1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \documentclass{emulateapj}
3: \begin{document}
4:
5: \def\bullet{\object{1E0657$-$56}}
6: \def\bbullet{\object{MACS~J0025.4$-$1222}}
7:
8: \def\arcsecf{\!\!^{\prime\prime}}
9: \def\arcminf{\!\!^{\prime}}
10: \def\diff{\mathrm{d}}
11: \def\ngx{N_{\mathrm{x}}}
12: \def\ngy{N_{\mathrm{y}}}
13: \def\eck#1{\left\lbrack #1 \right\rbrack}
14: \def\eckk#1{\bigl[ #1 \bigr]}
15: \def\rund#1{\left( #1 \right)}
16: \def\abs#1{\left\vert #1 \right\vert}
17: \def\wave#1{\left\lbrace #1 \right\rbrace}
18: \def\ave#1{\left\langle #1 \right\rangle}
19: \def\kms{{\rm \:km\:s}^{-1}}
20: \def\dds{D_{\mathrm{ds}}}
21: \def\dd{D_{\mathrm{d}}}
22: \def\ds{D_{\mathrm{s}}}
23: \def\cs{\mbox{cm}^2\mbox{g}^{-1}}
24: %===============================================================================
25:
26: \title{Revealing the properties of dark matter in the merging cluster {\bbullet}\altaffilmark{*}} \altaffiltext{*}{Based on
27: observations made with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, obtained
28: at the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the
29: Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under
30: NASA contract NAS 5-26555. These observations are associated with
31: program \# GO11100 and GO10703. This work is also based on
32: observations collected at the W.M. Keck Observatory. }
33: \shorttitle{}
34: %
35: \author{Maru\v{s}a Brada\v{c}\altaffilmark{1,x},
36: Steven W. Allen\altaffilmark{2},
37: Tommaso Treu\altaffilmark{1,y},
38: Harald Ebeling\altaffilmark{3},
39: Richard Massey\altaffilmark{4},
40: R.\ Glenn Morris\altaffilmark{2},
41: Anja von der Linden\altaffilmark{2},
42: Douglas Applegate\altaffilmark{2},
43: }
44: \shortauthors{Brada\v{c} et al.}
45: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA}
46: \altaffiltext{2}{Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology,
47: Stanford University, 382 Via Pueblo Mall, Stanford, CA 94305-4060, USA}
48: \altaffiltext{3}{Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA}
49: \altaffiltext{4}{Institute for Astronomy, Royal Observatory Edinburgh, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK}
50: \altaffiltext{x}{Hubble Fellow}
51: \altaffiltext{y}{Sloan Fellow, Packard Fellow}
52: \email{marusa@physics.ucsb.edu}
53:
54: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
55:
56:
57: \begin{abstract}
58: We constrain the physical nature of dark matter using the newly
59: identified massive merging galaxy cluster {\bbullet}. As was
60: previously shown by the example of the Bullet Cluster (1E0657-56),
61: such systems are ideal laboratories for detecting isolated dark
62: matter, and distinguishing between cold dark matter (CDM) and other
63: scenarios (e.g.\ self-interacting dark matter, alternative gravity
64: theories). {\bbullet} consists of two merging subclusters of similar
65: richness at $z=0.586$. We measure the distribution of X-ray emitting
66: gas from Chandra X-ray data and find it to be clearly displaced from
67: the distribution of galaxies. A strong (information from highly
68: distorted arcs) and weak (using weakly distorted background galaxies)
69: gravitational lensing analysis based on Hubble Space Telescope
70: observations and Keck arc spectroscopy confirms that the subclusters
71: have near-equal mass. The total mass distribution in each of the
72: subclusters is clearly offset (at $>4\sigma$ significance) from the
73: peak of the hot X-ray emitting gas (the main baryonic component), but
74: aligned with the distribution of galaxies. We measure the fractions of
75: mass in hot gas ($0.09^{+0.07}_{-0.03}$) and stars ($0.010^{+0.007}_{-0.004}$),
76: consistent with those of typical clusters, finding that dark matter is
77: the dominant contributor to the gravitational field. Under the
78: assumption that the subclusters experienced a head-on collision in the
79: plane of the sky, we obtain an order-of-magnitude estimate of the dark
80: matter self-interaction cross-section of $\sigma/m < 4\cs$,
81: re-affirming the results from the Bullet Cluster on the collisionless
82: nature of dark matter.
83: \end{abstract}
84: \keywords{cosmology: dark matter -- gravitational lensing -- galaxies:clusters:individual:MACS~J0025.4$-$1222}
85:
86: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
87:
88: \section{Introduction}
89: \label{sec:intro}
90: One of the most important quests in cosmology is to understand the
91: formation and evolution of galaxies and galaxy clusters. While the
92: standard paradigm of cold dark matter (CDM) within a $\Lambda$CDM
93: cosmology works well overall, discrepancies between the predictions of
94: this model and observations remain (such as the abundance of
95: substructure in halos, and the shapes of dark matter profiles,
96: especially in dwarf systems). These issues can be resolved in several
97: ways, for example by invoking warm and/or self-interacting dark
98: matter.
99:
100: Mergers of galaxy clusters are excellent laboratories to test such
101: ideas. Not only are cluster mergers the most energetic events since
102: the Big Bang, but, as demonstrated by a recent study of the Bullet
103: Cluster (1E0657$-$56; \citealp{clowe04,bradac06,clowe06}), they
104: provide a unique avenue by which to probe the self-interaction
105: cross-section of dark matter particles and test alternative gravity
106: theories.
107:
108: In clusters with recent major merger activity, the positions of the
109: dark matter and main baryonic component (the X-ray emitting gas) can
110: become temporarily separated. This occurs because the gas is
111: collisional and experiences ram pressure, whereas galaxies and
112: (presumably) dark matter are effectively collisionless. A merging
113: direction perpendicular to the line-of-sight maximizes the apparent
114: separation, allowing observers to independently study the main
115: baryonic and dark matter components. In the example of the Bullet
116: Cluster, \citet{clowe04},
117: \citet{bradac06}, and \citet{clowe06} used X-ray and gravitational
118: lensing data to derive mass maps for both the baryonic and dark matter
119: components, clearly showing the presence and dominance of dark matter.
120: In agreement with the standard CDM paradigm, these observations
121: indicate that dark matter has to be in a near-collisionless form, with
122: a scattering cross-section $\sigma/m < 0.7\cs$ \citep{randall07}.
123:
124: A recent study of the merging cluster A520 by \citet{mahdavi07} rests
125: less easily within this simple picture. For A520, \citet{mahdavi07}
126: find a central mass peak that contains gas and dark matter but no
127: significant galaxy concentration. These authors argue that such a
128: configuration could occur if dark matter is collisional with a
129: self-interaction cross-section of $3.8 \pm 1.1\cs$, a result that is
130: inconsistent with the Bullet Cluster limits. However, the statistical
131: significance of the result for A520 is not high and the dynamics of
132: the cluster are more complicated than {\bullet}, with A520 appearing
133: to be in the late stages of multiple, complex merger events.
134:
135: It has also been argued that the optical and X-ray
136: observations of {\bullet} might be explained without standard CDM, by instead
137: modifying the theory of gravity (and thus the effects of gravitational
138: lensing). Models using the modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) theory
139: \citep[e.g.][]{milgrom83,bekenstein04} have, however, so far achieved
140: only limited success in reproducing the weak lensing observations
141: (e.g.\ \citealp{angus06, brownstein07}) and are unable to explain the
142: observed strong lensing. Moreover, the application of MOND models to
143: galaxy clusters in general still requires the presence of large masses
144: of invisible matter, which are typically argued to be a mixture of
145: massive neutrinos and cold baryons \citep[e.g.][]{angus07}.
146:
147: Clearly, a satisfactory resolution to this debate requires further
148: observations of massive, merging clusters; preferably those with
149: simple, two-body configurations. Using deep, ground-based optical
150: imaging and short, snapshot Chandra exposures of clusters in the
151: all-sky, X-ray flux-limited MAssive Cluster Survey (MACS)
152: \citep{ebeling01, ebeling07}, we have identified the X-ray brightest,
153: most massive, obvious post-merging clusters in the redshift range
154: $0.3<z<0.7$. From this search, {\bbullet} emerges as a massive,
155: merging cluster with an apparently simple geometry, consisting of two
156: large subclusters of similar richness, both at redshift $z=0.586$,
157: colliding in approximately the plane of the sky.
158:
159: Owing to their high masses and favorable redshifts, MACS clusters are
160: ideally suited to gravitational lensing studies. Here we use new,
161: multi-color Hubble Space Telescope (HST) data to determine a projected
162: mass map for {\bbullet}, using both strong and weak lensing
163: information. When combined with the Chandra data, this allows us to
164: map the distributions of dark matter, hot X-ray emitting gas, and
165: stars. The dark matter is resolved into two main clumps, centered on
166: the galaxy populations. The Chandra data reveal a single, clear X-ray
167: peak located between the two optical/lensing subclusters. The observed
168: offset between the locations of the hot gas and galaxies/lensing mass
169: is in good agreement with the expectations for standard collisionless
170: cold dark matter. Both {\bullet} and {\bbullet} provide direct
171: evidence for the existence of dark matter and can be used to estimate
172: the self-interaction cross-section.
173:
174: This paper is structured as follows. Section~\ref{sec:data} describes
175: the optical and X-ray data and reduction procedures. Section 3
176: discusses the dynamics of the cluster, based on optical spectroscopy.
177: Section~\ref{sec:swdata} presents the strong and weak gravitational
178: lensing analysis and the mass reconstruction based on these
179: data. Section~\ref{sect:xray_analysis} discusses the X-ray data
180: analysis. Section~\ref{sec:stellarmass} details the results on the
181: stellar and X-ray gas mass fractions.
182: In Section~\ref{sec:bardm} we present our main
183: result on the relative distributions of dark and baryonic matter in
184: the cluster, and determine rough limits on the dark matter
185: self-interaction cross-section. Our conclusions are summarized in
186: Section~\ref{sec:conclusions}.
187:
188: Throughout the paper we assume a $\Lambda$CDM cosmology with
189: $\Omega_{\rm m} = 0.3$, $\Omega_{\Lambda} = 0.7$, and Hubble constant
190: $H_0 = 70 {\rm \ km \: s^{-1}\:\mbox{Mpc}^{-1}}$. At a redshift
191: $z=0.586$, the length scale is 6.61 kpc/arcsec.
192:
193:
194:
195: \section{Observations of \protect\bbullet}
196: \label{sec:data}
197:
198:
199: We observed {\bbullet} with HST/ACS for $4140\mbox{s}$ in the F555W
200: filter and $4200\mbox{s}$ in F814W (6 exposures each) as part of the
201: Cycle 13 proposal GO-10703 (PI Ebeling, November 5 2006). We also
202: obtained a $11000\mbox{s}$ F450W HST/WFPC2 observation (11 exposures)
203: as a part of the Cycle 16 proposal GO-11100 (PI Brada\v{c}, June 9 2007). As a
204: part of the MACS survey, the cluster has been observed in the BVRIz'
205: bands with Subaru Suprime-Cam. Here we use ACS F814W as our primary
206: weak lensing band because it has the largest number of resolved
207: background sources for which shapes can be measured, and a well
208: understood point spread function (PSF)
209: \citep{rhodes07}. The other bands are used to aid the color matching
210: for identifying strongly lensed systems and to exclude foreground
211: objects from the weak lensing catalogs.
212:
213: The demands placed by the lensing analysis require special care when
214: reducing the images. The ACS images were reduced using the HAGGLES
215: pipeline (P. Marshall et al. 2008, in preparation). A similar
216: procedure was also followed for the WFPC2 data. The data reduction
217: procedure is described in \citet{bradac08}.
218:
219:
220:
221: A sample of more than $200$ objects in {\bbullet} were targeted in the
222: course of a DEIMOS/KECK spectroscopic campaign for the MACS survey
223: (\citealp{ebeling07}). The DEIMOS data were reduced using the same procedure as described in \citet{ma08}. In addition, LRIS/KECK
224: \citep{LRIS} has been used to target likely multiply-imaged sources
225: selected based on their colors in the HST data. One slitmask was used
226: with an exposure of $6.3\mbox{ks}$ on September 13 2007. The LRIS data
227: were reduced using a dedicated pipeline, developed and kindly made
228: available by M.\ Auger (see also \citealp{auger08}).
229:
230:
231:
232: {\bbullet} has been observed twice with the Chandra X-ray Observatory,
233: in November 2002 for 19.3 ksec (obsid 3251); and in August 2004 for
234: 24.8 ksec (obsid 5010). Both observations were made with ACIS-I in
235: VFAINT mode. We have analysed the data using version 3.4 of the CIAO
236: software and CALDB version 3.3.0.1. Applying conservative filtering,
237: we obtain clean exposures of 15.7 and 21.3 ksec for obsid 3251 and
238: 5010, respectively (total 37 ksec). These two exposures were combined
239: for imaging purposes, but fitted separately and simultaneously in
240: the spectral analysis.
241:
242:
243:
244: \section{Optical dynamical analysis}
245: \label{sec:dyn}
246:
247: Using the redshifts obtained with DEIMOS, we measure the cluster
248: redshift $z_{\rm Cl}$ and velocity dispersion $\sigma_{\rm Cl}$. This
249: is done via an iterative algorithm to determine $z_{\rm Cl}$ and
250: $\sigma_{\rm Cl}$ from galaxies within 1.5~Mpc from the peak of the
251: X-ray emission (\S\ref{sect:xray_analysis}), and within
252: $\pm3\sigma_{\rm Cl}$ from $z_{\rm Cl}$. Both $z_{\rm Cl}$ and
253: $\sigma_{\rm Cl}$ are calculated using the biweight estimator of
254: \citet{bfg90}. Galaxies are allowed to re-enter the sample at each
255: iteration. This yields $z_{\rm Cl}=0.5857$ and $\sigma_{\rm Cl} =
256: 835^{+58}_{-59}\kms$, measured from 108 galaxies. The overall
257: appearance of the redshift distribution is roughly Gaussian, with
258: little evidence for a bimodal distribution (Fig.~\ref{fig:specmemb}).
259: \begin{figure}[ht!]
260: \begin{center}
261: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{fig1.ps}
262: \end{center}
263: \caption{Histogram of the redshift distribution around the cluster
264: redshift. Only galaxies within projected 1.5~Mpc are shown. The
265: dashed line indicates the cluster redshift, the dotted lines the
266: $\pm3\sigma_{\rm Cl}$ limits used to calculate the cluster redshift
267: and velocity dispersion. The Gaussian curve overplotted in red
268: illustrates the measured velocity dispersion.}
269: \label{fig:specmemb}
270: \end{figure}
271:
272: As a test for the presence of dynamical substructure, we compute the
273: statistics suggested by \citet{drs88}. Briefly, this method measures
274: local deviations from the overall cluster redshift and velocity
275: dispersion, and compares the result to Monte Carlo realizations of the
276: redshift and position values, where the redshifts have been
277: randomized. The probability of finding larger deviations in the
278: randomized cluster realizations is 3\%, i.e. cluster substructure is
279: marginally detected. This is mainly driven by some of the galaxies in
280: the north-western subcluster, which have slightly lower than systemic
281: redshifts.
282:
283:
284:
285: The south-eastern (SE) subcluster has two equally-dominant galaxies (BCG1
286: and BCG2; their magnitudes are equal within the errorbars; see
287: Fig.~\ref{fig:arcs}) of redshifts $z=0.5856 \pm 0.0003$ and $z=0.5838
288: \pm 0.0003$. The north-western (NW) one has a single dominant galaxy
289: (BCG3) at a redshift $z=0.5842 \pm 0.0003$. Assuming that the dominant
290: galaxies lie at or near the minimima of the subcluster potentials, and
291: averaging the redshifts of BCG1 and BCG2 in the SE subcluster, we
292: infer a redshift difference between the NW and SE clumps of $\Delta z=0.0005
293: \pm 0.0004$. This implies a line of sight velocity difference between
294: the subclusters of $100\pm80\kms$. Given that the subclusters have
295: collided, they have likely decoupled from the Hubble flow.
296:
297:
298: Based on this result and the measured velocity dispersion, we can
299: obtain a crude estimate of the merger velocity and the angle of the
300: merger axis relative to the plane of the sky. For {\bullet},
301: \citet{barrena02} measure a velocity dispersion of
302: $1132^{+117}_{-106}$ km/s (from 52 early-type galaxy spectra) and
303: \citet{markevitch06} estimate a merger velocity for {\bullet} (based
304: on a 500ks Chandra observation) of $\sim 4500$ km/s (although this
305: value is thought to be extreme;
306: e.g. \citealp{hayashi06,springel07}). Scaling by the ratio of these
307: velocity dispersions, and assuming that the merger velocity in
308: {\bbullet} is more typical for a cluster of its mass, we crudely
309: estimate a merger velocity of $\sim2000\kms$. Given this merger
310: velocity, the strong evidence that the subclusters in {\bbullet} have
311: merged recently, and the small, observed line-of-sight velocity
312: difference between the subclusters, the merger event is likely to have
313: occured in close to the plane of the sky (within 5 degrees). The
314: separation between the subclusters implies that closest approach
315: occured a few $10^8$ years ago. Deeper X-ray data are required to refine
316: our understanding of the geometry of the cluster.
317:
318:
319:
320:
321: \section{Lensing Analysis}
322: \label{sec:swdata}
323:
324: The optical imaging data were used to identify multiply imaged sources (for strong lensing) and measure the distortion of background galaxies (for weak lensing). We then simultaneously fit these two data sets to obtain the (total) mass distribution of {\bbullet}.
325:
326: \subsection{Strong lensing features}
327:
328: Using the F450W/F555W/F814W HST and BVRIz' Subaru data, we have
329: searched for multiply-imaged, lensed background sources. The positions
330: of the multiple images used in the analysis are
331: listed in Table~\ref{tab:arcs} and shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:arcs}.
332:
333: \begin{figure}[ht!]
334: \begin{center}
335: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{fig2.ps}
336: \end{center}
337: \caption{LRIS spectrum of the images A and B (a single slit was placed over both images).
338: Lines redshifted to $z=2.38$ are marked. Over-plotted (and offset for
339: clariy) in green (top) is the composite Ly-break galaxy spectrum from
340: \citet{shapley03}. The emission line is significantly detected
341: (6$\sigma$), no other significant features are seen in the spectrum.}
342: \label{fig:spec}
343: \end{figure}
344:
345:
346: We measure a spectroscopic redshift for system AB from the LRIS/KECK
347: data of $z=2.38$. This source has two distinct components (as seen from
348: Fig.~\ref{fig:arcs}; hence the name AB) and we placed slits over
349: both components each time. The spectrum of the northern of the three
350: images is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:spec}, together with a composite
351: Ly-break galaxy template from \citet{shapley03}. A Ly-$\alpha$
352: emission line is significantly detected (6$\sigma$). The other two
353: images had lower S/N spectra, but yield consistent results. For
354: system C, we obtain a photometric redshift $z_{\rm C} =
355: 1.0^{+0.5}_{-0.2}$ using the IRAF {\tt polyphot} task and the HyperZ
356: package \citep{bolzonella00}; this redshift is robust (i.e.\ there is
357: no other likely redshift solution) due to the presence of the
358: $4000$\AA\, break seen between the F555W and F814W bands. We have
359: placed a slit over the northern of the two images and we see a
360: tentative absorbtion feature at 7140\AA. If interpreted as \ion{Mg}{2}
361: at 2799{\AA} this gives a redshift of 1.55. However, the absorbtion
362: feature is detected at a very low significance and no other features
363: are seen. Therefore we do not consider this identification as reliable
364: and adopt the photometric redshift as our best estimate. Adopting the
365: tentative spectroscopic redshift instead would not change our results
366: significantly.
367:
368:
369: The photometric redshift of system D is less well determined. In
370: addition the spectra did not have high enough S/N to obtain any
371: spectroscopic redshift information. Using the photometric information
372: we estimate $z_{\rm D} = 2.8^{+0.4}_{-1.8}$.
373:
374:
375: The scarcity of reliably defined multiply imaged
376: systems and spectroscopic redshifts limits our ability to determine an
377: absolute calibration for the lensing mass map, due to the mass-sheet
378: degeneracy (i.e.\ the reconstruction suffers from a degeneracy of the
379: form $\kappa \to \kappa' = \lambda \kappa + (1 - \lambda)$, where
380: $\lambda$ is an arbitrary constant, see e.g.\ \citealp{bradac03b}).
381: This degeneracy can, in principle, be lifted when information from at
382: least two source-redshift planes is available (see e.g.\
383: \citealp{seitz97}; since $\kappa$ is redshift-dependent, data from two
384: redshifts can simultaneously constrain $\kappa$ and $\lambda$). In our
385: case, we have only one spectroscopically-determined source redshift
386: (around the NW peak). In principle, weak lensing data can provide a
387: second effective redshift plane, allowing us to tightly constrain the
388: mass, at least around the NW peak; in practice, however, the weak
389: lensing data are too noisy to completely break the mass-sheet
390: degeneracy (see e.g.\ \citealp{bradac03, limousin07}). We might also,
391: in principle, constrain the redshifts of systems C and D around the SE
392: peak using the predictive power of the lens model. This requires the
393: adoption of a specific family of models; which includes assumptions
394: that lift the mass-sheet degeneracy, such as assuming zero mass at
395: large distances. Moreover the constraints in regions far from the
396: systems of known redshift tend to be weak.
397:
398:
399: \subsection{Weak lensing data}
400: \label{sec:weak_lensing}
401:
402: Our weak lensing analysis of the HST/ACS data uses the RRG
403: \citep{rhodes00} galaxy shape measurement method, and the pipeline
404: developed for the HST COSMOS survey \citep{massey07}. This
405: has been tested and calibrated on simulated images containing a known
406: weak lensing signal by \citet{leauthaud07}. The \bbullet\ and COSMOS
407: observations use the same filter and are contemporary, although the
408: COSMOS survey covered a much larger area of sky and provides a better
409: calibration of instrumental systematics, including the camera's point
410: spread function (PSF) and Charge Transfer Inefficiency (CTI). Thermal
411: variations within HST's orbit cause it to expand and contract by a few
412: microns \citep{rhodes07}. By matching the shapes of stars in the
413: \bbullet\ images to those in COSMOS fields \citep[which were in turn
414: compared to TinyTim models of the PSF, see][]{drizzle}, we determined
415: that the focal length of HST (the distance between its primary and
416: secondary mirrors) was $2\mu m$ shorter than nominal at the time of
417: ACS exposure. This is a typical value \citep{leauthaud07}. We created
418: a model of the PSF over the field of view and over all possible focus
419: positions by interpolating the shapes of stars in all images within
420: the COSMOS survey. Similarly, the PSF-corrected ellipticities of
421: galaxies in the \bbullet\ data were corrected for CTI trailing
422: (associated with radiation damage in the ACS detectors) by subtracting
423: the spurious ellipticity induced by this effect. This spurious
424: ellipticity was modelled from the observed shapes of galaxies within
425: the COSMOS survey as a function of object flux and position on the
426: detectors \citep{rhodes07}.
427:
428: From the final catalog we selected background objects, excluding
429: cluster members using color information from the HST
430: (F450W/F555W/F814W) images and spectroscopic data. Galaxies in the
431: cluster red sequence are identified by two color criteria: $0.0 <
432: m_{\rm F555W} - m_{\rm F450W} < 1.4$ and $1.8 < m_{\rm F555W}- m_{\rm
433: F814W} < 3.0$. We furthermore exclude objects brighter in F814W than the three
434: BCGs. We note that these cuts will not remove blue cluster members
435: (and some bluer or redder foregrounds), which will dilute the weak
436: lensing signal. However since the signal is mainly driven by the
437: strong lensing data (see also \citealp{bradac08}) this will not
438: bias our results significantly. Following \citet{bradac08}, where data
439: of similar depth were used, we assume the average redshift for galaxies
440: in the weak lensing catalog to be $z_{\rm WL} = 1.4$. Again the exact
441: value has little influence on the end results (as discussed in
442: \S\ref{sec:syst}) because it does not change the location of the peaks
443: and only marginally affects the overall scaling of the surface mass
444: density.
445:
446:
447: \begin{figure*}[ht]
448: \begin{center}
449: \begin{tabular}{ccc}
450: \multicolumn{3}{c}{\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{fig3a.ps}} \\
451: \includegraphics[width=0.33\textwidth]{fig3b.ps} &
452: \includegraphics[width=0.33\textwidth]{fig3c.ps} &
453: \includegraphics[width=0.33\textwidth]{fig3d.ps} \\
454: \includegraphics[width=0.33\textwidth]{fig3e.ps} &
455: \includegraphics[width=0.33\textwidth]{fig3f.ps} &
456: \includegraphics[width=0.33\textwidth]{fig3g.ps} \\
457: C & D & AB\\
458: \end{tabular}
459: \end{center}
460: \caption{(top) The F555W-F814W color composite of the cluster
461: \protect \bbullet. North is up and East is left. The field is
462: $2.5^{\prime}\times 2.0^{\prime}$. $15\arcsec \times
463: 15\arcsec$ cutouts (indicated in top panel) of C and D and $30\arcsec \times 30\arcsec$ of the multiply imaged
464: systems AB from the F555W-F814W (middle row) and F450W-F555W-F814W (bottom row)
465: color composite are also shown. The three BCGs are marked with circles, the gas peak position with a $+$ (with its size indicating the measured uncertainty, see \S\ref{sect:xray_analysis}).}
466: \label{fig:arcs}
467: \end{figure*}
468:
469: \begin{deluxetable}{rrrr}
470: \tablecolumns{4}
471: \tablewidth{0pc}
472: \tablecaption{The properties of the multiply-imaged systems.}
473: \tablehead{ \colhead{} & \colhead{RA} & \colhead{Dec} & \colhead{$z$}}
474: \startdata
475: & 6.365628 & -12.36976 & \\
476: {A} & 6.363495 & -12.37609 & {2.38} \\
477: & 6.363393 & -12.37276 & \\
478: \cline{1-4}
479: & 6.365353 & -12.36974 & \\
480: {B} & 6.363261 & -12.37606 & {2.38} \\
481: & 6.363169 & -12.37268 & \\
482: \cline{1-4}
483: & 6.392082 & -12.38603 & \\
484: \raisebox{0.5ex}{C} & 6.391968 & -12.38757 & \raisebox{0.5ex}{$1.0^{+0.5}_{-0.2}$} \\
485: \cline{1-4}
486: & 6.382898 & -12.38511 & \\
487: {D} & 6.384163 & -12.38253 &{$ 2.8^{+0.4}_{-1.8}$} \\
488: & 6.382926 & -12.38472 & \\
489: \cline{1-4}
490: \enddata
491: \tablecomments{
492: The redshift of systems A and B were obtained using KECK spectroscopy (a
493: single slit was placed over both components each time), whereas the others have been
494: determined photometrically.}
495: \label{tab:arcs}
496: \end{deluxetable}
497:
498: \subsection{Mass reconstruction of \protect\bbullet}
499: \label{sec:results}
500:
501: Our combined strong and weak lensing analysis follows the method
502: described in \citet{bradac04a} and implemented on ACS data in
503: \citet{bradac06, bradac08}. We describe the cluster's
504: projected gravitational potential by a set of values on a regular grid
505: $\psi_k$, from which all observable quantities are evaluated by finite
506: differencing. For example, the scaled surface mass density $\kappa$ is
507: related to $\psi$ via the Poisson equation, $2\kappa = \nabla^2\psi$
508: (where the physical surface mass density is $\Sigma = \kappa \:
509: \Sigma_{\rm crit}$ and $\Sigma_{\rm crit}$ is a constant that depends
510: upon the angular diameter distances between the observer, the lens,
511: and the source). Similarly, the shear $\gamma = \gamma_1 + {\rm i}
512: \gamma_2$ and the deflection angle $\vec \alpha$ are derivatives of
513: the potential $\gamma_1 = 0.5(\psi_{,11}-\psi_{,22})$, $\gamma_2 =
514: \psi_{,12}$, and $\vec \alpha = \nabla \psi$. The advantage of such
515: an approach is that we avoid strong assumptions regarding the shape
516: and profile of the potential, which is crucial when dealing with
517: merging clusters.
518:
519: The strong and weak lensing data are combined in a $\chi^2$-fashion,
520: minimizing the $\chi^2$ difference between the data and the model by
521: searching for a solution to the nonlinear equation $\partial \chi^2 /
522: \partial \psi_k =0$. Hence we solve it
523: in an iterative fashion (keeping the non-linear terms fixed at each
524: iteration step). This requires an initial guess for the gravitational
525: potential; the systematic effects arising from these particular
526: choices are discussed below.
527:
528:
529: Figure~\ref{fig:kappa} shows our best-fit reconstruction of the
530: surface mass density, starting from an initial model consisting of two
531: isothermal spheres, each of $\sigma=1000\kms$. The first sphere was
532: centered between the two brightest galaxies in the SE cluster (BCG1
533: and BCG2), and the second on the BCG of the NW subcluster (BCG3, see
534: also Fig.~\ref{fig:arcs}). We also examined models in which the
535: initial velocity dispersion of the spheres was reduced to
536: $\sigma=700\kms$, and where the initial guess had zero mass: the
537: resulting reconstruction did not change significantly. Throughout the
538: paper we will quote the results with the initial model using
539: $\sigma=1000\kms$ as this model gives the best fit to the data. The other final solutions (encountered due to secondary minima in $\chi^2$ function) were however not significantly different.
540:
541:
542: The recovered distribution of mass in {\bbullet} shows two distinct
543: peaks, each centered approximately at the centers of the light
544: distributions (galaxies). The measured positions and error bars are
545: given in Table~\ref{tab:offset}. The quoted error bars reflect the
546: effects of exploring different initial conditions and other systematic
547: effects (like misidentification of multiply imaged systems), and the
548: statistical and systematic errors in the weak lensing data (see
549: below). Table~\ref{tab:mass} lists the projected masses within
550: $300\mbox{ kpc}$ of each of the BCG1 and BCG3, and the mass within
551: $500\mbox{ kpc}$ of the X-ray peak.
552:
553:
554: \subsection{Systematic and statistical uncertainties}
555: \label{sec:syst}
556:
557: As in previous work, we pay special attention to possible systematic
558: effects when obtaining the surface mass density map. We have performed the
559: following tests of robustness:
560: \begin{itemize}
561: \item {\bf Initial Conditions:} Instead of assuming a two component mass
562: model, we have examined the effects of starting with an ``ignorant''
563: model, i.e.\ assuming zero mass for the system. The final
564: reconstructed peak positions differ little from those shown in
565: Figure~\ref{fig:kappa} and are well within the quoted error bars. We obtained a better fit, however, when using two isothermal spheres as
566: initial conditions, hence the quoted numbers are from this
567: reconstruction.
568: \item {\bf Multiply imaged system identification and redshifts:}
569: Misidentification of multiply imaged systems can, in principle,
570: significantly change the
571: outcome of a reconstruction. We have examined the effects of
572: removing one system at a time, as well as removing them all. While
573: the absolute calibration of the mass distribution changes, the peak
574: positions are not significantly altered and these
575: changes are added in quadrature to the quoted error bars.
576: \item {\bf Statistical errors on weak lensing measurements:} The
577: observed ellipticities of galaxies provide a noisy estimate of the
578: local reduced shear $g = \gamma / (1-\kappa)$. We
579: bootstrap resample the measured ellipticities to estimate the uncertainties.
580: These are added to the errors discussed above to obtain the final
581: estimate of the uncertainty on the measured positions and masses of
582: the two peaks.
583: \item {\bf Systematic error budget on weak lensing measurements:}
584: We estimate a $\sim 6$\% uncertainty in the overall normalisation of
585: the shear measurements. There is an additional $\sim 15\%$ calibration
586: uncertainty from the assumption on the average redshift for galaxies
587: in the final catalog. These uncertainties only affect the mass
588: measurement (for which the systematic errors mentioned above dominate)
589: and do not add to the positional uncertainty.
590: \end{itemize}
591:
592:
593:
594:
595:
596:
597: \begin{figure*}[ht!]
598: \begin{center}
599: \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{fig4.ps}
600: \end{center}
601: \caption{The F555W-F814W color composite of the cluster
602: \protect \bbullet. North is up and East is left. The field is
603: $2.5^{\prime}\times 2.0^{\prime}$, which corresponds to $1000 \times
604: 800 \mbox{ kpc}^2$ at the redshift of the cluster. Overlaid in {\it
605: red contours} is the surface mass density $\kappa$ from the combined
606: weak and strong lensing mass reconstruction. The contour levels are
607: linearly spaced with $\Delta\kappa = 0.1$, starting at $\kappa=0.5$,
608: for a fiducial source at a redshift of $z_{\rm s} \to \infty$. The
609: X-ray brightness contours (also linearly spaced) are overlaid in
610: {\it yellow} and the I-band light is overlaid in {\it white}. The
611: measured peak position and errorbars for the total mass are given as a cyan cross (see
612: Tab.~\ref{tab:offset}).}
613: \label{fig:kappa}
614: \end{figure*}
615:
616:
617: \begin{deluxetable}{rlrr}
618: \tablecolumns{4} \tablewidth{0pc}
619: \tablecaption{Offsets (with 1$\sigma$ errorbars) of the mass peaks and gas peaks.}
620: \tablehead{ \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{$\Delta x ([\mbox{arcmin}])$} & \colhead{$\Delta y ([\mbox{arcmin}])$}}
621: \startdata
622: & total & $-0.70 \pm 0.25$ & $-0.43 \pm 0.06$ \phn \\
623: SE & gas& $0.0 \pm 0.08$ & $0.0 \pm 0.08$ \phn \\
624: & galaxies & $-0.79\pm 0.20$ & $-0.50\pm 0.20$ \phn\\
625: \hline
626: & total & $0.46 \pm 0.13$ & $0.20 \pm 0.04$ \phn \\
627: NW & gas & $0.0 \pm 0.08$ & $0.0 \pm 0.08$ \phn \\
628: & galaxies &$0.39 \pm 0.20$ & $0.18 \pm 0.20$\phn
629: \enddata
630: \tablecomments{
631: Offsets are calculated from (00:25:29.5, -12:22:36.6) which corresponds to the peak in gas distribution (marked with a white $+$ in \protect{Fig.~\ref{fig:arcs}}).}
632: \label{tab:offset}
633: \end{deluxetable}
634:
635:
636: \begin{deluxetable}{rlr}
637: \tablecolumns{3} \tablewidth{0pc}
638: \tablecaption{{\it 2-D projected} enclosed mass within a radius of $300 \mbox{kpc}$ centered on BCG1 and BCG3 and within $500 \mbox{kpc}$ centered on the gas peak.}
639: \tablehead{ \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{$M \; [10^{14}M_{\sun}$]}}
640: \startdata
641: SE - BCG1 & total & $2.5^{+1.0}_{-1.7}$\phn\\
642: & galaxies & $0.027 \pm 0.008$\phn\\
643: \hline
644: NW - BCG3 & total & $2.6^{+0.5}_{-1.4}$\phn\\
645: & galaxies & $0.019 \pm 0.006$\phn \\
646: \hline
647: Gas peak & total & $6.2 ^{+1.2}_{-4.0}$\phn\\
648: & gas & $0.55 \pm 0.06$\phn\\
649: & galaxies & $0.05 \pm 0.01$
650: \enddata
651: \tablecomments{Total projected masses are calculated from strong and
652: weak lensing reconstruction, gas mass from Chandra X-ray data, and
653: stellar mass from F814W data.}
654: \label{tab:mass}
655: \end{deluxetable}
656:
657:
658: \section{X-ray data analysis}
659: \label{sect:xray_analysis}
660: Using the Chandra data, we have constructed an exposure-corrected,
661: 0.5--7.0keV, 4 arcsec/pixel count image of the central 4x4 arcmin
662: region of the cluster. Two point sources in this region were removed,
663: and the CIAO \texttt{dmfilth} tool used to fill in the excised
664: regions by sampling from the distribution of surrounding pixels. The
665: image was then adaptively smoothed using the \texttt{csmooth} tool,
666: applying a sliding Gaussian kernel. The linearly-spaced contours
667: derived from this image are shown in yellow in Fig.~\ref{fig:kappa}.
668: The peak position in the adaptively smoothed X-ray contours is
669: 00:25:29.5, -12:22:36.6. Although the precise position of this peak
670: depends in detail on the smoothing algorithm, we conservatively
671: estimate the accuracy to be better than 5 arcsec (i.e., the X-ray
672: brightness peak is constrained to lie within 5 arcsec of this
673: position). Significant X-ray emission from the cluster is detected out
674: to a radius $\sim$ 150 arcsec (1 Mpc).
675:
676: The overall X-ray morphology of {\bbullet} exhibits
677: characteristics typical of a large merger event: the cluster shows a
678: modest central surface brightness, high overall ellipticity and clear
679: shifting of the X-ray centroid as a function of radius. Fitting a King
680: model to the X-ray surface brightness profile, we measure a large core
681: radius of $\sim 60$ arcsec (400kpc) which is also typical for
682: large, merging clusters (e.g.\ \citealp{allen98}).
683:
684: We have carried out a spectral analysis of the Chandra data using the
685: XSPEC code (version 11.3.2; \citealp{arnaud96}). Background spectra
686: were extracted from appropriate source-free regions of the ACIS-I
687: chips. The Galactic absorption was fixed at the value of $2.5 \times
688: 10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$ derived from HI surveys \citep{kalberla05}. We
689: use the MEKAL plasma emission code (\citealp{kaastra93};
690: incorporating the Fe-L calculations of \citealp{liedahl95}) and the photoelectric absorption models
691: of \citet{balucinska92}. The abundances of the elements were assumed
692: to vary with a common ratio, $Z$, with respect to Solar
693: values \citep{anders89}. Only data in the 0.6--7.0 keV energy range
694: were used.
695:
696: \begin{figure}
697: \begin{center}
698: \includegraphics[width=0.35\textwidth,angle=270]{fig5.ps}
699: \end{center}
700: \caption{Temperature profiles of the X-ray gas. Red diamonds show the
701: projected values, blue circles the deprojected values (assuming
702: spherical symmetry and using a \texttt{projct} model to account for
703: geometric effects). Error bars are 1$\sigma$.}
704: \label{fig:Xtemp}
705: \end{figure}
706:
707: \begin{figure}
708: \begin{center}
709: \includegraphics[width=0.38\textwidth,angle=270]{fig6.ps}
710: \end{center}
711: \caption{Mass profiles of the X-ray gas. The lower curve shows the
712: mass within a sphere, the upper curve the projected mass within a
713: cylinder along the line of sight, assuming the cluster extends to
714: 1.5Mpc. The crosses show the statistical 1$\sigma$ errors
715: associated with each point, as obtained from the method of \citet{allen08}. The red dotted lines show a (conservative) 10\%
716: systematic error (e.g.\citealp{nagai07b}). The green dashed lines
717: combine in quadrature the effect of a 10\% systematic error on the
718: projected mass with the effect of varying the outermost cluster
719: radius from 1.1 to 2.0Mpc.}
720: \label{fig:Xmass}
721: \end{figure}
722:
723: Examining a circular region of radius $100$ arcsec (660 kpc) centered
724: on the X-ray peak, we measure a temperature of $6.26^{+0.50}_{-0.41}$
725: keV and a metallicity $Z=0.37 \pm 0.10$ solar. This spectrum contains
726: approximately 4300 net (background-subtracted) counts. Dividing this
727: region into four annuli with approximately equal net counts, we obtain
728: the (projected and deprojected) temperature profiles shown in
729: Fig.~\ref{fig:Xtemp}. The deprojected metallicity rises from a value
730: of 0.2 solar in the outer regions to $> 1.0$ within the central 25
731: arscec ($\sim$ 160 kpc).
732:
733:
734: \section{The gas and stellar mass content}
735: \label{sec:stellarmass}
736:
737: The gas mass profile has been determined, under the assumption of
738: spherical symmetry, using the deprojection method described by
739: \citet{allen08}. As discussed by e.g.\ \citet{nagai07b},
740: such an approach should provide an accurate measure of the gas mass,
741: with systematic errors of $<10\%$, even for clusters
742: experiencing major merger events. The deprojected gas mass profile,
743: with statistical and (conservative) systematic error bars, is shown as
744: the lower curve in Fig.~\ref{fig:Xmass}. Within a spherical radius of
745: 500 kpc, we measure a gas mass of $3.6 \pm 0.4 \times 10^{13}$
746: M$_{\sun}$. The \textit{projected} gas mass within a cylinder along
747: the line of sight is shown in the upper curve; this result is
748: (slightly) sensitive to the outermost extent assumed for the cluster.
749: The surface brightness profile is measurable out to 1.1Mpc, whereas
750: a virial
751: radius for a cluster of this temperature and redshift is expected to
752: be $\sim 1.5$Mpc. We
753: therefore consider values from 1.1--2Mpc for the outermost cluster radius.
754: Within the region plotted (for which X-ray temperature data are
755: available), the variation in projected mass due to our choice of outer
756: radius is less than 10\% at all radii. The error-range displayed in
757: Fig.~\ref{fig:Xmass} is formed from the sum in quadrature of this
758: uncertainty and a conservative 10\% systematic error. At 500kpc we measure
759: a projected mass $(5.5 \pm 0.6) \times 10^{13}$~M$_{\sun}$.
760:
761: We adopt the following procedure to measure the stellar mass
762: distribution from the HST data. We identify cluster members based on
763: color-color diagrams, with the color cuts described in
764: \S\ref{sec:weak_lensing}, making use of the DEIMOS/KECK
765: spectroscopic redshifts when available. These cuts primarily select
766: red cluster members, which should be the dominant contributors to the
767: total luminosity. To calculate the stellar mass, we transform observed
768: $I$-band magnitudes (MAGAUTO,
769: \citealp{sextractor}) to K-band rest-frame luminosities, adopting an
770: absolute solar magnitude $M_{\rm K,\sun} = 3.28$, Galactic extinction
771: following \citet{ned1} and \citet{ned2} with $A_{\rm I}= 0.054$, and
772: K-correcting (we assume zero evolutionary correction) using an SED
773: template for an elliptical galaxy from \citet{coleman80} (extended in
774: the UV and IR regions with the GISSEL spectra,
775: \citealp{bruzual93}). The resulting K-correction is $2.464$.
776:
777: We note that our template is likely slightly redder than the cluster
778: members (possibly giving a larger stellar mass), although the
779: approximation is adequate for our purposes. The resulting luminosity
780: distribution (smoothed with a Gaussian kernel with FWHM $80\mbox{
781: kpc}$) is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:kappa}. To convert luminosities to
782: stellar masses we follow \citet{drory04} and assume the
783: stellar-mass-to-light ratio in K-band to be $M_{*}/L_{\rm K}= 0.74\pm
784: 0.30$ (see also \citealp{bell03}).
785:
786: The enclosed, projected total mass within 500 kpc of the X-ray peak,
787: and the projected masses in X-ray emitting gas and stars (in galaxies)
788: are listed in Table~\ref{tab:mass}. The gas mass fraction of $9^{+7}_{-3}\%$ is consistent with the typical value of $\sim 11\%$ observed at
789: similar radii in other massive, X-ray luminous clusters
790: (e.g.\citealp{allen08}; note that the value of $11\%$ does not refer to the projected values, but the projection will make little
791: difference given the errorbars). The mass-to-light
792: ratio ($M/L_{\rm K} ( < 500\mbox{kpc}) = 130^{+40}_{-80}$) and stellar
793: mass fraction ($1.0^{0.7}_{0.4}\%$) within this aperture are also normal (see e.g.\
794: \citealp{kneib03,lin04}). Studying the inner regions of
795: the two subclusters, we measure mass-to-light ratios of $M/L_{\rm K} (
796: < 300\mbox{kpc}) = 70^{+40}_{-50}$ and $100^{+40}_{-60}$ for the SE
797: and NW peaks respectively, which are also consistent with values found
798: for other clusters (see e.g.\ \citealp{kneib03}). Both subclusters
799: have a stellar-to-total mass ratio of 1 per cent within $300\mbox{
800: kpc}$.
801:
802: \section{Dissecting {\protect\bbullet} into dark matter and baryons}
803: \label{sec:bardm}
804: Figure~\ref{fig:kappa} shows the distributions of galaxies, X-ray
805: emitting gas and total mass in {\bbullet}. The figure clearly
806: demonstrates our main result: an obvious spatial offset is observed
807: between the peak of the X-ray emission and the twin peaks of the total
808: mass distribution. As in the case of {\bullet}, we see a good
809: alignment between the total mass and light distribution. The offsets
810: between the X-ray and total mass components are significant at
811: $>4\sigma$ for both the SE and NW clumps (see
812: Table~\ref{tab:offset}). We calculate the significance by assuming
813: that the errors on the total mass distribution follow Gaussian
814: distribution and those on the peak gas position a top-hat
815: function. This is conservative, since both strong and weak lensing
816: (separately) give the peak positions within the observed multiple
817: images, hence the lensing errors are also unlikely to be Gaussian.
818:
819:
820:
821: Like the Bullet Cluster, the morphology and properties of {\bbullet}
822: are consistent with those of a high velocity merger event
823: approximately in the plane of the sky. Given a sound speed for the
824: X-ray emitting gas of $\sim 1300\kms$ and a collision velocity of
825: order $2000\kms$, the merger is likely to have been supersonic;
826: clearly it was violent enough to have separated the baryonic and dark
827: matter cores. The existing, short Chandra exposures are insufficient
828: to indentify and measure shock fronts in the cluster; a deeper Chandra
829: observation of {\bbullet} is required. Such a Chandra
830: observation would also permit detailed thermodynamic mapping of the
831: cluster \citep[e.g.][]{million08}.
832:
833:
834: In contrast to {\bullet}, neither of the subclusters in {\bbullet} contains
835: an X-ray bright, relatively cool, dense `bullet' of low-entropy gas. This is
836: not suprising; at low-to-intermediate redshifts only a fraction (tens of per
837: cent) of clusters contain such cores \citep[e.g.][]{peres98,bauer05}. Once
838: formed, these cores are expected to be relatively robust and, after the
839: merger event, eventually settle at the base of the newly-formed cluster
840: potential. Thus, whereas in $1-2$ Gyr time {\bbullet} may still not possess
841: a cool core, {\bullet} appears likely to evolve into a cool-core cluster.
842:
843:
844:
845: \subsection{Limits on self-interaction cross-section and dark matter alternatives}
846: \label{sec:dmcs}
847:
848:
849: Following \citet{markevitch04} and based on the new data for {\bbullet},
850: we can make an order-of-magnitude estimate for the self-interaction
851: cross-section of dark matter. In the first case,
852: the observed offset between the gas and
853: total mass component implies that the scattering depth of dark matter
854: particles $\tau = \Sigma\sigma/m$ during the collision cannot
855: be much greater than $1$. The surface mass density $\Sigma$ at the
856: position of both peaks averaged over a radius of $150\mbox{kpc}$ is
857: $\sim (0.25 \pm 0.10) \mbox{g}\:\mbox{cm}^{-2}$. Assuming that the two
858: subclusters experienced a head-on collision within this radius, we obtain
859: an estimate for the scattering cross-section of $\sigma/m < 4\cs$. The
860: assumption of spherical symmetry (we assume that the surface mass
861: density along the collision direction is similar to that along the
862: line-of-sight) appears reasonable in {\bbullet} with both subclusters
863: showing little ellipticity.
864:
865:
866: Secondly, the apparent survival of the dark matter content after the
867: recent merger event, implied by the mass-to-light ratios, confirms
868: that the dark matter needs to be
869: collisionless \citep{markevitch04}. Unfortunately current constraints
870: on the escape velocity and shock velocity are too weak to derive more
871: stringent limits on the cross-section. Better X-ray data, improved
872: lensing constraints and detailed hydrodynamical simulations are
873: required to significantly improve upon on these constraints.
874:
875:
876: Just like {\bullet}, {\bbullet} severely challenges modified gravities
877: theories such a MOND \citep[e.g.][]{milgrom83} and TeVeS
878: \citep{bekenstein04}. \citet{angus06} attempt to explain the weak
879: lensing data for {\bullet} using a MOND-like model with $2\mbox{ eV}$
880: neutrinos. However, such neutrinos alone cannot explain the X-ray
881: properties of groups \citep{angus07}, and lie at the limit of the
882: allowed region from current neutrino experiments (Maintz/Troitsk;
883: \citealp[e.g.][]{weinheimer03}). Moreover, such as model cannot easily
884: explain the tight strong lensing constraints on the mass distributions
885: in the inner regions of {\bullet} and {\bbullet}, where multiple
886: images are observed.
887:
888:
889:
890: \section{Conclusions and Outlook}
891: \label{sec:conclusions}
892:
893: We have presented new data for the post-merging galaxy cluster
894: {\bbullet}. This system exhibits many similar properties to the
895: Bullet Cluster {\bullet}, although it does not contain a
896: low-entropy, high density hydrodynamical `bullet'. HST and Chandra
897: data have allowed us to derive a high-resolution total mass map, as
898: well as the X-ray gas mass and stellar mass distributions in the
899: cluster. Our main conclusions are as follows:
900: \begin{enumerate}
901: \item The total mass distribution in {\bbullet} shows two distinct
902: peaks. Both are clearly offset from the main baryonic
903: component (the hot gas) as traced by the X-ray emission, at $>4\sigma$
904: significance (for each of the peaks). There is no significant offset
905: between the peaks of the total mass distribution and the galaxies.
906: \item We have measured the projected, enclosed mass of the three main
907: mass constituents (dark matter, gas, and stars) within 500 kpc of the
908: X-ray center. The gas-to-total mass ratio ($9^{+7}_{-3}\%$) and the mass-to-light
909: ratio ($1.0^{+0.7}_{-0.4}\%$) are typical for a massive cluster.
910: \item The mass-to-light ratios $M/L_{\rm K}$ ($< 300\mbox{kpc}) =
911: 70^{+40}_{-50}$ and $100^{+40}_{-60}$ for the SE and NW peak,
912: and the stellar-to-total mass ratios ($1.0^{+0.7}_{-0.4}\%$) in these
913: regions are consistent with values for other
914: massive clusters, arguing that there was no significant
915: loss of dark matter from either subcluster during the
916: collision.
917: \item The majority of the mass is spatially coincident with the
918: galaxies which implies, just as for the Bullet
919: Cluster, that the cluster must be dominated by a relatively
920: collisionless form of dark matter. We obtain an estimate for the
921: self-interaction cross-section $\sigma/m < 4\cs$.
922: \end{enumerate}
923:
924: {\bbullet} is a remarkable cluster with properties that allow us to
925: improve our understanding of the details of cluster formation and
926: evolution, and the nature of dark matter. Our results can be further improved with additional strong lensing information to
927: better constrain the normalization of the mass model and better X-ray
928: data to improve the determination of the merger speed, and hence
929: improve the limits on the dark matter cross-section. Discovering more
930: clusters like {\bbullet} and {\bullet} will also improve the
931: systematic uncertainties on dark matter self-interaction cross-section
932: inherent to the study of a small number of these objects.
933: \vspace{0.3cm}
934:
935: %===============================================================================
936:
937: \begin{acknowledgements} We would like to thank Cheng-Jiun Ma for the work done on KECK spectra and Matt Auger for sharing his KECK/LRIS pipeline with us. We would also like to thank Phil Marshall and Eli
938: Rykoff for many useful discussions and Alice Shapley and Chun Ly for
939: providing us the spectral templates. Support for this work was
940: provided by NASA through grant numbers HST-GO-11100 from the Space
941: Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by AURA, Inc., under
942: NASA contract NAS 5-26555 and NNX08AD79G. MB acknowledges support from
943: NASA through Hubble Fellowship grant \#~HST-HF-01206.01 awarded by the
944: Space Telescope Science Institute. TT acknowledges support from the
945: NSF through CAREER award NSF-0642621, by the Sloan Foundation through
946: a Sloan Research Fellowship, and by the Packard Foundation through a
947: Packard Fellowship. RM acknowledges support from STFC through Advanced
948: Fellowship \#~PP/E006450/1. SWA and RGM acknowledge support from the
949: U.S. Department of Energy under contract number DE-AC02-76SF00515.
950: This research has made use of data obtained from the Chandra Data
951: Archive and software provided by the Chandra X-ray Center (CXC). Some
952: of the data presented herein were obtained at the W.M. Keck
953: Observatory, which is operated as a scientific partnership among the
954: California Institute of Technology, the University of California and
955: the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The Observatory was
956: made possible by the generous financial support of the W.M.\ Keck
957: Foundation. \end{acknowledgements}
958:
959:
960: \input{ms.bbl}
961:
962: \end{document}
963:
964: