1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2005 December 5
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21:
22: %%\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
23:
24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
25:
26: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
27:
28: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
29: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
30: %% use the longabstract style option.
31:
32: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
33:
34: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
35: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
36: %% the \begin{document} command.
37: %%
38: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
39: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
40: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
41: %% for information.
42:
43: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
44: %\newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
45:
46: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
47:
48: %\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
49:
50: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
51: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
52: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
53: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
54: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
55: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
56:
57: \shorttitle{A Massive Evolved Galaxy at $z$ = 1.26}
58: \shortauthors{Matsuoka et al.}
59:
60: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
61: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
62:
63: \begin{document}
64:
65: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
66: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
67: %% you desire.
68:
69: \title{Optical to Near-IR Spectrum of a Massive Evolved Galaxy \\ at $z$ = 1.26}
70:
71: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
72: %% author and affiliation information.
73: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
74: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
75: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
76: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
77:
78: \author{Y. Matsuoka\altaffilmark{1,2}, B. A. Peterson\altaffilmark{3}, S. Oyabu\altaffilmark{4},
79: K. Kawara\altaffilmark{1}, N. Asami\altaffilmark{1}, \\ H. Sameshima\altaffilmark{1}, N. Ienaka\altaffilmark{1},
80: T. Nagayama\altaffilmark{5}, and M. Tamura\altaffilmark{6}}
81: %T. Nagayama\altaffilmark{5}, T. Nagata\altaffilmark{5},
82: %E. Elson\altaffilmark{6,7}, C. Koen\altaffilmark{8}, and others}
83:
84: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
85: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
86: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
87: %% affiliation.
88:
89:
90: \altaffiltext{1}{Institute of Astronomy, The University of Tokyo, 2-21-1, Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-0015, Japan;
91: matsuoka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp.}
92: \altaffiltext{2}{Research Fellow of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.}
93: \altaffiltext{3}{Mount Stromlo Observatory, Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Australian National University,
94: Weston Creek P.O., ACT 2611, Australia.}
95: \altaffiltext{4}{Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, Sagamihara, Kanagawa
96: 229-8510, Japan.}
97: \altaffiltext{5}{Department of Astronomy, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan.}
98: \altaffiltext{6}{National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 2-21-1, Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan.}
99: %\altaffiltext{6}{South African Astronomical Observatory, Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa.}
100: %\altaffiltext{7}{Mathematics Department, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa.}
101: %\altaffiltext{8}{Department of Statistics, University of the Western Cape, Private Bag X17, Bellville, 7535 Cape, South Africa.}
102:
103: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
104: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
105: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
106: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
107: %% editorial office after submission.
108:
109: \begin{abstract}
110: We present the optical to near-infrared (IR) spectrum of the
111: galaxy TSPS J1329$-$0957, a red and bright member of the class of
112: extremely red objects (EROs) at $z$ = 1.26. This galaxy was found in the
113: course of the Tokyo-Stromlo Photometry Survey (TSPS) which we
114: are conducting in the southern sky.
115: The spectroscopic observations were carried out with the Gemini
116: Multi-Object Spectrograph (GMOS) and the Gemini Near Infra-Red
117: Spectrograph (GNIRS) mounted on the Gemini-South telescope.
118: The wide wavelength coverage of 0.6 -- 2.3 $\mu$m provides useful
119: clues as to the nature of EROs while most published spectra
120: are limited to a narrower spectral range which is dictated by
121: the need for efficient redshift determination in a large
122: survey. We compare our spectrum with several optical composite
123: spectra obtained in recent large surveys, and with stellar
124: population synthesis models.
125: The effectiveness of using near-IR broad-band data, instead of
126: the spectral data, in deriving the galaxy properties are also investigated.
127: We find that TSPS J1329$-$0957 formed
128: when the universe was 2 -- 3 Gyr old, and subsequently evolved
129: passively to become one of the most massive galaxies found in
130: the $z$ = 1 -- 2 universe. Its early type and estimated stellar mass
131: of $M_{*} = 10^{11.5} M_{\odot}$ clearly point to this galaxy being a
132: direct ancestor of the brightest elliptical and spheroidal
133: galaxies in the local universe.
134: \end{abstract}
135:
136: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
137: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
138: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
139: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
140:
141: \keywords{galaxies: evolution --- galaxies: formation --- galaxies: high-redshift --- galaxies: individual (TSPS J1329$-$0957)
142: --- galaxies: stellar content --- infrared: galaxies}
143:
144: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
145: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
146: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
147: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
148: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
149: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
150: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
151: %% each reference.
152:
153:
154: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
155: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so by tagging
156: %% their objects with \objectname{} or \object{}. Each macro takes the
157: %% object name as its required argument. The optional, square-bracket
158: %% argument should be used in cases where the data center identification
159: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper. The text appearing
160: %% in curly braces is what will appear in print in the published paper.
161: %% If the object name is recognized by the data centers, it will be linked
162: %% in the electronic edition to the object data available at the data centers
163: %%
164: %% Note that for sources with brackets in their names, e.g. [WEG2004] 14h-090,
165: %% the brackets must be escaped with backslashes when used in the first
166: %% square-bracket argument, for instance, \object[\[WEG2004\] 14h-090]{90}).
167: %% Otherwise, LaTeX will issue an error.
168:
169: \section{Introduction\label{sec:intro}}
170:
171: The formation and evolution of massive (stellar mass $M_* > 10^{11} M_{\odot}$) galaxies represent
172: one of the key issues in understanding the whole picture of mass assembly in the universe.
173: This class of objects is believed to correspond to the local early-type galaxies, i.e., ellipticals and spheroidals,
174: constituting the brightest end of the luminosity function.
175: They are predicted to form gradually with time through merging of smaller subsets in the hierarchical
176: structure formation scenario based on the $\Lambda$ cold dark matter (CDM) model \citep[e.g.,][]{white78, cole94}.
177: While the $\Lambda$CDM model can successfully reproduce the large scale structure of galaxies,
178: %a difficulty comes out
179: difficulties appear
180: when it deals with smaller systems such as individual galaxies.
181: Although the hierarchical scenario predicts the time of appearance of the most massive galaxies at $z \sim 1$,
182: there is growing evidence that fully assembled galaxies exist at $z >1$ \citep[e.g.,][]{dunlop96, spinrad97,
183: daddi04, fontana04, glazebrook04, cimatti04, saracco05}.
184: They are largely passively evolving, early-type galaxies containing old stellar populations
185: %and passively evolving
186: \citep[e.g.,][]{yan03, yan04, mccarthy04, mignoli05, longhetti05}.
187: The alternative scenario of mass assembly is represented by the monolithic model, in which galaxies are
188: formed in a single collapse and star burst, and subsequently evolve passively \citep[e.g.,][]{larson74,
189: tinsley77, bruzual80}.
190: In this framework even the most massive galaxies could exist in very early universe.
191: While both the hierarchical and monolithic scenarios are consistent with the observations in the local universe,
192: their differences should become evident at $z > 1$.
193: Recently \citet{conselice07} showed that the observed mass growth of massive galaxies from $z = 2$ to
194: $z = 0$ is significantly different from the prediction of the Millennium Simulation \citep{lemson06, delucia06} based
195: on the $\Lambda$CDM model.
196:
197:
198: Thus motivated by their
199: % irreplaceable
200: unique importance, the massive galaxies beyond redshift $z = 1$
201: have been a subject of
202: extensive studies over the last decade.
203: Several large survey programs have been completed or are ongoing,
204: %which include
205: such as
206: the Gemini Deep Deep Survey \citep[GDDS;][]{abraham04}, the K20 Survey \citep{cimatti02}, and others
207: \citep[e.g.,][]{doherty05, saracco05, roche06}.
208: The $z > 1$ massive galaxies exhibit very red optical to near-IR colors, either due to evolved stellar populations, or
209: severe reddening in case of dusty starbursts, and they
210: %are often recognized as
211: form a class of
212: extremely red objects \citep[EROs;][]{elston88}.
213: This ERO nature is commonly utilized to pick up the objects from multi-color photometry catalogs for
214: subsequent
215: spectroscopy, usually carried out in the red-visible (0.6 -- 0.9 $\mu$m) light, to obtain the objects' redshifts
216: \citep[e.g.,][]{mccarthy04b}.
217:
218:
219: While the recent studies have been achieving great successes in revealing the mass assembly history out to the redshift
220: $z >$ 2, and placing significant constraints on the galaxy formation scenarios, one should be aware of the fact that most
221: of these works are based on optical spectroscopic observations supplemented with near-IR broad-band photometry, usually fitted
222: with the spectral energy distribution (SED) models constructed from the local galaxy populations.
223: It is based on the implicit assumption that the optical
224: to IR SED, and its evolution with age, of the $z > 1$ galaxies are well represented by those of local counterparts.
225: However, such an assumption has not yet been observationally confirmed due to the lack of the data with sufficiently large (i.e., from
226: optical to near- or mid-IR) spectral coverage.
227: The same shortage of the data has prevented the empirical-template method to be used in the analysis of the observed
228: (spectral or broad-band) SEDs in wide wavelength ranges.
229: Although recent works based on the large surveys have constructed some composite spectra by stacking all the obtained data,
230: such composites have an apparent disadvantage in that different parts of the spectra are represented by systematically different
231: galaxy populations, e.g., blue part by the high-redshift objects and red part by the low-redshift objects.
232: Thus, the accumulation of the observations and analysis of wide spectral regions for individual galaxies are definitely needed at this
233: stage in order to make comprehensive studies of the massive galaxy population existing at $z > 1$.
234:
235:
236: In this paper we report the first example of that kind of data, a red-visible to near-IR (0.6 -- 2.3 $\mu$m) spectrum of the massive evolved galaxy
237: TSPS J1329$-$0957 at $z$ = 1.26.
238: It has been discovered in the course of the Tokyo-Stromlo Photometry Survey (TSPS) which we are conducting in
239: the high galactic-latitude sky observed from the southern hemisphere.
240: Introduction of the TSPS, target selection, and the observations and reductions of the optical and near-IR spectra are detailed in \S \ref{sec:obs}.
241: We present in \S \ref{sec:char} the reduced spectrum which is compared to optical composite spectra generated in the past surveys and to
242: stellar population synthesis models.
243: %They
244: Our comparisons
245: reveal the basic properties of TSPS J1329$-$0957 as a representative of passively-evolving galaxies found in the $z$ = 1 -- 2 universe.
246: The effectiveness of using near-IR broad-band data, instead of the spectral data, in deriving the galaxy properties are also investigated.
247: Finally a brief summary appears in \S \ref{sec:summary}.
248: Throughout this paper we use the Vega magnitude system and a standard cosmology of $H_{\rm 0}$ = 70 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$, $\Omega_{\rm M}$ = 0.3, and
249: $\Omega_{\Lambda}$ = 0.7.
250:
251:
252: \section{Observations\label{sec:obs}}
253:
254: %% In a manner similar to \objectname authors can provide links to dataset
255: %% hosted at participating data centers via the \dataset{} command. The
256: %% second curly bracket argument is printed in the text while the first
257: %% parentheses argument serves as the valid data set identifier. Large
258: %% lists of data set are best provided in a table (see Table 3 for an example).
259: %% Valid data set identifiers should be obtained from the data center that
260: %% is currently hosting the data.
261: %%
262: %% Note that AASTeX interprets everything between the curly braces in the
263: %% macro as regular text, so any special characters, e.g. "#" or "_," must be
264: %% preceded by a backslash. Otherwise, you will get a LaTeX error when you
265: %% compile your manuscript. Special characters do not
266: %% need to be escaped in the optional, square-bracket argument.
267:
268:
269: \subsection{Target Selection: the Tokyo-Stromlo Photometry Survey}
270:
271: The Tokyo-Stromlo Photometry Survey (TSPS) is a multi-color ($IZJHK_s$) photometry survey of the high galactic-latitude ($| b | > 30^{\circ}$) sky
272: observed from the southern hemisphere.
273: The main targets of the survey are bright extra-galactic sources.
274: It has been developed by the collaboration of teams in The University of Tokyo and in the Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics,
275: The Australian National University (ANU).
276: The survey is divided into two parts; the $I$- and $Z$-band survey observation and the near-IR (usually $JHK_s$-band) follow-up photometry.
277:
278: The $IZ$-band survey started in 2003.
279: More than 1000 deg$^2$ has been observed to date in photometric conditions using the Wide Field Imager (WFI) on the ANU 40-inch Telescope and
280: the drift-scan camera on the United Kingdom Schmidt Telescope (UKST), both located at the ANU's Siding Spring Observatory (SSO).
281: Observations with the WFI are carried out under the typical seeing condition of around 2\arcsec\ while the pixel scale of the camera, with the
282: configuration of 2 $\times$ 2 pixel binning, is 0.76\arcsec/pixel.
283: The standard 5$\sigma$ limiting magnitudes are $I_{\rm Vega}$ = 21.4 and $Z_{\rm Vega}$ = 20.5.
284: The performance and data products of the drift-scan camera on the UKST are currently under examination.
285: To date over 150 nights have been devoted to the $IZ$-band survey.
286:
287:
288: Parts of the surveyed fields are subsequently observed in the near-IR ($JHK_s$) bands
289: for the purpose of discovering high-redshift ($z > 5.7$) quasars.
290: We aim at exploring various aspects of the early universe such as the growth of super massive black holes related to
291: galaxy formation \citep[e.g.,][]{magorrian98, haring04}, the re-ionization of intergalactic medium by means of the Gunn-Peterson trough
292: \citep[e.g.,][]{gunn65, loeb01, fan06}, and star formation activity traced by chemical-abundance analysis \citep[e.g.,][]{hamann93, kawara96, yoshii98,
293: matsuoka05, matsuoka07, matsuoka08, tsuzuki06}.
294: Two telescopes/instruments are mainly used for the near-IR observations; the Cryogenic Array Spectrometer/Imager (CASPIR) on the ANU 2.3-m Advanced
295: Technology Telescope at the SSO, and the SIRIUS camera \citep{nagashima99, nagayama03} on the Infrared Survey Facility (IRSF) 1.4m telescope located
296: at Sutherland, South African Astronomical Observatory.
297: The sky conditions of the CASPIR observations are similar to those of the WFI observations while the pixel scale of the camera is 0.5\arcsec/pixel.
298: On the other hand, typical seeing of the SIRIUS observations, with the pixel scale of 0.453\arcsec/pixel, is around 1\arcsec.
299: 5$\sigma$ limiting magnitudes range from ($J$, $H$, $K_s$)$_{\rm Vega}$ = (20.0, 19.4, 18.1) to (20.7, 20.1, 18.8) depending on the apparent
300: brightness of the high-redshift quasar candidates in the surveyed field\footnote{
301: Magnitudes in the near-IR bands are expressed in 2MASS photometric system throughout this paper.
302: See Nakajima, Y. et al., in preparation, for the conversion of magnitudes and colors between IRSF/SIRIUS and 2MASS systems.}.
303: All the near-IR observations are carried out in photometric conditions.
304: We have devoted another 150 nights, so far, to the near-IR observations.
305: The main features and results of the TSPS project will be presented in detail in forthcoming papers (e.g., Asami, N., et al., in preparation).
306:
307:
308: TSPS J1329$-$0957 has been discovered at R.A. 13:29:44.52, Decl. $-$09:57:29.8 (J2000.0) in a TSPS field owing to its extremely red color.
309: The $IZ$-band images were obtained with the WFI on 2005 February while the $JHK_s$ images were taken with the SIRIUS on 2006 March.
310: Its apparent magnitudes, measured within the 4.5\arcsec\ aperture, are $I$ = 21.7, $Z$ = 20.9, $J$ = 19.7, $H$ = 18.6, and $K_s$ = 17.6.
311: Since its color and magnitudes ($I-K_s$ = 4.1 and $K_s$ = 17.6) clearly show that TSPS J1329$-$0957 is a fairly red and bright member of EROs
312: \citep[$R-K > 5.3$ or $I-K > 4$; see also, e.g., Fig. 6 of][]{abraham04},
313: we decided to obtain its optical to near-IR spectrum in order to further investigate its nature.
314: The $I$- and $J$-band images of the galaxy are shown in Figure \ref{findchart}.
315:
316:
317: \subsection{Optical Spectroscopy}
318:
319: The optical spectrum of TSPS J1329$-$0957 was obtained on 2007 February 18 with the Gemini Multi-Object Spectrograph
320: \citep[GMOS;][]{hook04} mounted on the Gemini-South telescope\footnote{
321: This work is based on observations obtained at the Gemini Observatory, which is operated by the
322: Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under a cooperative agreement
323: with the NSF on behalf of the Gemini partnership: the National Science Foundation (United
324: States), the Science and Technology Facilities Council (United Kingdom), the
325: National Research Council (Canada), CONICYT (Chile), the Australian Research Council
326: (Australia), CNPq (Brazil) and SECYT (Argentina).}
327: (Program ID: GS-2007A-Q-14).
328: The R400\_G5325 grating was used with the RG610\_G0331 filter,
329: at two slightly different central wavelengths (791.0 nm and 794.0 nm) in
330: order to fill the CCD gaps.
331: A slit width of 1.0\arcsec\ was used in average seeing of 0.8\arcsec.
332: This configuration gives a wavelength coverage of 0.6 -- 1.0 $\mu$m and a resolution of $R \sim 1000$.
333: The object was dithered along the slit in the classical A-B-B-A pattern for better sky subtraction.
334: The total exposure time was 3.5 hours, constituting 32 400-sec exposures.
335:
336: Data reduction was performed in a standard manner using the GEMINI.GMOS package within the reduction software IRAF\footnote{IRAF
337: is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatories, which are operated by the Association of Universities for Research
338: in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.}.
339: Wavelength calibration was established using CuAr arc spectra.
340: The sensitivity function along the dispersion axis was obtained from the observed spectrum of the white dwarf EG 274,
341: taken with the same instrumental configuration as the target observations.
342: The calibrated spectrum of EG 274 and the atmospheric extinction data at the Cerro Tololo Inter-American
343: Observatory contained in the IRAF database were used to calculate the sensitivity function.
344: Since the galaxy possibly exhibits an extended feature whose morphology is dependent on the observed wavelength,
345: though the morphology in the $IZ$-band images is not very clear due to the poor seeing ($\sim$2\arcsec) of the WFI observations
346: (see Fig. \ref{findchart}), aperture correction is not expected to be achieved properly by referring to the spectroscopic standard star.
347: We assumed the wavelength dependence of the slit loss of the form $\lambda^{-\alpha}$ where the power index $\alpha$ was determined so
348: that the final spectral slope is consistent with the broad-band $I-Z$ color obtained from the imaging observations ($\alpha$ = 3.5).
349: While the choice of function shape is rather arbitrary, it is the simplest form, and we found that, as shown below, the
350: resultant optical spectrum is completely consistent with the composite spectra obtained in past surveys.
351: Finally the calibration for absolute flux scale was obtained from the broad-band photometric data.
352:
353:
354: \subsection{Near-IR Spectroscopy}
355:
356: The near-IR spectrum of TSPS J1329$-$0957 was obtained during 4 nights in 2007 February and March (Program ID: GS-2007A-Q-14).
357: The Gemini Near Infra-Red Spectrograph \citep[GNIRS;][]{elias98} mounted on the Gemini-South telescope was used in the cross-dispersed mode,
358: which covers 0.9 -- 2.5 $\mu$m simultaneously.
359: The average seeing was 0.6\arcsec.
360: The adopted 31.7 l/mm grating and 1.0\arcsec\ slit with the short (0.15\arcsec/pixel) camera give a resolving power of $R \sim 500$.
361: Two off-source (sky) positions were observed by slightly offsetting the telescope perpendicular to the slit in order to obtain sky spectra
362: which were used for subtracting sky emission from the object frames.
363: Total exposure time on source is 2.0 hours constituting of 16 450-sec exposures.
364:
365: Data reduction was carried out with the GEMINI.GNIRS package within the IRAF in a standard manner.
366: Distortion and wavelength calibrations were achieved with the pinhole and Ar arc spectra, respectively.
367: The A0V- and F0V-type stars, HIP 63109 and HIP 63151, were observed as telluric standard stars to which blackbody spectra
368: with appropriate temperatures were fitted in order to calculate the sensitivity along the dispersion axis.
369: The additional aperture correction described in the previous section were not applied since the galaxy shows fairly concentrated shapes
370: with spatial profiles similar to those of nearby stars in the $JHK_s$ bands.
371: The spectral slope beyond $\sim$1.2 $\mu$m agrees with the broad-band $J-H$ and $H-K$ colors within the measurement errors.
372: We do not use the GNIRS spectrum at wavelengths shorter than $\sim$1.2 $\mu$m since the appropriate broad-band (e.g., $Y$-band) imaging
373: data is not available for checking the slit loss.
374: As in the optical spectrum, the calibration of the absolute flux scale was obtained from the broad-band photometric data.
375:
376:
377:
378: \section{Results and Discussion\label{sec:char}}
379:
380: \subsection{Reduced Spectrum}
381:
382: The reduced GMOS and GNIRS spectrum is shown in Figures \ref{full_spec} and \ref{composites} ({\it black}).
383: The \ion{Ca}{2} HK absorption lines are clearly detected, giving the redshift of this object as $z$ = 1.26.
384: There are the absorption features at the expected positions of \ion{Mg}{2} $\lambda$2800 and \ion{Mg}{1} $\lambda$2852, though the data quality
385: is rather poor around these features since they are near the detector edge.
386: No other single absorption or emission lines can be identified while some broad features are in common with the composite spectra of
387: past surveys and/or with the model predictions as shown below.
388: The detection of \ion{Ca}{2} HK lines and absence of any strong emission features such as [\ion{O}{2}] $\lambda$3727, as well as the overall SED,
389: clearly indicate that TSPS J1329$-$0957 is an old, passively-evolving galaxy whose light is dominated by evolved stellar population.
390: Considering its redshift and $K_s$-band brightness ($K_s$ = 17.6 mag), this ERO is likely to be among the most massive
391: galaxies with a stellar mass M$_{*}$ exceeding 10$^{11.5}$ M$_{\odot}$.
392: Hereafter we reveal some basic properties of the galaxy through comparisons with the optical composite spectra obtained in recent large
393: surveys and with the stellar population synthesis (SPS) models.
394:
395:
396: \subsection{Comparison with the Optical Composite Spectra\label{sec:optcomp}}
397:
398: In Figure \ref{composites} we compare the optical spectrum of TSPS J1329$-$0957 with the composite spectra
399: generated from the K20 early-type galaxies \citep[{\it red};][]{mignoli05}, the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Luminous Red Galaxies
400: (LRGs) at $z$ = 0.30 -- 0.35 \citep[{\it green};][]{eisenstein03}, and the local early-type galaxies ({\it blue}) compiled by \citet{mannucci01}.
401: Each spectrum has been scaled in accordance with the flux at the wavelength interval 0.34 -- 0.36 $\mu$m and is expressed in the rest frame.
402: The overall feature of the spectra blueward of $\sim$4000 \AA\ are remarkably similar in spite of the systematic difference in the redshifts of galaxies
403: constituting the composites, i.e., mean redshift $<z>$ = 0.75 for the K20 galaxies, $z$ = 0.30 -- 0.35 for the SDSS LRGs, and
404: $z$ = 0 for the local early types, while $z$ = 1.26 for TSPS J1329$-$0957.
405: It clearly demonstrates the early-type nature of TSPS J1329$-$0957, containing little amount of dust responsible for the reddening of the visible light.
406: %and that dust is not responsible for the reddening of the visible light.
407:
408: On the other hand, a small but clear difference is seen in the 4000 \AA\ break.
409: We show the D4000 index, adopting the definition of \citet{bruzual83}, of various composite spectra and TSPS J1329$-$0957 in Figure \ref{d4000}.
410: The plotted composites are those described above plus those generated from the GDDS early-type galaxies at $z$ = 1.3 -- 1.4, the
411: Las Campanas Infrared Survey (LCIRS) pure early-type galaxies \citep{doherty05}, and the Munich Near-IR Cluster Survey (MUNICS) ``young''
412: early-type galaxy population defined by \citet{longhetti05}.
413: Also shown, are the predictions of the SPS models by the \citet{bc03} code, assuming an exponentially-declining
414: star formation history with the e-folding time $\tau$ = 1.0 Gyr, the metallicity $Z$ = $Z_{\odot}$, 0.4 $Z_{\odot}$ and 0.2 $Z_{\odot}$, and
415: the epoch of the onset of star formation at redshift $z_{\rm f}$ = 7.
416: The figure clearly shows the increase of the observed D4000 index from $z$ = 1.5 toward the local universe, which coincides with the
417: simple galaxy aging represented by the SPS models.
418: The index of TSPS J1329$-$0957 is also on this trend and is consistent with those of the GDDS galaxies and the MUNICS young subsamples within
419: the measurement error.
420: We infer the age of TSPS J1329$-$0957 to be a few Gyr.
421:
422:
423:
424: \subsection{Comparison with the SPS Models\label{sec:sedfit}}
425:
426: \subsubsection{Basic Properties of TSPS J1329$-$0957}
427:
428: Here we compare the overall SED of TSPS J1329$-$0957 with the predictions of SPS models by the \citet{bc03} code.
429: In the model calculations, star formation is assumed to start at $t$ Gyr before the galaxy is observed and subsequently reduce its rate
430: exponentially with the e-folding time $\tau$ Gyr.
431: Dust content is parametrized in terms of the color excess $E_{\rm B-V}$ with the extinction law of \citet{calzetti00}.
432: These parameters are varied over the plausible ranges, i.e., $t$ = 0.01 -- 10.0 Gyr, $\tau$ = 0.01 -- 10.0 Gyr, and $E_{\rm B-V}$ =
433: 0.0 -- 1.0 mag, and the best-fitting model is searched for by the least ${\chi}^2$ method.
434: The total stellar mass of the galaxy is determined through normalization of the model SED.
435: We start with the \citet{salpeter55} initial mass function (IMF) and the solar metallicity ($Z$ = $Z_{\odot}$).
436: Although other sets of calculations adopting the \citet{fitzpatrick99} dust extinction raw or the \citet{chabrier03} IMF were also performed,
437: they provide neither better fits nor significantly different best-fitting results.
438:
439:
440: We show the best-fitting model with the observed spectrum in Figure \ref{full_spec} ({\it green}).
441: The (observed-frame) optical and near-IR parts of the spectrum make similar contributions to the ${\chi}^2$ where it is minimum.
442: As seen in the figure, the overall agreement between the observation and the model is fairly good over the whole wavelength range.
443: The parameter values comprising the best-fitting model are summarized in the first row of Table \ref{sps_params}.
444: They are: $t$ = 2.4$^{+0.2}_{-0.5}$ Gyr, $\tau$ = 0.55$^{+0.10}_{-0.15}$ Gyr, $E_{\rm B-V}$ = 0.06$^{+0.07}_{-0.03}$ mag, and
445: log $M_{*}$ [$M_{\odot}$] = $11.49^{+0.01}_{-0.04}$ where the quoted errors denote 90 \% confidence.
446: The derived age (2 -- 3 Gyr) and dust content ($E_{\rm B-V} \la$ 0.1 mag) are quite consistent with the estimates from D4000 index and
447: from the comparison with the composite spectra of the early-type galaxies as described in the previous section.
448: We have also performed the calculations assuming the sub-/super-solar metallicity ($Z$ = 0.4 $Z_{\odot}$ and 2.5 $Z_{\odot}$) and found that
449: the best-fit age of the galaxy is $\sim$1.5-Gyr older/younger than the original ($Z$ = $Z_{\odot}$) case, which is the consequence of the well-known
450: age-metallicity degeneracy.
451: However, no better fits than the $Z$ = $Z_{\odot}$ case are achieved in these calculations.
452:
453:
454: Thus we conclude that TSPS J1329$-$0957 is very likely to be formed 2 -- 3 Gyr before it was observed, and subsequently evolved passively
455: to become one of the most massive objects found in the $z$ = 1 - 2 universe.
456: Its formation epoch corresponds to the redshift $z_{\rm f}$ = 2.6 when the universe is about 2.5 Gyr old.
457: It is similar to the median formation redshift of the GDDS evolved galaxies studied by \citet{mccarthy04} ($<z_{\rm f}>$ = 2.4)
458: and of the MUNICS young subsamples studied by \citet{longhetti05} ($<z_{\rm f}>$ = 2.3).
459: The early-type nature and the estimated stellar mass of $M_{*} = 10^{11.5} M_{\odot}$ clearly indicate that the galaxy is a direct ancestor of the
460: brightest elliptical and spheroidal galaxies present in the local universe.
461: %Then the D4000 index of TSPS J1329$-$0957, which is smaller than the composite of these galaxies (\S \ref{sec:optcomp}), might imply the presence of
462: %dust-obscured star formation, rather than the young nature of the galaxy.
463: %However, the presence of the star-formation component might conflict with the remarkable similarrity of the optical spectrum of TSPS J1329$-$0957
464: %with the composite spectra of the quiescent early-type galaxies.
465:
466:
467:
468: \subsubsection{Effectiveness of Near-IR Broad-Band Data}
469:
470: Most of the previous studies have utilized optical spectra supplemented with near-IR broad-band photometry in deriving the physical properties of
471: EROs by the SED-model fitting.
472: Thus it is useful to compare the fitting results for such data sets with the above results for the whole (optical and near-IR) spectral data.
473: We first consider the optical spectrum with the $K$ ($K_s$)-band photometry, which is the most common data set used in the ERO studies.
474: The $K_s$-band magnitude was calculated from the GNIRS spectrum and the SIRIUS filter transmission curve.
475: We fitted the SPS-model SEDs to this data set in the same way as described above, and deduced the best-fitting parameters.
476: The results are summarized in the second row of Table \ref{sps_params}; the data set yields smaller $t$, $\tau$ and $E_{\rm B-V}$ than the case of the
477: whole spectral data.
478: The shorter duration of star formation makes the galaxy SED (at a fixed age) redder while the younger age and less dust content make it bluer,
479: thus the overall SED is similar to the case of the whole spectral data.
480: Detailed features in the near-IR spectrum give rise to the difference in the best-fitting parameters for the two data sets.
481: Adding the $J$- and $H$-band photometry to the above data set does not improve the situation (the last row of Table \ref{sps_params});
482: the derived $t$, $\tau$ and $E_{\rm B-V}$ are tend to be even smaller than the previous case.
483: These three parameters are clearly degenerated and the different data sets find the best SED models on the different locations of this ($t$, $\tau$, $E_{\rm B-V}$)
484: degeneracy sequence.
485: On the other hand, the total stellar mass $M_{*}$ is found to be fairly robust.
486: It is consistent with the results of the previous studies \citep[e.g.,][]{conselice07} reporting the robustness of the stellar-mass estimate as opposed
487: to other parameters (galaxy age, star-formation duration, metallicity, etc.) suffering from various degeneracies.
488:
489:
490: We conclude that the optical spectrum supplemented with the near-IR broad-band data provide slightly different view of the target galaxy from
491: those deduced from the whole spectral data.
492: However, the basic classification of the galaxy could be achieved without the near-IR spectrum; the three
493: data sets listed in Table \ref{sps_params} consistently suggest that the galaxy is a few Gyr old system with faded star-formation activity and with
494: little dust. The stellar-mass estimate is fairly robust.
495: We note that the errors of the $JHK_s$ broad-band magnitudes used above have been calculated by appropriately propagating the error of the GNIRS spectrum,
496: which gives 0.05 mag for the $J$ band and 0.03 mag for the $H$ and $K_s$ bands.
497: These are similar to the typical magnitude errors achieved in recent photometric observations.
498: Thus the above data sets of the optical spectrum with the near-IR broad-band photometry well represent those obtained in real observing programs.
499:
500:
501:
502:
503: %In previous studies it is usual to deduce the physical properties of EROs by using optical spectra supplemented with near-IR broad-band data.
504: %Thus it is useful to check whether such a fitting procedure reproduces the results obtained from the optical and near-IR spectral data (denoted as
505: %the data set ``$S_{\rm whole}$'' hereafter) as we derived above.
506: %Two sets of data are considered;
507: %the optical spectrum supplemented with $K$-band photometry (the data set ``$S_{\rm opt}K$'') and the optical spectrum supplemented with $JHK$-band
508: %photometries (the data set ``$S_{\rm opt}JHK$'').
509: %We use the near-IR broad-band magnitudes which are directly calculated from the GNIRS spectrum and the appropriate filter transmission curves,
510: %rather than the magnitudes measured in the IRSF/SIRIUS imaging observation.
511: %It allows us to use precisely the same filter transmission curves for the observed and model data, and also prevents any errors originated from
512: %the slight difference in near-IR colors between the SIRIUS and the GNIRS measurements being contaminated into the comparison of the fitting results
513: %($S_{\rm whole}$ versus $S_{\rm opt}K$ and $S_{\rm opt}JHK$).
514:
515:
516:
517:
518:
519: \section{Summary\label{sec:summary}}
520:
521: We present a Gemini/GMOS and GNIRS spectrum of the galaxy TSPS J1329$-$0957, a red and bright member of the ERO population.
522: It has been discovered in the course of the Tokyo-Stromlo Photometry Survey (TSPS) we are developing in the southern sky.
523: The spectrum covers red-visible to near-IR (0.6 -- 2.3 $\mu$m) wavelength range, providing a useful example to be compared with the same
524: population which has been vigorously discovered in the recent surveys using the 8-m class telescopes and multi-object spectrographs.
525: The \ion{Ca}{2} HK absorption lines are clearly detected, which gives the redshift of the galaxy as $z$ = 1.26.
526: The detection of \ion{Ca}{2} HK lines, the absence of any strong emission features, and the overall SED indicate that the galaxy is an old,
527: passively-evolving system whose light is dominated by an evolved stellar population.
528: We compared the observed spectrum with the predictions of the SPS models and found that the model with
529: age 2 --3 Gyr, little amount of dust ($E_{\rm B-V} \la$ 0.1 mag), and stellar mass $M_{*}$ = $10^{11.5} M_{\odot}$ to best-fit the observations.
530: The inferred properties of the galaxy are supported by the estimate from the D4000 index and by the resemblance of the observed spectrum to several
531: composite spectra of early-type galaxies at $z <$ 1.
532: We also investigated the effectiveness of using near-IR broad-band data, instead of the spectral data, in deriving the galaxy properties.
533: It shows that the optical spectrum supplemented with near-IR broad-band data provide slightly different view of the target galaxy from those deduced
534: from the whole spectral data.
535: However, the basic classification of the galaxy could be achieved without the near-IR spectrum and the stellar-mass estimate is fairly robust.
536:
537:
538: We conclude that TSPS J1329$-$0957 is very likely to have formed 2 -- 3 Gyr before it was observed, and subsequently evolved passively
539: to become one of the most massive objects, of early-type, in the $z$ = 1 - 2 universe.
540: The presence of such a massive galaxy in the early universe might argue against the current representations of the hierarchical formation scenario and
541: might favor the monolithic scenario.
542:
543:
544: %% If you wish to include an acknowledgments section in your paper,
545: %% separate it off from the body of the text using the \acknowledgments
546: %% command.
547:
548: %% Included in this acknowledgments section are examples of the
549: %% AASTeX hypertext markup commands. Use \url without the optional [HREF]
550: %% argument when you want to print the url directly in the text. Otherwise,
551: %% use either \url or \anchor, with the HREF as the first argument and the
552: %% text to be printed in the second.
553:
554:
555: \acknowledgments
556: We are grateful to the referee for giving useful and suggestive comments.
557: We thank the staff of the Siding Spring Observatory, the South African Astronomical Observatory, and
558: the Gemini Observatory for technical support and assistance with the observations.
559: The IRSF/SIRIUS team in Nagoya University, Kyoto University, and National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
560: has provided great help during the IRSF observations.
561: We are especially grateful to T. Nagata for his cooperation.
562: We also thank C. Koen for conducting the follow-up observation of our target.
563: Y. Hamada has contributed greatly to the TSPS project.
564: Y.M. acknowledges grants-in-aid from the Research Fellowships of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
565: (JSPS) for Young Scientists.
566: This work has been supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research
567: (15253002, 17104002) and the Japan-Australia Research Cooperative Program from JSPS.
568:
569:
570: %% To help institutions obtain information on the effectiveness of their
571: %% telescopes, the AAS Journals has created a group of keywords for telescope
572: %% facilities. A common set of keywords will make these types of searches
573: %% significantly easier and more accurate. In addition, they will also be
574: %% useful in linking papers together which utilize the same telescopes
575: %% within the framework of the National Virtual Observatory.
576: %% See the AASTeX Web site at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX
577: %% for information on obtaining the facility keywords.
578:
579: %% After the acknowledgments section, use the following syntax and the
580: %% \facility{} macro to list the keywords of facilities used in the research
581: %% for the paper. Each keyword will be checked against the master list during
582: %% copy editing. Individual instruments or configurations can be provided
583: %% in parentheses, after the keyword, but they will not be verified.
584:
585: %%{\it Facilities:} \facility{Nickel}, \facility{HST (STIS)}, \facility{CXO (ASIS)}.
586:
587: %% Appendix material should be preceded with a single \appendix command.
588: %% There should be a \section command for each appendix. Mark appendix
589: %% subsections with the same markup you use in the main body of the paper.
590:
591: %% Each Appendix (indicated with \section) will be lettered A, B, C, etc.
592: %% The equation counter will reset when it encounters the \appendix
593: %% command and will number appendix equations (A1), (A2), etc.
594:
595:
596: \begin{thebibliography}{}
597: \bibitem[Abraham et al.(2004)]{abraham04} Abraham, R. G., Glazebrook, K., McCarthy, P. J., Crampton, D., Murowinski, R.,
598: J{\o}rgensen, I., Roth, K., Hook, I. M., Savaglio, S., Chen, H., Marzke, R. O., \& Carlberg, R. G. 2004, \aj, 127, 2455
599: %\bibitem[Benitiez(2000)]{benitiez00} Benitiez, N. 2000, \apj, 536, 571
600: %\bibitem[Bolzonella et al.(2000)]{bolzonella00} Bolzonella, M., Miralles, J.-M., \& Pell{\'o}, R. 2000, \aap, 363, 476
601: \bibitem[Bruzual(1983)]{bruzual83} Bruzual, A. G. 1983, \apj, 273, 105
602: \bibitem[Bruzual \& Charlot(2003)]{bc03} Bruzual, G., \& Charlot, S. 2003, \mnras, 344, 1000
603: \bibitem[Bruzual \& Kron(1980)]{bruzual80} Bruzual, A. G., \& Kron, R. G. 1980, \apj, 241, 25
604: \bibitem[Calzetti et al.(2000)]{calzetti00} Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., Kinney, A. L.,
605: Koornneef, J., \& Storchi-Bergmann, T. 2000, \apj, 533, 682
606: \bibitem[Chabrier(2003)]{chabrier03} Chabrier, G. 2003, \pasp, 115, 763
607: \bibitem[Cimatti et al.(2002)]{cimatti02} Cimatti, A., Daddi, E., Mignoli, M., Pozzetti, L., Renzini, A., Zamorani, G.,
608: Broadhurst, T., Fontana, A., Saracco, P., Poli, F., Cristiani, S., D'Odorico, S., Giallongo, E., Gilmozzi, R., \& Menci, N.
609: 2002, \aap, 381, L68
610: \bibitem[Cimatti et al.(2004)]{cimatti04} Cimatti, A., Daddi, E., Renzini, A., Cassata, P., Vanzella, E., Pozzetti, L.,
611: Cristiani, S., Fontana, A., Rodighiero, G., Mignoli, M., \& Zamorani, G. 2004, \nat, 430, 184
612: \bibitem[Cole et al.(1994)]{cole94} Cole, S., Aragon-Salamanca, A., Frenk, C. S., Navarro, J. F.,
613: \& Zepf, S. E. 1994, \mnras, 271, 781
614: %\bibitem[Collister \& Lahav(2004)]{collister04} Collister, A. A., \& Lahav, O. 2004, \pasp, 116, 345
615: \bibitem[Conselice et al.(2007)]{conselice07} Conselice, C. J., Bundy, K., Trujillo, I., Coil, A.,
616: Eisenhardt, P,, Ellis, R. S., Georgakakis, A., Huang, J., Lotz, J., Nandra, K., Newman, J., Papovich, C.,
617: Weiner, B., \& Willmer, C. 2007, \mnras, 381, 962
618: \bibitem[Daddi et al.(2004)]{daddi04} Daddi, E., Cimatti, A., Renzini, A., Vernet, J., Conselice, C., Pozzetti, L.,
619: Mignoli, M., Tozzi, P., Broadhurst, T., di Serego Alighieri, S., Fontana, A., Nonino, M., Rosati, P., \& Zamorani, G.
620: 2004, \apj, 600, L127
621: \bibitem[De Lucia et al.(2006)]{delucia06} De Lucia, G., Springel, V., WHite, S. D. M., Croton, D., \& Kauffmann, G.
622: 2006, \mnras, 366, 499
623: \bibitem[Doherty et al.(2005)]{doherty05} Doherty, M., Bunker, A. J., Ellis, R. S., \& McCarthy, P. J. 2005,
624: \mnras, 361, 525
625: \bibitem[Dunlop et al.(1996)]{dunlop96} Dunlop, J., Peacock, J., Spinrad, H., Dey, A., Jimenez, R., \&
626: Stern, D., Windhorst, R. 1996, \nat, 381, 581
627: \bibitem[Eisenstein et al.(2003)]{eisenstein03} Eisenstein, D. J., et al. 2003, \apj, 585, 694
628: \bibitem[Elias et al.(1998)]{elias98} Elias, J. H., et al. 1998, \procspie, 3354, 555
629: \bibitem[Elston, Rieke \& Rieke(1988)]{elston88} Elston, R., Rieke, G. H., \& Rieke, M. J. 1988, \apj, 331, L77
630: \bibitem[Fan et al.(2006)]{fan06} Fan, X., Carilli, C. L., \& Keating, B. 2006, \araa, 44, 415
631: \bibitem[Fitzpatrick(1999)]{fitzpatrick99} Fitzpatrick, E. L. 1999, \pasp, 111, 63
632: \bibitem[Fontana et al.(2004)]{fontana04} Fontana, A., Pozzetti, L., Donnarumma, I., Renzini, A., Cimatti, A., Zamorani, G.,
633: Menci, N., Daddi, E., Giallongo, E., Mignoli, M., Perna, C., Salimbeni, S., Saracco, P., Broadhurst, T., Cristiani, S.,
634: D'Odorico, S., \& Gilmozzi, R. 2004, \aap, 424, 23
635: \bibitem[Glazebrook et al.(2004)]{glazebrook04} Glazebrook, K., Abraham, R. G., McCarthy, P. J., Savaglio, S., Chen, H.,
636: Crampton, D., Murowinski, R., J{\o}rgensen, I., Roth, K., Hook, I., Marzke, R. O., \& Carlberg, R. G. 2004, \nat, 430, 181
637: \bibitem[Gunn \& Peterson(1965)]{gunn65} Gunn, J. E., \& Peterson, B. A. 1965, \apj, 142, 1633
638: \bibitem[Hamann \& Ferland(1993)]{hamann93} Hamann, F., \& Ferland, G. 1993, \apj, 418, 11
639: \bibitem[H{\"a}ring \& Rix(2004)]{haring04} H{\"a}ring, N., \& Rix, H.-W. 2004, \apj, 604, L89
640: \bibitem[Hook et al.(2004)]{hook04} Hook, I., J{\o}rgensen, I., Allington-Smith, J. R., Davies, R. L., Metcalfe, N., Murowinski, R. G.,
641: \& Crampton, D. 2004, \pasp, 116, 425
642: \bibitem[Kawara et al.(1996)]{kawara96} Kawara, K., Murayama, T., Taniguchi, Y., \& Arimoto, N. 1996, \apj, 470, L85
643: \bibitem[Larson(1974)]{larson74} Larson, R. B. 1974, \mnras, 166, L585
644: \bibitem[Lemson et al.(2006)]{lemson06} Lemson, G, the Virgo Consortium 2006, preprint (astro-ph/0608019)
645: \bibitem[Loeb \& Barkana(2001)]{loeb01} Loeb, A., \& Barkana, R. 2001, \araa, 39, 19
646: \bibitem[Longhetti et al.(2005)]{longhetti05} Longhetti, M., Saracco, P., Severgnini, P., Della Ceca, R.,
647: Braito, V., Mannucci, F., Bender, R., Drory, N., Feulner, G., \& Hopp, U. 2005, \mnras, 361, 897
648: \bibitem[Magorrian et al.(1998)]{magorrian98} Magorrian, J., Tremaine, S., Richstone, D., Bender, R., Bower, G., Dressler, A., Faber, S. M.,
649: Gebhardt, K., Green, R., Grillmair, C., Kormendy, J., \& Lauer, T. 1998, \aj, 115, 2285
650: \bibitem[Mannucci et al.(2001)]{mannucci01} Mannucci, F., Basile, F., Poggianti, B. M., Cimatti, A.,
651: Daddi, E., Pozzetti, L., \& Vanzi, L. 2001, \mnras, 326, 745
652: \bibitem[Matsuoka et al.(2008)]{matsuoka08} Matsuoka, Y., Kawara, K., \& Oyabu, S. 2008, \apj, 673, 62
653: \bibitem[Matsuoka et al.(2007)]{matsuoka07} Matsuoka, Y., Oyabu, S., Tsuzuki, Y., \& Kawara, K. 2007, \apj, 663, 781
654: \bibitem[Matsuoka et al.(2005)]{matsuoka05} Matsuoka, Y., Oyabu, S., Tsuzuki, Y., Kawara, K., \& Yoshii, Y. 2005, \pasj, 57, 563
655: \bibitem[McCarthy(2004)]{mccarthy04b} McCarthy, P. J. 2004, \araa, 42, 477
656: \bibitem[McCarthy et al.(2004)]{mccarthy04} McCarthy, P. J., et al. 2004, \apj, 614, L9
657: \bibitem[Mignoli et al.(2005)]{mignoli05} Mignoli, M., Cimatti, A., Zamorani, G., Pozzetti, L., Daddi, E.,
658: Renzini, A., Broadhurst, T., Cristiani, S., D'Odorico, S., Fontana, A., Giallongo, E., Gilmozzi, R.,
659: Menci, N., Saracco, P. 2005, \aap, 437, 883
660: \bibitem[Nagashima et al.(1999)]{nagashima99} Nagashima, C., et al. 1999, in Star Formation 1999, ed. T. Nakamoto (Nobeyama:
661: Nobeyama Radio Observatory), 397
662: \bibitem[Nagayama et al.(2003)]{nagayama03} Nagayama, T., Nagashima, C., Nakajima, Y., Nagata, T., Sato, S., Nakaya, H., Yamamuro, T.,
663: Sugitani, K., \& Tamura, M. 2003, \procspie, 4841, 459
664: \bibitem[Roche et al.(2006)]{roche06} Roche, N. D., Dunlop, J., Caputi, K. I., McLure, R., Willott, C. J., \&
665: Crampton, D. 2006, \mnras, 370, 74
666: \bibitem[Salpeter(1955)]{salpeter55} Salpeter, E. E. 1955, \apj, 121, 161
667: \bibitem[Saracco(2005)]{saracco05} Saracco, P., Longhetti, M., Severgnini, P., Della Ceca, R., Braito, V.,
668: Mannucci, F., Bender, R., Drory, N., Feulner, G., Hopp, U., \& Maraston, C. 2005, \mnras, 357, L40
669: \bibitem[Spinrad et al.(1997)]{spinrad97} Spinrad, H., Dey, A., Stern, D., Dunlop, J., Peacock, J., Jimenez, R., \&
670: Windhorst, R. 1997, \apj, 484, 581
671: \bibitem[Tinsley(1977)]{tinsley77} Tinsley, B. M. 1977, \apj, 211, 621
672: \bibitem[Tsuzuki et al.(2006)]{tsuzuki06} Tsuzuki, Y., Kawara, K., Yoshii, Y., Oyabu, S., Tanab\'{e}, T., \& Matsuoka, Y. 2006, \apj, 650, 57
673: \bibitem[White \& Rees(1978)]{white78} White, S. D. M., \& Rees, M. J. 1978, \mnras, 183, 341
674: \bibitem[Yan \& Thompson(2003)]{yan03} Yan, L., \& Thompson, D. 2003, \apj, 586, 765
675: \bibitem[Yan, Thompson \& Soifer(2004)]{yan04} Yan, L., Thompson, D., \& Soifer, B. T. 2004, \aj, 127, 1274
676: \bibitem[Yoshii et al.(1998)]{yoshii98} Yoshii, Y., Tsujimoto, T., \& Kawara, K. 1998, \apj, 507, L113
677: \end{thebibliography}
678:
679: \clearpage
680:
681: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
682: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
683: %% To embed the sample graphics in
684: %% the file, uncomment the \plotone, \plottwo, and
685: %% \includegraphics commands
686: %%
687: %% If you need a layout that cannot be achieved with \plotone or
688: %% \plottwo, you can invoke the graphicx package directly with the
689: %% \includegraphics command or use \plotfiddle. For more information,
690: %% please see the tutorial on "Using Electronic Art with AASTeX" in the
691: %% documentation section at the AASTeX Web site,
692: %% http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX.
693: %%
694: %% The examples below also include sample markup for submission of
695: %% supplemental electronic materials. As always, be sure to check
696: %% the instructions to authors for the journal you are submitting to
697: %% for specific submissions guidelines as they vary from
698: %% journal to journal.
699:
700: %% This example uses \plotone to include an EPS file scaled to
701: %% 80% of its natural size with \epsscale. Its caption
702: %% has been written to indicate that additional figure parts will be
703: %% available in the electronic journal.
704:
705: \begin{figure}
706: \epsscale{0.80}
707: \plotone{f1.eps}
708: \caption{
709: WFI $I$-band ({\it left}) and SIRIUS $J$-band ({\it right}) images
710: of TSPS J1329$-$0957 at the center of the small box.
711: North is up, east to the left.
712: The field is approximately 50\arcsec\ $\times$ 50\arcsec.\label{findchart}
713: }
714: \end{figure}
715:
716:
717: \begin{figure}
718: \epsscale{0.80}
719: \plotone{f2.eps}
720: \caption{The reduced GMOS and GNIRS spectrum of TSPS J1329$-$0957 in the rest frame ({\it black}).
721: The upper axis denotes the observed wavelength.
722: Also shown is the best-fitting SPS model calculated with the \citet{bc03} code ({\it green}; see text).
723: \label{full_spec}}
724: \end{figure}
725:
726:
727:
728: \begin{figure}
729: \epsscale{0.80}
730: \plotone{f3.eps}
731: \caption{The observed spectrum of TSPS J1329$-$0957 in the rest frame ({\it black}) compared with
732: the composite spectra generated from the K20 early-type galaxies ({\it red}), the SDSS LRGs at
733: $z$ = 0.30 -- 0.35 ({\it green}), and the local early-type galaxies ({\it blue}).
734: Dashed lines mark the expected positions of \ion{Mg}{2} $\lambda$2800, [\ion{O}{2}] $\lambda$3727, and \ion{Ca}{2} HK lines.
735: \label{composites}}
736: \end{figure}
737:
738: \begin{figure}
739: \epsscale{0.70}
740: \plotone{f4.eps}
741: \caption{The D4000 index, adopting the definition of \citet{bruzual83}, of various composite spectra and TSPS J1329$-$0954
742: plotted as a function of redshift. The open circle with the error bar represent TSPS J1329$-$0954 while the other symbols
743: represent the composite spectra of the early-type galaxies
744: ({\it filled circle}: the local galaxies, {\it open diamond}: the SDSS LRGs, {\it open squares}: the K20 bright subsamples, {\it filled squares}:
745: the K20 faint subsamples \citep[see][]{mignoli05}, {\it filled triangle}: the LCIRS galaxies,
746: {\it open triangle}: the GDDS galaxies at $z$ = 1.3 -- 1.4, and {\it filled diamond}: the MUNICS ``young'' subsamples).
747: See text for a full description of the references.
748: Three dashed lines show the predictions of the SPS models by the \citet{bc03} code with the metallicity $Z$ = $Z_{\odot}$, 0.4 $Z_{\odot}$,
749: and 0.2 $Z_{\odot}$ from top to bottom, assuming the exponentially-declining star formation with the e-folding time $\tau$ = 1.0 Gyr and a formation
750: epoch (the epoch of the onset of star formation) at redshift $z_{\rm f} = 7$.
751: Dotted lines represent the redshifts corresponding to the galaxy ages of 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 Gyr.\label{d4000}}
752: \end{figure}
753:
754:
755:
756: %% If you are not including electonic art with your submission, you may
757: %% mark up your captions using the \figcaption command. See the
758: %% User Guide for details.
759: %%
760: %% No more than seven \figcaption commands are allowed per page,
761: %% so if you have more than seven captions, insert a \clearpage
762: %% after every seventh one.
763:
764: %% Tables should be submitted one per page, so put a \clearpage before
765: %% each one.
766:
767: %% Two options are available to the author for producing tables: the
768: %% deluxetable environment provided by the AASTeX package or the LaTeX
769: %% table environment. Use of deluxetable is preferred.
770: %%
771:
772: %% Three table samples follow, two marked up in the deluxetable environment,
773: %% one marked up as a LaTeX table.
774:
775: %% In this first example, note that the \tabletypesize{}
776: %% command has been used to reduce the font size of the table.
777: %% We also use the \rotate command to rotate the table to
778: %% landscape orientation since it is very wide even at the
779: %% reduced font size.
780: %%
781: %% Note also that the \label command needs to be placed
782: %% inside the \tablecaption.
783:
784: %% This table also includes a table comment indicating that the full
785: %% version will be available in machine-readable format in the electronic
786: %% edition.
787:
788: \clearpage
789:
790:
791: \begin{table}
792: \begin{center}
793: \caption{Best-Fitting SPS Model Parameters\label{sps_params}}
794: \begin{tabular}{lcccc}
795: \tableline\tableline
796: Data Set & Age $t$ [Gyr] & $\tau$ [Gyr] & $E_{\rm B-V}$ [mag] & log $M_*$ [$M_{\odot}$]\\
797: \tableline
798: Optical spec. + NIR spec. & $2.4^{+0.2}_{-0.5}$ & $0.55^{+0.10}_{-0.15}$ & $0.06^{+0.07}_{-0.03}$ & $11.49^{+0.01}_{-0.04}$\\
799: Optical spec. + $K_s$ phot. & $1.6^{+0.4}_{-0.3}$ & $0.01^{+0.31}_{-0.01}$ & $0.00^{+0.02}_{-0.00}$ & $11.46^{+0.02}_{-0.04}$\\
800: Optical spec. + $JHK_s$ phot. & $1.3^{+0.1}_{-0.1}$ & $0.01^{+0.02}_{-0.01}$ & $0.00^{+0.02}_{-0.00}$ & $11.32^{+0.02}_{-0.01}$\\
801: \tableline
802: \end{tabular}
803: %% Any table notes must follow the \end{tabular} command.
804: %\tablenotetext{}{Note --- The quoted errors denote 90 \% confidence.}
805: \end{center}
806: \end{table}
807:
808:
809: \end{document}
810:
811: %%
812: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
813: