1: \documentclass[prc,showpacs]{revtex4}
2: %\documentclass[prc,twocolumn,showpacs]{revtex4}
3: %\documentclass[showpacs,preprintnumbers,twocolumn,amsmath,amssymb,groupedaddress,superscriptaddress]{revtex4}
4: \usepackage{graphicx}
5: \usepackage{dcolumn}
6: \usepackage{bm}
7:
8: \begin{document}
9:
10: \title{Shape transitions in neutron-rich Yb, Hf, W, Os, and Pt isotopes
11: within a Skyrme Hartree-Fock + BCS approach}
12:
13: \author{P. Sarriguren}
14: \affiliation{Instituto de Estructura de la Materia, CSIC, Serrano
15: 123, E-28006 Madrid, Spain}
16:
17: \author{R. Rodr\'{\i}guez-Guzm\'an}
18: \affiliation{CEA-Saclay DSM/IRFU/SPhN, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France}
19:
20: \author{L.M. Robledo}
21:
22: \affiliation{Departamento de F\'{\i}sica Te\'orica C-XI,
23: Universidad Aut\'onoma de Madrid, 28049-Madrid, Spain}
24:
25: %\email{sarriguren@iem.cfmac.csic.es}
26:
27: \date{\today}
28:
29: \begin{abstract}
30: Self-consistent axially symmetric Skyrme Hartree-Fock plus BCS calculations
31: are performed to study the evolution of shapes with the number of nucleons
32: in various chains of Yb, Hf, W, Os, and Pt isotopes from neutron number
33: $N$=110 up to $N$=122. Potential energy curves are analyzed in a search
34: for signatures of oblate-prolate phase shape transitions and results from
35: various Skyrme and pairing forces are considered. Comparisons with results
36: obtained with the Gogny interaction as well as with relativistic mean field
37: calculations are presented. The role of the $\gamma$ degree of freedom
38: is also discussed.
39:
40: \end{abstract}
41:
42: \pacs{21.60.Jz, 27.70.+q, 27.80.+w}
43:
44: \maketitle
45:
46: \section{Introduction}
47: \label{Intro}
48:
49: The study of the equilibrium shapes that characterize the ground states
50: of atomic nuclei, as well as the transitional regions where shape changes
51: occur, have been the subject of a large number of theoretical and experimental
52: works (for a review, see, for example, Ref. \cite{review} and references
53: therein). In particular, the complex interplay between different competing
54: degrees of freedom, taking place in transitional nuclei, offers the possibility
55: to test microscopic descriptions of atomic nuclei under a wide variety of
56: conditions. In this context, mean field approximations based on effective
57: interactions with predictive power all over the nuclear chart, which are a
58: cornerstone to almost all microscopic approximations to the nuclear many-body
59: problem, appear as a first theoretical tool to rely on when looking for
60: fingerprints on nuclear phase shape transitions.
61:
62: Nowadays, systematic mean field studies have become possible due to two main
63: reasons. First, important advances have already been made in the fitting
64: protocols providing effective nucleon-nucleon interactions with predictive
65: power all over the nuclear chart. Popular energy density functionals for
66: calculations along these lines are the nonrelativistic Gogny \cite{gogny}
67: and Skyrme \cite{vautherin,Bender-Review} ones, as well as different
68: parametrizations of the relativistic mean field Lagrangian
69: \cite{Bender-Review,lala-ref}. Second, it has also become possible to recast
70: mean field equations in terms of efficient minimizations like successive
71: iteration methods or the so called gradient method (see, for example, Refs.
72: \cite{Bender-Review} and \cite{gradient-egido}). The last point is very
73: important when constrained calculations are performed since there, in addition
74: to the usual constraints on both neutron and proton numbers, other external
75: fields could also be added. A typical situation is that where both $\beta$ and
76: $\gamma$ degrees of freedom are taken into account. In addition, mean field
77: approximations are based on product trial wave functions, used to minimize
78: a given energy density functional. Such products break several symmetries of
79: the underlying nuclear hamiltonian, allowing the use of an enlarged
80: Hilbert space. Within this space, static correlations associated with collective
81: modes (e.g., deformation) are incorporated at the cost of a moderate effort.
82: These are the main reasons why the mean field framework can be considered as
83: a valuable starting point for microscopic nuclear structure studies.
84:
85: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%Fig1%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
86: \begin{figure*}[b]
87: \centering
88: \includegraphics[width=110mm]{fig1}
89: \caption{(Color online) Experimental ratio of the first $4^+$ and $2^+$ energies
90: for various isotone (left) and isotope (right) chains. Dashed horizontal lines
91: are plotted at 3.33 and 2.5. For details, see the main text.}
92: \label{fige42}
93: \end{figure*}
94: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
95:
96: In this paper we plan to use this approach to get insight into nuclear shape
97: transitions around $^{190}$W. This mass region is particularly interesting
98: because it lies below doubly magic numbers and small islands of oblate
99: deformations might be favored energetically. It is also characterized by
100: the strong competition between oblate and prolate configurations (i.e.,
101: shape coexistence) and special interest has received the case of $^{190}$W
102: \cite{podolyak,caamano,walker2006}. So far, much data have been collected,
103: especially on the energy spacing of the lowest-lying states in even-even
104: systems with mass number $A$=170-200.
105: Spectroscopic studies on these nuclei have become possible by exploiting the
106: decay of K-isomers, which is also a well known feature characterizing this
107: mass region \cite{nature}.
108: This turns into a significant amount of information on the global behavior of
109: these nuclei. For example, the excitation energy of the first $2^+$ state is
110: used to correlate the extent of quadrupole deformation, and the ratio of the
111: first $4^+$ to the first $2^+$ $(E_{4^+}/E_{2^+})$ can be used, in simple
112: models, to distinguish between an axially symmetric deformed rotor
113: $(E_{4^+}/E_{2^+}=3.33)$, a spherical vibrational nucleus
114: $(E_{4^+}/E_{2^+}=2.0)$ and a triaxial rotor
115: $(E_{4^+}/E_{2^+}=2.5)$ \cite{casten2000,jolie}.
116:
117: The experimental situation \cite{firestone,podolyak,caamano} concerning the
118: ratio $E_{4^+}/E_{2^+}$ for even-even isotopes in this region is summarized
119: in Fig. \ref{fige42}. Clear signatures of shape transitions, which are the
120: main objective of this paper, are visible from this figure. In the left panel,
121: we have plotted the ratio $E_{4^+}/E_{2^+}$ as a function of $Z$ for nine
122: isotone chains from $N$=106 up to $N$=122. As can be observed, there is a clear
123: tendency toward the prolate rotational limit ($E_{4^+}/E_{2^+}=3.33$) in the
124: isotone chains below $N$=116 as the number of protons decreases. In the case
125: $N$=116 a change of tendency is also observed between $Z$=76$\,(^{192}$Os)
126: and $Z$=74$\, (^{190}$W) that has been interpreted as a subshell effect \cite{mach}.
127: On the other hand, the heavier $N$=116 isotones $^{192}$Os and $^{194}$Pt, are
128: well known examples of $\gamma$-soft nuclei \cite{wu96} and then, it is natural
129: that the $\gamma$ degree of freedom might also play an important role in $^{190}$W,
130: as it can be deduced from the close value of the $E_{4^+}/E_{2^+}$ ratio to the
131: 2.5 limit. In the right panel of Fig. \ref{fige42}, the ratio $E_{4^+}/E_{2^+}$
132: has been plotted for various isotopes as a function of the neutron number. As
133: can be seen, the lighter Yb, Hf, W, and Os isotopes have a ratio which is very
134: close to the rotational limit. On the other hand, for heavier isotopes the ratio
135: decreases up to values close to 2.5 and the tendency is to continue toward the
136: spherical limit. Finally, the Pt isotopes have ratios that indicate a
137: pronounced $\gamma$-soft character.
138:
139: From the theoretical point of view, a shape transition from prolate to oblate
140: shapes, as the number of neutrons is increased in this mass region, has
141: already been predicted within different models
142: \cite{wu96,naza90,wheldon2000,naik,fossion,stevenson05}. For instance, a
143: pioneer study within the shell correction method with a deformed Woods-Saxon
144: potential and monopole pairing interaction has been used \cite{naza90} to
145: discuss the prolate-oblate shape change in Os isotopes. It has been found
146: that the shape change takes place between $N$=114 and $N$=116, while similar
147: studies \cite{wheldon2000}, based on total routhian surface calculations, also
148: suggested this transition to occur at $N$=118. On the other hand, various
149: collective models were tested in Ref. \cite{wu96} to describe the $E2$
150: properties of the low-lying states in several rare-earth Os and Pt isotopes.
151: The results indicated that the data were consistent with the description
152: of these nuclei as being $\gamma$-soft. Shape predictions from relativistic
153: and nonrelativistic studies with angular momentum projection for Hf, W, and
154: Os isotopes were also compared in Ref. \cite{naik}. While relativistic
155: calculations predicted a majority of prolate shapes, cycling changes in the
156: sign of the quadrupole parameters were observed in the case of nonrelativistic
157: calculations. More recently, the shape transition in both Os and Pt isotopes
158: has been studied \cite{fossion} within the relativistic mean-field (RMF)
159: approximation using the parametrization NL3, perhaps the best parameter set
160: ever fitted for the RMF Lagrangian, together with a finite range Brink-Boeker
161: pairing interaction and also within a nonrelativistic self-consistent axially
162: deformed Hartree-Fock (HF) framework based on a separable monopole interaction
163: \cite{stevenson05,stevenson01}.
164:
165: Nevertheless, and to the best of our knowledge, no systematic study of shape
166: transitions in this mass region has been carried out yet within the framework
167: of Skyrme Hartree-Fock calculations with pairing correlations, which is at
168: present one of the state of the art mean field descriptions (see, for example,
169: \cite{vautherin,Bender-Review,ev8}). Therefore, in this work we study the
170: ground state shape evolution in five isotopic chains, namely, Yb, Hf, W, Os,
171: and Pt from $N$=110 up to $N$=122 in an attempt to get first hints on nuclear
172: shape transitions for these nuclei. In particular, we will first keep axial
173: symmetry as a self-consistent symmetry \cite{rs} and construct
174: potential energy curves (PECs) as functions of the (axially symmetric)
175: mass quadrupole moment for the above mentioned chains of nuclei. These PECs
176: are obtained from the corresponding constrained Skyrme Hartree-Fock + BCS
177: calculations, using the forces Sk3 \cite{sk3}, SLy4 \cite{sly4}, and
178: SLy6 \cite{sly4} in the particle-hole channel and different recipes for
179: pairing correlations. The axially symmetric calculations should be regarded
180: as a first step and will allow us to disentangle the sensitivity of our
181: predictions with respect to the method employed to solve the deformed
182: HF+BCS equations (i.e., discretization in a cartesian mesh or expansion
183: into an axially symmetric harmonic oscillator basis), as well as to the effective
184: Skyrme and pairing interactions. Additionally, we will also take the chance for
185: a comparison with results obtained with the parametrization D1S \cite{d1s} of
186: the Gogny interaction \cite{gogny}. Let us remark that the main intention in
187: this work is to obtain first hints on shape transitions around the nucleus
188: $^{190}$W using effective forces whose predictive power has already been shown
189: when describing ground state nuclear properties all over the nuclear chart.
190: In this context, the set of effective interactions already mentioned is well
191: suited and it is very interesting to compare their predictions. In a second step,
192: the role played by the $\gamma$ degree of freedom will also be discussed. The
193: corresponding triaxial calculations, will be based on the code EV8 \cite{ev8},
194: our main computational tool in the present work. We will take advantage of its
195: three dimensional lattice discretization that allows to treat any quadrupole
196: deformation effect, axial or triaxial, on the same footing
197: \cite{flocard,Bender-Review}. On the other hand, these calculations are much
198: more involved than the axial ones (about a factor 60 much more expensive in
199: computing time) and therefore have been restricted to a relevant sample of
200: nuclei in the present study.
201:
202: The paper can be outlined as follows. In Sec. \ref{T-FRAMEWOK} we present a
203: brief description of the main theoretical formalism (Hartree-Fock + BCS) used
204: to obtain the main ingredients of the present study, i.e., the PECs and
205: potential energy surfaces (PESs) for the considered isotopic chains. For more
206: details, the reader is referred to the corresponding literature.
207: Sec. \ref{Results} contains our results. There, we will first discuss
208: the sensitivity of the PECs (obtained in the framework of axially symmetric
209: calculations) to the effective nucleon-nucleon force and to the treatment of
210: the pairing correlations while in a second step the role of triaxiality
211: (i.e., the $\gamma$ degree of freedom) will be illustrated for nuclei of
212: the Yb, Hf, W, Os, and Pt chains with neutron numbers $N$=114,116, and 118.
213: Finally, Sec. \ref{Conclusions} is devoted to the concluding remarks and
214: work perspectives.
215:
216: \section{Theoretical framework}
217: \label{T-FRAMEWOK}
218:
219: Our microscopic approach is based on a self-consistent formalism built on a
220: deformed Hartree-Fock mean-field, using Skyrme type two-body interactions,
221: plus pairing correlations between like nucleons included in the BCS
222: approximation. As it is well known, the density-dependent HF+BCS approximation
223: provides a very good description of ground-state properties for both spherical
224: and deformed nuclei \cite{flocard} and it is at present one of the possible
225: state of the art mean-field descriptions \cite{Bender-Review}.
226:
227: We have used two methods of solving the deformed HF+BCS equations. The first
228: method, is based on the expansion of the single-particle wave functions into
229: an appropriate orthogonal basis (the eigenfunctions of an axially symmetric
230: harmonic oscillator potential), following the procedure based on the formalism
231: developed in Ref. \cite{vautherin}. The second method, which is our main
232: choice for the calculations performed in this study, uses a coordinate space
233: mesh, solving the HF+BCS equations for Skyrme type functionals via
234: discretization of the individual wave functions on a 3-dimensional cartesian
235: mesh \cite{ev8}. As a matter of fact, it can be shown that this corresponds
236: to an expansion on the basis of Lagrange polynomials associated with the
237: selected 3-dimensional mesh \cite{3D-ref}. One of the main advantages of the
238: 3-dimensional discretization is that any quadrupole deformation effect, axial
239: or triaxial, can be taken into account on the same footing
240: \cite{flocard,Bender-Review}. As a result, this second method represents our
241: main computational tool in the present study and will be used later on, when
242: examining the role played by the $\gamma$ degree of freedom for the considered
243: nuclei.
244:
245: We have mainly considered three different parametrizations of the effective
246: Skyrme-like interactions in the particle-hole channel. As the leading choice,
247: we have performed calculations (both axial and triaxial) with the parametrization
248: SLy4 \cite{sly4}. We also show results in some instances (i.e., at the level of
249: axially symmetric calculations) for the Skyrme forces Sk3 \cite{sk3} and SLy6
250: \cite{sly4}. They are examples of global effective Skyrme interactions that have
251: been designed to fit ground state properties of spherical nuclei and nuclear
252: matter properties. While Sk3 is the most simple one, involving in particular a
253: linear dependence on the density, the Lyon force SLy4 represents a
254: parametrization obtained with a more recent fitting protocol and its
255: predictive power has already been shown to be very reasonable all over the
256: nuclear chart \cite{Bender-Review}. Calculations have also been
257: performed with the Skyrme parameter set SLy6, which includes additionally a
258: two-body center of mass correction in the corresponding energy functional.
259:
260: As a first step, HF+BCS calculations preserving axial symmetry have been
261: performed using the Skyrme forces mentioned above. Our plan is, on the one hand,
262: to use the axially symmetric calculations to study the sensitivity of our
263: results to the effective interactions used in the particle-hole and
264: pairing channels. On the other hand, we will also use them to obtain, in the
265: framework of our Skyrme HF+BCS study, first hints on shape transitions around
266: $^{190}$W. Obviously, pairing correlations have also been taken into account
267: and we have selected a zero-range density-dependent pairing force \cite{terasaki},
268:
269: \begin{equation}
270: V({\bf r_1},{\bf r_2})=-g \left( 1-\hat{P}^{\sigma} \right)
271: \left( 1-\frac{\rho({\bf r_1} )}{\rho_c}\right)
272: \delta ( {\bf r_1}- {\bf r_2} )\, ,
273: \label{dd-pairing}
274: \end{equation}
275: as our leading choice in the particle-particle channel. In Eq. (\ref{dd-pairing})
276: $\hat{P}^{\sigma}$ is the spin exchange operator, $\rho({\bf r})$ is the nuclear
277: density, and $\rho_c=0.16$ fm$^{-3}$. The strength $g$ of the pairing force
278: [Eq. (\ref{dd-pairing})] is taken $g=1000$ MeV fm$^3$ for both neutrons and
279: protons and a smooth cut-off of 5 MeV around the Fermi level has been introduced
280: \cite{terasaki,Rigo}. Let us mention that very recently the parametrization SLy4
281: has been successfully applied in combination with the pairing interaction
282: [Eq. (\ref{dd-pairing})] (with $g=1000$ MeV fm$^3$) in systematic studies of
283: correlation energies from $^{16}$O to the superheavies \cite{other1} and in
284: global studies of spectroscopic properties of the first $2^{+}$ states in
285: even-even nuclei \cite{other2}. Thus, the predictive power of this combination
286: of effective interactions, has been well established along the nuclear chart,
287: and this is the main reason for selecting the combination SLy4 in the
288: particle-hole channel and the interaction of Eq. (\ref{dd-pairing}) (with $g=1000$
289: MeV fm$^3$) in the pairing channel as the leading choice for the present study.
290: Calculations with the parametrization SLy6 in the particle-hole channel
291: and the interaction of Eq. (\ref{dd-pairing}) (with $g=1000$ MeV fm$^3$) have also been
292: performed.
293:
294: In this work we also consider other recipes for pairing correlations. For example,
295: a schematic seniority pairing force with a constant pairing strength $G$
296: parametrized to reproduce the phenomenological pairing gaps will also be used.
297: This treatment is called constant-force approach. One can also further simplify
298: the pairing treatment by parametrizing the pairing gaps $\Delta_{p,n}$ directly
299: from experiment, we call this treatment constant-gap approach. The pairing
300: strength $G$ and the pairing gap are related through the gap equation \cite{rs}
301:
302: \begin{equation}
303: \Delta = G \sum_{k >0} u_{k} v_{k} \, ,
304: \end{equation}
305: where $v_{k}$'s are the occupation amplitudes ($u_k^2=1-v_k^2$).
306:
307: The PECs shown later on in this paper (see Section \ref{Results}) are computed
308: microscopically by constrained HF+BCS calculations \cite{rs,constraint} in which
309: axial symmetry is kept as self-consistent symmetry \cite{rs} during the typical
310: mean field iterative procedure \cite{Bender-Review}.
311:
312: In a second step, calculations exploring the role played by the $\gamma$ degree
313: of freedom have been performed \cite{ev8} for the Yb, Hf, W, Os, and Pt chains
314: with neutron numbers $N$=114,116, and 118. As mentioned before, the triaxial
315: calculations are more involved than the axial ones and we have restricted them to
316: that selected set of nuclei. As in the axially symmetric
317: calculations, the corresponding energy functional is minimized under a quadratic
318: constraint that holds the mass quadrupole moment fixed to a given value (expressed
319: in barns) \cite{ev8,rs} and the non linear HF+BCS equations are solved using the
320: method of successive iterations \cite{Bender-Review,ev8}. In addition to the usual
321: mean field constraints on both neutron and proton numbers, the nuclear shape is
322: determined by constraining simultaneously the pair of values $(q_{1},q_{2})$ related
323: with the parameters $Q$ and $\gamma$ through the equations \cite{ev8}
324:
325: \begin{eqnarray} \label{eq-q1q2}
326: q_{1} &=& Q \left( \cos \gamma - \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} \sin \gamma \right)
327: \nonumber\\
328: q_{2} &=& Q \frac{2}{\sqrt{3}} \sin \gamma
329: \nonumber\\
330: Q &=& \sqrt{q_{1}^{2} + q_{2}^{2} + q_{1}q_{2}}
331: \end{eqnarray}
332:
333: Particular shapes of interest are the prolate ones with
334: $\gamma = 0^{o}$ ($(q_{1}=Q,q_{2}=0)$ ) and the oblate ones with
335: $\gamma = 60^{o}$ ($(q_{1}=0,q_{2}=Q)$ ), while triaxial shapes lie in between
336: them. Using chains of triaxial calculations, we have checked the stability of
337: the minima predicted in the framework of the axially symmetric calculations
338: (first step in the present study) with respect to the $\gamma$ degree of freedom.
339: These calculations will also be discussed in Sec. \ref{Results} and have been
340: performed with the parametrization SLy4 plus the pairing interaction of Eq.
341: (\ref{dd-pairing}) (with $g=1000$ MeV fm$^3$).
342:
343: \section{Discussion of results}
344: \label{Results}
345:
346: In this section we present a discussion of the results obtained in our study.
347: First, we will discuss those obtained with the restriction to axially symmetric
348: shapes and later on, in a second step, the role played by the $\gamma$ degree
349: of freedom will also be illustrated.
350:
351: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%Fig2%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
352: \begin{figure}
353: \centering
354: \includegraphics[width=180mm]{fig2}
355: \caption{(Color online) Potential energy curves for several isotope chains
356: obtained from HF+BCS calculations with various Skyrme and pairing forces.
357: For details, see the main text in Section \ref{Results}. }
358: \label{figeq}
359: \end{figure}
360: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
361: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%Fig3%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
362: \begin{figure}
363: \centering
364: \includegraphics[width=170mm]{fig3}
365: \caption{(Color online) PECs for $N$=116 isotones obtained from mean field
366: calculations with various forces. For details, see the main text in
367: Section \ref{Results}.}
368: \label{fign116}
369: \end{figure}
370: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
371:
372: As it is well known, PECs are sensitive to the effective nuclear force in both
373: relativistic \cite{meng} and nonrelativistic \cite{tajima,sarri} approaches,
374: as well as to pairing correlations \cite{tajima,sarri,rrguzman}. Thus, we begin
375: our discussion on the PECs by considering sample results in order to study the
376: sensitivity of our predictions to effective interactions in both the particle-hole
377: and the pairing channels. In Fig. \ref{figeq} we consider the PECs obtained in the
378: framework of the axially symmetric calculations described in Sec. \ref{T-FRAMEWOK}
379: with the Skyrme forces Sk3, SLy4, and SLy6 and various pairing treatments. Taking
380: as a reference the results obtained from the most sophisticated method based on
381: the coordinate space mesh calculation \cite{ev8} with the forces SLy4 and SLy6 plus
382: a zero-range density dependent pairing force with strength $g=1000$ MeV fm$^{3}$,
383: labeled SLy4-ev8 (solid lines) and SLy6-ev8 (dotted lines) in the figure, one
384: can see that the results do not differ much when changing the pairing treatment
385: to a constant-force approach (dashed lines) or when changing the Skyrme interaction
386: into Sk3 (dash-dotted lines). It can also be seen, that the
387: locations of the oblate and prolate minima appear at the same deformations, no
388: matter what the force is. However, the relative energies can be slightly different
389: and the spherical energy barriers between the prolate and oblate minima of the
390: PECs can change by a few MeV, depending on the force. In general, the energy
391: barriers at zero deformation are lower with the force Sk3 and the delta pairing
392: force makes also the barriers somewhat lower. These results indicate that the
393: topology of the PECs is sensitive to the details of the calculations as has
394: already been pointed out in Ref. \cite{rrguzman}. Additionally, looking at
395: Fig. \ref{figeq}, it is clear that, at least for some of the nuclei considered,
396: there is a very strong competition between different low-lying configurations
397: corresponding to different intrinsic deformations (i.e., shape coexistence) and
398: therefore dynamical correlations not explicitly taken into account at the mean
399: field level (for example, symmetry restoration and/or configuration mixing)
400: could certainly play a role in the description of ground state properties in
401: these nuclei.
402:
403: If one analyzes Fig. \ref{figeq} in the vertical direction along isotope chains,
404: one can see a clear evolution from prolate to oblate shapes for increasing
405: neutron number. This transition takes place at $N$=116 in Yb and Hf isotopes,
406: at $N$=116, and $N$=118 in W and Os isotopes, and it is a very soft transition in Pt
407: isotopes. On the other hand, horizontally along isotone chains and exception
408: made of the Pt isotopes, the isotones with $N$=122,120, and 118 are oblate, while
409: those with $N$=114,112, and 110 are prolate. Isotones with $N$=116 are transitional
410: nuclei with oblate and prolate minima at about the same energy and therefore
411: showing a more pronounced shape coexistence. It is also worth noticing that
412: the energy barriers at zero deformation decrease almost linearly with the number
413: of protons as $Z$ increases in a given isotone chain. The same reduction is
414: observed in isotope chains as $N$ increases.
415:
416: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%Fig4%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
417: \begin{figure}
418: \centering
419: \includegraphics[width=180mm]{fig4}
420: \caption{PECs for $Z$=74 isotopes obtained from mean field calculations with various
421: forces. For details, see the main text in Section \ref{Results}.}
422: \label{figw}
423: \end{figure}
424: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
425:
426: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%Fig5%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
427: \begin{figure}
428: \centering
429: \includegraphics[width=110mm]{fig5}
430: \caption{Intrinsic quadrupole moments for five isotope chains as a function
431: of the neutron number. Theoretical results obtained from Skyrme-SLy4 (solid lines),
432: relativistic mean-field (dashed lines), and Gogny force (dotted lines) are compared
433: to experimental data from Refs. \protect{\cite{stone}} (full circles) and
434: \protect{\cite{raman}} (open circles). For details, see text. In the case of
435: SLy4, thick lines are used to connect the quadrupole moments of the ground states.}
436: \label{figqn}
437: \end{figure}
438: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
439:
440: The previous results are in qualitative good agreement with the ones obtained
441: in Ref. \cite{fossion} using the parametrization NL3 of the RMF Lagrangian
442: and a pairing force based on the Brink-Boeker part of the Gogny interaction.
443: The energy barriers are found to be lower than SLy4, but the location of
444: the equilibrium deformations does not change much. The agreement of our
445: results with those in Ref. \cite{stevenson05} is also satisfactory concerning
446: the location of the minima, but the energy barriers at zero
447: deformation are clearly lower in that reference. In general, our results
448: are in good agreement with the ones obtained in previous studies. However, the
449: nuclides at which the transitions from one shape to another take place, may
450: change because of the small energy differences between the oblate and prolate
451: minima in the transitional region.
452:
453: Figs. \ref{fign116} and \ref{figw} show a comparison of the PECs obtained from
454: the force SLy4 and a zero-range density dependent pairing force (referred as
455: SLy4-ev8) with those obtained from Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov calculations
456: \cite{egido-1,hilaire} based on the parametrization D1S of the Gogny interaction
457: \cite{d1s}. As it is well known, the advantage of the Gogny interaction over
458: other alternatives, is that its finite range allows a fully self-consistent
459: treatment of pairing correlations with the same interaction that produces, due
460: to its structure, the proper cut off for the pairing matrix elements.
461:
462: The comparison is done in Fig. \ref{fign116} for the isotone chain $N$=116
463: while a similar comparison in done in Fig. \ref{figw} for the isotope chain
464: $Z$=74. In Fig. \ref{fign116} we also show the results obtained with the Skyrme
465: force SLy4 using a simple constant-gap approach in the pairing channel with
466: pairing gaps obtained from the experimental masses of neighboring
467: nuclei \cite{audi}. These figures show again that the
468: location of the minima is rather stable at practically the same deformations.
469: It should also be noted that the energy barriers are somewhat lower with the
470: Gogny interaction and somewhat larger with the constant-gap approach.
471:
472: The quadrupole moments of the charge distributions of these nuclei can be
473: compared with the available experimental information. This is done in
474: Fig. \ref{figqn} for our five isotopic chains as a function of the neutron
475: number. Our theoretical results obtained from SLy4 are shown by thin solid
476: lines, one connecting the prolate minima and the other joining the oblate
477: ones. Thick lines connect the quadrupole moments corresponding to the ground
478: states of the nuclei. We also show by dashed lines the quadrupole moments of
479: the ground states obtained from RMF calculations \cite{lala} (parametrization
480: NL3) and the BCS formalism with constant pairing gaps. Dotted lines correspond
481: to Gogny-D1S calculations \cite{hilaire}.
482: Experimental data (full circles) are taken from the most updated compilation
483: of available data on static nuclear electric quadrupole moments \cite{stone},
484: transforming the laboratory quadrupole moments
485: corresponding to the first $2^+$ excitations into intrinsic ones by using
486: $Q_{\rm intr}=-3.5\; Q_{\rm lab}$. We also show the experimental intrinsic
487: quadrupole moments derived from the experimental values of $B(E2)$ strengths
488: \cite{raman}. In this case the sign cannot be extracted and therefore we show
489: by open circles in Fig. \ref{figqn} both possibilities of signs. Actually, the
490: $B(E2)$ strengths are converted into quadrupole moments \cite{raman} under the
491: assumption of a well defined axial rotor behavior that in our case can be
492: identified with values of the $E_{4^+}/E_{2^+}$ ratio close to 3.33.
493: It is worth noticing that in Ref. \cite{wu96} a complete set of $E2$ matrix
494: elements involving the low-lying excited states in $^{186,188,190,192}$Os
495: and $^{194}$Pt was measured. This includes not only the $B(E2)$ values but also
496: the relative signs between the transitional $E2$ matrix elements and the
497: static quadrupole moments. In particular, it was shown that the $<Q^2>$ centroids
498: are nearly spin-independent, suggesting that the $E2$ properties are correlated
499: and that the collective motion is rotation-like. The general trend of the data
500: in Ref. \cite{wu96} is consistent with the description in terms of $\gamma$-soft
501: type collective models through a prolate to oblate shape transition. It would
502: be very interesting in the future to include dynamical correlations beyond
503: the static mean field picture used in this work and compare the results
504: with those data.
505:
506: As can be observed from Fig. \ref{figqn}, there is a nice agreement between our SLy4
507: results and the experimental ones, including the sign (full circles). At the same
508: time RMF calculations fail to describe the sign of $^{192,194}$Pt isotopes,
509: while calculations with the Gogny interaction fail to describe the quadrupole
510: moment of $^{192}$Os. Nevertheless, one should notice that in the transitional
511: region this discrepancy is not very significant because the energies corresponding
512: to the two deformations are practically the same and small details of the
513: calculation may change the relative energy difference between the oblate and the
514: prolate shapes.
515:
516: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%Table1%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
517: \begin{table}[h]
518: \begin{center}
519: \caption{Ratio $E_{4^+}/E_{2^+}$ and moments of inertia ${\cal I}$ [MeV $^{-1}$]
520: obtained from the first
521: experimental $2^+$ energy (${\cal I}_{\rm exp}$), from a cranking calculation
522: with SLy4 (${\cal I}_{\rm SLy4}$) and Gogny (${\cal I}_{\rm Gogny}$), as well as
523: from macroscopic descriptions of the nucleus as an irrotational flow
524: (${\cal I}_{\rm i.f.}$) and a rigid rotor
525: (${\cal I}_{\rm r.r.}$). Only nuclei with
526: $E_{4^+}/E_{2^+} > 3$ are considered.}
527: \vskip 0.5cm
528: {\begin{tabular}{c|cccccc}
529: \hline
530: \hline & $E_{4^+}/E_{2^+}$ & ${\cal I}_{\rm exp}$ & ${\cal I}_{\rm SLy4}$
531: & ${\cal I}_{\rm Gogny}$ & ${\cal I}_{\rm i.f.}$ & ${\cal I}_{\rm r.r.}$ \\
532: \hline
533: $^{182}$Hf & 3.29 & 30.7 & 31.8 & 31.5 & 5.0 & 87.9 \\
534: $^{184}$Hf & 3.26 & 27.9 & 33.6 & 35.0 & 4.8 & 89.4 \\
535: $^{184}$W & 3.27 & 27.0 & 30.0 & 27.6 & 4.3 & 89.0 \\
536: $^{186}$W & 3.23 & 24.5 & 32.0 & 32.5 & 4.1 & 90.4 \\
537: $^{188}$W & 3.09 & 21.0 & 33.0 & 23.3 & 3.2 & 91.3 \\
538: $^{186}$Os & 3.16 & 21.9 & 29.2 & 26.8 & 3.8 & 90.2 \\
539: $^{188}$Os & 3.08 & 19.4 & 31.6 & 23.5 & 3.6 & 91.6 \\
540: \hline
541: \end{tabular}}
542: \end{center}
543: \label{table1}
544: \end{table}
545: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
546:
547: Finally, we show in Table I the moments of inertia calculated microscopically
548: within the cranking model, as well as the moments of inertia from various
549: macroscopic models, namely, the rigid rotor (${\cal I}_{\rm r.r.}$) and the
550: irrotational flow (${\cal I}_{\rm i.f.}$) models. The expressions used to
551: calculate the moments of inertia can be found in Refs. \cite{rs,momin}:
552:
553: \begin{eqnarray}
554: {\cal I}_{\rm cranking} & = & 2 \sum _{k,k'>0} \frac{\left| \langle k
555: \left| J_x \right| k' \rangle \right| ^2 }{E_k+E_{k'}} \left( u_k v_{k'}
556: -u_{k'} v_k \right) ^2 \, ,\\
557: {\cal I}_{\rm r.r.} & = & \frac{2}{5}mAR_0^2\left( 1 + \sqrt{\frac{5}{16\pi}}
558: \beta \right) \, ,\\
559: {\cal I}_{\rm i.f.} & = & \frac{3}{5}\rho_0 R_0^5 \beta ^2 \, .
560: \end{eqnarray}
561: In these expressions $\beta$ is the quadrupole deformation defined in terms
562: of the mass quadrupole moment $Q$ and the mean-square radius of the mass
563: distribution $\langle r^2 \rangle$,
564:
565: \begin{equation}
566: \beta = \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{5}}\frac{Q}{A\langle r^2 \rangle }.
567: \end{equation}
568: We compare our results with the experimental moments of inertia extracted from
569: the first $2^+$ excitations under the assumption that they correspond to
570: rotors with $E_{2^+}=3/{\cal I}$ \cite{rs}. Thus, we quote only those nuclei
571: with ratios $E_{4^+}/E_{2^+}$ close to the value 3.33. As expected, the rigid
572: rotor and irrotational flow models predict, respectively, upper and
573: lower limits to the phenomenological moment of inertia. The cranking moments
574: of inertia, calculated either with SLy4 or Gogny forces, are much closer to
575: experiment.
576:
577: Let us turn now, to the second step of our discussion, i.e., the role played
578: by the $\gamma$ degree of freedom in the considered nuclei. That triaxiality
579: could certainly play a role for nuclei in this region of the nuclear chart,
580: becomes already clear if one keeps in mind that the heavier $N$=116 isotones
581: $^{192}$Os and $^{194}$Pt, are known to be $\gamma$-soft nuclei \cite{wu96}.
582: The same applies to $^{190}$W from its $E_{4^+}/E_{2^+}$ ratio approaching
583: the limit of 2.5 (see Fig. \ref{fige42}). Therefore, to confirm the
584: reliability of the shape transitions predicted in the framework of the axially
585: symmetric calculations already discussed above, we have carried out
586: calculations constraining the $Q-\gamma$ degrees of freedom (instead of the
587: $\beta$ deformation parameter we use the Q quadrupole moment) along the lines
588: described in Sec. \ref{T-FRAMEWOK}. The calculations in
589: Figs. \ref{beta-gamma-190W} and \ref{minima-q1q2} have been performed with
590: the parametrization SLy4 in the particle hole channel plus the pairing
591: interaction (Eq. (\ref{dd-pairing})) with $g=1000$ MeV fm$^{3}$.
592:
593: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%Fig6%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
594: \begin{figure}
595: \centering
596: \includegraphics[width=110mm]{fig6}
597: \caption{(Color online) Contour plot of the potential energy surface of the
598: nucleus $^{190}$W in a $\beta-\gamma$ plane-like representation. Instead of
599: the $\beta$ deformation parameter we have used the total mass quadrupole
600: moment $Q$ (see Eq.(\ref{eq-q1q2}) in Sec. \ref{T-FRAMEWOK}) in units of barns.
601: The contour lines correspond to the following scheme: from
602: ${\epsilon}_{min}+0.25$ MeV to ${\epsilon}_{min}+2.0$ MeV alternating dotted
603: and dashed contours every $0.25$ MeV (the contour ${\epsilon}_{min}+0.25$ MeV
604: is plotted in blue, the contours ${\epsilon}_{min}+0.50$ MeV and
605: ${\epsilon}_{min}+0.75$ MeV are plotted in green, whereas those corresponding
606: to ${\epsilon}_{min}+1.00$ MeV and ${\epsilon}_{min}+1.25$ MeV are plotted in red;
607: the rest in black); from ${\epsilon}_{min}+2.50$ MeV to ${\epsilon}_{min}+4.50$ MeV
608: the contour lines are plotted every $0.50$ MeV as full lines; from
609: ${\epsilon}_{min}+5.00$ MeV to ${\epsilon}_{min}+10.00$ MeV the contour lines are
610: plotted again every $0.50$ MeV but this time as dashed lines; finally from
611: ${\epsilon}_{min}+11.00$ MeV to ${\epsilon}_{min}+20.00$ MeV contour lines
612: are depicted every $1.00$ MeV as full lines. Calculations have been performed
613: with the parametrization SLy4 of the Skyrme force in the particle hole channel
614: plus a zero range and density dependent pairing interaction with strength
615: $g=1000$ MeV fm$^{3}$. For details, see the main text.
616: }
617: \label{beta-gamma-190W}
618: \end{figure}
619: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
620:
621: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%Fig7%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
622: \begin{figure}
623: \centering
624: \includegraphics[width=170mm]{fig7}
625: \caption{HF+BCS energy of $N$=114, 116, and 118 isotones plotted as a function
626: of the triaxial deformation parameter $\gamma$ (degrees) for the $Q$-values
627: at which the energy minima are obtained in the axial case.}
628: \label{minima-q1q2}
629: \end{figure}
630: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
631:
632: In Fig. \ref{beta-gamma-190W} the contour plot for the PES of the nucleus
633: $^{190}$W is presented. From this figure we immediately realize that the
634: nucleus $^{190}$W has a triaxial ground state whose coordinates in the
635: $Q-\gamma$ plane are $(Q,\gamma)=(14{\rm b}, 25^{o})$. The figure shows
636: a soft behavior on the $\gamma$ degree of freedom with a very shallow
637: triaxial minimum, which lies less than 0.5 (1.3) MeV below the prolate
638: (oblate) minimum. To gain a better insight into the role of triaxiality
639: in this mass region, we have performed similar calculations for other
640: Yb, Hf, W, Os, and Pt nuclei with neutron numbers $N$=114,116, and 118.
641: The results of these calculations are summarized in Fig. \ref{minima-q1q2},
642: where we plot the HF+BCS energy as a function of the triaxial deformation
643: parameter $\gamma$ (in degrees) for the $Q$-values at which the energy
644: minima are obtained in the axial case. In general, we can see that the
645: oblate and prolate minima are connected in the $\gamma$ variable with
646: smooth functions exhibiting in some cases shallow local minima or low
647: peaks. The barriers found are of the order of a few hundred keV, much
648: lower than the typical spherical barriers in the $\beta$ variable, which
649: can reach values up to 20 MeV, depending on the example (see Fig. \ref{figeq}).
650: In the case of Yb and Hf isotopes we can see a transition from prolate ($N$=114)
651: to oblate ($N$=118) shapes, passing through a $\gamma$-soft isotope ($N$=116),
652: which shows smooth peaks and valleys. We also observe that in these two
653: isotopes, one of the axial minima, oblate in $N$=114 and $N$=116 and prolate
654: in $N$=118,
655: is indeed a saddle point, unstable in the $\gamma$-direction.
656: In the case of W isotopes we can see that the axial prolate and oblate minima
657: are again connected through soft curves in the $\gamma$ direction,
658: allowing for triaxial minima, especially clear in the $N$=118 isotone.
659: The oblate minima in $\beta$ become saddle points when the $\gamma$
660: degree of freedom is considered. The same happens for the $N$=116 and $N$=118
661: prolate minima.
662: Finally, Os (Pt) isotopes are examples of very soft prolate (oblate) nuclei
663: with axial minima separated by about 1 MeV and connected through extremely
664: shallow triaxial minima.
665: Again, the oblate minima become saddle points and this is also the case for
666: the prolate ones, exception made of $^{190}$Os.
667: It is worth noticing once more that the axial minima are
668: separated by spherical energy barriers ranging between 5 and 10 MeV.
669: The general trend seems to be quite clear: whenever there is a minimum,
670: which is much deeper than the other (2 MeV or more), the lower-lying
671: minimum remains a minimum when the $\gamma$ degree of freedom is included.
672: On the other hand, the higher-lying minimum becomes a saddle point.
673: When the two minima lie at a depth not differing by more than a couple of
674: MeV, it is likely that a triaxial minimum develops and the prolate and
675: oblate minima become saddle points. The latter is not a theorem but
676: represents a very likely situation that obviously is prone to exceptions.
677:
678: \section{Conclusions}
679: \label{Conclusions}
680:
681: With the aim to obtain first hints on nuclear phase shape transitions around
682: $^{190}$W within the self-consistent Skyrme HF + BCS scheme, we have considered
683: in the present work the PECs of five isotopic chains, namely, Yb, Hf, W, Os, and
684: Pt for 106 $\le$ N $\le$ 122. Our study has been based on different Skyrme-like
685: energy functionals plus different recipes for pairing correlations and comparisons
686: have also been undertaken with results obtained using the Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov
687: approximation based on the Gogny interaction.
688:
689: From the analysis of our results we conclude that, at least in the mass region
690: studied, the PECs are not sensitive to the method employed to solve the HF+BCS
691: equations (3-dimensional cartesian lattice or deformed harmonic oscillator basis).
692: We also conclude that the qualitative behavior of the energy profiles remains
693: unchanged against changes in the Skyrme and pairing interactions in the sense
694: that the deformations at which the energy minima occur are rather stable. This
695: agrees well with results obtained with other nonrelativistic approximations
696: including those involving the Gogny force, as well as with results obtained
697: within the RMF. However, the spherical energy barriers between the minima are
698: found to be sensitive to the details of the calculations.
699:
700: As already mentioned, our main intention in this study has been to obtain
701: first hints on nuclear phase shape transitions in the region under discussion.
702: In this context, we find signatures for a transition from prolate to oblate
703: shapes as the number of neutrons increases from $N$=110 up to $N$=122 in Yb,
704: Hf, W, and Os isotopes.
705: The lighter isotopes of these nuclei exhibit a rotational behavior that
706: changes gradually toward $\gamma$-soft as the number of neutrons increases.
707: The transition is found to happen at $N$=116-118, where the energies of
708: prolate and oblate shapes are nearly degenerate. In the case of Pt, the
709: isotopes considered do not show up a rotor behavior and a prolate shape in
710: the lighter isotopes is not clearly developed yet. Let us also mention
711: that our results are in qualitative agreement with previous predictions on
712: shape transitions in this mass region.
713:
714: The role played by triaxiality in the description of ground state
715: properties for nuclei in this mass region has been investigated
716: by calculating $\beta-\gamma$ energy contour plots, and in particular,
717: the energy behavior with the $\gamma$ variable for fixed values of
718: $\beta$ corresponding to the axial minima. The analysis of our
719: results shows that the axial prolate and oblate minima, which are
720: well separated by high spherical barriers in the $\beta$ degree of
721: freedom, are linked very softly in the $\gamma$ degree of freedom.
722:
723: Finally, there remains a long list of tasks to be undertaken in the
724: near future and this work can be viewed as a starting point for a more
725: ambitious project. In particular, it will be worth studying
726: up to what extent the results discussed above
727: might be modified by including dynamical correlations beyond the static mean
728: field picture. This is particularly interesting if one notes that, at least
729: for some of the considered nuclei, shape coexistence is clearly visible and
730: therefore it is important to check the role played by symmetry restoration
731: and/or configuration mixing.
732:
733: \begin{acknowledgments}
734: This work was partly supported by Ministerio de Educaci\'on y Ciencia
735: (Spain) under Contract No.~FIS2005--00640 and
736: Contract No.~FIS2004--06697.
737: \end{acknowledgments}
738:
739: \begin{thebibliography}{00}
740:
741: \bibitem{review} J. L. Wood, K. Heyde, W. Nazarewicz, M. Huyse, and P. Van
742: Duppen, Phys. Rep. {\bf 215}, 101 (1992).
743: \bibitem{gogny} J. Deharg\'e and D. Gogny, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 21}, 1568 (1980).
744: \bibitem{vautherin} D. Vautherin and D. M. Brink, Phys. Rev. C
745: {\bf 5}, 626 (1972); D. Vautherin, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 7}, 296 (1973).
746: \bibitem{Bender-Review} M. Bender, P.-H. Heenen, and
747: P.-G. Reinhard, Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 75}, 121 (2003).
748: \bibitem{lala-ref} D. Vetrenar, A. V. Afanasjev, G. A. Lalazissis,
749: and P. Ring, Phys. Rep. {\bf{409}}, 101 (2005).
750: \bibitem{gradient-egido} J. L. Egido, J. Lessing, V. Martin, and L. M. Robledo,
751: Nucl. Phys. A {\bf{594}}, 70 (1995).
752: \bibitem{podolyak} Zs. Podoly\'ak {\em et al.}, Phys. Lett. {\bf B491},
753: 225 (2000).
754: \bibitem{caamano} M. Caama\~no {\em et al.}, Eur. Phys. J. A {\bf 23}, 201 (2005).
755: \bibitem{walker2006} P. M. Walker and F. R. Xu, Phys. Lett. {\bf B635}, 286 (2006).
756: \bibitem{nature} Ph. Walker and G. Dracoulis, Nature {\bf 399}, 35 (1999).
757: \bibitem{casten2000} R. F. Casten and B. M. Sherrill, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.
758: {\bf 45}, S171 (2000).
759: \bibitem{jolie} J. Jolie and A. Linnemann, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 68}, 031301(R) (2003).
760: \bibitem{firestone} R. B. Firestone, C. M. Baglin, S. Y. Frank Chu,
761: Table of Isotopes, 8th. ed., 1999 update (Wiley Interscience, 1999)
762: \bibitem{mach} H. Mach, Phys. Lett. {\bf B185}, 20 (1987).
763: \bibitem{wu96} C. Y. Wu {\em et al.}, Nucl. Phys {\bf A607}, 178 (1996).
764: \bibitem{naza90} W. Nazarewicz, M. A. Riley, and J. D. Garrett, Nucl.
765: Phys. {\bf A512}, 61 (1990).
766: \bibitem{wheldon2000} C. Wheldon {\em et al.}, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 63},
767: 011304(R) (2000).
768: \bibitem{naik} Z. Naik, B. K. Sharma, T. J. Jha, P. Arumugam, and S. K. Patra,
769: Pramana {\bf 62}, 827 (2004).
770: \bibitem{fossion} R. Fossion, D. Bonatsos, and G. A. Lalazissis,
771: Phys.Rev. C {\bf 73}, 044310 (2006).
772: \bibitem{stevenson05} P. D. Stevenson, M. P. Brine, Zs. Podolyak, P. H. Regan,
773: P. M. Walker, and J. Rikovska Stone, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 72}, 047303 (2005).
774: \bibitem{stevenson01} P. Stevenson, M. R. Strayer, and J. Rikovska Stone,
775: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 63}, 054309 (2001).
776: \bibitem{ev8} P. Bonche, H. Flocard, and P.-H. Heenen, Comput. Phys.
777: Comm. {\bf 171}, 49 (2005).
778: \bibitem{rs} P. Ring and P. Schuck, {\it {The Nuclear Many-Body Problem}}
779: (Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York) (1980).
780: \bibitem{sk3} M. Beiner, H. Flocard, N. Van Giai, and P. Quentin,
781: Nucl. Phys. {\bf A238}, 29 (1975).
782: \bibitem{sly4} E. Chabanat, P. Bonche, P. Haensel, J. Meyer, and
783: R. Schaeffer, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A635}, 231 (1998).
784: \bibitem{d1s} J. F. Berger, M. Girod, and D. Gogny, Nucl. Phys.
785: {\bf A428}, 23c (1984).
786: \bibitem{flocard} P. Bonche, H. Flocard, P. H. -Heenen, S. J. Krieger,
787: and M. S. Weiss, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A443}, 39 (1985).
788: \bibitem{3D-ref} D. Baye and P.-H. Heenen, J. Phys. A {\bf{19}}, 2041 (1986).
789: \bibitem{terasaki} J. Terasaki, P.-H. Heenen, H. Flocard, and P.
790: Bonche, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A600}, 371 (1996).
791: \bibitem{Rigo} C. Rigollet, P. Bonche, H. Flocard, and
792: P.-H. Heenen, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 59}, 3120 (1999).
793: \bibitem{other1} M. Bender, G. F. Bertsch, and P.-H. Heenen, Phys.
794: Rev. C {\bf 73}, 034322 (2006).
795: \bibitem{other2} B. Sabbey, M. Bender, G. F. Bertsch, and P.-H.
796: Heenen, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 75}, 044305 (2007).
797: \bibitem{constraint} H. Flocard, P. Quentin, A. K. Kerman, and D.
798: Vautherin, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A203}, 433 (1973).
799: \bibitem{meng} J. Meng, W. Zhang, S. G. Zhou, H. Toki, and L. S. Geng,
800: Eur. Phys. J. A {\bf 25}, 23 (2005).
801: \bibitem{tajima} N. Tajima, S. Takahara, and N. Onishi, Nucl. Phys.
802: {\bf A603}, 23 (1996).
803: \bibitem{sarri} P. Sarriguren, O. Moreno, R. Alvarez-Rodriguez, and
804: E. Moya de Guerra, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 72}, 054317 (2005).
805: \bibitem{rrguzman} R. Rodriguez-Guzman and P. Sarriguren, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 76},
806: 064303 (2007).
807: \bibitem{egido-1} J. L. Egido, L. M. Robledo and
808: R. Rodriguez-Guzman, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 93}, 082502 (2004).
809: \bibitem{hilaire} S. Hilaire, M. Girod, {\it Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov results
810: based on the Gogny force}, www-phynu.cea.fr
811: \bibitem{audi} G. Audi, O. Bersillon, J. Blachot, and A. H. Wapstra, Nucl. Phys.
812: {\bf A729}, 3 (2003).
813: \bibitem{lala} G. A. Lalazissis, S. Raman, and P. Ring, At. Data and
814: Nucl. Data Tables {\bf 71}, 1 (1999).
815: \bibitem{stone} P. Raghavan, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables {\bf 42}, 189 (1989);
816: N. J. Stone, Table of Nuclear Moments (2001)
817: ${\rm www.nndc.bnl.gov/nndc/stone\_moments}$
818: \bibitem{raman} S. Raman, C. W. Nestor, Jr., and P. Tikkanen, At. Data Nucl.
819: Data Tables {\bf 78}, 1 (2001).
820: \bibitem{momin} E. Moya de Guerra, Phys. Rep. {\bf 138}, 293 (1986).
821:
822: \end{thebibliography}
823:
824: \end{document}
825:
826:
827:
828: