1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2: %% SELECT THE LAYOUT

3: %%

4: %% The class supports further options.

5: %% See aipguide.pdf for details.

6: %%

7: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

8: 

9: \documentclass[

10:     ,final            % use final for the camera ready runs

11: %%  ,draft            % use draft while you are working on the paper

12: %%  ,numberedheadings % uncomment this option for numbered sections

13: %%  ,                 % add further options here if necessary

14:   ]

15:   {aipproc}

16: 

17: \layoutstyle{6x9}

18: 

19: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

20: %% NEW COMMANDS

21: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

22: 

23: \newcommand{\etal}{et~al.}

24: \newcommand{\eg}{e.g., }

25: \newcommand{\ie}{i.e., }

26: \newcommand{\Msun}{M_{\odot}}

27: \newcommand{\kms}{km~s$^{-1}$}

28: \newcommand{\ergs}{erg~s$^{-1}$}

29: \newcommand{\Fefs}{$^{56}$Fe}

30: \newcommand{\Cofs}{$^{56}$Co}

31: \newcommand{\Nifs}{$^{56}$Ni}

32: \newcommand{\Mms}{M_{\rm MS}}

33: \newcommand{\Mej}{M_{\rm ej}}

34: \newcommand{\KE}{E_{\rm K}}

35: \def\gsim{\mathrel{\rlap{\lower 4pt \hbox{\hskip 1pt $\sim$}}\raise 1pt

36: \hbox {$>$}}}

37: \def\lsim{\mathrel{\rlap{\lower 4pt \hbox{\hskip 1pt $\sim$}}\raise 1pt

38: \hbox {$<$}}}

39: \newcommand{\vph}{v_{\rm ph}}

40: \newcommand{\samurai}{\texttt{SAMURAI}}

41: \def\pa{\partial}

42: \def\ion#1#2{{\rm #1}~{\sc #2}}

43: 

44: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

45: %% FRONTMATTER

46: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

47: 

48: \begin{document}

49: 

50: \title{Multi-Dimensional Simulations of Radiative Transfer 

51: in Aspherical Core-Collapse Supernovae}

52: 

53: \classification{97.60.Bw; 97.10.Ex; 26.30.-k}

54: \keywords{supernovae; gamma-ray bursts; radiative transfer; nucleosynthesis}

55: 

56: 

57: \author{Masaomi Tanaka}{

58:   address={Department of Astronomy, Graduate School of Science, 

59: University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; mtanaka@astron.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp}

60: }

61: 

62: \author{Keiichi Maeda}{

63:   address={Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe, 

64: University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Japan}

65:   ,altaddress={Max-Planck-Institut f\"{u}r Astrophysik, 

66: Garching bei M\"{u}nchen, Germany}

67: }

68: 

69: \author{Paolo A. Mazzali}{

70:   address={Max-Planck-Institut f\"{u}r Astrophysik, 

71: Garching bei M\"{u}nchen, Germany}

72:  ,altaddress={Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica, OATs, Trieste, Italy}

73: }

74: 

75: \author{Ken'ichi Nomoto}{

76:   address={Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe, 

77: University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Japan}

78:   ,altaddress={Department of Astronomy, Graduate School of Science, 

79: University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; mtanaka@astron.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp} % additional visiting address

80: }

81: 

82: 

83: 

84: \begin{abstract}

85: 

86: We study optical radiation of aspherical supernovae (SNe)

87: and present an approach to verify the asphericity of SNe 

88: with optical observations of extragalactic SNe.

89: For this purpose, we have developed

90: a multi-dimensional Monte-Carlo radiative transfer code, 

91: \texttt{SAMURAI} \ (SupernovA MUlti-dimensional RAdIative transfer code).

92: The code can compute the optical light curve and spectra both at 

93: early phases ($\lsim$ 40 days after the explosion) and late phases

94: ($\sim$ 1 year after the explosion),

95: based on hydrodynamic and nucleosynthetic models.

96: We show that all the optical observations of SN 1998bw 

97: (associated with GRB 980425) are consistent with polar-viewed 

98: radiation of the aspherical explosion model with kinetic energy

99: $20 \times 10^{51}$ ergs.

100: Properties of off-axis hypernovae are also discussed briefly.

101: 

102: \end{abstract}

103: \maketitle

104: 

105: 

106: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

107: %% MAINMATTER

108: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

109: 

110: 

111: \section{Introduction}

112: \label{sec:introduction}

113: 

114: Although the explosion mechanism of core-collapse supernovae (SNe) 

115: is not well understood,

116: there is several observational evidence of non-spherical explosion,

117: obtained by the imaging of {\it very} nearby SNe, 

118: \eg SN 1987A \citep{wan02} and Galactic supernova remnants \citep{hwa04}.

119: Even when the imaging is not possible, 

120: the detection of polarization from extragalactic SNe 

121: \citep{wan01, kaw02, leo06} suggests that SNe are not spherical.

122: In addition to these studies, 

123: spectroscopy of SNe can also give clues of the structure of SN explosion.

124: For example, emission line profiles in the late time spectra 

125: ($t \gsim$ 1 year, where $t$ is the time after the explosion)

126: reveals the asphericity of the explosion \citep{maz05}.

127: 

128: It is well established that 

129: a special class of Type Ic SNe

130: \footnote{SNe that do not show H, He, and strong Si

131: absorption in the early time spectra ($t \lsim 40$ days)

132: are classified as Type Ic \citep{fil97}.} 

133: are associated with the long gamma-ray bursts (GRBs, see \citep{woo06}

134: and references therein).

135: This class of SNe is thought to be highly

136: energetic, so called hypernovae

137: (here defined as SNe with ejecta kinetic energy 

138: $E_{51} = \KE / 10^{51} {\rm ergs} > 10$; \eg \citep{nom06}).

139: The asphericity of hypernovae is of great interest

140: related to the nature of GRBs.

141: 

142: Since GRBs are induced by relativistic jets, 

143: hypernovae are also thought to be aspherical.

144: However, the large kinetic energy of hypernovae 

145: is estimated by the analysis under the spherical symmetry.

146: No realistic multi-dimensional explosion models have been 

147: verified against the observed early phase spectra.

148: 

149: To study the multi-dimensional nature of the SN explosion

150: through the various observational facts, 

151: radiative transfer calculations are required to

152: connect observables and hydrodynamics models.

153: In this paper, 

154: radiative transfer in SN ejecta is solved 

155: with a multi-dimensional Monte-Carlo radiative transfer code, \samurai

156: \ (SupernovA MUlti-dimensional RAdIative transfer code),

157: based on hydrodynamic and nucleosynthetic models of hypernovae.

158: The results are compared with observations of SN 1998bw, and

159: implications for off-axis hypernovae are discussed.

160: 

161: 

162: \begin{figure}

163: \includegraphics[scale=0.6, angle=270]{f1.eps}

164: \caption{

165: Aspherical explosion model A20 with the kinetic energy

166: $E_{51} = \KE / 10^{51} {\rm ergs} =20$.

167: {\it Left}: Density distribution (log ${\rm g \ cm^{-3}}$) at t=10 days.

168: The contour also shows the density. 

169: {\it Right}: Mass fraction of \Nifs.

170: The velocity can be used as spatial coordinate

171: thanks to the homologous expansion ($r \propto v$).

172: \label{fig:model}}

173: \end{figure}

174: 

175: \section{Explosion Models}

176: \label{sec:models}

177: 

178: 

179: We use the results of multi-dimensional hydrodynamic 

180: and nucleosynthetic calculations for SN 1998bw \citep{mae02} 

181: as input density and element distributions.

182: Figure \ref{fig:model} shows the density structure and 

183: the distribution of \Nifs.

184: Since the original models used a He star as a progenitor,

185: we simply replace the abundance of the He layer with that of the C+O layer.

186: In the hydrodynamic model, energy is deposited aspherically, with 

187: more energy in the jet direction (z-axis, defined as $\theta = 0^{\circ}$).

188: As a result, \Nifs\ is preferentially synthesized along this direction 

189: (right panel of Fig. \ref{fig:model}).

190: In this paper, an aspherical model with $E_{51} =20$ (A20)

191: and a spherical model with $E_{51} =50$ (F50) are studied.

192: They are constructed based on the models with $E_{51}=10$ 

193: \citep{mae02, mae06a}.

194: 

195: 

196: \section{The Numerical Code}

197: \label{sec:method}

198: 

199: \begin{figure}

200: \begin{tabular}{cc}

201: \includegraphics[scale=0.9]{f2a.eps}&

202: \includegraphics[scale=0.9]{f2b.eps}

203: \end{tabular}

204: \caption{The LC of SN 1998bw (points) compared with 

205: the results of simulations.

206: {\it Left}: The LCs at early phases. The LC of the polar-viewed model 

207: ($\theta = 0^{\circ}$) rises earlier than that of the side-viewed model

208: ($\theta = 90^{\circ}$).

209: {\it Right}: The LCs including late phases. 

210: The LC of the spherical model that explained early phase LC and spectra (F50)

211: fades faster than the observed LC. 

212: \label{fig:LC}}

213: \end{figure}

214: 

215: In order to study the detailed properties of the radiation 

216: from aspherical SNe, 

217: we have unified a SupernovA MUlti-dimensional RAdIative transfer code \samurai.

218: \samurai\ is a combination of 3D codes adopting Monte-Carlo 

219: methods to compute the bolometric light curve (LC) \citep{mae06a,mae06}, and

220: the spectra of SNe from early \citep{tan06, tan07} to late phases 

221: \citep{mae06b} 

222: \footnote{See also \citep{hoe96, hoe99, tho02, kas04, koz05, sim07}

223: for other multi-dimensional codes.}.

224: 

225: The early phase spectra are calculated as snapshots 

226: in the optically thin atmosphere, using the results of 

227: the LC simulation as initial conditions.

228: A sharply defined photosphere is assumed as an inner boundary for simplicity.

229: The position of the inner boundary in each direction is 

230: determined by averaging the positions of the last scattering photon packets 

231: (see Fig. 3 of \citet{mae06a}).

232: For the computation of ionization and excitation state

233: in the atmosphere,

234: the local physical process same as in the previous 1D code 

235: \citep{maz93, maz00}.

236: Line scattering under the Sobolev approximation

237: and electron scattering are taken into account.

238: For line scattering, the effect of photon branching is included

239: as in \citet{luc99}.

240: In the simulations, 16 elements are included,

241: \ie H, He, C, N, O, Na, Mg, Si, S, Ti, Cr, Ca, Ti, Fe, Co and Ni.

242: 

243: 

244: \section{Light Curves}

245: \label{sec:LC}

246: 

247: \citet{mae06a} computed bolometric LCs in 3D space.

248: A common problem in hypernova LCs is  

249: that a spherical model reproducing the LC and spectra at early phases 

250: ($E_{51} = 50$ for SN 1998bw) declines more rapidly than the observed LC

251: at $t \gsim 100$ days \citep{nak01, mae03} 

252: (see model F50 in the right panel of Fig. \ref{fig:LC}).

253: This problem can be solved by aspherical models with a polar view.

254: In aspherical models, even with a lower kinetic energy

255: ($E_{51} = 10 - 20$, model A20 in Fig. \ref{fig:LC}) than 

256: in the spherical case ($E_{51} = 50$),

257: which allows sufficient trapping of $\gamma$-rays at late times,

258: the rapid rise of the LC can be reproduced

259: because of the extended \Nifs\ distribution \citep{mae06a}.

260: 

261: 

262: \section{Spectra}

263: \label{sec:spectra}

264: 

265: \begin{figure}

266: \begin{tabular}{cc}

267: \includegraphics[scale=0.48]{f3a.eps}&

268: \includegraphics[scale=0.95]{f3b.eps}

269: \end{tabular}

270: \caption{

271: {\it Left}: Temperature structure ({\it upper left}), Ca mass fraction

272: ({\it upper right}), ionization fraction of \ion{Ca}{ii} and \ion{Ca}{iii}

273: ({\it lower left} and {\it lower right}, respectively) in 

274: the SN atmosphere at $t=20$ days.

275: {\it Right}: The observed spectrum of SN 1998bw at t=18 days 

276: compared with the synthetic spectra computed with model F50 (spherical), 

277: A20 (aspherical) and A20p0.2 (aspherical $+$ mixing).

278: For aspherical models, the solid and dashed lines show the spectra

279: viewed from polar ($\theta = 0^{\circ}$) 

280: and equatorial ($\theta = 90^{\circ}$) direction, respectively.

281: The synthetic spectra are scaled to match the observed spectra 

282: since the input luminosity is slightly brighter than the observation

283: (Fig. \ref{fig:LC}, see \citet{tan07} for details).

284: The synthetic spectra are shifted by 3.0, 2.0, 1.0 $\times 10^{-14}$

285: from top to bottom.

286: \label{fig:specd20}}

287: \end{figure}

288: 

289: 

290: The right panel of Figure \ref{fig:specd20} shows the synthetic spectra

291: at $t=20$ days (around the maximum brightness) 

292: for models F50 and A20 compared with 

293: the observed spectrum of SN 1998bw.

294: In model A20, all the absorption lines 

295: except for \ion{Si}{ii} $\lambda$6355 are

296: stronger for larger $\theta$, \ie for a side view.

297: This is understood by the asphericity of the temperature structure 

298: in the SN atmosphere.

299: As shown in the left panel of Figure \ref{fig:specd20}, 

300: the temperature near the z-axis is higher than in 

301: the equatorial plane by $\sim 2000$ K ({\it upper left}),

302: tracing the aspherical distribution of \Nifs.

303: This makes the ionization degree near the z-axis higher

304: ({\it lower} panels).

305: As a result, all species that have strong lines,

306: \ie \ion{O}{i}, \ion{Si}{ii}, \ion{Ca}{ii}, \ion{Ti}{ii}, \ion{Cr}{ii}

307: and \ion{Fe}{ii}, dominate near the equator but not near the z-axis.

308: 

309: The right panel of Figure \ref{fig:specd30} shows the synthetic spectra

310: at $t=30$ days for models F50 and A20.

311: The emergent spectra of the aspherical model are not 

312: significantly different for different viewing angles (Fig. \ref{fig:specd30}).

313: At this epoch, the temperature structure are still 

314: anisotropic, and consequently, 

315: the distribution of ionization fractions is also aspherical 

316: (see the left panel of Fig. \ref{fig:specd30}).

317: However, since nucleosynthesis occurs entirely near the polar 

318: direction in the model, and the photosphere at this epoch is

319: located inside the region where heavy elements are synthesized 

320: in the explosion,

321: the suppression of important ions near the z-axis is compensated by the larger 

322: abundance of the heavy elements

323: (see $X$(Ca) in Fig. \ref{fig:specd30}).

324: 

325: \begin{figure}

326: \begin{tabular}{cc}

327: \includegraphics[scale=0.48]{f4a.eps}&

328: \includegraphics[scale=0.95]{f4b.eps}

329: \end{tabular}

330: \caption{

331: Same as Figure \ref{fig:specd20} but at $t=30$ days.

332: The synthetic spectra are shifted by 1.8, 1.2, 0.6 $\times 10^{-14}$

333: from top to bottom.

334: \label{fig:specd30}}

335: \end{figure}

336: 

337: We compare the polar-viewed spectra of model A20 with the observed 

338: spectra of SN 1998bw.

339: At $t=20$ days, the absorptions of \ion{O}{i}, \ion{Ca}{ii}

340: and \ion{Fe}{ii}/\ion{Fe}{iii} in the model are weaker 

341: than in SN 1998bw.

342: At $t=30$ days, the \ion{Ca}{ii} and 

343: \ion{Fe}{ii} lines become strong, although the 

344: \ion{O}{i}-\ion{Ca}{ii} absorption at 7000 -- 8000 \AA\ is still narrower than 

345: in the observed spectrum. 

346: In the synthetic polar-viewed spectrum,

347: the peaks around 4000 and 4500 \AA\ are partially suppressed 

348: by the high velocity absorption by the extended Fe near the jet, 

349: while they are strong in the side-viewed spectrum. 

350: The suppression of the peaks is similarly seen in the spectrum of SN 1998bw.

351: 

352: The strengths of the \ion{Ca}{ii} and \ion{Fe}{ii} lines at $t=20$ days 

353: can be increased if heavy elements synthesized 

354: in the explosion are mixed to outer layers.

355: In SN explosions, Rayleigh - Taylor (R-T) instabilities are expected to occur

356: (see \citet{kif00} for the case of Type Ic SNe),

357: which could deliver the newly synthesized elements to higher velocities.

358: In Figures \ref{fig:specd20} and \ref{fig:specd30}, 

359: synthetic spectra of model A20p0.2 are also shown.

360: In this model, $20 \%$ of synthesized material is assumed to be mixed 

361: to the outer layers.

362: The agreement with the observed spectra becomes better especially at 

363: $t=20$ days.

364: 

365: \section{Discussion}

366: \label{sec:discussion}

367: 

368: We have presented the detailed simulations of 

369: optical radiation with realistic jet-like hypernova models.

370: The emergent LC and spectra are different for different viewing angles.

371: The spectral properties are determined by the combination of 

372: aspherical abundances and anisotropic ionization states.

373: Although the agreement of the spectra is far from perfect, 

374: the spectra of the model with mixing are in qualitative agreement 

375: with those of SN 1998bw.

376: 

377: The LC study shows that 

378: the kinetic energy of an aspherical model that explains SN 1998bw

379: is $E_{51} = 20$, which is less than 

380: that of a well-fitting spherical model ($E_{51} = 50$).

381: The early phase spectra can also be explained by the model with

382: $E_{51} = 20$.

383: However, it should be noted that the higher kinetic energy than the canonical

384: SNe ($E_{51} \sim 1$) is still required.

385: 

386: The simulations enable us to predict the 

387: radiation from off-axis hypernovae.

388: The LC viewed off-axis rises more slowly than that of on-axis,

389: and its maximum brightness is fainter (Fig. \ref{fig:LC}).

390: The spectra viewed off-axis show

391: (1) a slightly lower absorption velocity, 

392: (2) stronger peaks around 4000 and 4500 \AA\ (narrower absorption of Fe) and

393: (3) a stronger \ion{Na}{i} $\lambda$5890 line.

394: However, the spectra still show general appearance of 

395: ``hypernovae'' or ``broad-line supernovae''.

396: At later phases, off-axis hypernovae would show 

397: double-peaked [\ion{O}{i}] emission profile \citep{maz05, mae06b}.

398: 

399: 

400: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

401: %% BACKMATTER

402: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

403: 

404: \begin{theacknowledgments}

405: M.T. is supported through the JSPS (Japan Society for the 

406: Promotion of Science) Research Fellowship for Young Scientists.

407: \end{theacknowledgments}

408: 

409: 

410: \begin{thebibliography}{}

411: 

412: \bibitem[Wang et al. (2002)]{wan02} Wang, L., et al. 2002, ApJ, 579, 671

413: 

414: \bibitem[Hwang et al. (2004)]{hwa04} Hwang, U., et al. 2004, ApJ, 615, L117

415: 

416: \bibitem[Wang et al. (2001)]{wan01} Wang, L., et al. 2001, ApJ, 550, 1030

417: 

418: \bibitem[Kawabata et al. (2002)]{kaw02} Kawabata, K.S., et al. 2002, ApJ, 580, L39

419: 

420: \bibitem[Leonard et al. (2006)]{leo06} Leonard, D.C., et al. 2006, Nature, 440, 505

421: 

422: \bibitem[Mazzali et al. (2005)]{maz05} Mazzali, P. A., et al. 2005, Science, 308, 1284  

423: 

424: \bibitem[Filippennko (1997)]{fil97} Filippenko, A.V., 1997, ARA\&A, 35, 309

425: 

426: \bibitem[Woosley \& Bloom (2006)]{woo06} Woosley, S. E. \& Bloom, J. S. 2006, ARA\&A, 44, 507

427: 

428: \bibitem[Nomoto et al. (2006)]{nom06} Nomoto, K., et al. 2006, Nucl. Phys. A, 777, 424 (astro-ph/0605725)

429: 

430: \bibitem[Maeda et al. (2002)]{mae02} Maeda, K., et al. 2002, ApJ, 565, 405

431: 

432: \bibitem[Maeda et al. (2006a)]{mae06a} Maeda, K., Mazzali, P. A., \& Nomoto, K. 2006a, ApJ, 645, 1331

433: 

434: \bibitem[Maeda (2006)]{mae06} Maeda, K. 2006, ApJ, 644, 385

435: 

436: \bibitem[Tanaka et al. (2006)]{tan06} Tanaka, M., et al. 2006, ApJ, 645, 470

437: 

438: \bibitem[Tanaka et al. (2007)]{tan07} Tanaka, M., et al. 2007, ApJ, 668, L19

439: 

440: \bibitem[Maeda et al. (2006b)]{mae06b} Maeda, K., et al. 2006b, ApJ, 640, 854

441: 

442: \bibitem[H\"oflich et al.(1996)]{hoe96} H\"oflich, P, et al. 1996, ApJ, 459, 307

443: \bibitem[H\"oflich et al. (1999)]{hoe99} H\"oflich, P, Wheeler, J.C., \& Wang, L. 1999, ApJ, 521, 179

444: 

445: \bibitem[Thomas et al. (2002)]{tho02} Thomas, R.C., et al. 2002, ApJ, 567, 1037

446: 

447: \bibitem[Kasen et al. (2004)]{kas04} Kasen, D., et al. 2004, ApJ, 610, 876

448: 

449: \bibitem[Kozma et al. (2005)]{koz05} Kozma, C., et al. 2005, A\&A, 437, 983

450: 

451: \bibitem[Sim (2007)]{sim07} Sim, S.A. 2007, MNRAS, 375, 154

452: 

453: \bibitem[Mazzali \& Lucy (1993)]{maz93} Mazzali, P.A. \& Lucy, L.B. 1993, A\&A, 279, 447

454: 

455: \bibitem[Mazzali (2000)]{maz00} Mazzali, P.A. 2000, A\&A, 363, 705

456: 

457: \bibitem[Lucy (1999)]{luc99} Lucy, L. B. 1999, A\&A, 345, 211

458: 

459: \bibitem[Nakamura et al. (2001)]{nak01} Nakamura, T., et al. 2001, ApJ, 550, 991

460: 

461: \bibitem[Maeda et al. (2003)]{mae03} Maeda, K., et al. 2003, ApJ, 593, 931

462: 

463: \bibitem[Kifonidis et al. (2000)]{kif00} Kifonidis, K., et al. 2000, ApJ, 531, L123

464: 

465: 

466: \end{thebibliography}

467: 

468: 

469: \end{document}

470: 

471: