1: \documentclass[12pt, preprint]{aastex}
2: \usepackage{psfig}
3: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
4: %%\documentstyle[emulateapj,psfig,side]{article}
5: %
6:
7: \def\gs{\mathrel{\raise0.35ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle >$}\kern-0.6em
8: \lower0.40ex\hbox{{$\scriptstyle \sim$}}}}
9: \def\ls{\mathrel{\raise0.35ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle <$}\kern-0.6em
10: \lower0.40ex\hbox{{$\scriptstyle \sim$}}}}
11: \def\et{\hbox{et al.}$\,$}
12: \def\etal{\hbox{et al.}$\,$}
13: \def\OII{\hbox{[O II]}$\,\,$}
14: \def\Hd{\hbox{H$\delta$}$\,\,$}
15: \def\Ha{\hbox{H$\alpha$}$\,$}
16: \def\Hdn{\hbox{H$\delta_{norm}$}$\,$}
17: \def\EWOII{\hbox{EW([O II])}$\,$}
18: \def\EWHd{\hbox{EW(H$\delta$)}$\,$}
19: \def\DHd{\hbox{$\Delta\EWHd$}$\,$}
20: \def\Msun{\rm{\hbox{M$_{\odot}$}}} % Solar masses
21: \def\ang{\hbox{\AA}$\,$ }
22: \def\kms{\rm{\hbox{km s$^{-1}$}}}
23: \def\OII{\hbox{[O II]}$\,$}
24: \def\HII{\hbox{H~II}$\,$}
25: \def\Hd{\hbox{H$\delta$}$\,$}
26: \def\24m{\hbox{24~$\micron$}$\,$}
27: % JRR-specific definitionsetal
28: \newcommand{\fnu}{$f_{\nu}$}
29: \newcommand{\microJy}{$\mu$Jy}
30:
31:
32: \slugcomment{Submitted: 2008 June 13; accepted: 2008 --- ---}
33:
34: \shorttitle{Dressler et al.}
35: \righthead{Spitzer-MIPS \24m detections in Abell 851}
36:
37: \begin{document}
38:
39: \title{Spitzer \24m detections of starburst galaxies in Abell 851}
40:
41: \author{Alan Dressler, Jane Rigby, \& Augustus Oemler Jr.}
42: \affil{The Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of
43: Washington, 813 Santa Barbara St., Pasadena, California 91101-1292}
44: \email{dressler@ociw.edu, jrigby@ociw.edu, \& oemler@ociw.edu}
45:
46: \author{Jacopo Fritz \& Bianca M.\ Poggianti}
47: \affil{INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova}
48: \affil{Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, vicolo
49: dell'Osservatorio 5, 35122 Padova, Italy}
50:
51: \email{bianca.poggianti@oapd.inaf.it \& jacopo.fritz@gmail.com0}
52:
53:
54: \author{George Rieke \& Lei Bai}
55: \affil{Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721}
56: \email{grieke@as.arizona.edu \& bail@as.arizona.edu,}
57:
58:
59: \begin{abstract}
60:
61: Spitzer-MIPS \24m observations and ground-based optical imaging and spectroscopy of
62: the rich galaxy cluster Abell 851 at $z = 0.41$ are used to derive and compare star formation
63: rates from the mid-IR \24m and from \OII $\lambda\lambda$3727 emission. Many cluster
64: galaxies have SFR(\24m) /SFR(\OII) $>>$ 1, indicative of star formation in regions highly
65: obscured by dust. We focus on the substantial minority of A851 cluster members where
66: strong Balmer absorption points to a starburst on a $10^{8-9}$ year timescale. As is typical,
67: two types of galaxies with strong Balmer absorption are found in A851: with optical emission
68: (starforming), and without (post-starburst). Our principal result is that the starforming variety,
69: so-called e(a) galaxies, are mostly detected (9 out of 12) at \24m --- for these we find typically
70: SFR(\24m)/SFR(\OII) $\sim 4$. Strong Balmer absorption and high values of SFR(\24m)/SFR(\OII)
71: indicate moderately active starbursts; both observations support the picture that e(a) galaxies are the
72: active starbursts that feed the post-starburst population. While \24m detections are frequent
73: with Balmer-strong objects (even 6 out of 18 of the supposedly ``post-starburst'' galaxies are
74: detected), only 2 out of 7 of the continuously starforming `e(c)' galaxies (with weak Balmer
75: absorption) are detected --- for them, SFR(\24m)/SFR(\OII) $\sim 1$. Their optical spectra
76: resemble present-epoch spirals that dominate today's universe; we strengthen this association
77: by showing that SFR(\24m)/SFR(\OII) $\sim$ 1 is the norm today. That is, not just the amount of star
78: formation but also its mode has evolved strongly from $z \sim 0.4$ to the present. We fit
79: spectrophotometric models in order to measure the strength and duration of the bursts and to quantify the
80: evolutionary sequence from active- to post-starburst. Our results harden the evidence that
81: moderately active starbursts are the defining feature of starforming cluster galaxies at $z \sim 0.4$.
82:
83:
84: %\vspace{1.0cm}
85:
86: \end{abstract}
87:
88:
89: \keywords{galaxies: clusters: general -- galaxies: evolution}
90:
91:
92: \section{Introduction}
93:
94: A remarkable change in our view of galaxy evolution over the last few decades has been the
95: realization that the properties of galaxies are changing on relatively short time scales, in cosmic
96: terms. The Butcher-Oemler (1978) effect, first at-odds with the then-prevailing
97: picture that strong galaxy evolution occurred only within the first few billion years, is now part
98: of the orthodoxy -- a large and still-growing body of evidence shows that the stellar populations
99: and even the morphologies of many galaxies have undergone significant change, even within the
100: last 4 billion years. Butcher and Oemler's discovery of a substantial population of luminous starforming
101: galaxies in intermediate-redshift clusters -- a great contrast with cluster populations today where
102: only a small fraction of galaxies are still actively forming stars -- is now widely confirmed and accepted.
103:
104: Less well known, but likely as important for understanding the causes of the Butcher-Oemler
105: effect, is the discovery by Dressler and Gunn (1983) that most of these starforming galaxies in the
106: cores of distant clusters show a starburst signature in their optical spectra: both starbursts and post-starbursts
107: are common. Later work has confirmed the ubiquity of this result (Couch \& Sharples 1987, Wirth \etal 1994,
108: Poggianti \etal 1999 -- P99, Tran \etal 2003).\footnote{Interested readers will appreciate
109: a review of the often-cited rebuttal by Balogh \etal (1999). These authors actually found a 5\%
110: incidence of strong Balmer-line sources --- for a lower redshift cluster sample, with a higher threshold of
111: Balmer strength --- quite consistent with the other work cited above. Balogh \etal discounted their
112: detections as simple noise in their spectra, after determining the ``noise'' from the \Hd distribution in their
113: full sample. Dressler \etal (2004) show that the detections were in fact reliable -- and the noise greatly
114: overestimated --- due to a difficulty with the bandpass measurement technique, which for small \Hd equivalent
115: width returns negative values --- see also Prochaska \etal 2007.} Data from these studies suggest
116: that a significant fraction of field populations at $z \sim 0.5$ is also undergoing moderate bursts
117: of star formation (Dressler \etal 2004). This behavior contrasts with today's population of field
118: galaxies, for which continuous star forming is the dominant mode, and starbursts are rare. This is yet
119: further evidence of rapid evolution of the galaxy population, at least as important, since it applies to field
120: and cluster galaxies alike.
121:
122: In this paper we address one of the long-standing uncertainties of this subject --- the amount of
123: dust-obscured star formation that has not been generally accounted-for in representative field
124: and cluster populations at $z \sim 0.5$. Although Balmer absorption is a reliable indicator of past
125: starburst activity, a coherent picture requires evidence of the bursts themselves. This has been
126: hampered by the possibility that much of the star formation is obscured by dust, and
127: therefore not part of the tally made with optical-to-near-IR observations. The remarkable
128: sensitivity of the Spitzer Space Telescope with its \24m MIPS camera is allowing great progress
129: in removing this uncertainty.
130:
131: As part of a successful Spitzer program to observe two rich clusters of galaxies, we investigated
132: archival MIPS data for Abell 851, a cluster that is well studied in the optical, x-ray, and radio, and for
133: which a significant spectroscopic sample has been obtained and explored in a companion paper
134: (Oemler et al. 2008, hereinafter Oem08). Our purpose here is limited to the implications for the amount
135: and character of star formation in distant clusters, specifically the subject of ``starburst vs. continuously
136: starforming'' for distant galaxies. Issues of causes and mechanisms are beyond the scope of this paper,
137: but Spitzer data for additional rich, distant clusters and their surrounding field populations will be able to
138: advance these discussions considerably.
139:
140: The paper is organized as follows. In section 2 we lay out the issues, in Section 3 we address the
141: ability of mid-infrared imaging to add to our knowledge of the star formation rates of distant galaxies,
142: in Section 4 we present the optical and mid-IR data for A851, and Section 5 we give the results of
143: combining these data sets. In Section 6 we compare our detections of dusty starbursts in A851 with
144: similar observations of present-epoch spirals. Finally, in Section 7, we apply stellar population
145: models to the optical spectra + MIPS data and discuss the results in terms of a consistent picture
146: of the starburst activity in distant clusters.
147:
148: \section{Where are the starbursts that feed the post-starburst population?}
149:
150: Dressler \& Gunn (1983) first reported spectra of L* galaxies in distant clusters with
151: strong Balmer absorption but no emission lines and interpreted these as {\it post-starburst}
152: (see also Couch \& Sharpes 1987, P99). The question ``where are the {\em active} starbursts that
153: turn into post-starburst galaxies?" was largely set aside. Dressler, Gunn, and
154: Schneider (1985) noted only a few examples in CL0024+24 of nearly pure emission-line
155: spectra --- characteristic of today's strong starbursts, for example, Markarian galaxies.
156: But, because it was expected that the starburst phase would be short, $\tau \ls 10^8$ yr,
157: compared to the $\tau \sim 10^9$ yr that the galaxy would be recognized as post-starburst,
158: it was reasonable at first to expect to catch few of the actual starbursts. This explanation
159: became untenable as the Morphs study of 10 clusters accumulated more than 100 post-starburst
160: spectra: although some tens of emission-line-dominated spectra were identified,
161: their distribution was distinctly shifted to lower-luminosities than the post-starburst
162: galaxies --- the predecessors to the post starbursts would be, if anything, more luminous (P99).
163:
164: However, the larger Morphs sample provided an alternate explanation. In addition to the post-starbursts,
165: the Morphs sample included a substantial number of galaxies with strong \Hd\ {\it\bf and} (relatively weak)
166: \OII emission. Initially, these were interpreted as decaying starbursts --- a phase of subsiding star
167: formation between the main burst and the post-starburst phase. However, the dusty appearance of
168: many of these `e(a)' galaxies (`e' for emission, `a' for A-stars) led P99 to another explanation --- that
169: e(a) galaxies were, in fact, the
170: actual starbursts. If heavily obscured by dust, \OII emission would greatly under-represent the star
171: formation rate. As examples, P99 pointed to the Liu \& Kennicutt (1995) sample of present-day mergers,
172: which shared the spectral properties of the e(a) galaxies (see Poggianti \& Wu 2000, Poggianti,
173: Bressan, \& Franceschini 2001). Liu \& Kennicutt showed, from IRAS mid-IR observations and
174: optical imaging, that the majority of star formation in such systems is hidden by dust
175: from optical or near-IR observation. Detection with the VLA of a radio continuum of many of these
176: putative dusty starbursts in the distant cluster sample also supported the idea of hidden star
177: formation (Smail \etal 1999). Furthermore, radio detections of a few supposedly {\it post-starburst}
178: galaxies suggested that dust might be hiding continuing star formation in some of these as well.
179:
180: Subsequent work has been supportive of the identification of dusty starbursts in distant clusters.
181: ISOCAM contributed extensively to the study of mid-IR emission from present-epoch galaxies at all types
182: was extensive. In particular, Duc \etal (2002) and Fadda \etal (2002) made pioneering observations
183: of galaxies in clusters at $z \sim 0.2$. ISOCAM's sensitivity did not allow it to detect typical starforming
184: galaxies at $z \sim 0.5$, and even at $z \sim 0.2$ the detections were mostly luminous infrared galaxies (LIRGs).
185: Despite limited sensitivity, several studies detected luminous, dusty starbursts in clusters at these
186: redshifts, galaxies that are rare (at best) in rich clusters at z=0. The pre-Spitzer era of mid-IR emission from
187: galaxies is well and thoroughly reviewed by Metcalfe \etal (2005).
188:
189: Now, with MIPS on Spitzer, it is possible to measure star formation rates $\sim1~\Msun~yr^{-1}$
190: at $z \sim 0.5$, a value typical of normal spiral galaxies today. This means that L* galaxies with even
191: modestly elevated rates of star formation compared to today's spirals are detectable, allowing us to
192: test directly the claim by the Morphs that the e(a) galaxies in intermediate-redshift clusters are dusty
193: starbursts of sufficient luminosity to feed the post-starburst population and judge, as well, whether the
194: post-starburst galaxies are really {\bf post} starburst.
195:
196: Ours is not the first study to use MIPS on Spitzer to image intermediate-redshift clusters. Geach \etal
197: (2006) targeted two clusters at $z \sim 0.5$ and found many mid-IR sources in one, although
198: comparatively few in another cluster of similar richness. They describe the properties of the
199: population -- luminosity function, spatial distribution, etc., but do not analyze the properties the
200: individual galaxies and basically bypass the question of starbursts, consistent with the paradigm
201: favored by Geach \etal in which starforming galaxies falling into clusters are simply extinguished.
202:
203: Bai \etal (2007) and Marcillac \etal (2007) imaged two very rich clusters at $z \sim 0.8$, for which they
204: detected 30-plus galaxies in the mid-IR that are either confirmed or suspected (photometric
205: redshift) cluster members. Because of the greater distance relative to the Geach \etal clusters
206: and A851, the detected galaxies have greater rates of star formation --- tens of solar masses
207: per year --- most of these can be classified as LIRGS. The optical spectra of these mid-IR
208: detections argue that these galaxies are strongly star-forming and considerably obscured by dust.
209: Both Bai \etal and Marcillac \etal, like Geach et al., analyze the properties of the population, velocity
210: kinematics, galaxy morphology, spatial distribution, particularly with respect to x-ray emission, colors,
211: and luminosity distribution. In addition, Marcillac \etal investigate the correlation with optical spectral
212: types -- passive, starforming, and post-starburst, but their sample included only 4 galaxies that are
213: candidates for active, dusty starbursts, of which 3 are detected in the mid-IR. Our goal in this and
214: subsequent studies is to extend this comparison of optical spectra and mid-IR emission to typical
215: starforming galaxies of lower luminosities, which will provide a fuller picture of the evolution of the
216: cluster population, $L > 0.4L*$.
217:
218: This study of A851 and the future observations we will obtain with Spitzer-MIPS will provide crucial
219: data for understanding the star formation history of galaxies that are involved in building
220: intermediate-redshift clusters. The optical spectroscopy and photometry of such samples are missing
221: information about dust obscuration that is necessary to this task; adding the Spitzer data provides
222: such data. We will pay particular attention to the presence of Balmer absorption in
223: our sample galaxies, highlighting the importance of starbursts in cluster evolution
224: (see D99, P99 and references therein). Unlike the other studies of clusters with Spitzer-MIPS,
225: we will concentrate on modeling the star formation history with the critical addition of the mid-IR data.
226: Specifically, through basic stellar population models of the data, we will address the question of
227: whether the distinctions we have drawn between continuously starforming, starbursting, and
228: post-starburst galaxies are quantitatively consistent with the observations of intermediate-redshift
229: cluster galaxies.
230:
231:
232:
233:
234: \section{The Data}
235:
236:
237: \subsection{Basic properties of the rich cluster of galaxies Abell 851}
238: % Dressler \& Gunn, Morphs, Oemler \etal 2008
239:
240: The rich cluster Abell 851 (aka CL0939+4713) at $z = 0.41$ is one of the best-studied
241: intermediate-redshift clusters and one of the clusters in which post-starburst galaxies
242: were first identified (Dressler \& Gunn 1992). A851 is among the most populous clusters
243: known at its epoch and is also noteworthy because it appears to be in the process
244: of assembly through the mergers of several subclusters. This is especially evident in X-ray
245: observations (Schindler \etal 1998) where two prominent centers of emission are also
246: centers of galaxy concentration.
247:
248: Although A851 is unusually rich and dynamically active, its galaxy population is not
249: qualitatively different from that of other rich clusters at $z \sim 0.5$, as shown by studies
250: by the Morphs collaboration (Smail \etal 1997, Dressler \etal 1999, P99, D04, Oem08). The
251: majority of its galaxies are red, passive elliptical and S0 galaxies, but A851 is also well
252: represented in both types of galaxies with strong Balmer absorption: those without emission
253: that are identified as post-starburst,
254: and those with emission that have been suggested to be dust-obscured,
255: active starbursts that feed the post-starburst population (P99).
256:
257: Oem08 studied an extended region $R \sim 2-3$ Mpc around the core of A851, including HST
258: images and spectroscopy for both an extended square region and the remarkable filament that
259: stretches further, to the north-west of the cluster. Oem08 found a substantial population of
260: active starbursts and fewer post-starburst galaxies in the outskirts of A851, consistent with
261: idea that many of the starbursts are triggered well outside the cluster core, probably within
262: the infalling groups from which the cluster is growing (P99, Treu \etal 2003, Moran \etal 2007).
263: Oem08 also found another population of starbursts that appear to have been triggered by
264: passing through the cluster core.
265:
266: Oem08 also show that the morphology-density relation for this cluster is well developed, even
267: though it is, at $z = 0.41$, in a unrelaxed dynamical state. From the spatially extended sample it
268: appears that A851 is one of the most active clusters known in terms of star formation and starbursts,
269: but that these differences are quantitative rather than qualitative, and likely the result of the very
270: dynamic phase in which it is observed. A complete description of A851, the observations, and the
271: implications for galaxy evolution in clusters can be found in Oem08.
272:
273:
274:
275:
276: \subsection{Optical data and Spitzer-MIPS Observations}
277:
278: The optical data for this study includes photometry and spectroscopy from Dressler \& Gunn (1992)
279: and the Morphs collaboration. HST WFPC-2 observations that cover a 3x3 mosaic (480 arcsec square)
280: are described in Smail \etal (1997) and Oem08. The morphological information from these images
281: is mainly discussed in Oem08 and briefly referenced here, but these fields basically define the
282: extent of the photometric and spectroscopic sample that we use here. The photometric data
283: come from these HST frames and ground-based observations by Dressler \& Gunn. The spectroscopic
284: data come from Dressler \& Gunn and the Morphs collaboration (Dressler \etal 1997, D99); they are
285: explained in more detail in Oem08.
286:
287: The core of Abell 851 was mapped in 24~\micron\ by MIPS in Spitzer GTO program 83
288: (PI G.~Rieke). The background level was 32 MJy/SR, which is classified as ``medium'' by
289: the SSC. The observation was done in Photometry Mode, with six cycles of
290: half-frame--overlapping coverage, and individual exposure times of 30~s. The resulting
291: exposure time per-pixel is 2685~s in a 5\arcmin\ $\times$ 5\arcmin\ box centered on the
292: cluster, and 900~s in two flanking boxes each 5\arcmin\ $\times$ 2.2\arcmin\ in area. The
293: online SSC tool SENS-PET estimates that these exposure times should have $5 \sigma$
294: point source sensitivities of 70 and 120 \microJy, respectively. At these depths,
295: confusion noise from extragalactic sources becomes important.
296:
297: The 24~\micron\ images were reduced and combined into a mosaic using the
298: Data Analysis Tool (Gordon \etal\ 2006) with a few additional processing steps
299: (Egami \etal\ 2006). Photometry at 24~\micron\ was obtained by PSF fitting
300: using the DAOPHOT task \textit{allstar}, as detailed in Rigby \etal (2008).
301:
302: The areas covered by optical spectroscopy and MIPS 24 micron are of similar size, but not
303: entirely coincident. There are 101 cluster members with high--quality optical spectra ($Q \le 3$, see
304: Oem08 for more information). Of these, 83 have MIPS \24m coverage. Of those, 22 are
305: Spitzer detections with $f(\24m) > 80~\mu$Jy. Using a $R=1.44$\arcsec\ matching
306: radius, and given the number density of \24m sources with $f > 80~\mu$Jy in the image, we expect
307: from the P-statistic (Lilly et al. 1999) that approximately one cluster member will be spuriously matched
308: to a \24m detection with $f>80~\mu$Jy . For non-detections in the regions of deep and shallower
309: coverage we quote upper limits of $f < 80~\mu$Jy and $< 120~\mu$Jy, respectively. For non-detections
310: located close to bright sources, we assign a larger upper limit of $f < 200~\mu$Jy.
311:
312: \section{Measurements of star formation histories from optical and mid-IR data}
313:
314: \subsection{Optical diagnostics}
315:
316: In this study we focus on the emission feature \OII $\lambda\lambda$3727 oxygen doublet and the
317: Balmer absorption line \Hd as indicators of the star formation rate (SFR). As discussed in P99 and
318: D04, these two features measure the time-averaged SFR over $\tau \sim 10^7$ yr and $\tau \sim 10^9$ yr,
319: respectively. Measurements of \OII and \Hd from our sample spectra have been done with a
320: semi-automated line-fitting technique, described in Oem08. A quantitative comparison of the
321: strength of these indicators measures whether the star formation rate has been steady over the
322: previous $\tau \sim 10^9$ yr or whether there has been a starburst with a rapid decline in the SFR
323: rate over that timescale. An ongoing starburst is inferred by comparing the current ($\tau \sim 10^7$ yr)
324: SFR to the total stellar mass of the galaxy, through spectral synthesis modeling.
325:
326: In the following we use the strengths of \OII and \Hd to divide galaxies into spectral types which correspond
327: to different histories of star formation (see Oem08, Table 5 for the definition of the types); e(c)'s are galaxies
328: with continuing star formation, k+a's and a+k's are moderate and strong post--starbursts, e(b)'s are starbursts with
329: strong optical emission, e(a)'s are dusty starbursts with weak optical emission, k's are passive, early--type
330: galaxies, and e(n)'s are AGN's. By starbursts, we shall mean any galaxy whose observed star formation rate is
331: at least a factor of two higher than its long-term average. We shall use the term ``post--starburst'' to signify any
332: galaxy which had a starburst in the recent ($\tau \ls 10^9$yrs) past, but at the epoch of observation shows no
333: detectable star formation, and buried starburst to signify a starburst which is sufficiently obscured by dust to
334: completely hide its \OII emission.
335:
336: Oem08 have measured the equivalent width of \OII in the A851 sample. We convert these equivalent widths
337: to \OII luminosities by the following steps. (1) Because our optical spectra cover only a fraction of each galaxy,
338: while the Spitzer photometry covers the entire object, we must make some assumption about the distribution of
339: \OII flux over the face of the galaxy. In the absence of any other information, we assume that the \OII flux has the
340: same distribution as the visble light. (2) Using the total r magnitudes of the galaxies, we calculate the total
341: $F_\nu$ at 6500\AA. (3) Using the shape of our fluxed spectra, we then determine the total $F_\nu$ at 3727\AA,
342: and from this and the measured \EWOII, we calculate the total flux in the \OII line. (4) We then use a standard
343: $\Lambda$ cosmology to calculate total \OII luminosity. This method is dependant on our assumption about the
344: spatial distribution of \OII, but the spectra, which come from slits that typically cover $\sim8 \times 12$ kpc at
345: $z = 0.41$, sample a reasonable fraction of each galaxy in our sample, so the sensitivity of our result to this
346: assumption is probably not severe.
347:
348: The UV flux from young, massive stars in \HII regions ionizes oxygen atoms which then produce \OII
349: through recombination. Only the hottest stars have sufficient UV flux to contribute, so \OII flux in an
350: \HII region is due mainly to the population of O and B stars. Rates of star formation come from
351: folding in the well-known lifetimes of these stars. Deriving the SFR
352: for stars of all masses requires the adoption of a universal initial mass function --- an
353: often-questioned, but yet to be invalidated, assumption. We have employed Kennicutt's (1998)
354: prescription:
355:
356: {\noindent SFR $\Msun yr^{-1}$ = $1.4 \times 10^{-41}$ L(\OII) ergs~s$^{-1}$ (1)}
357:
358: {\noindent We note that, because this is an average rate that includes lower-luminosity spiral and irregular
359: galaxies less luminous irregular galaxies, we are perhaps overestimating the SFR for our
360: sample --- by $\ls40\%$ --- which makes this a conservative choice for the purposes of this study.
361: On the other hand, there might be even greater uncertainty just from using this $z \sim 0$ relation
362: on earlier-epoch starforming galaxies. We show below that, despite these uncertainties, we derive
363: approximately equal SFRs from both the Kennicutt \OII relation and from \24m for ``normal"
364: starforming galaxies (in both A851 and a present-epoch field sample covering the same luminosity
365: range), which is reassuring.}
366:
367: The Kennicutt formulation is sometimes corrected for dust extinction and sometimes not.
368: The relation adopted here is corrected for average dust extinction from \OII to H$\alpha$,
369: but not for extinction at H$\alpha$. Our goal is to compare the SFRs derived from \OII
370: to the SFR derived from the dust-insensitive \24m luminosity, so measuring \OII
371: flux and applying the standard correction to H$\alpha$ for present-epoch galaxies will show
372: whether the distant starforming galaxies in A851 have an unusual amount of dust and thus
373: more star formation than is evident with optical diagnostics. Because our analysis depends
374: on the relative values of these two indicators, our conclusions are not dependent on a
375: rigorous analysis of the absolute value of extinction in our sample galaxies, which is beyond
376: the scope of this paper.
377:
378: Measurements of \Hd strength are comparatively insensitive to dust aborption, because, over
379: the $10^9$ yr timescale for which it measures the SFR, the A-F stars that contribute most
380: to the \Hd\ signal are expected to have diffused out of the dusty regions in which they were born.
381:
382:
383: \subsection{Mid-infrared diagnostic}
384:
385: Empirically, the total infrared (8--1000~\micron) luminosity, L(TIR), correlates reasonably well with
386: other star formation rate tracers in nearby dusty star--forming galaxies (Hunter \etal\ 1986, Lonsdale,
387: Persson, \& Helou 1987, Kennicutt 1986). Far-IR emission arises from grey-body emission of
388: dust heated by hot stars. Since the escape fraction for ionizing photons is low, and the
389: dust cross-section peaks in the UV, the far-IR is essentially a calorimeter of hot young stars
390: (Kennicutt 1986, and references therein). Only at low redshift is it currently possibly to
391: sample fully the long--wavelength SED of galaxies to measure L(TIR) directly. Fortunately,
392: monochromatic luminosities in the rest-frame mid-IR (5--30~\micron) range correlate well with
393: L(TIR) at low redshift (Chary \& Elbaz 2001, Calzetti 2007), and this correlation has been
394: demonstrated to extend to $z=1.3$ (Marcillac \etal\ 2006).
395:
396: Mid-IR emission is a combination of continuum from small grains plus aromatic features. The
397: luminosity surface density in both the continuum--dominated $\lambda_r = 24$~\micron\ spectral
398: region and the aromatic--dominated $\lambda_r = 8$~\micron\ spectral region correlate well with
399: that of extinction--corrected Paschen~$\alpha$ (Calzetti 2007); in both cases the $1 \sigma$
400: scatter is about 0.3 dex. Figure 3 of Alonso-Herrero et al. (2006) shows a tighter correlation between
401: rest-frame 12~\micron\ and extinction--corrected P$\alpha$, $\sigma \sim$ 0.1--0.2 dex.
402:
403: At $z=0.4$, the 24~\micron\ band of MIPS on Spitzer detects rest--frame 15--19~\micron. These
404: wavelengths are also dominated by continuum emission from small grains, with a contribution from the
405: relatively weak 17~\micron\ aromatic feature. The rest-frame 15--19~\micron\ bandpass has not been
406: similarly calibrated at $z = 0$ because IRAS had no such band, however, since the 15--19~\micron\
407: continuum arises from the same small grains that produce the 12um and the 24um rest-frame continua,
408: the scatter in this band should be similar. We conclude from the results from Calzetti, Marcillac \etal,
409: and Alonso-Herrero \etal, and also Smith \etal (2006, 2007) that the continuum emission in this
410: region should trace the star formation rate with only moderate dispersion. Because mid-IR photons are
411: not further absorbed by other dust grains in starforming regions, they provide a clear view of the total star
412: formation in the system, which \OII and even H$\alpha$ cannot do.
413:
414: In the next section we will use template SEDs generated by Chary \& Elbaz (2001) and Dale \&
415: Helou (2002) that model the flux distribution from the mid-to-far IR to derive the total SFRs
416: for our detected galaxies. The SED shapes of these templates vary smoothly as a function of
417: mid-IR luminosity, allowing a reliable correction to bolometric IR emission from observations
418: over a relatively narrow wavelength range. A small complication is that these templates do
419: not include $\lambda > 15$~\micron\ aromatic features. This means that the 17~\micron\
420: aromatic feature, which falls in the \24m band at the $z=0.407$ redshift of A851, will not be
421: correctly accounted for. However, the feature has a typical equivalent width
422: of only 0.36~\micron\ (Brandl \etal\ 2006), and affects the detected MIPS 24~\micron\ flux density
423: only at the $10\%$ level. This small systematic effect is not important for our results.
424:
425: For a sample of 59 SINGS galaxies, Smith \etal\ (2007) observed an intrinsic dispersion
426: in aromatic feature strength compared to the dust continuum. Figure 19 of Smith \etal\
427: quantifies how this spectral variation affects 24~\micron\ flux density: at $z=0.4$ the
428: $10\%$--$90\%$ variation in the spectra of their luminous (L(TIR) $> 2.6\times
429: 10^{10}$~L$_\odot$) sample causes a $\pm 20\%$ change in the MIPS 24~\micron\ flux
430: density. Thus, flux differences of this magnitude should not necessarily be interpreted as
431: differences in star formation rate, since they may be due to intrinsic spectral
432: variation.
433:
434: Despite these caveats, the robustness from dust obscuration, the well--behaved nature of the
435: mid-IR continuum (Calzetti 2007), and the relative weakness of the 17~\micron\ aromatic
436: feature makes it a relatively reliable diagnostic of star formation rate in bursting galaxies.
437:
438: \subsection{Deriving star formation rates from mid-IR fluxes.}
439:
440: We converted from observed 24~\micron\ flux density to inferred star formation rate as
441: follows: Chary \& Elbaz have derived template SEDs that model the full emission from
442: 8-1000~\micron\ for galaxies with a wide range of mid-IR luminosity. We transformed each
443: of the Chary \& Elbaz synthetic templates to the cluster redshift and converted L$_\lambda$
444: to f$_\lambda$, assuming a flat cosmology with h$_0 = 0.72$ and $\Omega_\lambda = 0.73$.
445: We then computed the 24~\micron\ flux density that would be measured for this template using
446: the MIPS response curve.\footnote{http://ssc.Spitzer.caltech.edu/mips/spectral\_response.html}
447:
448: We integrated each template from rest--frame 8--1000~\micron\ to find the total infrared
449: luminosity, and converted that to a star formation rate using equation 4 of Kennicutt (1998).
450: The result is a look-up table, at the cluster redshift, of star formation rate as a function of
451: 24~\micron\ flux density. For the range of detected MIPS flux densities, the corresponding
452: Chary--Elbaz templates were numbers 36 to 75.
453:
454: This extrapolation from rest-frame 15--19 \micron\ to total 8--1000 \micron\ luminosity necessarily
455: depends on the templates assumed. Since we observe large populations of A stars extending
456: well beyond the starforming regions in galaxies which, we will show, have had significant, long duration
457: starbursts, we considered the extra heating that these might provide. Our modeling included comparing
458: the contribution to mid-IR luminosity from young populations ($\tau \ls10^7$ yr) to intermediate-age
459: populations ($\tau \sim10^8$ yr). From this we concluded that, for a Salpeter IMF and a single-age Starburst 99
460: model (Leitherer \etal 1999), the power available in A stars to heat dust is only $\sim$1\% of the power available
461: from O and B stars. Thus, we expect our \24m detections to be dominated by O and B stars, even in
462: galaxies with large A star populations.
463:
464:
465:
466: \section{Results}
467:
468: \subsection{Detection with Spitzer-MIPS is a strong function of spectral type}
469:
470: In Figure 1 we show the result of our attempt to measure Spitzer \24m flux densities
471: for our A851 cluster sample. We plot Spitzer \24m flux density versus R-band optical
472: flux for the 96 confirmed members of A851 (see Oemler \etal\ 2008) that are within the
473: Spitzer field. Figure 1 shows that --- even for cluster members, which comprise an essentially
474: volume-limited sample --- galaxies are detected over a wide range of luminosity. In
475: other words, we are not picking off only the most luminous objects. Most of the cluster
476: members are not detected; however, this sample includes many galaxies that are not
477: starforming (passive), for which detection by Spitzer at \24m is not expected, unless the
478: galaxy harbors an AGN.
479:
480: The non-detection of galaxies without star formation is seen more easily in Figure 2, from
481: the data in Table 1 which break down the detections by optical-spectral classification.
482: Of the 41 galaxies `k' types that are passively evolving,
483: only 2 are detected. There is nothing in the optical spectra of these galaxies that suggests
484: any activity. It is possible that these could be examples of extremely-dust-hidden star formation,
485: as we find below for some of the putative post-starburst galaxies, or AGN, or both.
486:
487: %Figure 1
488:
489: \begin{figure*}
490: \vspace*{0.1cm}
491: \hbox{~}
492: \centerline{\psfig{file=f1.eps,angle=0.,width=6.5in}}
493: \noindent{\scriptsize
494: \addtolength{\baselineskip}{-3pt}
495:
496: \hspace*{0.3cm}Fig.~1.\ Spitzer \24m flux density vs, optical R-band flux for the cluster members
497: of the optical-spectroscopic sample of A851 galaxies. Most galaxies are undetected by Spitzer:
498: only 2/7 e(c)'s, and 2/41 k's are detected. (The k-types upper-limits are
499: the smaller arrows.) However, 9/12 e(a)'s, 1/3 e(b)'s, and even 6/18 ``post-starburst''
500: galaxies, k+a \& a+k, are detected, indicating a clear connection between starburst activity and heavily
501: dust-obscured star formation. This figure shows the spread of flux for the sample: a factor of 20 for both
502: the \24m observations and the R-band (3.2 mag).
503:
504: \vspace*{0.2cm}
505: \addtolength{\baselineskip}{3pt}
506: }
507: \end{figure*}
508:
509: \subsection{Continuously starforming (``normal'') galaxies are generally not detected}
510:
511: Our A851 cluster sample includes both continuously starforming (CSF), e(c) galaxies as well as starburst
512: (SB) and post-starburst galaxies (PSB). The strength of Balmer absorption lines in an integrated
513: spectrum of a galaxy is key to distinguishing the CSF galaxies from the SB and PSB galaxies.
514: The Balmer absorption line strength is a combination of effects, including:
515: (1) the dominance of Balmer absorption lines in the spectra of A stars, which contribute most of the
516: light in populations of age $\tau \ls10^9$ years; (2) the in-filling of Balmer absorption by Balmer emission
517: from the ionized gas in H II regions excited by OB stars; (3) the migration of A stars from the
518: dust-obscured H II regions of their birth, and the distribution and amount of that dust; (4) the
519: strength and duration of the starburst; and (5) the relative contribution of light from KIII stars ---
520: populations older than $2 \times 10^9$ years. It is the combination of these effects that results in
521: substantially different spectra for CSF as compared to SB or PSB galaxies, the key to distinguishing
522: CSF galaxies from other types.
523:
524: The part of the A851 cluster sample that is coincident with Spitzer MIPS observations contains
525: 7 CSF e(c) galaxies. Only 2 of these are detected with MIPS. The 7 e(c) galaxies cover the full range
526: of optical and \24m luminosity, so this poor detection rate is not mainly due to some luminosity-dependent
527: selection effect. As we show in Section 6, we expect SFR(IR) $\sim$ SFR(\OII) for these galaxies (from
528: a comparable low-redshift, local sample), which would give them \24m luminosities scattered around the
529: Spitzer--MIPS detection limit.
530:
531:
532: %Figure 2
533:
534: \begin{figure*}
535: \vspace*{0.1cm}
536: \hbox{~}
537: \centerline{\psfig{file=f2.eps,angle=0.,width=4.0in}}
538: \vspace*{1.0cm}
539: \noindent{\scriptsize
540: \addtolength{\baselineskip}{-3pt}
541:
542: \hspace*{0.3cm}Fig.~2.\ The distributions of` ``detectability'' as a function of the spectral type.
543: The horizontal axis is labeled in \24m flux density (below) and star formation rate (above).
544: The only type for which a majority of galaxies (9/12) is detected is the e(a) class --- the putative dusty
545: starbursts. (The two lightly shaded squares are k+a galaxies with \OII $\approx~ -4$ \ang, slightly below the
546: threshhold for the class defined in P99.) The least detected are k-types (2/41) --- passively evolving
547: early-type galaxies. Most post-starburst galaxies are not detected, as expected, but 6/18 are, suggesting that
548: some members of this class are still actively forming stars well hidden by dust. Only 2/7 of the e(c)
549: galaxies; some may lie just below the detection limit (but this could also be the case for the 3 undetected
550: e(a) types). Of the 3 e(b) galaxies in this sample, only 1 is detected. Forgetting the small-number statistics,
551: this might seem surprising, however, the one detected e(b) is a high-luminosity system, while the others
552: are much less luminous, and likely less dusty (as evidenced by the strong emission lines).
553:
554:
555:
556: \vspace*{0.2cm}
557: \addtolength{\baselineskip}{3pt}
558: }
559: \end{figure*}
560:
561: \subsection{One-third of post-starburst galaxies are detected}
562:
563: The post-starburst galaxies of types ``k+a" and ``a+k" are also mostly undetected, but the
564: fraction 6/18 that are detected is significantly higher than even that of the e(c) galaxies, so this
565: is a surprisingly high rate for galaxies that are supposed to be observed {\it after} star formation has
566: completed. The fact that some of these post-starburst galaxies could have substantial star formation hidden
567: by dust, particularly in their nuclei, had been previously suggested by detections in the radio continuum
568: (Smail \etal 1999), preferentially of objects with the strongest \Hd. These a+k galaxies also show
569: the broadest \Hd absorption lines, indicative of the youngest A-star populations (closest in time to the
570: burst) --- see D04 and Oem08. Of the a+k galaxies in the Spitzer field, 2/5 are detected, compared to
571: only 4/13 of the k+a, but with such a small sample, this is only suggestive.
572:
573: The Spitzer data, then, lead to two important results for the post-starbursts: (1) Most of the
574: galaxies classified as post-starburst are exactly that --- there is little or no ongoing, hidden
575: star formation (SFR $<$ 3 \Msun\ $yr^{-1}$). This removes a critical uncertainty in earlier work.
576: (2) A significant minority of cluster galaxies classified as post-starburst hide some residual star
577: formation. A few of these may be as active as the starbursts we discuss next, but as we show in
578: Section 7 (where we model the history of star formation), for most the rate of residual star
579: formation is much lower than the preceding burst. It is quite possible that this
580: remaining dust-obscured star formation is concentrated to the center of the galaxy --- this
581: is perhaps the only location where a very high extinction can be supported --- while the
582: previous, larger starburst might have been a more global, and thus more powerful event.
583:
584: %Figure 3
585:
586: \begin{figure*}
587: \vspace*{0.1cm}
588: \hbox{~}
589: \centerline{\psfig{file=f3.eps,angle=0.,width=6.5in}}
590: \noindent{\scriptsize
591: \addtolength{\baselineskip}{-3pt}
592: \hspace*{0.3cm}Fig.~3.\ The cumulative distributions of star formation rates (SFRs) for the galaxies in A851
593: measured from Spitzer \24m fluxes and \OII emission lines. The data are for all galaxies with
594: EQW(OII) $< -4$ angstroms. Galaxies in which EQW(H$\delta) < +4$ \ang --- e(c) --- are shown in the upper
595: plot; galaxies with H$\delta > +4$ \ang --- e(a) --- are shown on the bottom. The weak Balmer absorption of the
596: upper sample is indicative of normal, continuously starforming galaxies, while the bottom is a sign of starburst
597: activity. The line with open circles shows the cumulative distributions of SFRs derived from \OII, and the
598: line with solid points shows the distribution with SFRs dervied from \24m. The lines trace each other in
599: the upper plot --- both methods measure the same SFR, but in the starbursts of the lower plot show an
600: offset that corresponds to a factor of 4 greater SFR(\24m) compared to the SFR(\OII). In other words,
601: starburst galaxies --- as identified by \Hd absorption --- have a majority of their star formation obscured by
602: dust, while continuously starforming galaxies do not.
603:
604:
605: \vspace*{0.2cm}
606: \addtolength{\baselineskip}{3pt}
607: }
608: \end{figure*}
609:
610: \subsection{Candidate ``active starburst" galaxies -- the majority are detected!}
611: As explained in Section 2, our hypothesis has been that e(a) galaxies, which show both strong \Hd and
612: some \OII, are active starbursts that feed the post-starburst population. Because the \OII\ strength of
613: these systems is insufficient to indicate a starburst, this only makes sense if most of their star formation
614: is hidden by dust. The Spitzer \24m data for A851 confirm that hypothesis --- for this cluster, at least.
615: For the e(a) galaxies, 9/12 are detected.\footnote{This includes 2 galaxies that we detected in \OII with
616: an equivalent width of \OII $\sim4$ \ang. This would have placed them in the k+a category previously,
617: but in the context of studying SFR from \OII, it makes more sense to include them as e(a) galaxies here,
618: because their weak [O II] flux is the result of extinction, not a low star formation rate.} This is our major
619: result.
620:
621: To quantify what this means for the amount of star formation that has been dust-obscured, we
622: calculate independently SFRs from \OII and from \24m, as described in Sections 4.1 and 4.2. Because
623: there is considerable uncertainty in the measurements for each individual galaxy (the calibrations will depend
624: on average values of dust temperature and UV-excitation by young stars, for example), we show in Figure
625: 3 the result of this comparison as a cumulative distribution of SFRs for both indicators. We plot
626: only the galaxies for which \OII is detected, $\OII~ \le -4$ \ang. The upper panel is for weak \Hd absorption, what
627: we identify as CSF --- spectral type e(c) --- starting at 1 \Msun~$yr^{-1}$ in the upper right corner and proceeding
628: to very high rates of star formation for a few galaxies in the 10's of \Msun~$yr^{-1}$. The solid points show
629: the rates inferred from the \OII indicator, the open circles, the \24m indicator. The fact that the two lines
630: closely follow each other means that approximately the same star formation rate is measured with both indicators:
631: SFR(\24m)/SFR(\OII) $\sim 1$.\footnote{Because of the inclusion of a partial extinction correction in the
632: Kennicutt relation for SFR(\OII), SFR(\24m)/SFR(\OII) $\sim$ 1 occurs at an extinction of about 0.9 mag
633: at \OII, calculated for a foreground screen (see Kennicutt 1998). Equality of these two derived star formation rates
634: does not mean that star formation is completely unobscured, but is attenuated by dust as is typical for a
635: present-epoch spiral galaxy.}
636:
637: The situation for the \Hd-strong, starbursting galaxies is very different. The two lines track each other,
638: but with a clear offset: SFR(\24m)/SFR(\OII) $\sim 4$. In other words, the \24m flux indicates an SFR that is, on-average,
639: a factor of 4 greater than is indicated by the \OII emission line, a sufficiently greater SFR that these qualify
640: as the active, moderate starbursts that feed the post-starburst galaxy population. In the next section we show that
641: SFR(\24m)/SFR(\OII) $\sim 1$ is typical of local, present-epoch, continuously starforming galaxies,
642: whereas those with SFR(\24m)/SFR(\OII) $\sim 4$ --- the low end of today's LIRGs --- are relatively rare.
643:
644:
645: \section{Comparison with local samples of starforming galaxies}
646: %SF(IR)/SF(OII) ~ 1
647:
648: Based on the \OII and \Hd spectral indices, P99 and D04 have argued that moderate starbursts
649: --- like those in A851 we are discussing here --- are a common feature of the intermediate-redshift
650: galaxy population, both cluster and field. The Spitzer--MIPS data for A851 give us an opportunity
651: to investigate this claim and remove the uncertainty of dust-obscured star formation to which the
652: optical indicators are more prone. In order to demonstrate that the prevalence of dust-obscured starbursts
653: at $z \sim 0.4$ is an epoch-dependent effect, we need to compare to a like sample of starforming
654: galaxies at the present epoch. Do present-epoch starforming galaxies mostly have SFR(\OII) $\sim$
655: SFR(IR), indicating that the modest extinction assumed in deriving SFR(\OII) applies? Or, do many
656: of them have a majority of their star formation hidden by dust, so that SFR(\24m) $>>$ SFR(\OII)?
657:
658: Despite the proliferation of local galaxy surveys, constructing a local comparison sample is not easy.
659: To begin with, we cannot use present-epoch rich clusters as a source, since these contain very few
660: starforming galaxies of mass $M > 10^{10}~\Msun$; this is the Butcher-Oemler effect, the point at
661: which we started. We must instead use galaxies in the field --- isolated and in groups --- to judge
662: if the characteristic {\it mode} of star formation, as well as its amount, has changed over time.
663:
664: Another difficulty is that we need both \24m observations and \OII~ fluxes that cover the full disk of each
665: galaxy in order to correspond to the distant cluster data. The survey that comes closest to this is a study
666: of 417 starforming galaxies by Moustakas \& Kennicutt (2006). In this study, \OII~ fluxes were obtained
667: from observations for which the slit of the spectrograph was scanned across the galaxy in order to obtain
668: an integrated \OII flux, as we obtain by necessity for intermediate-redshift galaxies by using $\sim$1
669: arcsec-wide slits. Unfortunately, this survey is not volume limited, but rather it was chosen to
670: represent many different galaxy types: not only normal galaxies, but also starbursts, peculiar galaxies,
671: interacting/merging systems, and dusty, infrared luminous galaxies were handpicked for inclusion.
672: As a result, we were not able to use this study to assemble a sample, based on optical luminosity alone,
673: that was complete in any volume-limited sense.
674:
675: However, the Kennicutt-Moustakas survey provides data that does allow us to construct such a
676: sample. In Figure 4 we show total U-band flux vs integrated \OII~ flux for all galaxies from that survey
677: for which both measurements are available. Fluxes are from the tables of Moustakas \& Kennicutt (2006),
678: which for U-band is generally taken from RC3 (deVaucouleurs et al. 1995), and correspond to
679: total magnitudes, that is, photometry through fixed apertures has been used to extrapolate a total
680: brightness for the galaxy in the U-band. The strong correlation is due to the fact that the UV flux arises from
681: the hot young stars that power \OII emission from the H II regions. Even with the ambiguity of dust
682: absorption/obscuration, the fact that these two indicators arise from the same spatial regions assures
683: a good correlation. From the data in Figure 4, we fit a relation between integrated U-band photometry and
684: integrated \OII\ emission, so that we can use U as a proxy for OII:
685:
686: log L([O II]) = M(U-band)/-2.5 +32.8404 (2)
687:
688: Next, we construct a volume--limited local sample of galaxies using the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database
689: (NED), as follows. We use an ``Advanced All-Sky'' NED query, restricting the velocity to
690: $1000~\kms~ < v < 2500~\kms~$, and select the 241 galaxies with absolute magnitude $M_V < -19.5$. We
691: remove galaxies whose morphological type is listed as E or S0.\footnote{This large percentage reflects the
692: prominence of the Virgo Cluster.} For the remaining 133 galaxies, we took photometric measurements from NED:
693: 112 had a total U-band measurement (all but 5 from the RC3), and 94 were detected by IRAS at 25~\micron.
694: (The several-arcminute beamsize of IRAS means that the mid-IR flux is also an integrated quantity.) We convert
695: U and 25\micron\ fluxes to absolute U-band magnitude and monochromatic 25\micron\ luminosity using the
696: velocities listed in NED, assuming pure Hubble flow and $H_o = 72$. Since the IRAS survey was all-sky, and
697: 85\% of the sample has tabulated U-band data, this sample is for the present purpose volume limited and unbiased.
698:
699: %Figure 4
700: \begin{figure*}
701: \vspace*{0.1cm}
702: \hbox{~}
703: \centerline{\psfig{file=f4.eps,angle=-90.,width=6.5in}}
704: \noindent{\scriptsize
705: \addtolength{\baselineskip}{-3pt}
706: \hspace*{0.3cm}Fig.~4.\ U-band flux versus \OII\ flux for the Moustakas \& Kennicutt (2006)
707: sample of local starforming galaxies. The \OII\ spectra are unique in that the spectrograph
708: was scanned over a large fraction of the galaxy. The solid line is the best-fit line of unity slope,
709: with coefficients given in eqn.~2; this relation lets U-band flux be used as a proxy for \OII.
710: \vspace*{0.2cm}
711: \addtolength{\baselineskip}{3pt}
712: }
713: \end{figure*}
714:
715:
716: %Figure 5
717: \begin{figure*}
718: \vspace*{0.1cm}
719: \hbox{~}
720: \centerline{\psfig{file=f5.eps,angle=0.,width=6.2in}}
721: \noindent{\scriptsize
722: \addtolength{\baselineskip}{-3pt}
723: \hspace*{0.3cm}Fig.~5.\ Comparison of U-band and 25\micron--derived star formation rates
724: for the local volume--limited sample, using the \OII vs. U-band calibration (Fig. 4).
725: The typical luminous ($M_V < -19.5$) starforming galaxy in the local sample has
726: SFR(IR)/SFR(U) $\sim$ 1, in other words, the optical measurement of the star formation rate
727: is consistent with the SFR determined from the mid-IR. This suggests that dust obscuration is
728: moderate for a typical present-epoch spiral or irregular galaxies. Only a few galaxies
729: show significantly enhanced SFR(IR)/SFR(U) $\sim$3, indicative of a high level
730: of dust obscuration, whereas the {\it average} SFR(IR)/SFR(OII) $\sim$4 for the distant galaxy
731: sample with the starburst signature. Open symbols represent known AGNs, which are
732: excluded because their mid-IR fluxes are not mainly a product of star formation. The errors in
733: this plot are dominated by extrapolation to total U-band magnitudes, which are typically 20\% or
734: less.
735:
736: \vspace*{0.2cm}
737: \addtolength{\baselineskip}{3pt}
738: }
739: \end{figure*}
740:
741: U-band absolute magnitudes were converted to \OII\ luminosities using eqn.~2, and from that to
742: SFR using the Kennicutt (1998) relation. IRAS 25\micron\ luminosities were converted to L(8-1000\micron)
743: using the relation we fit to the Chary \& Elbaz (2001) models:
744:
745: log L(8-1000\micron) (Lsun) = 0.89942*(log L$_{\nu}^{25}$ (Lsun) + 1.77782 (3)
746:
747: \noindent and from there to SFR using the relation from Kennicutt (1998).
748:
749: \noindent To make the most straightforward comparison to the A851 sample, in Figure 5 we plot
750: log SFR(IR) -- log SFR(U) versus $M_V$ for the local sample. For local galaxies corresponding to
751: the absolute magnitude distribution of our A851 sample, $-22 < M_V < -19.5$, we find that, on average,
752: the $SFR(IR) \ls SFR(U)$. That is, we find few galaxies comparable to the SFR(IR)/SFR(\OII) $\sim$ 4
753: that we found to be typical of the e(a) galaxies in A851, those identified as starbursts. Rather, we find
754: the local sample to cluster around SFR(IR)/SFR(U) $\sim$ 1, values that we found for the e(c)
755: galaxies in A851 --- galaxies without starbursts. There appears to be a rising trend in SFR(IR)/SFR(U)
756: for the faintest objects in the local sample, but the IRAS sensitivity limits begin to be important, and these
757: are, at any rate, fainter than the galaxies in our A851 sample.
758:
759: As we suggested earlier, finding SFR(U) $\approx$ SFR(\24m) for the large local sample and
760: the relatively small e(c) sample in A851 supports the claim that we are dealing with the same
761: kinds of objects, and it also indicates that our \24m SFR diagnostic is reasonably good.
762:
763: From our small but complete sample, we can see that for typical, present-epoch, starforming
764: galaxies, star formation is only moderately obscured by dust. While it is not hard to find galaxies
765: that are significantly dust-obscured today, they account for only a few percent of the local population
766: (see, for example, Rieke \& Lebofsky 1978). For the Morphs ten-cluster sample, Dressler \etal (1999)
767: found a typical fraction of e(a) galaxies of $10-20\%$. Assuming the association of dusty starbursts
768: with e(a) spectra we find in A851 is representative of this larger sample, this points to a factor of $\sim$4
769: decrease in the number of dusty starbursts in the last 4 Gyr, a relatively short time in cosmic terms.
770:
771: \section{The star formation histories in A851 galaxies}
772:
773: The next step should be to analyze the spectra of our galaxies to see what the heuristic
774: distinctions `starburst, post-starburst, and `continuously starforming' really mean in terms of
775: star formation histories. Our data for this study is minimal for this purpose, but here we
776: develop the tools in anticipation of the much larger, higher quality data set to come.
777:
778: Our A851 galaxies have on-average low S/N spectra, so we follow the technique of
779: Dressler \etal\ (2004) to increase the S/N substantially and create representative templates
780: of each class. We use the spectrophotometric model of Fritz \etal\ (2007) to analyze the
781: composite spectra in order to derive approximate star formation histories of the various
782: classes. The model performs a simultaneous fit to the stellar continuum and to a number of
783: emission and absorption features in each observed composite spectrum, as well as to
784: the total IR luminosity, as derived by the \24m flux (Section 4.3). For the A851 composites
785: we substituted the broad-band fluxes in place of the optical continuum shape, due to uncertainties
786: in the relative flux calibration of these spectra.
787:
788: The program measures equivalent widths of absorption and emission features in
789: the modeled, synthetic spectra in the same way as is done for the observed spectrum.
790: This requires that, in performing the fit, spectra representing a single stellar population,
791: or SSP, are degraded to the resolution of our observed spectra, and also that spectral
792: regions with sky-subtraction problems
793: are excluded. The result is a sum of single stellar populations (SSPs) that
794: minimize a $\chi^2$ function that measures the differences between the model
795: and the observed values of the observables. The fitting algorithm is discussed in
796: detail in Fritz \etal.
797:
798: Dust obscuration is allowed to vary with stellar age, to account for the fact that younger
799: stars are generally more obscured than older ones. Three metallicities --- solar, Z=0.05,
800: and Z=0.004 --- are explored when searching for the best fit. For each value of SSP
801: metallicity, we perform 11 different fits of the same observed spectrum changing both
802: the initial point in the parameter space and the seeds of the random number generator,
803: to evaluate the robustness of our results and the ``spread" in parameter space (i.e., in
804: star formation history) of all acceptable solutions. We choose the metallicity yielding the
805: best $\chi^2$. ĘAmong the 11 models of that metallicity, we choose as reference model
806: the one that has the median value of the total stellar mass: all the quantities quoted in this
807: paper, such as masses, star formation rates, and extinction values, refer to this model. ĘError
808: bars are computed as the half-difference between the two models (among the 11) with the
809: most disparate values of total mass from the reference model. Details on the error
810: determination for the SFRs computed by our model can be found in Fritz et al. (2007). The model
811: employed here uses the new MILES observed stellar library from Sanchez-Blazquez \etal
812: (2006) and a Salpeter IMF with stellar masses in the range $0.15 \le M/\Msun \le 120$.
813:
814: Finally, since not all galaxies are detected by Spitzer-MIPS, we explored two cases: one in
815: which the non-detections correspond to an IR luminosity = 0, and one adopting as IR
816: emission the upper limit of our Spitzer data, $SFR = 3 ~\Msun yr^{-1}$. These two cases
817: should bracket the possible range of star formation rates acceptable, and allow us to
818: assess the uncertainty in the conclusions due to the unmeasured IR fluxes.
819:
820: By determining the contribution of SSPs of different ages, the model yields a star
821: formation history. That is, the mass formed at each cosmic time up to the epoch of
822: observation, the extinction by dust and the total stellar mass for each composite spectrum.
823: The synthetic spectra computed by the model are compared to the input composite-spectra
824: observations in Figure 6. In the next sections we discuss each of these classes and
825: the SFR histories that have been derived.
826:
827: \subsection{Post-starburst spectra}
828:
829: Post-starburst spectra with and without a Spitzer-MIPS detection have been modeled separately
830: in order to compare their star formation histories. In the following discussion we will use
831: the term ``observation epoch" --- OE --- to refer to the properties of galaxies as observed
832: at the lookback time, for this case, approximately 4 Gyr ago.
833:
834: The Spitzer-detected, post-starburst (k+a) composite spectrum is best fitted by a population
835: of age $\tau > 6 \times 10^9$ years that comprises 70\% of the OE galaxy stellar mass,
836: followed by a strong burst occurring over $2-5 \times 10^8$ yr before OE that produced most of the
837: remaining 30\%. The IR detection by itself indicates residual continuing star formation
838: at the OE (Figure 7). The average galaxy stellar mass for this type was $M = 1.50 \times 10^{11} \, \Msun$.
839: The average SFR per galaxy was about 16 $\Msun~yr^{-1}$ over the galaxy's history, but during the last
840: $\tau \ls 6 \times 10^8$~ yr, the SFR was considerably higher, 72 $\Msun~yr^{-1}$. More recently, over the
841: last $2 \times 10^7$~yr before OE, the rate was $9-10~ \Msun~yr^{-1}$, significant in absolute terms, but
842: substantially less to the extended high rate of star formation that preceded it. To summarize in words, the
843: IR-detected post-starburst galaxies are galaxies that have experienced a substantial burst of star
844: formation --- significantly above the long-term past average --- followed by a level of ongoing star formation
845: that is significant in absolute terms, but a sharp decline from the previous burst.\footnote{Though the
846: equivalent widths of the spectral features and the broad-band continuum fluxes can be reproduced,
847: our model fails to account for the broadness of the Balmer lines in Spitzer-detected a+k/k+a,
848: as can be seen in Figure 6 (second spectrum from the top). We found no single SSP or combination
849: that was able to account for this. We simulated the effects of an high velocity dispersion of 250
850: $\rm km \, s^{-1}$ {\it for the galaxy}, by convolving our SSPs with a Gaussian. The top spectrum
851: of Figure 6 shows the best fit star formation history and rate unchanged with respect to the unbroadened
852: fit, however, the line width is now reproduced. The broadening of the lines due to high galaxy velocity
853: dispersions is consistent with the high average galaxy stellar mass found by both types of fits,
854: $M = 1.5 \times 10^{11} \, \Msun$. This mass agrees well with the value expected for early-type
855: galaxies: assuming $M/L = 4$ (at the low end of the range for early type galaxies, and thus appropriate
856: for this post-starburst example), the predicted velocity dispersion from a modern determination of the
857: Faber-Jackson relation in the Coma cluster (Matkovic and Guzman 2007) is $\sigma = 230~\kms$.}
858:
859: Our model for the {\it IR-undetected} post-starburst (k+a) spectrum confirms a substantial burst that
860: is followed by a low-to-zero level of residual star formation (depending on how the IR non-detections
861: are handled). The average SFR per galaxy in this group is $\sim12~\Msun~yr^{-1}$ over the
862: typical galaxy's history, rising by a factor of 3.3 (1.4) to 39 (17) $\Msun~yr^{-1}$ (the first number
863: corresponds to setting IR flux $=0$, while the number in parentheses corresponds to setting the
864: IR flux $=$ upper limit) during the last $6 \times 10^8$\,yr, and 0.0 (0.9) solar masses per year during
865: the last $2 \times 10^7$\,yr. In words, the burst of star formation represents a significant rise over the past
866: average, and there is no significant star formation at the epoch of observation --- a definite post-starburst.
867:
868: The average galaxy stellar mass for this class is somewhat lower than for the Spitzer-detected
869: post-starbusts, yielding 1.1 $\times 10^{11} \, \Msun$ regardless of the IR limits adopted, while
870: the mass fraction formed during the last $6 \times 10^8$~yr varies significantly depending on whether
871: no IR emission or IR upper limits are included in the fit, $\sim 20\%$ versus 9\%.
872:
873: The post-starburst galaxies with and without a Spitzer detection have in common a history
874: where a significant fraction, $10-30$\% of the galaxy mass has formed in a recent burst with
875: exceptionally high star formation rates. A lower limit for the SFR {\it during} the burst can be
876: estimated from the average SFR during the last $6 \times 10^8$\,yr, thus SFR $> 20-70~
877: \Msun \, yr^{-1}$.
878:
879:
880: %Figure 6
881:
882: \begin{figure*}
883: \vspace*{0.1cm}
884: \hbox{~}
885: \centerline{\psfig{file=f6.eps,angle=-90.,width=7.0in}}
886: \noindent{\scriptsize
887: \addtolength{\baselineskip}{-3pt}
888: \hspace*{0.3cm}Fig.~6.\ Observed composite spectra (red, thick line) compared to models (overlaid.
889: thin black line). From top to bottom: post-starburst galaxies with and without IR emission, of starforming galaxies
890: and dusty starbursts. Broad-band galaxy photometry, rather than the spectroscopic continuum, was used in the
891: fitting procedure. The fits were to these broad band colors and the equivalent widths of the emission and
892: absorption lines, not the shape of the lines. The line shape fits are acceptable except for the infrared
893: post-starburst spectrum (IR k+a), which has significantly broader Balmer absorption lines than the model.
894: The bottom of the two templates for IR-detected k+a galaxies shows a poor fit to the width of the Balmer
895: absorption lines. The top spectrum shows that we are able to reproduce the Balmer line profiles by smoothing
896: the model fit to correspond to a velocity dispersion of $250$ \kms, which is appropriate for elliptical galaxies of
897: the mass of the average k+a in the composite.
898:
899:
900: \vspace*{0.2cm}
901: \addtolength{\baselineskip}{3pt}
902: }
903: \end{figure*}
904:
905: %Figure 7
906:
907: \begin{figure*}
908: \vspace*{0.1cm}
909: \hbox{~}
910: \centerline{\psfig{file=f7.eps,angle=-90.,width=7.0in}}
911: \noindent{\scriptsize
912: \addtolength{\baselineskip}{-3pt}
913: \hspace*{0.3cm}Fig.~7.\ Star formation rate as a function of SSP age for the best-fit models
914: of post-starburst galaxies with IR emission (IR k+a), post-starburst galaxies without IR emission
915: (k+a), starforming galaxies [e(c)], and dusty starbursts [e(a)]. SFRs are in $\Msun yr^{-1}$, averaged
916: over the number of galaxies of each spectral class. Age = 0 corresponds to the epoch of
917: observation. Green dots indicate the value of E(B-V) for each stellar population, with the scale shown
918: on the right.
919:
920:
921: \vspace*{0.2cm}
922: \addtolength{\baselineskip}{3pt}
923: }
924: \end{figure*}
925:
926: \subsection{Emission-line spectra}
927:
928:
929: The star formation history that best fits the e(c) ``continuously starforming galaxy" composite
930: spectrum is markedly different from the two similar starburst histories described above. The
931: average SFR per galaxy in this group is about 7.5 $\Msun \, yr^{-1}$ over the typical galaxy's history,
932: between 1.6 (0.6) $\Msun \, yr^{-1}$ (null IR flux or upper limit) during the
933: last $6 \times 10^8$\,yr and 2.1 (1.5) $\Msun \, yr^{-1}$ during the last $2 \times 10^7$\,yr
934: before OE. Recent and ongoing SF levels are low, significantly lower than the all-time past
935: average. It is important to stress that the variations of SFR over a single stellar population should
936: not be considered significant, as the model cannot have such detailed time resolution.
937: The overall SFR trends, as quantified in the broad age intervals of which will be presented inTable 2, are
938: significant, but smaller intervals with higher or lower SFRs are not. For example, in the case of the e(c)
939: galaxies, we note that the observed composite spectrum is noisier than in the post- or dusty- starburst
940: composites, due both to the small number of objects (7) and their relative faintness. The full star formation
941: history shown in Figure 7 for the e(c) shows many ups and downs, but these are not statistically
942: significant. The overall star formation history --- with these data --- can best be interpreted as strong in the
943: first few Gyr ($z \sim 2$) and steadily declining thereafter. Unlike the post-starbursts discussed above, and
944: the dusty-starbursts discussed next, there are no important bursts for many Gyr before OE.
945:
946: The stellar mass determined by the model for the average galaxy in the e(c) group is around
947: $7 \times 10^{10} \, \Msun$, lower than the either of the post-starburst types discussed above.
948:
949: The average galaxy mass is even lower for the fit of the e(a) ``dusty-starburst" spectrum: for
950: the typical galaxy in this class $M = 2.5 \times 10^{10} \, \Msun$. The model history of the dusty
951: starbursts is consistent with an all-time average SFR per galaxy of 2.7 (2.8) (null IR or upper limit),
952: while the recent and ongoing SFRs are 6.4 (6.6) during the last $6 \times 10^8$\,yr and 6.9 (7.3) during
953: the last $2 \times 10^7$\,yr. The recent star formation in these galaxies is therefore more than twice
954: the all-time average. The rise in SFR compared to the $\sim10^9$ years immediately preceding the
955: burst might actually be more than a factor-of-two, because most massive galaxies show histories of
956: monotonically declining SFR over time, in other words, using the ``all-time" average is
957: likely to be an upper limit for the period immediately preceding the burst. The modeling cannot, without
958: very high S/N spectra, resolve this difference, but a more accurate assessment of the rise in SFR compared
959: to the time immediately preceding the burst, would be important in understanding the actual physical
960: conditions and mechanisms that might be responsible.
961:
962: In summary, the e(a) galaxies have had starbursts like the k+a types, but these starbursts -- substantially
963: hidden b dust --- are continuing at the OE.
964:
965: Table 2 contains a summary of the model results for each of the different spectral classes, including
966: the SFR per galaxy averaged over the last $2\times 10^7$, $6\times 10^8$ and over the age
967: of the universe at $z=0.4$ (``all-time"), $\tau = 9.2 \times 10^9$\,yr). Also listed is the number
968: of galaxy spectra which contributed to each composite spectrum. The classification into
969: spectral classes has clearly identified galaxies with markedly different stellar histories.
970: The k+a galaxies are once more confirmed to be post-starburst galaxies, with or without
971: (depending on IR detection) residual star formation activity. Among the emission-line galaxies,
972: the star formation activity has declined with time in e(c) galaxies without a detectable burst,
973: while in e(a) galaxies there is a mild-to-moderate burst of star formation at the OE.
974:
975: The models are constrained to reproduce the FIR luminosity inferred from the mid-IR luminosity, not the SFR
976: as indicated from the \24m measurements (section 4.3). Nevertheless, we find good agreement between
977: what the modeling returns for the SFR over the time bin $2 \times 10^7$ yr and our ``direct" determination of
978: the SFR from the mid-IR. The agreement is not expected to be exact because (1) the FIR (from mid-IR) flux
979: is one of many constraints in the models, and (2) the two paths incorporate different assumptions about the
980: initial mass function and the timescales for the relevant calculations.
981:
982: We summarize this section by noting that the star formation histories derived with the spectral
983: modeling of star formation are consistent with the simple picture presented in Section 5 where we
984: compared \24m and [O II] fluxes to distinguish the histories of galaxies of the different spectral
985: classes. The results of this small, first study using Spitzer-MIPS data are consistent with the idea that e(a)
986: and e(b) galaxies are active starbursts, k+a galaxies are the post-starburst phase of those galaxies,
987: and e(c) galaxies are those that have not experienced any starbursts in the past few billion years.
988: The numbers of cases and spectra are sufficiently small that we must consider this a preliminary
989: step toward confirming the Poggianti \etal (1999) interpretation of galaxy spectra in
990: intermediate-redshift clusters. For example, the e(a) galaxies studied here have a mass 2-3
991: times smaller than the two types of post-starbursts. This could easily be the result of the small
992: sample sizes, but if it were to be confirmed with the much larger study we have begun, this would
993: provide a puzzling distinction that would not fit with the simple model.
994:
995: Cycle GO-4 observations of 27.5 hrs (PID 40387, PI A. Dressler) have been awarded to
996: extend the coverage of Abell 851, and to observe two additional clusters at similar redshift,
997: for which large spectroscopic samples of field and cluster galaxies have been obtained.
998: These data should allow further investigation of obscured star formation
999: in this cluster and its relevance to other intermediate-redshift galaxy populations.
1000:
1001:
1002: \section{Conclusions}
1003: %Galaxies with strong \Hd and relatively weak \OII really are dusty starbursts
1004: %Starbursts are an important part of the life of starforming galaxies
1005:
1006: Our study of optical spectroscopy and Spitzer-MIPS observations of a spectroscopic sample of cluster
1007: members of A851 at $z = 0.42$ has yielded the following results: (1) Detection with MIPS at \24m
1008: is a strong function of spectral type: almost all passive galaxies are undetected, and most normal
1009: starforming galaxies (type e(c), weak \Hd absorption) are also undetected. However, some
1010: post-starburst galaxies (strong \Hd) and {\it most} e(a) galaxies (strong \Hd {\it and} \OII emission)
1011: are detected. The non-detection of e(c) galaxies as compared to the detection of most e(a) galaxies
1012: occurs across the full range of luminosity sampled --- in fact, the e(c)'s are systematically more
1013: massive in this sample --- so this difference in detection is not a selection effect. (2) For the
1014: e(a) galaxies, the SFR derived from \24m is typically several times that inferred from \OII, indicating a
1015: substantial amount of dust obscuration of ongoing star formation in these systems. Ongoing
1016: star formation is seen in some galaxies classified as post-starburst, for which
1017: SFR(\24m)/SFR(\OII) is likely to be as much as a factor of 10, but this it represents a significant
1018: decline from the burst that came before. (3) The high rates of star formation
1019: in e(a) galaxies --- factors of 2-3 above the past average for these systems --- qualifies them as
1020: moderate starbursts capable of accounting for the post-starbursts seen in A851, although for
1021: the specific, small samples we have here, there is a factor of 2--3 lower mass associated with the
1022: e(a) compared to the k+a galaxies. (4) A small sample of present-day starforming
1023: galaxies shows that these typically have SFR(IR)/SFR(optical) $\sim$ 1. We suggest that these
1024: galaxies are like the e(c) galaxies in A851, which would be consistent with these objects
1025: having \24m flux below the detection limit of these observations.
1026:
1027: The assembly of these observations supports the model in which the e(a) galaxies and even
1028: some post-starburst galaxies are actually dust-obscured starbursts, with a factor of $\sim$4
1029: of the star formation hidden. As we will show in a forthcoming paper, the significant fraction
1030: of e(a) spectra among field galaxies at intermediate-redshift suggests that starbursts are also
1031: relatively common among field galaxies at intermediate-redshift. The rarity of such objects in
1032: the present-epoch universe indicates that star formation in ordinary spirals was more
1033: bursty --- more variable --- as recently as 4 Gyr ago. The extent and magnitude of this phenomenon
1034: will become increasingly clear as further Spizter-MIPS observations become available for
1035: intermediate-redshift clusters and the field.
1036:
1037: \section{Acknowledgments}
1038:
1039: The authors thank the referee for a careful review of the manuscript and many helpful suggestions.
1040: Dressler and Oemler acknowledge the support of the NSF grant AST-0407343. All the authors
1041: thank NASA for its support through NASA-JPL 1310394. Jane Rigby is supported by a Spitzer Space
1042: Telescope Postdoctoral Fellowship. Partial support was also provided through contract 1255094
1043: from JPL/Caltech to the University of Arizona.
1044:
1045:
1046: %
1047: %Table 1
1048: %
1049: \begin{deluxetable}{lrr}
1050: \tablecaption{Detection Rate of Spectral Types}
1051: \tablehead{\colhead{Type} & \colhead{Total} & \colhead{Detected}}
1052: \startdata
1053: k & 41 & 2\\
1054: e(c) & 7 & 2\\
1055: e(a)\tablenotemark{a} & 12 & 9\\
1056: e(b) & 3 & 1\\
1057: k+a\tablenotemark{a} & 13 & 4\\
1058: a+k & 5 & 2\\
1059: e(n) & 2 & 2\\
1060: \enddata
1061: \tablenotetext{a}{As explained in the text, two objects meeting the k+a criteria --- $\EWOII > -5$\AA\ and $\EWHd > 3$
1062: --- but with detected \OII are included in the e(a) rather than k+a numbers.}
1063: \end{deluxetable}
1064:
1065:
1066: %
1067: %Table 2
1068: %
1069: \begin{table}
1070: \begin{center}
1071: {
1072: \caption{Model summary.\label{tbl1}}
1073: \vspace{1.0cm}
1074: \begin{tabular}{lcccc}
1075: \tableline\tableline
1076: &&&& \\
1077: & IR-det. k+a & Undet. k+a & e(c) & e(a) \\
1078: \tableline
1079: &&& \\
1080: $N_{obj}$ & 6 & 12 & 8 & 19\\
1081: ``all-time" & $16 \pm 3$ & $12 \pm 2$ & $ 7 (7) \pm 3$ & $3 (3) \pm 0.8$ \\
1082: $6\times 10^8$yr & $72 \pm 7$ & $39 (17) \pm 5 (1)$ & $1 (2) \pm 2$ & $6 (7) \pm 2$ \\
1083: $2\times 10^7$yr & $9 \pm 1$ & $1.1 \pm 0.1$ & $1 (2) \pm 1$ & $7 (7) \pm 3$ \\
1084: &&&&\\
1085: SFR(\24m) & 12.1 & $<$3.0 & 1.5 & 7.7 \\
1086: &&&&\\
1087: Mass & $1.5 \pm 0.3 \times 10^{11}$ & $1.1 \pm 0.1 \times 10^{11}$ & $7 \pm 0.6 \times 10^{10}$
1088: & $2.5 \pm 0.6 \times 10^{10}$ \\
1089: \tableline
1090: \end{tabular}
1091: }
1092: %\tablenotetext{a}{Sample footnote for table~\ref{tbl-2} that was
1093: %generated with the \LaTeX\ table environment}
1094: %\tablenotetext{b}{Yet another sample footnote for table~\ref{tbl-2}}
1095: %\tablenotetext{c}{Another sample footnote for table~\ref{tbl-2}}
1096: \tablecomments{Average SFR ($M_{\odot} \, yr^{-1}$) per galaxy of each spectral
1097: class, as determined in the models. The SFR is averaged over the last $2\times 10^7$,
1098: $6\times 10^8$ and over the age of the Universe at $z=0.4$ --- ``all-time", $9.2\times
1099: 10^9$ yr. The values in parentheses come from adopting the \24m upper limit as
1100: opposed to the null value, in case of non-detection. The SFR(\24m) values, actual
1101: measurements, are to be compared to the $2 \times 10^7$ yr SFR from the model, as
1102: explained in the text. The last row contains the average galaxy stellar mass in solar
1103: masses.}
1104: \end{center}
1105: \end{table}
1106:
1107:
1108:
1109: \vfill\eject
1110: \clearpage
1111:
1112: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1113: \begin{thebibliography}
1114:
1115: \bibitem[Alonso-Herrero et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...650..835A} Alonso-Herrero, A., Rieke, G.~H., Rieke, M.~J., Colina, L.,
1116: P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez, P.~G., \& Ryder, S.~D.\ 2006, \apj, 650, 835
1117:
1118: \bibitem[Bai et al (2007)]{} Bai, L., Marcillac, D., Rieke, G.\,H., Rieke, M.\,J., Tran, K-V.\, H.,
1119: Hinz, J.\,L., Rudnick, G., Kelly, D.\,M., Blaylock, M., 2007, \apj, 664, 181
1120:
1121: \bibitem[Balogh et al (1999)]{} Balogh, M.\L., Morris, S.\,L., Yee, H.\,K.\,C., Carlberg,
1122: R.\,G., \& Ellingson, E., 1999, ApJ, 527, 54
1123:
1124: \bibitem[Brandl et al.(2006)]{brandl06} %{2006ApJ...653.1129B}
1125: Brandl, B.~R., et al. 2006, \apj, 653, 1129
1126:
1127: \bibitem[Butcher \& Oemler (1978)]{} Butcher, H., \& Oemler, A.\ Jr., 1978, ApJ, 279, 18
1128:
1129: \bibitem[Calzetti et al.(2007)]{calzetti07}
1130: Calzetti, D., et al. 2007, \apj, in press (astro-ph/0705.3377)
1131:
1132: \bibitem[Chary \& Elbaz(2001)]{charyelbaz} %{2001ApJ...556..562C}
1133: Chary, R., \& Elbaz, D.\ 2001, \apj, 556, 562
1134:
1135: \bibitem[Couch\&Sharples]{} Couch, W.\,J., \& Sharples, R.\,M., 1987, \mnras, 229, 423
1136:
1137: \bibitem[Dale \& Helou(2002)]{dalehelou}{} Dale, D.~A., \& Helou, G.\ 2002, \apj, 576, 159
1138:
1139: \bibitem[RC3(1995)]{} de Vaucouleurs, G., de Vaucouleurs, A., Corwin, H.\,G., Buta, R.\,J.,
1140: Paturel, G., \& Fouque, P., 1995, Third Reference Catalog of Bright Galaxies (Revised),
1141: University of Texas Press.
1142:
1143: \bibitem[Dressler \& Gunn (1983)]{} Dressler, A., \& Gunn, J.\,E., 1983, ApJ, 270, 7.
1144:
1145: \bibitem[Dressler, Gunn \& Schneider (1985)]{} Dressler, A., Gunn, J.\,E., \& Schneider, 1985, \apj\,
1146: 294, 70
1147:
1148: \bibitem[Dressler \& Gunn (1992)]{} Dressler, A., \& Gunn, J.\,E., 1992, ApJS, 70, 1
1149:
1150: \bibitem[Dressler et al (1999)]{} Dressler, A., Smail, I., Poggianti, B.\ M., Butcher, H.,
1151: Couch, W.\ J., Ellis, R.\ S., \& Oemler, A.\ Jr., 1999, \apjs, 122, 51
1152:
1153: \bibitem[Dressler et al (2004)]{} Dressler, A., Oemler, A.\,Jr., Poggianti, B.\ M., Smail, I.,
1154: Trager, S.\,C., Shectman, S.\,A., Ellis, R.\,S., \& Couch, W.\,J. 2004, ApJ, 617, 867
1155:
1156: \bibitem[Duc et al (2002)]{} Duc, P.-A., Poggianti, B.\, M., Fadda, D., Elbaz, D., Flores, H., Chanial, P.,
1157: Franceschini, A., Moorwood, A., \& Cesarsky, C., 2002, \aap, 382, 60
1158:
1159: \bibitem[Egami et al.(2006)]{egami-bcg06}
1160: Egami, E. et al. 2006, ApJ, 647, 922
1161:
1162: \bibitem[Fritz et al (2007)]{} Fritz, J., Poggianti, B.\, M., Bettoni, D., Cava, A., Couch, W.\, J., D'Onofrio, M.,
1163: Dressler, A., Fasano, G., Kjľrgaard, P., Moles, M., Varela, J., 2007, \aap, 470, 137
1164:
1165: \bibitem[Fadda et al (2000)]{} Fadda, D., Elbaz, D., \& Duc, P.-A., 2000, \aap, 382, 60
1166:
1167: \bibitem[Geach et al (2006)]{} Geach, J.\, E., Smail, I., Ellis, R.\,S., Moran, S.\,M., Smith, G.\,P., Treu, T.,
1168: Kneib, J.-P., Edge, A.\,C., \& Kodama, T., 2006, \apj, 649, 661
1169:
1170: \bibitem[Gordon et al.(2006)]{gordon06} Gordon, K. D., Rieke, G. H.,
1171: Engelbracht, C. W. et al. 2005, \pasp, 117, 503
1172:
1173: \bibitem[Hunter et al.(1986)]{hunter86} %{1986ApJ...303..171H}
1174: Hunter, D.~A., Gillett, F.~C., Gallagher, J.~S., III, Rice, W.~L.,
1175: \& Low, F.~J.\ 1986, \apj, 303, 171
1176:
1177: \bibitem[Kennicutt(1998)]{kennicutt98} %{1998ARA&A..36..189K}
1178: Kennicutt, R.~C., Jr.\ 1998, \araa, 36, 189
1179:
1180: \bibitem[Leitherer et al. (1999)]{leitherer} Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., Goldader, J.\,D.,
1181: Delgado, R.\,M.\,G., Robert, C., Kune, D.\,F., de Mello, D.\,F., Devost, D., Heckman, T.\,M.,
1182: 1999, \apjs, 123, 3
1183:
1184: \bibitem[Lilly et al.(1999)]{Lillly} Lilly, S.\,J., Eales, S.\,A., Gear, W.\,K.\,P., Hammer, F., Le FŹvre, O., Crampton, D.,
1185: Bond, J.\,R., \& Dunne, L., 1999, \apjl, 518, 641
1186:
1187: \bibitem[Liu \& Kennicutt]{} Liu, C.T., \& Kennicutt, R.C., 1995, ApJ, 450, 547
1188:
1189: \bibitem[Lonsdale Persson \& Helou(1987)]{lph87}%{1987ApJ...314..513L}
1190: Lonsdale Persson, C.~J., \& Helou, G.\ 1987, \apj, 314, 513
1191:
1192: \bibitem[Marcillac et al (2007)]{} Marcillac, D., Rigby, J.\,R., Rieke, G.\,H., Kelly, D.\,M.,0
1193: 2007, \apj, 654, 825.
1194:
1195: \bibitem[Marcillac et al.(2006)]{marcillac06} Marcillac, D., Elbaz, D., Chary, R.~R.,
1196: Dickinson, M., Galliano, F., \& Morrison, G.\ 2006, \aap, 451, 57
1197:
1198: \bibitem[Matkovic, \& Guzman (2007)]{} Matkovic, A. \& Guzman, R., 2007, in ``First Light Science with
1199: the GTC," (Eds. R. Guzm‡n, C. Packham, J. M. Rodr’guez-Espinosa, \& S. Torres-Peimbert),
1200: Revista Mexicana de Astronom’a y Astrof’sica (Serie de Conferencias) Vol. 29, pp. 107-109
1201:
1202: \bibitem[Metcalfe, Fadda, \& Biviano 2005]{} Metcalfe, L., Fadda, D., \& Biviano, A., 2005, Space Science
1203: Reviews, 119, 425 (arXiv:astro-ph/0506421)
1204:
1205: \bibitem[Moran et al 2007]{} Moran, S.\,M., Ellis, R.\,S., Treu, T., Smith, G.\,P., Rich, R.\,M., Smail, I., 2007,
1206: arXiv:astro-ph/0707.4173
1207:
1208: \bibitem[Oemler et al 2007]{} Oemler, A., Dressler, A., Kelson, D., Rigby, J. Poggianti, B.\,M., Fritz, J.,
1209: Morrison, G., \& Smail, I., 2008, \apj, submitted (Oem08)
1210:
1211: \bibitem[Poggianti et al. (1999)]{P99} Poggianti, B.\,M., Smail, I., Dressler, A.,
1212: Couch, W.J., Barger, A.J., Butcher, H., Ellis, R.S., \& Oemler, A.\ Jr. 1999, \apj,
1213: 518, 576 (P99)
1214:
1215: \bibitem[Poggianti & Wu (2000)]{} Poggianti, B.\,M., \& Wu, H., 2000, ApJ, 529, 157
1216:
1217: \bibitem[Poggianti, Bressan, \& Francheschini (2001)]{} Poggianti, B.M., Bressan, A., \&
1218: Franceschini, A., 2001, ApJ 550, 195
1219:
1220: \bibitem[Prochaska et al (2007)]{} Prochaska, L.\,C., Rose, J.\,A., Caldwell, N., Castilho, B.\,V.,
1221: Concannon, K., Harding, P., Morrison, H., \& Schiavon, R.\,P., 2007, \aj, 134, 321
1222:
1223: \bibitem[Rieke & Lebosvsky (1978)]{}, Rieke, G. \,H., Lebofsky, M.\,J., 1978, \apj, 220, 37
1224:
1225: \bibitem[Rigby et al.(2008)]{Rigby08} Rigby, J.~R. et al. 2008, ApJ, submitted.
1226:
1227: \bibitem[Sanchez-Blazquez et al. (2006)]{} S‡nchez-Bl‡zquez, P., Peletier, R. F., JimŽnez-Vicente, J.,
1228: Cardiel, N., Cenarro, A. J., Falc—n-Barroso, J., Gorgas, J., Selam, S., Vazdekis, A., 2006, \aap, 457, 823
1229:
1230: \bibitem[Schindler et al. (1998)]{} Schindler, S., Belloni, P., Ikebe, Y., Makoto, H., Wambsganss, J.,
1231: \& Tanaka, Y., 1998, \aa, 338, 843
1232:
1233: \bibitem[Smail et al 1999]{} Smail, I., Morrison, G., Gray, M.\,E., Owen, F.\,N., Ivison, R.\,J.,
1234: Kneib, J.\,-P., Ellis, R.\,S., 1999, \apj, 525, 609
1235:
1236: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2007)]{jdsmith07} %{2007ApJ...656..770S}
1237: Smith, J.~D.~T., Draine, B. T., Dale., D. A., et al., 2007, \apj, 656, 770
1238:
1239: \bibitem[tran2003]{} Tran, K.--V.\, H., Franx, M., Illingworth, G., Kelson, D.\,D.,
1240: \& van Dokkum, P. 2003, \apj, 599, 865
1241:
1242: \bibitem[treu et al 2003]{} Treu, T., Ellis, R.\,S., Kneib, J.-P., Dressler, A., Smail, I., Czoske, O., Oemler, A.,
1243: \& Natarajan, P., 2003, \apj, 591, 53
1244:
1245: \bibitem[wirth1994]{} Wirth, G.\, D., Koo, D.\,C., Kron, R.\,G., 1994 \apj, 435, 105
1246:
1247: \end{thebibliography}
1248:
1249:
1250:
1251:
1252:
1253: \end{document}
1254:
1255: