1: \documentclass[preprint,aps,tightenlines,showpacs]{revtex4}

2: \usepackage[dvips]{graphicx}

3: \usepackage{dcolumn}

4: \usepackage{epsfig}

5: %\usepackage{braket}

6: \def\bra#1{\mathinner{\langle{#1}|}}

7: \def\ket#1{\mathinner{|{#1}\rangle}}

8: \def\braket#1{\mathinner{\langle{#1}\rangle}}

9: 

10: \def\slash#1{\not\!#1}

11: \def\slashb#1{\not\!\!#1}

12: \def\delsla{\not\!\partial}

13: 

14: \begin{document}

15: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%  title %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

16: \title{Extraction of  Resonances from  

17: Meson-Nucleon Reactions\footnote{Notice: Authored by

18: Jefferson Science Associates, LLC under U.S. DOE Contract No. DE-AC05-06OR23177. 

19: The U.S. Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide

20: license to publish or reproduce this manuscript for U.S. Government purposes.

21: } }

22: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Authors %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

23: \author{N. Suzuki}

24: \affiliation{ Excited Baryon Analysis Center (EBAC), Thomas Jefferson National

25: Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA 23606, USA}

26: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Osaka University, Toyonaka,

27: Osaka 560-0043, Japan}

28: \author{T. Sato}

29: \affiliation{ Excited Baryon Analysis Center (EBAC), Thomas Jefferson National

30: Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA 23606, USA}

31: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Osaka University, Toyonaka,

32: Osaka 560-0043, Japan}

33: \author{T.-S. H. Lee}

34: \affiliation{ Excited Baryon Analysis Center (EBAC), Thomas Jefferson National

35: Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA 23606, USA}

36: \affiliation{Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory,

37: Argonne, IL 60439, USA}

38: 

39: 

40: 

41: 

42: \begin{abstract}

43: 

44: We present a pedagogical study of the 

45: commonly employed Speed-Plot (SP) and Time-delay (TD) methods

46: for extracting the  resonance parameters 

47: from the data of two particle coupled-channels  reactions. 

48: Within several exactly solvable models,

49: it is found  that these two methods find  poles on  

50: different  Riemann sheets and are not always valid.

51: We then develop an analytic continuation method for extracting

52: nucleon resonances within a 

53: dynamical coupled-channel formulation of $\pi N$ and $\gamma N$ reactions.

54: The main focus of this paper is on resolving the complications due to

55: the coupling with the unstable $\pi \Delta, \rho N, \sigma N$ channels which

56: decay into $\pi \pi N$ states. 

57: By using the results from the considered exactly solvable models,

58:  explicit numerical procedures are

59: presented and verified.

60: As a first application of the

61: developed analytic continuation method, we present

62: the nucleon resonances in 

63:  some partial waves extracted within

64: a recently developed coupled-channels

65: model of $\pi N$ reactions.  

66: The results from this realistic $\pi N$ model, which includes

67: $\pi N$, $\eta N$, $\pi\Delta$, $\rho N$, and $\sigma N$ channels, also 

68: show that the simple

69: pole parametrization of the resonant propagator using the poles

70: extracted from SP and TD methods works poorly.

71: 

72: 

73: \end{abstract}

74: \pacs{13.75.Gx, 13.60.Le,  14.20.Gk}

75: 

76: 

77: \maketitle

78: 

79: 

80: \newpage

81: 

82: 

83: \section{Introduction}

84: 

85: The excited baryon and meson states couple strongly with the continuum

86: states. Thus they are identified with the

87: resonance states in  hadron reactions.

88: The spectra and decay widths of the hadron resonances  reveal

89: the role of  the confinement and  chiral symmetry of QCD

90: in  the non-perturbative region. 

91: Therefore, the extraction of the basic resonance parameters from

92: reaction data is one of the important tasks in hadron physics.

93: Ideally, it should involve the following steps:

94: \begin{enumerate}

95: \item Perform complete

96: measurements of all independent observables of the reactions considered.

97: For example, for pseudo-scalar meson photoproduction

98: reactions one needs to measure 8 observables\cite{tabakin} : 

99: differential cross sections,

100: three single polarizations $\Sigma$, $T$ and $P$, and four double 

101: polarizations $G$, $H$, $E$, and $F$.

102: \item Extract the partial-wave amplitudes (PWA) from the data.

103: Here  we need to solve a non-trivial practical

104: problem since all observables

105: are bi-linear combinations of PWA; i.e. $\sigma \sim {f_{L'S'} f^*_{LS}}$. 

106: \item Extract the resonance parameters from the extracted PWA. Here the often

107: employed methods are based on the 

108: Breit-Wigner form\cite{feshbach}, 

109: Speed-Plot  method of Hoehler\cite{hoehler92,hoehler93}, 

110: and Time-Delay  method of Wigner\cite{eisenbud,wigner55}. 

111: A more sophisticated and rigorous method is to use 

112: the dispersion relations, K-matrix, and dynamical

113: model to analytically 

114: continue the PWA to the complex energy plane on which

115: the resonance poles and residues are determined. 

116: Extensive works based on 

117: these three models are reviewed in Ref.\cite{burkertlee}.

118: \end{enumerate}

119: In reality, we do not have complete measurements for practically all 

120: meson-nucleon reactions. Even if the measurements are complete,

121: the step 2 requires some model assumptions to solve

122: the inverse bi-linear problem in extracting PWA. This model dependence

123: must be taken into account in interpreting the extracted

124: resonance parameters.

125: 

126: In this work, we focus on the step 3 in conjunction with the recent efforts in

127: extracting the nucleon resonances from very extensive and high quality data

128: of meson production reactions, as reviewed in Ref.\cite{burkertlee}.

129: The nucleon resonances $N^*,\Delta$ listed by the Particle Data Group\cite{pdg}

130: are mainly from 

131: the analysis of $\pi N$ scattering and pion photoproduction reactions.

132: The Speed-Plot and Time-Delay methods are most often used in these analyses

133: since they only require the

134: PWA determined in the step 2. The purpose of this work is to examine the extent

135: to which these two methods are valid and to develop an analytic continuation

136: method within a recently developed dynamical model\cite{msl} of meson 

137: production reactions in the nucleon resonance region.

138: 

139: It is useful to first  briefly recall how the resonances are defined

140: in textbooks. By analytic continuation, the scattering T-matrix can be 

141: defined on the complex energy plane. 

142: Its analytical structure is well studied\cite{newton1,newton,peierls59,

143: couteur60, kato65}

144:  for the non-relativistic two-body scattering.

145: For the single-channel case, the scattering

146: T-matrix is a  single-valued function of momentum $p$

147: on the complex  momentum p-plane, but is

148: a double-valued function of energy $E$ on the 

149: complex  energy E-plane because

150: of the quadratic relation $p=|2mE|^{1/2}e^{i\phi_{E}/2}$.

151: Therefore the complex E-plane is composed of two Riemann sheets.

152: The physical ($p$) sheet is defined by specifying the range of

153: phase $0 \le \phi_E \le  2\pi $,

154: and the un-physical ($u$) sheet

155: by $2\pi \le \phi_E \le 4\pi$.  As illustrated in Fig. \ref{fig:ep-sheet},

156: the  shaded area with $\mathrm{Im}\, p > 0$ of the  upper part of Fig. 1(a)

157: corresponds to the physical $E$-sheet shown in Fig. 1(b).

158: Similarly, the unphysical $E$-sheet shown in Fig. 1(c)

159: corresponds to the

160: $\mathrm{Im}\, p <0$ area in the lower part of Fig. 1(a).

161: On the physical sheet, the only possible singularities  are on the

162: real E-axis :

163: the bound state poles (solid square in Fig. 1(b)) below the threshold 

164: energy $E_{th}$

165: and the unitarity cut from $E_{th}$ to infinity.

166: On the unphysical sheet, a pole (solid circle in Fig. 1(c)) 

167: on the lower half plane and 

168: $\mathrm{Re}\, E_{pole} > E_{th}$

169: corresponds to a

170: resonance.  From unitarity and analyticity of S-matrix, each resonance pole

171: has an accompanied pole, called conjugate pole, which exists on the upper half

172: of the un-physical sheet.

173: A resonance pole is due  to the mechanism

174: : an unstable system is formed and decay subsequently during the collision.

175: The mathematical details of this interpretation

176:  can be found in textbooks, such as in chapter

177: 8 of Goldberger and Watson\cite{gw}.

178: 

179: For multi-channel case, the analytic structure of the scattering

180: T-matrix  becomes more complex

181: \cite{newton,peierls59,couteur60,kato65}. 

182: We postpone the discussion on this

183: until section III where 

184: a two-channel Breit-Wigner form of scattering amplitude will be used

185: to give a pedagogical explanation.

186: 

187: \begin{figure}

188: \begin{center}

189: \includegraphics[width=10cm]{fig1.eps}

190: \caption{The complex momentum $p$-plane ((a)) and its corresponding

191: complex energy $E$-plane which has a physical sheet ((b)) and

192: unphysical sheet ((c)). Their correspondence is indicated by

193: the same number. Solid squares (circles) represent the  bound state (resonance) poles.}

194: %\caption{Complex $p$-plane and $E$-plane.

195: %Correspondence between the complex momentum $p$-plane (a) and 

196: %the complex energy $E$-plane

197: %(physical sheet (b) and unphysical sheet (c))

198: %is shown. Closed square(circle) shows bound state (resonance) pole.}

199: \label{fig:ep-sheet}

200: \end{center}

201: \end{figure}

202: 

203: 

204: The essential point of the Time-Delay  and Speed-Plot methods is that

205: the resonance poles discussed above can be determined from the partial-wave

206: amplitudes defined on the physical real energies.

207: The concept of time delay was originally introduced 

208: by Eisenbud\cite{eisenbud} and discussed by Wigner\cite{wigner55}, 

209: Dalitz and Moorehouse\cite{dalitz70}, and Nussenzveig\cite{nussen72}.

210: It is defined as the difference between the time in which a wave packet

211: passes through an interaction region and the time spent by a free wave packet passing though

212: the same distance.

213: It was generalized to the time delay matrix in multi-channel problems and

214: discussed further in terms of a lifetime matrix by Smith \cite{smith60}.

215: Kelkar et al.\cite{kelkar03b, kelkar04} applied this multi-channel 

216: formulation to develop a practical Time-Delay  method

217: to extract hadron resonances.

218: 

219: The Speed-Plot  method was developed by 

220: Hoehler\cite{hoehler92,hoehler93}

221:  to extract the nucleon resonances from the  $\pi N$ partial-wave amplitudes.

222: It is also based on the concept of time delay, but he identified resonances 

223: by "speed" which is the absolute value of 

224: the energy derivative of the scattering amplitude.

225: The speed  is

226: always positive by its definition while

227: the time delay  can be negative and becomes "time advance" \cite{kelkar03a}.

228: 

229: 

230: 

231: It is generally assumed that both  

232: the  Speed-Plot  and Time-Delay  methods 

233: give  approximate positions of the resonance poles which are rigorously defined

234: by the analytic continuation of  scattering amplitudes.

235: However their validity is not clear at all.

236: Moreover it is not clear which Riemann sheet the pole positions extracted from 

237: using these methods belong to.

238: In this paper we analyze several exactly solvable models to clarify these

239: questions.

240: In particular, we find that these two methods give poles

241: on different Riemann sheets. 

242: 

243: We then develop an analytic continuation method for extracting

244: the resonance parameters within a recently developed 

245: Hamiltonian formulation\cite{msl} of meson-nucleon reactions. 

246: We first establish

247: the method by using several exactly solvable models. The main task

248:  here is to handle the singularities associated with the unstable particle 

249: channels such as $\pi \Delta$, $\rho N$, and $\sigma N$. We then apply

250:  the method to extract the nucleon resonances in some 

251: partial waves of $\pi N$ scattering within 

252: the dynamical coupled-channels model 

253: developed in Ref.\cite{jlms}.  The analytical structure of the resonance

254: propagator is also analyzed within this model.

255: 

256: In section II, we describe the formula for applying

257:  the Speed-Plot (SP) and 

258: Time-Delay (TD) methods.  These

259:  two methods are then analyzed and tested in section III by

260: using the commonly used two-channel Breit-Wigner form 

261: of  S-matrix.

262: In section IV, we  develop an analytic continuation method 

263: by using several

264: exactly solvable  resonance

265: models and further

266: test the SP and TD methods. Section V is devoted to

267: resolve the complications due to couplings with 

268: unstable particle channels.

269: In section VI, we present

270: the results from applying the developed analytic continuation  method to 

271: extract the nucleon resonances in some partial waves

272: within the $\pi N$ model of Ref.\cite{jlms}.

273: A summary is given in section VII. 

274: 

275: \section{Formula for Time-Delay and Speed-Plot Methods}

276: 

277: The objective of the Time Delay (TD) and Speed-Plot (SP) methods is to

278: determine the mass $M_R$ and width $\Gamma_R$ of a resonance from the S-matrix

279: of reactions. 

280: In this section, we will not explain how these two methods

281: were introduced, as briefly discussed in section I. Rather we only give

282: their formula in practical applications.

283: 

284: For the single-channel elastic scattering case, the time delay of the 

285: outgoing wave packet with respect

286: to the non-interacting wave packet in a given partial wave

287: is defined\cite{wigner55,dalitz70,nussen72} as

288: \begin{eqnarray}

289: \Delta t (E) & = & \mathrm{Re}\left(-i\frac{1}{S(E)}\frac{dS(E)}{dE}\right)\,,

290: \label{eq:td-1}

291: \end{eqnarray}

292: where the S-matrix is related to

293: the phase  shift $\delta$ by 

294: \begin{eqnarray}

295: S(E)=e^{2i\delta}\,.

296: \label{eq:phaseshift}

297: \end{eqnarray}

298: Eqs. (\ref{eq:td-1}) and (\ref{eq:phaseshift})

299: lead to a simple expression of time delay

300: \begin{eqnarray}

301:  \Delta t =2\frac{d\delta}{dE}\,.

302: \label{eq:td-2}

303: \end{eqnarray}

304: 

305: 

306: The time-delay (TD) method is to find the resonance mass $M_R$ by 

307: finding  the maximum  

308: of the time delay

309: \begin{eqnarray}

310: \frac{d\Delta t}{dE}\mid _{E=M_R} =0.

311: \label{eq:td-e}

312: \end{eqnarray}

313: As an ideal example, we evaluate the time delay

314: for the S-matrix defined  by the well known Breit-Wigner resonance formula

315: \begin{eqnarray}

316: S(E) & = & \frac{E - M_R - i \Gamma_R/2}{E - M_R + i \Gamma_R/2}, \label{eq-bw}

317: \end{eqnarray}

318: Eq. (\ref{eq:td-1}) then leads to

319: \begin{eqnarray}

320: \Delta t & = & \frac{\Gamma_R}{(E-M_R)^2 + \Gamma_R^2/4},

321: \end{eqnarray}

322: which obviously takes a maximum at $E=M_R$ and hence $M_R$ is defined as the

323: resonance mass.  It also gives the following simple physical interpretation

324: of the width $\Gamma_R$ in terms of the time delay of the wave packet passing

325: through the interaction region

326: \begin{eqnarray}

327: \Delta t|_{E=M_R} & = & \frac{4}{\Gamma_R}.

328: \end{eqnarray}

329: 

330: Here and in the rest of this paper,

331: the normalization is chosen

332: such that the S-matrix is related to the T-matrix by

333: \begin{eqnarray}

334: S(E)=1+2iT(E) \,.

335: \label{eq:s-t}

336: \end{eqnarray}

337: We then note that for the S-matrix Eq. (\ref{eq-bw}), the width

338: can also be expressed in terms of T-matrix  as

339: \begin{eqnarray}

340: \frac{\Gamma_R}{2}=\left[\frac{|T|}{|\frac{dT}{dE}|}\right]_{E=M_R}.

341: \label{eq:sp-width1}

342: \end{eqnarray}

343: 

344: In the analysis of $\pi N$ scattering, Hoehler\cite{hoehler92,hoehler93}

345:  introduced a speed plot (SP) method. The speed is defined as

346: \begin{eqnarray}

347: \mathrm{sp}(E) & = & \left|\frac{dT}{dE}\right|.

348: \label{eq:sp-1}

349: \end{eqnarray}

350: Using Eqs. (\ref{eq:phaseshift})-(\ref{eq:td-2}), Eq. (\ref{eq:sp-1}) leads to 

351: \begin{eqnarray}

352: \mathrm{sp}(E) = \frac{|\Delta t|}{2}.

353: \label{eq:sp-td}

354: \end{eqnarray}

355: Thus the speed is also related to the time delay of the wave packet. 

356: The SP method defines the resonance mass $M_R$ by

357: the maximum of the speed

358: \begin{eqnarray}

359: \frac{d}{dE} \mathrm{sp}(E)\mid_{E=M_R} =0.

360: \label{eq:sp-e}

361: \end{eqnarray}

362: From Eqs. (\ref{eq:td-e}), (\ref{eq:sp-td}), and (\ref{eq:sp-e}),

363: it is obvious that the speed plot and time delay will give 

364: the same resonance mass for the single-channel elastic scattering case.

365: %

366: 

367:  

368: For the multi-channel reactions with $N$ open channels, the S-matrix

369: becomes a $N \times N$ matrix $\hat{S}(E)$. 

370: Smith\cite{smith60} introduced a life-time matrix $\hat{Q}$ 

371: defined by

372: \begin{eqnarray}

373: \hat{Q}(E) & = & -i \hat{S}(E)^\dagger \frac{d\hat{S}(E)}{dE}.

374: \label{eq:td-smith}

375: \end{eqnarray}

376: The above equation can be considered as

377: an extension of Eq. (\ref{eq:td-1}) of the single-channel case.

378: The trace of the life-time matrix can be 

379: expressed in terms of eigen phases $\delta_i$ of the S-matrix\cite{hazi,iga04,haber}

380: \begin{eqnarray}

381: \mathrm{Tr}\, \hat{Q}(E) & = & 2 \frac{d(\sum_i \delta_i)}{dE}.

382: \label{eq:td-smith-1}

383: \end{eqnarray}

384: The resonance mass $M_R$ is then obtained by finding

385: \begin{eqnarray}

386: \frac{d\mathrm{Tr}\, \hat{Q}(E)}{dE}\mid_{E=M_R} =0.

387: \label{eq:td-smith-2}

388: \end{eqnarray}

389: However,  the eigen phases $\delta_i$ can be obtained only when 

390: we know all of the

391: S-matrix elements associated with all open channels. In practice,

392: only the elastic scattering amplitude and a few

393: of the inelastic amplitudes can be extracted from the data.

394: Therefore Eqs. (\ref{eq:td-smith-1})-(\ref{eq:td-smith-2}) of Smith's TD method

395: can not be used rigorously in practice.

396: 

397: Here we focus on the TD method  

398: used by Kelkar et al.\cite{kelkar03a,kelkar03b,kelkar04}.  They defined

399: the time delay 

400:  for the  channel $i$ 

401: only by the diagonal component $S_{ii}$ of the S-matrix and its derivative

402: \begin{eqnarray}

403: \mathrm{td}(E)& = & \mathrm{Re}\left(-i\frac{1}{S_{ii}}\frac{d S_{ii}}{dE}\right). \label{td-mul}

404: \label{eq:td-kel-1}

405: \end{eqnarray}

406: Obviously, 

407:  this method is  identical to Eq. (\ref{eq:td-1}) of

408: the single channel case except that the S-matrix element here is

409: $S_{ii}= \eta e^{2i\delta}$ with $\eta$ denoting the inelasticity.

410: Eq. (\ref{eq:td-kel-1}) can be considered as an approximation of

411: Eq. (\ref{eq:td-smith}) by neglecting the inelastic channels in summing the

412: intermediate states.

413: In Refs. \cite{kelkar03a,kelkar03b,kelkar04}, the resonance mass $M_R$ 

414:  is determined by the maximum of the time delay

415: \begin{eqnarray}

416: \frac{d}{dE} \mathrm{td}(E)\mid_{E=M_R}&=&0 

417: \label{eq:td-kel-2a}, \\

418: \end{eqnarray}

419: and the width $\Gamma_R$ by

420: \begin{eqnarray}

421: \mathrm{td}(M_R \pm \Gamma_R/2)& = & \mathrm{td}(M_R)/2.

422: \label{eq:td-kel-2b}

423: \end{eqnarray}

424: 

425: 

426: The SP method for multi-channel case is simply to define the speed by

427:  the diagonal

428: $T_{ii}$ of the T-matrix

429:  \begin{eqnarray}

430: \mathrm{sp}(E) & = & \left|\frac{d T_{ii}}{dE}\right|,

431: \label{eq:sp-nch}

432: \end{eqnarray}

433: and define\cite{hoehler92} the width $\Gamma_R$ by assuming that 

434: the T-matrix element can be parametrized as

435: \begin{eqnarray}

436: T_{ii}(E) & = & T_b(E) + z(E)\frac{\Gamma_R/2}{E - M_R + i\Gamma_R/2}.

437: \label{eq:sp-t}

438: \end{eqnarray}

439: Here $T_b$ is an non-resonant amplitude and the resonant amplitude

440: is defined by the resonance mass $M_R$,  the width $\Gamma_R$, and

441: a complex residue $z(W)$. 

442: By assuming that  the energy dependence of 

443: $T_b(W)$, $z(W)$, and $\Gamma_R$  can be neglected

444: at energies near $M_R$, 

445: Eqs. (\ref{eq:sp-nch}) and (\ref{eq:sp-t}) obviously

446:  satisfies Eq. (\ref{eq:sp-e}) and lead to the following condition

447: \begin{eqnarray}

448: \mathrm{sp}(M_R \pm \Gamma_R/2) & =& \mathrm{sp}(M_R)/2.  \label{speed-width}

449: \label{eq:sp-width}

450: \end{eqnarray}

451: Eqs. (\ref{eq:sp-nch}), (\ref{eq:sp-e}) and (\ref{speed-width}) 

452: are used in applying the SP method to extract the resonance

453: mass $M_R$ and width $\Gamma_R$ from the partial-wave amplitudes.  

454: Eq. (\ref{eq:sp-t})

455: is not needed in practice, but is an essential assumption of SP method.

456: 

457: 

458: %The difference between  $td(E)$ of Kelkar and $sp(E)$ of Hoehler can be more clearly seen

459: %when we write the diagonal component of the S-matrix

460: %using the $N/D$ form

461: %\begin{eqnarray}

462: %S_{ii}(E) & = & \frac{N(E)}{D(E)}.

463: %\label{eq:s-nd}

464: %\end{eqnarray}

465: %where we assume that both $N(E)$ and $D(E)$ do not have poles, but they

466: %can have zeros $N(E=E_{ZS})=0$ or $D(E=E_{R})=0$. 

467: %Obviously $E_{ZS}$ is also the zero

468: %of S-matrix defined by $S_{ii}(E=E_{ZS})=0$. With Eq. (\ref{eq:s-nd}), 

469: %$td(E)$ can be written as

470: %\begin{eqnarray}

471: %td(E)  & = & Im (\frac{d N(E)/dE}{N(E)}) -Im (\frac{d D(E)/dE}{D(E)}).

472: % \label{eq:td-nd}

473: %\end{eqnarray}

474: %Therefore, the energy-dependence of

475: % $td(E)$ is sensitive to the positions of  

476: %the zeros $E=E_{ZS}$ as well as

477: % the poles $E=E_{R}$ of the S-matrix.

478: %Clearly, the positions of $E_{ZS}$ and $E_{R}$

479: %can be determined by finding by  positive maximum and/or the

480: %negative minimum positions of $td(E)$.

481: %

482: %On the other hand, by using Eq. (\ref{eq:s-nd}) the $sp(W)$ defined by

483: %Eq. (\ref{eq:sp-nch}) leads to 

484: %\begin{eqnarray}

485: %sp(E) & = & \frac{|D(E)dN(E)/dE - N(E)dD(E)/dE|}{2|D(E)|^2},

486: %\label{eq:sp-nd}

487: %\end{eqnarray}

488: %which is only  sensitive to the pole $E=E_{R}$ of the S-matrix.

489: %The above equation indicates that

490: % the pole position $E_R$ can be determined by finding the

491: %positive maximum of $sp(E)$.

492: %The difference between Eq. (\ref{eq:td-nd}) and Eq. (\ref{eq:sp-nd}) indicates

493: %that the pole positions extracted by TD and SP could locate on different

494: %Riemann sheets, as we will show explicitly in the next section.

495: 

496: 

497: 

498: \section{Analysis of Speed-Plot and Time-delay Methods}

499: 

500: To examine the SP and TD methods, we consider a commonly used two-channel

501: Breit-Wigner (BW) amplitude which can be derived\cite{newton,kato65,fujii,fujii75}

502:  from the analytical property of the S-matrix. To make the contact with what

503: we will discuss in the rest of this paper, we will indicate here how this 

504: amplitude can be derived from a Hamiltonian formulation of 

505: meson-baryon  reactions, such as that developed 

506: in Ref.\cite{msl}. 

507: 

508: It is sufficient to consider the simplest two-channel case 

509: with a non-relativistic two-particle

510: Hamiltonian defined by

511: \begin{eqnarray}

512: H & = & H_0 + V.

513: \end{eqnarray}

514: In the center of mass frame $H_0$ can be written as

515: \begin{eqnarray}

516: H_0 = \sum_{i} \ket{i}[m_{i1} + m_{i2} + \frac{p^2}{2\mu_i}]\bra{i},

517: \end{eqnarray}

518: where $m_{ik}$ is the mass of $k$-th particle in channel $i$, and

519: $\mu_i =m_{i1}m_{i2}/(m_{i1}+m_{i2})$ is the reduced mass.

520: In each partial-wave, the S-matrix is a $2\times 2$ matrix and can be

521: written  

522: \begin{eqnarray}

523: S = \frac{1 - i \pi \rho K}{1 + i \pi \rho K},

524: \label{eq:s-kmx}

525: \end{eqnarray}

526: where $\rho$ is the density of state,  and

527:  the K-matrix, which is also a $2\times 2$ matrix,

528:  is defined  by the following Lippmann-Schwinger equation

529: \begin{eqnarray}

530: K(E) = V + V \frac{P}{E - H_0}K(E).

531: \end{eqnarray}

532: Here $P$ means taking the principal-value of the integration over the

533: propagator.

534: 

535: We now consider the on-shell matrix element of the S-matrix Eq. 

536: (\ref{eq:s-kmx}). 

537: If the on-shell momentum is denoted as $p_i$ for channel $i$, we

538: then have 

539: \begin{eqnarray}

540: \braket{i|1 \pm i \pi \rho K |j} & = &

541:   \delta_{i,j} \pm i \pi \rho_i K_{i,j},

542: \end{eqnarray}

543: where $\rho_i = p_i\mu_i$.

544: The  S-matrix element of the $1\rightarrow 1$

545: elastic scattering is then of the following explicit form

546: \begin{eqnarray}

547: S_{11} & = & \frac

548: {(1 - i\pi\rho_1 K_{11})(1 + i\pi\rho_2K_{22})-\pi^2\rho_1\rho_2K_{12}K_{21}}

549: {(1 + i\pi\rho_1 K_{11})(1 + i\pi\rho_2K_{22})-\pi^2\rho_1\rho_2K_{11}K_{22}}.

550: \label{eq:s-matrix-11}

551: \end{eqnarray}

552: If we

553: assume that at energies near the resonance energy the

554: K-matrix can be approximated as

555: \begin{eqnarray}

556: K_{ij} \sim \frac{g_ig_j}{E - M},

557: \end{eqnarray}

558: where $M $ is a mass parameter which is a real number,

559: Eq. (\ref{eq:s-matrix-11}) can then be written as

560: \begin{eqnarray}

561: S_{11} & = & \frac{E - M - i p_1 \gamma_1 + i p_2 \gamma_2}

562:                   {E - M + i p_1 \gamma_1 + i p_2 \gamma_2}.

563: \label{eq:bw-s}

564: \end{eqnarray}

565: Here we have defined $\gamma_i = \pi g_i^2 \mu_i >0$.

566: If we further assume that 

567: $\gamma_i$ is independent of scattering

568: energy, Eq. (\ref{eq:bw-s}) is the commonly

569: used two-channel Breit-Wigner formula\cite{fujii,fujii75,badalyan82}.

570: In the rest of this section, we will follow these earlier works

571: and treat

572: $\gamma_1$ and $\gamma_2$ as energy independent parameters of the

573: model.

574: 

575: 

576: Since the scattering T-matrix is related to the S-matrix by

577: \begin{eqnarray}

578: S_{11}(E)= 1 +2i T_{11}(E),

579: \end{eqnarray}

580: Eq.(\ref{eq:bw-s}) leads to 

581: \begin{eqnarray}

582:  T(E)&=& T_{11}(E) \nonumber \\

583: &=& \frac{-\gamma_1 p_1}{E-M+i\gamma_1 p_1 +i \gamma_2 p_2}.

584: \label{eq:bw-t}

585: \end{eqnarray}

586: From nowon we use the notation $T(E)$ for the $1\rightarrow 1$ 

587: amplitude $T_{11}(E)$.

588: 

589: 

590: 

591: \subsection{Analytic Properties of the S-matrix}

592: Within the two-channels Breit-Wigner model specified above, we will

593: analyze in this subsection 

594: the analytic properties of the S-matrix

595: on the complex energy E-plane. This will also allow

596: us to explain clearly some 

597: terminologies which are commonly seen  but  often not explicitly

598: explained in the literatures on resonance extractions.

599: 

600: The on-shell momenta $p_i$ for channel $i$ is defined by

601: \begin{eqnarray}

602: E_i=\frac{p^2_i}{2\mu_i} ,

603: \label{eq:p-on-1}

604: \end{eqnarray}

605: where

606: \begin{eqnarray}

607: E_i=E-( m_{i1}+m_{i2}).

608: \label{eq:p-on-2}

609: \end{eqnarray}

610: We can define the threshold variable $\Delta$ between two channels by

611: \begin{eqnarray}

612: E_1  = \frac{p_2^2}{2\mu_2} + \frac{\Delta^2}{2\mu_1},

613: \label{eq:p-on-3}

614: \end{eqnarray}

615: where 

616: \begin{eqnarray}

617: \frac{\Delta^2}{2\mu_1} & = & m_{21} + m_{22} - m_{11} - m_{12}

618: \label{eq:p-on-4}

619: \end{eqnarray}

620: is the threshold energy of the second channel.

621: 

622: The momenta at poles of the S-matrix Eq. (\ref{eq:bw-s})

623:  can be determined by solving

624: \begin{eqnarray}

625: E - M + i p_1 \gamma_1 + i p_2 \gamma_2 =0.

626: \label{eq:s-pole}

627: \end{eqnarray}

628: By using Eqs. (\ref{eq:p-on-1})-(\ref{eq:p-on-4}),

629:  the above equation can be written as

630: \begin{eqnarray}

631: p_1^4 + a p_1^3 + b p_1^2 + c p_1 + d = 0,

632: \label{eq:pole}

633: \end{eqnarray}

634: where

635: \begin{eqnarray}

636: a & = & i 4 \mu_1 \gamma_1, \\

637: b & = & 4\mu_1(\mu_2 \gamma_2^2 - M - \mu_1 \gamma_1^2),\\

638: c & = & -8i \mu_1^2 M\gamma_1,\\

639: d & = & 4(\mu_1^2 M^2 - \mu_1\mu_2 \gamma_2^2 \Delta^2).

640: \end{eqnarray}

641: Eq. (\ref{eq:pole}) means that  the Breit-Wigner

642: amplitude Eq. (\ref{eq:bw-s}) has four poles.  

643: Each pole is specified by two on-shell momenta

644:  $P_{\alpha}= (p_{1\alpha},p_{2\alpha})$ with $\alpha=1,2,3,4$.

645:  The analytic properties of the S-matrix Eq. (\ref{eq:bw-s})

646: depends on how these poles are located on the complex energy $E$-plane. 

647: As we explained in section I, the energy plane for each channel

648: has two Riemann sheets because of the quadratic relation Eq. (\ref{eq:p-on-1})

649: between the momentum

650: $p_i$ and energy $E_i$; namely

651: $p_i=\sqrt{2\mu_i|E_{i}|}e^{i\phi_i/2}$ for $i=1,2$. 

652: For each channel, the physical ($p$) sheet is defined by specifying the range of

653: phase $0 \le \phi_i \le  2\pi $, 

654: and the un-physical ($u$) sheet 

655: by $2\pi \le \phi_i \le 4\pi$. The correspondence between  the momentum

656: $p_i$-plane

657: and the energy $E_i$-plane is similar to that

658: illustrated in Fig. \ref{fig:ep-sheet}.

659: For the considered

660: two-channel case, we thus have

661: four energy sheets specified by the signs of $\mathrm{Im}\, p_1$

662:  and $\mathrm{Im}\, p_2$:

663: $pp$, $up$, $uu$, and $pu$, as shown in Fig.2. 

664: Thus each of four poles $P_{\alpha}= (p_{1\alpha},p_{2\alpha})$

665:   can be on one of these

666:  E-sheets.

667: 

668: To be more specific, we now consider the case which is most relevant to

669: our study of nucleon resonances. That is the  

670: $\mathrm{Re}\, E_1 >0$ and $\mathrm{Re}\, E_2 >0 $ case that the poles are all 

671: above the thresholds of both channels.  

672: From Eq. (\ref{eq:s-pole}),

673: we immediately notice that if $(p_{1a},p_{2a})$ with $E=E_a$ is one of the

674: solutions,

675:  $(-p_{1a}^*,-p_{2a}^*)$ with $E=E^*_a$ is also a solution.

676: Therefore the four poles determined by Eq. (\ref{eq:pole}) can be grouped

677: into two pairs. In the following discussions,

678: they are denoted as  $(E_a, E^*_a)$ and $(E_b,E^*_b)$. 

679: Without  losing  generality,

680: one can assume that one of the poles

681: is in the range of ($\mathrm{Re}\, p_1>0, \mathrm{Re}\, p_2 >0$)

682: and the other in the range of ($\mathrm{Re}\, p_1<0, \mathrm{Re}\, p_2 <0$).

683: If the first pole $(p_{1a},p_{2a})$ is in 

684: the region where ($\mathrm{Re}\, p_{1a}>0$, $\mathrm{Re}\, p_{2a}>0$) and

685:  ($\mathrm{Im}\, p_{1a}<0$, $\mathrm{Im}\, p_{2a}<0$) , it 

686: is a pole, denoted as $E_R$,  on the $uu$-sheet of Fig. \ref{pole-2}.

687: This pole is usually called  the resonance pole and is  closer than other poles

688: on $up$ or $pu$-sheets  

689: to the physical $pp$-sheet, as  will be explained later. 

690: In the Hamiltonian formulation considered in this work and the

691: well developed collision theory, a resonance pole can be mathematically

692: derived\cite{gw} from  the mechanism 

693: that an unstable system is formed and decay subsequently during the collision.

694:  The resonance pole $E_R$ has an accompanied pole $E^*_R$

695: at $(-p_{1a}^*, -p_{2a}^*)$ which is also on the $uu$-sheet

696: as shown  in Fig. \ref{pole-2}. $E_R^*$ is called the 'conjugate pole' of $E_R$.

697: 

698: 

699: The second pole at $(p_{1b},p_{2b})$ with $\mathrm{Im}\, p_{1b}<0$

700:  and $\mathrm{Im}\, p_{2b}>0$ ( $\mathrm{Im}\, p_{1b}>0$ and $\mathrm{Im}\, p_{2b}<0$)

701:  may be on the $up$-sheet ($pu$-sheet), depending on the parameters 

702: $\gamma_1$ and $\gamma_2$.

703: This pole is called  the shadow pole\cite{eden64}.

704: A shadow pole on $up$-sheet and its conjugate pole are 

705: $E_S$ and $E^*_S$ in  Fig. \ref{pole-2}.

706: 

707: We now note that in this simple BW model, the zeros of 

708: the S-matrix Eq. (\ref{eq:bw-s}), where $S_{11}(E)=0$,

709: is defined by its numerator

710: \begin{eqnarray}

711: E - M - i p_1 \gamma_1 + i p_2 \gamma_2 = 0.  

712: \label{eq:s-zero-1}

713: \end{eqnarray}

714: The above equation can be cast into the form of Eq. (\ref{eq:s-pole}) by

715:  simply replacing $p_1$ by $-p_1$.

716: Thus solutions of Eq. (\ref{eq:s-zero-1}), called the zeros of S-matrix, can 

717: be readily 

718: obtained from the solutions 

719: $(p_{1a},p_{2a})$ and $(p_{1b},p_{2b})$

720: of Eq. (\ref{eq:s-pole}). They are 

721: $(-p_{1\alpha},p_{2\alpha})$ with $E_\alpha$ 

722: and  $(p_{1\alpha}^*,-p_{2\alpha}^*)$ with $E^*_\alpha$ for $\alpha=a,b$.

723: The zero at $(-p_{1b},p_{2b})$ is on the $pp$-sheet,

724: denoted as $E_{ZS}$ and $E^*_{ZS}$ in Fig. \ref{pole-2}.

725: Similarly, the zero at $(-p_{1a},p_{2a})$ is on the $pu$-sheet,  

726: shown as $E_{ZR}$ together with its conjugate  $E^*_{ZR}$ in

727: Fig. \ref{pole-2}. Note that Fig. \ref{pole-2} is for the case that

728: the parameters $\gamma_1$ and $\gamma_2$ are chosen such that the

729: shadow poles $E_{S}$ and its conjugate $E^* _{S}$ are on the $up$-sheet.

730: For other possible $\gamma_1$ and $\gamma_2$, the pole positions could be

731: different from what are shown in Fig. \ref{pole-2},

732:  but their close relations, as discussed above, are the same.

733: 

734: 

735: 

736: \begin{figure}

737: \begin{center}

738: \includegraphics[width=12cm]{fig2.eps}

739: \caption{Poles and zeros  of the simplified two-channel

740: Breit-Wigner form ($\mu_1=\mu_2$ and $\Delta=0$)

741: of S-matrix on the complex E-plane which has

742: $pp$ , $uu$ , $up$ and $pu$ sheets.

743: The open circles on the $uu$-sheet ((b)) are the

744: resonance pole $E_R$ and its conjugate pole $E_R^*$.

745: The open circles on the $up$-sheet ((c)) are the

746: shadow pole $E_S$ and its conjugate pole $E_S^*$.

747: The crossed on the $pp$-sheet ((a)) are the zero $E_{ZS}$ and its conjugate

748: $E^*_{ZS}$ which are at the same energies of

749: the shadow poles $E_{S}$ and $E^*_{S}$.

750: The crossed on the $pu$-sheet ((d))

751: are the zero $E_{ZR}$ and its conjugate

752: $E^*_{ZR}$ which are at the same energies of

753: the resonance poles $E_{R}$ and $E^*_{R}$.}

754: \label{pole-2}

755: 

756: %\caption{Poles and zeros  of the two-channel 

757: %Breit-Wigner formula.

758: %The open circles on the $uu$-sheet(b)($up$-sheet(c))

759: % are the resonance pole $E_R$(shadow pole $E_S$)

760: % and its conjugate pole $E_R^*$($E_S^*$).

761: %The crosses on the $pp$-sheet(a)($pu$-sheet(d)) 

762: %are the zero $E_{ZS}$($E_{ZR}$)

763: % and its conjugate  $E^*_{ZS}$ ($E^*_{ZR}$).}

764: %\label{pole-2}

765: \end{center}

766: \end{figure}

767: 

768: From the above analysis, it is clear that the poles and zeros of the S-matrix

769: are closely related. Their locations  on the 4 Riemann sheets can 

770: be conveniently

771: displayed on  one complex plane by introducing

772: a variable $t$\cite{newton-book}

773: \begin{eqnarray}

774: p_1 & = & \Delta \frac{1 + t^2}{1 - t^2}, \label{eq:t2}  \\ 

775: p_2 & = & 2\Delta\sqrt{\frac{\mu_2}{\mu_1}}\frac{t}{1 - t^2}.

776: \label{eq:t2b}

777: \end{eqnarray}

778: Hence each point  in the $t-$plane corresponds to a set of $(p_1,p_2)$.

779: In Fig. \ref{fig:t-plane}, the resonance position $E_{R}$ and shadow $E_{S}$ 

780: poles

781: and their conjugate poles and zeros of S-matrix 

782: $E_{ZS}, E_{ZR}, E_{ZS}^*, E_{ZR}^*$

783: are shown on t-plane. The physical S-matrix at real energies, which determine

784:  the observables,  are on the 

785: bold lines. The zero energy and the threshold of the second channel

786: correspond to  $t=i$ and $t=0$, respectively.

787: One can see that the resonance pole $E_{R}$ is closer 

788: than the shadow pole $E_{S}$

789: to the bold lines (S-matrix) and

790: hence can have the largest effect on the observables. 

791: Consequently, most of the rapid energy dependence of observables

792: are attributed to the resonance poles, not the shadow poles or the other poles

793: shown in Fig.\ref{fig:t-plane}. On the other hand, the zero $E^*_{ZS}$

794: of the S-matrix is also close to

795: the bold lines. As seen in the derivations given above,

796: this zero $E^*_{ZS}$ is closely related to shadow pole $E_{S}$. 

797: Thus the shadow poles

798: can also be related to the observables. 

799: Of course, which pole is most important in determining the

800: rapid energy dependence of observables also depends on the residues

801: of the T-matrix at the pole positions.

802: \begin{figure}

803: \begin{center}

804: \includegraphics[width=12cm]{fig3.eps}

805: \caption{The poles and zeros of S-matrix shown in Fig.2 are displayed

806: on the complex t-plane defined by Eqs. (\ref{eq:t2}) and (\ref{eq:t2b}).} 

807: \label{fig:t-plane}

808: \end{center}

809: \end{figure}

810: 

811: 

812: In the next subsection, we will use a further simplified BW form to

813:  explain more clearly the close relations between the poles and

814: zeros of the S-matrix. In particular we will

815: see explicitly that the

816: shadow pole  $E_S$ in Fig. \ref{pole-2}, which is not on the same Riemann sheet as $E_R$,

817: can be located by the zeros of the S-matrix.

818: More importantly, we will also see

819:   how the SP and TD methods work  both

820: analytically and numerically.

821: 

822: 

823: 

824: \subsection{Positions of poles}

825: 

826: For simplicity, we assume that the threshold energies of the two channels

827:  are the same and hence $\mu \equiv \mu_1=\mu_2$ and $\Delta=0$.

828: Therefore we have  simple relations  between energy and momenta :

829: $ E=p_1^2/2\mu=p_2^2/2\mu $ and $p \equiv p_1=\pm p_2$.

830: As discussed in the previous subsection, 

831: the four Riemann sheets  are classified by the sign of the

832:  imaginary part of the momentum; namely, 

833:  physical (unphysical) sheet is assigned by $\mathrm{Im}\, p >0$ $(\mathrm{Im}\, p<0)$. 

834: With the simplification $p \equiv p_1=\pm p_2$, 

835: we obviously have $p_1=p_2=p$ on the $pp$ and $uu$-sheets,

836: and $p_1=-p_2=p$ on $up$ and $pu$-sheets.

837: 

838: Let us start with the case of  $p_1=p_2=p$ for the  $pp$-sheet or

839: $uu$-sheet. The S-matrix element Eq. (\ref{eq:bw-s})

840: of the first channel 

841: can be written as

842: \begin{eqnarray}

843:  S_{11}(E) & = & \frac{E - M - i (\gamma_1 - \gamma_2)p}

844:                       {E - M + i (\gamma_1 + \gamma_2)p}.

845: \label{eq:s11-uupp}

846: \end{eqnarray}

847: It can be cast into the following more transparent form

848: \begin{eqnarray}

849:  S_{11}(E) & = & \frac{(p + p_S)(p - p_S^*)}{(p - p_R)(p + p_R^*)},

850:   \label{eq:s11-p}

851: \end{eqnarray}

852: with

853: \begin{eqnarray}

854:  p_R & = & \sqrt{2\mu M - (\mu\gamma_+)^2} - i \mu \gamma_+,

855: \label{eq:p-r} \\

856:  p_S & = & \sqrt{2\mu M - (\mu\gamma_-)^2} - i \mu \gamma_-,

857: \label{eq:p-s} 

858: \end{eqnarray}

859: where

860: \begin{eqnarray}

861:  \gamma_{\pm}  =  \gamma_1 \pm \gamma_2.

862: \end{eqnarray}

863: Remembering that we consider $\gamma_1 >0$ and $\gamma_2 >0$.

864: To make use of Fig.\ref{pole-2} in the following discussion, 

865: we consider the case that  $\gamma_1 > \gamma_2$ and hence

866: $\gamma_\pm >0$ and both $p_R$ and $p_S$ defined in 

867: Eqs. (\ref{eq:p-r})-(\ref{eq:p-s}) are associated with the unphysical $u$-sheet.

868: For the case of $\gamma_- <0$, $p_S$ is associated with the physical $p$-sheet

869: and the following presentation can be easily modified to account for this

870: case.

871: 

872: Clearly, Eq. (\ref{eq:s11-p}) means that

873: the S-matrix has a pole at $p_1=p_2=p=p_R$ on the $uu$-sheet with a resonance

874: energy

875: \begin{eqnarray}

876: E_R & = & \frac{p_R^2}{2\mu} = M - \mu\gamma_+^2 - 

877:                              i \gamma_+\sqrt{\mu(2M - \mu\gamma_+^2)}\,.

878:  \label{uu-pole}

879: \end{eqnarray}

880: Its conjugate pole $E^*_R$ is at $p_1=p_2 =p= -p_R^*$. 

881: The positions of $E_R$ and $E^*_R$ are shown in 

882: the upper right side of Fig.\ref{pole-2}.

883: Eq. (\ref{eq:s11-p}) also indicates that the zero of S-matrix

884: is at $p_1=p_2=-p_S$ which is on the $pp$-sheet because of 

885: $\mathrm{Im} (-p_S) > 0$. The energy of this zero of S-matrix is

886: \begin{eqnarray}

887: E_{ZS} & = & \frac{p_S^2}{2\mu} = M - \mu\gamma_-^2 - 

888:                              i \gamma_-\sqrt{\mu(2M - \mu\gamma_-^2)}.

889: \label{eq:e-zs}

890: \end{eqnarray}

891: Its conjugate  $E_{ZS}^*$ is at $p_1=p_2 = p_S^*$. The positions

892: of $E_{ZS}$ and $E_{ZS}^*$ are on the

893: $pp$-sheet, as shown in the upper left side of Fig.\ref{pole-2}.

894: 

895: We next consider the $p_1=-p_2=p$ case that the poles and zeros of

896: the S-matrix are on the 

897: $up$ or $pu$-sheets.

898:  The S-matrix Eq. (\ref{eq:bw-s}) for this case then takes the following form

899: \begin{eqnarray}

900:  S_{11}(E) & = & \frac{E - M - i (\gamma_1 + \gamma_2)p}

901:                       {E - M + i (\gamma_1 - \gamma_2)p}.

902: \label{eq:s11-uppu}

903: \end{eqnarray}

904: By comparing Eq. (\ref{eq:s11-uupp}) and  Eq. (\ref{eq:s11-uppu}) and using

905: the variables $p_R$ and $p_S$ defined by Eqs. (\ref{eq:p-r}) and (\ref{eq:p-s}),

906: Eq. (\ref{eq:s11-uppu}) 

907: can be written as

908: \begin{eqnarray}

909:  S_{11}(E) & = & \frac{(p + p_R)(p - p_R^*)}{(p - p_S)(p + p_S^*)}.

910: \label{eq:s11-up}

911: \end{eqnarray}

912: The above equation indicates that 

913: for the considered $\gamma_->0$, the S-matrix has a shadow pole at

914: $p_1=-p_2=p=p_S$ on the $up$-sheet. Thus its position

915: $E_{S}=p^2_S/(2\mu)$ is  identical to

916: $E_{ZS}$ of the zero of the S-matrix on the $pp$-sheet; namely

917: \begin{eqnarray}

918: E_S &=& E_{ZS} \nonumber \\

919: & = & \frac{p_S^2}{2\mu} = M - \mu\gamma_-^2 -

920:                              i \gamma_-\sqrt{\mu(2M - \mu\gamma_-^2)}.

921: \label{eq:e-s}

922: \end{eqnarray}

923: This means that the shadow pole $E_S$ on the $up$-sheet

924: can be found from searching for 

925: the zero $E_{ZS}$ of S-matrix on the $pp$-sheet.

926: 

927: Eq. (\ref{eq:s11-up}) also gives a zero of S-matrix at 

928: $p_1=-p_2=p=-p_R $ on $pu$-plane because $\mathrm{Im} (-p_R) >0$. 

929: Its energy  $E_{ZR}$ is also identical to $E_R$ defined above

930: \begin{eqnarray}

931: E_{ZR}&=& E_R \nonumber \\

932: &=&\frac{p_R^2}{2\mu} = M - \mu\gamma_+^2 -

933:                              i \gamma_+\sqrt{\mu(2M - \mu\gamma_+^2)}\,.

934: \label{eq:e-zr}

935: \end{eqnarray}

936: The positions of $E_S$ and

937: $E_{ZR}$ and their conjugates $E^*_S$ and $E^*_{ZR}$ are also in the

938: lower parts of

939: Fig.\ref{pole-2}.

940: 

941: From the above analysis  for the $\gamma_- >0$ case, 

942: we see that  the energies of the resonance poles

943: may be obtained by studying the poles of the S-matrix on the $uu$-sheet

944: and those of the shadow poles may be obtained from

945: the zeros of the S-matrix on the $pp$-sheet. 

946: The analysis for the $\gamma_- <0$ case  is similar. Here we only

947: mention that when $\gamma_- >0$ is changed to $\gamma_- <0$,

948: the shadow poles $E_S$ and $E^*_S$ on the $up$-sheet move to the $pu$-sheet 

949: and zeros $E_{ZS}$ and $E^*_{ZS}$ will be on the $uu$-sheet.

950: 

951: 

952: 

953: Now let us examine how the SP and TD methods can

954: find the poles defined  by the above exact expressions of the

955: two-channel BW amplitude. We first recall that

956: in applying the SP and TD methods, the energy $E$ and momentum $p_i$

957: in the S-matrix are restricted on the positive real-axis.

958: For the considered simplified case, we thus have $p_1=p_2=p$ and

959: the $T$-matrix Eq.(\ref{eq:bw-t}) 

960: then becomes

961: \begin{equation}

962:   T(E) = \frac{-\gamma_1 p}{E-M+i\gamma_+ p}. 

963: \label{t-pp}

964: \end{equation}

965: Our task is to examine whether

966: the resonance mass $M_R$ and width $\Gamma_R$ found by applying the SP and TD 

967: methods on the expression Eq.(\ref{t-pp})

968: are close to the real and imaginary parts of the

969: poles defined in the previous subsection.

970: 

971: According to Eqs. (\ref{eq:sp-e}) and (\ref{eq:sp-nch}),

972: the SP method finds the resonance mass $M_R$ by finding

973:  the maximum of the speed through the use of the condition

974: \begin{eqnarray}

975:  \left[\frac{d}{dE}\left | \frac{dT}{dE} \right |\right]_{E=M_R} = 0\,.

976: \label{eq:sp-sbw}

977: \end{eqnarray}

978: With the T-matrix Eq.(\ref{t-pp}), Eq. (\ref{eq:sp-sbw})

979: leads to the following equation

980: \begin{equation}

981:   3M_R^3+(3M+2\mu\gamma_+^2)M_R^2-(7M^2-6\mu M\gamma_+^2)M_R+M^3 = 0.

982: \end{equation}

983: This equation can be written in the dimension-less form as

984: \begin{equation}

985:   3\tilde{E}^3+(3+2\alpha)\tilde{E}^2-(7-6\alpha)\tilde{E}+1 = 0,

986: \label{eq:bw-pole-exp}

987: \end{equation}

988: with $\tilde{E}=M_R/M, \alpha=\mu\gamma_+^2/M_R$. With some inspections,

989: one can see that Eq. (\ref{eq:bw-pole-exp}) has 

990: real and positive $M_R $ solutions

991:  only in the

992: $ \alpha < 0.417 $ region.

993: Two of the three solutions are the maximum and minimum points of the speed, 

994: and the third one is less than 0.

995: The SP method defines the maximum point of the speed

996: as the resonance mass. We find that this solution can be expanded as

997: \begin{equation}

998:   [M_R]_{SP} = M - \mu\gamma_+^2 - \frac{1}{4M}(\mu\gamma_+^2)^2

999:   + O\left(\frac{(\mu\gamma_+^2)^3}{M^2}\right).

1000: \end{equation}

1001: Clearly, $[M_R]_{SP}$ equals to the real part of

1002:  Eq. (\ref{uu-pole})

1003:  if we neglect the second and higher order terms in 

1004: the expansion in powers of

1005: $ \mu\gamma_+^2/M $.

1006: Therefore the SP method is accurate only under the condition that 

1007:  $ \mu\gamma_+^2/M \ll 1 $.

1008: Moreover, it is clear from the above equation that speed has no stationary

1009: point for  $ \mu\gamma_+^2/M > 0.417 $ and therefore the SP method

1010: will fail to find the pole even if there is a pole within the model.

1011: 

1012: 

1013: We next turn to discussing the width $\Gamma_R$ obtained by the SP method.

1014: It is evaluated by using 

1015: Eq. (\ref{eq:sp-width1}). We find that it can also be expanded as 

1016: \begin{equation}

1017: \frac{[\Gamma_R]_{SP}}{2} \equiv

1018: \frac{|T|_{[M_R]_{SP}}}{\left | \frac{dT}{dE} \right |_{[M_R]_{SP}} }

1019: = \sqrt{\mu\gamma_+^2(2M-\mu\gamma_+^2)}

1020: \left [ 1 - \frac{\mu\gamma_+^2}{2M}

1021:       + O\left(\left(\frac{\mu\gamma_+^2}{M}\right)^2 \right)  \right ].

1022: \end{equation}

1023: Here again, if we neglect higher order terms of $\mu\gamma_+^2/M$, the

1024: SP method 

1025: can give the imaginary part of $E_R$ of the exact expression Eq. (\ref{uu-pole}).

1026: As we have seen in Fig.\ref{pole-2}, the two-channel BW S-matrix   

1027: has two pairs of poles on the $uu$-sheet and the $up$-sheet.

1028: However the SP method can only find the pole $E_R$ on the $uu$-sheet.

1029: 

1030: 

1031: 

1032: From the above analysis, it is clear that

1033: the accuracy of SP method is  controlled 

1034: by $\mu\gamma_+^2/M$. We examine this by using an example with

1035:   $\mu  = \frac{m_{N}m_{\pi}}{m_{N}+m_{\pi}}$,

1036:   $m_{N} = 938.5 \ \mbox{MeV}$ and

1037:   $m_{\pi} = 139.6 \ \mbox{MeV}$, and

1038:    $  M = m_N + m_\pi + 600 \ \mbox{MeV}$.

1039:  In Fig.\ref{bw-pole1} 

1040:  the solid curves are the

1041:  pole positions on the $uu$-sheet.

1042: They are obtained from evaluating 

1043: the exact analytical formula Eq. (\ref{uu-pole})

1044: for $\gamma_-/\gamma_+=0.5$ and varying $\mu\gamma_+^2/M$ from $0.01$ to $0.6$.

1045: With the same parameters we then apply the SP method to 

1046: search for pole $(M_R, -i\Gamma_R/2)$ from the amplitude Eq. (\ref{t-pp}) 

1047: numerically by using 

1048: Eqs. (\ref{eq:sp-width1}), (\ref{eq:sp-1}) and  (\ref{eq:sp-e}).

1049: The obtained pole positions

1050: were the filled squares shown in Fig.\ref{bw-pole1}.

1051: As expected, the SP method works very well for small $\mu\gamma_+^2/M$. However

1052: the pole position from SP starts to deviate from the exact results

1053: (solid curves) as $\mu\gamma_+^2/M$ increases.

1054: There is no filled squares in Fig.\ref{bw-pole1} in the 

1055: region   $\mu\gamma_+^2/M > 0.417$ because  the SP can not find a pole in

1056: this region.

1057: This is not because of the numerical accuracy of our calculation,

1058: but is the intrinsic limitation of the SP method as, discussed above.

1059: 

1060: 

1061: 

1062: \begin{figure}

1063: \begin{center}

1064: \includegraphics[width=7.5cm]{fig4a.eps}

1065: \includegraphics[width=7.5cm]{fig4b.eps}

1066: \caption{

1067: The $\mu\gamma_+^2/M$ dependence of the pole positions on the

1068: $uu$-sheet (solid curve) and $up$-sheet (dashed curve) of the

1069: simplified two-channels Breit-Wigner form ($\mu_1=\mu_2$, $\Delta=0$)

1070:  calculated at $\gamma_-/\gamma_+=0.5$. The real (imaginary) parts of poles

1071: are shown in  (a) ( (b)) of the figure.

1072: The solid squares ( solid circles) are the results obtained from

1073: using the SP (TD)  method.

1074: Triangles in (b) are

1075:  the widths of the poles obtained using Eq. (\ref{eq:td-kel-2b}).

1076: }

1077: %\caption{

1078: %$\mu\gamma_+^2/M$ dependence of the pole positions.

1079: %The solid(dashed) curve shows

1080: %the pole positions  of the two-channels Breit-Wigner formula

1081: % on the $uu$-sheet ($up$-sheet)

1082: % calculated at $\gamma_-/\gamma_+=0.5$.

1083: %The solid squares (solid circles) are the poles obtained from 

1084: %the SP (TD)  method.

1085: %Triangle shows the widths of the poles obtained from Eq. (\ref{eq:td-kel-2b}).

1086: %}

1087: \label{bw-pole1}

1088: \end{center}

1089: \end{figure}

1090: 

1091: 

1092: 

1093: We now turn to investigating the TD method. We apply

1094: Eq. (\ref{eq:td-kel-2a})

1095: to search for the resonance mass $M_R$ from the amplitude

1096: Eq. (\ref{t-pp}). Since it is not clear how to

1097: interpret Kelkar's prescription Eq. (\ref{eq:td-kel-2b}),

1098:  we assume that the S-matrix element $S_{11}$ is of the following form

1099: \begin{eqnarray}

1100: S_{11}(E) &=& \frac{E- M - i \Gamma_{S}/2}{E- M + i\Gamma_{R}/2} \\

1101: &=& \eta e^{2i\delta}.

1102: \end{eqnarray}

1103: Then Eq. (\ref{eq:td-kel-2b}) leads to an improved expression for

1104: the width $\Gamma_S$

1105: \begin{eqnarray}

1106: \frac{[\Gamma_R]_{TD}}{2} = \frac{\Gamma_S}{2}& \equiv &

1107:  \frac{1\pm\eta }{2}\left |\frac{1}{\frac{d\delta}{dE}} \right |_{E=[M_R]_{TD}} ,

1108: \label{eq:td-kel-2c}

1109: \end{eqnarray}

1110: where $+$ $(-)$ of $\pm$ is 

1111: for the maximum(minimum) of the TD suggesting

1112:  the  pole on $up$- ($pu$-) sheet.

1113: We have found that the TD method, defined by Eq. (\ref{eq:td-kel-2a})

1114: and Eq. (\ref{eq:td-kel-2c}) can only find the shadow poles

1115: on the $up$-sheet which are given by

1116: exact expression Eq. (\ref{eq:e-s}). The results from using the same

1117: parameters specified above are also

1118:  shown in Fig.\ref{bw-pole1}.

1119: The dashed curves are from the exact expression

1120: Eq. (\ref{eq:e-s}) and the solid dots are from applying

1121: Eq. (\ref{eq:td-kel-2a}) and Eq. (\ref{eq:td-kel-2c}) to search numerically

1122: for the poles from Eq. (\ref{eq:s11-uppu}).

1123: Clearly TD method works very well in finding the shadow poles on $up$-sheet.

1124: In the same figure the triangles are from using Kelkar's prescription

1125:  Eq. (\ref{eq:td-kel-2b}). Obviously,

1126:  our 

1127: formula Eq. (\ref{eq:td-kel-2c}) works better.

1128: We have also examined TD for $\gamma_-< 0$. In this case

1129: the TD becomes negative and has minimum.

1130: We apply Eq. (\ref{eq:td-kel-2a}) for the minimum of TD 

1131: and find that TD works also well in finding the  pole on $pu$-sheet. 

1132: 

1133: 

1134: \section{Analytic continuation of resonance models}

1135: 

1136: With the analysis presented in the previous section, it is clear that

1137: the empirical partial-wave amplitudes determined from experimental

1138: data can not be blindly used to extract resonance parameters by using 

1139: SP or TD methods. To make progress, one needs to construct a reaction

1140: model to fit the data and then extract the resonance parameters by analytic

1141: continuation within the model.

1142: In this paper, we focus on a dynamical model\cite{msl} 

1143:  which accounts for the main features of  meson production reactions in the 

1144: nucleon resonance region. Our task in this section is to develop numerical

1145: methods for finding the resonance poles from such models which do not have

1146: analytical forms of their solutions. We will first consider the simplest

1147: one-channel and one-resonance case, then two-channels and one-resonance, and 

1148: finally two-channels and two-resonances cases. 

1149: All of these models are exactly solvable such that their poles are known 

1150: analytically and the developed numerical methods can be tested.

1151: \subsection{One-channel, one-resonance}

1152: To be specific, we consider 

1153: the two-particle reactions defined by the following well known

1154: isobar Hamiltonian 

1155: in the center of mass frame 

1156: \begin{eqnarray}

1157: H = H_0 + H',

1158: \end{eqnarray}

1159: with

1160: \begin{eqnarray}

1161: H_0 &=&  [E_{1}(\vec{p}) +E_{2}(-\vec{p})] + \ket{N_0} M_0 \bra{N_0} \,,\\

1162: H' &=&   \ket{g} \bra{g}\,,

1163: \end{eqnarray}

1164: where $M_0$ is the mass parameter

1165: of a bare particle $N_0$ which can decay into two particle states through

1166: the vertex interaction $g$ in $H'$, and

1167: $E_{i}(p)=[m_{i}^2+p^2]^{1/2}$ is the energy of the $i$-th particle.

1168: The scattering operator is defined by

1169: \begin{eqnarray}

1170: t(E) = H' + H' \frac{1}{E-H_0-H' } H'\,,

1171: \end{eqnarray}

1172: which leads to the following Lippmann-Schwinger

1173: equation for the scattering amplitudes in each partial-wave

1174: \begin{equation}

1175:   t(p',p;E) = v(p',p;E)

1176:   +\int_{C_0}dq\,q^2 

1177: \frac{v(p',q;E)t(q,p;E)}{E-E_{1}(q)-E_{2}(q) }\,,

1178: \label{eq:isobar-t}

1179: \end{equation}

1180: where the integration path $C_0$ will be specified later.

1181: The interaction in Eq. (\ref{eq:isobar-t}) is

1182: \begin{eqnarray}

1183:   v(p',p;E)=\frac{g(p')g(p)}{E-M_0}\,.

1184: \label{eq:isobar-v}

1185: \end{eqnarray}

1186: Eqs. (\ref{eq:isobar-t})-(\ref{eq:isobar-v}) leads to the following

1187: well known solution

1188: \begin{eqnarray}

1189:   t(p',p;E) &=& \frac{g(p')g(p)}

1190:                      {E-M_0-\Sigma(E)},

1191: \label{eq:isobar-tij}

1192: \end{eqnarray}

1193: with

1194: \begin{eqnarray}

1195:  \Sigma(E)&=& \int_{C_0}dp\,p^2\frac{ g^2(p) }

1196: {E-E_{1}(p)-E_{2}(p)}\,.

1197: \label{eq:isobar-sigma}

1198: \end{eqnarray}

1199: 

1200: From the analysis in the previous section, the

1201: resonance poles can be found from $ t(E)= t(p_0,p_0;E)$ on the

1202: unphysical Riemann sheet defined by $\mathrm{Im}\, p_{0} <0$ with $p_{0}$

1203: denoting the on-shell momentum 

1204: \begin{eqnarray}

1205: E=\sqrt{m_1^2+p^2_{0}} + \sqrt{m_2^2+p^2_{0}}.

1206: \label{eq:isobar-pole}

1207: \end{eqnarray}

1208: Obviously $p_0$ is also the pole position of the propagator in 

1209: Eq. (\ref{eq:isobar-t}) or Eq. (\ref{eq:isobar-sigma}).

1210: 

1211: The physical scattering amplitude at a positive energy $E$ can be obtained from

1212:  Eq. (\ref{eq:isobar-t}) or Eq. (\ref{eq:isobar-tij}) by setting

1213: $E \rightarrow E + i \epsilon$ with a positive $\epsilon \rightarrow 0$

1214: and choosing the integration

1215: contour $C_0$ to be along the real-axis of $p$ with $ 0\leq p \leq \infty$.

1216: From Eq. (\ref{eq:isobar-t}) it is clear that

1217: $t(E)$ has a discontinuity on the positive real $E$

1218: \begin{eqnarray}

1219: Dis(t(E)) & = & t(E + i \epsilon)  - t(E - i \epsilon) \nonumber \\

1220: &=& 2\pi i \rho(p_0) v(p_0,p_0)t(E)\,,

1221: \label{eq:t-dis}

1222: \end{eqnarray}

1223: where $\rho(p_0)=p_0E_1(p_0)E_2(p_0)/E$.

1224: Thus the t-matrix has a

1225: cut  running along the real positive $E$.

1226: To find resonance poles, 

1227: we need to find the solution

1228: of Eq. (\ref{eq:isobar-t}) on the un-physical sheet with $\mathrm{Im}\, p \le 0$

1229: on which the pole $p_0$ of the propagator 

1230: moves into the lower p-plane, as shown in (a) of Fig.\ref{fig:path}.

1231: From Eq. (\ref{eq:t-dis}), it is clear that the solution of

1232: Eq. (\ref{eq:isobar-t}), with the contour $C_0$ chosen to be on the real-axis

1233: $0\le p \le \infty$,  will

1234: encounter the discontinuity and is not the solution

1235: on the unphysical sheet where we want to search for the resonance poles.

1236: It is well-known\cite{badalyan82,orlov84,pearce84,pearce89} 

1237: that this difficulty can be overcame by

1238: deforming the integration path to the

1239: contour $C^\prime_{1}$  shown in (a) of Fig.\ref{fig:path}.

1240: By this the pole will not cross the cut and the integral is

1241: analytically continued from real positive $E$ to the  lower half of the

1242: unphysical E-sheet with $\mathrm{Im}\, p_0 \le 0$.

1243: Obviously, the same solution can be obtained by choosing any contour which is 

1244: below the pole position $p_0$, such as the contour $C_1$ of

1245: (b) of Fig.\ref{fig:path}. 

1246: 

1247: \begin{figure}

1248: \begin{center}

1249: \includegraphics[width=12cm]{fig5.eps}

1250: \caption{The shift of the singularity (open circle) of the propagator

1251: of the two-particle scattering equation Eq. (\ref{eq:isobar-t}) as energy E

1252: moves from physical sheet to unphysical sheet. $C^\prime_1$ in (a) 

1253: or $C_1$ in (b) is  the integration path for calculating the scattering

1254: amplitude with E on the unphysical plane.}

1255: %\caption{Contours $C_1$ (right) and $C^\prime_1$ (left)

1256: %for calculating scattering amplitude on the unphysical sheet.

1257: %Open circle shows the 'on-shell' momentum $p_0$ of the

1258: %propagator.}

1259: \label{fig:path}

1260: \end{center}

1261: \end{figure}

1262: 

1263: With the solution of the form of Eq. (\ref{eq:isobar-tij}),

1264: the numerical procedure of finding resonance poles is to solve

1265: \begin{eqnarray}

1266:    E-M_0-\Sigma(E) = 0.

1267: \label{eq:find-pole}

1268: \end{eqnarray}

1269: with 

1270: \begin{eqnarray}

1271:  \Sigma(E)&=& \int_{C_{1'}}dp\,p^2\frac{ g^2(p) }

1272: {E-E_{1}(p)-E_{2}(p)} \\

1273: &=& \int_{C_1}dp\,p^2\frac{ g^2(p) }

1274: {E-E_{1}(p)-E_{2}(p)},

1275: \label{eq:isobar-sigma-a}

1276: \end{eqnarray}

1277: for $E$ on

1278: the unphysical Riemann sheet defined by  $\mathrm{Im}\, p_0\le 0$.

1279: To test this numerical procedure, 

1280: let us consider the case that $\Sigma(E)$ defined

1281: by Eq. (\ref{eq:isobar-sigma}) can be calculated analytically.

1282: Such an analytic form can be obtained by taking the

1283:  non-relativistic kinematics $E_1(p)+E_2(p)=m_1+m_2+p^2/(2\mu)$

1284: with $\mu=m_1m_2/(m_1+m_2)$ and a monopole form

1285: for the vertex function

1286: \begin{equation}

1287:    g(p)=\frac{\lambda}{1+p^2/\beta^2},

1288: \label{eq:isobar:ff1}

1289: \end{equation}

1290: where $\beta$ is a cut-off parameter.

1291: The integration in $\Sigma(E)$ of Eq. (\ref{eq:isobar-sigma})

1292: can then be done exactly to give the following simple form

1293: \begin{eqnarray}

1294:   \Sigma(E)&=&

1295:               \frac{\pi\mu\beta^3\lambda^2}{2(p_0+i\beta)^2}\,,

1296: \label{eq:sigma-ana}

1297: \end{eqnarray}

1298: where $p_0$ is defined by $E=m_1+m_2+p^2_0/(2\mu)$.

1299: If the imaginary part of $p_0$ is positive (negative),

1300: it means that we choose the poles on physical (unphysical) sheet.

1301: Only the pole with $\mathrm{Im}\, p_0 \le0$ on the unphysical sheet is called resonance,

1302: as discussed in the previous section.

1303: 

1304: 

1305: 

1306: The resonance poles on the unphysical

1307: sheet ($\mathrm{Im}\, p_0 \le 0$) obtained from 

1308: using Eq. (\ref{eq:sigma-ana}) to solve Eq. (\ref{eq:find-pole}) are 

1309: the solid curve displayed 

1310: in Fig.\ref{fig:11-pole} using the parameters: 

1311: $m_{1}=m_N = 938.5 \ \mbox{MeV}$, $m_{2}=m_\pi=

1312: 139.6 \ \mbox{MeV}$, $M_0 = m_{N} + m_{\pi} + 600 \ \mbox{MeV}$ and

1313: cutoff momentum

1314:   $ \beta = 800 \ \mbox{MeV}$,

1315: for a range of coupling constant

1316:   $0 \le \lambda \le 0.04 $.

1317: We next solve Eqs. (\ref{eq:find-pole}) and

1318: (\ref{eq:isobar-sigma-a}) by choosing contour $C_1$ illustrated in

1319:  Fig.\ref{fig:path}. The solutions are stable as far as the path is not too

1320: close to the pole.  

1321:  The solutions completely agree with the solid curve of the exact solution

1322: and hence are not displayed  in Fig. \ref{fig:11-pole}.

1323: Here we also note that  Eq. (\ref{eq:sigma-ana}) also allows to calculate

1324: the poles by using the SP and TD methods.

1325: The results for the value of $\lambda= 0.01$, $0.02$, $0.03$, $0.04$ are the 

1326: solid squares in Fig.\ref{fig:11-pole}.

1327: As expected we confirm the previous findings that both SP and TD 

1328: work well for the single channel case.

1329: 

1330: 

1331: \begin{figure}

1332: \begin{center}

1333: \includegraphics{fig6.eps}

1334: \caption{$\lambda$ dependence of the pole position of the one-channel,

1335: one-resonance model. 

1336: The line  represents the pole position of the t-matrix on the 

1337: unphysical sheet.

1338: Solid squares  are the pole positions extracted by using the SP and TD methods.}

1339: \label{fig:11-pole}

1340: \end{center}

1341: \end{figure}

1342: 

1343: \subsection{Two-channels, one-resonance}

1344: 

1345: The formula for two-channels, one-resonance case can be easily obtained by

1346: extending the equations in the previous subsection to include channel

1347: label $i=1,2$.  We thus have 

1348: \begin{equation}

1349:   t_{ij}(p',p;E) = v_{ij}(p',p;E)

1350:   +\sum_{k}\int_{C_0}dq\,q^2

1351: \frac{v_{ik}(p',q)t_{kj}(q,p;E)}{E-E_{k1}(q)-E_{k2}(q) }\,,

1352: \label{eq:isobar-t2c}

1353: \end{equation}

1354: where $E_{kn}(p)=[m^2_{kn}+p^2]^{1/2}$ with $m_{kn}$ denoting the

1355: mass of $n$-th particle in channel $k$, and

1356: \begin{eqnarray}

1357:   v_{ij}(p',p;E)=g_i(p')\frac{1}{E-M_0}g_j(p) \,.

1358: \label{eq:isobar-v2c}

1359: \end{eqnarray}

1360: Eqs. (\ref{eq:isobar-t2c})-(\ref{eq:isobar-v2c}) leads to

1361: \begin{eqnarray}

1362:   t_{ij}(p',p;E) &=& \frac{g_i(p')g_j(p)}

1363:                      {E-M_0-\Sigma_1(E)-\Sigma_2(E)},

1364: \label{eq:isobar-tij2c}

1365: \end{eqnarray}

1366: with

1367: \begin{eqnarray}

1368:  \Sigma_k(E)&=& \int_{C_0}dp\,p^2\frac{ g^2_k(p) }

1369: {E-E_{k1}(p)-E_{k2}(p)} \,.

1370: \label{eq:isobar-sigma2c}

1371: \end{eqnarray}

1372: For the physical scattering amplitude at a positive energy E, 

1373: Eq. (\ref{eq:isobar-t2c}) is solved by

1374: setting $E \rightarrow E + i\epsilon$ with a positive $\epsilon \rightarrow 0$

1375: and choosing $C_0$ along  the real axis $0 \le p \le \infty$.

1376: 

1377: With Eq. (\ref{eq:isobar-tij2c}), the poles 

1378: of the scattering amplitudes are defined by

1379: \begin{eqnarray}

1380: E-M_0-\Sigma_1(E)-\Sigma_2(E) =0 \,.

1381: \label{eq:find-pole2c}

1382: \end{eqnarray}

1383: The poles from solving the above equation can be on one of  the

1384: four  Riemann sheets, $pp$, $up$, $uu$, and

1385: $pu$, as explained in section III. 

1386: The numerical procedure for finding the resonance poles on $uu$-sheet is

1387: to solve Eq. (\ref{eq:find-pole2c}) 

1388: for $E=E_{11}(p_{01})+E_{12}(p_{01})=E_{21}(p_{02})+E_{22}(p_{02})$

1389:  with $\mathrm{Im}\, p_{01}\le 0$ and $\mathrm{Im}\, p_{02}\le 0$.

1390: The integration path $C_0$ is changed  to  $C_1$

1391:  shown in (b) of Fig.\ref{fig:path} to calculate both self-energies

1392: $\Sigma_1(E)$ and $\Sigma_2(E)$ of Eq. (\ref{eq:isobar-sigma2c}). 

1393: Of course the contour $C_1$ for the integration over the momentum for $i$-th 

1394: channel must be below the pole $p_{0i}$ defined by 

1395: $E-E_{i1}(p_{0i})- E_{i2}(p_{0i}) =0$.

1396: Here we note that for

1397: finding the poles on $pu$-sheet ($up$-sheet),

1398: the contour $C_0$ is replaced by $C_1$ only for $\Sigma_2(E)$ ($\Sigma_1(E)$).

1399: 

1400: To test numerical procedures and to further test the SP and TD methods, let us 

1401: consider again the

1402: non-relativistic kinematics $E_{i1}(p)+E_{i2}(p)= \Theta_i +p^2/(2\mu_i)$ 

1403: with $\Theta_i=m_{i1}+m_{i2}$ and

1404: $\mu_i=m_{i1}m_{i2}/(m_{i1}+m_{i2})$. 

1405: This will allow us to find the exact solutions by choosing the monopole 

1406: form factor

1407: \begin{eqnarray}

1408:    g_i(p)=\frac{\lambda_i}{1+p^2/\beta_i^2}\,.

1409: \label{eq:isobar:ff}

1410: \end{eqnarray}

1411: We then have

1412: \begin{eqnarray}

1413:   \Sigma_i(E)&=&

1414:               \frac{\pi\mu_i\beta_i^3\lambda_i^2}{2(p_i+i\beta_i)^2}.

1415: \label{eq:sigma-ana2c-1}

1416: \end{eqnarray}

1417: With Eq. (\ref{eq:sigma-ana2c-1}), the poles defined by 

1418: Eq. (\ref{eq:find-pole2c}) can be found by solving algebraic equations.

1419: For numerical calculations, we consider a case similar to $\pi N$ scattering in $S_{11}$

1420: partial wave:

1421: (1)channel-1 is $\pi N$ with $m_{11}=m_\pi=139.6$ MeV ,

1422: $m_{12}=m_N=938.5$ MeV, and

1423: $\beta_1 = 800 \ \mbox{MeV} $, (2)channel-2 is $\eta N$ with 

1424: $m_{21}=m_\eta=547.45$ MeV ,

1425: $m_{22}=m_N=938.5$ MeV, and $\beta_2 = 800 \ \mbox{MeV}$, (3)

1426: bare mass $M_0 = m_{\pi} + m_{N} + 600 \ \mbox{MeV}$.

1427: The results are shown 

1428: in Fig.\ref{21-pole}. The dash-dotted (solid) curves are the calculated

1429: poles on $uu$-sheet ($up$-sheet) with the coupling

1430: constants $  \lambda_1 = 0.02$ for $N_0 \rightarrow \pi N$ 

1431:  and a range of

1432: $  \lambda_2 = 0 - 0.02$ for $N_0 \rightarrow \eta N$.

1433: We see that when $\lambda_2$ is 0, which is the single-channel case, 

1434: the $uu$-pole

1435: and the $up$-pole are on the same position. They then split as $\lambda_2$

1436: increases. 

1437: 

1438:  We next evaluate Eq. (\ref{eq:isobar-sigma2c}) for $E$ on the

1439:  $uu$-sheet, $up$-sheet

1440: or $pu$-sheet by appropriately

1441: choosing the path $C_0$, as described above.

1442: The  poles are found when the

1443: calculated $\Sigma_1(E)$ and $\Sigma_2(E)$  satisfy

1444: Eq. (\ref{eq:find-pole2c}). We find that  the poles obtained by this

1445: numerical procedure reproduce accurately the dash-dotted($uu$-sheet),

1446: solid($up$-sheet) and dashed($pu$-sheet)

1447: curve in Fig.\ref{21-pole} and hence are omitted there.

1448:  Thus this analytic continuation method can be used in practice

1449: to find the resonance

1450: poles (i.e. poles on $uu$-sheet as defined in section III) for general

1451: case that $\Sigma_i(E)$ can not be integrated analytically.

1452: 

1453: We now turn to examining the SP and TD methods.

1454: In Fig.\ref{21-pole}, we show that  the SP method (open squares) reproduces 

1455: the poles (dash-dotted curve) on the $uu$-sheet

1456: only at $\lambda_2 \le 0.015$. 

1457: When $\lambda_2$ is larger than 0.015 where the magnitude of $\mathrm{Im}\, E_R$

1458: continues to increase, the speed has no maximum and the SP method

1459: fails to find the pole. 

1460: This is another example showing that SP method has its limitation.

1461: On the other hand, the TD method

1462: (solid squares) can reproduce  the poles on the $up$-sheet (solid curve) 

1463: and $pu$-sheet (dashed curve)

1464: in the considered range of parameters. Here we see that the SP and TD find 

1465: different poles which have different physical meanings in the Hamiltonian

1466: formulation. One can show\cite{gw}

1467:  that the poles on $uu$-sheet are due to the process that

1468: an unstable

1469: system is created and then decays during the collision and are called the

1470: resonance poles.  

1471: The physical interpretations of the poles on $pu$ and $up$-sheets remain to be

1472: developed.

1473:    

1474: 

1475: 

1476: \begin{figure}

1477: \begin{center}

1478: \includegraphics{fig7.eps}

1479: \caption{$\lambda_2$ dependence of the pole positions on the

1480: $uu$-sheet (dash-dotted curve),  $up$-sheet (solid curve) 

1481: and $pu$-sheet (dashed curve) of

1482: the two-channels, one-resonance model. 

1483: The open squares (solid squares) are obtained from using the SP (TD) method.}

1484: \label{21-pole}

1485: \end{center}

1486: \end{figure}

1487: 

1488: It is interesting to point out here

1489:  that the two-channel Briet-Wigner form analyzed

1490:  in detail in the previous  section can be derived 

1491: from the two-channels, one-resonance

1492: model if the non-relativistic kinematics is used.

1493: To see this, we first write

1494: the non-relativistic relation between the S-matrix and the T-matrix

1495: \begin{eqnarray}

1496:   S_{ij}(E)&=&\delta_{ij}+2iT_{ij}(E),

1497: \label{eq:s-matrix}\\

1498:   T_{ij}(E)&=&-\pi\sqrt{\mu_{i}p_{i}\mu_{j}p_{j}}

1499:   t_{ij}(p_{i},p_{j};E),

1500: \label{eq:t-matrix}

1501: \end{eqnarray}

1502: where $p_i$ is the on-shell momentum in channel $i$

1503: \begin{equation}

1504:   p_{i}=\sqrt{2\mu_{i}(E-\Theta_{i})}.

1505: \end{equation}

1506: With the above and the analytic form Eq. (\ref{eq:sigma-ana2c-1}) for

1507: $\Sigma_{i}(E)$ , we can write the $1 \rightarrow 1$ elastic

1508: scattering amplitude of

1509: Eq. (\ref{eq:t-matrix}) as

1510: \begin{eqnarray}

1511: T_{11}(p_1,p_1,E)= \frac{-p_1\gamma_1(p_1)}

1512: {E-M(E)+ip_1\gamma_1(p_1)+ip_2\gamma_2(p_2)},

1513: \label{eq:T11}

1514: \end{eqnarray}

1515: where $\gamma_i(p_i)=\pi\mu_i g_i^2(p_i) > 0$ and

1516: \begin{eqnarray}

1517: M(E) &=& M^0 +\sum_{k}P\int p^2 dp

1518: \frac{ g^2_k(p) }{E-m_{k1}-m_{k2}-\frac{p^2}{2\mu_k}}

1519: \end{eqnarray}

1520: where $P$ means taking the principal-value integration.

1521: By using Eq. (\ref{eq:s-matrix}), we then have the $1\rightarrow 1$

1522: elastic part of the S-matrix

1523: \begin{eqnarray}

1524: S_{11} & = & \frac{E - M(E) - i p_1 \gamma_1(p_1) + i p_2 \gamma_2(p_2)}

1525:                   {E - M(E) + i p_1 \gamma_1(p_1) + i p_2 \gamma_2(p_2)}.

1526: \label{eq:S11}

1527: \end{eqnarray}

1528: If the E-dependence of $M(E)$ and $\gamma_i(p_i)$

1529: are further neglected, 

1530: Eqs. (\ref{eq:T11}) and

1531: (\ref{eq:S11}) are identical to what are usually called the two-channel

1532: Breit-Wigner resonant amplitude discussed in the previous section.

1533: Thus the conditions under which SP and TD are valid can be related now

1534: to the parameters of the vertex function 

1535: $g_i(p)$ within this two-channels, one-resonance model.

1536: 

1537: \subsection{Two-channels, two-resonances}

1538: 

1539: 

1540: For the two-channels, two-resonances case, 

1541: the scattering amplitude is defined by

1542: the same Eq. (\ref{eq:isobar-t2c}), but with the following driving term

1543: \begin{equation}

1544:   v_{ij}(p',p;E) = g_{i1}(p')\frac{1}{E-M_1}g_{j1}(p)

1545: +g_{i2}(p')\frac{1}{E-M_2}g_{j2}(p).

1546: \end{equation}

1547: The scattering amplitude is then of the following form

1548: \begin{eqnarray}

1549:   t_{ij}(p',p;E) =

1550:  \sum_{\alpha,\beta}

1551: g_{i,\alpha}(p')[D^{-1}(E)]_{\alpha,\beta} g_{j,\beta}(p).

1552: \label{eq:2c2r-t}

1553: \end{eqnarray}

1554: The propagator  $D(E)$ in Eq. (\ref{eq:2c2r-t}) is

1555: \begin{eqnarray}

1556:  [ D(E)]_{\alpha,\beta} = [E-M_\alpha]\delta_{\alpha,\beta}

1557: -\Sigma_{\alpha,\beta}(E),

1558: \label{eq:2c2r-resp}

1559: \end{eqnarray}

1560: with

1561: \begin{eqnarray}

1562:   \Sigma_{\alpha,\beta}(E) = \sum_{i}\int_{C_0}dq\,q^2

1563:  \frac{g_{i,\alpha}(q)g_{i,\beta}(q)}{E-E_{i1}(q)-E_{i2}(q)

1564: +i\varepsilon}.

1565: \label{eq:2c2r-sigma}

1566: \end{eqnarray}

1567: The poles are defined by 

1568: \begin{eqnarray}

1569: \mathrm{Det}\, D(E) &=& [E-M_1-\Sigma_{11}(E)][E-M_2-\Sigma_{22}(E)]

1570: -\Sigma_{12}(E)\Sigma_{21}(E)\nonumber \\

1571: & =&0\,.

1572: \label{eq:2c2r-pole}

1573: \end{eqnarray}

1574: 

1575: 

1576: The numerical procedures of finding the resonance poles on the $uu$-sheet

1577: from Eqs. (\ref{eq:2c2r-sigma}) and (\ref{eq:2c2r-pole}) are 

1578: the same as that in the previous two subsections. Namely the

1579: path $C_0$ of Eq. (\ref{eq:2c2r-sigma}) is set to be the path

1580: $C_1$ shown in Fig.\ref{fig:path}

1581: in evaluating the integrals for $E$ on the $uu$-sheet where the on-shell

1582: momenta are $\mathrm{Im}\, p_i < 0$ for $i=1,2$ channels. To test this, we again

1583: choose the non-relativistic kinematics and the  monopole form

1584: factor like Eq. (\ref{eq:isobar:ff}). The self energy $\Sigma_{\alpha,\beta}(E)$

1585: then takes the analytic form similar to Eq. (\ref{eq:sigma-ana}).

1586:  The condition Eq. (\ref{eq:2c2r-pole}) 

1587: can then be expressed in a analytic form from which

1588: the pole positions on the unphysical sheet can be easily obtained. 

1589: 

1590: We only state that the resulting poles on the unphysical sheets are 

1591: reproduced by the numerical analytic continuation method described above.

1592: Instead our focus here is to further test the SP and TD  methods

1593: for the situation that two resonances are  close and could overlap.

1594: We again consider $\pi N$ and $\eta N$ channels and use 

1595: the following form factor

1596: \begin{equation}

1597:    g_{i\alpha}(p)=\frac{\lambda_{i\alpha}}{1+p^2/\beta_{i\alpha}^2},

1598: \end{equation}

1599: where $\alpha = 1,2$ denote the $\alpha$-th bare state with mass $M_\alpha$.

1600: The four cut-off parameter $\beta_{i\alpha}$ and four coupling

1601: constants $\lambda_{i\alpha}$ are taken to be:

1602: $\beta_{11}=\beta_{12}=\beta_{21}=\beta_{22}=800$ MeV,

1603:  $\lambda_{11}=0.005$, $\lambda_{12}=0.01$, $\lambda_{21}=0.003$ and 

1604: $\lambda_{22}=0.008$.

1605: One of the bare masses $M_1$ is fixed in the calculations.

1606: $M_2$ is defined by

1607: \begin{eqnarray}

1608: M_2 = M_{\pi}+M_N+\tilde{M}_2,

1609: \end{eqnarray}

1610: where $\tilde{M}_2$ is varied for examining how the poles move as $M_2$

1611: moves away from the $M_1=M_{\pi}+M_{N}+550 = 1628$ MeV.

1612: 

1613: The pole positions are searched numerically by

1614: using the analytic continuation method described above.

1615: There are two poles on the $uu$-sheet and the other two  on the $up$-sheet.

1616: As $\tilde{M}_2$ varies, these two poles will develop

1617: two trajectories. They are 

1618: the crosses connected by the solid curves shown in

1619: Fig.\ref{pole3rd-sp} for $uu$-sheet and Fig.\ref{pole2nd-td} for the 

1620: $up$-sheet. According to the findings we made in section III, 

1621: the poles, $(M_R,-i \Gamma_R/2)$, found by the SP (TD)  method

1622:  should be compared with 

1623: the poles on $uu$ ($up$) sheet of

1624: Fig. \ref{pole3rd-sp} (\ref{pole2nd-td}). We now discuss these two comparisons.

1625: 

1626: We see from Fig. \ref{pole3rd-sp} that 

1627: in the regions near $\tilde{M}_2 = 700$ MeV, the positions 

1628: ($\mathrm{Re}\, E$) of

1629: these two poles are far from each other

1630: and we find that SP (open squares connected by dashed lines near

1631: the point marked 700) works well.

1632: When $\tilde{M}_2$ is reduced to $600$ MeV where the positions

1633: ($\mathrm{Re}\, E$)

1634: of two  poles

1635: move closer, the  SP  method can find only one pole

1636: ( open squares connected by dashed line) near the

1637: top end of the trajectory on the right hand side.

1638: Apart from the points on the dashed lines, SP method fails to find  poles

1639: close to the poles 

1640: on the solid curves which are obtained numerically

1641: by the analytic continuation method.

1642:  

1643: 

1644: The results for examining TD is shown in Fig.\ref{pole2nd-td}.

1645: We see that  TD can find two poles

1646:  on the $up$-sheet in the

1647: considered range of $\tilde{M}_2 = 600 - 700$. The results

1648: are the open squares connected by dashed lines which are indistinguishable

1649: from the crosses connected by  solid curves which were obtained by analytic continuation method.

1650: But TD  obtains another two poles at $\tilde{M}_2 = 600$ and 

1651: $\tilde{M}_2 = 625$, as indicated by the dashed line in the middle of

1652: Fig.\ref{pole2nd-td}. 

1653:  The positions of these two poles are very close to those

1654: obtained from SP and they are interpreted as poles on $uu$-sheet.

1655: As we have discussed in section II, TD is sensitive to both zero and

1656: pole of the S-matrix on $pp$ and $uu$-sheets. 

1657: In this example, width of the poles on

1658: $uu$-sheet become comparable to the poles on $up$-sheet(zero on physical

1659: sheet) and hence TD could find pole on $uu$-sheet.

1660: The results shown in Fig. \ref{pole3rd-sp} and Fig. \ref{pole2nd-td}

1661: further indicate the limitation of SP and TD methods.

1662: 

1663: 

1664: 

1665: The results from the above several models have shown 

1666: that the TD method based on Eq. (\ref{eq:td-kel-1}),

1667: where the phase of the elastic channel is used instead of  the

1668: eigen phases discussed in

1669:  Refs. \cite{hazi,iga04,haber},

1670: gives both the resonance poles on the $uu$-sheet and the zeros(shadow poles).

1671: Our findings could provide some information for investigating the

1672: differences between Refs.\cite{haber} and\cite{kel2008}.

1673: We also want to mention here that an improved SP method

1674: using higher order derivatives of the amplitudes was proposed in

1675:  Ref. \cite{ceci2008}.  

1676: It may be interesting to compare this method with the TD method.

1677: While it could be interesting to address the questions concerning 

1678: these recent developments,  they are far from the main focus of this

1679: paper and will not be discussed further.  

1680: 

1681: \begin{figure}

1682: \begin{center}

1683: \includegraphics{fig8.eps}

1684: \caption{

1685: Pole positions (crosses connected by solid lines)

1686: on the $uu$-sheet of the two-channels, two-resonances model.

1687: The results from using the SP method are the open squares connected by

1688: the dashed lines. The numbers on the figure are the value of $\tilde{M}_2$.

1689: }

1690: \label{pole3rd-sp}

1691: \end{center}

1692: \end{figure}

1693: 

1694: \begin{figure}

1695: \begin{center}

1696: \includegraphics{fig9.eps}

1697: \caption{

1698: Pole positions (crosses connected by solid lines)

1699: on the $up$-sheet of the two-channels, two-resonances model. 

1700: The results from using the TD method are the open squares connected by 

1701: the dashed lines. The numbers on the figure are the value of $\tilde{M}_2$.

1702: }

1703: 

1704: \label{pole2nd-td}

1705: \end{center}

1706: \end{figure}

1707: 

1708: \section{Analytic continuation of resonance model with unstable

1709: particle channels}

1710: 

1711: For meson-baryon reactions, the nucleon resonances can decay into

1712: some unstable particle channels such as the $\pi \Delta$, $\rho N$, $\sigma N$

1713: considered in the model of Ref.\cite{msl}. Here we discuss 

1714: the analytic continuation

1715: method to find resonance poles within such a reaction model. 

1716: 

1717: It is sufficient to consider the one-channel and one resonance case. 

1718: The scattering formula is then identical to that presented in subsection IV.A.

1719: The only difference is that  one of the particles in the open

1720: channel can further

1721: decay into a two particle state. To be specific, let us consider

1722: the $\pi \Delta$ channel. Within the same Hamiltonian formulation\cite{msl} 

1723: used in the previous section,  the scattering amplitude can then be written as

1724: \begin{eqnarray}

1725: t(p',p,E)=

1726: \frac{g_{N^*,\pi\Delta}(p')g_{N^*,\pi\Delta}(p)}{E-M_0 -\Sigma_{\pi \Delta}(E)}

1727: \label{eq:unst-t}

1728: \end{eqnarray}

1729: with 

1730: \begin{eqnarray}

1731: \Sigma_{\pi \Delta}(E) =\int_{C_2}p^2\, dp\frac{g^2_{N^*,\pi\Delta}(p)}

1732: {E-E_\pi(p)-E_\Delta(p)-\Sigma_\Delta(p,E)}

1733: \label{eq:unst-sigma-pid}

1734: \end{eqnarray}

1735: where

1736: \begin{eqnarray}

1737: \Sigma_\Delta(p,E) = \int_{C_3} q^2 dq \frac{g^2_{\Delta,\pi N}(q)}

1738: {E-E_\pi(p)- [(E_\pi(q)+E_N(q))^2+p^2]^{1/2}}\, .

1739: \label{eq:unst-sigma-d}

1740: \end{eqnarray}

1741: 

1742: To obtain the $\pi\Delta$ self energy for complex $E$,

1743: the analytic structure of the integrand of Eq. (\ref{eq:unst-sigma-pid})

1744: should be examined first.

1745: The discontinuity of the $\pi\Delta$ propagator in the integrand of 

1746: Eq. (\ref{eq:unst-sigma-pid}) is the $\pi\pi N$ cut 

1747: along the real axis between $\pm p_0$ ($-p_0 \le p \le p_0$)

1748: which is obtained by solving

1749: \begin{eqnarray}

1750: E=E_\pi(p_0)+[(m_\pi+m_N)^2+p^2_0]^{1/2}.

1751: \end{eqnarray}

1752: For finding the resonance poles on $uu$-sheet  with $\mathrm{Im}\, p_0 \le 0$, 

1753: the integration contour $C_2$ of Eq. (\ref{eq:unst-sigma-pid})

1754:  must be chosen below this cut which is the dashed line in 

1755: Fig.\ref{fig:c2}.

1756: There is also a singularity in the integrand of Eq. (\ref{eq:unst-sigma-pid}) 

1757: at momentum $p=p_x$, which satisfies

1758: \begin{eqnarray}

1759: E-E_\pi(p_x)-E_\Delta(p_x)-\Sigma_\Delta(p_x,E)=0.

1760: \label{eq:px}

1761: \end{eqnarray}

1762: Physically, this singularity corresponds to the $\pi\Delta$ two-body 

1763: scattering state.

1764: For $E$ with large imaginary part,

1765: $p_x$ can be below the $\pi\pi N$ cut as also indicated in

1766: Fig.\ref{fig:c2}. 

1767: Therefore the integration contour of momentum $p$

1768: must be chosen to be below the $\pi\pi N$ cut (dashed line)

1769:  and the singularity $p_x$, such

1770: as the contour $C_2$ shown in  Fig.\ref{fig:c2}.

1771: 

1772: The singularity position $q_0$ 

1773: of the propagator in Eq. (\ref{eq:unst-sigma-d}) depends on 

1774: spectator momentum $p$

1775: \begin{eqnarray}

1776: E-E_\pi(p) = [(E_\pi(q_0)+E_N(q_0))^2+p^2]^{1/2} \,.

1777: \end{eqnarray}

1778: Therefore the singularity $q_0$

1779:  moves along the dashed curve  in Fig.\ref{fig:c3}

1780: when the momentum $p$ varies along the path $C_2$ of Fig.\ref{fig:c2}.

1781: To analytically continue $\Sigma_\Delta(p,E)$ from positive energy $E$ to

1782: the un-physical plane with $\mathrm{Im}\, p\le 0$, we need to choose the contour $C_3$

1783: of Eq. (\ref{eq:unst-sigma-d}) which must be

1784:  below $q_0$. A possible contour $C_3$ is the solid curve in Fig.\ref{fig:c3}.

1785: 

1786: 

1787: 

1788: 

1789: \begin{figure}

1790: \begin{center}

1791: \includegraphics{fig10.eps}

1792: \caption{ Contour $C_2$ for calculating the $\pi\Delta$ self energy

1793: on unphysical sheet. See the text for the explanations of the dashed line and

1794: the singularity $p_x$.}

1795: \label{fig:c2}

1796: \end{center}

1797: \end{figure}

1798: 

1799: 

1800: \begin{figure}

1801: \begin{center}

1802: \includegraphics{fig11.eps}

1803: \caption{ Contour $C_3$ for calculating the $\pi N$ self energy

1804: on the unphysical sheet. Dashed curve is the singularity $q_0$ of

1805: the propagator in Eq. (\ref{eq:unst-sigma-d}), which depends on

1806: the spectator momentum $p$ on the contour $C_2$ of Fig.\ref{fig:c2}. }

1807: \label{fig:c3}

1808: \end{center}

1809: \end{figure}

1810: 

1811: To verify the numerical procedures described above, we again consider

1812:  non-relativistic  kinematics and monopole form factor.

1813: With the similar analytic form Eq. (\ref{eq:sigma-ana}), we have

1814: \begin{eqnarray}

1815: \Sigma_\Delta(p,E)=

1816: \frac{\pi \mu_{\pi N}g^2_{\Delta,\pi N}\beta^3_{\Delta,\pi N}}

1817: {2(\bar{k}+i\beta_{\Delta,\pi N})^2}

1818: \label{eq:unst-sigma-da}

1819: \end{eqnarray}

1820: where

1821: \begin{eqnarray}

1822: \bar{k}=\left[2\mu_{\pi N} \left(E-2m_\pi - m_N - \frac{p^2}{2\mu_{\pi\pi N}}\right)\right]^{1/2},

1823: \end{eqnarray}

1824: with $\mu_{\pi\pi N}=m_\pi(m_\pi+m_N)/(2 m_\pi + m_N)$.

1825: With Eq. (\ref{eq:unst-sigma-da}), we can solve Eq. (\ref{eq:px}) and verify

1826: its relation with $\pi\pi N$ cut as discussed above and illustrated in

1827: Fig.\ref{fig:c2}. Eq. (\ref{eq:unst-sigma-da}) and the chosen monopole 

1828: form factor also allow us to get

1829: \begin{eqnarray}

1830: \Sigma_{\pi\Delta} =

1831: \int_{c_2} p^2 dp\frac{g^2_{N^*,\pi \Delta}}{(1+p^2/\beta^2_{N^*,\pi \Delta})^2}

1832: \frac{1}{D_{\pi \Delta}(p,E)}

1833: \label{eq:unst-sigma-pida}

1834: \end{eqnarray}

1835: with

1836: \begin{eqnarray}

1837: D_{\pi \Delta}(p,E) = E-m_\pi - m_\Delta - \frac{p^2}{2\mu_{\pi \Delta}}

1838: -\frac{\pi \mu_{\pi N}g^2_{\Delta,\pi N}\beta^3_{\Delta,\pi N}}

1839: {2(\bar{k}+i\beta_{\Delta,\pi N})^2}.

1840: \label{eq:d-pid}

1841: \end{eqnarray}

1842: Unfortunately, Eq. (\ref{eq:unst-sigma-pida}) can not be integrated out

1843:  analytically

1844: for directly checking our numerical procedure for searching resonance poles.

1845: 

1846: We test our analytic continuation method  by the following procedure.

1847: We calculate Eq. (\ref{eq:unst-sigma-pida}) numerically to find the

1848: pole position $E_{R}$ by solving

1849: $E_R-M_0-\Sigma_{\pi \Delta}(E_R)=0$ of the denominator of

1850: Eq. (\ref{eq:unst-t}).

1851: With the parameters:

1852: \begin{eqnarray}

1853: \beta_{N^*,\pi \Delta}  = & 800MeV\,\,,  \ g_{N^*,\pi\Delta}=& 0.02MeV^{-1/2}, 

1854: \nonumber \\

1855: \beta_{\Delta,\pi N}    = & 200MeV\,\,,  \ g_{\Delta,\pi N} =& 0.05 MeV^{-1/2},

1856: \nonumber \\

1857:   M_0= & 650MeV+m_\pi + m_N & \nonumber,

1858: \end{eqnarray}

1859: we find $E_{R}=( 1679.1, - 33.6i) $ MeV. 

1860: We then construct an approximate propagator

1861: \begin{eqnarray}

1862: G^{approx}_{N^*}(E)=\frac{1}{E-E_{R}}\,.

1863: \label{eq:g-appr}

1864: \end{eqnarray}

1865: For the positive E, we find that

1866: $G^{approx}_{N^*}(E)$ is in good agreement with the direct calculation of

1867: $G_{N^*}(E)=1/(E-M_0-\Sigma_{\pi \Delta}(E))$ by 

1868: using Eq. (\ref{eq:unst-sigma-pida}).

1869: The results are shown in Fig.\ref{fig:g-pid}.

1870: It is clear that the resonance pole found by

1871: our  analytic continuation method

1872: can reproduce what is expected for a resonance propagator for real positive E.

1873: In this way our numerical procedure is justified and can be applied

1874: to solve Eqs. (\ref{eq:unst-t}) - (\ref{eq:unst-sigma-d}).

1875: 

1876: \begin{figure}

1877: \begin{center}

1878: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{fig12.eps}

1879: \caption{$N^*$ Green function.

1880:  The solid (dash-dotted) curve is the real (imaginary) part 

1881: of exact Green function $G_{N^*}(E)=1/(E-M_0-\Sigma_{\pi\Delta}(E))$.

1882: They are compared with the dashed (dotted) curve

1883: of the real (imaginary) part of the approximate Green function

1884: $G_{N^*}^{approx}$. }

1885: \label{fig:g-pid}

1886: \end{center}

1887: \end{figure}

1888: 

1889: 

1890: \section{Resonance model with non-resonant interactions}

1891: 

1892: With the numerical methods described above, we can proceed to extract

1893: the resonance poles within a coupled-channels 

1894: model which also include non-resonant interactions.

1895: In this section, we explain 

1896: how this can be done for 

1897: the  $\pi N$ model developed in Refs.\cite{msl,jlms}.

1898: 

1899: Recalling the formulations presented in Refs.\cite{msl,jlms}, the

1900: t-matrix considered is of the following form

1901: \begin{equation}

1902:   t_{ij}(p',p;W) = 

1903: \bar{t}_{ij}(p',p;W) + \sum_{\alpha,\beta}

1904: \bar{\Gamma}_{i,\alpha}(p';W)[D^{-1}(W)]_{\alpha,\beta}

1905: \bar{\Gamma}_{j,\beta}(p;W).

1906: \label{eq:msl-t}

1907: \end{equation}

1908: where $i,j$ can be stable channels $ \pi N$ and $ \eta N$, or 

1909: unstable channels $ \pi \Delta, \rho N$, and $\sigma N$, and $\alpha$

1910: denotes a bare resonant state with a mass $M_\alpha$.

1911:  

1912: For extracting resonance poles, we now apply the methods presented 

1913: in previous sections to choose appropriate contours for calculating

1914: various integrations on unphysical E-plane with $\mathrm{Im}\, p\le 0$.

1915: The non-resonant t-matrix $\bar{t}_{ij}(p',p;E)$ is defined by the 

1916: following couple-channel equations with the non-resonant

1917: potential $v_{ij}(p',p)$,

1918: \begin{equation}

1919:   \bar{t}_{ij}(p',p;E) = v_{ij}(p',p)

1920:   +\sum_{k}\int_{C_4}dq\,q^2 

1921:   \frac{v_{ik}(p',q)\bar{t}_{kj}(q,p;E)}{E-E_k(q)-\Sigma_k(q,E)+i\varepsilon},

1922: \label{eq:msl-nont}

1923: \end{equation}

1924: where the contour is $C_4=C_1$ ((b) of Fig.\ref{fig:path})

1925: for $k = \pi N, \eta N$, and $C_4=C_2$ (Fig.\ref{fig:c2}) for

1926: $k = \pi \Delta, \rho N, \sigma N$, and

1927: \begin{equation}

1928:   E_k(p) = \sqrt{m_{k1}^2+p^2}+\sqrt{m_{k2}^2+p^2}.

1929: \end{equation}

1930: The self-energies in Eq. (\ref{eq:msl-nont})  are $

1931: \Sigma_{\pi N} (q,E)= \Sigma_{\eta N}(q,E)=0$ and $\Sigma_{\pi \Delta} (q,E)$,

1932: $ \Sigma_{\rho N}(p,E)$, and $\Sigma_{\sigma N}(q,E)$ are defined by the

1933: same Eq. (\ref{eq:unst-sigma-pid}) with appropriate changes of mass parameters

1934: and the choice of contour $C_2$ and $C_3$  shown in Figs. \ref{fig:c2}

1935: and \ref{fig:c3}.

1936: 

1937: The dressed vertex  $\bar{\Gamma}_{i}(p;W)$ is 

1938: determined by the bare vertex $\Gamma_{i}(p)$ and the meson-baryon loop,

1939: \begin{equation}

1940:   \bar{\Gamma}_{i,\alpha}(p;E) = \Gamma_{i,\alpha}(p)

1941:   +\sum_{k}\int_{C4} dq q^2 

1942:   \frac{\bar{t}_{ik}(p,q;E)\Gamma_{k}(q;E)}

1943: {E-E_k(q)-\Sigma_{k}(p,E)+i\varepsilon}.

1944: \label{eq:dress-v}

1945: \end{equation}

1946: The resonance propagator  $D(E)$ in Eq. (\ref{eq:msl-t}) is

1947: \begin{equation}

1948:  [ D(E)]_{\alpha,\beta} = [E-M_\alpha]\delta_{\alpha,\beta}

1949: -\Sigma_{\alpha,\beta}(E),

1950: \label{eq:msl-resp}

1951: \end{equation}

1952: with

1953: \begin{equation}

1954:   \Sigma_{\alpha,\beta}(E) = \sum_{k}\int_{C_4}dq\,q^2 

1955:   \frac{\Gamma_{k,\alpha}(q)\bar{\Gamma}_{k,\beta}(q;E)}{E-E_k(q)-\Sigma_k(q,E)

1956: +i\varepsilon}.

1957: \end{equation}

1958: In Ref.\cite{jlms}, the above equations are solved on the real-axis by

1959: using the standard method of subtraction. Here we solve the equations by

1960: choosing contours indicated above. We first verify that our numerical results

1961: obtained here for positive real E agree with that of Ref.\cite{jlms}.

1962: This establish our numerical procedure in this complex

1963: five-channel model.

1964: 

1965: Here we show the results for some of the 

1966: $S$, $P$, $D$, and $F$ partial waves of 

1967: $\pi N$ scattering within the model of Ref.\cite{jlms}.

1968: We search the resonance poles by looking for zeros of 

1969: the resonant propagator $D(E)$ defined by Eq. (\ref{eq:msl-resp}).

1970: Our results from using the analytic continuation method

1971: are shown in the second column of Table \ref{tab:ress11s31}. They are 

1972: compared with those extracted by using SP and TD methods described in

1973: the previous sections 

1974:  as well as the values listed by PDG. 

1975: The Breit-Wigner resonance parameters are also given by PDG, but

1976: are not considered here.

1977: We see in Table \ref{tab:ress11s31} that the SP method fails to

1978: find the first resonance pole in the $S_{11}$ partial wave.

1979: We also see that  while the

1980: real parts of the resonance poles from different approaches are within the

1981: ranges of PDG, the extracted imaginary parts can differ by as much as a 

1982: factor of two or three. 

1983: 

1984: The model of Ref.\cite{jlms} is currently

1985: being improved by also fitting other data of $\pi N$ and $\gamma N$ reactions.

1986: For example, some progress has been made to also fit

1987: the data of

1988: $\pi N \rightarrow \pi\pi N$\cite{kjlms08}, 

1989: $\gamma N \rightarrow \pi N$\cite{jlmss08}, and

1990: $\pi N \rightarrow \eta N$\cite{djlss08}.

1991: We thus do not include the results for other partial waves

1992: in Table \ref{tab:ress11s31}. Our purpose here is to simply demonstrate

1993: how the analytic continuation method

1994: works for a realistic model.

1995: The full resonance parameters, 

1996: including the extracted residues and the

1997: relations to the Breit-Wigner parameters listed by PDG, 

1998: extracted from our complete analysis of all 

1999: $\pi N \gamma, N \rightarrow \pi N, \eta N, \pi\pi N$ will be reported 

2000: elasewhere. 

2001: 

2002: 

2003: 

2004: 

2005: \begin{table}

2006: \caption{Resonance poles extracted from the $\pi N$

2007: scattering amplitudes of Ref.\cite{jlms}}

2008: \begin{tabular}{c|cc|cc|cc|cc} \hline\hline

2009:  & Analytic Continuation & & Speed PLot & & Time Delay & & PDG & \\ \hline

2010:  & Re & Im & Re & Im & Re & Im & Re & Im \\ \hline

2011: S11 & 1540 & -191 & - & -  & 1543 & -52 & 1490 $\sim$ 1530

2012:   & -45 $\sim$ -125 \\

2013:   & 1642 & -41 & 1644 & -89 &   1645 & -61 & 1640 $\sim$ 1670

2014:   & -75 $\sim$  -90 \\ \hline

2015: S31 & 1563 & -95 & 1574 & -67 & 1616 & -53 & 1590 $\sim $ 1610

2016:     & -57 $\sim $-60 \\ \hline

2017: P33 & 1211 & -50 & 1212 & -49 & 1212 & -49 & 1209 $\sim $ 1211

2018:     & -49 $\sim $-51 \\ \hline

2019: D13 & 1521 & -58 & 1525 & -57 & 1522 & -11 & 1505 $\sim $ 1515

2020:     & -52 $\sim $-60 \\ \hline

2021: F15 & 1674 & -53 & 1671 & -59 & 1683 & -24 & 1665 $\sim $ 1680

2022:     & -55 $\sim $-68 \\ \hline

2023: \end{tabular}

2024: \label{tab:ress11s31}

2025: \end{table}

2026: 

2027: 

2028: We now turn to discussing whether the extracted resonance pole $M$

2029: can be used to evaluate the $N^*$ propagator defined by Eq. (\ref{eq:msl-resp}) for the physical positive E.  

2030: Let us consider the $S_{31}$ case listed in Table \ref{tab:ress11s31}.

2031: Its $N^*$ propagator $G_{N^*}(E)$ can be written as

2032: \begin{eqnarray}

2033:  G_{N^*}(E)&=&\frac{1}{E-M_0-\Sigma(E)}, 

2034: \label{eq:nstar-g-exact}\\

2035: \Sigma(E)&=&

2036: \Sigma_{\pi N}(E)+\Sigma_{\pi\Delta}(E)+\Sigma_{\rho N}(E).

2037: \end{eqnarray}

2038: By using the analytic continuation methods described in the previous

2039: sections, the  resonance energy $M = (1563 - i 95) $ MeV

2040: is found numerically by solving

2041: \begin{eqnarray}

2042:  M-M_0-\Sigma(M)=0.

2043: \end{eqnarray}

2044: 

2045: We now perform the Laurent expansion of $G_{N^*}(E)$ for real $E$

2046: around the pole position $M$ 

2047: \begin{eqnarray}

2048:  G_{N^*}(E)&=&[

2049: (1-\Sigma'(M))(E-M)-\frac{1}{2}\Sigma''(M)(E-M)^2+\cdots]^{-1} \nonumber \\

2050: &=&\frac{1}{E-M}\left [ \frac{1}{1-\Sigma'(M)

2051: -\frac{1}{2}\Sigma''(M)(E-M) + \cdots} \right ] \nonumber \\

2052: &=&\frac{1}{E-M}\left[ \frac{1}{1-\Sigma'(M)}

2053: +\frac{\Sigma''(M)(E-M)}{2(1-\Sigma'(E))^2} + \cdots \right] \nonumber \\

2054: &=&\frac{1}{E-M}\cdot\frac{1}{1-\Sigma'(M)}

2055: +\frac{\Sigma''(M)}{2(1-\Sigma'(M))^2} + \cdots.

2056: \label{eq:nstar-g}

2057: \end{eqnarray}

2058: The naive $1/(E - M)$ works well for a model studied in the previous section.

2059: However when the enery dependence of the self energy $\Sigma$ 

2060: becomes large, two important modifications should be considered:

2061: (1) at the pole, the residue is not one

2062: but modified by the field renormalization factor $Z=1/(1-\Sigma'(M))$.

2063: (2)The second term of the last expression gives a constant term.

2064: 

2065: With the above expansion Eq. (\ref{eq:nstar-g}),

2066:  we can introduce three different approximate forms for the $N^*$ propagator

2067: \begin{eqnarray}

2068: G_{N^*}^{(0)}(E)&=&\frac{1}{E-M},

2069: \label{eq:natsr-g0} \\

2070: G_{N^*}^{(1)}(E)&=&\frac{1}{E-M}\cdot\frac{1}{1-\Sigma'(M)},

2071: \label{eq:nstar-g1}\\

2072: G_{N^*}^{(2)}(E)&=&\frac{1}{E-M}\cdot\frac{1}{1-\Sigma'(M)}

2073: +\frac{\Sigma''(M)}{2(1-\Sigma'(M))^2}.

2074: \label{eq:nstar-g2}

2075: \end{eqnarray}

2076: In Fig.\ref{fig:nstar-g}, we compare the above three 

2077: approximate propagators

2078: with the exact result of $G_{N^*}(E)$ of Eq.  (\ref{eq:nstar-g-exact}).

2079: The simple $G_{N^*}^{(0)}(E)$ (dashed curves) of Eq. (\ref{eq:natsr-g0})

2080: are far from the  exact green function $G_{N^*}(E)$ (cross)

2081: defined by Eq. (\ref{eq:nstar-g-exact}). When the factor

2082: $1/(1-\Sigma'(M))$ is included, we obtain the dashed-dotted curves

2083: for $ G_{N^*}^{(1)}(E)$. The solid curves are from 

2084: $G_{N^*}^{(2)}(E)$. We see that

2085: the constant term $\frac{\Sigma''(M)}{2(1-\Sigma'(M))^2}$

2086: of Eq. (\ref{eq:nstar-g2}) mainly 

2087: affects the imaginary part of the propagator.

2088: 

2089: Eq. (\ref{eq:nstar-g}) shows  that the simple pole approximation 

2090: $G_{N^*}^{(0)}(E)=\frac{1}{E-M}$, which can be cast into the

2091: usual Breit-Wigner form $1/(E-M_R + i\Gamma_R/2)$ with

2092: $M_R=\mathrm{Re}\, M$ and

2093: $\Gamma_R = -2\mathrm{Im}\, M$, works poorly. We also find that

2094: the pole parametrization of the resonant propagator

2095: using the poles extracted by  the TD and SP methods also work poorly.

2096: For the considered $S_{31}$ case, the pole positions from using these two

2097: methods are:

2098: $E_{SP}=(1574,-67i)$ and $E_{TD}=(1616,-53i)$, as given in Table \ref{tab:ress11s31}.

2099: In Fig.\ref{fig:nstar-g1}, we compare the exact propagator

2100: (cross)

2101: $G_{N^*}(E)$ of Eq. (\ref{eq:nstar-g-exact})

2102: with the following two 

2103: propagators

2104: \begin{eqnarray}

2105: G_{N^*, SP}(E) & = & \frac{1}{E-E_{SP}}, 

2106: \label{eq:nstar-g-sp}\\

2107: G_{N^*, TD}(E) & = & \frac{1}{E-E_{TD}}.

2108: \label{eq:nstar-g-td}

2109: \end{eqnarray}

2110:  Clearly, phenomenological forms

2111: Eqs. (\ref{eq:nstar-g-sp})-(\ref{eq:nstar-g-td}) can not account for the

2112: complex coupled-channel resonant mechanisms.

2113: 

2114: 

2115: \begin{figure}

2116: \begin{center}

2117: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{fig13a.eps}

2118: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{fig13b.eps}

2119: \caption{ Comparisons of various resonance propagators: 

2120:  exact propagator $G_{N^*}(E)$ (cross),

2121:  $G_{N^*}^{(0)}(E)$ (dashed curve),

2122: $G_{N^*}^{(1)}(E)$ (dash-dotted curve) 

2123:  and $G_{N^*}^{(2)}(E)$ (solid curve). The real (imaginary) parts

2124: are shown in the (a) ((b)) parts of the figure.

2125: }

2126: \label{fig:nstar-g}

2127: \end{center}

2128: \end{figure}

2129: 

2130: 

2131: \begin{figure}

2132: \begin{center}

2133: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{fig14a.eps}

2134: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{fig14b.eps}

2135: \caption{The resonant propagator

2136:  $G_{N^*}(E)$ (cross)

2137: is compared with 

2138:  $G_{N^*, SP}(E)$ (solid curve) using the SP poles and

2139: $G_{N^*, TD}(E)$ (dashed curve) using the TD poles.

2140: The real (imaginary) parts

2141: are shown in the (a) ((b)) parts of the figure.

2142: }

2143: \label{fig:nstar-g1}

2144: \end{center}

2145: \end{figure}

2146: 

2147: 

2148: 

2149: \section{Summary}

2150: 

2151: In this paper, we have presented a pedagogical study of the commonly

2152: used Speed-Plot (SP) and Time-Delay (TD)

2153: methods for extracting the resonance parameters

2154: from the empirically determined partial-wave amplitudes. Using a two-channel

2155: Breit-Wigner form of the S-matrix, we show that

2156: the poles extracted  by using theses two methods are 

2157: on different Riemann sheets.

2158: The SP method can find resonance poles on the unphysical $uu$-sheet, while

2159: the TD method can find poles and zeros of S-matrix on $uu$ or $pp$-sheets

2160: and therefore its validity is sensitive to the poles on $up$ or $pu$-sheets.

2161: Furthermore, we also show numerically that these two

2162: methods can fail to find those poles. Our results support the previous 

2163: findings that

2164: these two methods must be used with cautions in 

2165: searching for  nucleon resonances from the meson-nucleon reaction data

2166: in the region where the coupled-channel effects are important.  

2167: 

2168: We then develop an analytic continuation method for extracting the

2169: resonance poles 

2170: within a  Hamiltonian formulation of

2171: meson-nucleon reactions.  

2172: The main focus is on resolving the complications due to the coupling 

2173:  with the unstable $\pi \Delta$, $\rho N$, and $\sigma N$ channels

2174: which can decay into $\pi\pi N$ states.

2175: Explicit numerical procedures are

2176: presented and verified within several exactly solvable models.

2177: The results from these models are also used to further demonstrate

2178: the limitation of the SP and TD methods.

2179: 

2180: As a first application of the developed analytic continuation method, 

2181: we present

2182: the results from analyzing the $S_{11}$, $S_{31}$, $P_{33}$, $D_{13}$

2183: and $F_{15}$ amplitudes of the dynamical coupled-channels model of $\pi N$

2184: reactions developed

2185: in Ref.\cite{jlms}. We also analyze the resonance

2186: propagators and show that the simple

2187: pole parametrization of the resonant propagator using the poles

2188: extracted from SP and TD methods works poorly.

2189: 

2190: With the progress made in this work, we can proceed to extract 

2191: all nucleon resonance parameters 

2192: within the model of Ref.\cite{jlms}.

2193:  However, this can be done more accurately only when 

2194: the coupling with the unstable $\pi\Delta$, $\rho N$ and

2195: $\sigma N$ channels are better determined by also fitting the

2196: two-pion production data. Our progress in this direction will be 

2197: reported elsewhere. 

2198: 

2199: \begin{acknowledgments}

2200:  This work is supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science,

2201: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research(C) 20540270, and by the 

2202: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Physics Division, under 

2203: contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357, and Contract No. DE-AC05-060R23177 

2204: under which Jefferson Science Associates operates Jefferson Lab.

2205: 

2206: \end{acknowledgments}

2207: 

2208: \clearpage

2209: 

2210: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

2211: 

2212: %

2213: \bibitem{tabakin}

2214: Wen-Tai Chiang and Frank Tabakin, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 55} (1997) 2054.

2215: 

2216: \bibitem{feshbach}

2217: For example, see the text book 

2218: {\bf Theoretical Nuclear Physics : Nuclear Reactions } by

2219:  Herman Feshbach, John Wiley $\&$ Sons, Inc (1992).

2220: 

2221: \bibitem{hoehler92}

2222: G. Hoehler and A. Schulte,

2223: $\pi$N Newsletter {\bf 7} (1992) 94.

2224: 

2225: \bibitem{hoehler93}

2226: G. Hoehler,

2227: $\pi$N Newsletter {\bf 9} (1993) 1.

2228: 

2229: \bibitem{eisenbud}

2230: L. Eisenbud, Dissertation, Princeton, June 1948, unpublished.

2231: 

2232: \bibitem{wigner55}

2233: E. P. Wigner,

2234: Phys. Rev. {\bf 98} (1955) 145.

2235: 

2236: \bibitem{burkertlee}

2237: V. D. Burkert and T.-S. H. Lee, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E {\bf 13} (2004) 1035.

2238: 

2239: \bibitem{pdg}

2240: W.-M. Yao et al. (Particle Data Group), J. Phys. G {\bf 33} (2006) 1, http://pdg.lbl.gov

2241: 

2242: \bibitem{msl}

2243: A. Matsuyama, T. Sato, T.-S. H. Lee, Phys. Rept. {\bf 439} (2007) 193.

2244: 

2245: 

2246: \bibitem{newton1}

2247: R. G. Newton, J. Math. Phys. {\bf 1} (1960) 319.

2248: 

2249: 

2250: \bibitem{newton}

2251: R. G. Newton, J. Math. Phys. {\bf 2} (1961) 188.

2252: 

2253: 

2254: \bibitem{peierls59}

2255: R. E. Peierls,

2256: Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A {\bf 253} (1959) 16.

2257: 

2258: \bibitem{couteur60}

2259: K. J. Le Couteur,

2260: Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A {\bf 256} (1960) 115.

2261: 

2262: 

2263: \bibitem{kato65}

2264: M. Kato,

2265: Ann. Phys. {\bf 31} (1965) 130.

2266: 

2267: \bibitem{gw}

2268: M. L. Goldberger and K.M. Watson, {\bf Collision Theory}, 

2269: Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company, INC. (1975).

2270: 

2271: 

2272: \bibitem{dalitz70}

2273: R. H. Dalitz and R. G. Moorhouse,

2274: Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A {\bf 318} (1970) 279.

2275: 

2276: \bibitem{nussen72}

2277: H. M. Nussenzveig,

2278: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 6} (1972) 1534.

2279: 

2280: \bibitem{smith60}

2281: F. T. Smith,

2282: Phys. Rev. {\bf 118} (1960) 349.

2283: 

2284: \bibitem{kelkar03b}

2285: N. G. Kelkar, M. Nowakowski and K. P. Khemchandani,

2286: Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 724} (2003) 357.

2287: 

2288: \bibitem{kelkar04}

2289: N. G. Kelkar, M. Nowakowski, K. P. Khemchandani and S. R. Jain,

2290: Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 730} (2004) 121.

2291: 

2292: \bibitem{kelkar03a}

2293: N. G. Kelkar,

2294: J. Phys. G {\bf 29} (2003) L1.

2295: 

2296: 

2297: \bibitem{jlms}

2298: B. Julia-Diaz, T.-S. H. Lee, A. Matsuyama and T. Sato,

2299: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 76} (2007) 065201.

2300: 

2301: 

2302: \bibitem{hazi}

2303: A. U. Hazi,

2304: Phys. Rev. A {\bf 19} (1979) 920.

2305: 

2306: \bibitem{iga04}

2307: A. Igarashi and I. Shimamura,

2308: Phys. Rev. A {\bf 70} (2004) 012706.

2309: 

2310: \bibitem{haber}

2311: H. Haberzettl and R. Workman,

2312: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 76} (2007) 058201.

2313: 

2314: \bibitem{fujii}

2315:  Y. Fujii and M. Kato, Phys. Rev. {\bf 188} (1969) 2319.

2316: 

2317: \bibitem{fujii75}

2318: Y. Fujii and M. Fukugita,

2319: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 85} (1975) 179.

2320: 

2321: \bibitem{eden64}

2322: R. J. Eden and J. R. Taylor,

2323: Phys. Rev. {\bf 133} (1964) B1575.

2324: 

2325: 

2326: \bibitem{newton-book}

2327: R. G. Newton,

2328: {\bf Scattering Theory of Waves and Particles}, Springer-Verlag, New York (1982).

2329: 

2330: 

2331: \bibitem{badalyan82}

2332: A. M. Badalyan, L. P. Kok, M. I. Polikarpov and Yu. A. Simonov,

2333: Phys. Rept. {\bf 82} (1982) 31.

2334: 

2335: 

2336: \bibitem{orlov84}

2337: Yu. V. Orlov, V. V. Turovtsev,

2338: Sov. Phys. JETP {\bf 59} (1989) 902.

2339: 

2340: \bibitem{pearce84}

2341: B. C. Pearce and I. R. Afnan,

2342: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 30} (1984) 2022.

2343: 

2344: \bibitem{pearce89}

2345: B. C. Pearce and B. F. Gibson,

2346: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 40} (1989) 902.

2347: 

2348: \bibitem{kel2008}

2349: N. G. Kelkar and M. Nowakowski,

2350: Phys. Rev. A {\bf 78} (2008) 012709.

2351: 

2352: \bibitem{ceci2008}

2353: S. Ceci, J. Stahov, A. Svarc, S. Watson and B. Zauner,

2354: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 77} (2008) 116007.

2355: 

2356: \bibitem{kjlms08}

2357: H. Kamano, B. Julia-Diaz, T.-S. H. Lee, A. Matsuyama, T. Sato,

2358:    submitted to Phys. Rev. C, e-Print: arXiv:0807.2273 [nucl-th]

2359: 

2360: \bibitem{jlmss08}

2361: B. Julia-Diaz, T.-S. H. Lee, A. Matsuyama, T. Sato, and L. C. Smith,

2362: 	Phys. Rev. C {\bf 77} (2008) 045205.

2363: 

2364: \bibitem{djlss08}

2365: J. Durand, B. Julia-Diaz, T.-S. H. Lee, B. Saghai, and T. Sato,

2366: 	Phys. Rev. C {\bf 78} (2008) 025204.

2367: 

2368: \end{thebibliography}

2369: 

2370: 

2371: 

2372: 

2373: \end{document}

2374: 

2375: