1: %######################################################################
2: \documentstyle[12pt,aaspp4]{article}
3:
4: \lefthead{Magnetic Dissipation and Electric Currents in the Photosphere}
5: \righthead{Abramenko}
6:
7:
8: \begin{document}
9:
10: \title{Spectrum of Magnetic Dissipation and Horizontal Electric Currents in
11: the Solar Photosphere}
12:
13: \author{Valentyna Abramenko}
14: \affil{Big Bear Solar Observatory, 40386 N. Shore Lane, Big Bear City, CA
15: 92314}
16:
17: \begin{abstract}
18:
19: A proxy for horizontal electric currents in the solar photosphere was suggested.
20: For a set of evolving active regions (ARs) observed with {\it Solar and Heliospheric
21: Observatory (SOHO)} Michelson Doppler Imager (MDI) in the
22: high resolution mode, the dissipation spectrum, $k^2E(k)$, and the spatial
23: structure of dissipation, i.e., the Stokes dissipation function
24: $\varepsilon(x,y)$, were calculated from the observed $B_z$ component
25: of the magnetic field. These functions allowed us to calculate (a part of) the
26: horizontal electric current density in the photosphere.
27: It was shown that as an active region emerges,
28: large-scale horizontal electric currents are gradually generated and
29: determine a bulk of dissipation. When an active region decays, the
30: large-scale horizontal currents decay faster than the small-scale ones.
31: The density of horizontal currents in active regions is in the range
32: of $\langle j_h \rangle \sim (0.008 - 0.028)$ A/m$^2$, that
33: is compatible with the density of vertical currents in active regions.
34: We suggest two possible mechanisms for generation of such horizontal currents
35: in the photosphere. One of them is the drift motions of charged particles in
36: the medium of varying plasma pressure gradient in a horizontal plane at the periphery
37: of a sunspot. Such a drift can produce quasi-circular closed horizontal currents around
38: sunspots. Another possibility could be an existence of
39: horizontal axial current inside a highly twisted horizontal magnetic structure
40: laying in the photosphere along the magnetic neutral line.
41: The horizontal currents may contribute significantly to the dynamics of the
42: photosphere/corona coupling, as well as the estimation of non-potentiality of ARs.
43:
44:
45:
46:
47: \end{abstract}
48:
49: \keywords{Sun: magnetic field; photosphere}
50:
51:
52: \section { Introduction}
53:
54: The ultimate source of energy for the majority of non-stationary processes
55: in the solar atmosphere is believed to be a dissipation of the free magnetic
56: energy. This energy, accumulated via plasma motions, manifests as
57: non-potentiality of the magnetic field or, in other words, as electric currents
58: that permeate through all levels of the solar atmosphere. Electric currents,
59: which can be compared to vortex filaments in a turbulent field, tend to be
60: formed wherever a magnetic field has created a thin layer with both shearing
61: and stretching. Therefore analysis of the electric current evolution seems to
62: be a promising approach to better understand processes of generation
63: and dissipation of the magnetic field as well as accumulation of the free
64: magnetic energy to be released in flares and CMEs.
65:
66:
67: In spite of the obvious usefulness of information that electric currents could
68: provide, it is not trivial to reliably derive them from observed data.
69: Rare and mostly state-of-art measurements
70: of the vector magnetic field in the photosphere can provide the only vertical
71: component of the current. To derive the horizontal component of the current,
72: vector magnetic field measurements at several heights in the photosphere are
73: required, which are not yet available.
74:
75:
76: Here we present a new approach to indirectly probe horizontal electric currents.
77: The approach is based on two well known facts, namely, that i) electric current
78: is a product of the magnetic energy dissipation (Moffatt 1978; Parker
79: 1979; Priest 1982) and ii) the magnetic field in the solar photosphere is in a
80: turbulent state (Parker 1979, Petrovay \& Szakaly 1993). This allows us to
81: consider the vertical component of the magnetic field, $B_z$, as a passive
82: scalar in a turbulent flow and thus to analyze its dissipation in the framework
83: of the turbulence theory. Spatial and spectral distributions of the dissipation
84: can then be derived. The former can give us an image of the dissipation over the
85: active region's area, while the later indicates at which spatial scales the
86: dissipation dominates. Physical inferences from such consideration can be made
87: when using the fact that the dissipation of the vertical magnetic field
88: component is intrinsically related to horizontal electric currents.
89:
90: In Section 2 of this paper we present two approaches (spatial and
91: spectral) to derive the dissipation of the $B_z$ component of the magnetic field
92: and corresponding electric current density. Section 3 is devoted to the
93: application of the technique to emerging and decaying active regions.
94: Discussion is presented in the last section of the paper.
95:
96:
97: \section{\bf Techniques to derive the magnetic dissipation}
98:
99: \subsection {Spatial structures of $B_z$ dissipation}
100:
101: Because the $B_z$ component is transported in the photosphere in the same way as
102: a passive scalar does (Parker 1979, Petrovay \& Szakaly 1993), one may apply the
103: Stokes dissipation function (Monin \& Yaglom 1975) to obtain the spatial
104: structure of dissipation:
105:
106: \begin{equation}
107: \varepsilon(x,y) = \frac{1}{2} \left ( \left ( \frac {{\it d}B_z}{{\it d}x}
108: \right ) ^2 + \left ( \frac {{\it d}B_z}{{\it d}y} \right ) ^2 \right ),
109: \label{eps}
110: \end{equation}
111: where $(x,y)$ is a current point on the horizontal plane and $z$ represents
112: direction normal to the solar surface.
113: In general, the right hand part of Eq.
114: (\ref{eps}) requires the magnetic diffusion coefficient, $\eta$, which is
115: unknown. Assuming the quasi-uniform behavior of $\eta$ over the active region
116: area, we will analyze the spatial distribution of
117: dissipation as it is derived from Eq. (\ref{eps}) and measured in
118: $Gs^2/Mm^2$ units.
119:
120: A relationship between the dissipation $\varepsilon$ and the squared electric
121: current, $\bf j^2$, can be easily derived from the general formula for the
122: squared curl of the magnetic field vector, ${\bf B} \equiv (B_x,B_y,B_z)$:
123: \begin{eqnarray}
124: \mu^2 {\bf j}^2 =(\nabla \times {\bf B})^2 = & \nonumber \\
125: & \left ( \frac {{\it d}B_z}{{\it d}y} - \frac {{\it d}B_y}{{\it d}z} \right
126: ) ^2 + \left ( \frac {{\it d}B_x}{{\it d}z} - \frac {{\it d}B_z}{{\it d}x}
127: \right )
128: ^2 + \left ( \frac {{\it d}B_y}{{\it d}x} - \frac {{\it d}B_x}{{\it d}y} \right
129: ) ^2 = \label{j2} \\
130: & \varepsilon(x,y) + \mu^2j_z^2 + f(B_x,B_y,{\it d/dz}). \nonumber
131: \end{eqnarray}
132: Thus, dissipation $\varepsilon(x,y)$ represents a part of the horizontal
133: electric current. The spatial structure of $\varepsilon(x,y)$ is shown in
134: Figures \ref{Fig0}, \ref{Fig2}, and \ref{Fig3}. Areas of strong dissipation,
135: and, therefore, strong horizontal currents, tend to be concentrated around
136: strong magnetic elements. Below we discuss the distribution of horizontal
137: currents with possible mechanisms for their formation.
138:
139:
140: %#####################################################################
141: \begin{figure}[!h] \centerline {\epsfxsize=4.0truein
142: \epsffile{Fig_0.eps}}
143: \caption{\sf MDI/HR magnetograms ({\it left}) and corresponding dissipation
144: structures, $\varepsilon(x,y)$, calculated for NOAA AR 0365 observed on 2003
145: May 26/01:01 UT. North is to the top, west is to the right. The image size is $
146: 156 \times 126$ arcsec. The magnetogram is scaled from -500 G to 500G. The
147: dissipation map is scaled from 0 to $ 10^5$ G$^2$/Mm$^2$.}
148: \label{Fig0}
149: \end{figure}
150: %#####################################################################
151:
152: Averaging $\varepsilon(x,y)$ over the magnetogram area, we obtain the mean
153: value of dissipation $\langle \varepsilon \rangle$ associated with $B_z$ component.
154:
155: Having the value of $\langle \varepsilon \rangle$ for an active region, we can estimate (a
156: part of) the horizontal electric current by using Eq. (\ref{j2}):
157: \begin{equation}
158: \langle {\bf j}_h^2\rangle =\frac{1}{\mu^2}\langle \varepsilon \rangle.
159: \label{jtr}
160: \end{equation}
161: Here $\mu=\mu_0=4\pi 10^{-7}$ H/m is the vacuum permeability.
162:
163:
164: \subsection {Spectrum of dissipation of $B_z$}
165:
166: For any measured quantity, which characterizes the
167: photospheric magnetized plasma, one can calculate the spectrum of energy, i.e.,
168: a function that shows how the energy (per unit volume) is distributed in the
169: wavenumber space, $k=2\pi/s$, where $s$ is a spatial scale. The energy spectrum,
170: $E(k)$ (often referred also as a power spectrum), is essentially a squared
171: Fourier transform of a measured array (here we consider a one-dimensional
172: spectrum of a two-dimensional array, see Abramenko (2005) for details of calculation).
173: For a turbulent medium, the energy spectrum displays a maximum at large scales
174: (see Figure \ref{Fig1}, blue curve) followed by a power-law decay at smaller
175: scales. The wavenumber where the maximum is reached, marked as $k_e$ ($e$ stands
176: for {\it energy}), refers to the scales which bear the maximum energy and where
177: the energy input occurs (in our case, this is the largest magnetic elements on
178: a magnetogram).
179:
180: The spectrum of {\it dissipation} can be derived from the energy
181: spectrum (Monin \& Yaglom 1975) as
182: \begin{equation}
183: W(k) = k^2E(k).
184: \label{W}
185: \end{equation}
186: Usually, for fully developed turbulence at high magnetic Reynolds number (the
187: ratio of the inertial force to the viscous force), the magnetic dissipation
188: becomes significant at high wavenumbers only. As a result, the maximum of the
189: dissipation spectrum, $k_d$ (see Figure \ref{Fig1}), is located at higher wavenumbers
190: than the maximum, $k_e$, of the energy spectrum. The energy interval (which corresponds
191: to the bulk of energy) and the dissipation interval (which corresponds
192: to the bulk of dissipation) are separated in the wavenumber space: the
193: energy is stored mostly at large spatial scales and dissipated at much smaller scales.
194: The energy cascade is formed from large to small scales, which manifests the
195: presence of the fully developed turbulent state. Turbulent magnetic diffusion
196: seems to be a key mechanism for dissipation in this case.
197:
198: %#####################################################################
199: \begin{figure}[!h] \centerline {\epsfxsize=5.0truein
200: \epsffile{Fig_1.eps}}
201: \caption{\sf MDI/HR magnetograms ({\it left}) and corresponding energy spectrum,
202: $E(k)$ ({\it blue curve and right axis}) and dissipation spectrum,
203: $W(k)=k^2E(k)$ ({\it red curve, left axis}), calculated for a coronal hole area
204: recorded on 2001 June 5/13:07 UT. Noise influence on the spectra was eliminated.
205: North is to the top, west is to the right. The image size is $ 266 \times 202$
206: arcsec. The magnetograms are scaled from -150 G to 150G. The arrows $k_e$ and
207: $k_d$ mark the maxima of the $E(k)$ and $W(k)$ spectra, respectively. The
208: locations of the maxima were derived from 5 point box car averaging ({\it thin
209: curves}). Peaks of $E(k)$ and $W(k)$ are distinctly separated in the wavenumber
210: space. }
211: \label{Fig1}
212: \end{figure}
213: %#####################################################################
214:
215:
216:
217: Sometimes the maximum of dissipation, $k_d$, is located close to $k_e$, so that
218: the energy and dissipation intervals are overlapped. In such a case, the
219: dissipation regime differs from the one described above. Namely, the bulk of
220: dissipation occurs at large scales, and both the ohmic dissipation of large-scale
221: currents and the turbulent diffusion at smaller scales contribute into the
222: dissipation process. Thus, the dissipation spectrum seems to be useful to diagnose
223: the turbulence and the dissipation regime.
224:
225: Another advantage of the dissipation spectrum arises from its straightforward
226: relation with the mean squared curl of a field $\bf B$ (Monin \& Yaglom
227: 1975, Biskamp 1993), in other words, with the electric currents:
228:
229: \begin{equation}
230: \langle {(\nabla \times {\bf B} )}^2 \rangle = 2 {\int_0^{\infty}} k^2 E(k)
231: dk.
232: \label{rot}
233: \end{equation}
234: This quantity gives us the mean value of dissipation per unit volume per unit
235: time.
236: We have in our possession the $B_z$ components of the magnetic field only. When
237: we apply Eq. (\ref{rot}) for $B_z$ by substituting the energy spectrum of $B_z$
238: as $E(k)$, we acquire the part of dissipation associated with the $B_z$ component,
239: i.e., the mean value of dissipation per unit area per unit time measured in
240: units of G$^2$/Mm$^2$. We denoted this value as $\langle W \rangle$:
241: \begin{equation}
242: \langle W \rangle = 2{\int_0^{\infty}} k^2 E(k) dk.
243: \label{Wsr}
244: \end{equation}
245:
246: One can see that $\langle W \rangle$ and $\langle \varepsilon \rangle$
247: determine the same physical quantity derived, however, from different
248: approaches: from spatial and spectral considerations. This circumstance will
249: allow us to provide two estimations for the mean magnetic energy
250: dissipation. Besides, the two approaches allow us to study different aspects
251: of the horizontal electric currents. The current density can be derived as
252: \begin{equation}
253: \langle {\bf j}_h^2\rangle =\frac{1}{\mu^2}\langle W \rangle.
254: \label{jtrW}
255: \end{equation}
256:
257:
258:
259:
260:
261:
262: \section{Application to active regions}
263:
264:
265: We utilized SOHO/MDI (Scherrer at al. 1995) magnetograms recorded in the high
266: resolution mode. We analyzed areas located at the center of the solar disk (no
267: farther than 15 degree away from the central meridian), so that the projection effect was
268: negligible and the direction of $z$ coincides quite well with the line-of-sight
269: direction.
270:
271: In this study, we focused on the problem of how the dissipation spectrum and
272: horizontal currents evolve when an active region emerges and decays.
273: An early emergence of an active region can be detected during a 2-day time interval
274: when the magnetic structure is in the close vicinity of the central meridian.
275: We selected three such cases: NOAA ARs 0314, 9574, 0798 (magnetograms and
276: dissipation maps for the last one are shown in Figure \ref{Fig2}).
277: However, to detect significant changes at the decay phase, the
278: 2-day interval is rather short. We decided to analyze the decay of a magnetic structure
279: by using observations at two consecutive rotations. For three strong,
280: well-developed active regions: NOAA ARs 9682, 9169, 9165, we determined
281: their remains at the next rotation, namely, NOAA ARs 9712, 9199, 9189,
282: respectively. Magnetograms and dissipation maps for the first pair, NOAA ARs 9682/9712,
283: are presented in Figure \ref{Fig3}.
284: As a reference, we also analyzed a coronal hole area shown
285: in Figure \ref{Fig1}.
286:
287: The data for all analyzed magnetograms are compiled in Table 1.
288: The first row refers to a coronal hole magnetogram;
289: three blocks below correspond to three emerging active regions;
290: three pairs below show the data for decaying complexes. The third (fourth) column, $r_e$ ($r_d$),
291: shows the scale where the maximum of the energy (dissipation) spectrum was located,
292: the fifth column shows the distance between the dissipation and energy maxima in
293: the wavenumber space, ($k_d - k_e$). The next three columns show
294: the three estimations of the mean value of the magnetic energy dissipation.
295: The sixth column, $\langle \varepsilon \rangle$,
296: is derived by averaging results from Eq. (\ref{eps}) over a magnetogram.
297: The seventh column represents the values $W_n$ calculated from Eq. (\ref{Wsr})
298: when noise was not eliminated in calculation of $E(k)$ (for the noise
299: elimination details see Abramenko et al. 2001).
300: The eighth column shows the values $W_y$ calculated
301: from the same Eq. (\ref{Wsr}), however, noise was preliminary eliminated. Thus,
302: for each magnetogram, we obtained values of
303: $\langle \varepsilon \rangle$, $W_n$, and $W_y$, which allowed us to use
304: Eqs. (\ref{jtr}, \ref{jtrW}) to derive three estimations of the squared horizontal
305: electric current density, $\langle {\bf j}_h ^2\rangle$. The average from the
306: three estimations $(\langle {\bf j}_h^2\rangle)^{1/2}$ is presented in the last column
307: of Table 1.
308: %The data of Table 1 are graphically represented in Figures (\ref{Fig4} - \ref{Fig5}).
309:
310: \begin{table}[!ht]
311: \caption{\sf List of studied active regions and calculated parameters}
312: \footnotesize
313: \begin{center}
314: \begin{tabular}{llcrccccc}
315: \hline
316: NOAA & Data & $r_e$ &$r_d$ &$k_d - k_e$ &$\langle \varepsilon \rangle$&$\langle W_n \rangle$ &$\langle W_y \rangle$ &$(\langle {\bf j}_h^2\rangle)^{1/2}$\\
317: AR & & Mm & Mm & Mm$^{-1}$ & G$^2$/Mm$^2$ & G$^2$/Mm$^2$ & G$^2$/Mm$^2$ & Amper/m$^2$ \\
318: \hline
319: CH & 2001 Jun05/13:07 & 14.129 & 2.018 & 2.669 & 3106 & 3806 & 1581 & 0.0059 $\pm$ 0.0013 \\
320: \hline
321: 0314 a & 2003 Mar13/22:19 & 18.988 & 6.995 & 0.567 & 6929 & 6872 & 4500 & 0.0087 $\pm$ 0.0011 \\
322: 0314 b & 2003 Mar14/11:44 & 44.310 & 10.223& 0.473 & 20471 & 19479 & 16878 & 0.0155 $\pm$ 0.0008 \\
323: 0314 c & 2003 Mar15/11:10 & 44.310 & 14.766& 0.284 & 35149 & 33228 & 30396 & 0.0204 $\pm$ 0.0007 \\
324: \hline
325: 9574 a & 2001 Aug10/05:20 & 31.653 & 4.996& 1.059 & 12726 & 12708 & 10333 & 0.0122 $\pm$ 0.0007 \\
326: 9574 b & 2001 Aug10/17:11 & 31.653 & 10.547& 0.397 & 39459 & 38421 & 37117 & 0.0220 $\pm$ 0.0003 \\
327: 9574 c & 2001 Aug11/08:43 & 31.653 & 31.653& 0.000 & 58558 & 60528 & 59573 & 0.0275 $\pm$ 0.0003 \\
328: \hline
329: 0798 a & 2005 Aug18/08:27 & 47.136 & 4.873& 1.156 & 6564 & 6570 & 4067 & 0.0085 $\pm$ 0.0011 \\
330: 0798 b & 2005 Aug18/16:09 & 47.136 & 6.729& 0.800 & 9227 & 8833 & 6290 & 0.0101 $\pm$ 0.0010 \\
331: 0798 c & 2005 Aug19/08:38 & 47.136 & 28.264& 0.089 & 13839 & 12736 & 10119 & 0.0124 $\pm$ 0.0010 \\
332: \hline
333:
334: 9682 & 2001 Oct30/17:02 & 63.853 & 7.093& 0.788 & 40802 & 40082 & 36922 & 0.0223 $\pm$ 0.0006 \\
335: 9712 & 2001 Nov26/15:46 & 63.853 & 2.487& 2.428 & 33839 & 35281 & 32545 & 0.0207 $\pm$ 0.0004 \\
336: \hline
337: 9169 & 2000 Sep23/19:00 & 86.307 & 3.547& 1.698 & 59743 & 59257 & 55694 & 0.0271 $\pm$ 0.0006 \\
338: 9199 & 2000 Oct20/20:53 & 86.307 & 2.785& 2.184 & 25770 & 26340 & 23946 & 0.0179 $\pm$ 0.0004 \\
339: \hline
340: 9165 & 2000 Sep15/02:00 & 44.848 & 3.281& 1.775 & 44853 & 43850 & 40661 & 0.0233 $\pm$ 0.0006 \\
341: 9189 & 2000 Oct12/10:03 & 26.908 & 2.862& 1.962 & 15050 & 15671 & 14051 & 0.0137 $\pm$ 0.0004 \\
342:
343:
344: \hline
345: \end{tabular}
346: \end{center}
347:
348: \end{table}
349:
350: %#####################################################################
351: \begin{figure}[!h] \centerline {\epsfxsize=6.5truein
352: \epsffile{Fig_2.eps}}
353: \caption{\sf MDI/HR magnetograms ({\it top row}) and corresponding dissipation
354: structures, $\varepsilon(x,y)$, calculated for emerging NOAA AR 0798 (E8
355: -W15, S10). North is to the top, west is to the right. The image size is $ 204
356: \times 126$ arcsec. The magnetograms are scaled from -500 G to 500G. The
357: dissipation maps are scaled from 0 to $6 \times 10^4$ G$^2$/Mm$^2$.}
358: \label{Fig2}
359: \end{figure}
360: %#####################################################################
361:
362: %#####################################################################
363: \begin{figure}[!h] \centerline {\epsfxsize=5.5truein
364: \epsffile{Fig_3.eps}}
365: \caption{\sf MDI/HR magnetograms ({\it top row}) and corresponding dissipation
366: structures, $\varepsilon(x,y)$, calculated for a decaying complex NOAA AR 9682/9712.
367: North is to the top, west is to the right. The image size is $ 264
368: \times 174$ arcsec. The magnetograms are scaled from -500 G to 500G. The
369: dissipation maps are scaled from 0 to $9 \times 10^4$ G$^2$/Mm$^2$.}
370: \label{Fig3}
371: \end{figure}
372: %#####################################################################
373:
374: %#####################################################################
375: \begin{figure}[!h] \centerline {\epsfxsize=5.5truein
376: \epsffile{Fig_4.eps}}
377: \caption{\sf Energy spectra, $E(k)$ ({\it blue lines}), and dissipation spectra,
378: $k^2E(k)$ ({\it double red lines}), for three emerging active regions. For each AR,
379: frames ({\it a, b, c}) correspond to a row with the same mark in Table 1. Vertical
380: blue (red) bars mark the maximum of the energy (dissipation) spectrum. Blue bars
381: correspond to $k_e$ and red bars correspond to $k_d$. As the active region
382: emerges, $k_d$ shifts toward the smaller wavenumbers.}
383: \label{Fig4}
384: \end{figure}
385: %#####################################################################
386:
387: %#####################################################################
388: \begin{figure}[!h] \centerline {\epsfxsize=5.5truein
389: \epsffile{Fig_5.eps}}
390: \caption{\sf Energy spectra, $E(k)$, and dissipation spectra,
391: $k^2E(k)$, for three decaying magnetic complexes (three rows).
392: The right frame in each row
393: shows a superposition of the dissipation spectra at the well-developed
394: ({\it double red line}) and decaying ({\it solid green line}) state
395: of a magnetic complex. As the magnetic complex decays, $k_d$ shifts
396: toward the larger wavenumbers.
397: Other notations are the same as in Figure \ref{Fig4}.}
398: \label{Fig5}
399: \end{figure}
400: %#####################################################################
401:
402: The data from Table 1 show that the coronal hole displays the smallest
403: energy input scales, $r_e$, as compared to active regions. This can be
404: attributed to smaller typical size of magnetic elements inside coronal holes.
405: A non-trivial inference from the CH data is that
406: the energy dissipation scale, $r_d$, is smaller and the distance ($k_d - k_e$)
407: is larger than that for active regions. This implies
408: that in a CH we observe the state of more developed turbulence as compared to ARs.
409: Thus, an assumption of fully developed turbulence seems to be valid for CHs.
410: The current density is smallest for the CH.
411:
412: Three emerging ARs show a well pronounced trend as the emergence proceeds.
413: Namely, at the very beginning of emergence, we observe the largest distance
414: ($k_d - k_e$), which resembles the situation in the CH. Later during the emergence
415: this distance decreases by means of shifting of $k_d$ toward the small wavenumbers.
416: The intervals of the energy and dissipation become more and more overlapped
417: (see Figure \ref{Fig4}, frames from {\it a} to {\it c}) and the current density
418: increases (the last column in Table 1). The observed fact, that during the emergence
419: the bulk of dissipation shifts toward larger scales, implies the formation
420: of large-scale strong currents. In the map of spatial distribution of dissipation
421: (see Figure \ref{Fig2}) we see formation of bright contours (frequently closed)
422: surrounding the magnetic flux tubes. Their size increases as the AR emerges.
423:
424: Three decaying magnetic complexes showed an opposite behavior, see Figure \ref{Fig5}.
425: As the magnetic structure decays, the maximum of dissipation shifts toward the
426: smaller scales, large-scale currents decay, the current density decreases and
427: the entire picture begins to resemble what we saw for a CH. Disappearance of large-scale
428: dissipation features is distinctively visible in Figure \ref{Fig3} (compare
429: left and right frames in the bottom row.)
430:
431:
432: The data obtained allow us to estimate the upper boundary of the plasma conductivity,
433: $\sigma=\tau/l^2$. Here $l$ is a typical scale of decayed current and $\tau$
434: is a typical dissipation time. The data for NOAA ARs 9682/9712 pair show that
435: currents of scales about 7 Mm dissipated during $\tau <$ 27 days. This gives us
436: $\sigma < 5\times 10^{-8}$ s/m$^2$, which is four orders of magnitude lower than
437: the classical ohmic conductivity for the photosphere.
438: The magnetic diffusion coefficient in the photospheric plasma of active regions:
439: $\eta=l^2/\tau$ (Priest 1982, here $l$ is a typical scale of decayed magnetic element and $\tau$
440: is a typical decay time). For magnetic elements of 7 Mm dissipated during
441: $\tau <$ 27 days we derive $\eta > 2\times 10^7$ m$^2$/s, which is four
442: orders of magnitude higher than the classical diffusion coefficient for the photosphere.
443:
444:
445: \section { Discussion}
446:
447: The study presented here suggests that in an active region there exist large-scale
448: horizontal electric currents, which appear and grow during 1-2 days as the AR
449: emerges and slowly decay, during a couple of weeks, when the AR decays.
450: A bulk of magnetic dissipation of the $B_z$ component is associated with these
451: large-scale currents rather than with small-scale currents.
452:
453: This inference recalls the publications where the
454: photospheric and chromospheric magnetic fields were compared (Abramenko et al. (1992),
455: Choudhary et al. (2002), Leka \& Metcalf (2003), Balasubramaniam et al. (2004);
456: see also a resent review by Nagaraju et al. (2008) and references in).
457: Their results
458: suggest that the stronger the line-of-sight magnetic field, the faster it
459: decreases with height. Nagaraju et al. (2008) argued that for the photospheric
460: field stronger than 700 G, the chromospheric field values "are much weaker
461: than what one gets from the linear relationship [between the photospheric and
462: chromospheric fields] and also from those expected from the extrapolation
463: of the photospheric magnetic field" in the potential approximation.
464: Leka \& Metcalf (2003) observed that the potential field of NOAA 8299 extrapolated from the
465: photosphere to reasonable heights (lower than 2 Mm) statistically exceeds the observed
466: chromospheric field.
467: In 1992 Abramenko and co-authors reported that for NOAA 6280 the chromospheric field
468: measured in $H_{\beta}$ spectral line is lower than the extrapolated potential
469: field. They also found that the vertical gradient of the line-of-sight magnetic fields
470: is higher for strong fields.
471: Note, that the above results were obtained from different types of measurements,
472: different spectral lines, different instruments, etc., and still they are
473: consistent with each other.
474: Several reasons were suggested to explain the effect (see Nagaraju et al. (2008) for review).
475: However, only one of them addresses the effect of horizontal electric current formation.
476: Namely, in Abramenko et al. (1992) the conclusion was made that the possible reason
477: for such a systematical deviation between the observed and potential fields
478: is the presence of horizontal electric currents enclosing sunspots. The magnetic fields of
479: such currents are predominantly vertical and directed opposite to the original
480: field of a sunspot, so that superposition of the two fields results in the
481: fast weakening with height of the observed field.
482:
483: We suggest that one of the possible mechanisms for formation of such horizontal currents
484: could be the drift motions of charged particles in the medium of varying plasma
485: pressure gradient in a horizontal plane. Presence of such a medium is unavoidable
486: at the periphery of a sunspot. Such a drift can produce quasi-circular closed
487: horizontal currents around sunspots. This suggestion is in part confirmed by
488: the imaging of the horizontal currents, see Figures \ref{Fig0}, \ref{Fig2},
489: \ref{Fig3}: in all of them, quasi-circular closed bright structures around
490: sunspots are noticeable.
491:
492: Another mechanism for the horizontal currents formation can be suggested.
493: Often inside strong active regions with stressed and sheared neutral line
494: one observe strongly elongated magnetic features of both polarities along
495: the neutral line, see, for example, Figures \ref{Fig0}, \ref{Fig3}. The most
496: obvious way to explain such a phenomenon is to suggest a presence of highly
497: twisted horizontal magnetic structure laying in the photosphere. A strong
498: electric current along the axis of a magnetic helical tube is unavoidably present.
499: A straight long electric current $I$ generates an azimuthal magnetic field
500: $B$ at a distance $r$ from the cur rent axis: $B=2I/cr$, where $B$ is in Gauss,
501: $I$ in the CGSE system of units, and $c$ is the light velocity. The data for
502: NOAA AR 9682 (see Figure \ref{Fig3}) shows that an azimuthal magnetic field
503: of about 500 G is generated at a distance of approximately 3 Mm from the axis
504: of the horizontal current channel laying along the neutral line. This gives us
505: an estimation of the current in the channel as $0.75 \cdot 10^{12}$ A and the
506: density of the current as $0.026$ A/m$^2$, which is compatible with the
507: magnitude given in Table 1 for this active region.
508:
509: Emergence of a horizontal helical flux rope along a neutral line was recently
510: reported by Okamoto et al. (2008) from vector magnetic field observations with
511: the Solar Optical Telescope (SOT) on board the {\it Hinode} satellite.
512:
513:
514: Taking into account all the above mentioned results, we suggest that strong
515: {\it horizontal} electric currents are present in the solar atmosphere, and they
516: occupy a large interval of heights: at least, from the photosphere to
517: chromosphere. Their density, $\langle j_h \rangle \sim (0.008 - 0.028) $ A/m$^2$,
518: is quit compatible with the density of vertical currents in the photosphere,
519: see, e.g., Abramenko et al. (1991): $\langle j_z \rangle \sim 0.06 $ A/m$^2$;
520: Wheatland (2000): (0.009 - 0.015) A/m$^2$. The horizontal currents may contribute
521: significantly into the dynamics of the photosphere/corona coupling, as well
522: as into estimation of non-potentiality of ARs. They have to be closely connected
523: with transverse plasma motions, with creation of shear motions. From this standpoint,
524: the recently suggested new approach to study plasma velocities (Nagaraju et al. 2008)
525: seems to be very promising.
526:
527:
528: One more result of the above study deserves to be briefly discussed.
529: The shifting of the maximum of the dissipation spectrum as an active region emerges
530: and decays indicates that the turbulence regime varies with the evolution of the AR.
531: Namely, as an active region emerges, the state of fully developed turbulence
532: becomes gradually replaced by a state of under-developed turbulence.
533: The state of under-developed turbulence in mature active regions
534: still bears a signature of a turbulent cascade, that is confirmed by
535: {\it gradual} decrease of energy along the energy spectrum.
536: High value of the magnetic diffusion coefficient obtained
537: here implies that the turbulent diffusion is significant
538: in well-developed active regions and is responsible to the energy cascading.
539: However, the presence of a bulk of dissipation at large scales suggests that
540: the ohmic dissipation of large-scale currents might compete with the turbulent
541: diffusion in formation of a dissipative regime in the photosphere of
542: well-developed active regions. As the active region decays, the large-scale
543: currents decay faster, as compared to the small-scale currents, and the
544: fully-developed turbulence tends to be restored.
545:
546:
547:
548: Author is thankful to Prof. Lennard Fisk for a suggestion to use the dissipation
549: spectrum as a proxy for the mean squared curl, to Drs. Vasyl Yurchyshyn,
550: Gregory Fleshman, Haimin Wang for helpful discussions, to Erika Norro and Aaron Coulter
551: for their help with language issues.
552: This work was supported, in part, by NASA NNX07AT16G grant and
553: NSF grant ATM-0716512.
554:
555:
556:
557:
558:
559: \begin{thebibliography}{}
560: \bibitem{}
561: Abramenko, V. 2005, ApJ, 629, 1141
562:
563: \bibitem{}
564: Abramenko, V. I., Gopasiuk, S. I., Ogir', M. B. 1991, Sol. Phys., 134, 287
565:
566: \bibitem{}
567: Abramenko, V. I., Gopasyuk, S. I., Ogir', M. B., Yurchishin, V. B. 1992, Kinematics Phys. Celest. Bodies, 8, No. 5, 43
568:
569:
570: \bibitem{}
571: Abramenko, V., Yurchyshyn, V., Wang, H. \& Goode, P. R. 2001, Sol. Phys., 201, 225
572:
573: \bibitem{}
574: Balasubramaniam, K. S.; Christopoulou, E. B.; Uitenbroek, H. 2004, ApJ, 606, 1233
575:
576: \bibitem{}
577: Biskamp, D. 1993, Nonlinear Magnetohydrodynamics (Cambridge University Press, New York)
578:
579: \bibitem{}
580: Choudhary, D. P., Suematsu, Y., Ichimoto, K. 2002, Sol. Phys. 209,349
581:
582: \bibitem{}
583: Leka, K.D.\& Metcalf, T.R. 2003, Sol. Phys. 212, 361
584:
585: \bibitem{}
586: Nagaraju, K., Sankarasubramanian, K. \& Rangarajan, K. E. 2008, ApJ, 678, 531
587:
588: \bibitem{}
589: Moffatt, H.K. 1978, Magnetic Field Generation in Electrically Conducting Fluids
590: (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, London - New York - Melburn)
591:
592: \bibitem{}
593: Monin, A.S.\& Yaglom, A.M. 1975, Statistical Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 2,
594: ed. J.Lumley (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
595:
596: \bibitem{}
597: Okamoto, T. J., Tsuneta, S., Lites, B. W., and 12 co-authors 2008, ApJ, 673, L215
598:
599:
600: \bibitem{}
601: Parker, E.N. 1979, Cosmical magnetic fields, their origin and their activity (Oxford
602: University Press)
603:
604: \bibitem{}
605: Petrovay, K. \& Szakaly, G. 1993, Astron. Astrophys., 274, 543
606:
607: \bibitem{}
608: Priest, E. 1982, Solar Magnetohydrodynamics (Reidel)
609:
610: \bibitem{}
611: Scherrer, P.H., Bogart, R.S., Bush, R.I., Hoeksema, J.T., Kosovichev, A.G.,
612: Schou, J., Rosenberg, W., Springer, L., Tarbell, T.D., Title, A., Wolfson, C.J.,
613: Zayer, I. and the MDI engineering team, 1995, Sol. Phys., 162,129
614:
615: \bibitem{}
616: Wheatland, M.S. 2000, ApJ, 532, 616
617:
618: \end{thebibliography}{}
619:
620: \end{document}
621:
622:
623:
624:
625: