1: \documentclass[emulateapj,epsfig]{article}
2: \usepackage[onecolumn]{emulateapj}
3: \usepackage[]{epsfig}
4: \usepackage{graphicx}
5: \def\perc{\%\,\,}
6: \hoffset -1.5truecm \lefthead{Menci et al.}
7: \righthead{}
8: \def\newline{\hfil\break}
9: \begin{document}
10: \title{The Red Sequence of High-Redshift Clusters: a Comparison with Cosmological Galaxy Formation Models}
11: \author{N. Menci$^1$, P. Rosati$^2$, R. Gobat$^2$, V. Strazzullo$^3$, A. Rettura$^4$, S. Mei$^{5,6}$, R. Demarco$^4$ }
12: \affil{$^1$INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, via di Frascati 33, I-00040 Monteporzio, Italy}
13: \affil{$^2$European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Strasse 2, D-85748 Garching, Germany}
14: \affil{$^3$National Radio Astronomy Observatory, P.O. Box O, Socorro, NM 87801}
15: \affil{$^4$Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218}
16: \affil{$^5$University of Paris Denis Diderot, 75205 Paris Cedex 13, France}
17: \affil{$^6$GEPI, Observatoire de Paris, Section de Meudon, 92195 Meudon Cedex, France}
18: \smallskip
19:
20: \begin{abstract} We compare the results from a state-of-the-art
21: semi-analytic model of galaxy formation with spectro-photometric
22: observations of distant galaxy clusters observed in the range
23: $0.8\leq z\leq 1.3$. We investigate the properties of their red
24: sequence (RS) galaxies and compare them with those of the field at the same
25: redshift. In our model we find that i) a
26: well-defined, narrow RS is obtained already by $z\approx 1.2$;
27: this is found to be more populated than the field RS, analogously to what
28: observed and predicted at $z=0$; ii) the predicted U-V rest-frame
29: colors and scatter of the cluster RS at $z=1.2$ have average values
30: of 1 and 0.15 respectively, with a
31: cluster-to-cluster variance of $\approx 0.2$ and $\approx 0.06$, respectively.
32: The scatter of the RS of cluster
33: galaxies is $\approx $ 5 times smaller than the corresponding field value;
34: iii) when the RS galaxies are considered, the mass growth
35: histories of field and cluster galaxies at $z\approx1.2$ are
36: similar, with 90 \perc of the stellar mass of RS galaxies at
37: $z=1.2$ already formed at cosmic times $t=2.5$ Gyr, and 50 \perc
38: at $t=1$ Gyr; v) the predicted distribution of stellar ages of RS
39: galaxies at $z=1.2$ peaks at $3.7$ Gyr for
40: both cluster and field populations; however, for the latter the distribution
41: is significantly skewed toward lower ages. When compared with
42: observations, the above findings show an overall consistency,
43: although the average value $\Delta_{U-V}\approx 0.07$ of the observed cluster
44: RS scatter at $z\approx1.2$ is smaller than the corresponding model
45: central value. We discuss the physical origin and the significance
46: of the above results in the framework of cosmological galaxy
47: formation.
48: \end{abstract}
49:
50: \keywords{galaxies: formation --- galaxies: clusters --- galaxies: evolution}
51:
52: \section{Introduction}
53:
54: Environment-dependent properties of galaxies constitute a natural
55: test-ground for cosmological theories of galaxy formation. These
56: envisage the properties of the galaxy populations to originate from the
57: primordial density field dominated by the Dark Matter (DM); the
58: collapse and growth of small-scale
59: perturbations (leading to galaxy progenitors) is thus modulated by the
60: underlying large-scale density field whose overdense regions will
61: collapse to form groups and clusters of galaxies.
62:
63: Among the galaxy properties, the color distribution constitutes a
64: major issue, as colors measure the ratio of the present star
65: formation rate to the overall mass of formed stars in a given
66: galaxy. Three fundamental observational results deal with the star
67: formation history and the color distribution of field galaxies: a) The
68: global star formation decrease from $z=1.5$ to the present by
69: almost 2 dex (see, e.g., the compilation by Hopkins 2004 and references therein);
70: b) The downsizing (Cowie et al. 1996),
71: i.e., a stronger ($\sim 3$ dex) and
72: earlier (starting at least at $z\approx 2$) decline of star formation
73: in massive galaxies compared to a slower ($\approx$ 1 dex)
74: decline of the star formation rate of the present blue/late-type
75: galaxies from $z\sim 1.5$; correspondingly, an inverse correlation of
76: the age of stellar population with the galaxy stellar mass is
77: observed; c) The bimodality (Strateva et al. 2001; Baldry et al. 2004;
78: Bell et al. 2004), i.e., a marked segregation in color
79: between the blue galaxy population (dominant at faint magnitudes and
80: for low-mass galaxies) and the red population (dominant for bright,
81: massive galaxies) populating the ''red sequence'' (RS).
82:
83: In hierarchical clustering models, the first property naturally
84: results from the high star formation rate at high redshifts $z\gtrsim
85: 2$ sustained by the high cooling efficiency in the dense
86: environments of galaxy progenitors and by effective starbursts; the
87: decline at $z\lesssim 2$ follows from the exhaustion of the gas reservoir
88: converted into stars at higher $z$. The interpretation of downsizing
89: in hierarchical galaxy formation is also straightforward: bright,
90: massive galaxies form from the coalescence of protogalaxies which
91: collapsed in a biased, overdense region of the primordial density
92: field; thus such progenitors collapsed and began to form stars at
93: earlier cosmic epochs, and their cold gas reservoir is exhausted
94: earlier thus yielding older (and hence redder) stellar population in
95: the final galaxy. The origin of the bimodality is more controversial;
96: recent works (see discussion in Neistein, van der Bosch, Dekel 2006;
97: Dekel \& Birnobim 2006; Menci et al. 2006) suggest that
98: self-regulation of star formation (due to Supernovae feedback) can be
99: effective below a critical (DM) mass scale $M\approx 5\times
100: 10^{11}\,M_{\odot}$; the inclusion of feedback from AGNs then quenches
101: further star formation in massive haloes.
102:
103: The above properties are strongly modulated by the galaxy
104: environment. Not only the morphology has long been recognized to
105: strongly depend on the environment (with the fraction of early-type
106: galaxies increasing in groups and clusters of galaxies, Spitzer \& Baade
107: 1951), but also the fraction of galaxies belonging to the blue
108: population has been recently recognized to decrease in dense
109: environments (Baldry et al. 2004, 2006; Gerke et al. 2007; Cooper et
110: al. 2006). The environmental dependence of the blue fraction
111: $f_b$ is stronger than the above mentioned luminosity dependence
112: observed in the field. This means that the environmental density
113: enhances the probability for an early star formation followed by
114: quenching even for low or intermediate mass galaxies.
115:
116: The scenario emerging from the above observational framework is the
117: following: galaxies flow from the blue population to the red sequence
118: (corresponding to the decline of star formation at $z<2$) at rates and
119: cosmic epochs that depend very strongly on their mass and
120: environment. Massive galaxies have converted most of their gas into
121: stars and moved to the red sequence very early at $z>2$ in both
122: cluster and field, since at high redshift their star formation was not
123: effectively self-limited by feedback. On the other hand, lower mass
124: galaxies $M<10^{12}\,M_{\odot}$ move to the RS later in the
125: field compared to clusters. The speed-up of the transition to the red
126: sequence of intermediate/low- mass galaxies in dense environments
127: (groups and clusters) can be contributed by a number of physical
128: processes: i) Biased galaxy formation; in principle, galaxies later
129: included in groups and clusters form from clumps which collapsed in biased,
130: overdense regions of the primordial field, hence characterized by an
131: earlier star formation. However, the initial overdensity corresponding
132: to the final group or cluster may be so tiny that such an effect might
133: be too small. ii) Starbursts resulting from galaxy merging and
134: fly-by (sometimes referred to as ''harassment'');
135: while merging is actually enhanced in groups compared to
136: clusters (see Cavaliere, Colafrancesco \& Menci 1992), the minor - but
137: more frequent - starbursts originated from galaxy grazing encounters
138: may significantly accelerate the star formation at high redshift in
139: groups and clusters, and hence anticipate the transition to the red
140: sequence. Note however that this process is effective mainly for
141: mid-size galaxies which strike the best compromise between cross
142: section and abundance. iii) Strangulation; in small-mass galaxies the
143: gas may be stripped off when they are included in the cluster (Larson,
144: Tinsley \& Caldwell 1980); in most semi-analytic models this is
145: captured by dispersing their hot gas mass through the whole host halo
146: (see, e.g., Balogh, Navarro \& Morris 2000). Note that our model,
147: similarly to canonical semi-analytic approaches, does not
148: deal with the ram pressure stripping of the dense, cold gas in satellite galaxies.
149: iv) AGN feedback;
150: to some extent, such a mechanism must be at work, and there is a general
151: agreement (Ciotti \& Ostriker 1997; Silk \& Rees 1998, Haehnelt,
152: Natarajan \& Rees 1998, Fabian 1999) that it may contribute to
153: suppress any residual star formation in massive galaxies; in models
154: where the AGN phase is triggered by galaxy interactions, the AGN feedback
155: depends on the environment which modulates the encounter probability.
156: The effectiveness of the AGN feedback in quenching the black hole growth
157: and the subsequent star formation has been confirmed by recent aimed
158: simulations of galaxy collisions triggering AGN activity (Di Matteo,
159: Springel \& Hernquist 2005). We have investigated the role of such a
160: process in a previous paper (Menci et al. 2006) showing that it can
161: affect the color distribution of most massive galaxies by removing the
162: residual fraction of such galaxies that otherwise would populate the
163: blue branch of the color distribution.
164:
165: The relative role of all these processes is still matter of
166: investigation. Their dependence on
167: the mass-scale of the host structure (group or galaxy cluster) would provide
168: an important clue to disentangle their contribution to the observed
169: environment-dependent properties of galaxies.
170: Several recent papers (Cooper et al. 2007, Gerke et
171: al. 2007) point out that the difference in the properties of the RS
172: between field and overdense environments remains unchanged up
173: to $z\approx 1$ but tends to vanish at redshifts $z\gtrsim 1.3$. Since
174: these results are based on samples which probe the environments up to
175: the group scale (rich clusters are not included), the epoch
176: $1.2\lesssim z\lesssim 1.5$ would represent a measure of the effectiveness of
177: poor/medium environments in modulating the star formation of member
178: galaxies; at such redshifts, the environment-induced decline of the
179: star formation would become stronger than the average cosmological
180: decline. Probing the transition to the RS of galaxies in
181: richer, extreme environment at $1\lesssim z\lesssim 1.5$ is then
182: crucial.
183:
184: In this context, recent HST/ACS observation of a sample of clusters at
185: $0.8<z<1.3$ have fueled much progress. E.g., Blakeslee et
186: al. (2003, 2006) and Mei at al. (2006a; 2006b) have found a well
187: defined and extremely narrow red sequence with an intrinsic scatter of
188: $\sim 0.05$ mag (in the color $i_{775}-z_{850}$ as observed
189: with HST/ACS), much smaller than the corresponding field RS. This points
190: toward the existence of a strong environment-dependent effect which,
191: for galaxies in extremely dense environments, has already been
192: effective at $z\approx 1.5$, thus supporting the view that the denser
193: the environment, the earlier the transition to the RS.
194:
195: How do such results compare with hierarchical models ? While such models
196: essentially capture the transition of faint galaxies to the RS
197: (at least in the redshift range $z\leq 0.8$, see De Lucia et al. 2007;
198: for results of hydro/N-body simulations see Romeo et al. 2008 ),
199: the tightness of the RS constitutes an impressive constraint for them,
200: since in the hierarchical scenario the growth of DM haloes constitutes
201: - on average - a gradual process, driven by the merging of
202: sub-clumps, the progressive cooling of gas at the center followed by a
203: quiescent star formation. Since the tightness of the
204: observed RS indicates a fast transition of
205: the galaxies to the same region of the color distribution acting on
206: very short time scales in the early epochs, this is particularly challenging
207: for hierarchical models which predict clusters of galaxies to be the last
208: structures to virialize (typically at $z<2 $). On the other hand, in
209: such models, high-redshift clusters also constitute the most biased
210: environments for galaxies to form, hence enhancing the effectiveness of
211: the processes i)-iv) described above in accelerating the transition to
212: the RS. Thus, comparing the observed properties of the RS in
213: high-z clusters with model predictions constitutes an extremely
214: sensitive probe of hierarchical models and of the physical processes there
215: included.
216:
217: Here we compare the results of a state-of-the-art semi-analytic model
218: of galaxy formation with the properties of the RS of galaxy
219: clusters at high redshift, the most extreme (biased) galaxy
220: environments observed so far. We also emphasize that the observations
221: used in this work are currently the most suited for such an
222: analysis, as with ACS observations in the $i$ and $z$ bands one
223: can achieve the photometric accuracy to reliably estimate color
224: scatters out to $z\sim\! 1.3$.
225:
226: The model we adopt is well suited for such an investigation since it
227: includes all the processes i)-iv) discussed above, which are though to
228: contribute to the environmental dependence of the star formation
229: histories. In particular, it includes both the burst of star
230: formation due to grazing encounters (important in the early building
231: up of massive galaxies) and a description of the AGN evolution which
232: has been extensively tested against observations both in the optical
233: (Menci et al. 2003) and in X-rays (Menci et al. 2004b). In previous
234: papers (Menci et al. 2005; 2006)
235: we have successfully compared the model with observations
236: concerning the galaxy color distribution at low redshifts as a
237: function of both luminosity and environment, and at high-redshift we
238: showed how the inclusion of AGN feedback allows to suppress
239: residual star formation in massive galaxies yielding the observed
240: abundance of EROs.
241:
242: The paper is organized as follows: in Sects. 2 and 3 we briefly recall
243: the main properties of the semi-analytic model we use, and the
244: observational data set we compare with. In Sect. 4.1 we show the model
245: results concerning the color-magnitude relation both at low and at high
246: redshift in the cluster and in the field, and we briefly discuss how it
247: compares with existing observations. In sect. 4.2 we focus on the
248: properties of the RS in high-redshift clusters, and compare the model results
249: concerning the scatter and the normalization of the RS with the ACS
250: observations of distant clusters. We also provide predictions
251: concerning the distribution of the scatter and the normalization of
252: the RS among the cluster population, which could be verified with
253: existing or future observations. In Sect. 4.3 we also compare the mass
254: assembly history and the age distribution of $z\approx 1.2$ galaxies in
255: the field and in clusters resulting from the model with estimates derived
256: from fitting observed galaxy colors and spectra with spectral
257: synthesis models. In Sect. 4.4 we interpret our results on the basis of
258: the physical processes which determine the scatter of the RS in
259: hierarchical models. In Sect. 5 we draw our conclusions.
260:
261: \section{The Model}
262:
263: Here we recall the key properties of the semi-analytic model we adopt,
264: referring to our previous papers for details. The DM
265: haloes of protogalaxies collapse from overdense regions of the
266: primordial DM density field, taken to be a Gaussian random density
267: field with a Cold Dark Matter (CDM) power spectrum in a ''concordance''
268: cosmology with $\Omega_{\Lambda}=0.7$,
269: $\Omega_{0}=0.3$, baryonic density $\Omega_b=0.04$, and Hubble constant
270: (in units of 100 km/s/Mpc) $h=0.7$. The normalization of the spectrum,
271: in terms of the variance of the field smoothed over a region of 8
272: $h^{-1}$ Mpc, is taken to be $\sigma_8=0.9$. Since the rms value of the
273: density field decreases with mass, progressively larger regions of the
274: density field collapse with increasing time (eventually leading to the
275: formation of groups and clusters of galaxies), and include the
276: previously formed condensations. The corresponding merging rate of the
277: DM haloes is provided by the Extended Press \& Schechter formalism (see
278: Bond et al. 1991; Lacey \& Cole 1993) and implemented as described in
279: detail in Menci et al. (2005, 2006). The clumps included into larger
280: DM haloes may survive as satellites, merge to form larger galaxies due
281: to binary aggregations among satellites, or coalesce into the central
282: dominant galaxy due to dynamical friction. These processes take place
283: over time scales which increase over cosmic times, so the number of
284: satellite galaxies increases as the DM host haloes grow from groups to
285: clusters. All the above processes are implemented using the usual
286: prescriptions of semi-analytic models as described in Menci et
287: al. (2005; 2006).
288:
289: We adopt the treatment of the baryonic processes described in our
290: previous papers (Menci et al. 2005) with the same choice of free
291: parameters. These include the cooling at the center of galaxies, the
292: settling of the cooled gas with mass $m_c$ into a rotationally
293: supported disk with radius $r_d$ and circular velocity $v_d$, the
294: gradual (quiescent) conversion of such gas into stars at a rate $\dot
295: m_*$, and the stellar feedback which results in redistributing part of
296: the cooled gas to the hot gas phase (with mass $m_h$) at the virial
297: temperature of the halo. An additional channel for star formation
298: implemented in the model is provided by interaction-driven starbursts,
299: triggered not only by merging events but also by fly-by events. Such a
300: star formation mode provides an important contribution to the early
301: formation of stars in massive galaxies, as described in detail in
302: Menci et al. (2004a, 2005).
303:
304: The model also includes a treatment of the growth of supermassive
305: black holes at the center of galaxies by interaction-triggered inflow
306: of cold gas, following the physical model in Cavaliere \& Vittorini
307: (2000). The accretion episodes, corresponding to the active AGN phases,
308: also trigger the AGN feedback onto the surrounding cold gas, whose
309: physical treatment is derived from Lapi, Cavaliere, Menci (2005). A
310: detailed description and testing of such a section of the model is
311: presented in Menci et al. (2006).
312:
313: Thus, all processes which are candidate for enhancing the early star
314: formation in galaxies in dense environments (and for the subsequent
315: quenching of star formation) are included in the model. The
316: distribution of gas mass, disk sizes, stellar masses, luminosities,
317: have been checked against observations in previous papers, as well as
318: the growth of AGNs and the corresponding redshift-dependent luminosity
319: functions both in the optical and in X-rays.
320:
321: \section{The Data Set}
322:
323: We compare our model mainly with the results from the HST/ACS
324: Intermediate Redshift Cluster Survey, which consisted of multi-color
325: observations of eight clusters with redshifts in the interval
326: $0.8\leq z\leq 1.3$. We focus on the observations of the RS of these
327: clusters, as described in Blakeslee et al. (2003, 2006), Homeier et
328: al. (2006), Mei et al. (2006a,b, 2008). We also use the analysis by
329: Gobat et al. (2008) and Rettura et al. (2008) of the 10-band spectral
330: energy distributions (SED) and spectra of the early-type galaxies in
331: RDCS1252, the cluster at $z=1.24$ with the best available multi-wavelength data
332: set in the cluster sample of early-type galaxies (Demarco et al. 2007). When comparing with
333: the field data we use the spectroscopic sample of early type galaxies in the
334: GOODS-S field from the Vanzella et al. (2008) study, with masses determined from the
335: multi-wavelength data set offered by the GOODS
336: survey (Rettura et al. 2006).
337:
338: \section{Results}
339:
340: \subsection{The Color-Magnitude Diagram of Cluster vs Field Galaxies}
341:
342: The color-magnitude diagram ($U-V$ color vs. absolute $V$ magnitudes
343: in the Vega system) obtained from the model is shown in fig. 1 for
344: both field (left) and cluster galaxies (right panel) in three redshift
345: bins. The color code corresponds to the density of galaxies in a given
346: color and luminosity bin divided by the density of galaxies in the
347: considered luminosity bin. Note that the cluster color-magnitude
348: diagram does not correspond to galaxies residing in a single cluster,
349: but it refers to all galaxies residing in host DM halos more massive
350: than $10^{14}\,M_{\odot}$.
351:
352: \begin{center}
353: \vspace{-0.2cm}
354: \scalebox{0.65}[0.65]{\rotatebox{0}{\includegraphics{f1.pdf}}}
355: \end{center} {\footnotesize \vspace{-0.6cm }
356: Fig. 1. -
357: The color-magnitude ($U-V$ vs. $V$) relation computed from
358: our model for all galaxies (left panels) and for galaxies hosted in
359: rich groups or clusters (i.e., in halos with mass $M\geq
360: 10^{14}\,M_{\odot}$, right panels), at $z=0.1$, $z=1.2$, and $z=2$
361: (from top to bottom). The color code (shown in the central color bar)
362: represents the number of galaxies in a given color- magnitude
363: bin normalized to the abundance of galaxies at the considered
364: magnitude.
365: \vspace{0.4cm}}
366:
367: Before discussing in detail the features of the color-magnitude
368: relation, we first check that the magnitude distribution of galaxies
369: predicted by the model is consistent with the observations. While at
370: low redshift the abundance of red galaxies in dense environments (as
371: well as in the field) has been checked against observations in Menci
372: et al. (2005), here we explore it at the highest available redshift in fig. 2,
373: where we perform a detailed comparison of the $z=1.2$ K-band luminosity
374: function from our model with the available observations of high-redshift
375: clusters (Strazzullo et al. 2006).
376: The model field luminosity function is also shown as a dashed line;
377: for graphical reasons, its actual normalization (predicted by the model), has been rescaled
378: to match the cluster luminosity function at the characteristic
379: luminosity $M_{K*}$.
380:
381: For the model cluster luminosity function shown in fig. 2,
382: we have checked that its normalization is consistent with the observed abundance of bright
383: galaxies, both at low and at high redshifts.
384: Indeed, the model predicts a cosmic density (per Mpc$^3$) of bright ($M_K<-20$) galaxies,
385: located in clusters with mass $M>10^{14.5}M_{\odot}$ at $z=1.2$ (corresponding to
386: the average X-ray luminosity of the cluster sample adopted in
387: Strazzullo et al. 2006 using the same conversion adopted by such
388: authors), which is 3\perc of the overall (field) density of model galaxies
389: with same brightness at such redshift.
390: This ratio between the cluster and the field density predicted by the model
391: is in good agreement with the observational value estimated by Strazzullo et al.
392: (2006) at the same redshift (4-5 \perc of bright galaxies are found in clusters).
393: Thus, a small uncertainty (a logarithmic factor 0.15) in the relative
394: normalization of the observed and the model luminosity function in
395: fig. 2 is present. It is interesting to note that the broad agreement
396: between the model and the observations concerning the fraction of
397: bright galaxies located in massive clusters persists down to redshift
398: zero, where the observations yield values of $6-7$ \perc compared to a
399: predicted value of $\approx 10$ \perc. Finally, we also show in fig. 2 the
400: model luminosity function predicted for the field at the same redshift. Note that
401: the model luminosity function shows little dependence on the environment
402: (in agreement with observations by Strazzullo et al. 2006),
403: although the model yields a somewhat
404: larger abundance of massive galaxies in clusters compared to the
405: field.
406:
407: \begin{center}
408: \vspace{0.2cm}
409: \scalebox{0.5}[0.5]{\rotatebox{0}{\includegraphics{f2.pdf}}}
410: \end{center} {\footnotesize \vspace{0cm }
411: Fig. 2. -
412: The K-band luminosity function at $z=1.2$ from our model (solid line) is
413: compared with data obtained from near-infrared images of three distant X-ray
414: clusters with an average redshift $z\approx 1.2$ (Strazzullo et al. 2005).
415: We have checked the normalization of the model luminosity functions by comparing the
416: abundance of bright model galaxies with the observations at both low and high
417: redshifts (see text). For comparison, we also show the
418: luminosity function of model field galaxies at the same redshift $z=1.2$ (dashed line).
419: For graphical reasons, its actual normalization (predicted by the model), has been rescaled
420: to match the value of the cluster luminosity function at the characteristic
421: luminosity $M_{K*}$.
422: \vspace{0.4cm}}
423:
424:
425: Having checked the abundance of galaxies as a function of their
426: magnitude against observations, we now examine in detail the
427: properties of the color-magnitude distribution shown in fig. 1.
428:
429: Firstly, we note that the overall trend of brighter galaxies to be
430: redder than fainter ones is effectively modulated by the environment,
431: so that the fraction of faint galaxies with red colors is larger in
432: clusters than in the field up to $z\approx 1.5-2$. This reflects the
433: shift of color distribution of faint galaxies toward red colors in
434: dense environments already shown for local
435: galaxies (Menci et al. 2005), and constitutes a first-order consistency-check with
436: local observations (Baldry et al. 2004) and with the observed trend in
437: groups up to $z\approx 1.3$ (Gerke et al. 2007).
438: Here such a check is extended to the richest environments at higher
439: redshifts and to a wider magnitude range in fig. 3. In particular, the
440: local fraction of blue galaxies ($f_b$, see caption for the
441: definition) is shown as a function of absolute magnitude for small
442: ($M/M_{\odot}\leq 10^{13}$) and for large ($M/M_{\odot}\geq 10^{14}$)
443: host halo masses, and compared with the SDSS data
444: group catalogue (Weinmann et. 2006) in fig. 3a. The decrease of $f_b$
445: with increasing density of the environment, especially marked for faint
446: galaxy magnitudes, is not
447: unexpected in hierarchical theories (see point i) in Sect. 1). It
448: traces back to the properties of the primordial density field:
449: galaxies in groups/clusters are formed from the collapse of clumps
450: within biased, high density regions of the primordial field, where the
451: enhanced density allowed for an earlier (and higher) star formation
452: activity. The gas conversion into stars is thus anticipated and the
453: rate of galaxy transition from the blue cloud to the RS is accelerated,
454: leading to a higher fraction of red galaxies at $z\lesssim 2$.
455:
456: \begin{center}
457: \vspace{-2.cm}
458: \scalebox{0.45}[0.45]{\rotatebox{0}{\includegraphics{f3a.pdf}}}
459: \scalebox{0.45}[0.45]{\rotatebox{0}{\includegraphics{f3b.pdf}}}
460: \end{center} {\footnotesize \vspace{-0.5cm }
461: Fig. 3. -
462: The model blue fraction (lines) is compared with available data for
463: different environments as a function of the $r$-band absolute magnitude in the
464: local Universe (left panel) and of redshift (right panel). To perform a proper
465: comparison, the blue fraction $f_b$ in the two panels has been
466: computed adopting the same magnitude cut adopted in the papers we
467: compare with, as detailed below. \newline Left panel: the fraction of
468: $z=0.1$ galaxies bluer than $(g-r)_{cut}=0.7-0.032(M_r+16.5)$ (where
469: the SDSS absolute magnitudes k-corrected to $z=0.1$ are adopted as in
470: Weinmann et al. 2006), is shown as a function of $M_r$ for model
471: galaxies hosted in haloes with different mass as indicated by the different line types.
472: For comparison, we have also included the observational results obtained
473: from the SDSS group catalogue described in detail in Weinmann et
474: al. (2006): the upper shaded area corresponds to galaxies in host
475: haloes with mass $10^{12.5}\,M_{\odot}\leq M\leq 10^{13}\,M_{\odot}$,
476: while the lower one to galaxies in clusters with
477: $10^{14}\,M_{\odot}\leq M\leq 10^{14.5}\,M_{\odot}$. \newline Right
478: panel: to compare with the observations from the DEEP2 survey (Gerke et
479: al. 2007) the fraction of galaxies bluer than $U-B=-0.032(M_B-5 log
480: h+21.62)+1.2$ and magnitudes brighter than $M_B-5 log
481: h=-20.7-1.37(1-z)$ is shown as a function of redshift for model field
482: galaxies (solid line) and for model galaxies in groups/clusters (with halo
483: mass $M\geq 10^{14}\,M_{\odot}$, dashed line). The shaded regions
484: correspond to the results from the sample I in Gerke et al. (2007)
485: for field galaxies (upper region) and group galaxies (lower region).
486: Making the group/field division of model galaxies at $10^{13} M_{\odot}$
487: (most of the groups of the DEEP2 survey have masses in the range
488: $10^{13}- 10^{14}\,M_{\odot}$) would yield model results close
489: to those plotted in fig. 3b, except for a slight upshift of the dashed line,
490: corresponding to an increment 0.025 in $f_b$ approximatively constant with z
491: \vspace{0.4cm}}
492:
493: Secondly, we note from fig.1 that at bright magnitudes, the color
494: distribution is {\it entirely} dominated by red objects (see also
495: fig. 3a). The origin of such an effect has been discussed in several
496: papers (see, e.g., Bower et al. 2006; Menci et al. 2005).
497: On the one hand, the downsizing (i.e., the
498: color/age-luminosity correlation) is a natural outcome of
499: hierarchical models since star formation within the progenitors of
500: massive galaxies was enhanced at high redshift due to the biasing effect
501: discussed above. On the other hand, the probability of grazing
502: encounters triggering bursts of star formation (see point ii) in
503: Sect. 1), is larger for massive galaxies (with larger cross section)
504: at high-redshift (where the densities are larger), thus contributing
505: to the early conversion of gas into stars for massive group/cluster
506: member galaxies. However, a substantial fraction ($\approx 40$
507: \perc, see Menci et al. 2006) of blue, massive galaxies would
508: persist without the inclusion of AGN feedback in the model. This
509: effectively suppresses residual star formation in massive halos thus
510: determining the extremely low fraction of massive (bright) blue
511: galaxies.
512:
513: At higher redshift, the overall redshift-dependence of the blue fraction
514: for bright galaxies (see caption) in clusters and in the field is
515: shown in fig. 3b. This shows that the blue fraction predicted in clusters
516: is larger than in the field up to $z=1.5$. This is not unexpected
517: since high-redshift clusters (though rare) constitute the most biased
518: environment for galaxy formation at high-redshift, where the
519: acceleration of star formation at $z>2$ due to the processes mentioned
520: above is maximally effective.
521: Our results concerning the transition of faint galaxies to the red sequence
522: in clusters of galaxies are consistent with the findings of other
523: semi-analytic models (De Lucia et al. 2007), and extend to higher redshifts
524: $z\approx 1.2$; our results are also consistent with existing hydrodynamical N-body
525: simulations (Romeo et al. 2008).
526:
527: Thus, the rate of transition of galaxies from the blue cloud to the
528: red sequence is reasonably well described in the hierarchical
529: clustering model, so that it can be reliably used to gain insight on
530: the properties of the RS galaxies on which we focus next.
531:
532: \subsection{The Properties of the RS in Clusters of Galaxies}
533:
534: The most striking feature of the color-magnitude diagram
535: resulting from the model (fig. 1) is the extremely reduced scatter of
536: the RS in clusters compared to the field, not only at low redshift but
537: even at $z>1$. When the cluster-to-cluster distribution of the RS
538: scatter and normalization are examined (see fig. 4), we find that all
539: clusters are predicted to have a RS color scatter
540: $\langle (c-\langle c\rangle)^2 \rangle^{1/2}$ (where $c\equiv U-V$)
541: lower than 0.2 mag and that the region enclosing 75 \perc of the model clusters includes values of
542: the RS scatter $\langle (c-\langle c\rangle)^2 \rangle^{1/2}$ smaller
543: than 0.1 mag. Such very narrow RS is predicted for all clusters up to
544: $z=2$. The high-$z$ values of the scatter and normalization of the RS
545: resulting from the model are compared in detail with those observed
546: in the distant cluster sample (sect. 2.2) in fig. 5.
547:
548: \begin{center}
549: \vspace{0.2cm}
550: \scalebox{0.75}[0.75]{\rotatebox{90}{\includegraphics{f4.pdf}}}
551: \end{center} {\footnotesize \vspace{0.cm }
552: Fig. 4. -
553: Normalization and scatter of
554: of the RS among the modeled cluster population. The RS is defined as
555: the region of the color-magnitude plane (fig. 1) with $c\equiv
556: U-V>0.8$, and for this we compute the average color $\langle
557: c\rangle$ and the dispersion $\langle (c-\langle c\rangle)^2
558: \rangle^{1/2}$ around the average. The applied color cut is
559: consistent with the minimum in the color distribution which
560: separates the two peaks corresponding to the blue and the red
561: populations (see fig. 1 and the color distribution in the AB
562: magnitude system computed in Menci et al. 2005, 2006).
563: The color code in the figure corresponds to the fraction of model clusters with given
564: RS scatter $\langle c\rangle$ and normalization $\langle (c-\langle c\rangle)^2\rangle^{1/2}$.
565: For comparison, we also show in the same plane the points that correspond
566: to 8 observed clusters in the redshift range $0.8\leq z\leq 1.3$ from the papers
567: cited in Sect. 3.
568: \vspace{0.4cm}}
569:
570: Note that an exact comparison between observed and model RS scatter
571: constitutes a delicate point, since the observational morphological selection
572: and the outlier rejection criteria adopted in the data analysis may affect the comparison with the model,
573: which includes exact cluster members with any morphological types.
574: In the original analysis of observed cluster data performed in the papers cited in Sect. 3,
575: only early-type galaxies were included: the corresponding observational results are represented by the square points (with the errors given by the smaller error bars) in fig. 5.
576: For the sake of a more accurate comparison to the model, we have recalculated the
577: RS scatters for the same observed sample using a procedure as close as possible to the one adopted
578: for model galaxies. In particular: 1) we included
579: all red sequence (rest--frame $U-V> 0.8$) galaxies, irrespective of their morphological type, as in the model;
580: 2) recomputed isophotal colors as from Sextractor (Bertin \& Arnouts 1996);
581: 3) performed a 3--$\sigma$ cut selection and made use of the available spectroscopic redshifts where
582: available to reject outliers.
583: The observational RS scatters are computed as $\langle (c-\langle c\rangle)^2 \rangle^{1/2}$ as done for model galaxies.
584: The results from this new analysis of cluster data are to be considered as upper limits to the
585: actual RS scatters due to the contamination from outliers. The larger possible values for the
586: observational RS scatters (including the uncertainties) resulting from our new analysis are shown as
587: downward arrows in Fig. 5.
588: The exact observational RS scatters to be compared with the model would lie between these upper limits
589: and the squared points, and would have to include spectroscopically confirmed members for all morphological
590: types (data that we do not have at present).
591:
592: \begin{center}
593: \vspace{-2.cm}
594: \scalebox{0.5}[0.5]{\rotatebox{0}{\includegraphics{f5.pdf}}}
595: \end{center} {\footnotesize \vspace{-0.6cm }
596: Fig. 5. -
597: Comparison between predicted and observed scatters of the RS
598: in high-redshift clusters. The lower shaded area represents the
599: region enclosing 75 \perc of the clusters in our Monte Carlo
600: computation; the observational data points (squares) are taken from
601: Blackeslee et al. (2003, 2006), Homeier et al. (2006), Mei et
602: al. (2006a,b). The low redshift point corresponds to the
603: RS $U-V$ scatter of the Coma cluster measured by Bower, Kodama, Terlevich (1998).
604: The downward arrows above all data points indicate the upper limits
605: on the observed RS scatter obtained from our new data analysis,
606: which includes galaxies of any morphological type
607: (see text). For comparison, we also show our estimate of the
608: scatter of the RS for model field galaxies (upper solid line).
609: \vspace{0.3cm}}
610:
611: Although appreciably smaller than the corresponding field value, the model
612: RS scatter $\langle (c-\langle c\rangle)^2 \rangle^{1/2}$ for
613: clusters is generally slightly larger than the observed
614: values at high redshifts, which lie in the lower envelope of the
615: region enclosing 75 \perc of the model clusters (the light-blue
616: region in fig. 4 and the shaded lower area in fig. 5). It is also
617: interesting to note that the model predicts a RS of high-z
618: clusters with no universal average color, but rather with cluster-to-cluster variance
619: of about 0.2 mag in $\langle c \rangle$. This is expected
620: since at high redshift clusters are still forming, so that the
621: distribution of average colors reflects the different formation
622: paths of these structures which are just emerging from the density
623: field. Such a prediction is in agreement with the HST/ACS
624: observations as is shown in the central panel of fig. 4, where the
625: points corresponding to observed clusters show RS colors differing
626: by $\approx 0.2$ mag. Note that the average value of the RS
627: scatter in the model decreases with redshift from z=2 to z=0 (see the red continuous line in fig. 5).
628: The dispersion around such an average scatter decreases with redshift (see shaded area in fig. 5 and fig. 4)
629: since different merging histories of sub-clusters formed at high redshift with different masses
630: are included into a unique rich cluster at low redshift.
631:
632: Thus, the model seems to capture the basic processes responsible for the
633: narrow scatter of the RS of clusters, although the
634: observations still lie on the envelope of the distribution of
635: simulated clusters, which have a mean scatter at least twice
636: as large as the observed one. The origin of this general behavior
637: must be traced back to the fact that RS galaxies in high-redshift
638: clusters are those formed in the most biased environmen existing at
639: those redshifts, so two possibilities arise to explan
640: such an effect. 1) The peak of the {\it star formation history} of
641: RS galaxies in clusters is shifted to earlier cosmic times compared
642: to RS galaxies in the field, thus compressing the star formation activity
643: of the progenitors of RS cluster galaxies in a narrow time range.
644: In this case, the dense environment would not only
645: accelerate the transition from the blue cloud to the red sequence
646: (thus depressing $f_b$ in clusters) but also affect the ages of
647: galaxies which have already moved to the RS. 2) The effect is due to
648: an intrinsic lower scatter in the {\it mass assembly history} of RS
649: galaxies in clusters with respect to the field. This means that the
650: number of possible paths along the merger trees leading to RS
651: galaxies is smaller for galaxies in clusters compared to the field.
652: We investigate both possibilities below.
653:
654: \subsection{The Mass Growth History and The Age Distribution of
655: Cluster vs. Field Galaxies}
656:
657: In fig.~6, we show the model predictions for the mass growth histories
658: of field and cluster galaxies for galaxies belonging to the RS
659: (i.e., with color $U-V\geq 0.8$) with stellar masses in the range
660: $5\times 10^{10}\leq M_*/M_{\odot} \leq 5\times 10^{11}$. The color
661: code refers to the fraction of galaxies which (at the given cosmic
662: time shown in the x-axis) has attained the fraction of final stellar
663: mass shown in the y-axis. The observational results (square data
664: points with error bars) are from Gobat et al. (2008) who used two
665: samples of spectroscopic early-type galaxies in the same stellar mass
666: range drawn from the GOODS field (Vanzella et al. 2008) and the
667: massive cluster RDCS1252 at $z=1.24$ (Demarco et al. 2007), and
668: derived the star formation histories by fitting both their spectral
669: energy distributions and spectra with a large grid of
670: Bruzual-Charlot (2003) models.
671:
672: Inspection of fig. 6 shows that in the hierarchical model the {\it
673: average} stellar mass growth of cluster galaxies does not differ
674: substantially from the field {\it when only red sequence galaxies
675: are considered}; it is only the {\it fraction} of galaxies belonging
676: to the RS which strongly depends on the environment, as discussed in
677: the previous section. Comparison with the data shows a global
678: consistency between expected and observed growth histories, although
679: observations suggest slightly earlier stellar mass formation in
680: cluster galaxies compared to the model. We should stress, however,
681: that while the model mass growth histories are computed
682: self-consistently from the star formation histories resulting from
683: Monte Carlo merging tree simulations, the data points have been
684: obtained by fitting star formation histories based on
685: Bruzual-Charlot models with adjustable parameters affected by some
686: degeneracies.
687:
688: \begin{center}
689: \vspace{0.2cm}
690: \scalebox{0.8}[0.8]{\rotatebox{90}{\includegraphics{f6.pdf}}}
691: \end{center} {\footnotesize \vspace{0.cm }
692: Fig. 6. -
693: The stellar mass growth history of galaxies at $z=1.2$ with stellar masses in
694: the range $5\times 10^{10}\leq M_*/M_{\odot} \leq 5\times
695: 10^{11}$. The mass fraction $M_*/M_{*0}$ (y-axis) formed at the
696: cosmic time t (x-axis) is computed as the stellar mass contained in
697: all progenitors of each considered galaxy at $z=1.2$ divided by its
698: final (at $z=1.2$) stellar mass. The color code represents the
699: number of galaxies with given $M_*/M_{*0}$ at a cosmic time $t$
700: normalized to the total number of galaxies at that time. The data
701: points, from Gobat et al. (2007), are derived from
702: spectrophotometric observations of early-type galaxies in the field
703: and in a rich cluster at $z=1.24$, with stellar masses in the same mass
704: range.
705: \vspace{0.4cm}}
706:
707: Fig. 6 also shows that a major difference between the model cluster and field
708: galaxies is in the {\it scatter} of the mass growth histories, which
709: is much smaller for cluster galaxies compared to the field. For
710: example, while there is a substantial fraction of field galaxies which
711: has assembled only 60 \perc of their stellar mass after 2 Gyr, almost
712: all cluster galaxies have assembled more than 75 \perc of their
713: stellar mass at the same cosmic time. Thus, the small scatter observed
714: in the cluster RS seems to be originated from a smaller dispersion in
715: the mass growth histories of galaxies rather than from an earlier
716: overall stellar mass growth. This is confirmed by the analysis of the
717: distribution of stellar ages shown in fig. 7. We define star formation
718: weighted ages as
719: \begin{equation}
720: \tau(t)={\int_0^t\,dt'\,(t-t')\dot m_*(t')\over \int_0^t\,dt'\dot m_*(t')}\,\,\,,
721: \end{equation}
722: where $t$ is the cosmic time at which we compute the average age of
723: the stellar populations, and $t-t'$ is the age of the populations
724: formed at time $t'$ at a rate $\dot m_*(t')$.
725: This definition has the advantage of taking into account the effective fraction of
726: stellar mass contributed by each stellar population included in the average.
727: Thus, the ages of the stellar populations contributing only a negligible fraction of the final
728: stellar mass do not affect appreciably the average age defined by (1).
729:
730: The predicted distribution of such quantity among the RS galaxy population in
731: field and clusters at $z=1.2$ is shown in the figure for the whole
732: range of galaxy masses (bottom panel) and for the stellar mass range
733: $5\times 10^{10}\leq M_*/M_{\odot} \leq 5\times 10^{11}$ (top panel)
734: used in fig. 6.
735:
736: The bottom panels of Fig. 7 show an evident downsizing in both the
737: field and cluster distributions, in the form of increasing average
738: stellar ages with increasing galaxy stellar mass. This is consistent with
739: a parallel analysis of observations by Rettura et al. (2008) of the same field and
740: cluster samples used by Gobat et al. (2008). The top panels also show a good
741: agreement between model predictions for SF weighted ages and those
742: derived from the spectrophotometric data (Gobat et al. 2008). In
743: particular, the peak values of the stellar ages in the field and in
744: clusters do not differ substantially in the considered mass range (a
745: confirmation of our results on the stellar mass growth). However,
746: while the cluster galaxies have a distribution neatly peaked around
747: the median value, the age distribution of field galaxies shows a
748: larger scatter with a tail toward shorter ages; the fraction of
749: galaxies with ages shorter than 2 Gyr is negligible in clusters but is
750: around 0.25 in the field.
751:
752: \begin{center}
753: \vspace{0.2cm}
754: \scalebox{0.7}[0.7]{\rotatebox{90}{\includegraphics{f7.pdf}}}
755: \end{center} {\footnotesize \vspace{0.cm }
756: Fig. 7. -
757: The distribution of stellar ages (see definition in the text) as a
758: function of final stellar mass for galaxies in the field (left) and
759: cluster (right-hand) at $z=1.2$. \newline Top Panels: the
760: distribution of ages (solid lines) for galaxies in the mass range
761: $5\times 10^{10}\leq M_*/M_{\odot} \leq 5\times 10^{11}$ at $z=1.2$
762: in the field (left-hand) and in clusters (right-hand). The histograms
763: represent the observed distributions of stellar ages derived,
764: using eq. (1), from fitting with Bruzual-Charlot models the same
765: spectrophotometric data as in fig. 6 (Gobat et al. 2007).
766: \newline
767: Bottom Panels: The distribution of stellar ages (see definition in the text)
768: as a function of final stellar mass for galaxies in the field (left) and clusters
769: (right) at $z=1.2$.
770: \vspace{0.4cm}}
771:
772: Thus, both observational and model results concur in indicating that
773: the smaller scatter of the RS in rich clusters compared to the field at high-$z$
774: cannot be accounted for by the difference
775: in stellar mass assembly between field and cluster RS galaxies; however, such a
776: (tiny) difference (not reproduced by model, see right panel in fig. 6)
777: may be responsible for the residual discrepancy (a factor
778: $\approx 1.5$) between the observed and the model RS, shown in figs. 4 and 5.
779: We shall come back to this point in the Conclusions.
780:
781: \subsection{Discussion: the Origin of Reduced Scatter in the Stellar
782: Mass Assembly of Cluster Galaxies}
783:
784: To understand the origin of the reduced scatter of the ages, color,
785: and mass growth histories of clusters galaxies compared to the field
786: we show in fig. 8 (top panel) the model resuts concerning the
787: ratio between the star formation
788: contributed by minor progenitors (i.e., all progenitor DM haloes except the
789: main one) to that contributed by the main progenitor, as a function of
790: cosmic time and final (at $z=1.2$) galaxy stellar mass. Clearly, minor
791: progenitors of cluster galaxies have contributed significantly to the
792: stellar mass growth only at very early epochs, when they had all
793: comparable masses. At times $t\gtrsim 1$ Gyr the contribution from
794: minor progenitors is negligible, and the bulk of the stellar mass is
795: formed in the main progenitors. Conversely, for field galaxies the
796: star formation in minor progenitors remains appreciable even at later
797: cosmic times, and the scatter generated by the different merging
798: histories effectively results into a final dispersion of galaxy color,
799: ages, and stellar mass growth histories.
800:
801: \begin{center}
802: \vspace{0.1cm}
803: \scalebox{0.65}[0.65]{\rotatebox{0}{\includegraphics{f8.pdf}}}
804: \end{center} {\footnotesize \vspace{0.cm }
805: Fig. 8. -
806: Top panels: The ratio between the star formation rate contributed by minor
807: progenitors (see text for definition) and the main one (color code) is plotted
808: as a function of the cosmic time (x-axis) for different values of the final (at
809: $z=1.2$) stellar mass (y-axis). Left-hand column refers to field galaxies,
810: right-hand column to cluster members.\newline Bottom panels: The number of
811: progenitors with stellar mass larger than $5\,10^9\,M_{\odot}$ is represented by
812: the colored contours as a function of cosmic time $t$, from $t=0$ to the present
813: for different values of the final (at $z=0$) stellar mass (y-axis).
814: \vspace{0.4cm}}
815:
816: In other words, the model predicts that, for field galaxies, the formation of stellar
817: populations finally included in a given galaxy is largely distributed
818: among all its progenitors, while the majority of galaxies in clusters
819: have been assembled earlier on into a single main progenitor, which
820: hosts the bulk of the subsequent star formation.
821:
822: Thus, although the overall (contributed by all progenitors) median
823: star mass growth of field and cluster galaxies is similar (see
824: figs. 6, 7) the scatter is considerably suppressed for the latter,
825: since the variance introduced by the different merging histories is
826: considerably reduced.
827:
828: For completeness, we also show in the bottom panel of fig. 8 the cosmological
829: evolution over the whole cosmic time of the predicted number of progenitors with
830: stellar mass larger than $5\,10^9\,M_{\odot}$. Note how, for field
831: galaxies, this number remains large even at low redshift, indicating a
832: delayed assembly of progenitors into a main object compared to cluster
833: galaxies. Note also that a small number of massive progenitors is
834: accreted also by cluster galaxies. Since the top-right panel shows
835: that their contribution to the build up of the stellar mass is
836: negligible when compared to the main progenitor, this implies that
837: most of the minor clumps accreted by cluster galaxies are gas poor, a
838: condition due to the gas stripping caused by the surrounding
839: cluster medium.
840:
841: Thus, the different scatter of the RS between clusters and field
842: results from the different balance between dry merging
843: and star formation history of progenitors. That such a balance
844: constitutes a key point in determining the properties of RS galaxies has been
845: recently pointed out by Faber et al. (2007), who proposed
846: that the building up of the RS results from a mixture of early star formation
847: followed by quenching and dry merging, and noticed that
848: the prevalence of the latter would result in a reduced scatter of the RS.
849: Here we argue that the balance between the
850: two processes depends on the environment, with dry merging of progenitors with quenched
851: star formation prevailing in biased environments (as results from the compution
852: shown above). This leads in clusters to a relevant reduction not only of the
853: RS scatter, but also of the scatter of the ages of the
854: stellar populations of RS galaxies, a marker of the
855: effect of dry merging already noted by Faber et al. (2007).
856:
857: \section{Conclusions}
858:
859: In this paper we have compared the results from a state-of-the-art
860: semi-analytic model of galaxy formation to spectrophotometric
861: observations of the most distant galaxy clusters observed in the range
862: $0.8\lesssim z\lesssim 1.3$, to investigate the properties of the red
863: sequence (RS) galaxies in high-redshift clusters and to compare them
864: with those of the field in the same stellar mass range.
865:
866: A long standing prediction of cosmological galaxy formation models
867: (see Kauffmann 1996; Diaferio et al. 2001 ) is that the {\it average}
868: stellar populations of galaxies in clusters are older, since the star
869: formation processes are accelerated in structures originated from
870: overdense regions of the primordial density field. Recent
871: observational progress (Baldry et al. 2004) has revealed in
872: detail such an average reddening of galaxies for increasing
873: environmental density, due to an increased population of the red
874: branch of the bimodal color distribution. Thus, the redder {\it
875: average} colors of the cluster galaxy populations we observe today
876: are not caused by a global shift of the ages of the galaxy
877: populations toward lower values, but instead by a different balance
878: between the populations of the two branches of the color distribution.
879:
880: In particular our results can be summarized as follows
881:
882: \begin{itemize}
883:
884: \item The speed up of the transition of galaxies from the blue cloud
885: to the red sequence which takes place in dense environments is
886: qualitatively reproduced by the hierarchical model for a wide range of
887: galaxy masses (being faster for more massive galaxies) and cosmic
888: times. In the case of distant galaxy clusters, the most extreme
889: environments which provide the most challenging test for hierarchical
890: models, such a fast transition in the model is able to reproduce a
891: well defined red sequence in clusters at $z\approx 1.3$, which is
892: narrower than in the field, as observed. The fraction of galaxies
893: which belong to the RS is larger in clusters than in the field from
894: $z=0$ to $z=1.5$, and stays nearly constant in such an interval.
895:
896: \item In agreement with observations, we find that at $z\approx 1.2$
897: the RS is not universal, i.e. is subject to a cluster-to-cluster
898: variance over the cluster population. The predicted color
899: normalization is close to the observed average value and is
900: distributed in a narrow range $\langle c\rangle \approx 0.9-1.1$,
901: when different clusters are considered. Observations (e.g. Mei et
902: al. 2007) suggest a cluster-to-cluster variation of $\sim\! 0.05$ mag,
903: a measurement which is limited by sample size and uncertainties in
904: the K-correction and passive luminosity evolution in the redshift
905: interval $0.8\leq z\leq 1.3$.
906:
907: \item The scatter of the model RS of cluster galaxies is found to be
908: much tighter than
909: that of the field by a factor ranging from 5 to 10. However, on
910: average, they are still larger than the observed tight scatters
911: ($\approx 0.05-0.08$ mag) which are consistent only with the lower
912: envelope of model distribution enclosing 75 \perc of the
913: clusters selected in the Monte Carlo simulation.
914:
915: \item When {\it only} the RS galaxies are considered, the mass growth
916: histories of field and cluster galaxies at $z\approx1.2$ are
917: similar. This is consistent with the mass growth derived from
918: observations through SED and spectral fitting (Gobat et al. 2008) of
919: massive early-type galaxies with adjustable star formation
920: laws. Both observations and the model converge in indicating that at a
921: cosmic time $t\approx 2.5$ Gyr more than 90 \perc of the stellar mass
922: finally assembled in the RS galaxies at $z=1.2$ has already been
923: formed in both field and clusters. The model also suggests that at
924: cosmic times $t\approx 1$ Gyr
925: the stellar mass fraction was about 50 \perc in both field and
926: clusters, whereas spectral-synthesis modeling of the
927: spectrophotometric data suggests a faster time scale in assembling
928: stellar mass in clusters. Even though our model predicts the scatter of
929: the growth histories to be larger in the field than in clusters, a
930: slightly faster assembly time scale seems to be needed to account for
931: the very tight observed RSs.
932:
933: \item The corresponding predicted ages of the stellar populations in
934: RS galaxies at $z\approx 1.2$ reflect the above behavior, with
935: distributions peaking at values $\tau\approx 3.5$ Gyr in both field
936: and clusters. These are consistent with the
937: values derived from observations through SED+spectral fitting,
938: although the latter indicate a slightly larger (by $\lesssim 0.5$ Gyr)
939: age for cluster RS galaxies as compared with the model (Gobat et al. 2008;
940: Rettura et al. 2008). The model
941: prediction of a larger dispersion of ages for field RS galaxies
942: compared to clusters is in good agreement with observations. Indeed,
943: a negligible fraction of RS galaxies are predicted and observed to
944: have ages shorter than 2 Gyr, while an appreciable - though minor-
945: fraction ($\approx 0.2$) of field RS galaxies have ages shorter than
946: that.
947:
948: \item The reduced scatter in color, ages, stellar mass growth, of
949: cluster RS galaxies at $z\approx 1.2$ compared to field RS galaxies
950: is originated from intrinsic properties of the merging histories of
951: cluster galaxies. These are characterized by an earlier (compared to
952: the field) assembly of galaxy progenitors into a main progenitor at
953: times $t\lesssim 1.5$ Gyr. After such a time, the bulk of the stellar
954: mass formation of cluster RS galaxies takes place in their main
955: progenitor; thus the scatter in mass growth histories, ages and
956: colors is considerably suppressed, since the variance
957: introduced by the different merging histories is considerably
958: reduced compared to the field, where the star formation is
959: distributed among a larger number of progenitors.
960:
961: \end{itemize}
962:
963: The picture emerging from the above results is the following. For
964: increasing cosmic time, the exhaustion of cold gas in galaxies and the
965: subsequent decrease of the star formation activity drives the galaxies
966: to flow from the ''blue cloud'' region of the color-magnitude space to
967: the RS; the more massive the galaxies (and the earlier their gas
968: conversion into stars), the earlier is the epoch of drift to the RS.
969:
970: In dense environments, and in particular for high redshift clusters,
971: the drift of faint galaxies
972: from the blue cloud to the RS is accelerated by various processes (namely,
973: processes i)-iv) recalled in the introduction) so that also fainter
974: galaxies rapidly drift to the RS. As a result, the blue fraction in
975: clusters is significantly smaller than in the field, and at
976: high-redshift a well defined, narrow RS is already in place.
977:
978: When only the galaxies that have drifted to the RS are considered,
979: their {\it average star formation history} does not depend strongly on
980: the environment and is not responsible for the reduced scatter of the RS
981: in clusters compared to the field; the effect of the environment is to
982: accelerate the drift to the RS (thus enhancing the relative population of
983: the red branch compared to the blue branch in the color distribution)
984: rather than changing the properties of the RS itself. This is
985: supported by the detailed measurements of the color distribution of
986: galaxies as a function of the environment in Baldry et al. (2004).
987:
988: On the other hand, the {\it mass assembly history} of RS galaxies in
989: clusters is considerably different from that occurring in the field,
990: and has a significant impact on the scatter of the RS. Since cluster
991: galaxies are formed from clumps that collapsed within high-density
992: regions of the primordial density field, their assembly into a
993: dominant progenitor is faster compared to the field, the formation of the
994: bulk of the stellar mass of cluster RS galaxies takes place in their main
995: progenitor, and the variance introduced to the star formation history
996: by the different merging histories is considerably suppressed. The
997: more biased the galaxy environment, the larger the above effect,
998: so that for RS galaxies in high-redshift clusters the dispersion of
999: mass growth histories, ages and colors is appreciably reduced compared
1000: to the field.
1001:
1002: Despite the overall good agreement between our models and
1003: observations on the color, luminosity and mass distributions of
1004: galaxies in high and low density environments, our analysis has
1005: shown that even faster mass assembly or shorter star formation time
1006: scales are needed to reproduce the surprisingly tight RS in the
1007: massive clusters at $z\approx 1.2$ (see fig. 5). This is
1008: extremely difficult to achieve in the model, since the dynamical history of DM
1009: haloes does not constitute a tunable component for a
1010: given initial power spectrum. Indeed, we have also verified that
1011: changing the normalization of the power spectrum, while affecting
1012: the abundance of clusters at a given redshift, is not effective in
1013: further narrowing down the scatter of the color-magnitude relation. Thus,
1014: we propose that the acceleration of mass assembly in cluster galaxies
1015: (making the bulk of the effect) must be complemented with a further
1016: acceleration of star formation in RS cluster galaxies. This is
1017: indicated also by the slightly mismatch between model and
1018: observations in the stellar mass growth history (fig. 6) and average
1019: ages (fig. 7), when the RS cluster galaxies are considered. The
1020: modeling of such an additional enhancement of early star formation
1021: in the progenitors of cluster RS galaxies will probably require a
1022: finer treatment of the environmental dependence of the
1023: interaction-driven starbursts.
1024: An additional issue is the slope of the cluster RS obtained from the model.
1025: Current observations find no significant evolution with redshift of the RS slope
1026: which remains close to $| \delta (U-B)/\delta B| \approx 0.04$
1027: (Mei et al. 2008, submitted), whereas the model predicts a (non-evolving) flat slope.
1028: This can be due to both an over-quenching
1029: of star formation at low masses, but also to a poor treatment of chemical evolution
1030: (e.g., the contribution of SNI is not properly accounted for in semi-analytic models) which is known to affect the RS slope through metallicity effects (Kodama \& Arimoto 1997).
1031:
1032: Finally, we mention two additional consequences of our interpretation of the
1033: model results, both consistent with preliminary indications from observations.
1034: First, at redshift $z\gtrsim 1.5$ our model predicts the scatter of the
1035: cluster RS to extend to a wider range of values
1036: compared to the low-redshift interval $z\lesssim 1.5$ (see fig. 4) and to
1037: easily reach values larger than 0.2 (see fig. 5), consistent with preliminary
1038: results by Gobat et al. (2008). Second, the model predicts the
1039: speed-up of star formation in dense environments to be larger for small mass
1040: galaxies (with $M\lesssim 10^{10.5}\,M_{\odot}$) (as inferred, e.g., by fig. 3)
1041: compared to massive RS galaxies (which indeed are predicted to have similar
1042: mass assembly histories in the field and in clusters, see fig.6). This is
1043: also qualitatively consistent with preliminary results by Gobat et. a. (2008),
1044: which indicate a lower average age of stellar populations in clusters
1045: only for galaxies with $M\lesssim 10^{11.2}\,M_{\odot}$.
1046: We shall address in detail both points in a next paper.
1047:
1048:
1049: \acknowledgments We thank the referee for helpful comments which contributed to improve the manuscript. We acknowledge grants from INAF and the ESO visitor programme. The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the National
1050: Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by Associated
1051: Universities, Inc.
1052:
1053:
1054: \bigskip\noindent
1055:
1056: \begin{references}
1057:
1058: \reference{} Baldry, I.K., Glazebrook, K., Brinkmann, J., Zeljko, I., Lupton, R.H., Nichol, R.C. and Szalay, A.S. 2004, ApJ, 600, 681
1059:
1060: \reference{} Baldry, I.K., Balogh, M.L., Bower, R.G., Glazebrook, K., Nichol, R.C., Bamford, S.P., Budavari, T. 2006, MNRAS, 335, 441
1061:
1062: \reference{} Balogh, M.L., Navarro, J.F., \& Morris, S.L. 2000, ApJ, 540, 113
1063:
1064: \reference{} Bell, E.F., Wolf, C., Meisenheimer, K., Rix, H.-W., Borch, A., Dye, S., Kleineinrich, M., Wisotzki, L.,
1065: \& McIntosh, D. 2004, ApJ, 608, 752
1066:
1067: \reference{} Bertin, E., Arnouts, S. 1996, A\&AS, 117, 393
1068:
1069: \reference{} Blakeslee, J. et al. 2003, ApJ, 596, 143
1070:
1071: \reference{} Blakeslee, J. et al. 2006, ApJ, 644, 30
1072:
1073: \reference{} Bond, J.R., Cole, S., Efstathiou, G., \& Kaiser, N., 1991, ApJ, 379, 440
1074:
1075: \reference{} Bower, R., Kodama, T., Terlevich, A. 1998, MNRAS, 299, 1193
1076:
1077: \reference{} Bruzual, G., Charlot, S. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000
1078:
1079: \reference{} Cavaliere, A., Colafrancesco, S., \& Menci, N., 1992, ApJ, 392, 41
1080:
1081: \reference{} Cavaliere, A., \& Vittorini, V. 2000, ApJ, 543, 599
1082:
1083: \reference{} Ciotti, L. \& Ostriker, J.P. 1997, ApJ, 487, L105
1084:
1085: \reference{} Cooper, M.C. et al. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 198
1086:
1087: \reference{} Cooper, M.C. et al. 2007, MNRAS, 370, 198
1088:
1089: \reference{} Cowie, L.L., Songaila, A., Hu, E.M., Cohen, J.G. 1996, AJ, 112, 839
1090:
1091: \reference{} Dekel, A \& Birnboim, Y. 2006, MNRAS, 368, 2
1092:
1093: \reference{} De Lucia, G. et al. 2007, MNRAS, 374, 809
1094:
1095: \reference{} Demarco, R. et al. 2007, ApJ, 663, 164
1096:
1097: \reference{} Diaferio, A., Kauffmann, G., Balogh, M.L., White, S.D.M., Schade, D., Ellingson, E. 2001, MNRAS, 323, 999
1098:
1099: \reference{} Di Matteo, T., Springel, V., Hernquist, L., 2005, Nature, 433, 604
1100:
1101: \reference{} Faber, S.M. et ak. 2007, ApJ, 665, 265
1102:
1103: \reference{} Fabian, A. 1999, MNRAS, 308, 39
1104:
1105: \reference{} Gerke, B.F. et al. 2007, MNRAS, 376, 1425
1106: ApJ, 622, 116
1107:
1108: \reference{} Gobat, R. et al. 2008, A\&A, submitted
1109:
1110: \reference{} Haehnelt, M.J., Natarajan, P., \& Rees, M.J., 1998, MNRAS, 300, 817
1111:
1112: \reference{} Homeier, N.L. et al. 2006, ApJ, 647, 256
1113:
1114: \reference{} Hopkins A. M., 2004, ApJ, 615, 209
1115:
1116: \reference{} Kauffmann, G. 1996, MNRAS, 281, 487
1117:
1118: \reference{} Kodama, T., Arimoto, N. 1997, A\&A, 320, 41
1119:
1120: \reference{} Lacey, C.G. and Cole, S. 1993, MNRAS, 262, 627
1121:
1122: \reference{} Lapi, A., Cavaliere, A., \& Menci, N. 2005, ApJ, 619, 60
1123:
1124: \reference{} Larson, R.B., Tinsley, B.M., \& Caldwell, C.N. 1980, ApJ, 237, 692
1125:
1126: \reference{} Mei, S. et al. 2006a, ApJ, 639, 81
1127:
1128: \reference{} Mei, S. et al. 2006b, ApJ, 644, 759
1129:
1130: \reference{} Mei, S. et al. 2008, ApJ, submitted
1131:
1132: \reference{} Menci, N., Cavaliere, A., Fontana, A., Giallongo, E., Poli, F. 2002,
1133: ApJ, 578, 18
1134:
1135: \reference{} Menci, N., Cavaliere, A., Fontana, A., Giallongo, E., Poli, F., Vittorini, V. 2003, ApJ, 587, L63
1136:
1137: \reference{} Menci, N., Cavaliere, A., Fontana, A., Giallongo, E., \& Poli, F. 2004a,
1138: ApJ, 604, 12
1139:
1140: \reference{} Menci, N., Fiore, F., Perola, G.C., Cavaliere, A. 2004b, ApJ, 606, 58
1141:
1142: \reference{} Menci, N., Fontana, A., Giallongo, E., \& Salimbeni, S. 2005,
1143: ApJ, 632, 49
1144:
1145: \reference{} Menci, N., Fontana, A., Giallongo, E., Grazian, A. \& Salimbeni, S. 2006,
1146: ApJ, 647, 653
1147:
1148: \reference{} Neistein, E., van den Bosch, F.C., Dekel, A. 2006, MNRAS, 372, 933
1149:
1150: \reference{} Rettura, A. et al. 2006, A\&A, 458, 717
1151:
1152: \reference{} Rettura, A. et al. 2008, submitted
1153:
1154: \reference{} Romeo, A.D., Napolitano, N.R., Covone, G.,
1155: Sommer-Larsen, J., Antonuccio-Delogu, V., Capaccioli, M. 2008, preprint
1156: (astro-ph/0804.1517)
1157:
1158: \reference{} Silk, J. \& Rees, M.J. 1998, A\&A, 331, 1
1159:
1160: \reference{} Spitzer, L, Jr., Baade, W. 1951, ApJ, 113, 413
1161:
1162: \reference{} Strateva, I. et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 1861-1874
1163:
1164: \reference{} Strazzullo, V. et al. 2006, A\&A, 450, 909
1165:
1166: \reference{} Vanzella, E. et al. 2008, A\&A, 478, 83
1167:
1168: \reference{} Weinmann, S.M., van der Bosch, F.C., Yang X., Mo, H.j. 2006, MNRAS, 366, 2
1169:
1170: \end{references}
1171:
1172:
1173:
1174:
1175: \end{document}