1: %
2: % WASP 10 SuperWASP ESP
3: % March 2008
4: % V1 13 MAr 2008
5: % V2 10 April
6: % v3 23 april with DLP and JY comments
7: % v4 2l april my edits + fortney fig
8: % v5 5 may 2008 add Vspan plot and ecc discussion
9: % V6 May 8 2008 now with more authors...
10: % v7 May 13 FPK comments
11: % comments from smalley on color
12: % May 22 comments from Horne
13: % June 2 also comments from Hasewell
14: % v10 with new ecc plot removed old histos NOT using ecc plot
15: % vsini plot doesn't show much for wasp-10
16: % first try as apj formst from lacie backups
17: % aded short ITP blurb, and ACC's June 11th numbers... but not in figures yet.
18: %% now back to MNRAS format and shorten!!!
19: %% new wasp10_short.tex -- shorten
20: %% v3 remove spectral SME figure and shorten
21: %% 1-Sep new acknow from Don/YCJ
22: %% V4 misc fixed, chisq to table 2
23: % v5 remove extra lines
24: %v6 from Jogesh.. condenese
25: % v7 my condensed version
26: % v8 with discussion from Matsumura
27:
28: %%% resubmit after Referee Report on 10-17-2008
29: %%
30:
31: \documentclass[useAMS,usenatbib]{mn2e}
32: %%\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
33: \usepackage{psfig}
34: \usepackage[a4paper]{hyperref}
35: \usepackage{amssymb}
36: \usepackage{aas_macros}
37: %\usepackage{mncite}
38: %\usepackage{graphicx}
39: %\usepackage{epstopdf}
40: %\usepackage{subfigure}
41:
42:
43: \newcommand{\rmsub}[2]{#1_{\rm #2}}
44: \newcommand{\bvec}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath ${#1}$}}
45:
46: \begin{document}
47:
48: \title[The transiting planet WASP-10b]{WASP-10b: a 3M$_J$, gas-giant planet transiting a late-type K star}
49: \author[D.J. Christian et al.]
50: {
51: D.J. Christian$^{1,17}$\thanks{E-mail: d.christian@qub.ac.uk},
52: N.P. Gibson$^{1}$,
53: E.K. Simpson$^{1}$,
54: R.A. Street$^{1,2}$,
55: I. Skillen$^{3}$,
56: \newauthor
57: D. Pollacco$^{1}$,
58: A. Collier Cameron$^{4}$,
59: Y.C. Joshi$^{1}$,
60: F.P. Keenan$^{1}$,
61: H.C. Stempels$^{4}$,
62: \newauthor
63: C.A. Haswell$^{5}$,
64: K. Horne$^{4}$,
65: D.R. Anderson$^{5}$, % (Keele)
66: S. Bentley$^{6}$, %(Keele)
67: F. Bouchy$^{7,8}$, % F. Bouchy, % (IAP),
68: W.I. Clarkson$^{5,16}$,
69: \newauthor
70: B. Enoch$^{5}$, % OU
71: L. Hebb$^{4}$, %(St Andrews) *** Hunter/mcmc interfacing, photometry ***
72: G. H\'ebrard$^{7}$, % (IAP), %G. H\'ebrard$^{12}$,
73: C. Hellier$^{6}$, % keele
74: J. Irwin$^{9}$, % now at Harvard CfA
75: S.R. Kane$^{10}$,
76: \newauthor
77: T.A. Lister$^{2,4,6}$,
78: B. Loeillet$^{11}$, % B. Loeillet, % (Marseille)
79: P. Maxted$^{6}$,
80: M. Mayor$^{12}$, % Michel Mayor (Geneva)
81: I. McDonald$^{6}$, % (Keele)
82: C. Moutou$^{11}$, % Claire Moutou (Marseille)
83: \newauthor
84: A.J. Norton$^{5}$, % OU
85: N. Parley$^{5}$, % OU
86: F. Pont$^{12,13}$, % Frederic Pont (Bern/Exeter)
87: D. Queloz$^{12}$, % Didier Queloz (Geneva)
88: R. Ryans$^{1}$,
89: B. Smalley$^{6}$, % Keele
90: \newauthor
91: A.M.S. Smith$^{4}$,
92: I. Todd$^{1}$, %(QUB)
93: S. Udry$^{12}$, % S. Udry, % (Geneva)
94: R.G. West$^{14}$,
95: P.J. Wheatley$^{15}$,
96: D.M. Wilson$^{6}$ % Keele
97: \\
98: \\
99: $^{1}$Astrophysics Research Centre, School of Mathematics \&\ Physics, Queen's University, University Road, Belfast, BT7 1NN, UK\\
100: $^{2}$Las Cumbres Observatory, 6740 Cortona Dr. Suite 102, Santa Barbara, CA 93117, USA\\
101: $^{3}$Isaac Newton Group of Telescopes, Apartado de Correos 321, E-38700 Santa Cruz de la Palma, Tenerife, Spain \\
102: $^{4}$School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9SS, UK\\
103: $^{5}$Department of Physics and Astronomy, The Open University, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK\\
104: $^{6}$Astrophysics Group, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG\\
105: $^{7}$Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris, CNRS (UMR 7095) -- Universit\'e Pierre \&\ Marie Curie, 98$^{bis}$ bvd. Arago, 75014 Paris, France\\
106: $^{8}$Observatoire de Haute-Provence, 04870 St Michel l'Observatoire, France\\
107: $^{9}$ Harvard/Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA\\
108: %$^{9}$Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HA, UK\\
109: $^{10}$Michelson Science Center, Caltech, MS 100-22, 770 South Wilson Avenue
110: Pasadena, CA 91125, USA \\
111: $^{11}$Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille, BP 8, 13376 Marseille Cedex 12, France\\
112: $^{12}$Observatoire de Gen\`eve, Universit\'e de Gen\`eve, 51 Ch. des Maillettes, 1290 Sauverny, Switzerland\\
113: $^{13}$ School of Physics, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QL\\
114: $^{14}$Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK\\
115: $^{15}$Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK\\
116: $^{16}$STScI, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA\\
117: $^{17}$Department of Physics and Astronomy, California State University Northridge, 18111 Nordhoff Street, Northridge, CA 91330-8268, USA\\
118: }
119:
120:
121: \date{Accepted 2008 October ??. Received 2008 September ??; in original form 2008 May ??}
122:
123: \pagerange{\pageref{firstpage}--\pageref{lastpage}} \pubyear{2008}
124:
125: \maketitle
126:
127: \label{firstpage}
128:
129: \begin{abstract}
130:
131: We report the discovery of WASP-10b, a new transiting
132: extrasolar planet (ESP) discovered by the WASP Consortium and confirmed
133: using NOT FIES and SOPHIE radial velocity data. A
134: 3.09 day period, 29 mmag transit depth, and 2.36 hour duration
135: are derived for WASP-10b using WASP
136: and high precision photometric observations.
137: Simultaneous fitting to the photometric and radial velocity data using
138: a Markov-chain Monte Carlo procedure leads to a planet radius of
139: 1.28R$_J$, a mass of 2.96M$_J$ and eccentricity of $\approx$0.06.
140: WASP-10b is one of the more massive transiting ESPs, and we compare its
141: characteristics to the current sample of transiting ESP, where there is
142: currently little information for masses greater than $\approx$2M$_J$
143: and non-zero eccentricities.
144: WASP-10's host star, GSC 2752-00114
145: (USNO-B1.0 1214-0586164)
146: %% odl(USNO-B1.0 1214-0586141)
147: is among the fainter stars in the WASP sample, with V=12.7 and a spectral
148: type of K5. This result shows promise for future late-type dwarf star surveys.
149:
150: \end{abstract}
151:
152: \begin{keywords} methods: data analysis
153: --
154: stars: planetary systems
155: --
156: techniques: radial velocities
157: --
158: techniques: photometric
159: \end{keywords}
160:
161: \section{Introduction}
162: % Intro
163: Photometric transit observations of extrasolar planets (ESP) are
164: important because the transit strongly constrains their orbital
165: inclination and allows accurate physical parameters
166: for the planet to be derived.
167: Their mass-radius relation allows us to probe their
168: internal structure and is vital to our understanding of orbital
169: migration and planetary formation.
170: The radial velocity measurements which are used to confirm a candidate
171: transiting ESP also provide more complete information on the
172: orbital eccentricity.
173:
174: As wide field photometric transit surveys have collected additional
175: sky and temporal coverage, and understood
176: their noise components \citep{cameron2007mcmc, smith07},
177: %their noise components (e.g. Collier Cameron et al. 2007a; Smith et al. 2007),
178: the number of transiting ESP has grown to over 50
179: in line with earlier predictions \citep{h1}.
180: Recently one
181: such survey, SuperWASP \citep{p1} published its first 5
182: confirmed ESP, all of which have periods of less than 3 days
183: \citep{A08, c4, P08, W08}, and reported an additional 10\footnote{http://www.inscience.ch/transits/}
184: \citep{Hel08, Hebb08, yog08, West08}.
185: %Skillen 08, others?
186: %SuperWASP consists of 2 identical instruments, one in the Northern hemisphere
187: %in La Palma and one in the Southern hemisphere at Sutherland in South Africa. Each
188: %telescope has nearly 500 square degrees of coverage.
189: SuperWASP is performing a "shallow-but-wide"
190: transit search, designed to find planets that are not only
191: sufficiently bright ($9 < V < 13$) for high-precision radial velocity follow-up
192: to be feasible on telescopes of moderate aperture, but also for
193: detailed studies such as transmission spectroscopy during transits.
194: Details of the WASP project and observatory infrastructure are
195: described in \citet{p1}.
196:
197:
198:
199: In this paper we present the WASP photometry of
200: 1SWASP~J231558.30+312746.4 (GSC 2752-00114),
201: higher precision photometric follow-up observations with the MERCATOR and
202: Tenagra telescopes,
203: and high precision radial velocity observations with the Nordic Optical Telescope new
204: FIbre-fed Echelle Spectrograph (FIES) and the OHP SOPHIE collaboration.
205: These observations lead to the discovery and confirmation of a new,
206: relatively high mass, gas-giant exoplanet, WASP-10b.
207: %Our observations
208: %and analysis are presented in \S\ 2, while results and derivations of the stellar
209: %and planet parameters are in \S\ 3. We compare WASP-10b to the current
210: %sample of transiting ESP in \S\ 4.
211:
212: \begin{figure}
213: \psfig{file=fig1.eps,width=8.0cm}
214: \caption{ %WASP-10 photometric light curves.
215: (a.) The {\it top} panel shows the SuperWASP light curve for WASP-10b (1SWASP~J231558.30+312746.4).
216: %(b.) The {\it lower} panel shows the light curves from the MERCATOR 1m telescope (V; top curve),
217: All the data (apart from that from SuperWASP-N) were averaged
218: in 300\,second bins. The data were phased using the ephemeris,
219: $T_O = 2454357.85808 ^{+ 0.00041}_{- 0.00036}$
220: $P = 3.09276$ days. %1.11997342E-05 - 1.82353281E-05
221: }
222: \end{figure}
223:
224: \section{Observations}
225:
226: 1SWASP~J231558.30+312746.4 (GSC 2752-00114)
227: was monitored by SuperWASP-N starting in 2004.
228: SuperWASP is a multi-camera telescope system with SuperWASP-North
229: located in La Palma and consisting of 8
230: Canon 200-mm f/1.8 lenses each coupled to e2v 2048 x 2048 pixel
231: back illuminated CCDs.
232: This combination of lens and camera yields a field of view of
233: 7.8$^o$ $\times$ 7.8$^o$
234: with an angular size of 14.2$\arcsec$ per pixel.
235: During 2004, SuperWASP was run with 4 or 5 cameras
236: as the operations moved from commissioning to routine automated observing.
237: %SuperWASP has been operated as a robotic telescope for the last several
238: %years and a sister facility was constructed at
239: %the South African Astronomical Observatory.
240: We show the WASP-10b SuperWASP light curve in Figure 1.
241:
242: %other photometry
243: \subsection{ Higher Precision Photometry}
244:
245: We obtained photometry of WASP-10 with the MEROPE instrument on the 1.2m MERCATOR Telescope in V-band on 1 September 2007.
246: Only a partial transit was observed due to uncertainties in the
247: period and epoch from the SuperWASP data. Observations were in the V-band with
248: 2$\times$2 binning over $\sim$2.9 hours. Despite clear conditions, exposure times were varied from 25-30s to account for changes in seeing and to keep below
249: the saturation limits of the chip. This allowed 170 images to be taken. There was a
250: drift of only ~1 binned pixel in x and y on the chip during the run.
251: The MEROPE images were first de-biased and flat fielded with combined twilight flats using IRAF and the apphot package to obtain aperture photometry of the target and
252: 5 nearby companion stars using a 10 pixel radius. Finally, the light curve
253: was extracted and normalized to reveal a depth of $\sim$33 mmag.
254:
255: Further observations of WASP-10 were taken
256: as part of an observing program sponsored by
257: the Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope
258: Network\footnote{www.lcogt.net} on the Tenagra II, 0.81m F7
259: Ritchey-Chretien telescope sited in the Sonora desert in S. Arizona,
260: USA. The science camera contains a 1k $\times$ 1k SITe CCD with a pixel scale
261: of 0.87 arcsec/pixel and a field of view of 14.8$\arcmin \times 14.8\arcmin$.
262: The filter set is the standard Johnson/Cousins/Bessel UBVRI set and
263: the data presented here have been taken in I band.
264:
265: Calibration frames were obtained automatically every twilight, and the
266: data were de-biased and flat-fielded using the calibration section of
267: the SuperWASP pipeline. Object detection and aperture photometry was then
268: performed using daophot \citep{Stet87} within
269: IRAF. Differential photometry was derived from a selection of
270: typically 5 to 10 comparison stars within the frame.
271:
272: These confirmed the object had a sharp egress with an amplitude of 0.033$\pm$0.001mag.
273: The MERCATOR V and Tenagra I light curves show consistent transit depths,
274: confirming that the companion is a transiting ESP.
275:
276:
277: % spectroscopy
278: \subsection{Spectroscopic Follow-up}
279: \label{section:radvel}
280: We obtained high precision radial velocity (RV) follow-up observations of
281: WASP-10 with the 2.5m Nordic Optical Telescope (NOT) new FIbre-fed
282: Echelle Spectrograph (FIES),
283: supplemented with observations from the Observatoire de Haute-Provence's
284: 1.93\,m telescope and the SOPHIE spectrograph \citep{b1}.
285: We present a summary of the FIES and SOPHIE RV data in Table~\ref{tab:rvspec}.
286:
287: \begin{table}
288: \caption[]{Journal of radial-velocity measurements for WASP-10 (1SWASP~J231558.30+312746.4, USNO-B1.0 1214-0586164).
289: Stellar coordinates are for the photometric apertures;
290: the USNO-B1.0 number denotes
291: the star for which the radial-velocity measurements were secured.
292: %The table presents,
293: The quoted uncertainties in the radial velocity errors include
294: components due to photon noise (Section~\ref{section:radvel}) and 10 m\,s$^{-1}$ of jitter
295: (Section~\ref{section:mcmc}) added in quadrature.
296: %The fourth and fifth columns give the FWHM of
297: %the CCF dip and the contrast of the dip as a fraction of the weighted mean continuum level.
298: %The signal-to-noise ratio at 550nm is given in column six.
299: }
300: \begin{center}
301: \begin{tabular}{lcccc}
302: BJD & $\rmsub{t}{exp}$ &$\rmsub{V}{r}$ \\
303: %BJD & $\rmsub{t}{exp}$ &$\rmsub{V}{r}$ & FWHM & Contrast & S:N & Notes \\
304: & (s) & km s$^{-1}$ \\
305: % & (s) & km s$^{-1}$ & km s$^{-1}$ & \% & & \\
306: \hline
307: %\multicolumn{4}{l}{\bf 1SWASP~J231558.30+312746.4:}\\
308: %\multicolumn{4}{l}{USNO-B1.0 1214-0586164= WASP-10 } \\ \\
309: %\multicolumn{4}{l}{USNO-B1.0 1214-0586164= GSC 2752-00114= WASP-10 } \\ \\
310: %2454286.5225 & 900 & $-5.751 \pm 0.018$ & 20.5 & 11.7 & 44 & Photometric \\
311: %SOPHIE.2008-02-11T18:39:42.210_e2ds_A.fits HE K5
312: {\em FIES} \\
313:
314: 2454437.540 & 2400 & -11.028 $\pm$ 0.026 & \\
315: 2454463.377 & 2400 & -11.941 $\pm$ 0.030 & \\
316: 2454465.342 & 2400 & -11.003 $\pm$ 0.018 & \\
317: 2454466.335 & 2400 & -11.804 $\pm$ 0.021 & \\
318: 2454490.329 & 2400 & -11.013 $\pm$ 0.143 & \\
319: 2454490.358 & 2400 & -10.990 $\pm$ 0.120 & \\
320: 2454491.340 & 2400 & -11.955 $\pm$ 0.024 & \\
321:
322: %2454437.540 & 2400 & -11.028135 $\pm$ 0.026293599 & \\
323: %2454463.377 & 2400 & -11.940704 $\pm$ 0.029755263 & \\
324: %2454465.342 & 2400 & -11.003023 $\pm$ 0.018495784 & \\
325: %2454466.335 & 2400 & -11.804111 $\pm$ 0.021350986 & \\
326: %2454490.329 & 2400 & -11.013135 $\pm$ 0.14292444 & \\
327: %2454490.358 & 2400 & -10.990278 $\pm$ 0.12040649 & \\
328: %2454491.340 & 2400 & -11.954736 $\pm$ 0.024017649 & \\
329:
330: {\em SOPHIE}\\
331: %new from ACC on 06 may
332: %2454340.568 & 3300 & -11.735 $\pm$ 0.004 & \\ %9.47 & 25.0 & 52.8 \\
333: %2454342.505 & 3600 & -11.689 $\pm$ 0.010 & \\ %7.96 & 12.2 & 40.6 \\
334: %2454508.262 & 1680 & -11.084 $\pm$ 0.006 & \\ %& 10.2232 & 31.13 & 27.4 \\ % 0.007 & -17.32022 \\
335: %SOPHIE.2008-02-12T18:47:31.901_e2ds_A.fits HE K5
336: %2454509.267 & 1680 & -11.398 $\pm$ 0.007 & \\ % 10.3847 & 30.71 & 25.8 \\ % 0.016 & -16.98750 \\
337: %SOPHIE.2008-02-13T18:59:28.785_e2ds_A.fits HE K5
338: %2454510.276 & 1680 &-12.047 $\pm$ 0.008 & \\ % 10.4784 &30.06 & 22.8 \\ % -0.002 & -16.64929 \\
339: %SOPHIE.2008-02-14T18:40:18.886_e2ds_A.fits HE K5
340: %2454511.262 & 1680 & -11.187 $\pm$ 0.006 & \\ % 10.3729 & 30.66 & 28.7 \\ % 0.012 & -16.30629 \\
341: %SOPHIE.2008-02-15T18:40:09.717_e2ds_A.fits HE K5
342: %2454512.262 & 1680 & -11.288 $\pm$ 0.006 & \\ % 10.3450 & 30.88 & 30.5 \\ % 0.047 & -15.95947 \\
343: %new G Heb oct 2008
344: 2454340.569 & 3300 & -11.657 $\pm$ 0.008 \\
345: 2454342.505 & 3600 & -11.575 $\pm$ 0.011 \\
346: 2454508.262 & 1680 & -11.027 $\pm$ 0.014 \\
347: 2454509.268 & 1680 & -11.336 $\pm$ 0.017 \\
348: 2454510.276 & 1680 & -11.990 $\pm$ 0.020 \\
349: 2454511.262 & 1680 & -11.135 $\pm$ 0.016 \\
350: 2454512.262 & 1680 & -11.244 $\pm$ 0.016 \\
351: %
352: %2454340.5686 & -11.657149 & 0.007786 \\
353: %2454342.5052 & -11.574944 & 0.011066 \\
354: %2454508.2622 & -11.027171 & 0.014491 \\
355: %2454509.2676 & -11.336464 & 0.016651 \\
356: %2454510.2758 & -11.989614 & 0.019875 \\
357: %2454511.2625 & -11.135368 & 0.016458 \\
358: %2454512.2623 & -11.243935 & 0.016395 \\
359:
360: \hline\\
361: \end{tabular}
362: \end{center}
363: \label{tab:rvspec}
364: \end{table}
365:
366: \subsubsection{NOT and FIES}
367:
368: % NOT FIES set-up here...
369: Spectroscopic observations were obtained using the
370: %FIbre-fed Echelle Spectrograph (FIES) mounted on the 2.5-m Nordic Optical
371: new FIES spectrograph mounted on the NOT Telescope.
372: A total of seven radial velocity points were obtained
373: during 2 December 2007, 28--31 December 2007 and 24--25 January 2008.
374: WASP-10 required observations with an exposure time of 2400s due its
375: relative faintness (V=12.7) yielding a peak signal-to-noise ratio per
376: resolution element of $\approx$60--70 in the H$\alpha$ region. FIES was used in
377: medium resolution mode with R=46000 with simultaneous ThAr
378: calibration. We used the bespoke data reduction package
379: FIEStool\footnote{http://www.not.iac.es/instruments/fies/fiestool/FIEStool.html} to
380: extract the spectra and a specially developed IDL line-fitting code
381: to obtain radial velocities with a precision of 15--25 m s$^{-1}$ (except for the
382: poor night of 24 January 2008, JD 2454490).
383:
384: \subsubsection{OHP 1.9\,m and SOPHIE}
385: Additional radial velocity measurements were taken for
386: %1SWASP~J231558.30+312746.4 (GSC 2752-00114)
387: WASP-10 on 2007 August 29 and 30, and again between
388: 2008 Feb 11 and 15 with the OHP 1.93\,m telescope and the SOPHIE
389: spectrograph \citep{b1}, a total of 7 usable spectra were acquired.
390: %SOPHIE is an environmentally stabilized spectrograph
391: %designed to give long-term stability at the level of a few m\,s$^{-1}$.
392: We used SOPHIE in its high efficiency mode, acquiring simultaneous star
393: and sky spectra through separate fibers
394: with a resolution of R=40000. Thorium-Argon calibration images were taken
395: at the start and end
396: of each night, and at 2- to 3-hourly intervals throughout the night.
397: The radial-velocity drift never exceeded 2-3 m\,s$^{-1}$, even on a night-to-night
398: basis. Although errors for each radial velocity measurement are limited by the
399: photon-noise. Thus, the average radial velocity error is $\approx$ 14 m\,s$^{-1}$ and
400: includes the 2-3 m\,s$^{-1}$ systematic error and the contribution from the photon-noise.
401: % comment from G Hebrard Oc t 2008
402: Typical signal-to-noise ratio estimates for each spectra were $\approx$30 (near
403: 5500 \AA).
404: The SOPHIE WASP-10 spectra were cross-correlated
405: against a K5V template provided by the SOPHIE control and reduction software.
406: Typical FWHM and contrasts for these spectra were $\approx$10.2--10.4 km s$^{-1}$
407: and 30--31\%, respectively. The cross-correlation techniques and derivation
408: of errors in the radial velocity measurements are presented in \citet{P08}.
409:
410: %\section{Data Reduction}
411: \section{Results and Analysis}
412: \subsection{Stellar parameters}
413:
414: \begin{table}
415: \caption[]{Stellar parameters for WASP-10. The last 5 parameters were derived
416: from the SME analysis of the FIES spectroscopy.}
417: \label{tab:star}
418: \begin{center}
419: \begin{tabular}{cc}
420: Parameter & WASP-10 \\
421: \hline\\
422: RA (J2000) & 23 15 58.3 \\
423: Dec (J2000) & +31 27 46.4 \\
424: V & 12.7 \\
425: %B-V ??
426: distance & 90$\pm$20 pc \\ % distance from m-M = 5 log(d/10)
427: $T_{\rm eff}$ & $4675 \pm 100$ K \\
428: log\,$g$ & $4.40 \pm 0.20$ \\
429: $[$M/H$]$ & $0.03 \pm 0.20$ \\
430: $v$\,sin\,$i$ & $<$6 km\,s$^{-1}$ \\
431: %$v$\,sin\,$i$ & $4.2 \pm 0.??$ km/s \\
432: $v_{\rm rad}$ & -11.44 $\pm$ 0.03 km\,s$^{-1}$ \\ % ?? better error/ average
433: \hline\\
434: \end{tabular}
435: \end{center}
436: \end{table}
437:
438: We merged all available WASP-10 FIES spectra into one
439: high-quality spectrum in order to perform a detailed spectroscopic analysis of the stellar atmospheric properties. Radial velocity signatures were carefully removed during
440: the process. This merged spectrum was then continuum-normalized with a low
441: order polynomial to retain the shape of the broadest spectral features. The
442: total signal-to-noise ratio of the combined spectrum was $\approx$180 per pixel.
443: We were not able to include the SOPHIE spectra in this analysis,
444: because these spectra were obtained in the HE (high-efficiency) mode, which is known to suffer from problems with removal of the blaze function.
445:
446: As previously undertaken for our analysis of WASP-1 \citep{s2}, and WASP-3
447: \citep{P08} we employed the methodology of \citet{v2}, using the
448: same tools, techniques and model atmosphere grid. We used the package {\it
449: Spectroscopy Made Easy} ({\sc sme}) \citep{v1},
450: which combines spectral synthesis with multidimensional $\chi^2$ minimization to determine which atmospheric parameters best reproduce the observed spectrum of WASP-10 (effective temperature $T_{\rm eff}$, surface gravity $\log g$, metallicity
451: [M/H], projected radial velocity $v \sin i$, systemic radial velocity $v_{\rm
452: rad}$, microturbulence $v_{\rm mic}$ and the macroturbulence $v_{\rm mac}$).
453:
454: The four spectral regions we used in our analysis are: (1) 5160--5190 {\AA}, covering the gravity-sensitive
455: Mg b triplet (2) 5850--5950 {\AA}, with the temperature and gravity-sensitive Na {\i} D doublet; (3) 6000-6210 {\AA}, containing a wealth of different metal lines, providing leverage on the metallicity, and (4)
456: 6520--6600 {\AA}, covering the strongly temperature-sensitive H-alpha line. In addition we analyzed a small
457: region around the Li {\sc i} 6708 line to possibly derive a lithium abundance, but no Li {\sc i} 6708 was
458: detected for WASP-10. The parameters we obtained from this analysis are listed in
459: Table~\ref{tab:star}.
460: In addition to the spectral analysis, we also use available photometry
461: (from NOMAD, TASS4 and CMC14 catalogues), plus 2MASS to
462: estimate the effective temperature using the Infrared Flux Method
463: \citep{bs77}. This yields T$_{\rm eff}$ = 4650 $\pm$ 120 K, which is
464: in agreement with the spectroscopic analysis and a spectral type of K5.
465: The characteristics of WASP-10 are also given in Table~\ref{tab:star}.
466:
467:
468: \begin{figure}[t]
469: \begin{center}
470: %\psfig{figure=figmcmctest_wasp10lc.eps,width=9.0cm,angle=0}
471: \psfig{figure=fig2a.eps,width=8.2cm,angle=0}
472: %\psfig{figure=fig2mcmctest_wasp10lc.eps,width=8.4cm,angle=0}
473: \medskip
474: \psfig{figure=fig2b.eps,width=8.2cm}
475: %\psfig{figure=fig_wasp10spec.eps,width=9cm}
476: \caption[]{
477: Simultaneous Markov-chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) solutions to the WASP-10
478: photometry and radial velocity data.
479: a. {\it Top} panels show the MCMC solutions to the combined SuperWASP-N, MERCATOR $V$, and Tenagra $I$ band photometry.
480: b. The {\it lower} panel
481: shows the MCMC solution to the FIES + SOPHIE radial velocity (RV) data.
482: (FIES RVs are shown as filled circles and SOPHIE as filled squares).
483: The model fit to the RV data includes orbital eccentricity (solid line), and
484: for a circular orbit (dashed line).
485: Both RV models also include the Rossiter-McLaughlin effect, which is
486: small for this system given the low $v sin i$ of the host star ($<$6\,km\,s$^{-1}$).
487: }
488: \label{fig:sol_rvlc}
489: \end{center}
490: \end{figure}
491:
492: \subsection{Markov-chain Monte Carlo analysis}
493: \label{section:mcmc}
494:
495: Transit timing and the radial-velocity measurements
496: provide detailed information about the orbit.
497: We modelled WASP-10b's transit photometry and the reflex
498: motion of the host star simultaneously
499: using the Markov-chain Monte-Carlo algorithm
500: described in detail by \citet{cameron2007mcmc},
501: and the same techniques that
502: were applied to WASP-3 by \citet{P08} to which we refer the reader
503: for more details.
504:
505: We find WASP-10b to have a radius
506: $1.28 ^{+ 0.08 }_{- 0.09 } R_J$, mass of $2.96 ^{+ 0.22 }_{- 0.17 } M_J$
507: and a significant non-zero eccentricity of $0.059 ^{ + 0.014}_{ -0.004}$ .
508: The best fit solution for the MCMC model for a circular orbit
509: (e = 0) has a $\chi^2$ 55 higher than the solution with non-zero eccentricity,
510: and thus, the eccentricity is significant at $>$ 99.6\% confidence level using the $F$ test.
511: The values of the parameters of the optimal solution are given,
512: together with their associated 1-$\sigma$ confidence intervals,
513: in Table~\ref{tab:params}.
514: The FIES+SOPHIE radial-velocity data measurements are plotted in Figure~\ref{fig:sol_rvlc}
515: together with the best-fitting global fit to the SuperWASP-N, MERCATOR, and Tenagra
516: transit photometry.
517:
518: %%%%%%
519: \begin{figure}
520: \begin{center}
521: \psfig{figure=fig3.eps,width=8.0cm}
522: %\psfig{figure=fig_wasp10vspan.eps,width=7.5cm}
523: \caption[]{Line bisectors as a function of radial velocity (RV) for WASP-10.
524: Plot symbols are the same as Figure 2.
525: Analysis of these line-bisectors for WASP-10 does not show a correlation between
526: the bisector velocity (V$_{span}$) and stellar radial-velocity (see text).
527: }
528: \label{fig:line_bisector}
529: \end{center}
530: \end{figure}
531:
532:
533: %%% from Yogesh
534: \subsection{Line-bisector variation}
535: %mine:
536: Line bisectors have been shown to be a powerful diagnostic in distinguishing
537: true extra-solar planets from blended and eclipsing stellar systems chromospheric activity \citep{bisectq1}.
538: \citet{torr04} showed, that for OGLE-TR-33 line asymmetries which changed
539: with a 1.95 day period, it was a blended system.
540: From the cross-correlation function (CCF) we obtained the
541: line bisectors and these are plotted, as a function of RV,
542: in Figure~\ref{fig:line_bisector}.
543:
544: We quantified the significance of the bisector variation as follows. We
545: determined the inverse-variance weighted averages of the RV and bisector span as
546: $$\hat{v} = \frac{\sum_i v_i w_i}{\sum_i w_i};~~~~
547: \hat{b} = \frac{\sum_i b_i w_i}{\sum_i w_i}$$
548: where the $v_i$ and $b_i$ are the RV and span bisector values respectively and the weights $w_i$ are
549: the inverse variances of the individual bisector measurements. The uncertainty in the span bisector
550: is assumed to be 2.5 times the uncertainty on the RV in our data. If we define $x_i = v_i - \hat{v}$
551: and $y_i = b_i - \hat{b}$, then the slope is determined as
552: $$\hat{a} = \frac{\sum_i x_i y_i w_i}{\sum_i x_i^2 w_i};~~~~
553: {\rm Var}(\hat{a}) = \frac{1}{\sum_i x_i^2 w_i}$$
554: The value of the scaling factor $\hat{a}$ is determined with signal-to-noise ratio
555: $${\rm SNR} = \frac{\hat{a}}{\sqrt {Var(\hat{a})}}$$
556: We obtain ${\rm SNR}$ = 1.16, indicating a non-significant correlation between
557: %We obtain ${\rm SNR}$ = 1.28, indicating a non-significant correlation between
558: the bisector span and radial velocity variations.
559: This demonstrates that the
560: cross-correlation function remains symmetric, and that the radial-velocity
561: variations are not likely to be caused by line-of-site binarity or
562: stellar activity and indicate WASP-10b is an exoplanet.
563: %The average bisector variations are $\approx$12 times smaller than the RV variations which suggests
564:
565:
566:
567: \begin{table}
568: \caption[]{WASP-10 system parameters and 1-$\sigma$ error limits derived
569: from MCMC analysis.}
570: \label{tab:params}
571: \begin{tabular}{lcc}
572: \hline\\
573: Parameter & Symbol & Value \\
574: \hline\\
575: %% from apr26_231558ecc.log
576: %%Transit epoch (BJD) & $ T_0 $ & $ 2454342.39409 ^{+0.0003}_{-0.0005}$ days \\
577: Transit epoch (BJD) & $ T_0 $ & $ 2454357.85808 ^{+0.00041}_{-0.00036}$ days \\
578:
579: Orbital period & $ P $ & $ 3.0927636^{+0.0000094}_{-0.000021} $ days \\
580:
581: Planet/star area ratio & $ (R_p/R_s)^2 $ & $ 0.029^{+0.001}_{-0.001} $ \\
582:
583: Transit duration & $ t_T $ & $ 0.098181^{+0.0019 }_{- 0.0015} $ days \\
584:
585: Impact parameter & $ b $ & $ 0.568^{+0.054}_{-0.084} $ $R_*$ \\
586:
587: & & \\
588: Stellar reflex velocity & $ K_1 $ & $ 0.5201^{+0.0084}_{-0.010} $ km s$^{-1}$ \\
589:
590: Centre-of-mass velocity & $ \gamma $ & $ -11.4854^{+0.0012}_{-0.0034} $ km s$^{-1}$ \\
591: %CHECK
592:
593: Orbital semimajor axis & $ a $ & $ 0.0369^{+0.0012}_{-0.0014} $ AU \\
594: & & \\
595:
596: Orbital inclination & $ I $ & $ 86.9 ^{+ 0.6 }_{- 0.5 } $ degrees \\
597:
598: Orb. eccentricity & $\epsilon$ & $0.059 ^{ + 0.014}_{ -0.004}$ \\
599:
600: Arg. periastron & $\omega$ & $2.917 ^{ + 0.222}_{ - 0.245}$ (rad) \\
601: & & \\
602:
603: Stellar mass & $ M_* $ & $ 0.703^{ + 0.068}_{-0.080} $ $M_\odot$ \\
604: Stellar radius & $ R_* $ & $ 0.775 ^{+ 0.043 }_{- 0.040 } $ $R_\odot$ \\
605: Stellar surface gravity & $ \log g_* $ & $ 4.51 ^{+0.06}_{ - 0.05}$ (CGS) \\
606:
607: Stellar density & $ \rho_* $ & $ 1.51 ^{+ 0.25 }_{- 0.20 } $ $\rho_\odot$ \\
608: & & \\
609: Planet radius & $ R_p $ & $ 1.28 ^{+ 0.077 }_{- 0.091 } $ $R_J$ \\
610: Planet mass & $ M_p $ & $ 2.96 ^{+ 0.22 }_{- 0.17 } $ $M_J$ \\
611:
612: Planetary surface gravity & $ \log g_p $ & $ 3.62 \pm 0.06 $ (CGS) \\
613:
614: Planet density & $ \rho_p $ & $ 1.43 ^{+ 0.31 }_{- 0.29 } $ $\rho_J$ \\
615:
616: Planet temp ($A=0$) & $ T_{\mbox{eql}} $ & $ 1119 ^{+ 26 }_{- 28 } $ K \\
617: & & \\
618: & & \\
619:
620: $\chi^2_\nu$ (photometric) & $\chi^2_{phot}$ & 4145 \\
621: Photometric data points & N$_{phot}$ & 4151 \\
622: $\chi^2_\nu$ (spectroscopic) & $\chi^2_{spec}$ & 17.2 \\
623: Spectroscopic data points & N$_{spec}$ & 14 \\
624: %Phot Ecc. fit &$\chi^2_\nu$ & 1.00 (4142 dof) \\
625: %Phot circular fit &$\chi^2_\nu$ & 1.00 (4142 dof) \\
626: % RV Ecc. fit &$\chi^2_\nu$ & 1.43 (12 dof) \\
627: % RV circular fit &$\chi^2_\nu$ & 5.10 (12 dof) \\
628:
629: \hline\\
630: \end{tabular}
631: \end{table}
632:
633:
634:
635: \section{Discussion}
636:
637: Photometric surveys have now provided a large sample of transiting ESP
638: that can be used to determine their mass-radius relation and provide constraints
639: on their compositions.
640: Here we presented the discovery of a new ESP with a mass of 2.96M$_J$,
641: 1.28R$_J$ radius, and a significant eccentricity of $0.059 ^{ + 0.014}_{ -0.004}$.
642: We now discuss the properties of WASP-10b in relation to the current sample
643: of transiting ESP, starting with its non-zero eccentricity.
644:
645: %%%%%%%%%ecc discussion
646: %J231558 = WASP-10:
647: %================
648: %tau_e = 1 / [36.5675/(Qp/10^5) + 0.295814/(Qs/10^6)] Gyr
649: %tau_a = 1 / [0.237616(e/.057)^2/(Qp/10^5) + 0.124553/(Qs/10^6)] Gyr
650: %
651:
652: Most of the current sample of published transiting ESP have orbits
653: consistent with being circular and are fit with models using
654: zero eccentricity as is expected for short-period planets in orbits
655: with semi-major
656: axes $<$ 0.2 AU. Recent work \citep{jack08, mard07}
657: has investigated the effects of tidal dissipation on the orbits of short period ESP.
658: The evolution of the orbital eccentricity appears to be driven primarily
659: by tidal dissipation within the planet, giving a circularisation
660: timescale substantially less than 1 Gyr for typical tidal dissipation parameter,
661: Q$_p$ = 10$^5$ to 10$^6$.
662: WASP-10 is a K dwarf with a spin period of 12 days and J$-$K=0.62
663: and is rotating more slowly than stars of comparable colour in the
664: Hyades \citep{tern00}. % and Coma Berenices clusters.
665: This suggests a rotational age between 600 Myr and 1 Gyr.
666: Thus, the persistence of
667: substantial orbital eccentricity in WASP-10b is therefore surprising.
668:
669: One plausible mechanism for maintaining the high eccentricity is secular
670: interaction with an additional planet in the system.
671: \citet{AL06} explore the effects of dynamical interactions among
672: planets in extrasolar planetary systems and conclude outer planets can
673: cause the inner planet to move through a range of eccentricities
674: over timescales that are short when compared to the lifetime of the
675: system, but very long when compared to the current observational baseline.
676: However, recently \citet{mat08} have argued that an unseen companion
677: driving short-Period systems is unlikely. They present an upper limit of
678: 1 M$_{Neptune}$ for a possible unseen companion in the GJ 436 system and exclude
679: this based on the current radial velocity upper limits of $\leq$ 5 m/s.
680: \citet{mat08} also present a range of tidal quality Q$_p$
681: timescales that could be as large
682: as 10$^9$ years, and argue that this new class of eccentric, short period
683: ESP are simply still in the process of circularizing.
684: WASP-10b has not been extensively studied to rule out a putative outer
685: plane that may be driving its eccentricity. Thus,
686: the $\approx$6\% eccentricity of WASP-10b makes it
687: an attractive target for future transit-timing variation studies, and
688: for longer-term RV monitoring to establish the mass and period of the putative outer planet.
689:
690:
691: %The most plausible mechanism for maintaining the high eccentricity is secular
692: %interaction with an additional planet in the system.
693: %\citet{AL06} explore the effects of dynamical interactions among
694: %planets in extrasolar planetary systems and conclude outer planets can
695: %cause the inner planet to move through a range of eccentricities
696: %over timescales that are short when compared to the lifetime of the
697: %system, but very long when compared to the current observational baseline.
698: %The $\approx$6\% eccentricity of WASP-10b makes it
699: %an attractive target for future transit-timing variation studies, and
700: %for longer-term RV monitoring to establish the mass and period of the putative outer
701: %planet.
702:
703: The majority of transiting ESP found have masses below 1.5M$_J$,
704: although there are a few more massive ESP.
705: HD 17156, and COROT-Exo-2 have similar masses to WASP-10b and
706: although there are two more massive ESP, the nearly 9 M$_J$ HAT P-2 (HD~149026b) \citep{bakos07} and
707: 7.3 M$_J$ WASP-14b \citep{yog08}, this higher mass region has been poorly
708: explored.
709: Additional transiting objects in the mass range are important for
710: completing the current
711: ESP mass-radius relations and constraining their compositions.
712: The current sample of transiting extrasolar giant planets (ESP)
713: reveals a large range of densities. We derive a mean density for WASP-10b
714: of $\approx$1.89 g cm$^{-3}$ (1.42 $\rho_J$) and it would lie
715: along the higher density contour in a mass-radius plot \citep{P08, sozz07}.
716:
717: One ultimate goal of our transit-search programme
718: is to provide the observational grist that will stimulate and advance refined models
719: for the formation and evolution of the hot and very hot Jupiters \citep{burr97, fortney2007, seag07}. By
720: thus constraining the underlying physics, we will have a richer context for
721: the interpretation of the lower mass planets expected from missions such
722: as COROT and Kepler.
723:
724: \section*{Acknowledgments}
725:
726: %%% new 1-Spe
727: The SuperWASP Consortium consists of astronomers primarily from the
728: Queen's University Belfast, St Andrews, Keele, Leicester, The Open
729: University, Isaac Newton Group La Palma and Instituto de
730: Astrof{\'i}sica de Canarias. The SuperWASP Cameras were
731: constructed and operated with funds made available from Consortium
732: Universities and the UK's Science and Technology Facilities Council.
733: SOPHIE observations have been funded by the Optical Infrared
734: Coordination Network. The data from the Mercator and NOT telescopes was
735: obtained under the auspices of the International Time of the Canary
736: Islands. We extend our thanks to the staff of the ING and OHP for their
737: continued support of SuperWASP-N and SOPHIE instruments. FPK is
738: grateful to AWE Aldermaston for the award of a William Penney Fellowship.
739:
740:
741:
742: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
743:
744: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Adams \& Laughlin}{2006}]{AL06}Adams F.C, Laughlin G. 2006, ApJ, 649, 992
745: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Anderson et al.}{2008}]{A08}Anderson D.R. et al. 2008, MNRAS, 387, 4 and ArXiv/0801.1685
746: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{eg Arras \& Bildsten}{2006}]{arras2006} Arras P., Bildsten L., 2006, ApJ, 650, 394
747: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Bakos et al.}{2004}]{b2} Bakos G.A., Noyes R.W., Kov\'{a}cs G., Stanek K.Z., Sasselov D.D., Domsa I., 2004, PASP, 116, 266
748: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Baraffe et al.}{2008}]{bar08} Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Barman, T. 2008, A\&A, in press and arXiv:0802.1810
749: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Berry \& Burnell}{2005}]{berry2005} Berry R., Burnell J., 2005, {\it The handbook of astronomical image processing}, 2nd Edition, Richmond, VA (Willmann-Bell)
750: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Bakos et al.}{2007}]{bakos07} Bakos G.A. et al., 2007, ApJ, 670, 826 %(arXiv:astro-ph 0705.0126v2)
751: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Blackwell \& Shallis}{1977}]{bs77} Blackwell D.E., Shallis M.J., 1977, MNRAS 180, 177
752: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{e.g Bodenheimer et al.}{2003}]{bode2003}Bodenheimer, P., Laughlin, G., Lin, D.N.C. 2003, ApJ, 592, 555
753: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Bouchy et al.}{2006}]{b1} Bouchy F., The Sophie Team, 2006, in Arnold L., Bouchy F., Moutou C., eds, Tenth Anniversary of 51 Peg-b: Status of and prospects for hot Jupiter studies, pp 319 -- 325.
754: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Brown et al.}{2001}]{Br01}Brown, T. et al. 2001, ApJ, 552, 699
755: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Burke et al.}{2007}]{burke2007xo2} Burke C.J., et al., 2007, ApJ, 671, 2115 %Submitted (arXiv:astro-ph 0705.0003)
756: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Burrows et al.}{2007}]{burrows2007} Burrows A., Hubeny I., Budaj J., Hubbard W.B., 2007, ApJ, 661, 502
757: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Burrows et al.}{2000}]{burrows2000} Burrows, A., Guillot, T., Hubbard, W.B., Marley, M.S., Saumon, D., Lunine, J.I., Sudarsky, D. 2000, ApJ, 534, 97
758: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{e.g. Burrows et al.}{1997}]{burr97} Burrows A. et al. 1997, ApJ, 491, 856
759: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Collier Cameron et al.}{2006}]{c3} Collier Cameron A., et al., 2006, MNRAS, 373, 799
760: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Collier Cameron et al.}{2007a}]{cameron2007mcmc} Collier Cameron A., et al., 2007a, MNRAS, 380, 1230 % lightcurves
761: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Collier Cameron et al.}{2007b}]{c4} Collier Cameron A. et al., 2007b, MNRAS, 375, 951 %wasp1 2
762: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Christian et al.}{2006}]{c1} Christian D., et al., 2006, MNRAS, 372, 1117
763: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Charbonneau et al.}{2000}]{c5}Charbonneau D., et al., 2000, ApJ, 529, 45L
764: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Claret}}{{Claret}}{2000}]{claret2000}Claret A., 2000, \aap, 363, 1081
765: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Clarkson et al.}{2007}]{c2} Clarkson W., et al., 2007, MNRAS.tmp..824C
766: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Dunham et al.}{2004}]{d1}Dunham E.W., Mandushev G.I., Taylor B.W., Oetiker B., 2004, PASP, 116, 1072
767: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Ford}{2006}]{ford2006} Ford E.B., 2006, ApJ, 642, 505
768: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Fortney et al.}{2006}]{fortney2006hd149026b} Fortney J.J., Saumon D., Marley M.S.,Lodders K., Freedman R.S., 2006, ApJ, 642, 495
769: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Fortney et al.}{2007}]{fortney2007} Fortney J.J., Marley M.S., Barnes J.W. 2007, ApJ, 659, 1661
770: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Girardi et al.}{2000}]{girardi2000} Girardi L., Bressan A., Bertelli G., Chiosi C., 2000, A\&AS, 141, 371
771: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Gregory}{2007}]{gregory2007} Gregory P.C., 2007, MNRAS, 374, 1321
772: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Gray}{1988}]{g1}Gray D.F., 1988, Lectures on Spectral-line Analysis: F, G, and K Stars (Arva, Ontario: Publisher)
773: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Gu et al.}{2004}]{gu2004} Gu P., Bodenheimer P.H., Lin D.N.C., 2004, ApJ, 608, 1076
774: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Guillot}{2006}]{guillot2006} Guillot T., et al., 2006, A\&A, 453, L21
775: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Harrington et al.}{2007}]{harrington2007hd149026b} Harrington J., Luszcz S., Seager S.,Deming D., Richardson L.J., 2007, Nature, 447, 691
776: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Hellier et al.}{2008}]{H08} Hellier, C. et al., 2008, ApJ, submitted (arXiv:astro-ph 0805.2600v1 )
777: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Henry et al.}{2000}]{henry2000} Henry G.W., Marcy G.W., Butler R.P., Vogt S.S., 2000, ApJ, 529, L41
778: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Holman et al.}{2006}]{holman2006} Holman M.J., et al., 2006, ApJ, 652, 1715
779: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Hebb et al.}{2008}]{Hebb08} Hebb L. et al. 2008, A\&A, submitted
780: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Hellier et al.}{2008}]{Hel08} Hellier C.. et al. 2008, ApJ, submitted, \& arXiv0805.2600
781: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Horne}{2003}]{h1}Horne K.D., 2003, Scientific Frontiers of Exoplanet Research, ASP Conf. 294, 361, eds. Deming \& Seager (San Francisco)
782: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Irwin \& Lewis}{2001}]{il2001}Irwin M., Lewis J., 2001, New Astronomy Reviews, 45, 105
783: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Jackson et al.}{2008}]{jack08} Jackson, B., Greenberg, R., Barnes, R. 2008, ApJ, 678, 1396
784: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Joshi et al.}{2008}]{yog08} Joshi Y.C. et al. 2008, MNRAS, submitted, \& arXiv0806.1478
785: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Lister et al.}{2007}] {l1} Lister T., et al., 2007, MNRAS, 379, 647
786: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Mandel} \& {Agol}} {{Mandel} \& {Agol}}{2002}]{mandel2002}{Mandel} K., {Agol} E., 2002, \apjl, 580, L171
787: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Mayor} \& {Queloz}}{1995}]{mq1}Mayor M., Queloz D., 1995, Nature 378, 355
788: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Mardling 2007 and references therein}{}]{mard07}Mardling R. 2007, MNRAS, 382, 1768
789: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Matsumura et al.}{2008}]{mat08} Matsumura S., Takeda G., \& Rasio F.A. 2008, ApJ, in press and arXiv:0808.3724
790: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Mazeh et al.}{2005}]{mazeh2005}Mazeh T., Zucker S., Pont F., 2005, MNRAS, 356, 955
791: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{McCullough et al.}{2006}]{m1} McCullough P.R. et al. 2006, ApJ, 648, 1228
792: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{O'Donovan et al.}{2006}]{o1} O'Donovan F.T., et al., 2006, ApJ, 644, 1237
793: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Piskunov \& Valenti}{2002}]{pv2002} Piskunov, N. E., \& Valenti, J. A. 2002, A\&A 385, 1095
794: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Pollacco et al.}{2006}]{p1} Pollacco D. et al., 2006, PASP, 106, 1088
795: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Pollacco et al.}{2008}]{P08} Pollacco D. et al., 2008, MNRAS, 385, 1576
796: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Pont et al.}{2006}]{p2} Pont F, Zucker S., Queloz D., 2006, MNRAS, 373, 231
797: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Queloz et al.}{2001}]{bisectq1} Queloz D. et al., 2001, A\&A, 379, 279
798: %\bibitem[Queloz et al.(2001)]{bisectq1} Queloz D., Henry G. W., Sivan J. P., et al., 2001, A\&A, 379, 279
799: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Sato et al.}{2005}]{sato2005} Sato B., et al., 2005, ApJ, 633, 465
800: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Sato et al.}{2005}]{sato2005} Sato B., et al., 2005, ApJ, 661, 521 % eps Tau
801: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Seager et al.}{2007}]{seag07} Seager S., Kuchner M., Hier-Majumder C.A., Militzer B. 2007, ApJ, 669, 1279
802: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Sestito \& Randich}{2005}]{s3} Sestito P., Randich S., 2005, A\&A, 442, 615
803: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Smith et al.}{2007}]{smith07} Smith A.M.S et al. 2007, MNRAS, 373, 1151
804: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Southworth et al.}{2007}]{southworth2007} Southworth J., Wheatley P.J., Sams G., 2007, MNRAS, 379, L11
805: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Sozzetti et al.}{2007}]{sozz07}Sozzetti A., Torres G., Charbonneau D., Latham D.W., Holman M.J.,Winn J.N., Laird J.B., O'Donavan F.T., 2007, preprint (arXiv:astro-ph 0704.2938v1)
806: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Stetson}{2007}]{Stet87}Stetson, P. 1987, PASP, 99, 191
807: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Street et al.}{2007}]{s1} Street R.A., et al, 2007, MNRAS, 379, 816
808: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Stempels et al.}{2007}]{s2}Stempels H.C, Collier Cameron A., Hebb L., Smalley B., Frandsen S., 2007, MNRAS, 379, 773
809: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Tegmark et al.}{2004}]{tegmark2004} Tegmark M., et al., 2004, PhRvD, 69, 103501
810: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Terndrup et al.}{2000}]{tern00}Terndrup D.M. et al. AJ, 119, 1303
811: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Torres et al.}{2004}]{torr04} Torres G., Konacki, M., Sasselov D.D., Jha, S. 2004, ApJ, 614, 979
812: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Udalski et al.}{2002}]{ogle}Udalski A., et al., 2002, Acta Astron., 52, 1
813: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Valenti \& Fischer}{2005}]{v2} Valenti J.A., Fischer D., 2005 ApJS 159, 141
814: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Valenti \& Piskunov}{1996}]{v1} Valenti J.A., Piskunov N., 1996 A\&AS, 118, 595
815: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Vidal-Madjar et al.}{2003}]{VM03} Vidal-Madjar, A. et al. 2003, Nature, 422, 143
816: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{West et al.}{2008}]{West08} West R. et al. 2008, A\&A, submitted, \& arXiv0809.4597
817: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Wilson et al.}{2008}]{W08} Wilson D. et al. 2008, \apjl, 675, 113
818: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Wu \& Goldreich}{2002}]{wu02} Wu, Y., Goldreich, P. 2002, ApJ, 564, 1024
819:
820: \end{thebibliography}
821:
822: \bsp
823:
824: %\appendix
825:
826: %%% Table for electronic on-line only
827:
828:
829:
830: \label{lastpage}
831:
832: \end{document}
833:
834: %....
835:
836: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
837: