoic chamber. Then

303: the 2.5 GHz was made scaling the 8.2 GHz unit and optimizing the

304: waveguide - coaxial transition. The 0.6 and 0.82 GHz horns were

305: then scaled from it.

306: \newline \noindent Horn walls, corrugations, corona, waveguide

307: sections and waveguide-coax transition are made of anticorodal

308: riveted plates. These parts are fastened with screws for easy

309: disassembling and transportation (before going to Campo Imperatore

310: the 0.82 and 2.5 GHz horns were used at the Amundsen Scott base at

311: South Pole). Aluminum tape on all the joints provides optimum

312: electrical contacts among the various parts and makes them

313: insensitive to variable weather condition and oxidation.

314: 

315: The 0.6, 0.82 and 2.5 GHz units were too large for the available

316: anechoic chambers. The horn beam was therefore measured on the 8.2

317: GHz prototype in anechoic chamber and at a test range, putting

318: special care on side and back lobes. Results, presented in Figure

319: \ref{F2:beam}, give a beam solid angle of $18^{\circ}(E) \times

320: 23^{\circ}(H)$ (HPBW). Tests on the 0.6, 0.82 and 2.5 GHz units,

321: made looking at the transit of the sun, confirmed it.

322: 

323: The transmission $e^{-\tau}$ of the components which bring the

324: signals from the antenna throat to the receiver were measured at

325: 0.6, 0.82 and 2.5 GHz with a Vector Network Analyzer (Agilent

326: 8510C) in laboratory. The attenuations of the horn between mouth

327: and throat was calculated. Results are shown in Table \ref{tab4}.

328: 

329: At Campo Imperatore the three antennas were on an almost East West

330: row, on stands which allow to steer the beam along the E-plane.

331: This plane is titled $7^\circ$ from the N-S plane in direction

332: N$\rightarrow$NE and S$\rightarrow$SW. This plane crosses the

333: southern profile of the surrounding mountains at azimuth

334: 187$^\circ$ where there is a brief levelling (see Figure

335: \ref{F3:horiz}).

336: 

337: \subsection{External Calibrator}

338: A SPTT (Single Pole Triple Throw) switch is used to link the

339: receiver to the antenna, the cold calibrator or the warm

340: calibrator. The switch is a source of thermal noise. The maximum

341: accuracy one can reach in evaluating it, is set by the

342: repeatability of the switch attenuation and by the stability of

343: its temperature (see eqs.(\ref{eq:Tnoise}) and

344: (\ref{eq:DeltaTnoise})). To minimize this noise and its

345: fluctuations, the switch is cooled at temperatures comparable to

346: the sky temperature and is stabilized putting it in a bath of

347: liquid helium. Because no commercially available units satisfied

348: our needs, we studied and built a cryogenic, purely passive,

349: manually driven, resonant coaxial SPTT switch based on $\lambda/4$

350: lines \cite{Zannoni1999}. With $\tau \leq 0.01 dB$ and $\delta

351: \tau \leq 2.3\times10^{-3}$ it gives $\delta T_{noise, switch}

352: \leq 10$ mK when cooled at 3.967 K, the boiling temperature of

353: liquid helium at Campo Imperatore (2000 m a.s.l.). When cooled the

354: switch can be driven through fiber glass rods which come out from

355: the dewar housing it.

356: 

357: \subsubsection{Cryogenic Waveguide}\label{cryo}

358: To minimize their thermal noise all the lossy components

359: distributed between the horn throat and the receiver input are

360: cooled. The cryogenic SPTT switch,  the waveguide-coaxial

361: transition and two 50 $\Omega$ dummy loads are mounted at the bottom of

362: a dewar (see Figure \ref{F4:dewar}) where they are always plunged

363: in liquid helium (LHe).  The third load is at the top of the

364: dewar, at a stable temperature close to the external ambient

365: temperature. A special stainless steel waveguide section brings

366: the electromagnetic signal from the waveguide transition to the

367: dewar top where it can be attached to the horn throat.

368: 

369: The stainless steel guide section is a thermal insulator. A window

370: made of a polyethylene sheet in the collar at the top of the

371: stainless steel section and two fluorglass (a special fabric

372: transparent to radio and microwaves, opaque to IR) sheets in the

373: stainless steel waveguide limit the input of thermal radiation. Holes

374: in the fluorglass windows allow a uniform distribution of the cold

375: helium vapors inside the waveguide.

376: 

377: A cable which goes through the flange at the dewar mouth links one

378: of the two cold dummy loads to the circulator third port in the

379: Internal Calibration Unit (see Figure \ref{F1:block}). A second

380: cable links the switch output to the receiver input. The three

381: inputs of the switch go to: 1) the antenna coaxial input through a

382: very short piece of cable at LHe temperature; 2) the second cold

383: dummy load (the {\it cold source}); 3) the load at the top of the

384: dewar (the {\it warm load}) through a long cable. Sensors monitor

385: the level of the liquid helium and the temperatures of switch,

386: cold and warm loads, waveguide walls and cables inside and outside

387: the dewar.

388: 

389: A 250 l dewar can house the 0.6 or the 0.82 GHz system. It is

390: sufficient to carry on observations for more than 48 hours without

391: refilling. The 2.5 GHz system is in a 100 l dewar. Once filled

392: with helium it allows continuous observation for about 90 hours.

393: 

394: The effective temperatures of the cold loads are larger than 3.967

395: K, the boiling temperature of LHe at the observing site, because

396: of the unavoidable e.m. mismatches which carry in a fraction of

397: the noise temperature radiated by the receiver (see Equation

398: \ref{eq:Teff} and Table \ref{tab5}). Their  values however can be

399: calculated. The high value of $T_{cl}^{eff}$ at 2.5 GHz is a

400: consequence of the increasing difficulties of matching resonant

401: systems when the wavelength decreases. The complete structure of

402: the horn and Cryogenic Waveguide is shown in Figure

403: \ref{F4:dewar}.

404: 

405: \subsubsection{Warm Waveguide}\label{warm}

406: 

407: A more simple calibrator based on a small dewar containing just

408: the SPTT switch and the three dummy loads was also prepared. It

409: requires a limited quantity of LHe. It was  used for preliminary

410: tests and for 0.82 GHz absolute measurements when the dewar of the

411: cryogenic waveguide failed. The final accuracy one gets on

412: $T_{sky}$ is however worse compared to the accuracy one gets using

413: the Cryogenic Waveguide because of the noise produced by the lossy

414: components, including the waveguide - coaxial transition, at

415: ambient temperature.

416: 

417: \subsection{Internal Calibrator and Reflectometer}\label{reflect}

418: \par A combination of circulators, directional couplers, solid

419: state noise source, matched dummy loads and electrically driven

420: switches form a unit, mounted between the receiver input and the

421: Low Noise Amplifier (see Fig.\ref{F1:block} IntCal block). It can be used to:

422: 

423: 

424: \noindent i) check the e.m. matching of the components attached at

425: the receiver input. This is done turning on the solid state noise

426: source and sending its signal toward the receiver input. The

427: measured variations of the receiver outputs $\Delta O_{inj}$ and

428: $\Delta O_{ref}$  when the receiver input is, respectively, short

429: circuited or connected to the device under test, give the {\it

430: power reflection coefficient} $r^2 = {\Delta O_{ref}/\Delta

431: O_{inj}}$ ({\it reflectometer mode}).

432: 

433: \noindent ii) check the receiver gain sending the noise generator

434: signal into the receiver ({\it internal calibration mode}).

435: 

436: \noindent iii) set to a known level the effective temperature

437: $T_{RX}^{eff}$ of the noise the receiver radiates toward the

438: antenna. This is the {\it effective noise temperature}

439: $T_{N}^{eff}$ of the load at the third port of the circulator (see

440: Equation (\ref{eq:Teff}) and Figure \ref{F1:block}). When this

441: load is cooled at liquid helium temperature (see below)

442: $T_{RX}^{eff}$ can be of few tens of K.

443: 

444: The internal calibrator and the reflectometer are used for regular

445: checks of the radiometer performance during the observations.

446: Cross checks are made on site with a scalar network analyzer.

447: 

448: \subsection{Receivers} \label{receiver}

449: TRIS receivers are standard heterodyne chains with double

450: frequency conversion, total gain of $\sim 100$ dB, used in total

451: power configuration (see Figure \ref{F1:block} and Table

452: \ref{tab5}). The frequency of the Local Oscillator LO1 can be

453: adjusted digitally (see Figure \ref{F1:block}) so one can tune the

454: observing channel among 256 adjacent frequencies separated by

455: $\Delta\nu$, symmetrically distributed around the system nominal

456: frequency $\nu_o$. $\Delta\nu$ is 75 KHz at 0.6 and 0.82 GHz,

457: spanning a range of 20 MHz, and 750 KHz at 2.5 GHz, over a range

458: of 200 MHz. The integration bandwidth is 0.3 MHz at 0.60 and 0.82

459: GHz and 3 MHz at 2.5 GHz one.

460: 

461: The post detection integration time constant is 10 sec. After

462: integration the receiver output is sampled and digitally converted

463: every 4 sec. Each sampled value, the housekeeping data and the

464: time signal are written in a record and stored on the hard disk of

465: the Personal Computer which drives the local oscillator LO1. The

466: time signals arrive from a master clock locked to radio signals

467: regularly transmitted by I.E.N. Galileo Ferraris in Turin. The

468: same clock drives the computer clock and guides the observational

469: sequence. To avoid digital noise the 20-bit AD converter is

470: integrated into the detector channel and data are transmitted via

471: optocoupler to the data recording system.

472: 

473: \par Measurements in total power configuration can be affected

474: by gain instabilities. To compensate for them the receiver

475: detection channel includes zero-bias Schottky diodes and

476: temperature stabilization of the DC section (active control with

477: accuracy better than $0.1~^{\circ}C$). The receiver temperature is

478: set at stable values ( $\pm 0.1~^{\circ}C$) chosen between

479: $25~^{\circ}C$ and $35~^{\circ}C$ for excursions of the external

480: temperature from well below zero up to the preset value (usually

481: $+35~^{\circ}C$). Gain variations can be monitored and, when

482: necessary, recovered looking at the amplitude of the internal

483: calibrator signal (see below). They are usually small ($\leq 2 \%

484: $) except in rare occasions during observations around the local

485: noon when clear sky and no breeze may bring the external

486: temperature of the receiver box above the preset value. When this

487: situation occurs data are rejected.

488: 

489: 

490: \section{Observations}

491: Between 1990 and 1993 prototypes of the three radiometers and

492: antennas were installed at Campo Imperatore (lat. =$42^o~ 26'$ N,

493: long.= $13^o~ 33'$ E), a plateau 2000 m a.s.l.. The site is

494: reasonably shielded against unwanted signals from the horizon by a

495: circle of low elevation mountains (see Figure \ref{F3:horiz}).

496: Served by road in summer and by cable car in winter, the site is

497: on the vertical of the underground Laboratori Nazionali del Gran

498: Sasso (LNGS) which provided logistical support. This accommodation

499: is a reasonable compromise between ideal places not easily

500: accessible (like Antarctica)  or isolated places with no

501: facilities available (like White Mt. (California) or Alpe Gera

502: (Italian Alps)) we used in the past.

503: 

504: Various tests were made at Campo Imperatore between 1991 and 1995.

505: They showed that in spite of the mountain circle, interferences

506: from horizon directions were occasionally present and forced us to

507: observe only at the zenith. The final installation of TRIS

508: radiometers was made between summer 1997 and summer 1998. After

509: repeated observations dedicated to find clean frequency channels,

510: differential measurements (drift scans) began. They continued in

511: 1999 when tests of the cryogenic front ends were completed.

512: Absolute measurements of the sky temperature were made in June and

513: October 2000. Drift scans were then resumed and continued until

514: May 2001 when antennas were removed from Campo Imperatore.

515: 

516: 

517: \subsection{Modes of operation} \label{modes}

518: \par Three modes of operation have been used with TRIS:

519: 

520: \par{\it Interference Search Mode}. The PC drives the Local Oscillator

521: and tunes cyclically the receiver  through the 256 frequencies

522: distributed around the receiver nominal frequency $\nu_o$ (10

523: minutes/channel). Simple statistics (mean and standard deviation)

524: have been used to recognize channels disturbed by interferences

525: and to choose quiet channels where observations were possible.

526:   Searches lasting at least 24 h were repeated at various epochs.

527: At 0.6 and 0.82 GHz we found frequencies free from interferences.

528: The best were 0.6005 and 0.8178 GHz. At 2.5 GHz no frequency

529: completely free from interferences was found. The best one was

530: 2.4278 GHz. These frequencies are those used for the final

531: observations in both the following modes.

532: 

533: \par {\it Absolute Measurement Mode}. The antenna is aimed at the

534: zenith. The horn throat is attached to the collar of the cryogenic

535: front end. A couple of hour after filling (or partial refilling)

536: with LHe, the system is in thermal equilibrium and observations

537: are possible. Moving the switch manually the receiver input is

538: cyclically connected to the Cold Source (receiver output

539: $S_{cold}$), the Antenna (receiver output $S_{sky}$) and the Warm

540: Source (receiver output $S_{warm}$). Each step of the cycle lasts

541: 10 minutes during which 15 records/minute are stored on the PC

542: hard disk. Each record contains $S_x$, UT time, Julian day,

543: temperature of loads and lossy components between switch and

544: antenna mouth, housekeeping data. The cycle of three steps is

545: repeated few times then the switch is set on the Antenna position

546: and observation goes on for about one hour recording $S_{sky}$. At

547: regular time intervals the solid state noise source is set on and

548: data necessary to check gain stability and power reflection

549: coefficients $r^2$ of the source at the receiver input are

550: recorded. \newline \noindent Absolute measurements are made only

551: at nighttime, when the observing conditions are good and the dewar

552: full of LHe well above the top of the waveguide coaxial

553: transition. At 0.6 GHz observations with the Cryogenic Waveguide

554: went on regularly. At 0.82 GHz we began observation in June using

555: the Cryogenic Front End but the dewar failed because of a leakage

556: in the vacuum tank. We fixed it but in October, when after the

557: 0.6 GHz run we moved at 0.82 GHz, the dewar failed again and we

558: had no possibility to fix it again before leaving Campo

559: Imperatore. So at 0.82 GHz we have only absolute measurements made

560: as preliminary tests in June, using the cryogenic switch cooled

561: with liquid helium and the completely warm antenna. This system

562: worked very efficiently, but because all the horn components,

563: including the waveguide-coaxial transition, were at ambient

564: temperature, final results at 0.82 GHz are less accurate than at

565: 0.6 GHz.\newline \noindent The absolute measurements at 2.5 GHz

566: with the Cryogenic Waveguide went on regularly but were plagued by

567: interferences.

568: 

569: 

570: \par {\it Drift Scan Mode}. Records with $S_{sky}$ and the

571: associated information are stored continuously every 4 sec while

572: the sky transits through the antenna beam aimed at the zenith. In

573: this mode we look at the variations of $S_{sky}$ with Right

574: Ascension and do not care of the signal zero level, provided it is

575: stable. The antenna can be attached to the dewar (no matter if

576: cold or warm) with the switch on position 2 or attached directly

577: to the receiver via an ambient temperature coaxial-waveguide

578: transition. Gain stability and antenna power reflection

579: coefficient are measured automatically two times per hour. In this mode

580: the radiometers can work unattended for weeks. Because data

581: collected at daytime and more noticeably around noon are usually

582: contaminated by the sun emission, to cover the entire

583: $(0^h~-~24^h)$ Right Ascension interval drift scans are repeated

584: months apart. \newline \noindent Drift scan data were collected

585: during the entire lifetime of TRIS. The more systematic

586: observations were made from 1998 on. At 0.6 and 0.82 GHz they are

587: sufficient to cover the entire 24 h circle of Right Ascension at

588: $\delta = +42^{\circ}$. At 2.5 GHz the great majority of the

589: observations were disturbed by interferences and no complete drift

590: scans were obtained.

591: 

592: 

593: \subsection{Data Reduction} \label{datared}

594: 

595: First of all the raw data collected in Absolute or Drift Scan mode

596: are {\em edited}. We reject all the records containing data

597: obtained:

598: \par i) at daytime (between half an hour before sunrise and half an hour

599: after sunset);

600: \par ii) less than six hour after the receiver was turned on;

601: \par\noindent or when

602: \par iii) interferences were evident on the records;

603: \par iv) the log book shows that the weather conditions were bad (rain,

604: snow);

605: \par v) the antenna reflection coefficients $r^2$ monitored by the receiver internal

606: reflectometer worsened (e.g because of water vapor condensation on

607: the antenna components at sunrise or sunset);

608: \par vi) the system gain or the noise level change or fluctuate by more than

609: $5 \%$.

610: 

611: The remaining  data are then divided in blocks, continuous time

612: series of homogeneous records, lasting at least 10 minutes. A

613: block starts when the switch is set in a position (or when drift

614: scan mode starts) and stops when the switch is moved to a new

615: position or whenever a major interruption of the time series

616: occurs.

617:  We call them {\it Absolute Sky, Cold, Warm} and {\it Drift Scan} or

618: {\it Differential} blocks (or records, or data), depending on the

619: observing mode and/or the switch position. Typical block lengths

620: are 5-20 minutes for absolute data. The blocks of differential

621: data can last hours.

622: 

623: Then we remove all the data collected in the first minute of a

624: block time series (to account for the response time of the system)

625: and continuous time series of differential data lasting less than

626: three hours and separated from the following homogeneous block of

627: data used for analysis by more than one hour.

628: 

629: Finally for each record we calculate and add to it $(\alpha,

630: \delta)$ of the antenna beam axis calculated from the recorded

631: values of time and Julian day, the effective noise temperatures

632: radiated by the receiver ~$T_{RX}^{eff}$ {\footnote{When loads are

633: well matched in Eq. (\ref{eq:Teff}) we can set $r^2\simeq 0$, get

634: the effective temperature of the circulator third port

635: $T_{N}^{eff}$ and set it equal to ~$T_{RX}^{eff}$. Then we repeat

636: the calculation of the effective noise temperature of the

637: circulator third port  as seen at the switch and use this value as

638: final $T_{RX}^{eff}$} and the effective noise temperatures of Cold

639: Load, Warm Load and Circulator third Port, respectively,

640: $T_{cold}^{eff}$, $T_{warm}^{eff}$ and $T_{N}^{eff}$ using

641: (Equation (\ref{eq:Teff})).

642: 

643: The resulting blocks are the data ready to be analyzed. They are

644: treated in different ways, depending on their type.

645: 

646: \subsection{Absolute values of sky temperature} \label{absmeas}

647: 

648: From pairs of time adjacent blocks of {\it cold} and {\it warm

649: data} the gain $G$ is obtained using Equation (\ref{eq:gain}) and

650: the average  values of $S_{cold}, T^{eff}_{cold}, S_{warm}$ and

651: $T^{eff}_{warm}$ on the block. Typical values are shown in Table

652: \ref{tab5}.

653: 

654: Then from each value of $S_{sky}$ in a {\it sky} block and $G$

655: from the nearest pair of {\it cold} and {\it warm} data we get the

656: instantaneous value of the signal temperature which arrives at the

657: switch:

658: \begin{equation}

659: T_{a,sw} = T^{eff}_{cold}+(S_{sky}-S_{cold}) G

660: \label{eq:Tainst}

661: \end{equation}

662: 

663: The system linearity, i.e. the stability of G and its independence

664: on the signal level, have been checked during all the calibration

665: campaigns, by looking at the amplitude of the Calibration Mark

666: (CM) when injected over very different level of signals: Cold Load

667: (He), Sky and Warm Load. It is worth to underline that the CM

668: provides an equivalent temperature in the same range of the

669: maximum variation of antenna temperature measured by our

670: experiment (about 20 K, 14 K and 1 K at 0.6, 0.82 and 2.5 GHz

671: respectively). CM amplitude was constant within statistical

672: fluctuations, setting a $0.4 \%$ upper limit to the deviation from

673: system linearity.

674: 

675: The antenna temperature at the horn mouth is then

676: \begin{equation}

677: T_{a}(\alpha,\delta) = \frac{1}{1 - r^2}\Biggl [\Biggl(

678: {\frac{T_{a,sw}-\int_0^{\tau_{tl}}{T_{tl}(x)e^{-\tau_{tl}(x)}d\tau}}

679: {e^{-\tau_{tl}}e^{-\tau_h}}}-\frac{\int_{0}^{\tau_{h}}

680: {T_{h}(x)e^{-\tau_{h}(x)}d\tau}}{e^{-\tau_{h}}}\Biggr) ~-~ r^2

681: T_{RX}^{eff}~\Biggr ] \label{eq:Tant}

682: \end{equation}

683: 

684: Here $T_{tl}$, $\tau_{tl}$, $T_h$ and $\tau_h$ are the

685: temperatures and the optical thicknesses of the lossy components

686: along the transmission line ($tl$) and the horn sections ($h$)

687: between the switch and the antenna aperture.

688: 

689: \subsubsection{\it Sky Temperature} \label{skytemp}

690: 

691: The sky brightness temperature is then:

692: \begin{equation}

693: T_{sky}(\alpha,\delta,\nu) = \Bigl[

694: {\frac{T_{a}(\alpha,\delta,\nu)-T_{RX}r^2}{1 -

695: r^2}}-T_{atm}^{0}(1-e^{-\tau_{atm}})-T_{env}\Bigr]/e^{-\tau_{atm}}

696: \label{eq:Tsky}

697: \end{equation}

698: 

699: \noindent where $\tau_{atm}$ and $T_{atm}^{0}$ are the optical

700: thickness and the average physical temperature of the atmosphere

701: above the antenna, $T_{env}$ the noise temperature of the

702: environment which reaches the antenna, usually through side and

703: back lobes, $T_{RX}^{eff}$ the temperature of the noise radiated

704: by the radiometer and $r^2$ the power reflection coefficient of

705: the antenna.

706: 

707: At nighttime, when the Sun contamination is absent, $T_{env} = T_{ground}+T_{inter}$ where $T_{ground}$,

708: the effect of the ground thermal emission, is the convolution of

709: $P_n(\theta,\phi)$, the normalized, three dimensional, beam

710: profile (see Figure \ref{F2:beam}) and a blackbody at ambient

711: temperature $T_{0}$, which fills the antenna beam up to $h(\phi)$,

712: the Campo Imperatore horizon profile, (see Figure \ref{F3:horiz}):

713: \begin{equation}

714: T_{ground} =

715: T_{0}~\int_{0}^{2\pi}d\phi\int_{0}^{h(\phi)}P_n(\theta,\phi)\sin

716: (\theta) d\theta  \label{eq:Tgr}

717: \end{equation}

718: 

719: \noindent $T_{inter}$ is the noise produced by radio

720: interferences. At 0.6 and 0.82 GHz channels free from

721: interferences were found (0.6005 GHz and 0.8178 GHz). Here the

722: interferences, if present, were completely buried in the system

723: noise. At 2.5 GHz also in the best channel at 2.4278 GHz, even when no

724: sudden changes of level were appreciable, the signal was unstable

725: and the noise anomalously high, probably because of a blend of

726: undesired signal from artificial sources at the horizon or below

727: it. This contribution has been measured surrounding the antenna

728: with ground shields which went well above the horizon visible from

729: the antenna mouth and reflected all the side and back lobes on the

730: sky.

731: 

732: For the atmospheric contributions we use values of absorption

733: calculated for various sites, including Campo Imperatore, by

734: \cite{Ajello1995} from a collection of vertical profiles of the

735: earth atmosphere collected for one year with sounding balloons

736: launched daily at meteo stations. Results are shown in Table

737: \ref{tab6}.

738: 

739:  The above values of $T_{sky}$, $T_a$,

740: $T_{a,sw}$ are oversampled because the TRIS sampling time (4 sec)

741: is shorter than the system time constant (10 sec). To make them

742: statistically independent  in each {\it sky block} data are binned

743: in groups of at least 50 sec and averaged. The average values and

744: standard deviations of $T_{sky}$ in a bin are considered

745: representative of the absolute brightness temperature of the sky

746: at ($<\alpha>$, $<\delta>$) only if they come from a block close

747: {\em (few tens of minutes)} to the pair of {\it cold} and {\it

748: warm} data used to get $G$ and $T^{eff}_{cold}$. This because $G$

749: and $T^{eff}_{cold}$ are helium level dependant and the level is

750: practically constant within this period of time.

751: 

752: \subsection{Drift scans of the sky temperature} \label{driftscan}

753: The edited time series of {\it drift scans} data are from

754: observations made in separate years at different times of the

755: year, in different conditions.

756: \par\noindent

757: During the drift-scan mode observations, every component of the

758: radiometers was at ambient temperature, with the receivers always

759: operating in a temperature controlled box. In this configuration,

760: the data were taken continuously for months. We decided to reject

761: daytime data. Moreover, bad weather conditions and interferences

762: didn't allow us to exploit all the night-time data collected,

763: therefore it took more than one year to cover all the

764: $\delta=+42^{\circ}$ sky circle since the last TRIS configuration

765: (antennas in vertical position, receivers in total power

766: configuration) was established. We combined data taken at

767: different times by virtue of the internal and stable noise source

768: (CM), whose signal was periodically (two times every 48$^m$) injected

769: towards the antenna port of the circulator in order to check the

770: SWR (\emph{reflectometer mode}) and, after that, towards the

771: receiver port as a calibration mark\footnote{The calibration mark

772: is the value above the noise floor of the signal injected by the

773: noise generator, expressed in analog-to-digital units (ADU). The

774: gain is properly the conversion factor K/ADU.}. In this way, we

775: could associate a value of the CM to every set of observations.

776: The different sets were then normalized to the reference CM

777: measured during absolute calibrations. We have been able to find

778: time sequences of good data (good weather conditions, no radio

779: interferences) lasting more than 48 hours. This allowed to compare

780: nighttime data separated up to two sidereal days and correct for

781: linear drifts of the signal (if present). The nighttime data,

782: corrected for drift and renormalized by means of the CM, have been

783: seamed at common RA. Integration of all the nighttime profiles

784: acquired during the life of the experiment gives the final

785: profile. Its scale, in ADU and arbitrary zero level, was then

786: converted to temperature scale and zero adjusted fitting the

787: profile to the absolute values of sky temperature measured during

788: calibration sessions. The reconstruction of the full sky profiles

789: at 0.6 GHz and 0.82 GHz deserves some other comments. The

790: calibration mark signals have a very small dispersion, witnessing

791: the stability of the system all along the observational campaign.

792: In fact the sample collected during several months at 0.6 GHz had

793: a mean value around 24000 ADU, while the mean standard deviation

794: set around 20 ADU. The corresponding quantities at 0.82 GHz were

795: respectively 19500 ADU and 30 ADU.

796: 

797: \noindent The error budget on the two definitive profiles at 0.6

798: and 0.82 GHz are then dominated by the uncertainties due to the

799: correction for the linear drifts and offsets and by the

800: uncertainty in the determination of the temperature scale. In

801: particular, along the galactic halo region ($8^h \lesssim \alpha

802: \lesssim 16^h$), which has been observed redundantly, the

803: definitive uncertainty upon temperature variations are in the

804: range $5 - 10$ mK both at 0.6 GHz and 0.82 GHz, depending on the

805: sky position (this uncertainty rises to $30 - 40$ mK near the

806: galactic plane, where we have collected a smaller number of drift

807: scans).

808: 

809: By this procedure we recover the full dynamic of the celestial

810: signal up to the antenna mouth and above the earth atmosphere.

811: Results are shown in Figure \ref{F5:TRISfinal}. This procedure

812: worked successfully at 0.6 and 0.82 GHz. At 2.5 GHz the

813: construction of drift scan profile was hampered by the

814: interference level which frequently covered the sky signal. The

815: few observing hours when interferences were small are so sparse

816: that we couldn't build a clean drift scan profile.

817: 

818: \section{Discussion}\label{Discussion}

819: The absolute values of $T_{sky}(\alpha,\delta)$ measured by TRIS

820: at 0.6005 GHz, 0.8178 GHz and 2.4278 GHz, at selected points of

821: constant declination $+42^{\circ}$ are listed in Tables

822: \ref{tab7}, \ref{tab8} and \ref{tab9}. The same data are plotted

823: in Figure \ref{F5:TRISfinal} together with the drift scans (0.6

824: GHz and 0.82 GHz are reported in Tables \ref{tab10} and

825: \ref{tab11}). Having no reliable drift scan at 2.5 GHz, we built a

826: profile only of the galactic component starting from the Stockert

827: \cite[]{Reich1986} survey at 1.420 GHz. This map has been

828: convoluted to the beam of the TRIS antennas in order to get the

829: synthetic drift scan at $\delta =+42^\circ$. Then we compared this

830: scan with the pure galactic signal we evaluated at 0.6 and 0.82

831: GHz (see Papers II and III). Using these measurements we evaluated

832: the galactic emission first at 1.420 GHz and then extrapolated it

833: at 2.5 GHz, using the local spectral index evaluated between 0.6

834: and 0.82 GHz. We used the local spectral index because it is a

835: well defined quantity throughout all the sky provided that

836: absolute galactic emissions measurements are available, which is

837: our case. We used the map at 1.42 GHz because it is the closest

838: one, public domain, at the frequency 2.5 GHz. In Figure

839: \ref{F5:TRISfinal} at 2.5 GHz, for uniformity with the measured

840: sky profiles plotted at 0.6 and 0.82 GHz, we added over the TRIS

841: absolute sky temperatures a profile (dashed line) obtained summing

842: to the galactic component calculated as described above, the

843: Unresolved Extragalactic Radio Sources contribution

844: \cite{Gervasi2008b} and Cosmic Microwave Background

845: \cite{Gervasi2008a}.

846: 

847: The systematic uncertainties are computed propagating through

848: Equation (\ref{eq:Tant}) and (\ref{eq:Tsky}) the uncertainties on

849: the measured values of attenuation and temperature of the lossy

850: components between the switch and the antenna mouth. The losses are very small. In some cases they are so small that

851: measurements give only upper limits (see Table \ref{tab4}) and the range of

852: fluctuation of the true losses is unknown but reasonably smaller and well

853: inside the upper limit, set by the accuracy of the instrumentation used to

854: carry on the measurements. The final uncertainties on the sky temperature obtained

855: propagating these errors are therefore considered as systematic.

856: At 0.6 GHz the great majority of the components is cold ($\sim 4$

857: K) and the final systematic uncertainty is small (66 mK). At 2.5

858: GHz the systematic uncertainty is worse because of the quality of

859: the e.m. matching of the SPTT switch and the presence of an

860: additional section of warm waveguide between the dewar flange and

861: the antenna throat. This correction contributes to the systematics

862: for 284 mK. At 0.82 GHz the systematic uncertainty is very large,

863: 660 mK, essentially because all the components above the switch

864: were warm and at high temperature (see Equation

865: \ref{eq:DeltaTnoise}). Such a large value, however, does not take

866: into account constraints set by unphysical situations (e.g.

867: negative values of the temperature of the diffuse radiation

868: components and values of the galactic spectral index not supported

869: by models of galactic emission). When astrophysical assumptions

870: are made on these values (for a complete discussion see Paper III)

871: the systematic uncertainty at 0.82 GHz is reduced to

872: $(^{+430}_{-300})$ mK.

873: 

874: The above results hold if the sky radiation is unpolarized. We

875: know however that the galactic component of $T_{sky}$ is partially

876: polarized and that polarization is linear. Since antennas are

877: polarized, our measured values of the sky temperature are better

878: written as

879: \begin{equation}

880: T_{sky}(\alpha,\delta,\nu) = T_{CMB}(\nu) + T_{uers}(\nu) +

881: T_{gal}^{unpol}(\alpha,\delta,\nu) +

882: T_{gal}^{pol}(\alpha,\delta,\nu)~\cos^2 [\theta(\alpha,\delta,\nu)

883: - \theta_0] \label{eq:Tpol}

884: \end{equation}

885: 

886: \par\noindent where $T_{gal}^{unpol}$ and $T_{gal}^{pol}$ are

887: respectively the unpolarized and polarized components of the

888: galactic signal, and ($\theta - \theta_0$) is the angle between

889: the polarization vector of the radiation and the polarization

890: vector of the antenna.

891: \par\noindent The true sky temperature is therefore

892: \begin{equation}

893: T_{sky}^{true}(\alpha,\delta,\nu) =

894: T_{sky}^{unpol}(\alpha,\delta,\nu) +

895: T_{sky}^{pol}(\alpha,\delta,\nu) = T_{sky}(\alpha,\delta,\nu) +

896: \Delta T^{pol}(\alpha,\delta,\nu) \label{eq:Ttrue}

897: \end{equation}

898: \par\noindent where

899: \begin{equation}

900: \Delta T^{pol}(\alpha,\delta,\nu) =

901: T_{gal}^{pol}(\alpha,\delta,\nu)~\sin^2 [\theta(\alpha,\delta,\nu) -

902: \theta_0] \label{eq:DeltaT}

903: \end{equation}

904: \par\noindent is the signal lost. Were circular

905: polarization present, an additional term should be added to

906: Equation (\ref{eq:Ttrue}).

907: 

908: The information today available on the polarization degree and

909: direction of the diffuse radiation is limited. We do not expect

910: circular polarization. Linear polarization on the contrary must be

911: expected but the information available is poor. Below 1 GHz there

912: are only data obtained thirty years ago by \cite{Brouw1976}. The

913: assessment of the overall sky temperature has been obtained

914: correcting our absolute measurements for the fraction of the

915: linearly polarized signal. In order to do this we used the Brouw

916: and Spoelstra maps of the Stokes Parameters Q$\&$U in the

917: resampled version prepared by E.Carretti in the framework of the

918: SPOrt program \cite{Cortiglioni 2004}. Carretti maps having

919: 7$^\circ$ resolution, were further convolved with the beam of our

920: experiment. Then, considering the relative orientation of the

921: polarization plane (E-plane) of our antennas and the polarization

922: of the celestial signal, we projected the polarized vector into

923: Copolar (collected by our antennas) and Crosspolar components

924: (rejected by our antennas). We conclude that, at TRIS angular resolution, the maximum

925: contribution of the polarized signal to the overall one, around

926: 2$\%$ at 0.6 GHz and $3\%$ at 0.82 GHz, comes mostly from regions

927: far from the galactic disk. This result is in agreement with

928: Platania et al. (1998) who gives a maximum contribution of $\sim

929: 5\%$ at 0.408 GHz with a $18^\circ$ beam in a sky region very close

930: to the one scanned by TRIS. A detailed discussion can be found in

931: Paper III. Between 1 and 3 GHz more recent and accurate data are

932: available (see for instance

933:  \cite{Duncan1991}, \cite{Wolleban2006} and references therein), but with

934: few exception they do not fill all the areas covered by TRIS

935: scans. Full sky models of the galactic synchrotron intensity and

936: linear polarization prepared for feasibility studies of

937: forthcoming space experiments (e.g. \cite{Giardino2002},

938: \cite{Bernardi2003}) are available. However we preferred to

939: evaluate the polarized component starting from real data acquired

940: at frequencies close to the TRIS ones. Considering that at 2.5 GHz

941: with the TRIS angular resolution

942: $(T_{gal}/T_{sky})\simeq(T_{gal}/T_{CMB})\leq 0.1$ and $T_{gal}^{pol}

943: \leq T_{gal}$, we can assume also at 2.5 GHz $(\Delta

944: T^{pol}/T_{sky}^{true})<0.02$.

945: 

946: In conclusion, neglecting the polarization effects is equivalent

947: to introduce an additional systematic uncertainty on the true

948: values of the sky temperature of less than $3\%$ (see Table

949: \ref{tab12}).

950: 

951: Table \ref{tab13} gives a list of measurements of $T_{Sky}$

952: present in literature at frequencies comparable to the frequencies

953: used by TRIS, the value of the derived $T_{CMB}$ and the

954: associated uncertainties for $T_{Sky}$ and $T_{CMB}$. All the

955: values of $T_{Sky}$ have been obtained as intermediate steps of

956: experiments aimed at getting the CMB temperature, so papers

957: usually focus the reader attention on the accuracy $\sigma_{CMB}$

958: of $T_{CMB}$. The accuracy $\sigma_{sky}$ of $T_{sky}$ should be

959: better ($\sigma_{sky}~<~\sigma_{CMB}$) but extracting it from

960: papers it is not always possible.  When no detailed information is

961: available in literature we assume $\sigma_{sky} ~\leq~

962: \sigma_{CMB}$. It appears that at 0.6 and 0.82 GHz the TRIS

963: absolute values of the sky temperature are the best today

964: available. At 2.5 GHz TRIS results are less accurate than data

965: obtained in the past by us with the White Mt. and the South Pole

966: collaborations. Nevertheless we report also the TRIS results at

967: 2.5 GHz because they came exactly from the same direction and have

968: been obtained with the same angular resolution of our observation

969: at lower frequencies.

970: 

971: \noindent TRIS data can be used to

972: 

973: \noindent i) disentangle the components of the diffuse radiation,

974: 

975: \noindent ii) extract the cosmological and astrophysical

976: information carried by these components,

977: 

978: \noindent iii) improve zero level and scale of temperature of the

979: full sky maps of the diffuse radiation at decimetric wavelength in

980: literature (see Tables \ref{tab1} and \ref{tab2}).

981: 

982: These types of analysis are intricate and require different

983: approaches, depending on the final aim: astrophysical or

984: cosmological conclusion. They are done in separate Papers II

985: \cite{Gervasi2008a}, III \cite{Tartari2008} and

986: \cite{Gervasi2008b} which accompany present Paper I. Here (Table

987: \ref{tab14}) we present a summary of the results discussed in the

988: cited papers. We have reduced the error bars on $T_{CMB}$ of a

989: factor 9 at $\nu=0.6$ GHz and of a factor 7 at $\nu=0.82$ GHz.

990: These results have been possible because of the improvements in

991: the absolute calibration system and in the foregrounds separation

992: technique. At 2.5 GHz TRIS did not improve the previous

993: measurements, but is in agreement with them.

994: 

995: 

996: \acknowledgments  {\bf Acknowledgements}: The TRIS activity has

997: been supported by MIUR (Italian Ministry of University and

998: Research), CNR (Italian National Council of Research) and the

999: Universities of Milano and of Milano-Bicocca. The logistic support

1000: at Campo Imperatore was provided by INFN, the Italian Institute of

1001: Nuclear Physics, and its Laboratorio Nazionale del Gran Sasso. We

1002: are indebted with E. Carretti who provided us a low resolution

1003: polarized map based on the Brouw and Spoelstra one. We are also

1004: grateful to R. Nesti for some crucial simulations of the horn

1005: attenuations. We acknowledge the contributions and comments by

1006: many peoples, among them G. Bonelli, A. Grillo, C. Cattadori, G.

1007: De Amici, E. Pagana, G. Navarra, of members of the LNGS technical

1008: staff A. Fulgenzi, G. Adinolfi , L. Masci, G. Giuliani. Frequently

1009: students who were preparing their thesis for the degree in Physics

1010: took part to TRIS activities. We acknowledge the use of the

1011: HEALPix package \cite{Gorski2005} to evaluate the polarized

1012: galactic signal at 0.610 and 0.82 GHz.

1013: 

1014: %\clearpage

1015: \begin{thebibliography}{}

1016: \bibitem[Ajello et al. 1995]{Ajello1995} Ajello, C., Bonelli, G.,

1017: Sironi, G., 1995, \apjs ~96, 643

1018: \bibitem[Bensadoun et al. 1992]{Bensadoun1992} Bensadoun, M., Witebsky, C., Smoot, G., de Amici, G.,

1019: Kogut, A., Levin, S., 1992, RScI 63, 4377-4389

1020: \bibitem[Bensadoun et al. 1993]{Bensadoun1993} Bensadoun, M., Bersanelli, M.,

1021: de Amici, G., Kogut, A., Levin, S.~M., Limon, M., Smoot, G.~F.

1022: Witebsky, C., 1993, \apj, 409, 1

1023: \bibitem[Berkhuijsen 1972]{Berkhuijsen1982} Berkhuijsen, E.M., 1972, \aap, ~5, 263

1024: \bibitem[Bernardi et al. 2003]{Bernardi2003} Bernardi, G., Carretti,

1025: E., Cortiglioni, S., Sault, R.J., Kesteven, M.J., Poppi, S. 2003,

1026: \apj, ~594, L5

1027: \bibitem[Bersanelli et al. 1993]{Bersanelli1993} Bersanelli, M., Bonelli,G., Sironi, G. et al., 1993,

1028: Antarctic Journal XXVIII, 306

1029: \bibitem[Bersanelli et al. 1994]{Bersanelli1994} Bersanelli, M., Bensadoun, M., de Amici, G.,

1030: Levin, S., Limon, M., Smoot, G. F., Vinje, W., 1994, \apj 424, 517

1031: \bibitem[Brouw \& Spoelstra 1976]{Brouw1976} Brouw, W.N. and

1032: Spoelstra, T.A.T., 1976, A\&A Suppl., ~26, 129

1033: \bibitem[Burigana et al. 1991]{Burigana1991} Burigana, C. and Danese, L. and de Zotti, G., 1991, \aap, 246,

1034: 49B

1035: \bibitem[Cortiglioni et al. 2004]{Cortiglioni 2004} Cortiglioni, S. et al., 2004, \na, 9, 297

1036: \bibitem[Duncan et al. 1999]{Duncan1991} Duncan, A.R., Reich, P.,

1037: Reich, W., Fuerst, E., 1999, \aap, ~350, 447

1038: \bibitem[Fixsen \& Mather 2002]{Fixsen2002} Fixsen, D.J \& Mather, J.C. 2002,

1039: \apj, ~581, 817

1040: \bibitem[Gervasi et al. 2008a]{Gervasi2008a} Gervasi, M., Zannoni, M., Tartari, A.,

1041: Boella, G., Sironi, G., 2008a, \apj, {\em submitted}

1042: \bibitem[Gervasi et al. 2008b]{Gervasi2008b} Gervasi, M., Tartari, A., Zannoni, M.,

1043: Boella, G., Sironi, G., 2008b, \apj, {\em in press},

1044: arXiv:0803.4138v1

1045: \bibitem[Giardino et al. 2002] {Giardino2002} Giardino, G., Banday, A.J., Gorsky,

1046: K.M., Bennet, K., Jonas, J.L., Tauber, J.,  2002, \aap ~387, 82

1047: \bibitem[Gorski et al. 2005]{Gorski2005} Gorski, K.~M., Hivon, E., Banday,

1048: A.~J., Wandelt, B.~D., Hansen, F.~K., Reinecke, M., Bartelmann,

1049: M., 2005, \apj, 622, 759

1050: \bibitem[Haslam et al. 1982]{Haslam1982} Haslam, C.~G.~T., Salter, C.~J., Stoffel, H. and

1051: Wilson, W.~E., 1982, \aaps, ~47, 1

1052: \bibitem[Howell \& Shakeshaft 1967]{Howell1967} Howell, T.F. \& Shakeshaft,

1053: J.R., 1967, Nature, 216, 7

1054: \bibitem[Jonas et al. 1998]{Jonas1998} Jonas, J., Baart, E.E. and

1055: Nicolson, G.D., 1998, MNRAS, ~297, 977

1056: \bibitem[Kogut et al. 2004]{Kogut2004} Kogut,.a., Fixsen, D.J.,

1057: Levin, S., Limon, M., Lubin, P.M., Mirel, P., Seiffert, M. and

1058: Wollack, E. 2004, \apj Suppl. ~154, 493

1059: \bibitem[Kogut et al. 2006]{Kogut2006} Kogut, A., Fixsen, D., Fixsen, S., Levin, S., Limon, M., Lowe,

1060: L., Mirel, P., Seiffert, M., Singal, J., Lubin, P., Wollack, E.,

1061: 2006, \nar, 50, 925

1062: \bibitem[Landecker \& Wielebinsky 1970]{Landecker1970} Landecker,

1063: T.L. \& Wielebinsky, R., 1970, Austr. J. Phys. Suppl., ~16, 1

1064: \bibitem[Mather et al. 1994]{Mather1994} Mather, J. C. et al,

1065: 1994, \apj ~420, 439

1066: \bibitem[Milogradov-Turin 1984]{Milogradov1984} Milogradov-Turin, J.,

1067: 1984, \mnras, ~161, 269

1068: \bibitem[Otoshi \& Stelzried 1975]{Otoshi1975} Otoshi, T.Y. \& Stelzried,

1069: C.T., 1975, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 24, 174

1070: \bibitem[Pelyushenko \& Stankevich 1969]{Pelyushenko1969} Pelyushenko, S.A. and Stankevich, K.S., 1969, Sov. Ast. 13, 223

1071: \bibitem[Platania et al.(1998)]{Platania1998} Platania, P., Bensadoun, M., Bersanelli, M., De Amici, G., Kogut, A., Levin, S., Maino, D. \& Smoot, G.F.,

1072: 1998, \apj, 505, 473

1073: \bibitem[Platania et al. 2003]{Platania2003} Platania, P., Burigana, C.,

1074: Maino, D., Caserini, E., Bersanelli, M., Cappellini, B. and

1075: Mennella A., 2003, \aap, ~410, 847

1076: \bibitem[Reich \& Reich 1986]{Reich1986} Reich, P. \& Reich, W., 1986, \aap S, 63, 205

1077: \bibitem[Roger et al. 1999]{Roger1999} Roger, R.S., Costain, C.H., Landecker, T.L. \& Swerdlyk, C.M., 1999, \aaps, 137,7

1078: \bibitem[Salvaterra \& Burigana 2002]{Salvaterra2002} Salvaterra, R. \& Burigana, C. 2002,

1079: \mnras, 336, 592

1080: \bibitem[Sironi et al. 1990]{Sironi1990} Sironi, G., Limon, M.,

1081: Marcellino, G., Bonelli, G., Bersanelli, M., Conti, G., Reif, K,

1082: 1990, \apj 357, ~301

1083: \bibitem[Sironi et al. 1991]{Sironi1991} Sironi, G., Bonelli, G.,

1084: Limon, M., 1991, \apj, ~378, 550

1085: \bibitem[Sironi et al. 1999]{Sironi1999} Sironi, G., Boella, G.,

1086: Bonelli, G., Gervasi, M., Vaccari, A. and Zannoni, M., 1999, AIP

1087: Conf.Proc., ~476, 149

1088: \bibitem[Smoot et al. 1985]{Smoot1985} Smoot, G.F., De Amici, G.,

1089: Friedman, S.D. et al., 1985, \apj, ~291, L23

1090: \bibitem[Stankevich et al. 1970]{Stankevich1970} Stankevich,

1091: K.S., Wielebinski, R., Wilson, W.E., 1970, Australian J. Phys.,

1092: ~23, 529

1093: \bibitem[Tartari et al. 2008]{Tartari2008} Tartari, A., Zannoni, M., Gervasi, M.,

1094: Boella, G., Sironi, G., 2008 \apj, {\em submitted}

1095: \bibitem[US Standard Atmosphere 1976]{US_STANDARD_ATMOSPHERE_1976}

1096: US Standard Atmosphere. 1976, US GPO, 1976 O-599-256

1097: \bibitem[Wolleben et al. 2006]{Wolleban2006} Wolleben, M., Landecker,

1098: T. L., Reich, W., Wielebinski, R., 2006, A\&A, 448, 411

1099: \bibitem[Zannoni et al. 1999]{Zannoni1999} Zannoni, M., Boella, G.,

1100: Bonelli, G., Cavaliere, F., Gervasi, M., Lagostina, A., Passerini

1101: A., Sironi, G. and Vaccari, A., 1999, AIP Cof. Proc., ~476, 165

1102: \end{thebibliography}

1103: 

1104: 

1105: 

1106: \clearpage

1107: 

1108: \begin{figure}[b]

1109: \begin{center}

1110: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.75]{f1.eps}

1111: \caption{Block diagram of TRIS Radiometers  ~H = corrugated Horn,

1112: ~LN = Low Noise Amplifier,  ~LO1, LO2 = Local Oscillators,  ~M1,

1113: M2 = mixers, ~PLL = Phase Locked Loop, ~~${\bf \tau}$ = system

1114: time constant, ~ADC = analog to digital converter, ~PC = Personal

1115: Computer, ~RxClock = Radio Clock,  ~ExtCal = External Calibrator,

1116: (WL = {\it warm Load}, ~CL = {\it Cold Load}, ~SPTT = {\it

1117: switch}), ~IntCal = Internal calibrator ~( C = {\it Circulator},

1118: ~DC = {\it Directional Coupler}, ~NG ={\it Noise Generator})}

1119: \label{F1:block}

1120: \end{center}

1121: \end{figure}

1122: 

1123: \begin{figure}[b]

1124: \begin{center}

1125: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.50]{f2.eps}

1126: \caption{Beam of TRIS antennas measured on a geometrically scaled

1127: model at 8.2 GHz (continuous line: H-plane, dotted line:

1128: E-plane)}\label{F2:beam}

1129: \end{center}

1130: \end{figure}

1131: 

1132: \begin{figure}[b]

1133: \begin{center}

1134: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.50]{f3.eps}

1135: \caption{Horizon profile at Campo Imperatore}\label{F3:horiz}

1136: \end{center}

1137: \end{figure}

1138: 

1139: \begin{figure}[b]

1140: \begin{center}

1141: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.50]{f4.eps}

1142: \caption{A schematic view of the Cryogenic External Calibrator (WG

1143: 1 = anticorodal waveguide section, WG 2, WG 3 = stainless steel

1144: waveguide sections, Wind. 1 = polyethylene window, Wind. 2 =

1145: fluorglass windows, WGT = brass coax-waveguide transition, SPTT =

1146: Single Pole Triple Throw switch, WL = warm dummy load, CL = cold

1147: dummy load; see also Table \ref{tab4} and text)} \label{F4:dewar}

1148: \end{center}

1149: \end{figure}

1150: 

1151: \begin{figure}[b]

1152: \begin{center}

1153: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=1.0]{f5.eps}

1154: \caption{Absolute values and differential profiles of $T_{sky}$

1155: measured by TRIS  at $\delta = +42^{\circ}$, ~($0~\leq \alpha

1156: \leq~24$). Uncertainties (3$\sigma$ statistic + systematic)

1157: associated to the absolute values are indicated: to make them

1158: visible at 0.60 GHz the error bars have been enlarged by a factor

1159: 10. The zero level of the differential profiles has been adjusted

1160: to fit the distribution versus $\alpha$ of the absolute values. At

1161: 2.50 GHz the plotted sky profile (dashed line) doesn't come from

1162: TRIS data but it has been obtained rescaling the sky profile

1163: extracted from the Stockert \cite{Reich1986} survey at 1.4 GHz. See Paper III

1164: for details.}\label{F5:TRISfinal}

1165: \end{center}

1166: \end{figure}

1167: 

1168: 

1169: \clearpage

1170: \input{tab1.tex}

1171: 

1172: \clearpage

1173: \input{tab2.tex}

1174: 

1175: \clearpage

1176: \input{tab3.tex}

1177: 

1178: \clearpage

1179: \input{tab4.tex}

1180: 

1181: \clearpage

1182: \input{tab5.tex}

1183: 

1184: \clearpage

1185: \input{tab6.tex}

1186: 

1187: \clearpage

1188: \input{tab7.tex}

1189: 

1190: \clearpage

1191: \input{tab8.tex}

1192: 

1193: \clearpage

1194: \input{tab9.tex}

1195: 

1196: \clearpage

1197: \input{tab10.tex}

1198: 

1199: \clearpage

1200: \input{tab11.tex}

1201: 

1202: \clearpage

1203: \input{tab12.tex}

1204: 

1205: \clearpage

1206: \input{tab13.tex}

1207: 

1208: \clearpage

1209: \input{tab14.tex}

1210: 

1211: 

1212: \end{document}

1213: