1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \begin{document}
3:
4: \title{Comparison of 3.6 -- 8.0 Micron {\it Spitzer}/IRAC Galactic Center Survey
5: Point Sources with Chandra X--Ray Point Sources in the Central 40x40 Parsecs}
6:
7: \author{
8: R.~G.~Arendt\altaffilmark{1,2},
9: D.~Y.~Gezari\altaffilmark{3},
10: S.~R.~Stolovy\altaffilmark{4},
11: K.~Sellgren\altaffilmark{5},
12: R. Smith\altaffilmark{6},
13: S.~V.~Ram\'{\i}rez\altaffilmark{7},
14: F.~Yusef-Zadeh\altaffilmark{8},
15: C.~J.~Law\altaffilmark{8,9},
16: H.~A.~Smith\altaffilmark{10},
17: A.~S.~Cotera\altaffilmark{11},
18: S.~H.~Moseley\altaffilmark{12}
19: }
20:
21:
22: \altaffiltext{1}
23: {CRESST/UMBC/GSFC, Code 665, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center,
24: 8800 Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD 20771; richard.g.arendt@nasa.gov}
25: \altaffiltext{2}
26: {Science Systems and Applications, Inc.}
27: \altaffiltext{3}
28: {NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 667, 8800 Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD 20771}
29: \altaffiltext{4}
30: {{\it Spitzer} Science Center, California Institute of Technology,
31: Mail Code 220-6, 1200 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125}
32: \altaffiltext{5}
33: {Department of Astronomy, Ohio State University, 140 West 18th Av.,
34: Columbus, OH, 43210, USA}
35: \altaffiltext{6}
36: {NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 662, 8800 Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD 20771}
37: \altaffiltext{7}
38: {IPAC, California Institute of Technology,
39: Mail Code 100-22, 1200 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125}
40: \altaffiltext{8}
41: {Department of Physics and Astronomy, Northwestern University,
42: Evanston, IL 60208}
43: \altaffiltext{9}
44: {now at Sterrenkundig Instituut ``Anton Pannekoek'', Universiteit van Amsterdam}
45: \altaffiltext{10}
46: {Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics,
47: 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138}
48: \altaffiltext{11}
49: {SETI Institute, 515 North Whisman Road, Mountain View, CA 94043}
50: \altaffiltext{12}
51: {NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 665, 8800 Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD 20771}
52:
53: \begin{abstract}
54: We have studied the correlation between 2357 Chandra X--ray point sources in a
55: $40 \times 40$ parsec field and $\sim$20,000 infrared sources we observed in the
56: corresponding subset of our $2\arcdeg \times 1.4\arcdeg$ {\it Spitzer}/IRAC Galactic
57: Center Survey at 3.6--8.0 $\micron$, using various spatial and X--ray hardness thresholds.
58: The correlation was determined for source separations of less than
59: $0\farcs5$, 1$''$ or 2$''$. Only the soft X--ray sources show any correlation
60: with infrared point sources on these scales, and that correlation is very weak.
61: The upper limit on hard X--ray sources that have infrared counterparts
62: is $<1.7\%$ (3$\sigma$). However, because of the confusion limit of the IR catalog,
63: we only detect IR sources with absolute magnitudes $\lesssim 1$. As a result, a stronger
64: correlation with fainter sources cannot be ruled out.
65: Only one compact infrared source, IRS~13, coincides with any of the dozen prominent X--ray emission features in the $3 \times 3$
66: parsec region centered on Sgr A*, and the diffuse X--ray and infrared
67: emission around Sgr A* seems to be anti-correlated on a few-arcsecond scale. We compare
68: our results with previous identifications of near--infrared companions to
69: Chandra X--ray sources.
70: \end{abstract}
71:
72: \keywords{Galaxy: center --- infrared: stars --- X-rays: binaries}
73:
74: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
75: \section{Introduction}
76:
77: X-ray surveys of the Galactic center with
78: {\it Chandra X-Ray Observatory} (Wang et al.\ 2002; Muno et al.\ 2003) have provided a deep sampling of the
79: population of X--ray point sources that shows a large increase in source density
80: toward the Galactic Center. These X--ray sources have been modeled
81: as a population mix of various sorts of X-ray binaries, Wolf-Rayet
82: stars, nearby X-ray active stars in the foreground, and background AGN
83: (Pfahl et al.\ 2002;
84: Belczynski \& Taam 2004;
85: Ebisawa et al.\ 2005;
86: Ruiter et al.\ 2006;
87: Liu \& Li 2006;
88: Muno et al.\ 2006). However, the high extinction toward the Galactic center
89: prohibits the detection of visible light emitted by the stellar components in the expected
90: binaries. Near--IR searches have also had little success in detecting IR counterparts
91: of the X--ray point sources. Several OB stars and Wolf-Rayet stars have been identified with X-ray sources by near-IR spectroscopy (Muno et al.\ 2006, Mikles et al.\ 2006, Mauerhan et al.\ 2007), but the paucity of near-IR detections sets limits that suggest only a small fraction of the X--ray sources can be high mass X--ray binaries (HMXBs; Laycock et al.\ 2005; Bandopadhyay et al.\ 2006).
92:
93: Our {\it Spitzer Space Telescope} IRAC survey of the Galactic Center
94: (Stolovy et al.\ 2006, S. Stolovy et al.\ 2008 in preparation) provides a new opportunity to
95: search for IR counterparts to the X--ray sources. IRAC observations cover
96: four broad bands at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8 and 8 $\micron$. The survey imaged a
97: $2.0\arcdeg \times 1.4\arcdeg$ ($280 \times 200$ parsec at 8.0 kpc)
98: region of the Galactic Center with a nominal resolution of $\sim2''$ (Figure 1).
99: Since our observations are at longer wavelengths
100: than ground--based near--IR ($J, H, K$) observations, extinction should be less
101: of a hinderance to the detection of stellar companions. Furthermore, at the longest IRAC
102: wavelengths (5.8 and especially 8 $\micron$), IRAC is sensitive to
103: circumstellar dust emission which may cause significant extinction at shorter wavelengths.
104: Thus, comparison of the X--ray and IR point source catalogs may reveal
105: stellar companions which are at an evolutionary stage where they produce
106: large quantities of dust, or are simply too heavily attenuated by the line of sight
107: extinction at shorter wavelengths.
108:
109: We calculated the correlation between 2357 hard and soft Chandra X--ray
110: sources identified and catalogued by Muno et al.\ (2003)
111: and the $\sim$20,000 {\it Spitzer}/IRAC infrared point sources that lie within
112: a $40 \times 40$ parsec ($20 \times 20$ arcmin) field at the Galactic Center (Figure 2).
113: The IR sources are a small subset of our
114: full catalog (Ram\'irez et al.\ 2008) which has a mean confusion limit of $[3.6] = 12.4$ mag.
115: We divide the Chandra sources by their hardness because the high column density of gas towards the GC, $N_H$ $\sim$ 5 $\times$ 10$^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$, absorbs all soft X-rays. Thus soft X-ray sources must
116: be in the foreground towards the GC; hard X-ray sources can be at
117: the 8 kpc distance of the GC or can be foreground/background sources.
118:
119: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
120: \section{Analysis}
121: \subsection{IR/X--ray Point Source Correlations}
122:
123: The positional uncertainty of the IRAC point sources is correlated with wavelength. In the final band--merged catalog, the reported position
124: is that measured at the shortest IRAC wavelength at which each source was detected.
125: Within a radius of $10'$ from the galactic center 86\% of the IRAC sources are detected at
126: 3.6 or 4.5 $\micron$. According to Ram\'irez et al.\ (2008), 90\% of these sources
127: have positional errors of $<0.16''$.
128: The positional uncertainties of the X--ray sources are reported by Muno et al.\ (2003)
129: to be increasing with distance from the center of the field. Based on the given information,
130: we have assigned uncertainties to the X--ray positions that are the larger of $0\farcs3$ or $0.209''\ e^{\theta/225''}$,
131: where $\theta$ is the distance from the center of the field. With this prescription, only 39
132: of the 2357 X--ray sources have positional uncertainties $>2\farcs5$, and 1645 ($\sim70\%$)
133: have uncertainties $<0\farcs8$.
134:
135: In light of these positional uncertainties, we searched for infrared sources
136: that fell within three different limits ($0\farcs5$, 1$''$ and 2$''$) of the
137: Muno et al.\ (2003) X--ray source positions. The tightest constraint here ($0\farcs5$),
138: should include all
139: associations between infrared and X--ray sources with high positional accuracies. Some associations
140: between sources with larger positional errors may be missed, but the tight limit
141: will best exclude coincidental associations between unrelated sources along the same line of sight.
142: The looser limits were employed to provide a more complete census of the total number of
143: possible associations, and to provide a statistical test for random unrelated
144: associations, which should increase directly proportionally to the area of the constraint.
145:
146: Figures \ref{fig_ch1x}a and \ref{fig_ch4x}a show all the X--ray source locations plotted on the
147: IRAC 3.6 and 8 $\micron$ images. Figures \ref{fig_ch1x}b and \ref{fig_ch4x}b show only the
148: X--ray sources with IR counterparts within the specified limits ($<2''$, 1$''$, $0\farcs5$
149: are red, green and blue symbols respectively).
150: Figure \ref{fig_dots}a--b illustrates the cataloged distribution of IR sources and
151: X--ray sources. The distribution of IR sources appears uniform only because it is confusion
152: limited. For stars much brighter than the confusion limit, the density is peaked at the
153: Galactic center (Ram\'irez et al.\ 2008) as is that of the X--ray sources.
154:
155: The number of X--ray sources $N$ found coincident with an IR source, for each of the
156: three radial constraints and at each IRAC wavelength is listed in Table 1.
157: The statistical uncertainty on $N$ is given by $\sigma_N = \sqrt{N}$.
158: The X--ray and infrared sources in the
159: study field show an extremely weak correlation. Fewer than 7\% of the 2357 X--ray
160: sources had 3.6 $\micron$ counterparts in the catalog of IRAC infrared sources
161: in a 1$''$ sampling radius, and most of these are likely to be false identifications.
162: The number of counterparts decreases with increasing wavelength.
163:
164: \subsection{Likelihood of Chance Associations}
165: We determined
166: the likelihood of false correlations in the crowded infrared field by repeating the
167: same correlation analysis eight additional times, but with the X--ray source position
168: template offset from the nominal location, in a $5''$--pitch regular grid of eight positions N--S and E--W of center.
169: Figure \ref{fig_dots}c shows the distribution of the X--ray sources with 3.6 $\micron$
170: counterparts (within 1$''$), and Figure \ref{fig_dots}d shows the distribution when the
171: IR sources are artificially offset by 5$''$.
172: The mean number of X--ray sources with IR counterparts in these offset comparisons
173: is listed in Table 1 as $M$, with $\sigma_M = \sqrt{M/8}$.
174: The number of coincidences found in excess of chance is $N-M$. This excess is
175: typically 1\% of the X--ray sources, and never larger than 3 times the statistical uncertainty.
176: However, the fact that $M$ increases proportionally to the area of the matching constraint,
177: while $N$ increases more slowly, is another indication that (depending on wavelength)
178: roughly 10-30 of the matching IR and X--ray sources are real associations.
179: There are no cases of multiple candidates within circles of $0\farcs5$ or 1$''$,
180: and only 11 sources with 2 candidates within a 2$''$ circle. These numbers
181: are lower than expected by random chance because the width of the IRAC beam prevents
182: resolving sources that are closer together than $\sim3''$.
183:
184: As some of the X--ray sources do have fairly large positional uncertainties, we have repeated
185: the matching using only the X--ray sources with uncertainties $<0\farcs8$. These results are
186: shown in Table 2. Qualitatively, the results are similar to Table 1, in that the offset
187: matching tests usually find fewer matches than the properly aligned tests. Also the number
188: of matching sources ($N$) again rises more slowly than is expected (and measured by $M$)
189: for purely random associations. However, because the overall sample size is reduced by a
190: factor of 0.7, the results are not as statistically significant as those obtained using
191: the full sample.
192:
193: An interesting difference appears if we separate the X--ray sources according to their spectral hardness.
194: There is a modest excess in the number of soft X--ray sources (defined as
195: those with detections in the 0.5--2.0 keV band) with infrared
196: counterparts above that expected from random chance (Table 3).
197: There is a 4$\sigma$ excess in the number of soft X--ray sources with IR
198: counterparts at 3.6 $\micron$ compared to a 2$\sigma$ excess
199: in the correlations at 8.0 $\micron$. Again the trend persists, but with lower
200: statistical significance, if we limit the X--ray data set to those sources
201: with positional uncertainties $<0\farcs8$ (Table 4).
202: Based on the soft X--rays observed from these sources
203: (and therefore their relatively low column densities), we expect that the soft X--ray
204: sources are foreground objects, and not at the distance of the Galactic Center. The
205: excess soft X--ray/IR correlation is therefore likely due to these sources being
206: nearby, rather than being intrinsically bright in both wavebands.
207: In contrast, the hard X--ray sources seem to have only as many infrared counterparts
208: as would be expected from random associations (Tables 5 and 6). This is indicated both
209: by the comparison of the aligned and offset matching ($N$ vs. $M$), and by the way
210: $N$ increases proportionally to the area of the matching constraint.
211:
212: \section{Results}
213: We provide a listing of IR and X--ray sources coincident within 1$''$ in Table 7.
214: The table is provided to facilitate follow up research on these sources, but we
215: remind the reader that the majority of these associations are likely to be merely
216: coincidental.
217: The table contains designations and coordinates from each catalog, along with the IR
218: magnitudes, an indication X--ray spectral hardness, and the actual
219: separation between the associated sources. Much additional information can be found
220: by consulting the original catalogs (Muno et al.\ 2003; Ram\'irez et al.\ 2008).
221:
222: \subsection{Nature of the Correlations}
223: The spatial distribution of soft X--ray sources is less concentrated
224: toward the Galactic Center than that of the hard sources. Figure \ref{fig_cumul}
225: shows the cumulative distributions of distance from Sgr A* for all X--ray sources
226: and for the hard and soft sources separately. Also shown is the distribution
227: of the 51 sources which had 3.6 $\micron$ IR counterparts within $0\farcs5$.
228: These distributions can be compared statistically using the
229: Kolmogorov--Smirnov (K--S) test (e.g.\ Press et al.\ 1986). This test
230: measures the maximum separation $D$ between two cumulative distributions. Then we
231: calculate that probability of having the two distributions differ by $D$ or larger,
232: under the assumption that they are sampled from the same parent distribution.
233: By this statistic, the probability of finding the observed $D(hard-soft)$ is
234: essentially 0, if the two types of X--ray source really have the same radial
235: spatial distribution with respect to Sgr A*. The probability of finding the observed
236: $D(hard - 3.6\micron)$ is 0.01, and the probability of finding the observed
237: $D(soft - 3.6\micron)$ is 0.72. Thus, the K-S test indicates that it is statistically
238: unlikely that the hard X--ray sources and the set of matching 3.6 $\micron$ IR sources
239: share the same degree of clustering toward the Galactic Center. Whereas the
240: distribution of the matching 3.6 $\micron$ IR associations is entirely
241: consistent with that of the soft X--ray sources. This is further evidence that a
242: substantial majority of IR counterparts are associated with the soft X--ray sources
243: rather than the more numerous hard sources. For comparison the distribution
244: of all 3.6 $\micron$ sources within the same area of the X-ray sources is also
245: shown in Figure \ref{fig_cumul}. As would be inferred from Figure \ref{fig_dots}a, this
246: distribution is very close to (but not exactly) uniform. The probability of finding
247: $D(uniform - all\ 3.6\micron)$ is 0.03.
248:
249: \subsection{Infrared Colors of Counterparts to X--ray Sources}
250:
251: We next investigated the colors of the potential IR counterparts, to see if they might
252: be useful for separating intrinsic IR/X--ray sources from the random associations. The
253: color--magnitude diagram for the 17613 IRAC sources in the $40 \times 40$ parsec study
254: region that were detected at both 3.6 and 4.5 $\micron$ is shown in Figure \ref{fig_cmd}.
255: The circles and squares indicate IR stars that are identified with hard and soft X--ray sources, respectively, in the Muno et al.\ (2003) catalog. 42 X--ray sources had IRAC sources falling within $0\farcs5$ of the nominal X--ray positions (large circles/squares), 130 had IRAC sources
256: within 1$''$ (medium circles/squares), and 394 had IRAC sources falling within 2$''$ (small circles/squares). See Tables 1--3 for details, including statistics for hard and soft X--ray sources.
257:
258: The colors of the possible infrared counterparts do not seem to be unusual in any way.
259: The distribution of colors of those infrared stars that have coincident X--ray sources
260: is essentially the same as the distribution of all other infrared stars in our sample.
261: There is also no apparent differentiation between the colors of infrared stars as a
262: function of their distance from the X--ray source.
263: The K-S test reveals no significant difference between the color distributions of
264: the infrared candidates and the larger sample of all infrared sources within the field.
265: Thus, the observed colors of the IRAC point sources are of little use in attempting to
266: discriminate between real and coincidental X--ray/IR correlations.
267:
268: \subsection{Infrared and X--ray Sources at the Central Parsec}
269:
270: Casual inspection of the Chandra and {\it Spitzer}/IRAC images gives the impression
271: that the bright X--ray cluster at the Galactic Center is well-correlated with the
272: infrared emission. However, closer examination
273: shows that only one of the bright, compact mid-infrared
274: sources, IRS 13, coincides with any of the discrete X-ray sources in the
275: central 3 $\times$ 3 parsecs (Figure \ref{fig_zoom}).
276: The separation between the X--ray and IRAC positions is $<1''$
277: (see source SSTGC 0524504 in Table 7).
278: Notably, IRS 13 has been proposed as a candidate host for an intermediate black hole (Maillard et al.\ 2004). While we do also detect IRS 10* (= IRS 10EE), the mid-infrared counterpart to an SiO maser source, with Spitzer/IRAC, and Peeples et al.\ (2007)
279: identify a Chandra X-ray source with IRS 10*, that X-ray source is more than 2$''$ east of IRS 10* so it does not meet our correlation criteria.
280: Peeples et al.\ (2007) find
281: spatial coincidences between Chandra X-ray sources and
282: five other point sources they observe at 1.6 and 2.2 $\micron$,
283: but we do not detect any of these sources with $Spitzer$/IRAC.
284: Thus, with the exception of IRS 13, none of the
285: point sources in the
286: central 3 $\times$ 3 parsecs imaged in the $Spitzer$/IRAC 3.6 -- 8.0 $\micron$ survey, and none of the compact 12 $\micron$ IRS sources imaged with
287: sub-arcsec resolution by Gezari et al.\ (1996), have X-ray counterparts. The
288: X--ray emission in the immediate vicinity of Sgr A* is discussed in Gezari et al.\ (2006).
289:
290: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
291: \section{Discussion}
292:
293: Several population studies have been done to estimate
294: what the relative contributions of different X-ray sources
295: are to the Galactic Center catalog of Muno et al.\ (2003)
296: or other Galactic Center X-ray surveys.
297: These models give insight into what infrared counterparts
298: we might hope to find with Spitzer/IRAC.
299: The Galactic Center is thought to contain a mix of
300: CVs, magnetically accreting CVs (intermediate polars),
301: low-mass X-ray binaries (LMXBs), high-mass X-ray binaries (HMXBs), massive stars with strong winds, colliding wind binaries, and pulsars
302: (Pfahl et al.\ 2002; Belczynski \& Taam 2004; Ruiter et al.\ 2006;
303: Liu \& Li 2006; Muno et al.\ 2006).
304: We would like to know which of these are most likely to be
305: detectable at a distance of 8 kpc with Spitzer/IRAC.
306: The donor stars for HMXBs, massive stars with strong winds,
307: and colliding wind binaries are O stars and Wolf-Rayet stars.
308: These stars are luminous enough to be detected with Spitzer/IRAC, especially if they have
309: circumstellar dust or heat the surrounding interstellar medium.
310: The donor stars for CVs, intermediate polars, and LMXBs
311: are probably not luminous enough to be detected with Spitzer/IRAC
312: unless they are a red giant or they are surrounded by circumstellar dust.
313:
314: The INTEGRAL gamma--ray observatory has discovered a new class of hard X--ray
315: source in the Galactic plane: highly obscured HMXBs, with hydrogen column
316: densities much higher than predicted by their extinction, due to intrinsic
317: absorption in the wind of the supergiant secondary (Dean et al.\ 2005; Walter et al.\ 2006).
318: {\it Spitzer}/IRAC photometry of highly obscured supergiant HMXBs has detected
319: moderate infrared excesses from a hot dust component, but with roughly a 25\% success rate
320: (Kaplan et al.\ 2006; Rahoui et al.\ 2008). However, none of these cases show
321: evidence for a large mass of cooler dust in the systems, which could lead to a
322: rising mid-IR spectrum at wavelengths $\gtrsim 5\micron$. Our lack of detection of a
323: large number of 8 $\micron$ counterparts suggests that the GC X-ray sources
324: also lack massive dusty shells.
325:
326: Pfahl et al.\ (2002) conclude that most of the X-ray sources found by Wang et al.\ (2002),
327: in a wider but shallower Chandra survey of the Galactic Center,
328: are HMXBs: neutron stars with O or B star companions.
329: Other authors, however, conclude that only a small
330: fraction of the Muno et al.\ (2003)
331: Galactic Center X-ray sources are associated with massive stars
332: (Belczynski \& Taam 2004; Ruiter et al.\ 2006;
333: Liu \& Li 2006; Muno et al.\ 2006).
334: Muno et al.\ (2006), Mikles et al.\ (2006), and Mauerhan et al.\ (2007)
335: have combined Chandra point source catalogs of the Galactic
336: Center with the 2MASS catalog to find candidate massive stars.
337: Muno et al.\ (2006) also includes 3.6 cm radio data.
338: They discard all soft X-ray sources, because the interstellar
339: absorption to the Galactic Center will absorb all soft
340: X-ray emission from there.
341: They also discard all 2MASS sources with blue J-K colors
342: as being foreground sources, because the interstellar extinction
343: to the Galactic Center reddens all sources there.
344: They use near-IR spectra to identify three (Muno et al.\ 2006),
345: one (Mikles et al.\ 2006), and two (Mauerhan et al.\ 2007)
346: massive stars in the Galactic Center with X-ray emission.
347: That so much effort has gone into identifying a total of six
348: massive stars with X-ray emission, either from colliding
349: winds or from accretion onto a compact companion,
350: out of more than a thousand hard X-ray sources in the
351: Galactic Center, underscores the difficulty of
352: observing infrared emission from the donor stars for X-ray sources in the Galactic Center.
353:
354: Bandyopadhyay et al.\ (2005), reported that roughly 75\% of a sample of 77 hard X--ray
355: sources had faint ($K = 13 - 20$) candidate K--band counterparts within a $1\farcs3$ radius.
356: However, they
357: noted that this is exactly the number of random associations that they predict from a
358: Monte Carlo simulation. Thus although Bandyopadhyay et al.\ (2005) identified 58 K--band ``candidates''
359: none of these sources are likely to be real infrared counterparts to the hard X--ray sources
360: in their sample. Correlations at H and J bands did show small statistical excess
361: above the randomly expected number of associations.
362: Follow--up spectroscopic observations by Bandyopadhyay et al.\ (2006) failed to find
363: indications of accretion (e.g.\ Br $\gamma$ emission) among 28 candidates observed.
364: They conclude that the apparent associations are merely foreground stars, and
365: that the X--ray sources are likely dominated by a population of low mass X--ray
366: binaries (LMXBs) and cataclysmic variables (CVs) with $K > 20$.
367: Laycock et al.\ (2005) compared 1453 hard and 105 soft X--ray sources with near infrared stars from
368: the 2MASS survey and concluded that high--mass X--ray binaries are not the dominant
369: hard X--ray source population.
370:
371: Unlike the hard X--ray sources examined by Bandyopadhyay et al.\ (2006), we clearly do detect (if only in a statistical sense) a population of sources with both soft X--ray and infrared emission, notably in the 3.6 and 4.5 $\micron$ bands (a net excess of $\sim34\pm8$ sources in these bands when a positional agreement of $< 1''$ is required; see Table 3). These sources represent $\sim6\%$ of the complete soft X--ray sample and, as noted previously, are likely foreground sources rather than being intrinsically bright in IR and X--rays.
372: Ebisawa et al.\ (2005) observed a blank part of the galactic
373: plane with Chandra, and were able to find 2MASS identifications
374: for almost all their soft X-ray sources; they concluded they
375: were nearby active stars on the main sequence.
376: For comparison, Sidoli et al.\ (2001) found 107 sources in a 12 deg$^2$ region around the GC surveyed with the ROSAT PSPC, which was sensitive to X--rays between 0.1--2.4 keV. Of these 107, they identified 20 (or 19\%) as being associated with stars, noting that these have softer or less absorbed spectra. Although our data cannot conclusively determine if the softer X--ray sources with IR counterparts are indeed from a different population than the sources without counterparts, this could be tested with more observations and may represent a method to eliminate foreground sources from a GC catalog.
377:
378: The donor stars in both LMXBs and CVs at the GC are expected to be too faint to be
379: detected in our IRAC survey. Over the full IRAC GC survey, Ram\'irez et al.\ (2008)
380: set mean confusion limits at 12.4, 12.1, 11.7 and 11.2 mag for 3.6, 4.5, 5.8 and 8 $\micron$
381: respectively. However, because of the general increase in the volume density of stars with decreasing
382: distance from the Galactic Center, confusion limits are about 2 magnitudes brighter in the
383: vicinity of Sgr A (see Fig. 8 of Ram\'irez et al.\ 2008). Given a distance modulus of 7.26 and
384: extinction of about 1.5 - 2 magnitudes, scaled from $A_K \approx 3.3$ (Blum et al.\ 1996), using
385: either the Indebetouw et al.\ (2005) or Flaherty et al.\ (2007) extinction laws, we should only
386: detect sources with absolute magnitudes $\lesssim 1$. Variations in extinction across the region
387: may alter the apparent magnitudes of some IR sources, but the main limitation of the IRAC survey
388: is due to confusion, not extinction nor sensitivity. At 8 $\micron$ and to a lesser degree at 5.8
389: $\micron$, a large instrumental beam, and confusion from the diffuse ISM are additional limitations
390: which reduce the number of sources detected compared to 3.6 and 4.5 $\micron$.
391: While the extinction is not the dominant factor in the detection of the IR sources, it is interesting
392: to note that extinction appears to have a strong effect on the distribution of the X--ray sources.
393: In Figures \ref{fig_ch1x}a and \ref{fig_ch4x}a, there is an evident correlation between
394: a relatively low X--ray source density and an IR dark cloud (IRDC) to the southeast of
395: the Galactic Center.
396:
397: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
398: \section{Conclusions}
399:
400: We have analyzed the possible correlations between the largest number of candidate
401: sources to date: 2357 X--ray sources (of which 1809 are hard X--ray sources most
402: likely located at the Galactic Center) and $\sim$20,000 {\it Spitzer}/IRAC infrared point sources.
403: Source confusion limits our correlations
404: to only bright infrared sources with absolute magnitudes $\lesssim 1$ if located near the Galactic Center.
405: The lack of any significant correlation between hard X--ray sources and
406: 3.6 -- 8 $\micron$ infrared point sources suggests that there is no unique population of sources that
407: are bright at both X--ray and 3.6 -- 8 $\micron$ wavelengths. Based on this study, we can set the upper limit
408: on the fraction of all hard X--ray sources that can be bright at both X--ray and 3.6 -- 8 $\micron$ wavelengths
409: to be $<1.7\%$ (3$\sigma$).
410:
411:
412: \acknowledgements
413: This work is based on observations made with the Spitzer Space Telescope, which is
414: operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology under
415: a contract with NASA. Support for this work was provided by NASA.
416: KS thanks the NASA Faculty Fellowship Program for financial support
417: and the hospitality of JPL's Long Wavelength Center and the Spitzer Science Center.
418: We thank the referee for substantial comments and suggestions.
419:
420:
421: \begin{thebibliography}{}
422:
423: \bibitem[Bandyopadhyay2005]{329} Bandyopadhyay, R. M., et al.\ 2005, \mnras, 364, 1195
424:
425: %\bibitem[Bandyopadhyay2006]{331} Bandyopadhyay, R. M., et al.\ 2006, astro-ph/0612007
426: \bibitem[Bandyopadhyay et al.(2006)]{2006smqw.confE..13B} Bandyopadhyay,
427: R.~M., Gosling, A.~J., Blundell, K.~M., Podsiadlowski, P., Einkenberry,
428: S.~A., Mikles, V.~J., Miller-Jones, J.~C.~A., \& Bauer, F.~E.\ 2006, VI
429: Microquasar Workshop: Microquasars and Beyond
430:
431: \bibitem[Belczynski2004]{337} Belczynski, K., \& Taam, R. E. 2004, \apj, 616, 1159
432:
433: \bibitem[Blum1996]{339} Blum, R. D., Sellgren, K., \& Depoy, D. L. 1996, \apj, 470, 864
434:
435: \bibitem[Dean et al.(2005)]{2005A&A...443..485D} Dean, A.~J., et al.\ 2005, \aap, 443, 485
436:
437: \bibitem[Ebisawa et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...635..214E} Ebisawa, K., et al.\
438: 2005, \apj, 635, 214
439:
440: \bibitem[Flaherty et al.(2007)]{2007ApJ...663.1069F} Flaherty, K.~M.,
441: Pipher, J.~L., Megeath, S.~T., Winston, E.~M., Gutermuth, R.~A., Muzerolle,
442: J., Allen, L.~E., \& Fazio, G.~G.\ 2007, \apj, 663, 1069
443:
444: \bibitem[Gezari1996]{349} Gezari, D., Dwek, E., \& Varosi, F., 1996, Proc. Symposium 169 of the IAU,
445: ed. L. Blitz \& P. Teuben, 231
446:
447: \bibitem[Gezari et al.(2006)]{2006JPhCS..54..171G} Gezari, D.~Y., et al.\
448: 2006, Journal of Physics Conference Series, 54, 171
449:
450: \bibitem[Ghez2006]{356} Ghez, A., et al.\ 2005, \apj, 635, 1087
451:
452: \bibitem[Indebetouw et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...619..931I} Indebetouw, R., et
453: al.\ 2005, \apj, 619, 931
454:
455: \bibitem[Kaplan et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...649L.107K} Kaplan, D.~L., Moon,
456: D.-S., \& Reach, W.~T.\ 2006, \apjl, 649, L107
457:
458: \bibitem[Laycock et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...634L..53L} Laycock, S., Grindlay,
459: J., van den Berg, M., Zhao, P., Hong, J., Koenig, X., Schlegel, E.~M., \&
460: Persson, S.~E.\ 2005, \apjl, 634, L53
461:
462: \bibitem[Liu2006]{365} Liu, X.-W., \& Li, X.-D. 2006, \aap, 449, 135
463:
464: \bibitem[Maillard2004]{367} Maillard, J. P., Paumard, T., Stolovy, S. R., Rigaut, F. 2004, \aap, 423, 155
465:
466: \bibitem[Mauerhan2007]{369} Mauerhan, J. C., Muno, M. P., \& Morris, M. 2007, \apj, 662, 574
467:
468: \bibitem[Mikles2006]{371} Mikles, V. J., Eikenberry, S. S., Muno, M. P., Bandyopadhyay, R. M., \&
469: Patel, S. 2006, \apj, 650, 203
470:
471: \bibitem[Muno et al.(2003)]{2003ApJ...589..225M} Muno, M.~P., et al.\ 2003,
472: \apj, 589, 225
473:
474: \bibitem[Muno et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...638..183M} Muno, M.~P., Bower, G.~C.,
475: Burgasser, A.~J., Baganoff, F.~K., Morris, M.~R., \& Brandt, W.~N.\ 2006,
476: \apj, 638, 183
477:
478: \bibitem[Peeples2007]{381} Peeples, M. S., Stanek, K. Z., \& Depoy, D. L. 2007, AcA, 57, 173
479:
480: \bibitem[Pfahl2002]{383} Pfahl, E., Rappaport, S., \& Podsiadlowski, P. 2002, \apj, 571, L37
481:
482: \bibitem[Press et al.(1986)]{1986nras.book.....P} Press, W.~H., Flannery,
483: B.~P., Teukolsky, S.~A., \& Vetterling, W. T.\ 1986, Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
484:
485: \bibitem[Rahoui et al.(2008)]{2008arXiv:0802.2410} Rahoui, F., Chaty, S.,
486: Lagage, P.-O., \& Pantin, E.\ 2008, arXiv:0802.2410
487:
488: \bibitem[Ramirez2008]{385} Ram\'irez, S. V., et al.\ 2008, \apjs, 175, 147
489:
490: \bibitem[Ruiter2006]{391} Ruiter, A. J., Belczynski, K., \& Harrison, T. E. 2006, \apj, 640, L167
491:
492: \bibitem[Sidoli et al.(2001)]{2001A&A...368..835S} Sidoli, L., Belloni, T.,
493: \& Mereghetti, S.\ 2001, \aap, 368, 835
494:
495: \bibitem[Stolovy2007]{399} Stolovy S., et al.\ 2006, J. Phys. Conf. Series, 54, 176
496:
497: \bibitem[Walter et al.(2006)]{2006A&A...453..133W} Walter, R., et al.\ 2006, \aap, 453, 133
498:
499: \bibitem[Wang et al.(2002)]{2002Natur.415..148W} Wang, Q.~D., Gotthelf,
500: E.~V., \& Lang, C.~C.\ 2002, \nat, 415, 148
501:
502: \end{thebibliography}
503:
504: \clearpage
505:
506: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccc}
507: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
508: \tablewidth{0pt}
509: \tablecaption{All X-ray Sources (2357)}
510: \tablehead{
511: \colhead{Wavelength ($\micron$)} &
512: \colhead{$N$} &
513: \colhead{$\sigma_N$} &
514: \colhead{$M$} &
515: \colhead{$\sigma_M$} &
516: \colhead{$N-M$} &
517: \colhead{$\sigma_{N-M}$} &
518: \colhead{$(N-M)/\sigma_{N-M}$}
519: }
520: \startdata
521: \cutinhead{Positional agreement $< 0.5''$}
522: 3.6 & 51 & 7.1 & 30.5 & 2.0 & 20.5 & 7.4 & 2.8\\
523: 4.5 & 46 & 6.8 & 27.8 & 1.9 & 18.2 & 7.0 & 2.6\\
524: 5.8 & 35 & 5.9 & 19.9 & 1.6 & 15.1 & 6.1 & 2.5\\
525: 8 & 22 & 4.7 & 10.1 & 1.1 & 11.9 & 4.8 & 2.5\\
526:
527: \cutinhead{Positional agreement $< 1.0''$}
528: 3.6 & 156 & 12.5 & 120.4 & 3.9 & 35.6 & 13.1 & 2.7\\
529: 4.5 & 137 & 11.7 & 108.2 & 3.7 & 28.8 & 12.3 & 2.3\\
530: 5.8 & 104 & 10.2 & 77.4 & 3.1 & 26.6 & 10.7 & 2.5\\
531: 8 & 64 & 8.0 & 42.0 & 2.3 & 22.0 & 8.3 & 2.6\\
532:
533: \cutinhead{Positional agreement $< 2.0''$}
534: 3.6 & 488 & 22.1 & 458.4 & 7.6 & 29.6 & 23.4 & 1.3\\
535: 4.5 & 424 & 20.6 & 414.5 & 7.2 & 9.5 & 21.8 & 0.4\\
536: 5.8 & 320 & 17.9 & 297.9 & 6.1 & 22.1 & 18.9 & 1.2\\
537: 8 & 179 & 13.4 & 170.9 & 4.6 & 8.1 & 14.2 & 0.6\\
538: \enddata
539: \end{deluxetable}
540:
541: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccc}
542: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
543: \tablewidth{0pt}
544: \tablecaption{All X-ray Sources with Uncertainty $<\ 0\farcs8$ (1645)}
545: \tablehead{
546: \colhead{Wavelength ($\micron$)} &
547: \colhead{$N$} &
548: \colhead{$\sigma_N$} &
549: \colhead{$M$} &
550: \colhead{$\sigma_M$} &
551: \colhead{$N-M$} &
552: \colhead{$\sigma_{N-M}$} &
553: \colhead{$(N-M)/\sigma_{N-M}$}
554: }
555: \startdata
556: \cutinhead{Positional agreement $< 0.5''$}
557: 3.6 & 29 & 5.4 & 20.5 & 1.6 & 8.5 & 5.6 & 1.5\\
558: 4.5 & 27 & 5.2 & 18.2 & 1.5 & 8.8 & 5.4 & 1.6\\
559: 5.8 & 19 & 4.4 & 13.0 & 1.3 & 6.0 & 4.5 & 1.3\\
560: 8.0 & 11 & 3.3 & 6.2 & 0.9 & 4.8 & 3.4 & 1.4\\
561: \cutinhead{Positional agreement $< 1.0''$}
562: 3.6 & 97 & 9.8 & 86.0 & 3.3 & 11.0 & 10.4 & 1.1\\
563: 4.5 & 86 & 9.3 & 75.8 & 3.1 & 10.2 & 9.8 & 1.0\\
564: 5.8 & 66 & 8.1 & 55.5 & 2.6 & 10.5 & 8.5 & 1.2\\
565: 8.0 & 37 & 6.1 & 29.4 & 1.9 & 7.6 & 6.4 & 1.2\\
566: \cutinhead{Positional agreement $< 2.0''$}
567: 3.6 & 328 & 18.1 & 324.9 & 6.4 & 3.1 & 19.2 & 0.2\\
568: 4.5 & 272 & 16.5 & 290.9 & 6.0 & -18.9 & 17.6 & -1.1\\
569: 5.8 & 213 & 14.6 & 210.4 & 5.1 & 2.6 & 15.5 & 0.2\\
570: 8.0 & 121 & 11.0 & 118.6 & 3.9 & 2.4 & 11.7 & 0.2\\
571: \enddata
572: \end{deluxetable}
573:
574: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccc}
575: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
576: \tablewidth{0pt}
577: \tablecaption{Soft X-ray Sources (548)}
578: \tablehead{
579: \colhead{Wavelength ($\micron$)} &
580: \colhead{$N$} &
581: \colhead{$\sigma_N$} &
582: \colhead{$M$} &
583: \colhead{$\sigma_M$} &
584: \colhead{$N-M$} &
585: \colhead{$\sigma_{N-M}$} &
586: \colhead{$(N-M)/\sigma_{N-M}$}
587: }
588: \startdata
589: \cutinhead{Positional agreement $< 0.5''$}
590: 3.6 & 28 & 5.3 & 5.8 & 0.8 & 22.2 & 5.4 & 4.2\\
591: 4.8 & 23 & 4.8 & 5.1 & 0.8 & 17.9 & 4.9 & 3.7\\
592: 5.8 & 17 & 4.1 & 3.5 & 0.7 & 13.5 & 4.2 & 3.2\\
593: 8 & 8 & 2.8 & 1.5 & 0.4 & 6.5 & 2.9 & 2.3\\
594:
595: \cutinhead{Positional agreement $< 1.0''$}
596: 3.6 & 64 & 8.0 & 26.4 & 1.8 & 37.6 & 8.2 & 4.6\\
597: 4.5 & 55 & 7.4 & 24.1 & 1.7 & 30.9 & 7.6 & 4.1\\
598: 5.8 & 37 & 6.1 & 15.9 & 1.4 & 21.1 & 6.2 & 3.4\\
599: 8 & 20 & 4.5 & 7.2 & 1.0 & 12.8 & 4.6 & 2.8\\
600:
601: \cutinhead{Positional agreement $< 2.0''$}
602: 3.6 & 126 & 11.2 & 103.0 & 3.6 & 23.0 & 11.8 & 2.0\\
603: 4.5 & 109 & 10.4 & 95.1 & 3.4 & 13.9 & 11.0 & 1.3\\
604: 5.8 & 78 & 8.8 & 69.2 & 2.9 & 8.8 & 9.3 & 0.9\\
605: 8 & 42 & 6.5 & 37.4 & 2.2 & 4.6 & 6.8 & 0.7\\
606: \enddata
607: \end{deluxetable}
608:
609: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccc}
610: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
611: \tablewidth{0pt}
612: \tablecaption{Soft X-ray Sources with Uncertainty $<\ 0\farcs8$ (303)}
613: \tablehead{
614: \colhead{Wavelength ($\micron$)} &
615: \colhead{$N$} &
616: \colhead{$\sigma_N$} &
617: \colhead{$M$} &
618: \colhead{$\sigma_M$} &
619: \colhead{$N-M$} &
620: \colhead{$\sigma_{N-M}$} &
621: \colhead{$(N-M)/\sigma_{N-M}$}
622: }
623: \startdata
624: \cutinhead{Positional agreement $< 0.5''$}
625: 3.6 & 16 & 4.0 & 3.2 & 0.6 & 12.8 & 4.1 & 3.1\\
626: 4.5 & 14 & 3.7 & 2.9 & 0.6 & 11.1 & 3.8 & 2.9\\
627: 5.8 & 9 & 3.0 & 1.6 & 0.5 & 7.4 & 3.0 & 2.4\\
628: 8.0 & 3 & 1.7 & 0.9 & 0.3 & 2.1 & 1.8 & 1.2\\
629: \cutinhead{Positional agreement $< 1.0''$}
630: 3.6 & 34 & 5.8 & 15.4 & 1.4 & 18.6 & 6.0 & 3.1\\
631: 4.5 & 30 & 5.5 & 13.9 & 1.3 & 16.1 & 5.6 & 2.9\\
632: 5.8 & 19 & 4.4 & 8.6 & 1.0 & 10.4 & 4.5 & 2.3\\
633: 8.0 & 9 & 3.0 & 4.2 & 0.7 & 4.8 & 3.1 & 1.5\\
634: \cutinhead{Positional agreement $< 2.0''$}
635: 3.6 & 68 & 8.2 & 58.4 & 2.7 & 9.6 & 8.7 & 1.1\\
636: 4.5 & 57 & 7.5 & 54.0 & 2.6 & 3.0 & 8.0 & 0.4\\
637: 5.8 & 40 & 6.3 & 37.4 & 2.2 & 2.6 & 6.7 & 0.4\\
638: 8.0 & 21 & 4.6 & 21.0 & 1.6 & 0.0 & 4.9 & 0.0\\
639: \enddata
640: \end{deluxetable}
641:
642: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccc}
643: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
644: \tablewidth{0pt}
645: \tablecaption{Hard X-ray Sources (1809)}
646: \tablehead{
647: \colhead{Wavelength ($\micron$)} &
648: \colhead{$N$} &
649: \colhead{$\sigma_N$} &
650: \colhead{$M$} &
651: \colhead{$\sigma_M$} &
652: \colhead{$N-M$} &
653: \colhead{$\sigma_{N-M}$} &
654: \colhead{$(N-M)/\sigma_{N-M}$}
655: }
656: \startdata
657: \cutinhead{Positional agreement $< 0.5''$}
658: 3.6 & 23 & 4.8 & 24.8 & 1.8 & -1.8 & 5.1 & -0.3\\
659: 4.5 & 23 & 4.8 & 22.6 & 1.7 & 0.4 & 5.1 & 0.1\\
660: 5.8 & 18 & 4.2 & 16.4 & 1.4 & 1.6 & 4.5 & 0.4\\
661: 8 & 14 & 3.7 & 8.6 & 1.0 & 5.4 & 3.9 & 1.4\\
662:
663: \cutinhead{Positional agreement $< 1.0''$}
664: 3.6 & 92 & 9.6 & 94.0 & 3.4 & -2.0 & 10.2 & -0.2\\
665: 4.5 & 82 & 9.1 & 84.1 & 3.2 & -2.1 & 9.6 & -0.2\\
666: 5.8 & 67 & 8.2 & 61.5 & 2.8 & 5.5 & 8.6 & 0.6\\
667: 8 & 44 & 6.6 & 34.8 & 2.1 & 9.2 & 7.0 & 1.3\\
668:
669: \cutinhead{Positional agreement $< 2.0''$}
670: 3.6 & 362 & 19.0 & 355.4 & 6.7 & 6.6 & 20.2 & 0.3\\
671: 4.5 & 315 & 17.7 & 319.4 & 6.3 & -4.4 & 18.8 & -0.2\\
672: 5.8 & 242 & 15.6 & 228.6 & 5.3 & 13.4 & 16.4 & 0.8\\
673: 8 & 137 & 11.7 & 133.5 & 4.1 & 3.5 & 12.4 & 0.3\\
674: \enddata
675: \end{deluxetable}
676:
677: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccc}
678: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
679: \tablewidth{0pt}
680: \tablecaption{Hard X-ray Sources with Uncertainty $<\ 0\farcs8$ (1342)}
681: \tablehead{
682: \colhead{Wavelength ($\micron$)} &
683: \colhead{$N$} &
684: \colhead{$\sigma_N$} &
685: \colhead{$M$} &
686: \colhead{$\sigma_M$} &
687: \colhead{$N-M$} &
688: \colhead{$\sigma_{N-M}$} &
689: \colhead{$(N-M)/\sigma_{N-M}$}
690: }
691: \startdata
692: \cutinhead{Positional agreement $< 0.5''$}
693: 3.6 & 13 & 3.6 & 17.2 & 1.5 & -4.2 & 3.9 & -1.1\\
694: 4.5 & 13 & 3.6 & 15.4 & 1.4 & -2.4 & 3.9 & -0.6\\
695: 5.8 & 10 & 3.2 & 11.4 & 1.2 & -1.4 & 3.4 & -0.4\\
696: 8.0 & 8 & 2.8 & 5.4 & 0.8 & 2.6 & 2.9 & 0.9\\
697: \cutinhead{Positional agreement $< 1.0''$}
698: 3.6 & 63 & 7.9 & 70.6 & 3.0 & -7.6 & 8.5 & -0.9\\
699: 4.5 & 56 & 7.5 & 61.9 & 2.8 & -5.9 & 8.0 & -0.7\\
700: 5.8 & 47 & 6.9 & 46.9 & 2.4 & 0.1 & 7.3 & 0.0\\
701: 8.0 & 28 & 5.3 & 25.1 & 1.8 & 2.9 & 5.6 & 0.5\\
702: \cutinhead{Positional agreement $< 2.0''$}
703: 3.6 & 260 & 16.1 & 266.5 & 5.8 & -6.5 & 17.1 & -0.4\\
704: 4.5 & 215 & 14.7 & 236.9 & 5.4 & -21.9 & 15.6 & -1.4\\
705: 5.8 & 173 & 13.2 & 173.0 & 4.7 & 0.0 & 14.0 & 0.0\\
706: 8.0 & 100 & 10.0 & 97.6 & 3.5 & 2.4 & 10.6 & 0.2\\
707: \enddata
708: \end{deluxetable}
709:
710: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
711:
712: \begin{deluxetable}{lllccccclllcl}
713: \rotate
714: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
715: \tablewidth{0pt}
716: \tablecaption{IR and X--Ray Sources Coinciding within $1''$ (No Physical Association Implied)}
717: \tablehead{
718: \multicolumn{7}{c}{IR Sources (Ram\'irez at al. 2008)} & & \multicolumn{4}{c}{X--Ray Sources (Muno et al.\ 2003)}\\
719: \cline{1-7}\cline{9-12}
720: \colhead{Name} &
721: \colhead{R.A. (deg)} &
722: \colhead{Dec. (deg)} &
723: \colhead{[3.6]} &
724: \colhead{[4.5]} &
725: \colhead{[5.8]} &
726: \colhead{[8.0]} &
727: \colhead{}&
728: \colhead{Name} &
729: \colhead{R.A. (deg) } &
730: \colhead{Dec. (deg)} &
731: \colhead{Spectrum\tablenotemark{a}} &
732: \colhead{$\Delta$ ($''$)\tablenotemark{b}}
733: }
734: \startdata
735: SSTGC 0469964 & 266.33191 & -29.02930 & 11.54 & 11.59 & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174519.7-290146 & 266.33212 & -29.02947 & soft & 0.91 \\
736: SSTGC 0470990 & 266.33348 & -29.04629 & 11.15 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174520.0-290246 & 266.33374 & -29.04620 & hard & 0.87 \\
737: SSTGC 0473500 & 266.33735 & -29.03927 & 8.91 & 8.17 & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174521.0-290221 & 266.33755 & -29.03930 & hard & 0.64 \\
738: SSTGC 0476142 & 266.34154 & -28.99323 & 9.85 & 9.68 & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174521.9-285936 & 266.34134 & -28.99344 & hard & 0.99 \\
739: SSTGC 0476234 & 266.34169 & -29.00903 & 9.42 & 8.95 & 8.30 & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174521.9-290032 & 266.34159 & -29.00908 & soft & 0.36 \\
740: SSTGC 0477415 & 266.34345 & -29.01875 & 9.28 & 9.21 & 8.77 & 8.55 & & CXOGCJ174522.4-290107 & 266.34369 & -29.01881 & hard & 0.79 \\
741: SSTGC 0479734 & 266.34707 & -28.95763 & 9.43 & 9.33 & 8.90 & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174523.2-285727 & 266.34682 & -28.95750 & soft & 0.92 \\
742: SSTGC 0479445 & 266.34664 & -29.01752 & 10.12 & 9.34 & 9.28 & 9.41 & & CXOGCJ174523.2-290103 & 266.34684 & -29.01764 & hard & 0.77 \\
743: SSTGC 0481996 & 266.35058 & -28.97954 & 9.93 & 9.51 & 9.21 & 9.32 & & CXOGCJ174524.1-285845 & 266.35064 & -28.97932 & soft & 0.82 \\
744: SSTGC 0482409 & 266.35126 & -29.03542 & 10.02 & 9.90 & 9.44 & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174524.3-290208 & 266.35145 & -29.03561 & soft & 0.91 \\
745: SSTGC 0483850 & 266.35344 & -29.00869 & 10.44 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174524.7-290031 & 266.35326 & -29.00888 & hard & 0.89 \\
746: SSTGC 0484205 & 266.35400 & -29.04215 & 9.62 & 9.57 & 9.28 & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174525.0-290232 & 266.35419 & -29.04226 & hard & 0.71 \\
747: SSTGC 0485202 & 266.35557 & -29.02035 & 11.64 & 11.09 & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174525.2-290113 & 266.35539 & -29.02049 & hard & 0.75 \\
748: SSTGC 0487698 & 266.35948 & -28.99733 & 8.92 & 8.10 & 7.59 & 7.51 & & CXOGCJ174526.3-285949 & 266.35961 & -28.99721 & hard & 0.60 \\
749: SSTGC 0492659 & 266.36710 & -28.99540 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 9.23 & & CXOGCJ174528.0-285943 & 266.36702 & -28.99547 & hard & 0.36 \\
750: SSTGC 0492380 & 266.36669 & -29.00646 & 10.18 & 9.96 & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174528.0-290023 & 266.36680 & -29.00644 & soft & 0.36 \\
751: SSTGC 0493525 & 266.36850 & -29.05255 & 11.22 & 10.93 & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174528.4-290308 & 266.36841 & -29.05230 & hard & 0.93 \\
752: SSTGC 0494379 & 266.36984 & -28.99134 & 10.28 & \nodata & 9.88 & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174528.7-285928 & 266.36960 & -28.99120 & hard & 0.91 \\
753: SSTGC 0494207 & 266.36958 & -29.01202 & 9.74 & 9.65 & 9.07 & 8.93 & & CXOGCJ174528.7-290042 & 266.36979 & -29.01183 & hard & 0.96 \\
754: SSTGC 0494633 & 266.37021 & -28.95736 & 10.68 & 10.21 & 10.10 & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174528.8-285726 & 266.37030 & -28.95749 & soft & 0.55 \\
755: SSTGC 0495190 & 266.37111 & -29.06847 & 6.41 & 5.81 & 5.19 & 5.36 & & CXOGCJ174529.0-290406 & 266.37109 & -29.06846 & hard & 0.08 \\
756: SSTGC 0496104 & 266.37251 & -29.00714 & 11.67 & 11.38 & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174529.4-290025 & 266.37254 & -29.00699 & hard & 0.56 \\
757: SSTGC 0496570 & 266.37324 & -29.03733 & 9.47 & 9.42 & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174529.5-290215 & 266.37326 & -29.03754 & soft & 0.75 \\
758: SSTGC 0496855 & 266.37365 & -28.95047 & 11.79 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174529.6-285701 & 266.37370 & -28.95046 & hard & 0.16 \\
759: SSTGC 0496842 & 266.37363 & -28.97793 & 10.30 & 9.69 & 9.50 & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174529.6-285840 & 266.37370 & -28.97790 & hard & 0.25 \\
760: SSTGC 0496808 & 266.37358 & -29.00602 & 10.78 & 10.42 & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174529.6-290021 & 266.37375 & -29.00607 & hard & 0.57 \\
761: SSTGC 0496815 & 266.37359 & -29.04089 & 9.32 & 9.20 & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174529.6-290227 & 266.37363 & -29.04084 & hard & 0.23 \\
762: SSTGC 0498139 & 266.37558 & -29.04694 & 9.15 & 8.53 & 8.12 & 8.32 & & CXOGCJ174530.0-290248 & 266.37530 & -29.04681 & hard & 1.00 \\
763: SSTGC 0498461 & 266.37611 & -29.06168 & 10.29 & 10.24 & 10.02 & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174530.3-290341 & 266.37628 & -29.06157 & hard & 0.67 \\
764: SSTGC 0500061 & 266.37851 & -29.02794 & 7.03 & 5.84 & 5.04 & 4.79 & & CXOGCJ174530.8-290139 & 266.37864 & -29.02777 & hard & 0.73 \\
765: SSTGC 0502935 & 266.38299 & -29.04974 & 7.01 & 6.92 & 6.51 & 6.44 & & CXOGCJ174531.9-290258 & 266.38306 & -29.04952 & hard & 0.83 \\
766: SSTGC 0503729 & 266.38422 & -29.02490 & \nodata & 9.80 & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174532.1-290130 & 266.38416 & -29.02509 & hard & 0.72 \\
767: SSTGC 0503925 & 266.38452 & -29.05826 & \nodata & 10.48 & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174532.2-290329 & 266.38439 & -29.05829 & hard & 0.43 \\
768: SSTGC 0504458 & 266.38536 & -28.98557 & 9.86 & 9.96 & 9.64 & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174532.5-285908 & 266.38566 & -28.98556 & hard & 0.94 \\
769: SSTGC 0505766 & 266.38734 & -29.07664 & 10.91 & 10.56 & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174532.8-290436 & 266.38703 & -29.07670 & hard & 1.00 \\
770: SSTGC 0507145 & 266.38945 & -28.94431 & 10.81 & 10.43 & 9.89 & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174533.4-285638 & 266.38941 & -28.94415 & soft & 0.58 \\
771: SSTGC 0508028 & 266.39072 & -28.95800 & 11.45 & 10.97 & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174533.7-285728 & 266.39077 & -28.95803 & soft & 0.19 \\
772: SSTGC 0507814 & 266.39043 & -29.07579 & 9.62 & 8.73 & 8.37 & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174533.7-290432 & 266.39053 & -29.07578 & hard & 0.32 \\
773: SSTGC 0508562 & 266.39155 & -28.99906 & 9.42 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174534.0-285956 & 266.39182 & -28.99901 & hard & 0.87 \\
774: SSTGC 0510334 & 266.39416 & -29.04338 & 7.98 & 7.73 & 7.17 & 6.47 & & CXOGCJ174534.5-290236 & 266.39409 & -29.04357 & hard & 0.73 \\
775: SSTGC 0510970 & 266.39515 & -29.07890 & 7.48 & 7.39 & 6.80 & 6.98 & & CXOGCJ174534.8-290444 & 266.39535 & -29.07906 & hard & 0.84 \\
776: SSTGC 0511940 & 266.39659 & -28.97869 & \nodata & \nodata & 8.27 & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174535.1-285843 & 266.39633 & -28.97877 & hard & 0.87 \\
777: SSTGC 0511999 & 266.39668 & -29.01359 & 8.57 & 8.45 & 7.86 & 7.22 & & CXOGCJ174535.2-290048 & 266.39689 & -29.01352 & hard & 0.71 \\
778: SSTGC 0512567 & 266.39755 & -28.93489 & 9.50 & 9.57 & 9.27 & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174535.4-285605 & 266.39763 & -28.93492 & hard & 0.28 \\
779: SSTGC 0514496 & 266.40052 & -28.94409 & 8.82 & 8.26 & 7.97 & 7.82 & & CXOGCJ174536.1-285638 & 266.40059 & -28.94407 & soft & 0.23 \\
780: SSTGC 0514528 & 266.40057 & -28.96362 & 10.20 & 10.36 & 9.89 & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174536.1-285748 & 266.40067 & -28.96347 & hard & 0.62 \\
781: SSTGC 0514886 & 266.40111 & -28.97721 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 8.17 & & CXOGCJ174536.3-285837 & 266.40125 & -28.97712 & hard & 0.55 \\
782: SSTGC 0515077 & 266.40139 & -29.02929 & 10.73 & 10.41 & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174536.3-290145 & 266.40150 & -29.02919 & soft & 0.51 \\
783: SSTGC 0515409 & 266.40189 & -29.02083 & 9.30 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174536.4-290114 & 266.40181 & -29.02067 & hard & 0.64 \\
784: SSTGC 0517465 & 266.40502 & -28.98550 & 8.15 & 8.16 & 7.79 & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174537.2-285906 & 266.40502 & -28.98526 & hard & 0.87 \\
785: SSTGC 0518345 & 266.40641 & -29.03129 & 10.04 & 9.92 & 9.80 & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174537.5-290153 & 266.40653 & -29.03142 & hard & 0.62 \\
786: SSTGC 0518659 & 266.40684 & -29.00667 & 9.45 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174537.6-290023 & 266.40683 & -29.00657 & hard & 0.36 \\
787: SSTGC 0519255 & 266.40776 & -29.02434 & 9.93 & 9.76 & 8.65 & 7.41 & & CXOGCJ174537.8-290127 & 266.40757 & -29.02426 & soft & 0.66 \\
788: SSTGC 0519545 & 266.40824 & -29.02626 & 8.25 & 8.13 & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174537.9-290134 & 266.40831 & -29.02622 & soft & 0.26 \\
789: SSTGC 0520087 & 266.40907 & -28.98803 & \nodata & \nodata & 8.26 & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174538.1-285916 & 266.40878 & -28.98805 & hard & 0.92 \\
790: SSTGC 0520903 & 266.41025 & -28.96968 & 8.50 & 8.45 & 7.91 & 7.69 & & CXOGCJ174538.4-285810 & 266.41031 & -28.96958 & hard & 0.40 \\
791: SSTGC 0521476 & 266.41115 & -29.01893 & \nodata & 8.51 & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174538.6-290107 & 266.41101 & -29.01889 & hard & 0.47 \\
792: SSTGC 0522739 & 266.41312 & -28.96061 & 9.19 & 9.22 & 8.79 & 8.46 & & CXOGCJ174539.1-285738 & 266.41308 & -28.96081 & hard & 0.73 \\
793: SSTGC 0522856 & 266.41327 & -29.04730 & 11.06 & 8.88 & 8.23 & 8.20 & & CXOGCJ174539.2-290250 & 266.41356 & -29.04738 & hard & 0.95 \\
794: SSTGC 0523283 & 266.41392 & -29.00467 & 8.12 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174539.3-290016 & 266.41397 & -29.00467 & soft & 0.16 \\
795: SSTGC 0523729 & 266.41463 & -29.02514 & 9.49 & 8.94 & 8.81 & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174539.5-290129 & 266.41465 & -29.02499 & hard & 0.54 \\
796: SSTGC 0524504 & 266.41584 & -29.00847 & 5.63 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174539.7-290029 & 266.41567 & -29.00827 & soft & 0.91 \\
797: SSTGC 0525460 & 266.41726 & -28.99969 & 6.18 & 4.59 & 3.16 & 1.69 & & CXOGCJ174540.1-285957 & 266.41718 & -28.99944 & hard & 0.92 \\
798: SSTGC 0525510 & 266.41735 & -29.01540 & 8.21 & \nodata & 6.98 & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174540.1-290055 & 266.41733 & -29.01546 & soft & 0.23 \\
799: SSTGC 0525714 & 266.41765 & -28.98358 & 8.52 & 8.46 & 7.72 & 6.99 & & CXOGCJ174540.2-285900 & 266.41753 & -28.98360 & hard & 0.38 \\
800: SSTGC 0526867 & 266.41944 & -28.94462 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 8.58 & & CXOGCJ174540.6-285640 & 266.41950 & -28.94445 & soft & 0.65 \\
801: SSTGC 0527316 & 266.42016 & -29.03007 & \nodata & \nodata & 8.12 & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174540.8-290149 & 266.42011 & -29.03029 & hard & 0.80 \\
802: SSTGC 0527347 & 266.42020 & -29.05794 & 11.12 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174540.8-290328 & 266.42037 & -29.05804 & soft & 0.65 \\
803: SSTGC 0527844 & 266.42100 & -29.00472 & 8.56 & 7.16 & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174541.0-290017 & 266.42095 & -29.00489 & hard & 0.62 \\
804: SSTGC 0529789 & 266.42400 & -29.00790 & 9.01 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174541.7-290027 & 266.42377 & -29.00774 & hard & 0.93 \\
805: SSTGC 0530322 & 266.42482 & -28.99881 & \nodata & \nodata & 8.47 & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174541.9-285955 & 266.42473 & -28.99865 & hard & 0.65 \\
806: SSTGC 0531615 & 266.42680 & -28.96723 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 9.28 & & CXOGCJ174542.4-285802 & 266.42678 & -28.96724 & hard & 0.07 \\
807: SSTGC 0532179 & 266.42763 & -28.95284 & 11.30 & 10.80 & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174542.6-285709 & 266.42768 & -28.95257 & hard & 0.99 \\
808: SSTGC 0532570 & 266.42818 & -28.97533 & 9.54 & 9.29 & 8.87 & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174542.7-285831 & 266.42816 & -28.97552 & hard & 0.68 \\
809: SSTGC 0533119 & 266.42903 & -29.07535 & \nodata & 10.74 & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174542.9-290431 & 266.42890 & -29.07535 & soft & 0.41 \\
810: SSTGC 0533640 & 266.42983 & -29.01391 & 7.39 & 6.73 & 6.11 & 5.85 & & CXOGCJ174543.1-290049 & 266.42961 & -29.01382 & soft & 0.76 \\
811: SSTGC 0533886 & 266.43016 & -28.98839 & 10.20 & 10.18 & 9.59 & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174543.2-285917 & 266.43035 & -28.98822 & hard & 0.85 \\
812: SSTGC 0534588 & 266.43123 & -28.98360 & 9.10 & \nodata & 9.08 & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174543.4-285900 & 266.43102 & -28.98341 & hard & 0.96 \\
813: SSTGC 0534566 & 266.43120 & -29.06347 & 8.47 & 8.36 & 7.85 & 7.97 & & CXOGCJ174543.4-290347 & 266.43106 & -29.06327 & hard & 0.83 \\
814: SSTGC 0535312 & 266.43230 & -29.02660 & 11.89 & 10.66 & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174543.7-290136 & 266.43234 & -29.02668 & hard & 0.32 \\
815: SSTGC 0535628 & 266.43280 & -29.04581 & 9.84 & 9.81 & 9.31 & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174543.9-290245 & 266.43309 & -29.04590 & hard & 0.96 \\
816: SSTGC 0535765 & 266.43300 & -29.08237 & 9.46 & 9.48 & 9.43 & 9.48 & & CXOGCJ174543.9-290456 & 266.43305 & -29.08238 & soft & 0.16 \\
817: SSTGC 0536043 & 266.43341 & -29.07468 & 10.24 & 9.67 & 9.44 & 9.04 & & CXOGCJ174544.0-290428 & 266.43363 & -29.07460 & hard & 0.75 \\
818: SSTGC 0537314 & 266.43533 & -28.97495 & 9.36 & 8.80 & 8.24 & 7.83 & & CXOGCJ174544.4-285829 & 266.43531 & -28.97486 & hard & 0.32 \\
819: SSTGC 0537395 & 266.43544 & -28.97053 & \nodata & \nodata & 6.76 & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174544.5-285813 & 266.43557 & -28.97044 & hard & 0.52 \\
820: SSTGC 0537801 & 266.43609 & -29.06095 & 12.55 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174544.7-290339 & 266.43631 & -29.06109 & hard & 0.87 \\
821: SSTGC 0539467 & 266.43859 & -28.97468 & 10.76 & 10.45 & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174545.2-285828 & 266.43870 & -28.97466 & soft & 0.36 \\
822: SSTGC 0539388 & 266.43847 & -29.04029 & 12.23 & 12.24 & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174545.2-290224 & 266.43840 & -29.04009 & soft & 0.75 \\
823: SSTGC 0543526 & 266.44459 & -29.05783 & 10.56 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174546.6-290328 & 266.44449 & -29.05786 & soft & 0.33 \\
824: SSTGC 0543690 & 266.44482 & -29.03528 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 8.35 & & CXOGCJ174546.7-290207 & 266.44473 & -29.03552 & hard & 0.92 \\
825: SSTGC 0544019 & 266.44530 & -29.04789 & 9.47 & 8.58 & 7.83 & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174546.8-290252 & 266.44521 & -29.04789 & soft & 0.28 \\
826: SSTGC 0546444 & 266.44903 & -28.94019 & 7.82 & 7.48 & 6.85 & 6.78 & & CXOGCJ174547.7-285624 & 266.44899 & -28.94008 & hard & 0.41 \\
827: SSTGC 0547195 & 266.45015 & -29.05055 & 7.54 & 7.26 & 6.80 & 6.89 & & CXOGCJ174548.0-290301 & 266.45010 & -29.05040 & hard & 0.55 \\
828: SSTGC 0548119 & 266.45158 & -28.99872 & \nodata & \nodata & 9.94 & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174548.4-285954 & 266.45179 & -28.99852 & hard & 0.97 \\
829: SSTGC 0548472 & 266.45212 & -28.96311 & 10.88 & 10.62 & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174548.5-285747 & 266.45240 & -28.96309 & hard & 0.88 \\
830: SSTGC 0548665 & 266.45244 & -29.04621 & 11.93 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174548.5-290246 & 266.45248 & -29.04616 & soft & 0.23 \\
831: SSTGC 0550312 & 266.45497 & -29.02723 & 10.71 & 10.72 & 10.67 & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174549.1-290137 & 266.45492 & -29.02721 & soft & 0.18 \\
832: SSTGC 0550210 & 266.45481 & -29.08411 & 10.33 & 9.94 & 9.58 & 9.10 & & CXOGCJ174549.1-290502 & 266.45467 & -29.08396 & soft & 0.71 \\
833: SSTGC 0550863 & 266.45578 & -28.95373 & 8.27 & 8.02 & 7.54 & 7.52 & & CXOGCJ174549.4-285712 & 266.45597 & -28.95356 & hard & 0.87 \\
834: SSTGC 0553475 & 266.45968 & -29.00568 & 12.25 & 11.87 & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174550.2-290020 & 266.45948 & -29.00566 & hard & 0.63 \\
835: SSTGC 0554271 & 266.46090 & -28.98878 & 9.63 & 9.00 & 8.63 & 7.90 & & CXOGCJ174550.6-285919 & 266.46096 & -28.98886 & soft & 0.36 \\
836: SSTGC 0554555 & 266.46134 & -29.07635 & 12.52 & 11.67 & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174550.7-290434 & 266.46159 & -29.07628 & soft & 0.83 \\
837: SSTGC 0558398 & 266.46721 & -28.96776 & 9.82 & 9.85 & 9.51 & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174552.1-285804 & 266.46722 & -28.96790 & soft & 0.50 \\
838: SSTGC 0559457 & 266.46887 & -28.99130 & \nodata & \nodata & 7.42 & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174552.5-285928 & 266.46878 & -28.99131 & hard & 0.29 \\
839: SSTGC 0560119 & 266.46985 & -29.03013 & 10.41 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174552.7-290148 & 266.46965 & -29.03021 & hard & 0.69 \\
840: SSTGC 0564995 & 266.47723 & -29.04817 & 11.86 & 11.62 & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174554.5-290252 & 266.47709 & -29.04805 & soft & 0.62 \\
841: SSTGC 0570573 & 266.48573 & -28.96011 & 10.59 & 10.53 & 11.08 & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174556.5-285736 & 266.48560 & -28.96019 & soft & 0.50 \\
842: SSTGC 0572280 & 266.48837 & -29.05031 & 9.12 & 9.07 & 8.67 & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174557.2-290301 & 266.48852 & -29.05042 & hard & 0.61 \\
843: SSTGC 0572559 & 266.48879 & -28.96801 & 9.52 & 9.09 & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174557.3-285804 & 266.48899 & -28.96787 & hard & 0.80 \\
844: SSTGC 0575612 & 266.49335 & -29.02236 & 8.91 & 8.90 & 8.62 & 8.92 & & CXOGCJ174558.4-290120 & 266.49364 & -29.02232 & soft & 0.93 \\
845: SSTGC 0577500 & 266.49625 & -29.04868 & 10.02 & 9.83 & 9.44 & 10.04 & & CXOGCJ174559.1-290255 & 266.49640 & -29.04875 & hard & 0.53 \\
846: SSTGC 0578722 & 266.49813 & -29.00052 & 10.09 & 9.93 & 9.74 & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174559.5-290002 & 266.49806 & -29.00067 & soft & 0.59 \\
847: SSTGC 0579221 & 266.49888 & -28.98583 & 9.61 & 9.60 & 9.26 & 9.22 & & CXOGCJ174559.7-285908 & 266.49881 & -28.98571 & hard & 0.47 \\
848: SSTGC 0580810 & 266.50121 & -29.01808 & \nodata & 11.52 & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174600.2-290105 & 266.50108 & -29.01809 & soft & 0.41 \\
849: SSTGC 0588034 & 266.51210 & -29.01352 & \nodata & 10.80 & \nodata & \nodata & & CXOGCJ174602.8-290049 & 266.51202 & -29.01366 & hard & 0.56 \\
850: \enddata
851: \tablecomments{Positional coincidence does not necessarily imply a physical association of IR and X--ray sources. In fact, $\sim70\%$ of the objects on this list are likely to be random positional coincidences of unrelated sources along the line of sight.}
852: \tablenotetext{a}{soft = detected in the 0.5--2.0 keV band; hard = not detected in the 0.5--2.0 keV band.}
853: \tablenotetext{b}{Separation between IR and X-ray source positions.}
854: \end{deluxetable}
855:
856:
857:
858:
859: \clearpage
860:
861: \begin{figure}
862: \plotone{f1.eps}
863: \caption{Our {\it Spitzer}/IRAC Galactic Center Survey mosaic image (Stolovy et al.\ 2006), showing the $40 \times 40$ pc
864: X--ray comparison field (square outline). This image is centered
865: at ($l$, $b$) = (0.0, 0.0) and is displayed in galactic
866: coordinates. \label{fig_1}}
867: \end{figure}
868:
869: \begin{figure}
870: \plotone{f2.eps}
871: \caption{The $40 \times 40$ parsec infrared and X--ray field that was
872: used for the X--ray/infrared point source correlation study. {\it Left}: Composite 3.6 (blue), 5.8 (green) and
873: 8.0 $\micron$ (red) {\it Spitzer}/IRAC image of the $40 \times 40$ parsec study field. It yielded $\sim$20,000
874: infrared point sources. {\it Right}: Composite Chandra image of the study field (Wang et al.\ 2002);
875: red = 1 - 3 keV, green = 3 - 5 keV, blue = 5 - 8 keV. Equatorial north is up, east is right. \label{fig_2}}
876: \end{figure}
877:
878: \begin{figure}
879: \plotone{f3a.eps}
880: \caption{(a) Our {\it Spitzer}/IRAC 3.6 $\micron$ image, showing the $\sim$20,000 compact infrared sources brighter than $[3.6] = 12$ that we extracted in a $40 \times 40$ parsec subset of the survey region (Ram\'irez et al.\ 2008), overlaid with 2357 hard and soft X--ray sources (orange circles) identified by Muno et al.\ (2003). (b) The same 3.6 $\micron$ image is shown. Here, only the X--ray point sources that fell within $0\farcs5$ (blue), 1$''$ (green), and 2$''$ (red) of a 3.6 $\micron$ source are indicated. Hard X--ray sources are indicated by crosses; soft sources are indicated by circles. The six white squares indicate the locations of the massive young stars studied by Muno et al.\ (2006). All six are detected by IRAC, but only three are X--ray sources. \label{fig_ch1x}}
881: \end{figure}
882: \clearpage
883: {\plotone{f3b.eps}}
884: \centerline{Fig. 3. --- Continued.}
885: \clearpage
886:
887: \begin{figure}
888: \plotone{f4a.eps}
889: \caption{(a) Our {\it Spitzer}/IRAC 8.0 $\micron$ image, overlaid with the 2178 X--ray sources without IR counterparts (orange circles). (b) The same 8.0 $\micron$ image is shown. Here, only the X--ray point sources that fell within $0\farcs5$ (blue), 1$''$ (green), and 2$''$ (red) of an 8.0 $\micron$ source are indicated. Hard X--ray sources are indicated by crosses; soft sources are indicated by circles. The six white squares indicate the locations of the massive young stars studied by Muno et al.\ (2006). All six are detected by IRAC, but only three are X--ray sources. \label{fig_ch4x}}
890: \end{figure}
891: \clearpage
892: {\plotone{f4b.eps}}
893: \centerline{Fig. 4. --- Continued.}
894: \clearpage
895:
896:
897:
898: \begin{figure}
899: \plottwo{f5a.eps}{f5b.eps}\\
900: \plottwo{f5c.eps}{f5d.eps}\\
901: \caption{(a) Positions of all $\sim$20,000 3.6 $\micron$ sources (black dots) in the $40 \times 40$ pc study field from our {\it Spitzer}/IRAC Galactic Center survey.
902: (b) Positions of all 2357 X--ray sources in the Muno et al.\ (2003) survey.
903: (c) Positions of the 156 IRAC 3.6 $\micron$ sources that fall within 1$''$ of an X--ray source in the Muno et al.\ (2003) sample, a correlation of about 7\%.
904: (d) Shifting the position template by 5$''$ from the source positions in (a) results in an average of 120 IRAC 3.6 $\micron$ sources within 1$''$ of X--ray source, suggesting that these are chance associations. The actual correlation of 3.6 $\micron$ and X--ray point sources within 1$''$ is therefore probably not greater than 2\%.
905: \label{fig_dots}}
906: \end{figure}
907:
908: \begin{figure}
909: \plotone{f6.eps}
910: \caption{The cumulative radial distributions with respect to Sgr A* are shown from
911: all X--ray sources, only the hard sources, only the soft sources, and only
912: the sources with matching 3.6 $\micron$ sources within $0\farcs5$.
913: The K--S test indicates that the hard sources have a statically different distribution
914: than the soft sources and the sources with IR counterparts. The distributions of
915: soft sources and sources with 3.6 $\micron$ counterparts are {\it not} significantly different. The thick red line shows the corresponding distribution for all 3.6 $\micron$
916: sources within the same region as the X-ray sources. This distribution differs only slightly
917: from that expected for a uniform source density across the region.
918: \label{fig_cumul}}
919: \end{figure}
920:
921: \begin{figure}
922: \plotone{f7.eps}
923: \caption{IR stars with X--ray candidates have typical colors. Color-magnitude diagram for 17613 IRAC sources (small black dots) that were detected in both channels 1 and 2 (3.6 $\micron$ and 4.5 $\micron$) in the $40 \times 40$ parsec study region. 42 X--ray sources had IRAC sources lying within $0\farcs5$ of the nominal X--ray positions (large symbols), 130 had IRAC sources within 1$''$ (medium symbols), and 394 had IRAC sources within 2$''$ (small symbols). Square symbols indicate soft X--ray sources; circles indicate hard X--ray sources. The horizontal and diagonal dotted lines indicate the levels at which
924: saturation may begin to affect the 3.6 and 4.5 $\micron$ photometry respectively (Ram\'irez et al.\ 2008). \label{fig_cmd}}
925: \end{figure}
926:
927: \begin{figure}
928: \epsscale{0.6}
929: \plotone{f8a.eps}
930: \plotone{f8b.eps}
931: \caption{(top) An enlarged view of matching X--ray and 3.6 $\micron$ point sources at
932: the Galactic Center cluster. Matching sources within $0\farcs5$, 1$''$ and 2$''$ are
933: indicated by blue, green and red symbols, respectively. Hard X--ray sources are indicated by crosses; soft sources are indicated by circles. IRS 13 is at the green circle
934: nearest to the center of the image. (bottom) The same view at
935: 8 $\micron$ with the matching X--ray and 8 $\micron$ point sources superimposed.
936: \label{fig_zoom}}
937: \end{figure}
938:
939:
940: \end{document}