1: \documentclass[preprint,12pt]{aastex}
2:
3: \usepackage{graphicx}
4: \usepackage{amssymb}
5: \usepackage{amsmath}
6: \usepackage{times}
7: \usepackage[]{eufrak}
8: \usepackage{color}
9:
10:
11:
12: \newcommand{\ab}[1]{{\textcolor{red}{\textit{\textbf{ AB: #1}} }}}
13:
14: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
15: \newcommand{\myemail}{ahmedov@astrin.uzsci.net}
16:
17: \begin{document}
18: %\slugcomment{submitted to ApJ}
19:
20: \shorttitle{Effect of Gravitomagnetic Charge on Pulsar
21: Magnetospheric Structure}
22:
23: \shortauthors{Morozova, Ahmedov $\&$ Kagramanova}
24:
25: %\begin{document}
26:
27: \title{General Relativistic Effect of Gravitomagnetic Charge on Pulsar
28: Magnetosphere and Particle Acceleration in a Polar Cap}
29:
30: %\vspace*{1cm}
31:
32: \author{V.S. Morozova\altaffilmark{1,2}, B.J. Ahmedov\altaffilmark{1,2}}
33: \affil{\altaffilmark{1}Institute of Nuclear Physics and Ulugh Begh
34: Astronomical
35: Institute, Astronomicheskaya 33, Tashkent 100052, Uzbekistan\\
36: \altaffilmark{2}International Centre for Theoretical Physics,
37: Strada Costiera 11, 34014 Trieste, Italy}
38:
39: \and
40:
41: \author{V.G. Kagramanova\altaffilmark{3}}
42: \affil{\altaffilmark{3}Institut f$\ddot{u}$r Physik,
43: Universit$\ddot{a}$t Oldenburg, D-26111 Oldenburg, Germany}
44:
45: \altaffiltext{1}{ICTP-OEA Student Fellow}
46: \altaffiltext{2}{ICTP
47: Regular Associate} \altaffiltext{3}{DAAD PhD Student Fellow, on
48: leave from Ulugh Begh Astronomical Institute, Tashkent 100052,
49: Uzbekistan}
50:
51: %\begin{document}
52:
53:
54:
55: \begin{abstract}
56:
57: We study magnetospheric structure surrounding rotating magnetized
58: neutron star with nonvanishing NUT (Newman-Tamburino-Unti)
59: parameter. For the simplicity of calculations Goldreich-Julian
60: charge density is analyzed for the aligned neutron star with zero
61: inclination between magnetic field, gravitomagnetic field and
62: rotation axis. From the system of Maxwell equations in spacetime
63: of slowly rotating NUT star, second-order differential equation
64: for electrostatic potential is derived. Analytical solution of
65: this equation indicates the general relativistic modification of
66: an accelerating electric field and charge density along the open
67: field lines by the gravitomagnetic charge. The implication of this
68: effect to the magnetospheric energy loss problem is underlined. In
69: the second part of the paper we derive the equations of motion of
70: test particles in magnetosphere of slowly rotating NUT star. Then
71: we analyze particle motion in the polar cap and show that NUT
72: parameter can significantly change conditions for particle
73: acceleration.
74:
75: \end{abstract}
76:
77: \keywords{MHD: pulsars --- general --- relativity --- NUT
78: parameter
79: --- stars: neutron}
80:
81: \section{Introduction}
82:
83: The theoretical study of radio pulsars can be traced back to the
84: work of Goldreich $\&$ Julian (1969) where the existence of
85: magnetosphere with charge-separated plasma around rotating
86: magnetized neutron stars has been suggested. A spinning magnetized
87: neutron star generates huge potential differences between
88: different parts of its surface. The cascade generation of
89: electron-positron plasma in the polar cap region (Sturrock 1971;
90: Ruderman $\&$ Sutherland 1975) means that the magnetosphere of a
91: neutron star is filled with plasma, screening the longitudinal
92: electric field. This screening results in the corotation of plasma
93: with a neutron star. Such a rotation is not possible outside the
94: light cylinder, thus it forms essentially different groups of
95: field lines: closed, i.e., those returning the stellar surface,
96: and open, i.e., those crossing the light cylinder and going to
97: infinity. As a result, plasma may leave the neutron star along the
98: open field lines and it is generally thought that pulsar radio
99: emission is produced in the open field line region well inside the
100: light cylinder (the radius at which the corotation speed equals
101: $c$).
102:
103: Study of plasma modes along the field lines is boosted by the
104: pioneering works of Goldreich $\&$ Julian (1969), Sturrock (1971),
105: Mestel (1971), Ruderman $\&$ Sutherland (1975), and Arons $\&$
106: Scharlemann (1979). The subsequent achievements and some new ideas
107: are reviewed by numerous authors, for example, by Arons (1991),
108: Michel (1991), Mestel (1992), and Muslimov $\&$ Harding (1997).
109: Although a self-consistent pulsar magnetosphere theory is yet to
110: be developed, the analysis of plasma modes in the pulsar
111: magnetosphere based on the above-mentioned papers provides firm
112: grounds for the construction of such a model.
113:
114: The existence of strong electromagnetic fields is one of the most
115: important features of rotating neutron stars observed as pulsars.
116: It was shown starting pioneering paper of~\citet{d55} that the
117: electric field is induced due to the rotation of highly magnetized
118: star. The general relativistic effect of dragging of inertial
119: frames is very important in pulsar magnetosphere~\cite{bes90,mt90}
120: and a source of additional electric field of general relativistic
121: origin.
122:
123: The field-aligned electric field is driven by deviation of space
124: charge from the Goldreich-Julian charge density, which is
125: determined by the magnetic field geometry. Therefore as it has
126: been noted by several authors (e.g.~\citet{bes90}, \citet{mt90},
127: Muslimov \& Harding (1997); Dyks et al (2001), Mofiz $\&$ Ahmedov
128: (2000)) the general relativistic frame dragging effects on the
129: field geometry in plasma magnetosphere of rotating neutron stars
130: is a first-order effect, which has to be carefully included in a
131: self-consistent model of pulsar magnetospheric structure and
132: associated electromagnetic radiation. It was first shown by
133: \citet{mt90} and independently by \citet{bes90} that general
134: relativistic effects due to frame dragging are crucial for
135: formation of the field aligned electric field and particle
136: acceleration in pulsar magnetosphere.
137:
138: At present there is no any observational evidence for the
139: existence of gravitomagnetic monopole, that is of exotic
140: space-time, called NUT space (Newman, Unti and
141: Tamburino~\cite{nut63}). Therefore it is interesting to study the
142: electromagnetic fields and processes in NUT space with the aim to
143: get new tool for studying new important general relativistic
144: effects which are associated with nondiagonal components of the
145: metric tensor and have no Newtonian analogues.
146:
147: \citet{MusTsy92} initiated the detailed general relativistic
148: derivation of magnetospheric electromagnetic fields around
149: rotating magnetized neutron star. In this paper, we attempt to
150: extend work of \citet{MusHar97} by including NUT parameter in
151: studying particle acceleration along the open field lines of a
152: rotating neutron star. In \S~\ref{ms} general relativistic
153: equations describing the electrodynamics of a rotating NUT star
154: are formulated. The equations are rewritten in the frame of
155: reference corotating with the rotating NUT star. A detailed
156: analysis of Goldreich- Julian charge density is also performed. A
157: general equation governing electrostatic potential in the
158: magnetosphere is derived. As it was shown by several authors, in
159: particular by \citet{ss03}, that the general relativistic effect
160: on particle motion in pulsar magnetosphere can not be neglected.
161: Due to this reason in \S~\ref{acceleration} we are solving
162: equations of motion for the charged particles for the region near
163: the magnetic pole just above the stellar surface. From study of
164: the particle motion along the field lines it has been shown that
165: the effect of NUT parameter, coupling with the frame-dragging
166: effect, plays noticeable role in the particle's dynamics. In
167: \S~\ref{concl} we conclude our findings and discuss them for
168: further investigations.
169:
170: Throughout, we use a space-like signature $(-,+,+,+)$ and a system
171: of units in which $G = 1 = c$ (However, for those expressions with
172: an astrophysical application we have written the speed of light
173: explicitly.). Latin indices run $1,2,3$ and Greek ones from $0$ to
174: $3$.
175:
176: \section{Plasma Magnetosphere of Slowly Rotating NUT Magnetized
177: Star} \label{ms}
178:
179: As it was shown in the paper~\citet{MusTsy92}, from the system of
180: Maxwell equations, assuming the magnetic field of a neutron star
181: to be stationary in the corotating frame, the following Poisson
182: equation for the scalar potential $\Phi$ can be derived
183: %
184: \begin{equation}
185: \label{Poiss}
186: {\mathbf\nabla}\cdot\left(\frac{1}{N}{\mathbf\nabla}\Phi\right)=
187: -4\pi(\rho-\rho_{GJ})\ ,
188: \end{equation}
189: %
190: where $N\equiv (1-2M/r)^{1/2}$ is the gravitational lapse
191: function, $M$ is the total mass of the star, $J$ is the angular
192: momentum of the star, $\rho-\rho_{GJ}$ is the effective space
193: charge density being responsible for production of unscreened
194: parallel electric field, $\rho_{GJ}$ is Goldreich-Julian charge
195: density to be discussed here.
196:
197: In a pioneering work, Goldreich $\&$ Julian (1969) have shown that
198: a strongly magnetized, highly conducting neutron star, rotating
199: about the magnetic axis, would spontaneously build up a charged
200: magnetosphere. The essence of the argument is that it imposes a
201: charge magnetosphere that is subject to enormous unbalanced
202: electric forces being parallel to the magnetic field {\bf B}.
203: Goldreich \& Julian (1969) hypothesized that a far better
204: approximation for the magnetosphere would be obtained by shorting
205: out the component of electric field {\bf{E}} along {\bf{B}}
206: charges originating in the star. The magnetospheric charges that
207: maintain ${\bf{E}}\cdot{\bf{B}}$ are themselves subject to the
208: ${\bf{E}}\times{\bf{B}}$ drift that sets them into corotation with
209: the star. Here we analyze Goldreich-Julian charge density in
210: general relativity in spacetime of slowly rotating NUT star. An
211: expression for the Goldreich-Julian charge density $\rho_{GJ}$ can
212: be calculated in terms of the vector $g_{i}=-g_{0i}/g_{00}$
213: through the formula
214: %
215: \begin{equation}
216: \label{rhoGJdef} \rho_{GJ}=-\frac{1}{4\pi}{\mathbf\nabla}(N{\bf
217: g}\times{\bf B})\ .
218: \end{equation}
219: %
220:
221: In the metric of the slowly rotating star with the non-vanishing
222: NUT-parameter
223: %
224: \begin{equation}
225: \label{metricNUT}
226: ds^2=-N^2dt^2+N^{-2}dr^2+r^2\left(d\theta^2+\sin^2\theta d\phi^2
227: \right) -2\left(4N^2l\sin^2\frac{\theta}{2}+\omega
228: r^2\sin^2\theta\right) d\phi dt
229: \end{equation}
230: %
231: vector ${\bf g}$ looks like following
232: %
233: \begin{equation}
234: \label{g} {\bf
235: g}=\frac{1}{N^2}\left(({\mathbf\Omega}-{\mathbf\omega})\times{\bf
236: r}- \frac{4lN^2\sin^2\frac{\theta}{2}}{r^2\sin^2\theta}\hat{\bf
237: z}\times {\bf r}\right)\ .
238: \end{equation}
239: %
240: This is a stationary axially symmetric solution of vacuum Einstein
241: field equations with three parameters. The
242: metric~(\ref{metricNUT}) is the linear approximation of the
243: Kerr-Taub-NUT metric (see, for example,~\citet{dt02},
244: ~\citet{Bini03}) in the specific angular momentum $a=J/M$ and the
245: gravitomagnetic monopole $l$. First term in the right hand side of
246: equation~(\ref{g}) takes into account the well-known effect of
247: dragging of inertial frames of reference (the Lense-Thirring
248: effect) with the angular velocity $\omega=2aM/r^3$. Here $\Omega$
249: is angular velocity of rotation of star. Obviously when $l=0$, the
250: metric~(\ref{metricNUT}) reduces to the external Hartle-Thorne one
251: ~(\citet{ht68}). On other hand when $\omega$ vanishes the
252: space-time reduces to the NUT one ~(\citet{nut63}).
253:
254:
255: To obtain this equation we remember that in the Cartesian
256: coordinates $\textbf{r}=(x,y,z)$, $x=r\sin\theta\cos\phi$,
257: $y=r\sin\theta\sin\phi$, $z=r\cos\theta$ and with the $\hat{\bf
258: z}=(0,0,1)$ the following relation takes place
259: (see~\citet{Bini03})
260: %
261: \begin{equation}
262: (\hat{\bf z}\times\textbf{r})\cdot d\textbf{r}=r^2\sin^2\theta
263: d\phi\ .
264: \end{equation}
265: %
266:
267: Inserting (\ref{g}) into the expression (\ref{rhoGJdef}) for the
268: Goldreich-Julian charge density $\rho_{GJ}$ we obtain
269: %
270: \begin{equation}
271: \label{rhoGJcont}
272: \rho_{GJ}=-\frac{1}{4
273: \pi}{\mathbf\nabla}\left\{\frac{1}{N}\left[1-\frac{\kappa}{
274: \eta^3}-L\left(1-\frac{\varepsilon}{\eta}\right)
275: \frac{1}{\eta^2}\frac{4\sin^2\frac{\theta}{2}}{\sin^2\theta}\right]
276: {\bf u}\times{\bf B} \right\}\ ,
277: \end{equation}
278: %
279: where we denoted $L\equiv {cl}/{\Omega R^2}$, $R$ is the stellar
280: radius, ${\bf u}={\mathbf\Omega}\times{\bf r}$, $\eta=r/R$ is the
281: dimensionless radial coordinate, parameter
282: $\kappa\equiv\varepsilon\beta$, $\varepsilon=2M/R$ is the
283: compactness parameter, and $\beta=I/I_0$ is the stellar moment of
284: inertia in the units of $I_0=MR^2$.
285:
286: In the assumption of the dipole-like configuration for the stellar
287: magnetic field the nonvanishing components of magnetic field ${\bf
288: B}$ measured by ZAMO (zero angular momentum observers) with
289: four-velocity $u_\alpha$
290: %
291: \begin{equation}
292: u_\alpha = \left\{-N^2,0,0,0\right\}
293: \end{equation}
294: %
295: take the form (see~\citet{MusTsy92})
296: %
297: \begin{equation}
298: \label{B} B^{\hat r}=B_0\frac{f(\eta)}{f(1)}\eta^{-3}\cos\theta\ ,
299: \ \ B^{\hat\theta} =\frac{1}{2} B_0 N\left[-2\frac{f(\eta)}{f(1)}+
300: \frac{3}{(1-\varepsilon/\eta)f(1)}\right]\eta^{-3}\sin\theta\ ,
301: \end{equation}
302: %
303: where
304: %
305: \begin{equation}
306: \label{f}
307: f(\eta)=-3\left(\frac{\eta}{\varepsilon}\right)^3\left[\ln
308: \left(1-\frac{\varepsilon}{\eta}\right)+\frac{\varepsilon}{\eta}
309: \left(1+\frac{\varepsilon}{2\eta}\right)\right]\ ,
310: \end{equation}
311: %
312: and $B_0\equiv 2\mu/R^3$ is the Newtonian value of the magnetic
313: field at the pole of star, hat labels the orthonormal components,
314: $\mu$ is the magnetic moment. The solution of this type was first
315: obtained by \citet{go64} and then reproduced by the number of
316: authors.
317:
318: The polar angle $\Theta$ of the last open magnetic line as a
319: function of $\eta$ will look like (see~\citet{mt91}
320: or~\citet{MusTsy91})
321: %
322: \begin{equation}
323: \label{Theta}
324: \Theta\cong\sin^{-1}\left\{\left[\eta\frac{f(1)}{f(\eta)}\right]^{1/2}
325: \sin\Theta_0\right\}\ ,\
326: \Theta_0=\sin^{-1}\left(\frac{R}{R_{LC}f(1)}\right)^{1/2}\ .
327: \end{equation}
328: %
329: Parameter $\Theta_0$ has the meaning of the magnetic colatitude of
330: the last open magnetic line at the stellar surface,
331: $R_{LC}=c/\Omega$ is the light-cylinder radius.
332:
333: Making further algebraic transformations on the equation
334: (\ref{rhoGJcont}) and taking into account equation (\ref{B}) we
335: come to the following expression for the Goldreich-Julian charge
336: density
337:
338: %
339: \begin{equation}
340: \label{rhoGJ} \rho_{GJ}=-\frac{\Omega B_0}{2\pi c
341: }\frac{1}{N\eta^3}\frac{f(\eta)}{f(1)}\left\{1-\frac{\kappa}{\eta^3}-
342: L\left(1-\frac{\varepsilon}{\eta}\right)\frac{1}{\eta^2}
343: \frac{4\sin^2\frac{\theta}{2}}{\sin^2\theta}\right\}\ .
344: \end{equation}
345: %
346:
347: Hereafter for the simplicity of calculations we assume that the
348: inclination angle between the magnetic axis and the axis of
349: rotation of the star is equal to zero. Figure~\ref{fig1} presents
350: the radial dependence of obtained general relativistic expression
351: for the Goldreich-Julian charge density $\rho_{GJ}$ normed in its
352: Newtonian expression for several different values of NUT
353: parameter. It can be found from the figure that even for
354: comparatively small values of NUT parameter its influence on the
355: Goldreich-Julian charge density $\rho_{GJ}$~(\ref{rhoGJ}) plays an
356: important role. The value of the Goldreich-Julian charge density
357: $\rho_{GJ}$ at the surface of the star is more sensitive to the
358: NUT parameter. The tendency seen from the Figure is so that
359: $\rho_{GJ}$ is vise proportional to the NUT parameter at the
360: surface of the star and in asymptotics it reaches Newtonian
361: expression. Here we took typical numbers for neutron star
362: parameters as $R=10 km$, $M=2 km$ and $T=0.1 s$.
363:
364: For the relativistic plasma the charge density $\rho$ is
365: proportional to magnetic field with the proportionality
366: coefficient being constant along the given magnetic field line
367: (see, for example, \citet{MusTsy91}) that is
368: %
369: \begin{equation}
370: \label{rho} \rho=\frac{\Omega B_0}{2\pi c
371: }\frac{1}{N\eta^3}\frac{f(\eta)}{f(1)}A(\xi)\ ,
372: \end{equation}
373: %
374: where $\xi=\theta/\Theta$ is the dimensionless angular variable,
375: $A(\xi)$ is an unknown function to be defined from the boundary
376: conditions. One could insert expressions (\ref{rhoGJ}) and
377: (\ref{rho}) into the Poisson equation (\ref{Poiss}), and in the
378: approximation of small angles $\theta$ get the following
379: differential equation
380: %
381: \begin{eqnarray}
382: R^{-2}\left\{N\frac{1}{\eta^2}\frac{\partial}{\partial\eta}\left(\eta^2
383: \frac{\partial}{\partial\eta}\right)+\frac{1}{N\eta^2\theta}\left[
384: \frac{\partial}{\partial\theta}\left(\theta
385: \frac{\partial}{\partial\theta}\right)+\frac{1}{\theta}
386: \frac{\partial^2}{\partial\phi^2}\right]\right\}\Phi \nonumber
387: \\
388: =-4\pi\frac{\Omega B_0}{2\pi
389: c}\frac{1}{N\eta^3}\frac{f(\eta)}{f(1)}\left\{1-\frac{\kappa}{\eta^3}-
390: L\left(1-\frac{\varepsilon}{\eta}\right)\frac{1}{\eta^2}+A(\xi)\right\}\
391: .
392: \end{eqnarray}
393: %
394:
395: Here we used a fact that in the small-angle limit
396: %
397: \begin{equation}
398: \label{approx} \frac{4\sin^2\frac{\theta}{2}} {\sin^2\theta}\sim1\
399: .
400: \end{equation}
401: %
402:
403:
404: Our further discourses are based on the extension of
405: work~\citet{MusTsy92} to NUT spacetime. Using dimensionless
406: function $F=\eta\Phi/\Phi_0$, where $\Phi_0=\Omega B_0 R^2$ and
407: variables $\eta$ and $\xi$, we can rewrite the equation
408: (\ref{Poiss}) for the dimensionless electrostatic potential as
409: %
410: \begin{equation}
411: \label{difLam}
412: \left[\frac{d^2}{d\eta^2}+\Lambda^2(\eta)\frac{1}{\xi}\frac{\partial}
413: {\partial\xi}
414: \left(\xi\frac{\partial}{\partial\xi}\right)\right]F=
415: -\frac{2}{\eta^2\left(1-\frac{\varepsilon}{\eta}\right)}\frac{f(\eta)}{f(1)}
416: \left[1-\frac{\kappa}{\eta^3}-
417: L\left(1-\frac{\varepsilon}{\eta}\right)\frac{1}{\eta^2}+A(\xi)\right]\
418: ,
419: \end{equation}
420: %
421: where
422: $\Lambda(\eta)=[\eta\Theta(\eta)(1-\varepsilon/\eta)^{1/2}]^{-1}$.
423:
424: After performing Fourier-Bessel transformation
425: %
426: \begin{equation}
427: \label{FourBes}
428: F(\eta,\xi)=\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}F_i(\eta)J_0(k_i\xi)\ , \quad
429: F_i(\eta)=\frac{2}{[J_1(k_i)]^2}\int^1_0\xi F(\eta,\xi)J_0
430: (k_i\xi)d\xi\ ,
431: \end{equation}
432: %
433: and using relation
434: %
435: \begin{equation}
436: \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\frac{2}{k_i J_1(k_i)}J_0(k_i\xi)=1\ ,
437: \end{equation}
438: %
439: one can obtain equation (\ref{difLam}) in the form
440: %
441: \begin{equation}
442: \label{difgamma}
443: \left(\frac{d^2}{d\eta^2}-\gamma^2_i(\eta)\right)F_i=
444: -\frac{2}{\eta^2\left(1-\frac{\varepsilon}{\eta}\right)}\frac{f(\eta)}{f(1)}
445: \left[\frac{2}{k_i
446: J_1(k_i)}\left\{1-\frac{\kappa}{\eta^3}-L\left(1-\frac{\varepsilon}{\eta}\right)
447: \frac{1}{\eta^2}\right\}+A_i\right]\ ,
448: \end{equation}
449: %
450: where $\gamma^2_i=k^2_i\Lambda^2$, $k_i$ are positive zeros of the
451: functions $J_0$.
452:
453: Considering a region near the surface of the star, where
454: $z=\eta-1\ll1$, and using following boundary conditions (that is
455: the conditions of equipotentiality of the stellar surface and zero
456: steady state electric field at $r=R$)
457: %
458: \begin{equation}
459: F_i|_{z=0}=0\ ,\ \frac{\partial F_i}{\partial z}|_{z=0}=0\ .
460: \end{equation}
461: %
462: one can find the expression for the scalar potential $\Phi$ near
463: the surface of the star and corresponding to this potential
464: component of the electric field $E_{\|}$, being parallel to the
465: magnetic field (see the discourses of~\citet{MusTsy92} work):
466: %
467: \begin{equation}
468: \Phi=\frac{36\Phi_0}{\eta}\sqrt{1-\varepsilon}(\kappa-L\varepsilon)
469: \Theta^3_0\sum^{\infty}_{i=0}\left[\exp\left\{\frac{k_i(1-\eta)}
470: {\Theta_0\sqrt{1-\varepsilon}}\right\}-1+\frac{k_i(\eta-1)}
471: {\Theta_0\sqrt{1-\varepsilon}}
472: \right]\frac{J_0(k_i\xi)}{k_i^4J_1(k_i)}\ ,
473: \end{equation}
474: %
475: %
476: \begin{equation}
477: E_{\|}=-\frac{36\Phi_0}{R}(\kappa-L\varepsilon)\Theta^2_0
478: \sum^{\infty}_{i=0}\left[1-\exp\left\{\frac{k_i(1-\eta)}
479: {\Theta_0\sqrt{1-\varepsilon}}\right\}\right]
480: \frac{J_0(k_i\xi)}{k_i^3J_1(k_i)}\ .
481: \end{equation}
482: %
483:
484: It should be noted that these formulae differ from the ones
485: obtained in~\citet{MusTsy92} by that the parameter $\kappa$ gets
486: replaced by $(\kappa-L\varepsilon)$.
487:
488: Considering now the region $\Theta_0\ll\eta-1\ll R_{LC}/R$, where
489: $|d^2F_i/d\eta^2|\ll\gamma^2_i(\eta)|F_i|$ one can see that
490: equation (\ref{difgamma}) becomes
491: %
492: \begin{equation}
493: -\gamma^2_i(\eta)F_i=
494: -\frac{2}{\eta^2\left(1-\frac{\varepsilon}{\eta}\right)}\frac{f(\eta)}{f(1)}
495: \left[\frac{2}{k_i
496: J_1(k_i)}\left\{1-\frac{\kappa}{\eta^3}-L\left(1-\frac{\varepsilon}{\eta}\right)
497: \frac{1}{\eta^2}\right\}+A_i\right]\ ,
498: \end{equation}
499: %
500: from which it immediately follows
501: %
502: \begin{eqnarray}
503: F_i=\frac{2}{k^2_i}\theta^2(\eta)\frac{f(\eta)}{f(1)}
504: \left[\frac{2}{k_i J_1(k_i)}\left\{
505: (\kappa-L\varepsilon)\left(1-\frac{1}{\eta^{3}}-\frac{3}{\gamma_i(1)}\right)
506: +L\left(1-\frac{1}{\eta^2}\right) \right\}\right]\ .
507: \end{eqnarray}
508: %
509:
510: Using this expression for $F_i$ one can obtain the scalar
511: potential in the region at distances greater than the polar cap
512: size as
513: %
514: \begin{eqnarray}
515: \Phi&=&\frac{\Phi_0}{\eta}F=2\Phi_0\Theta^2_0(\kappa-L\varepsilon)
516: \left(1-\frac{1}{\eta^3}\right)\sum_i\frac{2J_0(k_i\xi)}{k^3_i
517: J_1(k_i)}\nonumber \\
518: &=&\frac{1}{2}\Phi_0\Theta_0^2(\kappa-L\varepsilon)
519: \left(1-\frac{1}{\eta^3}\right)(1-\xi^2)\nonumber \\
520: &=&\frac{1}{2} \Omega R^2 B_0\Theta_0^2(\kappa-L\varepsilon)
521: \left(1-\frac{1}{\eta^3}\right)(1-\xi^2)\ .
522: \end{eqnarray}
523: %
524:
525: Corresponding to this potential component of electric field
526: $E_{\|}$ will look like
527: %
528: \begin{equation}
529: E_{\|}=-\frac{1}{R}\frac{\partial\Phi}{\partial\eta}|_{\xi=constant}=-E_{vac}
530: \Theta^2_0\frac{3(\kappa-L\varepsilon)}{2\eta^4}(1-\xi^2)\ ,
531: \end{equation}
532: %
533: where $E_{vac}\equiv(\Omega R/c)B_0$ is the characteristic
534: Newtonian value of the electric field generated near the surface
535: of a neutron star rotating in vacuum~\citet{d55}. In
536: Fig.~\ref{fig2} one can find the radial dependence of parallel
537: electric field $E_{\|}$ in terms of $E_{vac}$ for the different
538: values of NUT parameter.
539:
540:
541: The energy losses from the polar cap of the rotating star with
542: non-vanishing NUT-parameter can now be calculated. According
543: to~\citet{MusHar97} the expression for the total power carried
544: away by relativistically moving particles is
545: %
546: \begin{equation}
547: \label{Ldif} L_p=2(-c\int\rho\Phi\ dS)\ .
548: \end{equation}
549: %
550:
551: In slow rotating NUT spacetime
552: %
553: \begin{equation}
554: \label{rphi}
555: -\rho\Phi\approx\frac{1}{4\pi}\left(\frac{\Omega
556: B_0}{c}\right)^2\frac{R^2\Theta^2_0}{N\eta^3}\frac{f(\eta)}{f(1)}
557: \left[(\kappa-L\varepsilon)\left(1-\kappa-
558: L(1-\varepsilon)\right)\right](1-\xi^2)\ .
559: \end{equation}
560: %
561:
562: Inserting (\ref{rphi}) into (\ref{Ldif}) and taking the integral
563: one can get, that
564: %
565: \begin{equation}
566: \label{Lmax}
567: (L_p)_{max}=\frac{3}{2}\left[(\kappa-L\varepsilon)
568: \left(1-\kappa-L(1-\varepsilon)\right)\right]\dot{E}_{rot}\ ,
569: \end{equation}
570: %
571: where
572: %
573: \begin{equation}
574: \dot{E}_{rot}\equiv\frac{1}{6}\frac{\Omega^4 B_0^2 R^6}{c^3
575: f^2(1)}=\frac{1}{f^2(1)}(\dot{E}_{rot})_{Newt}\
576: \end{equation}
577: %
578: and $(\dot{E}_{rot})_{Newt}$ is the standard Newtonian expression
579: for the magneto-dipole losses in flat space-time approximation.
580:
581: In the limiting case when $l\rightarrow 0$ one could get the
582: result~\citet{MusHar97}:
583: %
584: \begin{equation}
585: \label{Lmax0} (L_p)_{max\
586: (l=0)}=\frac{3}{2}\kappa(1-\kappa)\dot{E}_{rot}\ .
587: \end{equation}
588: %
589: The ratio
590: %
591: \begin{equation}
592: \label{ratioL} \frac{(L_p)_{max}}{(L_p)_{max\
593: (l=0)}}=1-\frac{L(\kappa+\varepsilon
594: -2\kappa\varepsilon)}{\kappa(1-\kappa)}+\frac{L^2\varepsilon(1-\varepsilon)}
595: {\kappa(1-\kappa)}\ .
596: \end{equation}
597: %
598: as function of NUT parameter is presented in Fig.~\ref{fig3}. {The
599: dependence has
600: a parabolic form. Namely, for small values of NUT parameter the energy
601: losses are decreasing. Then the graph has a minimum and with further growth of NUT parameter,
602: more energy is lost.} Physically it is due to the fact that
603: contributions in accelerating electric field coming from the
604: different parameters have the opposite signs.
605:
606: Taking into account that $\kappa=\varepsilon\beta\sim\varepsilon$
607: one can see, that the magnitude of additional terms arising from
608: the NUT parameter is determined by the magnitude of $L$. For a
609: millisecond pulsar with $l\sim10^3cm$, $\Omega\sim10s^{-1}$ and
610: $R\sim10^6cm$ we have
611: %
612: \begin{equation}
613: L=\frac{c l}{\Omega R^2}\sim 1\ .
614: \end{equation}
615: %
616: It shows that corrections to energy losses, concerned with
617: non-zero NUT parameter cannot be neglected and in principle can
618: provide an important information which will help to detect the
619: gravitomagnetic charge.
620:
621: {Equation (\ref{Lmax}) has physical sense only if $(L_p)_{max} <
622: \dot{E}_{rot}$, that means the power of a polar cap accelerator in
623: principle cannot exceed the total spin-down power of a pulsar if
624: one suppose that electromagnetic radiation is powered by rotation.
625: Using equations (\ref{Lmax}), (\ref{Lmax0}) and (\ref{ratioL}) one
626: can see that the physical sense is preserved for discussed
627: magnetosphere model (when electric field created by rotation of
628: star is dominating) if
629: %
630: \begin{equation}
631: L^2\lesssim\frac{2}{3\kappa(1-\kappa)}-1\ .
632: \end{equation}
633: %
634: Using the value $\kappa=0.15$ (\cite{MusTsy92}) one can obtain
635: upper limit for the value of NUT-parameter $l\lesssim ~1000 cm$.}
636:
637:
638: For practical useful applications the equation (\ref{Lmax}) can be
639: rewritten in terms of pulsar's observable characteristics as the
640: period $P$ and its time derivative $\dot{P}\equiv dP/dt$:
641: %
642: \begin{equation}
643: \label{PP} (P\dot{P})_{max}=\frac{3}{4}\left[(\kappa-L\varepsilon)
644: \left(1-\kappa-L(1-\varepsilon)\right)\right]\frac{I}{\tilde{I}}
645: \frac{1}{f^2(1)}(P\dot{P})_{Newt}\ ,
646: \end{equation}
647: %
648: where the expressions
649: %
650: \begin{equation}
651: \label{LPP} (L_p)_{max}=-\tilde{I}(\Omega\dot{\Omega})_{max}
652: \end{equation}
653: %
654: and
655: %
656: \begin{equation}
657: (P\dot{P})_{Newt}\equiv\left(\frac{2\pi^2}{3c^3}\right)
658: \frac{R^6B^2_0}{I}\
659: \end{equation}
660: %
661: have been taken into account.
662:
663: In equation (\ref{LPP}) $\tilde{I}$ is the general relativistic
664: moment of inertia of the star (see e.g.~\cite{r3})
665: %
666: \begin{equation}
667: \tilde{I}\equiv\int d^3\mathbf{x}\sqrt{\gamma}e^{-\Phi(r)}\rho
668: r^2\sin^2\theta\ ,
669: \end{equation}
670: where $e^{-\Phi(r)}\equiv 1/\sqrt{-g_{00}}$, $\rho(r)$ is the
671: total energy density, $\gamma$ is the determinant of the three
672: metric and $d^3\mathbf{x}$ is the coordinate volume element.
673:
674: Period of pulsar and it's time derivative are very precisely
675: measured quantities for a large number of pulsars (for example, in
676: the paper of~\cite{Kaspi04} there is a $P-\dot{P}$ diagram for the
677: 1403 catalogued rotation-powered pulsars, see also~\cite{a07}).
678: Thus, expression (\ref{PP}) for $P\dot{P}$ may indicate the
679: possible existence and magnitude of NUT-parameter. The main
680: difficulty encountered on this way nowadays is the uncertainty of
681: estimation of the moment of inertia of the neutron star. But in
682: future, when the moment of inertia of the neuron stars would be
683: determined more precisely, one can in principle obtain the value
684: of NUT-parameter from the observational data.
685:
686: \section{Charged Particle Acceleration in a Polar Cap in Magnetosphere
687: of Slowly Rotating NUT Star} \label{acceleration}
688:
689: The origin of radio emission from the polar cap is one of the most
690: mysterious, still unsolved question in the physics of pulsars. One
691: of the likely scenarios is that particles are accelerated along
692: open magnetic field lines and emit $\gamma$-rays that subsequently
693: convert into electron-positron pairs under a strong magnetic
694: field. The combination of the primary beam and pair plasma
695: provides the radio emission mechanism. Due to this reason it is
696: interesting to study particle acceleration conditions and
697: equations of motion in the pulsar magnetosphere in the presence of
698: NUT parameter.
699:
700: In our preceding paper~\citet{ma00} effects of general relativity
701: on plasma modes along the open field lines of rotating magnetized
702: neutron star have been studied. Here we investigate equations of
703: motion of charged particle in the region just above the polar cap
704: surface of a neutron star with NUT parameter by extending results
705: of~\citet{ss03} to spacetime with gravitomagnetic charge.
706:
707: Equations of motion for particle with mass $m$, charge $e$, proper
708: time $\tau$ and 4-velocity $v^{\mu}\equiv dx^{\mu}/d\tau$ look
709: like
710: %
711: \begin{equation}
712: \label{motion}
713: m\left(\frac{dv^{\mu}}{d\tau}+\Gamma^{\mu}_{\nu\lambda}v^{\nu}v^{\lambda}\right)
714: =e \mathcal{F}^{\mu\nu}v_{\nu} \ ,
715: \end{equation}
716: %
717: where $\Gamma^{\mu}_{\nu\lambda}$ is the affine connection,
718: $\mathcal{F}^{\mu\nu}=u^\mu E^\nu -u^\nu E^\mu
719: +\eta^{\mu\nu\gamma\rho}u_\gamma B_\rho$ is the electromagnetic
720: field tensor, $\eta^{\mu\nu\gamma\rho}$ is the Levi-Civita tensor.
721:
722: In the approximation of small angles
723: $\theta$ in the polar cap region the equations of
724: motion~(\ref{motion}) can be rewritten in the form
725: %
726: \begin{equation}
727: \label{eqmot1}
728: \frac{N}{s^2}\frac{d}{d s}\left(s^2\frac{d\phi}{d
729: s}\right)-\frac{l(l+1)}{N s^2}\phi=\frac{B}{B_0
730: N}\left(\frac{j}{V}-\bar{j}\right)\ ,
731: \end{equation}
732: %
733: \begin{equation}
734: \label{eqmot2} \frac{d}{d s}\left(N\gamma\right)=\frac{1}{N^2}
735: \frac{d\phi}{d s}\
736: \end{equation}
737: %
738: in the space-time outside the star described by Kerr-Taub-NUT
739: metric in the slow rotation limit (\ref{metricNUT}). It formally
740: coincides with the equations of motion from~\citet{ss03}. Here the
741: Lorentz factor $\gamma\equiv -v^\mu u_\mu =Nv^0=1/(1-V^2)^{1/2}$,
742: the relative 3-velocity $V^i\equiv v^\mu h^i_\mu/\gamma$, the
743: projection tensor $h^{\alpha\beta}\equiv g^{\alpha\beta}+ u^\alpha
744: u^\beta$ and the following normalized variables
745: %proposed by Shibata
746: %
747: \begin{eqnarray}
748: \label{var}
749: j\equiv-\frac{2\pi N(s) J(s)}{\Omega B(s)}=const\ ,\quad
750: \phi(s)\equiv\frac{e}{m}\Phi(s)\ ,\nonumber \\
751: s\equiv\sqrt{\frac{2\Omega B_0e}{mc^2}}r\ ,
752: \quad\bar{j}\equiv-\frac{2\pi N(s)\rho_{GJ}(s)}{\Omega B(s)}\
753: \end{eqnarray}
754: %
755: are introduced. To obtain equations (\ref{eqmot1}) and
756: (\ref{eqmot2}) the scalar potential $\Phi$ was expanded in spherical
757: harmonics $Y_{lm}(\theta,\phi)$ as
758: $\Phi=\sum_{l,m}\bar{\Phi}(r)Y_{lm}(\theta,\phi)$ and only the mode
759: of the polar cap scale $l\approx\pi/\Theta_0$ was taken. In
760: (\ref{var}) $J$ is the electric charge current density,
761: $B\equiv|\textbf{B}|=B^{\hat r}+O(\theta^2)$.
762:
763: The approximate value of Goldreich-Julian charge density
764: (\ref{rhoGJcont}) is
765: %
766: \begin{equation}
767: \label{rGJapp}
768: \rho_{GJ}=\frac{1}{2\pi}\frac{B\Omega}{N}\left(1-\frac{\omega}{\Omega}-\frac
769: {N^2l}{\Omega}\right)\ ,
770: \end{equation}
771: %
772: and consequently NUT-parameter will provide additional radial
773: dependence to $\bar{j}$.
774:
775:
776: According to recent paper of~\cite{Bel07} motion of charged
777: particles in the vicinity os the polar cap of the pulsar is
778: governed by equation (momentum of the particle is given in units
779: of $mc$)
780: %
781: \begin{equation}
782: \frac{dp}{dt}=\frac{eE_\|}{mc}\ .
783: \end{equation}
784: %
785:
786: And for parallel electric field $E_\|$ one could get equation
787: %
788: \begin{equation}
789: \label{Gauss} \nabla\cdot
790: E=\frac{dE_\|}{dz}=4\pi(\rho-\rho_{GJ})\,\qquad z\ll r_{pc}\ ,
791: \end{equation}
792: %
793: where $r_{pc}$ is the radii of the polar cap of the star.
794: Rewriting (\ref{Gauss}) using $d/dt\equiv vd/dz$, $a\equiv
795: j/c\rho_{GJ}$, $\rho=j/v$ and $v=cp(1+p^2)^{-1/2}$ one could
796: obtain (see ~\cite{Bel07})
797: %
798: \begin{equation}
799: \frac{dE_\|}{dt}=4\pi j\left(1-\frac{ap}{\sqrt{1+p^2}}\right)\ ,
800: \end{equation}
801: %
802: where
803: \begin{equation}
804: \label{a} a(z)=
805: a_0\frac{1-\kappa+L\varepsilon}{(1-\kappa+L\varepsilon)(1+z/R)^{-3}}\
806: .
807: \end{equation}
808:
809: Then the system of equations for $p(z)$ is graphically solved.
810: Fig.\ref{fig 0999} presents $p(z)$ for several values of
811: $L\varepsilon$, when $\kappa=0.15$ (\cite{MusTsy92}) and
812: $a_0=0.999$ and shows that influence of NUT-parameter
813: significantly changes the period of oscillations. From the
814: Fig.~\ref{fig 11} and Fig.~\ref{fig 2} one could see when
815: $\kappa-L\varepsilon\sim 1$ oscillations take place even for large
816: $a_0$. For the values of $\kappa-L\varepsilon$ very close to $1$,
817: the character of graphs almost has no dependence on the value of
818: $a_0$. For old recycled neutron stars with almost zero angular
819: momentum the effects connected with NUT-parameter may play single
820: mechanism for pulsar radiation.
821:
822: Following~\cite{a98} and using equations (\ref{rhoGJ}),
823: (\ref{rho}) and (\ref{approx}), one can obtain for the
824: accelerating potential drop:
825: %
826: \begin{equation}
827: \Delta\Phi_{\|}\approx(\kappa-L\varepsilon)\Phi_{pole}
828: \left[1-\left(\frac{1}{\eta^3}\right)\right]\ ,
829: \end{equation}
830: %
831: while in Newtonian case it looks like
832: %
833: \begin{equation}
834: \Delta\Phi_{\|}\approx\Phi_{pole}\left(\frac{R}{\rho_B}\right)\ ,
835: \end{equation}
836: where $\rho_B$ is the radius of curvature of the magnetic field
837: lines, $\Phi_{pole}\equiv\Omega^2\mu/c^2$ and $\mu$ is the
838: magnetic moment.
839:
840: Taking into account the frame dragging effect noticeably improve
841: comparison between theory and observations. As
842: $R/\rho_B\sim10^{-2}P^{-1/2}$ and $\kappa\sim10 P^{-1/2}$, the
843: energy of curvature gamma rays in relativistic frame-dragging case
844: may rise up to be $1000$ times greater than that occurs
845: in~\cite{as79} pair creation theory (see ~\cite{a98}). As the
846: effect of NUT-parameter seems to have the same order as the effect
847: of frame dragging, it makes an additional contribution to the
848: energy of curvature gamma photons and thus may play noticeable
849: role in the formation of the plasma magnetosphere of neutron star
850: with gravitomagnetic charge.
851:
852:
853: \section{Conclusion}
854: \label{concl}
855:
856:
857: We have considered astrophysical processes in the polar cap of
858: pulsar magnetosphere in assumption of slowly rotating NUT
859: space-time. In particular, general-relativistic corrections to the
860: Goldreich-Julian charge density, electrostatic scalar potential
861: and accelerating component of electric field being parallel to
862: magnetic field lines in the polar cap region due to the presence
863: of gravitomagnetic charge are found. The presence of NUT-parameter
864: slightly modulates Goldreich-Julian charge density near the
865: surface of the star. However as it is known the effective electric
866: charge density i.e. difference between Goldreich-Julian charge
867: density $\rho_{GJ}$ (being proportional in the case of flat
868: space-time to $\mathbf{\Omega\cdot B}$) and electric charge
869: density (being proportional to $\mathbf{B}$) in the star
870: magnetosphere is responsible for the generation of electric field
871: being parallel to magnetic field lines. This difference is equal
872: to zero at the surface of the star and changes with the distance
873: from it due to the fact that $\rho$ can not compensate
874: $\rho_{GJ}$. General relativitistic terms arising from the
875: dragging of inertial frames and presence of the gravitomagnetic
876: charge give very important additional contribution to this
877: difference. Both of these terms depend on the radial distance from
878: the star as $1/r^3$ and have equally important influence on the
879: value of accelerating electric field component generated in the
880: magnetosphere near the surface of the neutron star.
881:
882: These results are applied to find an expression for
883: electromagnetic energy losses along the open magnetic field lines
884: of the slowly rotating NUT star. It is found that in the case of
885: non-vanishing NUT-parameter an additional important term to the
886: coefficient of standard magneto-dipole energy losses expression
887: appears. Comparison of effect of NUT-parameter with the already
888: known effects shows that it can not be neglected. Obtained new
889: dependence may be combined with astrophysical data on pulsar
890: periods slow down and be useful in further investigations on
891: possible detection of the gravitomagnetic monopole.
892:
893: It is also shown that the presence of gravitomagnetic charge has
894: influence on the conditions of particles motion in the polar cap
895: region. From derived results it can be seen, that NUT-parameter
896: modulates the period of oscillations of particle's momentum. As
897: the effect, connected with NUT-parameter has the angular velocity
898: of the star's rotation in denominator, it will be increased for
899: the old stars, where the frame-dragging effect will be decreased.
900: Thus possible candidates for verification of the existence of NUT
901: parameter are old compact objects with extremely low rotation
902: period.
903:
904:
905: \acknowledgments
906:
907: This research is supported in part by the UzFFR (project 05-08)
908: and projects FA-F2-F079, FA-F2-F061 and A13-226 of the UzAS, by
909: the ICTP through the OEA-PRJ-29 and by NATO through the
910: reintegration grant EAP.RIG.981259. VGK acknowledges the financial
911: support from DAAD. BJA is grateful to Exchange of Astronomers
912: Programme of the IAU C46-PG-EA and the ICTP Associate Programme
913: for the travel support. Authors thank Ahmadjon Abdujabbarov for
914: his help and assistance in making numerical calculations and
915: graphs and anonymous referee for his invaluable work in improving
916: our manuscript.
917:
918:
919: \begin{thebibliography}{Newman, Tamburino \& Unti(1963)}
920:
921: \bibitem[Arons (1998)]{a98}
922: Arons, J. 1998, arXiv:astro-ph/9802198 v3
923:
924: \bibitem[Arons(2007)]{a07}
925: Arons, J. 2007, arXiv:0708.1050v1 [astro-ph]
926:
927: \bibitem[Arons \& Scharlemann(1979)]{as79}
928: Arons, J., \& Scharlemann, E. T. 1979, ApJ, 231, 854
929:
930: \bibitem[Beloborodov(2007)]{Bel07}
931: Beloborodov, A. M. 2007, arXiv:0710.0920v1 [astro-ph]
932:
933: \bibitem[Beskin(1990)]{bes90}
934: Beskin, V. S. 1990, Soviet Astron. Lett., 16, 286
935:
936: \bibitem[Beskin(2005)]{bes05}
937: Beskin, V. S. 2005, "Osesimmetrichnye Stacionarnye Techeniya v
938: Astrofizike" (Axisymmetric Stationary Flows in Astrophysics),
939: Moscow, Fizmatlit, in Russian
940:
941: \bibitem[Bini et al.(2003)]{Bini03}
942: Bini, D., Cherubini, C., Jantzen, R. T., \& Mashhoon, B. 2003,
943: Class. Quantum Grav., 20, 457
944:
945: \bibitem[Dadhich \& Turakulov(2002)]{dt02}
946: Dadhich, N., \& Turakulov, Z. Ya. 2002, Class. Quantum Grav., 19,
947: 2765
948:
949: \bibitem[Deutsch(1955)]{d55}
950: Deutsch, A. 1955, Ann. d'Ap., 18, 1
951:
952: \bibitem[Ginzburg \& Ozernoy(1964)]{go64}
953: Ginzburg, V. L., $\&$ Ozernoy, L. M.
954: 1964, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 47, 1030
955:
956: \bibitem[Goldreich \& Julian(1969)]{gj69}
957: Goldreich, P., \& Julian, W. H. 1969, ApJ, 157, 869
958:
959: \bibitem[Hartle \& Thorne(1968)]{ht68}
960: Hartle, J. B., \& Thorne K. S. 1968, ApJ, 153, 807
961:
962: \bibitem[Kaspi et al.(2006)]{Kaspi04}
963: Kaspi, V. M., Roberts, M. S. E., \& Harding, A. K. 2006, in
964: Compact Stellar X-ray Sources, W. Lewin and M. van der Klis, eds.
965: (Cambridge: Cambridge UP), 279-339 (astro-ph/0402136)
966:
967: \bibitem[Mestel(1971)]{m71}
968: Mestel, L. 1971, Nature, 233, 149
969:
970: \bibitem[Mofiz \& Ahmedov(2000)]{ma00}
971: Mofiz, U.A., \& Ahmedov, B.J. 2000, ApJ, 542, 484
972:
973: \bibitem[Muslimov \& Harding(1997)]{MusHar97}
974: Muslimov, A., $\&$ Harding, A. K. 1997, ApJ, 485, 735
975:
976: \bibitem[Muslimov \& Tsygan(1986)]{mt86}
977: Muslimov, A., $\&$ Tsygan, A. I. 1986, AZh, 63, 958
978:
979: \bibitem[Muslimov \& Tsygan(1990)]{mt90}
980: Muslimov, A., $\&$ Tsygan, A. I. 1990, Soviet Astr., 34, 133
981:
982: \bibitem[Muslimov \& Tsygan(1991)a]{mt91}
983: Muslimov, A., $\&$ Tsygan, A. I. 1991, Preprint No. 1544 of A. F.
984: Ioffe Institute
985:
986: \bibitem[Muslimov \& Tsygan(1991)b]{MusTsy91}
987: Muslimov, A., $\&$ Tsygan, A. I. 1991, in: The Magnetospheric
988: Structure and Emission Mechanisms of Radio Pulsars, IAU Colloq.
989: No. 128, p. 340, eds Hankins, T., Rankin, J. \& Gil, J., Kluwer,
990: Dordrecht
991:
992: \bibitem[Muslimov \& Tsygan(1992)]{MusTsy92}
993: Muslimov, A.G., \& Tsygan, A.L. 1992, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc.,
994: 255, 61
995:
996: \bibitem[Newman, Tamburino \& Unti(1963)]{nut63}
997: Newman, E., Tamburino, L., \& Unti, T. 1963, J. Math. Phys., 4,
998: 915
999:
1000: \bibitem[Rezzolla et al.(2001)]{r1}
1001: Rezzolla, L., Ahmedov, B.J., \& Miller, J.C. 2001a, Mon. Not. R.
1002: Astron. Soc., 322, 723; Erratum 338, 816 (2003)
1003:
1004: \bibitem[Rezzolla et al.(2001)]{r2}
1005: Rezzolla, L., Ahmedov, B.J., \& Miller, J.C. 2001b, Found. of
1006: Phys., 31, 1051
1007:
1008: \bibitem[Rezzolla \& Ahmedov(2004)]{r3}
1009: Rezzolla, L., \& Ahmedov, B.J. 2004, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.,
1010: 352, 1161
1011:
1012: \bibitem[Ruderman \& Sutherland(1975)]{rs75}
1013: Ruderman, M., $\&$ Sutherland, P. G. 1975, ApJ, 196, 51
1014:
1015: \bibitem[Sakai \& Shibata(2003)]{ss03}
1016: Sakai, N., \& Shibata, S. 2003, ApJ, 584, 427
1017:
1018: \bibitem[Sturrock(1971)]{s71}
1019: Sturrock, P. A. 1971, ApJ, 164, 179\
1020:
1021: \bibitem[Zhu \& Ruderman(1997)]{zhr97}
1022: Zhu, T.,
1023: $\&$ Ruderman, M. 1997, ApJ, 478, 701
1024:
1025: \end{thebibliography}
1026:
1027: \clearpage
1028:
1029: \begin{figure}
1030: %\epsscale{figure1}
1031: \plotone{f1.eps} \caption{Radial dependence of the
1032: Goldreich-Julian charge density normed in its Newtonian expression
1033: for the different values of the NUT parameter.} \label{fig1}
1034: \end{figure}
1035:
1036: \newpage
1037:
1038: \begin{figure}
1039: %\epsscale{figure1}
1040: \plotone{f2.eps} \caption{Radial dependence of the accelerating
1041: component of electric field normed in its vacuum magnitude for the
1042: different values of the NUT parameter.} \label{fig2}
1043: \end{figure}
1044:
1045: \newpage
1046:
1047: \begin{figure}
1048: %\epsscale{figure1}
1049: \plotone{f3.eps} \caption{Ratio of polar cap energy losses into
1050: its zero gravitomagnetic charge expression as a function of NUT
1051: parameter.} \label{fig3}
1052: \end{figure}
1053:
1054: \newpage
1055: %
1056: \begin{figure}
1057: %\epsscale{figure1}
1058: \plotone{f4.eps} \caption{The dependence of the momentum of
1059: charged particle, extracted from the polar cap by $E_\|$, on
1060: height for different values of NUT-parameter. The range of used
1061: values: $B=3\times10^{12}G$, $P=1s$, $k=0.15$, $a_0=0.999$,
1062: rotator is assumed to be aligned. Considered region is $z<100m$
1063: which lies within the polar cap radii.} \label{fig 0999}
1064: \end{figure}
1065: %
1066: \newpage
1067:
1068: \begin{figure}
1069: %\epsscale{figure1}
1070: \plotone{f5.eps} \caption{The dependence of the momentum of
1071: charged particle, extracted from the polar cap by $E_\|$, on
1072: height for $a_0=1.1$, $k=0$ and different values of
1073: NUT-parameter.} \label{fig 11}
1074: \end{figure}
1075:
1076: \newpage
1077:
1078: %
1079: \begin{figure}
1080: %\epsscale{figure1}
1081: \plotone{f6.eps} \caption{The dependence of the momentum of
1082: charged particle, extracted from the polar cap by $E_\|$, on
1083: height for $a_0=2$, $k=0$ and different values of NUT-parameter.
1084: When NUT-parameter $L\varepsilon$ is very close to $1$,
1085: oscillations take place independently on the value of $a_0$.}
1086: \label{fig 2}
1087: \end{figure}
1088: %
1089:
1090: %\newpage
1091:
1092: %\begin{figure}
1093: % \begin{center}
1094: % \begin{tabular}{cc}
1095: % \resizebox{70mm}{!}{\includegraphics{ac.eps}} &
1096: % \resizebox{70mm}{!}{\includegraphics{cc.eps}} \\
1097: %\end{tabular}
1098: %\caption{$\gamma$ as a function of $s=r-R$ in $1D$-approximation. }
1099: %\label{china}
1100: %\end{center}
1101: %\end{figure}
1102:
1103: \label{lastpage}
1104:
1105:
1106: \clearpage
1107:
1108: \end{document}
1109: